STATE ROAD 60 MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STUDY SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT 1
~
)
I
."
SR 60 MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT STUDY
CITY OF CLEARWATER
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1
~EMENT AL AGREEMENT, made and entered into this at) ~ day
of , 1995, by and between the CITY OF CLEARWATER, an
incorporated area in Pinellas County, Florida, hereinafter called the CITY, and HDR
ENGINEERING, INC., of 5100 West Kennedy Boulevard, Tampa, Florida 33609,
hereinafter called the ENGINEER.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the CITY and the ENGINEER heretofore on October 21. 1994,
entered into an agreement whereby the CITY retained the ENGINEER to furnish certain
services in connection with SR 60 Memorial Causeway Bridge Replacement Feasibility
Study: and
WHEREAS, Section IX. Additional Engineering Services and Paragraph 1.B
of Exhibit "B" of the original AGREEMENT provided a mechanism for the ENGINEER
to provide additional services as authorized by the CITY; and
WHEREAS, the CITY has determined it necessary, for the ENGINEER to
perform additional services to conduct a project development and environmental study
consistent with the State Environmental Impact Review guidelines, and that the
ENGINEER be granted an extension of time and increased compensation;
NOW THEREFORE, this Agreement witnesseth that for and in consideration of
the mutual benefits to flow each to the other, the parties agree that the ENGINEER
shall perform the services as added in Exhibit "A-1", attached to hereto and made a part
hereof and that the ENGINEER shall receive for his services hereunder the increased
maximum amount of $ 860.000 Donars.
Except as hereby modified, amended, or changed, all of the terms, conditions,
billing procedures, and other administrative procedures of said Agreement and any
supplements and amendments thereto shall remain in full force and effect.
( /)
, .......;: -y"
(!J21 D<~iJ'1 c '
.' .' '; (
/',_ {,I L it'I" ([,.
()2~ II t/ (
(IjJ
=--
)
I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be
executed, the day and year first above written.
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Name of Consultant
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
BY:
11/J~')/,~
Authorized Signature
BY: ~~~
Ci ana r
Name
William H. Wadsworth, P.E.
COUNTERSIGNED:
Title: Senior Vice President
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
, '..
~~.~
0~ Z~.)i~ fJ~
City <(jerk -
JODIE M. MUTCHLER
No!afy Public. State of Aorida
My Comm. Exp. June 21, 1996 - No. CC209333
~ey ;pproved as to For~ &
Correctness)
I
I
EXHIBIT A -1
SCOPE OF SERVICES
SR 60 MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STUDY
sA
v ·
~1
~
l:::.
I
I
EXIDBIT A-I
STATE ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT REPORT (SEIR)
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT STUDY
SCOPE OF SERVICES
FOR
SR 60 Memorial Causeway Bridge
Replacement Study
City of Clearwater,
PineUas County Florida
Florida Department of Transportation
WPI No. 7117181
State Job No. 15220 - 1599
12/14/951:26 PM
C:\APROJECT\MEMBRIDG\MEM3SCOP .DOC
I
I
EXHIBIT A-I
STATE ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT REPORT (SEIR) PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
ENVIRONMENT STUDY
SCOPE OF SERVICES
FOR
SR 60 Memorial Causeway Bridge
Replacement Study
City of Clearwater,
Pinellas County Florida
Florida Department of Transportation
WPI No. 7117181
State Job No. 15220 - 1599
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY
II. PURPOSE
III. STUDY OBJECTIVE
IV. METRIC
V. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
A. Project Initiation
1. Notice to Proceed Meeting
2. Prepare Public Involvement Plan
3. Initiate Advance Notification
4. Introductory or Kickoff Meeting
B. Engineering Data Collection
1. Aerial Survey
2. Existing Highway Characteristics
a. Roadway
b. Bridge (Highway):
c. Bridge (Waterway):
3. Traffic Data
4. Accident Data
C. Environmental Data Collection
1. Land Use Data
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
6
7
7
8
9
9
10
10
10
I
I
2. Cultural Features and Community Services
3. Hydrologic and Natural Features Data
a. Wetlands
b. Outstanding Florida Waters
c. Floodplains
d. Floodways
e. Drainage
f. Soils
g. Water Quality
h. Endangered and Threatened Species
4. Utilities
5. Transportation Plans
6. Permit Coordination
7. Right-of-Way Relocation Data
8. Noise Impact Data
9. Contamination Assessment
a. Identification (Data Collection Process)
1. Physical Land Use History
2. Records Search
3. Visual Walk-Thru
4. Evaluation (Risk Ranking)
5. Recommendations
10. Archaeological/Historical Assessment
a. Purpose and Objectives
b. Services to be Performed
1. Conduct a Literature Review and Background Research
2. Prepare Archaeological, Historical, and Environmental Overviews of the Project Area.
3. Prepare a Research Design for the Project
4. Conduct a Field Survey of the Project Area
5. Process, Analyze, and Catalogue Recovered Cultural Materials
6. Prepare Report Documenting the Results of the Cultural Resource Assessment
8. Formal Consultation with the SHPO
a. Qualifications Standards
11. Determination of Section 4(f) Involvement (optional)
12. Visual and Aesthetic Impact Analysis
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
13
13
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
18
18
18
19
19
20
21
21
22
22
D. Project Design Analysis
1. Corridor Analysis
a. Establish Need for Improvements
b. Corridor Consideration
c. Evaluation of Corridors
2. Conceptual Design Analysis
a. Establish Design Traffic Volumes
b. Develop Design Alternatives
1. Typical Section
2. Alternatives Base Maps
3. Alignment
4. Hydraulic Analysis
5. Conceptual Drainage Design
6. Soils
7. Structures
8. Access Management
9. Design Exceptions and Variances
10. Prepare Design Alternatives
22
22
22
22
24
24
25
25
25
26
26
26
26
27
27
28
29
29
11
I I
3. Environmental Analysis 29
a. Land Use 29
b. Cultural Features and Community Services 29
c. Wetlands 29
d. Floodplains 29
e. Water Quality 30
f. Farmlands 30
g. Endangered and Threatened Species 30
h. Utilities 30
i. Mitigation 30
j. Noise Impact 30
k. Air Quality 31
l. Relocation 32
4. Comparative Analysis of Feasible Design Alternatives 32
a. Comparative Analysis 32
b. Consideration and Resolution of Engineering Items 33
c. Selection of Alternatives 33
d. Conceptual Design Plans 34
e. Typical Section Design Packages (Optional) 34
f. Identify Construction Segments 34
g. Value Engineering Multi-discipline Team Review (Optional) 34
h. Project Team Review 34
E. Preliminary Engineering Report 35
1. First Draft Engineering Report 35
2. Submit Second Draft Preliminary Engineering Report 36
3. Final Preliminary Engineering Report 36
F. Environmental Documents 37
1. Form 508-05 Document - State Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) 37
2. Air and Noise Study Reports 37
a. Noise Study Report 37
b. Air Quality Report 38
3. Wetland Evaluation Report 38
a. Evaluate Impacts 38
b. Conceptual Mitigation Plans 38
c. Wetland Evaluation Report 38
4. Endangered and Threatened Species Evaluation 39
5. Prepare Pre-Draft Environmental Document 39
6. Submit Pre-Draft Environmental Document 41
7. Draft Environmental Document 41
8. Final Environmental Document 42
9. Conceptual Stage Relocation Plan 42
G. Public Involvement and Project Meetings 42
1. Public Involvement 43
a. Mailing List Preparation 43
b. Identify and Inspect Public Meeting Sites 44
c. Collect Public Input 44
d. Photo Imaging 44
2. Alternatives Public Meeting 45
3. Coordination Meetings with Local Officials and Special Planning Services 47
a. Local Officials' Briefing Meetings 47
b. MPO Coordination 47
III
I
I
c. Special Planning Services
1. MPO Long Range Plan Amendment
2. Transportation Improvement Plan Priorities
3. Funding Plan
4. Other related Tasks
4. Comments and Coordination Report
5. Public Hearing
6. Progress Reporting
7. Unscheduled Meetings and Presentations
a. Unscheduled Meetings
b. Local Interest Group Meetings
c. Graphics for Short Notice Meetings and Group Meetings
8. Location/Design Acceptance and Public Notice
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
49
49
49
VI. STUDY REQUIREMENTS AND PROVISIONS FOR WORK
49
A. Governing Regulations
49
B. Project Schedule
50
C. Correspondence
50
D. Quality Control
50
E. American With Disabilities Act (ADA)
51
F. Computer Disk Scanning
51
G. Liaison Office
51
VII. SUBMITTALS
51
VIII. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CITY AND DEPARTMENT
52
x. BEGINNING AND LENGTH OF SERVICES
54
IV
I
I
ExmBIT A-I
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SEIR)
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT STUDY
SCOPE OF SERVICES
FOR
SR 60 Memorial Causeway Bridge
Replacement Study
City of Clearwater,
Pinellas County Florida
Florida Department of Transportation
WPI No. 7117181
State Job No. 15220 - 1599
This Exhibit is the scope of services for a State Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) relative to the
transportation facility described as follows:
SR 60 Memorial Causeway Bridge
Replacement Study
City of Clearwater,
Pinellas County Florida
This study is being paid for and conducted by the City of Clearwater, Florida (CITY). HDR
Engineering, Inc.(CONSULTANT) is under contract to perform this scope of work. The Florida
Department of Transportation (DEPARTMENT) is assisting the city in the process and in the technical
reviews for the study
I. Description of Facility
The proposed study area limits for SR 60 Memorial Causeway Bridge Replacement Study (Study) are
from west of Island Way, north of Drew Street, east of Myrtle Avenue, and south of Chestnut Street.
The length of the project is approximately 2.6 km (1.6 miles) in length. The proposed study shall
include a State Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) Study for this area, including applicable
engineering and environmental documentation.
The study shall be consistent with the City of Clearwater and Pinellas County Comprehensive Plans and
the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization's Long Range Transportation Plan. The study
shall also include the proposed project's affect on the study area. A No-Build alternative shall be fully
evaluated.
1
I
I
The recommended typical section and other features of the project shall be determined by the SEIR Study
to be performed.
II. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Exhibit is to describe the scope of work and responsibilities required in connection
with preparation of a State Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), and the Preliminary Engineering
(Conceptual Design) and Environmental Studies necessary for District Approval of proposed
improvements to the herein described transportation facility.
The CONSULTANT shall perform those engineering services required for location/design studies,
including consideration of all social, economic, environmental effects, and mitigation as required by the
DEPARTMENT's PD&E Manual along with the required environmental documents, engineering reports
and public hearing.
This scope contains descriptions of optional services that either expand the level of effort for the SEIR or
add to it to comply with the full federal PD&E process. Optional services are annotated as "optional"
and marked with bold underline and italics.
III. STUDY OBJECTIVE
The general objective of the study is to provide the documentation necessary for the CITY and
DEPARTMENT to reach a decision on the type, design, and location of the transportation facility
described herein. All factors related to the design and location of the facility must be considered
including transportation needs, social impacts, economic factors, environmental impacts, and engineering
analysis.
The CITY, in cooperation with the DEPARTMENT completed a feasibility study, documented in a
report entitled Memorial Causeway Bridge Feasibility Study Report, July 1995, regarding the replacement
of the Memorial Causeway Bridge located west of downtown Clearwater. The study determined the
feasibility of replacing the existing bascule bridge with either a higher bascule or a high-level fixed-span
bridge. The objective was to provide a functionally safe, cost-effective bridge that is aesthetically
compatible with the downtown Clearwater and Clearwater Beach area.
The feasibility study evaluated a total of nine alternatives for replacing the eXlstmg bridge. This
evaluation included analysis of three different roadway approaches (corridors). The study recommended
that two proceed to the next stage of study. They are - in the preferred order: (1) A four lane high-level
fixed bridge connecting to Pierce Boulevard-Alternative P4A; (2) A four lane high-level fixed bridge
connecting to Pierce Boulevard-Alternative P4 - (which requires channel relocation). The benefit-cost
analysis indicated a positive economic value to replacing the bridge with a high-level fixed structure.
The CITY will use the technical work and results of the Memorial Causeway Bridge Feasibility Study
Report to the extent possible to supplement this scope of work and gain the necessary approvals from the
DEPARTMENT.
2
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemolI Causeway Bridge
The study will focus on the preferred alternatives (P4 and P4A), No Build alternative and other
alternatives that may become apparent during the course of the study.
The specific objective of the study is to prepare a series of reports documenting the requirements for
preliminary design, including existing and predicted conditions, typical sections, right-of-way
requirements, environmental impacts, and costs of the alternatives. The CONSULTANT shall evaluate
the alternatives and make recommendations as to the best selection. The documentation shall be
developed to and in compliance with all applicable State and Federal regulations, including the
DEPARTMENT's PD&E Manual and Chapter 339.155 of the Florida Statutes governing the content and
development of this type study. The Study information shall be objective and complete. The
CONSULTANT is encouraged to seek and bring to the attention of the CITY AND DEPARTMENT
unforeseen information and issues which are relevant to the project decision. The CONSULTANT shall
abstain from indicating preferences publicly for any alternative prior to the public hearing unless
specifically requested to do so by the CITY .
IV. METRIC
All project documents will be prepared using metric standards and units. All project documents (project
reports, public displays, project correspondence, etc.) will be prepared using metric standards with the
former English equivalent standards value noted in parenthesis where an equivalent standard value exists,
(i.e. 3.6 m (12 ft.), not 3.6 m (11.81 ft.)). If no former English equivalent standard exists, a soft
conversion from the metric value to the English value will be made. A note at the bottom of the displays
or in the preface to all project documents should be provided stating that the English conversions are
nominal rather than exact.
V. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
The CONSULTANT is responsible for preparing engineering reports with environmental documentation
that is acceptable to the CITY AND DEPARTMENT. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall respond to
reasonable third party requests for information relative to the project or services being performed.
The CONSULTANT shall perform the necessary coordination with Federal (optional), State, and local
agencies, and citizen groups which would have an influence upon the study and the preparation of the
environmental documents.
The CONSULTANT may be called upon to prepare the content of letters to other agencies, public
officials, etc.
The CONSULTANT shall provide plans, at individual property owner requests, showing the effect of the
project on the owner's property.
The CONSULTANT shall make the maximum use of existing information available from State, regional,
local agencies, private sources and his own files. Further the CONSULTANT shall make the maximum
use of the Memorial Causeway Bridge Feasibility Study Report data and findings.
3
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemoJil Causeway Bridge
The DEPARTMENT's PD&E Manual incorporates all the requirements of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA); Federal Law and Executive Orders; applicable Federal Regulations included in the
Federal Highway Administration Federal Aid Policy Guide; and applicable State Laws and Regulations
including Chapter 339.155 of the Florida Statutes. The project documentation prepared by the
CONSULTANT in accordance with the DEPARTMENT's PD&E Manual shall therefore be in
compliance with all applicable State and Federal Laws, Executive Orders and Regulations.
During the performance of any work activity by the CONSULTANT within the right-of-way, traffic shall
be maintained on all affected roadways throughout the duration of the contract.
If an activity is to be performed which will disturb the right-of-way, place permanent or long term
reference points, monuments, monitoring installation, etc. or will require a Maintenance of Traffic
(MOT) setup to be in compliance with Series 600 Standard Indices, a Special Use Permit must be
submitted to the Local Maintenance Office (LMO) and approved. If excavation, boring or otherwise
disturbing the right-of-way take place, a letter of notification to all concerned utilities shall be submitted
with the permit submittal. Only one (1) permit need be submitted prior to the initial file activity of the
contract; however, during the duration of the contract, the LMO shall be notified 48 hours in advance of
initiating any activity that disturbs the right-of-way or requires an MOT. In the event an activity is
scheduled which requires an MOT plan that is not covered by any of the Series 600 Indices, a site
specific MOT plan signed and sealed by registered engineer must be submitted to the LMO for approval
at least 48 hours in advance of the planned activity.
Special Use Permit forms may be obtained from and submitted to the DEPARTMENT's Pinellas
Maintenance Office.
A. Project Initiation
1. Notice to Proceed Meeting
The CONSULTANT shall attend a Notice to Proceed meeting conducted by the CITY. The
DEPARTMENT will also attend and be represented by:
District PD&E Engineer
District Environmental Administrator
District Public Involvement Coordinator
PD&E Public Transportation Specialist
District Professional Services Administrator
Administrator of Survey and Mapping
District Design Engineer
District Geotechnical Engineer
District Drainage Engineer
District Structures Engineer
District Utilities Engineer
District Traffic Operations Engineer
4
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater Memo~al Causeway Bridge
PD&E Project Engineer
Design Project Manager
The purpose of this introductory meeting is two-fold:
a. The CITY AND DEPARTMENT will render all relevant information in its possession.
This may include previous correspondence, traffic figures, planning information,
previous studies and existing right-of-way and utility information.
b. The CITY will establish any ground rules upon which the study process will be
conducted.
2. Prepare Public Involvement Plan
The CONSULTANT shall prepare, according to Part I, Chapter 8, PD&E Manual, a detailed Public
Involvement Plan, outlining each element of the public involvement process. The program may involve
but is not limited to newsletter, public informational workshops, meetings with governmental agencies
and civic associations, invitation to concerned citizens to call, ask questions and provide comments. It
shall be updated and amended throughout the Study. The plan shall indicate the basic public involvement
approach to be taken with the project. It also lists generally the contact persons, media officials and
agencies and the means which shall be used to involve them in the process. The most recent public
official and media listing for the project area will be compiled by the CITY. The plan shall also identify
any organized homeowners groups or other groups of citizens which should have input for the project.
Within ten (10) working days after the Notice to Proceed Meeting, a Preliminary Public Involvement
Plan shall be submitted to the CITY and DEPARTMENT for approval.
3. Initiate Advance Notification
Governmental agencies with a possible interest in the project's planning must be notified at the beginning
of the study process. An announcement in the form of an Advanced Notification Package shall be
prepared by the CONSULTANT for the CITY and DEPARTMENT's review and approval. The
Advanced Notification Package (Form 508-03) shall also identify by industry or commercial type any
known hazardous material generators within the vicinity of the project per Part 2, Chapter 22, of the
DEPARTMENT's PD&E Manual. Upon the CITY and DEPARTMENT's approval, the package shall
be distributed by the CONSULTANT.
After the responses from the Advance Notification are received and reviewed, the CONSULTANT will
assist the CITY in a presentation to the Clearwater City Commission to provide the Commission an
overview of the study and the status of the progress on the funding scenarios. The need to comply with
the full federal environmental review process will be evaluated at this stage.
5
Exhibit A-I
1
City of Clearwater MemOltl Causeway Bridge
4. Introductory or Kickoff Meeting
The CONSULTANT will conduct a Study public kickoff meeting. This public meeting will include
invitations to Federal, County, City and State officials; and elected and appointed officials representing
the project area. The meeting will be held in the general study area and is intended to notify those
persons invited of the study.
The purpose of the meeting is to present the intent of the study and obtain comments on the study
area/corridors under possible consideration. This meeting is to be advertised and conducted as an
Information Meeting. The CONSULTANT shall attend the meeting and prepare all necessary displays,
maps, script, etc. The CONSULTANT may be required to actively participate in any portion of the
presentation.
For the Kickoff Meeting the CONSULT ANT shall:
a. Notify officials and interested parties by letter, news releases, telephone, or any other
appropriate means. A twenty (20) day notice will be given.
b. Prepare formal presentation - script, graphics, displays.
c. Deliver the presentation using knowledgeable staff members, including answering
questions, if requested, and prepare meeting site, setup and breakdown of audiovisual
equipment.
B. Engineering Data Collection
Immediately following the Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT shall begin preliminary assessments of
the study corridor from an engineering standpoint.
This activity consists of collecting various information and materials relative to engineering concerns
within the study area. The information shall include data necessary to perform adequate evaluation of the
location and design of a transportation facility.
The CONSULTANT will use the technical work and results of the Memorial Causeway Bridge
Feasibility Study Report to the extent possible to accomplish this task.
1. Aerial Survey
(Optional) Survev services shall be completed for a controlled aerial survev. This will be accomplished
in accordance with the Department's Highwav Field Survev Soecification. Department Topic NO. 550-
030-010-a (Procedure 760-00]) through Topic No. 550-030-012-a (Procedure 760-012>' Department
Location Manual and current Memorandums. Work must comp{v with the minimum technical
standards for Land Survevs Rule 61GI7-6~ Florida Statute 472.027. Department oj Natural Resources
Rule. Florida Administrative Code Chapter 18-5 (Florida Statue 177 - Part Two!, Department of
6
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemoJal Causeway Bridge
Environmental Regulations state jurisdiction boundary survevs (where applicable ) and anv data will
require the certification of a Professional Land Survevor. licensed to practice in the State oj Florida.
Survey services will be completed at the level needed for uncontrolled aerial photography. The following
aerial photography will be obtained by the CONSULTANT:
Public Involvement - 1 :500 metric ratio, color
Natural Features/Geotechnical - 1: 500 metric ratio, color
Geometrics - 1: 500 metric ratio, black and white, Alternatives Analysis and Preferred Alternative.
2. Existing Highway Characteristics
The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for procuring all the engineering data listed in Part I, Chapter
9, of the PD&E Manual necessary to conduct a PD&E study and prepare a Preliminary Engineering
Report.
The CONSULTANT will use the engineering data from the Memorial Causeway Bridge
Feasibility Study Report to the extent possible to accomplish this task.
Data includes all pertinent physical features and condition ratings which define the existing highway
segment under consideration. Some of this information is available from the CITY AND
DEPARTMENT. Other sources may be from field observation and personal interviews with officials and
the general public. CITY AND DEPARTMENT sources include project files, old plans, right-of-way
maps, bridge books, bridge logs, straight line diagrams, computer programs, and old drainage maps as
available. The following classes of data shall be obtained:
a. Roadway
Roadway characteristics shall include, but are not limited to, those items described
below:
1) Typical Sections - Number and width of each cross-section element and access
features.
2) Existing roadway right-of-way - Obtain all available right-of-way information for
project limits from the CITY, DEPARTMENT and CONSULTANT offices.
3) Other right-of-way - Identify additional right-of-way at intersection locations;
drainage easements, etc.
4) Property lines - Obtain existing property lines.
5) Pedestrian facilities - Walkways, crosswalk, handicapped provisions, and school
routes.
6) Bicycle facilities - Number, type, and width, designated or undesignated.
7
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemoJal Causeway Bridge
7) Lighting - Type, location, spacing, maintenance responsibility.
8) Traffic signals - Identify those traffic signal locations necessary to perform
capacity analysis, obtain signal timing and phasing. Contact District Traffic
Operations Engineer for comments/input.
9) Posted speed - Identify posted speed throughout project limits. Verify speed limit
data with District Traffic Operations.
10) Railroad crossing - Check for any Railroad abandonment plans. Determine the
following for existing crossings: Number of tracks and type, number of trains,
speed, length of trains, passenger, freight, type of warning device, time of day,
etc.
11) Structural and operational conditions - Obtain structural and operational ratings
and engineering rating throughout project limits (available from the
DEPARTMENT).
12) Drainage systems inventory - Identify existing drainage systems listing types and
discharge points.
13) Alignment - Obtain horizontal and vertical alignment as necessary. Review sight
distances.
14) Intersection Design - Channelization, turning lane arrangement.
b. Bridge (Highway):
Interchange or grade separation structure (available from the DEPARTMENT).
1) Typical Section - lane width, overall clear width.
2) Type Structure - Timber, concrete, steel; loading.
3) Condition - Obtain latest bridge inspection reports and Structure Inventory and
Appraisal (SIA) sheets from the District Structures and Facilities Office; obtain
evaluation from the District Structures and Facilities Office as to the suitability
for widening. Obtain existing bridge plans.
4) Horizontal and Vertical Clearance.
5) Span arrangement - Number and length of spans.
6) Bridge Number.
8
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemoItal Causeway Bridge
c. Bridge (Waterway):
Navigable or non-navigable, fixed span or bascule.
1) Typical Section - Lane width, overall clear width.
2) Type structure - Timber, concrete, steel; loading.
3) Condition - Obtain latest bridge inspection reports and Structure Inventory and
Appraisal (SIA) sheets from the District Structures and Facilities Office; obtain
evaluation from the District Structures and Facilities Office as to the suitability
for widening. Obtain existing bridge plans.
4) Horizontal and vertical clearance.
5) Span arrangement - Number and length of spans.
6) Channel data - Alignment, width, depth, maintenance program area of hydraulic
opening at structure.
7) Existing and projected vessel volumes and sizes.
8) Bridge Number
9) Collect Data necessary to complete the Bridge Project Questionnaire (USCG
Form D7-11003)
3. Traffic Data
The DEPARTMENT and CITY shall furnish the most recent traffic counts.
Up to 30 intersection (turning movement) traffic counts and up to 60 machine road tube traffic counts
will be conducted within and east of the study area. The CONSULTANT will prepare a plan showing
the locations and durations of the counts for the CITY and the DEPARTMENT to approve prior to
conducting the counts.
The CONSULTANT shall provide the traffic count data in the format specified by the DEPARTMENT.
The CONSULTANT shall conduct the counts and analyze the resulting data to determine daily peak
hours and percent daily variation from the peak hour.
The CONSULTANT shall furnish 24-hour two-way traffic machine counts in 15-minute increments for
each approach, and 10-hour manual turning movement counts including pedestrian and bicycle counts.
The pedestrian and bicycle counts shall be conducted in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic
Studies and the 1986 Bicycle Usage Trend Program Report.
9
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemOItl Causeway Bridge
The CONSULTANT shall furnish a copy of the count data to District Planning and District Traffic
Operations.
4. Accident Data
Obtain available data from DEPARTMENT's computer (Program numbers AARPJ12 and AARPJ13) and
local sources for various highway segments as required. Obtain data for the latest five years.
a. Number of accidents - type, location, etc.
b. Fatalities - number
c. Injuries - number
d. Property damage - cost
e. Economic loss - cost
Data will be collected for Memorial Causeway, Pierce Boulevard, Court Street and Chestnut Street
within the study area.
c. Environmental Data Collection
Immediately following the Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT shall begin preliminary assessments of
the study corridor from an environmental standpoint. This task shall be of sufficient detail to begin
alternative analysis.
This activity consists of collecting various information and materials relative to the social, economic, and
environmental concerns within the study area. The CONSULTANT shall maintain an inventory of
pertinent development occurring throughout the duration of the study, and keep aerial photography
updated accordingly.
1. Land Use Data
( in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual)
a. Collect data regarding past and present land usage as well as future land use plans,
proposed developments, zoning guidelines, municipal comprehensive plans and observed
growth trends.
b. Collect data required to prepare eXlstmg and future land use map(s) indicating as a
minimum, residential, commercial, industrial, public, agricultural, and undeveloped areas
adjacent to the alignment.
10
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemOltl Causeway Bridge
2. Cultural Features and Community Services
a. Through contact with local officials, research of tax rolls and field inventory, identify the
following in the project area (to be in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E
Manual and Section 267,F.S.).
1) Medical facilities (hospitals, clinics, emergency rescue facilities, convalescent
centers, ambulance facilities for the handicapped, etc.).
2) Fire stations.
3) Educational facilities (public and private) - identify bus routes, student walkways
and school crossings.
4) Religious institutions.
5) Cemeteries (public and private).
6) Public (government) buildings and civic facilities.
7) Existing and proposed parks, recreation areas, wildlife refuges, historic sites.
b. Coordinate with public service organizations. Determine operational practices and solicit
comments regarding proposed alternative(s).
3. Hydrologic and Natural Features Data
a. Wetlands
( in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 18 of the PD&E Manual.)
1) Identify all wetlands falling partially or wholly within project boundaries or
which may be affected by the project. Data Collection for wetlands shall be
commensurate with the information needed to use the Wetland Evaluation
Technique (WET II) program version 2.1 (Level 2).
2) Obtain information concerning each wetland including, but not limited to, floral
species, fauna species, amount and types of previous disturbance, size, functional
value, etc.
3) Classify wetlands utilizing U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service's "Classification of
Wetlands and Deep Water Habitats of the United States, 1979".
11
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater Memortl Causeway Bridge
The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with federal and state permitting agencies. Agencies involved may
include but not be limited to: U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (USACOE), U.S. Coast Guard, Southwest
Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection
(FDEP), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (FGFWFC) and National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS).
b. Outstanding Florida Waters
The CONSULTANT shall identify any Outstanding Florida Waters in the project area in accordance with
Chapter 17-3.041 FAC and as described in Part 2, Chapter 21 of the PD&E Manual.
c. Floodplains
The CONSULTANT shall identify floodplains as required under the Federal Aid Policy Guide and the
DEPARTMENT's Drainage Manual, Vol. 2, Chapter 3 and as described in Part 2, Chapter 24 of the
PD&E Manual and listed below.
1. Identify and delineate all base (100 year frequency) floodplains using Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), Flood Hazard Boundaries Maps (FHBM),
quadrangle maps, water management district topographic maps, DEPARTMENT
drainage maps, etc.
2. Determine natural and beneficial values of specific floodplain areas (recharge,
storm water retention, wildlife habitat, etc.).
3. Determine the role this facility may have m providing emergency services,
evacuation, etc.
4. Identify any historic maintenance problems involving drainage or flooding. The
CONSULTANT shall contact the DEPARTMENT's staff, as well as the
appropriate personnel within the CITY or other local jurisdiction(s), for
complaint records and known drainage or flooding problems.
d. Floodways
The CONSULTANT shall identify any project involvement with designated floodways using floodway
maps information from the CITY and other local government, the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) and jurisdictions through which the project traverses.
e. Drainage
The history and past hydraulic performance should be researched and noted on all structures. Obtain any
stormwater management or master drainage plans prepared by local authorities.
1. Bridges and Culverts: Determine the hydrologic basin characteristics, such as
size, topography and land use both future and existing. Inventory of immediate
upstream and downstream structures.
12
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemoJal Causeway Bridge
2. Storm Drain Systems: Inventory the existing storm drain systems. Note their
type, size, the hydrologic basins they serve and the discharge points.
f. Soils
The CONSULTANT shall furnish necessary subsoil data and recommendations for drainage, roadways
and bridge foundation design and in general accordance with the recommendations of the
DEPARTMENT. Borings, samples, and tests will be prepared in accordance with the
DEPARTMENT's Soil and Foundations Manual (Procedure No. 675-020-012-c) dated 1994 as approved
by the District Geotechnical Engineer.
Using the aerial photography, available County and Soil Conservation Service data, USGS quadrangle
mapping, SWFWMD mapping, and data available from existing PD&E, engineering and construction
projects within the study area, the CONSULTANT will inventory the existing and known soils
conditions. In addition, roadway maintenance records and published records of sinkhole activity within
the study area will be researched and documented.
The CONSULT ANT, if necessary, will perform geotechnical work necessary to determine seasonal high
groundwater levels and perform a soil permeability assessment in all areas being considered fOf
stormwater management facilities.
This available data will be composited on available metric ratio aerials, and relatively desirable conditions
from a geotechnical/geological viewpoint will be identified. This information will be utilized during the
cOfridor analysis phase of the study. Geotechnical information obtained in this task will be presented in
the final geotechnical report.
All soils information shall be reviewed by a geotechnical engineer and samples taken at selected sites.
Auger Borings, if necessary, will be taken at locations along the proposed alternatives where the
geotechnical engineer determines additional information is required. The depth of borings shall be at least
1.52 m (5 feet). Groundwater, if encountered, shall be recorded.
If unsuitable material is encountered additional borings or probing shall be taken to determine the extent.
These additional borings shall be in sufficient quantity to assure that the alignment selected will not later
be determined impractical due to soil conditions.
An evaluation of the potential for sinkhole subsidence along the selected right-of-way shall be provided.
The subsurface investigation shall be sufficient to assure that the alignment selected will not later be
determined impractical due to potential for sinkhole subsidence.
Other general information shall be obtained to describe the soils composition along the developed
alternative(s) using USGS hydrologic maps, county soil survey maps and other information from the Soil
Conservation Service to perform the engineering analysis and determine the impacts of the project.
g. Water Quality
The CONSULTANT shall collect data necessary to complete an evaluation of project related water
quality impacts in the project area in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 20 of the PD&E Manual.
13
Exhibit A-I
~
City of Clearwater MemolI Causeway Bridge
h. Endangered and Threatened Species
The CONSULTANT shall identify any "critical habitat" as defined by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 27 of the PD&E Manual, the CONSULTANT shall survey the
alignment for state and federally designated endangered and threatened species, individuals, or other
positive indications (nests, burrows, droppings, etc.) of their presence. Identify any significant
potentially threatened or endangered species habitat.
A survey methodology approach shall be coordinated with the FGFWFC and USFWS to determine
survey methodologies and locations prior to performing the field work.
4. Utilities
The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Utility Assessment Package in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 10
of the PD&E Manual and identify the following existing and proposed utilities which may influence
location or design considerations:
a. Overhead - Transmission lines, microwave towers, etc.
b. Underground - Water, gas, sanitary sewer, force mains, power cables, etc.
c. Bridge Attachments
5. Transportation Plans
Obtain plans for all modes of transportation; surface, transit and non-motorized modes.
a. Local plans; city and county, and MPO.
b. Transit; rail, bus, other.
c. Non-motorized modes, including bikeways and pedestrian walkways. Interview local
officials and identify the following factors: Existing and projected user types; generators
attracting users; existing and anticipated hazards; high accident locations.
6. Permit Coordination
This process consists of obtaining permit-related information about wetland sites which may reqUIre
dredge and fill/water quality permits or stormwater discharge permits. This information will
subsequently be organized into a Wetland Evaluation Report for distribution to the various jurisdictional
agencies. Permit and permit review agencies to be considered are the U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, Southwest Florida Water
14
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater Memoli Causeway Bridge
Management District, local environmental agencies, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission,
National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.
a. Determine the existence and location of possible permit sites.
b. Obtain characteristics of above sites including ordinary or mean high water elevations,
vegetation characteristics, and significant fauna components.
c. Take reproducible photographs.
d. Collect data necessary to fill out Bridge Project Questionnaire (USCG Form D7 -1103).
e. Obtain additional permit-related information about these sites, such as connections to
other water bodies, types of water-related activities supported, etc.
f. The CITY and DEPARTMENT should be notified in advance of any meetings with
permitting agencies.
7. Right-of-Way Relocation Data
Obtain information necessary to make preliminary assessments of the feasibility of alternatives.
(Optional): A...Conceptual Sta,ge Relocation Plan for the proposed alternatives within Project limits as
described in Part 2. Chapter 11 oj the PD&E Manual will be prepared.
a. Note neighborhoods, economic, and racial/ethnic groups.
b. Determine representative property values in the area (to be used for estimating right-of-
way costs).
8. Noise Impact Data
The CONSULTANT shall obtain information concerning existing and future noise levels and noise-
related characteristics of existing activities as described in Part 2, Chapter 17 in the PD&E Manual. The
CONSULTANT shall determine noise sensitive sites along all viable alignment(s). These could include
historic sites or districts, residences, motels, churches, schools, libraries, hospitals and other sites
requiring a quiet atmosphere.
9. Contamination Assessment
The CONSULTANT shall identify, evaluate, and prepare recommendations for the CITY concerning
potential project contamination problems associated with each proposed alignment per Part 2, Chapter 22
of the PD&E Manual, revised July 1,1994.
15
Exhibit A-I
1
City of Clearwater MemOltl Causeway Bridge
a. Identification (Data Collection Process)
This task consists of the examination of each alternative alignment to identify potential project
contamination problems on sites located within, partially within, or adjacent to proposed right-of-way
limits. This examination consists of, but is not limited to:
1. Physical Land Use History
Public record searches to identify the current tenants and legal owners as well as past tenants and the
associated land usage/business activities. Coordinate this data with the appropriate aerial survey;
2. Records Search
State and local environmental and health agency visits to obtain information about the past, present and
future enforcement actions that could impact upon the proposed project such as, Notices of Violations,
document records, compliance inspection, reports, enforcement notices, contamination assessment
reports, remedial action plans, EDI files, etc.
3. Visual Walk-Thru
On-site verification of acquired data for parcels along the alternative alignments with particular attention
to site storage and handling, those sites with changed land use, and previously unrecorded/undocumented
problems.
These research and field verification tasks should yield a comprehensive parcel profile revealing any
likelihood or risk of waste or pollutant contamination that could impact the proposed highway
development.
4. Evaluation (Risk Ranking)
This task consists of assigning ratings for all properties based on Part 2, Chapter 22 of the PD&E
Manual.
5. Recommendations
After contamination potentials are identified and evaluated the CONSULTANT shall develop
recommendations. These recommendations shall be used in shaping the development of alignment and
right-of-way strategies (focusing on avoidance of contamination) prior to selection of a "preferred"
alternative.
The CONSULTANT shall provide recommendations for any additional evaluations or investigations on
suspect parcels to be completed prior to right-of-way acquisition and construction.
Data collected, analyses, and recommendations made as a result of these tasks shall be assembled by the
CONSULTANT in a technically and scientifically concise Contamination Screening Evaluation Report.
This report shall include an executive summary, a narrative, tables, graphics, and appendices (parcel
profiles, violation summaries, correspondence, etc.), to completely illustrate the screening effort. The
16
Exhibit A-I
1
City of Clearwater MemorLI Causeway Bridge
report shall discuss in detail low, medium and high risk sites and the feasibility of alignment
modifications and further assessment strategies, as appropriate.
10. ArchaeologicallHistorical Assessment
An archaeological and historical site assessment survey of the preferred alignments including proposed
stormwater retention areas will be conducted for this project.
a. Purpose and Objectives
The assessment is intended to comply with the provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act of
1966 (Public Law 89-665, as amended) and the provisions contained in the revised Chapter 267, F.S.
The purpose of the surveys is to locate, identify, and bound any cultural resources, prehistoric or
historic, associated with this project and to assess the significance of these resources in terms of eligibility
for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) according to criteria set forth in 36 CFR
Section 60.4.
The specific objectives of the surveys will be to:
1. Identify any cultural resources associated with the project that are already listed
on or that are previously recorded as potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP.
2. Locate, identify, and bound any additional cultural resources associated with the
project.
3. Collect and document sufficient data from each identified prehistoric or historic
resource to permit an assessment of its significance in terms of eligibility for
listing on the NRHP.
4. Provide a final report with appropriate documentation detailing the results of the
survey and the final assessments of resource significance. The report shall
include a Florida Master Site File Form on all identified cultural resources and a
NRHP Determination of Eligibility (DOE) package on all resources determined to
be significant. In the case of historic resources, the DOE package shall include a
NRHP Registration Form with accompanying documentation.
All of the work conducted on the surveys shall be coordinated with cultural resource
management personnel of the DEPARTMENT'S Environmental Office. The
DEPARTMENT will coordinate this project with the Florida Department of State,
Division of Historical Resources.
b. Services to be Performed
The assessment survey shall be conducted along the preferred alignment(s) of the Project.
The work elements to be accomplished are as follows:
17
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemorIal Causeway Bridge
1. Conduct a Literature Review and Background Research
Archaeological and historical resource documentation pertinent to project area shall be identified and
reviewed to determine the types of cultural resources present, their chronological associations, locational
patterning, and other pertinent findings. Such documentation shall include but not be limited to cultural
resource survey reports, comprehensive plan studies, published books and journal articles, the National
Register of Historic Places, and the Florida Master Site File and any county or local site inventory. This
review shall also include, when possible, information gathered from other professionals in pertinent
disciplines, avocational archaeologists and historians, and local residents of the project area in question.
2. Prepare Archaeological, Historical, and Environmental Overviews of the Project
Area.
Archaeological Overview: A summary of the area's prehistoric and historic archaeology shall be
prepared based on the findings of the literature review and other background research. The overview
shall identify the chronological, functional, and locational dimensions of the project area's archaeological
record, as well as provide a basis to partition the project area into ranked zones of archaeological site
occurrence potential, to analyze recovered cultural data and to evaluate the significance of archaeological
sites occurring in the project area.
Historical Overview: An overview of the history of the project area shall be prepared based on the
findings of the literature review and other background research. The overview shall identify the salient
events, locations, structures, and individuals associated with the development of the project area.
Particular attention shall be paid to land use patterns and the historical environment. The potential for
historical archaeological sites shall also be addressed. The overview shall provide a basis for evaluating
the significance of both historical and architectural! historical resources occurring in the project area.
Environmental Overview: An overview of the project area's salient environmental features shall be
prepared including a description of the area's topography, geology, hydrology, pedology, and vegetative
associations. The description shall include a discussion of past and present environmental configurations
in terms of relationships to the occurrence of cultural resources.
3. Prepare a Research Design for the Project
Using data provided by the literature review, general background research, the archaeological, historical,
and environmental overviews developed, and other pertinent sources of information, a research design
shall be generated for the project. The research design is essentially the overall plan for conducting the
survey and interpreting its results. It should identify the basic types of cultural resources that may be
present in the survey area and outline the methods, techniques, and knowledge necessary to locate,
identify, and evaluate them. The research design should also provide an appreciation of the cultural
resources present or expected in the survey area in terms of broader, regional cultural resource
patterning. The research design should reflect the guidelines set forth in The Florida Division of
Historical Resource's "Historic Preservation Compliance Review Program" manual (revised November
1990) promulgated by the Florida Division of Historical Resources.
The research design will be submitted to the Environmental Administrator for approval prior to the
initiation of field work. A meeting attended by all to the initiation of field work. A meeting attended by
all pertinent parties will usually be required to discuss the submitted research design and its implications
for the project (for example, man-hours, project budget, survey quality).
18
Exhibit A-I
1
City of Clearwater Memorlal Causeway Bridge
4. Conduct a Field Survey of the Project Area
A cultural resource field assessment survey of the project area shall be conducted. The survey shall
employ both surface and subsurface testing techniques to locate, identify, and evaluate the significance of
cultural resources occurring in the project area. The intensity of field testing shall be keyed to ranked
probability zones (high, medium, low) of possible cultural resource occurrence based on paleo-
environmental data, the occurrence of known sites, historic land use patterns and other pertinent
information. Subsurface testing in these ranked zones shall adhere to standards set forth in the guidelines
promulgated by the Florida Division of Historical Resources (see "The Historic Preservation Compliance
Review Program" Manual revised November 1990). Testing in areas of high site probability shall
proceed at approximately 25 meter intervals and in areas of moderate site potential at approximately 50
meter intervals. Testing in low probability areas should generally proceed on a judgmental basis with at
least ten percent of such areas subjected to testing. Judgmental testing shall also be employed in areas of
high and moderate site potential as appropriate.
Subsurface tests shall be 0.5 meters in diameter and dug to a minimum, subsurface conditions permitting,
of one meter. All spoil from excavated tests shall be sifted through 1/4 inch metal hardware cloth. Any
cultural materials recovered from either surface or subsurface testing shall be stored in plastic bags and
properly labeled as to provenience. Any organic materials recovered in testing such as fauna and floral
materials shall be stabilized, if necessary, and preserved for future analysis. In the event that historic
structures are encountered on a survey, each site shall be properly mapped and photographed, the
estimated date of construction and architectural style determined, and its architectural- historical
significance evaluated. In addition, archaeological subsurface testing shall be conducted in an attempt to
detect any subsurface artifacts or features associated with the historical structure.
Documentation: A Florida Master Site File form shall be completed on every prehistoric or historic
cultural resource identified in the assessment survey. A National Register of Historic Places
Determination of Eligibility (DOE) package shall be completed on each prehistoric and historic cultural
resource considered to be a significant resource according to criteria established by law (see Federal
Register, CFR No. 18, Vol. 39, Part III, pp. 3369-3370). In the case of historic resources, the DOE
package shall include a NRHP Registration Form with accompanying documentation. Maps, drawings,
and photographs shall be used, as appropriate, in the documentation of the cultural resources addressed in
the assessment process. Field notes documenting the progress of the assessment survey shall be
maintained. These notes shall include the type and number of tests conducted, a brief description of
artifacts or features encountered in testing, soils information, and other information pertinent to the
assessment survey. All subsurface tests and areas of surface examination shall be clearly marked on
aerial photographs of the project area.
5. Process, Analyze, and Catalogue Recovered Cultural Materials
Laboratory processing shall consist of artifact cleaning, stabilization (if required), packaging, and
storage. Laboratory analysis shall consist of the morphological and functional (if possible) classification
of artifacts and, if diagnostic, the establishment of their cultural/temporal affiliations. Proper and
detailed documentation of artifact provenience, number, type, description shall be maintained. Artifacts
will eventually be transferred to the DEPARTMENT by the CONSULTANT pending a decision on their
final disposition.
19
Exhibit A-I
1
City of Clearwater MemOltl Causeway Bridge
6. Prepare Report Documenting the Results of the Cultural Resource Assessment
A draft report presenting the methods, findings, evaluations, and recommendations of the cultural
resource assessment of the entire project shall be prepared. The report shall be so prepared as to
conform to the standards set forth in DEPARTMENT'S Project Development and Environment Manual
(Part 2, Chapter 12 revised) as well as to the standards embodied in the Florida Division of Historical
Resource's "Historic Preservation Compliance Review Program" manual (revised November 1990).
Following the review of the document and receipt comments, a final report shall be submitted according
to the project schedule.
7. Section 106 Consultation (optional)
U one or more National Register (NR) eligible properties are located within the Area of Potential Effect
(APE) for a studv segment. the CONSULTANT shall assess the tifJects that the proposed "Build
Altematives(s)" mav have on it (them). IYJects should not be discussed in the Cultural Resources
Survev Report. but in a separate Case Stut{v Report (CSR)' The CSR should enable the
DEPARTMENT. FHWA. SHPO and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) and other
interested parties to determine whether the proiect will have no e.ffect., no adverse effect or an adverse
effect on one or more NR eligible properties.
If No Effect is found, the CONSULTANT shall document in the CSR how this conclusion was made.
After review of the CSR bv the CITY and DEPARTMENT the CONSULTANT shall prepare the
appropriate transmittal letters for the DEPARTMENT to submit the CSR to the FHWA for their review
and subsequent submittal to the SHPO per the requirements of 36 CFR Part 800.5(b)' Once the SHPO
concurs with the determination. the CONSULTANT shall note this in the Environmental Document per
the requirements contained in Part 2. Chapter 12 of the PD&E Manual.
If the CONSULTANT concludes that an effect mav occur. it shall be documented in the CSR whether
or not the effect is adverse bv applying the Criteria Qj Adverse Effect (36 CFR Part 800.9(bH to the
prlQect. Exceptions to the criteria are covered in 36 CFR Part 800.9(d.
If the CONSULTANT concludes that the prQject mav have No Adverse e.t!ect on NR eligible resources
the CSR should document how this conclusion was reached. If the CONSULTANT recommends that
the potentiallv adverse effect can be mitigate then it should describe the mitigation in the CSR and
indicate that it will be accomplished as Dart Qj a "Conditional No Adverse Effect" determination which
is to be made bv the DEPARTMENT on behalf of the FHWA and concurred in bv the SHPO. The
CSR should note the results Qj the consultation and concurrence between the FHW A and the SHPO.
The CONSULTANT shall submit the CSR and evidence of SHPO concurrence to the CITY and
DEPARTMENT, along with the documentation called for in 36 CFR Par 800.8(a) which is addressed
in the CSR. The CONSULTANT shall note the results of the FHWA. SHPO and Advisory Council
consultation in the Environmental Document.
If the CONSULTANT concludes that the prQject within the study segment mav have an Adverse IYJect
on one or more NR eligible resources the CSR should document how this conclusion was reached. The
CONSULTANT should evaluate whether the prQject mav directlv impact the resource bv taking all of
its property. The CONSULTANT should also evaluate whether the project mav also indirect{v impact
the resource through affecting its views. noise levels. vibration effects. traificlaccessibility. economics
or air quality amongst other criteria. The CONSULTANT shall prepare the documentation called for
20
Exhibit A-I
1
City of Clearwater Memorll Causeway Bridge
in 36 CFR 800.8(b) and address it in the CSR. The CONSULTANT should ensure that the segment's
CSR contains a discussion on wavs to avoid or reduce the effects on the resource(s),
Providing that the project mav have an Adverse E;ffect., the CONSULTANT shall lJrepare a
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) which outlines the commitments agreed upon bv the consulting
parties to avoid. reduce or mitigate the adverse effects the project mav have on NR eligible resource(s ).
The MOA should discuss the undertaking,. the qffected NR eligible properties and name the consulting
parties and contain stipulations ensuring that the various agreed upon commitments are carried out.
The CONSULTANT shall assist the CITY and DEPARTMENT in the formal consultation process
amongst the FHWA. THE DEPARTMENT, SHPO. ACHP and others when discussing the adverse
effects. The CONSULTANT shall also assist the CITY and DEPARTMENT in providing members of
the public opportunities to be informed of the pro;ect and its effects on the resources. Individual
meetings with interested persons or a series of public information meetings mav be required. . Public
newsletters mav also be required. The extent and methods of public involvement effort followed in the
consultation process must be documented in the CSR.
8. Formal Consultation with the SHPO
The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the SHPO and others when discussing any effects to resources
protected by F.S. 267 (Optional: Section 106). The CONSULTANT shall also provide members of the
public opportunities to be informed of the project and its effects on the resources.
a. Qualifications Standards
Personnel shall meet the minimum criteria for archaeologists, historians, architectural historians and
other professionals as set forth in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology
and Historic Preservation. Resumes of the Principal Investigator, other supervisory personnel, and
Consultant's documenting their qualifications to conduct work in their stated area of expertise must be
submitted for review and approval by the DEPARTMENT. If sub-Consultant's are to be hired as needed
during the course of the project then documentation concerning these professionals shall be provided at
the appropriate time for review and approval by the CITY and DEPARTMENT. The proposed
participation of the above individuals is subject to approval by the DEPARTMENT based on their
meeting the minimum qualifications for such work as stated in the above mentioned guidelines and based
on a review of their work history. Any change of any of the above mentioned employees occurring
during the performance of the contract must have the prior approval of the CITY and DEPARTMENT.
The CONSULTANT shall also:
1. Provide or demonstrate access to adequate field and laboratory equipment
necessary to complete the work required for the project.
2. Provide or demonstrate adequate facilities necessary for the proper treatment,
analysis, and storage of specimens recovered from the project.
21
Exhibit A-I
J
City of Clearwater Memorll Causeway Bridge
11. Determination of Section 4(f) Involvement (optional)
The CONSULTANT shall assist the CITY and DEPARTMENT in determining if Section 4(f) apDlies to
anv existing and pro Dosed Section 4(j) properties affected bv anv of the proposed alternatives within the
studv area. and if so. evaluate and document the direct impacts. or indirect proximity effects to the
Section 4(j) propert.y(ies) as described in the PD&E Manual and CFR 771.135., as required.
The DEPARTMENT will coordinate with FHWA and submit information developed bv the
CONSULTANT to receive a determination of applicability. If FHWA determines that Section 4(f)
applies to the prQ,ject. the CONSULTANT shall assist the CITY and DEPARTMENT in the preparation
oj a Section 4(j) Evaluation as part oj an Optional Services provision for this contract.
12. Visual and Aesthetic Impact Analysis
The CONSULT ANT shall analyze the visual and aesthetic impacts of all proposed alternatives as
described in Part 2, Chapter 15 of the PD&E Manual. Since this project may have special impacts, a
special review of the visual and aesthetic impacts will be conducted according to Exhibit C-l.
D. Project Design Analysis
1. Corridor Analysis
Following the environmental and engineering inventory, the CONSULTANT shall investigate the area to
establish reasonable corridor alternatives. The CONSULTANT will use the recommended
corridors/alternatives from the Memorial Causeway Bridge Feasibility Study Report to the extent
possible to accomplish the requirements of this section.
The tasks for corridor analysis include:
a. Establish Need for Improvements
Evaluate transportation plan (if appropriate) for need, considering parallel facilities and the status of the
plan. Compare plan against the project traffic data. Perform basic capacity analysis as necessary to
establish the number of lanes required for the improvement. Safety and condition of existing facilities
must also be considered in determining the need for improvement.
b. Corridor Consideration
Using available aerial photography and field reviews, identify possible corridor locations, giving
consideration to the following items which may influence corridor location.
22
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater Memoil Causeway Bridge
1. Alignment controls - Identify available right of way through which an
improvement providing acceptable service could be routed with
consideration being given to the following:
a. Cultural Features - All public and private development, as well as
archaeological or historic sites.
b. Natural Features - Significant features which could be impacted by
the project, especially wetlands and endangered species.
C. Hazardous Material and Hazardous Waste Sites.
d. Termini - Establish logical termini giving consideration to
directness, length and service.
2. Develop alignments within corridors - Determine general design
requirements in sufficient detail to establish and analyze representative
alignments within corridors.
a. Typical Section - Establish alternate basic cross section elements
including right of way requirements.
b. Design Features - Establish major design features in consideration
of the terrain and related highway facilities which could affect
alignment. These include grade separations, major intersections,
long structures, significant embankment requirements, etc.
c. Preliminary Corridor Base Maps
Plot pertinent information on aerial photographs (metric ratio
1 :4800, 1 :2400) for evaluation of costs and associated impacts.
1. Important Cultural Features - All public and private
development.
2. Natural Features - Significant features which could be
impacted by the project.
3. Termini - Establish logical termini giving consideration to
directness, length, and service.
4. Existing and Proposed Right of Way.
5. North arrow and scale.
6. Photo-flight date.
23
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater Memoil Causeway Bridge
c. Evaluation of Corridors
Each alternative corridor shall be analyzed and evaluated to a point of rejection or selection as a viable
alternative. The CONSULTANT shall identify the impacts for each alternative and express them in a
form suitable for comparison to other alternatives. Differences shall be contrasted in sufficient detail to
identify the most viable alternatives and to select the one that would be in the best overall public interest.
The CITY and DEPARTMENT (optional): and FHWA)will make the final decision on which alternatives
are viable. Types of items to be presented by the CONSULTANT include the following:
1. Construction Costs - Develop construction cost estimate.
2. Right of Way Costs - To be provided by the CONSULTANT.
3. Preliminary Engineering Costs - Estimated cost to prepare construction
plans and construction engineering cost.
4. Relocation Estimate - Estimated number of individuals, families,
businesses, farms, and nonprofit organizations relocated including
relocation costs, to be coordinated with the DEPARTMENT.
5. Business Damage Estimate - To be provided by the CONSULTANT.
6. Environmental impacts - Air, noise, water pollution, wetlands and
floodplain encroachment, Historic/Archaeological Sites, 4(t) involvement,
Socioeconomic effects.
7. Data Comparison - Compare the various impacts to show the most viable
alternatives.
Prepare the viable alternatives in a reproducible form suitable for use in public involvement meetings.
2. Conceptual Design Analysis
After selection of the viable corridor(s), the CONSULTANT shall establish design traffic and design
speed, prepare Conceptual Plans, and develop and analyze design alternatives for the Project. All data
gathered thus far shall be used in the development of these alternatives.
The objective is to develop viable alternatives based on standard engineering practice which provide
appropriate highway daily Level of Service D (Year 2020 Peak Hour) or higher commensurate with the
social, economic and environmental impacts involved and the applicable City of Clearwater
Comprehensive Plan standards. If such a design is determined by the CONSULTANT to be non-
feasible, he shall recommend to the CITY the most feasible design concept which will maximize the
capacity of the proposed facility. The design of the proposed improvement shall be established and
developed in conceptual form but in sufficient detail to permit definitive analysis.
24
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater Memolal Causeway Bridge
The analysis of the alternatives shall identify the non-viable alternates and provide documentation for
rejection. The more viable alternative(s) shall be further evaluated to a point where conceptual design
plans can be developed. The Memorial Causeway Bridge Feasibility Study Report findings, to the will be
utilized for the documentation for the Conceptual Design Analysis section.
a. Establish Design Traffic Volumes
The CONSULT ANT shall prepare a Traffic Memorandum showing the existing and future traffic
volumes in schematic form and documenting the design hour volumes to be used for the concept
development. The CONSULTANT will coordinate with the MPO to ensure consistency of the future
traffic projections with the MPO's long range plan projections. The Traffic Memorandum will cover the
study area and an additional area sufficient to analyze the potential impacts of the relocation of the bridge
approach.
This technical memorandum, or traffic report, shall be conveyed to the CITY AND DEPARTMENT and
shall also serve as the instrument for the CITY AND DEPARTMENT's approval of project traffic. It
shall also be shown in the preliminary engineering report. All traffic capacity analyses shall be
completed utilizing the latest release of the Highway Capacity Manual software (HCS).
The CONSULTANT shall not develop design alternatives or perform analysis depending on traffic inputs
(e.g., noise impacts, air quality assessment) until the Technical Memorandum is approved.
b. Develop Design Alternatives
This task consists of identifying, developing, and analyzing feasible design alternatives for subsequent
evaluation of viability. This shall include adequate consideration of non-motorized modes of
transportation. The studies shall determine the horizontal and vertical alignment, typical cross-section,
preliminary right-of-way costs, preliminary drainage to the extent of identifying required outfalls, traffic
data, geometric concepts of intersection/interchanges listed under the Traffic Data Collection section of
this Exhibit, existing and proposed utility location to the extent they effect the decision process, soils
information, extent of improvement to all intersecting roads, acreage involved, preliminary structure
concepts and locations, locations of retention basins and/or impoundments as may be required, locations
of noise barriers, and such other design features as may be pertinent to the analysis of the environmental
and engineering impacts. Major elements involved in this task are:
1. Typical Section
The CONSULTANT shall develop a proposed Typical Section utilizing all appropriate standards. The
range of alternatives to be evaluated for this project will be determined by the SEIR .
With consideration of business and residential development, drainage requirements and environmental
impacts, establish the type of design (urban vs. rural) for the proposed improvement.
The typical section shall be reviewed by the CITY and DEPARTMENT and preliminary approval
received.
25
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemoJal Causeway Bridge
2. Alternatives Base Maps
The CONSULTANT shall prepare base maps from which alternatives will be developed. These maps
shall include property lines, right-of-way lines, street names and identify adjacent buildings and
landmarks.
3. AlignEBent
The CONSULT ANT shall establish alignment alternatives in conjunction with typical section refinement
to identify design alternatives. The specific location of the improvement shall be developed and
evaluated with respect to right-of-way impacts and construction costs. Alignments shall be developed and
evaluated that include right-of-way acquisition from either side and both sides of the existing right-of-way
or a combination of either. In developing the alignments the CONSULTANT shall determine the benefit
of incorporating the existing pavement and shall make maximum use of existing right-of-way. Special
effort shall be taken to avoid conflicts with areas containing hazardous materials. The CONSULTANT
shall develop the alternatives with respect to horizontal and vertical geometry in sufficient detail to
determine right-of-way requirements, intersection geometry, and any required features such as retaining
walls, culverts, wildlife crossings, etc.
The CONSULT ANT shall prepare the design alternatives on aerial mapping as necessary to develop
preliminary estimates of right-of-way costs, construction costs and relocation impacts and determine those
alternatives which can be eliminated as non-viable. The remaining alternatives will be retained for
further development and detailed evaluation. For some alignment and typical section combinations, only
a brief evaluation may be all that is necessary to reject them from further consideration. However, the
actual data, and rationale used, shall be documented.
Before preparing these prints, the CONSULT ANT shall decide which alternatives shall be evaluated for
right-of-way, business and relocation costs. All viable alternatives will require a relocation count or
right-of-way cost estimate using Base Conceptual Plans. The submittal shall have the right-of-way lines
color coded (existing right-of-way lines green, proposed right-of-way lines red or separate distinguishable
colors). Schematic layouts of probable interchange and grade separation shall be shown. These layouts
shall be accompanied by appropriate justification data to support the recommendation of these locations.
Sufficient information shall be provided on the layouts to indicate the extent of the improvements on
intersecting roadways. The CONSULTANT shall also clearly identify limited or controlled access right-
of-way lines as required (i.e.; access management, noise walls, etc.). The analyses involved with these
alternatives are discussed in detail under the Comparative Analysis of Feasible Design Alternatives
section of this Exhibit.
4. Hydraulic Analysis
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Location Hydraulic Report in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 24 of
the PD&E Manual and also incorporate it into the Preliminary Engineering Report.
5. Conceptual Drainage Design
Prepare a conceptual drainage design for the chosen typical section and alignment. The required services
include the establishment of locations for outfalls and for a conceptual design of stormwater treatment and
attenuation facilities which will comply with rules of the Department of Environmental Protection, the
26
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemoJal Causeway Bridge
Southwest Florida Water Management District and DEPARTMENT Rule 14.86. The CONSULTANT
shall supply data and reports required to support the conceptual design. The data and reports shall be
prepared in accordance with the DEPARTMENT's Drainage Manual. The information shall include
critical duration storm analysis for determining attenuation requirements. If attenuation per Rule 14.86 is
not reasonable, then the CONSULT ANT shall provide the reasons and justifications for not conforming
to this rule. The CONSULTANT shall also research the requirements/regulations of local governments
and incorporate those requirements/regulations into the conceptual drainage design, or present reasons as
to why the local government restrictions are not reasonable to be applied to the proposed improvements.
The CONSULTANT shall prepare all of the data and information necessary and obtain written
conceptual approval from the Department of Environmental Protection and Southwest Florida Water
Management District for stormwater treatment and surface water management as required by Chapter 17-
25, Regulation of Stormwater Discharge, Florida Administrative Code; Chapter 40D-4 and 40D-40,
Rules of the Southwest Florida Water Management District; and DEPARTMENT Rule 14.86.
(OptionalLProvide a Bridge Hvdraulics Report and Bridge Hsdraulics Recommendation Sheet for all
bridges and bridge culverts located within the limits of the proiect. The "one foot rise" in backwater
required bv FHW A must be addressed and if not appropriate. its dismissal should be fullv explained
and iustified. An appropriate risk analysis should be prepared for bridge and bridge culvert extensions.
replacements or modifications per Chapter 3 of the DEPARTMENT'S Drainage Manual. the
DEPARTMENT'S Structures Design Guidelines and included with the Bridge Hydraulics Report.
6. Soils
The CONSULTANT shall provide to the CITY and DEPARTMENT a written geotechnical report based
on review of existing information, field reconnaissance and a minimum of field borings, if necessary, to
identify soils-related problem areas. Report shall include anticipated soil conditions along roadway
and/or at structure sites and recommendations for treatment of problems that will hinder or preclude
design and/or construction.
(optional): A Preliminary Geotechnical ReDort (Structures) shall be prepared in order to provide
enough data to evaluate the foundation types studied in the Bridge Development Report.
7. Structures
The CONSULTANT shall evaluate all structure needs, including widening and/or replacement of existing
structures necessary to match the proposed typical section. (Optional) A Bridge Development Report
(prepared in accordance with the requirements of the DEPARTMENT's Structure Design Guidelines)
will be required for the structures within the limits of this prQject. The report shall list and evaluate all
viable alternatives considered and the reports shall contain the following information for each
structure:
The evaluation shall include all viable alternatives considered and the following information for each
structure:
27
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemorIal Causeway Bridge
a. Suitability of widening eXlstmg structures. The bridge inspection reports and other
pertinent information, available from the DEPARTMENT's District Structures and
Facilities Office, shall be reviewed and included in the reports.
b. Bridge alternative typical sections, discussion of the advantages and disadvantages and
estimated cost for widening and replacement options, as well as each alternative
superstructure and substructure considered. Cost evaluations shall include life cycle cost
analyses, as accepted by the CITY AND DEPARTMENT. Appropriate back-up data
regarding unit prices shall also be provided.
c. Evaluation and estimated costs of viable options for upgrading the underclearance at
structures to bring them up to compliance with the DEPARTMENT's Structures Design
Guidelines.
d. Design related considerations which must be addressed, such as constructability,
drainage, lighting, utilities, traffic control, erosion protection, cross wind impacts and
recommendations for foundations.
e. Conceptual drawings showing general features of the alternatives considered.
f. A recommendation as to which alternative should be carried forward to final design, as
well as the basis for the recommendation, should be provided. The concepts
recommended shall include, as a minimum:
1. Horizontal Plan View
2. Vertical Elevation View
3. Bridge Typical Section
4. Bridge Overall Length
The basis for the recommendations shall be stated and prepared to illustrate special details for review by
the CITY AND DEPARTMENT.
g. If aesthetics are of particular importance, then drawings should be made to illustrate
special details for review by the CITY .
h. Special design criteria not already established by DEPARTMENT or AASHTO, but that
may be required should be developed.
8. Access Management
The CONSULTANT shall review the DEPARTMENT's State Highway System Access Management
Classification System and Standards (Rule 14-97) and determine their application to the project. The
CONSULT ANT shall determine the proper access classification and standards to be applied to the
project. The access management standards shall be presented as part of the public involvement. The
CONSULTANT's review will include a study of the impacts due to the imposition of Limited Access
right of way lines and changes in existing access for the project area.
28
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater Memo'al Causeway Bridge
9. Design Exceptions and Variances
The CONSULTANT shall provide adequate documentation to justify any design exceptions and/or
variances required to implement the project alternatives. The CONSULTANT is responsible for
providing documentation (justification, cost to eliminate, B/C analysis, accident forecasts, etc.) as
required to obtain an approved design exception/variance per the direction given in the
DEPARTMENT's Roadway Plans Preparation Manual.
10. Prepare Design Alternatives
The CONSULT ANT shall plot each design alternative on aerial mapping in sufficient detail to use for the
evaluation of costs and associated impacts. These preliminary maps will include as a minimum centerline
alignment, existing and proposed right-of-way lines, property lines, street names, subdivision names and
boundaries, horizontal and vertical alignment, and typical cross section.
3. Environmental Analysis
The CONSULTANT shall perform the following analyses for all viable alternatives to document all
impacts in the appropriate reports.
a. Land Use
The CONSULT ANT shall determine any changes or impacts to existing or future land use as described in
Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual.
b. Cultural Features and Community Services
The CONSULT ANT shall determine the effects of the project on cultural features and community
services including impacts on emergency services, school bus routes and other community services. The
analysis shall be consistent with Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual.
c. Wetlands
The CONSULTANT shall complete a WET II evaluation for all impacted wetlands. The
CONSULTANT shall quantify all wetland impacts for each alternative and determine the project's
overall effect on wetlands. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with SWFWMD, FDEP, and other
agencies as appropriate.
d. Floodplains
The CONSULTANT shall determine the amount of floodplains to be impacted by each alternative. The
CONSULTANT shall coordinate with FEMA as necessary and shall determine the effect of the project
on floodplains consistent with Part 2, Chapter 24 of the PD&E Manual.
29
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater Memortal Causeway Bridge
e. Water Quality
The CONSULTANT shall complete the Water Quality Impact Evaluation consistent with Part 2, Chapter
20 of the PD&E Manual.
f. Farmlands
The CONSULTANT shall complete Parts I and III of Form AD-1006 (Farmland Conversion Impact
Rating) as indicated by Part 2, Chapter 28 of the PD&E Manual. The CONSULTANT, in accordance
with the Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1984, shall coordinate with the U.S. Soil Conservation
Service in order to determine if farmlands are prime, unique, statewide or of local importance.
g. Endangered and Threatened Species
Based on the results of the species surveys, any involvement with endangered or threatened species shall
be documented in a Biological Assessment which is to be submitted to the USFWS and FGFWFC. This
shall be completed in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 27 of the PD&E Manual. The CONSULTANT
shall maintain continuous coordination with USFWS and FGFWFC to determine any impacts to
endangered or threatened species.
h. Utilities
The CONSULTANT shall complete the Utility Assessment Package in accordance with Part 2, Chapter
10 of the PD&E Manual. Utility relocation costs shall be included in the evaluation of alternatives.
i. Mitigation
The CONSULTANT shall develop a conceptual mitigation plan to offset all impacts created by the
project. The plan shall include recommended ratios, types of mitigation and potential locations. The
plan shall be coordinated with the USCOE, USFWS, SWFWMD and FDEP.
J. Noise Impact
I. The CONSULTANT shall complete a noise impact analysis as described in
Part 2, Chapter 17 of the PD&E Manual. The CONSULTANT shall:
a. After the noise impact analysis methodology meeting, monitor existing
ambient noise, traffic volume and speed levels concurrently at
representative noise sensitive sites adjacent to the "No Build" and viable
"Build" alternative(s). Noise monitoring activities shall be in accordance
with the procedures described in Sound Procedures for Measuring
Highw<\)' Noise: Final Report, FHWAP-45-1R, August 1981, and Part
2, Chapter 17 of the PD&E Manual. The noise impact model(s)
(STAMINA, FLAMOD or their successors) to be used in the analysis
must be validated for use prior to predicting existing and design year
noise levels.
30
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemOltl Causeway Bridge
b. Develop the traffic inputs to be used for the noise analysis, including but
not limited to, peak hour traffic volumes, daily traffic volumes and peak
hour speeds.
c. The validated noise impact analysis model(s) are to be used to predict
existing year, No Build design year (2020) and viable Build design year
(2020) noise levels for the noise sensitive sites identified for the project.
Isopleth contour lines will be graphically identified for noise levels of 65
and 67 Reports (NSR). The 67 dBA contour is only included in the NSR
for land use coordination activities between the CITY and the
appropriate local governments and DEPARTMENT.
d. When predicted design year noise levels for the identified noise sensitive
sites exceed 65 dBA or when FHW A substantial increase criteria are met,
noise abatement considerations must be analyzed and discussed in the
NSR and the Environmental Document. The OPTIMA noise barrier
analysis portion of the STAMINA 2.1 model will be utilized at the noise
sensitive sites as appropriate.
k. Air Quality
The CONSULTANT shall obtain information concerning existing air pollution levels in the project area
and prepare a detailed air quality assessment as described in Part 2, Chapter 16 of the PD&E Manual for
all viable "Build" alternative(s), as well as for the "No Build" alternative.
1. The future years for which air quality is to be analyzed must include the opening
year, future design year (2020) for the viable Build alternative(s) and the No
Build alternative.
2. Using the "worst case" part of each project section (usually at the most congested
interchange/intersection), by obtaining and comparing peak hour traffic volumes,
speeds and distances to nearly reasonable receptor sites. Select the location with
the highest volume, lowest speeds and closest receptors. Then select the leg of
the interchange/intersection which has the highest volumes and lowest speed. If
it is not obvious that one leg is the worst leg, repeat the computerized screening
test for each of the possible worst legs of the intersection.
3. After approval of the traffic data for the project by the CITY and
DEPARTMENT, opening year and future design year design hour volumes are
to be used with the design hour average speeds for the viable "Build"
alternatives(s) and the "No Build" alternative. Utilize the appropriate urban
and/or rural screening test as outlined in Part 2, Chapter 16 of the PD&E Manual
to determine if further analysis is required.
4. If the project does not pass the screening test, obtain all data required for the use
of the computer programs MOBILE5A and CAL3QHC, their successors, or
equivalent programs approved by the DEPARTMENT. Evaluate and refine all
data so that they are ready for the programs.
31
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater Memojal Causeway Bridge
1. Relocation
The CONSULTANT shall determine the number of residential, business and non profit organization
relocations for each alternative. The CONSULTANT shall ensure that the number of relocations shown
in the (optional): Conceptual Stage Relocation Plan is consistent with the number shown in all other
documents.
4. Comparative Analysis of Feasible Design Alternatives
a. Comparative Analysis
After developing the feasible design alternatives, each alternative's costs shall be determined, associated
impacts identified and analyzed, and compared to the other feasible alternatives to select the most viable.
The types of items to be evaluated include the following:
1. Construction costs - Develop the construction cost estimate usmg the
DEPARTMENT's Long Range Estimate (LRE) program. The CONSULTANT
shall estimate the cost for engineering supervision during construction. The
CONSULTANT will consider and recommend the most efficient construction
methods.
2. Right-of-Way, business damages and relocation costs - estimated right-of-way
impacts, business damages and relocation costs will be prepared to include land,
severance, court awards, settlements, and data relative to business damages.
These estimates will be prepared in the DEPARTMENT's format for review and
approval. Right of way estimates will be prepared for all viable alternative(s).
3. Preliminary engineering costs - Estimated cost to prepare construction plans.
The CONSULTANT shall use the DEPARTMENT's Long Range Estimating
System (LRE) to prepare these estimates.
4. Estimates of "life cycle" costs for operation and maintenance of
alternatives.
5. (Optional): Relocation Plan - The CONSULTANT will prepare a Conceptual
Stage Relocation Plan in accordance with the Right-of- Wav Procedures Manual
Procedure RAI-4., Policv Reference 4.102 and as described in Part 2. Chapter
11 of the PD&E Manual. This plan will be reviewed and approved bv the CITY
AND DEPARTMENT.
6. Economic Evaluation - The CONSULTANT will prepare benefit/cost analyses as
necessary .
7. Drainage Features - The CONSULT ANT will identify major drainage features
and the requirements for obtaining permits inherent in each alternative.
32
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater Memoli Causeway Bridge
8. Environmental impacts - The CONSULTANT will analyze impacts, such as air,
noise, contamination, wetlands and floodplain encroachment.
9. Maintenance of Traffic - Identify methods of maintenance of traffic during
construction, potential sequencing and an evaluation of their cost.
10. Design Exceptions - The CONSULTANT shall evaluate the project to determine
the requirements for any design exceptions. These exceptions shall be submitted
as per the DEPARTMENT's Plans Preparation Manual for review and approval.
b. Consideration and Resolution of Engineering Items
The CONSULTANT will comply with the DEPARTMENT'S PD&E Manual, Part 1, Chapter 9. This
Section (9 - 2.2.3) details the 13 basic engineering items to be covered concerning the proposed
improvement.
These 13 basic engineering items will be discussed with the CITY and DEPARTMENT and a decision
reached regarding the disposition of each item prior to submitting the environmental document with
support documentation in the Draft Engineering Report. The items are as follows:
1. Alternatives to be considered (Location and Design)
2. Alternatives found feasible (Location and Design)
3. Typical sections for each alternate
4. General horizontal and vertical alignment
5. Preliminary right-of-way and construction cost estimates
6. Major drainage, including outfalls
7. Bridge location and type
8. Proposed interchange layout
9. Major intersection design concepts
10. Major utility adjustment
11. Maintenance of traffic concepts
12. Right-of-Way requirements
13. Bicycle accommodations
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a brief summary report detailing these 13 engineering items.
c. Selection of Alternatives
Following the performance of the comparative analysis of design alternatives, the CONSULTANT in
consultation with the CITY and DEPARTMENT will select the viable alternative(s) to be evaluated. The
information amassed thus far will be the basis upon which the decisions are made. The possibility exists
that the "No Build" alternative may be selected at this point.
33
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater Memoli Causeway Bridge
d. Conceptual Design Plans
After the viable alternatives are selected the CONSULTANT shall prepare Conceptual Design Plans of
the selected alternatives in reproducible form on Conceptual Base Plans. Prints of the Conceptual Design
Plans shall be prepared for use in review and public involvement meetings.
e. Typical Section Design Packages (Optional)
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Tvpical Section Design Package for the project to be submitted to
the CITY and DEPARTMENT for review and approval. This package is to include typical sections for
the vroiect and shall consist of the following:
Transmittal Letter
Location Map(s)
Tvpical Section(s) (Including bridge sections)
Data Sheet(s)
The Typical Section Design Package shall be submitted to the CITY and DEPARTMENT for approval
at the earliest possible date.
f. Identify Construction Segments
The CONSULTANT shall determine feasible segments for construction projects within the project
corridor in consideration of budget, priority needs, maintenance of traffic, and the public demand for the
improvement.
g. Value Engineering Multi-discipline Team Review (Optional)
The proiect development and conceptual design peiformed under this contract MAY be subject to Value
Engineering.
h. Project Team Review
The CONSULTANT shall attend a review meeting.
The purpose of the review is to assure that the Pre-draft Environmental Analysis Report is complete and
ready for submission.
The environmental personnel shall participate in this review. The sufficiency of the work accomplished
will be determined at this time.
34
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemoJal Causeway Bridge
E. Preliminary Engineering Report
1. First Draft Engineering Report
The information amassed thus far shall be submitted to the CITY and DEPARTMENT in a First Draft
Engineering Report. This is to be a technical report developed using the scientific method which shows
why and how the various alternatives (build and no-build) were developed, as outlined in Part 1, Chapter
9 of the DEPARTMENT's Project Development and Environment Manual.
The engineering report shall be prepared addressing all viable project alternatives both graphically and
verbally. A comparative evaluation shall also be included addressing alternative horizontal and vertical
alignment, typical cross-section, preliminary right-of-way costs, preliminary drainage to the extent of
identifying outfalls, traffic data, geometrics, maintenance of traffic, schematic sketches of
intersections/interchanges, preliminary utility information, extent of improvement to all intersecting
roads, acreage involved, preliminary structure concepts and locations, the location of retention basins
and/or impoundments as may be required, the location of noise barriers, and such other design features
as may be pertinent to the analysis of the environmental and engineering impacts. All this information is
shown on uncontrolled aerial photography. The Location Hydraulic Report shall be incorporated into
the Engineering Report.
For new, widened or rehabilitated bridges the CONSULTANT shall include in the Preliminary
Engineering Report, all of the alternative structural design concepts considered, and the basis of their
further consideration or their rejection as being unfeasible or not cost effective.
The report shall be prepared on 8-112" X 11" paper and written on both sides in order to reduce bulk.
The use of charts, sketches, diagrams, tables, etc., is encouraged to reduce the narrative that would
otherwise be required. A highly legible reduced copy of the conceptual plans of the most viable
alternative shall also be included on 11" X 17" inch paper. The format for the written Engineering
Report is:
a. Description, purpose and need for the study.
b. Description of existing facilities.
c. Methodology of the study.
d. Formulation of Alternatives.
e. Analysis of Alternatives.
f. Selection of Viable Alternatives.
35
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemoJal Causeway Bridge
g. Summary of Recommendations.
h. Appendices:
1. Field Data
2. Data Analysis
3. Supporting Studies (geotechnical, traffic, Utility Assessment Package, etc.)
4. Conceptual Plans (including structural)
2. Submit Second Draft Preliminary Engineering Report
The first draft Preliminary Engineering Report shall be updated to reflect all changes resulting from the
public meeting, CITY and DEPARTMENT reviews. Copies of the second draft shall be submitted for
review concurrently with the Pre-draft Environmental Document.
3. Final Preliminary Engineering Report
Following the Public Hearing and allowing sufficient time for all comments to be reviewed, the
CONSULTANT shall recommend a Location/Design alternative. Once approved, the CONSULTANT
shall prepare the Final Preliminary Engineering Report. These documents shall:
a. Address the engineering issues raised at the hearing and effect disposition of same.
b. Revise Second Draft Preliminary Engineering Report to discuss the selected alternative,
agency and Public Hearing comments. Add in the Final Report a Commitments and
Recommendation Section.
c. List engineering related public hearing comments and responses to same.
d. Revise Comments and Coordination Sections to reflect public hearing and general
comments received.
e. Submit required number of copies of Final Preliminary Engineering Report.
Included in the final engineering report will be Conceptual Plan drawings of the recommended
alternative. The Concept Plans included in the final engineering report shall be 11" X 17" sheets
attached in an appendix. These plans shall be in accordance with the DEPARTMENT's Roadway Plans
Preparation Manual, Structures and Right of Way Mapping Standards and Guidelines.
36
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater Memolal Causeway Bridge
The Final Preliminary Engineering Report is submitted with the Final Environmental Document and shall
be signed and sealed by the responsible Engineer.
F. Environmental Documents
1. Form 508-05 Document - State Environmental Impact Report (SEIR)
Prepare and submit a Form 508-05 to the DEPARTMENT for review in accordance with Part 1, Chapter
13 of the PD&E Manual. This form will summarize the environmental impacts of the proposed
improvements.
2. Air and Noise Study Reports
The CONSULTANT will develop and provide the necessary Air and Noise impact reports only for the
viable alternative(s) that will be presented at the Public Hearing. The CONSULTANT shall summarize
the information for inclusion in the environmental document. Documentation to verify the analysis shall
be submitted to the CITY AND DEPARTMENT upon submittal of the Air and Noise reports for CITY
AND DEPARTMENT review, comment and final approval.
a. Noise Study Report
The environmental document will only include a noise level analysis summary for the 65 dBA level and
above at the identified noise sensitive sites. When predicted design year noise levels for the identified
noise sensitive sites exceed 65 dBA or when the FHW A substantial increase criteria are met, noise
abatement consideration must be analyzed and discussed in the Noise Study Report (NSR) and the
environmental document. The OPTIMA noise barrier analysis portion of the STAMINA model will be
utilized at the noise sensitive sites as appropriate. The noise level analysis shall be performed in
accordance with the requirements noted in Part 2, Chapter 17 of the PD&E Manual and a NSR will be
prepared for the project.
All computer input/output and noise sensItIve site information will be made available for the
DEPARTMENT's review and comment when the draft NSR is submitted. All comments and/or
questions received will be addressed in written form to the CITY and DEPARTMENT prior to preparing
the final NSR. The final NSR will be completed after the public hearing to ensure all noise impact issues
are addressed.
The NSR should include as a minimum, a project location map, an illustration of the 65 dBA and 67 dBA
isopleth lines and a map showing the locations of noise sensitive sites. Tables should include, at a
minimum, traffic related information (volumes and speeds) utilized in the analysis, a short description of
each noise sensitive site with existing noise levels and predicted 2020 "No Build" and "Build" noise
levels, activity category relationships, and substantial increase criteria for noise abatement considerations.
37
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater Memolal Causeway Bridge
b. Air Quality Report
All air quality impact analyses shall be performed in accordance with the requirements noted in Part 2,
Chapter 16 of the PD&E Manual. An Air Quality Report (AQR) will be prepared for the project.
All computer input/output data will be made available in a legible and easy to follow format for the
Environmental Administrator to review and comment. All comments and/or questions received shall be
addressed in a written response to the CITY and DEPARTMENT prior to preparation of the final AQR.
The final AQR will be submitted following the public hearing.
3. Wetland Evaluation Report
In order to obtain meaningful comments from permit and permit review agencies, a Wetland Evaluation
Report shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT for the project. Upon approval, the report shall be
distributed. The report shall:
a. Evaluate Impacts
Evaluate impacts of the "Build" alternative(s) upon permittable areas. Consider such things as
elimination of habitat, changes in flow, erosion and sedimentation, destruction of vegetation, etc.
b. Conceptual Mitigation Plans
The CONSULT ANT shall prepare conceptual mitigation alternatives if wetland impacts are to occur, as
described in Part 2, Chapter 18 of the PD&E Manual. The conceptual mitigation will be documented as
part of the Wetland Evaluation Report.
c. Wetland Evaluation Report
Compile and print the Wetland Evaluation Report to be provided to permit and permit review agencies
for early coordination and jurisdictional determinations. The report shall contain, at a minimum, the
following:
1. Location map indicating project termini and each potential permit site.
2. Description of existing and proposed facility.
3. General description of project area.
4. Site Specific information as outlined in Part 1, Chapter 10 of the PD&E Manual.
5. Color photograph(s) of each site.
6 Request for comments.
7. Offer of a joint field review upon request.
8. Conceptual stormwater management scheme.
9. Completed Waterway Investigation Sheets.
10. All information contained in the wetlands section, including dredge and fill
quantities, total wetland acreages, function and importance, proposed mitigation,
etc. An evaluation of each wetland site impacted by the project based on the use
38
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater Memoli Causeway Bridge
of WET II, version 2.1 (to a level 2) program. The results of the WET II
analysis shall be in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 18 of the PD&E Manual.
11. Set of Concept Plans (may be reduced) for the preferred "Build" alternative(s).
The proposed mitigation measures for the "Build" alternative(s) could include, but not be limited to,
habitat restoration/creation, modifying slopes, bridging wetlands, reducing median widths, creation of
wetlands and treatment of runoff. Specifically address FAC. Chapter 17-25.
Documentation verifying the analysis has been completed shall be submitted for review with the submittal
of the Draft Wetland Evaluation Report.
4. Endangered and Threatened Species Evaluation
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Biological Assessment to document the endangered and threatened
species evaluation. This assessment shall be in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 27 of the PD&E Manual
and shall document the methods and results of the literature search and field surveys for determining
involvement with state and federal species within the project study area. The level of documentation will
be determined by the project's involvement with endangered and threatened species. If the project
"Build" alternative(s) have a likely involvement with any protected species, then the evaluation must
discuss the extent of the involvement and address means to avoid or mitigate/minimize the involvement.
If it is determined that the proposed "Build" alternative(s) will have no involvement with any protected
species then the evaluation must state this. In either case, the evaluation must be prepared in such a
manner as to obtain USFWS concurrence of "No Involvement" or "No Effect" depending on the project
improvements.
5. Prepare Pre-Draft Environmental Document
The Pre-Draft Environmental Document containing all viable alternatives shall be prepared, submitted to
and approved prior to the public hearing. The following steps may be used as a guideline for the
preparation of this document.
a. Prepare engineering graphics and write draft engineering section of the environmental
document.
Include, when appropriate, the following graphics:
1. Project location map.
2. Study area map.
3. Corridor alternatives.
4. Alignment alternatives.
5. Design alternatives (typical section).
Include discussion on the following subjects as developed for the Preliminary Engineering
Report.
39
Exhibit A-I
I
City of Clearwater MemoJal Causeway Bridge
1. Description of the proposed action.
2. Planning basis for the proposed action.
3. Transportation demand.
4. Social demands and Economic Development.
5. Modal Interrelationships.
6. Safety.
7. Deficiencies of the existing facility.
8. Emergency Services.
9. System linkage.
10. Highway planning objectives.
11. Alternative corridors.
12. No Improvement Alternative.
13. Design alternatives.
14. Alignment alternatives.
15. Major intersections/Interchanges.
16. Maintenance of traffic.
17. Required design exceptions
18. Obtain letter from MPO expressing their view of the project (if applicable).
b. Prepare graphics and write draft "Impacts" section of the environmental document.
Include, when appropriate, the following graphics:
1. Existing and future land use.
2. Noise analysis receptor site, location map.
3. Air analysis receptor site, location map.
4. Wetland site location map.
5. Base floodplain location map.
Include discussion of existing conditions, potential impacts and proposed mitigative
measures on the following areas of interest:
1. Social and Economic Impacts - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 9 of the
PD&E Manual. Impacts to be addressed include land use changes, community
cohesion, churches and schools, Title VI considerations and controversy
potential.
2. Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 14 of the
PD&E Manual.
3. Wetlands - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 18 of the PD&E Manual. The
Wetland Evaluation Technique Version 2.1 (WET II) shall be incorporated into
the wetland assessment analysis for all viable alternatives.
4. Aquatic Preserves - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 19 of the PD&E Manual.
5. Outstanding Florida Waters - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 21 of the PD&E
Manual.
6. Wild and Scenic Rivers - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 23 of the PD&E
Manual.
40
I
City of Clearwater MemOltl Causeway Bridge
Exhibit A-I
7. Floodplains - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 24 of the PD&E Manual.
Coordinate with FEMA and local agencies to determine the project's consistency
with any regulated flood way .
8. Farmlands - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 28 of the PD&E Manual.
9. Wildlife and Habitat - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 27 of the PD&E
Manual.
10. Water Quality - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 20 of the PD&E Manual.
11. Coastal Barrier Islands - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 26 of the PD&E
Manual.
12. Relocation and Community Impact - In accordance with Part 2, Chapters 9 and
11 of the PD&E Manual.
13. Noise Impacts - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 17 of the PD&E Manual.
14. Air Quality Impacts - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 16 of the
PD&E Manual.
15. Coastal Zone Consistency - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 25 of the PD&E
Manual.
16. Contamination - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 22 of the PD&E Manual.
17. Construction Impacts - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 30 of the PD&E
Manual.
18. Utilities and Railroads - In accordance with Part 2, Chapter 10 of the PD&E
Manual.
19. Cultural Resources - Discuss all cultural resource impacts (archeological,
historical, recreation areas, etc.) in accordance with Part 2, Chapters 12 and 13
of the PD&E Manual.
20. Navigation Impacts - In accordance with Part 1, Chapter 3 of the PD&E Manual.
21. Advance Notification - The CONSULTANT shall also consider and formulate
responses to any comments received through the Advance Notification process.
6. Submit Pre-Draft Environmental Document
Submit pre-draft Environmental Document to the CITY and DEPARTMENT for review (optional): and
submission to FHWA for review and approval.
7. Draft Environmental Document
The Draft Environmental Document shall be prepared, reflecting those comments obtained from the pre-
draft review, and submitted to the CITY and DEPARTMENT for review and approval.
The DEPARTMENT will also circulate copies of the Draft Environmental Document to the Central
Environmental Management Office. The CONSULTANT shall anticipate the necessity of further
revisions to the draft report based on review comments.
Coincident with the submittal of the Draft Environmental Document the CONSULT ANT will assist the
CITY in a presentation to the Clearwater City Commission to provide the Commission an overview of
the study and the status of the progress on the funding scenarios. The need to comply with the full
federal environmental review process will be evaluated at this stage.
41
Exhibit A-I
J
City of Clearwater MemoJal Causeway Bridge
8. Final Environmental Document
Following the Public Hearing and allowing sufficient time for all comments to be reviewed, the
CONSULTANT will recommend a Location/Design alternative. Once approved, the CONSULTANT
will prepare the Final Environmental Document. The document will:
a. Address the engineering and environmental issues raised at the hearing and effect
disposition of same. This action is an important part of the study process and shall
involve appropriate staff personnel studying suggestions received as a result of the
meeting. This will be done in coordination with the CITY AND DEPARTMENT.
b. Revise draft environmental document to discuss the selected alternative, agency and
Public Hearing comments. Add in the final document a Commitments and
Recommendation Section.
c. Revise draft impacts section to reflect selected alternative and pertinent comments
received. Include a summary of further agency comments, a "Wetlands Finding", a
"Floodplain Finding", and discussion of results of any formal endangered species
consultation with the USFWS.
d. List environmental related public hearing comments and responses to same.
e. Revise Comments and Coordination Section to reflect public hearing and general
comments received.
f. Submit Pre-Final Environmental Document to the CITY and DEPARTMENTjoptional):
and FHW A for review.
g. Revise pre-final document to respond to the comments and submit document to
DEPARTMENT (optional): and FHWA as the Final Environmental Document for
approval.
9. Conceptual Stage Relocation Plan
(Optional): The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Conceptual Stage Relocation Plan in accordance with
DEPARTMENT procedures.
G. Public Involvement and Project Meetings
Gaining public support for the proposed facility is of primary importance in the development of the
alternatives for the project. To assure that the public is aware of the project objectives, a continuous
public involvement program shall be provided by the CONSULT ANT for the duration of the study. The
42
Exhibit A-I
)
City of Clearwater MemoJal Causeway Bridge
CONSULT ANT shall coordinate and perform the appropriate level of public involvement as outlined in
Part 1, Chapter 8 of the PD&E Manual including the following:
1. Public Involvement
The CONSULTANT shall prepare for review by the CITY a continuous Public Involvement Program.
Possible items to be included in the program are:
. Presentation to local officials
. Periodic newsletters to the concerned citizens
. Formal news releases
. Informal "town-meetings" on routine basis
· Schematic displays at public sites easily accessible to pedestrians
· "Living-room" meetings with small groups of concerned citizens
. Scoping Meetings
· Presentations to interested civic groups
Upon the CITY's approval of the Public Involvement Program, the CONSULTANT shall implement the
program. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the scheduling of meetings and the preparation
or updating of all displays for the program. The CONSULTANT shall conduct the presentations to the
communities. The CONSULTANT shall pay for all ads, postage, fees, mailings, reproductions, etc.
involved with all meetings and the hearing. If it is determined that a court reporter be present, the
CONSULT ANT shall be responsible for all costs associated with arranging for a court reporter to be
present and obtaining transcripts of comments made during the public meetings or hearing.
a. Mailing List Preparation
1. The CONSULTANT with assistance from the CITY shall identify and compile a
mailing list of any affected, possibly affected, and interested parties early in the
study process. This includes the identification (from county tax rolls) of all
persons owing property within 300 feet either side of the centerline of all viable
alternatives pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statute 339.155.
2. Elected and appointed officials in the area (city, state, federal, county) and
community leaders shall be identified and placed on the mailing list of officials
and interested parties.
3. Possible permitting agencies shall be identified and placed on the mailing list of
officials and interested parties.
43
)
City of Clearwater Memorll Causeway Bridge
Exhibit A-I
4. The mailing list of officials and interested parties shall also include any person or
institution expressing an interest in the project.
5. Media in the project area shall be identified and placed on a mailing list to be
used for news release/distribution, advertisements or any other concerns.
b. Identify and Inspect Public Meeting Sites
Prospective sites for any meetings to be held shall be inspected for suitability. Consideration shall be
given to location, seating capacity, sound system, lighting, display space and any other physical
characteristic which would influence the viability of this site. The CONSULTANT shall obtain the
meeting site.
1. Possible Public Involvement Meeting sites (which may also be the Public Hearing
site) shall be cataloged.
2. Sites which have characteristics more suitable to a public hearing (than a more
informal information meeting) shall be cataloged.
All costs associated with the obtaining of the meeting sites shall be the responsibility of the
CONSULTANT.
c. Collect Public Input
This activity occurs throughout the life of the project and requires maintenance of files, newspaper
clippings, letters and especially direct contact before, during and after any of the public meetings in the
Project Development phase. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for all costs associated with
arranging a court reporter to be present during public meetings and obtaining transcripts of comments
made during the public meetings.
1. Input is gathered during the Public Involvement Meeting, either by personal
contact or by formal testimony and by letter, visit or phone call in response to
said meeting. The CONSULTANT may be asked to assist in preparing responses
to any public inquiries.
2. Input is also gathered by personal contact during the Public Hearing or during the
formal public testimony time frame of the hearing. This formal input is
documented in the transcript of public hearing proceedings.
d. Photo Imaging
The CONSULTANT will scan photographs of up to 10 sites where proposed construction will take place
and show before and after construction conditions. The CITY will approve the photography used for the
Photo Imaging. The general procedure is as follows:
1. A 8xlO photo is scanned into the computer. In order to create the correct
perspective, it is necessary to know, as accurately as possible, the lens size,
44
1
City of Clearwater Memort Causeway Bridge
Exhibit A-I
height of camera above existing ground, the orientation of the camera to North
and what time of day picture was taken.
2. Creation or conversion of CADD drawings into 3D-CADD. These files can be
from any CADD package that can generate a DXF format file.
3. The camera location is then located in the 3D Model to match the existing photo.
4. Lighting is arranged to produce shadows on the proposed facilities that will match
the existing conditions photo.
5. Surface colors and textures are applied to all 3D faces. When creating the
CADD drawing all items of the same color should be on the same layer. (i.e..
concrete, light poles, road stripes, etc.)
6. The image is then rendered using AutoCAD 3D Studio on a black background.
7. The image is then merged with existing photo scan. The black background is
keyed out, images aligned and Targa file is created.
8. The final output can be on slides or poster size photos (up to 30 x 40 at this
time) .
2... (Optional): The final output can be produced in a video as an optional service.
lYhnLoutputting to video tape a "transition" can be animated showin.g before
and qfter, along with the appropriate text.
2. Alternatives Public Meeting
Before the Alternative Public Meeting is held the CONSULTANT will assist the CITY in a presentation
to the Clearwater City Commission to provide the Commission an overview of the study and the status of
the progress on the funding scenarios. The need to comply with the full federal environmental review
process will be evaluated at this stage.
The purpose of the Alternatives Public Meeting is to present to the public the results of the study to date
and obtain comments on the alternatives. It is possible that additional alternatives may be suggested by
citizen involvement during this meeting.
This meeting shall be advertised and conducted by the CONSULTANT as an informational meeting. The
CONSULTANT shall conduct the meeting and prepare all necessary displays, maps, script, slides, etc.
The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for all required postage costs. One (1) meeting is anticipated to
publicly present the viable design alternatives for this project. The CONSULTANT's responsibilities for
the meeting are as follows:
45
J
City of Clearwater Memort Causeway Bridge
Exhibit A-I
a. All presentations (script and graphics), media releases, legal and display advertisements,
and general (mass) property owner letters shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT and
reviewed and approved by the CITY.
b. Displays advertisements - A black-and-white, quarter-page display advertisement
announcing any meeting shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT and submitted to the
CITY for approval. This advertisement shall be published by CONSULTANT in the
area newspaper(s) having the largest daily circulation. All media costs for media and
display advertisements shall be the responsibility of the CONSULT ANT. This
advertisement shall be published by the CONSULTANT at least twenty-one (21) days
and five (5) to twelve (12) days prior to the public alternatives meeting.
c. The CONSULTANT shall notify elected and appointed officials and other interested
persons by letter a minimum of twenty-five (25) days before the meeting. The CITY
shall review and approve the proposed mailing list and letters. The District Secretary
will review and sign the letters for elected and appointed officials.
d. Property Owner Letters - A letter announcing the workshop meeting shall be written and
sent by the CONSULTANT twenty-one (21) days before the meeting to all property
owners whose property lies in whole or in part within 300 feet of the centerline of any
alternative. The CITY will review and sign the property owner letters.
e. News releases shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT and approved by the CITY.
Publication during the week of the workshop and kickoff meetings shall be performed by
the CONSULTANT. The most recent media listing shall be compiled by the
CONSULTANT with assistance from the CITY and DEPARTMENT.
f. A memorandum about the meeting with location map shall be prepared by the
CONSULTANT for submission to the CITY and DEPARTMENT.
g. The meeting format shall be developed by the CONSULTANT and submitted to the
CITY for review.
h. The CONSULTANT shall prepare displays or wall graphics for use during the meeting.
These shall include typical sections, aerial photographs, renderings, charts, and graphs,
as needed. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for placing conceptual plans and
all technical documents in an appropriate place for viewing by the public prior to the
public meeting. An appropriate place may be a library or public office within the project
vicinity. This information shall be made available at least twenty-one (21) days prior to
the public meeting.
I. The CONSULTANT shall prepare the script for a formal tape recorded presentation, if
used, to include synchronization with 35 mm, color slides.
J. The CONSULTANT shall prepare camera-ready graphics to be used with a formal
presentation if this technique is used.
46
I
City of Clearwater Memorll Causeway Bridge
Exhibit A-I
k. A briefing of CONSULTANT personnel (who will be on hand during the meeting) shall
be performed prior to the meeting to make sure the staff is up to date on the project and
understands the study well enough to discuss it with the public and to answer questions.
1. Meeting equipment setup and tear down shall be handled by the CONSULTANT familiar
with audiovisual equipment and the facilities available at the meeting site.
m. Conducting the meeting will take knowledgeable CONSULT ANT staff and shall require
enough members to handle the crowd anticipated for the meeting. Although the meeting
may be scheduled for a certain time period, the CONSULTANT staff shall be available
for some time before and/or after those set hours in order to maintain public contact or
for media interviews, etc.
n. The identification of issues brought up at the meeting is an integral part of the meeting
debriefing process, which shall be attended by all staff members taking part in the
meeting process and talking with the public.
o. Once issues have been identified from the meeting, their significance shall be determined
by the CONSULTANT; i.e., are the issues valid for further consideration or do they
have elements which may require further consideration.
p. Addressing the issues and responding to them is also an integral part of the meeting
process which shall be performed by the CONSULTANT. This task involves letter
writing, the preparation of a follow-up newsletter, the placement of an ad, distribution of
news releases, or any other appropriate techniques.
3. Coordination Meetings with Local Officials and Special Planning Services
a. Local Officials' Briefin& Meetin&s
These meetings shall be held just prior to the Public Hearing to apprise local officials of the project
status, specific location and design concepts, and receive their comments. In addition, meetings with the
County staff to coordinate the project development are anticipated. A maximum of eight (8) individual or
small group meetings are anticipated. In addition four presentations will be made to the Clearwater City
Commission.
b. MPO Coordination
It is specifically required that the document shall show evidence of coordination with the Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO) including support and concerns of the MPO regarding the project. This
coordination is accomplished by presentations to the MPO's Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) (and
possibly the Citizen I s Advisory Committee) and to the MPO prior to the public hearing. Presentation
materials for the T AC Meetings shall include copies of aerial photography depicting the design
concept(s). Presentation materials for the MPO Meetings may include aerial photography, 35 mm slides,
and posters. A total of six briefings total to the MPO, TAC and CAC, and three meetings with the MPO
staff are anticipated.
47
I
City of Clearwater Memorll Causeway Bridge
Exhibit A-I
c. Special Planning Services
In addition to the above, The CONSULTANT shall provide special planning support services to assist the
CITY in the preparation of reports, presentations, and technical work; attendance at meetings,
representing the CITY and other appropriate tasks to support the CITY's efforts to secure funding,
accelerate the construction of the new bridge and gain the cooperation of other agencies and governments
in this effort. This task is expected to include assistance with accomplishing the following:
1. MPO Long Range Plan Amendment
2. Transportation Improvement Plan Priorities
3. Funding Plan
4. Other related Tasks
4. Comments and Coordination Report
a. Document the public participation accomplished throughout the study period.
b. Summarize and respond to the comments received from public involvement meetings,
advanced notification and permit coordination efforts as per Part 2, Chapter 31 of the
PD&E Manual.
5. Public Hearing
In accordance with Part 1, Chapter 8 of the PD&E Manual and Section G. 2. a - p of this scope.
6. Progress Reporting
The CONSULTANT shall meet on a monthly basis and provide written progress reports which describe
in detail the work performed on each task.
7. Unscheduled Meetings and Presentations
a. Unscheduled Meetings
The CONSULTANT shall be available with no more than a two (2) day notice to attend meetings or
make presentations as requested. Such meetings and presentations may be held at any hour between 8:00
a.m. and 12:00 midnight on any day of the week. The CONSULTANT may be called upon to provide
maps, press releases, advertisements, audiovisual displays and similar material for such meetings. No
more than eight (8) such meetings are anticipated.
48
I
City of Clearwater Memorll Causeway Bridge
Exhibit A-I
b. Local Interest Group Meetings
The CONSULTANT shall conduct a maximum of three informal meetings that are open to the public to
provide status reports to interested parties and to seek input on various aspects of the study. The "local
interest group" will include but is not limited to community groups, condominium associations, chambers
of commerce, interested agencies, and other interested parties.
c. Graphics for Short Notice Meetings and Group Meetings
The CONSULTANT shall provide the necessary graphics, displays and other presentation formats for the
unscheduled meetings, and the Group meetings as needed.
8. Locationffiesign Acceptance and Public Notice
Once all comments have been satisfied, the CITY and DEPARTMENL(optional): and FHWA) approves
the Final Environmental Document and grants project Location and Design Concept Acceptance for the
project. A determination approval notification shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT and approved by
the CITY and DEPARTMENT After the CITY and DEPARTMENT (optional): and FHWA approves the
final document. The CITY will prepare and publish a notice in the newspaper.
VI. STUDY REQUIREMENTS AND PROVISIONS FOR WORK
A. Governing Regulations
The services performed by the CONSULTANT shall be in compliance with all applicable State and
Federal regulations. Included among these regulations are:
1. U. S. c.: Title 23: Highways
2. 42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c), popularly known as Section 102(2) @ of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, P.L. 91-190.
3. The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-665) and Section 267,
FS.
4. The "Endangered Species Act of 1973 (amended 1978)", 16 U.S.C., (P.L. 93-
205).
5. Executive Order No. 11990, "Protection of Wetlands".
6. Executive Order No. 11988, "Floodplain Management".
7. Chapter 339.155 of the Florida Statutes.
8. DEPARTMENT'S PD&E Manual.
9. 23 CFR 771.
10. The standards referred to and recommended in the American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and DEPARTMENT's Design
49
I
City of Clearwater Memorll Causeway Bridge
Exhibit A-I
Criteria related to highway safety shall be used to the extent applicable. The
horizontal and vertical alignments developed by the CONSULTANT shall be the
best engineering solution to a given problem and not merely an adherence to the
minimum AASHTO standards.
11. Manual of Uniform Standards for Design, Construction, and Maintenance for
Streets and Highways.
12. Bicycle Facilities Planning and Design Manual, Rev. Ed. 1982.
13. Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209.
14. Chapter 337.241 Florida Statutes.
15. DEPARTMENT'S Roadway Plans Preparation Manual.
16. DEPARTMENT'S Right of Way Mapping Handbook.
17. DEPARTMENT'S Utility Accommodation Manual.
18. DEPARTMENT'S Drainage Manual.
19. DEPARTMENT'S Soils and Foundation Manual.
20. DEPARTMENT'S Structures Detailing Manual.
21. DEPARTMENT'S Structures Design Guidelines.
22. (Optional): 42 V.S.C. 1653 (f). popularlv known as Section 4(j) of the
Department of Transportation Act Qj 1966, P.L. 89-670.
23. (Optional): All of the appropriate Federal Aid Policv Guide issuances
and related DEPARTMENT policies and directives governing the
implementation of the previous{v mentioned regulations.
B. Project Schedule
Within ten (10) days after the Notice to Proceed meeting the CONSULTANT shall submit a detailed
project schedule to the CITY and DEPARTMENT for the completion of the study. The detailed project
schedule shall include the establishment of milestone dates for the major work items. Comments shall be
returned to the CITY within ten (10) days. The schedule shall be used as a basis for the
CONSULTANT's allocation of resources.
C. Correspondence
Copies of all written correspondence between the CONSULTANT and any party pertaining specifically
to this study shall be provided to the CITY within one (1) week of the receipt or mailing of said
correspondence.
D. Quality Control
The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for ensuring that all work products conform to CITY AND
DEPARTMENT standards and criteria. This shall be accomplished through an internal Quality Control
(QC) process performed by the CONSULTANT's Supervisors. The QC process shall ensure that quality
is achieved through checking, reviewing and surveillance of work activities by objective and qualified
individuals who were not directly responsible for performing the initial work.
50
I
City of Clearwater Memorll Causeway Bridge
Exhibit A-I
E. American With Disabilities Act (ADA)
All project designs and public involvement activities shall be in full compliance with the American With
Disabilities Act (ADA).
F. Computer Disk Scanning
All disks shall be scanned for viruses prior to using on CITY or DEPARTMENT systems.
G. Liaison Office
The DEPARTMENT will designate a Project Engineer who shall be the representative of the
DEPARTMENT for the Project. While it is expected, the CONSULTANT and CITY shall seek and
receive advice from various State, regional, and local agencies, the final direction on all matters relating
to the DEPARTMENT's participation in this Project remain with the Project Engineer.
VII. SUBMITTALS
A. The CONSULT ANT shall furnish copies of the below listed documents containing sufficient
detail regarding corridor location, conceptual design considerations and copies of various plans, exhibits,
etc., as follows:
Sheet
Size
Document Quantity (inches)
ED.QI ~
Draft SEIR 508-05 Form 5 1 81h x 11
Final SEIR 508-05 Form 5 1 81/2 X 11
Draft Environmental Determination Form 3 1 8~ x 11
(508-01) (Optional)
Final Environmental Determination Form 5 1 8~ x 11
(508-01) (Optional)
Pre- Draft Environmental Document 3 1 81h x 11
Draft Environmental Document 3 1 81h x 11
Revised Draft Environmental Document 6 1 81h x 11
Final Environmental Document 10 10 81h x 11
(Type 2 CE) More for EA/EIS
First Draft Preliminary Engineering Report 5 2 81h. x 11
Second Draft Preliminary Engineering Report 10 2 81h x 11
51
I
City of Clearwater Memorl. Causeway Bridge
Exhibit A-I
Final Preliminary Engineering Report 25
Drqft Bridge Hvdraulics Report (Optional) 10
Bridge Hydraulics Report (Optional) 25
Draft Bridge Development Report (Optional) 10
Bridge Development Report (Optional) 25
Draft Location Hydraulic Report 3
Final Location Hydraulic Report 5
Draft Geotechnical Report 3
Final Geotechnical Report 10
Draft Traffic Report 4
Final Traffic Report 10
Public Hearing Transcript 4
Draft Cultural Resource Survey Report 3
Final Cultural Resource Survey Report 10
Draft Section 106 Case Study Report (Optional) 5
Final Section 106 Case Study Report (Optional) 10
Final 13 Point Summary Report 10
Draft Comment and Coordination Report 3
Final Comment and Coordination Report 5
Draft Air Quality Report 3
Final Air Quality Report 10
Draft Noise Study Report 3
Final Noise Study Report 10
Draft Biological Assessment 3
Final Biological Assessment 10
Draft Contamination Screening Evaluation 3
Final Contamination Screening Evaluation 10
Draft Wetland Evaluation Report 3
Final Wetland Evaluation Report 10
15
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
81h. x 11
8~ x 11
8~ x 11
8~ x 11
8~ x 11
81h. x 11
81h. x 11
81h x 11
81J2 X 11
81h x 11
81h x 11
81h x 11
81h. x 11
81h x 11
8~ x 11
8~ x 11
81h. x 11
81h x 11
81h. x 11
81h. x 11
81h x 11
81h. x 11
81h x 11
81h x 11
81h. x 11
81h. x 11
81h. x 11
81h x 11
81h x 11
B. Upon completion of the study, the CONSULTANT shall deliver, in an organized manner, all
project files, maps, sketches, worksheets, and other materials used or generated during the study process.
C. Upon approval of the Environmental and Engineering Documents by the CITY and
DEPARTMENT, the CONSULTANT shall sign and seal the front cover of the appropriate documents.
The Final Engineering Report will be signed and sealed by a Registered Professional Engineer of the
CONSULTANT and submitted to the CITY and DEPARTMENT.
VIII. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CITY AND DEPARTMENT
The CITY and DEPARTMENT will provide those services and materials as set forth below:
A. Review and Approval of Advance Notification Package by the DEPARTMENT
B. Elected and Appointed official and media mailing list by the CITY
52
I
City of Clearwater MemoJal Causeway Bridge
Exhibit A-I
C. Project data currently on file.
D. Engineering standards and review services.
E. Environmental standards and review services.
F. All available information in the possession of the CITY and DEPARTMENT pertaining to utility
companies whose facilities may be affected by the proposed construction.
G. All future information which may come to the CITY and DEPARTMENT, in the opinion of the
CITY and DEPARTMENT, is necessary to the prosecution of the work.
H. All available information in the possession of the CITY pertaining to subdivision plans so that the
CONSULT ANT may take advantage of additional areas that can be utilized as part of the existing
right-of-way.
I. Coordination by the DEPARTMENT with the State Historic Preservation Officer regarding the
results of historic and archaeological survey.
J. Environmental analysis reports processing by the DEPARTMENT including Wetland Evaluation
Reports.
K. The DEPARTMENT will permit the CONSULTANT to utilize the DEPARTMENT's computer
facilities upon proper authorization as described in the DEPARTMENT Procedure No. 261-009.
The models anticipated for use in this project are AARPJ12 and AARPJ13.
IX. OPTIONAL SERVICES
After the recommended alternative has been determined and subsequent to the public hearing, the CITY
may, at its option, negotiate with the CONSULTANT for the following Optional Services. Upon
satisfactory completion of the negotiations, a supplemental agreement may be executed with the
CONSULTANT. In the event that an agreement cannot be reached between the CITY and the
CONSULTANT, the CITY reserves the right to acquire professional engineering services in accordance
with Section 287.055 Florida Statutes and CITY Procedures. (Refer to Exhibit "B", Optional Services,
for compensation provisions)
These optional services are as follows:
A. CONSULTANT Services for final design, including preparation of Baseline Control,
R/W Survey, Right of Way Maps and Design Surveys. The CITY, at its option can request a design-
build services contract for the final design and related services and construction.
B. In the event of an unavoidable involvement with those lands defined in Section 4(t) of the
U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966, preparation of the required 4 (t) Evaluation and
associated documentation.
C. If the event of an unavailable involvement with Section 106 properties, preparation of the
required evaluation and documentation.
53
I
City of Clearwater Memorll Causeway Bridge
Exhibit A-I
X. BEGINNING AND LENGTH OF SERVICES
The services described herein shall commence upon notice of the Notice to Proceed meeting and shall be
completed within eighteen (18) months from such notification.
54
I
I
EXHIBIT B -1
METHOD OF COMPENSATION AND SUMMARY OF FEES
SR 60 MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STUDY
Exhibit "B" will be supplemented and referenced sections superseded by Exhibit
"B-1."
I. METHOD OF PAYMENT
C. Out of Pocket Expenses - The CITY shall reimburse the ENGINEER actual
costs for all out - of - pocket expenses directly chargeable to the services. All
costs will be summed and will be charged up to the agreed to total upset limit for
the project.
IV. SUMMARY OF FEES
The total maximum fee for this supplemental is $860,000. (See summary page in
Section VI. DETAILS OF COSTS & FEES)
V. BILLING RATE SCHEDULE
Job Class
1995 & 1996 Hourly Billing Rate
Manager of Planning
$ 130.00
E j:S
~ .
,
13 1
I
r
I
I
AGREEl\1ENT
BETWEEN CITY AND ENGINEER
FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
:f:l1:~il~. IlECEIVEO
~
.~.
~i NOV~:2~~ "94
.~,'~~
~':t,.. HOR~INC.
: ..~~ TAMPA. rLORIDA
NffiMO~LCAUSEWAYBrornGE
THIS AGREEl\1ENT, made and entered into this ;;</ S I- day of Q-l,L1994, by and between
the City of Clearwater, Florida, hereinafter referred to as the CITY, and HDR Engineering,
Inc., a corporation licensed and authorized to do business in Florida, hereinafter referred to as
the ENGINEER.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the CITY proposes to do certain work related to the Memorial Causeway Bridge
as described in EXHIBIT A; and
WHEREAS, the CITY desires to engage the ENGINEER to perform certain professional
services pertinent to such work in accordance with this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the ENGINEER desires to provide such professional services in accordance with
( . this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits which will
accrue to the parties hereto in carrying out the terms of this Agreement, it is mutually
understood and agreed as follows:
I. GENERAL SCOPE OF THIS AGREEMENT
The relationship of the ENGINEER to the CITY will be that of a professional
consultant, and the ENGINEER will provide the professional and technical services required
under this Agreement in accordance with acceptable engineering and planning practices and
ethical standards.
I ~)+
~'--
)'YI.crv1
P:(/
II. PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICES
It shall be the responsibility of the ENGINEER to work with the CITY and apprise it
of solutions to engineering, planning and design problems and the approach or techniques to be
used towards accomplishment of the CITY'S objectives as set forth in EXHIBIT A. The scope
of services to be provided to accomplish the CITY'S objectives is set forth in EXHIBIT A.
M504A098.WP1
1
I
I
III. PERIOD OF SERVICE
A. The ENGINEER will begin work promptly after receipt of a fully executed copy of
this Agreement and shall complete the work within six months; such receipt shall
constitute written notice to proceed.
B. If the ENGINEER'S services called for under this Agreement are delayed for
reasons beyond the ENGINEER'S control, the time of performance shall be adjusted
appropriately.
C. The services called for under this Agreement shall be for a Feasibility Study as
described in Exhibit "A".
D. Additional services may be added in accordance with Section IX of this Agreement.
IV. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
A. All original sketches, tracings, drawings, computations, details, design calculations
and other documents and plans that result from the ENGINEER'S services under this
Agreement are and remain the property of the CITY.
B. The CITY may at no additional cost obtain a set of rep'roducible copies of any maps
and/or drawings prepared for it by the ENGINEER in consideration of which the
CITY agrees that no additions, deletions, changes or revisions shall be made to same
without the express written approval of the ENGINEER.
C. Notwithstanding that specific services are enumerated in EXHIBIT A, the
ENGINEER will, upon written request of the CITY, provide any and all other civil
engineering ,planning , and environmental consulting services as requested by the
CITY provided, however, that such additional services shall result in extra
compensation to the ENGINEER, as provided by EXHIBIT B. It is understood and
agreed that if such additional services are requested, the Agreement shall be
considered as a continuing contract with respect thereto.
D. The CITY hereby acknowledges that estimates of probable construction costs cannot
be guaranteed, and such estimates are not to be construed as a promise to design
facilities within a cost limitation.
E. It is understood and agreed that the ENGINEER's services under this Agreement do
not include, participation, whatsoever, in any litigation unless specifically agreed to
in writing by both parties.
F. Upon the ENGINEER'S request, the CITY will furnish or cause to be furnished
such reports, studies, instruments, documents, and other information as the
M504A098.WP1
2
I
I
ENGINEER and CITY mutually deem necessary, and the ENGINEER may rely
upon same in performing the services required under this Agreement.
G. The CITY and the ENGINEER each binds itself and its successors, legal
representatives, and assigns to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners,
successors, legal representatives, and assigns of such other party, in respect to all
covenants of this Agreement; and neither the CITY nor the ENGINEER will assign
or transfer their interest in this Agreement without written consent of the other.
H. In consideration of the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) the receipt and
sufficiency of which is acknowledged, payable as part of the first payment for
services, the ENGINEER hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and save harmless,
the CITY, its officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and all claims
arising out of the negligent acts, errors, or omissions of the ENGINEER. The CITY
agrees to limit the ENGINEER's liability to the CITY, and to all construction
contractors and subcontractors on the project due to the ENGINEER'S negligent
acts, errors or omissions such that the total aggregate liability of the ENGINEER
to all those named shall not exceed $1,000,000. or the ENGINEER'S total fee for
services rendered on this project whichever is greater.
1. All reports submitted to the CITY by the ENGINEER in fulfIllment of contract
obligations shall use recycled paper when it is available at a reasonable price and of
satisfactory quality to meet contractual performance standards. For the purposes of
this Paragraph, the price of recycled paper shall be considered "reasonable" if its
cost is no more than ten percent higher than the lowest price offered for non-recycled
paper. All reports submitted to the CITY by the ENGINEER shall use both sides
of paper sheets whenever practicable. The ENGINEER shall use both sides of paper
sheets whenever practicable. The ENGINEER shall be responsible for maintaining
records documenting usage of recycled paper for reports submitted to the CITY in
fulfIllment of contractual obligations. The ENGINEER shall submit such records
to the CITY according to procedures to be established by the CITY Purchasing
Manager.
J. The ENGINEER shall execute the appropriate State of Florida sworn statement
under Section 287.133(3)(a), Florida Statutes, Public Entity Cr~es prior to the
execution of this Agreement.
K. The ENGINEER shall attach a brief status report on the project with each request
for payment.
MS04A098.WP1
3
I
1
V. INST1RAl'iCE REOUlRE1\1ENTS
A. Workers Compensation and Employers Liability. The ENGINEER shall procure
and mainrain, for the life of this Agreement, Workers Compensation Insurance
covering all employees with limits meeting al applicable state and federal laws. This
coverage shall include Employers Liability with limits meeting all applicable state and
federal laws.
B. General Liability. The ENGINEER shall procure and maintain, for the life of this
Agreement, General Liability Insurance. This coverage shall be on an "Occurrence"
basis. Coverage shall include Premises and Operations; Independent Contractors;
Products and Completed Operations and Contracrual Liability. Coverage shall be no
more restrictive than the latest edition of the Commercial General Liability policies
of the Insurance Services Office (ISO).
This policy shall provide coverage for death, bodily injury, personal injury of
propeny damage that could arise directly or indirectly from the performance of this
Agreement.
The minimum limits of coverage shall be $500,000. Per Occurrence Combined
Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability.
The CITY shall be included and identified as an Additional Insured under the
policy/certificate of insurance.
C. Business Automobile Liability. The ENGINEER shall procure and maintain, for
the life of the Agreement, Business Automobile Liability Insurance.
~
The minimum limits of coverage shall be $500,000. Per Occurrence, Combined.
Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Propeny Damage Liability. This
coverage shall be an "Any Auto" type policy. Coverage shall be no more restrictive
than the latest edition of the business Automobile Policies of the Insurance Services
Office (ISO).
The CITY shall be included and identified as an Additional Insured under the
policy/certificate of insurance.
D. Professional Liability Insurance. The ENGINEER shall procure and maintain for
the life of this Agreement, Professional Liability Insurance. This insurance shall
provide coverage against such liability resulting from this contract/project. The
minimum limits of coverage shall be $1,000,000.
MS04A098.WP1
4
I
I
E. Supplemental Provisions. The insurance coverages and conditions afforded by the
above mentioned policies shall not be suspended, voided, canceled or modified except
after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested
has been given to both the Assistant City Manager and the Risk Management Offices
of the CITY.
Certificates of Insurance meeting the specific required insurance provisions specified
within this Contract! Agreement shall be forwarded to both the Assistant City
Manager and Risk Managemem Offices of the CITY and approved prior to the start
of any work. After review, the Certificate will be filed with the city Clerk as a part
of the official contract file.
Receipt and acceptance of the ENGINEER Certificate of Insurance, or other similar
document does not constitute acceptance or approval of amounts or types of
coverages which may be less than required by this Agreement.
The CITY may at its option require a copy of the Engineer/Consultants Insurance
Policies.
F. Safety and Health Requirements. It is the ENGINEER'S sole duty to provide safe
and healthful working conditions to its employees on and about the site of Agreement
Performance. The CITY assumes no duty for supervision of the ENGINEER.
The CITY may order that the work stop if a condition of immediate danger to CITY
employees, equipment or properry damage exists. This provision shall not shift
responsibility or risk of loss for injuries or damage sustained from the ENGINEER
to the CITY, and the ENGINEER shall remain solely responsible for compliance
with all safety requirements and for the safety of all persons and property at the site
of ENGINEER performance until the beginning of COnstruction and arising out of
ENGlNEER'S negligence.
The ENGlNEER shall comply with the standards and regulations set forth by the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Florida Department of
Labor and Employment Security and all other appropriate federal, state, and local
regulations or City safety and health standards.
G. Hazardous Substances. It is understood and agreed that in seeking the professional
services of the ENGINEER under this Agreement. the CITY does not request the
ENGINEER to undertake uninsurable or potentially uninsurable obligations for the
CITY'S benefit involving or related in any manner to hazardous substances.
Therefore, the ENGINEER undertakes no such obligation hereunder, and the CITY
agrees to hold harmless, indemnify, and defend the ENGINEER from and against
any and all claims, losses, damages, liability, and costs arising out of or in any way
connected with the presence, discharge, release, or escape of contaminants or
M504A098.WP1
5
I
I
hazJrdous substances of any kind, or environmental liability of any nature, in any
marmer related to services performed by the ENGINEER under this Agreement.
VI. COMPENSATION
The ENGINEER shall be compensated for all services rendered under this Agreement
in accordance wid1 the provisions of EXHIBIT B.
VII. TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by either pany by thirty (30) days prior written
notice, in the event of substantial failure to perform in accordance with the terms hereof
by the other pany through no fault of the terminating party. If the Agreement is
terminated, the ENGINEER shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of
EXHIBIT B for all work performed up to the date of termination.
VIII. SUSPENSION. CAL'fCELLATION OR ABANDONMENT
In the event the project described in EXHIBIT A, or the services of the ENGINEER
called for under rhis Agreement, is/are suspended, canceled or abandoned by the CITY,
the ENGINEER shall be given thirty (30) days prior written notice of such action and
shall be compensared for the professional services provided and! or related fees for which
there is an irreversible obligation up to the date of suspension, cancellation or
abandonment.
IX. ADDmONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
At the conclusion of the feasibility study, the CITY may, at its option, negotiate with the
ENGINEER to perform a full Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) Study.
Such PD&E Study shall be performed in accordance with FDOT Guidelines. The
specific scope of service, schedule and fee shall be negotiated at the time the CITY
decides to exercise its option for the ENGINEER to perform such a Study.
Likewise, as described above, the CITY may, at its option, negotiate with the
ENGINEER to perform fInal design services. The specific scope of services, schedule,
and fee shall be negotiated at the time the CITY decides to exercise its option.
X. A IT ACHl\1ENTS
The following Exhibits are attached to this Agreement and made a part hereof.
Exhibit It A" - Scope of Services, pp. A-I through A-16 .
Exhibit ItB It - Method of Compensation, pp. B-1 through B--ZL
M504A098. WP1
6
I
I
IN WITNESS 'WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made and executed this
Agreement upon the terms and conditions above stated on the day and year fIrst above
written.
CITY:
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
112 Osceola Avenue South
Clearwater, Fl. 34616
BY:
~~
COUNTERSIGNED:
ENGINEER:
HD R Engineering, Inc.
5100 W. Kennedy Blvd.
Suite 300
Tampa, Florida 33609
(813)287~1960
BY.
ATTEST:
AITES~J!~~tu41J~
Senior Vice President
r UI.U.~!:. 11.. db-
City Clerk
Approved as to form & correctness
DATE
liT Zttj/11?
-,1 L 4
City Attorney
Date: IO/~ /~y
MS04A098.WP1
7
I
I
VI. DETAILS OF COSTS & FEES
The following pages detail the cost and fees.
~ .~
~:.~ (j
o
~b
e,
~'~-,
1::.
~
~
Cll
CD
0) (j -
CO iil ~
~ ~ ai'
10 !!? ~
~ ;;; en
Cl ~ '
~ ~ !
~ I :'
t ~ ~
o
~ CD ..
:c i's
~ g'2j fII.-
i ~ ~ 8. i
~ ~~ ~~
1ii -
5- ~ I
.... .::: f-I H.,:!
~ -: ~ 'E
,..: -g Oil '::i
~ -21 ,_
I'- 0 all ~
~ ~.g,' Q.
~ ~ ~i_ ~
-0 'E;j Q)
'" 0 iil 0
~ () > 8.
~ ~ 12
'<l" z A.
'tJ
c
o
I I.
'<l" II a) .0
~ ,~ 0
~ ~I .l!1-+--.Y
:g ~, I - '<l" :g co N co ' I
co ~ i.l!?' g,~I'- :8 ' 1
O:CD 0
~ t;l~:""". '0 3,
~ ~ I~ ! I;_~ ~ ::: :g ~ ~ I I lS' ~i
_:0 ~Gi -c , -' I~I
-----' >- i U - ~ _ :J ~,g :---J +-
'<l" Ol:g- - ,'5 'ffi '<l" 10 '<l" C') '0 I I a.: j 81
co ~I: 0 '....0 ~ 0, U '.. CD' ..0
~ CDI~:. :<( E.,. <D CD ',..1 I I""
en 3'Q)' 15 c: CDC ~ i I I' 01 :~I~
it<; "u' ~ ~i6rE I ~~~~!I2~i~~~,~ 0 '.e......C; I ~ E~I~!~!12
I~ w ~oi ~ .g iOI1;; i ~i ~I~.e 8 !K Q. ~~: ~E c, 0 ~'.E ill nCDI~ -_~
~ 00.1 0 0 i.e ,W -'.en-I' "'CD t 0<(""1- ><-, Sl' ~ ,.e'1 <f> ~ J '"
Z I- ~''Ol _ E'51 ffi .... 0 t . 'w:g ~I 0 u.. as ,:0 @ 'O~ 0.1 CD 10'1 (j; .g
"'I' z g ol:i: ~ Ui C, 0 CD 0 : :i '~ >~~ ~ &. a; ~O I.: '010 5> a.. <i) "" 'a'& Elgl 0.15 en
O U 0 !,!,!,~I. C ~ '" 0 10.0 ..:1. Co E ~ ~ _ ICD C U <D@.l!?lS ....10 8,~I'010. <I)."
w 0. en' ' 0 I <D CD 0 0 0:: 'C 0 'I "" '" -;. 0 ",,' I 0' C I. <I) 'I c' <I) ~
1:;;.1 >= ~ w 1-0:: 0'.00.' _ CD -.r:. '0 0 -,+= - O. 0 I:;:: c.!:I 0 0 - ",I '-0'10 -O,en Oi.... <I)',',
10i U:...J 0:: ZQ. 0:: "':E Q) C I a. c';' g~t;. ~ - "",. CD 010 .l!? - U u:!ii "" (j;j "t A.'
0.' ~OS!2(!)WO Q.,Q G) C ~ 0 100....,-<::. 0. "e 'O,'E+=IO g.g.Q lS: CD! '~--':::~:JX
1-,'1 :...JU~Z~Z C C Ot;) lIIIli: :o.t;mg'c~"" ",,"- <C.CDO<l)'.a: en-o..eU., _E, II 15:J'luiOW
1:5 0 <( :...J~ B<( 0;: >-..::; ill.2'wl O'~ (!) >-U ~u.. .... a..... 0 CDI 1-1 Q E 0 ,0
I~I UI-<(tl:J1- ~ G) 0 3'1/)' 1-gI<(OI""I+='O~ - ,Q>-<D-=,Q ~.Qoc .... C5i<D:UIO"":'';;;'
z<(<(zzoz _ ~O~"..I'~~. 'olol,]l2gll~luE" 0) 6t:..o'->-<D>-co,.<D,:c. <I) 'Od:OlI'O '5
I 0 I- 0 <( - 0 ~ 55 '" ~ _ 0 (1)1- , 0 - ,J;;.o III ~ 00'0'0' '51 J;; <D'.... C ftl<D
01 - <( :...J z (!) :...J ~ 0> C C -~ 0 <I) _III.e olOltil' Q. Q,.l!?:o; lS ~...... U CDC'), 0,-0 Q.!C').o c,Q 0 C
~I <01$~1~$~:...J:~ ~ ... 00: _ '0 81-et;l.!io,w ~ (j;51~io<Di~-~:.~g?E~I~'offi~.E,Q
... -01_::::J <l)1.e a: _~ _ a. 0, O.e 0.,J;; 0 CD~'O~ 0 ~ xl.e.... - a;
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ r-u8 -< ~ ~H' , ~ I .! (1)1 al,'.<(1 o.!;.~! I. -g 8.1,U: xIQ.dj:m.~ 2>.0 IU' ~ d~ elj.Q ~ ~. ~ ~
I- ~ Z I- Z'Z 1;; '0 0' 0", ~:gl ~~!~:~I I! 0 ~I~r~,:g (j;i~ ~ 3,~:8 I ~IIi~,~ 8 ~ ~ ~
~+--, ~ tl:J1 0, ~i ~ 0'10 ,If---r~ ~ Q) c,g - IU~:gi <I) 0 <:J--t 0 ~ <D Oi CD :€~-- . i II-
:-,~Q;;,-,:::;Q;;:::;' N '" ~ 0' :0 <(<(ICO'(!)Zo::j II Q.~l<(U: I , i
-f-- 0 (!) > i 0 W > co - '" ::J , <D ! 0 "I ..
0:: z zio:: 0:: z;1? .2 -CI) I ~ ~.~:. ~ I .' .. ..' 'I ! I
0. wwlQ. 0. w,Q. 0. IU)~, A. I:: I Iii
<(coUOwu..(!), I II I ,I i
I
I
- 0
C
CD
E
~I
-J:
o
;g~~~;g~N
~r-"'CO""",,,,"~
~ N
'<l"NC'ol'<l"O-oCO
I'-CO-ol'-C')
C')
cocoo-o-oo-o
N-o-o16~-o:;:,
COO::5;::!:CO~~
~ ~
~08~~~~
N ~
8
-0
O'<l"C'olOOCO-o
~OC')N~
C') -0
~~~~~~;g
C') ~
-oCOCOONCON
C')'<l"~g,I'-C')16
CO'<l"-oO'<l"'<l"'<l"
N~IOC')NC')C')
~ 10
~I.I
IO,~)I~:
~i~18
~!lOl""'"
.......:64:~
T"""!_I.....
T"""! Ojar
al ~iij,
iijC:'O
!'O ~m'
-;>Ow
:g.2:gj
&~Iel
e! all ~
~~~,
~1~I;i
~1~I~i
~~glgl:gl~~
g:i! ;i ~I:li ~
I
OCOCO~ -ON
LOlO::8"'''';!,.....
~ I~:-O:-O ~
, '
~~
2~
: 0
I '
'01
CI
as i
:21
~
Ii
=!
-'
o
III
....
s
o
'0
~
~
'01
~
I: ~ 0
~I~
all ~-5
,5' C
!~i I~:~
,0 CD(\I
,(\,I, T'"",~
i~ :.".' ,
o
al
o
C
, ;j!
8
I
-0
-0 I
I
I
I
I
i I .
E
CD
'6
(j;
a.
~
m
>
2
-
o
S!
I
,
'8 <0
I"" N
I~~
I
o
CD
>.
ai
E
.s
m'
(\II
X'
.l!ll
CDI
CDI
~I
:1
~
~I
g
I
C:'
01
!i
c:
<Il'
EI
;jl
!
I~I
~
.0
<Il
f!
al
!I
<Il'
en'
I'-!
(').
01
-I
O)!
(\II
~!
,
i
I::
c: :;i
,gg
.fI1 cl
ci~1
~I 01
;j' c:'
8i~
'01 <Il
~E :Il
:r:c6 a.
-ui't: 8
all s;! 0
.oi as 0
<Ill .... (')
f!,~ '01
caiN
Igjx 51
01 e, .5,
CD'~. C:I
CDlo; -
enl<(1 ~
(')18',8 S!i8!02 (\I ,..
(')1 ' in' '15'~ CD
:61~~~!~!N.o ~,
T'""',..:69- ..~,,...
~~, ....
~
I
g-.:tcog-.:t'<t53
u
<D
C
CONN~NN-.:t-.:t-.:t -.:t-o
N'"
R ..
__ '" 03 l3 &5_"-
> ~I ~ U i1 c ~ ~ ~ 0 8 ~ J!l C
E= 1 ,g ~ -0' 1;; ,g I~O go ol:S -~o~,g
~ C 0 ~ <D 'f:: 0 I~ '" u o. coo
;::: I 0 ~:E 0 ~ ~l3 <D j!Z c~o <D<O 13 <1>i!:Cj!
a:: 2:: C -<00<0 - '0 (50 :J:JC~ CW Co E-<((5
<( ~_g:t=:;::Z 113.g~>~.gi! 0 uF. Eo6~ <D:; 0'0 IIlC'Ou
I~ .f; &5 :t= ~ ~ Q ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (; o:~ E <D u.. 0 0 0 Eo c C <D ~ 0 0
'0 m E 8 ~ Q" 0 ffi u ~ Q <D ol:S g 6 o,,::f 8 ~ -g 3 ~ (f (; C ~ <D ~ g g- -0
c.. <D~!E_:t: c..~ (/)1:::_Cii~-=(; >.~ ~O,'O u~o.g 1-0 ":.Q IIlE<1>:t=_o
--'<( ~ (5 -0 5i ~ 010'" (5 g Qj 0 ij) O.c ~ 0 0 0 ~'O C .2 0 ;:: U:; <D C -0 <I> III :; ~ Q 0
,..:: U>Zc:o - ~;>~ol:S~>u 033 -.f;'< oo~o C_ C:OOO~<1>_(/)-_
'~I Z ~ ~ g 15 ~ ~ ~'~ 03 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I €; ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~: ~ 0 * ~ ~Ig '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~I ~~~~~53l ~~~'~~~~~~!~~~~Eg~~~ggZ~~i~~ ~~6 ~~gi~,~~~~~
f- +- !:: E <D <( z '0 ~t-- ~ ~ _ U E ~ E ti ~ U ~ ~ ~ g C ii5 o' ~ 9l ~ 1 g g ~ U U ~ t-- 2 6 ~ f- '5 8 _ E E .Q 0 ~ a i!:
~ <I> (; 2 -5i -6.f; liiii >- 0 ~ j! ~ ~ x :: g :Q:Q a:l 0 ~ g> - ::::E :J 2 (5 <D 3 g g 2 ~ 0 U 0 "'I g:t:: 0 - 0 ~ .g t:: _ ~
f-+-oglgQ~Q~8t--~~~tIQ~c~~~~~oEU~~oz-g~u30~~O~3~e~~E~~cTIE2gE
w 0 ~ :t:: ::;] - Z :J .l.< <1>1 g g - )( - 0 0 x 0 :J ~ I U ~ 0 <D .l.< 0 0 ~ '" <I> '" 0
~~zc..c~cw (/)~u(/) (/) WODO~~<(w ~--,UIODOU<D_a.c~:J~c..~ZU<(I051-
I 0 I I I ~ I I > c--- III 0 D
i g:i~ NI"" ~I'" -Oi ~'~ N "" -.:t I"'i -0 ..... COOl ~ ~ N,"" E -.:t "'I-Oi.....lco O-i~ ~:~ N
I 1--1---- 0 ! I
< ,ID I, 0 I' I-!
-
-'"
c:
(\)
E
E
8
'"
a:
e-!~
I
I
I
cl-
o!~
~a:
~~'~
'" ~ 01
;s z.
:5 ~I ~I
';: .e C
Q "OI~
.., lij'.-
~ ~~
alE '. '6i C
Ci Cl
all CD' C
e! 'ills
al: _1"0
>J c'"O
"0, o'Gi
.;!'--- =el.c:
~'j1 ~I~
~ j ~~
;I~~I~
3l (5 01 ill
z z .E'w
~ j. U I, 1 f,.. I,. .:.:_~~. ~I.c ~t ~
!:,. __oo-~I CD ;'i 1 ~ - (\)
llll .: ~ 1ii] 0i I '!~! ~I ~ i' 8
~i ~ ~ i: I,",.. 'I . '^ ",.::;] E
~' _"'I ~ -i-I iou;, '" i 0 c: .so
~:: .c: 5l! I al 'E -
~,~ il i ~I~I. :1 ~ ~~I' l~ _~ i ~,
~i~c: ';1: ~ W_o ~ ~ al ~ICD ~iCD '" '=-11
~ ~ - "0 == (d':5I.al 1'6 l!!.c .0
(\) .c: eo' ::;] ~ 1iiEI1ii.c{z g~ ~
~~ ~ i :~i 10: 'E ~g'~~IE ~ECx::5
:ll'i '" .0 2! al:lR Sial.g! ',~ '2 sl:5 a: ~ ;'I~ iii;:
.c: al CD .- ~Io:;, al."O - 'C +=> all_ <Ic '" C en C
-_co !U -:;: '5.c:!al', "0.5"0 0 -~'o~o 00
.- :;::: ta -a. ~ ei~1 . g> Q. g> , 0 ~I O/S III
g ~ _ ~_ E _ (I) mI2L-'1il ~_. :;::: ..s''i 0 5] ~ E 'i,-a:I~ o~"-
"0 0 0 0""",' -~~:' .CD~ I oEo:o~'I~ Ci~-,g
"0 '"' c: CD 0 .c:!Di )( O! ~" ' c:- ~ .s'1ll C 0:; J:lo:; Q) ~
(\) 0 ::0 0 - '""1"0 CD -' ~'I i... _0,..00 (I)> '&Jill." (\)> 'PI 08 .0>- 8 :g 8
.018 ~ 1U - ~.....' CD ..........I"Ei 1 - 'u
'II.. ,_ci _0... S ~ ~.~ ~ ai'l CDI ! C' 0 al al 0 .y ()
0;0 oallS ~"C,ca EEl EI I I~lo .s=.='1-'=18io 501=a.o
~,- i _,~"O 8 -8. ~ CD CD' CD I. 1 c'- ~ 0 >oJ ~,- ,. -10.-
~ '" ' I )( I -i '" "0'-'"0101"''' '" al III
~.~ :al,_~ ::al~ 8:8:: ~ 1~1..5 mial:m,';;;I~ ~SI(5~
1 0 CD' 0 "0 0 0.0 ::;]::;],::;], ~: 0 .=' (\)'':' <-:i 0 ~ 0 Z 0
~I ,Z'Zc( U. ZU.WWI W ii::I c(iZc('J:II u. J:', J:
I , I "6 I' 1 I i I I 6
o :!! p~ ' :!l ~ re ~ ~ ~ ~ N m ~ ~ N m ~ 0 maN ~ m ro 0 ro ~ O::J 0
'~~.I . ~ co ~~co ~M'" "" ""NN ~
N ~ ~~-.:tN N NN ~O ~OCOO-.:tNNNN-.:t-.:t-.:t-.:tN
~ ~ N .....
-'
co N co
~NN
~
0,
co 0 -0
co '"
~
o 0000
-
N-.:t-.:t
-.:t
-.:t
~
-
"-
-.:t
-.:t
N
co
N
co
~
-.:t
~CO-o-o'<tco
'l""'"C\I___ '<0
coo
OCOCON
~ ""
o N
~
53
-
-.:t
"- -
-.:t
co
o
o
~CO
O~ ~
~
-0
~
o
""
co
'"
~
-
-.:tN-.:t
"- -
co
co
~
o
o
00
~
~~ ~
-0
~
0-0
N~
~
8
N
-
"-
o
o
-.:t
-.:t
~~O
~~co
~
coS!
-
-.:t'<to
-
coco
-0
~
-.:t
N
~ ~o-oco
~~~
~
Oco
-.:t
N
"-
"'coco
-0
-0
""
~
~reco
N
~~O~O
~
co
-.:t
co co
"-
-.:t-.:t-.:t
-0
co
N
~
"'CONN
-.:t
-.:t
NN
NO'l""'"'I""'"C\lN
I
I cJb -g ~i~ II~ I
':!a 0 (\Iie--
3l'U..5 <Di!!? I~ '
'O.c ~ i8..: 1: =:;t:: III I
~.s 10;..0 Je....IO 0
:! '0 III ~ ~ .Ei ~ ~! '0
- III al 8 ~ 'CIa: 01!!?1
~ ~ '0 III ~!!?i ..: ~ 'g.I,
1Il~ a-8' x'3!'O t::1Il
~ ~ ~~i Jg ~:~ ml~a:'"
'" III ~I- ~ "'illlCl
~. +! ~!o! 1ll,'O E'" 0
'" lQ ",!'l::0,1O "'i'l:: lal
III III ~,~iU.ig elal ~ ~
~U. .Qil-l=:;i~lIllo r;i:8.
~I~ ~iOI~i""EiZ ~11Il
III 1 =1 O'i:!: j iij' lij-' ~ 1::1 =. a:
~ 0 ~OI~IE iij 8. ~-
~t::1 'O'-'~~~ Ill, .~.1Il
'<I' ~ a,~''O -''E ~, I~ a.
_ '" : "':Gf-- ""-1 ; E' III =,--' ~ :'
e 0 III e: 0 8.' e: > fill i'E Qj
!!1 - III III ::;'1- '-'oll "'": 12.ai
~ ~I~I~ 8 .9 ~i~l~ ~ ! ~,o
8 ",1",':= 'iii1'O ~iQ..IO.::r:1 :...'.1Il
III I c. 1Il.c=1 1~.~: ,O,C>>
I E'!l! c. III III .~'. III ..01 1- 'C.
'" 1:><( 'lii ~ IIl!NI~; 'l!!'I::
-::;,'" 'OO:>i~=o:::ltl ::;,jal,
~~:EO c.!!!.cb'_IIl,g 001
iJ: <('I- Z ::>1<( a:'0 a:j-l ::r: Z
II I
co
N
o
10
'<I'
~~:eg~;!~~~~~~~:e
(\l ... <O(\l
...
;!<O:80~(\l'<l'reO~<o~:g
...
~
o
(\lCO~NOCOOO~~
(')~NIO 10
<Xl.
~
(\l (\l '<I''<I''<t '<t(\l 0 (\l '<t (\l (\l '<I' <0 0 '<t'<f NOO~~
(') (\l It) (\l
'<t <0 (\l'<t <0 0 <0 ~8 '<I' <0 '<t (\l ~ <l N OO~~
(\l I'-(\l '<t ~ ... ~ '"
(\l (\l
<0 <0 10 10 '<1'10 <O(\l(\l '<I' 10 '<I' NN OOp,~
... ... (\l '<t r--
10 (\l '<t~~ '<t '<t (\l (\l (\l ~ '<I' NN OO~~
... (\l
0 '<t 0 ~~ 0 (\lCO <l oo;eo
'<t (\l (\l ... 0- r- g
... ... ...
0 <0 <010 <OO'<t <0<0 <010'<1' ~ '<I'(\l <0 <0 <0 g <l<l<l ~OO:?l~
(\l ... '<I' ...(\l ~ ~ ~
... ... '"
'<t <01010 0 <0 '<t1O~ ftl .... '<t (\l 0 '<t OO<t~
(\l (')1'- <0 ...
"'N (\l N
N
o
~
~
co
N
~
'<f
N
co
o
(\l
(\l'<t'<t(\l<O(\l~(\l(\l(\l(\l<O~~
(\l
III
III
(.)
~
III f; C c.. .. III .!!! '" .. c;; C C ..
a: U ~ ~ $$~ ~~ ~1Il ~~ ~ $ ~~
~ s;! Q) 0 >.2:-: :E5 ~o 0 Q./!! 92~0
,g... Cl >",:;:::'50~:;::l c..Q1 C oc ...Jc
III 0'" u-OCC ::;,Ill ~ D 0 ~Q)
(.) uQ) ~ -C~C"-<( E~ '0,,- <(c;;:;::: OE ~Q)<(
~ 0:::.2: ~ Co~"-Q)c :;::l III -0 ~ 1Il01~ C
, ;.l2olS- 0 ",Q) E~::" E:1! OQ) OIllCo..l~ 1Il,Q
u. 1Il~ 0 .!!2C Q)E~Q<(<(~ 0 ~ eLl.. ilIQ)O Q) Oc;;
~ ~ol1lE ~o ~Q)0Q) c$ Uiij", ~ Q)_~Q).2:~~~ Q)Q)
~ ~ c<(cE~6 00 ~g~~a~e.l2 ~~~ ~ E~~~'56~Q~ ~Cl
~ ,g 2<(:;::: c- ~cmcc;;$O~ Ill~~ ~ c~OCE~Cl-~ ou
~ ~ ~~gcOQ_<(g ~OoQ~Cl~o 1Il(.)~ w ~~~OQ)$ gf ~Q)
c ~.l2Sc;;o~~offig~ ~o~~gQ)uog~ *~g~ ~ ~gQ)5~e~~~3~oe
, !<~~Q)~Q)o~E~Q) ~~~c~"--O- 'lii~~:E III U ~<(.2::;:::-o-c~Q)c~
~ I z 0 :!: e 2 Cl Q 9l c ~ g.lll ti -g ~ ~ ~ 8. ~ 6 E Ql Lf ~ ~ ~ ~ al C ~I~ 5 E ~ "2 2 ~ 2 ~ 8 g ~ < E
~ i~~~~~B~g~~8~~~~~8~~u~E~e~~~a~~gg~~~~s~2~0~~~~~
-~~"-a~~Q) 00 'O~Ill~Ql~Ill_~Qlo8--oE"'O oe~E5--
Je.g ~ Q) ~ ij) ~ N:'" ~IO -0 r--i COI 0- o!~IN - 0 C C = ~ <51ii t:: !!? ~;:"~ - Q. 0 6 ~ 6:g Q) 00...
_ to: ~ ~ g Cl Cl 1 I _ ' . ~ ~~ ~ I- ~ ~ ~ 3: u: 3: ~ ~ :5 :1! ~ ~ ~ E U U ~ U I- :g > ~ 8._
! I ~ 0 - 0 C I I 10 ",I _ E
-'l~~I~~OD ! i: 1 I ~1ll.c1(')'OQl-iCl~'_"~i-><- ~OIDOU~1 0lL:'~=
!e I ill I I ~
>-
:>
~
E
III
lQ
.c III
~~ lQ
~-a
~ C
_ Cl
~ .~
i'" '0
~ III "- "-I
.!!:; .E.E
15.--VJVJl------
0.2 ........
S .5 S S
>Ql II
Q) c .
:So iijiij
III -0 C C
,~ 0 0
CI. W -"-
q::.o aa
~i~ 99
I
I
'0
~'
III
~
III
'lii
~I
Q.
o
JI
11: I
!Wl
,1ii
~
::l
(.)
.S!
III
; ::;,
i ~
I I
I
III gi
>, u.1
~I Ei
~ t
III I a:'
(.)! : >-
=! iij,c
~I. >, 0
- W.c <(
~ ~. ~ al ~
::1 .!!l~ Ea:
Ill' ai - ::;, <(
'0' '3: ~ "'Q..
si : i ~ 5 ~:.c
al'.. 1 ..~ ~ i'~
-g~5~0~
- ''O'E1ii'E
(.) 'Q) 8 III 8
~ '''" 1-'
~ ~. (.) ~o
.Q 8o~o
as -c:-
::l, l!! l!! m l!!
iij ::;, ~ i ... ::l
ai. ~ ~S~
1 I I
(\l
'<I'
'<I'~~~
<0 (\l '<I' (\l,
(\l
u.
oil
QI:
~
...
.E
>- >-
(.) (.)
C C
Ql Ql
Cl Cl
.!: .!:
CC
o 0
(.) (.)
Ql Ql
==
(i) m
'0'0
C C
::l ::l
Ql Ql
alal
::l ::l
00
.5.5
'" III
;S;S
NOO~g
I
I Oi U
~ Q)
'0 ta
-2l (ij
~ Ii ~
(5 ! 51~
C (1)1-
i!: ~IO
o ~~
==. cl ~
al' ~i(l) 10
~: .0 (l)i al 0
col ::J! .!ii CD
.o<D1 (l)la'O ig
_I ~'.512 :*
_ ...' Ci (.) IS::
'5, ~:3lC (l)t:
0' :;;:: '"' ; '0.0
==, ~&l:; . ~~
I~' ~Ci,g : fall-2l
. E~ 00 >,---! C C
::::I' o.:I:IQj 1-' ::::I
gl I~'~I~ 'al'5l
'01' . 0 <D C '0 '0
= :.....; c: ::J ::J ::s
el l!!.Olel '0'0
<DI ali'OI.5: .5 .5
'0, l!! <D. Qj l!! l!!
~I 5'.0:'8 ::::I ::::I
<(I :I:,~i:::!: ~ ~
~, I
01,_
N
'"
~
0:
Q;
<D
a:
wi
0.::
~I
-,
~I
.s!
I i
-.l!l:_~
5i ~,
E ~
E <D
o u'i
U i "01
(I) : fa I
Cc ~
,0 W
~:I:
exlexlO -0
~"'O 10
N~~ "It
"Itexlexl 0
N~~ -0
exlN-o -0
"It"'~ 0-
"ItNNexl
exl-oexl N
N
"Itexlexl 0
~ '"
o o "It ~
exl "It N
~
N "It -0 N
C"')C\I--.......
exlexlexl"lt
N
I
I l:l! ~! ~
18i <D I. <IlX
I .-
lei>, <Il
I a.,O, .0
1 <D,N' '0
o '1 :61. II '5
<Il 0 I (I) 0
'2' ail i'5~ ==
0.. ~!\::I~~ g
o ~'s::::I1 E '0
~ C 5i el<D >'.
~ <Il ()I=~' ~
i~!!l<D1 all == !!!IN,Ol
- .!i! ~ 'iij10 alE I.
1'0' > 0 ~' ,
<Ill Q <Dlo.';:1
2, Elt:! 5ias,S
01 iii al ~i ~ gj
.5, :U:I: a.!.E EI
C)I c '- -g~ UJ Oi
,ii == 0 asl == 01
:ilL ~.s l!!! <D al,
E' € C <D> 01
:!; ~ c3 j:~ 51
o e 0 0:'0 tf
~ 0.:2 :;IE ::::J
52 ~ () cl::::I -g,
'0 ~ 01 E a:'
2 ~ f3':~
~ Jl ~I:::!:
i ,
,
Ic
10
~
~
:5
,
!
.
C
<D
E
1::::1
!!:g
w'O
en<D
a:ota
m;U;
enCale----
<D 0 ~
J:]i.E
->'0
o l!! <D
;; 'iij'S
CCO'
.~ ,g l!!
.~ '6 (5
a::it:
--
e
:s
~:
01
~NOPq~OOS!go~
~ CO"ltO~N
"It
N
0 ON
~
"It 0 "ItN
10
0 0-0
~
Oexl
N
'It
N
'"
N
~
~
'It
exl
exl
exlO"lt-oCOexl
-oN-o~~~
I
, :
I ~I
d iili
0: c'
~<D::::I; ~I
il 021
~ fa
(5 c.1
olI ~
'iij ! ~
.g 8-
<D (l)olI
"0 CD ~
+ a.()
~~:6 b
';; :s'~ fr
o 3l .5 olI
E E'E ~
co ~o U
....- g 8--~ --
>< en UJ =::
o co2 ==,
E 0 ~ 51
f! Eel ~i
~ ::::I CI C
co .51~ 'E
C:, ~'E! g
~i :::!: CO') ()
~ ~
o 0
-0 exl
10-0
N
~~~~8~~S!
LO~NN
~~8N"ItN
--_.--oq- ~
N
-
-oNO -0 'It'lt C\l ~~ -0 -o"ltNN "It "It exl N exl
~ ~ l"- N I"- '" '" N '" l"- NN "It '"
'"
-0 exl ~ , 'It ~ ~ N"It 8- -o~ NON -0
~ i N I"- N "'exl~ I"-
~ '"
-
-0-0 0 Oexl O"ltexl 0 0
~ ~ N N "It
~
-
NN ~ 'It <0 0-0 Oexl-o~ "It-o 0 ~
~ ~ .... N~ N~ "It
~
-'
exl ~ Oexl 0 exl 0 -0
N 0
<0 -0
I -
-o-oO~ ! <0 <Oexl O"ltexlO 0 -0
.... .... N LO
~~ao8
N
~
I
'It N 0 <0 exl 6 exl exl :g! ClO co ~ co ;Z ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ;S ~ ~ CD ~ ~
'ltNO<O"Itg_exlexlO~ coco~~;z~ ~."It. exlexlexlexl~exl~~
~~ 0. .
> E (9{",
_ w Z .,
I Q g tl '0" lB 13 .. Iii' ~ C VJ.;.: a> ~ c: '" t t - 9 I"- ::::J u; .:J
~I ~ -E '5 0' ~ ~ '0 0 c ~ Wi ~ ~ ~ ~ a en E a (!) 0 (; ~ E (!) ~ g> ~
~'I g: CD Q. at! ::) Q ~ e .Q CDE:E1 CD ~ 0>0 E ~ g '0 a: E g i: a> ~ CD E c ~ 0
F .... c CD a> 0::' cr CD M 0 _ 0.. ~ ~ CD - c a> 0:: ::; lB ~. CD a> 0 lo~~
~ 1K;::.50:: ' a> 0:: -cccc::::J V ~E>.lIlai CDc :t:: en~ .f;~:t::a>0> ~
<( oCD"' ~ ~~ '0 CD 00 W 0 -- Oa> Ea> ~c CDo.. - ~ ~
I ~ CD C 0> cli>O> is CD CD E <D - 0 -'1 '0 ~ 0 0 9 '0 lB <( E en 0 0 :; '0 a> CD 0 0
~ W .f; w -E -a5' l!! 1:: ~ ::::J 5 (j; E ::::J E'O e ~ C::::J u: '0 ~ c E ~ g c CD ~ ~ '5 '0 C 9 ~ ,g ~ a 13
~: ~F~!~'i5 It ~~jg~8~~~ ~I ~n~~~$~~c~~~c~~~ ~~~g~~!fi~
<(I Q2~EO>C' ~ .?:-a'5Eoc-g~~-o::~ 1~1_~~g2~~3-.:~g~~Q+- 8 '~a>S!'5 0'01
~I l:l g a> ~ w 0 '0 CD Q. ~ z .Q w t c .E ~ c ... c (D ~ '0 6. - g :E ~ 0 .f c - c.. ~ 0 g a> ~ (!) t5 <( c I
~ ~EC:~~ g ~~~iJ-gg-gQ~~.E~ i5:~C:u'OE~.g3Q~~g8go:: '09t~"2~o a~
~ ~! ~ i ~'H'~ ~ ~ ~Ii j ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ @ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- - IK 0 '0 0> ~ w 0 CD G +- r- '0 CD CD c > Q. '0'- 01 c = c CD u - :;: .:= 0 0 U CD :I: ~ '0 0 0 ~-- c > r-
<(oc~~ I:ELO-g-a~5 a'Oow~~~1 >I'O~CDO~ g'Ogc..,~~N"'''It Eo@~~ge 2~
_ ~ +.: 8 ~ '0 -oz ~ 0 Z <( 0 __ ~ CD Q fj ~ c ~ '0 ~ ~ 0 (/'J _ (j; o....J ~ (/'J E'O Q: ~ =>....J (!) 8.f f-
-:E ~ CD c ~ 0 ~I > 1: @ ~ c 0 - O::::J :t:: 0 0 ::::J S! C 0
__::; u: en u: ~ u.. <(Ial .0 0 > ~ 0.. 0 u: 0 ::; 0.. al .0 0'0 <( 0 0.Cl U 00.. 0.. ~ 0.Cl U ....J Q f-
I~ ~ N '" 1 ~ ~ N I]! "', "It LO -0 I"-exl, ~! ~ N I "'. .. I "It LO -0 1"-: exl .g
II.;. Iw Ii. i 11.;., I' I ! I 0..
w ... I I I (9i I I I I I I I I - :g f-
"It NNexlN "It
-0'" 0 ~
i!~ ~I
1'<( 'Oi
o (])C!
I-- i
II-- ~
IU+:i
!:!:l 61
o u'
C!! ~ I
0.0
-
~I
U) .
:J
0:
icn
I~
:2
5 ~ U
ZF 0 !:!:l
O U a., 0
- w wi(/)Ia:::
u::lC!!Zo.
wO!Q(,I)Wo
::l U en Z :2.z
O<(~Q:::><(
Ut-<(ttlUI--,
Z <( <( Z Z oz i.
I-- 0 <( _,ow
0<( ..... Z (,1),.....:2 ~
~ o.~ (,I) ~~ ~i
E(,I)~ill>~o'
~~;:20~:2>~
'I-- ffiiZ I-- Z Z ~
~~o~~OU
-,,_.C!! -, :J'C!!:J~
O(,l)!50w!5m i
C!! Z'Z C!! C!!iZ::> .
o.wiw a. o.iW!o.
I
I
"0
c
o
(])
t
>-
:2
_I
o
1;;
o
(])
o
-
~
3,
(])!
U)
:J'
o
o
(])
~
-
c
o
>-
o
~.
-oi
c:
o
:i1i
'0
~
~
...
~:
.2
~
to
o
'0
.
c
'i
'0.
i:
~i
...
::J
o
:t:
U
A.
'2 i5
... ZIF
0, OIU!
_ F~I
.... U ..... I
Q ~8!~
-< 0 <(I <(~
UI--
U z<(<(z
1--0
'tJ ~Q'<( .....
CD i~o ~
- i!:::~~
o ~~'Q::2
E 191'ttll.51
-- J~ia:::!
1;; 0 (,I)15!
W 8::'~'~
(f)
(,I)
Z
~
w
:2
I--
~ U
o !:!:l
o.(f)O
~z8::
(,I)Wo
z:2z
Q:::><(
wUI--
woz
~Ow
(,1).....:2
~~~
~~o
<(:2>
zz~
~OU
:JQ;:J
w>m
C!!Z::>
o.wo.
t!!
::J >-
o g
_ (f) ~
.... (,I) c
U ffi ~
A. ' I~ 8
-g 15 ~ u ~
, 0 oZ'G 2 lo!:!:l f?
-w w(f)C!! '0
.Q ud C!!zo. .2
'_ WO(f)(,I)wo u
,.... ,::l:u~z:2z..f:
-< 'I 0<( -'f5 B<( i.!!lla
U ,U < ~ w oziEE
. iZ~O <(~OWI~!~,
'tJ ,.~Q <( ..... Z (,I) ......'asl' I
CD : 1< o~ (,I) ~ ~>
- HE ~.~ ill~ ~o
o ~ Q: :2 0 <( :2.> I
E' I--wZI--ZZZI
i~wo~~ool !
~ --------c -, ~. Q; -, :J Q;':J I-I
eI) 0 (,I) > 0 w > 1m i I I
W 8::~~8::8::~'~, I
I
'0
:J
en
I
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
:MEMORIAL CAUSEWAY BRIDGE
FEASffiILITY STUDY
I
I
I
FEASIBILITY STUDY
TO BE CONDUCTED PRIOR TO A FUTURE
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
PAGE NO.
I.
PURPOSE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A-I
II. STUDY OBJECTNES ..................................................... A-I
III. FEASIBILITY STUDY SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED .............................. A-2
A. NOTICE TO PROCEED MEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-2
13. PUI3I.IC I~()I.VEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-3
1. Initial Alternatives Public Meeting ......................................... A-3
2. Second Alternatives Public Meeting ........................................ A-3
3. First Presentation to City Council. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-3
4. Pinal Presentation to City Council ......................................... A-3
C. ENGINEERING DATA COI.LECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-4
1. Aerial Photography and Preliminary Site Survey .............................. A-4
2. Existing Highway Characteristics .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-4
3. Traffic Data ..................................................... A-6
4. Utilities and Railroads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-6
5. Transportation Plans .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-7
6. Soils Information .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-7
D. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-7
1. Project Need . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-7
2. Design Traffic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-7
3. Corridor Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " A-7
4. Conceptual Design Analysis ........................................... A-8
5. Conceptual Drainage Analysis ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-8
6. Cost Analysis .................................................... A-8
7. Comparative Analysis of Design Alternatives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " A-9
8. Prepare Final Recommendation ......................................... A-9
E. ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-9
1. Corridor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-9
2. Corridor Base Maps ..................................,.............. A-9
3. Preliminary Engineering Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-9
4. Alternative Concept Plans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " A-I0
5. Location Hydraulic Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-to
6. Design Traffic Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-1O
M504A098.WPl
I
I
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND REPORTS .................................. A-I0
A. GENERAL.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-I0
B. ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL IMPACTS .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-11
1. Land Use Information ........................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-11
2. Cultural Features ................................................. A-II
3. Analysis of Social-Economic Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-II
4. Right-of-Way Acquisition/Relocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-11
Data Collection and Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-II
5. Archaeological and Historical Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-II
6. Determination of Section 4(F) Involvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-11
7. Visual and Aesthetic Impact Analysis .................................... A-ll
C. ANALYSIS OF NATURAL IMPACTS ....................................... A-12
1. Hydrologic and Natural Features ....................................... A-12
2. Identify Permit Conditions ........................................... A-12
3. Wetland Impact Analysis ............................................ A-12
4. Biological Assessment Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " A-12
5. Wildlife and Habitat Impact Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-12
6. Aquatic Preserve Impact Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " A-12
7. Outstanding Florida Waters and Wild
and Scenic Rivers Impact Analysis
D. ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL IMPACTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . .. A-13
1. Contamination Impact Analysis ........................................ A-13
2. Water Quality Impact Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-13
3. Floodplain Impact Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-13
4. Coastal Barrier Impact Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-13
5. Noise Impact Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-13
V. STUDY REQUIREMENTS AND PROVISIONS FOR WORK ........................... A-13
A. GOVERNING REGULATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-13
B. PROJECT SCHEDULE ................................................. A-14
C. KEY PERSONNEL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-14
D. PROGRESS REPORTING ............................................... A-14
E. MEETINGS AND PRESENTATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-14
F. QUALITY CONTROL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-15
G. CORRESPONDENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. A-15
H. LIAISON OFFICE .................................................... A-15
I. OPTIONAL SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " A-15
J. SUBMITTALS ......................:................................ A-15
VI. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CITY/DEPARTMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " A-15
VII.
METHOD OF COMPENSATION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A-16
M504A098.WPl