Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLS2007-10045
FLS2007-10045 826 WOODLAWN ST LAKE BELLEVUE PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 314A ZONING: I LAND LASE: INS RECEIVER: 10!01/2007 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverS~eet General Contracting ® Plumbingg Electrical • Air Conditioning , Mul#i-Family. Repipe Specialist Florida's Most Trusted Service CompanyL i Chris Koncal , Chief Operating Officer CGC1508455 CFCA25591 MEP Division EC13003598 CMC1249534 4677 118th Avenue N. Qfifice~. 727-573-9500' Clearwater, Florida 33762 1-800-MIDWAY-5 ckoncal@midwayservices.com Fax: 727-456-2088 :~_• i • i Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 ~ Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATIbN ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1405.00 CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: ~Nc~~ $; ~It11~ ~ ~ ~UQ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ , ~~n~r * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 04/24/2007) ,; ' PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Midway Services 4677 118th Avenue North (727) 573-9500 FAX NUMBER: (727) 456-2146 EMAIL: PROPERTY owNER(s): Woodlawn Church of God Board of Trustees I List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: AVID GfOUp MAILING ADDRESS: 2300 GUf12W Road - SUlte 100, Palm Harbor, FL 34683 `PHONE NUMBER: (727) 789-9500 FAX NUMBER: (727) 784-6662 __ CELL NUMBER: ~~ EMAIL: kent.edwards(c'~aVldgrOUp.COm B. PROPOSED DE\/ELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: TOWnhOmeS (~ Lake BeIIeVUe PROJECT VALUATION: $ 1 ,250,000.00 STREET ADDRESS 802, 826 & 830 Woodlawn Street PARCEL NUMBER(S): 22/29A15198941/000/2101, 22129115/00000/32010200, 0700 8~ 0300 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 8.10 Acres ~J~PARCELSIZE (square feet): 353,037 Sf LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See included survey ------__ ----__ _-_______ __~ _----------__ __ ~_ _.v_ PROPOSeD usE(s): Multi-family Townhomes DESCRIPTION OE REOUEST: Specifically identify the request Proposed 113 townhome development (include number of units or square -- - ------- footage ofnon-residential use and all ~_ _ ~ ~__~ _ requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of -- ---------~------------ parking spaces; specific use, etc.) C:1Documents and Settings4derek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms 07071Fiexible Standard Development(FLS) 04-24-O7.dot Page 1 of 7 • DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHT DR), REVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO !~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5] 0 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Q Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Please see attached sheet. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impairthe value thereof. Please see attached sheet. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Please see attached sheet. ____.______-__..___._.___._._~___.__._~_~-_~ __._ _...__._ ~.___.__. ______~__ ~.. _-..~.-_~-s:'~----------- _......_ _.~ _ ~ _..__ __._~~ _ ~m_ m_~..__...~__m_..~_ ~._.__ ~~~~I_ _._~ _____ Q. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ~~~~~~~ L~~~'~S~fiY1E~IT Please see attached sheet.. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Please see attached sheet. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Please see attached sheet. C:1Documems and Seftingsklerek.fergusonlDesktop~planningtorms_0707tFlezible Standard Development(FLS) 04-24-07.doc Page 2 of 7 • • WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) IQ Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) '^ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ©' if a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. A~'~~p~ Q A# a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; R~~4f~ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; p Q Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ~A ~ ~ ~ ~0~0 0 All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; H 0 Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structur~`~~`~r ~~~ti~~~ '^ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary t~d~~rata ~~p~~ac~-~th the City manual. 4o,P tC Proposed stormwater detentionfretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable Q ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS {Applicant must initial one of the following): stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shalt be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION RE1/IEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A~ Q SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) --One original and 14 copies; ~i TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip Lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; i0 TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecking size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; 0 LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; '0 PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunctian with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; Q PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); Q COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C:1D000ments and Settings~tJerek fergusonlDesKtoptplanningrorms 07071FIexibie Standard DeveWpment (FI_S) 04-24-07.doc Page 3 of 7 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"}: ~ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; I'- North arrow; I'- Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ,.~°- Ali dimensions; C' Footprint and size of ail EXISTING buildings and structures; ~I~, Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; ~'' All required setbacks; ~' All existing and proposed points of access; ~i~' ~0 ~~Eo~'t~G+'~. ~~ ~a1°IM;` ~ P~~~2U0~~yC1~'T Yi.l~til~ifaA~~ ti~~,P~eo:Y~Gl~tl ?" All required sight triangles; ~~~ ~ ~~ ~Is~'~~ 4afd~~~~~ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including E~' description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of alf street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fre hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; ~~ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; i^ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of al! required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening Q {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and lndex #701 }; Location of all landscape material; 0 Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ 0 Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and _ ,, Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED _ _!~ 'Land area in square feet and acres; 8.10 AC 8.10 AC i~ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 0 ~'"-~` '-'~~~"-"--~`"-` " _v_____~___~.~ ___ _ 0 Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; 113 __~~ Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ 109,032 Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the ~~~ ,_ i'` number of required spaces; 230 230 __ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, ~ ~~~~~~~~ _ i' expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; 5.5.9 AC Official records book and page numbers of all existing utiGry _.._.~__.~_ i~ easement; ON SURVEY Q Building and structure heights; 30-40 FT 24'-1114" ~''- Impermeable surface ratio (LS.R.); and 9% 75% 60% 1', Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. NIA __. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 °/: X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the folEowing additional information on site plan: I' One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; ~~ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; 0 All open space areas; ~~ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; ;~ Lot fines and building lines (dimensioned); r~ Streets and drives (dimensioned); _ ~'~ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _~' Structural overhangs; C:1Documents and Settings~derek.fergusonlDesktopwlanningforms 07071FIexibte Standartl Development{FLS) D4-24-07.doc Page 4 of 7 • H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ~~~). Q LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ~~• 0 All existing and proposed structures; A,~ p ry _~ Names of abutting streets; 141/'1 1 ~ 2U0~ _~ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; ~~1~~~810.~i~ ~t~/at~~E~7 0 Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; ^^~ .. ~.~ u,~~~~ Sight visibility triangles; _ 0 Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; T Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; ____s_ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or labep indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all _ 0 existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and ^ percentage covered; ~I 0 Conditions of a previous development approval {e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); I^ Irrigation notes. REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/: X 11}; Q COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ~Q BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information: 0 All sides of all buildings; ~_ .Dimensions; 0 Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); and Materials. REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 Y X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS !Section 3-1806) I® All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they wilE be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) i~ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). Q Reduced signage proposal (t3'/ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:IDocumentsand SettingsWerek.fergusonlDeskioplplanningforms_07071FIexible Standartl Development(FLS) 04-24-07.tloc Page 5 of 7 • • C~~~~!, --- - K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ~;~~ ~ 2 2008 Q Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager orhis/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable leveE of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ~ a,rb-~.1~~ ~is d (3f~ C`~~ =vcva6 a~~~ • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directions! trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Q Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 662- 4750. :L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS! WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150°~ of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 3142 (Annex H) is required. Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/'V1later Study is included. Fire Flow CalculationsNVater Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS! WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727} 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS wom~ and subscribed before me this 'y day of h , A.D. 20 a and/or by who i ersonally kno as produced as identification. ~°"'°"'~, PETER CO MY GOMMESSION # DEYt53iS09 EXPIRES: JULY 28, 2009 Notary ~ubli~," - - - Mycommission expires: C:1Documen[s and Settings~derek.FergusonlDesktoplplanningforms 07071FIexible Standard Develo pment (FLS) 04-24-W.doc Page 6 of 7 • • N. AFFI©AVIT TO AU"{HOREZE AGENT: ~ . Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT fu11 names: Church of Gfld Board of Trustees _....~ ~~"N~Y_o~~, ...... ........._._ ___. 2. That (1 am/we are) the owners}end record title holders} of the following described property (address or general IacaHon): 802. and 826 Weod Lawn Sheet, Clearwater FL ~~C;~I~f~$. 3. That Phis property constitutes the property forwhich a request for a: (descn'be request) R~ Flexibis Standard ©evelopment and Preliminary Pla# ....._~.-----___~___._~.._ ___~~_-..._------------__._._~...~--.___.______.._--_-___._.-__.._T ~~ 1z~~Q~B_..__ 4. Thal the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (doesldo} appoint: ~~A~oRtl~ ~~~~~aE~T ~BTf ~F G~~~"~~d~ a`f~b~ Richard Tommell, AVID Group as (hislthelr} agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such pelition; 5. Thak this atridavtt has been executed to induce the City of Cleatwatet, Rorida to cronstder and act on the above described property: 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City repn:senlatives in order to process this appticattan and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this appliaatlon; ~. ghat (Ilwe}, the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and come _.1_-~........ _ o-•t~ - _._..._ -._d_.._ - .__. _....._._...._ ~.m..__. ~_ _ ..._ Prnpe~Dwner . _.. _._..._... -- - -._ . - . _ ,. ___ p~ ity Owner ~~/ ~ Property C7vmer Prvperty+ Dwner STATE ®F FLORl~A, COUNTY OF PtNELLAS t3efare me the unden;igned, an officer duly commissioned by the Paws of the State of Ronda, on this T__ __i ~~`._, day of G~~~,._ ~_ zr~o`l ---. y PersonaflY appeared 1.~ Y~~1~ ~yprz~~~l,;!l,_nS~'.~_c_e!rw.t,1~?F~7.,~;~nrho having been first duly swum t7epases and says that he/she fully understands fhe contents of the affidavit Ihal he/she signed. `tier "'•• RICHARD •i, MORRIS ~` .` MY COMMiSS101V tr OD 328469 '~ ~~; EXPiR~S: OcEobar t3, 2008 ~?~,Af~:` Oo:WedtTruNOtaryP~ScVndcixriltr~ Notary SeatlStamp Notary Public Signature iNy C mission 1=rtpires: __..-.._ __.__.~____ G.'l0acumentsnnd5elllngsSd9rekferg~aan5peskloplplarmingfarms 0767V"Ee~dbk:S>andaid0evdopmenl(Fi.S)04-24-07.doc Pogo 7 of 7 247-t19-1714:56 KAHEh! 72734» 5957U60 • TTY ®F ~I.,EAR~VATE~ .~FFI~AglI'T ~'~ ,~.IITHGI~IZE AGENT PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION MUi`IICIPAL SE}7V1CFS BUILDING, ]00 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE[vUE. 2"' FLOC}R PHOK£ {727)-562.4561 FAX (727) 582-4578 WQOCilawn ~:hurch of Gal Bc-ard of Trustees P 112 {Ronald Stockman, Bud Niyork, Rcx $ruwn) (Name of aU propcity_owners) 1. That (I amMre are) the owner(s) and retort! title holder(s) of the foElowing described properly: $E32 Wcxxjlawn Sirret. Clearwater. FL 3375fi, R26 Woodlawa Street, Clearwater, FL 33756 83Q Wtxxilawn Street, Clearwater. FL 33755 and ttnaddr~ssetl parcel ciesignateti as 22/24/t5!()OOOQ/320lg2tx) (Addrea9 a GeneraiLocaUrxiJ 2. That this property constitutes the properly for which a request for a: A.) Compre3tensivc Plan Amendment of Future land Use 842 Woodlawn 5t. from RG to RM, 826 Woadlawn St. from Institutional to RM 83(1 Wnndlawn 5t. and unaddressed .wetl ~.21291151000U(}/32tNt)2iX] from Instiwtional to R'v1 B.) ~.ezunint; Amandrnent irons Institution: Zoning district {826 & 83~ dYoudlawn St. and an unaddressed parcel 22/2yl13fD00d{1/320J024p) to Mediuny 13ertsiry 'Residential Zoning district.. fNahrd ar raqussi) 3- ~ That the undersigned (has/Ftave) appointed and (doesldo) appoint Chris }C.oneat, Chief Operating Officer, A9EP DiviSiVn, Midway Services. 4b77 1 ] 8th Ave- 1d., Clearwater, FL 33Tb2 as (his/dieir) aQenEieJ to e~ue any peridore ar other d0a neoe~ary to aKert suds petition, 4- -That this atfidgvit has bean executed to induce tfle City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby csrtity that the foregoing is true and correct. ,,._....T__---- ~ owner ~;~ ~ r -~., ry`r ~ r ~ .: ProPartV C7wner ~~~ _ C.~ t3~`ATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY Oi RNfIl.AS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commia&ioned 6y the laws of the State 4f Florida, on this ~ tl8y of S~~~c'e~i~c1 , '7~~ ? personally appeared wh9 having been first duly sworn deposes and says chat helshe fully undaratands the contents of the a}r~tlsvit that he/6he,.slgnecj~ ;--~ ~ , ;' •:i V otary Public AAy Commission F~cpires: ~ ~"~'~°~'•• RICHARDH.MORRIS '~~~ ~'"_ NY COMMISSION # DD328A69 "'~.Opo EKPfRES:Ociober13,i00B •'~; dF'rv,,:' BonAe]Tnru NCery Pubic W+Jprn:hers .~' AtY~i[1it10n firYrl6/QDY6100r11£!Tt lCrn.~w/Ar11C1Hvi1 rtl A11t170REB f~~':r `- 6:G r..F.y ~" I ~ ~ ,~ ~~....ie ~ ~a[ ~w Q • • General Application Criteria Townhomes at Lake Bellevue The proposed multi-family workforce housing development conforms to the character of the adjacent community by providing an attractive development within a residential district already zoned for medium density residential development. The proposed site conforms to the bulk and density requirements designated in the City of Clearwater Zoning Ordinance. In addition, the property directly adjacent to the northeast of the proposed development is a multi-family development in an area with the same zoning. Adverse impact to adjacent properties is actively being kept to a minimum through reduced height in construction (proposed building height is 24'-1/4", which is within the allowable limits for medium density residential), construction of a buffer wall/fence which will. help alleviate any noise an illumination impacts to the adjacent properties. in addition, attractive building materials and landscaping are being utilized to enhance the look of the developed community. The single family properties that border the site to the south and southeast will not be negatively impacted, as this will bring an attractive development in the area and will replace an existing site that is for the most part, vacant. The northwestern part of the site is pretty heavily wooded and due to the lack of a.ecess, shows evidence of use by vagrants and possibly others as a site for living and other activities The development of this site will discourage the use of the property for less than seemly reasons. 2. The development of the site will encourage growth and future development of similar within the area, as projects of this nature are intended to provide an area for local professionals to live, thus generating more revenue within the community itself In addition, property values should not be negatively impacted' as the development of the site will bring quality homes into the area. There are nq~ ~,: proposed encroachments onto adjacent land and thus, will not impede any future development of said property. The safety of the surrounding community will also be enhanced, as the current site is somewhat vacant, allowing for the site to be potentially be used in a less than proper manner (especially in the more densely wooded portions). The r- ~~ ~ ti~~ ~' mo °_ ~ ~ ~..~ ~~ ~~ .~ ~ p _~ ~ ~U • • proposed development will keep the site maintained and will help eliminate the less desirable uses of the site, since there will be people inhabiting the area. 3. The proposed development will have a positive impact on the safety of the surrounding community by providing easy access to the northwest portion of the property and keeping the proposed site in a state of general upkeep. The presence of additional people near the neighborhood will help eliminate the use of the site (especially the northwestern portion) by any vagrants. In addition, the proposed development is a residential. development anal will therefore produce the same types of effects on the community, as any other residential residence. The site will also be gated, including a 6' high screening wall that will help eliminate any unwanted audio or visual effects to the properties directly adjacent to the proposed development. 4. An interior road network with one ingress and two egress paints is provided as part of this workforce housing project. As such, traffic will be allowed to flow freely within the site and use of external public roads will not. be necessary to get from one portion of the site to another. The traffic patterns were reviewed, and there are no anticipated negative impacts to local traffic. The proposed development conforms to all zoning and land use requirements of the site. The precedent for multi-family use of property in this area is demonstrated by the development_bordering the northeast portion of the proposed-------------- development. In addition, there is currently an existing multi-family dwelling on- site, which was part of an approved, but never fully constructed, project that was to be constructed on this same piece of property. The proposed development will add aesthetically pleasing development to the community, in place of undeveloped, overgrown area that is not readily accessible to the public or authorities. This site will provide an attractive development within the community and will keep the site well maintained and accessible to the public and authorities, reducing the potential for use by vagrants and for purposes that are unwanted within any community. ' ~ c~ b. The design of the proposed development will minimize adverse effects to the . ~ Y ~ ~` ~ surrounding properties by placing a 6' wall between the development and the ~ properties immediately adjacent to east, north and south of it. This is anticipated to help reduce acoustic and visual effects to the surrounding properties. The proposed buildings conform to the height requirements within the building code and should thus not have an impact on the site that is in excess of the typical impact of a two story home. Also, in its present condition, the woods along the site are overgrown and provided a partial visual barrier to the site. The proposed fence/wall will provide the same service. In addition, this is a proposed residential development. with curb side garbage collections, so there are no anticipated. olfactory issues that are not. common to any residential residence. t' • • In addition, the proposed building units shall be approximately 24 feet in height, which is well within the allowable maximum height limits within a single family development, thus reducing any potential negative impacts due to proposed building height. The proposed gates within the project will not impede use of sidewalks by pedestrians and will be available to emergency personnel through use of the Knox System, as specified by the City of Clearwater. The gates are anticipated to 6e used as needed by the residents of the site, but are designed with queuing at the entrance to help alleviate any impacts to the traffic on Woodlawn Street. The proposed project will employ interior landscaping, per City of Clearwater code and will be well maintained through the supervision of a Homeowner's Agency. The proposed dwelling unit themselves will be constructed of materials that will. provide an attractive facade to the development and contribute to the overall appearance of the surrounding community. ~ • • Responses to Flexible Standard Criteria for Attached Dwellings Townhomes at Lake Bellevue 1. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance. There is no increased height allowance being sought, as the maximum allowable height within this zoning district is 30 feet for a residential home, per Section 2- 302 of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code. The proposed buildings will be 24'-1 I/a " in height and therefore a flexible standard is not being sought regarding building height. b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. There is no increased height allowance being sought, as the maximum allowable height within this zoning district is 30 feet for a residential home, per Section 2- 302 of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code. The proposed buildings will be approximately 24 '-1 'l " in height and therefore a flexible standard is not being sought regarding building height. 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel which is contiguous to a parcel which is designated as low density residentia! in the zoning atlas. According to zoning atlases 314A and 314B on the City of Clearwater Web Page, the existing surrounding zoning to the south, east and west is MDR (Medium Density Residential), which has an allowable density of up to 1 S units per acre. The future land use for the adjacent parcel is to remain MDR and therefore should not be adversely impacted by the proposed development. Impacts will be further reduced to surrounding properties through use of attractive construction materials, landscaping and construction of a barrier fence/wall surrounding the site. ~. ~- ~~ uu ~ - ~ ~'n ap c°a ~~" a~ ,-~ c cis ~ ~ w~ ~ ~ s • • 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. Any proposed parking will be screened from opposing property by their respective building units, as well as a proposed 6' high wall on the eastern and northern sides. The proposed wall along Woodlawn Street may only be 3 ' in height, per City of Clearwater requirements. The western portion of the site is separated from. adjacent properties by a railroad right-of way and a wooded drainage easement and will also be separated by a proposed PVC Fence. As such, there are not any anticipated negative impacts on the properties adjacent to the proposed project. ~- ~ ~ u~ ~ ,~,. a~. ~ ~_ ~~ &~ ~ ~.' 9 s c S;~ OJ' p~~y ~9 + GG ti i -~ r i.L + .~ L. - T • • Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION (Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets) ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN FEE: $200.00 (Not required if submitted as part of an FLS or FLD application) ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE OF $600.00 CASE #: RECEIVED BY: (Staff Initials) DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION (REVISED 04/24/07) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AGENT AND PLAT PREPARER INFORMATION: (code section a-2o2.A and a-7o3.A.) APPLICANT NAME: Affordable Dreams, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 4685 118th Avenue North, Clearwater FL 33762 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 573-9500 FAX NUMBER: (727) 456-2146 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): WOOdIaWrl ChUfCh Of GOd ~ List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: AVID GfOUp MAILING ADDRESS: 2300 CUfI2W Road - SUlte 100, Palm Harbor, FL 34683 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 789-9500 FAX NUMBER: (727) 784-6662 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: kerlt.edWardS@avldgrOUp.COm PLAT PREPARER: AVID GfOUp ~! MAILING ADDRESS: 2300 Curlew Road -Suite 100, Palm Harbor, FL 34683 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 7$g-g500 FAX NUMBER: (727) 784-6662 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: kent.edwardS@aVldgrOUp.COm C: (Documents and Settingslderek jergusonlDesktoplptairningforms_07071Preliminary Ptat 04-14-07.doc Page 1 of 7 ~Rl~li~iAL 82EC~:VED PL:~ial~"si~;C~ ytc~r"~YM~i~6T ~11Y O~ WLFr4RWAlER B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code section 4•zoz.Al PROJECT NAME: YOWnflOmeS C~ Lake BelleVUe PROJECT VALUATION: $ 1,250,000.00 STREET ADDRESS 802, 826, and 830 Woodlawn Street _ PARCEL NUMBER(S): 22/29/15/98941/000/2101, 22/29/15/00000/320/ 0200, 0700 & 0300 PARCEL SIZE {acres): 8.1 fl ACr2S PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 353,037 Sf LEGAL DESCRIPTION: $ee InClUded SUi'VeV PROPOSED USE(S): Multi-family Townhomes C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (code section a•zoz.A.s) l~ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 3) Fourteen (14) copies of the preliminary plat shall be submitted The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than one inch equals 100 feet (1:100), shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMWARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY, U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY ANb EASEMENTS; PROPOSED STREET NAMES; NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOLLOWING: THE OVERALL PLAT; EACH LOT; STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS; COMMON OPEN SPACE OR-OTHER LANb TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY; NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE. D. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative F~ICN~R d TnMr-nPLC j L! C: IL>ocumenrs and Selringslderek.fergusonl/~eskiopVplanriingforms_07071Preliminar}y Plal D4-24-P7.doc Page 2 of 7 STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEJ~LAyS S orn to and subscribed before me this ~hpp day of (Jl~ b~ , A.D. 2D to me and/or by tr om n_~ e ~ l o is personally know as produced as identification. /~ Notary public, ~""~ p~~R ~~ My commission expires: ~~~~// ~7f5Ii btY COMMISSION N FL Koury Di~oa+at Aasm Cu. ~R1G1~- R~~~~ r.v;~ ~I~g4~R~i1~~ ~,t.r'~.~itJl~~ly ~RIGI~It41. REr VED Af~~rda~1~ Dlr+eaxr~s, L`L~ ~ :~~; c: ~~ 2007 ~~~~I~~ ~t~~l~~r~~;~~.. CIiY ~~ ~LE~1~~?~ 4685 118 Avenue, N. Clearwater, FL 33762 September 27, 2007 I.E'I'TER QF AT~JT~ORIZA~ION To Whom It May Concern: This letter does authorize Richard M. Tommell/Avid Group, to act as our agent for and with all regulatory .agencies, departments and their personnel for the City of Clearwater, Southwest Florida Water Management District, Pinellas County, Florida Department of Transportation and Florida Department of Environmental Protection, in an effort to receive all permits necessary for the construction and development of the Townhomes at Lake Bellevue project located at 802 and 826 Woodlawn Street, Clearwater, Florida, Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. ~~"I~ a1 C-wner Date State of Florida (fin tl~~is a1~'day of ~' , 2007, before me personally appeared ,known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrumen ,and acknowledged. that he executed the same as his free act and deed. . ~_ Notary Public ~. ,~"`°~ KAREN A. GAN ,f~i MY COMMISSION M DD573392 "~ sT EXPIRES: tiny 12.2010 Yd iiuas•N~4`'r~`' AAY FI.NarryDieeountAaoeCa ~ r Date County of ~-e-~ * It is recommended that 3 vegetation types be utilized contingent upon availability ~` It is recommended that a total of 725 units be planted in the littoral zone C)RIG9NAL ~. _.~ ~%~- ZaO~ Pi.A~~Ji~G ~cs~~~I~~~ ~C1TV ~OF ~L~HRI+~~'` -¢ I ~~ I 03Ni~a3lN3~ ~ •.~.• •~•• ~ ~~ ovoavrn , ~, i S ~... .n:>+ i.. ' I ...1 ~. i I : I ~_ -- --. I I Ij ~ - ~ J : I ~' ~ o n n c~i ~ II ~ I I f ~ o~' E n ~ I+II `~ ~ ~ 1 __ _ __~__ __ __ -_ __ ti a ~ i i ~ ~ ~ rn ~ I,-_1 ., - Q ~ m ' I I , I , , ~ I z ~ ' ,U ~+ ( ( I ( 1 ~ ~ ~ o i ~ I ~ I __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ I 11 ~ I I I L~ .1L rn I ~ ~ I I I II I i II11'1 N, N " I I I ~1! i~l ~ ° I I 1 "Il 1:' ® ~ ~ {~ I I I I;;;I W 1 ;I I : II ~ tI n w :p ~ __ _/ E 1 - I •II 1 ... _... _ ... _... _..._ ... _ ... I ~~ ~ I . I ~ I I 1 11 I 1 ^ 1 ' I _ I I _ _ _ _ +-_ _ - ~ I I I I I ~ If I I U I I I ~ rn I 3 I I I Z I I I I j~ ~ I O ~ ~ : I I ~ I I ~ ~ 1 I °W' m o v m I I 1 I O .__ I f:`I 1 I i I m I ( ~ ~ ~ l i I i I I p ~ c l ! I O~ I ° I o ~ ~ 1--~~ I o I ~ ~ m ; , ~ I 1 W rn ° I I F 1 J V ~ m 1 I 1 .1 ~ ~ N I ~ ~ N "' I ~ I ~ I I ~ ~ N 11 I ~ w ' 1111 i III ~Il _......r.... ..._......®..,. _.., _. I a I O ~ -- I I I l I w I i I I t I II // - -.. ._. ~I I ~~.~ I I I I ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ; tl ~~. _ _ 1 ~~ I I I °m w ~ m v°. °t+ W N c o° m v of u"Di p u v o o m rn 11 IIII ~ I ~ _... _...._..._... ,~.~. .~ 111 Ili I ~~ Itl I ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 11 I~ __~__ - __ it t ~ I 191 I I £ !1111 i ~ I Ili! .. .. _..._... _.... _.,.., _.... _...._.., + - I II 1 ll`I I I ~. I IIII- ~ u3 1 ;, I ,'p, 1 Z i I~~~L_If I1 1 `11,11 I 1 I IN I- ~ I r, ~ ;~. II Li P11I. I CIVIL ENGINEERING 2800 CURLEW ROAD,STE100 ~~®~~~® ~®~®~ ~~TE ~~~ LANG PLANNING PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA TRAFFICITRANSPORTATION 34683 TOW6~FIOMES ar LAKE BELLEVUE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES PHONE (727 789-9500 SURVEYING FAX (727) 784-6862 DLEARWATER FLORIDA G~QV~® GIS AVIDGROUP.EOM 9 ®RfGIfV~, RtECflfl~ I'LANiYIN~ DFPAR'~ENP CITY QF C~EARINATER 10' , Building Materials to be used on Lake Bellevue TownHomes Material Key: '{ardie Siding 0-year Dimensional Shingle ilverline DP-50, Low E Windows 'fetal Clad Doors letal Door fetal Garage Doors x 6 Exterior Frame Walls Hour Fire Seperation between units t~:i~i. ~~:~; .. ,; h i Fr ~~o~! • PROPOSED COLOR SCHEME FOR THE 'TOWNHOMES AT LAKE BELLEVUE ~EVELOFMENT Proposed Shingle Color Timberline Select 40 -- Burnt Sienna Blend Proposed Trim Color SW 6140 Moderate White Proposed Garage Door Color SW 6410 Moderate White Pro osed Buildin Color SW 6109 Hopsack *Please note that there maybe slight variations to the proposed colors listed above to enhance the appearance of the proposed development and to prevent every unit from looking exactly the same. u' a ~' y ~'9 ~ C'~ ;~' ~ . ~ ~ ~~ P .~ ~ }-"' ~,' W J ~~' .t ~ ~~ • ~ ~~ ~ ~ t~ ay ,~,,, AD m ('~ ~~ ~ ~~ a~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 4 • • w~ra: ~rpica: e~~ wirer 2 w ma ~~~=' FRONT EXTERIOR E!_EyATION Ili" = I'-®'' REAR EXTERIOR ELEVATION U4" = t'-®" _'~ HARDI TR/IVI~ INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS '~KtC~lltl~ ~EC~:VE~ } ' ilv ~~ ~ JANUARY 2001 IMPORTANT: FAILURETO WSTALLAND FINISH HARDITRiM® EXTERIOR TRIM IN ACCORDANCEWITHAPPLICABLE BUILDING CODES AND JAMES HARDIE'S WRITTEN APPLICATION INSTRUCTi0N5, MAY AFFECT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE, VIOLATE LOCAL BUILDING CODES REQUIREMENTS, AND VOID THE PRODUCT ONLY WARRANTY. FASTENING OF Hi4RDITRIM Fastening instructions are similar for each of these applications. Position nails:no closer than 3/4" from the side edges of.the trim board, and no closer than 1" froln'the-ends. Space fasteners a maximum of i fi" on .center. When installing over lap siding, fasten the trim by nailing through the trim and underlaying siding, making sure to nail on the overlap or high points into framing and/or sheathing. Additional fasteners may be required to ensure that the trim is adequately secured. TRIM APhLICATIaN FAR MIND®WS, DOC)RS & DTFIER OPf~NING$ Trim, Butt Joint to Siding (Figures 1, 1A,1 B) fn this application, the opening is trimmed out prior to the application of siding (Figure 1). Leave up to a 1/8" gap between the siding and trim, then caulk (Figure 1A, 1 B). NQTE=: It is recommended that flashing be properly installed around al[ wail openings such as windows and doors. James Hardie will assume.no responsibility for water infiltration within the wall. TRIMMING INSIDE 'G~.IRNER flashing ` , 4 _ _ - ~'= =-1 Figure i ~=~ t,; Harditrim 'ati" board ~~~ 3/4" minimum to aboard edge ~ 3 up,toi/8" gap r, . 'for caulk ~.Ili;~'-~_i„from ends- Inside Corner Trim Butt Joints (Figures 2, 2A, 2B) ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~'~ ~ ,; As illustrated, position a single trim board on the wall ~ =° ,~~ ._~`~ ,~ and secure (Figures 2, 4A). i ` ,' ,:~ - r TRIMMING O~J-TSIDE CORNER Corner Trim Butt Joints (Figures 2, 2G, 4B) As illustrated, position a single trim board on the wall and secure (Fgure 2). Allow proper spacing around edges and ends as specified above. Figure 2A WARNING: AVOID BREATHING SILICA DIDST Product contains Silica. Inhalation of respirable silica dust can cause silicosis a potentially disabling lung disease, and is known to the State of California to cause lung cancer. When drilling, cutting, or abrading product during installation or handling. (1) Work outdoors where feasible, otherwise use mechanicai ventilation, {2) Wear a dust mask or, if dust may exceed PEL, use NIQSH approved respirator, (3) Warn others in area. For further information, refer to material safety data sheet or consult employer. FAILURE TO ADHERE TO WARNINGS, MSDS, AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS MAY LEAD TO SERIOUS PERSONAL INJURY. plywood or weather-resistive OSB sheathing barrier . / ~= :~ ~-- - .?~i do not =`-~ ::; caulk along Figure 1A top edge 3/4" minimum flashing ~~'` 1/8" figure 16 gap ~ ~ {,. '~ p i ' -; caulk gap `" a ,; . '~~ between I . _' L trim and '{ .~ ~~~o~ - siding ~` ,~ ~' Figure 2 Figure 2B weather- resistive barrier Lap siding -~ J apply siding _ leaving up to -- 1/8" gap '~ -; for caulk 16" max. 'j L'.:. ;:: ~ ~ .~ ~~~ . - ..e leave up to 1/8" gap\ between plank Figure zc and trim, then caulk~~,, a ~~ ;t"~ :; inside outside ~`_ corner corner ~~ ~ ~~ 4 TRIM e4PPLI~ATI®IV FOR'W1'N®O~WSs Figure3 flashing weather- U.~®RS & OTHER ®PEIVIIVGS _ resistive barrier ^u+ to u 4~~ y?Y.~+a. Trim Applied Over Siding (Figures 3 & 4) _ ° ~~`` °; ~:~~~a~ '~ac a,~~ ~ "~ 4a Lap The a lication of sidin must be com leted ~ Harditnm ~ - ~u• -- °'° ~-~ siding PP g P boards ~,;~ ~1. a prior to the placement of the trim boards. - - - Carefully measure and position the trim, and ~~ h - ~; ~k. secure as detailed (Figures 3, 4). ~~ , `° ~~ ~,~,1 o fl ~ , -~ i , See Page (1) for Fastening Instructions. v ~~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~~ s: ~' ~ ~ do not place nails in between lap _~ ~' ~ i s" max. ~, ~. joints (Figure 4A). - r ~ "a ` ~ e til -'K ; , ': Erg ~ ' ~ u ~- ~ . o r ,r4 ~ { ,-~ NOTE: It is recommended that flashing be properly ~~__~:;~~ r j = ° ,~ ° ~ '" ~ installed around all wall openings such as windows and d0 not Caulk "` ~~---- •f doors. James Hardie will assume no responsibility for water ~~'"'---=---~~ • 3/4° minimum infiltration within the wall. along the top edge Figure 3B z=~ flashing ~' ~ {~ _ 3 » ~~9ap ~~ ~~~'~ ~~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ b R nt:x`_u t '_'~ : caulk is ,. ~~,~. TM , .= 't' ' ',~ (~~==~ optional ~: ~., •. ~; ~~. Figure 3A T~R[MMIhICa ®~-TS~®E C®RIVER Corner Trim Over Siding (Figures 4, 4A,4B) See Page (1 }for Fastening Instructions. ®o not place nails in between lap joints (figure 4A). Figure 4 plywood or OSB sheathing weather-resistive barrier Figure 4B position nail to secure trim into framing and/or sheathing do not place nails in-between lap joints --- w ~ c®~e ~ ~ e,u u, ~~ U ` ~~ ~~ ~. ~i r ~ ,,~ Band Boards, Frieze Boards9 9~akes, & Fasoia Harditrim boards may also be used as band boards, frieze boards, rakes, and fascia. - Figure ~ For band board applications, install Harditrim boards over a wood furring strip with appropriate flashing (Figure 5A). Harditrim for use as rakes is shown Harditrim ~ in Figure 5. rake board Figure 5A wood furring strip Soffit panel 2x subfascia Leave up to 1/8" gap (caulk if using butt joints, optional if applying trim over siding) ~. -_ For frieze board applications with '- ' ` `_ 2 ' ' :~,~ ~ Figure fi Harditrim boards over previously applied `` ~ '' ,, . siding, a shim may be required to create .a;~ ~~= '; `z~;. Harditrim frieze an even look (Figures 6, 6A). ''4 - ~~ board For fascia applications, James Hardie ~ ~:~ ~ -k recommends 7/16" thick Harditrim board over a ; ~~ ~~ a woad 2x subfascia (Figures ~, 7). _ rt'v YY- x,13. roofing /. f// , / // Figure fiA Note: shim is shown Figure ~ beyond trim piece for clarity only 2,.~ -~- ~ 4 ~ _ ~! ~ ~ _ ,- ~~ L"~ ~~~ °' ~ ~ U 7/16" Harditrim. fasci '~~ ~ C.) ' ~ ~- over a 2x subfascia ~- ~n.~ • p ~ - 1"minimum spac ~ ~ for nail clearance .~ from board edge 3 `1 ®R[CI~. - -~, ,~ . , tr ~. U STORAGE & HANDLING: Keep material dry prior to and during installation. Store in garage or covered. Protect from dirt and moisture. Garry trim on edge. CUTTWG OPTIONS: P i~i`~I i a 'r r"`'r• e' tgC~ Circular saw with Circular saw blade Electric or pneumatic ~`o FEZ oFO dust collector with carbide=tipped teeth hand shear A JH recommends Makita®#5044KB 4" ar #5D57K8 7-114" saw with dust collection. Cafl 800.4MAKITA ;;146 ei PBlll~~j A Hitachi HARDIBLADET"' w!4 PCD Diamond Teeih. Call Hitachi at 800-546.1666 for nearest dealer. ~F W,~ A SiVAPPER SNEAKY"' electric or pneumatic hand shear. Call 80D-297-7487 #or tool information. Always wear safety glasses and dust protecfion when operating power tools. Far more information on avoiding inhalafion refer to the MATERIAL SAI=ETY DATA SHEET available wherever James Hardie fiber-cement products are sold. Harditrim boards can be hand nailed or fastened with the use of a pneumatic tool. Set your air pressure so that the fastener is driven snug with the board surface. RECOMMENDED: DO ldOT STAPLE tJse a flush mount attachment on pneumatic tool. This will help control the depth that the nail is driven. This will be especially helpful when more than one pneumatic tool is driven off the same compressor. FASTENER REQUIREMENTS: • Drive fasteners perpendicular to siding and framing. • Fastener heads should fit snug against siding (no alr space). (Fig. A & B) • Do not under drive nails (Fig. C). do not under Snug Flush drive nails Figure A Figure B Figure C NAIL TYPE: Fasteners must becorrosion-resistant, galvanized or stainless steel Electro-galvanized Waifs are acceptable for use with James Hardie Siding Products, but may exhibit premature corrosion, James Hardie recommends the use of hot-dipped galvanized nails. James Hardie is not responsible for the corrosion resistance of fasteners. CODE COMPLIANCE: ~o~N1ZipF Harditrim planks may be installed as an equal alternative to conventional e~ ~ James Hardie's seal of approval'iridicates trim permitted for use in the 1997 Uniform Building Code, Section 601.5.5; ~~nes Flardie products recommended far use by the 1997 Standard Building Cade, Section 1404.1; the 1999 BOCA gp1L91e~ a"~~asr8 James Hardie Buildin Products National Building Code, Section 1407.2.2; and the 1995 GABO One and sF wit g Two Family Dwelling Code, Section 703.1. Weather-resistive barrier: Use a weather resistive barrier in accordance with: 1999 BOCA National Building Code Section 1404.3; SBCCI Standard Building Code Section 2303.3; 1997 lCBO Uniform Building Code Section 1402.1; or 1995 CABO One-and Two-Family Dwelling Code Section 703.2. NOTE: Many Building Codes exempt the use of weather-resistive barriers over "water-repellent sheathing" or exterior panels classified as "weather-resistive barriers". However, in most cases where aweather-resistive barrier is not used, wind driven rain and snow may penetrate the unprotected wall cavity. Therefore James Hardie recommends the use of "building paper type" weather-resistive barriers with all siding products. James Hardie will assume no responsibility for water infiltration within the wall. FINISHING HARDITRIM: Caulking: Painting: A high quality; palntable Caulk IS reCOm- James Wardle products must be painted. Patching: mended. For best results use caulks that Harditrim comes with our exclusive Prime Plus''"' e Dents, chips and cracks can be filled with factory priming system, For best results a cementitious atchin compound. comply with either ASTM C 834 or use a 100% acrylic p g ASTM C 920. Caulking should be applied in topcoat (s}. K 1=or paint accordance with caulking manufacturers manufacturer's paint ' written instructions, Leave up tot/8"gap at JH T fchni al Bulletino AcAVUC C AM~HT trim for caulk. Caulking at butt joints is options{. No. s-~ oo. ~AI"~ Note: Please refer to paint manufacturers' CAULK. ; .~.~... specifications for application rates. Corporate Headquarters ^ ® 263DO La Alameda, Suite 250, Mission Viejo, CA 92691 James ~1ard~e ©20D3 James Hardie Building Products, Inc. Printed in the U.S.A. TM, C~7, and ©denote #rademarks and copyrights owned by Building Pre-du~ts James Hardie Research Pty Limited ACN 066 1 14 092. Printed in USA For Technical Assistance, MSDS, Approved by Lowe's and Product information ~ ~~~~~~~~~ Call 1-B00-9HARDIE (1-500-942-7343) I~Z~ ~~ ~~ vvww.jameshardie.com Improving Home Improvement 4 JH2O57DIY 1/03 ©2003 by Lowe's®. All rights reserved. LDwe's and the nahkp rlasinn ara ranistared trademarks of LF CoroDration. PNEUMATIC FASTENING: s-, •' ®• `~ ~, _ _- 9 ~~ ~ b. >~ .y ~ ~~ x ®e~~~~~~~~~ rf~ ,; ~~"~ • ,~ w ~fp ~ J ~` - f .~ .~ f ~~ ~~ ~ g ~~`~ GL 4 ~Q G • ~, ~~ Oo ~ o ° ° ° ~li-~ ° 0 °~° ~/~D ~w ~ Q o°a ~o ooa °~ W ° d ° ~ o ° ~ t~ ~~ a 0 0 (0 ° o ~ U UI~J~~a ~~~~ o a o° oU~o ~p~o G~~(~~~ a o pQ~~~ o 0 ° a d 0~ o o OUll~c ~1(~Uf~OUt o~ a~ ~0 ° d WoW~ ~O Cf~C°~o t~O ~~1[1~1 ap f~0 of~o ~C~ ~O~O~o ~c~~~ ° °~ ~IOo~g o4 ~0~ (~ o ° ° '° ~@~ ~~~ 0~ t~ ° o C~Df1~100~C~ C~Gt o c ° 0~ ~0 f~lU ~~ X10 ° o ~~ ~~OU o ° (~ a~t~Go~ ~1~04° C o f~ic~ o o a~ ~ ° ° 0 0~ o 0 0 ~ ~1~C~ ~~~o~ ~~C~ol~~ 0~ ~W(r~~1~~ ° o ~Oo C~ ~ Mn~C~a4~C~~ ~C~ ~1~i ~C~o ~O~DGc~'6~~C~~ ~C~C~ (~ ra0 °a~o • P~~= 0~~~9 01 O o~ ~~~~~ G~' Q ~o G - _- W_r _.- _ _ I ~, of ;V -^ - ._ V/ ~,.~i ~~~~~v ~- - - - _ . _ ,r L~.~La~ Ai d~ L,cti _ - ~- f _ y ~ ;. - ~ i _ ~: . ,. . R, s .,. .~. -~ ~ ,.< ~_ -- ^- ~ .-., ., _. -yy ~!t - ,-irYT' ~p ~, y~ ~ ~ °~ ~ t i r r 7 •~ , u ..,. , -rte .. ,:~ = ~ - -v~ _ Ls ~„«w.. .~ --~ .L ~p~ :1 ~, >~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ` !~` ~r:. ~ :r I 4 i 5 ~~~ ~~yy _ _ . _ { `} i _ }. ... ; _ P },.- ~ f ~~ L ~~s.t 1. ,u ~ - a6~ ~M ~ '. h - f ~ A .~. u. x.. '; - .,. .o: _ ~w .k .. r ~, r °~,E ~„ - 4. r ~'x. ~~ I ~, ~~ - ~ - ~ - - ' --- r~ -. .. ! ~: ~R,G,~~~ a~~~ 1,~ ~ppl 4~pc+~ o f ~~~ ~o ~OGt]~fl C~P~30~J~ a a s,~o°d0~ o~ o a e ~~ n ° ~~ 04 t a moo. ~p 4® ~C~ ~Ik~ n ° t`~ o ° ° ~ t[~u ~~ a ° (~~OC~ ~ o ~ 0 0~ o~Co ~ ° ~ a a b~J ~Oo ~0~~ o o ~o ° E d ~®o o ° ~fl t[~V oC~4 00~ Co~~ o o ~"o ~ ° L1 ~ °~° ~ QP~~Q a o ° ~4 a ~o ° a ono ~~Oa 0 o ado 1~O~o o G~O~~o COQ o 0~ G~MfM~(iCo~O~o ~' ° ~l (~~~ o ° ©~~4~~~t ° ooa J~~ ,aC~O1~a a ~~ al ~Oo a 1~ oG~O~Ml° o C~ I~~~ ~OP° a o a O~1C~€~lo ~l a o~ ~0~'o W o o a Q'` ,~Q lQ o°Q~a~o, ~1 a ° o a ~ f ~,. - ~ ~ `i i~~ ~` "' Y ~ 'B ~' ~q y S ~ ~ "~ ~~ n ~ r i7. ~ ~ `r "fig ~•' . + 1 )~ t` ... ,. ,. ,A-, _ ....~ .. 1 _ ~~ a i 9 :._ - , ~ 4 ,- f • ~__ i r ~ -~~ _ 1 r . .. - - ' " _ Mme-. -° e,,.,, ... • _ _ 4 .-~ tll ~ _ -'~'. 1 ,. . , ~ ~i_~ ~ , -' ,~~-~ F -0 ~ ` '~ r Ryy ~ ~'4' ..Y F a. 13~' aqx i r ~ ~ ' 4~ I ~ ~,g fit,. ~ ~ § - 1 ~ i T C •. a ~ l ~ ~, ;} x r I pia-- .. _ ~ ! a ~ t f. ~i _ _ - '`~ ,2 g, - t ,. _ - w. ~ s~•a r ~0 4 '! D ~ ~©~19~C°~ ~ ~ ~Q G~®~1~C@9 ~~°~ ~ Q l'~J UI:.I VU~JVUU~O ~®~~ d~~~~ D~~~ ~~~D~~n~ [~~ ~~ ~ ° ~ o~D ~~ir` ~~ ~~ ~ ~c~ ~:~fll l~ ~~ lJ~ ~U~~~ ~1~ ~D~J''~o V l/~ UUI~~ ~" ~~~~~ ~IJC~S1n DD ~~~ NhuJ ~~~ ~~~D~ C~ 100 a~ ~1"M C~ I~dOC~o ~ 00 ~~ o~ ~ t o ~~ISIUJO U L~L~ UI~J NN~u~ lSU 1R=S~v~ VU U U U a U UI~JiYV p \JU tAUSU iiL~MJ ~~~ ~~°DD o ° ~DC~ ~© ~b 0 0~ ~, o~°[~~ o o ~o~~~i ~i~ ~uC~o~~>~l ~~~~ ^ o ~U~ ~ dot Q DDS ~~C~~~i~~~~~~a~~ ~~~0~ 0~ 1U l'~~D~ ~~ ~•io_UVI:~~`~~ ISUU~~pV l:J ~~U li U UL:.1~~10~ Vul:~o~ ~I~~ ~V~ lSU UVf~n~ ~ ~~J~JF~ ~ UI~SU f~l~~~ O'!~ II`u V OQ`~G`~4~" Q~1- ~~ ~~ti ~~~ ~~,~° """`; }~. ~ ~ M ~,: '`w- ~" ~.. ..{ ~Stt 4~,1-. ~, ~~t-~: 1' , } ~ .r .~ i .r .~ *~ r ~, wt tii' r (Y.Li }~ti ~( r i ~(`1y d }.~-' ~;~~4 P i ~' 3~, r ~~y',k Tt' ~; 'yt ,. _ f f~, 4ti tr. yam! ~-~~y,~r .f 3 ~'~ l ~~~^~~ ~`1~ «a~ t~ - 4.714.. pi ~ ~. Y t;~~»sr'` ~ i t icy ~ L ~~k.r., y ~l~ ~'~.t~ ~y ~ ' F • 1:" 7 V ' ~~ ~# ..• ~, -- .. _ _F C+ ' ~~Gp .. REG~N~ r .~ '1~',;'~Q~~ ~~ Q~~o~ Od ~ ° ° Q ° D ° o o ~ ~© D o °~ ~~~1 D 4 ~~ ~° ~ a Q U G~I~J~JC~I:f ~~1~0~~ ~Q ~ ° ° n ~° ,~ o UV~ O Q O O~Q n ° ~@ a D D ° D 0 ~0 ~J _ _" °"t.J ~ ~~. D D Q. O o V C/~ lSU U~UUW ~q~ l~l"S~ l`.LJ ~q O~ D ° a q (( o~~ Q ° ~DQ D ° QDI~ ° 0 D°OD °o ~l ~~qOO d D D~~ d c, a q a~ C~~~ ~~~0 .. D D D J° O °~ D n D ° D. 0 D n D ~I n a o /-i ~(~1 ry o. n fe 1 D ° oQo ~ ~° ~y D( dD °o. ~~ ° a U~ Il1 U Ulf D D D E~1 E)l~ ~O ~ a o Q ° D °~~DD o~~° ~ o 0 ~GE~ ~ ~~P~~~ P~~.1\N~ G`~'~~`' G~ ~ s Lap Siding ,'~ . - -_ -- _ e~ Verkca! Panels trim .. -~ ~. ~ _i ~ ~ ~ „ 1 I ~ ,~..-I - ~ { ~ //~ [[r~ Shingle Siding ~,, .I ~.__. w ®' 1' 1 r ~_ ., , O~~'~~D REG~ ~~ ~''~ ~~ QC \N~ p~p~~yp,~ER ~~~ pF G~~ _. '~ - ?~ =- i4 .;; ~,„,;~;~~,c , t; ~~- - __ ~. ;,. ~ i F.~yS,{Z ,~ cL,~ y7` # - - - .M:. - ~ ,. ~ ' ~r 7 i -_ _,g .. _ ,. ~- 7 ' ~. ~. ~I~.t _h . :i, N: _ I •'..{~ r. ~.: ~, i~,[ - - i i _~ ~ - . k' :L :. .~ ,. _- l ' - ~ ._, ~ 1 b ' 11 __ ~ .:~ ._ _ W ,,_, ~~"~ LJ __ ___1 ~~te~l~lank" ~". S S~IeL't Cedarmi9l° j -. _. I 4 t i k __. _.._ -_w_-_.,,_._._ _ I E I -- -- ~. t ~.-,-_-r -- -- _ _ - ~ i __ ~~___.__ Beaded cedar~rtill Hardielalank°lap siding is the siding by which al! others are measured, ~i~,e most. popular brand of siding in America HardieFlank lap siding is available. in Select Cedarmill~vuhich offers a natural texture, Smooth which offers a classic, finely-sand>;d appearance, and Beaded Cedarmili°and Beaded Smooth with the look and charm of a country beaded lap. And every style of tfardiePlank lap siding is manufactured with our exclusive P'rlmeplus°sealer and primer. ~ ~ ~~G1N~ ~~1~ Qc~ ~12oa~ P+~''a~ ~ CL~w E ~~ o ~~~~Shingle" i~ ! 1 ~~ ~~` '~ 9nd'n,~iduat Shingles ~~~~~~~anel'~ Srnootlt Panel ~~ i ';, . >> Staggered Edge fdatchsd Panel Sierra S Pane! -- -, i Half Round Pane! Stucco Panel HardieShingle'"siding has the same warm, authentic look of cedar shingles, yet it resists ratting, cracking. and splitting. Tt's beautiful as a primary siding ar as a complement to our other siding styles. With James Hardie vertical panels, trim and soffits, the entire exterior of your home will give you years of lasting beauty. Hardiepanei `"vertical siding is equal to our lap siding in value and Tang-Tasting performance. When you combine HardiePane! vertical siding with HardieTrim boards for an attractive Board and Batten look. [=ew exteriors compare with the charm of this Took or the durability and ease of maintenance of James Hardie. ~~ ~~~ ~ f ~,~~ -- ~~~_ _T, ~ir~ Y ; b~ T ~ StsaigFt2 Edge ~dotci~ed Pane! C.ed'art~ili° Pane! HardieTrim`"boards and HardieSofifit'" panels are the perfect complement for all ,lames ~fardie°siding products. A complete James Hardie exterior ensures you will have a low maintenance home for years to come. ~~~~®~Trm`" Boards ~'-,~,: ,~.. ;- --~-------- ;.~ . µ ~.._, ~.. ,11 qur trim boards add the finishing: touch to a'beautiful borne. They provide unmatched durability in Lcrners> columns, rakes and friezes that allows for ~ Cons[stent overall appearance. Hardie~'rirn .boards are sealed and primed with our Primep)us~ technology. ~~~~Saffi~'"Pan~~s -°`" ~~~ ~~ ./ ~'~~~ ~~~- ~~~~ ~;: f, ~ James'Hardie sofFit products have the rich, warm aapearance of wood without many of the ;problems with wood-based products. HardieSoffit panels are available vented or non-vented, in a range of precut sizes and are pre-primed with Primepius sealer and primer. i2 AEG P1A~~0~ G EFAR~ ERA C1 . Jar~~~ Ha~ai~~° Products wit0~ ColarPlcas'°l"~chraolo9Y I~ ~ ~ar~S Can ~ ~n ~~lor, ~~ ~~~'~ ~e~a ~r~es~ ~a0'90S ~$ar~9@ ~0~!Dr~~US~ ~o~t~n~~Ogy Q$~~rS the Sar~10 Cc:€cr dr~sr~'t j~si r~a:e y~~r €~QUSe s~antl out. Celar makes it ~~a anC~ ~~~a~`~~ aS ?~ ~~(~0~ ~ar~oo ~I~~ngy: ~ll~ distin~t'r~e. Dior gives if ~erLCnaiity. ~~d r~ettting gets your hern~'s f an9S~iivd In ~. '4"~~d0 ~'~ngr~ 0~ COIO'~'S ~~'O~OSS~On~~€~ eoin~ right iike ti:e ,:ernes Hardie j Cc€QrP€es" system. °i"tiget€~er with ~e~elop dust ~~r James H~r~~e. C0~0'~os pro~uc~s aro ~,~ ~~ther,tic ~~~;f ~~ w~sJd and drrab€€ih~ cf.~ar~es t•€araie siwing, a~~~~ng~~- res~s~ant t0 S0~"a~0~i~. end beoaose $0 CO`0~' ~fe ~clori/€us cal€ec~ti~~ €ets ycu fir<~ eo€~r that's right fir yeu. ~~ ac~~.Bc~ ba~te~: ~ar~$ ~~ ~~~ r~s~st o~~~Eng, ~ee~ung any crao~~rag for ~ea~s o cOrne. ~~~ ~ ~ ~-dear f€n~sh ar~an~j, ~o9or~~os ~O~s c0~e ans. range. 0~ co~o~s ~~a~ a~0u~~ ~o~ ra6nouv to s~am~. ,~as~es I~ardae s~d~ng ~rodn~s ~~~r~ti~ COIorP~us ~eo~nolog~ are ava;~ab~e ~n ~a si~~ngp ~e~i~a s~~~ng, ShYng~e sad'o~g, ~rirn any s0~~, ~reairtg a ~ar~es ardoe o0rnp~ete exterior. tJaie: CoY~rs sEiu:•~m rue ac as ptUrYnO rsmf trolls Nvf Painti~. Peso sae a~amun des for ~a.ada: t ~a2or rfi N t~ ~,°r Chedt rAth yraa rr~esen~tne a g7 t•86&•-0}4+A,OfE'fa arryinyan area. -- .. ~ ~, . < -~ ~~~~~~~ Ti/~~~~~r~~Y ~~~~~ ~, ~~~~]~ ~9C~3f~lc~ i i iJinyl inriil melt or bum wl yen exposes to a significant scurue of ~,~at or Marie. -; _ _ _ _ _~ ~ "_"_l s _ ~ _. e~ ,~ar~es P~a~di~" ~idrtg Moisture causes waod t© shrink. and sweN`, which causes paint to crack and flake off. + 14 lames Mardis siding prodocts' strength and thickness provide impact resistance caused by hail and wind. Because h resists shrinking and swelling, James Hardie siding holds paint longer .than wood. James i~ardie siding is flame-resistar~. premium ~°inyl Siding is only 5110Q of an inch thick. • ~:~ _ '` _-_ - 0 0 ° t~ a UU 0~ I~JI!~11~1~~0 0 0~ l~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ OO~I ~ ~~ ° 0 a o~~ ~1 Q° ~(0 ~~0 QO ~l 0 (~ ° l 0 ° p ~l ° ~~~0 U (1~0 OY~ 0 0 ° O~ 0 ° uU ~C~°~ 0~ 0 ° o ° ° o ~ l° tt Q~ o~ ~ p ° ~®~ Flo Q a ° o E~1 U~Il~t~1U U ~UUVt~U~1~J ~~ ~D~o u ~ ~ , ~ 4c..r-~ n I:;~id ~ ~ G~ ~ ~~~ = ? [ ~ : L ~~ ~ o,~{e' °`, ~#~~+u~~~~~~ ~:. ~k,.or~ ~ , ~r~~ ;; b ~ ~^2i!F7~1CI ~? 'i~pi Ftcs5? s :, - , ~: .q~ ~ ~~ y . 'i ~ ~ ~ ~ J , .._ ~«~ ~ -Alm r' r ~; r ~ r'`4` ~~, '_ ` 1`lJf'F~ ,. _ ~ , ,~ _ .~¢ ~ `. ~. ~~- ~~~ 0 ~~~~a~l~~~~'~ y F fF ,~ J~ij ~ -. ~CPVDYk'~ !~A d4C~~G~~y. ~6a~~a LtreLYS' ~~~i~~ Vi:v~o, ~ 9~+1 ~rww.james~aEdie.~om . '1-8~~-4H1~RDt~ ~-BfrS-~2-7343 Additiaia(Installaiian IMormatian, 4Namantias, and ~Vamtngs are2va8able at wti"n~.jamesharala.ooin ~ ~OC17 James Fiat~B 1rde~1~ flnatxe B.V. 1.:1 Ss1 utcd 4"a tlar~ta i~91C.alks ai reg'st:tad i~atlert^.r~ics of James tlatde Ursnmlionai Fnars:c B,V. n`~' is a isg~ewa vak al .k~nss tta~e kuama+.~naf Rtr~ce B.V. etisooia zm7 • ORIGINAL REGENED ~,;. .L PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF GtEARWATER • • ~ • STORAGE ~ HANDLING:. CUTTING OPTIONS: r-'1 Keep material dry prior taand during installation. Store in garage ° or.covered. Protect from dirt and moisture, Carry trim on edge. Circular saw with Circular saw blade Electric or pneumatic 6A,tf F dust collector with carbide-tipped teeth hand shear „aria nu,,,, A JH recommends Makita®#5044KB 4" or #5451KB 7.114° saw with dust collection. Ga11800.4MAKITA ,,ones Nartlle A Hitachi®~HAAOIBLADEr"' w14 PCD Diamond Teeffi. CaII Hitachl~ ai 800.54fi-1666 for nearest dealer. rr rrn A SNAPPER SHEAAT"' electric or pneumatic hand shear. Gall 800.297-7487 for tool information. AMrays wear safely glasses and dust protedion when operatlng power tools. Far more ~Iformatbn on availing inhalation refer to the MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET availaae whereverJames Hardietiber~emem produds are sold. PNEUMATIC FASTENING: Harditrim boards can be hand nailed or iastenetl with the use of a pneumatic tool. Set your air pressure so that the fastener is driven snug with the board surface. Do Nor RECOMMENDED: STApt_t=_ Use a flush mount attachment on pneumatic 1001. This will help control the depth that the nail is driven. This will be especially helpful when mare than one pneumatic tool is driven oft the same compressor. NAIL TYPE: FASTENER REQUIREMENTS: Drive fasteners perpendicular io siding and framing; e Fastener heads should lit snug against sltling (no air space). (Fig. A & B) Do not under drive nails (Fig. C). do not under Snug Flush drive nails Figure A Figure B Figure C Fasteners must be corrosion•resistant, galvanized or stainless steel. Electro-galvanized nails are acceptable for use with James Hardie Siding Products, but may exhibit premature corrosion. James Hardie recommends the use oihot-dipped galvanlzetl nails. James Hardie is not responsible for the corrosion resistance of fasteners. CODE COMPLIANCE: 4~yN11fOF Harditrim planks may be installed as an equal alternative to conventional = i 9 James Hardie's seal of approval indicates trim permitted for use in the 1997 Uniform Building Code, Section 601.5.5; ~a~nesHarde products recommended for use by the 1997 Standard Building Code, Section 1404.1; the 1999 BOCA 601LUIB6 PBO~OpErB James Hardie Builtlin Products National Building Code, Section 1407.2.2; and the 1995 CABO One and dr ~,rz g Two Family Dwelling Code, Section 703.1. Weather-resistive barrier: Use aweather-resistive barrier in accordance with:1999 BOCA National Building Gode Section 1404.3; SBCCI Standard Building Code Section 2303.3;1997 ICBO Uniform Building Code Section 1402.1; ar 1995 CAB4 One-and Two-Family Dwelling Cotle Section 703.2. NOTE: Many Building Codes exempt the use ofweather-resistive barriers over "water-repellent sheathing" or ex#erior panels classified as "weather-.resistive barriers". However, in most cases where aweather-resistive barrier Is not used, wind driven rain and snow may penetrate the unprotected wall cavity. Therefore James Hardie recommends the use of "building paper type" weather-resistive barriers with all siding products. James Hardie will assume no responsibility for water infiltration within the wall. FINISHING HARDITRIM: Caulking: Painting: Patching: Dents, chips and cracks can be filled with a cementitious patching compound. CEMENT PATCH A high qualify, paintable caulk is recom- mended.For best results use caulks that comply with either ASTM C 834 or ASTM C 920. Caulking should be applied in accordance with caulking manufacturers written instructions. Leave up to118" gap at trim for caulk. Caulking at butt joints is optional CAULK .1.~.~ James Hardie products must be painted. Harditrim comes with our exclusive Prime PIusT"' factory priming system. Far hest results use a 100% acrylic topcoat {s). `Far paint manufacturer's paint specifications, refer to tocq JH Technical Bulletin ACRyuC No. S-100. PAINT 'Note: Please refer to paint manufacturers' specifications for application rates. Corporate Headquarters 26300 La Alameda, Suite 250, Mission Viejo, CA 92691 James Hardie® ©2003 James Hardie Building Products, Inc. Printed in the U.S.A. Buiidi~tg Products TM, 0, and ©denote trademarks and copyrights owned by / James Hardie Research Pty Limited ACN D66114 092. ®RIGflVAL Printed in USA For Technical Assistance, MSDS, Approved by Lowe'e and Product Information ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ Call 1.600-9HARDIE t1-soa-sae-~sa3j BNI02121602 www.jameshardie.com i'l.f,'`ri''"h~?-rrM1EM Improving llomelmplrovement gat:.,, ~.u,~~~rEo 4 JH2O57DIY 1103 0 2003 by Lowe's®. All rights reserved. Lowe's and the gable design are registered trademarks of LF Corporation. ORIGINAL RECEIVE[? ~~® ocT ~ ~ pool James Hardie Ha~Di~~ 1NSTALLATI~N INSTRUCTIONS PtANNINGDEPARTMENi JANUARY 2001 CITY OF CLEARWATER IMPORTANT: FAILURET0INSTALLANb FINISH HARDITRIM EXTERIOR TRIM IN ACCORDANCEWITH APPLIGABLE BUILDING CODES AND JAMES OCAL BUILDING CODES REQUOIREMEN SCAND WOID THEFPRODUCT ONLY WARRANTyCE, VIOLATE FASTENING OF HARDITRIM flashing - - - - - weather- ~- " resistive Fastening instructions are similar for each of these applications. Position nails no closer than 3/4" from the side edges of the trim board, and no closer than 1"from the ends. Space fasteners a maximum of 16" on center. When installing over lap siding, fasten the trim by nailing through the #rim and underlaying siding, making sure to nail on the overlap or high points into framing and/or sheathing. Additional fasteners may be required to ensure that the trim is adequately secured. TRIM APPLICATION FOR WINDOWS, DOORS & OTHER OPENINGS Trim, Butt Joint to Siding {Figures 1, tA, iB) In this application, the opening is trimmed out prior to the application of siding (Figure i). Leave up to a 1/8" gap be#ween the siding and trim, then caulk (Figure 1A,1 B). NOTE: It is recommended that flashing be properly installed around all wall openings such as windows and doors. James Hardie will assume no responsibility for water infiltration within the wall. TRIMMING INSIDE CORNER Inside Corner Trim Butt Joints (Figures 2, 2A, 2B) As illustrated, position a single trim board on the wall and secure (Figures 2, 4A). TRIMMING OUTSIDE CORNER p Corner Trim Butt Joints (Figures 2, 2C, 4B) As illustrated, position a single trim board on the wall and secure (Figure 2). Allow proper spacing around edges and ends as specified above. Figure 1 - n ~ barrier ° ~ ~ Lap Harditrim `~ ~ ~ siding board r .il apply siding ( ~ ~ leaving up to 1/8" gap I ~ - for caulk 16" max. do not ""`' =~__ caulk along 3/4" minimum Figure ib top edge , flashing ~- gap Figure iB !I - , `~ ; caulk gap '~~ between ° i~~~+-~~-~ trim and ~ ~;T~.~ siding ,~ 3/4" minimum to `boar~d edge up'to118"gap for caulk I .. ~ Figure 2A WARNING: AVOID BREATHING SILICA DUST Product contains Silica. Inhalation at respirable silica dust can cause silicosis a potentially disabling lung disease, and is known to the Stale of California to cause lung cancer. When drilling, cutting, or abrading product during installation or iland6ng. (1) Work outdoors where feasible, otherwise use mechanical ventilatton, (2) Wear a dust mask or, if dust may exceed PEL, use NIOSH approved respirator, (3) Warn others in area. For further information, refer to material safety data sheet or consult employer, FAILURE TO ADHERE TO WARNINGS, MSDS, AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS MAY LEAD TO SERIOUS PERSONAL INJURY. Figure 2 Figure 26 plywood or weather-resistive OSB sheathing barrier ~\ 1"from "Ilf''~~ ends 16" leave up to 118" gap\ between plank \\ Figure 2C and trim, "~ then caulk ~~ i- i ,. inside outside corner corner '' ~ a LJ TRIM APPLICATION FOR WINDOWS, Fgure3 flashing weather- DOORS & OTHER OPENINGS _ _ _ resistive Trim Applied Over Siding {Figures 3 & 4) _~ ° ~ ~o barrier The application of siding must be completed Harditrim ~ ~ -- a°, Lap boards 1, , ='~=~""°" '~ ""= siding prior to the placement of the trim boards. Carefully measure and position the trim, and f `~ secure as detaiied (Figures 3, 4). , I ; , See Page (1) for Fastening Instructions. Do not place nails in between !ap joints (Figure 4Aj. NOTE: It is recommended that flashing be properly installed around all wall openings such as windows and doors. James Hardie will assume no responsibility far water infiltration within the wall. flashing do not caulk "'`- along the top edge 3/4" minimum ,`. ` _ - Figure 3B f~ ~ i ~. ' ____- `, 118" ~,- ~- - - -, ;gap ; ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~;i _ caulk is ~- - - -~_~ `'~~ ~=;k~ optional ~` - ~`aQ ) i ~ "~.. ,. Figure 3A TRIMMING OUTSIDE CORNER Corner Trim Over Siding (Figures 4, 4A,4B) See Page (1) far Fastening Instructions, Do not place nails in between lap joints (figure 4A). ORIGINAI RECENED i'l.~NNI~lG DEPARTMEM Figure 4B position nail to secure trim into framing and/or sheathing Fi do nc in-betu • • • Band Boards, Frieze Boards, Rakes, & Fascia soffit 2x subfascia panel Fascia Harditrim boards may also be used as band boards, frieze boards, rakes, and fascia. / Figure 5 For band board applications, install Harditrim boards aver a wood furring strip with appropriate fjashing (Figure 5A). Harditrim for use as rakes is shown Harditrim in Figure ~. rake board Figure 5A Fjshing .' Harditrim Harditrim band board wood band furring board strip For frieze board Harditrim board siding, a shim n an even look (Fi For fascia applic recommends 7/ wood 2x subfas Figure 7 7/16" Harc over a 2x from board sage ' 16" oc o 0 a o a a --~ _ ~. ~ '.. o ,., a Sze 2 3 Leave up to 118" gap (caulk if using butt joints, op#ional if applying trim over siding) plywood or weather-resistive OSB sheathing barrier :i General `acting ' Plumbing • Electri~ir Cand'Itioning Florida's Most Trusted Service Companyt , ' Chris Koncal Chief Operating Officer I cccJSOaa6s MEP Division eFGA25591 - EL1300359a CFAC~249634 4fi77118th Avenue N. Office: 727-573-9500 Olearwater, Florida 33762 1-800-MIDWAY-5 ckoncal@midwayservices.com Fax: 727-456-2088 r 1 `/ ~~ t ~~/ J / , ~~- ;- //' %/- 6~~ ~-~ ,,> I It ,~: ~/ .f` >~ ~- i I_ . ~ a~ - '~~'r aE James Hardie' Additional Installation Information, Warranties, and Warnings are available ~ Building Products at www.jameshardie.com www.jameshardie.com ' 26300 La Alameda, Suite 250 ?° Mission Viejo, CA 92691 APRrpppoved~~IIby L~~oj~ujuIlllwffII~~e's Improving Home Improvement' ~~~~ ©2005 by Lowe's°. All rights reserved. Lowe's and the gable design are registered trademarks of LF Corporation. ~J 20tlb James Herdle lnkrnmisnelFreaee,V, A4 nghls reseryed.iM,SM,aM®tlende tretlemaMsarrcgsmred laler~eM1SOl James Hardle Inl:rnatgr131 Fi19eC09.V ~isamgislered dademaR Of Jame$Hardle htemalunal rtlaa@a.V JHP054~IY 11-5 .; ~ a• ~ I W a l r¢~ o e ~odluol~gj (~oa~¢9aac4~ We don't compromise. Why should you? We've spent the better part of a century creating siding that stands up to some of the most demanding climates a home will ~ face. Antl we've worked just as hard to give you something else you can't get _ _. _ from other siding, the look and feel of (J~ natural wood. ' ~p~ Whether you're building, re-siding or i'_-~ ' ~ ii r, , adding on, the exterior of your home is ~ ~; - - `I ;~ one of the biggest investments you'll 5 ~~ make, Antl it's one you'll likely live with a j for a long time. So before you make any ~~~ decision, consider the following carefully. Then decide if James Hardiee siding is right for you. ~ w t ktl . _ ~ ,~_, ~ to ~ c", ~ t ~~ ~ qgU ~ 2 ~' Z~ $~ James Hardie® Building Products James Hardie® ~/~-/ Building Products Vinyl will melt ar burn when exposed to a significant source of heat or flame. James Hardie®siding isflame-resistant. Premwm vinyl siding is only 5/100 of an inch thick. James Hardie siding products' strength and thickness provide impact resistance against hail and flying debris. Moisture causes wood to shrink and swell, which causes paint to crack and flake off. Because it resists shrinking and swelling, James Hardie siding holds paint 3 to 4 times longer than wood. James Hardie`s authentic texture is hard to distinguish from wood, even when examining it up close. ~-~ James hartlie° $iding Pr°d ueta Hardiplank®lap sill ng comes with a 50-yeartransferable limited product onlywarranty.Seecompletewarranty at www,jameshardie.com for details. Smooth ' SPECIFICATIONS Select Cedarmill ° and Smooth Thickness: 5116° Weight 2.31bs.lsq .ft. ' Length: 12' planks Widths: Exposure: Pu.lsq. 51/4' 4" 25 ~~ 6 1/4' 5" 28 l 1l d" 6" 17 ' 8 114° 7" 15 12' 10 3J4' 10 Hardiplank®siding offers enormous advantages over conventional siding materials, with an unsurpassed ability to stand up to She elements. For its strength, beauty and durability, Hardiplank lap siding is simply the best lap siding for enhancing and protecting homes, anywhere in the world. All styles of Hardiplank siding are manufactured with our exclusive PrimePlus° sealer and primer. This proprietary process ensures uniform coverage of sealer and primer, providing an excellent surface for paints. It resists mold, fungus and mildew, even 'm damp climates. Colpnial Roughsawn° Beaded Cedarmill and Beaded Smooth Inot shown Thickness: 5116" Weight 2316s./sq.N. Length: 12' planks Width: Exposure: Pcs.ISq. 8114' 7" 15 ~I Colonial Rouahsawn• ' Colonial Smooth° Inot shown i Thickness: 5116" Weight: 2.31bs.lsq.ft. Length: 12' planks ' Width: Exposure: PcsJSq. B' 6 314' 15 Some items are available through the Special Order Program hosed on regional availability. Band Boards, frieze Boards, Rakes, & F~ Harditrim®XLD®trim may also be used as ban noartls, frieze boards, rakes, and fascia. For band board applications, install XLD trim with appropriate fiashing {Figure 5A1. XLD trim for use as rakes is shown in Figure 5. Forfrieze board applications with XLD trim over previously applied siding, a shim maybe required to create an even look (Figures 6, 6A). Forfascia applications, James Hardie• recommends XLD trim over steel or a wood 2x subfascia (Figure 51. Forfascia applications, James Hardie recommends XLDtrim over steel or a wood 2x subfascia IFigure 51. gore 5A t. _„ FI Soffit 2x subfascia xLD Weather Panel fascia /resistant I barrier Lap siding I ~ Flashing ' '~ XLD trim xLo rake trim ` xL6frieze 1 i, ' ~~ board lo. / ° e I Figure 6A Installer Tip: / "'f I XLD trim is an extremely versatile product; An experienced Noteahim'sahovm installercanachieveeithera re-built 45°miteretlcorner b=y°ndtdm piece p for clarity °nly (figure 7A) or an overlapped edge corner {figure 761 Two- ' inch finishing nails are recommended for securing prebuilt carnerstogether. Siding nails are not recommended for securing pre-built corners as this fastener may damage XLD trim. For securing pre-built corners Hardie recommends a 2"finish nail. Each side of a prebuilt corner must be securedtothewallassemblywithrecommendedfasteners. ' Requirements, Warnings & References For Installation of ' Harditrim° XLDT"' Planks ' ' Building Code Recognition: XLD trim may be installed as an equal alternative to conventional trim permitted for use in the 1997 Uniform Building Code, Section 601.5.5; the 1997 Standard Building Code, Section 1404.1; the 1999 BOCA National Building Code, Section 1407.2.2; 2000 International Building Code Section 1406.2.2 and 20001nternational Residential Code for One and Two-Family Dwellings Section R 703.1. Weather•Resistive Barrier: Use aweather-resistive barrier in accordance with:1999 BOCA National Building Code, Section 1404.3; SBCCI Standard Building Code, Section 2303.3;1997 ICBO Uniform Building Code, Section 1402.1; 20001nternational Building Code Section 1406.3.2 and 20001nternationalRasidential Code for One and Two-Family Dwellings Section R 703.2. Note: Many Building Codes exempt the use ofweather-resistive barriers over "water-repellent panel sheathing" or exterior panels classified as "weather-resistive barriers". However, in most cases where aweather-resistive barrier is not used, wind driven rain and snow may penetrate the unprotected wall cavity. Therefore James Hardie recommends the use of "building paper type" weather-resistive barriers with all siding products. James Hardie wit I assume no responsi bit ity for water infiltration within the wall. xLO ~ band board Leave up to 118"gap ' (caulk if using butt joints, ~. aptlonal it appEying Erim aversiding) = r I Figure 6 -.., ~ ~~ 'fing Figure 7 ~~ '' / /~ ~/. ~~~ ~ ~ ; c _ /~ XLD fascia trim over a 2x subfascia 0 p t 1° minimum space fur nail clearance ti I from boob edge I IL,` Figure 7A mm ~~~~9 ~ '°,~ e~=~~m Figure 7e ~ °"'~ ~~ wi °~o >~ Flush do mt under ® drive oats Figure A Figure 8 1 Harditrim° XLD° Planks Storage & Handling ProperHandliag ImiropaHandling In ordertc assure the hest resultsfor installing XLDtrim the following handling ~ recommendations are suggested: ~' • Always carry XLD trim on edge II storage ~~~111 • When banding use corner protectors • When using a forklift to move product, always separate the forks to the widest setting passible to limit stress on the product • Keep material dry prior to installation. Store in covered area. ~~ 1 Select Cedarmill° Beaded Cedarmill Harditrim® XLD® Planks a Installation Instruction do not caulk along Figiae to top edge Rpure 1A Va" flashing ~^~""~`~gap XLD~trim is a decorative non-load bearing trim product. Fastening of Harditrim Fastens ng instructions are similar for each of the following applications. Position nails no closerthan 314" from the side edges of the trim, and no closerthan 1"from the ends. Space fasteners a maximum of 1B" on center. Nails should penetrate 3/4"minimum into wood. Fastener typeshould beconsidered when determiningspacing. Additional fasteners may be required to ensure that the trim is adequately secured. When installing over lap sidi ng, fasten the tri m by nailing through thetrimand underlaying siding, making sure to nail on the overlap or high points intoframing andlorsheathing. Trim Application for Windows, Doors & Figure 2e Other Openings Trim, Butted to Siding (Figures t, tA, tBl In this application, the opening is trimmed out prior to the application of siding IFigure 11. i~gure 1 flash/inllg krim < o , ~ ~- ~~ 3!4"minimum caulk gap / --r between o trim and ~ ` ~t siding ~ " i ~~ Figure 1B inside corner Leave up to a 118" gap between the siding and trim, then leabetweeo plank~p. caulk{Figure lA,1B1. and trim,`: then caulk NOTE: Follow your window/door manufacturers installation instructions. James Hardiewill assume no responsibilityfor water infiltration within the wall, Trimming Inside Corner Inside Corner Trim Butt Joints (Figures 2, 2A, 261 As illustrated, position a single tri m plank on the wall and secure (Figures 2, 2A1. Figure 4 Trimming Outside Corner Outside Corner Trim Butt Joints {Figures 2, 2C) As illustrated, position a single trim plank on the wall and secure IFigure 21. Allow proper spacing around edges and ends as specified above.manufacturer. Trim Application For Windows, Doors & Other Openings ~ Trim Applied Over Siding (Figures 3 & 4) The application of weatherboards must be completed priorto the placement of the Harditrim®XLD®boards. Carefu Ily measure and position the trim, and secure as detailed (Figures 3, 41• See Fastening Instructions above. Do not place nails in between lap joints IFigure 4A). Roof Clearance At the juncture of the roof and vertical surfaces, flashing and counterflashingshall °m' be installed per the roofing manufacturer's instructions. Provide a minimum 1" clearance between the roofing and bottom edge of XLD trim and as recommended by ~~ the roofing manufacturer. outside Cemer - weather- ;Y resistive " barrier _ _ ~p siding l id Hardipanel Vertical Siding app ys ng , leaving up tc I ,.. k iI .. 16'6 max. J I f f ~il~ l , u~ ~ q ~ ~ ~ ~ Prl ~~~~ i ,,'r~1'~~~` Ji , f r ~ P ~ I 314" minimum io board edge Fi ure2A / up Cotta"gap 9 / forcaulk i ~ ~~~ a ~,'. •, Figure 2C Figure 3 Clashing weather plywood or weather-resistive _ resistive OSa sheathing barrier 4 ~ barrier \~ / trim = .. =~' sid9 ts° max. `~~I,I,Y/r7"from do not caulk `ends along the tap edge 3!4"minimum Figure 3A ,~ FgureSar Trashing ~~1la" gap l t caulk Is - F~ure4A ~. ~'~ opdanal ~o ' tlo not place nails Figure 3S io-between lapjcirrrs Grade Clearance install XLD®trim in compliance with local Building Code requirementsforclearanceto grade. Harditrim®XLD should not be installed in contact with concrete slab or other deck materials. Do not install such that XLD trim is in contactwithstanding water. Figure 2 phywood or weather-resistive 058 sheathing barrier ~ 1" from ends yr I16! /, I )~1 ,` as i SS~ ~~~ G' ,f I ~ ~' i t it ~' t it i'li ~ 'i t ~i i } .i ~~ r Il "~', t i;l Ir _,. .. -, ..,rte - -- James Hardie Siding Products t ~tJ! I I I~ l' 1 1~ ~~)j '~) , o ~ f i i ir' ~ 'tu:, I 4 il ~ . ~ I ~ j I ~ 4 A ~ ' i / ~ ~ ,a~f I~. f ~ ~~~' ~ ~{ 11S ! ! ~~ i '~ ~' lj ~ ~~ i~ ~ y~ ' L h /r I!! I. 7 r~ C ~, '~ t i I {t,l~'~n ,,, fi ', ' 1 ~, ii ~~' ' ~ i I ~ ~ I ~~' - ~,;tti I ~ I ~ 1 ~ li ..il ', L 4 1~ i ~ ~~' ' i ~ i ~~ ~ ~ i 4~ I , ~~ t ~ ~ " rj ~ , J +~ t .f l j , ~j ~ ~i Hardipanel®vertical siding comes with a 50-yeartransferable Hmited product only warranty. See complete warranty at www.jameshardie.com for details. i~ ~ y 1 ~~~~ IJ ~~ a1 ,_r. I ~ ~ ~~Y ~f 1 ~ 1 ~xf i ~ ` ~ i ,~ t ~ it I' ~ jl ~ ~ ~'~ ,ll ` al ~ ~ P i I , 1~(~ tt'1 I ;I G ~ ~~ ~ g~~ {i~a ~ ' ~ ~ j '~ ~ P 111 !;r ~; ,,, : i;. t ~ l , ~ 1 `•vl f' p ~ i ~~ ~ ~ " ~ l r i `~ ~r ~ ~ I s . ~ SPECIFICATIONS -' - -- - - Select Sierra a. Stucco 8 Si and Smooth Panels erra Thickness: 5(16" a' weight'. 2.31bs./sq.h. '` Sizes: Pcs1Sq. A'x6' d d'x9' 3 ! s ' '~~ ~ -: Y 4' x 1g' 3 ` Stucco i ~ ~~~ For thoseappllcations that call for verticai siding, Hardipanel® vertical k siding rs equal to our lap siding in looks, value end long-lasting ~ I '' performance, with the same 50-year limited transferable product ' ~i~a warranty. And~because of its structural strength, Hardipanel vertical 4 ' siding may be utilized as a shear panel. A board and batten look can also be achieved when Hardipanel vertical siding is combined with Harditrim planks. All styles of Hardipanel are pre-primed with the PrimePlus~ sealer and primer. Cedarmill$ Panel Thickness: 5116" i,[ ~ {~ , l Weight 2.31bsJsq.ft. '~~1 y rp , ... 1~j_S ~ ~ Sizes: PcslSq. - ~~, 4'x8' d ~~, I d t! ; , ,, , - ~l' 4' x 9' 3 t ~i 4"x1D' 3 ' 1 .iii . . ~. C e d a r m i l l® Same items are available through the Special Order Program baeetl 6n regional availability. • Hardishingle~ Siding P~ T t t 41 ~.°n--;.:'rte ~\~ I _J_:;~~~F~ °r 4d ~ i ~ I~ . ~ ~ ~ r trip F n~',~`r ,I I ~ I~ I~jl~' ~ nmuluu foot, inl ~ f. ~ ~':l~ IIII ~ I +I~ ~ ~ II ' ~ . r ,T ; w ~ i ~li ~ ~~~ ~ ~, i ~ ~~ t i F~,ii 4 t l i'~ .. il 1 F I ~I ~1 =, , sat ~ II;.'t i } m 1, ; b ~ Individual Shingles ' t SPECIFICATfONS Individual Shingles Harditrim® boards should not b~ured to other Harditrim boards. plyvrood or losasheatning ~ weather-resistive harrier' / " Always secure boards to a nailable substrate (Figure Thickness. 1(4 481. weight: 1s ms•(sq.ft. If caulk is used, a high quality, paintable latex caulk is sizes: Height 1s" recommended. (Figure 3A, 3Bi Figure 4 ' "` te'°Mazm~um~ width 6", a", 12" ~/ i/ t Pcs.lSq. Sq./Pallet i 19s a.oa Trimming Outside Corner Corner Trim Over Siding (Fig 4- ~ ~ ~ / " Position nails as described above allowin ro er g p p ° " t"from : I~ ends Exposure: 8 ~ spacing arou nd edges and at the ends. Inslallldm such that ~ meyarenot In ground contact and not subjecte to standing water. ~ For sidewall applications, HartliShingleT"'siding offers the distinctive look of wood shingles with the law maintenance and durability of fiber-cement. HardiShingle products are available with a 30-year limited transferable product warranty. ~~ ,- .~~~ Strainht-Edge Penel m I~i~' ~ r I r ~~~~ . . Thickness: 1I4' ~ ~` ~ i ~ - ~~~ Weight: 1,9165./sq.ft, ~ ~ r~i, ~ ,I ~ i rl ~' Sheet Size 48' x 18` ~ a. r '~~' ~Ty~~ i ~~ ~ 11II Pcs.IPallet Sq.lPallet Pcs.15q. ( ~ r ` } t a ~ , ~ 1 ' 86 2.00 43 ~ i I ' ~= r ~~ 4 ~r_" }f '~ ,. ~ F B t- t ~ Exposure: 7" ~• ° _ . -~- ~ r .:, ~,~ Straight Edge Panel Jamda aartl a Siding Products I I -, 1 fi _~1...r,,r 1.,-.4. ~--~a -~,~~, 1 ~ i~ l:" rf ~ I' ~~ ~:~. ~ ~ it li '~ ~~ ~ ~I I y I 'f::.I , ' ~ ?:, i ~ r i ~ ~ '.II'.~: I ~ P r , ', ,,p' „i~ Fa `~ i I .L _ ~ I i. ~~~_ ..r ~ - ~ t, ~' I r . I i~: .. Staggered Edge Panel r Staggered-Edue 1'anei ~ Thickness: 1f4" I WeighC. i 1.91hs.isq.ft. Sheet Size: 48" x 16" Pcs.IPallet Sq.(Pallek Pcs.lSq .100 ' 2.00 60 ' Exposure: i 6° ,~ HardishingleT"'sidingptoducts come with a 30-yea r transferable limited product only warranty. See complete warranty at www.jameshardie.com fordetails. Half Round Panel • r,,. Thickness: 114" f '^ >f,l 1 fN I; Weight: 1.91bs.(sq.ft. „ "~ `I~ (' Sheet Size: 48" x 19' Pcs.lPallet Sq./Pallet Pcs./Sq. B6 2.00 43 Exposure: 7" I,• • - - 'r ~ Someitems are available through [he Special Order Half ROUnd Panel ~ Program based on regional. availability. Band Boards, Frieze Boards, Rakes, & Fascia Harditrim may also be used as band boards, frieze boards, rakes, and fascia. For band board applications, install Harditrim HLD over a woad furring strip with appropriate flashi ng (Figures 5, 5A1. Harditrim HLD®fior use as rakes is also shown in Figure 5, For frieze board applications with Harditrim HLD over previously applied siding, a shim may be required to create an even look (Figures 6, 6A1. For fascia applications, use 7(16" thick Harditrim over a' wood 2x subfascia (Figures 5, 7}. Nailing Fastening instructions are similar fior each of These applications. Position nails no closer than 3(4" and no furtherthan 2" #ram the side edges of the trim board, and no closer than 1"from the ends. Space fasteners a maximum of 15" on center. When installing over Hardiplankesiding,fasten thetrim by nailingthrough boththetrim and underlaying siding, into studs. Nails must penetrate into wood a minimum of 314" (which may include the sheathingl. Additional fasteners may he required to ensure thatthe trim is adequately secured. Figure 7 ;~/ \'\/ 7116" Harditrim fascie~ ° overa2x subfascia o 1" minimum space far nail clearance 1h`~- trom board edge positi to secu woad f Figure 4A I Figure ae corner 1. studs do not place nails ~' I- on nail in-between lap joints n?into taming Hardisoffit® 2xsuhfascia p°n~ ~ 7116" Harditrim®lascia Figure 5 6" Harditrim rake board HardRrim i hand board - Flashing wood Harditrim furring HL6 band strip ~board Leave 1/8"gap (caulk rf using butt joints, Figure 5a optional it applying trim over siding( Figure 6 Harditrim frieze Note: shim is shown board beyond trim piece for clarity only ~ Figure 6A Harfi~trim® Planks 7116" and HLD~ Installata®au Ins4rau~fi:u~vu Trim Application For NNindows, Doors ftr Other Openings Trim, Butt Joint to Siding jfigures 1, 1A, 161 In th is application, the opening is trimmed out prior to the application of siding (Figure 11. Position nails no closerthan3/4" and no further than 2"from the side edges of the trim board, and no closer than 1"from the ends. Space fasteners a maximum of 16" on center (Figure 1 BI• Leave a 118" gap between the siding and trim, then caulk (Figure 1A). A high quality, paintable latex caulk is recommended. 2 N(pTE:II is recommended (hat Hashing be properly ihstallad aroundall wall openingssuchas windowsand doors. James Hardie will assume no responsibility forwater inflltiatioawithin thewall Trimming Inside Corner Inside Corner Trim Butt Joints (figures 2, 2A, 2B) As illustrated, position a singletrim board onthewall and secure {Figure 21. Fasten thetrim bynailingthroughthetrim intoa stud. Nails must penetrate intowood a minimum of 3/4" (which may include the sheathing). Additional fasteners maybe required to ensure thatthe trim is adequately secured. Trimming Outside Corner Corner Trim Butt Joints (figures 2, 2C) As illustrated, position a single trim board on the wall and secure (Figure 2). Allow proper spacing around edges and ends as specified above. Harditrim boards should not be secured to other Harditrim boards. Always secure boards to a nailable substrate. Trim Application For VNindaws, Doors Zft Other Openings Trim Applied Over Siding (figures 3 & 4) The application ofsiding mustbecompletetl prior to the placement of the trim boards. Carefully measure and position the trim, and secure as detailed IFigures3,4). Fasten the trim by nailing through both the trim and underlying siding, into studs. Nails must penetrate into wood a minimum of 3/4" (which may includethe sheathingl, Additional fasteners may be required to ensure thatthe trim is adequately secured. Position nails no closerthan 314" and nofurtherthan 2"from the side edges of thetrim board, and no closerthan 1"from the ends. Space fasteners a maximum of 16" on center. Secure nails through overlapping boards, Do not place nails in between lap joints (Figure 4AI. flashing ~., -_ waather- G - resistly~ barrier Harditrim f'~~' f Hardiplenk® board ~ siding ~~4 apply siding 7 leawng ll0" F1gUre 1 ^--- gaP for sulk ~~ } i _ 1fi mac. Harditrim'" Planks SPECIFICATIONS Herditrirn° HLn 44 Rustic Gmin° and Smooth Planks Thickness: 4/d IAutual 3/4"1 Weight: 3.a lbs./sq.h. Langth: 12' planks Widths'. 4", 6", 8", 10", 1 Inominall -_ ,~' do not ~'~---~-. __ _ caulk along 314"-2" top edge ' Figure IA 118" Figure 18 I' flashing r ~ gap ~ -'I - U _1~ _® _:_ - ..,. fin. ®. ,. 1 caulk gap _r-- detweeP ~ - _ '~ ~-~ trim and fig t ~~.,._.__ ~~~~ -- siding ` _ '~ ~~ 1 ~ `..Smoot h 314" - 2" to plywood or xrether-res stive boats edge OSB sheathing harried 1/8"gaP y'from ~ for caulk ~ Figure 2A „J fiends-,°~ s ae~ ~~ rr/i/ Figure 2 ~'! "Install trim such that they are not in growd contact and notaubjected leave 118" gap to standing water. between plank F we 2C Figure 2B and trim, 'B then caulk ~~ u c ~ ~ Inside outside \~ Cprnaf C9rner weather- resistive ~--~-~"'"" u barrier --a-' Harditrim® ~~ Herdiplank boaNs l~--:" -":~-, siding ®'°°'0` j Harditrim®Planksourtrim and fascia sad the finishing -'~ [ouch to a beautiful, lasting James Hardie° home. They provide unmatched durability in corners, columns, windows, rakes and frieze. Harditrim planks are pre primed with the PrimePlus®sealer and primer. James Nardie° Siding Products ~I~ ~°° (lashing ~f '. I it f 16"maz~ ~t I Figure 3 ~~ _ ~ ' I ---_ _~ . ~_>~. ~ Al I Harditri m®products are not available in s/a° -2° all regions. Check the Special Order Desk F~,~an Figare36, 4'. for availability. s-o_ --°, Harditrim planks come with a caalkis s - -- 10-yeartransferablelimited product i '~- optional f only warranty. See complete warranty ,--- atwww.jameshardie.comfnr details. XLD® 51d Harditrim NID 7176 Cedarmill° and Smooth Planks Thickness: 7/16" Weight 3.OIbs/sq.ft. Length. 12 planks Widths: d', 6", B", l2' {nominal) Harditrim XLU° 514 Smooth Thickness: 5/a lActual 1.0") Weight: 4.a5 I bs.lsq.ft Length: 10'planks (nominal! Some items are available through the Special Order Program based on regional availability. Rustic Grain° Select Cedarmill° • Hardisoffit'" Panels ~..'~.`. `~> / ~~ , fi'r' SPECIFICATIONS Non-Vented Soffit _Cedarmill° Soffit Panel Thickness: 1/4' WeighC 7:9 lbs.lsq:k. ' Sizes: d' x 8' i 12" x 12' - 1e°;<ir • Hardisoffit® Panels Iets,ta99ati®n 9nstraac~~®at Framing Requirements: Hardisoffit®panels may be installed over either metal or wood framing members complying with the local Building Code, including the use ofweather- resistive barriers where required. ~°~' A. ' ''\ ~ ' ~ ~r.- Apply soffit panels to nominal 2 x 4 framing members { I ~ ~,1~ spaced a maximum ot24 inches on center, with the long .~., ~~~° ~ dimension perpendiculartotheframing.Fastenersare ,. . ~ ~ •r~e ~ Installed 3/B" from the edge ofthe board and 2" in from ~ t= - "--z" .-" ----- ky,•_ r_ __~~_-__ ."""". ^-----~ snNit-Panel===~- _- ~ theCOrners. a ,~ ~ '~~ ~' ~ ~ tld,~ ,1 ~;f ~ ~ ~ ~, t? ~ ' is ms/aq.h. Joining INethads '~• : Hardisoffit panels are fastened at abutting board edges, r; ~`'~~; ~ and optionally covered by PVC or metal joiners, ~+ ~,~'° tz° x 12' battens, or with anacrylic caulk. Ifigure 41 ,i'fi ,, ~~-~' _ ~ 1 s" x 12~ iraming 24" x &' Figure 4 member figure 4 P4CH-molding t James Xardie'r Siding Products ~.y Attention: Builder/Architect ,~ .' =~~ •~y~ Hardisoffit® Pan@ISJames Hardie®'s pre-cut soffit GENERAL INFORMATION:IMPORTANTThese _ instructions are to be used for the application of •i -'' •~ ,m . •. = products eliminate the need for separate box or strip vents and j " Hardisoffit panels on conventional, site built wood and a ~ " a -' :~ minimize the need for cutting. Hardisoffit panels are available vented metal frame buildings. For other applications, such as or non vented, in a range of pre-cut sizes. All styles of Hardisoffit those for factory-built construction linClutling - •.J manufactured housing, modular or panelized buildings) j panels are pre~pnmed with the PrimePlus® sealer and primer. please Contact James Hardie®Bullding Products r ~`~ 1-($001-9HARDIE (942-13431• ' - IMorking Nfith Vented Hardisoffit panels: Hardisoffit panels must be fastened to a solid, nailable substrate (e.g. a wooden 2 x 4 subfascia), not into t" -~.- _ Vented Soffit another Hardie product. Position the vented section of • _ `,~ ~ Cedarmill and Smooth the Hardisoffit anel towards the outside ofthe save far " Soffk Panel.. P -~ _~j' ~ 9 optimal airflow. - Thickness: 114' r .° .I I we~gnr: t.a ms.l5q ft. _ Vent pel!formance: { _ sizes: t2"x tr ~, Continuous ventilationsystems providethe most '-- ~; ,~,„ ; ; efficient mode of air intake possible. Hartlie's vented _ ... .__ ts° x tr ' ~ - ~ _ soffit products provide 5.0 square inches of net free - "'mow-~„~„ zd"xa' ventilation per linearfiootofsoffit. Hardisoffit°panels comewitha vented Soffit Panel Joining Requirements 25-yeartransferable limited product Hardisoffit panels are fastened at abutting board edges only warranty. See complete warranty snore aemsare avauible and optionally covered by PVC or metal joiners, at www.jameshardie.com for details. mreUgn me specla~ omer ~ battens, or with a com atible caulk see Finishing ' Program based on regional P { avaiiabifitw Hardisoffit). • ~~ ! / ~ venting shim - fascia (Wood) Hardisoffit' subfascia vented panel Figure 1 j Hafdiplank® siding ~ t -- -- ` I nailerio r 1 I b rick frieze Hardisoffd fascia non-vented tifai? (wood) panel f f"''' +' r r•r•1 Figure 2 1 fti f:~:f subfascia b ric k 's~"r.1 ~.:~.~. venting scrip ~~~ 2 x 4 nails r -~ ¢~~~~,4 ~ for brick frieze hartlisoffit panel fSf1~1 ti" fascia (wood) ` `''°~ subfascia frieze rti~tif~ :~ board ',. ss~ brick Figure 3 f';r;r}, , i Fastener Size And Spacing • Installation to conventional wand frame construction inmost locations: minimum 4d common nails spaced B" o.c• at panel edges and intermediate framing members spaced up to 24" on center • Installation to conventional 20ga metal frame construction inmost locations: minimum No. 8-18 x 0.323" HD x 1"long Hi-Lo®SO or S-12r"' ribbed bugle screws spaced 6" o.c. at panel edges and intermediate framing members spaced up to 24" on center. • Minimum Basic Wind Speed differs by locality. Where specified levels of wind resistance are required, referto Building Code Compliance Reports ~' (Approvals). Cedarmill° Soffit Panel Hardishingle~ sidjng Installation Instruction The instructions that fol low are for HardiShi ngle® Individual Shingles, only. Forlnstallationlnstructions for HardiShingle Straight Edge Panel, Staggered Edge Panel, Half Round Panel or Straight Edge Shingle Plank cal 11-500-9HARDI E or go to www.jameshardie.com. Preening Requirenoenfs Use aweather-resistive barrier in accordance with: BOCA National Building Code Section 1403.3; SBCCI Standard Building Code Section 2303.3; ICBO Uniform Building Cade Section 1402.1; or CABOOne-and Two Family Dwelling Code Section 703.2,1. NOTE: Many Building Codes exompttheuse ofweather- resistivebarriers over "water-repellent sheathing" or exterior panels classified as "weather-resistive barriers". Therefore James Hardie recommends the use of "building papertype"weather-resistive barriers with all siding products. James Hardie will assume no responsibilityforwater infiltration within the wall. Carade Clearance figure 2 Install Hardishinglecladding in compliancewith local Building Code requlrementsfor clearance between the bottom edge of panelJframing and the adjacent finished grade. Shingle Spacing figure3 Fasteners are a minimum 0.091" shank x D.221" HD x 1 1/2" long corrosion-resistant siding nail. Corner I)eltails figure 4 A. Shingles butted against corner boards. B. Shingles butted against square wood strip on inside corner, flashingbehtnd. C. Laced outside corner. D. Laced inside corner. Figure 4 txa 'Ka a e c c Vgindows, ®oors, And Ven4s Installation of building wall components such as windows, doors, vents, water pipes and other exterior wall penetrations shall be in accordance with the componentmanufacfurer'swritteninstallation instructions and the Code. It is the responsibility of the component installerto insure that penetration areas are properly prepared and that all required sheathing membranes, flashing, caul king, and sealants are installed in accordance with the Code and the published installation details provided by the component manufacturer. vqure t-owb~wauconswaon Figure i ~~SIIQ 1W-lath slop sheathing weathewesisgve homer ' Figure 2 _R~ plate ~, wnaete bundation sh wcether- msiseve hartier ` space shingles max. 114 apart raminimu m p of 1112 u2enicin~ wccesrve courses Roof Clearance figures At the junctu re of the roof and vertical surfaces, flashing and counterflashing shall be provided per the roofing manufacturer's instructions. Provide a 1"- 2"clearance between the roofing and bottom edge of siding or as recommended bythe roofing manufacturer. Figure 5 The above instructions arefor HardiShingleTM Individual Shingles Only. For Installation Instructions forStraightEdge, Staggered Edge, Half Round or Straight Edge Shingle Plank call our Technical SupportAt 1-800-9HARDIE. James Hardie® Siding Products with CalorPlus~ Technology I _~ ~---- ~ Light Mist JH70-10 Seil Cloth JH2O-10 Navejo 8elge JH30-10 MonfereyTaupa JH4a2g ArdicWhile JH10.20 AWumnTan JHZO.20 i Sandsfoneeeige JH30.2D HeatheredMoss JH50-20 WoodlanliCmam JH10-30 Hhaki brown JH2O-30 Woodslwk Broom JH00-30 Boathbay Blue JH70-20 James Hardie Siding Products with Some items are Colorplus~ technology come with a available through the Special Order Program 15-year finish warranty. See complete based on regional warranty at www.jameshardie.com availability. for details. James Ha~a4 Siding Produscs James Hardie Siding Products with ColorPlus®Technology James Hardie®siding products with ColorPlus® technology offers, the beauty and durability of James Hardie siding pre-finished in a wide range of designer colors. Thanks to a proprietary process, colors are baked onto create a smooth, consistent, even-colored finish not possible with on-site painting. The mar-resistant surface resists scratching, chipping or cracking. Colors are stay fast - guaranteed to provide years oflow-maintenance beauty. Check with your local representative for colors available in your area. • Available on select lap siding, trim, fascia and soffit products • Full line of matching touch-up paints • 15-year limited finish warranty; material and labor i ,_i Product Specifications Installing James Hardie® Siding Products Basic CompositionlSize Portland cement, ground sand, cellulose fiber, select additives and water. James Hardie®siding products contain no asbestos, glass fibers or formaldehyde. Approvals Hardiplank® lap siding, Hardipaneh vertical siding and HardiShingleT"^ siding are recognized as exterior claddings in National Evaluation Service (NESI, Inc., Report No. NER-405 (BOCA, ICBO, SBCCI}; City of Los Angeles, Research Report No. 24862; Texas Department of Insurance Product Evaluation EC23, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Materials Release 1263b; California DSA Product Acceptance Number PA-019; and City of New York MEA No. 223-93-M. Hardiplank lap siding is recognized as exterior cladding in CCMC Evaluation Report 12678-R. These documents must also be consulted for additional information concerning the suitability of this product for specific applications. IMPORTANT: FAILURE TO INSTALL AND FINISH ANY JAMES HARDIE SIDING PRODUCTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE REPORTS AND JAMES HAADIE'S WRITTEN APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS, MAY AFFECT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE, VIOLATE LOCAL BUILDING CODES REQUIREMENTS, ANDVDiDTHEPRODUCTONLY-WARRANTY. ,- Handling & Storage Store flat and keep dry priortc installation. Installing siding wet or saturated may result in shrinkage at buttjoints. Carry product on edge. Durability James Hardie siding products are dimensionally stable and most have a limited, transferable warranty for 50 years to resist cracking, rotting and delamination. James Hardie fiber-cement products resist damage caused by extended exposure to moisture, humidity, and salt air. Flexural Strength James Hardie siding and soffit products comply with ASTM C1186, Standard Specification for Grade II, Type A, Non-Asbestos Fiber Cement Flat Sheets. Non•cambustibility Hardiplank, Hardipanel and HardiShingle siding products have been evaluated in accordance with ASTM Method E-136 and may be installed where non-combustible con- struction is required. Surface Burning Capabilities When tested in accordance with ASTM test method E-84: Flame Spread p Fuel Contribution 0 Smoke Developed 5 Thermal Resistance (Approximate valued 5/16" thick: R=0.15 1/4" thick: R=0.13 Full specifications conforming to CSI guidelines can be downloaded from www.jameshardie.com or received via fax from Fax-on-Demand 1-800-9Hardie, document #2170. Please call 1-800-9HARDIE for installation instructions and safe handling information. p Recommended Cutting Instructions ourooafls ~. Position cutting station so that wind will blow dust away from user or others in work area. 2. Use one of the following methods based on the required cutting rate: a. Best: i. Score and snap ii. Shears iPneumatic or Handheld] b. Better: i. Dust reducing circular saw equipped with Hardiblade and HEPAvacuum extraction c. Good: i. Dust reducing circular saw with Hardiblade INDOORS 1. Position cutting station Inwell-ventilated area; otherwise, additional mechanical ventilation (e.g. box fan, HEPA vacuum, etc.) is required 2. Cut only using score and snap, or shears Imanual, electric or pneumaticl. - NEUER use a power saw indoors - NEUERuseacircularsawbladethatdeesnotcarrythe Hardiblade logo - NEVER dry sweep Additional exposure information is available at www.jameshardie.com to help you determine the most appropriate cutting method for your job requirements. If concern still exists about exposure levels or protection levels, you should alwaysconsulta qualified industrial hygienist. Grade Clearance figure 4 • Install Hardipanel®IHardiplank®in compliancewith local Building Code requirements #or clearance between the bottom edge of panel/framing and the adjacent finished grade. Roof Clearance figure 5 At the juncture ofthe roof and vertical surfaces, flashing and counterflashing shall be provided perthe roofing manufacturer's instructions. Provide a 1 "-2"clearance between the roofing and bottom edge of siding or as recommended by the roofing manufacturer. Concrete Construction Figure 5 flashing figure 6 Hardipanel siding can be installed directly to masonry block. Hardipanel siding can also be installed to concrete construction, when the wall is furred out with wood framing or minimum No. 20 gauge steel framing anchored to the wall. Framing can be spaced up to 24" OC. Consult National Evaluation Service report NER-405 for recognized applications to masonry block and wood or metal framing. Aweather- resistive barrier* isrecommended between the framing and the siding. ~, ~J Hardipanel® stud Siding weather- resistive i ° ° barrier' i place ~ o ° tj ° ° o Figure 4 E' concrete foundation ~1-2° weather- ~ resistive barrier' w ~I J I nominal 2°x2" Figure 6 wood framing Hardipanel siding Thank you for using James Wardie siding products Hardiplank® Lap Siding Hardipanel® Vertical Siding Hardisoffit® Panels Harditrim~ Planks Hardi~hingle~ Siding Hardipalnel Vertical Siding Installation Instruction Framing Requirements figure 1 Hardipanel®vertical siding can be installed to studs spaced a maximum of 24" o.c. Irregularities in framingcan mirrorthroughthefinished application. Aweather-resistive barrier is required. Applying Hardipanel Siding: • Start Hardipanel vertical siding at middle of stud. • Keep nails 2"away from, corners. • Start at edge and work across. • Follow caulk and paint requirements. "'Useawaalherresi6tivetrarrierinaccordancewRh:BOCANatlonalBuilding C¢tleSeuion 1403.3; SBCCI Standard Building Coda Sactioa 2303,3; ICBO Uniform BuildiegCode Section 1 W21; or CABO One and Two family 6welrmg Cade Secoan703.2.1. NOTE Soma BuildingCodes eremt Ihause iwaathar-resistive barriers over "avatarrepellent panel sheathing" a: exterior panels dasslflad as "waatharresistive ha:nam". Tterefoiefames Hardie recommends the use of "bailding paparrype° weathar-resistlve barriers wish all sid'mg protlurls. JamesHardlywill assumenaresponsi6111ty forwater infiltrationwLh~m rho wall. JOINT DETAIL figure 2 • Keep fasteners 3/8" back from panel edges. • Place fasteners 2" in from all corners; don't nail into corners. • Joints may also be covered with lumber batten, PVC "H" or "T" type jointtreatment. • When caulking vertical panel joints, space panels aocordinglyto caulking manufacturers required bead size, but not to exceed 1J8" maximum. • HorizontalJoints-use"Z-Bar"orsimilartype flashing for all horizontal joints. Suggestion jfigure 3}: Using a double stud at panel joints will allow forfastener placement to be out of panel grooves (Sierra 8") for improved appearance. SMOOT SELECT SIERRA 8" SELECT CEDARMILL° STUCCO Figure 1 weather-resistive harrier keep nails o n 3I8"min. from panel edges plate ~ o 3 18"~-' " 0 keep fasteners 2 away from corners Figure 2 Caulk Joint 2 x 4 stud Q weather-resistive barrier' t stud Useaflushmountattachmenton p stud pneumatictaol. This will help control the --- ~ depth thatthe nail is driven. This will be especially helpful when mare than one pneumatic tool is driven off the same compressor. Hardipanel siding space panel accord- ing to J01NTDETAIL (fig. 2) shown at right, allow a max.118" gap for caulk "H"Joint Batten Joint weather-resistive •~ 2 x 4 stud bamer" 1,N Figure 3 Pneumatic Fastening: Our products can be hand nailed or fastened with the use of a pneumatic tool. Set your air pressure so that the fastener is driven snug with the shingle surface. Recommended: Finishing: Patching: Dents, chips and cracks can be filled with CEMENT acementitiouspatchingcampound. PATCH do not Caulking: sty le A high quality, paintable caulk Is recommended. For best results use caulks that comply with either ASTM C 834 or ASTM C 920. Caulking should be applied in accordance with caulking manufacturers written instructions. {Leave 1J8" gap at trim for caulk. Caulking at butt joints is optional.) Nail Type: Fasteners must be corrosion resistant, galvanized or stainless steel. Electra-galvanized nails are acceptable for use with James Hardie®5iding Products, but may exhibit premature corrosion. James Hardie recommends the use of quality, hot-dipped galvanized nails. (James Hardie is not responsible forthe corrosion resistance of fasteners.) Fastener heads should fit snug figure A Snug Fastening Requirements: • Consult Tables 2 and 3 of James Hardie's National Evaluation Service report NER-405 for correct fastener typeand placementtoachieve specified design wind loads and shearvalues. • NOTE: Published shear values and wind loads may not be applicable to all areas where Local Building Codes have specific jurisdiction. Consult James Hardie Technical Services if you are unsure of applicable Building Code jurisdiction. • Drive fasteners perpendicularto siding and framing. er' against siding (no air space}. iFig.A&8) • Do not aver-drive nail heads or drive nails at an angle. ~ If nail is countersunk, caulk nail hale and add a nail. (Fig. C) ` T Flush figure B Countersunk, Caulk & add nail do not under figure C drive nails CAULK .~.-~.• Painting: James Hardie®products must be painted. Far best results Install Hardiplank siding with our exclusive Prime Plus®factory priming system and a 100% acrylictapcoat Isl. * If our Prime Plus"^ factory priming is not being used, ° ° Hardie recommendsthe application ofan alkali- 100Po resistentprimeralongwith ACRYLIC 1D0°1°acrylictopcoatlsl• PAINT (For paint manufacturer's paint specifications, refer to JH Technical Bulletin No. S-1D0.) *Note; Please referto paint manufacturers` specifications for application rates. WARNING: AVOID BREATHING SILICA DUST James Hardie productscontain respirable crystalline silica, which is known to the State of California to cause cancer. It is also recognized as a cause of cancer by OSHA, N105H andtARC. Braathing respirable silica dust can cause a disabling lung disease called silicosis, possibly lung cancer, and has been linked, therefore, to death When drilling, cutting, sanding, or grinding products during installation or handling:11) follow our best practicesto limitthe reiease of dust; f21 work outdoors whenever possible,13) wear a NI05H approved d ust mask. or respirator (e.g.,the N 95 dust mask)tofurther limit exposure to respirablesilica dust; and 14) warn others in the area. During clean-up, never drysweep. Instead, use HEPAvacuumsorweteleanupmethods. According to some medical experts, and Che U.S. Surgeon General, if you smoke tobacco products, such as cigarettes, you are at greaterriskfor health problems relatedta silica dust exposure, includmgsilica-related lung diseases. For further information, referto our installation instructions and Material Safety Data Sheet available at www.jameshardie.com or bycalling 1-800-9HAADIE. FAILURETOADHERETOOURWARNINGS, MSDS, ANp INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS MAY LEADTO SERIOUS PERSONAL INJURY OR 6EATH. Hardiplank® Lap ~Td~ng Installation Instruction m ' Feaming.Requirements Hardiplank~lapsidingcan be installed over braced woad or steel studs spaced a maximum of 24" o.c. or directly to m inimum 7/16" thick OSB sheathing. Hardiplank lapsidingcan also be installed over foam insulation up tot"thick.t Irregularities in ' framing,sheathing,andlor foam insulation can mirrorthrough the finished application. The use of aWeather-resistive barrier is required in frame construction with siding. James Hardie recommends the use of asphalt saturated felt Or equivalent non-woven, non-perforated, vapor permeable building paper or housewrap. Note: James Hardie does not recommend the use of water repellant wood based panel sheathing as the primary weather resistive barrier. The weather resistive barrier must be appropriately incorporated with penetration and junction (lashings. Materials must be lapped such that water will drain down and to the outside. James Wardie will assume no responsibilty for water infihration within the wal I. The first course of anywall should be installed over a 1/4"lath strip to ensure a consistent plank angle (see figure 11, Figure 1 Double Walt Single Wall elindnailingNardiplank conso-ecrion eonarrumm~ stud weather-resis6webarder` weather-resistive J t Irom ~ plywood or @4°o.c.mea.letmbracing barrier ,r planktop~ t DSB Shaa,hing l~ "~ ~IL-318°Gom plaokedg~ ,,~ "moderate contact ''' < ~weamer-resistive • 2 barrier ° ° , fastener leave appropriate,g,gap between "° plankandtim,thenraulk" 0 114"thick lath step `Space plank according to jointtreatment either in "moderate contact" (joints not caulked) or in accordance with the caulking manufacturer's written application instructions (joints caulkedi, see detail at right. t Forapplicatian overfoam insulation, the length ofthe specified lastener shall be increased bythethickness ofthe roam insulation. Grade Clue Install Hard ®lapsitlingincompliancewith local building code requ irements for clearance between the bottom edge of plank and the adjacent finished grade {see Important Ndte). stud weather-resistive barrier Figure 2 concrete I E n foundation I -~ ,r 114° thick~~!~ -'Hardiplank® lath drip \ ~ lap siding Roof Clearance At the juncture of the roof and vertical surfaces, flashing and counterflashing shall be provided per the roofing manufacturer's 2~, Instructions. Provide a ~ ~~ minimum ofa 2"clearance ~ ~{ between the roofing and ~ bottom edge of siding, I Figure 3 ~ _ ~~ flashin 9 Concrete Construction Hardiplank lap siding can he installed directlyto masonry block. Hardiplank siding canaslobe installed to concrete construction when the wall is furred outwith wood framing or minimum No. 20 gauge steel framing anchored to the wall. Framing can be spaced up to 24" OC. Consult applicable code compliance report for recognized application to masonry block. Aweather-resistive barrier is recommended between the framing and the siding. Figure 4 II weather resistive '° barrier wood or metal fumng Important Note • Install James Hardie®productswithaminimum 6" clearance to the earth on the exterior of the building ar in accordance with local building codes if greaterthan 6" Is required. • Maintain a minimum 2"clearance between James Hardie®praducts and roofs, decks, paths, steps and driveways. • Adjacent finished grade must slope awayfrom the building in accordancewith local building codes - typically a minimum of 6" in the first 10'. • Do not install Hardiplank®lap siding, such that it may remain in contact with standing water. ~~ `~1 /l i!i Face Nail: (All Lap Products) .gure 5 Corrosion Resistant Nails (galvanized or stainless steel) • 6d 10.113"shankx0.267"HDx2"longl • Siding nail {0,089" shankx 0.221" HD x 2" longl • SidingnaiP(0.091"shankx0.221"HDx1-112"lang)# Corrosion Resistant Screws • Ribbed Bugle-head or equivalent {No. 8-18 x 0.323" HD x 15/8" long) Serews must penetrate 114" or 3 threads into metal framing. Corrosion Resistant Fasteners • ET&Fpin10.100"shankx0.25"HDx1-1/2"long) stud I~ 24" ~ o,c. max. 1 1/4"min. :--m--~ ouedap ~ ' moderafemMact ~ Minimum overlap I ~/ _ _ _ - - of for Both Face 314°•1' ; _ - f and 91ind Nailing "0 face nail } min.11l4 overlap wealheriesistive f barrier Figure 5 Blind Nail: ** ~gure 6 Corrosion Resistant Nails (galvanized ar stainless steel) • Siding nail {0.089" shankx 0.221" HD x 2" long) • 11ga. roofing nail (0.121" shankx 0.371" WD x 1 114" Icng) Corrosion Resistant Screws • Ribbed Bugle-heatlor equivalentlNo.8-18x 0.323" HD x 15(8" long) Screws must penetrate 1!4" or 3 threads into metal framing. Corrosion Resistant Fasteners • ET & F panelfastT"' 10.10D"shankx 0.313" HD x 1-1/2" long) stud weather-resistive Figure 6 1114" min. overlap 24" - o.c. maz. i °i blind nail - ° i ~~ `moderate contact 4 When face nailing to OSB, planks must be no greaterthan 9 1/2"wide and fasteners must be 12" o.c. or less. ** See Fastening Requirements. o n ~! er-resistive i bonier Coverage Chart/EstimatingGvide - NardiPlank 1. Figures shown are inpieces -all 12 long 2. 5°/a cutting and fitting waste factor included '3. Com putations based on minimum over lap of 1-1(4 4. Actual u sage subject to variables such as building design and installers COVERAGE AREA LESS HARDIPLANKO WIDTH OPENINGS 5-114" 6-114" 7-1/4" 7-1/2" B" 8-114" 9-114" 9-112° 12" (exposure) (4) (5} (61 16-1141 16-3/41 i7j {el (e-1/4) (10-3/4) 100 sf 1 SQ 26 21 18 17 16 15 13 73 10 200 sf 2 S4 53 42 35 34 31 30 26 25 20 300 sf 3 SQ 79 63 53 5D dl 45 39 38 29 40Dsf 45i1 705 84 70 fi7 62 60 53 51 39 5DOsf 55Q 131 1115 88 84 78 75 66 64 49 600 sf 6 Sff 158 126 1 D5 101 93 90 79 76 59 7DD sf 7 SQ 184 147 123 118 109 10S 92 89 6$ 800sf 8 SO 210 168 14D 134 124 120 105 1D2 78 90Dsf 9 SQ 236 189 158 151 140 135 118 1'15 88 1000sf 10SQ 263 21D 175 1'68 156 150 131 1'17 98 1100sf 11 SQ 289 231 193 185 171 165 144 1dD 107 1200sf 12 SQ 375 .252 210 202 187 180 158 153 117 1300 sf 13 SQ 341 273 228 218 202 196 171 165 127 1400 sf 1d SD 368 294 245 235 218 210 184 178 137 1500 sf T5 SQ 394 315 263 252 233 225 197 '191 147 1600sf 165ff 420 336 260 269 Z49 240 210 2D4 156 17005f 17 5Q 446 357 298 286 264 255 223 216 186 18DOst 18 5ff 473 378 315 3112 28D 270 236 229 176 1900 sf 19 SQ 499 399 333 319 296 285 249 242 186 200D sf 20 SQ 525 420 350 336. 311 300 263 255. 195 2100 sf 21 SQ 561 .441 368 353 323 34b 276 267 205 220Dsf 22 SC1 576 d62 385 370 342 330 289 280 275 2300sf P3 SQ 6D4 483 d03 3$6 358 345 302 293 225 2400sf 24 SQ 63D 504 420 403 373 360 315 305 234 2500sf 25 SQ 656 525 438 420 389 375 328 318 244 26DOsf 26 SQ 683 ~ 546 455 437 404 390 341 331 254 2700 sf 27 SQ 709 567 473 454 d20 405 354 344 264 2800 sf 28 SQ 735 588 490 4l0 436 420 368 356 273 29045f 295ff 761 609 508 487 451 435 381 369 283 3000 sf 30 S4 788 630 525 504 467 450 394 362 293 i i 4 I ~~ -- ~ aFF IC~PY. 4'~ ~ ~ Rn~E i 3 9 7 E A S E.M E N T ~. .~ :,_.`~~, c c- ~' .~ y ;~ r. - ~. °~O y ~ .~ ~~~~ = = ~. - ~' _ :; w ~~ `J r~ u 4^~ ~~ - _- H~i FOR AND IN GONSIDE&ATION of the•sum of One Dollar 01.00) Dash in hand' paid to it, t}ie receipt of ishioh ie hereby acknowledged', and the benefits to be derived therefrom, Cenan Carp,,. A Flor$da Corgaration does hereby grant and convey to the CITY OF CI=EA$WATEH, FIAHIDA, e.n easement over, under and across the following described land, g an a ng situate, in the County of Pknellss, State of Florida, to wit: That oartian of the following description lying within the S g0 ft, of the N1. 1/4 of 'the 5l4 1/fit of Sea, 22 Tevp, 2e7 Rng. 15 E: Begin 4-DD ft. E of the 5F1 cor. of tYae P~1~~ 1/4 .of the 5',f 1/4 of Sec. 22-2g-15 thence run N 210 ft,, thence E 152 ft., thence S 210 ft,, thence ~1 152 ft. to the Y.O. B,, less existing road. ~` o '•ti ~ ~ • • , i ~CilAT This easement being 1'or right-of-way purposes - The CZTy OF CI.F,AEWATEE, FLO$IDA, shall have the right to enter upon the above descr~hed ~remiees and to constz-uct, fnstall and maintt~in thereon any right of way snd to inspect and alter such -right•of way. Sram time to. time. TN WITNE55 WHEE.EOF, the party hereto has caused ~hese presents to be duly executed by its proper ofPicp~s~thereunto a hazized and ligs~~al to .be hereunto af'f'ixed, this ,~}} ~y of ~..J Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of; ~i T ~ ate/ CENAN GORP, ey t`-: Its Pre id nt ~ ~ / Attest: , A~ ~ ~~ ,L •~ Its -. ~e. retary (Corporate 5ea1} - ~ • ° " ' ' . ,~ .. .~ ~Ii:~i9 i~Ai~ ~ ~ 2ti0~ ~ tit3Ua I~~~~r ~i'~i~~'~AE~T r'u~tiP aY.a L.~•r ~~7~3 ~ . PGE.~~9$ STATF OF FI~QRIDA COUNTY OF .PYNELLAS Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Gerald R. Custer to me we17. known and known to me to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument as, its president _ of the Corporation named In the foregoing instrument, and he •severally acknowledged to and before me that .he• executed said instrument on behalf of and Sn the name of Bald corporation as such officer!; that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation and that it.was off ized thereto by due and regla.lar corporate authority';•that txe is •. duly su~orized by said corporation to execute said Snstrument. and that said instrument is the free act and deed of said corporation. IN WITNE55 WHEREOF I have hereu~ to set my, hand and affixed,_my official seal this~day of • lN4i.~.t,~,~.~ , A.p. 7.~9 •?.N•.~. 1~n • /~ //,7 `1 ' J ~i ~,Ca ...it. ~.{' ~ G Notary' Public •_~. ~- ~3y Commission Expires; ..v' -R7 a;1l:C i7 t:; c aCa]Or AI _s:C! ~d: '._!d ~i'i S:CV i.+P1 x!5 IAN. i5 19:: STATE OF ~~ COUNTY OF ~~~~- Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Gerald F, 'Nihil to me well known and known tp me to ~~e individual. describes in and who executed the foregoing instrument as- its Secretary of the Corporation named in the foreg©1ng instrument, and he severally acknowledged to and before me that [~e. executed said Snstrument an behalf of and in the name of said corporation as such ^fflcer that the seal. aTfiaed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corporatle. end that it was affixed thereto by due and regular corporate authority; that he is duly authorized by sa~'d corporation to execute said instrument and that said instn-~.mez;t is the free ~ict and deed of said corporation. 2N WITNESS 1dHE33E F I have hereunto set m hand and affixed m~ official seal this ~~ day:of , A.D. 1~.~~ .~;~~- ~' Notar Public', ~• ^`~ • ~~~~4 . My commission Expires: N.~ery Pu6licr Sla le o! Florid: a~ LSrelo ~~t,~ ~ "- ~~9U4 1Ny :C.rm:usfen E~ph.n Oel. Z7 I577 ~A p~Y "' °Y ~.mr:.an Fln 6 Cwueity Ca. r , :~ ~r • ~ "YIE1Y 1 • • sw cnrnar o} KW 1/q at SW I, Sec.22-29-15 1N000L:AWN M88 6 (Q N ~~~~ ~~ RO.W. E~semenl south E..ine of the T1W I/4 eT SW }/p F- .~ Sec.22 TWp.29 Rnp.15 E ~ E1 LJ IdJ >r `~ ~_ ~a w C'~ 5 T. .~ . ~ ~ ~- ~ 4~ ~ ~~: ~ ~ :, :~ ~ w ~~ , _., u /l `~~ r !3Q' RIGHT OF WAY_ EAS.EMENT~ IMETES-,.a 60UNDS T!0 _ _ ~ _ 'SEC.22-2S-l5 - ~ '-'----- M.J.G - ... _- , - 1 12/77 ~. +-„ ~ , , _-~ . . ~~~y~~.4~~~ ~ i ~, ~~~~~ ~ASEM$~}T • o.R. 4 '~ ~ ~ P~c~ ~. 3 9 9 FoH AND IN CaNSIDEAATION of the sum of One Dollar 01.00} cash in hand paid to it, the receipt oi' which is hexebp acknowledged, and the benefits to be derived therefrom, Cenan Corp., a Florida Corvoration _ - .-0 `~ .. _ c :a T ~ ~a :n - ti L d .~ ~_ =-+ . _a J r ,r J V ~ - V J J ?'hat portion of the following description lying within the 5 30 ~'t. of the 1•ii! 1/4 of the S.•! 1/~ of Sec. 22 `Iw+p. 29 Eng. 15 ~': 3eging ?1? ft. :Y of the S: cor, of the: Tk?1' 1/4~ of the S1Y 1/4. of Sec. ~2-2q-15 thence run iV 50 ft „ thence TI 239.?I f't,. thence E 50 ft „ thence 5 238,?1 ft. to the P, O. R,, less existing road. :_~ L'] :~ _~ H ~ 4' ~ c:: .. `~ c . Thls easement tieing for ri~gbt_of-waq purposes W The CITY OP CLEElEW9TE8, F;,pg~DA~--skull have the r}.ght to enter upon the above described premise s and to construct, Snstall and maintain thereon any right of way snd to ins ect d °° iC.~ `~ p an alter such right of way frnm time to time. ~ ; 1N WITNk;S3 1,IHEHEOF, the party hereto has caused these presents to be duly esecuted by its r ~ z3 ~ `~ ~~ _ p oper officersy.thereunto authorized and' its ~eal to be kiereunto aSi'ixed, this ~ GG da of ~ '' _, p lq~_• Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence oi': (Corporate Seal.) ~- Y. ' •.~, w. ~4, J~ does hereby grant and convey to the CITY OF CI~E,AEWATEg~ FLO~Ipg~ an easement over„~under and across the following described Iand,. -dying and being situate. in the County of Pinellas, State of Plorida, to wits CENAN COi2.P, By ~, .ts ~ ~ Ps sSdent~ Attests` _ ,:~~ •Its cx-ety y 1 J• ;~ , ~C ^'J ,r ~ ~` i + ..~, _ . _ ~ti ~, ~ ~ ~. Qi ~"t+ T. ~1~ h~ r ~.4 n ^ +: a a'-~4 ~ L; _.°; ~,~ n ~ L' x „~ r ~' .. D.R. 4'~ 9 3 PasE ~ ~ G 0 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINRLI.AS Before me, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared Gerald R. Custer to me well known and known to me to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument as; its President _ ~ ~af the Corporation named in the foregoing~instrllment, axed he 'severally acknowledged to and before me that .he executed said instrument on behal#' of and in the name of said corporation as such officer!; that the seal off ized to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation and that it was affixed thereto by duo and zegular corporate authority; that he 3.s duly authorized by said corporation to execute said instrument and that said instrument is the free act. and deed of said corporation. 1N WITNESS WHEREQi? x have hereunto set my hand and affi~ced._m- ' official seal this .~71~-~`' day of ,~ ~" , ~„D_ ]~9 ~~'• .. • _ _ r _. / ,~. r ~. Notary Public ~ - My Commission Expires: ..._ =7.7 ~L 2r IC 9.T1 ;F °i. d7vA . _ .~•a ~, ~5 }-- _ - ~ ~ ' ®~ '~ . ~ ~'~ ~ ~ .,s ~ ~3 ~~ STATE OF COUNTY OF X~~~lGif-crJ ' Before me, the undersigned suthority~ this day personally appeared Gerald E. Nihil~ tv me Nell known and knoxt~ to me to the individual. described in and saho executed the foregoing instrument as~ its Secretary of the Corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and he severally acknowledged to and before me that he. executed said instrument on behalf of and Sn the name of said corporation as such officer that the sac'! ,?f;.ized to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corparatioi: ~nd~that St xas affixed thereto by due and regular corporate authority; that be is .duly authorized by said corporation to execute said instrument and that said.instrumeat is the free ct and deed of said,.carporetion. • ~.r,~ IN WITN~55 ~3Ir'"f. tE~~ have he=eunto et my nd and .affised m~ official seal this dav. of ~ R.D.. '%9~_. i ~ . .l.~, .. cry Ply Commission Expires: 1ia!ery ?v7•Ce, ,•-,.n ¢f ?]: •:dy d largo ,'Y ~:~rclrl¢n :: is Op. 19, is7Y ~.... an .y Anar na ,F,n ~ G~r~alry Go. • • W F.~ ~~ fir ~a r-! •~ U `el ~ ~~~ ~ ~`~ ~ `~_, O,t i - - 71p' . of the N W !/q e1 S yy 1/4 Sea22 Tvp.29 Anp.l5 E WUQaLAWN S T_ . E cornar of W 1/q of SN ee. 22 - 29-IS i t-.~r r.~ I;Y Q= CLEt,R~:',~,7er. E ~_:'::. 130`R16FiT OF-VJAY -- nTI.'.E• EASEMENT -- ~ME7E5 8 BOUNDS )~_~~-~--~- -- ~SEC. 22- 29-15 '~------ .. • . i. ~ .+ ,~ • • a-- w ~ r~ ,t `~ ~ ~ r-r ~; ~ r ~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~~! / ~ 4~ J { 1n_~ fi ~' , ~~ ! ~ J L ~ !_ ~ Y ~1 ~Po ~U ~ M ~ ~~ -- ~ ~ i {Corporate 5es1} ~, l .. 1 a Its Pre id r,t ~,., Attest: ,~{~ ,iy ~'~ LL{ Lts retarp :• o • Townhomes @ Lake Bellevue (A Workforce Housing Project) Avid Project #: 2596-001 Ct~ of Cle~rw~ter LIFT STATION CALCULATI4I~TS PREPARED BY: C.MI) A VID' Group 2300 CURLEW ROAD, SUITE 100 PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34683 Date: March LI, 2008 °;. Prepared.By: Ri~h'ard;M"T`Q~m`Iru~eIl~~Pr ~~g~~ra • - ,~ ~ ,~; . 15..E L'i~;d '1,t 1[.'yY '• \?+~,' Date: 3 ~ > > "~ ~' ~~~~ ~~R 1 ~ 208 ~~~~a~s~ c~~~:r~r~~r ~~~o>F cam,-~a~~;~' 61859 Florida Registration No. • PROJECT NAME: Townhomes @ Lake Bellevue PROJECT NUMBER: 2596-001 AVERAGE DAILY FLOW DEMAND CHART FLOW DAILY QUANTITY RATE FLOW Residentail (30d GFD per unit) 1.13 300 33,900 TOTAL FOR PROJECT 33,900 GPD ~t~a~s.. ~~ ~'~1~~,"~~ C-~,~~~~,'.,~Ef~T PREPARED BY AVID GROUP K:IPROJECTS125001259600'E1DOC1UtilitieslLiR Station Cakcs125S6001-Lift Station Design_20080201.x1s WRITTEN 6Y; RHP PROJECT NAME: Townhomes @ Lake Bellevue PROJECT NUMBER: 2596-001 PUMPS ON10FF (Proposed. force main will connect to gravity manhale) BOLD INDICATES USER INPUT ITALICS INDICATE CALCULATED VALUES rrvrv- uH-H 1. ENTER AVERAGE DAILY FLOW IN G~'D (ADF) SEE ATTACHED DEMAND CALCULATIONS 2. HOURS OF OPERATION 3. COMPUTE AVERAGE DAILY FLOW IN GPM ADF /HOURS OF OPERATION 4. ENTER PEAK HOUR FACTOR (PHF} USUALLY 3.0 -RANGE 2.5 TO 4.0 5. COMPUTE PEAK FLOW IN GALLON PER MINUTE (ADF (gpm) x PHF) 6. ENTER DESIGN PEAK FLOW IN GALLONS PER MINUTE (DPF) DESIGN Q SHOULD BE >= PEAK FLOW. V > 2.0 ft/sec 7. ENTER MINIMUM PUMP CYCLE TIME IN MINUTES (PCT) USUALLY 10 MINUTES 8. ENTER INSIDE DIAMETER OF WET WELL IN FEET (WD) USUALLY q FEET 9. ENTER DIAMETER OF FORCE MAIN IN INCHES (FMD} ENTER "0" !F ONL Y ONE FM 10. ENTER C FOR FORCE MAIN USE 120 FOR PVC, OR 100 FOR UNLINED IRON OR STEEL PfPE 11. COMPUTE EFFECTIVE LENGTH OF FORCE MAIN FORCE MAIN EFFECTIVE LENGTH 120 SEE TABLE BELOW 21N. 2.5 31N. 41N. 61N. 81N. GROSS LENGTH IN FEET 0 0 0 1050 0 0 NO. OF GATE VALVES 0 0 0 3 0 0 NO. OF 45d ELBOWS 0 0 0 3 0 0 NO. OF 90d ELBOWS 0 0 0 5 0 0 NO. OF REDUCER/INCREASER 0 0 0 0 0 0 NO. OF TEE THRU SIDE OUTLET 0 0 0 0 0 p NO. OF CHECK VALVES 0 0 0 0 0 0 COMPUTE EFFECTIVE LENGTH 0 0 0 1920 0 ~~~II~. p 1~~C~1~+ ~A~ 1 ~ ~00~ ~~A9~t~~"br D~;~~~T~fiENT PREPARED BY AVID GROUP ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~_'~ ~'~~~~~ K:IPROJECTS12500125960011DOCIUtilitieslLift Station CaIcs12596001-Lift Station Design_20080201.x1s WRITTEN BY: RHP 33,900 gpd 24 hours 23.54 gpm 3.0 phf 70.63 gpm 77.00 gpm 10.00 min 4.00 ft FM #1 = 4.00 in FM #2 = 0.00 in 12. ENTER HIGH POINT ELEVATION OF FORCE MAIN (Assumed 1.5` below proposed grade elevation at highest point in run ELEV. = 51.00) 12A EFFECTIVE HEAD (IN FEET} AT POINT OF CONNECTION (pressure head (D) ~- fm elev (48.5} = 48.5) 13. COMPUTE STATIC HEAD IN FEET (SH) HIGH POINT' !N FOl4CE MAIN -PUMP OFF ELEVATION 14. ENTER MINIMUM RUN TIME IN MINUTES (MRT) USUALLY 2 MINUTES, ABSOLUTE MINIMUM fS 1 MINUTE 15. COMPUTE MINIMUM SUMP VOLUME (SV) (AS A FUNCTION OF CYCLE TIME & PUMP RATE (PCT/2 x DPF/4)) 16. COMPUTE AS A FUNCTION OF MIN RUN TIME (MRT x DPF) 17. COMPUTE STORAGE FOR ONE FOOT OF DEPTH 18. COMPUTE REQUIRED MlN. STORAGE (RMS) 19. COMPUTE MINIMUM PUMP CYCLE TIME 20. COMPUTE CYCLE TIME FOR AVERAGE FLOW 21. ENTER INCREMENTS OF Q 22. COMPUTE PUMP SYSTEM CURVE • ~~-~~~. ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ 7oa~ ~LAA~IN~a•9C ~~~!r~T.~ENT ~6I~1 ~~ ~~ ~`."`!y! ~~~~ FORCE MAIN VEL(]CITY TART 1= 48.50 ft 48.5(1 ft 13.74 ft 2.00 min. 96.25 gal 154.00 gal 94.01 gal 1.64 ft 16.00 min 9.42 min 5 4.0 INCH F.M. 0.0 INCH F.M. Static TOTAL TDH Q { m) DH (ft) V {ftlsec) DH (ft) V (ft/sec) Head TDH {ft) 0 0. DO 0.00 0.000 0.00 13.74 13.74 57 3.51 1.49 O.ODO 0.00 13.74 17.24 62 4.10 1.62 0.000 0.00 13.74 17.83 67 4.73 1.75 0.000 0.00 13.74 1$.47 72 5.40 1.88 0.000 0. DO 13.74 19.14 77 6.12 2.01 0.000 0.00 13.74 19.86 82 6.$7 2.14 0.000 0.00 13.74 20.61 87 7.67 2.27 0.000 0.00 13.74 21.41 92 8.50 2.40 0.000 0.00 13.74 22.24 97 9.38 2.53 O.OOD 0.00 13.74 23.12 102 10.30 2.66 O.D00 O.OD 13.74 24.03 ELEVATION CHART 23. TOP OF WETWELL 24. TOP OF VALVEBOX 25. INLET INVERT 26. HIGH LEVEL ALARM 27. SECOND PUMP ON 28. FIRST PUMP ON 29. PUMPS OFF 30. BOTTOM OF WETWELL. 49.00 MUST BE ABOVE 25-YR STORM 49.00 MUST BE ABOVE 25-YR STORM 37.90 37.40 SHOULD BE LOWER THAN INLET INVERT 36.90 HIGH LEVEI ALARM - 4.50' 36.40 SECOND PUMP ON - 0.50' 34.76 32.76 PUMP OFF - 2.0' (PREFERRED) PREPARED BY AVID GROUP K\PROJECTS12500525960011DOC1UfilitieslLift Station Calcs12596001-Lift Station Design_20080201.xis WRITFEN BY RHP . - ®~~ - --~~wrt~wme -_ • - - ,~ ~ • P~~~®~M,AN~~ Cl~IRVES Mani PR~JECfi: GSM: TDH: OFF: HP: CHK'D, ~ATE:'~ry ~ OpDL6~ .5S 'I OODL61.5 (3 HP) Synchronous Speed: 1800 RPM 4 Ineh Discharge 3^ 60 e 54 20 a ~ a~i can A~6 = w m u ~ ~ 30 m - 10 ~' 20 10 d o .:.. •,: .,;Y .a, ~. ~; .. m .. 3: ~' o '. 3.y, n,. - , c, a? C L.. • o. 1 . ~' 0 .:`.:; (7 5d i d0 150 200 25d 300 35d ':;; ~~! Capaoiry USGFM ~ - ~~~~~~• ~~~ i°~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~I~BIdB~^,G i~:~ENT ~81~1 ~r ~~``~~~ ~"t~l? • • PROJECT NAME: Townhomes @ Lake Bellevue PROJECT NUMBER: 2596-001 LIFT STATION BOUYANGY CALCULATIONS DENSITY: ~- WATER = 112 62.40 Ibs/cf FIBERGLASS = 113 50.00 Ibs/cf SOIL = 114 100.00 Ibs/cf CONCRETE = 115 150.00 Ibs/cf LIFT STATION: A INSIDE DIAMETER = 117 4.00 ft B WALL THICKNESS 118 1.00 in C BOT. SLAB THICKNESS = 11s 1.00 in E BOT. SLAB DIAMETER = 120 5.00 ft TOP SLAB THICKNESS = 121 1.00 in G TOP SLAB DIAMETER = 122 4.50 ft OPENING HATCH AREA= 123 6.00 sf ELEVATIONS GROUND ELEVATION = 126 49.00 ft TOP SLAB ELEVATION = 127 49.00 ft BOTTOM SLAB ELEVATION = 128 32.76 ft HIGH WATER TABLE ELEV. = 129 49.00 ft WEIGHT OF WATER DISPLACED W =VOLUME OF LS BELOW HIGH WATER TABLE x DENSITY 223 X 62.40 = 13,918 Ibs VOL OF LS = ((T129-T128)*((T118/12)+(T117/2})^2+(T119/12)'(T120/2)^2)'3.14159 WEIGHT OF LIFT STATION: W =BOTTOM SLAB WEIGHT + TOP LID WEIGHT + WALL WEIGHT 82 + 41 + 863 987 Ibs BOT SLAB WT = ({(T120/2}^2) 3.14159"(T119/12})*T113 TOP LID WT = ({((T122/2)^2)*3.14159*(T121/12))'T113)-T123*T121/12*T1 i3 WALL WT = ({(T 117/2+T118/12) "2)-(7117/2j"2) *(T 127-T121/12-T128} * T? 13 *3.14 959 WEIGHT OF OVER-BURDEN (V~}: W ~~,~ =WEIGHT OF SOIL BELOW WATER TABLE -WEIGHT OF WATER 9, 742 - 6, 079 = 3, 663 Ibs WEIGHT OF CONCRETE BALLAST: AMOUNT OF CONCRETE REQUIRED= 4.00 cy WEIGHT = 16,200 Ibs WT OF SOIL = (((T120/2)^2)-(T117/2+Ti18/i2}^2)'3.14159*T1 i4 *(T129-7128) WT OF WATER = (((T120/2)^2)-(T117/2+T1181i2}^2)*3.14159"T112 *(T129-T128)~~~~~~yy ~~ ~dh~ ~ cZ ~UU~ PREPARED BY AVIQ GROUP ~- ~ ^ENT ~~N~ G~~P~ K:IPROJECTS12500125960091DOC1UtiiitieslLift Station CaIcs12596Q01-Lift Station Design_20080201 ~~q~ ~¢i:' ~~~ • • Total Upward Pressure = Total Downward pressure = SAFETY FACTOR = NOTE: Downward weights of pumps, pipes and grouts are ignored. G I, ,I 49.00` Dimensions A 4.00 ft ~ A B 1.00 in ' C 1.00 in B ~ ~ Vi', D D 16.24 ft F E 5.00 ft F 16.32 ft ~, G 4.50 ft 32.7fi' C Wet Well Diagram 13,918 Ibs 20,850 Ibs 1.50 t~ ~vy° r ~`~,~ Jcav ~A~ PREPARED BY AVID GROUP K:\PFtOJECTS12500125960011DOC\UtilitieslLift Station CaIcs12596001-Lift Station Design_20080201.x15 wRirreN ev: RHP • • - ~C)~v.N~IOMES @ LAKE ~ELLEVtTE ~A ~v®RKk'~-RCE ~~US~NG ~'1~C~QTECrT~ ~~LEAR~VV.A'~'E~, FL®DA y~1~OL®GIC AN~AL~SIS ®F T'I3E FF`~P~SED `yATER SY~'~Ely~i DESIGNED USING: WATERCAD V7.4 BY HAESTAD METHODS, INC. Prepared by Avid Group 2300 Curlew ~o~d Fal~ ~I~rbor, Floricl~ 34b~3 Phone: (727}789-9500 Fax: (727} 784-6662 .A _ ~ eo ~i o `~ ~ `°g ~= ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ K:\PROJECTS\2500\259600I\DOC1Utilities\WaterCA:D\2596001-WaterCAD Cover.doc Townhomes @ Lake Bellevue (A Workforce Housing Project) Clearwater, Flarida Table of Contents Part A- General Information City of Clearwater Hydrant Flow Results ........................................................................... 1 Part S- Hydrologic Analysis -Fire Flow Model Pipe/Junction Schematic ..................................................................................................... 2 Pump Report ....................................................................................................................... 3 Junction Report ................................................................................................................... 5 Pipe Report .......................................................................................................................... 6 ~~ w ~~ a ~ ~~ _ G~2 ~' ~ ~ ~ ~~'. Q ~.. '~ . t r' t. i r~~, , . r i . .T .d .- ~%; ~.. 4 ;1. 4~~ Ric~h'rd M.°`T'o~~ell, P.E;- . ~`.` ~; FL Reg No .61859 - .. ~f ~'triid~f ~'31~~'~~ • • PART A GENERAL INFORIVIA'I'ION ~~ ® ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ c~ ~' ~~ ~ ~© ~v g 1H/61/2007 08:06 7275624961 PUBLIC UTILITIES PAGE 63 F~L~1~I' TAT CITY OF CLEARWATER WATER ~1EPARTMEhIT L,C~CAT~CtM cj~~ !/~-'~V~{~'W~V ~~. O~4TE QP TEST 3T~.TfC• E~7 PS[ RESfDUAI.~ PS1 / PITOT ~~ PSl ~ FL.DW ~ ~ C~,F'M ~, B-IYQRA,MT # D~ GRI®# .~ ~lIfSC: ~-~ ~~ / ~~ ~!~ ~- CUST'~E~9EFt FtEQI~ESTING TESL' ~- ~~ uu ~ r; ©o ``` c 'i' 9 ~ ~~, ~ ~~ `~ G..3 --- ~, . .... .---- ;. __.`•~T.A~G _.._..._......_-.......-~----~--------- _._._....._... ..._-._...--~---~-- a~1 ~~("ti_`T'~I~- -- 17'7%l,h"~ c , rr`'* --- -- -- ~~ ~ .._.... - ((,° ~l I . - ... -. i . .~ ~~ ~ ~ ._._._ ..~.~` iv` .'• \--C.L~ 1. ~(.A-~. l'~~• ~ ~ :~ ~ _ 111~..'v~ - _._. ., fE _ // ~ ...,_ ... .... .. ... ..._ .. ~ - ~ ~,~ ~r.l °r[ ~ `~ ° 1 ,I~ f 1 ~ - . f t ~~ r~ - __.._. ~ ~ = ~`'Jt~'.C'~'}G%~iN_-tl•...'~ .lid' '~' ._.. ._... - -- ~ 1 ii.~ i .~. 1 - ~. ~ / - ~. i~ _ . _ ._.: - / ~ L~ _ 'fir[ //// . _.___ 1 ~ . - -- ---.... ..... ............ :~ _ _ j• ._ ~~ t r- ~- _ /// I ~ i.L. i ... - - ~+ a .. i' _.. - I _,_ ,-, ~ ~ ~. - ~, -~ ~ . . . ~ -. .. V - I~ _. ... ~. ~.V L . . ~ f ~ 1 .. . _._-... .__.. ~ f _ _ ->. ~ ~ ~ I f ~~ ;- y d -, ~ - ' .~ r J ~ ~' L~ ~ _ ___ _. W..., ... ..- - _. - -._ .... - ~ i ^, , ~~ - - - - _ ~ 1. _ -- ~ c:~ ~~ ~-~~ ~ ' ;~`, _. ti ,`9, ~.. _ ... ~ E ~ _. ___ i..... .. -. ._.. - .. - ... _ . - ..- - - .. _. - _. -. .. _.~ i - ~~ r~ } -. _ L _ d - - p I~ r ~ ` -.......... .. ._. _. -..... . - - .-. ..._- ` '~ ~.Ta -I• _. _. ..... - VVV V ~ I -~. . ~. ~_ 12~, q ~T U ~~c GSM ~ _... 103. ~ ~~ ~ Il~v G,PN1 _ _ _ _.. __ .. _ • PART B HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS Fire Flow Model ~~ ~ ~ ~i t eia w' CV ~`~ iy 'kd ~ 1 Scenario: Base r, y ysi .:.: 3-! '. 3: `n~h ~(~~i ~el~ (I - S\~ f, 3 9 ~, y `. ~C~'' ~~ ~~ ~°°~:t:'~r,~~~ ~'. it 1 ~ ' ~„- ~~'_ .~ . Title: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue °} ~"' k:1_.lwatercad1206 8 0 2 0 1_watercad_2596001.wcd Avid Engineering 02/11!08 03:57:03 PM O Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1_203-755-'1666 r - ~!-c'__--_-~_ ~ _ _ I I _~; ~j :~; 1}' -- _ a>. . ...,; - ,y '.... ~ r, ~ I~ i I P i i ~~ r" 1~1 ~ pl1a i<+ I ! I Project Engineer: Richard Tommell WaterCAD vZ0 X07.00.027.00] Rage 1 of 1 • • Detailed Report for Pump: PMP-7 Note:. The input data may have been modified since the last calCUlation was performed. The calculated results may be outdated. Scenario Summary Scenarie Base Active Topology Alternative Base-Ackive Topology 'Physical Altemative Base-Physical Demand Alternative Base-Demand Initial Settings Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Operational Age Altemative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Constituent Trace Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Ftow Alternative Base-Fire Fiow Capital Cost Alternative Base-Capital Cost Energy Cost Alternative Base-Energy Cost User Data Alternative Base-User Data Global Adjustments Summary <None> Roughness <None> Geometric Summary X 5,517.02 ft Upstream Pipe P-3B Y 5,OOR.73 ft Downstream Pipe P-51 Elevation 0.00 ft Pump Definition Summary Pump Definition Eastern Connection Inikial Status Initial Pump Status On Initial Relative Speed Facto 1.00 Calculated Results Summary Time Control Intake Discharge Intake Discharg~ischarg~umpRelativeCalculated (h r) Status Pump Pump Pump Pump (gpm) Head Speed Water Grade Grade PressurePressure (ft} Power {ft) (ft) lPsi) (Psi) (HP) 0.00 N!A N/A NIA N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A NIA 160. 140. 120. .0 100. u $0. 60. 40. 20. 0. 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0 2000.0 Discharge (gpm} 2500.0 ua ~ P.t ` ~8 ~. ' ~ ~ ~ + G:1 ` ~,J f~~% ~ ' ~? ~ a ~~ Title: T©wnhomes at Lake Bellevue Project Engineer: Richard Tornmell K~1...lwatercatl\20080201_watercad_259fi001 .wcd Avid Engineering WatarCAp v7.0 [07.00.027.00] 02/11/08 04:47:31 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-~?03-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 3 Pump Head Curve ' PMP-1 {Relative Seeed Factor = 1 nrn Detailed Report for Pump: PMP-2 Note: The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed. The calculated results mey be outdated. Scenario Summary Scenario Base Active Topology Altemative Base-Active Topology Physical Alternative Base-Physical Demand Alternative Base-Demand Initial Settings Altemative Base-Initial Settings Qperational Alternative Base-Operational Age Altemative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Constituent Trace Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Base-Fire Flow Capital Cost Alternative Base-Capital Cost Energy Cost Alternative Base-Energy Cost User Data Alternative Base-User Data Glohal Adjustments Summary <None> Roughness cNone> Geometric Summary X 5,132.03 ft Upstream Pipe pmt Y 5,OD2.62 ft Downstream Pipe p~2 Elevation 0.00 ft Pump Definition Summary Pump Definition Western Connection Initial Status Initial Rump Status On Initial Relative Speed Facto 1.00 Calculated Results Summary Time Control Intakepischarge Intake Discharg~ischargd'umpRelativeCalculated (hr) Status Pump Pump Pump Pump (gpm) Head Speed Water Grade Grade PressurePressure (ft) Power (ft) (ft) (Psi) (Psi} (HP) 0.00 NIA NIA N/A N!A NIA NIA NIA N/A N/A 160. 140. 120. .0 100. v $0. 60. 40. 20. 0. ~ ~ ~ o ~l ~' ~ '~ ~ ~. ~: 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0 2000.0 2500.0 Discharge ; (gPm) Title: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue Project Engineer: Richard 7ommell k:1...\watercad120480241 watercad 259600i.wcd Avid Engineering VVate~rCAD v7.0 [47.00.027.00] 02!11108 04:x7:55 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road 1 ANaterbury, GT 06708 USA +1-203-755-166& Page 1 of i y ~ Pump Head Curve PMP-2 (Relative Soeed Far-.tnr- _ ~r nn~ Scenario: Base Steady State Analysis Junction Report Labol Elevatio (ft} n Zon© Type Base Flow (gpm) Pattern Demand Calculated (gPm) Calculated ydraulic Grad (ft) Pressure (psi} Blow-Off 50.00 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0,00 177 47 55 15 Blowoff 2 50.OD Zone Demand 0 00 Fixed . , elowoff 3 52.00 Zone Demand . 0 00 Fixed QOD 162.13 48.51 Hydrant 52.00 Zone Demand . 0 00 Fixed D.00 182.36 56.4D Hydrant 51.00 Zone Demand . O DO Fixed 0.00 185.32 57.68 Hydrant 51.00 Zone Demand . 792.00 Composite 0.00 175,32 53.79 Hydrant 52.00 Zone Demand 0 00 Fixed 792.00 160.04 47.18 Hydrant 52.00 Zone Demand . 0 00 Fixed D.DO 176.63 ' 53.92 Hydrant 5LOD Zone Demand . 0 04 Fixed 0.00 180.53 55.61 Hydrant 54.00 Zone Demand . 0 00 Fixed 0.00 180.42 56.00 J-2 49.OD Zone Demand , 0 00 Fixed D.00 184,28 5fi.37 J-3 44.00 Zone Demand . 0 00 Fixed D.00 184.28 58.53 J-4 44.00 Zone Demand . 0 00 Fixed O.OD 180.56 59.D8 J-5 45.00 Zone Demand . 0 00 Fixed O.DO 179.86 58.78 J-7 44.50 Zone Demand . 0 00 Fixed D.OD 177.47 57.31 J-8 45.00 Zone, Demand . 0 00 Fixed 0.00 176,63 57.17 J-g 44.Op Zone Demand . 4 00 Fixed 0.00 174.28 55.93 J-1 D 44.25 Zone Demand , 0 00 Fixed 0.00 162.13 51.11 J-12 49.00 Zone Demand . 0 00 Fixed O.DD 162.13 51.p0 J-13 45.00 Zone Demand . 0 00 Fixed 0.04 162.13 48.94 J-14 45.00 Zone Demand . 0 00 Fixed 0.00 176.36 5fi.83 J-15 45.00 Zone Demand . 0 00 Fixed 0,00 180.41 58.58 J-17 43.00 Zone Demand . 0 00 Fixed 0.00 182.36 59.43 J-18 44.00 Zone Demand . 0 00 Fixed 0.00 180.42 59.46 J-19 44.00 Zone Demand . O pO Fixed 0.60 185.32 61.14 J-25 45.00 Zone Demand . D 00 Fixed 0.00 185.62 61.27 J-27 44.50 Zone D emand . 0 00 Fixed D.OD 175.32 56.38 . D.00 180.53 58.85 ~r~ ~ ^x, ~ ~ r ~y p'~ 4~t ~~, a~ ~~~ ~` t~ c; ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ r ~~ .,~. ,~ _~ Title; 7 ownhomes at Lake Bellevue Project Engineer: Richard Tommeli k:1...lwatercad120080201 wafercad 2596001.wcd Avid Engineering WaterCAD v7,0 [07.00.027.00] 02/11/08 D4:46:22 PM O Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-168fi Page 1 of 1 Scenario: Base Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Labe l length (ft} iamete {in} iNaterla l Hazen- William C Gheck Valve? Minor Loss oeffrcien Contro Sfafus l ischarg {gpm} pstream Struct >-iydraulic Grade {f1) wnstream Structu Hydraulic Grade (ft} ressur Pipe Headlos (ft) e Headloss Gradient {ft/10DOft) P-3 228.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 1.15 NIA NIA NIA N/A NIA NIA P-6 232,00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 0.00 NIA NIA N/A N!A NIA N/A P-11 202.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 1.15 NIA NIA NIA NiA N/A NIA P-14 41.00 6.0 PVC 13D.D false 0.00 NIA N/A N/A NIA NIA N/A P-15 iDAO 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 0.35 NIA N/A N!A NIA NIA NIA P-16 81.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 1.28 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA P-25 25.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 0.35 NIA N1A NIA NIA NIA N/A P-32 5.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false i.47 NIA NIA N!A NIA NIA NIA P-33 6.00 6.0 PVC 130,0 false 1,47 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA P-35 8.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 1.47 NIA NIA N!A NIA N/A N/A P-37 5.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 1,47 NIA N/A NIA N/A NIA N/A P-38 1.OD 60.D PVC 130.4 false 0.00 N1A N/A NIA NIA NIA N/A P-40 6.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 1.47 N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A NIA P-41 1.00 60.0 PVC 130.0 false 0.00 NIA NIA N(A NIA N1A NIA P-42 11.00 6,0 PVC 130.D false 0.00 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIR NIA P-44 43.00 6.0 PVC 130,0 false 0.80 N/A NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA - P-45 9.00 6.0 PVC 130.0. false 1.47 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA P-46 40.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 1.82 NIA N/A NIA NIA N(A NIA P~17 74.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 0.59 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA N/A P-48 183.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false O.DO NIA NIA N!A NIA NIA N/A P-49 36.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 1.28 NIA N/A NIA NIA NIA N/A P-5D 16.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false O.DO NIA NIA NlA N1A NIA NIA P-51 17.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 0.18 NIA N/A NIA NIA N/A NIA P-52 20.00 6.0 PVC 130.D false 0.18 N/A NIA N1A N/A N/A NIA P-53 221.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false D.99 NIA NIA NIA N/A N/A NIA P-54 80.D0 6.0 PVC 13D.0 false 1.47 N!A N!A NIA NIA NIA N/A P-55 118.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 1.82 N1A NIA NIA NIA N/A NIA P-56 187.00 6.6 PVC 130.0 false 2.27 N/A NIA N/A N/A NIA NIA P-57 56.DD 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 0.54 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA P-58 1 92.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 2.32 NIA NIA N!A N!A NIA NIA P-59 62.00 6.0 PVC 130.0 false 0.00 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA N/A ~ ~. r-; ~ O ~ . ,ry ~ • a F ~y ..Ty ' ~ t ^ L r ~ v V. ~~ '"° 4~ °:i~: ~ ~= `.~ C? Title: Townhgmes at Lake Bellevue Project Engineer: Richard Tommell k:\._\watercad120D8020i watercad_2596001.wcd Avid Engineering WaterCAD v7.0 [07.00.027.D0j 02!71108 04:46:42 PM _ C9 Haestad Methods, Ina. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1_203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 r„ STORM QRAIN TABULATION FORM ENG/NEER/NG Per F.D.O.T. Drainage Manual, Volume 2, Figure 1o-tt DATE: 09112!08 PRpJECT: Townhpmes n Lako Bellevue AVID PRpJECT Np.: 2596.001 '71 swq i..~>, ~ Fvi O a"'~j OD m COUNTY: Pinollas BY: CMD BAR- DRAINAGE z ELEV. OF H.G. HYpRAUUC NOTES 2 RELS AREA (ACRES) Z Z 3 u CROWN ELEV. Z PHYSICAL ZONE 6 -FREQUENCY ID VR lOCA710N a ~ w ~ C= O.UU J p ~ ~ Z Z Z FLOWLINE ELEV. -- ^ OF ~ LL~ O x C= 0.20 F _ U Z LL O ~ V ~ ~ u ~ y UPPER END cJ O U a w C7 C= 0.96 ~ a 0 0 0 U `~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ rn ~ a~ ~ ~ w INCRE SUB- m U ~ ~ ~ uwi r ~ ~~ ~ ~ w na i 0 z a w MAT O ~ a a LL STATION DIST S m ~ ~ TO J MENT TOTAL ~ ~ t- ~ ? ? ~ ~ U ? w LL. . ~ w ~ w w ~ n = cn > ~ U U REMARKS I 0.60 0.60 0.00 46.09 4G.D6 0.00 18 0.16% ?.60 4.59 G D10-1 rG.s FA 1 0.00 G.17 0.03 10.7 0.0 7.28 0.83 4.59 3300 A0.50 0.0.50 0.00 RCP 0.10% 2.04 3.61 0.6G 0.61 0.60 39.OU 39.D0 i:i i~ O.Ot2 ~i:Ea i~i: ~6~5i:: ~i: :5i~i: i:5 1 U-OD O.OG OA4 49.iG 40.09 0.07 18 0.16% 2.6p 4.6U U D70.2 rrc~a PA 4"t D.06 G.17 D.03 10.7 U.0 7.29 0.63 4.60 48.41 44.30 44.50 3.8U RCP E.84% 19.19 33.92 zwo•~c D10-I 0.10 D.51 Qfi0 42.60 39.UG ~~ i~ 0.042 :!:i:?:':i: :: a:?:::i: :?:i:i'i:.: I 0.60 QOG 0.00 ' 46.19 x6.16 0.03 18 0.11 % 2.17 3.83 0 D1 D-3 ^,~- Iniel M 29 0.09 G.11 0.02 10.6 0.1 7.31 0.52 3.83 A9 a i 44.50 44:30 0.20 RCP 0.69 % 5.3fi 9.46 _ _ _ 01U-[ U.2U 0.51 0.50 43.UU 42.80 i:i~i~i~ 0.012. :1;:!1;1:1; pi;i;d:i;ip ;f;f~iEii~i 1 U.UD 0.00 0.00 43,22 46.19 0.03 18 0.04% 1,29 2.28 0 D70.4 wr~i ai 71 0.00 G.G3 0.01 10.3 0.3 7.40 0.31 2.28 49.41 44.72 44.50 0.22 RCP ~ 0.31 % 3.59 6.35 0103 D.00 0.31 0.30 x3.22 439G is i= 0.012 :1:::::?:i: :::?:.:ias :?:i:iasis 1 0.00 0.00 0:00 46.2'! 45.22 O.Od 18 0.00% 0,31 0.55 D D10-5 V'Inler M 41 0.02 O.D2 0.00 10.0 0.2 7.47 0.07 0.55 49.02 44.85 44.72 0.13 RCP 0.32% 364 fi.43 D1d-4 O.U7 0.07 0.97 43.35 43.22 5i is 0.012 :i:i:i:i:i: :i:i:i:i:!: :i:i:i:i:i: 1 D.UD DAp 0,90 46.5E 46.22 0.3fi 10 0.46% 3.21 9.75 U Df0.6 vG M 78 0.01 4A~1 0.00 10.0 0.3 7.47 D23 1.75 49.30 44.98 44.05 0.93 PVC 1.19% 5.20 2.64 D10-4 G24 G.2A 0.23 44.15 43.22 :: i~ 0.011 :1'88::1: ~J:::: i::: :E:::=:~:i: . 1 O.D6 6.00 0.00 46.14 4fi.09 0.01 18 0.65% 5,22 9.23 0 011-1 P.ES M 1 0,00 U.31 OA6 10.7 0.0 7.26 1.27 9.23 3900 39.50 39.50 0.00 RCP 0-10% 2.04 3.61 O.UU 1.23 1.21 3b.00 38.00 i i i~ 0.012 ;:; r;i;:; i: :i; i; i;!`i; ;i; i:i;i: 1 U.dO 0,00 0.00 x6.11 46.1p 0.02 30 0.04% 1.89 9.28 0 D11.2 Typea PA 42 6.02 0.31 0.06 10.5 0.2 7.32 1.27 9.28 4B.?6 40.60 40.50 0.10 RCP 0.24% 4.41 21.63 2~Wii~q 011-4 U.OG 1.23 1.21 38.10 3(5.00 i:E is 0.012 ?i:i:i: i:` :i: i:i`:i? ?i!i"::?:, I 0.00 O,Op 0.00 46.11 40.11 0.00 3U 0.00% 0.15 0.74 0 Dtt-s rvr~a M 37 U.U6 U.00 O.U1 107 0.1 7.28 0.10 0.74 4920 4070 40.60 OJO RCP 0.32% 5.16 25.31 2'JJinc D11-2 6AG 099 0.09 38.20 3E5.10 ~ 0.012 ?i?i~5i:i: :i:E:i:i:i: :S::E:9:? 'I U.UO 0,00 0.00 46.11 45.11 0.00 3U 0.00% 0.00 0:00 U D11.4 Mri PA 91 D.00 6.U0 0.00 10.3 0.4 7.39 O.DO 0.00 49.15 40.85 40.7D 0.15 RCP 0.16% 3.69 18.09 P11-3 U.00 O,GG 0.00 38.35 38.20 ~= is 0.012 ;`;i;:;8i; ;i;:;i;i=:; `;i;:;i;i; - 1 OAO 6.00 0.00 46.11 4G.11 0.00 3U 0.00% 0.00 0.00 G Dti-5 F.E a. NI d9 0.00 G.GO 0.00 10.0 0.3 7.47 0.00 0.00 39A0 40.90 40.85 0.05 RCP 0.19% 2.90 14.23 01f-4 0.00 O,DG 0.00 38.40 38.35 is is 0.012 ??p!:i;i:i? `?i;i~l;i; =i~,i;:;i;i' 1 U.UG O.OG 0.00 48.21 48.11 0.10 24 0.11 % 2.59 8.12 0 D91.6 htr~i Po1 98 0.00 0.23 0.05 10.5 0.1 7.35 1,11 8.12 48,96 43.85 46.10 3.75 RCP 426% _ 16.15 50.73 U3'I.2 G.OD 1.D6 1.06 4'1.85 38.1D is 5 0.012 is?;!;!; i;i '.;!;S>i:i !; i:::: ;'~: 1 O.UO O.OG 0.00 aG.2G 45,21 0.05 18 0.09% 1.9D 3.36 U' D1t•7 ti^Initt P.9 6G 4.U4 0.12 0.02 10.1 0.2 7.44 0.45 3.36 48.20 43.80 43.35 0.45 RCP 0.75% 5,59 9.68 Dt l-G D.2G 0.44 0.43 42.30 41.85 i'i:i-i~ 0.012 ;;;;;;;;;;; ;;;iji;i[:; ;:'; 9;;;as 1 U.OD 0.0G 0.00 4627 46.26 0.00 18 0.02% 0.80 1.42_ 0 D11.8 ^/° In~br M 32 fi.08 0.08 0.02 10.0 0.1 7.47 0.19 1.42 49.26 44.00 43.80 0.20 RGP 0.63 % 5.10 9.0? U1'I.7 U.18 0.10 0.17 4'2.5U 42.30 i~5i i~ 0.012 ~i`~i;i~i: Eti'-:111:1: :?~?i'?:?`i 1 U.UD OAG 0.00 48.28 48,27 0.01 18 0.02% 0.80 1.42 U D11.9 ^J' InIeI M y0 0.08 6.G6 0.0? 10.0 0.4 7.47 O. f 9 1.42 49.26 43.60 43.35 0.25 RGP 0.28 % 3.40 fi.01 D11-G 0.18 0,16 0.17 4210 41.65 :~i:i:8 OAt2 :i'~: i~i~i i'~ :i: i~i:i; - 1 O.UO 0.00 0.60 45.27 46.2E 0.06 18 0.18% 2.73 4,63 0 D11-10 ^v Infer Al 33 D 63 G.14 0.02 10.3 0.1 7.38 0.65 4.83 49.26 43.60 43.60 0.20 RCP 0.61 % 5.03 8.88 011-9 0.26 0.65 0.63 a'L.36 42.10 ri~i~i~ 4.Of2 :i:E, i; i::~ ~: i::~::::: ::'.:'.:?:?'-: 1 0.00 O.U4 0.00 A6.32 48.27 0.05 18 0.07 % 1.65 2.92 0 D11-N vG PA 78 D_O7 0.08 0.02 10.1 0.2 7.43 0.39 2.92 46.50 44.60 43.80 0.80 RGP 1.03°!0 6.54 11.56 D11-10 0-2D Q.36 0.38 43.'IU 42.36 :~ i~ 0.012 ;:;:fi;Ji; jijij ipi;ij jij:;i: i; ij 1 0-OU 0.4G 0.00 46A4 45.32 0.12 tU 4.29% 2.56 1.40 0 D71.12 'rG PA 42 0.01 0.41 D.00 10,0 0.1 7,47 0,19 1.40 48.95 43.13 42.fi8 OA5 PVC 1.07% 4.93 2.69 D11-G 0.19 0.19 0.19 42,30 41.05 5 is 0.011 ~5 1 U.UO O.OD 0.00 46.47 46.21 0,2fi 10 0.36% 2.85 1.55 0 D11.13 'ro M 73 0.02 0.42 0.00 10.6 0.3 7.47 0.21 1.55 45.00 43.88 43.13 0.75 PVC 1.03% 4.83 2.63 Dii-12 U.21 0.21 0.20 x3.05 42.30 i'~i i~ 0.011 ;i;:; i;I;i; ;i; i;i;i;E:, '1[1;1;1:.:; Page 1 °Y? ~_ ~~ ~ ~~ R"' ~ ~:J PV ~: rrf m ~ ~ --~ STORM DRAIN TABULATION FORM ENG/VEER/NG Per F.D.O.T. Drainage Manual, Volume 2, Figure 10-11 DATE: D3112lOfi PROJECT: Townhomes Cu? Lako Bollovutt AVID PROJECT NO.: 2596.001 COUNTY: Pinellas BY: CMD BAR- DRAINAGE 2 ELEV. OF H.G. HYDRAULIC NOTES z RELS AREA (ACRES) c~.7 z 3 LL CROWN ELEV. z PHYSICAL ZONE 6 -FREQUENCY 14 YR LOCATION ~ ~ a ~ 0 = O.Op ~ p ~ ~ z ~ z FLOW LINE ELEV. OF ~ LL F O z C= 0.20 H ~ z LL~ ~ U ~ O N UPPER END o O v ' a w c9 C= 0.90 ~ aa O O ~ O U W z ~ ~ a a ~ cn w v v ~ a ~ ~ ~ w INCRE- _ SUB- m U ~ ~ r n F F F LL J W w a b ~ o ~ W MAT O ~ a a LL STATION DIST S ~ ~ ~ TO J MENT TOTAL N ~ ~ ~ ~ $ r0 Or V ? w ~- ~ w ~ w uQ. LL n = h > ~!- V U REMARKS 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.33 46". 11 0.21 24 0.18 % 3.29 10.34 (1 D11.21 'rypr,q M 119 0.03 (125 0.05 11.3 p,7 7,14 1,45 10.34 18.241 45.05 39.30 5.75 RCP 4.83% 17.19 54.02 zvviru D11-2 0.18 t a3 1.a0 43.45 37.30 E 0.012 - E E `:: E :'E=:=:: :'; :=i E 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.34 16,33 0.02 78 0.06"/, 1.61 2.85 (1 D11.22 ^M Iola: h1 29 0.06 0.05 0.01 10.0 0.1 7.47 0.38 2.85 4H25 44.75 44.55 0.20 RCP 0.69% 5.36 9.48 DII-21 0.38 0.38 0.37 43.25 43,05 : 'i 0,012 :iEii=i 1111'1 ii 1111 1 0.00 QOa 0.00 46.38 46.33 0.05 24 0.071 2.03 6.39 0 D11.23 'ryaF M HO 0.03 0.76 0.03 11.1 0.2 7.19 0.89 6.39 4H.4fi 39.75 39.30 0.45 RCP 0.56% 5.87 18.43 2-Wing D11-21 0.29 0,87 0.86 37.75 37.34 ~i:i~i~i 0.012 .~ i~i~i~ ~ i~i ~ ~i~i 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.42 0.00".38 0.04 24 0.03 % 1.38 4.34 0 D11.24 n+H M 123 0.00 11.73 0.03 10.8 0.3 7.28 0.60 4.34 40:30 40.80 39.75 1.05 RCP 0.85% 7.23 22.70 DII-23 0.00 0.58 0.57 38.80 37.75 I;i i' 0.012 ,; 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.47 46,12 0.06 7E 0.04% 1.30 2.30 _ 0 D11.25 v°Inie,: M 137 0.06 (1.08 0.02 70.1 0.7 7.45 0.37 2.30 39,15 40.65 40.30 0.35 RCP 0.26% 3.26 5.77 D11~24 0.11 0,3P 0.29 39.15 38.80 ::: :i 0.01? .~[~ i~i~i i~i~i~i~i~f :~f~i~i~[~i 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 •18.48 46.47 0.00 78 0.02% 0.81 9.44 (1 D31.26 ^~." miF: M 26 p.02 0.f12 0.00 10.0 0.7 7.47 0.19 1.44 4P.AH 40.85 40.65 0.20 RCP 0.77% 5.66 10.01 DII-25 0.19 0.19 0.19 39.35 39.15 7i i' (1.012 ~~ 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 45A5 46.12 0.03 78 0.04% 1.22 2.15 0 D11.27 ryc~,a M H2 0.03 (1.05 4.01 10.1 0.4 7.44 0.29 2.15 4H.76 40.50 40.30 0.20 RCP 0.24% 3.19 5.64 bWinry D11-24 0.18 029 0.28 39.40 38.80 :; i 0.012 i;i; is?i:i~ i; 7 aa4 o.oa o.oo 45.as 46.a5 o.OD 1H D.DD% D.as 4.7s ' f1 D11.28 "ry2::A M :t2 0.02 C1.p1 0.00 10.a O.i 7.47 0.11 0.79 4H.7Ei 40.70 40.50 0.20 RCP O.fi3% 5.10 9.02 1-Wing DI!-27 0.11 0.11 0.10 39.20 39.00 Ji 'i 0.012 ~~i'i~i~i'i :~i~i=i~i'i i~i~i~i~i~i 1 0,00 0.04 0.00 46.74 46.74 0.00 18 0.04% 1.37 2.4? 0 420^t r.f~,s M I U.O(I O.t{) 0.02 11.2 0.0 7.17 0.34 2.42 45. G41 46.51 46.50 0.01 F2CP 1.00% 6.46 11.41 0.00 0,32 0.32 45.01 45.00 i; :; 0.012 ii[i ;:;:; -sl~i~;~i~i `s'si~i~: 1 0.00 0.a0 0.00 46.79 46.74 0.05 18 0.05% 1.41 2.49 0 D20-2 1"va:a M 103 0.02 (1.1(1 Q.02 70,3 0.9 7.39 0.34 2.49 19.3a 46.60 46.51 0.09 RCP 0.09% 1.91 3.37 2-Wing D20-1 020 0.32 0.32 45.90 45.01 I~ i 0.012 '= 1 0.00 0,00 0.00 46.79 46,79 0.00 18 O.D7% 0.59 1.05 0 620-3 iyp~k M 55 O.OH fL08 0.02 10.0 0.3 7.47 0.14 1.05 49.2.5 46.75 46.60 0.15 RCP 0.27% 3.37 5.96 °_wring D20-2 0.13 0.13 0.12 45.25 45.10 ': i 0.012 i 7 0.00 0,00 0.00 46.82 46,79 0.02 18 0.01°~ 0.59 1.05 0 D20.12 n+r,. M 274 O.OH (1.00 0.02 10,0 0.5 7.47 D.14 1.05 4J.25 46.15 39.75 6.40 RCP 2.34% 9.87 17.44 420.13 0.13 Q 9 3 0.12 44.65 38.25 1 i 0.012 . i 1 0.00 D.00 0.00 46.10 40A9 0.01 18 0.02.% 0.82 1.45 4 D20-13 haH M 6 0.00 0.01 0.00 10.2 0.3 7.41 0.20 1.45 4JA9 39.75 39.50 0.25 RCP 0.40% 4.06 7.17 D20-14 0.00 0.20 Q19 3,°,.25 38,00 '5 i 0.012 :: 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.09 16.09 0.00 78 0.02% 0.81 1.44 b D20.14 r.ts. Ivl I O,Otl fl.C)1 0.00 70.5 0.0 7.34 0.20. 1,44 38,00 39.50 39.50 0.00 RCP 0.10% 2.p4 3.61 0.00 0.20 0.19 _ 3H.00 36.00 I:i :i' f1.012 i:i:iasi:i i~'~i; 1:1:1:1 "i~i':I: 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.35 16.10 0.25 10 0.32 % 2.69 1.47 0 020.15 vp h1 7"r, 0.07 0,01 0.00 10.0 0.2 7.47 0.20 1.47 4(,Da 39.98 38.88 1.10 PVC 1.41 % 5.65 3.08 D20-13 0.20 0.20 0.79 39.75 30,Ofi '.; i 0.019 :~ Page 2 ~~ A V I D G R O U P. C O M AVID Group PHONE {727) 789-9500 FAX (727}784-6662 2300 CURLEVd ROAD, STE 100 PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34683 TECHNICAL MEMORAND-LTM TO: Bennett Elbo -City of Clearwater. FROM: Richard Oujevolk, P.E. -AVID Group. COPY TO: Himanshu Patni, E.I. -City of Clearwater. Jane A. Caldera, P.E, -AVID Group. Pradeep Nimmatoori, E.L, -AVID Group. Kent Edwards, P.E, -AVID Group. DATE: Angust 15, 2007 SUBJECT: 'Woodlawn Terrace Town homes AVID NO: 2596-001 The purpose of this technical memorandum is to provide the traffic information associated with the proposed development located to the north of Woodlawn Street and west of S. Greenwood Avenue in City of Clearwater, Florida, see Figure 1 for the site location map. The proposed development consists of 120 dwelIiz~g units of residential townhomes. The anticipated build out year for this project is Year 2010 and will be completed in one single phase. Site access is proposed from Woodlawn Street, see Figure 2 for the concept site plan. As shown on Figure 2, two driveways are proposed on Woodlawn Street. The Daily, AM, anal PM peak trip characteristics of the proposed development are calculated based on the rates contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7`i' Edition. Attached Tahle 1, 2, and 3 sununarize the daily, AM, and PM peak of the project trips. The proposed development is projected to generate 749 two-way daily trips out of which 60 two-way trips occur in the AM peak hour and 70 two-way trips occur in the PM peak hour. ORIGINAL. RECENED OCT ~ 1 2001 PLANNING DEPARTMEM CITY OF CLEARWATER August 15, 2007 Woodlawn Terrace Townhomes Technical Memorandum AVID contacted City of Clearwater for discussing a methodology on the traffic study for the proposed development. Since the proposed development generates less than 1,040 daily trips and less than 100 peak hour trips, as per discussions with city staff and City of Clearwater traffic study guidelines, a traffic study is not required for this development. Please see attached the confirmation email from city staff that a traffic study is not required for this proposed development. AVID appreciates your time and assistance in the approval process of this project. If you should have any question or requixe additional information, feel free to call me at your convenience at (727) 789-9500. ~° essional Engineer: Richard M. Oujevolk P.E. # 40205 ORIGINAL R~CEIV~R p~T 01200? PLANNING [3EPARTIVIENT CIN OF CLEARWATER 2 ~ ~ 1 ~~ f+tcL~~F~;roaru ~t ~ I'} I' I' f: 1I ~,. i ti ~~ i ¢F r~ ~ ~, ; i ~ ;~' ~ t ~==' ~,;~ dom. y 'T i !1 ~ ~J ~u~' ~r ~T~1~ ~C ~ F 3,, ~~~, 0 F+;,t~lSLrl ,i = SITE i _ ~Yildi°,r~Hti~ Sr ` ~r~~~~,ura,•~,~ ~~ ~~ ; ~; ~ ~ ~R ~ 1~ .;I ~ , 4~ il~;~~+ar~ ~t 4~1 S` ~ ~ 'tt: .~, 'mil Cl a< \ ~X 1t '= ,.tom ~' `~ . ti `~ ~ ~ ~ ORIGINAL RECENED SITE LOCATION MAP ocT o l 2~~a PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIVIL ENGINEERING 4901 VINELAND ROAD, STE 190 PROJECT: WOODLAWN TERRACE LAND PLANNING ORLANDO, FLORIDA ~~ TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION 32811 LANDSCAPEARCHITECTURE APPLICANT: MIDWAY SERVICES ENVIRDNMENTAL SCIENCES PHONE (407)248.0505 SURVEYING FA8 (407) 248-0334 LOCATION: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FL FIGURE: 1 GIS AVIDGROUP.COM TABLE 1 WOODLAWN TERRACE TOWNHOMES DAILY TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES ITE daily Daily Daily Daily Description ITE Land-Use Land-Use Independent Size Trip 2-Way Trips Trips In Trips Ouf Category (Code) Variable RATE OR FORMULA (vpd) (vpd) (vpd) P~bOROSED'D~/ELOFNt1=t~T~'~'~'.':':':':':':':'~'~'~'.'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~':':'~'.•: •. •: •: •: •: •: •:-:•.:~:•.~:~:•:.~:-.~:~:~:~:~:~::...... •:......•..:.,...,. .:~ ... . Town Residential 230 Dwelling 120 Ln{T)=0.85Ln(X)+2.55 749 375 375 Homes CondominiumlTownhouse Units TABLE 2 WOODLAWN TERRACE TOWNhIOMES AM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES ITE AM Peak Hour AM Peak AM Peak AM Peak Description ITE Land-Use Land-Use Independent Size Trip 2-Way Trips Trips In Trips Out Category (Code) Variable RATE OR FORMULA (vph) (vph) (vph) PRQPQS~El•D~V•Ei.Ot?MAN'C•:•:•:•:•:•:-:•:-:•:-:•:-:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:-:•:•::-::-:~:-:~:-::-::•:~:~:•:-:~:•:~:~:•:~:•:~:•:•: •:~:•:~:•:•;•:•;•:• •:• - Town Residential 230 Dwelling 120 Ln{T)=0.80Ln{X)+.26 60 10 50 Homes Condominium/Townhouse unit TABLE 3 WOODLAWN TERRACE TOWNMOMES PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES ITE PM Peak Hour PM Peak PM Peak PM Peak Description ITE Land-Use Land-Use Independent Size Trip 2-Way Trips Trips In Trips Out Category (Code) Variable RATE OR FORMULA (vph) (vph) (vph) PROPOSED:[JiE'r/ELOPIUIENT:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:• :•: •:•:•:•:•: •. •:• : :...:..::..... ... ... . Town Residential 230 Dwelling 120 Ln(T)=0.82Ln(X)+0.32 70 47 23 Homes CondominiumlTownhouse unit ORIGINAL RECEIVED AVID Group K:hPROJ ECTS12500\259fi0011TRAFFiCVTrip_Gen_DD.xls T (~ i 2007 PLANNING DEPARIIVIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Woodlawn Terrace Townhomes 8/15/2007 • Pradeep fVirnmatoori From; Himanshu.Patni@MyCiearwater.com Seni: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 8:48 AM To: Pradeep Nimmatoori Cc: Bennett.~ibo@myClearwaier.com Subject: RE: Woodlawn Terrace Townhomes Attachments: Trip Generation.pdf In this case na traffic impact study is required. Thanks, Himanshu -----Originai Message----- Frorrt: [mailto:Pradeep.Nimmatoori@avidgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 8:45 AM To: Patni, Himanshu Subject: Woodlawn Terrace Townhomes Himanshu, rake ~ Sri ~ As per our earlier discussions on the traffic study for a 120 dwelling units of residential town homes project located to the north of Woodlawn Street and west of S. Greenwood Avenue in City of Clearwater, Florida, please find attached the trip generation estimates for this project. And as you stated earlier and since the proposed project generates less than 1000 daily trips and less than 100 peak hour trips (city traffic study thresholdsy, please acknowledge us by confirming to this email that there will be no traffic study needed for this development. Thank you and let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Pradeep Nimmatoori '~ a Traffic Engineer r~ ~ ~ cv AVID Group ~ '~' ~ p 2300 Curlew Rd. Suite 100 ~ WU O O Palm Harbor, FL ` " Q g z Tel: {727) 789-9500 ~ ~ ~ U Fax: {727) 784-6662 'D- email: pradeep.nimmatoori@avidgroup.com web: www.avidgroup.com ------Original Message----- From: Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com {mailto:Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.comt Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 2:14 PM To: Pradeep Nimmatoori Subject: Traffic Study Guidelines oRtGrN~L. See attached. RECI<IVrra «Traffic Impact Study Guide.doc» Himanshu Patni, E.I. PLANNING ~EPARIMEN7 CITY OF CLEARWAYER rage ~ or ~ Traffic Operations City of Clearwater (727) 562-4560 DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY AVID Group (AVID makes the electronically stored data. on this email available for the accuracy or reliability of this data. AVID reserves the right to revise, update damages which may arise as a result of the use of its data. The user agrees to veri effort to ensure this email is virus free, however AVID assumes no responsibility f indicates that the user accepts the above condition. OPENING THIS EMAIL CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCE OF THE ABOVE CONDITIONS. ~~ r- ~ w ~ Q 0 N 'r ~ w 'U V ~ -' (] J ,~ U ~ as ~ ._n -~ z CJ •~~ ~ .~! o. PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: FILENAME: Townhomes (~ Lake Bellevue 2596001 20071008 Hazen Fire Flow 2596001 This calculation will provide the water pressure at the hydrant near Unit 66 in the far northwes#ern portion of the po]ect 6" GROSS LENGTH IN FEET 970 NO. OF GATE VALVES 4 NO. OF 45d ELBOWS 18 NO. OF 90d ELBOWS 0 NO. OF TEE LINE FLOW 5 NO. OF TEE BRANCH FLOW 2 NO. OF INCREASERS 0 EFFECTIVE LENGTH 1223 CALCULATION: 6-ENCH SYSTEM Results of Hydrant Test by City of Clearwater STATIC HEAD AT HYDRANT 9 64 psi RESIDUAL HEAD AT HYDRANT 9 54 psi PITOT PRESSURE AT WYDRANT 8 45 psi 1=LOW AT WYDRANT 8 1130 gpm TOTAL FLOW 'O' gpm 800 The average daily use is 150gpm/person x 3.5 people/unit x 115 uni This equates to 60375 GPD, or 41.93 gpm. This was used in PIPE LENGTH 1,223 in con]unction with the City"s 750 gpm requirement for fire flow to ge a total flow of approx. 800gpm ROUGNESS'C' 140 PIPE DIAMETER'D' inches 6.00 HEAD LOSS IN PSf 23 psi SUMMARY: HEAD LOSS FROM PIPING= 23 STATIC HEADLOSS= 0 psi [ELEV=43.8 AT Unit 66; ELEV = 47 AT Woodlawn Street] RESULTING STATIC PRESSURE= 64 psi RESIDUAL PRESSURE @ TEST HYDRANT 54 psi CALCULATED PRESSURE AT PROP. HYD. 31 psi _. 'Note: This will be a public system, so no ,.~"'""''Jr;,'.-.~-'' . master meter is proposed. ~ ,O-«-off ,,'~ ~` t., ~` r1 ~~~~; , '~ '~' ~, ~ .. f ~ ~ r. ~' ~-~ 61859 t _r Richard M. Tomrr{ell, P.E. ~, • :F,L PL ~. No:~= ~'~ ,~ - rr ,' F D . ~~ i W l i . a ~ ~~ I`1jS~r~ ~ ~py~!rypp~~~p~ ~M10 _ qCT ~.I 2 07 iE. PLANNING DEAARTMENF CITY OF CLEAf2WATER Avid Engineering, Inc. 10/11/2007 To: Chris Koncal Ken# Edwards From: Joe Samnik Subjec#: Townhomes a# Lake Betievue Qate: September 4, 2007 There are certain species of trees found growing on this site that, while not prohibited species per the City of Clearwater, are not necessarily protec#ed. Once the City's arborist has reviewed the site and determined that the species' names are correct, these trees should nat be a problem to remove. These trees have been numbered and listed along with the protected trees. These trees all received a # 2 condition and should be exempt from mitigation. Species names are: citrus, winged sumac, chinaberry, ear pod, and woman's tongue. Several trees were named incorrectly on the survey. The correct tree names are listed in the provided table. Most notably, tree numbers 52, 58,_ and 59 were called oaks and are not oaks. You will went to make this change (especially number 59, as it is large) before submission to the City. In addition, several trees found in the field are not depicted on the survey. These trees were measured, listed, and added to the survey. These locations are approximafe. As .requested by Kent Edwards, trees that "could give you a problem with removal" have been highlighted on the provided survey, These trees include all trees with a condition of "4" or better and any oak with a condition of " 3" that is 24" or larger. There are a total of 20. oRrGrrvaL RECENED oor o ~ za~l PFANNING DEP,4Rp~IFrV}~ Clry OF C~'WATfR 1©15 Michigan tlvenue + Palm Harbor, PL 34683 • (727} 786-8128 • (727} 410-5797 Cell • (727} 7139-1647 Fax • www.ExpertTreeConsuhants.com Mission: To provide our diencs with the latest research-backed information regarding n-cc issues and the development process while offering the finest representation in dispute resolueien. Chris Koncal, COO -.MEP Division Illf'idway Services 4677 118' Avenue North Clearwater, Florida 33762 September 4, 2007 RE: Towrthornes at fake Bellevue Tree Assessment Dear Mr. Koncal: ENGAGEMENT As you requested, !have completed my assessment of the referenced property. ASSIGNMIENT My assignment was to inventory and assess each subject tree by Warne, size, and condition, assign each tree a number, record each subject tree's number on the provided survey, and provide a written report of inventory and tree assessment. St`IMMARY. OPINION There are forty~one (41 }trees and clusters of trees which are # 1, or 2, one hundred twenty-nine (129} #rees and clusters of trees which are # 3, and seven (?} trees which are # 4. Additionally, there are two (2} prohibited. species on this site; Melaleuca, and Australian pine. All palms on this site are mature cabbage palms in average condition. Following is an explanation of the rating system which was used: O-Qead, require removal 1-Poor (nearly dead, hazardous}, require removal ~ 2-Below Average (declining, diseased, poor structure, potential hazard), r~ a ~ a require removal ~ ~ "' a 3-Average (worthy of preservation but has some minor problems, minor ~ ~ o ° d decline, tip die-back, minor inclusion) problems can be corrected. o ~ ~ Z o ~- Above Average (rather healthy tree with very minor problems) o ~ ~ 5-Outstanding (very healthy) U fi-Specimen (unique in size, age, exceptional quality) Trees rated Q-2 should be removed because they pose a hazard, no replacement required, trees rated 3 are worthy of preservation brat could be sacrificed to allow additional preservation requirements for trees rated 4-fi, trees rated 4-5 should receive most of the attention for preservation. Great efforts must be made to preserve these trees, and trees rated 6 {very rarely used) are trees that cannot be removed. 1015 Michigan Avenue • Palm Harbor, FL 34683 • (727) 786-8128 • (727) 410-5797 Cell • {727} 789-1697 Fax • www.ExpertTreeConsultants.eom Mission: To provide our clients with the latest research-hacked information regarding tree issues and the development process while offering the flncst rcprescntarion in dispute resolution. Townhomes at Lake Bellevue September 4, 20Q7 Aufhor: Joseph R. Samnik Certified Arborist, #SO-0408 Certified -Bureau of Entomology, #7774 Page 2 DISCUSSION The City of Clearwater requires that protection measures betaken for any tree located within 24' of a construction site. Trees within 20' of this site have been included on the provided survey. These subject trees were inspected far condition per the City of Clearwater's standards and were found to be in average condition (# 3}.. Please note that my grading of these subject trees is based upon their in-place condition at the time of my assessment. Please advise if f may be of further assistance to you in this matter. I affirm that my opinions have been made in total goad faith, based on the facts presented during my inspection, with no coercion from others. l further affirm that I have na interest with the parties or people involved with this issue nor any interest with regard to the outcome. Trees of concern were inspected for highly visible and patent signs or symptoms of stress or decline. Problems not apparent upon visual inspection cannot be and were not noted. All trees of concern should be monitored on an annual basis for new or deteriorating conditions. Sincerely, _ ~~~~~ J h R. Samnik JRS/abh P. ~ ~~ w ~ ~~° N ~ p~ ~jw ~~ O ~U ~ O ~~ V a ~NHOMES AT LAKE. BELLEVU~ Author: Joseph R. Samnik September Q, 20D7 NUMBER COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION 1 LAUREL OAK 34" ~ 2 2 CAMPHOR 5" 2 3 LAU REL OAK 20" 3 4 LIVE OAK 29" 3 5 LAUREL OAK 27" 3 6 L}VE OAK 23" 3 7 LAUREL OAK 28° 3 8 LIVE OAK 19" 3 9 LIVE OAK 33" 3 1D LIVE OAK 21" 3 11 LAUREL OAK 10" 3 12 LIVE OAK 14" 3 13 LIVE OAK 15" 3 14 LIVE OAK 18" 3 15 LAUREL OAK 28" 3 16 LIVE OAK 17" 3 17 .U1/-E-OAK 28" 3 18 LIVE OAK. 27" 3 19 LAUREL OAK 24" 3 20 LIVE OAK 16" 3 21 WATER OAK 4" 3 22 LAUREL OAK 24" 3 23 LIVE OAK 7", 6", 3" 3 24 LIVE OAK 22" 3 25 LIVE OAK 23" 3 26 LIVE OAK 21" 3 27 LAUREL OAK 11" 4 28 CAMPHOR CLUSTER 3 29 LIVE OAK 12", 12" 3 3D LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 31 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 32 CAMPHOR 6" 3 33 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 34 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 35 LIVE OAK 8", 9" 3 36 LIVE OAK 12" 3 37 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 38 LIVE OAK 18", 21" 4 39 LIVE OAK ~ CLUSTER 3 40 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 41 MAPLE 9" 3 42 SWEETGUM 6" 3 43 WOMAN'S TONGUE 8", 9" 2 44 LAUREL OAK ~ 8", 7" 3 45 LAUREL OAK 8", 8" 3 46 LAURE}_ OAK 6" 3 47 WOMAN'S TONGUE 7" 2 48 LAUREL OAK 30", 19" 2 49 CAMPHOR 4", 5" 1 50 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 ~ v-- o o W ~~ a ~~ _ ~~ ~ W ~?`~ ~ ~ °u ? o a- o c~ ~ ~ u a ~NHOMES AT LAKE BELLEVU~ Aufhor: Joseph R. Sarrtnik September 4, 2007 NUMBER COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION 51 WOMAN'S TONGUE 14", 8" 2 52 MAPLE 7" 3 53 LAUREL OAK 15" 3 54 LIVE OAK 7", 8" 3 55 LIVE OAK 4", 6", 8" 4 56 LIVE OAK 8" 2 57 WOMAN'S TONGUE CLUSTER 2 58 CAMPHOR 5", 5", 5" 4" 3 59 EAR POD TREE 12" 22" 2 60 EAR POD TREE 34" 1 61 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 62 CHINABERRY CLUSTER 2 63 CHINABERRY CLUSTER 2 64 WOMAN'S TONGUE 3", 8", 9" 2 65 EAR POD TREE CLUSTER 2 66 LAUREL OAK 6" 3 67 LAUREL OAK 5" 3 68 LIVE OAK 10", 8" 2 69 LAUREL OAK 19" 3 70 LAUREL OAK 12" 3 71 LAUREL OAK 7" 3 72 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 73 WOMAN'S TONGUE 4" 2 74 LAUREL OAK 7" 3 75 WOMAN'S TONGUE ' S" 2 76 LIVE OAK 4" 3 77 WOMAN'S TONGUI~ CLUSTER 2 78 WOMAN'S TONGUE 9", 9" 2 79 LAUREL OAK 6", 11" 3 80 CAMPHOR 8", 11" 3 81 WOMAN'S TONGUE 4", 5" Z 82 MAPLE 8" 3 83 WOMAN'S TONGUE 4", 5" 3 84 LAUREL OAK 6", 7" 3 85 LIVE OAK 10" 3 86 LIVE OAK 14" 3 87 LIVE OAK 8" 3 88 LIVE OAK 12" 3 89 CAMPHOR 22" 3 90 LAUREL OAK 7" 3 91 LAUREL OAK . 7" 3 92 LAUREL OAK $" 3 93 LAUREL OAK 7" 3 94 LAUREL OAK 12", 6" 3 95 LAUREL OAK. 9", 9" 3 96 CAMPHOR 8" 3 97 CAMPHOR 9", 14" 3 98 LAUREL OAK 8" 3 99 WINGED SUMAC CLUSTER 2 100 LAUREL OAK 6", 7" 3 ~NHOMES AT LAKE BELLEVU~ Author: Joseph R. Samnik September4, 2007 NUMBER COMMON NAME SIZE CQNDITIQN 101 CAMPHOR 4" 3 102 LAUREL OAK CLUSTER 3 103 CAMPHOR 8" 3 104 CAMPHOR 8", 9" 3 105 LIVE OAK 18" 3 106 LIVE OAK 6" 3 107 LIVE OAK 7" 3 108 LIVE OAK. 22" 3 109 CHERRY LAUREL 7", 6", 3" 2 110 LAUREL OAK CLUSTER 3 111 LIVE OAK 21" 3 112 CAMPHOR 14", 14", 13" 3 113 WOMAN'S TONGUE 16", 18", 12" 2 114. CHERRY LAUREL 5" 3 115 EAR POQ TREE 17" 2 116 Ck-TERRY LAUREL 7" 3 117 CHERRY LAUREL 8" 3 118 LAUREL OAK 16" 3 119 EAR POD TREE 42" 2 120 EAR POD TREE 9", 12", 12" 2 121 MAPLE 6" 3 122 LIVE OAK 18" 3 123 LIVE OAK 18", 18", 12", 12 3 124 CAMPHOR 6" 4" 3 125 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 126 CAMPHOR 4", 3" $ 127 WOMAN`S TONGUE 6", 6° 2 128 LAUREL OAK CLUSTER 3 129 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 130 LAUREL OAK CLUSTER 3 131 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 132 CITRUS 5" 2 133 LAUREL OAK 12" 3 134 CITRUS 5", 5" 2 135 LAUREL OAK CLUSTER 3 136 LIVE OAK 35" 3 137 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 138 LAUREL OAK 24" 3 139 LAUREL OAK 12" 3 140 LAUREL OAK 17" $ 141 CAMPHOR 12", 17", 25", 30 3 142 LIVE OAK 23" 3 143 LIVE OAK 25" 2 144 LAUREL OAK 12", 30" 3 145 HONG KONG ORCHID CLUSTER 2 146 MELALEUCA 24", 24", 30" PROHIBITED 147 EAR POD TREE 31" 2 148 LIVE OAK 8" 3 149 LIVE OAK 14" 3 150 LIVE OAK 8" 3 R ~~ _ w ~, ~ ~~ ~~ o ~ •--r ~ 4U ~-. z ~. 0 ® 5v ~WNHOMES AT LAKE BELLEVU~ Author: Joseph R. Samnik Sepfem6er 4, 2007 NUMDER GO(V1MON NAME SIZE CONDITION 151 LIVE OAK 30" 4 152 LAUREL OAK 35" 3 153 KONG KONG ORCHID CLUSTER 2 154 LIVE OAK 18" 3 155 LAUREL OAK 18" 3 156 CHERRY LAUREL 4" 3 157 LAURI~L OAK 15" 3 158 PECAN 16" 3 15J LAUREL OAK 11" 3 160 LIVE OAK 25" 4 161 CHERRY LAUREL 5" 3 162 CAMPHOR 10" 3 183 LIVE OAK 30" 4 184 LAUREL OAK CLUSTER ~ 3 165 CAMPHOR 13", 14", 15" 3 186 CAMPHOR 5" 3 167 WINGED SUMAC CLUSTER 2 1fi8 WINGED SUMAC CLUSTER 2 169 WINGED SUMAC 7" 2 170 LIVE OAK 9" 2. 171 EAR POD TREE CLUSTER 2 172 JACARANDA 5", 5", 6", 8" 2 173 LIVE OAK 9" 3 174 WWGED SUMAC CLUSTER 2 175 LIVE OAK 30" 4 . 176 LAUREL OAK 11" 3 177 LIVE OAK 17" 3 178 CAMPHOR 13" 3 179 AUSTRALIAN PINE CLUSTER PROH161TED ALL PALMS ARE MATURE CA68AGE PALMS IN AVERAGE CONDITION • ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 QQ' i. Z LL ~. • ! ~" ~_ ~ ~ a ® c., w ~ W 0 0 ~ O Z (~ J C~ ~~~ Chris i4onca[, COO -11AEP Division Midway Ser>srices 4677 118' Avenue North Clearwater, Florida 33762 September 4, 2007 RE: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue Tree Assessment Dear Mr. Koncal: • ENGAGEIl~ENT As you requested, I have completed my assessment of the referenced property. ASSIGNMENT My assignment was to inventory and assess each subject tree by name, size, and condition, assign each tree a number, record each subject tree's number on the provided survey, and provide a written report of inventory and tree assessment. SUMI6HARY OPINION There are forty-six (46) trees and clusters of trees which are # 1, or 2, one hundred fifty-four (154) trees and clusters of trees which are # 3, and nine (9) trees which are # 4. Additionally, there are two (2) prohibited species on this site; Melaieuca, and Australian pine. All palms on this site are mature cabbage palms in average condition. Following is an explanation of the rating system which was used: 0-Dead, require removal 1-Poor (nearly dead, hazardous}, require removal 2-Below Average (declining, diseased, poor structure, potential hazard), require removal. 3-Average (worthy of preservation but has some minor problems, minor decline, tip die-back, minor inclusion) problems can be corrected. 4-Above Average (rather healthy tree with very minor problems) 5-Outstanding (very healthy) 6-Specimen (unique in size, age, exceptional quality) r-- O 0 G N V-'U ~ o ~ r-- Trees rated 0-2 should be removed because they pose a hazard, no replacement ~' required, trees rated 3 are worthy of preservation but could be sacrificed to allow additional preservation requirements for trees rated 4-6, trees rated 4-5 should receive most of the attention for preservation. Great efforts must be made to preserve these trees, and trees ra#ed 6 (very rarely used} are trees that cannot be removed. 1015 Michigan Avenue • Palm Harbor, FL 34683 • (727) 786-8128 • {727) 410-5797 Cell • (727) 789-1697 Fax • «nvw.ExpertTrceConsultants.com W ~~ ~U ~LL z~ z ~U Mission: To provide our clients with the latest research-backed information regarding tree issues and the development process while offering the finest representation is dispute resoludon. Townhomes of Lake Bellevue September 4, 2007 Author. ,laseph R. Samnik Certified Arborist, #SO-0408 Certified -Bureau of Entomology, #7774 Page 2 a1SCUSSI,ON The City of Clearwater requires that protection measures be taken for any tree located within 2U' of a construction site. Trees within 20' of this site have been included on the provided survey. These subject trees were inspected for condition per the City of Clearwaters standards and were found to be in average condition (# 3). Please Hate that my grading of these subject trees is based upon their in-place condition at the time of my assessment. Please advise if t may be of further assistance to you in this matter. I affirm that my opinions have been made in total good faith, based on the facts presented during my inspection, with na coercion from others. 1 further affirm that f have no interest with the parties or people involved with this issue nor any interest with regard to the outcome. Trees of concern were inspected for highly visible and patent signs or symptoms of stress or decline. Problems not apparent upon visual inspection cannot be and were not noted. All trees of concern shouid be monitored on an annual basis for new or deteriorating conditions. Sincerely, ~~ Jos ph R. Samnik J RS/abh x~ ~ Q ~~ ~ ~ ~•- • ,-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w O V ~U ~ ,~ a~ --- ~~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ c,s 0. TQOMES AT LAKE BELLEVl1E ~har~ --oseph R. Samnik September 4, 20Q7' NUMBER COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION 1 L AUREL OAK 34" 2 2 C AMPHOR 5" 2 3 L AUREL OAK 20" 3 4 L IVE OAK 29" 3 5 L AUREL OAK 27" 3 6 L IVE OAK 23" 3 7 L AUREL OAK 28" 3 $ L IVE OAK 19° 3 9 L IVE OAK 33" 3 10 L IVE OAK 21 ° 3 11 L AUREL OAK 10" 3 12 L IVE OAK 14" 3 13 LIVE OAK 15° 3 14 LIVE OAK 1S" 3 15 LAUREL OAK 28° 3 1 B LIVE OAK 17" 3 17 LIVE OAK 28" 3 18 LIVE OAK 27" 3 19 LAUREL OAK 24" 3 20 LIVE OAK 16" 3 21 WATER OAK 4" 3 22 LAUREL OAK 24" 3 23 LIVE OAK 7", 8". 3" 3 24 LIVE OAK 22" 3 25 LIVE OAK 23" 3 26 LIVE OAK 21" 3 27 LAUREL OAK 11" `I' 28 CAMPHOR CLUSTER 3 29 LIVE OAK 12", 12" 3 30 LIVE OAK GLUSTER 3 31 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 32 CAMPHOR 'S" 3 33 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 34 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 35 LIVE OAK 8", 9° 3 36 LIVE OAK 12" 3 37 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 38 LIVE OAK 18", 21" 4 39 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 40 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 41 MAPLE g" 3 42 SWEETGUM 5" 3 43 WOMAN'S TONGUE 8", 9" 2 44 LAUREL OAK $", 7" 3 45 LAURI=L OAK $", S" 3 48 LAUREL OAK 6" 3 47 WOMAN'S TONGUE 7" 2 48 LAUREL OAK 30", 19" 2 49 CAMPHOR 4", 5" 1 5C1 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 ~~ r~ O W 1W-~ o ~ ° `~' ~-+ ¢~ C4 ~ G7 J ~, U Onu'e G- ~O :s TO~HOMES AT LAKE BELLEVUE ~thor: Joseph R. Samnik September 4, 2447 Ail li1M15'td rnnanAr1A11UA M~ S1~E CDNDITION 51 WOMAN'S TONGUE 14", 8" 2 52 MAPLE 7" 3 53 LAUREL OAK 15" 3 54 LIVE OAK 7°, 8" 3 55 LIVE OAK 4", 6", 8" 4 56 LIVE OAK 8" 2 57 WOMAN'S TONGUE CLUSTER 2 58 CAMPHOR 5", 5". 5" 4" 3 59 EAR POD TREE 12", 22" 2 60 EAR POI TREE 34" 1 61 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 62 CHINABERRY CLUSTER z 63 CHINABERRY CLUSTER 2 64 WOMAN`S TONGUE 3", 8", 9" 2 65 EAR POD TREE CLUSTER 2 66 LAUREL OAK 6" 3 67 LAUREL OAK 5" 3 68 LIVE OAK i 0", 8" 2 69 LAUREL OAK 19" 3 70 LAUREL OAK 12" 3 71 LAUREL OAK 7" 3 72 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 73 WOMAN'S TONGUE 4" 2 74 LAUREL OAK 7" 3 75 WOMAN'S TONGUE 5" 2 76 L1VE OAK 4'° ~ 3 77 WOMAN'S TONGUE CLUSTER 2 78 WOMAN'S TONGUE 9", 9" 2 79 LAUREL OAK 6'T, 11" 3 Sn CAMPHOR 8", 11" 3 81 WOMAN'S TONGUE 4", 5" 2 $2 MAPLE 8" 3 83 WOMAN'S TONGUE 4", 5" 3 84 LAUREL OAK 6", 7" 3 85 LIVE OAK 10" 3 86 LNE OAK ~ 4" 3 87 LIVE OAK 8" 3 88 LIVE OAK 12° 3 89 CAMPHOR 22" 3 90 LAUREL OAK 7" 3 97 LAUREL OAK 7" 3 92 LAUREL OAK 6" 3 93 LAUREL OAK 7" 3 94 LAUREL OAK 12", s" 3 95 LAUREL OAK 9", 9" 3 96 CAMPHOR 8" 3 97 CAMPHOR ~", 14" 3 98 LAUREL OAK 8" 3 99 WINGED SUMAC CLUSTER 2 100 LAUREL OAK 6", 7" 3 ~ r'~• o o W ~- ~ ~ ~~ 4~ a ~ 0 J W ~U Q U c9 OcY U z0 p ~ U d TO~HOMES AT LAKE BELLEVUE ~hor: I J 1 LI V 1-. vr'u ~ 132 CITRUS 5" 2 133 LAUREL OAK 12° 3 134 CITRUS 5"• 5" 2 135 LAUREL OAK CLUSTER 3 136 LIVE OAK 35" 3 137 LIVE OAK CLUSTER 3 138 LAUREL OAK 24" 3 139 LAUREL OAK ~ 2" 3 140 LAUREL OAK 17" 3 141 CAMPHOR 12", 17", 25", 3fl 3 142 LIVE OAK 23" 3 143 LIVE OAK 25" 2 144 LAUREL OAK 12", 30" 3 145 I--iON'G KONG ORCHID CLUSTER 2 146 MELALEUCA 24", 24", 30" PROHIBITED 147 EAR POD TREE 31" 2 148 LIVE OAK 6° 3 149 LIVE OAK 14" 3 150 LIVE OAK S" 3 Joseph R. Sam-~ik September 4, 20U7 ~~ ~~ ~ W Q« ~z~ >~ ~ ~ ~ d~ ~ ~~ ~ Z Q ~.~ ~~ ~ U ....r...~., „r,wllwenr„ r.~nnne ~f7F CONDlTl~N TOHOMES AT LAKE BELLEVUE ~ihor: ,lnseph R. Samnik September 4, 2007 Rl! InnR~R r_nnntuinN NnMF SIZE CONDITION 151 LIVE OAK 30" 4 152 LAUREL OAK 35" 3 153 HONG KONG ORCHID CLUSTER 2 154 LIVE OAK 18" 3 155 LAUREL OAK 18~ 3 156 CHERRY LAUREL 4" 3 157 LAUREL OAK 15" 3 158 PECAN 18" 3 159 LAUREL OAK 11" 3 160 LIVE OAK 25" 4 161 CHERRY LAUREL 5" 3 162 CAMPHOR 10" 3 163 LIVE OAK 3Q" 4 164 LAUREL OAK CLUSTER 3 165 CAMPHOR 13", 14", 15" 3 166 CAMPHOR 5" 3 167 WINGE© SUMAC CLUSTER 2 168 WINGED SUMAC CLUSTER 2 169 WINGED SUMAC 7" 2 170 LIVE OAK 9" 2 171 EAR POD TREE CLUSTER 2 172 JACARAN IAA 5", 5", 6", 8" 2 173 LIVE OAK 9" 3 174 WINGED SUMAC CLUSTER 2 175 LIVE OAK 30" 4 176 LAURI=L OAK 11" 3 177 LIVE OAK 17" 3 178 CAMPHOR 13" ~ 3 179 AUSTRALIAN PINE CLUSTER PROHIBITED 180 PECAN 17" 2 181 LIVE OAK 16" 3 182 LIVE OAK 22" 3 183 LIVE OAK 5" 4 184 LAUREL OAK 21" 3 185 WATER OA1C 23" 2 186 RED CEDAR 24" 3 187 CHERRY LAUREL 4", 4" 3 188 PECAN 12" 3 189 LAUREL OAK 23" 2 190 LAUREL OAK 22" 3 191 LAUREL OAK 17" 3 192 LAUREL OAK 6" 3 193 LAUREL OAK 8" 3 194 WATER OAK 22" 2 195 LIVE OAK 8" 3 196 LIVE OAK 11" 3 197 CAMPHOR 4", 5", 6" 3 198 CAMPHOR 6", 6", 8", 7" 3 199 LIVE OAK 29" 3 200 CAMPHOR 6", 9" 3 ~m ~ ~ ~~ a ~o ~ ~~ ~~ ~W C .~ -'° r~ ~~~ ~ 7 J ~ i:' TOHU-MES AT LAKE BELLEVUE ~titor- Joseph R. Samnik September 4, 2007 NUMBER COMMON NAME 51ZE CONC]IT[fliN 201 LNE OAK 6" 3 202 LAUREL OAK 6", 3" 2 203 GAMPI-i0R 7" 3 204 LAUREL OAK 27" 3 205 LIVE OAK 2B" 3 206 CAMPHOR 12" 207 LIVE OAK 23" 3 208 CAMPHOR 54" 4 209 CAMPHOR 8" 3 210 LAUREL OAK ~4" ~ 211 LIVE OAK 20" 3 ALL PAC.MS ARE MATURE CABBAGE PALMS IN AVERAGE CONI]ITION ~~ r-~ o ~ I~ Q ~ ~ N a---1 ~3 ~ Oa O ~ ~ ~ ~ U a !• ~ 1 4` ,~ . a ,!i~ `'~' ,,; ,,, _ -. AVID GROUP® 2300 Curlew Road, STE 100 Palm Harbor, i=L 34683 Phone (727} 789-9500 Fax (727} 787-4306 AVIDGROtJP.COM MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Alt, P.E. -SWFWMD (Tampa Office) FROM: Kent A. Edwards, P.E. SUBJECT: Pre-Application Meeting Notes -Townhomes at Lake Bellevue AVtD JOB NO.: 2596001.100 DATE: September 28, 2007 A pre-application meeting was held between the Southwest Florida Water Management District and Avid Group on Thursday, September 27, 2007 regarding the Townhomes at Lake Bellevue Project in the City of Clearwater, Florida. Those present are as follows: Richard Alt, P.E. ,Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) Richard Tommell, P.E. -Avid Group Kent Edwards, P.E. -Avid Group Several items regarding the project were discussed and are listed below. Drainage Issues 1. The Water Management District has stated that any existing historical storage will have to be accounted for within the drainage calculations presented to the Water Management District. It was noted that during the Building Plan Review Commission Meeting with the City of Clearwater, it was stated by the City that the drainage calculations presented to the Gity were #o treat the site as though it had never been developed, since there was not an approved ERP or SWFWMD permit discovered during the research process. SWFWMD stated that this would not be the case during the Water Management District's review and credit will be given for the existing impervious area on-site, but that the detention ponds constructed during the previous project must be accounted for during analysis of the existing conditions. ORIGIfVAI. K:IPROJ~CTS12500125960011DOCISWFWMD120070927_Pre-App Merr~o_2596001.doc ~2iCEtVED ~~r o 1 za~~ PLANIdiNG DEPAi2TMENi CITY QF CLEARWATER 2. It was noted that per City of Clearwater Design Standards, the preliminary drainage calculations were prepared using the Modified Rational Method, as the project site is less than ten (10) acres in area. SWFWMD stated that any calculations presented to the Water Management District must be modeled using the ICPR program, due to the potential complex nature of the drainage system. Other Issues 1. The open area for the rear-yard swales must be designated as a drainage easement. As such, there must be assurances that fences, etc. will not be placed by the residents, potentially blocking the drainage system. 2. The Water Management District stated that any floodplain compensation should be accounted for by widening the existing ditch and that it is not preferable that the floodplain compensation be accounted for within the proposed detention ponds. These are the topics that were discussed at the above referenced meeting to the best of my knowledge and recollection. If any items have been omitted or any items require further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me at {727) 789-9500. Thank you far your time and assistance with this project. K:IPRQJECTS12500125960011DOC15WFWMD120070927_Pre-App Memo_259fi001.doc ®~1~1~ REG~N~~ ±~ ~~ ~ ~. L~~~ Pl~N1NG DEP W~pTER GIN OF GLFAR 4 ° m ~ Q ~ aev~LL~ GNOUP° ° m 3 a PHONE (727) 789-9500 ~ ~ ~ J FAX (727) 784.6662 v aQ. March 19, 2008 City of Clearwater Attn: Scott ~2ice -Assistant Engineering Director 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: PROJECT NAME: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue FLS2007-10045 Avid Job No. 2596-001 Dear Mr. Rice: IAUTH#6139 L00000361 LB73451 As a supplement to the submittal of the Site Plans for the Towmhomes as Lake Bellevue Project to the City of Clearwater, please find the following items attached. Please note that these items are 'for your review and signature. Four {4) copies - FDEP Notice of Intent to Use the General Permit for Construction of Water Main Extensions for PWSs Four {4) copies - FDEF Notification/Application for Constructing a Domestic Wastewater Collection/Transmission System If you should have any questions, comments, or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me either via e-mail, or by phone at {727) 789-9500. Sincerely, AVID Grou Kent A. Edwards, P.E. Senior Design Engineer Cc: Chris Koncal -Midway Services 2596-001.720 and 2596-001.722 ®R~1NAd. R~G~!!9 PiANid{NG G~~a~fN#ENY ~6~ ~E Cl~`~"~"r`~oiul~ d ~~ ~ GROUP ° ¢ ~ ~ a PHONE (727 789-9590 ~ ~ FAX (727) 784-6662 ~ a March 19, 2008 City of Clearwater Attn: Scott Rice -Assistant Engineering Director i00 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: PROJECT NAME: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue FLS2007-10045 Avid Job No. 2596-001 Dear Mr. Rice: ~AUTNG6134 LC0990361 LB7345~ As a supplement to the submittal of the Site Plans for the Towmhomes as Lake Bellevue Project to the City of Clearwater, please find the following items attached. Please note that these items are for your review and signature. Four (4) copies - FDEP Notice of Intent to Use the General Permit for Construction of Water Main Extensions for PWSs • Four (4) copies - FDEP Notification/Application for Constructing a Domestic Wastewater Callection/Transmission System if you should have any questions, comments, or require any additional. information, please do not hesitate to contact me either via e-mail, or by phone at (72'1) 789-9500. Sincerely, AVID Grou O ~ ~.``. ~.a~- Kent A. Edwards, P.E. Senior Design Engineer Cc: Chris Koncal -Midway Services 2596-001.720 and 2596-001.722 C~l~~I(1~° (~C ~'~N~{~JG ~~Sll/IEIWT ~b1Y pF C`~~A~~R • • .- NOTICE OF INTENT TO USE THE GENERAL PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 'iNATER MAIN EXTENSIONS FOR PWSs INSTRUCTIONS: This notice shall be completed and submitted by persons proposing to construct projects permitted under the "General Permit for Construction of Water Main Extensions for Public Water Systems" in Rule 62-555.405, F.A.C. AT LEAST 30 DAYS BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION OF A WATER MAIN EXTENSION PROJECT, complete and submit one copy of this notice to the appropriate Department of Environmental Protection District Office or Approved County Health Department {ACHD) along with payment of the proper permit processing fee. (When completed, Part H of this notice serves as the preliminary design report for a water main extension project, and thus, it is unnecessary to submit a separate preliminary design report or drawings, specifications, and. design data with this notice.) All information provided in this notice shall be typed or printed in ink. The permit processing fee for projects requiring the services of a professional engineer during design is $250, and the permit processing fee for projects not requiring the services of a professional engineer during design~is $] 00.* Checks for permit processing fees shall be made payable to the Department of Environmental Protection or the appropriate ACHD. NOTE THAT A SEPARATE NOTIFICATION AND A SEPARATE PERMIT PROCESSING FEE ARE REQUIRED FOR EACH NON-CONTIGUOUS PROJECT.t * Except as noted in paragraphs 62-555.520(3) (a) and (b), F.A. C, projects shall be designed under the responsible charge of one or more professional engineers licensed in Florida. t Non-contiguous projects are projects that are neither interconnected nor located nearby one another (i. e., on the same site, on adjacent streets, ar in the same neighborhood). F A. Name of Project: Townhomes @ Lake Bellevue B. Description of Project and Its Purpose: Installation of 1400 LF of b" PVC, 400 LF of 4" PVC,'100 LF of 3/4" PVC, two 6"x6" wet tapping sleeves and valves, and 9 fire hydrant assemblies to serve a 113-unit townhome development. water main C. Location of Project 1. County Where Project Located: Pinellas County 2. Description of Project Location: 802, 826 & 830 Woodlawn 33756 r ;-~~ ~. D. Estimate of Cost to Construct Project: $135,000 ~IJaNl~I~1~ ~e~a~c?Fl\!T E. Estimate of Dates for Starting and Completing Construction of Project:8/2008 -1/2009 ~iT},r fay ~~ a~;,aF~a,ar;~ !Err-=Y F. Permittee PWS/Com an Name: Affordable Dreams, LLC PWS Identification No.:* PWS T e:* Communi Non-Transient Non-Community Transient Non-Community Consecutive Contact Person: Chris Koncal Contact Person's Title: Chief Officer of Operations Contact Person's Mailin Address: 4685 118th. Avenue North. Ci :Clearwater State: FL Zi Code: 33762 Contact Person's Tele hone Number: (727)573-9500 Contact Person's Fax Number: (727)456-2146 Contact Person's E-Mail Address: ckoncal@MSICORP.NET This in~ jormatton is requared only if the permittee is a public water system (YWJJ. G. Public WaterSvstem (PWS} Suvvlvin~ Water to Proiect PWS Name: City of Clearwater PWS Identification No.: PWS T e: x Communit Non-Transient Non-Community Transient Nan-Community Consecutive PWS Owner: City of Clearwater Contact Person: D. Scott Rice, P.E. . Contact Person's Title: assistant Engineering Director Contact Person's Mailin Address: 100 South Myrtle Avenue #220 Ci :Clearwater State: Florida Zi Code: 33756 Contact Person's Tele hone Number: (727)562-4750 Contact Person's Fax Number: Contact Person's E-Mail Address: scott.rice@myclearwater.eom DEP Form 62-555.900(7) Effective August 28, 2003 Page I NOTICE OF INTENT TO USE THL~ENERAL PERMIT FOR CONSTR~ION OF WATER MAIN ,~ EXTENSIONS FOR PWSs Project Name: Townhomes Lake Bellevtte Pertnittee: Affordable Dreams LLC H. Public Water System (PWS) that Will Own. Project After It Is Placed into Permanent Operation PWS Name: City of Clearwater PWS Identification No.:* PWS T e:* Communit Non-Transient Non_Community Transient Non-Community Consecutive PWS Owner: City of Clearwater Contact Person: D. Scott Rice P.E. Contact Person's TItle: Assistant engineering Director Contact Person's Mailin Address: 1.00 South Myrtle Avenue #220 Ci :Clearwater State: Florida Zi Code: 33756 Contact Person's Tele hone Number: (727)562-4750 Contact Person's Fax. Number: Contact Person's E-Mail Address: scott.rice@myclearwater.com { 1 his mormation is required only ij the owner/operator is an existing PWS. I. Professional Engineer(s) or Other Person(s) in Responsible Charee of Desienine Project* Com an Name: Avid Group Designer(s): Title(s) of Designer(s): Richard M Tommeli. P.E.. Project Manager ualifications of Designer(s): Professional Engineer(s) Licensed in Florida -License Number(s): 61859 Public Officer(s) Employed by State, County, Municipal, or Other Goven-xmental Unit of State Plumbing, Contractor{s) Licensed in Florida -License Number(s): Mailin Address of Desi er s : 2300 Curlew Road, Suite 100 Ci :Palm Harbor State: FL Zi Code: 34683 Tele hone Number of Desi er s : (727) 789-9500 Fax Number of Desi er s : (727} 784-6662 E-Mail Addresses} of Designer(s): rick. tommell@avidgroup.com '~ except as noted in paragraphs bZ-SSS.SZO(3J(aJ and (bJ, F.A. C, projects shall be designed under the responsible charge of one or more professional engineers licensed in Florida. -~- Attach a detailed construction cost estimate showing that the cost to construct this project is $1 D, 000 or less. AAttach documentation showing that this project will be installed by the plumbing contractor(s) designing this project, documentation showing that this project involves a public water system serving a single property and fewer than 2S0 fixture units, and a detailed construction. cost estimate showing that the cost to construct this project is $S0, 000 or less. 1 ~ ~ A. Service Area, Water Use, and. Service Pressure Information 1. Design Type and Number of Service Connections, and Average Daily Water Demands and Maximum-Day Water Demands, in the Entire Area to 13e Served by the Water Mains Beine Constructed Under this Proiect- D =Total Average C -Average Daily Daily Water Demand Water Demand Per gpd (Columns i3xC for E -Total Maximum B = I~Eumber of Service Service Connection Residential Service Day Water Demand b A - T e Or Service Connection Connections Connections d Sin le Famil Home 113 Units 300 33 900 101 700 Mobile Home A arttnent Commercial Institutional or Industrial Facili ' Total 113 Units 33 900 101 700 a. Description of Commercial, Institutional, or Industrial Facilities and Explanation of Method(s) Used to Estimate Average Daily Water Demand for These Facilities: (113 Townhome Units) X (300 GPD /Unit) = 33,900 GPD C~R~INJ~. 300 GPD / Urtit is based on 64E-6.008 (FAC) ~, ~ ~t ~~ ~ 4.:i~~ Or ~~e-~'~ f~ait:R b, Explanation of Peaking~Factor(s) or Method(s) Used to Estimate Maximum-Day Water Demand: Peaking Factor = 3.00 Based on the McGraw-Hill "Water Distribution Systems Handbook" Page 3.9, Table 3.6, the common range for the Peak Hour: average day is 2.5 - 4.0 Page 2 ..._.. ,: NOTICE OF INTENT TO USE THE GENERAL PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS FOR PWSs Pro~ect Name: Townhvmes Lake Bellevue Permittee: Affordable Dreams LLC 2. Explanation of Peaking Factor(s) or Method(s) Used to Estimate Design Peak-Hour Water Demand and, for Small Water Systems that Use Hydropneumatic Tanks or that Are Not Designed to Provide Fire Protection, Peak Instantaneous Water Demand: 33,900 GPD x 3.00 (Peaking Factor) = 101,700 GPD / 24 hours Per Day = 4,238 GPH 3. Design Fire-Flow Rate and Duration:1,000 GPM, with a duration of 2-hours (As specified in AWWA "Distribution System Requirements for Fire Protection", Table 1-1). 4. Design Service Pressure Range:40-GO PSI B. Project Site Information I. ATTACH A SITE PLAN OR SKETCH SHOWING THE SIZE AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF NEW OR ALTERED WATER MAINS, SHOWING THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF HYDRANTS, VALVES, METERS, AND :BLOW-OFFS IN SAID MAINS, AND SHOWING HOW SAID MAINS CONNECT TO THE PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM SUPPLYING WATER FOR THE PROJECT. 2. Description of Any Areas Where New or Altered Water Mains Will Cross Above or Under Surface Water or Be Located in Soil that Is Known to Be Aggressive:There are no known aggressive soils or surface water crossings. C. Information About Compliance with Design and Construction Requirements 1. If this project is being designed to comply with the following requirements, initial before the requirements. If any of the following requirements do not apply to this project or if this project includes exceptions to any of the following requirements as allowed by rule, mark "NA" before the requirements and complete Part ILC.2 below. RSWW =Recommended Standardsfor Water Works as incorporated into Rule 62-555.330, F.A.C. ~'r a. This project is being designed to keep existing water mains and service lines in operation during construction or to minimize interruption of water service during construction. [RSww 1.3.a; exceptions allowed under FAC 62- ~,r, 5553301 b. All pipe, pipe fittings, pipe joint packing and jointing materials, valves, fire hydrants, and meters installed under this project will conform to applicable American Water Works Association (AWWA) standards. [FAc 62-555.32D(21)(b), RSWW 8.D. and AWWA standards as incorporated into FAC 62-555330; exceptions allowed under FAC 62- ;- 555.320(21}(c)] c. All public water system components, excluding fire hydrants, that will be installed under this project and that will come into contact with drinking water will conform to NSF International Standard 61 as adopted in Rule 62-555.335, F_A.C., or other applicable standards, regulations, or requirements referenced in paragraph 62- 555.320(3)(b},F.A.C. [FAC 62-555.320(3)(b); exceptions allowed under FAC 62-555.32D(3)(d}] ~-r d. All pipe and pipe fittings installed. under this project will contain no more than 8.0% lead, and any solder or flux used in this project will contain no more than 0.2% lead. [FAC 62-555.3221 ~^ e. All pipe and pipe fittings installed under this project will be color coded or marked in accordance with subparagraph 62-555.320(21)(b)3, F.A.C., using blue as a predominant color. (Underground plastic pipe will be solid-wall blue pipe, will have a co-extruded blue external skin, or will be white or black pipe with blue stripes incorporated into, or applied to, the pipe wall; and underground metal or concrete pipe will have blue stripes applied to the pipe wall. Pipe striped during manufacturing of the pipe will have continuous stripes that run pazallel to the axis of the pipe, that are located at no greater than 90-degree intervals around the pipe, and that will remain intact during and after installation of the pipe. If tape or paint is used to stripe pipe during installation of the pipe, the tape or paint will be applied in a continuous line that runs parallel to the axis of the pipe and that is located along the top of the pipe; for pipe with an internal diameter of 24 inches or greater, tape or paint will be applied in continuous lines along each side of the pipe as well as along the top of the pipe. Above ground pipe will be painted blue or will be color coded or marked. like underground pipe.) [FAC 62- f All new or altered water mains included in this project are sized after a hydraulic analysis based on flow demands and pressure requirements. ATTACH A HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS JUSTIFYING THE SIZE OF ANY NEW OR ALTERED WATER MAINS WITH AN INSIDE DIAMETER OF LESS THAN THREE INCHES. [FAC 62-555.320(2])(b) and RSWWB.t] DEP Form 62-555.90017} Page 3 Effective august 2s, saoa NOTICE OF INTENT TO USE THE GENERAL PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS FOR PWSs Pro'ect Name: Townhomes Lake Bellevue Permittee: Affordable Dreams LLC R~ g. The inside diameter of new or altered water mains that are included in this project and that are being designed ,~~, to provide fire protection and serve fire hydrants will beat least six inches. [FAC 62-555.320(21)(6) and Rsww s.l.z) h. New or altered water mains that are included in this project and that are not beine designed to carry fire flows do not have fire hydrants connected to them. [FAC 62-555.320(21)(6) and RSww8.1.51 ~-T ~. This project is being designed to minimize dead-end water mains by making appropriate tie-ins where practical. [FAC 62-555.320(21)(6) and RSWW8.1.6.a) ~ ,]. New or altered dead-end water mains included in this project will be provided with a fire or flushing hydrant or blow-off for flushing purposes. [FAC 62-555.320(21)(6) and RSwW8.l.b.b] ~"T k. Sufficient valves will be provided on new or altered water mains included in this project so that inconvenience ~T and sanitary hazards will be minimized during repairs. [FAC 62-555.320(21)(6) and Rswws.2J 1. New or altered fire hydrant leads included in this project will have an inside diameter of at least six inches.and will include an auxiliary valve. [FAC 62-555.320(21)(6) and RSWW 8.3.3) N/A in. All fire hydrants that will be installed under this project and that will have unplugged, underground drains will be located at least three feet from any existing or proposed storm sewer, stormwater force main, pipeline conveying reclaimed water regulated under Part III of Chapter 62-61 0, F.A.C., or vacuum-type sanitary sewer; at least six feet from any existing or proposed gravity- or pressure-type sanitary sewer, wastewater force main, or pipeline conveying reclaimed water not regulated under Part III of Chapter 62-1 0, F.A.C ;and at least ten feet from any existing or proposed "on-site sewage treatment and disposal system." [FAC 62-555.314(4)] N/A n. At high points where air can accumulate in new or altered water mains included in this project, provisions will be made to remove the air by means of air relief valves, and automatic air relief valves will not be used in situations where flooding of the valve manhole or chamber may occur. [FAC 62-555.320(21)(6) and Rsww8.4.1] N/A o. The open end of the air relief pipe from all automatic air relief valves installed under this project will be extended to at least one foot above grade and will be provided with a screened, downward-facing elbow. [FAC 62-555.320(2 1)(b) and RSwW 8.4.2] N/A p, New or altered chambers, pits, or manholes that contain valves, blow-offs, meters, or other such water distribution system appurtenances and that are included in this project will not be connected directly to any sanitary or storm sewer, and blow-offs or air relief valves installed under this project will not be connected directly to any sanitary or storm sewer. [FAC 62-555.320(21)(6) and RSWW8.4.3] q. New or altered water mains included in this project will be installed in accordance with applicable AWWA' standards or in accordance with manufacturers' recommended procedures. [FAC 62-555.320(21)(b),RSWW8.5.1, and ~~ AWWA standards as incorporated into FAC 62-555.330] r. A continuous and uniform bedding will be provided in trenches for underground pipe installed under this project; backfill material will be tamped in layers around underground pipe installed under this project and to a sufficient height above the pipe to adequately support and protect the pipe; and unsuitably sized stones (as described in applicable AWWA standards or manufacturers' recommended installation procedures) found in trenches will be removed for a depth of at least six inches below the bottom of underground pipe installed ~,(-. under this project. [FAC62-555.320(21)(b),RSwW8.5.2] s. All water main tees, bends, plugs, and hydrants installed under this project will be provided with thrust blocks or restrained joints to prevent movement. [FAC 62-555.320(21)(6) and RSWW8.5.4J t. New or altered water mains that are included in this project and that wiltbe constructed of asbestos-cement or polyvinyl chloride pipe will be pressure and leakage tested in accordance with AWWA Standard C603 or C605, respectively, as incorporated into Rule 62-555.330, F.A.C., and all other new or altered water mains included in this project will be pressure and leakage tested in accordance with AWWA Standard C600 as Q T„ InCOipOiated lnto Rule 62-555.330. [FAC 62-555.320(21)(6)1 and AWWA standazds as incorporated into FAC 62-SSS.330] 4• u. New or altered water mains, including fire hydrant leads and including service lines that will be under the control of a public water system and that have an inside diameter of three inches or greater, will be disinfected and bacteriologically evaluated in accordance with Rule 62-555.340, F.A.C. [FAC 62-555.320(21)(6)2 and FAC 62- 555.3401 N/A v. New or altered water mains that are included in this project and that will be installed in areas where there are known aggressive soil conditions will be protected through use of corrosion-resistant water main materials, through encasement of the water mains in polyethylene, or through provision of cathodic protection. [FAC 62- 555.320(2 1)(b) and RSWW 8.5.7.d) ~~~~~ ~~ b~~~ ~ 0 200 DEP Form 62-555.900(7) Page 4 ~~N~~G ~~'>~'FMENT Effective August 28, 2003 • e NOTICE OF INTENT TO USE THE GENERAL PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAlN EXTENSIONS FOR PWSs l Praiect Name: Towuhomes (rr~, Lake Bellevue I Permittee° Affordable Dreams LLC ~~ w. New or relocated, underground water mains included in this project will be laid to provide a horizontal distance of at least three feet between the outside of the water main and the outside of any existing or proposed vacuum-type sanitary sewer, storm sewer, stormwater force main, or pipeline conveying reclaimed water regulated under Part III of Chapter 62-61 0, F.A.C ; a horizontal distance of at least six feet between the .outside of the water main and the outside of any existing or proposed gravity-type sanitary sewer (or a horizontal distance of at least three feet between the outside of the water main and the outside of any existing or proposed gravity-type sanitary sewer if the bottom of the water main will be Iaid at least six inches above the top of the sewer); a horizontal distance of at least six feet between the outside of the water main and the outside of any existing or proposed pressure-type sanitary sewer, wastewater force main, or pipeline conveying reclaimed water not regulated under Part III of Chapter 62-61 0, F.A.C ; and a horizontal distance of at least ten feet between the outside of the water main and ail parts of any existing or proposed "on-site sewage i, treatment and disposal system." [FAC 62-555.314(]); exceptions allowed under FAC 62-555.314(5}] ~ x. New or relocated, underground water mains that are included in this project and that will cross any existing or proposed gravity- or vacuum-type sanitary sewer or storm sewer will be laid so the outside of the water main is at ]east six inches above the other pipeline or at least 12 inches below the other pipeline; and new or relocated, underground water mains that are included in this project and that will cross any existing or proposed pressure-type sanitary sewer, wastewater or stormwater force main, or pipeline conveying reclaimed water will be laid sa the outside of the water main is at least 12 inches above or below the other pipeline. [FAC 62-555.314(2); exceptions allowed under FAC 62-555.314(5)] ~"~ y. At the utility crossings described in Part ILC. Lw above, one full length of water main pipe will be centered above or below the other pipeline so the water main joints will be as far as possible from the other pipeline or the pipes will be arranged so that all water main joints are at least.three feet from all joints in vacuum-type sanitary sewers, storm sewers, starmwater force mains, or pipelines conveying reclaimed water regulated under Part III of Chapter 62-61fl, F.A.C., and at least six feet from alljoints in gravity- or pressure-type sanitary sewers, wastewater force mains, or pipelines conveying reclaimed water net regulated under Part III of Chapter 62-610, F.A.C. [FAC 62-555.314(2); exceptions allowed under FAC 62-555.314(5)] N/A z. New or altered water mains that are included in this project and that will cross above surface water will be adequately supported and anchored, protected from damage and freezing, and accessible for repair or replacement. [FAC 62-555.320(2 1)(b) and RSWw 8.7.1 ] N/A aa. New or altered water mains that are included in this project and that will cross under surface water will have a minimum cover of two feet. EFAC 62-555.320(2 1)(b) and RSWW 8.7.2) N/A bb. New or altered water mains that are included in this project and that will cross under surface water courses greater than 15 feet in width will have flexible or restrained, watertight pipe joints and will include valves at both ends of the water crossing so the underwater main can be isolated for testing and repair; the afotementioned isolation valves will be easily accessible and will not be subject to flooding; the isolation valve closest to the water supply source will be in a manhole; and permanent taps will be provided on each side of the isolation valve within the manhole to allow for insertion of a small meter to determine leakage from the underwater main and to allow for sampling of water from the underwater main. [FAC 62-555.320(21)(b) and ~~, Rswws.7.21 cc. This project is being designed to include proper backflow protection at those new or altered service connections where backflow protection is required or recommended under Rule 62-555.360, F.A.C., or in Recommended Practice for Backflow Prevention and Cross-Connection Control, AWWA Manual M 1 4, as incorporated into Rule 62-555.330, F.A.C ~>: the public water system that will own this project after it is placed into operation has across-connection control program requiring water customers to install proper backflow protection at those service connections where backflow protection is required or recommended under Rule 62-555.360, F.A.C., Or In AWWA Manual M14. [FAC 62-555.36p and AWWA Manual M14 as incorporated .p .~ into FAC 62-555.330] dd. Neither steam condensate, cooling water from engine jackets, nor water used in conjunction with heat exchangers will be returned to the new or altered water mains included in this project. [FAC 62-555.320(2l)(b) and RSWW8.8.21 ~~i~E~~R'M6. ~~ DEP Form 62-555.900(7} Page 5 ~il'iNi~119tlV' F'4lfWYEItlr Effective August 2g, 2003 ~`~ ~f' ~~ft~ ~~~~~ • • NOTICE OF INTENT TO USE THE GENERAL PERMIT` FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS FOR PWSs I Proiect Name' Tawnhomes (a7 Lake Bellevue Permittee• Affordable Dreamc i 7 [~ 2. Explanation for Requirements Marked "NA" in Part ILC. 1 Above, Including Justification, Documentation, Assurances, and/or Alternatives as Required by Rule for Exceptions to Requirements in Part iLC. 1: (m.) -The are no hydrants proposed that are unplugged and have underground drains. (n.) -Every service connection acts as air release mechanism, therefore no additional valves added. (o.) -There are na automatic air relief valves proposed. (p.) - No altered chambers, pits, or water manholes proposed. (v.) -There are no known aggressive soils within the project site. (z.) - No water mains will cross above surface water. (aa.) - No water mains will cross beneath surface water. (bb.} - No water mains will. cross beneath surface water. I completed Part lI of this notice, and the information provided in Part II and on the attachments} to Part II is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature, Seal, and Date of Professional Engineer (PE) or Signature, Seal, and Date of Professional Engineer (PE) or Signature and Date of ether Person in Responsible Charge of Signature and Date of Other Person in Responsible Charge of Designing Project:* Designing Froject:* ,. ~n~ :~;~ > ~a 1 I 7 r ` t i} Y (f t~- ~~/ ; ; t~ `a ~ ~ ~ ~ '~t r _,~~. '' P"riaf~ed~~Yped]~ame:`•Ricliard M Tommell. Y.E. 'License.Nu b'er of:PE'or License Number or Title of Other ~~,~~~ PeTSOn in Responsible Charge of Designing Project: 61859 - '- ::::- ~A~~i'fii'IM- ~E~1N9dINC ~P~?TMENT Printed/T ed Name: License Number of PE or License Number or Title of Other Person in Responsible Charge of Designing Project:* Portion. of Preliminary Design Report for Which Responsible Portion of Preliminary Design Report for Which Responsible: IJxcept as noted in paragraphs 61-555.520(3) (a) and (b), EA. C projects shall be designed under the responsible charge of one or more PEs licensed in Florida. If this project is being designed under the responsible charge of one or more PEs licensed in Florida, Part II of this notice shall be completed, signed, sealed, and dated by the PE(s) in responsible charge. If this project is not being designed under the responsible charge of one or more PEs licensed in Florida, Part II shall be completed, signed, and dated by the person (s) in responsible charge of designing this project. DEP Form 62.555.900(7) Page 6 Effective August 28, 2003 • n NOTICE OF INTENT TO USE THE GENERAL PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS FOR PINSs Project Name: Tawnhomes Lake Bellevue Permittee: Affordable Dreams LLC A. Certification by Permittee I am duly authorized to sign this notice on behalf of the Permittee identified in Part LF of this notice. I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this project complies with Chapter 62-555, F.A.C. I also certify that construction of this project has not begun yet and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this project does not include any of the following construction work: • construction of water mains conveying raw or partially treated drinking water; • construction of drinking water treatment, pumping, or storage facilities or .conflict manholes; • construction of water mains in areas contaminated by low-molecular-weight petroleum. products or organic solvents; •.construction of an interconnection between previously separate public water systems or construction of water mains that create a "new system" as described under subsection 62-555.525(1), F.A.C ; or • construction of water mains that will remain dry following completion of construction. (A specific construction permit is required for each project involving any of the above listed construction work.) I understand that, if this project is designed under the responsible charge of one or more professional engineers (PEs) licensed in Florida, the Permittee must retain aFlorida-licensed PE to take responsible charge of inspecting construction of this project for the purpose of determining in general if the construction proceeds in compliance with the Department of Environmental Protection construction perruit, including the approved preliminary design report, for this project. I understand that the Permittee must have .complete record drawings prepared for this project. I also understand that the Permittee must submit a certification of construction completion to the Department and obtain written approval, or clearance, from the Department before the Permittee places this project into operation for any purpose other than disinfection or .testing for leaks. "C~' oo Richard M. Tommell, P.E. Authorized Agent Signature and Date Printed or Typed Name Title B. Certification by PWS Supplying Water to Project I am duly authorized to sign this notice on behalf of the PWS identified in Part LG of this notice. I certify that said PWS will supply the water necessary to meet. the design water demands for this project. As indicated below, the water treatment plant(s) to which this project will be connected has (have) the capacity necessary to meet the design water demands for this project, and I certify that all other PWS components affected by this project also have the capacity necessary to meet the design water demands for this .project. I certify that said PWS is in compliance with applicable planning requirements in Rule 62-555.348, F.A.C ; applicable cross-connection control requirements in Rule 62-555.360, F.A.C ;and to the best of my knowledge and belief, all. other applicable rules in Chapters 62-550, 62-555, and 62-699, F.A.C ; furthermore, I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, said PWS's connection to this project will not cause said PWS to be in noncompliance with Chapter 62-550 or 62-555, F.A.C. I also certify that said PWS has reviewed the preliminary design report for this project and that said PWS considers the connection(s) between this project and said PWS acceptable as designed. • Name(s) of Water Treatment Plant(s) to Which this Project Will Be Connected: • Total Permitted Maximum Day Operating Capacity of Plants}, gpd: • Total Maximum Day FIow at Plant(s) as Recorded on Monthly Operating Reports During Past 12 Months, gpd; Scott Rice Signature and Date Printed or Typed Name C. Certification by PWS that Will Own Project After It Is Placed into Permanent Operation Land Development Engineering Manager Title I am duly authorized to sign this notice on behalf of the PWS identified in Part LH of this notice. 1 certify that said PWS will own this project after it is placed into permanent operation. I also certify that said PWS has reviewed the preliminary design report for this project and that said PW5 considers this project acceptable as designed. Signature and Date Scott Rice Printed or Typed Name Land Development Engineering Manager Title ~• .~,_ ~~+~ ~, l)EP Forth 62-555.900(7) Effective August 2B, 2003 Page 7 LIAR 2 `°'; ~ • ,- NOTICE OF INTENT TO USE THE GENERAL PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS FOR PWSs Pro'ect Name: Townhomes Lake Bellevue Permittee: Affordable Dreams LLC • D. Certification by Professional Engineer(s) in Responsible Charge of Designing Project* I, the undersigned professional engineer licensed in Florida, am in responsible charge of designing this project. I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the design of this project complies with Chapter 62-555, F.A.C. I also certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this project is not being designed to include any of the following construction work: • construction of water mains conveying raw ar partially treated drinking water; • construction of drinking water treatment, pumping, or storage facilities or canflict manholes; • construction of water mains in areas contaminated by low-molecular-weight petroleum products or organic solvents; • construction of an interconnection between previously separate public water systems or constriction of water mains that create a "new system" as described under subsection 62-555.525(1), F.A.C ; or • construction of water mains that will remain dry following completion of construction. A specific construction permit is required for each ~roiect invol~ ..Signature, Seal, and Date: ~• .k: , ~~~,, ~ . = ,?;rihtacl/Tv ed Name: Richard M Tommell. V License Number:' 6)I 134 • • >PGrtzon, of Preliminary' Design Report for Which Responsible: *Ez~~p't~as floted iiz paragraphs 62-555.520(3) (a) and (b), F.A Signature, Seal, and Date: License Number: Portion of Preliminary Design Report for Which Responsible: C, projects shall be designed under the responsible charge of one or more professian'al engineers (PEs) licensed in Florida. If this project is being designed under the respansible charge of one or more PEs licensed yin Florida,• Part IUD of this notice shall be completed by the P,E(s) in responsible charge. If this project is rat being designed under the responsible charge of one or more PEs licensed in Florida, Part IILD does not have to be completed ~I~' ~~ ~;"= ~~ MAR :'.. -.~ DEP Form 62-555.900(7) Page Effective August 28, 2003 Pl~N~IA' ~IiV Ors , .. • ~ Affordable Ureanns, LLC ~+v a ~ i ~ ~ avenue, N. Clearwater, FL 33762 September 27, 2007 LETTER OF AUTgoRIZAT~oN To Whom It May Concern: This letter does authorize Richard M. TommelUAvid Group, to act as our agent for and with all regulatory agencies, departments and their personnel for the City of Clearwater, Southwest Florida Water Management District, Pinellas County, Florida Department of Transportation and Florida Department of Environmental Protection, in an effort to receive all permits necessary for the construction and development of the Townhomes at Lake Bellevue project located at 802 and 826 ~Voodlawn Street, Clearwater, Florida, Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. ~ I a~`I~ 07 Owner Date State of Florida On this a-1~~'day of , 2007, before me personally appeared L known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrumen ,anal. acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. ~~. c~ ~ Notary Public ~`"''~ KAREN A GAN S i'~h~i MY CONfMf5510N i~ UD573392 "~ E7~IR,FS:luly i2, 2tl10 IiDO .NOTARY R,NatvyDismmrAsowCa ~ ~ La-~1 ~1 Date C7~-$11VlRi. RED!' ~~~~ ~ a 200 ~'~~~~ D~~,~:~i /IENI' County of ~~ ~ • Florida Department of Environmental Protection Twin Towers Office Blda., 2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 NOTIFICATION/APPLICATION FOR CONSTRUCTING A DOMESTIC WASTEWATER COLLECTION/TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PART I - GEl'~RAL Subpart A: Permit Application Type Permit Application Type (mark one only) IDUs Application Fee* ~XS' Served Are you applying for an individual pemut for a domestic wastewater collection/transmission > 10 $500 system? Note: an EDU is equal to 3.5 persons. Criteria for an individual permit are contained in Rule 62-604.6000, F.A.C. ~ l0 $304 Is this a Notice of Intent to use the general permit for wastewater collection/transmission NIA $Z50. systems? Criteria for qualifying for a general permit are contained in Rule 62-604.600(6), F.A.C. Projects not meeting the criteria in Ruie 62-604.600(6}, F.A.C., must apply for an individual ermit. *Note: Each non-contiguous project (i.e., projects that are not interconnected or are not located on adjacent streets or in the same neighborhood} requires a separate application and fee. Subpart B:Instructions {l) This form shall be completed for all domestic wastewater oollection/transmission system construction projec#s as follows: • ]f this is a Notice of Intent to use the general permit, this notiftcation shall be submitted to the Department at least 30 days prior to initiating construction. if this is an application for an individual permit, the permit must be obtained prior to initiating construction. (2) One copy of the completed form shall be submitted to the appropriate DEP district office or delegated local program along with the appropriate fee, and one copy of the following supporting documents. Checks should be made payable to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, or the name of the appropriate delegated local program. If this is a Notice of Intent to use the general permit, attach a site plan or sketch showing the size and approximate location of new or altered gravity sewers, pump stations and force mains; showing the approximate location of manholes and isolation valves; and showing how the proposed project ties into the existing or proposed wastewater facilities. The site plan or sketch shall be signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in Florida. If this is an application for an individual permit, one set of plans and specifications shall.be submitted with this application, or alternatively, an engineering report shall be submitted. Plans and specifications and engineering reports shall be prepared in accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapters 10 and 20 of Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities.. The plans and specifications or engineering report shall be signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer registered in Florida. (3) All information shall be typed or printed in ink. Where attached sheets (or other technical documentation) are utilized in lieu of the blank spaces provided, indicate appropriate cross-references on the form For Items (1) through (4) of Part II of this application form, if an item is not applicable to your projec#, indicate "NA" in the appropriate space provided. ~~ ;'~ i~9~:R '~ 0 2000 DEP Farm 62-604 300(8xa) Page 1 Of 11 . ElreuiveiN6vember6,2003 N nh t Di i M 1)i i N l 1)i i C i i u wes sa a 160 Go l l C w east sb a ¢ 7623 B d W e¢tra an cl a Sduthvrcst D sV Q Bl 3319 M d 38D D i vetamm a ro oymea ey ovrs 4 ago e v ve S Cocoa¢t Palm r i Patac¢la Florida 32302-3794 Snile 20 8 ]aekco¢vilie Florida 72T36-7590 te 23T S Florida 32663 3767 Tam 6719 Otlaado ida 39619 Fl . 830 393 8300 , 04 80 ~BJ`l~i~~~ Ld~t"P4tHWrE1~61 ~{7E/ a~ p ~p ~,~, ~,- ~~~a99 ~Se!'~vi'er'~et:R S¢nth Dimiet ~ SovN6ast Diwia 2295 VICIOIie Ave /00 North CA¢61eb8 Ave ~Solte 764 Solte 200 , - Furl Myer, Flori6a 33902-2349 West palm 9eaeb, FLaida 33101 pa, or . . . 9 7-3700 407-694-7335 613-744-6I00 23933T-6975 381.681-660P PART II - PROJECT DQCUMENTATIQI~I (1) Callection~I'ransmission System Permittee ~§ ~ '~~ ~~N~li~~' G~~~~r ~6~V C~ ,~ ~s:~~~2 Name Chris Koncal Title Chief Officer of Operations Company Name Affordable Dreams, LLC Address 4685 118th Avenue North City. Clearwater State Florida dip 33762 Telephone (727)573-9500 Fax (727)456-21.46 ~~ ckoncal@MSICORP.NET (2) General Project Information Project Name Townhomes @ Lake Bellevue (A Workforce Housing PrDject} Location: County Pinellas City Clearwater Section 22 Township 298 gauge 15E Project Description and Purpose (including pipe length, range of pipe diameter, total number of manholes, and total number ofpump stations) Installation of: 1,850 LF 8" PVC rani sewer, 11 manholes, a lift station and 1 050 LF 4" force main to serve a 113 unit townhome development; force main will connect to an existing manhole at the intersection of Woodlawn Stand Scranton Ave Estimated date for. Start of construction 8f2008 Completion of construction 42009 Connections to existing system or treatrneni plant 1/2009 (3) Project Capacity A = Type of Unit B = Number of Units C = Population Per Unit D =Total Population Columns 13 x E _ Per Capita Flow F = Total Average Daily Flow Columns D x E Cr =Peak hour flow Sin a-Famil Home 113 Units 113 Units 300 GPD 33,900 4,238 GPH Mobile Home A artment Commercial, Institutional, or Industrial Facili Total 113 33,900 4,238 GPH * Description of commercial, institutional, and industrial facilities and explanation of method used to estimate per capita flow for these facilities: (113 Townhome Units) x (300 GPD /Unit) = 33,900 GPD 304 GPD / Unit is based. on 64E-6.008 (FAC) Peaking Factor of 3.0 Used to determine Peak Flow Rate (101,700 GPD) (4) Pump Station Data (attached additional sheets as necessary) Estimated Flow to the Station fGPD) Location Type Maximum Average Minimum Operating Conditions GPM FT TD NWC of site EBARA 100DL6L5 3HP 101 700 GPD 33 900 GPD 77 GPM 19.86' (5) Collectiom/'I'ransmission System I?esigrr Information A. This information must be completed for all projects by the applicant's professional engineer, and if applicable, those professional engineers in other disciplines who assisted with the design of the project. If this projeci bas been designed to comply with the standards and criteria listed below, the engineer shall initial in ink before the. standards or criteria. If any of the standards or criteria do not apply to this project or if this project has not been designed to comply with the standards. or criteria, mark "X" before the appropriate standard or criteria and provide an explanation, including any applicable rule references, in (S)B. below. DEP Form 42-604.300(9)(a) Page 2 of l I Efrective Nwanber 6, 20Q3 - • • Note, if the project has not been designed in accordance with the standards and criteria set forth in Rules 62-604.400(1) and (2), F.A.C., an application for an individual pernut shall be submitted. However, if Rules 62-b04.400(1) and (2}, F.A.C., specifically allow for another alternative that will result in an equivalent level of reliability and public health protection, the project can be constructed using the general pesmiit. General Requirements X 1. The project is designed based on an average daily flow of 100 gallons per capita plus wastewater flow from industrial plants and major institutional and commercial facilities unless water use data or other justification is used to better estimate the flow. The design includes an appropriate peaking factor, which covers Ifl contributions and non-wastewater connections to those service lines. [RSWF 11.243] I~T 2. Procedures aze specified for operation of the collection/transmission system during construction. [ILSWF 20.15] 'Q~ 3. The project is designed to be located.. on public right-of--ways, land owned by the permittee, or easements and. to be located no closer than 100 feet from a public drinking water supply well and no closer than 75 feet from a private drinking water supply well; or documentation is provided in Part II.(5}B., showing that another alternative will result in an equivalent level of reliability and public health protection. [62-604.400(lxb) and (c), F,A.G.] TAT 4. The project is designed with no physical connections between a public or private potable water supply system and a -sewer or force main and with no water pipes passing through or coming into contact with any part of a sewer manhole. [RSFW 38.1 and 48.5] 1 5. The project is designed to preclude the deliberate introduction of storm water, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff, subsurface drainage, swimming pool drainage, air conditioning system condensate water, non-contact cooling water except as provided by Rule 62-610.668(1}, F.A.C., and sources of uncontaminated wastewater, except to augment the supply ofreclaimed water in accordance with Rule 62-610.472(3)(c), F.A.C. [62-604.400(1)(d), F.A.C.] Z"r 6. The project is designed so that all new or relocated, buried sewers and force mains, are located in accordance with the separation requirements from water mains and reclaimed water lines of Rules 62-604.400(2)(g)(h) and (i) and (3}, F.A.C. Note, if the criteria. of Rules 62-604.400(2)(8) 4. or (2xi) 3., F.A.C., are used, describe in Park I1.C. alternative construction features that will be provided to afford a similar level of reliability and public health protection. [62-604.400(2)(8), (h), and {i) and (3), F.A.C.] Gravity Sewers ~T 7. The project is designed with no public gravity sewer conveying raw.wastewater less than 8 inches in diameter. [RSWF 33.1] ~.`1' 8. The design considers buoyancy of sewers, and appropriate construction techniques are specified to prevent. flotation of the pipe where high groundwater conditions are anticipated. [RSWF 33.3] 9. All sewers are designed with slopes to give mean velocities, when flowing full, of not less than 2.0 feet per second, based on Manning's formula using an "n" value of 0.013; or if it is not practicable to maintain these minimum slopes and the depth of flow will be 0.3 ofthe diameter or greater for design average flow, the owner of the system has been notified that additional sewer maintenance will be required. The pipe diameter and slope are selected to obtain the greatest practical velocities to minimize solids deposition problems. Oversized sewers are not specified to justify flatter slopes. [RSWF 33.41, 33.42, and 33.43] ~T 10. Sewers are designed with uniform slope between manholes. [RWSF 33.44] X 11. Where velocities greater than 15 fps are designed, provisions to protect against displacement by erosion and impact are specified. [RSWF 33.45] X 12. Sewers on 20% slopes or greater are designed to be anchored securely with concrete, or equal, anchors spaced as follows: not aver 36 feet center to center on grades 20% and up to 35%; not over 24 feet center to center on grades 35% and up to 50%; anal nat over 16 feet center to center on grades 50% and over. [RSWF 33.46] _- t'az-t~tnli~a Rg! DEP Form 62-604.300(Sxa) Page 3 of S l Etketive November 6, 2.003 ~~~~~ ~ 0 2000 P~N~l~~ ~iVT '~6N ~r ~f,~F~ "~'~'a';i~~ • `~~ 13. Sewers 24 inches or less are designed with straight alignment between manholes. Where curvilinear sewers are proposed for sewers greater than 24 inches, the design specifies compression joints; ASTM or specific pipe manufacturer's maximum allowable pipe joint deflection limits are not exceeded; and curvilineaz sewers are limited to simple curves which start and end at manholes. [RSWF 33.5] ~T 14. Suitable couplings complying with ASTM specifications are required for joining dissimilar materials. [RSWF 33.7] `RT 1S. Sewers are designed to prevent damage from superimposed loads. [RSWF 33.7] .~ 16. Appropriate specifications for the pipe and methods of bedding and backfllling are provided so as not to damage the pipe or its joints, impede cleaning operations and future tapping, nor create excessive side fill pressures and ovalation of the pipe, nor seriously impair flow capacity. [RSWF 33.81] jZT 17. Appropriate deflection tests are specified for all flexible pipe. Testing is required a$er the final backfill has been in place at least 30 days to permit stabilization of the sail-pipe system. Testing requirements specify: 1) no pipe shall exceed a deflection of 5%; 2) using a rigid ball ar mandrel for the deflection test with a diameter not less than 95% of the base inside diameter or average inside diameter of the pipe, depending on which is specified in the ASTM specification, including the appendix, to which the pipe is manufactured; and 3) performing the test without mechanical pulling devices. [RSWF 33.85] R'~ 18. Leakage tests are specified requiring that: 1) the leakage exfiltra6on or infiltration does not exceed 200 gallons per inch of pipe diametee per mile per day for any section of the system; 2) exfiltration or infiltration tests be performed with a minimum positive head of 2 feet; and 3} air tests, as a minimum, conform to the test procedure described in ASTM G$28 ' for clay pipe, ASTM C 924 for concrete pipe, ASTM F-1417 forplastic pipe, and for other materials appropriate test procedures. [RSWF 33.93, 33.94, and 33.95] X 19. If an inverted siphon is proposed, documentation of its need is provided in Part ILC. Inverted siphons are designed with: 1) at least two barrels; 2) a minimum pipe size of 6 inches; 3) necessary appurtenances for maintenance, convenient flushing, and cleaning equipment; and 4) inlet and discharge structures having adequate clearances far cleaning equipment, inspection, and flushing. Design provides sufficient head and appropriate pipe sizes to secure velocities of at least 3A fps for design average flows. The inlet and outlet are designed so that the design average flow may be diverted to one barrel, and that either barrel may be cut out of service for cleaning. [RSWF 35] Manholes lZT 20. The project is designed with manholes at the end of each line; at all changes in grade, size, or alignment; at all .intersections; and at distances not greater than 400 feet for sewers 15 inches or less and 500 feet for sewers 18 inches to 30 inches, except in the case where adequate modem cleaning equipment is available at distances not greater than 600 feet. [RSWF 34.1] X 21. Design requires drop pipes to be provided for sewers entering manholes at elevations of 24 incites or more above the manhole invert. Where the difference in elevation between the incoming sewer and the manhole invert is less than 24 inches, the invert is designed with a fillet to prevent solids deposition. Inside drop connections {when necessary) are designed to be secured to the interior wall of the manhole and provide access for cleaning. Design requires the entire outside drop connection be encased in concrete. [RSWF 34.2] ~T 22. Manholes are designed with a minimum diameter of 48 inches and a minimum access diameter of 22 inches. [RSWF 34.3] ~.'r' 23. Design requires that a bench be provided on each side of any manhole channel when the pipe diameter(s) are less than the manhole diameter and that no lateral sewer, service connection, or drop manhole pipe dischazges onto the surface of the bench. [RSWF 34.5] ~-r 24. Design requires: 1) manhole lift holes and grade adjustment rings be sealed with non-shrinking mortaz or other appropriate material; 2) inlet and outlet pipes be joined to the manhole with a gasketed flexible watertight connection or another watertight connection arrangement that allows differential settlement of the pipe and manhole wall; and 3) watertight manhole covers be used wherever the manhole tops may be flooded by street runoff or high water. [RSWF 34.6] . ~~ 25. Manhole inspection and testing for watertightness ar damage prior to placing into service are specified. Air testing if specified for concrete sewer manholes, conforms to the test procedures described in ASTM C-1244. [RSWF 34.7] X 25. Electrical equipment specified for use in manholes is consistent with Item 46 of this checklist. [RSWF 34.9] ~??~(l~t111,~ P.~ DPP Form 62-604.300(8)(a) EfreGivc November 6, 2°°3 Page 4 of 11 ~~tN#~E~G Cn''1~~xn.~t:~:T • ~ Stream Crossings X_ 27. Sewers and force mains entering or crossing streams are designed to be constructed of ductile iron pipe with mechanical joints or so they will remain watertight and free from changes in alignment or grade. Appropriate materials which will not readily erode, cause siltation, damage pipe during placement, or corrode the pipe are specified to backfill the trench. [RSWF 36.21 and 48.5] X 28. Stream crossings are designed to incorporate valves or other flow regulating devices (which may include pump stations) on the shoreline or at such distances form the shoreline to prevent discharge in the event the line is damaged. [62- 604.400(2)(k)5.; F.A.C.] X 29. Sewers and force mains entering or crossing streams are designed at a sufficient depth below the natural bottom of the stream bed to protect the line. At a minimum, the project is designed with subaqueous lines to be buried at Ieast three feet below the design or actual bottom, whichever is deeper, of a canal and other dredged waterway or the natural bottom of streams, rivers, estuaries, bays, and other natural water bodies; or if it is not practicable to desiga the project with less thanthree-foot minimum cover, alternative construction features (e.g. a concrete cap, sleeve, or some other properly ' engineered device to insure adequate protection ofthe line] are described in Part II.C. [62-604.400{2)(k)i., F.A.C., and RSWF 36.11] X 30. Specifications require permanent warning signs be placed on the banks of canals, streams, and rivers clearly identifying the nature and location (including depths below design or natural bottom) of subaqueous crossings and suitably fixed signs be placed at the shore, for subaqueous crossings of lakes, bays, and other large bodies of water, and in any area where anchoring is normally expected. [62-604.400(2)(k)2, F.A.C.] X 31. Provisions for testing the integrity of subaqueous lines are specified. [62-604.400(2)(k~l.; F.A.C.] X 32. Supports are designed for all joints in pipes utilized for aerial crossings and to prevent overturning and settlement. Expansion jointing is specified between above ground and below ground sewers and force mains. The design considers the impact of floodwaters and debris. [RSWF 37 and 48.5] X 33. Aerial crossings are designed to maintain existing or required navigational capabilities within the waterway and to reserve riparian rights of adjacent property owners. [62-504.400(2)(k)3., F.A.C.] Pump Stations ~~' 34. In azeas with high water tables, pump stations are designed to withstand flotation forces when empty. When siting the pump station, the design considers the potential for damage or interruption of operation because of flooding. Pump station structures and electrical and mechanical equipment are designed to be protected from physical damage by the 100-year flood. Pump stations are designed to remain fully operational and accessible during the 25-year flood unless lesser flood levels are appropriate based on local considerations, but not less than the l0-year flood. [62-604.400(2)(e), FAC.] ~'~ 3S. Pump stations are designed to be readily accessible by maintenance vehicles during all weather conditions. [RSWF 41.2] 36. Wet well and pump station piping is designed to avoid operational problems from the accumulation of grit. [ILSWF 41.3] X 37. Dry wells, including their superstructure, aze designed to be completely separated from the wet well. Common walls are designed to be gas tight. []tSWF 42.21] {~~ 38. The design includes provisions to facilitate removing pumps, motors, and o#her mechanical and electrical equipment. [RSWF 42.22] ~~~ ~.~' ~A~ ? Q 1DDD ~~~~~G ~~~~~r DEPForm6~604.300($)(a) Page 5 of I1 a ve~~l8°~ Sfftctive Nwanber 6, 2003 ~.'r 39. 1'he design includes provisions for: ])suitable and safe means of access for persons wearing self-contained breathing apparatus are provided to dry wells, and to wet wells; 2) stairway access to wet wells more than 4 feet deep containing either bar screens or mechanical equipment requiring inspection or maintenance; 3) for built-in-place pump stations, a stairway to the dry well with rest landings at vertical intervals not to exceed 12 feet; 4) for factory-built pump stations over 15 feet deep, a rigidly fixed landing at vertical intervals not to exceed 10 feet unless a manlift or elevator is provided; and S) where a landing is used; a suitable anal rigidly fixed barrier to prevent an individual frosty falling past the intermediate landing to a lower level. if a manlift or elevator is provided, emergency access is included in the design. [RSWF 42.23] QT 40. Specified construction materials are appropriate under conditions of exposure tv hydrogen sulfide and other corrosive gases, greases, oils, and other constituents frequently present in wastewater. [RSWF 42.25] 'Q,'1` 41. Except for low-pressure grinder or STEP systems, multiple pumps are specifted, and each pump has an individual intake. Where only two units are specified, they aze of the same size. Specified units have capacity such that, with any unit out of service, the remaining units will have capacity to handle the design peak hourly flow. [RSWF 42.31 and 42.36] X 42. Barracks are specified for pumps handling wastewater from 30 inch or larger diameter sewers. Where a bar rack is specified, a mechanical hoist is also provided. The design includes provisions for appropriate protection from clogging far small pump stations. [RSWF 42.322] X 43. Pumps handling raw wastewater are designed to pass spheres of at least 3 inches in diameter. Pump suction and discharge openings are designed. to be at least 4 inches in diameter. [RS WF 42.33] (Note, this provision is not applicable to grinder pumps.) a'r 44. The design requires pumps be placed such that under normal operating conditions they will operate under a positive suction head, unless pumps aze suction-lift pumps. [RSWF 42.34] 'Q,"~ 45. The design requires: 1) pump stations be protected from lightning and transient voltage surges; and 2) pump stations be equipped with lighting arrestors, surge capacitors, or other similar protection devices and phase protection. Note, pump stations serving a single building aze not required to provide surge protection devices if not necessary to protect the pump station. (62-6U4.400(2)(b}, F.A.C.] ~'f 46. The design requires 1) electrical systems and components (e.g., motors, lights, cables, conduits, switch boxes, control circuits, etc.) in raw wastewater wet wells, or in enclosed or partially enclosed spaces where hazardous concentrations of flammable gases or vapors may be present, comply with the National Electrical Code requirements for-Class 1 Group D, Division 1 locations; 2} electrical equipment located in wet wells be suitable for use under corrosive conditions; 3) each flexible cable be provided with a watertight seal and separate strain relief; 4) a fused disconnect switch located above ground be provided for the main power feed for all pump stations; 5}electrical equipment exposed to weather to meet the requirements of weatherproof equipment NEMA 3R or 4; 6) a 110 volt power receptacle to facilitate maintenance be provided inside the control panel far pump stations that have control panels outdoors; and 7) ground fault interruption protection be provided for all outdoor outlets. [RSWF 42.35] X 47. The design requires a sump pump equipped with dual check valves be provided in dry wells to remove leakage or drainage with dischazge above the maximum high water level of the wet well. [RSWF 42.37] ~,'~ 48. Pump station design capacities are based on the peak hourly flow and are adequate to maintain a minimum velocity of 2 feet per second in the force main. [RSWF 42.3$] i~.`C- 49. "The design includes provisions to automatically alternate the pumps in use. [RSWF 42.4] 1LT 54. The design requires: 1) suitable shutoff valves be placed an the suction line of dry pit pumps; 2) suitable shutoff and check valves be placed on the discharge line of each pump (except on screw pumps); 3) a cheek valve be located between the shutoff valve and the pump; 4) check valves be suitable for the material being handled; 5) check valves be placed on the horizontal portion of discharge piping (except for ball checks, which may be placed in the vertical run}; 6) all valves be capable of withstanding normal pressure and water hammer; and 7) all shutoff and check valves be operable from the floor level and accessible for maintenance. [RSWF 42.5] R ~ 51. The effective volume of wet wells is based on design average flows and a filling time not to exceed 30 minutes unless the facility is designed to provide flow equalization. The pump manufacturer's duty cycle recommendations were utilized in selecting the minimum cycle time. [RSWF 42.62] ZT 52. The design. requires wet well floors have a minimum slope of 1 to 1 to the hopper bottom and the horizontal area of hopper bottoms be no greater than necessary for proper installation and function of the inlet. [RSWF 42.63] - l~~``".3~4Rl~dl DEP Form 62.504.3oo(S}(a) Page 6 of 11 ~~_ Eff ective November 6, 2003 • • ~~ 53. For covered wet wells, the design provides for air displacement to the atmosphere, such as an inverted "j" tube or other means. [RSWF 42.64] ~'r 54. The design provides for adequate ventilation all pump stations; mechanical ventilation where the dry well is below the ground surface; permanently installed ventilation if screens or mechanical equipment requiring maintenance or inspection are located in the wet well, Pump stations aze designed with no interconnection between the wet well and dry well ventilation systems. [RSWF42.71] X SS. The design requires all intermittently operated ventilation equipment to be interconnected with the respective pit lighting system and the manual lighting/ventilation switch to override the automatic controls. [RSWF 42.73] X 56. The design requires the fan wheels of ventilation systems be fabricated from non-sparking material and automatic heating and dehumidification equipment be provided in all dry wells. [RSWF 42,74] ~'t' S7. If wet well ventilation is continuous, design provides for at least 12 complete 100% fresh air changes per hour; if wet well ventilation is intermittent, design provides for at least 30 complete 100% fresh air changes per hour; and design requires air to be forced into wet wells by mechanical means rather than solely exhausted from the wet well. [RSWF 42.75] X 58. If dry well ventilation is continuous, design provides at least 6 complete 100% fresh air changes per hour; and dry well ventilation is intermittent, design provides for at least 30 complete 100% fresh air changes per hour, unless a system of two speed ventilation with an initial ventilation rate of 30 changes per hour for 10 minutes and au#omatic switch over to 6 changes per hour is used to conserve heat. [RSWF 42.76] ~r 59. Pump stations are designed and located on the site to minimize adverse effects from odors, noise, and lighting. [62- 604.400(2xc}, F.A.C.] R'r 60. The design requires pump stations be enclosed with a fence or otherwise designed with appropriate features to discourage the entry of.animals and unauthorized persons. Posting of an unobstructed: sign made of durable weather resistant material at a location visible to the public with a telephone number for a point of contact in case of emergency is specified. [62-604.400(2)(d), F.A.C.] ~"~ 61. The design requires suitable devices for measuring wastewater flow at all pump stations. Indicating, totalizing, and recording flow measurement aze specified for pump stations with a 1200 gpm or greater design peak flow. [RSWF 42.8] R~ 62. The project is designed with no physical connections between any potable water supplies and pump stations. If a potable water supply is brought to a station, reduced-pressure principle backflow-prevention assemblies are specified. [RSWF 42.9 and 62-555.30(4), F.A.C.] Additional ]terns to be Completed for Suction-Lift Pum~Stations X 63. The design requires all suction-lift pumps to be either self-priming orvacuum-priming and the combined total of dynamic T suction-lift at the "pump off' elevation and required net positive suction head at design operating conditions not to exceed 22 feet, For self-priming pumps, the design requires: 1) pumps be capable of rapid priming and repriining at the "lead pump on" elevation with self-priming and repriming accomplished automatically under design operating conditions; 2) suction piping not to exceed the size of the pump suction or 25 feet in total length; and 3) priming lift at the "lead pump on" elevation to include a safety factor of at least 4 feet from the maximum allowable priming lift for the specific equipment at design operating conditions. For vacuum-priming pump stations, the design requires dual vacuum pumps capable of automatically and cornpletelyrernoving air from the suction-liR pumps and the vacuum pumps.be adequately protected from damage due to wastewater. [RSWF 43.1 ] X 64. The design requires: 1) suction-lift pump equipment compartments to be above grade or offset and to be effectively isolated from the wet well to prevent a hazardous and corrosive sewer atmosphere from entering the equipment compartment; 2) wet well access not to be through the equipment compartment and. to be at least 24 inches in diameter; 3} gasketed replacement plates be provided to cover the opening to the wet well for pump units to be remove for service; and 4) no valuing be located in the wet well. [RSWF 43.2] ~ [.. ~~ ~-/1+~1~11/1~~LG/~Cr~~#+~i.'l~Al~i ~1N9 l' DEP Fmm G2-604.300{8)(x) Page70f 11 ~r~AS ~Lf 44,~i~V~`diril~:l~ Effttave Novanber 6, 20°3 Additional items to be Completed for Submersible Pump Stations ~r 65. Submersible pumps and motors are designed specifically for raw wastewater use, including totally submerged operation during a portion of each pump cycle and to meet the requirements of the National Electrical Code for such units. Provisions for detecting shaft seal failure orpotential seal failure are included in the design. [RSWF 44.I] jZ.'~ 66. The design requires submersible pumps be readily removable and replaceable without dewatering the wet well or disconnecting any piping in the wet well. [RSWF 44.2] Q'~' 67. In submersible pump stations, electrical supply, control, and alarm circuits are designed to provide strain relief; to allow disconnection from outside the wet well; and to protect terminals and connectors from corrosion by location outside the wet well or through use of watertight seals. [RSWF 44.31] ~ ~ 68. In submersible pump stations, the design requires the motor control center to be located outside the wet well, readily accessible, and protected by a conduit seal or other appropriate measures meeting the requirements of the National Electrical Code, to prevent the atmosphere of the wet well from gaining access to the control center. If a seal is specified, the motor can be removed and. electrically disconnected without disturbing the seal. The design requires control equipment exposed to weather to meet the requirements of weatherproof equipment NEibiA 3R or 4. [RSWF 44.32] '[" 69. In submersible pump stations, the design requires: 1) pump motor power cords be flexible and serviceable under conditions of extra hard usage and. to meet the requirements of the National Electrical Code standards for flexible cords in wastewater pump stations; 2} ground fault intemrption protection he used to de-energize the circuit in the event of any failure in the electrical integrity of the cable; and 3) power cord terminal fittings be corrosion-resistant and constructed in a manner to prevent the entry of moisture into the cable, provided with strain relief appurtenances, and designed to facilitate field connecting. [RSWF 44.33] ~-'1 ^ 7Q. In submersible pump stations, the design requires all shut-off and check valves be located in a separate valve pit. Provisions to remove or drain accumulated water from the valve pit are included in the design. [RSWF 44.4] Emergencv Operations for Pump Stations X 71. Pump stations are designed with an alarm system which activates in cases ofpower failure, sump pump"failure, pump failure, unauthorized entry, or any cause of pump station malfunction. Pump station alarms are designed to be telemetered to a facility that is manned 24 hours a day. If such a facility is not available and a 24-hour holding capacity is nofiprovided, the alarm is designed to be telemetered to utility offices during normal working hours and to the home of the responsible person(s) in charge of the lift station during off--duty hours. Note, if an audio-visual alarm system with a self-contained power supply is provided in lieu of a telemetered system, documentation is piovided in Part ILC. showing an equivalent level of reliability and public health protection. [}tSWF 45] 72. The design requires emergency pumping capability be provided for all pump stations. For pump stations that receive flaw from one or more pump stations through a force main or pump stations discharging through pipes 12 inches or larger, the design requires uninterrupted pumping capability be provided, including an in-place emergency generator: Where portable pumping and/or generating equipment or manual transfer is used, the design includes sufficient storage capacity with an alarm system to allow time for detection ~of pump station failure and transportation and connection of emergency equipment. [62-604.400(2)(a)1. and 2., F.A.C., and RSWF 46.423 and 46.433] ~~ 73. The design requires: 1) emergency standby systems to have sufficient capacity to start up and maintainthe total rated running capacity ofthe station, including lighting, ventilation, and other auxiliary equipment necessary for safety and proper operation; 2) Special sequencing controls be provided to start pump motors unless the generating equipment has capacity to start all pumps simultaneously with auxiliary equipment operating; 3} a riser from the force main with rapid connection capabilities and appropriate valuing be provided for all pump stations to hook up portable pumps; and 4) all pump station reliability design features be compatible with the available,temporary service power generating and pumping equipment of the authority responsible for operation and maintenance of the collection/transmission system. [52-604.400(2xa)3., F.A.C., and RSWF 46.431] R'~ 74. The design provides for emergency equipment to be protected from operation conditions that would result in damage to the equipment and from damage at the restoration of regular electrical power. [RSWF 46.411, 46.417, and 46.432] ~~S-d ~,~ ~ DEP Form 62-604.30o(8)(a) Page 8 of 11 ~`~~'~~ ~ 0 2~~~ Elreelivt November 6, 2003 ~~~~~~ ~37~ ~~ c~~~~'Nr • • X 75. For permanently-installed internal combustion engines, underground fuel storage and piping facilities aze designed in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations; and the design requires engines to be located above ,grade with adequate ventilation of fuel vapors and exhaust gases. [RSWF 46.414 and 46.415] X 76. For permanently-installed or portable engine-driven pumps aze used, the design includes provisions for manual start-up. (RSWF 4b.422] X 77. Where independent substations are used for emergency power, each separate substation and its associated transmission lines is designed to be capable of starting and operating the pump station at its rated capacity. [1ZSWF 46.44] Force Mains 'R t 78. Force mains aze designed to maintain, at design pumping rates, a cleansing velocity of at least 2 feet per second. The minimum force main diameter specified for raw wastewater is not less than 4 inches. [ASWF 48.1] ~~ 79. The design requires: 1} branches of intersecting force mains be provided with appropriate valves such that one branch may be shut down for maintenance and repair without interrupting the flow of other branches; and 2) stubouts on force mains, placed in anticipation of future connections, be equipped with a valve to allow such connection without interruption of service. [62-604.400(2)(f), F.A.C.] X 80. The design requires air relief valves be placed at high points in the force main to prevent air locking. [RSWF 48.2] ~'~ 81. Specif ed~force main pipe and joints are equal to water main strength. materials suitable for design conditions. The force main, reaction blocking, and station piping are designed to withstand water hammer pressures and stresses associated Q ~ with the cycling of wastewater pump stations. (RSWF 48.4] {~-(' 82. When the Hazen and Williams formula is used to calculate friction losses through force mains, the value far "C" is 100 for unlined iron or steel pipe for design. For other smooth pipe materials, such as PVC, polyethylene, lined ductile iron, the value for C does not exceed 120 for design. [RSWF 48.61] R~ 83. Where force mains are constructed of material, which might cause the force main to be confused with potable water mains, specifications require the force main to be clearly identified. (RSWF 48.7] ~~ 84. Leakage tests for force mains aze specified including testing methods and leakage limits. (RSWF 48.8] *RSWF = Rernmmended Standards for Wastewater Facilities (1997) as adopted by rule 62-fi04.300(5)(c), F.A.C. B. Explanation for Requirements or Standards Marked "X" in II(5)A. Above (Attach additional slzeets if necessary): See Attached Sheet PART ffi -CERTIFICATIONS (1) CollectionlTransmission System Permittee I, the undersigned owner or authorized representative* of Affordable Dreams, LLC am fully aware that the statements made in this application for a construction pemtit are true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I agree to retain the design engineer or another professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observation of construction, to prepare a certification of completion of construction, and to review record drawings for adequacy. Further,l agree to provide an appropriate operation and maintenance manual for the facilities pursuant to Rule 62-604.500(4), F.A.C., and to retain a professional engineer registered in Florida to examine (or to prepare if desired) the manual. I am fully aware that Department approval must be obtained before this project is placed inters 'ee for any purpose other than testing for leaks and testing equipment operation. Signed ~ Date ~~lf `O oy Name Richard M. TammeIl, P.E. Title Authorized Agent *Attach a letter of authorization. ~+ • ~ ~i~.4~ ~~~ 7++' bEP Form 62-604.300(H)(a) ~[rtttive November 6, 2003 Page 9 of 11 ~ p ~ 2 (~ ~Q ~~ ~o ~.~.twa+3tP T'm~Lbe'?711.~~I~Ifi • • (2} Owner of Collection/Transmission System I, the undersigned owner or authorized representative* of City of Clearwater certify that we will be the Owner of this project after it is placed into service. I agree that we will operate and maintain this project in a trranner that will comply with applicable Department rules. Also I agree that we will promptly notify the Department if we sell or legally transfer ownership of this project. Signed Date Name D. Scott Rice, P.E. Title Assistant Engineering Director Company Name City of Clearwater Address 100 South Myrtle Avenue #220 City Clearwater State Florida Zip 33756 Telephone (727)562-4750 Fax Email scott.rice~myclearwater.com _ * 14ttaeh a letter of authortzation. (3) Wastewater Facility Serving Collectianrl'ransmission System** If this is a Notice of Intent to use a general permit, check here: ® The undersigned owner or sutliorized represerita6ve* of the wastewater facility hereby certifies that the above referenced facility has the capacity to receive the wastewater generated by the proposed collection system; is in compliance with the capacity analysis report requirements of Rule 62-600.405, F.A.C.; is not under a Department order ..associated with effluent violations or the ability to treat wastewater adequately; and will provide the necessary treatment. artd disposal as required by Chapter 403, F.S., and applicable Deparlrnent rules. If this is an application for an individual permit, check one: 0 The undersigned owner or authorized representative* of the .wastewater facility hereby certifies that the above referenced facility has and will have adequate reserve capacity to accept the flow from this project and will provide the necessary treatmem and disposal as required by Chapter 403, F.S., and applicable Department rules. ^ The undersigned owner or authorized representative* of the wastewater facility hereby certifies that the above referenced facility currently does not have, but will have prior to placing the proposed project into operation, adequate reserve capacity to accept the flow from this project and will provide the necessary treatment and disposal as required by Chapter 403, F.S., and applicable Department rules. Name of Treatment Plant Serving Project County City DEPpermitnumber FL Maximum monthly average daily flow over the last 12 month period Maximum three`month average daily flow over the last 12 month period Expiration Date MGD Month(s) used MGD Current permitted capacity MGD Current outstanding flow commitments (including this project) against treatment plant capacity: Month(s) used ~AADF ^MADF ^ TMADF Signed Date Name D. Scott Rice, P.E. Title Assistant Engineering Director Address 100 South Myrtle Avenue #220 City Clearwater State Florida Zip 3375b Telephone (727)562-4750 Fax Email scott.rice@myclearwater.com " Attach a letter of authorization. ** If there is an intermediate collection system, a letter shall be attached cent Eying that the intermediate downstream collection system has adequate reserve capacity to accept the jlow from this project. ~; ~:.~~_ ~a~'~ DFY Form 62-609.300(6)(a) E6ktwe November 6.2001 Page 10 of 11 ~~ ~~pp,~~~~~a~~$1~2pQ "Z~~~ hhs~ ~~'d1YliS7L~ ~1~1~l~i4~~tV~ • ~ {4) Professional Engineer Registered in Florida I, the undersigned professional engineer registered in Florida, certify that I am in responsible charge of the preparation and production of engineering documents for this project; that plans and specifications for this project have been completed; that I have expertise in the design of wastewater collection/transmission systems; and that, to the best of my lrnowledge and belief, the engineering design for this project complies with the requirements of Chapter 52-5G4, F.A.C. Name Richard M. Tommell J. f•// OOf ~ - ~: ~ . Signed Date 3 -~ f - o,p ~... _ ; -~ ---: ' _~ . - . _ _ ~~, Florida Registration No. 61859 - CompanyName Avid Group .. _ - _ _ Address 2300 Curlew Road City Palm Harbor State Florida ~ Zip 34683 Telephone (7z7) ~s9-ysoo Fax (727) 784-6662 Fmk rick.tommell@avidgroup.com Portion ofPxoject for Which Responsible Entire Project ~ f ~ r ~f r I Signed Date Name Company Name Address Florida Registration No. City State Zip Telephone Fax Email Portion of Project for Which Responsible Signed Date Name Florida Registration No. Company Name Address City State Zip Telephone Fax Portion of Project for Which Responsible Emad ~°:a~fi. P~#s Mai ? 0 200 DEP Fom~ 82.604.300(8)(a) Page I 1 of l l ~~~~i`~ ~~~ EtrcebveNOVember6,20o3 ^'~.U9 P ®~ ~'~ally~~~ • • s Florida Department of Environmental Protection Notification/Application for constructing a domestic wastewater collection/transmission system. explanations for Requirements or Standards marked "X". 1 -Per City of Clearwater Design Criteria, flow was determined at an Average Daily Flow of 300 gallons, per unit 11 -Velocities do not exceed 15 fps 12 -Slopes do not exceed 20% 19 -Inverted siphons are not proposed 21 -Design does not require drop pipes 26 - No electrical equipment is proposed in manholes 27-33 - No stream crossings are proposed 37 - A dry well system is not proposed 42 --Ail pipes are less than 30" in diameter 43 -The proposed pump station will incorporate a grinder pump 47 - A dry well system is not proposed 55 -Intermittent ventilation is not proposed 56 -Fan wheels are not proposed 58 - A dry-well system is not proposed 6364 -.A suction-left.pump station is not proposed 71 ='Qesign does not~include;analarm`system 75 -Internal combustion engines are not proposed 7fi=- Desig-~ does not`include;~provisions for°rnanual start-up . ~~"~ 77 -Independent substations are not proposed ~~~ 80 -Air relief valves are not proposed ~~;~ ~ d ~QQQ ~~I~"G ~~,~I~NT ~R~`T~1= ~~u °'r'1i~F~ • • Affordable Dreams, ~~C 4b85 118"' Avenue, N. Clearwater, FL 33762 September 27, 200? LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION To Whom It May Concern: This letter does authorize Richard M. Tommeli/Avid Group, to act as our agent for and with all regulatory agencies, departments and their personnel for the City of Clearwater, Southwest Florida Water Management District, Pinellas County, Florida Department of Transportation and Florida Department of Environmental Protection, in an effort to receive all permits necessary for the construction and development of the Townhomes at Lake Bellevue project located at 802 and 826 Woodlawn Street, Clearwater, Florida., Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. Owner Date State of Florida Cn this a-~~~"day of , 2047, before me personally appeared ~ ,known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrumen ,and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. ~~ a ~ Notary Public KAREN A GAN MY COMM[S510N N bD593392 1~(P€RES:.Fuly 12.2010 Ii0W4it7TAtlY Ft.NotsryTiitcamtAamCa~ r ~ j a-~~ ~~ Date ~~"~ P~ ~~&~~ ~' ~ 2008 County of \ . ~: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPURT For tf~e TOWNHOMES AT BELLEVUE NE CORNER OF 15T AVE WEST AND WOODLAWN STREET GLEARWATER, FLQRIDA Prepared for Midway Services, inc. 4fi77 118t~ Ave N. Clearwater, FL 33762 Prepared by Professional Service Industries, Inc. 5801 Benjamin Center Drive Suite 112 Tampa, Florida 33834 Telephone (813} 886-1075 Fax {813} 888-6514 PSI Project No. 787-75142 September 7, 2007 .~ ~ ~ ~ '}~ Infortnution ~~~ ~ ~~~ . ~o Build on Engineering • Conset-t~ing • Testing .. a '~ J ss`ca J. N s~' P ~ ` ct Geal ' 'Martin ~_ Millburg, P.E.. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Florida License Cr1o. 36584 4~RIGIIdAL. RE~EIYED acs 01 ~aaZ PLANNING DEPARTFAEIVT CITY OF GLEARWATER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION .............................................................,,.....................,..... 1 1.1 PROJECT AUTHORIZ,4TION .............•----.............-...-.................................................. 1 1.2 PROJECT- DESCRIPTION .......................•---................................................................ 1 1.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK .............................................................................. 1 2.0 SITE AND SUBS~JRFACE CONDITIONS ..... ............................................................ 3 ... .......................................... 3 2.1 SfTE ^ESCRIPTION ........................................................ 2.2 PINELLAS COUNTY SOIL Sl1RVEY ............................................................................. 3 2.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ...................................................•-•-----......................_..... 3 2.4 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION ................................................................................. 4 2.5 DOUBLE-RING INFILTRATION TEST ............................................................................ 4 3.0 EVALUATION AND REGOMMENDATIONS ..................................................,........... 4 3.1 GENERAL ................................................................................................................4 3.2 'GENERAL SITE PREPARATION .................................................................................. 5 3.3 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS ..............................:........................•-------............. 7 3.4 SETTLEMENT ..........................................................................................................7 3.5 FLOOR SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................ 8 3.6 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................... 8 3.6.1 BASE ........................................................................................ ... 9 ............... 3.fi.2 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT ..........................•--............._..................... 9 3.6.3 RIGID CONCRETE PAVEMENT ........................................................................ 9 3.7 FILL AVAILABILITY......,...................... .............-•---•................................................... 1Q 4.0 CONSTRUCTION CONS[DERATIONS ..................................................................... 10 4.1 GENERAL ......................... ...............•----...............................................................10 4.2 DRAINAGE ANb GROUNDWATER CONCERNS ........................................................... 10 4.3 POND DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................ 10 .................... 10 4.3.1 BAS!` or= AQuiFER .................................................................. 4.3.2 FILLABLI POROSITY ---------------------•--................................................---........ 10 4.3.4 SUMMARY OF POND DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................ 1 1 4.4 ExcavATloNS ............................................-- ............._........................................ 11 5.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................. 11 ATTACHMENTS SHEET 1 -BORING LOCATION PLAN SHEET 2 -SOIL PROFILES OR{GtN~ DOUBLE-RING INFILTROMETER TEST GRAPE-I REO~~~ P~N1NG DEP~ jgp~R C11Y Op CLEAR ~.~a~'st~:~~ ' Midway SerWices. Inc, ~~~'~`~`y~ Tpwnhomes at Bellevue ~ ~ 1.0 PRQJECT INF4RMATIQN 1.1 PROJECT AUTHORIZATION Authorization to proceed with this project. was provided by Mr. Christopher Koncal, Chief Operating Officer of Midway Services, Inc. through written acceptance of PSI's proposal on July 31, 2007. This study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for these services dated July 20, 2007 {Revised 7125107), PSI Proposal No. 787-7G0232 {rev.1 }. 1.2 PROJECT BESCRIPTiON We understand approximately $ acres are planned to be developed at the northeast corner of the intersection of Woodfawn Street and 1st Avenue Westin Clearwater, Florida. The proposed construction includes fourteen two-story multi-townhome buildings, three stormwater detention ponds, and associated drives and parking areas are planned for the site. Only one of the ponds is new, the other two wilt be slightly reconfigured to accommodate the proposed construction. PS! has been requested to provide subsurface soil and groundwater information to assist. in developing this project site. Should any of the above information or assumptions made by PSI be inconsistent with the planned construction, we request that you contact us immediately to allow us to make any necessary modifications to the recommendations contained herein. 7.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK The purpose ofi this study is to provide a geotechnical study for developing geotechnical design criteria for the project site. In this regard, engineering assessments of the following items have been formulated: 1. Feasibility of utilizing a shallow foundation system for support of the proposed building, with slab-on-grade floor systems. 2. Design parameters for the foundation system including allowable bearing pressures and expected settlements. 3. Soil subgrade preparation, including stripping, grubbing and compaction. Engineering criteria for placement and compaction of approved structural fill materials. 4. General location and description of potentially dele#erious materials encountered in the borings which may interfere with construction progress or structure performance, including existing fills or surficiai organics. 5. Identification of groundwater levels and estimated seasonal fluctuations. ®Rti~~ ~~CEPlE~ oc~~ o ~ ~~a~. S ~P11N~ pEP W~TE~ c-N ®¢ c~~ ~: ,~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ f~lidway Services- !nC. ,~,Q;~,.~:__. To~~+r.hC!r~f:s at Bclleti-u~ ~ ~ 6. Pond design criteria including depth to the seasonal high groundwater, depth to the confining layer, estimated vertical and horizontal permeability of the sails and the finable porosity. The fonowing services have been provided in order to achieve the preceding objectives: 1. Executed a program of subsurface exploration consisting of subsurface sampling and field-testing. As requested, we performed eleven (11) Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings in the proposed project area. Ten SPT borings were performed in proposed building areas. One SPT baring was performed in the proposed pond. Each soil boring was. extended 2U feet below the current ground surface, In each boring, samples were collected for the top 10 feet and on intervals of 5 feet thereafter. 2. A Double Ring Infiltration Test (DRIT) was performed far the proposed pond. 3. Visually classified representative sail samples in the laboratory using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS}. Conducted a limited laboratory testing program. Identified soil conditions at each boring location and farmed an opinion of the site soil stratigraphy. 4. Reviewed available published topag~aphic and soils information. This published information was obtained from the "Clearwater" Quadrangle Map published by the United States Geological Survey (USCS} and the "Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida" published by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA} Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 5. Collected groundwater level measurements and estimated ORtG~N-~ normal wet seasonal high groundwater levels. ~ECErvED 6. The results of the exploration have been used. in the ®~~ o ~- 2d~Z engineering analysis and the formulation of Pu~NNti-vGDE~~,ar~nENr recommendations. The results of the subsurface CIZYOfCLEARWATER exploration, including the recommendations and the data on which they are based, are presented in this report supervised by a professional engineer. The scope of services did not include an environmental assessment for determining the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, bedrock, ~.~ ~~~_ ~ ~ Midway Services. Inc. t~ n`~,,r~iF.~.~~ ' TQwr,hom~a ~~ i32flevC~e ~ • ground water, or air, on or below or around this site. Any statements in this report or on the boring logs regarding odors, unusual or suspicious items or conditions are strictly for the information of our client. 2.0 SITE ANQ SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION This project is located in Section 22, Township 29 South, and Range 15 East in Pinellas County, Florida. The elevation of the site is about 45 to 55 feet NGVD based on the 2(3Q'( U.S. Geological Survey quadrangle map titled "Clearwater''. The site is currently partially wooded and partially developed with single family homes and two existing ponds. The property lies just to the south of Ed C. Wright Parkin Clearwater. 2.2 PINELLAS COUNTY SOIL SURVEY The "Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida'" published by the USDA, SCS, was reviewed for general near surface soil information. This information indicated the primary soil unit at the project location is Myakka fine sand (mapping unit My). This soil type is nearly level and poorly drained on broad fiats between sloughs and swamps. In places it is gently sloping. The water table is normally at a depth of 10 to 30 inches. The water table rises to the surface for a short time during wet periods and falls below 30 inches during extended dry periods. 2.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS As noted above, the subsurface conditions were explored using eleven (11) Standard Penetration Test (SPT} borings; each extended 2Q feet below the current ground surface. The boring locations were based on the site plan provided by AVID Engineering, Inc. The soil borings were located in the €ield by measuring distances from existing features, in accessible areas. Therefore the boring locations presented on Sheet 2 are approximate. The SPT borings were advanced utilizing rotary mud drilling methods and soil samples were routinely obtained at select intervals during the drilling process- Samples obtained in the field were returned to the laboratory for visual classification and laboratory testing. ~3rilling and sampling techniques were accomplished in general accordance with ASTM Standards. In general the borings encountered clean to slightly silty fine sands (SPISP-SM) with measured SPT resistances (N--values} of 3 to 65 blows per foot (BPF}. These soils are a classified as very loose to very dense with a color ranging from light gray to very dark brown. An organic layer composed of very dark fibrous soil was encountered at a depth z~ ~ ~ from Q to 8 and 8 to 1 Q feet in several of the soil borings. Borings B-4 encountered a silty ~ ~ ° cn sand stratum from approximately 15 to 20 feet deep. o `~ ~. ar A ,~ ~w€.~ ~jj 3 MiUway Services. Inc- t~`~`~'~~7 Townhai?'~~s ~t 8ellev~~e The description presented above is of a generalized nature to highlight the major subsurface features and material characteristics. The soil profiles included on Sheet 2 should be reviewed for specific information at individual boring locations. These profiles include soil description, stratifications, penetration resistances and laboratory classification of soils. The stratifications shown an the boring profiles represent the conditions only at the actual boring locations. Variations may occur and should be expected between boring locations. The stratifications represent the approximate boundary between subsurface materials and the actual transition may be gradual. 2.4 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION The groundwater level was encountered between 4 and 6 feet deep in the borings throughout the site. It should be noted that groundwater levels tend to fluctuate during periods of prolonged drought and extended rainfall and may be affected by manmade influences. !n addition, a seasonal effect wil{ also occur in which higher groundwater levels are normally recorded in rainy seasons. In this regard,. it is estimated that the seasonal high groundwater table (SHGWT) will be approximately 3 feet below the current ground surface. In general, the estimated seasonal high groundwater level is not intended to define a limit or ensure that future seasonal fluctuations in groundwater levels will not exceed the estimated levels. Groundwater levels could exceed the estimated seasonal high groundwater levels as a result of a series of rainfall events, changed conditions at the site that alter surface water drainage characteristics, and/or variations. in duration, intensity, or total volume of rainfall. 2.5 1,70UBLE-RING INFILTRATION TEST A double-ring infiltration test ~DRIT) was performed in accordance with ASTM Designa#ion D5493-42 near boring 8-10 in the proposed pond. The test was performed August 16, 2047, and yielded an infiltration rate of 17.3 inches per hour. A graph of the results is attached in the appendix. 3.U EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3.'I GENERAL Based on our observations, it is our opinion that subsurface soil conditions at the site are generally favorable far the planned development from a geatechnical engineering ~~ perspective provided that the recommendations presented herein are followed. v ~ a ~ N ~ ~ The following design recommendations have been developed an the basis of the ~ ~ ~ o previously described project characteristics and subsurface conditions encountered. If o ~ ~_ ~ u there are any changes in these project criteria, including project location an the site, a review must be made by PSI to determine if any modifications in the recommendations a, ~~'' ~ t7~ 4 Mid~ti~8y Services. !nc- ~~~~~~~ ~ Tow~hc!~nes ~t Qeile~~ve will be required. The findings of such a review should be presented in a supplemental report. Once final design plans and specifications are available, a general review by PSI is strongly recommended as a rr~eans to check that the evaluations made in preparation of this report are correct and that earthwork and foundation recommendations are properly interpreted and implemented. 3.2 GENEf2At_ SITE PREPARATION The following are oUr recommendations for overall site preparation. These recommendations should be used as a guideline for the pro}ect general specifications prepared by the design engineer. Organics, vegetation or any other deleterious materials present within proposed building and pavement areas should be removed. If existing pavements, floor slabs, and foundations are at least 12 inches below the bottom of any floor slabs or foundations ar at least 92 inches below the surface of any proposed pavement, those existing structures should be removed. All encountered deleterious materials should be removed and disposed of properly. At a minimum, it is recommended that the clearing operations extend at least 5 feet beyond the development perimeters. 2. Fallowing clearing and stripping operations, it is recommended that the site be proafrolled with a heavy vibratory roller (40,000 to 60,000 ft-Ibs of energy) and be compacted to a minimum depth of 1 foot below stripped grade to a dry density of at least 95% of the modified Proctor maximum dry density within the proposed structure and new pavement areas. Compaction of the construction site should continue until the roller has made at least eight passes over ail areas of the site. Half of the roller passes should be perpendicular to the direction of travel of the other passes. Any area where the recommended density has not been achieved should be undercut to firm soils and backfilled with structural fill. It is essential that this compaction effort be implemented for the upper soils on this site. Excessive settlement may occur if compaction of these upper sails is not performed. 3. Following satisfactory completion of the initial compaction, the structure and pavement areas may be brought up to finished subgrade levels, if needed, using structural fill. The on-site clean to slightly silty fine sands (SP/SP-SM) are generally suitable for use as fill, if available. Off-site fill soils should be ~ tested and approved by PSI prior to hauling to the site. Imported fill should o consist of fine sand with less than 12% passing the No. 200 sieve, free of rubble, organics, clay, debris and other unsuitable material. Fill should be tf ;:,1"~c'~~.~j~ ~ NEidway Services. Inc. a _~ i ~ tested and approved prior to acquisition. Approved sand fill should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 12 inches in thickness and should be compacted to a minimum density of 95% of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. Density tests to confirm compaction should be performed in each fill lift before the next lift is placed. 4. Prior to beginning compaction, soil moisture contents may need to be controlled in order to facilitate proper compaction. If additional moisture is necessary to achieve compaction objectives, then water should be applied in such a way that it will not cause erosion or removal of the subgrade soils. A moisture content within the percentage range needed to achieve compaction (typically +/- 3%} is recommended prior to compaction of the na#ural ground and fill. 5. After compaction and proofrolling, building foundation excavations can begin. All foundation excavations should be observed by the geotechnical engineer or a representative to explore the extent of any €oose, soft, or otherv+rise undesirable materials. if the foundation excavations appear suitable as load bearing materials, the Bottom of the foundation excavations should be compacted to a minimum density of 95°l0 of the modified Proctor maximum dry density for a rx~inimum depth of one fioot below the bottom of the footing depth, as determined by field density compaction tests. Backfill soils placed adjacent to footings or wal€s should be carefully compacted with a light rubber-tired roller or vibratory plate compactor to avoid damaging the footings or walls. Approved sand fills to provide foundation embedment constraint should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding Z 2 inches and should be compacted to a minimum density of 95% of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. 6. If soft pockets or debris are encountered in the footing excavations, the unsuitable materials should be removed and the proposed footing elevation may be re-established by backfilling after the undesirable material has been removed. This backfilling may be done with a very lean concrete or with a well-compacted, suitable fill such as clean sand, gravel, or crushed FDflT No. 57 or FDOT No. 67 stone. Backfill should be compacted to a minimum density of 95% of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. 7. Immediately prior to reinforcing steel placement, it is suggested that the bearing surfaces of all footing and floor slab areas be compacted using hand operated mechanical tampers. €n this manner, any localized areas which have been loosened by excavation operations should be adequately ~ ~F ~: recompacted. Q 8. A representative from our firm should be retained to provide on-site o ~ ~ ~ observation of earthwark and ground modification activities. Density tests ~; ~ should be performed in the top 1 foot of compacted existing ground, each ' t"+~~ ~' N'iidway Services, Inc. ~~~. ~~ 7ewnha~ies aI Sellevu~ ~'S1 P~o~ec! P:n :~i 7~ jcl~ fill lift, and the bottom of foundation excavations. It is important that PSI be retained to observe that the subsurface conditions are as we have discussed herein, and that foundation construction, ground modification and fill placement is in accordance with our recommendations. 3.3 FOUNDATION RECOMMEFlDA71QN$ With proper subgrade preparation, column footings and continuous wall foundations can be designed for a net allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,508 pounds per square foot, based on dead load plus design live load. Minimum dimensions of 24 inches for column footings and 18 inches for continuous footings should be used in foundation design to account for variable subsurface conditions, regardless of whether the maximum allowable foundation bearing pressures have been fully developed. Exterior footings should be located at a depth of at least 18 inches below the final exterior grade. Interior footings can be located on properly compacted soils at nominal depths (minimum 12 inches) compatible with architectural and structural considerations. The foundation excavations should be observed by a representative of PSI prior to steel or concrete placement to confirm that the compacted fill foundation materials are capable of supporting the design loads and are consistent with the materials discussed in this report. If the foundation excavations appear suitable as load bearing materials, the bottom of the foundation excavations should be compacted to a minimum density of 95% of the modified Proctor maximum dry density for a minimum depth of one foot below the bottom of the footing depth, as determined by field density compaction tests. Soft or loose soil zones encountered at the bottom of the footing excavations should be removed and replaced with fill soils (as directed above), lean concrete or dense graded compacted crushed stone (FDQT No. 57). After opening, footing excavations should be observed and concrete placed as quickly as possible to avoid exposure of the footing bottoms to wetting and drying. Surface run-off water should be drained away from the excavations and not be allowed to pond. The foundation concrete should be placed during the same day the excavation is made. 3.4 SETTLEMENT The settlement of shallow foundations supported on compacted sand fill should occur rapidly after loading. Thus, the expected settlement should occur during construction as structural loads are imposed. Provided the recommended site preparation operations are properly performed, any organic materials have been removed and the recommendations previously stated are utilized, the total settlement of wall and isolated- column footings should not exceed approximately 1 inch. Differential settlement is estimated to be on the order of 50 percent of the total settlement. Settlement of this magnitude is usually considered tolerable for the anticipated construction; however, the tolerance of the proposed structure to the predicted total and differential settlement should be confirmed by the structural engineer. ~- 0 ,~ ~ ~~ ~- f.J ~ti~ „_ - ~ ni~'c~. F ~ Midway ServicFss. #nc. ,~ ,° --~~ ;~ 7ewnhon~e{ . t fie Ee~1~ic ~ r1..z i ~ 3.5 •iLOOR SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS Slab-on-grade construction should be supported on soils compacted to a minimum dry density of at least 95% of their modified Proctor value, We have assumed no extraordinary floor slab performance requirements such as very low allowable deflections or smoothness requirements are necessary. Any cuts that are made in the building pad for utility installation should be backfilled with clean granular materials that are compacted. to at least 95 percent of their ASTM d-1557 maximum dry density. Material to be placed within 12 inches of the bottom of the slab should have no single particle greater than 3 inches in size, and should meet the requirements of approved structural fill. The floor slab should be reinforced to reduce the risk of cracking due to settlement. An impervious membrane should be installed between the soil subgrade and bottom of floor slabs to be overlain with moisture sensitive coverings to avoid slab moisture problems. Floor slab design should conform to American Concrete Institute (ACI) design standards and practices. 3.6 PAVEMENT RECUiVIMENDATIQNS In general, following the completion of the recommended site preparation as discussed earlier, the compacted natural and new fill soils should be acceptable for construction and support of a flexible (limerock, crushed concrete or shell base} or rigid (concrete) type pavement section. Any fill utilized to elevate the cleared pavement areas to subgrade elevation should consist of reasonably clean (maximum 12 percent passing. the No. 2(}0 sieve) fine sands uniformly compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor rnaximurn dry density (ASTM ~-1557 }. The following pavement. recommendations are considered minimum far the site soil and limited traffic conditions expected. ASPHALTIC COH[CRETE PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Minimum Thickness (inches) Material Light Traffic Medium Traffic Parkin Drives Type S-I or SP-12.5 4 '/z 2 As haitic Concrete Base ~ ~ 8 Minimum LBR = 100 Stabilized subgrade ~~ 12 {Minimum L8R = 4D} A ~~ Q ~ ~' `" ~ 3 a W ~ ~ Q ~ 0 ~ W ~ ~ F ~U ~~ ''^'"~,~F,7'1 ~ MidEV2y Services. [nc. ~~~~~ i t~tivntiu!nes at BelfEvuF 3.6.1 BASS The choice of pavement base type basically will depend on final pavement grades. If a minimum separation of 18-inches between the bottom of the base and the seasonal high groundwater level is maintained, then a limerock, or bank-run shell base can be utilized; otherwise, crushed concrete or asphaltic concrete base would be required. I_imerock, bank-run shell, crushed concrete and asphaltic concrete base materials should meet FDOT requirements including compaction to 98% of its maximum dry density as determined by the modified Proctor test (ASTM D-1557) and a minimum I_BR of 100%_ Crushed concrete should be graded in accordance with FDOT Standard Specification Section 204. Based on the expected traffic conditions, we recommend that the base course be a minimum of six (6) inches thick in light duty areas and eight (8) inches thick in medium duty areas. The subgrade should be firm and true to line and grade prior to paving. Traffic should not be allowed on the subgrade as the base is placed to avoid rutting. 3.6.2 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT Based on the results of our evaluation, it is recommended that the total asphaltic concrete thickness consist of Type S-1 (or SP-12.5) asphaltic concrete material with a minimum of 1 % inches for parking and 2 inches for driveway areas. The asphaltic concrete should meet standard FDOT material requirements and placement procedures. as outlined in the current FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. The asphaltic concrete should be compacted to a minimum of 90i% ofi the Marshall maximum laboratory unit weight (or 93% of the maximum theoretical specific gravity (Gm~,) if using type SP-12.5). 3..6.3 RIGID CONCRETE PAVEMENT Rigid (concrete} pavements could also be used: The concrete should have a minimum compressive strength of 4000 psi at 28 days when tested in ~ accordance with ASTM C-39. Based on our experience, a minimal ~ thickness of 5 inches should be utilized for light duty applications and a o minimal thickness of 7 inches should be utilized for medium-duty applications. The steel reinforcement within the concrete pavement should be designed by the civil engineer. The subgrade soils should be compacted to a minimum density of 98% of the modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D-1557). All pavement materials and construction procedures should conform to Florida DOT or appropriate city and/or county requirements. Acfual pavement section thickness should ~.~~ j ~n~ ~ Midway Seri~rces. Inc. (~`~ £l . ~;~;~~_,_,. 7ownhomes ~t BElle~ue t'Si Prpj~Cl lJC. 7°7.7i;1.?Z ~~ ~¢ N ~~ ~ ~~ Q °u ~._ ~ ~- i_ ~ z o ~~ ~ v a be provided by the design civil engineer based on traffic loads, volume and the owners design life requirements. 3.7 ~ICL AVAILABILITY The fine to slightly silty fine sands ASP/SP-SM) encountered from the ground surface to termination in most of the borings can be used as structural fill material provided it is free of any clay, organics or deleterious materials. ~.D CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIQNS 4.1 G~NI`RAL It is recommended that PSI be retained to provide observation and testing of construction activities involved in the pavement, earthwork, and related activities of this project. PSI cannot accept any responsibility for any conditions which deviate from those described in this report, if not engaged to also provide construction observation and testing for this project. 4.2 DRAINAGE AND GROUNDWATER CONCERNS Water should not be allowed to collect in or on the prepared subgrades of the construction area either during or after construction. Undercut or excavated areas should be sloped toward one corner to facilitate removal of any collected rainwater, groundwater, or surface runoff. Positive site drainage should be provided to reduce infiltration of surface water within the construction area. 4.3 POND De51GN RECOMMENDATIONS 4.3.1 BASE OF ACaUIFEFt For the design of stormwater pond, the base of the aquifer can be determined by the depth to the confining layer. A confining layer is generally regarded as a soil stratum that will significantly impede the infiltration of water- No confining layer was encountered in the soil borings. D 4.3.2 1`iLLABLE PQROSITY ~ Q~ The porosity of a soil is the percentage of the total volume of the material that is occupied by pores or interstices. These pores may be filled with water or air and are referred to as void space. Generally, it is assumed 9Q percent of the unsaturated void space is available for filling. From St. Johns Water Nlanagernent District, special publication SJ93-SP~O (1993), the value for fillable porosity for fine sands can be expected to vary from 2Q to 30 percent. Based on the soil profile encountered, we believe a very r-. N '~ u © n U e•-_ ~ ~, f...3 ~:3 ~ ~U {)~r:~'~r'~1 i0 Mid~v~y ServiCps. Inc i3r~ € ownnon~es at BeiEevue conservative value on the order of 20% should be assumed for the finable porosity. 4.3.4 SUMMARY of STORMWATER POND DESIGN RaCOMMENDATIONS Approximate Base of Aguifer Depth ~ 20 feet Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater pe th 3 Feet Vertical Permeability 34.5 ft/day Horizontal Permeability 34.5 ft/day Finable Porosity 20% 4.4 EXCAVATIOIVS In Federal Register, Volume 54, No_ 209 (October 1989), the United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) amended its "Gonstruction Standards for Excavations, 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P". This document was issued to better insure the safety of workmen entering trenches or excavations, 1t is mandated by this federal regulation that excavations, whether they be utility trenches, basement excavations or footing excavations, be constructed in accordance with the current OSHA guidelines. It is our understanding that these regulations are being strictly enforced and if they are not closely followed, the owner and the contractor could be liable for substantial penalties. The contractor is solely responsible for designing and constructing stable, temporary excavations and should shore, slope, or bench the sides of the excavations as required to maintain stability of both the excavation sides and bottom_ The contractors "responsible person", as defined in 29 CFR, Part 1926, should evaluate the soil exposed in the excavations as part of the contractor's safety procedures_ In no ease should slope height, slope inclination, or excavation depth, including utility trench excavation depth, exceed those specified in ati local, state, and federal safety regulations. We are providing this information solely as a service to our clienf. PSI does not assume responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor`s ar other party's compliance with local, state, and federal safety ar other regulations. 5.d REPORT LIMITATIONS The recommendations submitted are based on the available subsurface information obtained by PSI and design details furnished by PJlidway Services for the proposed project. If there are any revisions to the plans far this project or if deviations from the subsurface conditions noted in this report are encountered during construction, PSI should be notified immediately to determine if changes in the foundation recommendations are required. 0 ~Q ~ _~ ~U ~ a oa ~ ~~. ~ ~r~~~~ 11 Midw2ySPrvices IY:C. ~~ TUwnhovres at E3elle~~uE . iii E"%iO~BCI fVl~. %~; .~-r:i i~G Much of the State of Florida is underlain by a salable limestone foundation. This limestone can dissolve, resulting in the formation of a sinkhole. An evaluation of the risk of sinkhole development was not included in the Scope of work far this study. Psi did not provide any service to investigate or detect the presence of moisture, mold or other biological contaminant in or around any structure, or any service that was designed or intended to prevent or lower the risk of the occurrence of the growth of the same. Mold is common to the environment with mold growth occurring when building materials are impacted by moisture. Client acknowledges that site conditions are outside of PSI's control, and that mold growth will likely occur, or continue to occur, in the presence of moisture. As such, PSI cannot and shall not be held responsible for the occurrence or recurrence of mold. The geotechnical engineer warrants that the findings, recommendations, specifications, or professional advice contained herein have been made in accordance with generally accepted professional geotechnical engineering practices in the local area. No other warranties are implied or expressed. After the plans and specifications are more complete, the geotechnical engineer should be retained and provided the opportunity to review the final design plans and specifications to check that our engineering recommendations have been properly incorporated into the design documents. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Midway Services and its consultants for the specific application to the proposed Townhames at Bellevue in Clearwater, Florida, Q9 ~~ t'~= ~ ~YI ~ 2 Midway SPr~rECes Frc. ~;~ .~~ TOw~~ho1i7~5 ~{ 62llevue !t W ~ ~ ~~ N H ~~ O ~O ~ C4 C:,~ 2 d ~• ~ U APPENDIX ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ a~ ~~ o ~ ~.- . ~ _~ Z Q ~, ~U p'r^~- ~ Cf r,"r~~ ~a ~~~~~~ g `s _.. 3i I LEGEND 1`\°e l' Approximate SPT boring location +I ~i :1+G~1?L4~1~~ SF 0 Approximate Double Ring Infiltrometer Test location ti ~ W ~ ~ N ,~ 3 a ~ ~ ~~ q ~ ~--. {~ ? z ~ ~U NOTE: SITE PLAN PROVIDED 6Y AVID ENGINEERING, INC. n BORING LOCATION PLAN 0 120 PLAN SCALE pgAlll ~~ AN GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ~H TOWNHOMES AT BELLEVUE MGM CLEARwATER, FLORIDA ~:f n arms aan ~"`~ ~JTo Butild On NOTED . F„ °"'~ AUG 07 `~'` "~ 787-75142 SHEET i } s u 4 B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 B -7 B-8 B-9 B-1~ 8-11 N N N N N N ~ N N N N N o .. 3 '.'.'. 3 .'.'. 18 .. ... 36 .. ~.'.' 10 '.'.' 13 .'.'. 12 . .. '.'. 7 ... 11' .. ..: A 5 .. ... 3 .. .'.'. 10 .".. A g .'.'. A 20 •••~• 33 •"~. 20 22 .'.' 15 ~ ~ " A 18 ~~ p 12 ~•~•• 8 ~•~• A 7 .".'. 8 .'.'. Q 9 '.'.' S 20 ,". ~ 20 .:.:. ~ 20 ... SZ. ~ - 24 _ •.'.' ~ 12 '.'.' ~_ 8 ..' ~- 13 • • .'.. 4. ~ 8 .'.'. it ...:. 5 = ~ ... ~ - S .'.' , B 8 ..... 8 ' ' . 10 "'•'• 8 •.., 15 ' .. 10 .•••. g. '.'.' g ~'.'. 7 .'.'. 10 '.',• • 1 0 .-. w 18 ... 5 ,.... @ S .... 9 ~ i0 .. ; } 9 5 , .. 10 ~.'.' 3 ; ". 6 14 ••~• 9 ... y . , . 11 . ' '. OC=4 .~.~ 10 ... ... 1 ~ "~ ... O .. .. 0 ' ' ... 1 O . 1 ~ O .' .'.. 1 = . . . OC=2 H w~ ~ ••••• 0 ~: to ~''~ 0 :•., ~j B 40 ','.'. 17 .'.'. 30 .'.'. 25 '.'.' 28 '.'.' 14 .".". 38 .'.'. 65 .'.. 28 '.'.' 38 '.'.' 62 .'.". 15 . ~ 15 '.'.'. 13 ... ~ 12 .'.'. 1S ~. ." 12 '.'.' 20 ..'. .. 45 .'.'. .. 18 .'.'. .. 16 .". ... 40 '.'.' .. 38 .".~. 20 LEGEND Light gray to very dark brown fine SAND to 0~ slightly silty fine SAND (SP/SP-SM) f~2 ~ Brown silty SAND (SM} a Root fragments e Orgonic SP Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D 2487) group symbol as determined by visual review N SPT N-value in blows/foot. -~ Groundwater level, August 2007 oc Organic Content (~) SOIL PROFILES o s' VERTICAL SCALE ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~U Ocr '- ZLL ~~ . 0.U o~~w~ AN GEOTECHN@CAL SERVICES ~~, ~H TOWNHOMES AT BELtEVUE ,, MEM CLEARWATER, FLORIDA n o~rma tion To Build 4n NOTED . r °"'~ AUG 07 `"0'LND~ 787-75142 SHEET 2 zo.o 1s s 1s.o 18.5 '0 18.0 r m ~ 17.5 c .q ._ 17.0 16.5 16.0 15.5 15.0 DOUBLE-RING INFILTROMETER TEST Townhomes at Bellevue. DRIT-1 PSI 'Project No. 787-75142 Stabilized Infiltration Rate = 17.3 inlhr at 36 in. below grade 0 ORIGINAL RECENEI? u ~: i t~ ~. 2~0~ PLANNING DI=PARTMENT CITY Of CLEARWATER 80 120 I`lapsed Time (minutes) 180 ~' ,~• :... ,. ,. .. ~a : _ _ _. _ _; :. _ ,,iVi .-. ..: .... .. ,.:_. . _ ,._. _: i~`::inti#irdir~ 8Q irnpnIflt3ntS anaE thet fcitiov~ing add~Uon~l proporty: _ . _ ,. ~. a~ .. .. ... _ .. .. ;._ ,. <. ~~ PI~CI: A'Na F"t~~G1N~ . ., ~ , - :,. 1t3 ,~, PIJ~!CMAS>=PRlC~: $ 1.9i~ tyEE?i1:~17 - ~ payraWe by ~ur.m U S: f~,nds a3e ft~#lrxws; .y 7. •(h}:~' iS ~~ Apt` Dopa'sit r?e~catire;! ~ctiacks are i3ub~ect Ea ctearAncaj tin , 18~ '~. ~, ..'for dei~very to ~ {'t~t-clro~ra~4g~nl"). .19 ~gnntL•ro N~tma ofCom~,arry.• "mm'_" : , _ ..., .. 2Q 21 (F~t~nrta;ttof s:5cr~w-Ag~nt~ ~` ~}:S' , . Additia~ta# dep~ft to be delivarad is Escraar Agant try . ~. ,,~: 23: ~ ar . days fr!orrt'~fladive Date (10~~tfays ~~lii.b~arrk). ., ...: QQ Total 6ner~rfg~.:(sirs P~agrapt:~ laelti~+r} {Qxpmss°as a dokiarv~tnllt~or panlage) ~6 fad ~ '~~S1Q~ t1p :Salart~o to mgrs '[nit its~rri~utg ~~yor'a rl~sli~g ra~+, PrepaE~ ~tol~ and ~aror~itiand~ 111i :~u~#s~< 27 paid pt dosing must G4:paid by idCatly:tlravrn cash,er'soheck, off~cfal rrhe~ck, ar whet! funds. 2$; ^tf~ (corrsp#ete'brlty Hpurchase prico will be deternlined based t7ri a perunik cost }nstea~isof ai:fixcsf price) Ttt© unit used #~,.: ~fl de#ormine !k'i+a~ purchase prime Is t:J iot ~? acm [! sq~rarc foot t~t~ther (spaci#y; ) Riorating: 34 aPeas of less than a full unit. Th©purt~a&u prigs wi}i t~ ~ per,unit:batt~trt! on a cattxtlafion o{ tokaC afro of 31 , th[s~Rr[iRerty.,~,g ~Cttrlifiad to Buyor Arad St,#lor by;a Flflrida-licensed sur~eyarfn aot:c~tances++tititti Paragr-aptt..8{~} of t~.is?- ~; ` Confract The;.fiillowing rfgtitofway bnd other iaraas -vi!#-tie excluded frr~rattha r~ieiilatiori:' fi.. ; ~~, ... - . 34 3.:-CAS Fl~F1NAf,tCNti1G: ~+~h tts appiicabl~} t~i (a} t3uyor Wil# pay piste>fof tMS' f~rai~+f5' 4~rith na tiri~nt±lrtg mnk~rx,~ieric~y 35 ~{[ (b)' This C~rtiract is wnt~ngent on Buyor qualifying and obtaining Iho ciarnmitment~s} or approval{s} apeC~fitxf~t~l~+~Ckttre t=inat~cing_}:-~nihln_f70 days from`Effedive Datc~.{lf ieft'blank then Closing Dato or 30'day5 from. Effete C)at~'wtriGhet?eir 37 ~ occurs firs#);~the "Financing; Period'). Buyt}r:vrilt apply ftaT i=inancfng ti+rithln ~~~ bays-from Efitsctlirq~F78tO"(;days if #dtt 38 l~tankj;and tiu+ll timely prouide-.any and all ri~dit; employment, finanE(al anti:-other inforn7ati~n regil}red byt[~e SeFider. If'13~ypf,; ~. ~g ~ ssfRer u~lcig d~[Qentxianti gdpd faith: cannot obtain the Finant:tng wviti,in the Finanein>~ Perit?d, either pmrry ma}r,.a~nc~l.th;ls ' d0 Contrail grid Buyer's depasit(o) will ~ r$ivrkied after 1=straw A$enk rives prpper authorizatlora from nil iate+^deterd parties; +3~ ~?:(i]-:N~w F'inancing: Buyrtrwiil srtcurs a commitment for notivthird party frn~nci>1g`fpr r ;~.,.~Z~}~tJD,¢r7_,tr ~~: $~` ~6 of the purch~so prfcd at i.hEr<prnvpiiing Intetost sate`and laar3 msts.based on E3uyBt't3 CredfivxsitFtilriexSS =.B~yet`' - ,. ~3: .wfl! ke'e}~ S©Ilar and ~-tiker fully iniprmed of the IQZit~ t~ppli~t+an s~~dttrs artt# progross anti~authc~rzes,the .I4ttdar:or: .. '~- '.tT4t3itga{~e broicRr.to disclasa al#:scrch #nforrreatian to &t~11cr,~rtrt,%B'rt#lu~t.: ... .. , .:. - . ~#5;. ~,~~; Sn!#er Filnaatt:lrlg. Bti er tivill axecuta a ~+ , , ,, ` , ~ ~rst'srsovnd "purchase mar~oy.note anti:tnortgago kra:5ndlarln_the ... . . aritiourat of,'S ,.. ,.: ,.. ", bearing artnu.ei interest ~k . _ ~ t~ntf`payabta as:;fat}~vvs,, ~4T:. ..- :.. .. . ::48°: ~~;. r~ork~i~ga, ,nglfl, r~naT arry .~ecurtty.: agrr~eri~ent ~iif ha in a form acceptabfa to Stiller arul.-MII t'o#to~r ftri`rx~s l~e~eralty: -_.~g, u (r'€titec±cruntywta~litheFnGpelly:is#o~t~d,wfi_#prt~+nde'.forz~latq; ~~.$. :~5{? - B or ~ -'brid Sitl#or ~ , Pa}'iitpt~tieo and aferatEon'at`ihv mortga . pY ~ '°' ~ adv~ov~Sat~ rt~eiptof a~py:.tf# th~spa~e, whlr~:is Pag®1 vf7 F'ifgcrs , VAGS Rav ~7 ~_2~, Ftarfds,f F.aIGTq~$~. A4tRiphtsived .. :. ~': phi; ~mi p'od~aod I?Y; ~'L~'~'' ~iQE}.44 f2. ~.rra~ ,.,.`: .. ~~C~~~ L. [: - ~ >..~ 5#:: option tf Bt~ypr'desFa~utts, will.give~~Hity~rtt~'right to pray vrlthbut;~nalty.all et ~artbP~the prEntdpal at~-s~n"ylimcs(s~ with' 52. °ntar~tst_vn3y tm date of"peymen#, w31E ba duo on ~onveya,nao or sitft~ wr~1i }afov~do fnt.rel~asrt of r~onti{feaus parcels, if. 5~~ -.~P1}hcabla, a~d~++ir '. - - uir~e l3uyarta keep liabili#y Gnaurance oft titib Propar'ty, with;SallnrasaddiUorial n~rrred tr~uPed; ~: E4ry~r~authante9 SatiEtr to o>atain credit, empiaymentai~d otlc+r:naao~sary intyrma#icn ira determine:c~etf~t+,~ral,hiner~<tvrt#vo•. ~; i'irtancl ~aUorc*r~11, r~iilhEn f ~ days from Ef{et~Ya iaaii+ giuaE3aty~rwrittan notice ~fwhet#~erQi`rtaf Safiartivilf inak~.tite~o~an :. SG` ~ {~j~~Vlpr~gp~o As~umptfon;,8u,~ar'will,t~kst #,it#a &uk~Jt~a`tc an~d.~ss~tnte,and iray,exsstCng tcrst,rr-c~itgage:to. ~~' ~ il.lU# trt turf $pproxlrkt~te ars>#urtt o>r$ curntntly payabla ~t ~ , _ ,: r month Irtctutlirg prnr3Fral, iittterbat~:~,7 taxes and rnsurance and ha+~rng a~ flxed~~ other {,dtcscfib~~ $1": ~tnter~st~r~i~o tat: ~36~tiyriit:h". ; .will ~ :+~rlEf not:QS~alato ~t#on assurpp#ton luny ~rarianoe in the m~rtgage.wiq bts>'~ 62> edJttstQCi In the"tralance due at closing ~vilh,no i~d}irsimoryt ie pur~cha~ezprrre ~uyorw:ill Rur~aea_S~Itafs'.~~... ' 6~ account:doii:tr~lvr doliaY. It the tender disapprayt~d,Bryar arth~i iratarest r~#e~ upan;ransfef exaestfs ,.'~.or the :84` ,a ssumptfars(traRSfcr f40 ax~eds S- , citFicr patty t~t8y;aleCt,fa.pay this excess, talilrig~vvhlt:h trill ~` egroement will torrninata and:Bt~ar'ad~~si{s~t-i3is`t~ r~etetrttis3d. ~ ~ C L~~IFJG E7 ~ C~SiN~`i7Ai'T~, CCU?ANCY.`-This i`~ntr~cf~rKrll`txs dosed slid tha.de~tl~and~pcsse°ssiorrdeinrarei~an:. ~. ~ ttGT {"C[~sing Uati~'~. Lintels the Closing Date fa"spctdf~relly~eaittwiderf bytho"@uyrsran~::3o11or~Qr byany other 69 '.provlsi~rn in this Cantr,~ct,.tt>d,Clos~n9 I]~te shall pri~vail.over aft other #imo periods Indudlr}g, bt,tnot limited ta; finan~ing snit-: 7r} frtaBfblity stutly periotls: IP,~vn.~lasing:`Daty insurorxaE~':undeniYriting"is.su5pended, Buyor may postpona ckasin$ upttr ~ daji~ aft~:r; 71 ths~ Ertst~ant:~s;suspension 3s'lift~, If this tra.nsat~ia~r does not doses for any mason, Bi,yrrr will ~n~tnnedietely return aiE,Sottpr=: ~2 .providsr+;f titl+3 aGidencs; surreys, assacJation dor~ments ar5d`nther items.. .. , 7.3 6.:+GI+dSIIVG F?ROCEDURr=; C+DST~: ~tc:slrr~ will bka pfaco in i}~t+ aounty,re it'll FfoPetlY.fs'{aaa#ed ~rtd ntaiy b~~asduded `7'~ `by inaEl 4r eledrorsic maans.;9f ritlo insu~nGe insures 8uyor for Gkkt datccts arising betyrr;en ihQ lifts binder otfrrc~ive.tiale anti::. 73 recordirMg of"Boyar's dt:ad, Closing egent wdl disburso at cEos~ng #Fstr nrst sale prgce<eds to Salton (in loc,~l cashio-'g checks ii: 76 Sotlor requQSts in willing sit I$ast.S days pdarta ddsinp} and trro#c$rag~s fens to ~raknr ns,par Paragraph 1T.. In..add~tltrn tQ.:otrlcr ?P ;axprznsris ~troviiieedln"thts Cord. Salton arfrJ Buy~r:wiil Fray t>~B ~rrsts fn~ticatad.batow:. .~d-,: Ca}`Sailor Costs: > . T~xes.on thi3 duct, ..: Rs~ordirsg teas farjdo~purt~uka tteeticd'taeur~e tale $1 Titrh:r~ridenca (if~plrilpiblle~undet Paragraph $} .:., .., . _.. Cttfipr: _ ... ,.: 84 ,Tars and recordingYes~.~n rtOtQ9':i~d ri~ortgag~; 85 :Rcror~ding fttfes ors lino tfr3ed~artd liranstatc~m8n#s° #3Ff Loan exp~sas ... o;,: ~7: ~en~crs tiUo p~cY;at th~r5inioibr78truS:iS~i!"r8#e ~.. ~. - ~ ... .~" ~ftrspotfi'ons~ a~ Scirti~y arxi askpEr 9(t.. aesur. ,~;; 'g t~ t7tlrar .. . ~; fc) Tiffin Evidesnco and Insoranc4;;:GheCk'{1} ar."~2j; - ~ ~ Q1) 7ti~ title evitlencc+ 4vill b4 a 1?ai•agraph ~{rt?(' } .o+arta~s tale ~rtsuranC~~cvrnrnftrrrr}rt.,~Q StsHr3r witl select ~e'~title! aigartt end wilt. ~ .tor tto avrnQr's:iitle iE , R , Y po cy, search, exant[raotian end roEaled charges ar.~ Buysr -wa11 selta:t tht~:t~llt% • ..., ,. g~; agtrrtt prjd pay for thQ eSti~eneYs t+tle pflilcy, aear~l~, examfnatitin anci:i+olated ct~arpes ar [] Buyer,~+Mill;st#t[~Ct`lttts.blioF~~et#f i~ ,r3rid Sollar -riill ply for the awnvra 17Ua"policy, sQarch, examinaUan and relatad chnr~es g7;, Cl (2) Sollorwiiil`prouido an aostrad as spea~t~rd In Paragraph ~(aJ(2) as title evidence L.--'$niiar(~ Br~yorw;ltpay fvrthe~' 9~" awne~a~ tiliQ~pc~ifcy and safari tha titla agent. Sailarwiil pay fd©s fortitfc~ soaeches priorto dasirtg; i~irJudfrtg tart ~r~trich.: g'9;. and lien stsn~c#siees, and Euyorwlll payfaes for tillo sea~hcs af#er~Josin d~ 9 C , nY?, tfttle oxaminsbon fees and cfosirtg lees.; 't~1 {d) Prornttnna: T'ho`foifowirig atoms will t>a made ce,rronYdnd #roratad ds of thn day tiotore ClosFng pate::rrsal astato taxes,' i~~ interos#, borid5, assessmenl.s, IeasQS and uthar I'raperty experts~s ar+d rCVOnttBS lf,iaxes:and~assc[~rits faritsQ,cu[r~snf: 10Gt" ycrar tannat ba detirrntifned, tha pr~auioua;y~aa~s;.ratas.svitl be used with aclJustimerst.far~ny exet'aptlons, PR~PERTYT'{tX tt1~~ Q.I$GL05URt SUMMARY: EtJYER SHs~L3LE],NOTRELY ~N THE:SELLEitv'S:CCJRFtENT R-FtaPiKFtTY TAXES AS:~'HE; 7i?4~: AM(7Ul~IT OF PRt7AJ^E~7Y 7AxES THAT B1JYIw~'lSAAY ,$E {)BLI~iATED TQ-Pl~Y I!~ THE:YR'~$U&~~ClUEfV~,T4" ~(~+;~ PUi3GHASE`A CHAihiGE i~F OWI+lERS3ill5 t)R IaF4~PEE~TY. iMF?R4VEPAEI•ITS'f`RiCaCaEE~S:iiEASSESSf4~llN7S~OF Ti~i, 1~3:, pI~E}p1=171' THAT Ci7U~.D RESULT IN .FIiGHER FRQ>~EFiTY TI?-X:I=S. 1F Yt7tJ FtAVE* Ai~i'~''QIIESTIQh7S GONGERl~f1NG: ..:, 10i 1rALEJATION; CQNTACT-7H~ GQtJMY PRC~PERT'YAt?E?RAfSER'S OFFICE F,OR FURTf-tEfZ"INFORIiRATIt3N ,., 1{i~4; ~a} ~Sprrcl~rl Assassmmnt by Pubtic Boeiy;`fiespartiing sp$~I asses~mt~nts [rttpastsd by,a publio~trpdy SolPer"tivsli pity it1 fhQ; `'~ full amount : of lions that arcs certifsied, confirmed send ra1rCdd t-©fare Gas~ng a.{Ei) the amount of tttd fast ~estfniate-:vC#fta ~`-i'IQ It3e~y~ ~" ~ ~ ,<~nd Scl.ltfr ~ ., ; - la~lgto:rct:ctpt of ri'copy otthss p~agigrrwhlt~ ts.P,Dgc'2 n. 7:f?q, viti~ ar~~: -~+7rm7 ~orkta; •,, fi. ~r Ate R~jtiEi e~rv4cssi"~ ~RI~~~[AL ~L~il~{~i1S~~ ~tr~rJ~I~~~~ 9~A :~ - t1.T; 'ass~$sme~nt rf rtn~prayer'nertt is°:subsl~r4tially cvmp~stext as af'Effectivo L7atebut hata;:nat rosttited rn;~ IJnr- i}tfata tacstng;:° ~, ~ . ,. .. 772:, and Buyarwyill pray .all otheramounte. If'sprtdat.:assossman3s rrtay ba paid fnln:s#alltnenls ~•Buyar L7 Saitri(tfle3tt:blartk;= :; 713: B~yot] shall pay7nstallrt~ents due after-tlasing.;lf5ogiaris ohe~l~ed, SaHarwill;-pay th6`asses5rrtent Irl;ftafi pnart~oo[,~tit7e: • 194`, oaf closing, Jaut5lic t;o~dy rives npt irulude a l~meo+~mer As~datiarncir Condominium AssaclaGan. ; 715 (f}Tax VYit:hholdJng: ff Saliar is a 'farefgn person' as dr3fined~by FIRPTR, Sect#on 1445 of the 9ntemaS l~r~venite ~ssd~-•. 718: :[equlras Huyr?ria wril~holti t.0`~.af the ambtrnt realirediby iha;Satlar'on the transfer aid rer~ititxt-+~lilhh~a}d8mptanf.#a~thB' t'~T trrtFSrnal Ruiieatua Servira (1RS] unless an`exemptiari appiles. The primarjr exemptions Ara {t);Sailar provlde5 8uycrrtti~th art 118 ` at~davit thaf Sollar is rtat a'"faraigry person', {~) Seller provEdaa'Buyo~ with a VYrthhalding Certificate providinfl`fcr redu~ti a1r 9'{9. alifrifnated withholding; at'{3] tno,gross sales prig is 330D,Qflp arI£55, Bt~y4r is an indiviidual whb purck~ashs t~tt~ Pnar#y to 9~t}. usaas a rQsidente and BuyrSr or-a rnem6er of Buyor's tamity has definite plays ta.reside rat the Property for at It3a~f~S~~ v#~ 'tai tha•rtumtier of-days the Properry.is;in use durfng-each of the first t~~,~o ~ 2.month p~riads after transfer. The IFS-requlrtts~8trynr 12~`~ ~nd'Sallartohavea U.S, federal'ttrxpayerltfcntlfrcatian number("TIN.'): Boyar:and SallarAgree ta'executb;~ndcfeliveras: 92.3 tiirecterj any in5tnam4nt, affidavit or 5taterreent reasonably necessary to c~rnplyivith FIRPTt1 requirements inducting"applying 92d for a TPN +~Ethin 3 days from E[fectiva pate an,~i.d~liirering their.r~espeetive3 TIN ar Social Secur4ty numt}ers is rho Glosing 1~gent., i25' ft Sonar applies far: a withhatdirifl pcri~ficate buk the appflraiipn i~ still p£nding a~, of ctas~nfl, Boyar will pla~+s;taie 1 D55 tax iri 1Zt3 esxxaw ~t`Solln~s exp8r+se tv tie:dlraburstttt In 8tzardnr with I)1q final d,ntorrnlndGar- aF:the IRS, provided $tellor sa req~est5. 1~7 and gives Btayor nratlC~ of ttta pending application"in accortlance t~61#t Section 1445, If' .Buyer does ndt':pay`sti{ficlenk C~5h dt ~~~;' ; ~#osing to motet thd+rrithholding requirement; Sa~fnr+~r~rill dcli~rerta Boyar of closing the hdditfonal ggh n€~ssary to satisfy'` 92.1?;: the;ci'+zsainerrtent.-Buyer wili`.timely disbursel the funds to the 1RS ans# provide Solfor ti~1GUar~pfas flf t~5o taz Torras-and receipts:" 1~1,'~. (~}:tx3'I :ExG~pr~gi}; #f~eitller Sotlnr or Boyar -rishes to enter Irtto.a,llke~sfndexchange {althcr:sfmultanecusly +vith dosing a~r 13'~ ;aflar] unde:tean'7t;131 a6 tfie irrternat R~Qrtse Godo ('~xchanfla'),1hb ether par#y +v;il toopente in afl:raasanaola resptrcts:' 'i32 :, to ~Fipctuatt3;th~e Exc.h~ng~ istcl~t:iing executang docurnnnts, provided, harrever, tt+at the csa4per31ing peaty will incur na:lJablbttt:= 'i33 ~ ar oost~r~fat~ tb;tEti'0-lcxatsange Arid Ifnat the dosipg steal!-riot ts~ carsEingent upon; eartent{ud ar.Qelayed Lyr the E=icol~nfle. . t, ..., ~ ~. _, ..:..... 734 ,. PFtaPERTY G~QNDITIpt,l 135 6: Lr4ND lg'~8: ~ollt~rwtll deffver "ifi$ Propttrty>to ~uyar at the tJme agreed in Its. prms~nt "ais is' t~andi#ian, w9th cnritlltiarrs 136 rirearl#r~g`tirom~Bityar'a`1ttsGons artid casualty damage. 3f any a~ceptetl S~tlar~viil mgfnl~lr~ iJaie~lands~pEng attdgrauncis to ~: 73T • . ;..~ !oarstparalit+~ coraditian ar~d ~+rilltkot engage rn.c#r p~ermat any;atliu}ty.:that ti*;~oufif matetj~Ify alt'Qr #tto Prapbrty's r~ndtticrir -~thout the': 939 ;Bttyo~is'prior ~ti~itten crnsent.:: . . .: . „ 139 [a} Pitied Zeno:Buypr~s,advised't6 vefifjl~DY Stir1!ry, vrith tttb lerttier andtiafttt npprapriato gavcrmrnent ageRCles'~Ifiiih , .94~ xvno'thb Property:is tn,,wClelher tlaad ~r"tsuran>rb..is.rar~~ired~8n~iwha# resttlctions'appty f~a irtJrrow[n~ tkttl,PT4perty and ~.]41 ret~uiSding In the event al cast~attsr,~' . .. ,. .. , "142 (b1 iz ovocrtrhbnt Ragufmifon, Btayor fs c~pvised Rnat chtir-ges in:$~nvernment regulations atui lai+els of servareuvhiclt-a€fect -743 B~cyar's intended .use} of thc. Pre,Po~S+ will nak b4',gra~rtitls itrFnc~ling,ttiis~ C4ntr~ct If the ,Fttasir9ility Study%F'erlc~d'has 1d4 oxPiret[ ar if Buyer ties chek~d chvica Lc][2} bels~v 1+i5 {e~ fn5pao*Dons;. felri;'ck {i~ or (2} r~olaw} t48; {9= F'aasibtllty Study: E9uyaF.will, at' Buyar.!s flxpei~se anti wtthia- 12p_:_d;ays tram Effective Dates { 1=eas~brlrkp-stuffy, 14.T.,: Ptlri+~d"J, _c3etarnllrke whether the A,roparty.i~ sortable,- in ~uyor"u ~ale,ariii ~bsolute'd#scretion, far- :: , . ~~ ~~s~.~~1<~1~~f,AQ1~!~lousi'rrg: use:.i}urfrifl tha;Fdasii~liity Sturiy.Periad, Buyer may iro~tltit~t ~ I~'ha~e t 94Q ~ eit+ar~tnmeratal asssssrnent and any other. tests, antrty5@5, surveys and invesllgatiaE~5 {"Jrlspecl.tons") that,J~Uyor,de~rta~: i.50: na,eessary tct dt~##dtitnlrtiv'to Boyars. satisfactie~n ltta Proporty`, anginpering, arctaitedural artd ertviranrzieritel prape-ties;° 151.' ~rting. artd zcrnir~ restrictions; sirtxtivisiort statutes; soli ol7d grade;"availabi[ety of ac~cess~ to #~bblia reacts, water and atitl~er .d52= riulit~es; otsnsistenc +aith:local, &tztts and. ..:` y regicnat gro~rrth man.ag+~rrser?t plans; a+railat>+lsty of parmils, gtxvesnntent appsovalsi . t53` 'and licenses; and'other-Irispbalans that Boyar deerr4s appropriate #o:determ(na the Property's suitablllty far the Boyar's.= t~S ~ rntended use. If the Pmpbrty mist be rezoned,. t3tayQr ~~rill obtain the rezoning from rho apprap;iate graverr~meht r3g~nc3es; 7t%ri= 9atlar mill siren off documents 8rayar is requirecita fits lri oannrction.wifh cie~rel,~p~ment or rezoning apprpvals. '' 15Ei~ Solior gives Suy~r, its 5flents,:wrrtraciors and;essigns,~the rfght.ta enter the Prbpert~r at any,tinae during rho FaaSif~rfrky. 't,ST~ '.study Pctriott fvr the purpose aI' conducting Inspections; pravJd+ad, however, that ~uyar, :its agirnt5, cantrnctars.and t58~: -assigns grater the Rroperty and oanductlnspections at kheir avert tisk.:BuyQr.CF~i11 indemnify and tt~fd Belief hartnfess frotxl 159: .lasses, darnages: t~sts,'t:laim5 and expensCs:ai any r-ature;::including attamtsys' fees, expenst+& 3rd liability lncurred,[n' 76fl:application for rezonin{~ ter relalad proecedings and from Ila;7itrky #a "any person, atising from the conduct of:any ancl~atl 'EBi:' lnsptactions er ariywprk autharize-d t3y 8ityar. Boyar +~1fll nott~ngttgo iri any activity tl'r3t cauld.fesutt:lrt a ear3slJU~apn:ller+ 76~` ~ii.ng,filed against the Property withaaf Saf[ar's prior ti~lrlttari:canseiit. if this transaction diae*. ncat:ciase, 8ttyarwiff -fit: 953; Buyor's expense; {#). repair afFdamag~s tr1 the Property r:~sulting from the inspections and'rotum:~tht~ prpperty t~;the 1t3#;, rxrtdition it was in priortp conduct of thei lilspedlons; and {Z) release,ta S~olfarall reports rartt#'oth~r~.genara~sdas':a' iF35; retuit of (fiat InspecUans 1t~=.. ~>~trypr-wilt deliverwrrtttennotica.io Sallar prSoriQ ihs s~tp#ratl4nal tt~o ~casibi~ity Study:Pdriocl :of Boyar's cietermEnat(~rti°of. ' 78T` t~hether or nak rho Prapbrty i~ accepta>ale. sBu dr"~"iallurt~ to comply,+vltly this nbtica requirement will>-t:onsti#uto" '1t;38°` ac~ptnnce of t11o Rroperiy as suitatsi'efear Buyo~s intendtci.usr3 in its 'as ls" canditPar7. Itthb P,roperky".fs unacceptable to> 16g'. -8uyor prod wr~tton nat~ce of this tact r3timoly'dellvere~d to 5ollor, thts:Contract wllC be dcert~d teirttiraatot# as o(~tfto ~doy 17th;'.: a{ter the Feasflailiiy Skuaty p@rioii setts ~aatd:auyor's dapos3t~s} +vill be: returned after l~sCrA+r~ +~gattt rb~3,va~:prbper ` "tT'f 8utharizatian Pram All {ntcrested partft:s-- _ °• -77~.; []:{~] ~!o Foaalblllty Study. Boyar ts~satfsfied that:tho Property Is s"uitablc far 8uyor's purposes rncludlnp~fng' >77;~. sa khat either public sa:'.verago :and vrbtar am =available to the Property ar the Pr+aperty ~vtEl~be s~Pp~roveti'ftrr rite '174 ,Buyer ~ _ _ ) tend SQll4r ~j ~ pr~rwL~ledga rer~tpt of:n copy of tars pAga~.~+#rlfidi is I~a~~,3 ctf'T:F'ag~s t .1e~f4i/-g ,`< 'RoY::±tJ07. ~.F047: El~ridu flea , ~ Pa4LTQl2;~ l~J.i~lh~:rvstd:. . ~ , .t«~; :~:I;a~~ sav=e ` . r~:. ... ~~&~ENAL i...., a li~~ ~~Q$ PLP+F~ive~~fG licr~;RTi1~EIVT . _. 9'7 976., 177'.. ~7~; '1,Z9•'. 9 t3tl. 181 162 :'i:133 .~~ay .:, • irast~llatiora of a tiwefl ~xndfor pr?,~atQ stnvera~e"efit3posal;sysidin a~rtd that einst~ng ipnirrg and 4thQf p~rUnorot iegu~tions:at~d restnatlCirti~,;~;uch as sukf~ddtvisloh of tleQd rrrstfiotron"s, i:ancurranry,.~rowth managp-tlonk atld Qnviron mental GandJtic~ns,: e~ atx~p'tat~la [ri ~uyirr 7'fiis Contract is nat conl;ingent otr )~uyrtr condi.tclJrig any:furthef intiesiye#8tioi~s, .. ~ Sulsc#lvfdoit !.rinds; lf,thls Contract:Es for"tfia pu[citaso of subdlvid4d tends, dt3f~ned by't=tari'da Law as'{m~ Any` rit'tguaus'Iand wfiich is divided or is proposQdta tx3 divided fflr tho burpose of disp6stllpri:'Entc SO' or mare:lots, pals, €ts:;"tar ~nteresls; s}r {4~ ~,y tarrd,.whtrther contiguous wnot, which is divided or presposed to tx~'dividad inta.50;or more late.:: reds, units. ar EnteresLs which ore dfiared as r part of a common prdmoiiana3 plan:'; B~ayar;n~ay aanc~i•1Ni~~Cc,ntrad far. t-r~abson v~atsoavar far a petsnd of 7 business,days from the dmta onwhlch Bu7~gr ~xecutPs ihEs CQntrac~:alfri~uyor ~lscts CBnt+ei wathin the p$riod;p~rovided, dli funos orathtarprapctty paid by f3uyar;s~±11i•be r$funded~rrtho~ai_pt~natty;arabl~~t .- htrti 20. days of i~ irocc{pt of tho notion of cancettation by th4 os3+xefa~r, "1i35 T,° RfSi{ 4F.LC3SS; 1=NtIHENT:D~MAIN: if any partian afttie Property is m$ttsrially~,. darr~ged tsy`,c,-~suatty bo#or~ cloafilg, Oe:~: 1 Bt3 Sclkor ne~otiatas brith a gouummcry~al auttxmty to trt~nsf~ar.afi ar;pnrt aF h® p~perty in -lieu ofiem3r~ont dama~rE'pl~edin~s,. '187 or if cn eminerit dumri{n procaading is Initiated, SQllar NiE1l,ptontpUy inform Buyo~. EithaF party niay t..7rlctft this:C:ontCapt 6y` 188 written naticety t>7e:dthervrifhln 10 dayslrom t~~;nyar'~cecei~Sl~v~ SDltar•s'i~p#ific~kion, faliingfv~rhiCh:@uy~01'~SAf€lICI0b8 fn: ~~ ~txardancc with this Cartitr~~ und,r~rceivtt all pPyrrtehts:.tn~de;by kfat3'gcrvemmtx~k dutharity or msurarat~~conlpsny,~ifiany::` 1~.:~ ~.. .._: .~. - . 'TiTLf r' . tilt ;8:~T1TL~: Seller wili.aonvey marketable tilte;to tho°?n~nrty i:sy stalutrfr5r tiscarrartisy<do~atd ar;trustp~; pa~€sanel r~pt~serltt~llv+~or ' 192 °+guardlan decd ~s afap'ta to 5oltcr's status. ,:.:._ .. _ t93 (a} TlkJo Ev[donce:..Tltla: evide'ncca wllt show legal amass to the Property and marketabte #llle v# reCalyd in Saliorin 1'~ 'racoofclancc3;~viti~ cautr$nt_kilte skanaards adaptad by.khc~ F€erlda Bar, subject only tc #hc+:folloyving title excep#lorts, ~vne~of` 9t;!~ ~~rhlch.proveokBuytsr"s;:intonded u§~ of th¢ Property as -. Me~TU-fam( ~?rL~l~Nj(k+,~,__~ cayenarn~. ~as~manfs:: 196 and rcrsUictiorts t~f reagrd; matters o6 piat; vxisting`zon€ng and gavemment reguk3ilpns; coil, gas and mineral righls.oP t'~or~d:if .:. .107 , thr'tlc is na right c~f~ntry;.current tuxes; martgages'that f3uyar ±u€ifassume; artid er+cvmtxances that 5nllnr will discharge; at or /if3A before ctasirtg. Sciltei• will f~livar b Buyor Sollrir'rs chdlao of.ono of the #aHa~uing types of title avid~nco; which must be 199' ger~et~dlly aczepted in the county wheni its Prapcgty is ioc.-at~ {sptsGify"In Paragraph 6{c) the seln•ctecl typd}. Sglldr111 us+~.; 2~. oP!~1.) In'Patm Seach Cpunty and option {2j.in hiiam€~dad~ Ceur-ty. • 2t3~t (9>~ A Ukta insurancp"commitmanl;i~sued by :a FtoridA-1lcarkscd title insurerirt the amaurit' of ihe, purchaso.prfQe~rrtl: 2Qi2 .:subJeci.anly to tftla exceptions sat #orth:{n ft~ls:Corjtract.bnt! deti~rered:tta tatnr than Z.days befare Clasing Dals.: :203 ~~):~ln uzistlctfl;absiract of #itio from a ropuiuble and existng.abetrt~ctl~trrr,t'it frm is rear exislirtg,,khi;n abstract tstiusttus ~~ "c+frf;~tetl as wrrr~ct by an existing firm) purport€ng tm t~ an aacurat4 synnp§is of tttiri instrumentsatfecting title to iha- 205` F'r^operrty.,:recarded in the pliblFc retards 4f klio:county where the Pfcperty is iacated and certifieid ko:EfteCtivoQa~to 2Dt3 l~nwever if such an abstra~ is net avnflahld to.Sullar, than.a priar:awsta~a titlo;poli:cy;'acceptdble.tt~ the propo5rzd 2t]!7> ]rtsurer~s a t~asa tar reigsuancsr of tavara{f®. SCllor wriil pay for copies of ail poiiiy excoptlons and an upckato in a fomwat 2t#8: ~iaccepiat>to fo:8uyar'~;clpsing agent from thd! paticyesffecfiwa cfate;and cxriified to puyor yr Buy"or's closing ag~enti 2fl9 ~ ` to~}e'therwzttt copies of a1i docxrrti~nts ret;iti3d ire iha prier palieyand in lira vpcli?t©. tf a pri3r peElty is'riot titable tai S+o-llo"r' 21D ttaen (1) at2ava,u~~11 @o Chia titles evidende.'7'itfo vvidcr~eawil! hEO "delivered no l+~ter-than iQ days tmfore Ctasing°~atcs. "' _.: 21i: (b} i`ItIQ ExamirratJonc ~uy4rwitl tzxamino ttw title cvidcn~sv and delivrx'i~rittrtn notiao in S•alldr, w3thirr S;days fririm receipt al!. 272; tido e+viddnraa-but na la1Qr than da&li'tg, flf any.dcfc~ts th>at.nta~ke~ tt~a iatle tnmari~ce#ataio. Salter twiltt~avo~4 days from r~c~Ipf 293..: sif 8uy~nr's notiao of d'8ftse#s t"Curit,v9e Period') td sx~ro the de~'ects a# So11e~s expense. I#.Satfer'psres ihc+ defects, iviUiin the ,. 21~ Gurativa (}criod, Sti2tnr vhli;dailvQr~wntt`tsn isalicv to t3uyar.attd tha;pnrtics witl:dase tt~~ t~naat#ipn an Cbsfag t]ate or within, 215°: 9t) days from.Huyai's receipt of 3allirrs nati~ if ~lvsictg ~f?afcs has pas.srrd:lf Snftor ls•urtabla lri clue the di:ft^~s within thy: .:~'0;. Curttlua Pvriad, Sirflirrtivi[I dasliucrti~eriften nbtiG4 to Huyor:and'LitayOrwill, wifFtirl 9t] drays from rp~.Pi,pt ef.~ollor's;mxtlp( ;.,297:: ttiUaeNraneel this Contract or aod3pt;titfu wilt's exisking defeds'at~d dose tttiQ transadEoJi. ;:215; (C~ Sierr~ayr ®uyar may, Prior to Ciosirx3 Date mntl at Buya~s e>cpCnsc, have.the`Pmparty sunie:~red anrt_dcrlnrer;writtenriotice ~2tg~ to.S.alfar~ t~rithln S days irorn receipt af:survpy but no taterr than 5 days,prlor #o plosing, aFany encroachments an.ttto=: -220. F~ropaGty, encroachments by Use Prio~arty's;impraverr~ntS Qn other !Delis or deed r~str€c~ian orxoning wialati0ns. Any.surh': :~29a` enc~chmrsnt or violation wiil be irepted 3n th4 s~mo,manner as:a t~tlo:dof~terld Buynr's•andSQllor`c obligations wti:be <222' 'd~ttartt~antd in a~coord~prt~e wilh subpura~raph (t}) diiave.: _ ... 223` d '~Qaffitai Cflnstriactlon Contt+dt Lfr~a: lf.an . { .~ _ y part of the Properly ilestsoa~?ard'ai lha.ca{estaJ=car+struct~an control line as'. :;2?t;i defined in Sccliar~ X61.053 of i~ Florida Statutes, Sa#ldr shall pr6Yide~~rryer svit4~ an aFfcsiav,t~r 6urvoy, as regurr~d by.;;taw. '225;_ ;delineating the ~tne`s location an the l~reperty, urafess E3uy~r ti~raives:this"tequtram~int in rrritir~g, The PrrapQrty~b'oid ",'226'; gurctseseci may fxe subfect 1ti'caastal eroslc~n and ta;fcdaral; state; brlar..llregeslatlons tf~at goverr- coastnl.property ittdu~ing; =227 ; daline~alian afithe- ooastnf constrvc~ian control tine, tigtd tstai prolc~e#irriakrudur~l5, beacin nosrrishmen#;rendtho protabiion ;;228 ~ oi'rxirarir~o #urttds ~'tslelrtlonal irrfation c.~r too oblai~trrd frem tt7q F,14rid~.Dapartn'ient o!r t=erviranrrenttrl Prata~an, 3nclr~dirtg , `2~'~ wtlsfhar khoru arcs significant`-~roa€on,conditions ass~datsr~ with-ktu~=sh~ralina:cfiti~e f~rvp~~rttr t~1ng purchased. ., , .. :. 2319 Slysrwa~ves"fright t~,>rpcaiy{s;a CC~Lafftdavit or survey ... , .. . . 23~ . . , ~IfSGELL/IIdE~tlfiS :, .2,32 9. I=FFEG7if1fE QA~; T1M~~ tF~RDii M}kJELIRE: . ::2343 (a} Effectrve`bate; 7ha"Ef#e~tive Data of llais•CQnIrnG# is rho cute on 4srhrch`thc iatsialr the"p~rtias i~nitirtlB er signs-8r,d 234, delives.~rnal oifior oncountcroffer. TiEno.i;s oP thr as$anao fnr al#~pr~vfsid~s of this Cd'ntrd~ti ~' (ta} Tlmfl:, ACI tlmct perldds.Qxpi~e5s~d as dzys wlli bi3 computed in business days. (a 'bUSInESv day lS .oVQry ciientlar:.d~y eat" aturday, Sunday aid nattorxaf"•€etgal alldays} •tf arry deadline .#irlis ore a Saturday, Sunday or nadvna9 legal„; ~7~7 t ~.l;and Solte~r settr-awiai ~ rtxx~t t of a, .' fsa~e, which is f? ~ t~f.7.P~ es.. , ~., g p oapy of this g 1r," 1~dv. 4tQ7 ia2007 Flaeida Otf2EA1L,TDEt;sr+?. A[3'Filghl~i-Rescnract` ,. ~~~g 4Vr'u^ i~[Z,~~R `~ ~'Y`~>(`a" ! :'kid . ~ t~ 62~Gs:Sv~~ ~': ~~~~ Rl~i~~tl~~ ~a~af•a~ti~~=tEi tY '~,°$ holrt!!ay, perfdrrru~nca~~+rill hs duo tt-©~n4:tpbusinea;3 ctay~AlLfirt~ct pt3riot38 w~lf;end at.5Op p m<tocafllimo {tYtparting #~i~ihe:; 239; aaunhf where the 1l~raRcrtY is I{~7leitl} rif t#t+n appropaate tl~y _ , ,.. 2A0.~ a Forco hta ou'v:_.13i, ar trr 5~allt}r shall no#"'be ~- ;, ,• ' ' [) ,;.. ~ 1 9 rxrqu~red to>: pcr'ierrn any-.;otaliga~an und+ar this Genfract nr f~ Ipat7le .7A7~. to $ech othar (ar damages 50 _ long ~s rho pi3rformanco or r3on-perfQrrrraricr~ ni rho ohli jation is dciisjrerd, r.~used ar•-° '~242'~ pi~vi;3nted eY an act ni G4dor forad maJeurt~. An 'ad af.taratt Qr; `ior~ maJeura' is ~dsfineti as. hurrlianes, ;:earihquakes,° _, 2+~3° t3e5ads, Fre,:unus~-al, transportakic+n d+etays, wars,. ~ngttn~drirrts; and any othercause nvt rt3as4nably ~ritttin the gntral of`. 2~; [lies' Buyar.or Sollor: and whkh bl' ho'aacefcise of~~trtt diligenrcb iha narrper#orrivng party is uriabies- in" ~wt~le' or to part. ~~~ t~-.;;7r~+rarrt ~r:Q~trcomo..All tir~,pariod~, inc~udiR~g`CE~sitg Date, wrill bo ext8ndisd (no4 try dxce~ed;3Q dajrs}'for th~.periacJ that '~24~;:: t;tit~ farms majQUro 6r,act trf dad is In placci In tfx+overttYt#wt each 'ad of hod' qr farc~;majeurQ° event contln~res tidyend ._ .. . :;247` trfiK3;3~ da s iin this sub- ~ . Y Pa~9~Pt1 '±aither=party ma~',:~anaal ir-~"Contract by. rfetivenrEg vr~rrfiten ttotiixa tv:thcs nttip~:arto;l3uyor'"~: .:;. ':~~~; depi7sit sh811:ba reCurrded:,_ _ ~ .. 2~9 1"0. NoriCES; `All nollces shall 1sa'>itt writsrig grid :rill tie' detnrErisd to~ "tho par#ies ~2rtd Broker t3y m~t9l;.persaannl dQli~rery`as"' `~ elertronEc media. BuyRe's•fall~r+o to`~itltviir t~rnQly wrlttott notJca #~ Sailaa when:seloh notlra is ~xsgralr4ii by this Cbntrzitt~,.. x:2.51 ro{lardir~g 'arry;ta~ntingancios rw11I :.rnndar that ~ccntingoncy null and v~1d and tlta Contraisf will b~o: conetruQtf ds if tho;. 2~ torrttngctnc~l d!d not oxfaL;Any notl~e, dacumtsnt or itam dol ivrsripd to orr~acalvod by an atipmoy+or ticgns~na ttlnet~ding ~' `2~3 lrarasacilan brokar} rapressientlrsg u.pariy will 6a as ~~actlvo as if da[ivorad.to ar:h~i thatptsriy, .. :?254 't'9. COA~IPLi=TE AGRE~N1Eh['1'; This C~onttact is itid t~nifrer'a~re~ment betw[setn ~uyor and Sailor. Excnpt for:br'okQr~~Ci <2,Sb; agraemnnts, no prinrQr=~rosantaigratsmorz4s wtlf t~lstd 8isyor, 8ollar or Brvker unfass ]neorpor,~tad intci ihls~Caritraic# 2,56 ModiHc~ttt~ris of#his Con#ract vr~ti not tsss bindinD unless fn writing, sigr?e~ orriitialed,3rld d[:livcsred by the party to bra bound. This>• Za7 Contract; sifjnatums, iniiiafs, dttcumeots referenctsd In this Corttra~t, countprparta artd writtan mociifir,~liara4. communicaicd; '253 l~leciranirally ocpn papervir~i bw,aocaptat-fcrfor,aU putposes,',induiifig defive,ry, and.taill he binding.: liantfiavrittert or-typ~vriite~n! 2~ t~rrns Inserted #n<ar atf~ to this Contrant ptcRVail oyar prapttrtted tQrms. If any provision of this Cantraa is or becan~ fnVa[It9 X264 . or-urtertforecable, all r~errrarning;;pravlslflns will t;antinue tQ i}e,tulty offiectivo. t3uyor nrid Salfac will usg diCfgencx< and 8~ faith to '2B1 pitrfortt~in~ a!i obtrgaliat~ c~nd~rthia Contract. This :Conlr~c# tii!rill no# ?~ recoi•dett in any public r~icards, . _. `2f2 ~;~ .,t4~SliaFPr48JL17Yt"PEFt$GMS"BOUPIig: Bu~rrrr rrtay rsot ~ssigrr,l#ifs Contr~et. without ~Snllor's~ vti~ftteri cortsortt.; Thn lerm~, X263 '.8uyor; ~`5allar' arid.'Braket.;inhy be ainguiar or plural. 't'his Contract Is,t~inding on the tielrs, ~dminis#r~toas;_~cec~#srrs;.,; ,: _:.. ~# persot}al .cepras~ent0.tire~ end ~t`ss~ns~{i(permittrtd} of BuyQr,~S~eltnr ar~d t3rtakcr; _ > •.:.. . ~~~ .:. UEFAiLILT`AND flISPt1TE>I~ESQL1,ITiQIJ ~~ '13. t7EFAtJE.F:'{o.a Seiler [tat'aifE ;If:fi~r any reasan:nther than failure of $ollcrr#a make'Sallor'~,~iE~a n~arikQtah~~:after"~~ii(~~~t' ~' ttfart, Sailor fF1173, r~eftis~; or reglccts to perinrrxa ihis Gbnlracf. Buyar,may.d~'oosts.ta n~ceivt a rotiirrt c~fr~uyar's:dopos~ yr[tt~rt 288 waiyfng tha right to sccls damages ¢t.#o seek ~pt:gfic periarmanct, ae per:Paragra~h f4::Solltrr.wilf ials.o:btu liable`ta l~rok~r idF: '~~ the lull amount of the brokerag4 fQe. {b} 6uyrsr t7pfault: it 8uypr. fads its perform th]e Carltract wilhin`iite time spacliiod;;. 27fl tnCluding;rtimcslypayment of alk dapa9its, Sonar may;#toostY.to ratan and collect all dtsposits paiti;;and ~gri:et9:io bc.psid a3s 271 lfquidate~ damages onto se~k`spcdfio porfomnanccr hs per:Raragraph 14; and 6rokor will;?.upon demartd,,reeeiva 5t}°.b, of"ally; -272 ;r~" omits" aid and a rr3ed tts bt>i _ ..~ F 9 paid (tatje sryl'rF ~ua3ly:arrron~ Brokers} up tvihcr full amount of thq broktrr,~(jp f:: 273 •1,4 QlSpIITE f~iSpleUTIOFF, Tt1la,~oittratx.vrirl tae cgnstruad.under FEoritia lAw. All.contriaversies, cta[ms, And altter mattes jn,- 274 t~uisstiisn arising-,out of ~r ft3l~Ititig~ir7`ttii8 transad+tion or this Contrail orit~ bteac~ w311 do scltleci as fol~-YS: .. _... --~75 ` '.. (aj;IRls,putni3 dor~COming ontitlarr~ont to dapasits'rnatio~ent! t~grpad to bo rnpdg; ®uyor And Satinrwil! have 3D days froth ~'~ tho'datd rcrrilicting demurads oro made to aitemptta rasolvcs thrs,dispute Through mndiattan. if th,~t folio; EsM ~g~nt stiiilC~ 2~'7 submit ti?fl: disputo, iF sa r~equEred by Florida Iatv,;ty Escar~aw flgenxs dac~ire 0(:arlsltralion.; a Florida cnurt:or rho ~iorEda I~c~af.:: ~7~; Estaia Carnmisafon. ;('FREC'}. ~uyor and. Sonar will he bound lay any resulting award, Juttgm[snt:gir ardcr,::A brvlsat'~: =~7~; .~.otiligatian uritter chAptar A7S; F5 arsd' the FREC rules tb timely ne}>,ify ttttt l'REC of an es~awd(sPutt+ a~ 6r~~iy.resa4v~'th~,.; 28(] ~• eficxo~ disputb through rnedlatian,;arbitraticn, interpleader, nr an escrow d~sbursem~nt girder, it th~°tra#tt3r~o~chho~a~es ;. ... 284 dppla~3~€ only #o brokers ~snd daas•r~f:apply to till[[ tsompanies, attarrieys ar pthpr est~u+.v corrtparti?s.e .'282. fh} Alf asthar dlspunas: Buynrand;Sallarwill hsue 3Q days from rho dalt~ a di8pute3 arises t~Nr,~eorl.thertr tv:`~ttempt to'~ °~soltio iho mallet thraugh:media~[ort, failing whidi:thv,partias vrili r~s,otve`ltte dtsputaith[ough neutraiblixding ~rbltr:3ilon in ;2~4 ~,#hv county where rho Prnpetty 9s locattsd. The arbltratorrrtaiy riot alterthe Contracli#rirsnsvr award any: rt~dy.riet provided' ;285 ~for~in-:this Contract. "the awarB wviN be based on this gre33ter weight ptthels"ti+#dl~r4CC.andwi115ttiCS findings of foci anclthc X88 "tciittradual,uthonty~ on tivttlch it is taase"d: If:#hE} parfios agr~o t4 u~ C~soovory, rt Wi31`b@ to acoordaQc~s wiih lhri Flar,da i~?ui~+9 ;287 of Civil Prot~eclurc arRd f1~rx.arbitratar will resolvo..al# discovery r~el~ted disputes. `Any disput¢s uiih a tool aslate lic~nsi~@'. :288 • namc+! ire t~trragra(rn 1 T will be szrbrriftted to ~trtiitration only if the lfisortspo`s'trrek,ac.~nS~Eits in~vlrrfang,te~_;t~pcon~e a p~rr(y.;tp =~89 `thg.procr#edirtg. This clauses will survive closing. '290 '(e)°.Madiatlon and Artsltratlon, Exponr3es: 'f4led€a#i4rt la a process ~niwhlch_parlie~aitarr~pt tc r4solve. b disput~r~6y 2~! ~suhrnltLn©lt.:to an impartial mcttiptor wht~ faciiiil.atrss the resoluUait of [tin dr$pute+ but.tivtt0 is nGt ~!r'np#pred to ir`ri~iois®: a' . , °282 -:.satRleririt~nf ontht< pariies. Mediation will l~ in ac~ardanne.~ti+itti:thir`rulns of the eriC~tr Artrtjan`~ssodatlon:~'A.Aq,~, or ':293- ~otitict;mcstfrator ~gr~d an lay the pt-rtit:s. The parties t~riq.aquelly divida the mediAtion fen ;if any "4rt~~tra~ar~"`is a prQtxt35; ifi X294 `:which rho ,parties rresvlve a disputo, by a hearing ~afara ~`rteutral. person who tfadti~os-.rho r~tatt+:sr ~nt>lwtitssu.dtrc~sittnl ;295' :binding cu; th€~~partie~s- ArbilrulCvn vrii ba En acacrdancet wititi iho rules of i#~o k.ar.cthar~mrbiiiaitiir"a~ru~d~orr by the partlds: 21~: `,~t~t ~iarh' i6_any arbitration will pay:its rn~ (ees; oasts ant! ttxpense5; indudlryg:iittaney^~' fees; anti +~e(II"et;uiliy spilt rho •2t~7 arbritritors' iQt3~ a»d adrmn~stratnre lees of arbitration to a curl ac#tvn to entorce an arbrlr,~tkon awartil, tttia pro~[ling gaiety 30. ~8 rho bon s II bcs;enlrtieci to ret~vQrtrom ih~ nanprEivai[,nt~ party re7,~rnahte af3arr~ay~' foes. costs.ar~d ax(rerisc~, .. Ir .. ,,.:. 29:x.: .V11t~,,.~'Ficv .;4tG7 ~,G'2t?07 F7cridpr .,n iti=/1L7C~ftS~' whirJ~ ~ s: P, ag©5 or 7 pages,;. QR~~~i~r~~- ~2EC~VED ... c~~_ ~oa~ PI.Aidfvii~i~ uC?~-':I~T~~I~~ ~IT`f Of CL~P+~Ir~`~Tle~ 3+~" ,. ,; E~~CR~1N kG~F1T 1~~[O'SI~L~It~4~ .. ., 301 1~ E~CR{,yW AGENT:-B~uyy~tr and S©llnratlthc]rt~t~ Esr,~c~av ~gent`to`re~ive; de{~asit an~i'liat~i funifs :end ~Ih~ri#ctrris In ttRCroav,; 302 and ,stibj~c:t taclearansx~,~+dis.6urse them upon proper nulhtrixatibn and !n"acapr~c9anso ~rri#n Ft~arid3-.lavtir and the".terms at-this;` 303 Contract, induding,dlsbur"CEng brokerage.#~es, Tile pnrtEes.agreo that Escrnw Agent",will, ~^rpt tse,tipbte to-any-persan.fora~ 30d mis~Ssiivery af~estxnvrQd items;to Buyer or.Sollar, unlr:ss thvrnisdelvory Es tine to Escro+~r7Agerst`s ilft~d txe~rrh of'thEs Ca~trat#` 3t~5 nr grass: neglEgcrtce. if:Eseraw'Agerrt:interpleads.the subJect rz~aktatr of tna oscrnw; Esctc~-ar went wilt pay the.Ging tees pnd- x#76 cflsts fram thm deposit;and viili<n:~vCr ra3sanaf>io attamayg':fa4a"a(1d cx}ats;to,lse pard fr,am the esrxo~sied-furtds'or ct~q~iti~Plent` 307 and chsmgctd and atilarded as court costs in favor of iria provaltlrrg, ~+rty ~A{t~ialms:agoln~# ~,screetic'Agdnt"witl'i~~itift~tad,~so:. 3AB ;long as'~s~aysr;Agvnt ~nr~nts #n arhitratn., i 30g i'ki PR~FIES510NAL-AQI~IC1=; 6f~01{ER LIABILIYY Sraker advi5~s buyer and SQilr?r to wtsn#y all facts and r~prescnfa#~ons:; 31Q tiis# ars irr~p~rtarit"ta tttont and to oon$utl; vn approp`rraty prafaaslQrtit~Yf~r~lagal sdvicQ (far i~uarript+~, In#erpretin~ contracts,; :;311 statormErfirtg tht's~~e##eaC, a# lams on ltty Rropatty ar7d trap§actinn -status ©#°~title; toratgn investor rrpnrtlrig'~quF~tnlents, 312 the ofictct of prpperty i.yirtg partially- or tota33y seavracd of the: Cazrst~l GvnBln~ction Car~trrt'Llne, ate.} "end for fix, P~'-P$~Y; >313 'condition, ~erivEronmental grid ntht~r specialized" advica` Buj!er. ocknawlodg[~g that :Broker'.davs not .:reside ln°~°th[~. 3~A PropQrtyt; and ,that all ; representatiarta (oral, written .nr otherviise} by Sraker atu based on'.Sflfler repr£sents~tions~ txr ~31~ :public -r$car.d5. ~uyr3r agrees to raly 5alaly an Seiler, profe$slonal;' inapeictars and governmQr~tal.;agenclc~s ;fob; '316 e~eriticatit~n of the Praparty ~ritliti~r,:,:ar~d acts ifiat matQria!!y aifvc# Pmporty value. Buyer end Selmer"reypc~tively'wi11' 317 :pay all casts artd. ctxp~ns4s includirafl reasonable altorneys' `fees "al all levels Encurred . t3y Broker :arid Brake~~' >318 :officers;: ditrrdars, a~cnls arrd` ernplflycas In?"carinectian itirith or arising,:fram ,Buyer's, ar Seller's mtsstp#ement ar "falpc~e ` 31Q to porfomn oant~actuubabfi~atior-s:`Buyor"an~9 Seiler hold ;harmless "and-roloast~ Brok©r.~nd'.Braker'S' 4tfic,~rs, .d~roc#vrs ~0 agents anti employees from all.liabilitY:far lass or dAmaga bawd nn {°!~ ~uya~'s ar 5cliae'e misstatentQnt'or falturo to p~ofiarm ;92t contractual abligatlons;.~(2) E3rokarrs pcrtorrriance, at Bt,tynr's'dndlar~oltr}ra~ request, of arty":task beyond ttin ~copo of sonricx 322 regulAted oy C~aptar 47~, R.S., as amended, Incl~idErig"Brok©~s"raferral, r~ecc4mmertttakian ar re#~ntinn of any vendaf, ta}`: 3Z3 pradvct~ ar services pra~ided by any ~r~xndar; and ~+1j expenses inwrred, by many v~endar.. Buyck and"Sollor cacti assuma.fuli 3~4 rr3sp~gnslbility far selecting anc# campent#ating theEr"re~pea3iv~t vendore3.: This paragraph w1lt not 7clieva"Brvkorbf statutory ;,3=~5 alstigatians. For;purpnai~s of this. paragraph, E3rokprwi[.I bo traatud as a part}i:fa this Contract`71~I5'pa~c~raph tivill:;urin+~a closing,.. 32t3 17. 6FdQKERS: Thtt licen5ee~;) anrJ orokera~e{s}named 6elaw arra c~,l[eetivoly rgir~rntd io as `Brvtser.' Instruction to Gtflstp 3~7. i4gant SnlJor and Buyer ciirrlct ciasirg 8gertt_ta d'rshuse ak closing tt®`fu[E ~rmount of;thc~ brr}keragafees ns;specafiad En ~3~8 seprirat~z braJser.~gc+ agriQemr7nts with the parties nrxi c~opetaiive egr~erncntab~flkvmQn tho tirokors, except-.;o the extant 8rckttr.: h$s raetolned such fctos from th[~"escroured funtl& !rr"#ho•absenc~ of sYt~elti brokerage agr~e,~ments, closing;Q~~rtk wil! disk~~r`so. ;:330 lrroka~g$ fea~s ais indtpatvd bglaw. This paragrt~ph ~+Vill~rii.i;tp use~::fio-~nodifj:~rty~1~4L~ ar...ct~cofter o~ carr~~-sativrr nnad~r b .-, -: ... 33i Sallorac,~itsingbr+akerto ovaperating t~takp~: . ,, :: - :~ 9:Shceea Assoda'eNLkan.o lea. b - ~~k ~ ar*;9rr olPrs~liaserPr>~ej . . ... .. .. ~~ .. .... "x ~;.F, .. ~. tip: I€;;:v."a r .. ~.. -. .. .. .< r...... . ., ;... Y}~~ .~.... ,... .. ..- .. F..• ... .. .... ~ _ . .. _.. .. ~}p~j .. ~~jyg~ ... • ... rr~~~~++ . , ... .. .. _ .. ~+'y. .. .. - ... _.. ::,_ _,., - .~~/~ _ :.. .. .. .:. _. - .., JlTT'L ` r~~ 777.~ '~I f.~ .... .,... .. - ... ,.-. 3A--// ~. ..... ... .. .. .. _ : - . ~ - 3~6 'fhls~ls fntQnded to~bpu fogafly bi#dir~g ~antra~;t. ~Frto~~fuly undarsiaod; saak:#hd adrtco~:of.an ~:t#brravy;pri~r:to:ai~~ing, `~~: OFF't31~ AfVQ ACC.EPT~hfC~ _ .. ,.., ~ ,.. t ..: - 3iB. lCht~ck if'aixpltca>tbla: ^ Btryt~r raves a "~vtttteri reAl prt~~er#y disddsure stot-3mf~nt,fr~m 54;Ii+Rr kaefbr~s makJn~-this ~~fer~} ~371~ t3t~yrtr offers to pc~rchase.the P~'opeilty:an the above terms afd condiUanB. Unless:this Cofatrar,# is signed:by ~allcr artd p'cbPY ~3D ~elCucr~d to 8uyar no Tatar #hnn ~J.b.rn. ~ p:rn, an ~ _.: .._ .- -,-. : ~,ihis.~ffer dill t}a 381X i~vakeci i~nd-.t3uyara :d~osit rofur~¢~f subject to c3eafanc~ of fuf~ds 3f32 .. CUUNI~Fi.+~FFERIREJECT~~N' 383 ~] ~allar touftters f3uynr'$ offer {#oa~cept thm countdr offer, Buyormust sigh or initial lf9`cout~fer~nffere~-terms "ai:~d da~ivar~a 3~7 Dopy of ttie acc~~tan~ to I1or Unless athervrisa stated, the fame for.aocaptance ofafty countefaf>`prs shad be ~ days~frotn_th 365 cla#a fha,cvunforis da~v~r~ I~'$~#i~r`ro~xts st,yrar'>~;ofic~: ~~'`. ., ~:, .r 3813 f~~ttt , '~" Z'~~ e 3g'j`r 3~ ' BuyQ f ~aEUf SaflRr ; , - aCFtf^~oti-?tL~clgfr riP# Cf ~,.4CC~y at;tkfi~ ~g~: ~~P1~Ckti~S ~'~gc;.~ e~ ~ F-a~~9 ,„ . :.... lhi,~orm In qay spoclno,tnnstrUon ~~ stands arm ahouEd rwt ba 11~ad firrt~l~~Ips t~saGllon~ or wl#h oxtunsfr# rlddA ar adlditicns: if~l~ i0rtri',Im mrailL~blo fer:imo6~r.lhe~enUrv oaf ostalefndurrryr:--` turf mtarWat Cv Fdeill~til~ It1e usier~.t a RFJIL:TQR. REAII't7R to a rrQlstetad,softrcUra nri~nnt~¢rnt~p:rnuk >:SlYit l'ni~.b(r;l~#ed ~rtfY~ytgSlt~L9Sa11CEn3DCis7wfF}1~~rem~l~AE4n 0lfi.~l~tt~h~117PAWC6n9trtl~kLTOR~ erd who aubzCr31i0'EG 111~:CntBe'O~kt!!kCei~, .. `". op~y~titdraia #.L'0 Uri; (1 ~Sli S. Coeli~) ku~[ 6ha unauwx~a~f ra~t#'rr~kan alt~ar+k lbnrs.'s~+ eryr ma¢n3 ~~~ t~lritiife er mrripu lormai: v~~s: ~a-~ nor o ~~ ~id~a,4ssoc~tat~n yr ~x~r~~r, wt a,~r~ ~~~n ~~f ~~~~,-. r.T x ~~ 200T Pl~~~v~~~~ ~`~~~~r~~vr~~~~~ ".: ~ ..: _ ` Thr~ pro~arty ~ra.r --,tht~r F7Cc~~ ~on'c~ ~ :d d~jolctri~ ri,n r'oc' cltca~.~"~ .: ' - :`Fate rr~cp Cgrnr~;~{q~~f: t~flf1C~ ~... `' ~ F'%+JC~J i.~B~ Dot$~' F ~ -. ~ : . ~. .. ,..~ , , ::.:_" , ,.. ... ...... ..... .. .", ,,I. - Rwa^~c:.FiCJJ'~ eL-'r'r1T,'QAi:"1'':~-~` .. _ ~t~ + ~~y -~..~11'~rST `, ~ ry~~; 7'~N ~ ~ mow.: P1~l~'GG, i ~ri ~•... - Ja~,. . . rJ..:~_. ` 't?r,515'Or ~cl+rr~.u~'.$: LI,_ Qr ~ `F I'~.k~: .J/' Q," 1,~t~ .S.~r: ~k Q~..,.5 C77[3;~ ~. ti ~: i «` - ": Cr„J r',T 7~1~` 50u'ih'~~'FS1 'CG.~r,~rt QF 7;~ ,'fuJ?Th'k~"~ST t/4 :~'F rF~µ ' .SG~i.~r~E,~i i~h GF S~~'~+p;+t ?? FQ}~';,,'SF11P ~9` S,~~JT,=?, P~h+~t "~7. ~`r,Si ;~~r, ~ ~ .~lJr`. r~f~r','Cc' ;Orc,N' G',~r~5" EJ~,~r "i?L~:'~ Ta-~~::~S~LT;~I^.+ Lf;r_,=,.~;G.t"i~Fc~.:~~'~ TG~r :.. a1 FvrJ'~'± C'' .~~Gl~,radJ':r'du: Fs':iJ~a T,tit:I'',rC~ i'~JRT~!` ~~'23'~C'" }4'~~F ?r•.~.1tL~a ~ , r+1 r ~ , , i ~- ~r ~ I `~ ~„~, ~, .. 7 ~ ,.r.'"iRrl-' ,'~lQ~ni~d~=-kti'" ~+~" ~ _ r,Y _t . D, k'h.~J,.i,d~lti ~~:,~~~~~~~ i,~'~D -~r0 ~ , ~;,:'; ~ J tf Y~ 41J~'!~J~ !J1 LYE 4~;'~aY r~~~~I'. ~. ~1J L•.~~L~' v~J~.7r ~h~~'flV•,V ,.. '~i-i.".~.? T~~j" rN~l`r'I:~ fti V,Y rN r ~~'~G:'t ,?~ .j'ICSF .a~~';'r^ .~A„? ?.r~.:,+„F~~Jr1~ I~ lar yn? ['(' T Y ~1G 15~:J i~.7 %, ~ t./iZ 4L JT ~!<;~ ~] y~ ~~t ~~7 [`~1 i` ~ ~TW';V k1., ~` i'F Ti 1 L~ I;' f'"r~r`fV n4r'~ u ' ~ y1 I 7ilLJJ I I ~F+1 ,':J .Tr i1 t~~ :FSri;.'.~~'Gr`•,W ~'v;(i;l~ ~i, ^i'kr,}. 'utiI~~KG .7~iRJitrv '~V(7KT'~' 'fin"~t'i'1 " k~.~l, '~9.,~,j :.`r~i - _ ~ ~~~~~~~~~,z~ ~ ~r r..~`ac ,~a~~+s~ ~ r ~ s~ ~'~F''c. rr;~ c~ ~~o ~f fry - r© .. ~. r,!~i7. ~.;+u'~?r'~~_14'vr~;i F;GNf-C~--k4~Y,,"''rfQ^:? a.'+R,'";G r`lORi~`~f ~"~5:',:Y-"`' ' . .+ ~ ) c~ , .rr l', ?T fi~~. IL'~C-r' ~w/,Q rJ :e -. .- , ':fr~J .r r,.„f r~r ?.E~ ~t~i ,~.IrD .R.tir,'7rL/SL i+ ~.Ec.':F'r.~i ;ua,,'4~" ~ ;,so~;rN'~~~.~s'~~r F~sr ~~i~~? ~~ o r~~t ~r~,~r>:> ,Q;u~•r.-~~--~r t.l'R= a~- ~~. .: ~i`vLGL1`t!"rY;, r'.tih''iJ'iw %+ .:r.'.Sir'~rCF D'F fC75:;.ri FEET 10 rN~ I',rC,'~r',~%JESj ~:'.r.,~`, G T.'-fE SO:ir:~t}4cST ~/~?' O~ r,4F -,r,rG~''N41'c~; if•# G~'?~N,: -~1t1i~':rSfS' 1y~-:,.G,= ` " Sr~; 1 :SL~~,`C'1 2~; ,'"-t3k1'r','S1;'IP 29: ~G~1it^;""':il,;;GEI~ ;5 `~~57' ,7'h`~?vCE:"GOF±TJ~ti'!J `SOU~N:c3~':~'SD" 1ST iT pi5ri,t~c G>"""~~.~;v~~ 'r N~'YCE`'Su"~~rt-G'"i 9 '5.~;" T ^ ^^ .yy- ~ y ` ~sk%~,~r Ca.,~i~j.LEL rG :r~j~ ~.dl,G S~~ifv, :'`~1J'id 4~'f. ~.7 'l ~E.li rl~~l~r/~;~Q U' )'i "~.. , ..8~'i3',SG'° Er45T S^~~E .~c_- Pr~Rr~L:.~L rG i;~F`kG r,v~~c ilP,'S A.`;:7 C..!4~,4~~~'~'E:. Gr k'.'IGG:tif1}t,'; n'>t-r`ti4,r rk?~rvCC' SOUTN. C3 ~ '~,:" .ri~i;: '1p.73 ~u:.41 Rry`,arti~iE:::= ro 1 ~L YV ~~^. >? ilG~ h1 ~1':.r ~.. i5rri,tifl Li r4L yy~',, r~' rl~f 15 r~ I`'~ If ~}C~ r*: ~ -V .7 .~..C ,k~~J /J f, f~nll y,>' rr lyl~v u ~J { ~ ,, G r}7` $q'~~~SG '}rl~Sl ~Jr G4 ,~ r ~P~~L+E,. r1 1. r`.7 f' e r,= ~:. ~~41 r~~L~I,L V~ /4/~/l.J•. !'rat .~li'~~ ~lJ f r ~ r ~ rl. 4 ~ rti1R~-I,,-r Y F~E't~~ `:~~ ~..r ,v`CW r;D;~rf lrJ'i ~.'3~ G~5r i'~G 0 !~`T; 1ir:J,'C~ p~'0'-, ?" ?Q 7,~ ~u kr _ .a `. x ` ' ... ~GD .Fa=ir ~ '~ rho ~r~rr9r Gr ~~Y?1,1jr'a1r'a't^i,: " ~ .1 ~- ,. ... .:. x. -tG'r,' 7;ti~ SfivTh'}'t'.~~i C'°.!,R,r ~'~`Ci: ,ti'i"`:~r~R~F'~V S~ '~ rN 'cGu ~'~ `",~ Gr ~~CTr"~`, "2 `a}t„'SrrrG ~c sr' -z, ~ w~ kJl~' '``~"I~'C.;> Vlff , ~n'4l+'~ 7'J; Jl cC n~1 l,'~~'r':!' J ~9 ~J~ :J1 ~I~ Ji~Vk ~ +`~` ~ h: '3Yn ~- ~~ t, rtv F;', ~~..7`ipr, ~f 1_ ~ vG e.; rFt..,.aC~' '?'.$~+ I'`.na4'r?, ~~ ~j'`' Q~r k~'`~rr.;, ~,y„LL~L ~CJ . . ~~'~ r`u'i). F N RI`Ghx JF= /r'i?Y:L? h~~:f;r } _ yr~ ~ __ } , ry 1 k '~J:.l1 Yl~i,r .'~~Jf~: ffL~ ~/fi'Yi`1i rr-~'1 l7 ~Qfr.~T VI'1r T ~~t,,. ::.11~1 '~~Ji^I'„Q`~4yh~~ /~L ' Vr tiL ~ ` 77 t + rr, c Gv ri+r~ h, r.r~.J G6+ik^ G(?.~sr R~ILr`S .>riHi~ tiJ .J~ i` ter.. r~r ~'`4Lf, ._- i~..,J~l I`'JP In, 1.., Y~J rV1 kIL..J ~~L"~,'^ ~rViy TL~i~fi l/~L~ ICI >~i ('^~l fiJr4+.~ IYi!f.{ f'C: ~1 ~- l~$C. 4a,`~~.'': ~ RurPr' rii,Cln`r .A Cil,~'~ . L~'r^,~ r:r~^j. "e;J`:rG S+i1D' Ri1.W"~,^~ a~ `R;Cr4r .Qe_`itl~- ~ ,~, ~ ~ cr~ur'~ 5~~~1R;~ of ,k,~;~rri o'o~~'~a~:;ti`~s~ ~~s.~~ ~~","a;~^ ~~:'2z~.~~ ~. . ~~~' Ft'i,r:l`j,'5 .C7" t v r1.6G ~,~'~'; 'TNe~~r.~'~ R:rf, ~~;Gl;s'v' r', i^.JRr> !'G .;'Jbf~ _~;'..',. --. r+riu ~'s ,'ili:_~S aii/ 7~117~7+~~.~ ~i}~i~r . 4~'a'S~ ~:.h ~^; ~'G" `{J,~ !`ti 4.'~. T,h '~1.~J: ~~J! ~~ s~~~.AT ` r • G'? •~c Y, r, .C 0~' J 7~: ' ~ F~ ~ tit,D ,4AjJ,!iS. Cr" r4-7~, o~ T 'Ff74 r, ,~rir.;T. c r1. L, ~~1 - G „-. L1i ~>~~t"i.ai`vf,'MS2, 7,~!~r`9L+t` 'I;!±~f r~~G~,ra n viliQjrG ~~ TNC'-~~`~~~s.~'.U v~,':~ .11 ~J1~~7'Viil 'fir CF'tl'~~-'41, 4. r"..tV~';U, J:.J,~~11 ~rnry T 4 ff C T _.: r, ~, Cr + v,~Tlfi J G ;4Q" rrt;,,Jrf .~S;J-~ :. , ,3W,r-- tF~r ~ ,D::,~ "kal^'L+ G.~ l -f 7r :i9 ""^ ~' ~ ,r~,.,,~ ,,,r,~. ~ 5t7J7't;' c39'2, 5'? '~5 ," ~r~~n~t_~C T~ 'r?t~ ,'vrG'rN ~7;"~,~'r D~-}r,dY ,r..:r.,t :G',~ ' ...._. ~rGD^r'~ik4~~j r~ti~c, ~:~:~; 6~Q.& Ft~'; TNSrv~~ nJ,kr So~`~r Q~re'„5 ° iS`~~,:: , tn^~fiL'2S ~.Ci F`~F J 5~Q fv'i,' L SN ~ +`ti~ .$.S Q ~.:.~ TJ~~r. Ci I~i!~,~r "rrQ~t~r ~~ u ~~77 ,ry d_,~.,~, , w ~yc r ,~t 5:~ ~-,J~ i~~s7r J'~~~L~LL TD ~J',~G ~4 if i4,r ~1L ~'I ~~-'r IT ~,':~.~. Fd ~ ~r' k~44~'~LJtR'~i~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~:t rr ~ ~- ~~ ri -''+-.' r ire Ir>..., ~,~_,",~,.. t:a~ Frei' 7',J r ~' F~ ,r Q~ ~~,.~~ ti~ ~ ~ ' PARi~~L „S:Sif~4~Yt.x C~!r~'dF'~;Ja,'S:-3G,!.,~~~ 5~; ~' ~'~C~ ~.:4.~Cl~FS-.'r~~C7r°R~; f]~ ' ASS .. .... _ . , . , - .. . ; ... P~ o-- Q ~ ® ~ ~ ~ w aa~ n.. ~~ ev r rt4~~ ` _ ~ ~ tifi ~ ~,4 ~ y '• ` T j CCrr ~, LJ'+ T {- 4 ^~ 1 .{~L ~fA ~T~ 1~ G~~.n.'i19' ~, r~ rFV lr~,;V f/J~~l. ~V.'f'f!l'~I'S'~~~ pr' rl~U ~7J']ll''~'.7~1 ~~`~.,~jF 'TF71 '..,._ -SO~rt~}4'F5T': Tft ~,`F ~P,^.F;D°"; ''??, -1 Gki'r'JSt°r' ~ ~~", S.^ri;rJTF+. ~1r,P.'C~ , 5 EAST. . t~;r".w~l_Ci,S C 0 I1,~''}',::FLG{?r~r ' ; Fl-f~'i~" D ~Fd7; ,~~~\'~~ a"~rt~f3t~i'..'.. > -:tr':{' ~r _ ~,..~.,rC.^ ~-~ - r ~ + T r~ ! 1 U 'it~r ~.~ i c..=.(i ~'~~~i ~"` r:i CJ7 ;`?.f.:v.CiV "'.."~`. ~` l~f"7~J'.'~'4~'J~V,IJ'r ~'r "`.~..1 ~.iri`U ~:.A~ 1[ .. r`l4f{4J ~L .1 ~r~i~~..~M": r ... c~~,p'L" ,tile. ~ ~ _ t Line Items: Receipt #: 1200700000000008821 Date: 10/02/2007 10/2/2007 1:2$:23PM Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid PLT2007-00006 Preliminary Plat 010-341240 600.00 FLS2007-1.0045 03 Flex Std-Commercial 010-341262 475.00 FLS2007-10045 Fire -Prelim Site Plan 010-342501 200.00 Line Item Total: $1,275.00 c: Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount. Paid Check MIDWAY SVCS INC R_D 3169 In Person 1,275.00 Fayment Total: $1,275.00 • THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. ' This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceip[.rp[ Page 1 of 1 ~ ~ FLS2007-10045 826 WOODLAWN ST LAKE BELLEVUE PLA ER OF REC RD: N T E TERED ATLAS # 314A ZONING: I LAND USE: INS RECEIVED : 10/01 /2007 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverSheet ~ ~ PLT2007-00006 826 WOODLAWN ST LAKE BELLEVUE PL NNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED ATLAS # 314A ZONING: I LAND USE: INS RECENED: 10/01 /2007 INCOMPLETE; COMPLETE: MAPS : PHOTOS; STAFF REPORT: DRC CDB: CLWCoverSheet k .10HNSON,~OPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BU IVS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR." CHARLES A. BUFORD GUY M. BURNS KATHERINE E. GOLE JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN BRIAN R. CUMMINGS ELIZABETH J. DANIELS COLLEEN M. FLYNN JOSEPH W. GAYNOR' RYAN C. GRIFFIN MARION HALE REBECCA L. HEIST SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ. FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR.' SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. CARSON 911 CHESTNUT ST. + CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33756 POST OFFICE BOX 1368 + CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33757-1368 TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 • TELECOPIER: (72?) 462-0365 ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A. R. "CHAFjLIE" NEAL F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. JENNIFER A. REH DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL CHARLES A. SAMARKOS SARA A. SCHIFINO KIMBERLY L. SHARPE HURRAY B. SILVERSTEIN JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON "OF COUNSEL FILE. NO. ~ ~ 4JO4 August 27, 2008 `r/Ia:E-F,IfAiL olio :9.5. nrir~iL Wayne Wells, AICP °°~City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: FLS2007-10045, Lake Bellevue Townhomes Dear Wayne: This Firm represents the Applicant of the above project. This letter serves as formal notice to withdraw the above referenced Flexible Standard Development Application from consideration by the City. As you are aware, there is also a land use and zoning amendment case pending (LUZ2006-08006), which will be heard by the City Council for First Reading at its September 4, 2008 meeting It is our desire that the land use and zoning case proceed forward as scheduled. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this request. Sincereiy,= `'~- Ka herine E. Gole, Esq. cc: Bill Wolf, Affordable Dreams, LLC Pastor Randy Morris, Woodlawn Church of God. Michael Delk, City of Clearwater Planning Director ~~~ #~1A9287 v1 -LAKE BELLEVUE.Itr wikhdraw Clearwater FLS app ~~n~ p tied ~~ 2Wo® ~6~~~ ~ G1YY ~F ~~A~VVAf~R TAMPA • CLEARWATER • ST. PETERSBURG JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR." CHARLES A. BUFORD GUY M. BURNS KATHERINE E. COLE JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN BRIAN R. CUMMINGS ELIZABETH J. DANlELS COLLEEN M. FLYNN JOSEPH W. GAYNOR' RYAN C. GRIFFIN MARION HALE REBECCA L. HEIST SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A, CARSON BURNS, LLP LAW ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D.MESSA A. R. "CHARLIE" NEAL F. WAtLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. JENNIFER A. REH DARRYL R_ RICHARDS PET/=R A. RIVEtLINI 911 CHESTNUT ST.. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 POST OFFICE BOX 1368 ~ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33757-1368 TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 . T€LECOPIER: (727) 462.0365 DENNIS G. RUPPEL CHARLES A. SAMARKOS SARA A. SCHIFINO KIMBERLY L. SHARPE HURRAY B. SILVERSTEIN JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON "OF COUNSEL FILE N0. "1 ~4J04 August 27, 2008 Via E-MAfL and U.S. MAIL Wayne Wells, AICP City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: FLS2007-10045, Lake Bellevue Townhomes Dear Wayne: This Firm represents the Applicant of the above project. This letter serves as formal notice to withdraw the above referenced Flexible Standard Development Application from consideration by the City. As you are aware, there is also a land use' and zoning amendment case pending (LUZ2006-08006}, which will be heard by the City Council for First Reading at its September 4, 2008 meeting. It is our desire that the land use and zoning case proceed forward as scheduled. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this reques#. Sincerely, Ka herine E. Cole, Esq. cc: Bill Wolf, Affordable Dreams, LLC Pastor Randy Morris, Woodlawn Church of Gad Michael Delk, City of Clearwater Planning Directory/ #448287 v1 -LAKE BELLEVUE.Itr withdraw Clearwater FLS app ~R~ ~lCEIVE~ ~~..IG ~ ~ 2D~~ CI1Y OF t+tEARWATER TAMPA • IiLEARWATER • ST. PETERSBURG • • .JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H_ BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.' CHARLES A. BUFORD GUY M. BURNS KATHERINE E. COLE JONATHAN S.COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN BRIAN R. CUMMINGS ELIZABI=TH J. DANIELS COLLEEN M. FLYNN JOSEPH w.GAYNOR• RYAN C. GRIFFIN MARION HALE REBECCA L HEIST SCOTT C. ILGENFRrr2 FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR.• SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. CARSON 81 t CHESTNUr ST. ~ CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33756 POST OFFICE BOX 736e ~ CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33757-1368 TELEPHONE: (727}4fi1-1818 ~ TELECOPIER: (727) 462-0365 ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE M]CHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A. R. "CHARLIE" NEAL F. wALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. JENNIFER A. REH pARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RiVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL CHARLES A. SAMARK05 SARA A. SCHIF#NO KIMBERLY L. SHARPE MURRAY B. S]LVERS7EIN JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER, JOSEPH J. wEISSMAN STEVEN A. wILL1AMSON •Of COUNSEL FILE No. 114504 August 27, 2008 Via E-MAIL and U.S. MAIL Wayne Wells, AICP City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: FLS2007-10045, Lake Bellevue Townhames Dear Wayne: This Firm represents the Applicant of the above project. This letter serves as formal notice to withdraw the above referenced Flexible Standard Development Application from consideration by the City. As you are aware, there is also a land use and zoning amendment case pending (LUZ2006-08006}, which will be heard by the City Council for First Reading at its September 4, 2008 meeting. It is our desire that the land use and zoning case proceed forward as scheduled. Please let me knew if you have any ques#ions regarding this request. Sincerely, Ka herine E. Cole, Esq. cc: Bill Wolf, Affordable Dreams, LLC Pastor Randy Morris, Woodlawn Church of God Michael Delk, City of Clearwater Planning Director #449287 v1 - LAKe= BELLEVUE.Itr withdraw Clearwater FLS app TAMPA • CLEARWATER • Sr. PETERSBURG • ~ Wells, Wa ne From: Robyn Moehring [RobynM@jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday,. August 28,.2008 9:02 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Katie Cole Subject: FLS2007-10045, Lake Be]levue Townhomes Lake. Bellevue ~wnhomes Lette Mr. Wells, Attached please find correspondence from Katherine Cole requesting that the above referenced Flexible Standard Development Application be withdrawn from consideration by the City. After reviewing, if ,you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Cole at 727-461-1816. Sincerely, Robyn Moehring Assistant to Katherine E. Cole, Esq. Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 727-461-1818 727-462-0365 fax • c: Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:31 PM To: 'kent.edwards@avidgroup.com' Subject: FLS2007-10045/PLT2007-00006 - 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street Kent - We are continuing to have discussions in our office regarding the "affordable housing" issue related to the requested reduction to required parking and have added the following Planning comment to the draft DRC comments: "Since 103 units in this project are being proposed as "affordable housing," where a reduced parking requirement may be approved, provide the homeowners association document that sets out the requirements for the initial sale and maintenance of the "affordability" of these 103 units." Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, 1=L 33756-5520 Phone: 727-562-4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 • ~J Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 5:10 PM To: 'kent.edwards~a avidgroup.com' Subject: FLS2007-100451PLT2007-00006 - 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street Kent - Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the meeting to occur at 1:00 pm on Thursday, April 3, 2008, in our offices. Should you have any questions, feel free to email or call me (562-4504). Wayne M. Wells, A1CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Prone: 727-562-4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 fy Draft 4.3.08 C Action Agend r z3 a° o m IAUTMiF6139 L00000361 L673451 w K v ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ GiPOUP • °~ a 3 a PHONE {727) 789-9500 ~ ~ FAX (727 784-6662 ~ March 12, 2008 City of Clearwater Attn: Sheri Watkins 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: PROJECT NAME: Woodlawn Terrace FLS2007-10045 Avid Job No. 2596-001 Dear Ms. Watkins: In response to the comments from the City of Clearwater's DRC review, we are submitting the following information. • Fifteen (15) copies - Flexible Development Application • Fifteen (15) copies - Affidavit to Authorize Agent • Fifteen (15) copies - Site Plans (one signed & sealed) • Fifteen (15) copies - Boundary, Topographic and Tree Surveys • Fifteen (15) copies - Architectural Elevation Plans • Fifteen (15) copies - Color Rendering of Buildings • Fifteen (15) copies - Building Materials Exhibits • Fifteen (15) copies - Color Scheme for the Proposed Development • Fifteen (15) copies - Responses to General Application Criteria • Fifteen (15) copies - Responses to Flexible Development Criteria for Attached Dwellings • Two (2) copies --- Geotechnical Engineering Services Report by PSI • Two (2) -Storm Drain Tabulation Calculations • Two (2) -Hydraulic Analysis of the Proposed Water System Calculations • Two (2) -Sanitary Lift Station Calculations The following are a list of comments sent to our off ce. For your convenience we have listed your comments in bold and our responses in italics. ~R~11lVAd. ~~1~~ y~~s~ ' ~ ~~0~ ~L11NI~0liG ~;R~E~~ ~3?~'' CAF ~1,~",~„t~k Comments• Prior to the issuance of a Development Qrder: 1. Proposed plans shall indicate dedication of a right-of-way easement for Woodlawn Street to provide a total of 30-feet of right-of--way or a right-of- way easement to be measured from the north line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. Please note that the right-of-way easements shown on the survey previously submitted do not agree with the pubic records referenced on the survey. Per discussion with the Project Surveyor, the area in questions has been designated as aright-of--way easement. Additional information was sent to Steve Doherty in Public Works on 1/15/08 via email. 2. The condominium plat of Woodlawn Terrace I indicates 30-feet of street right-of--way measured from the Southwest 114 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Rangel5 East. Please amend the site plan to show this existing street right-of--way for Woodlawn Street. Per discussion with the Project Surveyor, the area in questions has been designated as aright-of--way easement. Additional information was sent to Steve Doherty in Public Works on 1/1 S/08 via email. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: «~ 1. Applicant shall provide a sanitary manhole detail showing how force main will be connected to the manhole. ~~ o ~ ;~ Please see the note added to the Utility Plan stating that the proposed forcemain will be connected to the existing manhole through core boring and will be grouted ~~ ~ t.' water tight. Also an additional cross section is added to Sheet 9 for further clarification. 2. Applicant shall provide a manhole liner to protect manhole from force main ~ effluent. A manhole liner is specified on the Utility Plan. Please see Sheet 6. 3. Provide a copy of an approved Florida Department of Environmental Protection (D.E.P.} permit for the construction of new water mains on the subject property. The applicant understands that all applicable FDEP permits must be obtained prior to issuance of the Building Permit. K:\PRO.iECTS12500'\2596001\OOC1City of Clearwater\20080115_2nd ~ ,~ Resubmittal 2596001\200801.31 City comments response letter_2596001-2.doc • • 4. All fire hydrant assemblies installed greater than 10 ft. from a water main shall be constructed with ductile iron pipe and shall have a gate valve at the tee on the branch line, and at the fire hydrant assembly {F.H.A.). This note has been added to the general notes (note 3) on the Utility Plan (Sheet 6). 5. Fire hydrant leads shall have a minimum inside diameter of 6-inches. This note has been added to the general notes (note 4) on the Utility Plan (Sheet b). 6. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved Florida Department of Environmental Protection {D.E.P.) permit for the installation of the sanitary sewer extension. The applicant understands that all applicable FDEP permits must be obtained prior to issuance of the Building Permit. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 7. Applicant shall bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) The applicant is aware of this requirement. All substandard sidewalks along the frontage of the property will be upgraded to current standards. All new sidewalks within the project boundary will be installed be these same standards. See Site Plan (Sheet 4). Environmental: The following three conditions were acknowledged in a letter dated December 3, 2007: ~~ ®~ 1. The plans provided show fill and structures within wetlands and wetland buffers, The Crty of Clearwater's Community Development Code Section 3- 907 states, "A vegetative buffer shall be provided on all lands within 25 feet of any property designated on the Zoning Atlas as preservation (P), or any property determined to be wetlands under the jurisdiction of the State of Florida ("jurisdictional wetlands"); and all lands within 15 feet of the top of the bank of any creeks, channels, or related waterways which contain jurisdictional wetlands." Revise plans so structures or parking lots do not impact wetlands or wetland buffers. 0 N K:IPROJECTS1250012596001\DOC\City of Clearwater120080 1 1 5_2nd ~ ,~ Resubmittal 2596001\20080131_City comments response letter 2596001-2.doc ~~ d ~~. ~~ L 6L1 ~~ ~~ `4 • • There are no known wetlands on-site. The Project Biologist and the Southwest Florida Water Management District met on-site on February 6, 2008 to discuss limits of surface waters and wetlands. As a result of this meeting, it was determined that there were not any jurisdictional wetlands on-site. A letter to this effect is forthcoming from SWFWMD and will be submitted to the City of Clearwater upon receipt. 2. The City's Design Criteria Storm Drainage rules require wet detention ponds to incorporate a vegetated littoral shelf over 35% of the area of the pond under normal conditions. Provide a planting plan for Wetland Detention Pond 10. A vegetated littoral shelf has been provided within Pond ll. This area exceeds 35% of the combined normal water area of both Ponds 10 & 11. With these ponds equalized the littoral zone is concentrated at the outfall to meet SWFWMD criteria. Please see the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheet S). 3. Provide a planting plan for littoral shelf in Pond 11. A planting plan for the Pond 11 littoral shelf is provided. Please see the Crass Sections (Sheet 9). New conditions (12/19/07): Prior to the issuance of a Development Order: 1. "The City of Clearwater's Community Development Code Section 3-907 requires a 15 foot setback from the top of the bank from any channel or waterway. Units 1-4 are located within the 15 foot setback of the waterway on the west side of the property. Revise plans so structures are not within this F- setback. "~' ~ The Site Plan is revised to meet this requirement. The building at the southwest a® 1 ~ ~ ty c~ q f corner of the project is reduced to a b-unit building to allow for this maintenance ~ ~' areas. Currently no structures are proposed within this area. Please see Site ~ ~ Plan (Sheet 4) and Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan (Sheet 5). ~ ~ F ~ C~ 2. Provide evidence from the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) that no wetlands occur on the site, specifically in the northwest corner. The Project Biologist met on-site with SWFWMD on February 6, 2008 to confirm boundary limits for any potential wetlands. It was determined that there are no wetlands on-site. The SWFWMD letter of no wetlands will be provided upon receipt. K:\PIZOJECTS1250012596001.1DOC1City of Clearwater\2008011 S_2nd ~ ~~ Resubmittal 2596001~20080131_City comments response letter 2596001-2.doc • • Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: 3. A planting plan for Fond 11 was not in the plans submitted. Provide a planting plan for Pond. A planting plan for the Pond 11 littoral shelf is provided. Please see the Cross Sections (Sheet 9). Land Resources- 1. 10/24/07-The Preservation Plan must reflect which trees require special attention such as root pruning, tunneling and canopy elevating, ie: root pruning at tree #205. The plan must be more precise. Revise prior to D.O. 12/27/07-Show the root prune limits for the top of banks @ trees #60, 199, 203, 205 and the two trees east of building 11 units 18 and 19. Insure the plans reflect the specifications and visa versa. Also show tree barricade limits @ all trees to remain on site and those trees along the property boundaries. Spec f c treatments for individual trees are shown on the Tree Protection Details Sheet (Sheet TP2). The individual tree along with the proposed treatment is listed in the table titled "Tree Preservation Specifications ". 2. Provide an east/west section through tree # 8, show root prune limits if needed. The east/west section through tree #8 has been added to the plans. Please see Section A-A on the Tree Preservation Plan (Sheet TPI) Landscaping- f 1. Sheet L6 -Revise $-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Based on other unit plans, there should be a sidewalk along the front of the units adjacent to the private street. Show the sidewalk and revise the plant ~ counts of AP on the plan and in the plant schedule; W ;~- b. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 12 HB; ~ ~~," _: c. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 30 AV; N d. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 25 CR; ~ ~ e. Plant schedule indicates S LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; ~ ~ £ Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 724 AP (see "a" above}; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ; m g. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I don't count any {0) DV; ~ t3 h, Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I don't count any {0) LEG; and ~ i. Plan indicates 14 MWA, but the plant schedule doesn't have MWA in it. The typical landscaping plan for the proposed $-Unit buildings has been revised. Please see the Typ. Unit LSP Sheet (Sheet L6). K:IPROJECTS1250012596001\DOC1City of Clearwater120080115 2nd Resubmittal_2596001120080131_City comments response letter_2596001-2.doc A `~ ~ • Z. Sheet L6 -Revise 7-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Based on other unit plans, there appears to be a sidewalk along the front of the units adjacent to the private street. Revise the location of AP and confirm plant counts on plan and in plant schedule; b. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 20 HB; c. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 18 AV; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 15 CR; e. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; f. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 422 AP (see "a" above); g. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I count 30 DV; and h. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I don't count any (0) LEG. The typical landscaping plan for the proposed 7-Unit buildings has been revised. Please see the Typ. Unit LSP Sheet (Sheet LS). 3. Sheet L8 -Revise ll~unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Flant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 24 HB; b. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 20 AV; c. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 20 CR; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; e. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 661 AP; f. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I count 45 DV; g. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I don't count any (0} LEG; h. Plan indicates 22 JP, but the plant schedule doen't include JP; and i. Plan does not indicate the sidewalk along the front adjacent to the private street on the left hand side between the single and double driveways and doesn't indicate any landscaping (probably AP}. Revise plan and plant schedule. The typical landscaping plan for a praposed 11-Unit building has been revised. Please see the Typ. Unit LSP Sheet (Sheet L8). ~4. Sheet L6 -Revise 6-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Based on other unit plans, there appears to be a sidewalk along the front of the units adjacent to the private street. Revise the location of AP and confirm w plant counts on plan and in plant schedule; ® `_ b. Flant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 6 HB; c. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count i4 CR; ~ c~ t d. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; ~ ~ '""'' ~ _ e.~.i ~ ter: e. Plant schedule indicates 2$0 AP, but I count 144 AP (see "a" above); ~? a~ ~ ~ ~ f. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I count 20 DV; ~ g. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I count 57 LEG; and n- h. Plan indicates 21 JP, but the plant schedule doesn't indicate ,IP at all. K:\PROJECTS\2500\2596001\DOC\City of Clearwater\20080115_2nd ~ ,~ Resubmittal 2596001\20080131_City comments response letter_2596001-2.doc • • The typical landscaping plan for a proposed 6-Unit building has been revised. Please see the Typ, Unit LSP Sheet (Sheet L6). 15. Sheet L7 e Revise 9-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 16 HB; b. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 30 AV; c. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 15 CR; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; e. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 655 AP; f. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I count 58 DV; and g. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I don't count any (0) LEG. The typical landscaping plan for a proposed 9-Unit building has been revised. f Please see the Typ. Unit LSP Sheet (Sheet L7). ~I 6. Sheet L6 -Remove 5-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule. There are no 5-unit buildings proposed. The 5-unit building landscape plan has been rerrroved Please see the Typ. Unit LSP Sheet (Sheets L6, L7 and L8). ~7. Sheet L7 -Revise 10-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 20 HB; b. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 20 AV; c. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 15 CR; ~ d. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I do~a't count any (0} LC; e. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but T count 874 AP; f. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I don't count any (0) DV; g. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I don't count any (0) LEG; and h. There are driveway dividers in the four double driveways but no landscaping is specified (either AP or LEG). Revise plan and plant schedule. The typical landscaping plan for a proposed 1 D-Unit building has been revised. Please see the Typ. Unit LSP Sheet (Sheet L7). 8. Section 3-1202.D.2 states: "Front stapes of stormwater retention areas may comprise up to 50 percent of any required landscape buffer width, provided that the slope is 4:1 or flatter and all required shrub plantings are not more than six inches below the top of the bank and provided that the buffer width is at least five feet in width." Based on the pond design on Sheet 5, cross- section G on Sheet 9 and the proposed landscaping on Sheet L5, provide evidence on across-section of pond design. and landscaping compliance with this Code section. The landscaping design has been added to Cross-Section G, stating that there will be plantings on the front slope of the proposed detention pond. K:1PRO.lECTS12500\25960011DOC\Gity of Clearwater1200801.15_2nd Resubmittal_2596001120080131_City comments response letter_2596001-2.doc ~~ w u,ai ao 0 c~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~. ~ ~~ C~ A~O • • Farks and Recreation: 1. A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat {if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. (Note: Open space and recreation land fees are not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1985.) The applicant will coordinate with Art Kader on all applicable recreation impact fees. It is understood that these fees must be paid prior to building permit issuance. Stormwater• The following shall be addressed prior to Development Order. 1. Frovide 50' adjacent topography and finished floor elevations of adjacent structures. Revised plan shows 50' topography of only the northeastern area; please provide the entire 50' adjacent topography (See section E submittal. requirements on FLS application). The adjacent topography has been surveyed and has been added to the plans. Please see the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheet 5). 2. There have been flooding problems occurring at the multi-family development directly adjacent to the proposed project on the northeast side. Revised drainage report shows that basn30 has been removed along with the by-pass swale along the eastern property line. Drainage report also states that most of runoff from basin 30 has been accommodated by the existing on- site drainage system. Please delineate on the plan which portion of basin 30 has been managed by the existing Swale and which portion is still needed to be attenuated. To avoid worsening the existing flooding problems, a Swale system with inlets shall be designed and depicted on the plan to ~ accommodate remaining off-site runoff that not managed by the existing ~ ~ Swale and runoff from the roof of the proposed townhomes. ~ There is an existing Swale along the northeast of our project, which intercepts ~ ~. ,~ ~ flow from the off-site apartment buildings prior to reaching the proposed project ~ ~ ~ ~ site. Please see the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheet 5) for this ~: ~ ~ information, as well as the revised survey. The Proposed project site will be U constructed with roof drains and yard drainage, directing all impervious discharge to the on-site Stormwater system. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. K:IPROJECTS\250012596041\DOC\City of Clearwater120080115 2nd Resubmittal_2596001\20080131_City comments response letter_2596001-2.doc ~ ,p • • 1. Demonstrate that the eastern side bank of the existing ditch adjoining the railroad right-of-way will be stable with the placement of additional fill. The geotechnical consultant will provide a method of stabilization, as necessary. Please note that the building at the southwest corner has been reduced to a 6-unit building so that a minimum of I5 ft between the top of bank and the back of the proposed patio is provided. Please see the Site Plan (Sheet 4). 2. Show more proposed spot elevations, especially around the back of all units. Behind unit 14 and the end of street A, it appears that the grade slopes toward the adjacent property, this is not an acceptable design. Additional spot elevations have been set on the plans. Please see the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheet 5) 3. A drainage easement over the southern portion of the existing ditch adjoining the railroad right-of--way, measured from the western property line to the eastern ditch's top of bank, shall be dedicated to the City for maintenance purposes. The required drainage area has been provided on the plans. Please see the proposed Site Plan (Sheet 4) demonstrating that no buildings will be within I S ft of the existing drainage ditch along the western side of the Project Site. 4. A fence shall be installed around entire the concrete headwall of the ditch and along the eastern bank where the bank slope is steeper than 4:1. A buffer wall/fence has been added to the perimeter of the property, including along the top of the concrete headwall, as requested. Please see the Site Plan (Sheet 4) for the proposed fence location. 5. Please show finished floor elevations, not pad elevations. Finished floor ~ elevations shall be a minimum of 1' higher than the adjacent crown of the 4 c~ ~ ~ road. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Finished floor elevations have been added to the plans. Please see the Paving, ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheet 5). =~- ~ U 6. What is the structure number and the invert elevation for the miter end section of the pond #11 outfall? The outfall pipe's slope is not legible. Please revise plan accordingly. The structure number for the proposed outfall of Pond 11 is Dl l -29. The invert elevation is 41.00. Please see the Paving, Grading and Drainage Sheet (Sheet 5). K:IPROJECTS\250012596001\DOC\City of Clearwater\200801 ] S_2nd Resubmittal_2596001120080131_City comments response letter 2596001-2.doc p ,Q • • 7. Please affirm in the drainage report and supportive documentation that the pond #11 outfall will not create erosion downstream. The proposed outfall from Pond 11 will spill on to a 10x10' Rip-Rap Pad. Therefore, additional erosion is not anticipated. 8. The ADS roof drain system shown on plan is not complete. Please show clearly the location of downspouts connecting to the roof drain system with inlet along the back of all units to catch all runoff and direct it to the ponds. The rear of the proposed buildings will drain into the provided ADS outlets. Stubs for the connections have been added to the plans. Please see the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheet S). 9. Cross sections provided in the revised plan do not show actual elevations and are not drawn to scale. Is the top of bank of pond 20 at elevation 49 or 52? Please review and revise plan, drainage report, and cross sections accordingly. The proposed cross-sections have been revised to include finish floor elevations. Please see the attached cross-section sheet (Sheet 9). 10. Percolation test was not included in the drainage report as stated in the response of 12/03/07. Please provide a soil report, seasonal high water table, and a 24-hours pond draw down analysis based on double ring test. A double-ring infiltration test (DRIT - 1) was performed within Pond 20. Please see Geotechnical Engineering Services Report by PSI, dated 9/D7/07. The season high water table for Ponds 10 c~C 11 was field identified by the project biologist and located by the project surveyor. This information is contained on the Boundurdy, Topo and Tree Survey (See attached). The drawdown calculations for the dry detention Pond 20 were included within the previous resubmittal. 1L Provide a SWFWMD permit and approved grading plan from this agency at the building permit application. The SWFWMD permitting process is occurring simultaneously with this permit. Upon receipt of a permit from SWFWMD, it will be provided to the City of ~ ~ Clearwater. _ ~ 12. Demonstrate that the proposed storm system. can handle a 10-year storm ~ ~ o ~ +~~"` ~ event by providing storm tabulations, delineation of sub-basin for each ~ '' ,--., ~ ~ proposed inlet, and other supportive data. ~ ~- ~ ~ h h C at t e Please see the attached Storm Tabulation worksheet demonstrating t ? stormwater system can handle a IO-year storm event. KIPROJEC`TSl2500l2596001lDOClCity of Clearwater120080115_2nd Resubmittal_2596001l20080131_City comments response letter_2596001-2.doc a ,~ I 1 ~~ Planning• ~1. 12/27/07 & 10/12/07 - WW On the building elevations, indicate the proposed exterior materials and colors of the building by name. Provide a color legend as to building face color, door and garage door colors and facia color. It is presumed that the facia color will not be the same color as the building face color. Please see the attached building material exhibit; as well as a color list. J2. 12/27ro7 - ww December 3, 2007, response letter states the responses to these criteria is on a separate sheet. I do not find this separate sheet. 10/12/07 & 10/2/07 - W W Provide responses to the following Flexible Standard Development criteria for attached dwellings. Explain HOW each criteria is achieved, in detail: L Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and. appearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. Please see the attached sheet addressing the Flexible Standard Development Criteria. 12/27/07 - WW December 3, 2007 response letter did not respond to the comment below. Comment deals with the note "optional screen enclosure under cantilever" indicated on the narrow units but not the wider units. If typical for all units, indicate "typical for all units" as part of this note on revised floor plans. This note has been updated. Please see the attached exhibit stating that the ~ optional screen enclosure is typical for all units, unless otherwise noted on the ~ plans. 10/29/07 - WW Floor plans for the narrow units indicate at the rear of the unit where the second floor cantilevers over the ground floor patio that there is an "optional. ~~ ~~ m N 4"~, Viz? --9 a~ t1 ~~ s ~~ .~- ~ ~ ~~ K:\PROJECTS\2500125960011DOC1City of Clearwater\20080115_2nd Res~bmittal_2596001\20080131_City comments response letter_2596001-2.doc A ,Q screen enclosure under cantilever." This is not similarly shown on the wider units. If such is an option for the wider units, revise to indicate such. Please see the comment above. f 4. 12/30/07 - W W Sheet 1 - c. Revise Proposed Building Height to what the actual height is proposed. 10/25/07 - W W Sheet 1 -Revise Site Data for the following: a. Property Address -Add 830 Woodlawn Street; b. Property Zoning -Add after MDR (Medium Density Residential) (Proposed under LUZ2006-08006); and c. Maximum Building Height -Revise to actual height. The proposed height has been revised. Please see the attached revised Flexible Development Criteria Application n5. 12/27/07 & 10/19/07 - WW ~' Based on the floor plans, windows are "optional" for the end unit, second floor narrow units only (wider units apparently don't have any "optional." windows on the end units). As these windows are "optional," the sides of the units will be blank walls, which is not appealing. This has been noted and additional alternatives are being explored. 12/30/07 - WW Response in the December 3, 2007, letter did not address the comment below from 10/12/07. Revise. 10/i2/07 - WW Floor plans indicate "optional screen enclosure under cantilever" with a door to the rear from this screen enclosure. iJnits 66 - 94 still shown with stem walls at the edge of the cantilever, which is still a problem. 10/2/07 - WW As a heads up, while it is not part of a completeness review, the building ~,+ elevations indicate sliding glass doors at the rear of units. By Building Code, ~ ~ there must be at least athree-foot wide stoop outside the sliding glass doors. Such stoops/patios must meet required setbacks. Additionally, certain buildings are indicated with a stem wall at the rear of the buildings, which can create additional issues regarding these stoops/patios. Lt is advised to look at this in greater detail to avoid comments requiring redesign during the DRC review process. Please see the revised detail attached. ~~ N °° ~ L ~~ ~_ ~~~. ~ ~ ~ f~ K:IPROJECTS~250012596001\1~OC1City of Clearwater~200801 15_2nd ~ ~~ ltesubmittal 259600120080131 City comments response letter_2596001-2.doc • • f 7. 12/30/07 - WW Response in December 3, 2007, letter is insufficient. In order to obtain a Development Order, revise site layout and/or floor plans appropriately as requested below. 10/12/07 - WW Site plan layout of units and entries do not match submitted floor plans and building elevations. The following are differences that need to be shown on revised site plans: a. floor plans indicate a protruding garage with. a recessed. entry area. Site plans don't indicate such (rectangle box shown}; b. floor plans submitted for the wider, three-bedroom units indicate a side entry for the unit, yet the site plan indicates two units (86 and 11.5) with a front entry for the unit; and c. floor plans submitted only show a front entry for the narrow units, yet the site plan indicates side entry for wider Units 20, 30, 45, SS, 66, 73, 74, 80, 94, 95, 104 and 105. The floor layout has been revised to show the buildings as described in the architectural plans, as opposed to the building footprint. Please see the Site Plan and Paving, Grading and Drainage Plans (Sheets 4 and 5). A table has been added to the Site Plan, stating which units will have a screened enclosure in the back; in addition to the proposed stem walls. Please see Sheet 4. 12/30/07 ~ 10/30!07 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Development Order: That approval of this Flexible Standard Development (FLS) application be subject to the approval of the change to land use and zoning under LUZ2006- 08006. This condition. has been noted. As such, no Final Plat may be approved by City Council and no building permits to construct horizontal or vertical improvements may be issued until ~ ~ LUZ2006-08006 is approved. ~ This condition has been noted. ' c~ ~ ±~ ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ c. - C~ ~9. 12/27/07 & 1or2s/o7 - ww ~ ~ Parking has been designed in a manner where the two parking spaces are y, ~ stacked, requiring the vehicle in the driveway to be moved to allow the ~ ~ vehicle in the garage to exit. As such, there is only one parking space ~' provided per unit. Need to provide one additional parking space per unit. The proposed units shall be deemed affordable and therefore are eligible to have the requirement of two parking spaces (not including the garage) waived. K:IPROJECTS12500125960011DOC1City of Clearwater~20080115 2nd Resubmittal_2596001.120080131_City comments response letter 2596001-2.doc ~ ®® • ~10. 12/30!07 - WW Response in the December 3, 2007, letter states afence/wall as suggested below will be installed. Indicate the fence/wall on Sheets 4 and L5. 1.0/30/07.. WW From a buffering standpoint to address compatibility of adjacent uses, recommend the installation of a six-foot high solid fence or wall with landscaping on the inside of the fence/wall adjacent to the three detached dwellings that this project wraps around (806, 818 and 822 Woodlawn Street). Within the front setback adjacent to Woodlawn Street, the fence/wall must be reduced to a maximum of three feet in height. The proposed fence/wall has been added to the plans. Please see the Site Plan, as well as the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheets 4 and S). 11. 12/27/07 & 10/12/07 - WW Provide building elevations for all fours sides of the proposed buildings. Submitted front building elevations continue to show end units with atwo- car garage. Based on Sheet 4 and the submitted floor plans, #here are no two- car garages. Revise building elevations to show reality circumstances. 10/2/07 - WW Based on the site layout on Sheet 4, buildings range from 6 - 11 units in each building. The building elevations submitted is for afour-unit building and depicts units with atwo-car garage. The site plan does not indicate any two- car garages. The building elevations also depict units that have many planes to the faces of the building, however, the site plan indicates rectangular buildings. Provide building elevations that will be typical to this development. The proposed plans have been revised to indicate two-car garages where applicable. Please see the note on the Site Plan (Sheet 4). f 12. 12/30/07 - WW Unclear of the meaning of the last sentence in second paragraph. Revise. ~ 10/30/07 - WW Response to General Applicability criteria #6 (Page 2 of FLS application) - The future land use for the three lots fronting on Woodlawn Street this property surrounds, as well as properties south of Woodlawn Street and to the west across the railroad tracks is Residential Urban (maximum density of 7.5 du/acre), which is not the same as what has been requested for this property. Revise the response to address these divergent land use densities relating to this criteria. Please see the revised FLS application. ~~ ua ~e Ei o_ c.} i'~ '~ x ~~ ~ Z~ S t~ K:\AROJECTS~2500125960011DOC1City of Clearwater\20080115 2nd ~ ~~ Resubmittal 2596001\20080131 Ciry comments response letter 2596001-2.doc • • J13. 12/30/07 - WW As with other similar comments, any approval of this proposal will not be for a "building envelop", but will be based on a building design submitted through this FLS process. Revise the elevations and Sheet 4 appropriately. 10/12/07 - WW On the building elevations, indicate the dimensions of the building, including the length and depth of the buildings. Also add length and depth of buildings an Sheet 4. The plans have been revised to reflect the building shown in the architectural plans, as opposed to a building envelope. Please see the Site Plan and Pdving, Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheets 4 and 5). ~4 12/30/07 - WW Based on the response in the December 3, 2007, letter, show the location of the six-foot high fence/wall along the property lines on Sheets 4, L4 and Ls. Unclear how applicant intends to screen parking from view from Woodla~cvn Street to be in compliance with this flexibility criteria. Revise. 10/29/07 - WW Flexibility criteria requires off-street parking to be screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. Show on all appropriate site and landscape plans. The location of the fence has been added to the plans. Please see the Site Plan (Sheet 4). 15. 2/27/07 - WW Thank you for adding such information to Sheet 1 of the civil drawings. Still need to add to building elevations, which have not been resubmitted. 10/2sro7 - wW Building elevations -Provide the height of the proposed buildings from grade W to the midpoint of the pitched roof of the main portion of the building. Please see the attached elevation detail. m °e ~ ~: y% ~ 6 12/30/0 W ~ ~ '.' ~~ Cy " 1 . 7 - W 3 C Once you have determined the method of mail delivery/storage for this C~ ~' development with the Post Office,. if such requires a mail kiosk, then the plans will need to be revised and the comments below will still be applicable. ~ ~ Taking the kiosk. off the plans doesn't solve the problem. 10/25/07 - W W Mail Kiosk - a. Provide a design for this kiosk, including elevations; b. Must be handicap accessible; K:IPROJECTS12500125960011DOC1City of Clearwater1200$0115 2nd ~ ~~ Resubmittal 2596001120080131_City comments response letter 2596001-2.doc • • c. There is no parking provided at this kiosk. Unclear how residents will actually get (heir mail at this kiosk, as unit owners on the north side will not walk to the kiosk but will park their vehicle at this kiosk on their way in or out. Parking now would be within the roadway, which is not safe. During a meeting with Wayne Wells of the City of Clearwater and George Kroft from the United States Postal Service, it was determined that there would be a mail kiosk required for central mail delivery, as opposed to delivery to individual homes. As such, a mail kiosk, along with corresponding parking has been added to the plans. Please see the proposed Site Plan (Sheet 4). 17. 12/27/07, 10/12/07 & 10/2/07 - WW On Page 1 of the application, add the addresses of 802 and 830 Woodlawn Street. These addresses have been added to the Flexible Standard Development Application. Please see the attached revised Flexible Standard Development Application. 18. 12/30/07 - WW Visibility triangles are still shown incorrectly on Sheets 4 and L5. Ensure proposed landscaping meets Code provisions for visibility triangles. Revise. 10/12/07 - WW Visibility triangles are shown on these sheets, but are drawn in the wrong locations. Revise to be along the front property line and the edge of the driveways. 10/2/07 - WW Show on Sheets 4 and L5 all required visibility triangles per City Code. Visibility Triangles have been revised. Please see the Site Plan (Sheet 4) and the Landscaping Plan (sheet LS) for the revisions. 19 12/30/07 & 10/30/07 - WW Note: Signage, which will need to meet Code requirements, will be handled separately through sign permits. This has been noted and a permit for proposed Signage will be applied for separately. 20 12/30/07 & 10/29/07 - WW ~4 ~-' All floor plan sheets are labeled Sheet 2 of 4. Unclear why they are so indicated when they show different floor plans. Revise. The floor plan sheets have been revised. Please see the attached revised Floor Plan Sheets. W ~ ~- ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ :~ ~° ~. K:IPROJECTS12500125960011DOC1City of Clearwater120080115_2nd Resubmittal_259600t1200$01.31_City comments response letter_2596001-2.doc A ~~ • • J21. Sheets 4, 6, L4 and LS -Show individual townhome lot lines as light, dashed lines, similar as shown on Sheet 5. The solid individual townhome lot lines confuse information being portrayed as something being constructed. These lines have been revised. Please see the Site Plan, Utility Plans and Landscaping Plans (Sheets 4, b, L4, and LS). 22 Since black barrels are to be used for solid waste storage far individual units, and since these black barrels are to be stored out of sight, provide evidence through floor plans that the black barrels physically can be stored within the individual garages along with a vehicle. The black barrels are shown within the garages in the revised floor plans sheets. 23. Building floor elevations indicated on the plans on Sheet 5 are, based on the note on the right-hand side, six inches below FFE. Flans are inconsistent with cross-sections on Sheet 9. Which are the correct FFE? a. The eight-uni# building in the southwest corner FFE is actually 50.20. However, cross-sections A and B on Sheet 9 indicate the FFE to be 49.20, which is a foot below the actual based on that shown on the plan and the note on the right-hand side on Sheet 5; b. The buildings along the north side are indicated to have actual FFE of between 48.60 and 49.10. Cross-section D is incorrect. This also indicates that the westernmost building along thenorth side will be 5.5 feet above existing grade. Correct? c. The buildings along the east side are indicated to have actual FFE of between 49.50 and 50,20. Cross-section E is incorrect; d. The 11-unit building in the southeast corner of the property will have an actual FFE of 50.20, but crosssection F is incorrect. There is no range of FFE for cross-section F; e. The 11-unit building on the east side of the western portion adjacent to Woodlawn Street is indicated to have an actual FFE of 50.20, but cross- section J is incorrect; f. Cross-section ~ incorrectly indicates FFE. On the left side it should be 48.90 and on the right side it should be 49.00; and ~. g, Cross-section L incorrectly indicates FFE. On the left side it should be l~'u 48.70 and on the right side it should be 49.70. o o '~ The fznish floor elevations have been revised. As such, the Paving, Grading and ~ ` ;~ Drainage Plan, as well as the Cross-Sections have been revised accordingly. ~ Flease see the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheet S) and the Cross- ~ ~ ~ Sections Sheet. y K:IPROJECTS12500125960011DOC1City of Clearwater1200801 15 2nd Resubmittal_2596001\20080131_City comments response letter 2596001-2.doc ~ ,~ • The DRC reviewed this a lication with the followin comments: General En~ineerin~: Conditions 1 - 5 include responses to the 10/01/07 DRC meeting and additional responses to the current submittal. 1. Indicate on the preliminary plat the dedication of a total of 30-feet of right- of-way for Woodlawn Street to be measured from the north line of the of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 1S East. 1.0/O1/07 APPLICANT AGREED TO PROVIDE ARIGHT-OF- WAY EASEMENT RATHER THAN ADDITIONAL STREET RIGHT-OF- WAY FOR. WOODLAWN AVENUE. ACCORDINGLY, PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLAT A CONTINUOUS RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR RIGHT-OF- WAY EASEMENT 30 FEET IN WIDTH MEASURED FROM THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST. Per the project surveyor, the existing 30' area is described as aright-of--way easement. It is proposed to remain as such. 2. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the property owner on the preliminary plat. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)2.) NOT MET This information has been added to the Plat. 3. Provide proposed street names. (Community Development Code Sec. 4- 703(A)6.} NOT MET The street names have been added to the plat. 4. Show on the preliminary plat the names of the adjoining plats, appropriately positioned. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)7.) NOT MET Adjoining Plat Names have been added to the Preliminary Plat. S. Provide area. and dimensions {to nearest foot) of the overall plat, each lot, ~ ~ street rights-of-way and common open space or other land to be dedicated w ~ for a public purpose, if any. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)8 0 a-d.) NOT MET N ~ ~' cat r~ Please see the dimensions provided on the preliminary plat. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ =~ o _.~ ~~ 6. The plat of Woodlawn Terrace Condominum, as recorded in plat book 92, ' tes that 30-feet of ri ht-of--way for Woodlawn Street was ~ U page 32, indica g provided, measured from the north line of the Southwest 1/4 of the K:\P1tOJECTS12500\2595001\DOC1City of Clearwater\20080115_2nd ~ ~~ Resubmittal_2596001\20080131_City comments response letter_2596001-2.doc GRDUP' • • Northwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. Please correct the preliminary plat document to reflect this condition. Per the project surveyor, this was dedicated as aright-of--way easement and is proposed to remain as such. 7. The survey submitted with the related FLS case, (FLS2007-10045), incorrectly depicts right-of--way easements attributed to recorded. documents, including #hose recorded in O.R. Book 4793, Page 1397 and O.R. Book 4793, page 1399. Portions of the right-of-way easements shown on the Preliminary Plat are incorrect as a result. Please revise preliminary plat accordingly. The project surveyor has provided documentation stating that this is a dedicated easement. Land Resaurces• 1. See comments under FLS2007~10045 Landscaping: 1. See comments under FL52007-10045 Parks and Recreation: A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. (Note: Open space and recreation land fees are not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1985.) The applicant will coordinate with Art Kader on all applicable recreation impact fees. It is understood that these fees must be paid prior to building permit issuance: Stormwater- 1. Show on plat the requested drainage easement of case FLS2007-10045.(A drainage easement shall be provided over the southern portion of the exist ditch adjoining the railroad right-of--way. The easement is to be measured ' from the western property line to the eastern ditch's top of bank, and shah dedicated to the City of Clearwater for maintenance purposes) Per the HOA documents, all common space shall be dedicated as a drainage/ utility easement. w o r; d c ~. c~a ~. M>' :mot ~ :~ C~ ~~ ~~ K:IPROJECTS1250012596001\DOC1City of Clearwaterl200$0115_2nd Resubmittal_2596001120080131_City comments response letter_2596001-2.doc a ~~ G~PDUP ° • • Solid Waste 1. See comments under FLS2007-10045 Plannin~• 1. See comments under FLS2007-10045 Enclosed. far your review are the requested materials. We anticipate your comments have been adequately addressed with this submittal and look forward to your approval. Should you have any questions or require additional information regarding this submittal, please contact our office at (727) 789-9500. Sincerely, AVID ~Group® Kent A. Edwards, P.E. Senior Design Engineer ./~~ Cc: Chris Koncal - IVlidway Services File ~~ W A~9 r . ~~ o 'v ~ i ~~ ~ ~a C ~ ° 9 ~ _ '"~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ _ K:IPROJECTS12500125960011DOC\City of Clearwater120080115_2nd Resubmittal_2596001.120080131_City comments response letter 2596001~2.doc ~ ~~ ~' Page 1 of 2 ~~ Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 6:31 PM To: 'kent.edwards@avidgroup.com' Cc: 2596001 @avidgroup.com; rick.tommell@avidgroup.com Subject: Criteria Responses for Lake Bellevue Kent - I have reviewed the proposed responses to criteria far this project and have the following comments: Responses to Flexible Standard Criteria for Attached Dwellings 2. Unclear as to what the second sentence is referring to, as the zoning for the surrounding properties is Medium Density Residential {MDR) District to the east, south and west and Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) to the north. '~onses to General Application Criteria - Suggest changing title to "General Applicability Criteria" 1. I think you still need to address HOW this proposal will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent properties. You have a start in the first paragraph regarding the existing multi- family development to the northeast, but I think you need to talk more about the proposed project's similarity with those things listed in the criteria related to this adjacent existing multi-family project. You are lacking justification regarding the other adjacent uses to the south and southeast. You may want to talk about how the proposed dis- similarity is being mitigated to justify the proposed project's "harmony". It is noted that the development of this property with detached dwellings in a subdivision would also clean out any vagrants and would discourage any unseemly use of the property. 2. You may want to address the existing conditions of the surrounding neighborhood in relation to the proposed development. HOW will this proposal "help improve the safety of the community as a whole"? Be specific. 3. HOW will this proposal "have a positive impact on the safety of the surrounding community"? HOW will easy access to the northwest portion of the property aid as a positive impact on the safety? Be specific. One may argue that the effects of an attached dwelling development produced may be different than detached dwellings. Address those differences. HOW will gating the proposed community improve the safety of the surrounding area? Define "unwanted" effects. ~. You may want to address the amount of traffic anticipated to be generated with this proposal, the existing surrounding road network and its capacities and specifically where proposed access points are for this proposed development in relation to existing surrounding development. 5. Some people may argue they like the existing undeveloped property, as it isn't producing any more noise, traffic or other negative impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. See also discussion in #1 above. How will this proposal upgrade the character? 6. You may want to address the operation of the gates at the access points relating to hours of operation and effects on the surrounding neighborhood. Wayne -----Original Message----- 2/1 l /2008 ~' Page 2 of 2 • Frorn: kent.edwards@avidgroup.com [mailto:kent.edwards@avidgroup.com] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 10:29 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 2596001@avidgroup.com; rick.tommell@avidgroup.com Subject: 20080201_Criteria Responses for Lake Bellevue Wayne, As we discussed during the meeting with Chris Koncal, Rick Tommel9 and George Kroft yesterday, please find the draft responses far the General Application Criteria and the Flexible Standard Criteria attached for your review. Please let me know if these appear to be acceptable responses. Thank you. Kent Edwards, P.E. Senior Design Engineer AVID Gr©up° 2300 Curlew Rd. Ste 100 Palm Harbor, FL 34683 Phone: (727) 789-9500 Ext. 118 Fax: (727)784-66fi2 Cell: (727} 487-4774 kent.edwards~a avidgroup.com www.avidgroup.com DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY AVID Group {AVID) makes the electronically stored. data on this email available the accuracy or reliability of this data. AVID reserves the right. to revise, u damages which may arise as a result. of the use of its data. The user agrees to effort to ensure this email is virus free, however AVID assumes no responsibil indicates that the user accepts the above condition. OPENING THIS EMAIL CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCE OF THE ABOVE CONDITIONS. 2/11/2008 • Flexible Standard Criteria Townhornes at Lake Bellevue ~. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance. There is no increased height allowance being sought, as the naaximurn allowable height within this zoning district is 30 feet for a residential home, per Section 2- 302 of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code. The proposed buildings will be 24'-1 %4" in height and therefore a flexible standard is not being sought regarding building height. b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from. a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. There is no increased height allowance being sought, as the maximum allowable height within this zoning district is 30 feet for a residential home, per Section 2- 302 of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code. The proposed buildings will be approximately 24'-1 % " in height and therefore a flexible standard is not being sought regarding building height. 2. The parcel proposed far development is not contiguous to a parcel which is .contiguous to a parse! which is designated as low density residential in the zoning atlas. According to zoning atlases 314A and 314B on the City of Clearwater YVeb Page, the existing surrounding zoning to the south, east and west is MDR (Medium Density Residential), which has an allowable density of up to 15 units per acre. The future land t~se for the adjacent parcel is low density residential, but should not be adversely impacted by this development, as the existing praperty is undeveloped and not actively maintained. 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. Any propased parking will be screened from opposing property by their respective building units, as well as a propased 6' high wall on the eastern and northern sides. The proposed wall along Waodlawn Street may only be 3 ' in height, per City of Clearwater requirements. The western portion of the site is separated from adjacent properties by a railroad right-of--way and a woaded drainage easement and will also be separated by a proposed PVC Fence. As such, there are not any anticipated negative impacts an the properties adjacent to the prapased project. ~ • General Application Criteria Townhomes at Lake Bellevue The proposed multi-family workforce housing development conforms to the character of the adjacent community by providing an attractive development within a residential district already zoned for medium density residential development. The proposed site conforms to the bulk and density requirements designated in the City of Clearwater Zoning Ordinance. Tn addition, the property directly adjacent to the northeast of the proposed development is amulti-family development in an area with the same zoning. The single family properties that border the site to the south and southeast will not be negatively impacted, as this will bring an attractive development in the area and will replace. an existing site that is for the most part, vacant. The northwestern part of the site is pretty heavily wooded and due to the lack of access, shows evidence of use by vagrants and possibly othexs as a site for living and other activities The development of this site will discourage the use of the property for less than seemly reasons. 2. The development of the site will encourage growth and future development of similar within the area, as projects of this nature are intended to provide an area for local professionals to live, thus generating more revenue within the community itself. In addition, property values should not be negatively impacted, as the development of the site will bring quality homes into the area and should help improve the safety of the community as a whole. There are no proposed encroachments onto adjacent land and thus, will not impede any future development of said property. The proposed development will have a positive impact on the safety of the surrounding community by providing easy access to the northwest portion of the property, thus reducing the likelihood of the property being used in an unsafe manner. In addition, the proposed development is a residential development and will therefore produce the same types of effects on the community, as any other residential residence. The site will also be gated, including a 6' high screening wall that will help eliminate any unwanted effects to the properties directly adjacent to the proposed development. • ~ 4. An interior road network with one ingress and two egress points is provided as part of this workforce housing project. As such, traffic will be allowed to flow freely within the site and use of external public roads will not be necessary to get from one portion of the site to another. The traffic patterns were reviewed, and there are no anticipated negative impacts to local traffic. The proposed development conforms to all zoning and land use requirements of the site. The precedent for multi-family use of property in this area is demonstrated by the development bordering the northeast portion of the proposed development. In addition, there is currently an existing multi-family dwelling on- site, which was part of an approved, but never fully constructed, project that was to be constructed on this same piece of property. The proposed development will add aesthetically pleasing development to the community, in place of undeveloped, overgrown area that is not readily accessible to the public or authorities. The design of the proposed development will minimize adverse effects to the surrounding properties by placing a 6' wall between the development and the properties immediately adjacent to east, north and south of it. This is anticipated to help reduce acoustic and visual effects to the surrounding properties. The proposed buildings conform to the height requirements within the building code and should thus not have an impact on the site that is in excess of the typical impact of a two story home. Also, in its present condition, the woods along the site are overgrown and provided a partial visual barrier to the site. The proposed fence/wall will provide the same service. In addition, this is a proposed residential development with curb side garbage collections, so there are no anticipated olfactory issues that are not common to any residential residence. In addition, the proposed building units shall be approximately 24 feet in height, which is well within the allowable maximum height limits within a single family development, thus reducing any potential negative impacts due to proposed building height. The proposed project will employ interior landscaping, per City of Clearwater code and will be well maintained through the supervision of a Homeowner's Agency. The proposed dwelling unit themselves will be constructed of materials that will provide an attractive facade to the development and contribute to the overall appearance of the surrounding community. • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 11:28 AM To: Lopez, Geraldine Garnpos Cc: Thompson, Neil; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael Subject: FI_S2007-10045/PLT2007-00006, 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street Geri - The above referenced project has been filed to redevelop the above properties with an attached dwelling (townhomes) project named Townhomes at Lake Bellevue. A Planning Department DRG review comment is: "Parking has been designed in a manner where the two parking spaces are stacked, requiring the vehicle in the driveway to be moved to allow the vehicle in the garage to exit. As such, there is only one parking space provided per unit. Need to provide one additional parking space per unit." The applicant has indicated that the project will have affordable units, where only one parking space is required by Section 3-919 of the Code. Section 3-919 states the following; "The minimum off-street parking requirement for affordable housing units,. as defined by the City of Clearwater Economic Development and Housing Department, may be reduced to one parking space per unit in any zoning district where residential uses are permitted." By letter to you dated December 17, 2007, Steven Williamson with Johnson, Pope, et al has indicated that a minimum of 107 units in this project will meet the definition of "affordable". In order to qualify for reduced parking far such affordable units, I need confirmation from your department that such units planned for this project meet the City's definition of "affordable housing units". All units that don't meet the City's definition must comply with the Planning Department comment regarding required parking above. Such confirmation may be via email or by letter. Thanks. Wayne M. We/Is, AlCP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Phone: 727-562-4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 '•v.. • • Jott~sc~ti, I't~t'l~, 1~c~1Dtt, I~utfnt~l. ~~. I3ult~s, LIT ,~:~•roz~,:5~s ;~!:n ~;cautasl:!.r.~Tt~ ,~r L~~~Y f ~..t .l.~If~2!:S +4TNf. I f f,.C4LF . cr,+.4:114. J . d; ~:. F.`•` A7; E1.17.;tiE[:Ti'.J ;~~.t'::Fil.ti F1'r'i"F:'i F"[rFl'_[.-~llir<f.` .a'hr: c. Gr:; Flt; "A.~I`uN r{~Lf F'~9F.CC t L !'`c15T SCb:~~. 1LC ct~FT:[Ti. f 111::1' 2 l.h!~ 4 T:_'.!bT115 .4 :C'.:.i5O:'t,1F: rft?.Rt7'lli F:F°1C!: FGi,R h. I,,•.kSO'1 !AiC:{AEL~ T.JT[LM L!ICN.~:F.L T' '.L4k:~i{.•S'~t :=Q;lErZT t'. r'r~T;T~, JFL_ C,ti~k4'LFl „I C:{n3GS C•F:'rNls G. RiJ '~l. C H,t.~,LC2 =4.5.d Ir.4 f; G; G3 $hkA A. ~'~lilflt~f~ ~Tr;L'Etl l . ~CIt1t1Cn`~Fw:T C75 F':{.t tEi55`:it! 51k r'.r-.!.A .l'lLLlrtt ti~wt{ •~7F C~:IY:$k:L t'LF.45[! F3[r'LYTI?L=L~l;kt4'i:'e.'t December 17, 2407 arts. Geraldine Campos iacor~omic Dovelopn~ent Director City of Cl~anF~ater 112 ~. Gsceola Avenue Clear~`~rater, f=L 3378-~7~8 Dear Geri: This loiter serves as a follo~rr-up to our conversation earlier today ~~dE~erein ~~ie discussed the proposed development of affordable housir7g tovmhorne units at tf~e property located at t34a I~doo~ilau~i3 Street ("f~roperty"). P~]idti~ray Developmer7t intends to retievr?lot3 the Property as a ko~;sni~ome community, ti~rith a rninirnum o1 147 units gttalifyir~e~ as "afforcl~rble" ("Affordable Units"). The Affardatale Units are depicted an the attacfted site plan as lho5e emits thal onl+~ have one parking space per wait. Ta meet the minimum development criteria, the t'lanning Depertn~ent (U~layne 1!tlells} requires proof that the ~jnlts tirilh one parking space rY~eet tine defnition of "'atfard~rt~lf~," Ac{:orrlir~g to t17e City's SNIP program and l_l°IAP plan, it~e "a(fordat~le" unit$ r~~ay riot exceed 94°0 of the average area purchase price. It is my uncil~rstandir~g that ibis maximurtt purchase price is currently 5184,004,00. This letter confirms that ltilidtrray Development ~^~ill meet the definition of "affordable", as ~fefined above, as it relates to the units ~`lth one parl<ir~g space. t, +,.4t.',~; ra ut lil; r+~s+o.a ~n.C F. al I c:r~x.rtur sr. ~.~ *sr:~a.+:~:ia:~ 3°r r 4T'F G. r]{E E1~JA I.1~g1 t 1}:yT=E 3i,!) 5 ~i 7Tr,' ~[t fL£~M1Ftt'hTLP..}t W.D.~r57'i S~`i?ST~F7.4'z9$±I irCk7:P1.^~S!-Il~fl ~s•i'.1, i l ~4, t1 ! 77:x: ;LL%. F.G 4'~~;7::~A¢1.g61~3 ;F;LEPAS~'~'G,UlI,~!•. SCO 'T~;,FCGCIu~~' I ~~7}'~i LLi!~ T.~,.C~7lFA II EJI 3:1:^I I~ .~ i J~~i~Sc~r, ~at)p~, l3(3tOC2, IZU~t~~:l. c'C I~U?~NS, ~,I.P - rlTTQ1~[:FY5 hTJil C: i7~S`a5:-`.I:tt7:33 .4T Lh~t Cris. Ge~aldir~e Cal~ipos Decernt~~r 17, 2007 Page 2 Phase conii7~unicai~ to the planning Department that tt~e develo~:er ~f'~1id~~~ay) f~as committed to the Economic ©evelopmentlHousing Department il~at it r~~lill meet if~e cietrtitic~n of "~fforcfabfe," as defined af~ove, as it relates to the f~ffordalale Units. if yor.j rec}airs additional information, ple~s~e do r~r~ 6~esitate to onr~tact m~. Sfr~cerely, Weo A. Williamson Sl~Wlrnt~ ~.:•-:2~~i ~ 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 4:02 PM To: 'kent.edwards@avidgroup.com' Gc: 2596001 @avidgroup.com; rick.tommell@avidgroup.com Subject: RE: 20080130_Sight Triangle_2596001 Our Community Development Code is online at www.municode.com. The drawing is also available as part of the online Code. Try this way first. -----Original Message----- From: kent.edwards@avidgroup.com [mailto:kent.edwards@avidgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday,. January 30, 2008 2:12 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 2596001@avidgroup.com; rick.tommell@avidgroup.com Subject: 20080130_Sight Triangle_2596001 Wayne, Could you send over a copy of the sight visibility triangle detail? This detail is not available on the Internet. Kent Edwards, F'.E. Senior Design Engineer AVID Group® 2300 Curlew Rd. Ste 100 Palm Harbor, FL 34683 Phone: (727) 789-9500 Ext. 118 Fax: (727)784-6662 Cell: (727) 4$7-4774 kent.edwards@avidgroup.com www.avidgroup.com DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY AVID Group (AVID) makes the electronically stored data on this email available the accuracy or reliability of this data. AVID reserves the right to revise, u damages which may arise as a result of the use of its data. The user agrees to effort to ensure this email is virus free, however AVID assumes no responsibil indicates that the user accepts the above condition. OPENING THIS EMAIL CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCE OF THE ABOVE CONDITIONS. 1 /30/2008 . • Page 1 of 1 . Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:22 PM 1"0: 'kent.edwards@avidgroup.com' Cc: rick.tommell@avidgroup.com; 2596001 @avidgroup.com Subject: RE: 20080123_Lake Believue Meeting_2596001 This meeting date and time are fine and I have added you to my calendar. See you here then. -----Original Message----- From: kent.edwards@avidgroup.com [maiito:kent.edwards@avidgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 3:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: rick.tommell@avidgroup.com; 2596001@avidgroup.com Subject: 20080123_Lake Bellevue Meeting_2596001 Wayne, We would like to set the meeting up for 10:30 in the morning on January 31St, 2008. Please confirm this and I'll forward to the client. Thank you. Kent Edwards, P.E. Senior Design Engineer AVID Group 2300 Curlew Rd. Ste 100 Palm Harbor, FL 34fi83 Phone: (727) 789-9500 Ext. 118 Fax: (727)784-66fi2 Celli (727} 487-4774 kent.edwards@avidgroup.com www.avidgroup.com DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY AVID Group (AVID) makes the electronically stored data on this email available the accuracy or reliability of this data. AVID reserves the right to revise, u damages. which may arise as a result of the use of its data. The user agrees to effort to ensure this email is virus free, however AVID assumes no responsibil indicates that the user accepts the above condition. OPENING THIS EMAIL CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCE OF THE ABOVE CONDITIONS. I /23/2008 • Page 1 of 1 Wetls, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 2:48 PM To: 'kent.edwards@avidgroup.com° Cc: rick.tommell@avidgroup.com; 2596001 @avidgroup.com Subject: RE: 20080123_Meeting for Lake Bellevue_2596001 I am available. all day on January 31st, except for lunch between noon and 1 pm. ----Original Message----- From: kent.edwards@avidgroup.com [mailto:kent.edwards@avidgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 12:13 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: rick.tommell@avidgroup.com; 2596001@avidgroup.com Subject: 20080123_Meeting for Lake Bellevue_2596001 Wayne, l am just following up on the phone call from earlier this morning and am making sure that you are still open for a meeting with Avid and the client on January 31, 2008. Please let me know what time is most convenient and I will get it set up with Rick Tommell and Midway Services. Again, your continued assistance with this process has been greatly appreciated. Kent Edwards, P.E. Senior Design Engineer AViQ Group 2300 Curlew Rd. Ste 100 Palm Harbor, FL 34683 Phone: (727) 789-9500 Ext. 118 Fax: (727)784-6662 Cell: (727) 487-4774 kent.edwards@avidgroup.com www.avidgroup.com DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITX AVID Group (AVID) makes the electronically stored data on this email available the accuracy or reliability of this data. AVID reserves the right to revise, u damages which may arise as a result of the use of its data. The user agrees to effort to ensure this email is virus free, however AVID assumes no responsibil indicates that the user accepts the above condition. OPENING THIS EMAIL CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCE OF THE ABOVE CONDITIONS. 1/23/2008 • ~ Fage 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 3:42 PM To: 'kent.edwards@avidgroup.com' Cc: rick.tommell@avidgroup.com; 2596001@avidgroup.com Subject: RE: 20080121_Lake Bellevue Meeting_2596001 I currently have openings in my schedule for the afternoons of January 24th & 25th and February 1, and all day January 28th and 31 st. Let me know. -----Original Message----- From: kent.edwards@avidgroup.com [mailto:kent.edwards@avidgroup.com] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 1;03 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: rick.tommell@avidgroup.com; 2596001@avidgroup.com Subject: 20080121_Lake Bellevue Meeting_2596001 Wayne, We would like to set up a meeting with yourself, Avid and the owner in order to resolve some of the issues regarding the Townhomes at Lake Bellevue Project. Please let me know when you would have an opening in your schedule and we will coordinate accordingly. Thank you for your time and continued assistance. Kent Edwards, P.E. Senior Design Engineer AVID Group 2300 Curlew Rd. Ste 100 Palrn Harbor, FL 34683 Phone: (727) 7$9-9500 Ext. 118 Fax: (727)784-6662 Cell: (727) 487-4774 kent.edwards@avidgroup.com www.avidgroup.com DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY AVID Group (AVID) makes the electronically stored data on this email available the accuracy or reliability of this data. AVID reserves the right to revise, u damages which may arise as a result of the use of its data., The user agrees to effort to ensure this email is virus free, however. AVID assumes no responsibil indicates that the user accepts the above condition. OPENING THIS EMAIL CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCE OF THE ABOVE CONDITIONS. ~i23~2aos .~ ~.- _'r. ~ ~ Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne Frvm: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 6:27 PM To: 'kent.edwards@avidgroup.com' Cc: 2596001 ~avidgroup.com Subject: RE: 20080110_Flexibility Criteria Sheet-Lake Bellevue_2596001 Kent - Planning Comment #2 was regarding the need to submit responses to the Flexible Standard Development criteria for attached dwellings. You still have not provided responses to these criteria. What you have attached to your email is responses to the General Applicability (not Application) criteria, which you already provided with your last submission. Re-read Planning Comment #2. I would be more than happy to discuss other comments provided. I should be available tomorrow afternoon, as do not have any appointments. Give me a call. As to Planning Comment #6, which related to the doors shown for the patios under the second floor cantilever and the issue of the stem wa11 drop off, this is still an issue needing to be resolved. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: kent.edwards@avidgroup.com [mailto:kent.edwards@avidgroup.com] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 5:02 PM Ta: Wells, Wayne Cc: 2596001@avidgroup.com Subject: 20080110_Flexibility Criteria Sheet-Lake Bellevue_Z596001 Wayne, Please find the attached comments for the General Flexibility Criteria, in response to comment number 2 on your portion of the DRC review. Please let me know if this is sufficient, or if further information is needed. Also, please let me know when a convenient time would be to discuss a couple of other items, including comment number 6. Thank you. Kent Edwards, P.E. Senior Design Engineer AVID Group 2300 Curlew Rd. Ste 100 Palm Harbor, Fl_ 34683 Phone: (727) 789-9500 Ext. 118 Fax: (727)784-6662 Cell: (727) 487-4774 Ice nt. ed wa rd s @ avidg ro u p. co m www.avidgroup.com DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY AVID Group (AVID) makes the electronically stored data on this email available the accuracy ar reliability of this data. AVID reserves the right to revise, u damages which may arise as a result of the use of its data. The user agrees to effort to ensure this email is virus free, however AVID assumes no responsibil indicates that the user accepts the above condition. 1/10/2008 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 9:03 PM . To: 'kent.edwards@avidgroup.com' Subject: FLS2007-10045/PLT2007-00006 - 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street Kent - Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the above referenced applications, which will be reviewed by the DRC at 9:35 am on Thursday, January 3, 2008, in the Planning Department conference room {100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL). Wayne 1. n~~: Draft 1.3.08 C Action Agend ~` `.~ ~ 4 ^ o W Q ~- GROUP° ~° 3 • PHONE (727 789-9500 ~ ~ ~ ~ FAX (727) 784-6662 v a December 3, 2007 Wayne Wells, AICP Planner II City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: PROJECT NAME: Woodlawn Terrace Townhomes Avid Sob No. 2596001 Dear Mr. Wells: IAUTHpb139 L00000361 LB7345~ The following are a list of comments received at the Development Review Committee Meeting on November 1, 2007. For your convenience we have listed your comments in bold and our responses in italics. Comments -General En~ineerin~: Prior to the issuance of a Develo ment Order: 1. Proposed dumpster shall not encroach into drainage easement. Per discussion with the City of Clearwater Solid Waste Department, garbage pick-up services will be provided via curb side pick up. As such, the dumpster enclosure has been removed from the plans. 2. Proposed plans shall indicate dedication of additional street right-of-way for Woodlawn Street to provide a total of 30-feet of right-of--way measured from the north line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. (Note that the condominium plat of Woodlawn Terrace I indicates 30-feet of street right-of-way measured from the 1/4 section line -the applicant's survey needs to be amended to reflect same). Per discussion with the City of Clear---uctter during the Development Review Committee Meeting, it is the intent of the clie-~t to maintain the right-of-wa~~ easement as ix is in the existing condition, as this workforce housing project may become untenable due to the loss of units. ORIGlf~AL 1ZEC`VED a -Y CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION LANOSCAPEARCNITECTURE ENVIRONM,ENTAt NC YEYING GIS Ci31r pF ~'1E. • 3. Revise drawings to show 20'x20' sight triangles located along a proposed property line drawn 30-feet north of the quarter section line described in preceding condition 2. The sight triangles have been revised. Please see the Site Plan (Sheet 4;. 4. The townhome building located in the southwest corner of the site is ;vcated adjacent a ditch that provides regional drainage from lands south oft e subject property to Lake Belleview. Applicant shall provide cross secticinal drawings for analysis by Stormwater review for a deter.,nir~atian of need for a drainage easement to enable maintenance of the drainage feature by the City of Clearwater. Cross-sections have been added showing the townhome building locateu' along the southwest corner of the property. Please. see the Cross-Se::^t;'r,n ,Sheet ire the plans. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: 1. The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will remove/relt3ccae any/all water meters that has to be relocated as part of this developanent, including reclaim water meters. (No meters shall be located within arty impervious areas.) This comment is acknowledged. 2. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.095), set the water meter (Clearwa±er Code cf Ordinances Section 32.096) and set the B.F.P.D. (back flow prevention. ~' =device). The applicant is responsible for the water main extension frorn't)re tap fo the device. Applicant is also responsible for all associated fees ar~~ u(1 other installation fees. This comment is acknowledged. 3. Sanitary sewer manhole cover(s) shall not have the lettering, "Clearwater°' or "City of Clearwater" on them. This system is a private system. Lettering referring to the City of Clearwater or "Clearwater" has been re;noved _ ~ from the details. Please see the detail sheet. Also, a note has been added stating ~ that there will be no lettering referring to the City of Clearwater for private ;rtility• ~ ~ straictures. 4. Show the force main discharging from the existing lift station. Indicate where the discharge is to connect to the public sewer system. Is the existing force main to be replaced? A~O z w ~,- ~ ® ~ ~A R s.r . C ~ ~~ c .~ ` -9 ~ ~ ~ The sanitary forcemain has been added to the plans. Please see the Utility Sheet. 5. Provide sanitary sewer pipe size/type/slope information on the utility plan. This information has been added to the plans. Please see the Utility Sheet and the Profile Sheet. 6. Reclaimed water is not presently available to this site. This comment is acknowledged. 7. Demolition plan references Hillsborough County standards for root pruning. Please reference City of Clearwater specifications and standards. The references to Hillsborough County Standards have been removed from the plans. Please see the Demolition Plan. 8. Applicant shall obtain permanent address assignments from the Engineering Department. This comment is acknowledged. 9. Applicant shall provide a recorded copy of the final plat for "Townhomes at Lake Belleview". The final plat will be provided upon receipt. 10. Water Note #1 on page 2 indicates minimum cover requirement of 34-inches; correct to read, "The depth of cover over the water main shall be a minimum of 30" and a maximum of 42" below finish grade". (City of Clearwater.: Contract Specifications and Standards,=•Part "B" Technical Specifications, Section IV, Article 41.03(B)(1) This note has been revised. Please see the revised note on the Notes and Specifications Sheet (Sheet 2). 11. Provide length of each run and type of pipe to be used for water mains. This information has been added to the plans. Please see the Utility Plum. ~U Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: C1 1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer or land surve3ror registered in tl~e State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. o-- z~ W y,~ _ ~ °o ~'~ c~ u ~~~ ca .~ c- ~ U P "~ ~ O ~_ ~U A~O • This comment is noted and as-built drawings will be provided upon completion of construction. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional Comments -Environmental: The plans provided show fill and structures within wetlands and wetland buffers. The City of Clearwater's Community Development Code Section 3- 907 states, "A vegetative buffer shall be provided on all lands within 25°feet of any property designated on the Zoning Atlas as preservation (P), or any property determined to be wetlands under the jurisdiction of the State of Florida ("jurisdictional wetlands"); and all lands within 15 feet of the top of the bank of any creeks, channels, or related waterways which contain jurisdictional wetlands." Revise plans so structures or parking lots do not impact wetlands or wetland buffers. There are no known wetlands on-site. Upon review by the Project Biologist, it was determined that the water areas on-site would be classified as "Other Surface Waters ", per SWFWMD criteria. Per discussion at the DRC Meeting on ~ {- November 1, 2007, the City of Clearwater stated that they would agree with the determination by the Water Management District. A meeting with the Soecthtit.est Florida Water Management District is currently being set tep and will be coordinated with the City of Clearwater. 2. The City's Design Criteria Storm Drainage rules require wet detention ponds to incorporate a vegetated littoral shelf over 35% of the area of the pond under normal conditions. Provide a planting plan for Wetland Detention Pond 10. Area of the littoral shelf located in Detention Pond 11 has been added to the plans. Please note that this is 35% of the totul area of Pond 10 and 11. 3. Provide a planting plan for littoral shelf in Pond 11. The planting plan for Pond 11 has been added to the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan. ~~ ~ ~}i ~ ~: W C A~O Comments -Fire: 1. Add note to page 2 "Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started". PRIOR TO DO. This note has been added to the plans. Please see the Notes and Specif cations Sheet (Sheet 2). 2. Gates will require KNOX key system with power backup or manual override. Acknowledge with note on page 2 PRIOR TO DO A note acknowledging the KNOX key requirement has been added to the plans. Please see the Notes and Specifications Sheet (Sheet 2). 3. East entry shows an island in drive. When an island is incorporated in a drive isle, 20' clearance is required on both sides. On current plan 20' is shown on entry side and 12' is shown on exit side. Change or remove island ~. PRIOR TO DO. Per discussion at the DRC Meeting on November 1, 2007, the entrance aisle was widened to be 24 feet. Also, it was noted that there are two means of egress from _ _ _ the site, as the western most driveway will be an out only drii~e. 4. Show Firefighter access to the rear of the buildings, Swab will not provide access of 150 ft. per NFPA 1 Chapter 18 PRIOR TO D.O. 7n response to questions brought to light by.the City of Clear-rvater, additin_nal~ topographic information was obtained along the off-site property to the east of the site. As such, the Swale behind the buildings along the east side of the properi`~~ line has been removed. Comments -Land Resources: 1. Sheet L-1 indicates trees to be removed that are shown to be preserved in the P , s readsheet on sheet L-2 i.e. tree #168. Insure that all plan sheets correspond ~ o to each other prior to D.O. ~ ~ c°v ,i ~U ~ ~~ The spreadsheet has been revised. Please see the above referenced sheet. ~ _~W. ,~. •~ ~ L- , ~O 2. Show the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets. The general rule ~ t~3..- for hardwoods is one-foot radius for each diameter inch (DBH). Revise prior _ to D.O. ~ -" A~O • i The tree canopies have been added for all trees to remain. Please see the attached Final Site Plans. 3. It does not appear that the tree inventory was utilized to design this site. No effort was made to preserve trees as the site is too dense, no open areas exist within the center of the site to preserve quality trees. Suggest a second look be made utilizing your arborist and the inventory. The site plan was re-examined with the City of Clearwater Arborist and a plan of action was agreed on, inclttding a plan for preserving existing quality trees to the greatest extent possible. Please see the Tree Preservation Plan. 4. All trees rated #2 should be trees that are declining and should not be preserved. However, the plans indicate saving these trees. Verify with your arborist that these trees truly are to be preserved prior to D.O. Per discussion with the City of Clearwater's Arborist and the Project Arborist, the #2 trees on-site have been scheduled for elimination. However, the trees along the ditch to the west side will be left undisturbed to the greatest extent possible, in order to preserve the site in as natural state as possible. Plectse see the Tree Preservation Plan. 5. The Preservation Plan must reflect which trees require special attention such as root pruning, tunneling and canopy elevating, i.e.: root pruning at tree #205. The plan must be more precise. Revise prior to D.O. The Tree Preservation Plan reflects the specific suggestions of the Project Arborist for the treatment of maintenance of existing quality trees. 6. Insure that impacts are reduced at trees to be preserved, i.e.: relocate the storm line outside the canopy of tree #8. Revise prior to D.O. The entrance roadway has been realigned and the storm line has beets relocated in order to reduce tree impacts. In addition, Detention Portd 20 has been realigned to reduce impacts to existing desirable trees. Please .see the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan. Comments - Landscaping: f 1. Sheet LS -Revise WP to the rear of Units 56 - 58 to CV, similar to that to the rear of Units 37 - 41, since these two locations are the. only units that are oriented rear of unit to side of unit separated by 20 feet. This comment has been addressed and the tree types have been revised. Please see Sheet L4 O`RICINAL l2EC VED ~,~-" ~ 1~ 2~~~ I'LA~1NiN~ D~~~TiviEhlT A ,Q CITY OF CLEARWAYE~ • • 2. Sheet L5 - Detail A -Section 3-904.A requires sight visibility triangles to have landscaping maintained so that views would not be blocked above 30 inches, not 18 inches. The detail on Sheet L4 has been revised to reflect a sight visibility triangle height of 30 inches. ~(3. Sheet LS & L6 -Live oaks are specified in the small approximate 10' x 11' planting area in front of the units (between driveways and sidewalks). These trees will not be good for these small areas, due to future canopy and root systems. Recommend replacing with Little Gem Magnolias, Florida Elms or Golden Rain Trees. The live oaks specified on sheets L4 and LS leave been replaced with Winged Elm Trees. Please see sheets L4, LS and the Plant Schedule on Sheet L9 for this. change. 4. East Palatka Holly trees are specified (38 total) have a disease and are unacceptable. Change to Dahoon Holly trees. The East Palatka Holly trees have been replaced with Dahoon Holly Trees. Please see the Plant Schedule on Sheet L9 J 5. Ensure the quantity counts in Plant Schedule on Sheet L8 is accurate to the counts shown on Sheets L5 & L6, as I count 39 LM (not 37 LM). The quantity counts have been reviewed and revised. f 6. Sheet L7 -Revise for the following: a.) This typical building landscape plan does not include a "typical" for end units that have side access; and b.)Plan. does not indicate the groundcover for the area between the driveways and sidewalks in front of the units where the trees are planned. _ A typical building landscape plan has been provided for each of the diJfe~ ~ rat rti-pe of units, including number of units and erad unit types. d 7. Sheet L7 -This typical building landscape plan is for a five-snit bi.:~i:dirg, .~_. Provide quantity counts for each of the building types by t:`~e.urit ii earl: - building, so that our landscape inspector ;~~ill know whet counts to i3-~spect 1's.~r when performing landscape inspections, A typical building landscape plan has beere proi~ided for each. of the dillererar. t}~pe of units, including number of units and end u}aii types. l~Ri~IN~-[. REC~`dED PLAP~~EiIVC Dir~~,2TiViEfVT A ,~ CITY OF CLEARWATER Comments -Parks and Recreation: 1. A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact. Art Kader at 727-562-4824. (Note: Open space and recreation land fees are not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1'85.) This comment has been acknowledged. Comments - Stormwater: the following shall be addressed prior to 17evelopment Order: 1. Please revise the drainage report to include the following information: a) As stated in the Building Permit Review Committee that there will not be any credit given for the existing impervious area; therefore, the run off coefficient for pre-development shall be C = 0.2. b} For post development, break down the area of townhomes into impervious and pervious area.-c) Show clearly the volume provided at the elevation that is 6" below top of _ bank. d) Per City of Clearwater criteria, the time of concentration shall be {0:. minutes. e) Provide draw down table demonstrating that pond 20 recovef,s . within 24 hours based on the double ring test. f) Show storm tabulation and sub basin area in sizing the inlets and storm system. g} Verify the survey datum and revise the tables in the drainage report accordingly. ~~ . a.) Credit was not soccght for existing impervious area on the proposed site. Existing impervious area. was used in rtenoff coefficient calculations to account for existing residential developments. The runoff coefficient of 0.2 wccs used for the entire site that was prel~icu:sly approved as the Woodlawn Terrace Project. b.) The proposed site was further divided into more specrfic categories of pavement coverage. Please see the attached drainage-calculations.. c.) -The area at the elevation 0.5' below the top of bank of the prcpcsed ponds has been added to the drainage calculations. d.) The drainage calculations have been rrcocli~ed to reflect a CO mircute time of concentration. e.) The percolation table is included in tine drecinag~ r~pvrt. f.) Storm Tabulations will be provi:~c:~~ at a later date. , . - g.) The survey datum is included on the plans, :See the :Sun~ey 17atun. Note on the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plcin. ORIGINAL REC~`V~~ ~l PlAi~i~ii~l~ ari~'Ai~TMEIVY /`+^ /Q CITY ~F GLEA~dWATER 2. Show top of bank of the existing ditch and show a cross section between the ditch and Unit #1. Based on the initial review, an approximate of 75' wide of drainage easement over the existing ditch shall be dedicated to the Citv for ditch maintenance. The actual width will be determined based on the review of the requested cross section. The cross sections showing the relationship to Unit #1 grid the ditch to the west are added to the plans. Please see the Cross Section Plan 3. Route all roof runoff to the ponds to be treated and not to the by-pass swales. All roof runoff is directed to the detention ponds for treatment through zcse of roof drains, or grading. Please see the note ora the Paving, Grading arzd Drainage Plan. 4. Provide storm structure table showing type of structures, invert elevations and slope of pipes. A storm structure table has been added to the Paving, Grading arzd Drainage Plan. 5. The proposed swale along the east side of the project shall be continued along the north side to direct runoff to the ditch. .. The proposed Swale along the east side of the property .has been eliminated, in light of additional topographic information obtained since the last submittal. Please see the attached Paving, Grading arzd Drainage Slzeet. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit• 1. Show cross sections at the following locations. a) Ponds 10, 11, 20 b) X11 swales c) Between the following Units 14, 37, 90,=100, 113 and the adjacent properties. Cross sections have been provided for all detention ponds arzd swales. In addition, typical cross-sections have been added for tlee proposed basildings and the adjacent properties. Please see the Cross-Section Sh~•et. 2. Provide 50' adjacent topo, include finished floor elevations of adjacent .:. structures. SO' adjacent topographic survey has been added to the plans. Please see the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan. ORIGINAL RECD VED :_~.~:~ ~!~~~ 2~~7 ~1A~1~9NING ~Fr'ARTMENT A ,Q CITY OF CLEARWATER 3. hoof drain system shall be provided between Units 10~ and 105 as shown between Units 94 and 95. A roof drain will not be necessary between knits 104 and 105, as a roof drain is being provided for unit 105, leading to Deter,.ti.on Pcnd 20. 4. How many linear feet of 30" RCF being proposed at the southwest corner? ~ - -- .:_~~ The 2 existing single wing inlets shall be relocated to the east of each. - proposed driveway. To maintain the capacity of the storm system, the existing single wing inlet to the east is not permitted to be replaced by.the -- grate inlet. The linear footage of the proposed 30" RCP has beery. added to the Paving,. Grading and Drainage Plan. In addition, the two single wing inlets have been relocated to the eastern side of the proposed driveway entrances. In addition, the existing single wing inlet is: being replaced with an appropriate grated cover: As such, there should not be a reduction in the capacity of the inlets in the area. 5. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit and approved grading plan. An approved SWFWMD Permit and Plan will be provided upon receipt. - 6. Indicate on the demolition. plan that the 1~" CMP outfall pipe from fond li _ - to the ditch and the 50 feet of 18" CMP connecting between pond 10 and the grate inlet to be removed as these pipes will be under the proposed buildings. This has been corrected and the removal hatch has been added. to the plans Please see the Demolition Plan. 7. For clarification, show a note on grading plan stating the survey datum is -. - being used.. _. The survey datum note has been. added to the-Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan: General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building I'ernzit Review; additional -• comments may be forthcoming upon sa~bnl:ittal a~f a Bdildi~og Permit . - Application. - This comment has been noted. ~~I~11.. 12ECVE~ I LL-, (~ ~. 191ANNINC ~E~AI~1l~IENT CITY OF ;;LEARVVATER A/O • Comments -Solid Waste: 1. Double enclosure will not be sufficient for 115 units were would recycling go? Would suggest either compactor or black barrel service to each unit Barrel would have to be placed out of view after collection. -Per the November 1, 2007 DRC meeting, it was determirted the garbage pick up services would be provided at the curb side. As .sttclt, the double durnpster- enclosure has been removed from all plan sheets. Comments -Traffic En~ineerin~: 1. On the site plan show where the RR signage, jarkings ~:nd RR crossing along with gates are in relation to the proposed development. The pavement markings are shown on the proposed site plan. General Note(s): 1. Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). This comment has been noted. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. ..This comment has been noted. Comments - Planning: Based on the floor plans, windows are "optional" for the end unit, second floor narrow units only (wider units apparently don't have any "optional" windows on the end units). As these windows are "optional," the sides of the units will be blank walls, which is not appealing. This comment has been noted and is being ~:amined ut this time. - - ~2. 10/12/07 - WW -Provide building elevations for all fours.sides of the - _ _ __ proposed buildings. Submitted front building elevations continue to show end units with atwo-car garage. Based on Sheet 4 and the submitted floor __- plans, there are no two-car garages. Revise building elevations to show - -, reality circumstances. 10/2/07 - WW -Based on the site layout on Sheet 4, _- buildings range from 6 - 11 units in each building. The building elevations RECVEe~ E~~-~~~~~oo~ A /D PIANP~Ii~~ ~€Plf~)=.Ii~E~11 CiN 41: bL~A~VVr~TER submitted is for afour-unit building and depicts units with atwo-car garage. The site plan does not indicate any two-car garages. The building elevations also depict units that have many planes to the faces of the building; however, the site plan indicates rectangular buildings. Provide building elevations that will be typical to this development. Building elevations are being examined at this time. Parking has been designed in a manner where the two parking spaces are stacked, requiring the vehicle in the driveway to be moved to allow the vehicle in the garage to exit. As such, there is only one parking space ,provided per unit. Need to provide one additional parking space per unit. The proposed site is to be designated as Workforce Housing. As such, the additional parking space. requirement may be waived.. Tha's is being further explored at this time. hJ 10/12{07 & 10/2/07 - WW - On Page 1 of the application, add the addresses of 802 and 830 Woodlawn Street. 802 and 830 Woodlawn Street have been added to page 1 of the application. . ~ Building elevations -Provide the height of the proposed buildings From grade to the midpoint of the pitched. roof of the main portion of the building. The height of the proposed buildings has been added to the cover sheet. Please see Sheet 1. 10/12/07 - WW -Visibility triangles are shown on these sheets, but are drawn m the wrong locations. Revise to be along the front property line and the edge of the driveways. 10/2/07 - WW -Show on Sheets 4 and L5 all required visibility triangles per City Code. The visibility triangle locations have been revised. Please see the proposed Site Alan (Sheet 4). 7~. On the building elevations, indicate the proposed exterior materials and colors of the building by name. Provide a color legend as to building face color, door and garage door colors and fascia color. It is presumed that the fascia. color will not be the same color as the building face color. The proposed exterior finish materials have been included with the submittal package. QRI~li11~9. REC~VE® ~~ ~ ~:.~ ZDd7 I~L~NPIiN(~ ~irlaRif~~i~T C1BY fl~ ~i.~Al~1rVA1Et~ ao • • 8. 10/12/07 - WW -Affidavit provided for the land use/zoning change, not for this application. Affidavit provided also appoints Chris Koncal, Midway Services, whom is not listed anywhere on the application. Provide a proper Affidavit for this application. 10/2/07 - WW -Provide Page 7 of the application, which is the Affidavit to Authorize Agent, which must be signed by the current owner of the property. Please see the attached affidavit. 10/12/07 & 10/2/07 - WW -Provide responses to the following Flexible Standard Development criteria for attached dwellings. Explain HOW each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of~the view from a parcel of land which is designated as low density:residential in the Zoning Atlas. 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 3.Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. Responses to the criteria above have been added on a separate sheet. 10 Site plan layout of units and entries do not match submitted floor plans and building elevations. The following are differences that need to be shown on revised site plans: a. Floor plans indicate a protruding garage with a recessed entry area. Site plans don't indicate such (rectangle box shown); b. floor plans submitted for the wider, three-bedroom units indicate a side entry far the unit, yet the site plan~indicates two units (86 and 115) with a-front entry for the unit; and c. floor plans submitted only show a front entry for the narrow units, yet the site plan indicates side entry for wider Units 20, 30, 45, 55, 66, 73, 74, 80, 94, 95, 104 and 105. The building shown on the plans is a general footpri~zt for the buildi~zg. Tlze,fi~zal building layout will fall within the general footprint provided. J 11. On Page 1 of the application, AVID Group is listed as the agent. The email address given is for Kent Edwards at the AVID Group. However, Richard Tommell seems to be the person authorized to submit the application on behalf of AVID Group, he is the engineer signing responses to comments and he is signing/sealing the plans. Should emails and other correspondence be going to Richard Tommell? ~7R16~~, RECVEgp F. .9e~ (~~" iool 1'1.A0~6~i1f~"°~ ~~PARTMEf~7 ~ ®Q CITY OF ~LEARWATER Richard Tommell is the Engineer of Record far the project. Kent Edwards is the Senior Design Engineer for the project and correspondences may be sent directly to him. 12 heat 1 -Revise Site Data for the following: a. Property Address -Add 830 Woodlawn Street; b. Property Zoning -Add after MDR (Medium Density Residential) (Proposed under LUZ200b-08006); and c. Maximum Building Height -Revise to actual height. The site data on the Couer Sheet (Sheet 1) has been updated. ~13. Required 25-foot front setback from Woodlawn Street must be measured from proposed property line (after right-of-way dedication.). This will affect at least the two buildings on the west side with Units 1-8 and Units 9-19. Show new property line with dimensions to the proposed buildings. Per discussion with the City of Clearwater at the DRC hearing, the existing right- of-way easement will be maintained in the current condition. •. J14. Need to provide a sidewalk south of Unit 3G, with HC ramp at intersection (all appropriate sheets). A propased sidewalk has been added to the plans. Please see the Site Plan. 15. Mail Kiosk - a. Provide a design for this kiosk, including elevations; lb. must be handicap accessible; c. There is no parking provided at this kiosk. Unclear how residents will actually get their mail at this kiosk; as unit owners on the north side-will not. walk to the kiosk but will park their vehicle at this kiosk on their way in or out. Parking now would be within the roadway, which is not safe. The development is proposed to have mailboxes on-site. This is being explored with. the post office. As such, the mail kiosk has been removed from the site. J16. Unclear why the entrances are being gated. Provide an explanation. The proposed entrances are being gated as it is an added selling point for the development and will enhance safety of the neighborhood. 17 On the building elevations, indicate the dimensions of the building, including the. length and depth of the buildings. Also add length and depth. of buildings on Sheet 4. The building length and depth shown on the proposed development is a building envelope. The proposed buildings will fall within the building envelope provided. p12~Gif~9A~ RECa~Ea p~,~Nii~iC~ v%F'ARTiViE!\!T cROVa• C1TY 4F uLEAiZ~A?ER 1S 10/12/07 - WW -Floor plans indicate "optional screen enclosure under cantilever"' with a door to the rear from this screen enclosure. Units 66 - 94 still shown with stem walls at the edge of the cantilever, which is still a problem. 10/2/07 - WW - As a heads-up, while it is not part of a completeness review, the building elevations indicate sliding glass doors. at the rear o€ units. By Building Code, there must be at least athree-foot wide stoop outside the sliding glass doors. Such stoops/patios must meet required setbacks. Additionally, certain buildings are indicated with a stem wall at the rear of the buildings, which can create additional. issues regarding these stoops/patios. It is advised to look at this in greater detail to avoid comments requiring redesign during the DRC review process. The proposed cantilever will occupy the portion of the site shown between the dashed portion of the building shown on the Site Plan and the dark line indicating the back of the proposed building. As such, all patios will fall within the building envelope provided and will be in compliance with all applicable city setback requirements. 19 Flexibility criteria requires off-street parking to be screened from adjacent parcels of land. and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. Show on all appropriate site and landscape plans. As stated previously, there is not any additional off-street parking proposed, as this is a Workforce Housing Project. In addition, the entire site will be surrounded by a 6' high fence/wall, except the southern portion of the site, as stated in the ]November 1, 2007 DRC Hearing. ~20. Sheet 4 (and other sheets) -Unclear of the meaning of "MC" on Units 1- 4. There is no "MC" in the Site Legend.. Revise. The "MC" on units 1-4 stands for Model Center. This nate has been added to the plans. 2~Floor plans for the narrow units indicate at the rear of the unit where the second floor cantilevers over the ground floor patio that there is an "optional screen enclosure under cantilever." This is not similarly shown on the wider units. If such is an option for the wider units, revise to indicate such. As stated above, the proposed cantilever will fall within the building envelope provided on the plans. 22. All floor plan sheets are labeled Sheet 2 of 4. Unclear why they are so indicated when they show different floor plans. Revise. This is being revised and will be provided by the architect. 4RIGII~IAL l2EC~VfD ~~°~ ~~. 20~~ ~ ~ ~~ GROUP PLANI~IIVC~ i~t_?~RTMENT CITY OF ~LEARWATFR N 23. Sheet 4 indicates the typical narrow units to be 16 feet in width (assumed to centerline of demising walls). However, floor plans for the narrow units indicate the units to be 15'-4" wide (to center of demising walls). Site plan and. floor plans are not coordinated. Which is correct? Revise. The typical building plan on the Site Plan (Sheet 4) has been revised accordingly. ~24. Sheet 5 -Unclear what the elevation on each building is denoting, since there is a little note in the bottom right hand corner that states the "finished floor elevations are 0.5' higher than pad elevations shown." The note on the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheet 5) is denoting that the elevation provided is that of the building pad, or grade for the fill material. The proposed slab for the building will be D.5' higher than the grade of the proposed fill material. d 25. Sheet 6 -All electric and communication lines must be underground, including for street lighting. Place note on this sheet. A note stating that all communications and electrical lines, etc. must be constructed underground. ~6. From a buffering standpoint to address compatibility of adjacent uses, recommend the installation of a six-foot high solid fence or wall with landscaping on the inside of the fence/wall adjacent to the three detached dwellings that this project wraps around (806, $18 and 822 Woodlawn Street). Within the front setback adjacent to Woodlawn Street, the fence/wall must be reduced to a maximum of three feet in height. A six foot fence/wall will be constructed around the site, as described above. 27. Preliminary Plat application. form -Signature cannot be determined as to who signed it, as it not notarized. Revise. The signature and notary on the Preliminary Plat Application Form has been revised. ~28. Preliminary Plat application farm -Add on Page 2 the following: a. additional addresses of the property of 802 and 830 Woodlawn Street; b. Project Valuation. The above referenced information has been added to Page 2 of the Preliminary Plat Application Form. ORIGINAL RECIr'VED ... ,; ~~ ~ 2~0~ PIANh4ii~G DC+~~.RTNIENT ~ ~~ CITY OF ~ LEHRWATER eROVp• 'f 29. Response to General Applicability criteria #1 (Page 2 of FLS application) - Explain in detail how the propased attached dwelling project is in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties zoned and developed with detached dwellings, including the three lots fronting on Woodlawn Street this project wraps around. Please see the attached General Applicability Criteria information provided with r the application. r 3Q. Response to General Applicability criteria #2 (Page 2 of FLS application) - Explain in detail how this project will not impair the value of adjacent detached dwelling lots, including the three lots fronting on Woodlawn Street this project wraps around. Please see the attached General Applicability Criteria information provided with the application. J3~. Response to General Applicability criteria #3 (Fage 2 of FLS application) - Explain in detail HQW this project will not affect the health or safety of persons residing in the neighborhood. Do not restate the criteria as the response. Please see the attached General Applicability Criteria information. provided with the application. 32. Response to General Applicability criteria #4 (Page 2 of FLS application} - Explain in detail IOW this project will minimize traffic congestion on these local roads. Please see the attached General Applicability Criteria information provided with the application. J 33. Response to General Applicability criteria #5 (Page 2 of FLS application) - Thefuture land use for the three lots fronting on Woodlawn Street this property surrounds, as well as properties south of Woodlawn Street and to the west across the railroad tracks is Residential Urban (maximum density of 7.5 du/acre). While the zoning district may be the same, the land use density is quite different. Revise the response to address these divergent land use densities relating to consistency and compatibility. What measures are being employed to minimize negative impacts? Please see the attached General Applicability Criteria information provided with the application. ~~r~ar~ ~eF~~~vF~ ~~.l~ (~~ 2007 ~~~~-~~ ~~~r,~r~ly~~ ~,vovp• 34. Response to General Applicability criteria #6 (Page 2 of FLS application) - The future land use for the three lots fronting on Woodlawn Street this property surrounds, as well as properties south of Woodlawn Street and to the west across the railroad. tracks is Residential Urban (maximum density of 7.5 du/acre), which is not the same as what has been requested for this property. Revise the response to address these divergent land-use densities--- relating to this criteria. Please see the attached General Applicability Criteria information provided with the application. ~35 Note: Signage, which will need to meet Code requirements, will be handled separately through sign permits. This comment has been noted. Condition of approval to be included in the Development Order: That approval of this Flexible Standard Development (FLS) application be subject to the approval of the change to land use and zoning under LUZ2006-08006. As such, no Final Plat may be approved by City Council and no building permits to construct horizontal or vertical improvements may be issued until LUZ200b-08006 is approved. This comment has been noted. The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1. Indicate on the preliminary plat the dedication of a total of 30-feet of right- of-way to be measured from the north line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. As stated above, the right-of--way easement will be maintained in the current condition. 2. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the property owner on the preliminary plat. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A) 2.) The name address and telephone number of the property owner have been added to the Preliminary Plat. 3. Provide proposed street names. (Community Development Code Sec. 4- 703(A) 6.) Proposed street names are being reviewed by the owner and will be provided as soon as they are agreed on by owner and the City of Clearwater. ORIGINAL Rl:C1/ED L ...; (~~~ 200 PLAP+11v1NC~ ~,E~~'cT~ai~~dlT OITY O~ i^_i F~~~ar~~.~.. ~~ GBOUP• 4, Show on the preliminary plat the names of the adjoining plats, appropriately positioned. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A) 7.) This information is currently being reviewed and the plan revised. 5. Provide area and dimensions (to nearest foot) of the overall plat, each lot, street rights-of-way and. common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purpose, if any. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703{A) 8 a-d.) Dimensions are provided on the typical details provided in the plan set. 1 . No Issues. Environmental: 1 . No issues Fire: No Comments Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . See comments under FZS2007-10045 :.Land Resources: `1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Landscaping: A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat. (if applicable} whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. (Note: Open space and recreation land. fees are not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1985.) Parks and Recreation: 1 . No Issues Stormwater: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Solid Waste; Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 13 Remove access east of the RR tracks. This driveway does not meet the 125' spacing requirements between intersections (Community Development Code Section. 3-102 C. ®R1C~11~lAL RECi:~5'VED ~ ~~ GROUP° ~~,-:~ c~~ zac~ X71 AP~FP,:sr~rr~ ssv-~; .~:-... Traffic Engineering: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Planning:. -No-Comments- - __ -- -- - - -- _ Other: Notes: REVISIONS ARE NECESSARY FOR THIS APPLICATION, AS IT IS INSUFFICIENT TQ ISSUE A DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND REQUIRES RE-REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (REVISE AND RESUBMIT). Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 14 Enclosed for your review are the requested materials. Should you have any questions or require additional information regarding this submittal, please contact our office at (727) 789-9500. Sincerely, AVID GROUP Kent A. Edwards, P.E. Senior Design Engineer OR~~ZNAI_ 6~EG~~VfD is ~~ ~ ~w 20~~ CITY 4~~ ;w'S~k:;'i;k :;;; ::, ~~~ ~''a ~~ GROUP' °o o ~ ~ IAUTHg6139 L00000361 L873451 GROUP' it ~ BLS 3 ¢ . Pi10NE. (727) 789-9500 w = ¢ f FAX (727),784-5662 -~ a _ __ _ December 03, 2007 City of Clearwater Planning Department Attn: Sheri Watkins 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: Townhortaes at Lake Bellevue Flexible Standard Development Site Flan Submittal S22/T29SlR15E Avid Job No.2596-001.100 Dear Ms. Watkins: Per the comments from the DRC Committee Meeting regarding the above referenced project, please fmd the following items attached: • Fifteen (15) copies -Flexible Development Standard Development Application • Fifteen (15) copies -Revised. Site Plans • Fifteen (15) copies -Revised Preliminary Plat Application for PLT 200700006 • Fifteen (15) copies -- Comment Response Letter • Fifteen (15) copies -Littoral Shelf Planting Plan (upon approval, planting plan will be incorporated into the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan. • Four (4) copies -Revised Drainage Calculations . , If you should need any additional information, or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact myself or Rick Tommell at (727) 789-9500. Thank you for your time and assistance with this project. Sincerely, AV1D Group Kent A. Edwards, P.E. Senior Design Engineer Cc: Chris Koncal, Midway Services File ~~ICal~4.. ~~~~~ `''~"~ ~'~~ 2U07 ~~1~~ ~~~,~TnnEf~T CITY OF Ci.ERRWATE~ K:IPROJECT~~50rS~t3fl0a - its i meter'cE®~Ir[~~ri~~l~FB~~C>~i~k~kr8Dm4 r~,~pt~iBU~ Submit 2596001.doc ~~'.. , • • Wells, Wayne From: kent.edwards@avidgroup.com Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 3:35 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLS2007-10045 - 802, $2$ and 830 Woodlawn Street Wayne , -- _ Thanks for the follow-up with those questions. I am forwarding the information on, but due to the time constraint, I would not foresee us going with a Level 2 Flexible Development Plan. But, since this is site development, I will keep you apprised of any further developments. Kent Edwards, P.E. Senior Design Engineer AVID Group (r) 2300 Curlew Rd. Ste 100 Palm Harbor, FL 34683 Phone: (727) 789-9500 Ext. 118 Fax: (727) 7$4-6662 Cell: (727) 487-4774 kent.edwards@avidgroup.com www.avidgroup.com -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wellsc~myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Friday, I3ovember 02, 2007 3:30 PM To: Kent Edwards Cc: neil.thompsonc~MyClearwater.com Subject: FLS2007-10045 - 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street Kent - The two items I was going to get back to you from the DRC meeting yesterday are as follows: 1. Parking for Affordable Housing - Section 3-919 of our Cade states °The minimum off-street parking requirement for affordable housing units, as defined by the City of Clearwater Economic Development and Housing Department, may be reduced to one parking space per unit in any zoning district where residential uses are permitted." We would need verification from the Economic Development and Housing Department that this project qualifies under these provisions to reduce the parking to one space per unit. 2. Fence/Wall Height - Section 3-804.A limits the height of a fence/wall located in front of a principal structure to a maximum height of 36 inches. Section 3-804.A.1 states "In the MDR and MHDR zoning districts, brick. or other masonry walls or walls with masonry columns linked by substantial grill work shall be permitted to a maximum height of six feet in a required front setback area as a Level Two {flexible development) approval. Such walls shall be architecturally compatible with the principal structure on the property and compatible with the surrounding properties." The proposed zoning of the property is MDR. The current application (FLS2007-10045) is a Level 1 request. A Level 2 application requires a public hearing by the Community Development Board (CDB). If the fence/wall height is desired to exceed 36 inches, a different application is necessary, only for the fence/wall, to be submitted for review and approval by the CDB. This process takes approximately three months of time. Wayne 1 • • DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY AVID Group (AVID) makes the electronically stored-data on this email available for information purposes only. No warranty either expressed. or implied is made regarding the accuracy or reliability of this data. AVID reserves the right to revise, update and improve its electronically stored data without notice and assumes no responsibility for any damages which may arise as a result of the use of ,its data. The user agrees to verify the data in the email (s) to ascertain its accuracy for the `intended use. AVID makes every effort to ensure this email is virus free, however AVID assumes no responsibility for damages caused by the installation of this data.. Use of the data on this email (s) indicates that the user accepts the above condition. OPENING THIS EMAIL CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCE OF THE ABOVE CONDITIONS. ' 2 • Wells, Wayr~e= From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 3:30 PM To: 'kent.edwards@avidgroup.com' Cc: Thompson, Neil Subject: _ __ FLS2007-10045 - 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street Kent - The two items I was going to get back to you from the DRC meeting yesterday are as follows: 1. Parking for Affordable Housing -Section 3-919 of our Code states "The minimum off-street parking requirement for affordable housing units, as defined by the City of Clearwater Economic Development and Housing Department, may be reduced to one parking space per unit in any zoning district where residential uses are permitted." We would need verification from the Economic Development and Housing Department that this project qualifies under these provisions to reduce the parking to one space per unit. 2. Fence/Wall Height -Section 3-804.A limits the height of a fencelwall located in front of a principal structure to a maximum height of 36 inches. Section 3-804.A.1 states "In the MDR and MHDR zoning districts, brick or other masonry walls or walls with masonry columns linked by substantial grill work shall be permitted to a maximum height of six feet in a required front setback area as a Level Two (flexible development) approval. Such walls shall be architecturally compatible with the principal structure on the property and compatible with the surrounding properties." The proposed zoning of the property is MDR. The current application (FLS2007-10045) is a Level 1 request. A Level 2 application requires a public hearing by the Community Development Board {CDB}. If the fence/wail height is desired to exceed 36 inches, a different application is necessary, only for the fencelwall, to be submitted for review and approval by the CDB. This process takes approximately three months of time. Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:03 PM To: 'kent.edwards@avidgroup.com' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLS2007-100451PLT2007-000Ofi - 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street Kent - Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the above referenced applications, which will be reviewed by the DRC at 9:15 am in the Planning Department conference room (100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL). Wayne ~< f >~~: Draft 11.1.07 2C Action Agenc Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 6:4$ PM 70: 'I<ent.edwards@avidgroup.com' ~-- - - ~ --° . Subject: FW: 802 Woodlawn Kent - This is a letter of opposition that I have received, based on our notification letter being sent out to surrounding property owners. This is for your information. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Pat Hostetler [mailto:dixiechick9088@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 9:04 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 802 Woodlawn Hi. I live at 151.1 South Prospect Ave, I would like to express my opion about the proposed 115 towne homes, I don't think we need this project in our neighborhood, It wi11 not fit in at all, look at the congestion it will bring to our neighborhood, We need more single family homes and not projects, If you take 115 units that's two cars min. per unit 230 more cars up and down Woodlawn, Also if each. family has one child, That's 115 more children running up and down the streets, Do we as seniors in this community really need this, How is this going to benefit us home owners, I feel it will bring more drugs and. crime to our neighborhood, T am totally against it, Thank You Pat Hostetler 1511 S Prospect Ave Clearwater FL 33756 727-647-7265 Do You Yahoo!? Tired of seam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.cam 10/21/2007 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 3:40 PM To: ~ 'kent.edwards@avidgroup.com' Subject: FLS2007-10045 - 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street Kent - Attached is a Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project. The original letter is being mailed. Any questions, contact me my email or at 562-4504. Wayne '-1_ letter of pleteness 10.1 1 `~ CITE OF CL~~~RWATER o ~a,l -r~,~~r PLANNING DEFARTMENT - MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA. 33756 TELEPHONE: (72T) 562-4567 FAX: (727)' 562-4576 W W W . MYCLEARWATER. COM Oc#ober 12, 2007 - ---- - Avid. Group VIA FAX; 727-784-6662 2300 Curlew Road Suite 100 Palm Harbor, F134683 RE: FLS2007-10045 -- 826 WOODLAWN ST -- Letter of Completeness Dear Avid Group The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2007-10045. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on November O1, 2007, in the Planning Department conference room -Room. 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be~preseit to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments maybe generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne. Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, ! Wavne Wells. AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLS2007-10045 - 826 WDODLAWN ST - °o ¢o ~ ~ ~ ~A€1TH#6139 L00000361 LB73451 ..y ~ A /~om~ w ~ PHONE (727)7$9-9500 ~ ~ U FA%(727)784-6662 ~ ~ i ~ ~ - -- October 11,-2007 _ _ City of Clearwater Planning Department Attn: Wayne Wells 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33755 Re: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue Flexible Standard Development Site Plan Submittal FLS2007-10045 - 802 & 826 Woodlawn Street Avid Job No. 2596-001.100 Dear Mr. Wells, Pursuant to your October 2, 2007 Letter of Incompleteness the following additional items are enclosed for distribution: • Fifteen (15) copies -Revised Flexible Development Application w/ Affidavit to Authorize Agent • Fifteen {15) copies -Fifteen (15) copies -Revised Site Plans {one signed 8r. sealed) • Fifteen (15) copies -Typical Unit Floor Plans ~ ~ • Fifteen (15) copies -Architectural Elevation Plans • Fifteen (15) copies -Proposed Signage Details ~ ~ • Fifteen (15) copies -Fire Flow Calculations u ~ ~ °~ v • One (1) copy -Color Rendering Elevation. of a Typical Building ~ ~c ~ ~ ~ • One (1) copy -Building Material Information ~ ~ v The following are a list. of comments sent to our office on 1.0/2/07. For your convenience we have listed your comments in bold and our responses in italics. 1. On Page 1 of the application, provide the Project Valuation of this project. The approximate project valuation has been added to the application. 2. On Fage 1 of the application, add the addresses of 802 and 830 Woodlawn Street. Addresses 802 and 826 Woodlawn Street have been. added to the application. 3. Frovide responses to the following Flexible Standard Development criteria for attached dwellings. Explain HOW each criteria is achieved, in detail: :.' • 1. Height: • The proposed maximum buildi~ag height is below the allowable maximum building height. 2. Adjacent Zoning: The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. Adjacent zoning is designated as 1, MDR and OS/R. 3. Off-street parking: Any proposed off-street parking will be screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall for fence of at least four feet in height. 4. On Page 2 of the application, the applicant must INITIAL one of the following for "ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS": Stormwater plan as noted above is included; Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. The applicant has initialed the appropriate line indicating that a Stormwater plan is included. 5. Show on Sheets 4 and LS all required visibility triangles per City Code. Visibility triangles are revised per City of Clearwater Code and shown on the Site and ti_ ~ ~ Landscape Plans (Sheets 4 & L6). ~ o ~ 3 ~ ~ r~ W 6. On the building elevations, provide the distance the eaves project from the face of ~ ~ W ~--a ° u C9 the building. ~ °C ~ o z ~ The distance the eaves project from the face of the building has been shown on the aU building elevations. 7. Perimeter landscape buffers are required to be provided per Section 3-1202.D.1. The width and character of the perimeter buffers are dependent upon the adjacent uses. Indicate on the landscape plans the provision of these required buffers. Perimeter landscape buffers have been shown on the Landscape Plans (,Sheets 1,5 & L6). 8. Similar to the "typical townhome layout" on Sheet 4 and the "typical service connections" on Sheet 6, provide a "typical townhome landscaping" plan showing what landscaping in the form of trees, shrubs and groundcovers will be planted around the townhomes. A "typical townhome landscaping" detail has been shown on the Landscape Plan (Sheet L7). K:\PRO]ECTS\2500\2596001\DOC\City of Clearwater\Incompleteness Resubmittal\Clearwater Incomplete Comment 1 d Q .. u 9. As part of the tree inventory, provide the driplines for the existing trees. Driplines for the existing trees have been shown on the Tree Removal Plans (Sheets LI- L2aswellas4,5&b). 10. Based on the site layout on Sheet 4, buildings range from 6 - 11 units in each. building. The building elevations submitted is for afour-unit building and depicts units with atwo-car garage. The site plan does not indicate any two-car garages. The building elevations also depict units that have many planes to the faces of the building, however, the site plan indicates rectangular buildings. Provide building elevations that will be typical to this development. Revised building elevations and floor plans are included with this rescrbmittal. ll. A. On the building elevations, indicate the following: (1). proposed exterior materials and colors of the building; (2}. the dimensions of the building. B. Provide one color rendered elevation of the typical building. G Provide one copy of the color swatches/chips of the exterior building colors. A.{I) The proposed exterior colors are included in the attached architectural renderings of the proposed buildings. In addition, brochures titled "Production Information, Installation and Warranty" from .Iarnes Hardy Products, describing the building materials are included in the re.cubmittal package. A.(2) The dimensions of the building are provided on the revised architectural c ~~ ~ plans included with this submittal. ~ `~ ~ d~ 3 ~~ B. As mentioned in A.(I) above, colored renderings of the buildings are O ' .--i F-- ~ V z O provided with this submittal. o ~ ~ ~U C. The information regarding the color swatches are provided in the attached material brochures titled "Production Infarmation, Installation and Warranty" from James Hardy Products. 12. If any freestanding signage is planned for this development adjacent to Woodlawn Street, need to show such freestanding signage locations on Sheets 4 and L5. The proposed signage is shown on the Site and Landscape Plans (Sheet 4 c~. LS). =4 detail showing size, height and preliminary colors is also provided. 13. On Page 6 of the application, the applicant rr-ust INITIAL one of the following for "TRAFFIC IMPACT STl`1DY": Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and past-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. K:~PROJEC"I'512500125960011D~C1City of CleanvaterUncompleteness ReSUbmittallCleanvater Iruomplete Comment 1 The applicant has initialed the appropriate line indicating that a Traffic Impact Study is not required. 14. On Page 6 of the application, the applicant must INITIAL one of the following for "FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/WATER STUDY": Fire Flaw Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. The applicant has initialed the appropriate line indicating that fire flow calculations are included. 15. On Page 6 of the application, while someone signed the application, it is unknown whom this person is, as the notary failed to indicate whom signed the form in front of the applicant. Revise notary acknowledgement to indicate such. The application has been revised to show the printed name of the person signing. 16. Provide Page 7 of the application, which is the Affidavit to Authorize Agent, which must be signed by the current owner of the property. An Affidavit to Authorize Agent is provided which. is executed by the current property owner. 17. As a heads-up, while it is not part of a completeness review, the building elevations indicate sliding glass doors at the rear of units. By Building Code, there must be at least athree-foot wide stoop outside the sliding glass doors.-Such stoops/patios must. meet required setbacks. Additionally, certain buildings are indicated with a stem wall at the rear of the buildings, which can create additional issues regarding these stoops/patios. It is advised to look at this in greater detail to avoid comments requiring redesign during the DRC review process. This information is appreciated and has been taken into consideration when showing the building footprint. As shown, the building footprint included the proposed outdoor patio area, as well as the second floor overhang, in order to help prevent the issue stated above. As such, any proposed stem wall, or retaining wall would be contained within the ~ u building footprint shown. ~ ~ 18. Setback requirements of 25-foot front, five-foot side and 10-foot rear is for all constructed improvements. There is only one location where this is an issue, at the northeast corner with a 9.4-foot dimension to a sidewalk, If changed to meet a 10- foot rear setback, this application can remain a Flexible Standard Development (FLS) application, to be reviewed only by the Development Review Committee. If not changed, then this application must be elevated to a Flexible Development application (FLD), which is a public. hearing application by the Community Development Board. The sidewalk in the northeast corner that encroaches to within 10 feet of the property line has been removed. Please see sheet 4 (Site Plan). r.. 0 c N z~ t- v ~k ~< ~~'a ~ G' Z W ~a ~U K:\PRO~J)~CTS\ZS00~25960011DOC1City of Clearwater\Incompleteness Resubmittal\Clearwater Incomplete Commen 1 ~: Enclosed for your review are the requested materials. We are anticipating making the November 1, 2007 DRC agenda for this review. Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated. If you require any further information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, AVID Group ~~ V Richard 'M. Tommell, P.E. Project Manager Cc: Chris Koncal, Midway Services File ~~ r- ~ Q N e~C ~~ 6 u] ~ V OG ~ ~ 't ~ ~ ~ i 4--'' ~ 49 1. K:~PROJECT512500~25460011DOC1City of Clearwaterllncompleteness ResubmittallClearwater Incomplete Commen ] 0 ~© • • Wells, Wa ne Frorn: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 6:15 PM To: 'kent.edwards@avidgroup.com' Subject: FLS2007-10045/PLT2007-00006, 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street Kent - " I forgot the following comment in the letter I just sent to you regarding this project: Since units are two story in height, provide a typical floor plan for both floors. Wayne ~~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ • LL CITY U~' CLEARWATER a ~~~~L~ PLANNYNG DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM October 02, 2007 Avid Group 2300 Curlew Road Suite 100 Palm Harbor, Fl 346$3 VIA FAX: 727-784-6662 RE: FLS2007-10045 -- 826 WOODLAWN ST -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Avid Group The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filang system and assigned the case number: FLS2007-10045. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the fallowing comments. 1. On Page 1 of the application, provide the Project Valuation of this project. 2. On Page 1 of the application, add the addresses of 802 and 830 Woodlawn Street. 3. Provide responses to the following Flexible Standard Development. criteria for attached dwellings. Explain HOW each criteria is achieved, in detail: i . Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall. for fence of at least four feet in height. 4. On Page 2 of the application, the applicant must IlvITIAL one of the following for "ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS": Stormwater plan as noted above is included; Stormwater plan. is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. 5. Show on Sheets 4 and LS all required visibility triangles per City Code. 6. On the building elevations, provide the distance the eaves project from the face of the building. 7. Perimeter landscape buffers are required to be provided per Section 3-1202.D.1. The width and character of the perimeter buffers are dependent upon the adjacent uses. Indicate on the landscape plans the provision of these required buffers. 8. Similar to the "typical townhome layout" an Sheet 4 and the "typical service connections" on Sheet 6, provide a "typical townhome landscaping" plan showing what landscaping in the form of trees,. shrubs and groundcovers will be planted around the townhomes. 9. As part of the tree inventory, provide the driplines for the existing trees. i ` • CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ ~(~~~„t~~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~- MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING U 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENTJE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W. MYC LEAR W ATER. C OM October 02, 2007 10.. Based on the site layout on Sheet 4, buildings range from 6 - 11 units in each building. The building elevations submitted is for afoot-unit building and depicts units with atwo-car garage. The site plan does not indicate any two-car garages. The building elevations also depict units that have many planes to the faces of the building, however, the site plan indicates rectangular buildings. Provide building elevations that will be typical to this development. 11. A. On the building elevations, indicate the following: (1}. proposed exterior materials and colors of the building; (2}. the dimensions of the building. B. Provide one color rendered elevation of the typical building. C. Provide one copy of the color swatches/chips of the exterior building colors. 12. If any freestanding signage is planned for this development adjacent to Woodlawn Street, need to show such freestanding signage locations on Sheets 4 and L5. 13. On Page 6 of the application, the applicant must INITIAL one of the following for "TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY": Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for ali roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. 14. On Page 6 of the application, the applicant must INITIAL one of the following for "FIRE FLOW C.ALCULATIONS/WATER STUDY": Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. 15. On Page 6 of the application, while someone signed the application, it is unknown whom this person is, as the notary failed to indicate whom signed the form in front of the applicant. Revise notary acknowledgement to indicate such. 16. Provide Page 7 of the application, which is the Affidavit to Authorize Agent, which. must be signed by the current owner of the property. 17. As a heads-up, while it is not part of a completeness review, the building elevations indicate sliding glass doors at the rear of units. By Building Code, there must be at least athree-foot wide stoop outside the sliding glass doors. Such stoops/patios must meet required setbacks. Additionally, certain buildings are indicated with a stem wall at the rear of the buildings, which can create additional issues regarding these stoops/patios. It is advised to look at this in greater detail to avoid comments requiring redesign during the DRC review process, 1 S. Setback requirements of 25-foot front, five-foot side and 10-foot rear is for all constructed improvements. There is only one location where this is an issue, at the northeast corner with a 9.4-foot dimension to a sidewalk, If changed to meet a 10-foot rear setback, this application can remain a Flexible Standard Development (FLS) application, to be reviewed only by the Development Review Committee. If not changed, then this application must be elevated to a Flexible Development. application (FLD), which is a public hearing application by the Community Development Board. • • `~ CITY ©F CLEARWAT~R o ~a,~,t~r PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WW W.MYCLEARWATER.COM October 02, 2007 Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete,~the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected. and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by noon on Thursday, October 11, 2007. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne. Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, w ~ Wa Wells Planner III • • Wells, Wa ne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 5:25 PM To: 'kent.edwards@avidgroup.com' Subject: FLS2007-10045/PLT2007-00006, 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street Kent - Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced project. The original letter is being mailed. Any questions, contact me my email or at 562-4504. Wayne letter of ~mpleteness ~ 0. °o ao ~ ~ ~ ~AUTHfi6139 L00000361 LB73451 '. & a A /t3am~ a~ d w 2 FHON€(727)789-9500 ~ U FAX (727)784-5662 °o ' ' ' OR1GiNAL RECENEiD October 2, 2007 ~=~ ~ ~ 210Q7 PLANNING QEPARTNlENT CIiY OF CLEARWATER City of Clearwater Planning Department Attn: Sheri Watkins 100 South Myrtle Avenue . Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue Flexible Standard Development Site Plan Submittal S22/T29S/R15E Avid Job No. 259G-001,100 Dear Ms. Watkins: Per your discussion with Rick Tommell from our office, please find the following supplemental items attached for addition to the submittal package: • One {1) Fee Check in the amount of $1,275.00 • Fifteen (1.5) copies -Preliminary Plat Application for PLT 200700006 (one original signed and sealed copy included) • Fifteen (15) copies - $uilding Elevation Plans Tf you should need any additional information, or have any questions, please do not. hesitate to contact myself or Riek Tommell at (727) 789-9500. Thank you for your time and assistance with this project. Sincerely, AVID Group Kent A. Edwards, P.E. Senior Design Engineer Cc: Chris Koncal, Midway Services File K:lPROJECTS12500'+25960011DOC1City of Clearwater120071002_PSP SuppGment Submit~2596001.doc 0 o m w o ~ •~~ ~ LL 0 o ° w s PHONE (727)789-9500 = ~ U ~ FAN 1727) 784-6662 ~ O 1 1 1 N October 1, 2007 City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue Flexible Standard Development Site Plan Submittal S22/T29S/R15E Avid Job No. 259fi-001.100 Dear Staff: ~AUTHIf6139 L00000361 LB7345~ Per City of Clearwater Design standards, the following items are enclosed for distribution: • Fifteen (15) copies -Flexible Development Application • .Fifteen (15) copies -Affidavit to Authorize Agent • Fifteen (15} copies -Contract to Purchase • Fifteen (15) copies -Site Plans (one signed & sealed} • Fifteen (l5) copies -Boundary, Topographic and Tree Surveys (one signed & sealed) • Fifteen (15} copies -Typical Unit Building Elevations • Fifteen (15) copies-Reduced Color Renderings 8-1/2" x 11") • Fifteen (15) copies -Architectural Elevation Plans • Fifteen (15) copies -Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) 7~ ~ w Pre-Application Notes. ~ `" ~ • Two (2) copies - Stormwater Report (signed & sealed) ° ~ ~ ~ • Two (2) copies - Geotechnical Engineering Services Reports (by PSI) ~ o a • Two (2) -Traffic Technical Memorandum --m z LL a 0 • Two (2) - Arborist Reports -. ~~' ~ ~ • One (1 } -Fee Check ~ v This project will consist of approximately 115 work force townhome units located on the north side of Woodlawn Street, just south of the Norton Recreational Complex, east of the Old Tampa Bay Railroad and west of Greenwood Avenue. Construction on this site was previously approved by the City of Clearwater in 1984 under the name Woodlawn Terrace. As part of that approved project, the infrastructure (water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer} was constructed, as well as one two-story condominium building. To our knowledge the installed infrastructure was never certified by the City of Clearwater. We are proposing to abandon, remove and replace the all existing utilities with the exception of the K:\PROJECTS\2500\259600t1DOCiCity of Clearwater~2007092i3_PSP Submit_2596001.doc s s • existing lift station wet well_ The sanitary sewer distribution system will be a private gravity system discharging into the existing lift station. The water distribution system is proposed to be public and will be serviced by the City of Clearwater and will be provided through connection to the existing F inch water main on the north side of Woodlawn Street. Storm drainage :=~i11 be provided on-site through three. proposed detention ponds. Two will be wet-detention, constructed by re-shaping the existing. stormwater facilities on-site, while the third will be dry-detention located on the southeast corner of the site. We are anticipating making the November 1, 20p7 DRC agenda for this review, Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated. if you require any further infor-nation or have arty questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, AVID GrouF Kent A. Edwards, P.E. Senior Design Engineer Cc: Chris Koncal, Midway Services File ~ r- c~ ~ a o ~ ~ `" ~ ~ ~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~U O~ ~ Zp ~r ~ U ti K:\PROJECTS1250012596001\DOC1City of Clearwater\20070928_PSP Submit_259b001.doc A~O r ~ Wells, Wa ne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 6:17 PM To: 'duketieman@aol.com' Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Reynolds, Mike Subject: Woodlawn townhome project Duke Thank you for inviting me to the association meeting last night. My comments last night and in this email is for educational purposes so that the neighborhood is addressing their concerns with proper terminology. What I explained at the meeting is that the applicant is asking for a future land use plan map amendment to Residential Medium (RM}that would permit a maximum of 15 dwelling units per acre and a rezoning to Medium Density Residential (MDR} District to permit attached dwellings. The existing apartments to the east of the subject property also has RM land use and MDR zoning. Except for the subject property {which primarily has Institutional [INS] land use and Institutional [I] zoning), the surrounding area, which includes most of the single family dwellings that you and your neighbors at the meeting live in, has a land use designation of Residential Urban (RU), which permits a maximum density of 7.5 dwelling units per acre, and is zoned MDR District. What I heard the neighborhood concern is the proposed density: Based on the surrounding zoning, that includes the existing single family dwellings, it would appear that the requested MDR zoning would be appropriate. If the concern is the increase in density (to 15 dwelling units per acre), then the neighborhood should be addressing this portion of the request (the request to amend the future land use plan category for the subject property to RM). If the neighborhood wants what the existing surrounding single family dwellings have from a density standpoint, then the neighborhood should be asking for Residential Urban (RU} land use (maximum of 7.5 dwelling units per acre} instead of the RM land use (asking City Council to deny the RM land use and instead approve RU land use). You and your neighbors may send letters addressing their support or opposition to City Council members regarding this request, which should also be copied to Mlke Reynolds {the case planner for the land use/rezoning request) in the Planning Department. if sent by email, Mike Reynolds email address is mike.reynolds@myclearwater.com. am the case planner for the site development request. If you or your neighbors desire to talk to me regarding the proposed development project, please call or email me and we can set up a time to discuss the proposal. Their application is also a public record and anything in my file you may get a copy of {copying fees may apply). My phone number is listed below and my email address is wayne.wells@myclearwater.com. Any letters addressing your concerns regarding the site development proposal should be sent to me. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtfie Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Phone: 727-562-4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 ~ , i ~ ~ C i G7)wtii f~IDJ~~ ~1,~' e..rr~.~ f ~ l~er.~1 s 'J If ~Pre~ P ~_ .~ y- .8~~ I_~ ,~ del ~.~,.~- ~ s ~[ ~ -~~-e.. --- ~. ~.~ i'I 1`P.i-!i~?l,.l~,- (NaJ~d,J~S~` ~~GL ~I'___,3 - C-P~r'S~ __~~_., I f ~~ i I i I i • Wells, Wayne From: Wilson, Charles E. Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 10:57 AM To• 'duketieman@aol.com' Subject: May 28 meeting - S Clearwater Citizens for Progressive Action Wayne Wells from the Planning Department will be attending your meeting....._For any questions before the meeting you can reach him @ 562-4504 or email him at Wayne.wells@myclearwater.com • • Wells, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008. 1:55. PM To: Wells,. Wayne Subject: FW: Neighbafiood Meeting Summary FYf Michael L. Delk, A1CP Planning. Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com ' -----Original Message----- From: ~ _ Kronschnabl, Jeff Sent: Thursday,. April 24, 2008 4:43 PM To: Delk, Michael;. CEayton, Gina Gc: Silverboard, Jill Subject: FW: Neighborhood Meeting Summary FYI -notes from neighborhood mtg. -heads up on this one - Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Melendez, Becky Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:24 PM To: Kronschnabl, Jeff Subject: Neighborhood Meeting Summary South nwood04 23 0, FYi • • South Clearwater Citizens for Progressive Action MEETING DATE: Apri123, 2008 NEIGHBORHOOD NAME: South Clearwater Citizens for Progressive Action MEETING LOCATION: Ross Norton Recreation Center STAFF PRESENT: Charles Eric Wilson Development and Neighborhood Services. MEETING PURPOSE: Neighborhood meeting Attendance: 11 people Main meeting points The residents brought up the Development property issue again. They are feeling that the 120 attached dwellings will have a negative impact in the neighborhood. Their concern is the units per acre, the impact of increased traffic, and the possibility of the failure of sales causing the project to turn into rentals. The residents were very concern about the Midway representatives and Pastor Morris failure to attend and meet with the neighbors to discuss their concerns on this project. The overall feeling in the community is that they want more ownership in this community. This housing issue is also a concern for the F.A.S.T organization that is focusing on attainable housing, crime, and school education and discipline. Actions requested South Clearwater Citizens far Progressive Action would like a Zoning representative from the Planning Department to attend their May 28 meeting @ Ross Norton Recreation Center @ 6:00 PM to address what is the units per acre in this area as well as other planning and zoning questions Summary submitted by: Charles Eric Wilson 1:00 ptn Case Number: FLS2007-10~ 826 WOODLAWN ST Owner(s): Woodlawn Church Of God Bd Of T ~, ~ ` 845. Woodlawn St Clearwater, Fi 33756 ~~ TELEPHONE:. Na Phone, FAX:. No Fax, E-MAIL:. No Email Represents#ive: Avid Group 2300 Curlew Road Suite 100 ' Pahn Harbor, F134683 . TELEPHONE: 727-789-9500,.. FAX: 727-784-6662, E-MAIL:. kent.edwards@avidgroup.com Location: 8.1 acres located on the north side of Woodlawn Street between S. Myrtle Avenue and Tilley Avenue Atlas Page: 314A Zoning District: I, Institutioxzal Reqnest: Flexible Standard Development application to permit 113 attached dwellings (townhomes) in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A, and Preliminary Plat approval for 113 lots (PLT2007-00006). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133763 1821 Springwood Cir S TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL:. No Email Neighborhood South Clearwater Citizens For Progr Association{s): Clearwater, FI 33756 1120 Kingsley St. TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: duketieman a~,7aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: 11/1/07: Wells, Thompson, Rice, Doherty, Albee, Keller, Glenn; 1/3108: Same as 11/1/07, except no Glenn;. 4/3/08: Same as 11/1/07 w! Butte Applicant: 11/1/07: Kent Edwards, Abbey Naylor, Chris Koncal, Rick.Tonnell; 1/3/08: Edwards; 4/3/08 -Edwards The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering; Development Review Agenda -Thursday, Apri13, 2008 -Page 23 DRC Action Agrnda 1. I Prior to the issuanc~a building pemut: 1. Final. plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County prior. to the issuance of a building permit. {Community Development Code 4-708) 2. Applicant shall deed or dedicate to the City ofClearwater aright-of--way. easement for Woodlawn Street to provide a total of 30-feet ofright-of--way or aright-of--way easement to be measured from the north line of the Southwest 1/4. of the Southwest 1/`4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East along the entire Woodlawn Street frontage. of the subject property wherever such right-of--way easement or right-of--way doesn't presently exist. 3. Project wall fronting on Woodlawn Street is shown in an area of the site that is presently or will become. aright-of--way easement. Wall shall be relocated outside of any existing/proposed right-of--way easement. 4. The condominium plat of Woodlawn Terrace. I indicates 3fl-feet of street right-of--way for Woodlawn Street measured from the Southwest 1/4. of the. Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29. South, Range. 15 East.. Please amend the site plan. to show this existing street right-of--way foa Woodlawn Street. 5. Turning radii.at all intersections shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #106.. 6. Depict on the utility plan a sample. point at the temporary blow. off at the far northeast end of the proposed new water main. Prior to the. issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 1: Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are. signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will. field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon subrrrittal of a Building Permit Application. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be instalied, the. installation shall be completed and in service. prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Environmental 1 , Prior to DO, submit a copy of the letter from Southwest Florida Water Management District confirming no wetlands are on the property. Fire: 1 , The streets in this development are Fire Access Roads and per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, NFPA 1..18..2.2.5.8 a clear width of 24' must be maintained at all times. "NO. PARKING - FIRE LANE BY ORDER OF TA$ FIRE DEPT" are to be posted at a maximum of 60' apart. These signs will be 12" by 18" with a white background and red letters and shall be no more than 7" in hieght from roadway to bottom of sign. They shall also be within sight of the. roadway. Provide details and confirmation PRIOR TO DO harbor Master: Legal: No issues. Project is seeking lesser amount of parking pursuant to Sec. 3-919, which states that required parking "may" be reduced to one parking space per unit for affordable housing units as defined by ED/Housing. A. Applicant will be required to record restrictive covenant guaranteeing affordability of units for appropriate time period, with language to satisfaction of City Attorney, prior to issuance of any building permit. B. Plat as recorded must contain language guaranteeing affordability of units for appropriate time period to satisfaction of City Attorney. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, April 3, 2008 -Page 24 URC ACUOO wgmea i.l Land Resources: 1 . 12/27/07-Provide an east/west section through tree. # 8, show root prune limits if needed. 4/1/08-The submitted responce letter states that the condition was addressed on sheet TP1 which was not submitted. Submit prior to D.O. Additional comments maybe forthcoming once received and reviewed. 2 . ] 0/24/07-The Preservation Plan must reflect which trees require special attention such as root pruning, tunneling and canopy elevating, ie: root prunig at tree #205. The plan must be more peecise. Revise prior to D.O. 12/27/07-Show the root prune limits for the top of banks @ trees #60, 199, 203, 205. and the. two trees east of building 11 units 18 and 19. Insure. the plans reflect the specifications and visa versa. Also show tree barricade. limits ~a all trees to remain. on site and. those trees anlong the property boundaries. 4/1/08-The submitted responce letter states that the condition was addressed on sheet TP2 which was not submitted. Submit prior to. D.O.. Additional comments may be forthcoming once received and. reviewed. Landscaping: 1 3/31/08 - WW Response states that Cross-section G shows buffer. landscaping, but (assumed to be Section g on Sheet 9) nothing is so indicated on Section G. 12/30/07. - WW Section 3-1202.D.2 states: "Front slopes of stormwater retention areas may comprise up to 50 percent of any required landscape buffer width, provided that the slope is 4:1 or flatter and all required shrub plantings are not more than six inches below the top of the bank and provided that the buffer width is at least five feet in width." Based. on the pond design on Sheet 5, cross-section G on Sheet 9 and the proposed landscaping on Sheet L5, provide evidence on a cross-section of pond design and landscaping compliance with this Code section. 2 . From a buffering standpoint to the adjacent single family dwelling on the west side of the eastern portion of the site, recommend extending the six-foot high decorative wall along the west property line of the eastern portion of the site to within 25 feet of the front property line, reducing to three-foot high to the front property line. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Site data table needs to be corrected to reflect correct number of existing residential units. Recreation Land and a recreation facility, impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat {if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. {Note: Open space fees are not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1985.) Stormwater: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, Apri13, 200$ -Page 25 DRC Acdrnr Agrnda 1.1 The following she addressed at building permit application: S 1. Update the plan to show the entire top-of--bank of the ditch located on the west side of the subject property. 2. Show on the. plans a drainage easement to be dedicated to the City prior to CO over the. drainage on the west side of the property to provide access for City maintenance. The easement shall extend from the Woodlawn Street right-of--way on the. south. to the. existing drainage easement on the north and from the west property line to a parallel. line tangent to the ditch top-of bank where it is furthest from the. west property line, 3. The ADS roof drain system shown on the plan is not complete. Please show clearly the location of downspout connections to roof drain system.. Provide calculations showing the size of gutter, downspout connections to the drainage system and demonstrate that the roof drain system is sufficient to duect all roof runoff to the retention ponds and not overflowing to the adjacent properties to the east. Furthermore, Cross Section E on Sheet 9 indicates grading that slopes toward adjacent properties. Provide a design that will not direct drainage. to adjacent properties. 4. Demonstrate that the eastern side bank of the existing ditch adjoining the railroad right-of--way will remain stable with the placement of additional. fill. 5. The fence around the entire concrete headwall of the ditch is not shown on the revised plan as stated in the response to comments. 6. Cross sections shall be drawn to scale. as requested. 7. Provide the drawdown analysis of the pond #20. The double ring test was.provided, but the drawdown analysis of pond # 20 has not included with either this or the previous submittal. 8. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit. 9. Show the sub-basins for the storm inlets; the sub-basins are not shown. on plans. 10. Sump is not permitted in proposed pond # 20. Ductile iron pipe(s) maybe an option to the depth cover issues. General note:. 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: i . Please show stowage area for black barrels Traffec Engineering: 1 . 1. The lack of visitor parking will encourage on street parking thereby making maneuverability difficult for emergency and sanitation vehicles. Provide a solution to prevent vehicles from parking on the street. 2. Describe how the gate on the west entrance to the property. is proposed to function. The above to be addressed prior to a Development Order (DA.). General Notes}: 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may he forthcoming upon submittal. of a Building Permit Application. ' Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, Apri13, 2008 -Page 26 DRC Actimi Agenda I.1 1 . 3/30/08 - WW ~ a T'he site layout produces no place for visitors to park. It is highly unlikely the "affordable". units will be stricktly limited. to only having one car, and that that one car will be parked in the garage. Based on the Fire Department's comments and. concerns'with accessibility through this development where residents and visitors will park in the. street creating impassible streets for residents, visitors, garbage trucks and fire trucks, that insufficient parking, especially for visitors,. is provided. Section 3-919 for affordable housing states that parking MAY be reduced to one parking space. per unit. Staff has serious concerns regarding the. site layout of units and insufficient parking provided. 12/27/07 & 10/25/07 - WW Parking has been designed in a manner where the two parking spaces are stacked, requiring the vehicle in the driveway to be moved to allow the vehicle in the garage to exit. As such, there is only one parking space provided per unit.. Need to provide one additional parking space per unit. 2 . 3/30/08, 12/30/07 & 10/30/07 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Development Order: That approval of this Flexible Standard Development (FLS) application be subject to the approval of the change to land use and zoning under LUZ2006-0$006. As such, no Final Plat maybe. approved by City Council and no building permits to construct horizontal or vertical improvements maybe issued until LUZ2006-08006 is approved. 3/30/08 - WW Fence/wall now shown. Parking for Unit 113 still not screened from view from Woodlawn Street. Recommend a hedge along the south side of the driveway of Unit 113 from the sidewalk to the unit front. 12/30/07 - WW Based on the response in the December 3, 2007, letter, show the location of the six-foot high fence/wall along the property lines on Sheets 4, L4 and L5. Unclear how applicant intends to screen parking from view from Woodlawn Street to be in compliance with this flexibility criteria. Revise. 10/29/07 - WW Flexibility criteria requires off-street parking to be screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. Show on all appropriate site and landscape plans. 3/31/08 - WW Respanse says revised floor plans showing where the black barrels will be in the garage was submitted. However, I don't find any revised floor plans submitted. 12/34/07 -. WW Since black barrels are to be used for solid waste storage for individual units, and since these black barrels are to be stored out of sight, provide evidence through floor plans that the black barrels physically can be stored within the individual garages along with a vehicle. 3/31/08 - WW Elevations now indicate the. building height at 21'-1 7/8". Revise height on Sheet 1 of civil plans to match. 12/27/07 - WW Thank you for adding such information to Sheet 1 of the civil drawings. Still need to add to building elevations, which have not been resubmitted. 10/25/07 - WW Building elevations -Provide the height of the proposed buildings from grade to the midpoint of the pitched roof of the main portion of the building. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, April 3, 2008 -Page 27 DRC Aclian Agrnda I.I 6 . 3/31/08 - WW Sight triangles incorrectly shown for the eastern driveway on Sheets 4 and L5. Revise to be located along the driveway and front property line. No landscaping is shown within the triangles, which the Code permits but must be maintained below 30-inches in height. Show shrubs on L5. Ensure signs and fencing are not located within the visibility triangles. Note: Signage must meet required setbacks of £ive feet from property lines. 12/30/07 - WW Visibility triangles are. still shown incorrectly on Sheets 4 and L5. Ensure poposed landscaping meets Code provisions for visibility triangles. Revise. 1.0/ 12!07. -. W W Visibility triangles are shown on these sheets, but are drawn in the, wrong locations... Revise to be along the front property line and the edge of the driveways. ' 10/2/07 - WW Show on Sheets. 4 and LS all required visibility triangles per City Code. 7 . ~ 3/31/08, 12/30107 & 10/30/07 - WW Note:. Signage, which will need to meet Code requirements, will be handled separately through sign permits. 8 . 3/31!08 - Ww Response sheet indicates revised floor plans were submitted, yet none were submitted. 12/30/07 & 1.0/29/07 - WW All floor plan sheets are labeled Sheet 2 of 4. Unclear why they are so indicated when they show different floor plans.. Revise. 9 . 3/31!08 - WW Response. says an exhibit was submitted, yet none was submitted. Additionally, the note on Sheet 4 regarding "stem. wall units" makes the screen rooms further confusing. 12/27!07 - WW December 3, 2007 response letter did not respond to the comment below. Comment deals with the note "optional screen enclosure under cantilever" indicated on the narrow units but not the wider units. If typical for all units, indicate "typical for all units" as part of this note on revised floor plans. 10/29/07 - WVJ Floor plans for the narrow units indicate at the rear of the unit where the second floor cantilevers over the ground floor patio that there is an "optional screen enclosure under cantilever. ° This is not similarly shown on the wider units. If such is an option for the wider units, revise to indicate such.. 10 . 4/3/08 - WW At DRC meeting, we advised the applicant that we want windows in the side wall of the end units. 3!31/08 - WW Once you have explored the additional alternatives, please subnvt what you intend (prior to issuance of a Development Order). 12/27/07 & 1.0/19/07 - WW Based on the floor plans, windows are "optional" for the end unit, second floor narrow units only (wider units apparently. don't have any "optional" windows on the end units). As these windows are "optional," the sides of the units will be blank walls, which is not appealing. ' Development Review Agenda -Thursday, Apri13, 2008 -Page 28 URC Action Agrnda 1.1 11 . 3/31/08 - WW ~ • There is no detail attached to the response. The rear of the. units with stem walls is still a problem. The note/table on Sheet 4 still makes this circumstance unclear, now that it says the patio will be cantilevered. 12/30/07 - W W Response in the December. 3, 2007, letter did not address the comment below from 10/12/07. Revise. 10/12/07 - WW Floor plans indicate "optional screen enclosure under cantilever" with a door to the rear, from this screen enclosure. Units 66 - 94 still shown with stem walls at the edge of the cantilever, which is still a problem. 10/2/07 - WW As a heads-up, while, it is not part of a completeness review, the building elevations indicate sliding glass doors at the. rear of units. By Building Code, there must be at least athree-foot wide stoop outside the. sliding glass doors.. Such stoops/patios must meet required setbacks... Additionally, certain buildings are indicated with a stem wall at the rear. of the buildings, which can create additional issues regarding these stoops/patios.. It is advised to look at this in greater detail to avoid comments requiring redesign during the. DRC review process. 12 . There continues to be a disconnect between the floor plans,. building elevations and the site plan: a. Note: No new floor plans were submitted; b. Previously submitted floor. plans indicate the two-car garage larger units to have an overall length dimension of 52'-4", yet the one-car garage smaller units have an overall length dimension of 54'-8"..The. site plan indicates both the two-car larger units and the one-car smaller units to have the same overall length dimension of approximately 55 ; c. The previously submitted floor plans still show the two-car garage larger units with aone-car garage door; d. Site plans now have changed the floor plan/unit layout (dark wider lines) to approximately 50 feet in length with a lighter, narrower .area at the rear of the units, potentially indicating the patios, but other lines make this unclear; e. Sheet 4 has added anote/table for "stem wall units", but this only further complicates and makes the proposal more unclear. Unclear how there will be cantilevered. patios, as there is no detail on Sheet 9;. f. Building elevations submitted with this resubmission are no different than what was submitted previously; g. Rear building elevations for the first floor do not conform to the previously submitted floor plans, as there are no windows, just sliding glass doors; h. Site plan indicates end two-car larger units paired with aone-car smaller unit so that the garages are adjacent to each other. There are no front elevations submitted showing such an adjacency garage. situation, which, in order. to keep the. same height of the garage roof,. the. pitch/slope of the one-car/two-car adjacency roof would be different than other two-car only or two one-car adjacency garage roofs would produce.. Likewise, the site plan indicates single one-car garages not attached to another garage, yet no building elevation has been submitted showing such situation; i. There does not appear any semblance, especially in light of the intended modular construction,. of architectural integrity of how building units are placed together to form a building design that produces similarity.. Units appear to be crammed together without any regard to the building layout and elevation such cramming produces. Examples include:. Building with Units 44-53. -. single one-car garage are on each end, yet for efficiency of design, construction and cost, it would seem that one of these end units. should be shifted to the other end of the building to produce two. one-car garages adjacent to each other. Another example is the building with Units 35-43 - It would seem unit 36 should be shifted to the north side of unit 43 to. produce two one-car garages adjacent to each other. 13 . A note has been added regarding the retaining wall with 4-foot high fence on the west side of the fire truck turnaround west of Units 44 and 64. This note. states this has to be designed by a licensed engineer.. Unclear if you mean a structural engineer, since Avid is a licensed (civil) engineer. 14 . Remove the wrought iron fence, Pond 20 berm and landscaping from the right-of--way easement (both sides of the property). (assumed to be the dashed line shown on Sheet 4). 1.5 . Show the gate and. how it is to open (swing or slide) for the western street (Cranberry Avenue). Development Review Agenda -Thursday, Apri13, 2008 -Page 29 onc,~uo~.a$md~ ~.i 16 . There are inconsist~es between slopes indicated on Sheet 5 and the~ietails on Sheet 9. Plan indicates 4:1 slope, but the details indicate 6:1 slope.. Which slope is correct (Sheet 5 or the details on Sheet 9)?: a. Building with Units 103-113. -Detail F; and b. Building with Units 54-63. -Detail K. 17 . Sheet 4 -Curb widening detail appears to present issues with the adjacent sidewalk from a. handicap. accessibility standpoint. Shouldn't the sidewalk be a consistent four-feet wide, wrapping around or extending from the. curb widening shown on the detail? The. sidewalk was bent around the storm manhole between Units 92 & 93. 18 . Condition of approval to be included in the. Development Order: That,. in the. event that the right-of--way easement is either purchased by or deeded to the City of Clearwater as actual right-of--way, Unit 7 will become nonconforming to setbacks and will need to follow nonconforming regulations in the. future; 19 . From an overall project standpoint, it appears the mix of units (affordable. and market-rate). is too skewed toward the affordable units.. Concern is that out of 113 total units, only 10 units are market-rate. 20 . Sheet 5 -Finish Floor Elevation Note (on right side of sheet) -. States that the FF will be 0.5 feet higher than building pad elevations,. yet proposed elevations on the plan now show the FF to be 0.7 feet higher than building pad elevations.. Which, is correct? 21 . Concerned with a total of 113 units being proposed with zero recreation opportunities on-site. While there may be a park adjacent to the north, there is no direct access to the park and the hours of operation at the park may not coincide with when recreational activities are desired by the residents. Concerned with this lack of on-site recreational facilities and relationship to market-rate. units. 22 . Since 103 units in this project are being proposed as "affordable housing," where a reduced parking requirement maybe approved, provide the homeowners association document that sets out the requirements for the initial sale and maintenance of the "affordability" of these 103 units. 23 . At the DRC meeting, it was stated (per Neil Thompson) that we want the necessary right-of--way dedicated instead of a R.O.W easement. Setbacks would be measured from the new ROW brie. Other: No Comments Notes: Revisions are necessary for this application, as it is still insufficient to issue a Development Order, and requires re-review by the. Development Review Committee (revise. and resubmit). Development Review Agenda -Thursday, April 3, 2008 -Page 30 SRC Action Agrnda ].1 :5 ~ . 1:00 pm Case Number: PLT2007-000 826 WOODLAWN ST Owner{s}: Woodlawn Church Of God Bd Of T 845 Woodlawn St Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone,. FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL:, No Email Representative: Avid Group _ 2300 Curlew Road Suite 100 Palm Harbor, F134683 -- ~- -- TELEPHONE: 727-789-9500, .FAX: 727-784-6662, E-MAIL: kent.edwards@avidgroup.com Location: 8.1 ACRES. LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WOODLAWN STREET BETWEEN S. MYRTLE AVENUE AND TILLEY AVENUE Atlas Page: 314A Zoning District: I, Institutional Request: Preliminary Plat approval for 113 lots in the proposed Medium Density Residential {MDR) District. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater,. F133763 1821 Springwood Cir S TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: CITY: 11/1/07: WELLS, THOMPSON, RICE, DOHERTY, KELLER, ALBEE, GLENN; 1/3/08: SAME, EXCEPT NO. GLENN; 4/3/08: SAME APPLICANT:, 11/1/07: KENT EDWARDS, ABBEY NAYLOR, CHRIS KONCAL, RICK TONNELL; 1/3/08:. EDWARDS; 4/3/08:. EDWARDS, The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . Conditions 1 - 5 include. responses to the 10/01/07 DRC meeting and additional responses to the current submittal. 1. Indicate on the preliminary plat the dedication of a total of 30-feet ofright-of--way for Woodlawn Street to be measured from the north line of the of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. lObl/07. APPLICANT AGREED TO PROVIDE ARIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT RATHER THAN ADDITIONAL STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR WOODLAWN. AVENUE. ACCORDINGLY, PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLAT A CONTINUOUS. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT 30 FEET IN WIDTH MEASURED FROM THE. NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH,. RANGE 15 EAST. 2. Provide the name, address and telephone. number of the property owner on the preliminary plat. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)2.) 3. Provide proposed street names. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A}6.) 4. Show on the preliminary plat the names of the adjoining plats, appropriately positioned. (Community Development Code. Sec. 4-703{A)7.) 5. Provide area. and dimensions{to nearest foot} of the overall plat,. each lot, street rights-of--way and common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purpose, if any. (Community Development Code Sec., 4-703(A}8 a-d.} 6. The plat of Woodlawn .Terrace Condominum, as recorded in plat book 92, page 32, indicates that 30-feet ofright-af--way for Woodlawn Street was provided, measured from the north line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29. South, Range 15 East. Please correct the preliminary plat document to reflect this condition. 7. The survey submitted with the related FLS case, (FLS2007-10045), incorrectly depicts right-of--way easements attributed to recorded documents, including those recorded in O.R. Book 4793,. Fage 1397. and O.R.. Book 4793, page 1399. Portions. of the. right-of--way easements shown on the Preliminary Plat are incorrect as a result. Please revise preliminary plat accordingly. Environmental: t . No. Issues. Development Review Agenda - Thursday,. Apri13, 2008 -.Page 31 DRC Acnia~ AgmAa F.1 Fire: 1.. No issues Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045. Land Resources: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 __ Landscaping: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Parks and Recreation: 1 . Recreation Land and a recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building pemut or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units.. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824._ (Note: Open space fees are. not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1985.) . Stormwater: i . Show on plat the requested drainage easement of case FLS2007-10045.(A drainage easement shall be provided over the southern portion of the existing ditch adjoining the railroad right-of--way. The easement is to be measured from the western property line to the eastern ditch's top of bank, and shall be dedicated to the City of Clearwater for maintenance purposes} Solid. Waste: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Traffic Engineering: 1 , No issues. Planning: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Other: No Comments Notes: REVISIONS ARE NECESSARY FOR. THIS APFLICATION, AS IT IS STILL 1NSUFFICIENT TO ISSUE A DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND REQUIRES RE-REVIEW BY THE DEVELOFMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (REVISE AND RESUBMIT). Development Review Agenda -Thursday, April 3, 2008 -Page 32 DRC Actew Agrnde I.I !! _ Ao~4-09216 : RE: Affordable H~ng Certification ~ Page 1 of 3 NVetls, Wayne From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 10:13 AM To: Lipowski, Laura; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Lopez, Geraldine Campos Cc: Clayton, Gina; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: A04-03216 : RE: Affordable Housing Certification IbINumAttach: 0 MessageGUID: {BF674F4D-32EF-4A5A-9284-G86FC2$DF707} MsgHeaderlD: <80F72182073070479C86FC6AD53E3FEC422EBE@MSB-EML-1.clearwater-fl.com> OriginalDate: None Originator: SQL Style: Economic Development general miscellaneous For purposes of this development approval process, I have asked Wayne to verify the affordability of this project relative to our provisions which provide incentives under the code. In this case, the incentive is a reduction in the parking requirement. Wayne's charge is to incorporate the affordability understanding/obligation as determined by Housing into the development approval process and ultimately the DO. Beyond that, we are not in a position to monitor the project on an ongoing basis. The only future issue of concern to us might arise if for some reason they leave themselves in a non- conforming status due to deficient parking as a result of a change in status of affordabiiity. That could impact them substantially. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Lipowski, Laura Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 3:46 PM To: Dougall-Sides, Leslie;. Lopez, Geraldine Campos Ce: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: A04-09216 : RE: Affordable Housing Certification To be clear - I'm not worried about the process being cumbersome -that's Geri's call for her department. Certainly if Housing wants to develop a policy and track, etc., that's fine with me. It just seemed like we already monitor these things through planning. A general Land Use restriction would cover the entire development parcel as discussed in the meeting. I meant for the individual units to put a deed restriction in p{ace if the party received Housing Funding separate and apart from the initial development of the project (down payment assistance, etc.) Sorry for the confusion. Laura Lipowski 4/1/2008 t A~4-09216 : RE: Affordable H~ng Certification ~ Page 2 of 3 Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4015 Fax: {727) 562-4021 mailto:Laura.lipowski(c~m~clearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 3:41 PM 70: Lipowski, Laura; Lopez, Geraldine Campos Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: A04-09216 : RE: Affordable Housing Certification Agreed that the Certification process is a step that is not now required and may be cumbersome. The development review process does not track individual buyers and affordability of the units once development approval is granted. Placing a deed restriction on the property as a condition of issuance of the Development Order would be the appropriate mechanism from the Planning standpoint. Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater 1'.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 (727) 562-4010 phone (727) 562-4021 fax Board Certified in City, County and Local Gavernment Law Admitted in Florida, Oregon, and the District of Columbia Senior Professional in Human Resources -----Original Message----- From: Lipowski, Laura Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 3:33 PM To: Lopez, Geraldine Campos Cc: Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: Affordable Housing Certification I have reviewed the Pinellas County Affordable Housing Development Certification, Affordable Housing Development Contract and Application That you provided at Thursday's meeting. As you all know, I am not a planner or the attorney for the planning department, so that may explain my ignorance and why I am having trouble figuring out why Housing should initiate and maintain some sort of "Certification List" with regard to Affordable Housing Development Applicants. It seems to me that approving applicants within agreed upon criteria and monitoring applicants and their projects in line how we normally monitor development applicants/applications might be sufficient, with our database tracking the applications and providing Housing a report reflecting same. If desired, a Land Use Restriction (for a specified time to be determined) would be a development condition. In subsequent 4/1/2008 l A04-09216 : RE: Affordable zng Certification Page 3 of 3 independent transactions for particular units, a Deed Restriction could be implemented. The County documents focus on the County's Development Code and continued "Certification" in order to qualify for enumerated considerations such as increased Density and Fee Relief -but last only until the project is complete. So, the Certification doesn't accomplish the long term goal of maintaining affordable housing. There is no reference to a Land Use Restriction. Let me know - Laura Lipowski. Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4015 Fax: (727) 562-4029 mailto:9aura.lipowski a~?myclearwater.com 4/1/2008 -`- - i ~~ 1 Case Number: FLS2007-10045 -- 826 WOODLAWN ST 1.:00 pm O ~'.~ ' Owners : Woodlawn Church Of God Bd Of T 845 Woodlawn St Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: Na Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Avid Group _ _ 2300 Curlew Road Suite 100 Palm Harbor, F134683 TELEPHONE: 727-789-9500, FAX: 727-784-6662, E-MAIL: kent.edwards@avidgroup.com Location: 8.1 acres located on the north side of Woodlawn Street between S. Myrtle Avenue and Tilley Avenue Atlas Page: 314A Zoning District: I, Institutional Request: Flexible Standard Development application to permit 113 attached dwellings (townhomes) in the proposed Medium. Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A, and Preliminary Plat approval for l 13 lots (PLT2007-00006). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33763 1821 Springwood Cir S TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood South Clearwater Citizens For Progr Association(s): Clearwater, F133756 1.120 Kingsley St. TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: duketieman@aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: 11/1/07: Wells, Thompson, Rice, Doherty, Albee, Keller, Glenn; 1/3/08: Same as 11./1/07, except no Glenn; 4/3/08: Same as 11/1/07 Applicant: 11/]/07: Kent Edwards, Abbey Naylor, Chris Koncal, Rick. Tonnell; 1/3/08: Edwards; 4/3/08 -Edwards The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, Apri13, 2008 -Page 23 DRC Action Agenda LI Prior to the issuance ot~ a building permit: 1. Final plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County prior to the issuance of a building permit. (Community Development Code 4-708) 2. Applicant shall deed or dedicate to the City of Clearwater aright-of--way easement for Woodlawn Street to provide a total of 30-feet ofright-of--way or aright-of--way easement to be measured from the north line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 o~f Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East along the entire Woodlawn Street frontage of the subject property wherever such right-of--way easement or right-of--way doesn't presently exist. 3. Project wall fronting. on Woodlawn Street is shown in an area of the site that is presently or will become aright-of--way easement. Wall shall be relocated outside of any existing/proposed right-of-way easement. 4. The condominium plat of Waodlawn Terrace I indicates 30-feet of street right-of--way for Woodlawn Street measured from the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. Please amend the site plan. to show this existing street right-of--way for Woodlawn Street. 5. Turning radii at all intersections shall be a minimum. of 30 feet pee City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #106. 6. Depict on the utility plan a sample point at the temporary blow off at the far northeast end of the proposed new water main. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy I . Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field. inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Environmental: 1 . Prior to DO, submit a copy of the letter from Southwest Florida Water Management District confn-ming no wetlands are on the property. Fire: 1 . The streets in this development are Fire Access Roads and per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, NFPA 1 18.2.2.5.8 a clear width of 24' must be maintained at all times. "NO PARKING -FIRE LANE BY ORDER OF THE FIRE DEFT" are to be posted. at a maximum of CO' apart. These signs will be 12" by 18" with a white background and red letters and shall be no more than 7" in hieght from. roadway to bottom of sign. They shall also be within sight of the roadway. Provide details and confirmation PRIOR TO DO Harbor Master: No issues. Legal Project is seeking lesser amount of parking pursuant to Sec. 3-919, which states that required parking "may" be reduced to one parking space per unit for affordable housing units as defined by ED/Housing. A. Applicant will be required to record restrictive covenant guaranteeing affordability of units for appropriate time period, with language to satisfaction of City Attorney, prior to issuance of any building permit. B. Plat as recorded must contain language guaranteeing affordability of units for appropriate time period to satisfaction of City Attorney. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, Apri13, 2008 -Page 24 DRC Action Agrnda 1.l i • Land Resources: 1 , 12/27/07-Provide an east/west section through tree # 8, show root prune limits if needed. 4/1/08-The submitted responce letter states that the condition was addressed on sheet TP 1 which was not submitted. Submit prior to D.J. Additional comments may be forthcoming once received and reviewed. 2 . 10/24/07-The Preservation Plan must reflect which trees require special attention such as root pruning, tunneling and canopy elevating, ie: root prunig at tree #205. The plan must be more precise- Revise prior to D.O. 12/27/07-Show the root prune limits for the top of banks @ trees #60, 199, 203, 205 and the two trees east of building 11 units 18 and 19. Insure the plans reflect the specifications and visa versa. Also show tree barricade limits ~a all trees to remain on site and those trees among the property bounderies. 4/1/08-The submitted responce letter states tfiat the condition was addressed on sheet TP2 which was not submitted. Submit prior to D.O. Additional comments maybe forthcoming once received and reviewed.. - Landscaping: , 1 , 3/31/08 --WW Response states that Cross-section G shows buffer landscaping, but (assumed to be Section g on Sheet 9} nothing is so indicated on Section G. 12/30/07 - WW Section 3-1202.D.2 states: "Front slopes of stormwater retention areas may comprise up to 50 percent of any required landscape buffer width, provided that the slope is 4:1 or flatter and all required shrub plantings are not more than six inches below the top of the bank and provided that the buffer width is at least five feet in width." Based on the pond design. on Sheet 5, cross-section G on Sheet 9 and the proposed landscaping on Sheet L5, provide evidence on a cross-section of pond design and landscaping compliance with this Code section. 2 , From a buffering standpoint to the adjacent single family dwelling on the west side of the eastern portion of the site, recommend extending the six-foot high decorative wall along the west property line of the eastern portion of the site to within 25 feet of the front property line, - reducing to three-foot high to the front property line. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Site data table needs to be corrected to reflect correct number of existing residential units. Recreation Land and a recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building pem-it or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. (Note: Open space fees are not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1985.) Stormwater: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, Apri13, 2008 -Page 25 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 The following shal~be addressed at building permit application: 1. Update the plan to show the entire top-of--bank of the ditch located on the west side of the subject property. 2. Show on the plans a drainage easement to be dedicated to the City prior to CO over the drainage on the west side of the property to provide access for City maintenance. The easement shall extend from the Woodlawn Street right-of--way on the south to the existing drainage easement on the north and from the west property line to a parallel line tangent to the ditch top-of--bank where it is furthest. from the west property hne. 3. The ADS roof drain system shown on the plan is not complete. Please show clearly the location of downspout connections to roof drain system. Provide calculations showing the size of gutter, downspout connections to the drainage system and demonstrate that the roof drain system is sufficient to direct all roof runoff to the retention ponds and not overflowing to the adjacent properties to the east. Furthermore, Cross Section E on Sheet 9 indicates grading that slopes toward adjacent properties. Provide a design that will not direct drainage to adjacent properties. 4. Demonstrate that the eastern side bank of the existing ditch adjoining the railroad right-of--way will. remain stable with the placement of additional fill. 5. The fence around the entire concrete headwall of the ditch is not shown on the revised plan as stated in the response to comments. 6. Cross sections shall be drawn to scale as requested. 7. Provide the drawdown analysis of the pond #2D. The double ring test was provided, but the drawdown analysis of pond # 20 has not included with either this or the previous submittal. 8. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit. 9. Show the sub-basins for the storm inlets; the sub-basins are not shown on plans. 10. Sump is not permitted in proposed pond # 20. Ductile iron pipe(s) maybe an option to the depth cover issues. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Pemvt Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: 1 . Please show stowage area for black barrels Traffic Engineering: 1 , 1. The lack. of visitor parking will encourage on street parking thereby making maneuverability difficult for emergency and sanitation vehicles. Provide a solution to prevent vehicles from parking on the street. 2. Describe how the gate on the west entrance to the property is proposed to function. The above to be addressed prior to a Development Order (D.O.). General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Buildmg Pernut Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Pernut Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, April 3, 2008 -Page 26 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 1 . 3/30/08 - WW ~ • The site layout produces no place for visitors to park. It is highly unlikely the "affordable" units will be stricktly limited to only having one car, and that that one car will be parked in the garage. Based on the Fire Department's comments and concerns with accessibility through this development where residents and visitors will park in the street creating impassible streets for residents, visitors, garbage trucks and fire trucks, that insufficient parking, especially for visitors, is provided. Section 3-919 for affordable housing states that parking MAS' be reduced to one parking space per unit. Staff has serious concerns regarding the site layout of units and insufficient parking provided. 12/27/07 & 10/25/07 - WW Parking has been designed in a manner where the two parking spaces are stacked, requiring the vehicle in the driveway to be moved to allow the vehicle in the garage to exit. As such, there is only one parking space provided per unit. Need to provide one additional parking space per unit. 2 . 3/30/08, 12/30/07 & 10/30!07 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Development Order: That approval of this Flexible Standard Development (FLS) application be subject to the approval. of the change to land use and zoning under LUZ2006-08006. As such, no Final Plat may be approved by City Council and no building permits to construct horizontal or vertical improvements may be issued until LUZ2006-08006 is approved. 3 . 3/30/08 - WW Fence/wall now shown. Parking for Unit 11.3 still not screened from view from Woodlawn Street. Reconunend a hedge along the south side of the driveway of Unit 113 from the sidewalk to the unit front. 12/30/07 - WW Based on the response in the December 3, 2007, letter, show the location of the six-foot high fence/wall along the property lines on Sheets 4, L4 and L5. Unclear how applicant intends to screen parking from view from Woodlawn Street to be in compliance with this flexibility criteria. Revise. 10/29/07 - W W Flexibility criteria requires off-street parking to be screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. Show on all appropriate site and landscape plans. 4 . 3/31./08 - WW Response says revised floor plans showing where the black barrels will be in the garage was submitted. However, 1 don't fmd any revised floor plans submitted. 12/30/07 - WW Since black barrels are to be used. for solid waste storage for individual units, and since these black barrels are to be stored out of sight, provide evidence through floor plans that the black barrels physically can be stored within the individual garages along with a vehicle. 5 . 3/31/08 - WW Elevations now indicate the building height at 21'-1 7/8'". Revise height on Sheet 1 of civil plans to match. 12/27/07 - WW Thank you for adding such information to Sheet 1 of the civil drawings. Still need to add, to building elevarions, which. have not been resubmitted. 10/25/07 - WW Building elevations -Provide the height of the proposed buildings from grade to the midpoint of the pitched roof of the main portion of the building. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, Apri13, 200$ -Page 27 SRC Action Agmida L 1 9 10 3/31/08 - WW ~ • Sight triangles incorrectly shown for the eastern driveway on Sheets 4 and L5. Revise to be located along the driveway and front property line. No landscaping is shown within the triangles, which the Code permits but must be maintained below 30-inches in height. Show shrubs on L5. Ensure signs and fencing are not located within the visibility triangles. Nate: Signage must meet required setbacks of fve feet from property lines. 12/30/07 - WW Visibility triangles are still shown incorrectly on Sheets 4 and L5. Ensure poposed landscaping meets Code provisions for visibility triangles. Revise. 10/12/07 - WW Visibility triangles are shown on these sheets, but are drawn in the wrong locations. Revise to be along the front property line and the edge of the driveways. 10/2/07 - W W Show on Sheets 4 and LS all required visibility triangles per City Code. 3/31/08, 12/30/07 & .10/30/07 - WW Note: Signage, which will need to meet Code requirements, will be handled separately through. sign permits. 3/31/08 - Ww Response sheet indicates revised floor plans were submitted, yet none were submitted. 12/30!07 & 10/29/07 - WW All floor plan. sheets are labeled Sheet 2 of 4. Unclear why they are so indicated when they show. different floor plans. Revise. 3/31J08 - WW Response says an exhibit was submitted, yet none was submitted. Additionally, the note on Sheet 4 regarding "stem wall units" makes the screen rooms further confusing. 12/27/07 - WW December 3, 2007 response letter did not respond to the comment below. Comment deals with the note "optional screen. enclosure under cantilever" indicated on the narrow units but not the wider units. If typical for all units, indicate "typical for all units" as part of #his note on revised floor plans. 10/29/07 - WW Floor plans for the narrow units indicate at the rear of the unit where the second floor cantilevers over the ground floor patio that there is an "optional screen enclosure under cantilever." This is not similarly shown on the wider units. If such is an option for the wider units, revise to indicate such. 3/31/08 - WW Once you have explored the additional alternatives, please submit what you intend (prior to issuance of a Development Order). 12/27/07 & 10/19/07 - WW Based on the floor plans, windows are "optional" for the end unit, second floor narrow units only (wider units apparently don't have any "optional" windows on the end units). As these windows are "optional," the sides of the units will be blank walls, which is not appealing. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, April 3, 2008 -Page 2$ DRC Adien Agenda 1.1 11 . 3/31/08 - WW There is no detail attached to the response. The rear of the units with stem walls is still a problem. The note/table an Sheet 4 still makes this circumstance unclear, now that it says the patio will be cantilevered. 12/30/07 - WW Response in the December 3, 2007, letter did not address the comment below from 10/12/07. Revise. to/lz/o7 - ww Floor plans indicate "optional. screen enclosure under cantilever" with a door to the rear from this screen enclosure. Units 66 - 94 still shown with stem walls at the edge of the cantilever, which is still a problem. 10/2/07 - WW As a heads-up, while it is not part of a completeness review, the building elevations indicate sliding glass doors at the rear of units. By Building Code, there must be at least athree-foot wide stoop outside the sliding glass doors. Such stoops/patios must meet required setbacks. Additionally, certain. buildings are indicated with a stem wall at the rear of the buildings, which can. create additional issues regarding these stoops/patios. It is advised to look at this in greater detail to avoid comments requiring redesign during the DRC review process. 12 . There continues to be a disconnect between the floor plans, building elevations and the site plan: a. Note: No new floor plans were submitted; b. Previously submitted floor plans indicate the two-car garage larger units to have an overall length dimension of 52'-4", yet the one-car garage smaller units have an overall length dimension of 54'-8". The site plan indicates both the two-car larger units and the one-car smaller units to have the same overall length dimension of approximately 55 ; c. The previously submitted floor plans still show the two-car garage larger units with cone-car garage door; d. Site plans now have changed the floor plan/unit layout (dark wider lines} to approximately 50 feet in length with a lighter, narrower area at the rear of the units, potentially indicating the patios, but other lines make this unclear; e. Sheet 4 has added anote/table for "stem wall units", but this only further complicates and makes the proposal more unclear. Unclear how there will be cantilevered patios, as there is no detail on Sheet 9; f. Building elevations submitted with this resubmission are no different than what was submitted previously; ' g. Rear building elevations for the first floor do not conform to the previously submitted floor plans, as there are no windows, just sliding glass doors; h. Site plan indicates end two-car larger units paired with none-car smaller unit so that the garages are adjacent to each other. There are no front elevations submitted showing such an adjacency garage situation, which, in order to keep the same height of the garage roof, the pitch/slope of the one-car/two-car adjacency roof would be different than other two-car only or two one-car adjacency garage roofs would produce. Likewise, the site plan indicates single one-car garages not attached to another garage, yet no building elevation has been submitted showing such. situation; i. There does not appear any semblance, especially in light of the, intended modular construction, of architectural integrity.of how building units are placed together to form a building design that produces similarity, Units appear to be crammed together without any regard to the building layout and elevation such cramming produces. Examples include: Building with Units 44-53 - single one-car garage are on each end, yet for efficiency of design, construction and cost, it would seem that one of these end units should be shifted. to the other end of the building to produce two one-car garages adjacent to each other. Another example is the building with Units 35-43 - It would seem unit 36 should be shifted to the north side of unit 43 to produce two one-car garages adjacent to each other. 13 . A note has been. added regarding the retaining wall with 4-foot high fence on the west side of the fire truck turnaround west of Units 44 and 64. This note states this has to be designed by a licensed engineer. Unclear if you mean a structural engineer, since Avid. is a licensed (civil) engineer. 14 . Remove the wrought iron fence, Pond 20 berm and landscaping from the right-of--way easement (both sides of the property) (assumed to be the dashed line shown on Sheet 4). ' 15 . Show the gate and how it is to open (swing or slide) for the western street (Cranberry Avenue}. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, Apri13, 2008 -Page 29 DRC Action Agn~da 1.1 16 . There are inconsistencies between slopes indicated on Sheet 5 and theaetails on Sheet 9. Plan indicates 4:1 slope, but the details indicate 6:1 slope. Which slope is correct (Sheet 5 or the details on Sheet 9)?: a_ Building with Units 103-113 -Detail F; and b. Building with Units 54-63 -Detail K. 17 . Sheet 4 -Curb widening detail appears to present issues with the adjacent sidewalk from a handicap.accessibility standpoint. Shouldn't the sidewalk be a consistent four-feet wide, wrapping around or extending from the curb widening shown on the detail? The sidewalk was bent around the storm manhole between Units 92 & 93. - 1$ . Condition. of approval to be included in the Development Order: That, in the event that the right-of--way easement is either purchased by or' deeded to the City of Clearwater as actual right-of--way, Unit 7 will become nonconforming to setbacks and will need to follow nonconforming regulations in the future; 19 . From an overall project standpoint, it appears the mix of units (affordable and market-rate) is too skewed toward the affordable units. Concern is that out of 113 total units, only 10 units are market-rate. 20 . Sheet 5 -Finish Floor Elevation Note (on right side of sheet) -States that the FF will be 0.5 feet higher than building pad elevations, yet proposed elevations on the plan now show the FF to be 0.7 feet higher than building pad elevations. Which is correct? 21 . Concerned with a total of 113 units being proposed with zero recreation opportunities on-site. While there may be a park adjacent to the north, there is no direct access to the park and the hours of operation at the park may not coincide with when recreational activities are desired by the residents. Concerned with this lack of on-site recreational facilities and relationship to market-rate units. Other: No Cornments Notes: Revisions are necessary for this application, as it is still insufficient to issue a Development Order, and requires re-review by the Development Review Conurtittee (revise and resubmit). Development Review Agenda -Thursday, April 3, 2008 -Page 30 DRC Action Agrnda LI 1.:00 m Case Number: PLT2007-0006b -- 826 WOODLAWN ST P ©wner(s}: Woodlawn Church Of God Bd Of T 845 Woodlawn St Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Avid Group 2300 Curlew Road Suite 100 Palm Harbor, F134683 TELEPHONE: 727-789-9500, FAX: 727-784-6662, E-MAIL: kent.edwards@avidgroup.com Location: 8.1 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WOODLAWN STREET BETWEEN S. MYRTLE AVENUE AND TILLEY AVENUE Atlas Page: 314A Zoning District: I, Institutional Request: Preliminary Plat approval for 113 lots in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33763 1821 Springwood Cir S • TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner llI Attendees Included: CITY: 11/1/07: WELLS, THOMPSON, RICE, DOHERTY, KELLER, ALBEE, GLENN; 1/3/08: SAME, EXCEPT NO GLENN; 4/3/08: SAME APPLICANT: 11/1./07: KENT EDWARDS, ABBEY NAYLOR, CHRIS KONCAL, RICK TONNELL; 1/3/08: EDWARDS; 4/3/08: EDWARDS, The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . Conditions 1 - 5 include responses to the 10/01/07 DRC meeting and additional responses to the current submittal. 1. Indicate on the preliminary plat the dedication of a total of 30-feet ofright-of--way for Woodlawn Street to be measured from the north line of the of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section. 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. 10/O1/07 APPLICANT AGREED TO PROVIDE ARIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT RATHER THAN ADDITIONAL STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR WOODLAWN AVENUE. ACCORDINGLY, PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLAT A CONTINUOUS RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT 30 FEET 1N WIDTH MEASURED FROM THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST. 2. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the property owner on the preliminary plat. (community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)2.) 3. Provide proposed street names. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)6.) 4. Shaw on the preliminary plat the names of the adjoining plats, appropriately positioned. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)7.) 5. Provide area and dimensions (to nearest foot) of the overall plat, each lot, street rights-of--way and con~non open space or other land. to be dedicated for a public purpose, if any. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)8 a-d.) 6. The plat of Woodlawn Terrace Condominum, as recorded in plat book 92, page 32, indicates that 30-feet of right-of--way for Woodlawn Street was provided, measured from. the north line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. Please correct the preliminary plat document to reflect this condition. 7, The survey submitted with the related FLS case, (FLS2007-10045), incorrectly depicts right-of--way easements attributed to recorded documents, including those recorded. in O.R. Book 4793, Page 1397 and O.R. Book 4793, page 1399. Portions of the right-of--way easements shown on the Preliminary Plat are incorrect as a result. Please revise preliminary plat accordingly. Environmental.: t . No Issues. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, April 3, 2008 -Page 31 DRC Action Agenda L I Fire: 1 . No issues Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045. Laud Resources: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Landscaping: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Parks and Recreation: 1 . Recreation Land and a recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. (Note: Open space fees are not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1985.) Stormwater: 1 , Show on plat the requested drainage easement of case FLS2007-10045.(A drainage easement shall be provided over the southern portion of the existing ditch adjoining the railroad right-of-way. The easement is to be measured from the western property line to the eastern ditch's top of bank, and shall be dedicated to the City of Clearwater for maintenance purposes) Solid Waste: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Traffic Engineering.; 1 , No issues. Planning: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Other: No Comments Notes: REVISIONS ARE NECESSARY FOR THIS APPLICATION, AS IT IS STILL INSUFFICIENT TO ISSUE A DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND REQUIRES RE-REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (REVISE AND RESUBMIT}. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, Apri13, 2008 -Page 32 DAC Action Agenda 1.1 _, • • Wells, Wayne From: Lopez, Geraldine Campos Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 8:46 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: FLS2007-10045/ELT2007-00006, 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street ' Thanks, I'll discuss with Gina. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 8:45 AM To: Lopez, Geraldine Campos Subject: RB: FLS2007-10045/PLT2007-00006, 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street By "Michael" 1 assume Michael Delk. Mr. Delk will be out of the office until next Monday. -----Original Message----- From: Lopez, Geraldine Campos Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 8:43 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: Re: FLS2007-10045/PLT2007-00006, 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street Wayne- I have the letter drafted. There is just one policy item I need to discuss with Michael and the ACM. Will have that for you today. Thanks, Geri City of Clearwater Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne To: Lopez, Geraldine Campos CC: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Sent: Fri Mar 07 17:46:01 2008 Subject: FL52007-10045/PLT2007-00006, 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street Geri - I have never received a response from you on this subject. I have the applicant calling saying they intend to resubmit next week. The issue of whether and how many of these units are "affordable housing" and its relationship to required parking affects this project's design. Could you please the confirmation requested (see below}? Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 11:28 AM To: Lopez, Geraldine Campos Cc: Thompson, Neil; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael Subject: FLS2007-10045/FLT2007-00006, 802, 826 and 830 Woodlawn Street Geri - The above referenced project has been filed to redevelop the above properties with an attached dwelling (townhomes) project named Townhomes at Lake Bellevue. A Planning Department DRC review comment is: "Parking has been designed in a manner where the two 1 Fn k~ parking spaces are stacked, requiring the vehicle in the driveway to be moved to allow the vehicle in the garage to exit. As such, there is only one parking space provided per unit. Need to provide one additional parking space per unit." The applicant has indicated that the project will have affordable units, where only one parking space is required by Section 3-919 of the Code. Section 3-919 states the following: '"The minimum off-street parking requirement for affordable housing units, as defined by the City of Clearwater Economic Development and Housing Department, may be reduced to one parking space per unit in any zoning district where residential uses are permitted." By letter to you dated December 17, 2007, Steven Williamson with Johnson, Pope, et al has indicated that a minimum of 107 units in this project will meet the definition of "affordable". In order to qualify for reduced parking for such affordable units, T need confirmation from your department that such units planned for this project meet the City's definition of "affordable housing units". All units that don't meet the City's definition must comply with the Planning Department comment regarding required parking above. Such confirmation may be via email or by letter. Thanks. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner TII City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Phone: 727-562-4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 2 9:35 am ~ Case Number: FLS2007-100 5 -- 826 WOODLAWN ST 1 Owner(s): Woodlawn Church. Of God Bd Of T • 845 Woodlawn St Clearwater, F133756 ~~ TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representa#ive: Avid Group ~ ~~ - 2300 Curlew Road Suite 100 Palm Harbor, Fl 34683 TELEPHONE: 727-789-9500, FAX: 727-784-6662, E-MAIL: kent.edwards@avidgroup.com Location; 8.1 acres located on the north side of Woodlawn Street between S. Myrtle Avenue and Tilley Avenue Atlas Page: 314A Zoning District: I, Institutional Request: Flexible Standard Development application to permit 11.5 attached. dwellings {townhomes} in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A, and Preliminary Plat approval for 115 lots (PLT2007-00006). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood South Clearwater Citizens For Progr Association(s): Clearwater, F133756 1120 Kingsley St. TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: duketieman@aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner TII Attendees Included: City: 11/1/07: Wells, Thompson, Rice, Doherty, Albee, Keller, Glenn; 1/3/08: Same as 11/1/07, except no Glenn Applicant: 1.1/1/07: Kent Edwards, Abbey Naylor, Chris Koncal, Rick Tonnell; 1/3/08: Edwards The DRC reviewed this application with the following commen#s: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 3 bRC Action Agrnda L 1 1 . Prior to the issuance of a Development Order: 1. Proposed plans shall indicate dedication of aright-of--way easement for Woodlawn Street to provide a total of 30-feet ofright-of--way or aright-of--way easement to be measured from the north line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. Please note that the right-of--way easements shown on the survey previously submitted do not agree with the pubic records referenced on the survey. 2. The condominium plat of Woodlawn Terrace I indicates 30-feet of street right-of--way measured from the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. Please amend the site plan to show this existing street right-ol=way far Woodlawn Street. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Applicant shall provide a sanitary manhole detail showing how farce main will be connected to the manhole. 2. Applicant shall provide a manhole liner to protect man~iole from force main effluent. 3. Provide a copy of an approved Florida Department of Environmental Protection (D.E.P.) permit for the construction of new water mains on the subject property. 4. All fire hydrant assemblies installed. greater than 10 ft. from a water main shall be constructed with ductile iron pipe and shall have a gate valve at the tee on the branch line, and at the fire hydrant assembly (F.H.A.). 5. Fire hydrant leads shall have a minimum inside diameter of 6-inches. 6. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved Florida Department of Environmental Protection (D.E.P.) permit for the installation of the sanitary sewer extension. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 7. Applicant shall bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building PetYnit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Pernut Application. General Note: if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Environmental: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, ]anuary 3, 240$ -Page 4 pRC Action Agrnda L 1 The following three conditions were acknowledged in a letter. datedriecember 3, 2007: 1, The plans provided show fill and structures within wetlands and wetland buffers. The City of Cleanvater's Community Development Code Section 3-907 states, "A vegetative buffer shall be provided. on all lands within 25 feet of any property designated on the Zoning Atlas as preservation (P), or'any property determined to be wetlands under the jurisdiction of the State of Florida ("jurisdictional wetlands"); and all lands within 15 feet of the top of the bank of any creeks, channels, or i-elated waterways which containjurisdictional wetlands." Revise plans so structures or parking lots do not impact wetlands or wetland buffers. 2. The City's Design Criteria Storm Drainage rules require wet detention ponds to incorporate a vegetated littoral shelf over 35% of the area of the pond under normal conditions. Provide a planting plan. for Wetland Detention Pond 10. Fire: 3. Provide a planting plan for littoral shelf in Pond 11. New conditions (12/19/07): Prior to the issuance of a Development Order: i . The City of Clearwater's Community Development Cade Section 3-907 requires a 1 S foot setback from the top of the bank from any channel or waterway. Units 1-4 are located within the 15 foot setback of the waterway on the west side of the property. Revise plans so structures are not within this setback. 2. Provide evidence from the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) that no wetlands occur on the site, specifcally in the northwest corner. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: 3. A planting plan for Pond 11 was not. in the plans submitted. Provide a planting plan for Pond 11. NO ISSUES Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 , 10/24/07-The Preservation Plan must reflect which trees require special attention such. as root pruning, tunneling and canopy elevating, ie: root prunig at tree #205. The plan must be more precise. Revise prior to D,O. 12/27/07-Show the root prune limits for the top of banks @ trees #60, 199, 203,. 205 and the two trees east of building 11 units 18 and 19. Insure the plans reflect the specifications and visa versa. Also show tree barricade lin>its @ all trees to remain on site and those trees anlong the property boundaries. 2 . Provide an eastlwest section through tree # 8, show root prune limits if needed. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 200$ -Page 5 DRC Actiou Agmda 1.1 1 . Sheet L6 - Revised-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Based. on other unit plans, there should be a sidewalk along the front of the units adjacent to the private street. Show the sidewalk and revise the plant counts of AP on`"the plan and in the plant schedule; b. Plant schedule indicates 14 IiB, but I count 12 HB; c. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 30 AV; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 25 CR; e. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; f. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 724 AP (see "a" above}; g. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I don't count any {0) DV; h. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but i don't count any (0) LEG; and i. Plan indicates 14 MWA, but the plant schedule doesn't have MWA in it. Z . Sheet L6 -Revise 7-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Based on other unit plans, there appears to be a sidewalk along the front of the units adjacent to the private street. Revise the location of AP and confirm plant counts on plan. and in plant schedule; b. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 20 HB; c. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 18 AV; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 15 CR; e. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; f. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 422 AP (see "a" above); g. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I count 30 DV; and h. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I don't count any (0) LEG. 3 , Sheet L8 -Revise 11-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 24 HB; b. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 20 AV; c. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 20 CR; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; e. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 661 AP; £ Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I count 45 DV; g. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I don't count any (0) LEG; h. Plan indicates 22 JP, but the plant schedule doen't include JP; and i. Plan does not indicate the sidewalk along the front adjacent to the private street on the left hand side between the single and double driveways and doesn't indicate any Landscaping (probably AP). Revise plan and plant schedule. 4 . Sheet L6 -Revise 6-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Based on other unit plans, there appears to be a sidewalk along the front of the units adjacent to the private street. Revise the location of AP and confirm plant counts on plan and in plant schedule; b. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 6 HB; c. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 14 CR; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any {0) LC; e. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 144 AP (see "a" above); f Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I count 20 DV; g. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I count 57 LEG; and h. Plan indicates 21 JP, but the plant schedule doesn't indicate JP at all. 5 , Sheet L7 -Revise 9-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 16 HB; b. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 30 AV; c. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 15 CR; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but 1 don't count any (0} LC; e. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 555 AP; f. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I count 58 DV; and g. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I don't count any (0} LEG. 6 . Sheet L6 -Remove 5-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule. There are na 5-unit buildings proposed. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, 7anuary 3, 2008 -Page 6 oec aciioa agenda i.i 7 . Sheet L7 -Revise l0-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 20 HB; b. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 20 AV; c. Plant schedule indicates S CR, but I count 15 CR; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; e. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 874 AP; f. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I don't count any (0) DV; g. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I don't count any (0) LEG; and h. There are driveway dividers in the four double driveways but no landscaping is specified {either AP or LEG). Revise plan and plant schedule. 8 . Section 3-1202.D.2 states: "Front slopes of stormwater retention areas may comprise up to 50 percent of any required landscape buffer width, provided that the slope is 4:1 or flatter and all required shrub plantings are not more than six inches below the top of the bank and provided that the buffer width is at least five feet in width." Based on the pond design on Sheet 5, cross-section G on Sheet 9 and the proposed landscaping on Sheet L5, provide evidence on a crass-section of pond design and landscaping compliance with this Code section. Parks and Recreation: 1 . A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. {Note: Open space and recreation land fees are not due on this project as land. had been given to the~City in 1985:) Stormwater: Development Review Agenda =Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 7 DRC Action Agcnda 1. i 1 , ~ The following sh~be addressed prior to Development Ordez. 1. Provide 50' adjacent topography and. finished floor elevations of adjacent structures. Revised plan shows 50' topography of only the northeastern area; please provide the entire 50' adjacent topography (See section E submittal requirements on FLS application) 2. There have been flooding problems occurring at the multi-family development directly adjacent to the proposed project on the northeast side. Revised drainage report shows that basin 30 has been removed along with the by-pass Swale along the eastern property line. Drainage report also states that most of runoff from basin 30 has been accommodated by the existing on-site drainage system. Please delineate on the plan which portion. of basin 30 has been managed. by the existing Swale and which portion is still needed to be attenuated. Ta avoid worsening the existing flooding problems, a Swale system with inlets shall be designed and dipicted on the plan to accommodate remaining off-site runoff that not managed by the existing Swale and runoff from the roof of the proposed townhonries. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. I. Demonstrate that the eastern side bank of the existing ditch adjoirring the railroad right-ot=way will be stable with the placement of additional fill. 2. Show more proposed spot elevations, especially around the back of all units. Behind unit 14 and the end of street A, it appears that the grade slopes toward the adjacent property, this is not an acceptable design. 3. A drainage easement over the southern portion of the existing ditch adjoining the railroad right-of--way, measured from the western property line to the eastern ditch's top of bank, shall be dedicated to the City for maintenance purposes. 4. A fence shall be installed around entire the concrete headwall, of the ditch and along the eastern bank where the bank slope is steeper than 4:1 5. Please show finished floor elevations, not pad elevations. Finished floor elevations shall be minimum of 1' higher than the adjacentcrown of the road. 6. What is the structure number and the invert elevation for the miter end section of the pond #11 outfall? The outfall pipe"s slope is not legible. Please revise plan accordingly. 7. Please affirm in the drainage report and supportive documentation. that the pond # 11 outfall will not create erosion downstream. 8. The ADS roof drain system shown on plan is not complete. Please show clearly the location of downspouts connecting to the roof drain system with inlet along the back of all units to catch all runoff and direct it to the ponds. 9. Cross sections provided in the revised plan do not show actual elevations and are not drawn to scale. Is the top of bank of pond 20 at elevation 49 or 52? Please review and revise plan, drainage report, and cross sections accordingly. l0. Percolation test was not included in the drainage report as stated in the response of 12/03/07. Please provide a soil report, seasonal high water table, and a 24-hours pond draw down analysis based on double ring test. 11. Provide a SWFWMD pernt and approved grading plan from this agency at the building penmit application. 12. Demonstrate that the proposed storm system can. handle a 10-year storm event by providing storm tabulations, delineation of sub-basin for each proposed inlet, and. other supportive data. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all information again for review Solid Waste: 1 , No issues. Traffic Engineering: 1 . No Tssues. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 200$ -Page 8 DRC Action Ag©"da 1_C 12/2.7/07 & 10/ 12/07 - W W On the building elevations, indicate the proposed exterior materials and colors of the building by name. Provide a color legend as to building face color, door and garage door colors and facia color. It is presumed that the facia color will not be the same color as the building face color. Z . 12!27/07 - WW December 3, 2007, response letter states the responses to these criteria is on a separate sheet. I do not find this separate sheet. 10/12/07 & 10/2/07 - WW Provide responses to the following Flexible Standard Development criteria for attached dwellings. Explain HOW each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel which is designated as iow density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. 3 . 12/27/07 - WW December 3, 2007 response letter did not respond to the comment below. Comment deals with the note "optional screen enclosure under cantilever" indicated on the narrow units but not the wider units. If typical for all units, indicate "typical for all units" as part of this note on revised floor plans. 10/29/07 - WW Floor plans for the narrow units indicate at the rear of the unit where the second floor cantilevers over the ground floor patio that there is an "optional screen enclosure under cantilever."' This is not similarly shown on the wider units. If such is an option for the wider units, revise to indicate such. 4 . 12/30/07 - WW Sheet 1 - c. Revise Proposed Building Height to what the actual height is proposed. 10/25/07 - WW Sheet 1 -Revise Site Data for the following: a. Property Address -Add 830 Woodlawn Street; b. Property Zoning -Add after MDR (Medium Density Residential) (Proposed under LUZ2006-08006); adn c. Maximum Building Height -Revise to actual height. 5 . 12/27/07 & 10/19/07 - WW Based on the floor plans, windows are "optional" for the end unit, second floor narrow units only (wider units apparently don't have any "optional" windows on the end units). As these windows are "optional,°' the sides of the units will be blank walls, which is not appealing. 6 . 12/30/07 - WW Response in the December 3, 2007, letter did not address the comment below from 10/12/07. Revise. to/lz/a7 - ww Floor plans indicate "optional screen enclosure under cantilever" with a door to the rear from this screen enclosure. Units 66 - 94 still. shown with stem walls at the edge of the cantilever, which is still a problem. 10/2/07 - W W As a heads-up, while it is not part of a completeness review, the building elevations indicate sliding glass doors at the rear of units. By Building Code, there must be at least athree-foot wide stoop outside the sliding glass doors. Such stoops/patios must meet required setbacks. Additionally, certain buildings are indicated with. a stem wall at the rear of the buildings, which -can create additional issues regarding these stoops/patios. It is advised to look at this in greater detail to avoid comments requiring redesign during the DRC review process. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, Ianuary 3, 2008 -Page 9 DRC. Acuan Agrnda 1.1 7 _ 12,30,07 - WW i Response in December 3, 2007, letter is insufficient. In order to obtain. a Development Order, revise site layout and/or floor plans appropriately as requested below. 10/1.2/07 - WW Site plan layout of units and entries do not match submitted floor plans and building elevations. The following are differences that need to be shown on revised site plans: a. floor plans indicate a protruding garage with a recessed entry area. Site plans don't indicate such {rectangle box shown); b. floor plans submitted for the wider, three-bedroom wets indicate a side entry for the unit, yet the site plan indicates two units (86 and 115) with a front entry for the unit; and c. floor plans submitted only show a front entry for the narrow units, yet the site plan indicates side entry for wider Units 20, 30, 45, 55, 66, 73, 74, 80, 94, 95, 104 and 105. 8 . 12/30/07 & 10/30/07 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Development Order: That approval of this Flexible Standard Development (FLS) application be subject #o the approval of the change to land use and zoning under LUZ2006-08006. As such, no Final Plat maybe approved by City Council and no building permits to construct horizontal or vertical improvements may be issued until LUZ2006-08006 is approved. 9 . 12/27/07 & 10/25/07 - WW Parking has been designed in a manner where the two parking spaces are stacked, requiring the vehicle in the driveway to be moved to allow the vehicle in the garage to exit. As such, there is only one parking space provided per unit. Need to provide one additional parking space per unit. 10 . 12/30/07 - WW Response in the December 3, 2007, letter states afence/wall as suggested below will be installed. Indicate the fence/wall on Sheets 4 and L5. 10/30/07 - WW From. a buffering standpoint to address compatibility of adj acent uses, recommend the installation of a six-foot high solid fence or wall with landscaping on the inside of the fence/wall adjacent to the three detached dwellings that this project wraps around (806, 818 and 822 Woodlawn Street). Within the front setback adjacent to Woodlawn Street, the fence/wall/ must be reduced to a maximum of three feet in height. 11 . 12/27/07 & i0/12/07 - WW Provide building elevations for all fours sides of the proposed buildings. Submitted front building elevations continue to show end units with. atwo-car garage. Based on Sheet 4 and. the submitted floor plans, there are no two-car garages. Revise building elevations to show reality circumstances. 10/2/07 - WW Based. on the site layout on Sheet 4, buildings range from b - 11 units in each building. The building elevations submitted is for afour-unit building and depicts units with. atwo-car garage. The site plan does not indicate any two-car garages. The building elevations also depict units that have many planes to the faces of the building, however, the site plan indicates rectangular buildings. Provide building elevations that will be typical to this development. 12 . 12/30/07 - WW Unclear of the meaning of the last sentence in second paragraph. Revise. 10/30/07 - WW Response to General Applicability criteria #6 (Page 2 of FLS application} -The future land use for the three lots fronting on Woodlawn Street this property surrounds, as well as properties south of Woodlawn Street and to the west across the railroad firacks is Residential Urban (maximum density of 7.5 du/acre), which is not the same as what has been requested for this property. Revise the response to address these divergent land use .densities relating to this criteria. 13 . 12/30/07 = WW As with other similar comments, any approval of this proposal will not be fora "building envelop", but will be based on a building design submitted through this FLS process. Revise the elevations and Sheet 4 appropriately. 10/12/07 - WW On the building elevations, indicate the dimensions of the building, including the length and depth of the buildings. Also add length and depth of buildings on Sheet 4. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 10 DRC Action Agrnde l.i 14 . 12/30/07 - WW $ased on the response in the December 3, 2007, letter, show the location of the six-foot high fence/wall along the property lines on Sheets 4, L4 and L5. Unclear how applicant intends to screen parking from view from Woodlawn. Street to be in compliance with this flexibility criteria. Revise. 10/29/07 - W W Flexibility criteria requires off-street parking to be screened from. adjacent parcels of land. and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. Show on all appropriate site and landscape plans. 15 . 12/27/07 - WW Thank you. for adding such infom~ation to Sheet 1 of the civil drawings. Still need to add to building elevations, which have not been resubmitted. 10/25/07 - W W Building elevations -Provide the height of the proposed buildings from grade to the midpoint of the pitched roof of the main portion of the building. 16 . 12/30/07 - WW Once you have determined the method of mail delivery/storage for this development with the Post Off ce, if such requires a trail kiosk, then the plans will need to be revised and the comments below will still be applicable. Taking the kiosk off the plans doesn't solve the problem. 10/25/07 - WW Mail Kiosk - a. Provide a design. for this kiosk, including elevations; , b. Must be handicap accessible; c. There is no parking provided at this kiosk: Unclear how residents will actually get their mail at this kiosk, as unit owners on the norkh side will not walk to the kiosk but will park their vehicle at this kiosk on their way in ar out. Parking now would be within the roadway, which is not safe. 17 . 12/27/07, 10/12/07 & 10/2/07 - WW On Page 1 of the application, add the addresses of $02 and 830 Woodlawn Street. 18 . 12/30/07 - WW Visibility triangles are still shown incorrectly on Sheets 4 and L5. Ensure poposed landscaping meets Code provisions for visibility triangles. Revise. 10/12/07 - WW Visibility triangles are shown on these sheets, but are drawn in the wrong locations. Revise to be along the front property line and. the edge of the driveways. 10/2/07 - W W Show on Sheets 4 and LS all required visibility triangles per City Code. l9 . 12/30/07 & 10/30/07 - WW Note: Signage, which will need to meet Code requirements, will be handled separately through sign pernuts. 20 . 12/30/07 & 10/29/07 - WW All floor plan sheets are labeled Sheet 2 of 4. Unclear why. they are so indicated when they show different floor plans. Revise. 21 . Sheets 4, 6, L4 and LS -Show individual townhome lot lines as light, dashed lines, similar as shown on Sheet 5. The solid individual townhome lot lines confuse information being portrayed as something being constructed. 22 . Since black barrels are to be used foz solid waste storage for individual units, and since these black barrels are to be stored out of sight, provide evidence through floor plans that the black barrels physically can be stored within the individual garages along with a vehicle. Development Review Agenda -Thursday,. January 3, 2008 -Page 11 DRC Action Agrnda L 1 23 . Building floor elevations indica#ed on the plans on Sheet 5 are, based-on the note on the right-hand side, six inches below FFE. Plans are inconsistent with cross-sections on Sheet 9. Which are the correct FFE? a. The eight-unit building in the southwest corner FFE is actually 50.20. However, cross-sections A and B on Sheet 9 indicate the FFE to be 49.20, which is a foot below the actual based on that shown on the plan and the note on the right-hand side on Sheet 5; b. The buildings along the north side arc indicated to have actual FFE of between 48.60 and 49.10. Cross-section D is incanect. This alsa indicates that the westernmost building along the north side will be 5.5 feet-above existing grade. Correct? c. The buildings along the east side are indicated to have actual FFE of between 49.50 and 50.20. Cross-section E is incorrect; d. The 11-unit building in the southeast corner of the property will have an actual FFE of 5020, but cross-section F is incorrect. There is no range of FFE for cross-section F; e. The 11-unit building on the east side of the western portion adjacent to Woodlawn Street is indicated to have an actual FFE of 50.20, but cross-section J is incorrect; f. Cross-section K incorrectly indicates FFE. On the left side it should be 48.90 and on the right side it should be 49.00; and g. Cross-section L incorrectly indicates FFE. On the left side it should. be 48.70 and on the right side it should be 49.70. Other: No Comments Notes: Revisions are necessary for this application, as it is still insufficient to issue a Development Order, and requires re-review by the Development Review Comrriittee (revise and resubmit). Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 12 SRC Ac~ion Agenda L I Case Number: PLT2007-006(16 -- 826 WOODLAWN ST 9:35 am Owner(s): Woodlawn Church Of God Bd Of T 845 Woodlawn St Clearwater, F] 33756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Avid Group 2300 Curlew Road Suite 100 Palm Harbor, F134683 TELEPHONE: 727-789-9500, FAX: 727-784-6662, E-MAIL: kent.edwards a~,?avidgroup.com Location: 8.1 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WOODLAWN STREET BETWEEN S. MYRTLE AVENUE AND TILLEY AVENUE Atlas Page: 314A Zoning District: I, Institutional Request: Preliminary Plat approval for 115 lots in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhoad Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition• Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: CITY: 11/1/07: WELLS, THOMPSON, RICE, DOHERTY, KELLER, ALBEE, GLENN; 1/3/08: SAME, EXCEPT NO GLENN APPLICANT: 1111/07: KENT EDWARDS, ABBEY NAYLOR, CHRIS KONCAL, RICK TONIVELL; 1/3/08: EDWARDS The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . Conditions 1 - 5 include responses to the 10/01/07 DRC meeting and additional responses to the current submittal. 1. Indicate on the preliminary plat the dedication of a total of 30-feet of right-of--way for Woodlawn Street to be measured from the north line of the of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. 10/01/07 APPLICANT AGREED TO PROVIDE ARIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT RATHER TITAN ADDITIONAL STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR WOODLAWN AVENUE. ACCORDINGLY, PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLAT A CONTINUOUS RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT 30 FEET IN WIDTH MEASURED FROM THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST. 2. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the property owner on the preliminary plat. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)2.) NOT MET 3. Provide proposed street names. (Community Development Cade Sec. 4-703(A)6.}NOT MET 4. Show on the preliminary plat the names of the adjoining plats, appropriately positioned. (Community Development. Code Sec. 4-703(A)7.) NOT MET 5. Provide area and dimensions (to nearest foot) ~of the overall plat, each. lot, street rights-of--way and common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purpose, if any. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703{A)8 a-d.) NOT MET 6. The plat of Woodlawn Terrace Condominum, as recorded in plat book 92, page 32, indicates that 30-feet of right-of-way for Woodlawn Street was provided, measured from the north line of the Southwest 114 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. Please correct the preliminary plat document to reflect this condition. 7. The survey submitted with the related FLS case, (FLS2007-10045), incorrectly depicts right-of--way easements attributed to recorded documents, including those recorded in O.R. Book 4793, Page 1397 anal O.R. Book 4793, page 1399. Portions of the right-of--way easements shown on the Preliminary Plat are incorrect as a result. Please revise preliminary plat accordingly. Environmental: 1 . No Issues. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 13 DRC Action Agfndn 1. I Fire: 1 , ~ No issues Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: 1 , No issues. Land Resources: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Landscaping: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Parks and Recreation: 1 . A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will. be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. (Note: Open space and recreation land fees are not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1985.} Stormwater: 1 , Show on plat the requested drainage easement of case FLS2007-10045.(A drainage easement shall be provided over the southern portion of the existing ditch adjoining the railroad . right-of--way. The easement is to be measured from the western property line to the eastern ditch's top of bank, and shall be dedicated to the Ciry of Clearwater for maintenance purposes) Solid Waste: 1 , See comments under FLS2007-10045 Traffic Engineering: , 1 , No issues. Planning: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Other: No Comments Notes: REVISIONS ARE NECESSARY FOR THIS APPLICATION, AS IT IS STILL INSUFFICIENT TO ISSUE A DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND REQUIRES RE-REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (REVISE AND RESUBMIT). Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 14 DAC Action Agcnda 1.1 ' Case Number: FLS2007-10045 -- 826 VdOODLAWN ST 9:35 am ~~~ Owner(s): Woodlawn Church Of God Bd Of T ' , ~' O 845 Woodlawn St Clearwater, Fl 33756 .TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email ~~~ Representative: Avid Group 2300 Curlew Road Suite 100 Palm Harbor, F134683 TELEPHONE: 727-789-9500, FAX: 727-784-6662, E-MAIL: kent.edwards@avidgroup.corn I~oeation: $.1 acres located on the north side of Woodiawn Street between S. Myrtle Avenue and Tilley Avenue Atlas Page: 314A Zoning District: I, Institutional Request: Flexible Standard Development application to permit 1.15 attached dwellings (townhomes) in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A, and Preliminary Plat approval for 115 lots (PLT2007-00006). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email. Neighborhood South Clearwater Citizens For Progr Association(s): Clearwater, F133756 1120 Kingsley St. TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: duketieman@aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Yncluded: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Rick Albee, Jim Keller, Tom Glenn Applicant: Kent Edwards, Abbey Naylor, Chris Koncal, Rick Tonnell The ©RC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 5 DRC Actiou Ageodn 1.1 Prior to the issuance of a Development Order: 1. Proposed plans shall indicate dedication of a right-of way easement for Woodlawn Street to provide a total of 30-feet ofright-of--way or aright-of--way easement to be measured from the north line. of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. Please note that the right-of--way easements shown on the survey previously submitted do not agree with the pubic records referenced on the survey. . 2. The condominium plat of Woodlawn Terrace I indicates 30-feet of street right-of--way measured from the Southwest. l/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, RatLge 15 East. Please amend the site plan to show this existing street right-of--way for Woodlawn Street. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Applicant shall provide a sanitary manhole detail showing how force main will be connected to the manhole. 2. Applicant shall provide a manhole liner to protect manhole from force main effluent. 3. Provide a copy of an approved Florida Department of Environmental Protection (D.E.P.) permit for the construction of new water mains on the subject property. 4. All fire hydrant assemblies installed greater than 10 ft. from a water main shall be constructed with ductile iron pipe and. shall have a gate valve at the tee on the branch line, and at the fire hydrant assembly (F.H.A.). 5. Fire hydrant leads shall have a minimum inside diameter of 6-inches. 6. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved Florida Department of Environmental Frotection (D.E.P.) permit .for the installation of the sanitary sewer extension. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 7. Applicant shall bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Environmental: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 6 DRC Action Agenda 1. I The following thre• nditions were acknowledged in a letter dated December 3, 2007 1. The plans provided show f 11 and structures within. wetlands and wetland. buffers. The City of Clearwater's Community Development Code Section 3-907 states, "A vegetative buffer shall be provided on all lands within 25 feet of any property designated on the Zoning Atlas as preservation (P), or any property determined to be wetlands under the jurisdiction of the State of Florida ("jurisdictional wetlands°); and all lands within 15 feet of the top of the bank of any creeks, channels, or related waterways which contain jurisdictional wetlands." Revise plans so structures or parking lots do not impact wetlands or wetland buffers. 2. The City's Design Criteria Storm Drainage rules require wet detention. ponds to incorporate a vegetated littoral shelf over 35% of the area of the pond under normal conditions. Provide a planting plan for Wetland Detention Pond 10. 3. Provide a planting plan for littoral shelf in Pond 11. New conditions (12/ 19/07): Prior to the issuance of a Development Order: 1. The City of Clearwater's Community Development Code Section 3-907 requires a 15 foo# setback from the top of the bank from any channel or waterway. Units 1-4 are located within the 15 foot setback of the waterway on the west side of the property. Revise plans so structures are not within this setback. 2. Provide evidence from the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) that no wetlands occur on the site, specifically in the northwest corner. Prior to the issuance of a Building Pemut: 3. A planting plan for Pond 11 was not in the plans submitted. Provide a planting plan for Pond 11. Fire: 1. NO ISSUES Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: t No issues. Land Resources: 1 , 10/24/07-The Preservation Plan must reflect which trees require special attention such as root pruning, tunneling and canopy elevating, ie: root prunig at tree #205. The plan must be more ' precise. Revise prior to D.O. 12/27/07-Show the root prune limits for the top of banks @ trees #60, 149, 203, 205 and the two trees east of building 11 units 18 and 19. Insure the plans reflect the specifications and visa versa. Also show tree barricade limits @ all trees to remain on site and those trees among the property bounderies. 2 , Provide an east/west section through tree # 8, show root prune limits if needed. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 7 llkC Action Agenda 1. t Sheet L6 -Revise 8-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: 1. a. Based on other unit plans, there should be a sidewalk along the front of the units adjacent to the private street. Show the sidewalk and revise the plant counts of AP on the plan and in the plant schedule; b. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 12 HB; c. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 30 AV; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 25 CR; e. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; f. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 724 AP (see "a" above); g. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I don't count any (0) DV; h. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I don't count any (0) LEG; and i. Plan indicates 14 MWA, but the plant schedule doesn't have MWA in it. 2 , Sheet L6 -Revise 7-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Based on other unit plans, there appears to be a sidewalk along the front of the units adjacent to the private street. Revise the location of AP and confirm plant counts on plan. and in plant schedule; b. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 20 HB; c. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 18 AV; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 15 CR; e. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; f. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 422 AP (see "a" above); g. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, bu# I count 30 DV; and h. Plant. schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I don't count any (0) LEG. 3 . Sheet L8 -Revise 11-unit building landscape plan and plant. schedule: a. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 24 HB; b. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 20 AV; c. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 20 CR; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; e. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 661 AP; f. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I count 45 DV; g. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I don't count any (0) LEG; h. Plan indicates 22 JP, but the plant schedule doen't include JP; and i. Plan does not indicate the sidewalk along the front adjacent to the private street on the left hand side between the single and double driveways and doesn't indicate any landscaping (probably AP}. Revise plan and plant schedule. 4 , Sheet L6 -Revise 6-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Based on other unit plans, there appears to be a sidewalk along the front of the units adjacent to the private street. Revise the location of AF and confirm plant counts on plan and in plant schedule; b. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 6 HB; c. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 14 CR; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; e. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 144 AP (see "a" above); f. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I count 20 DV; g. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I count 57 LEG; and - h. Plan indicates 21 JP, but the plant schedule doesn't indicate JP at all. 5 . Sheet L7 -Revise 9-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 16 HB; b. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 30 AV; c. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 15 CR; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; e. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 655 AP; f. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I count 58 DV; and g. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I don't count any (0) LEG. 6 , Sheet L6 -Remove 5-unit. building landscape plan and plant schedule. There are no 5-unit buildings proposed. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 8 ORC Actiou Ags~da LI 7 . Sheet L7 -Revise 10-unit building landscape plan and plant schedule: a. Plant schedule indicates 14 HB, but I count 20 HB; b. Plant schedule indicates 37 AV, but I count 20 AV; c. Plant schedule indicates 5 CR, but I count 15 CR; d. Plant schedule indicates 5 LC, but I don't count any (0) LC; e. Plant schedule indicates 280 AP, but I count 874 AP; f. Plant schedule indicates 25 DV, but I dont count any (0) DV; g. Plant schedule indicates 44 LEG, but I don't count any (0) LEG; and h. There are driveway dividers in the four double driveways but no landscaping is specified (either AP or LEG). Revise plan and plant schedule. 8 , Section 3-1202.D.2 states: "Front slopes of stormwater retention areas may comprise up to 50 percent of any required landscape buffer width, provided that the slope is 4:1 or flatter and all required shrub plantings are not more than six inches below the top of the bank and provided that the buffer width is at least five feet in width." Based on the pond design on Sheet 5, cross-section G on Sheet 9 and the proposed landscaping on Sheet L5, provide evidence on a cross-section of pond design and landscaping compliance with this Code section. Parks and Recreation: 1 . A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each. new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. (1`lote: Open space and recreation land fees are not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1985.) Stormwater: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 9 SRC Ac~ion Agenda 1.1 The following shall be addressed prior to Development Order. 1. Provide 50' adjacent topography and finished floor elevations of adjacent structures. Revised plan shows 50' topography of only the northeastern area; please provide the entire 50' adjacent topography (See section. E submittal requirements on FLS application) 2. There have been flooding problems occurring at the multi-family development directly adjacent to the proposed project on the northeast side. Revised drainage report shows that basin 30 has been removed along with the by-pass Swale along the eastern property line. Drainage report also states that most of runoff from basin 30 has been. accomnnodated by the existing on-site drainage system. Please delineate on the plan which portion of basin 30 has been managed by the existing Swale and which portion is still needed to be attenuated. To avoid worsening the existing flooding problems, a Swale system. with inlets shall be designed and dipicted on the plan. to accommodate remaining off-site runoff that not managed by the existing Swale and runoff from. the roof of the proposed townhomes. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. 1. Demonstrate that the eastern side bank of the existing ditch adjoining the railroad right-of--way will be stable with the placement of additional fill. 2. Show more proposed spot elevations, especially around the back of all units. Behind unit 14 and the end of street A, it appears that the grade slopes toward the adjacent property, this is not an acceptable design. 3. A drainage easement over the southern portion of the existing ditch adjoining the raikoad right-of--way, measured from the western property line to the eastern ditch's top of bank, shall be dedicated to the City for maintenance purposes. 4. A fence shall be installed around entire the concrete headwall of the ditch and along the eastern bank where the bank slope is steeper than 4:1 ,. 5. Please show finished floor elevations, not pad elevations. Finished floor elevations shall be minimum. of 1' higher than the adjacent crown of the road. 6. What is the structure number and the invert elevation for the miter end section of the pond #11 outfall? The outfall pipe's slope is not legible. Please revise plan accordingly. 7. Please affirm in the drainage report and. supportive documentation that the pond #11 outfall will not create erosion downstream. 8. The ADS roof drain. system shown on plan is not complete. Please show clearly the location of downspouts connecting to the roof drain system with inlet along the back of all units to catch all runoff and direct it to the ponds. 9. Cross sections provided in the revised. plan do not show actual elevations and are not drawn to scale. is the top of bank of pond 20 at elevation 49 ar 52? Please review and revise plan, drainage report, and cross sections accordingly. 10. Percolation test was not included in the drainage report as stated in the response of 12/03/07. Please provide a soil report, seasonal high water table, and a 24-hours pond draw down analysis based on double ring test. 11. Provide a SWFWMD permit and approved grading plan from this agency at the building permit application. 12. Demonstrate that.the proposed storm system can handle a 10-year storm event by providing storm tabulations, delineation of sub-basin for each proposed inlet, and other supportive data. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit all information again for review Solid Waste: 1 . No issues. Traffic Engineering: 1 , No Issues. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 10 DRC Action Agrnds Lk 1 . 12/27/07 & 10/ 12107 - W W On the building elevations, indicate the proposed exterior materials and colors of the building by name. Provide a color legend as to building face color, door and garage door colors and facia color. It is presumed that the facia color will not be the same color as the building face color. 2 , 12/27/07 - W W December 3, 2007, response letter states the responses to these criteria is on a separate sheet. I do not find. this separate sheet. 10/12/07 & 10/2/07 - WW Provide responses to the following Flexible Standard Development criteria for attached dwellings. 1/xplain HOW each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel which is designated as low. density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land. and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. 3 . 12/27/07 - WW December 3, 2007 response letter did not respond to the comment below. Comment deals with. the note "optional screen enclosure under cantilever" indicated on the narrow units but not the wider units. If typical for all units, indicate "typical for all units" as part of this note on revised Floor plans. 10/29/07 - WW Floor plans for the narrow units indicate at the rear of the unit where the second floor cantilevers over the ground floor patio that there is an "optional screen enclosure under cantilever." This is not sin>ilarly shown. on the wider units. If such is an option for the wider units, revise to indicate such. 4 . 12/30/07 - WW Sheet 1 - c. Revise Proposed Building Height to what the actual height is proposed. 10/25/07 - WW Sheet 1 -Revise Site Data for the following: a. Property Address -Add 830 Woodlawn Street; b. Property Zoning -Add after MDR (Medium Density Residential) (Proposed under LUZ2006-08006); adn c. Maximum Building Height -Revise to actual height. 5 . 12/27/07 & 10/19/07 - WW Based on the floor plans, windows are "optional" for the end unit, second floor narrow units only (wider units apparently don't have any "optional" windows on the end units). As these windows are "optional," the sides of the units will be blank walls, which is not appealing. 6 . 12/30/07 - WW Response in the December 3, 2007, letter did not address the comment below from 10/12/07. Revise. IO/12/07- WW Floor plans indicate "optional screen enclosure under cantilever" with a door to the rear from this screen enclosure. Units 66 - 94 still shown with stem walls at the edge of the cantilever, which is still a problem. 10/2/07 - W W As a heads-up, while it is not part of a completeness review, the building elevations indicate sliding glass doors at the rear of units. By Building Code, there must be at least athree-foot wide stoop outside the sliding glass doors. Such stoops/patios must meet required setbacks. Additionally, certain buildings are indicated with a stem wall at the rear of the buildings, which can create additional. issues regarding these stoops/patios. It is advised to look at this in greater detail to avoid comments requiring redesign during the DRC review process. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 11 PRC Ac[ian Agen~e [. [ 7 . 1213 0/07 - W W Response in December 3, 2007, letter is insufficient. In order to obtain a Development Order, revise site layout and/or floor plans appropriately as requested below. 10/12/07 - WW Site plan layout of units and entries do not match submitted floor plans and building elevations. The following are differences that need to be shown on revised site plans: a. floor plans indicate a protruding garage with a recessed entry area. Site plans don't indicate such {rectangle box shown); b. floor plans submitted for the wider, three-bedroom units indicate a side entry for the unit,. yet the site plan indicates two units (86 and 11.5) with a front entry for the unit; and c. floor plans submitted only show a front entry for the narrow units, yet the site plan indicates side entry for wider Units 20, 30, 4S, 55, 66, 73, 74, 80, 94, 95, 104 and 105. 8 . 12/30/07 & 10/30/07 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Development Order: That approval of this Flexible Standard Development (FLS) application be subject to the approval of the change to land use and zoning under LUZ2006-08006. As such, no Final Flat maybe approved by City Council and no building pernuts to construct horizontal or vertical improvements maybe issued until LUZ2006-08006 is approved. ~ . 12/27/07 & 1.0/25/07 - WW Parking has been designed in a manner where the two parking spaces are stacked, requiring the vehicle in the driveway to be moved to allow the vehicle in the garage to exit. As such, there is only one parking space provided per unit. Need to provide one additional parking space per unit. 10 . 12/30/07 - WW Response in the December 3, 2007, letter states afence/wall as suggested below will be installed. lndicate the fence/wall on Sheets 4 and L5. i 0/3.0/07 - W W From a buffering standpoint to address compatibility of adjacent uses, reconunend the installation of a six-foot high solid fence or wall with landscaping on the inside of the fence/wall adjacent to the three detached. dwellings that this project wraps around (806, 818 and, 822 Woodlawn Street). Within the front setback adjacent to Woodlawn Street, the fence/walll must be reduced to a maximum of three feet in height. 11 . 12/27/07 & 10/12/07 - WW Provide building elevations for all fours sides of the proposed buildings. Submitted front building elevations continue to show end units with atwo-car garage. Based on Sheet 4 and the submitted floor glans, there are no two-car garages. Revise building elevations to show reality circumstances. 10/2/07 - W W Based on the site layout on Sheet 4, buildings range from 6 - 11 units in each building. The building elevations submitted is for afour-unit building and depicts units with atwo-car garage. The site plan does not indicate any two-car garages. The building elevations also depict units that have many planes to the faces of the building, however, the site plan indicates rectangular buildings. Provide building elevations that will be typical to this development. 12 . 12/30/07 - WW Unclear of the meaning of the last sentence in second paragraph. Revise. 10/30/07 - WW Response to General Applicability criteria #6 (Page 2 of FLS application) -The future land use for the three lots fronting on Woodlawn Street this property surrounds, as well as properties south of Woodlawn Street and to the west across the railroad tracks is Residential.Urban (maximum density of 7.5 du/acre), which is not the same as what has been requested for this property. Revise the response to address these divergent land use densities relating to this criteria. 13 . 12/30/07 - WW As with other similar'comments, any approval of this proposal will not be fora "building envelop", but will be based on a building design submitted through this FLS process. Revise the elevations and Sheet 4 appropriately. 10/12/07 - WW On the building elevations, indicate the dimensions of the building, including the length and depth of the buildings. Also add length and depth of buildings on Sheet 4. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 12 DRG Auion Agrnda I. ] 14 . 12/30!07 - WW Based on the response in the December 3, 2007, letter, show the location of the six-foot high fence/wall along the property lines on Sheets 4, L4 and L5. Unclear how applicant intends to screen parking from view from Woodlawn Street to be in compliance with this flexibility criteria. Revise. 10/29/07 - W W Flexibility criteria requires off-street parking to be screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. Show on all appropriate site and landscape plans. .. .. _ . 15 . 12/27/07 - WW Thank you for adding such information to Sheet 1 of the civil drawings. Still need to add to building elevations, which have not been resubmitted. 10/25/07 - WW Building elevations -Provide the height of the proposed buildings from grade to the midpoint of the pitched roof of the main portion of the building. 16 . 12/30/07 - WW Once you have determined the method of mail delivery/storage for this development with the Post Office, if such requires a mail kiosk, then the plans will need to be revised and the comments below will still be applicable. Taking the kiosk off the plans doesn't solve the problem. 10/2.5/07 - WW Mail Kiosk - a. Provide a design. for this kiosk, including elevations; b. Must be handicap accessible; c. There is no parking provided at this kiosk. Unclear how residents will actually get their mail at this kiosk, as unit owners on the north side will not walk to the kiosk but will park their vehicle at this kiosk on their way in or out. Parking now would be within the roadway, which is not safe. 17 . 12/27/07, 10/12/07 & IO/2/07 - WW On Page 1 of the application, add the addresses of 802 and 830 Woodlawn Street. 18 . 12/30/07 - WW Visibility triangles are still shown incorrectly on Sheets 4 and L5. Ensure poposed landscaping meets Code provisions for visibility triangles. Revise. 10/12/07 - WW Visibility triangles are shown on these sheets, but are drawn in the wrong locations. Revise to be along the front property line and the edge of the driveways. 10/2/07 - W W Show on Sheets 4 and LS all required visibility triangles per City Code. 19 . 12/30/07 & 10/30/07 - WW Note: Signage, which will need to meet Code requirements, will be handled separately through sign permits. 20 . 12/30/07 & 10/29/07 - WW All floor plan sheets are labeled Sheet 2 of 4. Unclear why they are so indicated when they show different floor plans. Revise. 21 . Sheets 4, 6, L4 and LS -Show individual townhome lot lines as light, dashed lines, similar as shown on Sheet 5. The solid individual townhome lot lines confuse information being portrayed as something being constructed. 22 . Since black barrels are to be used for solid waste storage for individual units, and since these black barrels are to be stored out of sight, provide evidence through floor plans that the black barrels physically can be stored within the individual garages along with a vehicle. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 13 SRC Action Agcrnda I. Y 2 Buildin floor elevations indicated on the plans on Sheet 5 are, based on the note on the 3 g right-hand side, six inches below FFE. Plans are inconsistent with cross-sections on Sheet 9. Which are the correct FFE? a. The eight-unit building in the southwest corner FFE is actually 50.20. However, cross-sections A and B on Sheet 9 indicate the FFE to be 49.20, which is a foot below the actual based. on that shown on the plan and the note on the right-hand. side on Sheet 5; b. The buildings along the north side are indicated to have actual FFE of between 48.60 and 49.10. Cross-section D is incorrect. This also indicates that the westernmost building along the north side will be 5.5 feet above existing grade. Correct? c. The buildings along the east side are indicated to have actual FFE of between 49.50 and 50.20. Cross-section E is incorrect; d. The 11-unit building in the southeast corner of the property will have an actual FFE of 5020, but cross-section F is incorrect. There is no range of FFE for cross-section F; e. The 11-unit building on the east side of the western portion adjacent to Woodlawn Street is indicated to have an actual FFE of 50.20, but cross-section J is incorrect; f. Cross-section K incorrectly indicates FFE. ©n the left side it should be 48.90 and on the right side it should be 49.00; and g. Cross-section L incorrectly indicates FFE. On the left side it should be 48.70 and on the right side it should be 49.70. Other: No Comments Notes: Revisions are necessary for this application, as it is still insufficient to issue a Development Order, and requires re-review by the Development Review Committee (revise and resubmit). Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 14 DRC Actioo Agaida 1.1 . Case Number: FLT2007-OOd{16 -- 82b WOODLAWN ST 9:35 am Owner(s): Woodlawn Church Of God Bd Of T 845 Woodlawn St Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Avid Group ' 2300 Curlew Road Suite 100 Palm Harbor, F134683 TELEPHONE: 727-7$9-9500, FAX: 727-784-6662, E-MAIL: kent.edwards@avidgroup.com Location: 8.1 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WOODLAWN STREET BETWEEN S. MYRTLE AVENUE AND TILLEY AVENUE Atlas Page: 314A Zoning District: I, Institutional Request: Preliminary Plat approval for 115 lots in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District. Proposed Use: At#ached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition . Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No, Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: CITY: WAYNE WELLS, NEIL THOMPSON, SCOTT RICE, STEVE DOHERTY, JIM KELLER, RICK ALBEE, TOM GLENN APPLICANT: KENT EDWARDS, ABBEY NAYLOR, CHRIS KONCAL, RICK TONNELL The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1,. Conditions 1 - 5 include responses to the 10/O1/07 DRC meeting and additional responses to the current submittal. 1. Indicate on the preliminary plat the dedication of a total of 30-feet of right-of way for Woodlawn Street to be measured from the north line of the of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. 10/01/07 APPLICANT AGREED TO PROVIDE ARIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT RATHER THAN ADDITIONAL STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR WOODLAWN AVENUE. ACCORDINGLY, PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLAT A CONTINUOUS RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT 30 FEET IN WIDTH MEASURED FROM THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST. 2. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the property owner on the preliminary plat. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)2.) NOT MET 3. Provide proposed street names. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)6.) NOT MET 4. Show on the preliminary plat the names of the adjoining plats, appropriately positioned. (Community Development Code Sec, 4-703(A)7.) NOT MET 5. Provide area and dimensions (to nearest foot) of the overall plat, each lot, street rights-of-way and common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purpose, if any. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)8 a-d.) NOT MET 6. The plat of Woodlawn Terrace Condominum, as recorded in plat book 92, page 32, indicates that 30-feet ofright-of--way for Woodlawn Street was provided, measured from the north line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. Please correct the preliminary plat document to reflect this condition. 7. The survey submitted with the related FLS case, (FLS2007-10045), incorrectly depicts right-of--way easements attributed to recorded documents, including those recorded in O.R. Book 4793, Page 1397 and O.R. Book 4793, page 1399. Portions of the right-of--way easements shown on the Preliminary Plat are incorrect as a result. Please revise preliminary plat accordingly. Environmental: 1 . No Issues. Fire: No issues Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 15 DRC Action Agenda 1.1 Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Landscaping: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Parks and Recreation: 1 . A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building pernut or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs fast. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. (Note: Open space and recreation land fees are not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1985.) Stormwater: 1 . Show on plat the requested drainage easement of case FLS2007-10045.(A drainage easement shall be provided over the southern portion of the existing ditch adjoining the railroad right-of--way. The easement is to be measured from the western property line to the eastern ditch's top of bank, and shall be dedicated to the City of Clearwater for maintenance purposes) Solid Waste: See comments under FLS2007-10045 Traffic Engineering: 1 . No issues. Planning: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Other: No Comments Notes: REVISIONS ARE NECESSARY FOR THIS APPLICATION, AS IT IS STILL INSUFFICIENT TO ISSUE A DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND REQUIRES RE-REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (REVISE AND RESUBMIT). Development Review Agenda -Thursday, January 3, 2008 -Page 16 DRC Action Agrnda I.1 Message C] • Page 1 of 4 Wells, Wayne From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 11 `50 AM To: Reynolds, Mike; Delk, Michael Cc: Porter, Catherine; Wells, Wayne; Thompson, Neil; Dougall-Sides, Leslie Subject: RE: Affordable Dreams/ Without that information, why should we move this forward? ----Original Message----- From: Reynolds, Mike Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 11:05 AM To: Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael Cc: Porter, Catherine; Wells, Wayne; Thompson, Neil; Dougall-Sides, Leslie Subject: RE: Affordable Dreams/ Gina, I am researching HB 1375 and Chapter 163 as to what we need. To date we have no documentation . submitted from the project applicant. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Dayton, Gina Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 4:15 PM To: Delk, Michael; Reynolds, Mike Cc: Porter, Catherine; Wells, Wayne; Thompson, Neil; Dougall-Sides, Leslie Subject: RE: Affordable Dreams/ What kind of documentation do we need to assure that this is an affordable housing project? Do we have any firm documentation? -----Original Message----- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 3:05 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Cc: Porter, Catherine; Clayton, Gina; Wells, Wayne; Thompson, Neil; Dougall-Sdes, Leslie Subject: [-vl/: Affordable Dreams/` FYI. It appears to me that we may proceed accordingly to process the Woodlawn matter as an "off cycle"' large scale amendment for purposes of provision of affordable housing. I understand this may be a difficult application which will require patience and additional assistance probably. Having said that, we need to try to facilitate the process as it is for affordable housing, it represents a significant identified community need. They currently have a development review application in process.. I believe it is Wayne's project. 12/24/2007 Massage ~ ~ ~ Page 2 of 4 We need to coordinate the two processes. Let's identify their project representative and make sure what needs to be done is communicated. I suggest they be brought in for a meeting at which we advise them of the following: 1. Status and anticipated schedule of the development review process. Also, what obligation they have to it to move it fiorward. 2. Status and anticipated schedule of the plan amendment process. Ditto their obligation. 3. Their need to coordinate with blousing per Geri's memo regarding limitations on sales prices. This needs to be determined in the near future I would think. If it does not qualify under the affordable housing provisions the large scale amendment would not be appropriate to process at this time. The project representatives are not versed in this process. Best thing we can do here is make sure we communicate effectively what is needed of them. Provide assistance any way that we can understanding the difficulties. Let me know if any questions or we'need to discuss. mld Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida - myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Lopez, Geraldine Campos Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 10:51 AM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Malcolm-Smith, Terry; Holmes, Michael Subject: RE: Affordable Dreams/ Michael: The City has an approved LHAP. The LHAP covers Fiscal Years 2006-2009. It was approved by the City Council on April 20, 2006 through Resolution #06-25. It was submitted to the State in May 2008 and approved by the Florida Housing Finance Corporation in June 2006. The pdf is attached. As I mentioned on the phone, the developers of this project have not requested development funds from the City for their project. They are interested in using our downpayment and closing cost assistance to assist their end-users. For them to comply with our strategies and be eligible for our programs, they will need to meet the sales prices limits for the units. Please let me know if you have any questions. thanks, Geri ~2/24i2ao~ Message ~ ~ Page 3 of 4 -----Original Message----- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 11:11 AM To: Lopez, Geraldine Campos Cc: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Subject: FW: Affordable Dreams/ Geri -FYI. In order to prudently proceed with this I would like to verify with Economic Development/Housing that the Housing Strategies are part of the LHAP. Could you or your staff review and provide me some written confirmation of that fact. If so, I will proceed to process the plan amendment accordingly. Thank you! Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com Catherine, Gina, Michael, and Leslie, I have a response from Ray Eubanks, which follows here. Mike Reynolds -----Original Message----- From: Ray.Eubanks@dca.state.fl.us [mailto:Ray.Eubanks@dca.state.fl,us] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 10:33 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Cc: Leslie.Bryson@dca.state.fl.us; Anita.Franklin@dca.state.fl.us Subject: RE: FW: Questions regarding a large scale comprehensive plan amendment Mike, I have finally had a chance to discuss with our legal department about the exemption outlined in Section 163.3187(1)(p), F.S. It appears that as long as the proposed amendment is consistent with the local housing strategies identified in Section 420.9076, FS, it will be considered exempt from the twice per calendar year limitation. The amendment would still need to be submitted as proposed for review by the department prior to adoption. The' proposed transmittal letter wil! need to clearly identify that the amendment is exempt from the twice per calendar year limitation based on Section 163.3187(1)(p), FS. It does not appear that the local government has to adopt the housing incentive strategies into the comp. plan prior to using the allowable exemption in Section 163.3187(1)(p),F.S. However, the incentives strategies are statutory required to be part of the LHAP, but are not required to be part of the comp plan. I hope this information is helpful. Thanks Ray Eubanks . Plan Review Administrator Department of Community Affairs ~ 2/24/~.00~ Massage ~ ~ Page 4 of 4 Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 850-922-1767 Ray.Eubanks@dca.state.f}.us 12i24i2oa~ 9 ,t ~ ~ ~~ 9:15 am ~ Case Number: FLS2007-10045 -- 802 WOODLAWN ST Owner(s): Woodlawn Church Of God Bd Of T ~ ~ . ~, O 845 Woodlawn St Clearwater, F133756 ~I~~ TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Avid Group 2300 Curlew Road Suite 1.00 +1~-1 Palm Harbor, FI 34683 TELEPHONE: 727-789-9500, FAX: 727-784-6662, E-MAIL: kent.edwards@avidgroup.com Location: 8.1 acres located on the north side of Woodlawn Street between S. Myrtle Avenue and Tilley Avenue Atlas Page: 314A Zoning District: I, Institutional Request: Flexible Standard Development application. to permit 115 attached dwellings (townhomes) in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A, and Preliminary Plat approval for 115 lots (PLT2007-00006}. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings ' Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood South Clearwater Citizens For Progr Association(s): Clearwater, F133756 1120 Kingsley St. TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: duketieman@aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Rick Albee, dim Keller, Tom Glenn Applicant: Kent Edwards, Abbey Naylor, Chris Koncal, Rick Tonnell The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 5 Prior to the issuancf a Development Order: 1. Proposed dumpster shall not encroach into drainage easement. 2. Proposed plans shall indicate dedication of additional street right-of--way for Woodlawn Street to provide a total of 30-feet ofright-of--way measured from the north line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. (Note that the condonunium plat of Woodlawn Terrace I indicates 30-feet of street right-of--way measured from the 1/4 section line - the applicant's survey needs to be amended to reflect same). 3. Revise drawings to show 20'x20' sight triangles located along a proposed property line drawn 30-feet north of the quarter section line described in preceding condition 2. 4. The townhome building located in the southwest comer of the site is located adjacent a ditch. that provides regional drainage from lands south of the subject property to Lake Belleview. Applicant shall provide cross sectional drawings for analysis by Stormwater review for a determination of need for a drainage easement to enable maintenance of the drainage feature by the City of Clearwater. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: 1. The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will remove/relocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as part of this development, including reclaim water meters. (No meters shall be located within any impervious areas.) 2. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.095), set the water meter (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.096) and set the B.F.P.D. (back flow prevention device}. The applicant is responsible for the water main extension from the tap to the device. Applicant is also responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. 3. Sanitary sewer manhole cover(s) shall not have the lettering, "Clearwater" or "City of Clearwater" on them. This system is a private system. 4. Show the force main discharging from the existing lift station. Indicate where the discharge is to connect to the public sewer system. Is the existing force main to be replaced? 5. Frovide sanitary sewer pipe size/type/slope information on the utility plan. 6. Reclaimed water is not presently available to this site. 7. Demolition plan references Hillsborough County standards for root pruning. Please reference City of Clearwater specifications and standards. 8. Applicant shall obtain permanent address assignments from the Engineering Department. 9. Applicant shall provide a recorded copy of the final plat for "Townhomes at Lake Belleview". 10. Water Note #1 on page 2 indicates minimum cover requirement of 34-inches; correct to read,"The depth of cover over the water main shall be a minimum. of 30" and a maximum of 42" below finish grade". (City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and. Standards, Part "B" Technical Specifications, Section IV, Article 41.03{B)(1) 11. Provide length of each run and type of pipe to used for water mains. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 6 1. The plans provi ed show fill and structures within wetlands and w• nd buffers. The City of Clearwater's Community Development Code Section 3-907 states, "A vegetative buffer shall be provided on all lands within 25 feet of any property designated on the Zoning Atlas as preservation (P), or any property determined to be wetlands under the jurisdiction of the State of Florida ("jurisdictional wetlands"); and a111ands within 15 feet of the top of the bank of any creeks, channels, or related waterways which contain jurisdictional wetlands." Revise plans so structures or parking lots do not impact wetlands or wetland buffers. 2. The City's Design Criteria Storm Drainage rules require wet detention ponds to incorporate a vegetated littoral shelf over 35% of the area of the pond under normal conditions. Provide a planting plan. for Wetland Detention Pond 10. 3. Provide a planting plan for littoral shelf'in Pond 11. Fire: 1 . Add note to page 2 "Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started". PRIOR TO DO 2 , Gates will require KNOX key system with power backup or manual override Acknowledge with note on page 2 PRIOR TO DO 3 , 11101/2007 DRC meeting comment was introduced to widen the 20' drive to 24' on entry and keeping the island and 12' on exiting. Also the West drive will be EXIT only with a gate at 24' width.This will be acceptable per phone conversation with Kent Edwards of Avid Graup @ 789-9500(JFIC) Eas# entry shows an island in drive. When an island is incorporated in a drive isle, 20' clearance is required on both sides. On current plan 20' is shown on entry side and 12' is shown on exit side. Change or remove island PRIOR TO DO 4 . Show Firefighter access to the rear of the buildings, Swale will not provide access of 150 ft. per NFPA 1 Chapter 18 PRIOR TO D.O. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 , No issues. Land Resources: 1 . Sheet L-1 indicates trees to be removed that are shown to be preserved in the spreadsheet on sheet L-2, ie tree #168. Insure that all plan sheets correspond to each other prior to D.O. 2 . Show the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets. The general rule for hard"woods is one-foot radius For each diameter inch (DBH). Revise prior to D.O. 3 . It does not appear that the tree inventory was utilized to design this site. No effort was made to preserve trees as the site is too dense, no open areas exist within the center of the site to preserve quality trees. Suggest a second look be made utilizing your arbarist and the inventory. 4 . All trees rated #2 should be trees that are declining and should not be preserved. However, the plans indicate saving these trees. Verify with your arborist that these trees truly are to be preserved prior to D.O. 5 . The Preservation Plan must reflect which trees require special attention such as root pruning, tunneling and canopy elevating, ie: root prunig at tree #205. The plan must be more precise. Revise prior to D.O. 6 . Insure that impacts are reduced at trees to be preserved, ie:'relocate the Strom line outside the canopy of tree #8. Revise prior to D.O. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 7 1 , Sheet LS -Revise WP to the rear ofLTnits Sb - 58 to CV, similar to that to the rear of Units 37 - 41, since these two locations are the only units that are oriented rear of unit to side of unit separated by 20 feet. 2 . Sheet LS - Detail A -Section 3-904.A requires sight visibility triangles to have landscaping maintained so that views would not be blocked above 30 inches, not 18 inches. 3 . Sheet LS & L6 -Live oaks are specified in the small approximate 10' x 11' planting area in front of the units (between driveways and sidewalks). These trees will not be good for these small areas, due to future canopy and root systems. Reconunend replacing with Little Gem Magnolias, Florida Elms or Golden Rain Trees. 4 . East Palatka Ho11y trees are specified (38 total) have a disease and are unacceptable. Change to Dahoon Holly trees. 5 . >~nsure the quantity counts in Plant Schedule oon Sheet L8 is accurate to the counts shown on Sheets LS & L6, as T count 39 LM (not 37 LM). 6 . Sheet L7 -Revise for the following: a. This typical building landscape plan does not include a "typical" for end units that have side access; and. b. Plan does not indicate the groundcover for the area between the driveways and sidewalks in front of the units where the trees are planned. 7 , Sheet L7 -This typical building landscape plan is for afive-unit building. Provide quantity counts for each of the building types by the units in each building, so that our landscape inspector will know what counts to inspect for when performing landscape inspections. Parks and Recreation: 1 , A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. (Note: Open space and recreation land fees are not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1985.) Stormwater: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 8 The following shall be addressed prior to Development Order. 1. Please revise the drainage report to include the following information: a) As stated in the Building Permit Review Committee that there will not be any credit given for the existing impervious area; therefore, the run off coefficient for pre-development shall be C = 0.2. b) For post development, break down the area of townhomes into impervious and pervious area. c) Show clearly the volume provided at the elevation that is 6" below top of bank. d) Per City of Clearwater criteria, the time of concentration shall be b0 minutes. e) Provide draw down table demonstrating that pond 20 recovers within 24 hours based on the double ring test. ~ Show storm tabulation and sub basin area in sizing the inlets and storm system. g) Verify the survey datum and revise the tables in the drainage report accordingly. 2. Show top of bank of the existing ditch and show a cross section between. the ditch and Unit #1. Based on the initial review, an approximate of 75' wide of drainage easement over the existing ditch shall be dedicated to the City for ditch maintenance. The actual width will be determined based on the review of the requested cross section. 3. Route all roof runoff to the ponds to be treated and not to the by-pass swales. 4. Provide storm structure table showing type of structures, invert elevations and slope of pipes. 5. The proposed Swale along the east side of the project shall be continue along the north side to direct runoff to the ditch. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. 1. Show cross sections at the following locations. a) Ponds 10, 11, 20 b) All swales c) Between the following Units 14,37, 90, 100, 113 and the adjacent properties. 2. Provide 50' adjacent topo, include finished floor elevations of adjacent structures. 3. Roof drain system shall be provided between Units 104 and 105 as shown between Units 94 and 95. 4. How many linear feet of 30" RCP being proposed at the southwest corner? The 2 existing single wing inlets shall be relocated. to the east of each proposed driveway. To maintain the capacity of the storm system, the existing single wing inlet to the east is not permitted to be replaced by the grate inlet. 5. Provide an. approved SWFWMD permit and approved grading plan. 6. Indicate on the demolition plan that the 18" CMP outfall pipe from Pond. 11 to the ditch and the 50 feet of 18" CMP connecting between pond 10 and the grate inlet to be removed as these pipes will be under the proposed buildings. 7. For clarification, show a note on grading plan stating the survey datum is being used. General note: 1.DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid. Waste: 1 , Double enclosure will not be sufficient for 115 units were would recycling go? would suggest either compactor or black barrel service~to each unit Barrel would have to be placed out of view after collection Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. On the site plan show where the RR signage,markings and RR crossing along with gates are in relation to the proposed development. The above to be addressed prior to a Development Order (D.O.). General Notes}: 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Pemut Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 9 1 . Based on the floor plans, windows are "optional" for the end unit, second floor narrow units only (wider units apparently don't have any "optional" windows on the end units). As these windows are "optional," the sides of the units will be blank walls, which is not appealing. 2 . 10/ 12/07 - W W Provide building elevations for all fours sides of the proposed buildings. Submitted front building elevations continue to show end units with atwo-car garage. Based on Sheet 4 and the submitted floor plans, there are no two-car garages. Revise building elevations to show reality circumstances. 10/2/07 - WW Based on the site layout on Sheet 4, buildings range from 6 - 11 units in each building. The building elevations submitted is for afour-unit building and depicts units with atwo-car garage. The site plan does not indicate any two-car garages. The building elevations also depict units . that have many planes to the faces of the building, however, the site plan indicates rectangular buildings. Provide building elevations that will be typical to this development. 3 . Parking has been. designed in a manner where the two parking spaces are stacked, requiring the vehicle in the driveway to be moved to allow the vehicle in the garage to exit. A5 such, there is only one parking space provided per unit. Need to provide one additional parking space per unit. 4 . 10/12/07 &c 10/2/07 - WW On Page 1 of the application, add the addresses of 802 and 830 Woodlawn Street. 5 . Building elevations -Provide the height of the proposed buildings from grade to the midpoint of .the pitched roof of the main portion of the building. 6 . 10/1.2/07 - WW Visibility triangles are shown on these sheets, but are drawn in the wrong locations. Revise to be along the front property line and the edge of the driveways. 10/2107 - WW Show on Sheets 4 and I,5 all required visibility triangles per City Code. 7 . On the building elevations, indicate the proposed exterior materials and colors of the building by name. Provide a color legend as to building face color, door and garage door colors and facia color. It is presumed that the facia color will not be the same color as the building face color. 8 . 10/12/07 - WW Affidavit provided for the land use/zoning change, not for this application. Affidavit provided also appoints Chris Koncal, Midway Services, whom is not listed anywhere on the application. Provide a proper Affidavit for this application. 10/2/07 - W W Provide Page 7 of the application, which is the Affidavit to Authorize Agent, which must be signed by the current owner of the property. 9 . 10/12/07 & 10/2/07 - W W Provide responses to the following Flexible Standard Development criteria for attached dwellings. Explain HOW each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential. in the Zoning Atlas. 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. 10 . Site plan layout of units and entries do not match submitted floor plans and building elevations. The following are differences that need to be shown on revised site plans: a. floor plans indicate a protruding garage with a recessed entry area. Site plans don't indicate such {rectangle box shown); b. floor plans submitted for the wider, three-bedroom units indicate a side entry for the unit, yet the site plan indicates two units (86 and 115) with a front entry for the unit; and c. floor plans submitted only show a front entry for the narrow units, yet the site plan indicates side entry for wider Units 20, 30, 45, 55, 66, 73, 74, 80, 94, 95, 104 and 105. 11 . On Page 1 of the application, AVID Group is listed as the agent. The email address given is for Kent Edwards at the AVID Group. However, Richard Trommell seems to be the person. authorized to submit the application on behalf of AVID Group, he is the engineer signing responses to comments and he is signing/sealing the plans. Should emails and other correspondence be going to Richard Trommell? Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 10 12 . Sheet 1 -Revise Site•Data for the following: a. Property Address -Add 830 Woodlawn Street; b. Property Zoning -Add after MDR {Medium Density Residential) (Proposed. under LUZ2006-08006); adn c. Maximum Building Height -Revise to actual height. 13 . Required 25-foot front setback from Woodlawn Street must be measured from proposed property line (after right-of--way dedication). This will affect at least the two buildings on the west side with Units 1-8 and Units 9-19. Show new property line with. dimensions to the proposed buildings. 14 . Need to provide a sidewalk south of Unit 36, with. HC ramp at intersection (all appropriate sheets). 15 . Mail Kiosk - a. Provide a design for this kiosk, including elevations; b. Must be handicap accessible; c. There is no parking provided at this kiosk. Unclear how residents will actually get their mail at this kiosk, as unit owners on the north side will not walk to the kiosk but will park their vehicle at this kiosk on their way in or out. Parking now would be within the roadway, which is not safe. 16 . Unclear why the entrances are being gated. Provide an explanation. 17 . On the building elevations, indicate the dimensions of the building, including the length and depth of the buildings. Also add length and depth of buildings on Sheet 4. 18 . 10/ 12/07 - W W Floor plans indicate "optional screen. enclosure under cantilever" with a door to the rear from this screen enclosure. Units 66 - 94 still shown with stem walls at the edge of the cantilever, which is still a problem. 10/2/07 _ W W As a heads-up, while it is not part of a completeness review, the building elevations indicate sliding glass doors at the rear of units. By Building Cade, there must be at least athree-foot wide stoop outside the sliding glass doors. Such stoops/patios must meet required setbacks. Additionally, certain buildings are indicated with a stem wall at the rear of the buildings, which. can create additional issues regarding these stoops/patios. It is advised to look at this in greater detail to avoid comments requiring redesign during the DRC review process. 19 . Flexibility criteria requires off-street parking to be screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. Show on all appropriate site and landscape plans. 20 . Sheet 4 (and other sheets) -Unclear of the meaning of "MC" on Units 1 - 4. There is no "NIC" in the Site Legend. Revise. 21 . Floor plans for the narrow units indicate at the rear of the unit where the second floor cantilevers over the ground floor patio that there is an "optional screen enclosure under cantilever." This is not similarly shown on the wider units. If such is an option for the wider units, revise to indicate such. 22 . All floor plan sheets are labeled Sheet 2 of 4. Unclear why they are so indicated when they show different Hoar plans. Revise. 23 . Sheet 4 indicates the typical narrow units to be 16 feet in width (assumed to centerline of demising walls). However, floor plans for the narrow units indicate the units to be 15'-4" wide (to center of demising walls). Site plan and.floor plans are not coordinated. Which is correct? Revise. 24 . Sheet 5 -Unclear what the elevation on each building is denoting, since there is a little note in the bottom right hand. corner that states the "finished floor elevations are 0.5' higher than pad elevations shown." 25 . Sheet 6 -All electric and communication lines must be underground, including for street lighting. Place note on this sheet. 26 . From a buffering standpoint to address compatibility of adjacent uses, recommend the installation of a six-foot high solid fence or wall with landscaping an the inside of the fence/wall adjacent to the three detached dwellings that this project wraps around (806, 818 and 822 Woodlawn Street}. Within the front setback adjacent to Woodlawn Street, the fence/walll must be reduced to a maximum of three feet in height. 27 . Preliminary Plat application form. -Signature cannot be determined as to whom signed it, as it not notarized. Revise. 28 . Preliminary Plat application form -Add on. Page 2 the following: a. additional addresses of the property of $02 and 830 Woodlawn Street; b. Project Valuation. Development Review Agenda _ Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 11 24 . Response to Gener~Applicablity criteria'#1 (Page 2 ofFLS applic~n) -Explain in detail how the proposed attached dwelling project is in harmony with the scale, bulls, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties zoned and developed with detached dwellings, including the three lots fronting on Woodlawn Street this project wraps around. 30 . Response to General Applicability criteria' #2 (Page 2 of FLS application) -Explain in detail how this project will not impair the value of adjacent detached dwelling lots, including the three lots fronting on Woodlawn Street this project wraps around. 31 . Response to General Applicability criteria #3 (Page 2 of FLS application) -Explain in detail HOW this project will not affect the health ar safety of persons residing in the neighborhood. Do not restate the criteria as the response. 32 . Response to General Applicability criteria #4 {Page 2 of FLS application) -Explain in detail HOW this project will minimize traffic congestion on these local roads. 33 . Response to General Applicability criteria. #5 (Page 2 of FLS application) -The future land use for the three lots fronting. on Woodlawn Street this property surrounds, as well as properties south of Woodlawn Street and to the west across the railroad tracks is Residential Urban (maximum density of 7.5 du/acre). While the zoning district may be the same, the land. use density is quite different. Revise the response to address these divergent land use densities relating to consistency and compatibility. What measures are being employed to nunimize negative impacts? 34 . Response to General Applicability criteria #6 (Page 2 of FLS application) -The future land use for the three lots fronting on Woodlawn Street this property surrounds, as well as properties south of Woodlawn Street and to the west across the railroad tracks is Residential Urban {maximum. density of 7.5 du/acre), which is not the same as what has been requested for this property. Revise the response to address these divergent land use densities relating to this criteria. 35 . Note: Signage, which will need to meet Code requirements, will be handled. separately through sign permits. 36 . Condition of approval to be included in the Development Order: That approval of this Flexible Standard Development {FLS) application be subject to the approval of the change to land use and zoning under LUZ2006-08006. As such, no Final Plat maybe approved. by City Council and no building permits to construct horizontal or vertical irrrprovements may be issued until LUZ2006-08006 is approved. Other: No Comments Votes: Revisions are necessary for this application, as it is insufficient to issue a Development Order, and requires re-review by the Development Review Comrruttee (revise and resubmit}. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 12 ' Case Number: PLT2007-00006 -- 826 WOODLAWN ST 9:15 am Owner(s): Woodlawn Church Of God Bd Of T 845 Woodlawn St Clearwater, F13375b TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Avid Group 2300 Curlew Road Suite 100 Palm Harbor, F134683 TELEPHONE: 727-789-9500, FAX: 727-784-6662, E-MAIL: 1<ent.edwards@avidgroup.com. Location: 8.1 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WOODLAWN STREET BETWEEN S. MYRTLE AVENUE AND TILLEY AVENUE Atlas Page: 314A Zoning District: I, Institutional Request: Preliminary Plat approval for 115 lots in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email .Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III ' Attendees Included: CITY: WAYNE WELLS, NEIL THOMPSON, SCOTT RICE, STEVE DOHERTY, JIM KELLER, RICK ALBEE, TOM GLENN APPLICANT: KENT EDWARDS, ABBEY NAYLOR, CHRIS KONCAL, RICK TONNELL The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. Indicate on the preliminary plat the dedication of a total of 30-feet ofright-of--way for Woodlawn Street to be measured from the north line of the of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. 2. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the property owner on the prelirrunary plat. {Community Development Code Sec. 4-703{A)2.) 3. Provide proposed street names. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)6.) 4. Show on the preliminary plat the names of the adjoining plats, appropriately positioned. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)7.) 5. Provide area and dimensions (to nearest foot) of the overall plat, each lot, street rights-of--way and. common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purpose, if any. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)8 a-d.) Environmental: 1 , No Issues. Fire: No issues Harbor Master: No Comrrients Legal: 1 , No issues. Land Resources: See comments under FLS2007-10045 Landscaping: I . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Parks and Recreation: 1 , A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit. or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. (Note: Open space and recreation land fees are not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1985.) Stormwater: 1 . No Issues Solid Waste: t See comments under FLS2007-10045 Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 13 Traffic Engineering: I . No issues. Planning: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Other: No Comments Notes: REVISIONS ARE NECESSARY FOR THIS APPLICATION, AS IT IS INSUFFICIENT TO ISSUE A DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND REQUIRES RE-REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (REVISE AND RESUBMIT). Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 14 9:15 am Case Number: FLS2007-1.0043 -- 802 WOODLAWN ST Owner(s): Woodlawn Church Of God Bd Of T 845 Woodlawn St ,' ~ 1 ~ Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email ~~ Representative: Avid Group 2300 Curlew Road Suite 100 Palm Harbor, F134683 TELEPHONE: 727-789-9500, FAX: 727-784-6662, E-MAIL: kent.edwards~7a avidgroup.com Location: 8.1 acres located on the north side of Woodlawn Street between S. Myrtle Avenue and Tilley Avenue Atlas Page: 314A Zoning District: I, Institutional Request: Flexible Standard Development application to permit 115 attached dwellings (townhomes) in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A, and Preliminary Plat approval for 115 lots (PLT2007-00006). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email. Neighborhood South Clearwater Citizens For Progr Association{s): Clearwater, F13375b 1120 Kingsley St. TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: duketieman@aol.com Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Rick Albee, Lenny Rickard Applicant: Kent Edwards The DRC reviewed this application with the following continents: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 5 Prior to the issuanc~ a Development Order: • 1. Proposed dumpster shall not encroach into drainage easement. 2. Proposed plans shall indicate dedication of additional street right-of--way for Woodlawn Street to provide a total of 30-feet ofright-of--way measured from the north line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22; Township 29 South, Range 15 East. (Note that the condominium plat of Woodlawn Terrace I indicates 30-feet of street right-of--way measured from the 1/4 section line - the applicant's survey needs to be amended to reflect same). 3. Revise drawings to show 20'x20' sight triangles located along a proposed property line drawn 30-feet north of the quarter section line described in preceding condition 2. 4. The townhome building located in the southwest corner of the site is located adjacent a ditch that provides regional drainage from lands south of the subject property to Lake Belleview. Applicant shall provide cross sectional drawings for analysis by Stormwater review for a determination of need for a drainage easement to enable maintenance of the drainage feature by the City of Clearwater. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: 1. The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will remove/relocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as part of this development, including reclaim water meters. (No meters shall be located within any impervious areas.) 2. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.095), set the water meter (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.096) and set the B.F.P.D. (back flow prevention device). The applicant is responsible for the water main extension from the tap to the device. Applicant is also responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. 3. Sanitary sewer manhole cover(s) shall not have the lettering, "Clearwater" or "City of Clearwater" on them. This system is a private system. 4. Show the force main discharging from the existing lift station. Indicate where the discharge is to connect to the public sewer system. Is the existing force main to be replaced? 5. Provide sanitary sewer pipe size/type/slope information on the utility plan. 6. Reclaimed water is not presently available to this site. 7. Demolition plan references Hillsborough County standards for root pruning. Please reference City of Clearwater specifications and standards. 8. Applicant shall obtain permanent address assignments from the Engineering Department. 9. Applicant shall provide a recorded copy of the final plat for "Townhomes at Lake Belleview". 10. Water Note #1 on page 2 indicates minimum cover requirement of 34-inches; correct to read,"The depth of cover over the water main shall be a minimum of 30" and a maximum of 42" below fuush grade". (City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "B" Technical Specifications, Section IV, Article 41.03(B)(1) 11. Provide length of each run and type of pipe to used for water mains. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 6 1. The plans provided show fill and structures within wetlands and wetland buffers. The City of Clearwater's Comrnur-ity Development Code Section 3-907 states, "A vegetative buffer shall be provided on all lands within 25 feet of any property designated on the honing Atlas as preservation (P), or any property determined to be wetlands under the jurisdiction of the State of :Florida (°jurisdictional wetlands"); and all lands within 15 feet of the top of the bank of any creeks, channels, or related waterways which contain jurisdictional wetlands." Revise plans so structures or parking lots do nat impact wetlands or wetland buffers. 2. The City's Design Criteria Storm Drainage rules require wet detention ponds to incorporate a vegetated littoral shelf over 35% of the area of the pond under normal conditions. Provide a planting plan for Wetland. Detention Pond 10. 3. Provide a planting plan for littoral shelf in Pond 1 L Fire: 1 . Add note to page 2 "Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241.. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started". PRIOR TO DO 2 . Gates will require KNOB key system with power backup or manual override Acknowledge with note on page 2 PRIOR TO DO 3 . East entry shows an island in drive. When an island. is incorporated in a drive isle, 20' clearance is required on both sides. On current plan 20' is shown on entry side and 12' is shown on exit side. Change or remove island PRIOR TO DO 4 , Show Firefighter access to the rear of the buildings, Swale will not provide access of I50 ft. per NFPA 1 Chapter 18 PRIOR TO D.O. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 , Sheet L-1 indicates trees to be removed that are shown to be preserved in the spreadsheet on sheet L-2, ie tree #168. Insure that all plan sheets correspond to each other prior to D.O. 2 . Shaw the canopies of all trees to remain on all plan sheets. The general rule for hardwoods is one-foot radius for each diameter inch (DBH). Revise prior to D.O. 3 . It does not appear that the tree inventory was utilized to design this site. No effort was made to preserve trees as the site is too dense, no open areas exist within the center of the site to preserve quality trees. Suggest a second look be made utilizing your arborist and the inventory. 4 , All trees rated #2 should. be trees that are declining and should not be preserved. However, the plans indicate saving these trees. Verify with your arborist that these trees truly are to be preserved prior to D.O. 5 . The Preservation Plan must reflect which trees require special attention such as root pruning, tunneling and canopy elevating, ie: root prunig at tree #205. The plan must be more precise. Revise prior to D.O. 6 , Insure that impacts are reduced at trees to be preserved, ie: relocate the strom line outside the canopy of tree #8. Revise prior to D.O. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 7 1 . Sheet L5 - Revis~P to the rear of Units 56 - 58 to CV, similar to tit to the rear of Units 37 - 41, since these two locations are the only units that are oriented rear of unit to side of unit separated by 20 feet. 2 , Sheet LS - Detail A -Section 3-904.A requires sight visibility triangles to have landscaping maintained so that views would not be blocked above 30 inches, not 18 inches. 3 . Sheet LS & L6 -Live oaks are specified in the small approximate 10' x 11' planting area in front of the units (between driveways and sidewalks). These trees will not be good for these small areas, due to future canopy and root systems. Recommend replacing with Little Gem Magnolias, Florida >/1ms or Galden Rain Trees. 4 . East Palatka Holly trees are specified (38 total) have a disease and are unacceptable. Change to Dahoon Holly trees. 5 . Ensure the quantity counts in Plant Schedule oon Sheet L8 is accurate to the counts shown on Sheets L5 & L6, as I count 39 LM (not 37 LM). 6 . Sheet L7 -Revise for the following: a. This typical building landscape plan does not include a "typical" for end units that have side access; and b. Plan does not indicate the groundcover for the area between the driveways and sidewalks in front of the units where the trees are planned. ~ . Sheet L7 -This typical building landscape plan is for afive-unit building. Provide quantity counts for each of the building types by the units in each building, so that our landscape , inspector will know what counts to inspect. for when performing landscape inspections. Parks and Recreation: 1 . A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. ('Note: Open space and recreation land fees are not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1985.) Stormwater: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 8 1 _ The following shaIrbe addressed prior to Development Order. 1. Please revise the drainage report to include the following information: a) As stated in the Building Permit Review Committee that there will not be any credit given for the existing impervious area; therefore, the run off coefficient for pre-development shall be C = 0.2. b) For post development, break down. the area of townhomes into impervious and pervious area. c} Show clearly the volume provided at the elevation that is 6"' below top of bank. d) Per City of Clearwater criteria, the time of concentration shall be 60 minutes. e} Provide draw down table demonstrating that pond 20 recovers within 24 hours based. on the double ring test. f) Show storm tabulation and sub basin area in sizing the inlets and storm. system. g) Verify the survey datum and revise the tables in the drainage report accordingly. 2. Show top of bank of the existing ditch and show a cross section between the ditch and Unit # 1. Based on the initial review, an approximate of 75' wide of drainage easement over the existing ditch shall be dedicated to the City for ditch maintenance. The actual width will be detemuned based on the review of the requested cross section. 3. Route all roof runoff to the ponds to be treated and not to the by-pass swales. 4. Provide storm structure table showing type of structures, invert elevations and slope of pipes. 5. The proposed Swale along the east side of the project shall be continue along the north side to direct runoff to the ditch. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. 1. Show cross sections at the following locations. a) Ponds 10, 11, 20 b) All. swales c) Between the following Units 14,37, 90, 100, 113 and the adjacent properties. 2. Provide 50' adjacent topo, include fnished floor elevations of adjacent structures. 3. Roof drain system. shall be provided between Units 104 and 105 as shown between Units 94 and 95. 4. How many linear feet of 30" RCP being proposed at the southwest corner? The 2 existing single wing inlets shall be relocated to the east of each proposed driveway. To maintain the capacity of the storm system, the existing single wing inlet to the east is not permitted to be replaced by the grate inlet. 5. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit and approved grading plan. 6. Indicate on the demolition plan that the 1$" CMP outfall pipe from Pond 11 to the ditch and the 50 feet of 18" CMP connecting between pond 10 and the grate inlet to be removed as these pipes will be under the proposed buildings. 7. For clarification, show a note on grading plan stating the survey datum is being used. General note: 1.DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Perrrut Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: 1 . Double enclosure will not be sufficient for 115 units were would recycling go? would suggest either compactor or black barrel service to each unit Barrel would have to be placed out of view after collection Traffic Engineering: 1 _ Relocate access east of the RR tracks. This driveway does not meet the 125' spacing requirements between intersections (Community Developemrtt Code Section 3-102 C. 3.) . 2. On the site plan show where the RR signage,markings and RR crossing along with gates are in relation to the proposed development. The above to be addressed prior to a Development Order (D.O.). General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall. comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments maybe forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 9 Planning: 1 . Based on the floor plans, windows are "optional" far the end unit, second floor narrow units only (wider units apparently don't have any "optional" windows on the end units}. As these windows are "optional," the sides of the units will be blank walls, which is not appealing. 2 . 10/12/07 - WW Provide building elevations for all fours sides of the proposed buildings. Submitted. front building elevations continue to show end units with atwo-car garage. Based on Sheet 4 and the submitted floor plans, there are no two-car garages. Revise building elevations to show reality circumstances. 10/2/07 - W W Based on the site layout on Sheet 4, buildings range from 6 - 11 units in each building. The building elevations submitted is for afour-unit building and depicts units with atwo-car garage. The site plan does not indicate any two-car garages. The building elevations also depict units that have many planes to the faces of the building, however, the site plan indicates rectangular buildings. Provide building elevations that wi1P be typical to this development. 3 . Parking has been designed in a manner where the iwo parking spaces are stacked, requiring the vehicle in the driveway to be moved to allow the vehicle in the garage to exit. As such, there is only one parking space provided. per unit. Need to provide one additional parking space per unit. 4 . 10/12/07 & 10/2/07 - WW On Page 1 of the application, add the addresses of 802 and 830 Woodlawn Street. 5 . Building elevations -Provide the height of the proposed buildings from grade to the midpoint of the pitched roof of the main portion of the building. 6 . 10/12/07 - WW Visibility triangles are shown on these sheets, but are drawn in the wrong locations. Revise to be along the front property line and the edge of the driveways. 10/2/07 - WW Show on Sheets 4 and LS all required visibility triangles per City Code. 7 . On the building elevations, indicate the proposed exterior materials and. colors of the building by name. Provide a color legend as to building face color, door and garage door colors and facia color. It is presumed that the facia color will not be the same color as the building face color. 8 . 10/12/07 - WW Affidavit provided for the land use/zoning change, not for this application. Affidavit provided also appoints Chris Koncal, Midway Services, whom is not listed anywhere on the application. Pravide a proper Affidavit for this application. 1012/07 - W W Pravide Fage 7 of the application, which is the Affidavit to Authorize Agent, which must be signed by the current owner of the property. 9 . 10/12/07 & 10/2/07 - WW Provide responses to the following Flexible Standard Development criteria for attached dwellings. Explain HOW each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. 10 . Site plan layout of units and entries do not match submitted floor plans and building elevations. The following are differences that need to he shown. on revised site plans: a. floor plans indicate a protruding garage with a recessed entry area. Site plans don`t indicate such. (rectangle box shown); b. floor plans submitted for the wider, three-bedroom units indicate a side entry for the unit, yet the site plan. indicates two units {86 and 115) with a front entry for the unit; and c. floor plans submitted only show a front entry for the narrow units, yet the site plan indicates side entry for wider Units 20, 30, 45, 55, 66, 73, 74, 80, 94, 95, 1.04 and 105. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 10 11 . On Page 1 of the app-lication, AVID Group is listed as the agent. The email. address given is for Kent Edwards at the AVID Group. However, Richard Trornmell seems to be the person authorized to submit the application on behalf of AVID Group, he is the engineer signing responses to comments and he is signing/sealing the plans. Should emails and other correspondence be going. to Richard Trommeil? 12 . Sheet 1 -Revise Site Data for the following: a. Property Address -Add 830 Woodlawn Street; b. Property Zoning -Add after MDR (Medium Density Residential) (Proposed under LL3Z2006-08006); adn c. Maximum Building Height -Revise to actual height. 13 . Required 2S-foot front setback from Woodlawn Street must be measured from proposed property line {after right-af--way dedication). This will affect at least the two buildings on the west side with Units 1-8 and Units 9-19. Show new property line with dimensions to the proposed buildings. 14 . Need to provide a sidewalk south of Unit 36, with HC ramp at intersection (all appropriate sheets). 15 . Mail Kiosk - a. Provide a design for this kiosk, including elevations; b. Must be handicap accessible; c. There is no parking provided at this kiosk. Unclear how residents will actually get their mail at this kiosk, as unit owners on the north side will not walk to the kiosk but will•park their vehicle at this kiosk on their way in or out. Parking now would be within the roadway, which is not safe. 16 . Unclear why the entrances are being gated. Provide an explanation. ' 17 . On the building elevations, indicate the dimensions of the building, including the length and depth of the buildings. Also add length and depth of buildings on Sheet 4. 18 . 10/12/07 - WW Floor plans indicate "aptional screen enclosure under cantilever" with a door to the rear from this screen enclosure. Units 66 - 94 still shown with stem walls at the edge of the cantilever, which is still a problem. 10/2/07 - WW As a heads-up, while it is not part of a completeness review, the building elevations indicate sliding glass doors at the rear of units. By Building Code, there must be at least athree-foot wide stoop outside the sliding glass doors. Such stoops/patios must meet required setbacks. Additionally, certain buildings are indicated with a stem wall at the rear of the buildings, which can create additional issues regarding these stoops/patios. It is advised to look at this in greater detail to avoid comments requiring redesign during the DRC review process. 19 . Flexibility criteria requires off-street parking to be screened from adjacent parcels of land and. any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. Show on all appropriate site and landscape plans. 20 . Sheet 4 (and other sheets) -Unclear of the meaning of "MC" on Units 1 - 4. There is no "MC" in the Site Legend. Revise. 21 . Floor plans for the narrow units indicate at the rear of the unit where the second floor cantilevers over the ground floor patio that there is an "optional screen enclosure under cantilever." This is not similarly shown on the wider units. If such is an option for the wider units, revise to indicate such. 22 . All floor plan sheets are labeled Sheet 2 of 4. Unclear why they are so indicated when they show different floor plans. Revise. 23 . Sheet 4 indicates the typical narrow units to be 16 feet in width (assumed to centerline of demising walls). However, floor plans for the narrow units indicate the units to be 15'-4" wide (to center of demising walls). Site plan and floor plans are not coordinated. Which is correct? Revise. 24 . Sheet 5 -Unclear what the elevation on each building is denoting, since there is a little note in the bottom right hand corner that states the "finished floor elevations are 0.5' higher than pad elevations shown." 25 . Sheet 6 -All electric and communication lines must be underground, including for street lighting. Place note on this sheet. 26 . From a buffering standpoint to address compatibility of adjacent uses, recon~rnend the installation of a six-foot high solid fence or wall with landscaping on the inside of the fence/wall adjacent to the three detached dwellings that this project wraps around (806, 818 and 822 Woodlawn Street). Within the front setback adjacent to Woodlawn Street, the fence/walll must be reduced to a maximum of three feet in height. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 11 27 . Preliminary Plat application. form -Signature cannot be determined as~"o whom. signed it, as it not notarized. Revise. 28 . Preliminary Plat application form -Add on Page 2 the following: a. additional addresses of the property of 802 and 830 Woodlawn Street; b. Project Valuation. 29 . Response to General Applicability criteria #1 (Page 2 of FLS application) -Explain in detail how the proposed attached dwelling project is in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties zoned and developed with detached dwellings, including the three lots fronting on Woodlawn Street this project wraps around. 30 . Response to General Applicability criteria #2 (Page 2 of FLS application) -Explain in detail how this project will not impair the value of adjacent detached dwelling lots, including the three lots fronting on Woodlawn Street this project wraps around. 31 . Response to General Applicability criteria #3 (Page 2 of FLS application) -Explain in detail HOW this project will not affect the health or safety of persons residing in the neighborhood. Do not restate the criteria. as the response. 32 . Response to General Applicability criteria #A (Page 2 of FLS application).- Explain in detail HOW this project will minimize traffic congestion on these local roads. 33 . Response to General Applicability criteria #5 (Page 2 of FLS application) -The future land use for the three lots fronting on Woodlawn Street this property surrounds, as well as properties south of Woodlawn Street and to the west across the railroad tracks is Residential Urban (maximum density of 7.5 du/acre). While the zoning district may be the same, the land use density is quite different. Revise the response to address these divergent land use densities relating to consistency and compatibility. What measures are being employed to minimize negative impacts? 34 . Response to General Applicability criteria #6 (Page 2 of FLS application) -The future land use for the three lots fronting on Woodlawn Street this property surrounds, as well as properties south of Woodlawn Street and to the west across the railroad tracks is Residential. Urban (maximum density of 7.5 du/acre), which is not the same as what has been requested for this property. Revise the response to address these divergent land use densities relating to this criteria. 35 . Note: Signage, which will need to meet Code requirements, will be handled separately through sign permits. 36 . Condition of approval to be included in the Development Order: That approval of this Flexible Standard Development (FLS) application be subject to the approval of the change to land use and zoning under LUZ2006-08006. As such, no Final Plat maybe approved. by City Council and no building permits to construct horizontal or vertical improvements may be issued until LUZ2006-08006 is approved. Other: No Comments Notes: Revisions are necessary for this application, as it is insufficient to issue a Development Order,. and. requires re-review by the Development Review Committee (revise and. resubmit). Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 12 a 9:15 tlm Case Number: PLT2007-000 -- 826 WOODLAWN ST Owner(s): Woodlawn Church Of God Bd Of T 845 Woodlawn St Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Avid. Group 2300 Curlew Road Suite 100 Palm Harbor, Fl 34683 TELEPHONE: 727-789-9500, FAX: 727-784-6662, E-MAIL: kent.edwards@avidgroup.com Location: 8.1 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WOODLAWN STREET BETWEEN S. MYRTLE A~IENUE AND TILLEY AVENIJE Atlas Page: 314A Zoning District: I, Institutional Request: Preliminary Plat approval. for 115 lots in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District.. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box $204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: CITY: WAYNE WELLS, NEIL THOMPSON, SCOTT RICE, STEVE DOHERTY, LENNY RICKARD, RICK ALBEE APPLICANT: KENT EDWARDS The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: ~' l , 1. Indicate on the preliminary plat the dedication of a total of 30-feet of right-of way to be measured from the north line of the of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. 2. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the property owner on the preliminary plat. {Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)2.) 3. Provide proposed street names. {Corrmlunity Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)6.) 4. Show on the preliminary plat the names of the adjoining plats, appropriately positioned. {Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)7.) 5. Provide area and dimensions (to nearest foot) of the overall plat, each lot, street rights-of--way and common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purpose, if any. (Community Development Code Sec. 4-703(A)8 a-d.) Environmental: 1 , No Issues. P'ire: 1 , No issues Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: I - No issues. Land Resources: 1 , See comments under FLS2007-10045 Landscaping; 1 - See comments under FLS2007-10045 Parks and Recreation: 1 . A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or fmal plat (if applicable) whichever occurs fast. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader a# 727-562-4824. {Note: Open space and recreation land fees are not due on this project as land had been given to the City in 1985.) Stormwater: 1 . No Issues Solid Waste: 1 See comments under FLS2007-10045 Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 13 ' Traffic Engineering: 1 , Remove access east of the RR tracks. This driveway does not meet the 125' spacing requirements between intersections (Community Developemnt Code Section 3-102 C. 3.) . Planning: 1 . See comments under FLS2007-10045 Other: No Comments Notes: REVISIONS ARE NECESSARY FOR THIS APPLICATION, AS IT IS INSUFFICIENT TO ISSUE A DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AND REQiTIRES RE-REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (REVISE AND RESUBMIT). Development Review Agenda -Thursday, November 1, 2007 -Page 14 • Wells, Wayne Fram: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 7:01 PM To: ~ Holmes, Michael Subject: FLS2007-10045 - 802, 82fi and 830 Woodlawn Street. Michael - I am the case planner for the above referenced project (Lake Bellevue, 115 townhomes), which is proposed on property currently owned by Woodlawn Church. of God. Michael Delk has suggested that we get together to go over their proposed puns, as Housing is (potentially) involved with this project. Please let me know what day/time works for you. Wayne P~nPllas County Property App~r Information: 22 29 15 98941 000 2 ~ Page 2 of 5 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.~ r ~~~~1 ~ aoa ~ Z~a~ 02-Oct-2007 Jim Smith, CFR Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:52:06 Ownership Information Condo/Pud Property Address, Use, and Sales WOODLAWH CHURCH OF GOD BD OF TRUSTEES OBK: 11402 OPG: 0688 845 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756-2180 EVAC: Non-EVAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 826 WOODLAWH ST of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract: 258.00 sales from 2005 - 2006: 54,400 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price {Qual/UnQ) VaclImp Plat Information 6 12,001 11,402/ 656 275,000 {Q} I 1986: Book 092 Pgs 032- 6 12,001 11,402/ 688 275,000 {U} I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 p { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS JustlMarket: 46,200 Homestead: NO Ownership ~ .000 Govt Exem: HO Use x: .000 Assessed/Cap: 46,200 Institutional Exem: HO Tax Exempt ~: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 46,200 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Tax: 957.62 Land Size Unit Land Land Land 07 Prop Tax: 921.11 Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 1) 0 x 0 .00 .00 07 Spec Asmt; .00 2} D x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes q} p x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 921.11 6} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be 921.11 Short Legal WOODLAWH TERRA CE I COHDO UNIT 8101 Description Building Information http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=22... 10/2/2007 Pinellas County Property Appr Information: 22 29 15 98941 000 2 Property and Land Use Code descri tp ions ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~L" ~~~~ Page 3 of 5 02-Oct-2007 Jim Smith, CFR Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:52:06 General Information Property Use: 230 Yr Blt: 1,986 Apt #: g-i01 Size: 600 Floor: 01 RE CRE AT I ~]?V SITE 1]ATA Kane View standard Building garden}n Location corner Balcony{Porch scr-std ~~ Condo! P1ann~+d LTrti.t Extra F~atur Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 z) . ao 0 o a a ~) . oo a o a o 4) .00 0 0 0 D 5) . DO 0 0 0 D 5} .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1&a=1&b=1&c=1&r=.16&s=4&t3=1&u=0&p=22.., 10/2/2007 Pir.,eilas County Property App~er Inforrnation: 22 29 15 98941 000 2~ I~~ Page 4 of 5 ~ MART IN I,~THER eu - ~~rt~' . ~ ~ ~~ r~; f ~i aL~ ~1 n ~_ +?~ rb ti~• ~, ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~` ~~~. ,~ ~ o 1~0~~~ o C7Q,A1+4~ ~~ Qi h! ~ ~-; ~~ ~7~ ~ cu ~~ ~~ ~ Lu ~ ~ - ~ ~r ~ rye, ~ ~~ ~7 f rddT~LAL+~N T I ~4~~ ~T EVE WdC~S~ ~.tNN 1511 TILL~EY ICI I I~il ~r`PAhIT(ti.h€ 1/S Mile Aerial Photograph (2402} ~~ gg ~ ~' '~~~.A SII ~~T 813- ~ 17 Tfi~1 ~~ ~ ~~! 5 LL gg ,~1~E httpa/136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=22... 10/2/2007 Pinellas County Property App~er Information: 22 29 15 98941 000 2~ ~~~;, E . ~~:-~ ~" ~ ~~,.a* E u,' s ~ -. ~. ~~_ . _, ~ "~~_ ~ ti~_ ~~ `.~~ . ~ { Fs T } {~T 4 ? 'i T~ S 1 ~Y ~t R -~~ } ~ ~~~1 ~ k ~,' R2 ~t } f f ,~ ._ ]» ~ t r _`-~ Y ~. i1 - ~ .: .: .,t i f- -.~.~~, i ~ 3;, ~~ ;r; ,~ ,`'~ ~ Y ~( Pinellas County Property Appraiser ~` ..YVF ~~ Parcel Information ~ _ pi ~' ~ ~' _ Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen Page 5 of 5 http:// 13 6.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=22... 10/2/2007 Pinellas County Property Appr~r Information: 22 29 15 00000 320 07~ Page 2 of 5 ~L I ~~ I 1~J ~ ~LJVVV ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~V 02-Oct-2007 Jim Smith, CFR Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:53:25 Ownership Information Vacant Property Use and Sales WOOOLAWN CHURCH OF GOB BO OF TRUSTEES QBK: 11402 OPG: D588 845 WOOBLAWH ST GLEARWATER FL 33756-2180 EVRC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Rddr: p of Jan 1,, 2007, based on Census Tract: 258, DD sale from 2005 - 2006: s p Sale Date DR BookJPa ge Price {quallUnQ} Vacllmp Plat Information 6 12,001 11,402/ 588 275,000 {U} V DODO: Boak Pgs - 0 10 OJ D 0 { } ODDD: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 D 0 { ) 0000: gook Pgs - 0 10 D/ D 0 { } 2007 Value E?GEMPTTDNS JustlMarket; 553,5DD Homestead: NO Ownership ~ .000 Govt Exem: NO 11se ~: .000 AssessedlCap: 553,500 Institutional~Exem: YES Tax Exempt ~: .000 Historic Exem: p Taxable; 0 Agricultural: p 2007 Tax Information District: CW Seawall; Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Tax; .DD Land Size lJnit Land Land Land 07 Prop Tax: .OD Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: ~ 19.9371 1} 415 x 478 175, 000. DO 4. 55 A 07 Spec Asmt: . 00 ~} D x 0 i, 000. DD . 74 A 3} D x 0 . 00 . DO LJithout the Save-Our-Homes q} D x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007.taxes will be : 5} D x D .DO .00 .00 6} 0 x 0 .00, .00 lJithaut any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be ; 13, 028. 89 Shart Legal PART SEC 22 & 21 OESG BEG ME GOR WOODLAWN TERRACE Description CONDO TH W ALG GOHDO BNURY 135,8FT TH 5W 115.87FT TH Building Information http:// 136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o~ 1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=2... 10/2/2007 Pinellas County Property Appr~r Information: 22 29 15 00000 320 07~ 22 ~ 29 ~ 15 ~ 00000 / 320 10200 Page 3 of 5 02-Oct-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas CDunty Property Appraiser 13:53:25 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 Va c and E x t r a F~ a~ ur e s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1} .00 0 0 0 0 2} .00 0 0 0 0 3} .00 0 0 0 0 4} .00 0 0 0 0 5} .00 D 0 0 0 6} .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=2... 10/2/2007 P;nellas County Property Appr~r Information: 22 29 1 S 00000 320 07~ Page 4 of S 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph {2002) http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &i=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=2... 10/2/2007 P;nellas County Property Appr Inforrnation: 22 29 15 00000 320 07~ Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser ~ ~ - ~~ ',- .:_`' Parcel Information , ~~ ' ~ r _., http://136.174.1 $7.13/lxtbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=2... 10/2/2007 Piilellas County Property Appr~r Information: 22 29 15 00000 320 02~ Page 2 of 5 02-Oct-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:53:49 Ownership Information Hon-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales CLEARWATER WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD BD OF TRUSTEES OBK: 13539 OPG: 1867 845 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756-2180 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 802 WOODLAWN ST of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract: 258.00 sales from 2005 - 2006: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price {Qua//UnQ} Vac/Imp Plat Information 4 12,004 13,539/1,867 165,000 {U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 7 12,002 12,09312,684 39,000 {M} I 0000: Book Pgs - 12/1,995 9,1901 747 70,000 {M) I D000: Book Pgs - 7 11,985 6,03311,543 50,000 {M} I 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS JustlMarket: 330,200 Homestead: NO Ownership ~ .000 Govt Exem: NO Use ~: .000 Assessed/Cap: 330,200 Institutional Exem: HO Tax Exempt ~: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 330,200 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Tax: 6,226.68 Land Size Unit Land Land Land 07 Prop Tax: 6,583.25 Front x Depth Price ~ Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 1) 238 x 192 i, 000. 00 238. 00 F 07 Spec Asmt: .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 ~.00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be 5} 0 x 0 .00 .DO 6, 583.25 6} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be : 6, 583.25 Short Legal FROM SW COR OF NW 114 OF SW i/4 TH H 2OFT FOR POB Description TH H 79FT{S} TH NW 115FT {S} ALG RR R/W TH E 254FT Building Information. http:// 136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=2... 10/2/2007 R Pinellas County Property Appr Information: 22 29 15 00000 320 02~ Page 3 of 5 L~ ! ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~V~~~ I ~J~~ ~ ~~~~ ~1 02-Oct-?007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:53:49 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Res Comm Use Property Address; $0? WOODLAWN 5T Prop Use; 353 Land Use: 71 Structural E1sm~rt-ts Foundation Continuous Fasting Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior lJall Siding Average Height Factor D Party LJall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Gable $c Hip Roof Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units i Heating & Air Heating&Coaling Pckg Fixtures ~ Bath Tile Half Wall. Electric Average Shape Factor Square Quality Average Year Built 1,921 Effective Age ?5 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation p S1a1•3 Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1} Base Area i.QO i,'6?4 7} .00 0 2} Base Semi Finished .OD 312 $} .00 0 3} Utility .35 144 9} .00 0 r}) Open Porch . ?D ?97 14} . 00 0 5} .00 0 11) .OD 0 ~} . DD 0 12) . 00 0 ~c~mm~rcial E~ctra ~'~atur~s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1} FIREPLACE ?,500.00 1 ?,500 1,000 1,9?i 2} .00 0 0 0 0 3} .00 0 0 0 0 4} .00 0 0 0 0 5} . QO D D 0 0 ~} .00 0 0 D 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: i,OpD Map 'With Property Address (non-vacant) ®®® http://136.174,187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=2... 10/2/2007 Pinellas County Property Appr~r Information: 22 29 15 00000 320 02~ 1~h1~W~00C~ LDWODD 1VAti` r DLA A 61~ ~ QODT WN YRTLE AVE 1516 tv1YRTLE AVE ,~,., Page 4 of 5 ~t~t~ 35l.3~ 25~CS) 4 ~ 802 u; ~-'~ o W0~1~N ~~I100AW~ m a' S 151 I AAYRTLE AVE MYAVE E 152$ MYR71 ~ 1515 MY~URELE ~c~~~~r~ LA N T SC~k Oi AVE 151 scRaNTOr, AVE sc~~~r~,TON AVE 1516 SCRANTON AVE ~cn~ 1517 C R~,~hJ 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=2... 10/2/2007 .A JclOc Pinellas County Property Appr Information: 22 29 15 00000 320 02~ Pinellas County Property Appraiser ~ ~.', ~. ~~ ~;~~ parcel Infor~nat~on ~ ~~~~'~~~~ .~ ~ , Page 5 of 5 http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u-0&p=2... 10/2/2007 ,P nellas County Property Appr~r Information: 22 29 1 S 98941 000 21~ Page 2 of 5 I ~~ I ~.J f ~QQ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~ 02-Oct-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas Gaunty Property Appraiser 13:52:36 Ownership Infarmatian Vacant Property Use and Sales WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD BD OF TRU5TEE5 OBK: 11402 OPG: 0688 845 WOODLAWH ST CLEARWATER FL 33756-2180 EVAC: Hon-EVAC Comparable sales value as Prap Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2007, based nn Census Tract; 258.00 2005 2DD6 l f : sa es rom - 0 Sale Date OR Book~Page Price {Qual{UnQ} VaclImp Plat Infarmatian 6 12,001 11,4021 6 88 275,000 {U} U 0000: Book Pgs - D 10 DI D 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - D 10 DI D 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs 0 10 01 0 0 { } 2407 Value EXEMPTIONS JustlMarket: 61,700 Homestead: HO Ownership ~ .000 Govt Exem: HO Use ~: .000 AssessedJCap: 61,70D Institutional Exem: YES Tax Exempt ~: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 0 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater 'View: 06 Tax: .00 Land Size L[nit Land Land Land 07 Prap Tax: .00 Front x Qepth Price Units Meth 07 Millage; 19.9371 1} 0 x 0 175, 000. 00 . 43 A 07 Spec Asmt: , 00 2} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 3} D x 0 . 00 00 Without the Save-Our-Names 4} 0 x 0 .00 .0D cap, 200.7 taxes will be 5} D x 0 .00 .00 . DO 6} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be ; 1,230.12 Short Legal PT OF HW 114 OF ASW 114 DESC AS BEG 400FT E GF SW Description COR OF HW 114 OF SW 114 TH H 210FT TH E i52FT TH H Building Information. http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &i=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=2... 10/2/2007 Pinellas Canty Property App~r Information: 22 29 15 9$941 000 2 ~~ / ~~ / 1~5 I C~~OOt~ 1 3~2~ ~ O~C~~ Page 3 of 5 02-Dct-2007 ,Iim Smith, CFR Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 13:52:36 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use; 70 Vacant Extra F~a~ux`es Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 D 0 0 ~) .00 0 0 0 0 S) .00 0 0 0 0 ~) . 00 0 0 0 0 5) DO 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE:, 0 Map With Property Address (nori-vacant} ®~®~ http://135.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=2... 10/2/2007 • P;nellas County Property Appr~r Information: 22 29 15 98941 000 2 ~ Page 4 of 5 32t~~'0 •1 c~ LU~ HER u7 :tl n~ ` l a +~;~ ~ ~t C -~2~~c ~~ 4 76 .,~`~ i 3 7 ~ ~ ~ iri ~_V~7Wh~ ~ 32 '! I 81.3 a. 3 1 ~ 6.71 ~ l?G~CL~ ~V~{„ ? ~c ~~ , ~ .. J~ .~ ~~ .~ t a- ~n ~ ~ o ~2 ~ ©A ~ ~ ~2fG€€ r- 3~~ Oda ~ Ir'c~.b s ' ~ VV 0 VI~ m VN ~ r ue . `~ "~ v ~ - ~ N 32~ I N 0 ~_ __ ~ bD .,a 5 T - ~ i , ~ 3l~ S7 65 1504 ~ IT SCRAN70~ TA N AVE ~I 4C7~4AWN L EE T I~~ Y Wt S E SC AVE~O~ 1+t{~0~4AVv~N 11~ I 1512' II~~II SCRAN7{7N TILLgY PE ? ~1Y U~E S~ ~hE ON AVE ~4 A 1516 11 SCF~~~TON T ~~~ Y MYP~TLE SC ASE ON W 1517 Oh C r 1516 W PROSPECT Pf W TI Y AVE S~F~S~~TgN ~ d AVE TILLFY AVE ~ AVE AVE ~ ~ti~ ~ ~ PE S ~~~~ r s~hi .~... _ PRO PECT 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=2... 10/2/2007 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 22 29 15 98941 000 2~ page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http:// 136,174,187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &z=.16&s=4&t3=18~u=0&p=2... 10/2/2007 v 4 } ;~, LJ ,. 7 !.1 t REVISED S~,ORMWATER REPORT FOR: TOWNHOMES AT LAKE BELLEViJE (F.k.a. Woodlawn Terrace) East of CSX Railroad aand South of Norton Park West of Greenwood Ave., North side of Woodlawn Street CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CLIENT: Midway Services 4677118th Ave. N. Clearwater, FL 33762 SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF CLEARWATER October 2007 Avid Project No. 259b-00~ Townhomes at Lake Bellevue City of Clearwater Table of Contents Project Narrative ......................................................................................................1 Existing Conditions Existing Condition Basin Map per SWFWMD Survey and Topo Survey...........? Existing Tune of Concentration Calculations ......................................................8 Offsite Contributing Area Runoff Coefficient Calculations ...............................10 Proposed Conditions Proposed Condition Basin Map ..........................................................................14 Proposed Offsite Basin Time of Concentration Calculations .............................15 Proposed Contributing Area Runoff Coefficient Calculations ...........................16 Proposed Starmwater Detention Calculations ....................................................18 Water Quality Treatment Volume Calculations (Ponds 10 & 11 } ......................21 Proposed Treatment Volume Drawdown (Ponds 10 & 11) ................................22 Water Quality Treatment Volume Calculations (Pond 20) ................................23 Proposed Outfall Weir Calculations (Ponds 11 and 20) .....................................24 Proposed Bypass Pipe Calculations ....................................................................25 Floodplain Encroachment Map ..........................................................................26 Floodplain Encroachment Calculations ..............................................................27 ~~ ~ f ~2 '~-03- Ronald M. Morahan, P.E. FL P.E. No. 4$257 ' PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW: The project site is located in Section 22, Township 295, Range 15E, in Pinellas County Florida ' and is located on the north side of Woodlawn Street, south of the Ross Norton Recreation Complex, east of the Atlantic Coastal Line and Old Tampa and Gulf Coast Railroads and west of ' Greenwood Avenue. The area of proposed construction is mostly vacant land that was previously approved for ' construction. The purpose of this Revised Stormwater Report is to address comments brought forth by the City of Clearwater. t The proposed development under this permit application covers the construction of a townhome development, including residential buildings, sidewalks, parking facilities, roadway ' improvements, and a surface water management system. DESIGN CRITERIA: Stormwater management for this site falls under the jurisdiction of SWFV~NID and the City of Clearwater. The stormwater design criteria for the system, according to the City of Clearwater are as follows: • There will not be any credit given for the existing impervious area on the site due to prior ' development, as the previously approved development was never completed. All attenuation • Per City of Clearwater Design Criteria, the site will be designed using the modified ' rational method, since it is less than 10 acres in area. ~ Drawdown the first 1" of water quality runoff for systems using wet detention with ' biological assimilation of pollutants. Treatment will be provided in the proposed detention ponds. • Attenuate the 25-yr, 24-hr proposed discharge rate for the site to the 25-yr, 24-hr discharge rate for this site prior to the existing development that has occurred. • Provide pond side slopes no steeper than 4:1. ' • Time of concentration shall be 60 minutes, per City of Clearwater criteria. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Basins: The site was previously approved through the City of Clearwater as the Woodlawn Terrace development. This site was partially developed, including water main, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and one condominium unit, However, the site was never developed to its ultimate approved build-out condition. The proposed detention ponds were constructed (these are preliminarily classified as other surface waters) as well as the outlet structure. The outlet structure empties into the ditch bordering the western side of the project site. Offsite Drainage Basin 30 was removed from the design criteria, as additional information obtained through survey demonstrated that this off-site runoff is included in the drainage system ' for the multi-family development directly adjacent to the proposed project on the northeast side. Also included in the analysis are two (2) offsite drainage basins (Basins 40 and 50). Basin 50 is ' located along the southern edge of the site. The proposed construction will include a by-pass Swale that will direct this drainage to the ditch, bordering the west side of the site. Basin 40 is located along the eastern border of the project site. This is consistent with existing conditions, ' where most of the offsite drainage is directed to the drainage Swale along the northern edge of the property. It should be noted that all drainage is ultimately directed in existing and proposed conditions to the main drainage ditch along the west side of the property and to Fake Bellevue itself. On-Site Soil The SCS Soil Survey for Pinellas County classifies a majority of the project site as Myakka Fine Sand, with some Anclote Sand being found on the northwestern portion of the site, near the surface water. A subsurface evaluation report. was prepared for the project site by the project eotechnical g engineer, PSI, Inc. According to the report, the Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT) is expected ' to occur at a depth of approximately three (3} feet below the existing ground surface. This is consistent with the seasonal high elevations determined within the existing Other Surface Waters on-site, by the project Environmental Consultant (Avid Group). ' Runoff Coefficient (C): ' The existing runoff coefficient was determined using the criteria set forth in the City of Clearwater Design Standards for storrnwater drainage. During the Building Plan Review Committee Meeting, it was noted that there would not be any credit given for the existing ' ,impervious area due to the fact that the site was never completed to the degree .previously approved for construction by the City of Clearwater. As such, the site was analyzed based upon the assumption that no development had occurred on the site and that it was a "clean slate'°, or ' open land. ' Time of Concentration- (Tc): The onsite Tc was determined based upon the SCS method. In addition, the proposed on-site drainage was determined using a time of concentration of 15 minutes, per City of Clearwater ' criteria. Existing_Conditian Dischar eg Rate: The existing condition discharge rate was determined using the Modified Rational Method, per City of Clearwater Design. Standards for stormwater drainage. 100 Year Flood Volume The 100-Year flood plain was determined using elevations described in the FEMA flood zone maps. Per the elevations provided on the FEMA maps and the topographic survey, it was determined that the majority of the site lies in flood zone X, with a small portion of the site lying within flood zone AE on the northwestern and southwestern portions of the property. The u floodplain elevations vary along the length of the existing drainage ditch along the site, causing the floodplain encroachment along the southwestern part of the site. Please see the attached plans for associated flood plain elevations within. the site. It is proposed that the floodplain compensation will be contained in the proposed detention ponds. Wetlands There are na known wetlands within the limits of the proposed site. The existing outfall for the on site facilities is described as Other Surface Waters by the site biologist. P®S~'-DEVELOPMENT C®NDITIONS: Basins: The proposed development has been divided into sub basins as shown.on the attached "Proposed Basin Map". - Basin 10 - Draua to proposed detention ponds 10 and 11. This basin accounts for approximately 5.91 acres of the proposed development. Ponds 10 and 11 will be equalized detention ponds and will basically function as one single pond. The starmwater runoff will be treated, attenuated, and then discharged into the ditch along the western end of the project site. It should be noted that the discharge rate will be less than that in existing conditions. - Basin 20 -Basin 20 is approximately 1.07 acres and collects the on-site runoff along the southeastern portion of the project site and directs it to detention pond 20. - Basin 40 -This off-site basin is located along the southeastern border of the proposed project site and encompasses flow from the industrial zoned property located along the southeastern. property line. The flow from Basin 40 will be treated in detention pond 20 and then discharged through the on-site stormwater system. - Basin SO -Basin 50 is an off-site basin located on the north side of Woodlawn Street, between the two entrances to the site. The property is zoned for Medium Density Residential and is currently being used as such, with two residential homes located within the basin limits. The stormwater runoff from this basin will be collected in a Swale along the property line, then diverted to the ditch along the western portion of the site through a proposed storm sewer. Runoff Coefficient {C): The runoff coefficient for the site was determined using City of Clearwater Design Standards for impervious areas, open space, pond areas and building areas. Time of Concentration: The Times of Concentration for the proposed development. basins were assumed. to be a minimum of 15 minutes, per City of Clearwater Design Standards. ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE; u 0 i The city of Clearwater requires that the project attenuate the proposed discharge rate in the 25-yr, 24-hx storm. down to the existing condition discharge in the 25-yr, 24-hr storm. As indicated above, the existing condition discharge rate was established using the Modified Rational Method for the site, disregarding the .drainage system that was constructed as part of the previously approved development. As such, the allowable discharge rate is equal to or less than that which occurs in existing conditions (again, working under the pretense that the previously approved development did not occur.) WATER QUALITY: Water quality treatment will be provided within the proposed detention ponds 10 and 11, as well as pond 20. Ponds 10 and 11 will be wet detention ponds and will treat the 1" storm, during post development through a littoral shelf located along the western side of the property, as indicated on the plans and in the calculations. Pond 20 will account for the drainage in the southeastern portion of the proposed project site. This pond will use percolation to provide water quality treatment of the stormwater runoff for the southeastern approximately 1.07 acres of the project site. The hydraulic conductivity of the soil is listed in the geotechnical report provided by PSI. _It_should be_noted_that_this value_was_di_v_ided_in_half for_the_calculations_o£ the_proposed_ percolation rate, in order to provide a factor of safety when calculating stormwater treatment. Pond 20 will also attenuate for the 25-year/24-hour storm event and then outlet, via control structure to ponds 10 and 1 i, where it will then ultimately discharge to the Other Surface Water on the northwest portion of the site. The approximate discharge rate is 0.72 cfs, which is not anticipated to have a significant impact on a stormwater pipe of that size and slope. WATER QUANTITY: The proposed discharge from the project. area will not exceed the allowable "Proposed Condition" discharge rate from the project area established via the stormwater calculations attached. Per design criteria set. forth by the City of Clearwater, the proposed stormwater system shall attenuate for the difference in runoff volume. for the 25-year/24-hour storm between existing and proposed conditions. It should be noted that the proposed stormwater discharge rate will be less than that which ultimately reaches the existing stormwater conveyance system {ditches and swales), which lie along the northern and western borders of the project site. The ultimate conveyance node is at the north western corner of the property and discharges to Lake Bellevue. In both existing and proposed. conditions, this is where the ultimate discharge form the project site flows to. WETLAND ENCROACHMENT & MITIGATIQN: There are no known wetland encroachment impacts anticipated at this time. As such, there is not. any mitigation proposed. CONCLUSIQN: ' The proposed surface water management system has been designed to meet or exceed. the requirements of the City of Clearwater and is not anticipated to have any negative impacts upon the existing drainage system in place, or on the surrounding property. I ^__'I~ Existine Time of Concentration Calculations Project: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue AVID Project #: 2596-001 Pre-Development Conditions Existine Basin 14 Sheet Flow Flow length (ft) = 300 {includes Basin 50 Tc) Manning's n = 0.15 Pz {i~) = 4.5 slope = .0.01.40 Tuneet {hr)= 0.38 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 370 Slope (ft/ft) OA095 Vag (Ells) = 3.2 (Reference: TR-55 manual, Figure 3-1) Trahallow (hr) _ (1.03 TC (hr) = Ttabcet + Ttshallow = 0.41 Tc (min) = 24.9 Min. 15 minutes per City of Clearwater Existine Basin 24 Sheet Flow Flow length (ft) = 300 (includes Basin 40 Tc) Manning's n = 0.15 P2 (in) = 4.5 slope = 0.01.0 Ttsheet (hr}= 0.44 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 459 Slope (ft/ft) 0.005 Va,$ (ft/s) = 2.3 (Reference: TR-55 manual, Figure 3-1) Ttshallow c>u>= 0.06 Tc (hr) = Tc~n~c + Ttshauow = 0.49 Tc (min) = 29.6 Min. 15 minutes per City of Clearwater Existing Basin 40 Sheet Flow Flow length (ft) = 86 Manning's n = 0.15 Pz (in) = 4.5 slope = 0.030 '~ Tuheet (hr)= 0.10 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 0 .slope = 0.0083 ' Ttshallow ~) = 0.00 TC (hi) = Ttshat+ TtaLallow= Tc (min) = 15.d Existing Basin 50 Sheet Flow Flow length {ft) = 252 Manuing's n = 0.15 P2 (in) = 4.5 slope = 0.0133 Tczneet (hr)= 0.34 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 0 Slope {ftlft) 0.021. Vag (ft/s) = 3.2 Ttsha3low (hr) _ 0.04 _ TC (hr) Tisheet+ Ttshallow Tc (min) = 20.4 (Reference: TR-55 manual, Figure 3-1) 0.10 (Reference: TR-55 manual, Figure 3-1) 0.34 PROJECT: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue PROJECT NO.: 2596001 'FILE NAME: 2007070907_Rat Med Starm_2596001 OFFSITE CONTRIBUTING AREA RUNOFF COEFFICIENT CALCULATION The City of Clearwater assigns the following runoff coefficient values for use when employing the rational method to determine stormwater runoff for sites less than 10 acres in area Description Ponds, lakes and detention areas Buildings, ;paved areas, and other impervious areas Turfblock Green, or Pervious areas :EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN 10 'Per City of Clearwater comments regarding this site during the Building Plan Review Committee Meeting, it was stated that there would be no credit given for existing impervious area on this site. Therefore, the coefficient is as foliows: Description Area (sft) Area (acre) Runoff Coefficient 826 Woodlawn 207812.20 4.77 0.2 802 Woodlawn 51400.80 1.18 0.51 Total Area Weighted Runoff Coefficient 259213 stt 5.95 acres 0.26 EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN 20 Description Area (sft) Area (acre} Runoff Coefficient O en S ace -Fair 45753.00 1.05 0.2 Im envious Area 0 0.00 0.98 Total Area Weighted Runoff Coefficient 45753 sft 1.05 acres 0.20 Coefficient 1.00 0.95 0.45 0.20 EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN 40 Basin 40 represents an off-site basin that #lows directly to Node 3710, given the design parameters set forth by the City of Clearwater. Under proposed conditions, the flow from this off-site basin will be diverted from entering the proposed drainage system and will thus funtion sumilarly to existing conditions. As a result, the runoff from this basin is omitted in determination of the allowable discharge rate in existing conditions and the discharge rate in proposed conditions. Descrip#ion Area (sft) Area {acre) Runoff Coefficient Medium Densit Residential 7 881 0.181 0.60 Total Area .7881 sft 0.181 ' Weighted Runoff Coefficient 0.60 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN 50 .Basin 50 represents an off-site basin that flows directly to Node 3710, given the design parameters set forth by the City of Clearwater. Under proposed conditions, the flow from this off-site basin will be diverted from entering the proposed drainage system and will thus funtion sumilarly to existing conditions. As a result, the runoff from this basin is omitted in determination of the allowable discharge rate in existing conditions and the discharge rate in proposed conditions. Description Area (sft) Area (acre) Runoff Coefficient Medium Densit Residential 41 963 0.963 0.40 Total Area Weighted Runoff Coefficient DRAINAGE BASIN SUMMARY 41963 sft 0.963 0.40 Description Area (sft) Area (acre) Runoff Coefficient EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN 10 259213 5.95 0.26 EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN 20 45753 1.05 0.20 EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN 40 7881 0.18 0.60 EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN 50 41963 0.96 0.20 Total Area Avg. Weighted Runoff Coeff 354810 sft 8.15 acres 0.25 PROJECT: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue PROJECT No.: 2596001 FILE NAME: 2007070907_Rat Med Storm_2596001 MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD - 25 YR RETURN PERIOD The Modified Rational Method estimates the attenuation volume needed to limit the rate of discharge from a developed site to the, peak rate of runoff from the existing site using the rational method: Q=c*i*a,where Q = rate of runoff (cfs) c =runoff coefficient i =rainfall intensity (in / hr) a =contributing area (ac) ' The rainfall intensity term is related to the time of concentration for the site, as indicated in the FDOT Drainage Manuai Figure 5-7 "Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves for Zone 6". ' EXISTING BASIN 10 EXISTING CONDITION - 25 YR RETURN PERIOD Runoff Coefficient = 0.26 Time of Concentration = 24.9 min Rainfall Intensity = 7.3 in / hr Contributing Area = 5.95 ac ' Existing Peak Rate of Runoff = 11.29 cfs EXISTING BASIN 20 EXISTING CONDITION - 25 YR RETURN PERIOD Runoff Coefficient = 0.20 Time of Concentration= 30 min Rainfall Intensity - 7.3 in / hr Contributing Area = 1.05 ac ' Existing Peak Rate of Runoff = .1.53 cfs EXISTING BASIN 40 EXISTING CONDITION - 25 YR RETURN PERIOD Runoff Coefficient = 0.60 -Time of Concentration = 15 min Rainfall intensity = 7.3 in / hr Contributin Area = 0.18 ac Existing Peak Rate of Runoff = 0.79 cfs EXISTING BASIN 50 EXISTING CONDITION - 25 YR RETURN PERIOD Runoff Coefficient = 0.40 Time of Concentration = 20 min Rainfall Intensity = 7.3 in / h r Contributing Area = 0.96 ac Existing Peak Rate of Runoff = 2.81 cfs Proposed Time of Concentration Calculations Project: Townhornes at Lake Bellevue ~iVID Project. #: 2596-001 Past-Development Conditions Proposed Basin 40 Sheet Flow Flow length (ft} = 175 Mapping's n ~ 0.1 S Pz (in) = 4.5 slope = O.D14 T~~~t (hr)- 0.25 Shallow Concentrated. Flow Flow length. (ft) = 120 slope = 0.0083 Ttshallow (tu) = 0.01 pitch Bottom Flow Flow length (ft) = 662 slope = 0.0117 TtshaIlow tttr) = 0.07 Ditch. Bottom Flow Flow length (ft) = 662 slope = 0.0117 Ttsha}low (br) = 0.07 Tc (hi) = Ttsneet + Ttshauow + Ttduchl + TtducL2 = Tc (min) = 24.6 Proposed Basin 50 Sheet Flow Flow length (ft) = 250 Marming's n = 0.15 Ps (in) = 4.5 slope = 0.0]4D Trsh~t (hr)= D.33 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft} = 0 Slope (ft/ft) n/a Ttshsllow (hr) = 0.00 Pipe Flow Flow length (ft) = 275 Slope (ft/ft) 0.010 Ttsheuow (hr} = 0.03 TC (}u') = Ttsheet ~1- Ttshallow + Ttpipe = Tc (min} = 21.7 (Reference: TR-55 manual, Figure 3-1) (Reference: TR-55 manual, Figure 3-1) (Reference: TR-55 marwal, Figure 3-1) 0.41 (Reference: TR-55 manual, Figure 3-1} (Reference: TR-55 manual, Figure 3-1) 0.36 1 n r n i~ i~ i~ PROJECT: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue PROJECT No.: 2596001 FILE NAME: 2007070907_Rat Med Storm_2596001 CONTRIBUTING AREA RUNOFF COEFFICIENT CALCULATION The City of Clearwater assigns the following runoff coefficient values for use when employing the rational method to determine stormvvater runoff for sites less than 10 acres in area. Description Ponds, lakes and detention areas Buildings, paved areas, and other impervious areas Turfblock Green, or Pervious areas PROPOSI=D BASIN 10 * Per City of Clearwater comments regarding this site during the Building Pfan Review Committee Meeting, it was stated that there would be no credit given for existing impervious area on this site. Therefore, the coefficient is as follows: Description Area {sft} Area (acre) Runoff Coefficient Buildin 96,445 2.214 0.95 Pavement 85192 1.956 0.95 Pond 14,678 0.337 '1.00 Green S ace 61 100 1.403 0.20 Total Area 257.415 sf 5.91 Average Runoff Coefficient 0.77 PROPOSED BASIN. 20 Description Area {sft) Area {acre) Runoff Coefficient Buildin s 10 488 0.241 0.95 Pavement 12 386 0.284 0.95 Pond 3 266 0.075 1.00 Green S ace 20 346 0.467 0.20 46486 sft 1.07 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ,0.63 Total Area Coefficient 1.ao 0.95 0.45 0.20 PROPOSED BASIN 40 Basin 40 represents an off-site basin that flows directly to Node 3710, given the design parameters set forth by the City of Cleannrater. Under proposed conditions, the flowfrom this off-site basin vv~ll be diverted from entering the proposed drainage system and will thus funtion sum ilarly to existing conditions. A5 a result, the runoff from this basin is omitted in determination of the allowable discharge rate in existing conditions and the discharge rate in proposed conditions. Description Area (sft) Area (acre} Runoff Coefficient Existin Residential 7,881 0.181 0.60 Total Area 7881 sft 0.18 Weighted Runoff Coefficient 0.60 COMBINi:D PROPOSED BASIN 20 AND 40 Basin 20 and 40 have been. added together to produce a combined runoff coefficient far this project, as both basins will be routed into Detention Pond 20, treated and discharged via controlled oufall (it wiil be regulated by a weir wRhingthe control structure) to Detention Ponds 10 and 11, to ultimately outfail to the surface water located on the northwest portion of the site. Description Area (sft} Area (acre) Runoff Goefficient Build ins 10 488 0.241 0.95 Pavement 12 386 0.284 0.95 Pond 3,266 0.075 1.00 Green S ace 20 346 0.467 0.20 Existin Residential Basin 40 7 881 0.181 0.60 Total Area 543fi7 sft 1.65 Weighted Runoff Coefficient 0.62 PROPOSED BASIN 50 Basin 50 represents an off-site basin that flows directly to Node 3710, given the design parameters set forth by the City of Clearwater. UndEr proposed conditions, the flowfrom this off-site basin will be diverted from entering the proposed drainage system and will thus funtion 5umilarly to existing conditions. As a result, the runoff from this basin is omitted in determination of the ailowable discharge rate in existing conditions and the discharge rate in proposed conditions. Description Area (sft) Area (acre) Runoff Coefficient Medium Dens' Residential 41,963 0.963 0.40 Total Area 41963 sft Weighted Runoff Coefficient 0.40 DRAINAGE BASIN SUMMARY 0.96 Description Area (sft) Area (acre) Runoff Coefficient PROPOSED BASIN 10 257,415 5.91 0.77 PROPOSED BASIN 20 46 486 1.07 0.63 PROPOSED BASIN 40 7 881 0.18 0.60 PROPOSED BASIN 50 41,963 0.96 0.40 Total Area Avg. Weighted Runoft Coeff. 353745 sft 8.12 0.71 ' PROJECT: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue .PROJECT No.: 2596001 FILE NAME: 2007070907_Rat Med Storm_2596001 MODIFIED RATIONAL METWOD - 25 YR RETURN PERIOD The Modified Rational Method estimates the attenuation volume needed to limit the rate of discharge from a developed site to the peak rate of runoff from the existing site using the rational method: Q = c" i' a, where ' Q =rate of runoff (cfs) c =runoff coefficient i ~ rainfall intensity (in / hr) a =contributing area (ac} The rainfall intensify term is related to the time of concentration for the site, as indicated in the FDOT . Drainage Manual Figure 5-7 "Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves for Zone 6". ' ATIONS FOR STORMWATER DETENTION BEING ROUTED TO DRAINAGE BASIN 10 CALCUL EXISTING CONDITION: 25 YR RETURN PERIOD Runoff Coefficient = 0.26 Time of Concentration = 60 min ' Rainfall Intensity = 3.65 in / hr Contributing Area = 5.95 ac Existing Peak Runoff = 5.65 cfs e PROPOSED CONDITION: 25 YR RETURN PERIOD Runoff Coefficient = 0.77 Contributing Area = 5.91 ac DURATION INTENSITY PROPOSED RUNOFF RATE PROPOSED RUNOFF VOLUME EXISTING RUNOFF VOLUME ATTENUATION VOLUME min) (sec) _ (in/hr) cfs) (cu ft) (cu ft (cu ft) {ac-ft) g 480 8.80 40.29 19341 2711 16630 0.382 10 600 8.40 38.46 23077 3388 19689 0.452 15 900 7.30 33.43 30083 5083 25000 0.574 20 1200 6.45 29.53 35440 6777 2$663 0.658 25 1500 5.80 26.56 39836 8471 31365 0.720 30 1800 5.25 24.04 43270 10165 33105 0.760 35 2100 4.95 22.67 47597 11859 35738 0.820 40 2400 4.60 21.06 50550 13553 36997 0.849 45 2700 4.30 19.69 53160 15248 37913 0.870 50 3000 4.05 1$.54 55633 16942 38691 0.888 60 3600 3.65 16.71 60166 20330 39836 0.914 75 4500 3.20 14.65 65935 25413 40522 0.930 g0 5400 2.85 13.05 70468 30495 39973 0.918 120 7200 2.35 10.76 77474 40660 36$14 0.845 180 10800 1.78 $.15 88023 60990 27033 0.621 24p 14400 1.46 6.69 96265 81320 14945 0.343 300 18000 1.24 5.68 102199 101650 549 0.013 360 21600 1.11 5.08 109782 121980 -12198 -0.280 48p 28800 0.91 4.17 120002 162640 -42639 -0.979 600 36000 0.79 3.62 130221 203300 -73079 -1.678 gOp 54000 0.60 2.75 148354 304950 -156597 -3.595 1200 72000 0.50 2.29 164837 406600 -241763 -5.550 1440 86400 0.39 1.79 i 54288 487920 -333633 -7.659 Required Volume: 40,522 0.930 CALCULATIONS FOR STORMWATER DETENTION BEING ROUTED TO DRAINAGE BASIN 20 and 40 EXISTING CONDITION - 25 YR ,RETURN PERIOD Runoff Coefficient = 0.20 Time of Concentration = 60.0 min Rainfall Intensity = 3.65 in / hr Contributing Area = Existing Peak Runoff = 1.25 ac 91 cfs 0 . ' PROPOSED CONDITION - 25 YR RETURN.PERIOD Runoff Coefficient = 0.62 Contributing Area = 1.25 ac DURATION INTENSITY PROPOSED RUNOFF RATE PROPOSED RUNOFF VOLUME EXISTING RUNOFF VOLUME ATTENUATION VOLUME (min) (sec (iNhr) (cfs) (cu ft (cu ft) cu ft) (ac-ft) 8 480 8.80 6.83 3277 437 2840 0.065 10 600 8.40 6.52 3910 547 3363 0.077 15 900 7.30 5.66 5097 820 -4277 0.098 20 1200 6.45 5.00 6005 1093 4911 0.113 25 1500 5.80 4.50 6750 1367 5383 0.124 30 1800 5.25 4.07 7331 1640 5691 0.131 35 2100 4.95 3.84 8065 1913 6151 0.141 40 2400 4.60 3.57 8565 2187 6378 0.146 45 2700 4.30 3.34 9007 2460 6547 0.150 50 3000 4.05 3.14 9426 2733 6693 0.154 60 3600 3.65 2.83 10194 3280 6914 0.159 75 4500 3.20 2.48 11172 4100 7072 0.162 90 5400 2.85 2.21 11940 4920 7020 0.161 120 7200 2.35 1.82 13127 6560 6567 0.151 180 10800 1.78 1.38 14914 9840 5074 0.116 240 14400 1.46 1.13 16311 13120 3191 0.073 300 18000 1.24 0.96 17316 16400 916 QA2i 360 21600 1.11 0.86 18601 19680 -1079 -0.025 480 28800 0.91 0.71 20332 26240 -5908 -0.136 600 36000 0.79 0.61 22064 32800 -10736 -0.246 900 54000 Q60 0.47 25136 49200 -24064 -0.552 1200 72000 0.50 0.39 27929 65600 -37671 -0.865 1440 86400 0.39 0.30 26142 78720 -52578 -1.207 Required Volume: 7072 0.1b2 c== PROPOSED BASIN 50 PROPOSED CONDITION - 25 YR RI=TURN PERIOD Runoff Coefficient = 0.40 Time of Concentration = 21.7 min Rainfall Intensity = 7.3 in / hr Cvntributin Area = 0.96 ac ' Existing Peak Runoff = 2.81 cfs I .PROJECT: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue PROJECT No.: 2596001 FILE NAME: 2fl0707fl907_Rat Med Storm_2596001 i_ WATER QUALITY TREATMENT VOLUME Pond 10 & Pond 11 Combined Elevation. (ft NGVD) Area (sq ft Area (acres) Incremental Volume (ac-ft) Cumulative Volume ac-ft 43.81 14396.00 0.330 0.000 0.000 44.00 15012.00 0.345 0.064 0.064 45.00 18372.00 0.422 0.383 0.447 46.00 21933.00 0.5D4 0.462 0.909 47.00 25695.00 0.590 D.546 1.455 47.75 28649.00 0.658 0.468 1.922 100-YR FLOODPLAIN COMP. (ac-ft) 0.033 VOLUME (CU-ft) 1,451 100-YR FLOODPLAIN COMP. (ft) 43.91 ELEVATION CONTRIBUTING AREA (ac) 5.91 DEPTFI OF (in) 1.00 TREATMENT WATER QUALITY+COMP. (ac-ft) 0.526 VOLUME (CU-ft) 22,902 WATER QUALITY+COMP. (ft) 45.17 ELEVATION POND AREA AT WATER {sq-ft) 18,981 QUALITY 112 WATER QUALITY (ac-ft) -0.26 VOLUME (cu-ft) 11,457 1/2 WATER DUALITY (ft) 44.52 ELEVATION POND AREA AT 112 WATER (sq-ft) 16,758 GIUALITY WATER QUALITY (in) 15.15 FLUCTUATION REQUIRED ATTENUATION (ac-ft) 0.930 VOLUME (cu-ft) 40,522 ATTENUATION (ft) 47.00 ELEVATION <= ~w~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PROJECT: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue PROJECT NO.: 2596001 FILE NAME: 2007070907_Rat Med Storm_2596001 BASIN 10 (PONDS 10 & 111-Proposed Treatment Volume Drawdown - Treatment Volume to be Discharged in no less than 120 hours. - No more than Half the Treatment Volume shall be discharged in the first 60 hours per SWFWlV1D ERP Part (B) Basis of Review Ch 5.4 Treatment Volume Required = 0.526 Treatment Stage = 45.17 ft 1/2 Treatment Volume Stage= 44.52 ft Normal Water Elevation = 43.91 ft Orifice Coefficient (C¢) = 0.60 Bleeddown at t = 60 hr Ao =Area ofi prifice (in.} h~ =Depth of water (ft.) from Normal Water to Treatment Stage hz =Depth of water (ft.) from NormaE Water to i/2 Treatment Stage t =Time (his) A =Average, area between Treatment Stage and Drawdown EL (3600 t) (Co) (2g)'~ ac-ft = 22902 Pond Area = 18981 sf Pond Area = 16758 sf Pond Area = 74716 sf = 1.76 0.012 cf inz ft2 Calcuated Dia.= 1.495 in. Try a 1.4900 inches Diameter Circular Orifice (1 8/16 IN) 1/2 Treatment Volume Bleeddown time = 60.4 his Total Treatment Volume Bleeddown time = 175.9 his h2 = (h, ~~ - [Ao (3600 t) (Co) (2g}'"~J / 2A}2 36 hr Draw Down EL.= 44.75 ft (Beginning of Attenuation for the 25 yr 24 hr Storm Event) .(Max Sfarage Height for treatment not to exceed i.5) PROJECT: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue .PROJECT No.: 2596001 FILE NAME: 2007070907_Rat Med Storm_2596001 WATER QUALITY TREATMENT VOLUME Pond 20 Elevation (ft NGVD) Area (sq ft) Area (acres) Incremental Volume {ac-ft) Cumulative Volume (ac-ft) 47.00 4743.00 0.109 0.000 0.000 48.00 6413.00 0.147 0.128 0.128 49.00 8184.00 0.188 0.167 0.295 CONTRIBUTING AREA (ac) 1.07 DEPTH OF (in) 0.50 TREATMENT WATER QUALITY (ac-ft) 0.044 VOLUME {cu-ft) 1,937 WATER QUALITY (ft) 47.35 ELEVATION POND AREA AT WATER (sq-ft) 5,325 QUALITY 1/2 WATER QUALITY (ac-ft) 0.022 VOLUME (cu-ft) 968 112 WATER QUALITY (ft) 47.17 ELEVATION POND AREA AT 1/2 WATER (sq-ft) 5,034 QUALITY WATER GlUALfTY (i n) 4.18 FLUCTUATION REQUIRED ATTENUATION (ac-ft) 0. ifi2 VOLUME (cu-ft) 48522 ATTENUATION ELEVATION {ft) 48.47 <- BOT t Discharge Rating Curve for Stormwater Pond Control Structure CS-1 t Project: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue Project #: 2596001 Orifice Flow Weir Flow O=C~A(2gH)'"~ O=CZLH~ Structure CS-11 31 in el. = 45.17 4 in r Orifice Coefficient = C, ~ 0.6 Weir Coefficient = Cz = 3.2 Orifice Area = A = 0.86 ftz Weir Length = L = 2.58 ft. Gravity Constant = g = 32.2 fUsecZ Structure GS-11 Stage ft. Type of Flow Head {H) ft. Flow cfs Total Flow cfs 47.10 orifice 1.76 5.51 5.51 47.00 orifice 1.66 5.35 5.35 46.94 orifice 1.60 5.25 5.25 46.69 orifice 1.35 4.82 4.82 46.44 orifice 1.10 4.86 4.36 46.19 orifice 0.85 3.83 3.83 45.94 orifice 0.60 3.22 3.22 45.69 orifice 0.35 2.46 2.46 45.50 orifice 0.17 1.69 1.69 45.17 weir 0.00 0.00 0.00 Allowable Flow Rate 5.65 cfs Discharge Rating Curve for Stormwater Pond Control Structure CS-20 Orifice Flow Weir Flow O = C, A (2gH)VZ O = Cz L Hyz Structure CS-20 4in ~~ 3 in 4 al - d7 '2F', i i~ Orifice Coefficient = C, = 0.6 Weir Coefficient = Cz = 3.2 Orifice Area = A F 0.08 ft2 Weir Length = L = 0.33 ft. Gravity Constant = g = 32.2 fUsecz Sfirur_fiure CS-2d Stage ft. Type of Flow Head (M) ft. Flow cfs Total Flow cfs 48.57 orifice 3.24 0.72 0.72 48.47 orifice 3.14 0.71 0.7t 48.10 orifice 2.76 0.87 0.67 47.85 orifice 2.51 0.64 0.64 47.60 orifice 2.28 0.60 0.60 47.35 orifice 2.01 0.57 0.57 Allowable Flow Rate 0.91 cfs A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PROJECT: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue PROJECT No: 2596001 .FILENAME: 2007070907_Rat Med Storm_2596001 CALCULATION OF.CULVERT CAPACITY USING MANNING'S EQUATION The capacity of a pipe may be determined using the following equations. v=(1.486/n)*R^(2/3)"`S^(1/2) Q=v~A R=A/WP A=pi''d^2 v =..flow velocity {cfs) A =flow area (sf) n = Manning's roughness caefficient WP =wetted perimeter {ft) R =hydraulic radius (ft) Q =flow rate (cfs) S =slope of hydraulic grade line (ftIft) ~ pi = 3.141593 d =pipe diameter (ft) PIKE DIAMETER (in) 24 MANNING'S ROUGHNESS 0.013 COEFFICIENT UPSTREAM ELEVATION (ft NAVD) 42 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION {ft NAVD} 41 LENGTH OF PIPE (ft) 314 SLOPE OF (ft/ft) 0.0032 HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE % 0.320 -CROSS SECTIONAL (sf) 3.14 AREA WETTED PERIMETER (ft) 6.28 HYDRAULIC RADIUS (ft) 0.50 FLOW VELOCITY (ftlsec) 4.06 TOTAL FLOW CAPACITY (cfs) 12.77 OF PIPE FLOW RATE CAPACITY (cfs} 2.81 REQUIRED 4-Dec-07 PROJECT:. PROJECT No.: FILE NAME: Townhomes at Lake Bellevue 2596001 2007071127_Rat Med Storm_2596001 Floodplain Encroachment Calculations .; AREA AVG FILL AREA OF F3LL VOL (FT) SF) CF) 1 0.16 697 111.52 2 0.16 171 27.36 3 0.25 933 233,25 4A 0.29 1703 493.87 4B 0.07 2270 158.9 4C 029 1468 425.72 TOTA L 1450.62 Page 1 of 1 Welis, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 6:56 PM To: 'Pat Hostetler' Subject: RE: 802 Woodlawn Pat - Thank you for you comments. If you desire to look at the proposed plans, they are available during office hours Monday -Friday, 8:00 am - 4:30 pm (except on Wednesdays, we close at 2:30 pm). Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Pat Hostetler [mailto:dixiechick9088@yahoo.com] Seat: Friday, October 19, 2007 9:04 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 802 Woodlawn Hi I live at 1511 South Prospect Ave, I would like to express my opion about the proposed 115 towns homes, I don't think we need. this project in our neighborhood., It will not fit in at all, look at the congestion it will bring to our neighborhood, We need more single family homes and not projects, If you take 115 units that's two cars min per unit 230 more cars up and down Woodlawn, Also if each family has one child., That's 115 more children running up and down the streets, Do we as seniors in this community really need this, How is this going to benefit us home owners„I feel it will bring mare drugs and crime to our neighborhood, I am totally against. it, Thank You Pat Hostetler , 1511 S Prospect Ave Clearwater FL 33756 727-647-7265 Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around h ttp ://mai 1. y aho a t o m 10/21/2007 • ~ Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Pat Hostetler [dixiechick9088@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 9:04 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 802 Woodlawn Hi I live at 1511 South Prospect Ave, I would like to express my upon about the proposed 115 towne homes, I don't think we need this project in our neighborhood, It will not fit in at all, look at the congestion it will bring to our neighborhood, We need more single family homes and not projects, If you take 115 units that's two cars min per unit 230 more cars up and down Woodlawn, Also if each family has one child, That's 115 more children running up and down the streets, Do we as seniors in this community really need this, How is this going to benefit us home owners, I feel it will bring more drugs anal crime to our neighborhood, I am totally against it, Thank You Pat Hostetler 1511 S Prospect Ave Clearwater FL 33756 727-647-7265 Do You Yahoo!? Tired. of spam? Yahoo! http://mail. yahoo. com Mail has the best spam protection around 10/21/2007 ~~: CITY OF CLEARWATER ~Q; PLANNING DEPARPMENT ~~E~° Posr OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 1VIASSARO, LEANDRO 151.4 S MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 3376 - 212 't ,, • , ~~~ _ ~ ~' uF O IdJ ~ _ ~ Z ~ ° c~~o° ~~ °~o ~ ~ WTNEY BOM7E5 Ilfififififi O (.~ yy o 0 o 02 1Afl ~ oooGCl~ ~ ~ 0004229492 OCT 1 7 2007 ~ E MAIIED FROM ZIPCODE 33602 ~axx~ 337 D~ i o© ~a,-aa,~o~ RETURN TO SENDER RIOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORIJARD BC: 3375E+474649 'x0901-0053-1®-02 ~~~~~~~~~~~¢~~'.: i„I1,,,!!-l,,,1,1,l,!„1„l,,Il,„!,l„!!„l„i„11„1,1,1.,,1 ~ o i `Clearwater October 15, 2007 • CITY OF CLEAR-WATER PLANNYNG DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYCLEARWATER. COM RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 802 WOODLAWN ST (FLS2007-10045) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of $02 WOODLAWN ST, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development application to permit 115 attached dwellings (townhomes) in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A, and Preliminary Plat approval for 115 lots (PLT2007-00006).. On November O1, 2007, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that. the City will make a decision on the application will be November O1, 2007. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on November 01, 2007. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development. Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, ~~~ Way~Wells Planner III Letter of Notifiention - FLS2007-IOD45 - 802 WOODLAWN ST fl ~ CLEARWATER CITY OF ~CSX TRANSPORTATION INC ~ ODRIGUEZ, EYVIND PO BOX 4748 500 WATER ST 915 TUSKAWILLA ST CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 JACKSONVILLE FL 32202 - 4423 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3441 BRANNEN, TODD A BRANNEN, AMY E 611 BELLEVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2016 MATARAZZO, ROLAND IVIATARAZZO, PASTIE M 623 BELLEVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2016 FLAMINGO INVESTMENTS INC 3984 MCKAY CREEK DR LARGO FL 33770 - 4567 SILVERSTONE, CHARLES NANKOVA, DANIELA 1872 MURRAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2308 HUNT, JEFFERY L HUNT, PATRICIA V 609 WILDWOOD WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2012 YEUNG 5IU REVOCABLE LIVING TRU 3194 SHORELINE DR CLEARWATER FL 33760 - 1736 SUAREZ, MARIA L RUIZ, RAFAEL A 632 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2053 NELSON-VANDETTE, DAVID 1013 RIDGE RD LARGO FL 33770 - 4453 SMITH, JOAN E 615 BELLEVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2016 ROMERO, CIRO 1452 FOREST RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5010 WARREN, DAWN M 3128 CRESCENT DR LARGO FL 33770 - 4203 JAYE, BARRY 1006 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 ROUSSELLE, JEAN 812 HELENA DR LARGO FL 33770 - 4339 KALEMBA, AGNIESZKA M MISTAK, BOGUSLAW 1241 TURNER ST # A CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5960 ELLIOTT, MICHAEL G ELLIOTT, PATRICIA J PO BOX 563 LARGO FL 33779 - 0563 KLIMCZAK, PAUL J PO BOX 518 PALM HARBOR FL 34682 - 0518 CADDIS, SUSAN L 670 ISLAND WAY # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1975 MARS, TODD T 334ELAKERD#301 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 WARREN, DAWN M 3128 CRESCENT DR LARGO FL 33770 - 4203 YAKUBOV, MICHI YAKUBOV, MAYYA 1786 DORCHESTER RD CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6528 KALEMBA, AGNIESZKA M MISTAK, BOGUSLAW J 1241 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5960 HORACE, BETTY J HORACE,HENRY 638 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2053 QUINTIN, MICHAEL L QUINTIN, BARBARA E P O BOX 7532 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 7532 JETER-CULLEN, LISA 515 MCLENNAN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2048 HIET, RICHARD J CORNIER, LOIS BJERKENES, GUSTAV BELL, PAMELA 625 MCLENNAN ST REVOCABLE TR 621 MCLENNAN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2048 BJERKENES, GUSTAV THE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2048 - 1564 OAKADIA LN CLEARWATER F'L 33764 - 2541 ERIKSEN, MARK A 630 BELLEVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2017 SHAPIRO, CHENEY A SEARS, TRINA 306 N LINCOLN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4728 LOPEZ, MANUEL LOPEZ, JULIAN EVERETT 613 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2076 MASSARO, LEANDRO 1514 S MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2152 DATA INVESTMENTS LLC DANMAR, J J INC 1065 IRENE AVE LARGO FL 33771 - 1213 WILDWOOD VILLAS LLC 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 WILDWOOD VILLAS LLC 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 WILDWOOD VTLLAS LLC 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 WTLDWOOD VILLAS LLC 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 HOME BUYERS LLC • 1259 SEMINOLE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4347 HAGGIS, PAUL SEARS, JONATHAN W 206 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91204 - 1310 WERDER, THERESA WERDER, ROGER W 619 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2076 WERDER, ROGER W WERDER, THERESA C 6I5 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2076 HAMMOND, MARK A 1540 S MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2152 WILDWOOD VILLAS LLC 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 WILDWOOD VTLLAS LLC 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 WILDWOOD VILLAS LLC 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 WILDWOOD VILLAS LLC 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 SHAPIRO, CHENEY A SEARS, TRINA 306 N LINCOLN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4728 WERDER, ROGER W WERDER, THERESA 615 WOODLAWN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2076 WERDER, ROGER WERDER, THERESA 615 WOOIDLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2076 WERDER, ROGER W WERDER, THERESA G 615 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2076 WILDWOOD VILLAS CONDO ASSN INC 10300 SUNSET DR STE 144 MIAMI FL 33173 - 3038 WILDWOOD VILLAS LLC 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 WILDWOOD VILLAS LLC 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 WILDWOOD VILLAS LLC 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 WILDWOOD VILLAS LLC 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 WILDWOOD VILLAS LLC WILDWDOD VILLAS LLC WILDWOOD VILLAS LLC 921 ALAVA AVE 921 ALAVA AVE 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 WILDWOOD VILLAS LLC 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL-33758 - 4748 INGRAM-HINKLEY, VALERIE J HINKLEY, JOHN E 806 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2164 WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD BD OFT 845 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2180 ALTON, RALPH T SR EST $40 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2164 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 NOLAN, GREGORY A 2257 LAKE DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 9337 VILLADA, JOSE VILLADA, WANDA I 1504 SCRANTON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2136 ERICKSON, JAYNE L 1516 SCRANTON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2136 ~WILDWOOD VILLAS, LLC 921 ALAVA AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 1217 WOODLAWN CHURCH, OF GOD BD OF T 845 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2180 ROMPON, JOHN S 822 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2164 WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD 845 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2180 COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND INC 925 LAKEVIEW RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3420 CSX TRANSPORTATION INC 500 WATER ST JACKSONVILLE FL 32202 - 4423 WEPPLER, JADE S 'WEPPLER, NATALIE J 1670 DARTMOUTH ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - WILKINS, GWENNETTE 1508 SCANTRON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2136 ALLEN, TERRY THE BURGESS FAMILY I V TRUST PO BOX 123 INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 0123 WILDWOOD VILLAS LLC 921 ALAVA. AVE CORAL GABLES FL 33146 - 121.7 CLEARWATER WOODLAWN CHURCH OF 845 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2180 ROMPON, JOHN S 822 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2164 TETRAULT, ANDRE TETRAULT, DANIEL 838 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2164 R S G FAMILY LTD PTRSHP- NORTON PO BOX 990339 NAPLES FL 34116 - SAWYER, DONALD SAWYER, TINA F 803 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2163 BLAKLEY, CHRISTOPHER 817 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2163 LOUTHAN, LEONA 1512 SCRANTON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2136 SMART, E RITA 1522 SCRANTON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2136 ALAMPI, VANESSA M COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND SANHA, DANIEL 2209 JAFFA PL INC 1533 S MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4929 925 LAKEVIEW RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2151 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3420 WOODRUFF, TIMOTHY 1527 S MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2151 VANDERBURGT, PAUL VANDERBURGT, TANYA 3127 SHORELINE DR CLEARWATER FL 33760 - 1737 SAVIO, TIM PO BOX 1117 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 1117 DAMS, TONY D DAMS, SANDRA D 2193 KARAN WAY CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2414 TEREBECKIJ, ADAM TEREBECKIJ, K ANJANETTE 6822 POTTS RD RIVERVIEW FL 33569 - 4603 RAYNER, ANNIE L C 1511 SCRANTON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2135 WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD BOARD O 845 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2180 MENGE, DAVID 1535 TTLLEY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2137 1VIURRAY, PATRICK M WARD, DEBRA 225 S HILLCREST AVE CLEARWATER. FL 33756 - 6033 .HOWARTH, PATRICIA A 1517 S MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2151 WHITNEY, DORIS ANN REVOCABLE L 1405 PEARL ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2160 LOGAN, DORIS 1526 TILLEY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2138 ROBERSON, MARK S ROBERSON, VONETTA 1533 SCRATON AVE CLEARWATER. FL 33756 - 2135 BOAITEY, KWAME F A PO BOX 1206 OCOEE FL 34761 - 1206 JELKS, HELEN EST 831 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2179 WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD BOARD O 845 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2180 FONTANA, COLETTE FONTANA, MARL 1823 TILLEY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2137 HOSTETLER, DONALD E HOSTETLER, PATRICIA 1.51.1 S PROSPECT AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2133 PAULEY, LAURA N 1511 S MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2151. SALEEBA, KENNETH M SALEEBA, TAMMY G 1512 TILLEY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2138 WOODS, LUCILLE 1528 TILLEY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2138 RICHEY, ROBERT RICHEY, JUDELYN 1529 SCRANTON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2135 LOMBARDO, MICHAEL A LOMBARDO, PATRTCIA A 2195 UNIVERSITY DR S CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4835 WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD BOARD O 845 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2180 OTLAGAN, PAUL JOHN 14010 LAKE GLENN DR LA MIRADA CA 90638 - 1843 WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD 845 WOODLAWIV ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2180 BOOZARJOMEHRI, HAMIDREZA 685 MAIN ST STE A SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 3 562 WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD BD OFT BD OFT BD OF T 845 WOODLAWN ST 845 WOODLAWN ST 845 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 21.80 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2180 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2180 WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD ~WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD BD OFT BD OFT BD OFT 845 WOODLAWN ST 845 WOODLAWN ST 845 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 218@ CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2180 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2180 WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD WOODLAWN CHURCH OF GOD BD OFT BD OFT BD OF T 845 WOODLAWN ST 845 WOODLAWN ST 845 WOODLAWN ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2180 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2180 CLEARWATER FL 3375E - 2180 - Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Po Box 8204 - Clearwater, F133758 President Joe Evich _ _ 802 Woodlawn Street ' FLS2007-10045 Wayne Wells