The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2006-09049 FLD2006-09049 109 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES PLANNER OF RECORD: NCT ATLAS # 292A ZONING: LMDR ~ LAND USE: RU ~ RECEIVED: 09/18/2006 ~i INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: j CDB: I CLWCoverSheet ~-c I~Iy FLD2006-09049 109 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD Date Received: 09/18/2006 AGOSTINO D GIOVANNI ORIGINAL RECEIVED ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE: ATLAS PAGE: 292A CEP 151006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEf~ PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet ii o ~` F G ~,~ , arming Department ~~~~~~~~~ 10 ouch Myrtle Avenue CI ater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AP LICAT N 4 ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGI AL I O -Plans and application are required to be colt e ~ I f ed into sets ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 04/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: ~ (~ U S~~ N C! ~ i G i o~~ a.~ N l _ MAILING ADDRESS: ~ ~ 3 3 A y s •, ~ l'7 ~ ; ~s~'_ ~ C ~ ~ n r ,,~, >,q ~~ `"~ ~ (, 33') PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: ?;j ~ _ (o ~~ - Gf $ PROPERTY.OWNER(S): ~ yo S'C ~ as v I'J ~ ~'• ~s v„Z rv N t List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: ~~ o N 54 I d ~ e ~ ~ Z ~ MAILING ADDRESS: ) ~ a, $ ~ as (e N cl A lti9 yi ./ L° (e ~ r w ca ~~ o~ ~ F(, 3 3 `) ~ ~' PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: '~~,- ~ CELL NUMBER: ~ a 7 _ ~ 33 _ I ~ y13 E-MAIL ADDRESS: !~®~ y+ I ~ 'L',a ~,,,, B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: e To w ~ ~~,~Jt,,,«S PROJECT VALUATION: $ g,l~~_f~D® STREET ADDRESS ~eSM~_~~I e!N I~o(~`=~ ~0+4~ ---_~~-` ~_~ PARCEL NUMBER(S): ~q r o~ l / I S `(~ p O pZ7 /vZ ~{ ~ ~(7 a C~ C7 ` PARCEL SIZE (acres): , 'sl $ p ~ PARCEL SIZE (square feet): ~ ~; ~ b Q LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ,5 e e ~ CC a~ c ~ e PROPOSED USE(S): ~', ~; ~ . To ~,~; ~ ~ ~ u DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Q~ 9 v ~ sr I Specifically identify the request ~_ w~. ~!. A I eta (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all U -~ ; `C s ~ ~ r requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of o ~ T I" ~ c-o P parking spaces, specific use, etc.) ~v:~S ~.,~ N,e ~ ~ v tn1 Dews`. t _c~5~~~'.q Nh~;o a ac-~ -r a lJ~u-w~=~ KeS~dEpN~~/Z' L- t7 ~~ R u- 1 r s cl-w cs l i ~. i CCPac~-e c~w~f~;ova 5 S:1Planning Department~Application Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Flexible Standard Development (FLS) Page 1 of 7 ~' ~ ~-~ ~ / ,~ Ca~E #: ~J aoC~ - (~ ~? °~ RECEIVED BY (staff initials DATE RECEIVED: 9RIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 412006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY IOF CLEARWATER S~pt~ro, 9/18/2006 ~~~' 8;45: 33AM •'I`• a Receipt #: 1200600000000009428 ~~'= ~ Date: 09/18/2006 ~Ir ~ Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2006-09049 03 Flex Std-Commercial 010-341262 475.00 Line Item Total: $475.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check MAGNUM HOMES NC R_D 2090 In Person 475.00 Payment Total: $475.00 1 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 SEAL"~ r! 5/4/2007 • '~`' ~ Receipt #: 1200700000000003925 2:06:08PM ~ _ ~ = ~ rFT ~` ' Date: 05/04/2007 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid PLT2007-00005 Preliminary Plat 010-341240 600.00 Line Item Total: $600.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check RENAISSANCE OAKS LLC lrn 2515 In Person 600` Payment Total: $600.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rp[ Page 1 of 1 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A P VIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ~f yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ^ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. "i1~is ~roPosal +s k c~ A r-edeue_(oP:>1ew~ o•~ th S:L'e ~rc~:„ s~w~le, •F=wn,, 1 ' ~ ~ am)/~r.Tl~~i:vr,sltdip t~ Rrcq i S A m•. K~u~rc a feSi~c~'~:nl Lo wC'Cacl~cd :+~ulZi -~ Nortek th C T ( L t'1 ~ e~ ~ d ' ( ~: d l ~d ' ' c e a,ud ~as qa w E q ti s~>nal e . e res e.., w res e~L~rtl types u~: C ~c iM v i e- o i+, a r1 r 'Cof c o u T (n e. C. ~ d~ A N . c: A e + e /~ u c o p N~ av'C d S t .x ~ (e4 r ~ro~e.rt;C3 •~S A iNOrc @t~~:CiearZ e)5C o~ ('esi~~e~+'C10.( PAu~g ika~ Z~lt CpN~iquP.ar;p~,a ©•~ 'C~e u_a;Lg :~ o A woalrJ;t~t q/ rye uwi'C' yC1^VC <JreS ~ SLd- '5 a Ar(v+~o~Y A~O~le p ' fvac~C3~ 6 r~u21~'au45 ie~ tkC 9r.lrrava~+diNq ~re-4 ~':Tk AP'~r~~f ~4tG opea~ SPAce.S. A1~d Set 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. T'(~e, A~~Ac.ea+t S':Tes pre Currewt~ de/e(o~c~ i4Ma ~+e•~r:.1w~ es'Ca~1;sNa+ew~ o•~ t'tie tA;N`~'+a;a~s A s~re~t'~rQ_~~ na~er,~,t1~A~$~~orZs A~o r;aTc ~AS"C west erc.ss s`L-rte, w rr t1S°~ Aid ~eyC~opw~cNZ o~ Ada/itcw+~ Prol-~tT'~;es cy~~C.~ SupAortS ~~I1eir•ug~ue. . 3. persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the prop ely affect the health or afety or o sed use. s sed development will not adver The pr opo s fr lI ~ y -} r `- y - N~S OPGAG~Cd ~F~ A~VJO AP~~ l.NreC i7t~i~~~7~(~' CGi)'FiQU7'R`IOA~ w~t~1 f'~~~b r:gl.e f~llAG{ntd ~+.J`t~~ i 1 l / w~' o'~tke geccs_5~~e To erl~eS v3 5pAces qs v~c=(~ As~c~~P'mn( ~•s'~A~~;s~~c ,Se~~Ne~s A/d o~e T6 LItC ~Ag~ cc~~`I -en.,~pr,nJe< NeV1l`~ ANd SAi~~~VV~Givy l.~l~ tY-3~~~wliA~~ ~reSe~-+GC V't ---- -- J t r• 1 n ' S " ~ Z t ' ~ ~ ' ° ~rB ~ C dvPe !-~ $eCu ri 1e_ S / ccZ ~ y A L v e ~/ O • - 5 i dam, rJ i G~./eS Ot+ ~ t er .$ f4 ~ 'T ~ f 4. e proposed development is designed o minimize traffi congestion. Th T a .+ ll~c ~rmlJc!'~;cs Te `?=1~~ Ces ,4~v~ iHA', y~+g`~r 1,~ti A..~ A,Pp~'e.pr~ t_e l~i~ ~Dr+a a~ai...~4 >F{ceess to II lI i ( + ( r -r ~1 DT' ud CI~aC~'GFJ ~~ r•.d t('p-t"r•t~t•~~a~ iS ~:wl P'~uc~d k~ rov•:d,r~ t'-e~f ~~5~ out f'A`s1e.r' iCl~a*~ ~y~tu`~ ~,u~ o~ ve~;c~e tr.~s on,~Cv ex:'sT ; +~+q eor..+~gestc strC~~s . 5. The propopsed developf~ment 's ~n~stent with the community character of th immediate viGlnity of the par el proposed for dev Igpment. .1.w J~`Uw1J wr.~A Su~ rff a•, SeCtiu s A M~KL~re. o~~C,usi.+ ~Ci'~rPes Au~ deNS'µ't'ie5 A~du/sZ'.a~~Z-///yyy/// ~ ~ dc~c~epvt~ew~T~~A•t,~/•NA~rcAdy j~ludeS f}Nc~ ~NTcre.srtr~ ue; ~b oo~s. itaeXist;-.+ Y^e5~,~ew~le q µ.1 '~ 1/Ej / r C o e rq c ..pp..e. ffw C a ~/ )[ ' G 5 . ff e ~c7 '~ i o 7.1 r+ S3~/ fl may- I /C Ld~T~ ~4 • iq c ~C/ q u.7C lilt) S A rbTP~~le( 4iJCr'Si iL ~1'lC YLOJticw ~ES,~ QrUJidiN S-lei-{~s'~2•-~ i--i/eSrWte MJZ ~ ~ s ~ ~~ ' ` ~ ` ~ Rw cS e~vs~ty M©der~tZ •• Cd>Yl MUn~ AH rACl eP O~ ~ C©c.~ < jai ~t+~CRreA ~C~°~~ 5er 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. II ! y- 1%G t~~A.p~i.+'~ t-c~~e(o~iv-eNt O•i- r~~ S Sic,G. ~,5 I^t5i~tr.+~7r4 I !5 /{S Aut,c~a~ca ~~/ ~~~ COde•.~'~ kGUtS a~oPcrt{Ziou Dt ~~tc reS~Aeu`~iA ~ u5C RS wt~~ /}s T~c UiSala~ri~lCausC+L - -°---~---~ - rr I ~Nd O'~AG~Ory .imQge~s Arc AS AW~~e~r~t~Tc~ ~Oi' t'e5;dee.~ L rr~( '~roPey'~i eS . QRIC~INAL RECENED ~~±=fi~rr'''')) n 12006 S:1Planning DeparimentlApplication Forms\development review\2006 FdrmslFlexible Standard Development (FL~)'2006.doc page 2 0£? PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ;. ..: ;/~ ~/I WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREN~LtJTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) ' "' ^ Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. r ! I Y~_t..-_~..,~_~s.t_~_u......_._~_g_5..~.._~e~.~.'.~.~....s'._u~~_e_tA_N~_~.....~_~Z~c~.~ddwc~':v{~ u_r.,;Z oe,~tk_~ s:T~.a_,~s''~+-caut' GLZ Z1ti Z wee ®~ t'4e 1499 OeJaf;o~+/+~w't C~~~ AdoP'C'`.~tt Ava -~3:n 1.:5tvr~c Js~ o~ 'Sc,luts pAr~ca....-..... As A._Sc>~1.._e.~e._N ~ko~ ~u,z~ ~.d;cwLe Crept a n~ _ !'`u~c. ~ Ti.ss a ~`qc`C s ~cecl-u~e~ixee - .- .---....- --- -..._~-...A..~._.-~--. _'C'°--c-or_we r_Iot _~!_~ aot_~(......~ _.._. S ' -. ....._._.._._......._... . ~+~{' Y1~c~(tCC4clta ~w+e+l .t• [~P't~Q 6f:'CatiA Ao-re~ '~kere oc-C rG uir~c t~G v SG e~ mkt ~G>~dtV~.A\ T+~~'`rl F1G~'r~~eJ ~tJe-(r+ ++~G N'C r'o~es ---~---------- - --- --- ---F-----P --- 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include th existing value of the site and the proposed value~Q f to}{~' site ~ylth th Im r vements) a kJ its N va „~t-~T~ i'~:aper'~`.as :s+~{.~ +-rcn aitZM~ 6~.Ta~lc •~~ ~C.IKJI~tKJ LSo tG pp rtt'ede~Jc~oP d o h Kd ~~.av~... Capes th t 1v~~~de !l'lo~i~ert~oa~ee Z'o 2b~St,:stl~ 3',u (c~A,~-'~~y~:'ICa~~•! Cotk.~astf a y _._. u.~ lt~;. ~r+-CS ill~+ S,a, ~c FArhl( datwc~i~~ =c~..."Lf+~-...~m~ _ ~~w~u -o..___e.__t~~o'~ure,S ow_t u~:'C~"Lk+~ u~,l'C5 Atu~ ©N~ w;'Ct~TMr~cua~it _ _`~ 4~ it b®~c7ed _` _ _ _ __-- - t----- -----~._._... _ _--- ------ ------- 5 f G u r e w! G c~ g i y.a J CsTiN a t.+ t' nl o'+t- O ca ~"c~SC-A << q -+ ~Yt ,A 3 ~++T~T~-~f~c t4 f'G A . `[' ~-:'~ Ne ~ 3 -.+ v ~: yL'rMC r~C u_~_l(.._?_~^.{l..r©~_:4....A_r...~.~ .~_w_r_F.~_~ ~._x_~. /_~s.__b.~ p ra u .,~ t-+ A ~ ~e~~ : u ~ Gs'Ca.G vZ't ~ w t w1 1~ e 1 _ ~a~eo ~ r ~J~ y -......------ it-raJeS~~MGvt q-.+c~ r'a-ia,vaStvtel~'t: fy~r q•r~n~na~~ ~~o~tr'C.est 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permittjed in the City of Clearwater. _~ V~_t_._....-..__r~.. _ELF...t11._~.._~Of'__A_~_AC~~~_.S'Gg~dnu~iA \ t1sC ~ S If~~t9w~~ ~1f~1_ da-NS,•~~ ~dwSisri~~+r w~rT~ ~~~ y~-+~er`lyilu~ (~a5:de~.+~tMl ~fgrk~-+ CA+r~r~tJSCc 4. Th11e uses or mix of useywithin the residential infill project are cormp(atible with adjaJCent land use 1st. TA~NC Qf611fJnSGt 1G41e+A+~G+M_fC~1f O G~A~1~~- MAt-c-~'~G4,~ S. KiIAf.~TpW'yY-OM~fC ~IJCCOP7-aCiAl~ LU ~~G 1~1C~: .n~~...-~.'.._~-~-\-1I~G==t~_~5....._LJ._t.._l.~ ~I~~NL M`. y. l.Jrt m.~ 1-bJ~i ~J `]~~GS /Y 1.^e 1~rG f1 ZRA~tUC. ftJ&~ ~',~ ~auSi~X -MQu.,~pature~--110+*~S_p itr'k _ S~~ v ~e ~ww~ ~~ ~~~Ae~ ~~ 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development a~ a residential infiW project yriil upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed fordevelo ment. 1k.. e.~:~tr,r+~ 5;wglc Fr-+.; ~ a qo a ~.ut t-~• c9x+ ~ e S;Ce re r seu=S /1u fl-tt~tc:r~.Q ~s.s e~~'A~pro erCY va~~(er,cvrr~vrco~~s /4r+~~r-~ar(Mac~t-~oQ.,~~C>I~,rrs, !~5_$v~.l, r,r d~s~ou~n t-S Itil4~.-.J~A:V/~aJc~ AN~ r'G'^,rl-tJagCMel.+r. ESt M~~,---'!~ TOJ-~F~ O~GS ~ -.~~T1 i S S i~ t uJ i ~------------------ ---- ------- ------~--- ~ ----------- T t i-C r ~ P r c 5 ~ ~-'C ~ " n~'~ i c.. K F.'t r e.S~e -~ t<f A -r c- s ~ p+ rc, u'i~h7Z+ -F :.+ ~ _~'loc~s-p.tl._'~•{~ .elN..';_`g_t._.`.~:.;~yCt+.>....dGJa(e :v-e..rfw'ilL Gull,nuae 'Ck~ u;lt'e~JU~,rorJiNG~T ~orv~rid TfA.~ d's a~ i G A C. Oiu o~ Z'e ~ av S ~A ~. w Y\ 7° J f! u d a ru G O c1 r ri 9 a $ ', en i l g r i --~ U e S~ rra a ~+ C i 1-r ~r~rra Drmpcr~C"t ~s . 5. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for developrment and the City of Clearwater as a whole. I r l /~ Z'I~,e_res:~ciN~;A\ Chkr•hGtt•- o~ tt+c y;e.:N:~~( ~_s estAlO tsk tl Ti~ ~~.J/~r;srC o~F ov3,N~ 'ry Fcx-Pt'¢sevC.Tk-9~'vw,yyt-ow~.. ~arv~eaz-is ~1~:~:utcs q t'.~+p.~utC' .~; t~ , Add A ~C'I~,r« u rJ iT b~,lA i~~ 'Co w.Al-JC.t_ u A c-or.JS~_s~AtuC ~rarryr~_v~.,~~; ~ rar-+ _W-....~_$-s......--.~__..~..._~~~. _~•.,.......w ~~~ so M~ e ~ T1•-~ ~. ~~ s~ ~ to c-~ a v u t L~ '. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 1~c+ ~a~ w ;del,. $tT~at~ ~e ~.. ~T ~~rk:r~.__t AcGeSS or n'I`1. ~ ~ Z' _._. -. ~_y......-._.. .. ........ _ _...._.._..._ .. ...... ........._.._...... t ~~e~, i~~~'[y i s raq~~s~~~ ~D Coa.~5~r~cC ~~.:s t~ro;~cL' S:1Planning DepartmenllApplication Forms\Development Review\2007 Farms\Residential Inrill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 3 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) ^ Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ^ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ^ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ^ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ^ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ^ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): ~~ Stormwater plan as noted above is included ' Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION = IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ^ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ^ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ^ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ^ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ORI~7~NA~' RECEIVED S:1Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Flexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.doc Page 3 of 7 ~~p 012006 PLANNING DEPARTfVIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER I G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Seotion 4-202.A) ' ^ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; _____ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; ____ All existing and proposed points of access; ____ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; ____ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ^ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED _ Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; ______ Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ^ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11); ^ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; ORIGINAI. ____ All open space areas; RECEIVED ~~ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; ___ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); ~ CEP 012006 Streets and drives (dimensioned); PWNNING DEPARTMENT Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); CITY OF CLEARWATER Structural overhangs; 5:1Planning DepartmentlApplication Forms\development review12006 Forms\Flexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.doc Page 4 of 7 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ^ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ' All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; - Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); _ Irrigation notes. ^ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ^ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information: All sides of all buildings; Dimensions; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); and Materials. ^ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8'/~ X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'/s X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ORIGINAL RECEIVED L~EP 011006 S:1Planning DepartmentWpplication Forms\development review\2006 FormslFlexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.doc Po ppr~ING DEPARTMENT Pa e 5 of 7 u9t V CITY OF CLEARWATER ~RIGIIVAI. K. TRAFF[C IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) SEP 0 1 Zoo ^ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: PI.~~~~NG ®EPART~E ^ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. C~TM OF CLEHRWATE ^ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ^ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ^ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified'in the Scoping Meeting. ~~ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to,the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ^ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow CalculationsNVater Study is included. _~__ Fire Flow CalculationslWater Study is not required. CAUTION - iF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. crK-~-~b~ Signature of property owner or epresentative S:\Planning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment review12006 Forms\Flexible Standard Page 6 of 7 Y ~-e Ion. ~~7 - ~G~il/ 4 %~ Notary public, My commission expires: _~ STA OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PIN Sw to d s bscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 to me and/or b who is personal) known has produced ~3ao- 7~- as identific Notary Public, State of Florida My comm. expires Jan. 11, 2010 No. DD 506234 { • N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): ~~~~ ~~C. ~u ~~~~ iJbO~~ ~~~ 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) (,N i ~ ~p vJ yV ~Oc~ SG p T'O ~t~G~ 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That I/we), the u ders' ed authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. C Property Owner Property O a Notary SeallStamp ~, t~D2.63152 ~ ^~ .~~~b My Commission Expires: •p Q ors:.;. Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS / Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this / y/ _, day of ~~Gv»- ~`'G personally appeared ~cu~T/~+w f/. ~a „t,....,-,.- / who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fual~y~y~~~,e[stands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. >®i s ~~e ~2u1 P~Prs ` ~r~., c~:~ O ~ CS~~ , ~(J C`) G b ~ e ~ m e ~; ~' u ~ Notary Public Signature 4y v A'oooQle~o asoao®.- /O~U~SS9999989 Q~ O~ ®RIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 011006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER S:\Planning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment review\2006 FormslFlexible Standard Development (FLS) 2006.doc Page 7 of 7 OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. The Landscape treatment has been maximized on the property without jeopardizing drainage patterns, underground or overhead utilities, and the function of the building. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is Dosed. Lighting will be controlled to be respectful of neighbori_g properties. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. Landscape treatment is designed to give years of benefits without the disruption of building function, drainage and utilities. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 012006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER P~~~ 2 v7 .~. Clearwater U C~ ~: Planning and. Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue " Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-4567 Fax 727-b62-4576 DATt? RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: _ ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING Z~ LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNI~ APPt.fCATION ^ SUBMIT 9 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plan NORTH- / SOUTH• ! WEST- - / EAST: / COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (Revisal 9/19ROQ1j D_ APPLICANT, PROPERTY GINNER AND AGENT INFORMATK?N: (Code Sec#ion 41001) APPLICANT NAME: __ ~ et 'o s ~ '~ i-~ c7 D '~ la : c~ V A 1V N i MAILING ADDRESS: ~~ 3 l~ Ay s: d e I/ it ~,, c~ L~ c~ r w saT e r F( 3 3 7 6 r( PHONE NUMBER: 7 ~ rI - ~ 5 (o ' ~( ~' ~ ~ FAX NUMBER: PROPt=RTY OWNER(S}: Include ALL owns} AGENT NAME (Contact Person) ~ b ~.- ri ~ d L e ~ ~ Z- ~ MAILING ADDRESS: I ~ 02 ~ l) A ~ e -a ~~. w ~ ~ -~ ~ ~e r~ r ~ r, `Cc r I~ ~ 3 ~ `~ ~ ~.( PHONE NUMBER: __~ a ~(- ~'(~ 3 - ! I /{~ FAx NUMBER: The hndscaping negtriremerrts of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or Level Two Appr+owal, as the case may tn:, if the a~liratian for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which the fallowing criteria. The use of landscape plans; sectionslelevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supp~mentary information in addition to the information provided on this worksheet: Ard~litectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a t :omprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development The Landscape is in concert with the local development maximizing Landscape treatment and enhancing architectural themes. ORIGNNAI RECENED Paae 9 of 3 CITY OF CLEARWATER 4. Property Values. The landscape ~ 5nent proposed in the Comprehensive L scape Program witit have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcefproposed for development. The Landscape treatment will benefit value by providing aesthetically pleasing views while roviding climate control for building and parking areas. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located_ Please return checklist for review and verification. 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify chat the foregoing is hue ` ` i Property er STATE OF FLORIDA, COLiiVTY OF PINELL~S t3efore me the undersigned, an officer duty commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, ~ q day of o thr Q ~y ~ ~ ~ ~~ -- L~ll"7-r--- ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~onaiiy appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the corrtents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Niy Commission Expires: Notary Public S: application forms/development n3view/comprehenshre landsppe program appiication.d ORIGINAL RECENED SEP 012006 p~uui~~. °C~~,,o1~?:~.?~E-,,. Da~~id 1~, Trt~tlten ~~: ~~ .~ _ . ~~~; ,~i~~ ~ ~ `t 303319 ~~•~~ , ,.~.~~ ..s.~ ~;~,~,~,~ ~a, zooa '~;'~';;_ :,~nde~ r~,~~ ~'~~,,,. ~ .. ~, ~ i.mtling Co., Inc, PLANNING DEPAR~I~QEDIT~~ 3 CITY OF CLEARWATER Clearwater • Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 CASE #: _~ RECEIVED BY: (Staff Initials) _. __... DATE RECEIVED: ~7RIGif~-L -»- ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION RECD IVE® ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION d o~~ 9 (Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets) ~ ••'°° r ~ 200( ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN FEE: $200.00 ~L~-NIiIIN~ ~~P/)1Rrnfl~l'~~) (Not required if submitted as part of an FLS or FLD application) ~+TM ~F ~~EA.R~//~~EI~ ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE OF $600.00 * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION (REVISED 04/24/07) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AGENT AND PLAT PREPARER INFORMATION: (Code Section a-2oz.A and a-7os.A.) I APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: . CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PLAT PREPARER: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: i FAX NUMBER: EMAIL: is / (i t~-' ti~ 1 3''t t~e+;.~a~ d ~~~ i 2,~ r~~.g ~1~~~~~:~~~ ~a~- ~~~-- ~ r~.~ Z~lrt-A ~~• ~ ~W~ i_48©_t3~~'C~Q~~ _SZ'_, 1a~1-'138-9oto FAX NUMBER: EMAIL: ('~^ N~e~i zc ~ ~riwq _.. FAX NUMBER: ~d2Z^ ~33~aD8~3 EMAIL: t' . C~ ~vv S: IPlmini~zg DeparGxentlApplication FormslDevelop~nent Review12007 ForrnslPreliniiruny Plnt 04-24-07.rloc Page 1 of 7 ED;DEVELOPMENT INS ^RMATION: (code section a:zoz.A) PROJECT NAME: ~ '' ~ PROJECT VALUATION: $ ~ d O QDD q ~l _g.. e .....{.) c 4u ~ ~ ~a e- 4. _ ...... ......... ~ l STREET ADDRESS iOq M~ I~,~~Ieti ~,, ~aot~.~ Q~_ C:~e qrw ~l~c.r PARCEL NUMBER(S): O'~ ~'19 ~P.S'~Q pO ~ b ~a~d 1`d ~`, C'~ C7 PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED USE(S): 6 `~ ~ PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 3 3 L( ( 9 _- C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (code section a-zoz.A.e) ^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 3) Fourteen (14) copies of the preliminary plat shall be submitted. The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than one inch equals 100 feet (1:100), shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY, U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; PROPOSED STREET NAMES; NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOLLOWING: THE OVERALL PLAT; EACH LOT; STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS; COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY; NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE. ~RIC~INAt. RECEIVED d-..,~1 ~~ ~ 2007 WCANNIN~ ~1=PARTfVIErv~ CIIY ®F CCEARWATER D. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. ~~ Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this i day of i1^-7' , A.D. 20~to me and/or by ~%r.~,~Ti ~ ~ cD . C:e ~~-• ~i ,who is personally kn~~n%n has produced ~a",,;;u(~~r~dy'i~;?~a~, as identifica~tion. ~^°' ~„~!a. ~!'r ; .,.~~`~ // L~~ ., ~a ~ A~~~u is ~'~ ~ ~,~,~I~.slt~,v~ '~a ~.•._ l D Nota pu lic, , l ,., d My commission expires: T ~ '«' '~,..r,.(7•L ~, o ~.~c~~iIPI7"sUSa~~ u`C:~~„e a S: (Planning DepartrnentlApplicntion ForrnslDevelopment Review12007 FormslPrelin:inary Plat 04-24-07.doc Page 2 of 7 ,, ~'` 4~ E. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: C9$L~NO ~`e ~Qutl+'a1JIJt .... _____ ............. 2. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): inq M~ M~I~~N ~a~T~ ~~~d _._ 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 4. That the undefersighed (has/have) appointed and does/do) appoint: ~c~ ~-~ td ~,~~~ i~ .............._.....__.._... as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. Th (I/we), t e and igned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ,. ~.~ ..................._ ..........._...! ..............._....................._. Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner ~ Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me fhe undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 7 ~ a of / ~.., a`5 a~.,y,n~ ~ ~ ~ personally appeared ~Ce ~?~^' ~ ~ ~ ~ '' ^ '` ^' ~ who havin~~~'~ear~.fsr~~ dliliy,~vQrna~ _....._ . _. _ ......... _ ..._ _.. _.._.._ .__ _ __ 5, _ _ ....._. ._. _._ ........ ...... .... ' °rJ i ~W.° pin' ~«~' Sl4 1 ~ ' ; Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. d°;~ `~ ,; , ~ .r v2. S _. ~~ 5, Notary Public SignaCur~r,~= ,,/ ; in My Commission Expires: .________-_____ ~~'~~ a~~~~-~enc~-"-:-qo;~~y 4` „~ Notary Seal/Stamp ~~ ~,, M1,~ae __ ~~ ~a. 0121E;II~aI, ~E~IVED :~,~i ~~ ~~ 200 S.•IPlr:nningDepartmentlApplicntiwiForms~~vel~o m~e~nt~~ig}±~~~,Q„7EF~o~mslPreliminaiyPlat04-24-07.doc ~IT~ C)F}-;'DLE~4P'/RiV~ r~4VTrE~ ~j -f . STORM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR - BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES ~ - JOHNS PARKWAY ' CLEARWATER, FLORIDA - SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29S, RANGE 16E PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA -- PREPARED FOR - _~ _ DIGIOVANNI HOMES, LLC 163 BAYSIDE DRIVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33767 JULY 2006 ~6»° :~=~~F~~' ° P .G }` - p Vii`- Y! ~ ): + ~~ - ~ e^t T' • r M~ w i , ' x i ' ~ 0-~ 5 ., Sw. ® C~ p 1 s \'.. 6„ . =a ~''S~~ - _:v ;~ ::~., x c.. STORM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS - Total Drainage Area = 0.50 Ac. _. - Existing Conditions: -Paved Areas ~ = 0.06 Ac. @ c = 0.95 , -Open Areas = 0.44 Ac. @ c = 0.20 "c" _ (0.06)(0.95/2) +(0.44)(0.20)/0.50 = 0.23 - Proposed Conditions: '- Building & Paved Areas = 0.34 Ac. @ c = 0.95 - Detention Area = 0.05 Ac. @ c = 1.00 - Open Area = 0.11 Ac. @ c = 0.20 "c" _ (0.34)(0.95) +(0.05)(1.00) +(0.11)(0.20)/0.50 = 0.79 - ~ Stage/Storage Relationship -Detention Pond Stage Surface Area Storge Available EI. _ (S.F.) (C.F.) 17.00 245 0 17.50 454 175 18.00 703 474 18.50 984 922 19.00 1,299 1, 544 19.50 1,646 2,364 20.00 ~ 2,022 3,401 - Water Quality Treatment Volume Required: O = 0.50 x 0.5/12 X 43,560 = 908 C.F. Required Storage EI. = 18.48 . Set Weir Slot Inv EI. @ 1'9.50 (see plans) v M®®RET HY®ROGRAPH ®ATA IiVPU~ - RAl'IONI~L HYDROGRAPH iNE~'HO® Project Name : BAYSIDE TOWNliOMES - 25 YR. PRE Contributing Basin Area _ 0.50 ac. Runoff Coefficient C 0.23 Time of Concentration 15.00 min. Rainfall Depth 9.00 in. Storm Duration 24.00 hrs Qpeak: 0.0431 ds Time of peak: 0.3 hrs Vtotal: 3,729 ft' ~+~st .dopy NYOROGRAPH : BAYSIDF TOW NHOMES - 25 YR. PRE- i . MODRET HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT -RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH: METHOD Project Name : BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES - 50 YR. POST Contributing Basin Area 0.50 ac. Runoff Coefficient C 0.79 Time of Concentration 15.00 min. Rainfall Depth - 10.50 in. Storm Duration 24.00 hrs r ~v~ilabie HYDROGP.APH : 3A1'SIUE 'lOWMHOtJ~ES - 5C YR. P05T MODRET _ SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PRO]ECT NAME : BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES - 50 YR. POST HYDROGRAPH RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS INCLUDED Pond Bottom Area Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL Pond Length to Width Ratio (L/W) Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table Elevation of Starting Water Level Elevation of Pond Bottom ' Is there overflow ? Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis _ Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Factor of Safety Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated, Analysis Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/E~Itration Trench Time Increment During Storm Event Time Increment After Storm Event _ Total Number of Increments After Storm Event Runoff Hydrograph File Name: 0624~ost.RAT Time of Peak Runoff: 0.25 hrs Rate of Peak Runoff: 0.17 cfs Hydraulic Control Features: _ 250.00 ft2 3,534.00 ft3 1.50 9.00 ft 14.50 ft . 17.00 ft 17.00 ft Y 0.20 27.40 ft/d 2.00 41.10 ft/d 0.23. 1.00 2.00 hrs 12.00 hrs 6.00 _ ~ Top Bottom Left Right Groundwater Control Features - Y/N N N N N Distance to Edge of Pond ~ 0.00 0.00 0.00 - o .0.00 Elevation of Water Level ~ 0.00 0.00 0.00, O.OQ Impervious Barrier - Y/N N N N N ~ Elevation of Barrier Bottom 0.00 _ 0.00 0.00 .0.00 Analysis Date: 7/31/2006 A~ MODRET . SUMMARY OF RESULTS -` PRO]ECT NAME : BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES - 50~YR. POST CUMULATIVE TIME . (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW (ft3) 00.00 - 0.00 14.500 0.000 0.00000 0.00 14.500 0.09232 0.09661 2.88 17.605 0.10090 0.00 O.I0387 4.88 18.026 0.10359 0.00 0.10331 6.88 18.451 0.10509 0.00 0.10686 .. 8.88 18.854 0.10908 0.00 0.11131 10.88 19.230 0.11244 0.00 0.11357 12.88 19.533 0.10927 69.40 0.10497 14.88 19.607 0.10153 470.73 0.09805 16.90 19.627 0.09559 990.82 0.09315 18.90 19.635 0.09121 1 554.70 0.08927 20.90 ~ 19:640 0.08775 2150.10 0.08623 22.90 19.644 0.07922 2 768.90 0.03714 34.90 18.282 0.02944 2 768.90 0.02173 46.90 17.485 0.01806 2 768.90 Analysis Date: 7/31/.2006 n • Y MODRET - SUMMARY OF RESULTS - ~O]ECT NAME : BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES - 50 YR. PO CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION " RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) CUMUI,.ATIVE OVERFLOW (ft3) - - ~ 0.01439 - 57.93 17.000 0.01232 2 768.90 - 0:01025 - 70.90 16.581 0.00896 2 768.90 - - 0.00767 82.90 16.300 0.00681 2 768.90 0.00594 94.90 16.082 2 768.90 Maximum Water Elevation: 19.644 feet @ 22.90 hours - Recovery~@ 57.932 hours * Time increment when there is no runoff Maximum Infiltration Rate: 8.330 ft/day - V Analysis Date: 7/31/2006 • `. . MODRET ELEVATION VS OVERFLOW RELATIONSHIP )JECT NAME : BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES - 50 YR. Pt ucture Type: SHARP CRESTED J Crest Elevation ~ ~ ~ 19.50 ft Crest Length : 0.50 ft .. Coefficient of Discharge 3.31 Weir Flow Exponent 1.50 Number of Contractions 2.00 Design High Water Level Elevation ~ 20.00 ft ,, 0 11.200 11,000 ` 10.800 10,600 10,400 10,200 ' - 10,000 9,800 ,. 9,600 9,400 9,200 ' 9.000 8,800 8.600 8,400 8,?00 ~ 8.000 7.800 i 7,600 ~~ 7.400 " 7,200 7,000 6.800 6.600 ~ 6;400 . a 6.200 ' = 6,000 ~ 5.800 5,600 - E 5,400 ~ 5.200 j 5,000 4,800 4,600 4,400 • 4,200 4,000 3,800 3,600 3,400 3,200 3.000 2,800 2,600 ~, ` , e 2,400 2,200 - ~ 2.000 1.800 ~ 1,600 1,400 1.200 1,000 800 600 ~' 400 200 - 0 INFILTRATION : BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES - 50 YR. POST - ~ Time (hrs) Total Volume Infiltrated = 11,400 iN F i :~ 19.5 19 INFILTRATION : BAYSIOE TOWNHOMES - 50 YR. POST 17.5 17 .. .. .., ._ .. -- -- -. Time (hrs) ' ~ ~ Max Water Elevation = 19.64 ft 20.00 2, 022 S. F. 19.50 >, 646 S. F. 19.00 1, 299 S. F. 18.50 984 S. F. 18.00 703 S. F. 17.50 454 S. F. > 7.00 245 S. F. DETENTION POND SURFACE AREA TABULATIONS. SCALE: 1" = 10' r P6ERC~A55 r.~V1MGLE ROOF TRU55 BRN'6, ZO'•G' - TRU55BRN'6, 19'•4' -- CEtAENTfTI0J5 VH.'EER PWISH RN. PLR. la'•k' _ %'•a' PIN, R.R. 3.4~~"i2 SCGPE PENT-~ CRYaCE1 12 G~ ~.,. I `, r~W.K~ . ~ ~ O RASED ' S 7L ~~ i 57LCG06AN7 ~ ~ r i _ rf ,i ~ ~~ II d, . rRE-N ~. ERVCxET ~ ~i,k"~~3Y 5LOPE - ROGE YEN1' ORCKET RCuE VH~T _ 12 - - - ~6 P6EW3LA55 - - -- - - - _. - - ~~~ __ SHINGLE ROOF --- - - -- - ~_ .. _ U55 BRN'Cr - - -. -. ._ .- -6' TR - _ P6. _ - _ 19'•4' TRU55 BRN'6~ ~~ I P~ - - lI1 ~~ ~ ,~j - 'C • --- ~,. I ~ , ~ r ~~ ti W -i ,` t ~ j ~ l I, 1: ~ ~ i ,~ ` l ~ ~ b LBA6VTITIDLS 1. ,l ~ 1 i ~ ~, ~ ', I ~i 'i 1.. I I _~ - 1~EN~PINSH i rRE~+ ~ W'•4' RN, PLK ~ ORAISW ._ 5 ~.~.., ~~~ ORASW ~ 9'0' 5Tl0006AnA I ~ STUCW 6AnD ~` ~,., ~ .- ~ I ~ i J to"- I w SEO~ ~ ;,ST' Aw ~, ~ ~. ~ ~~ { ~ ~ .nAw ~,~ I `° ~ _ ~r 1 ~i ~ N~ ~'rr' I~ I l r i I ~~ , _ l II 4. Lo 4!.d _ _ o'-D' PIN, PLR. PR&IA c~co. ERXKET ~ REAR ELCVA 101J 3 UNIT ~U1LD1N6 - SCALE: i/g° = i'-D° ~^ ~r--,~.._.,_ ~-. '~a ~~,~~ r ~ a 4F ~ w ,:~ '~ ~ ,. ~ ~11~M L i a t~ ~. k ~ { ~ .~~ `~j ~fi~' ~-.. "~(f^ ~yj~, i"'~x ~}}~~ ~ ~ ~H y~ ~r~~N ,~.~"~'~° ~~~, ~ ?R ~ ~ ti 4,~.5 r. ~~ 3 ~ `"'~",."„Ate ;'*"~~"!4 ~L "~ t ~. ) ~ ~ tan 12 ~ ~' T ~'`, l- ~ I 1.yf r n4~~,t~ ,~f ~~ ! ~~'~ ~y~ ,. !~ I[ ~~ M„ +i-nt._.,.~ ! ~ y1 ~y {p µ, ' ~L^ 7`.] ,,,.F. ! a ~ ~...~p L~' J (lyri -~. !{ f 6 _ V - „µ. ~,^'attW`^r ~ ~nr +v a i~ ~N" /' ~'~,, !~ ~ r tit.?~ ,.,.~1~ '~'~( D r 9 P °; ~~ ~~ ~~_ I ;i ~,. ~f'.; 1~ I ~ ~ ~~ ~ p.. i ti~ ~ I 4 ~_ i 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ t 9 ~: ~t ~. ~ ~ t~ S ~. ~ ~~ 1 n ~_ ~ ,~, ~ ~ tl G ®Z r ~_~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ c ~ z -~ P6BiGLA55 5HNGI.E RppP TRUrfJ BRN'6, Zo' b' _ 7RU59 BRN'G. I%'•q' 09ABJTffI0U5 ~ 4B~IEEQ PNSM PIN, RR, l0'•4' aa- % p~ - Vi" RAIS® SNGGp DAND w/ iRN PRE•MAN1Pb DECA, 6RAQCET ~N. PLR. a, p' p' 12 PrsEo-+uapv. G GTXA. V6Ji 1 34'~"325LCPE RWiE ~51T I ~ [RK]:Ei ~RDGE V$JT ~~ n' ~~ ~~M~~I ~, I~CT~' MiL I FRONT ELEVATION 2 UNIT BUILDING-SCALE: I/$° = I'-0" 3' SLL IZ b elze+AwPb. - pELp 1BJT PDERGU55 5HNaI.E Kpq' _ 2o'•G' 1RU5y E~tN'G. a ~ - ce.+oatRwuz VENER PN15H c.J. Ip'.p' FlN,PLR. -%~•0~ IG~ RASW 510000 tO ~~ ~- w/ TRN DA PREiAAN1Pb o'•o~FlN, PLR. ~~ o~ ~ ~ ~ m® ~o D ~' ~', .. ~ O~ en ~~ ~ ~.r i J } t ~~ 7 -~S~ ?` ~ -, v f9~' ,~ ~~~~`! U , ~~^ ~" .,• 6 ~~ tr1' 4 ~°~~ A P ~ 8l~ ~ VN ~~ r~," ~V~ ti~ r r i ~ ~ ~~~ / . ~t 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ) ~ ( ) ~ ,~ ~ ~ i ~ v 1 -~ ~ ~*'E ,. ~~ ~ '. ~ I ~ . ,A w~~ ,1 ~~,R~s ~ i -- t r SI ~ f ~ r I ~~ - 48rEHt PMSH -- - -= ~)~I i ~~ 1 F9N. PLR, l0'-4' ( , ` _ _ ~'•d - ~ ~ stucco aAw~ M I - l0'•4' FIN. PLR ~~ ~ ~~'.r~ ~ RAKE :._. ., __.. .. _ i STUCCO 6ArD ~~ - 0~ 0' ~~ _ `I ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ `5i AFD ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~Vi 1 ~! -1 "~ I >> ~ s ~ J -- ~_~ -, Zw ~,, J~` I ~ 444[ L I ~~ a - _ a'-a' PIN. PLR h ~co. erucxei ~ REAR ELEVATION 2 UNIT BUp.pINC~ - yCALE: I/g° = I'-o" ~ Z oZ ~ ~ ~® ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ o ® D ~ Qa ~ ij ~ ~ 55~ r ~ ~~ try w °k...wF;,:~r t3 M, ~;~ ; ~ ~ ~ t ~., ~a ~ 4 F~ ~ ~ ~w~~~.. ~ ,, ,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ., ~.., > ~~{fir '~t ~~~ . , i >fyy~ ~-~ V t Z. T'Nik dw' „_. r,~.,s :1..Y"7 ~' r ar: r a.N ~ a~ /`" r < / .J .' ~' ~ ~ '~ t ~ ( ` Y 1 1111 I \, {~a ~ ~..~. ~ ~Y ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ a ~ ,~ ~ r `~ ~~ RU55 BRN'6. 'RU55 BRN'G. IN. PLR. N. PLR, 51DE ELEVATION ALSO IN REVERSE -SCALE; I/Sn = li_Qn y~ t• F e ~, 'i~ r t ~`.~, i~ f ~~,.,'~,.,, ~~ M .. ~" ~ ". a s w tit , ,~ ~ ~ ,.sy ~~ *~ ~~ _ \ 1 l'~ -,.~ % -_ ~ k ~s r _...~ ~ ~'~ ~-~ .Tate-.~ ~~~~t ~. .t ° -e.>~.f--', ~~ '~ '.7f ~ __ r ,> ,. ~ 51 tF.,.. 1 ( lc e M, ~ , ~. ~ ~jJ~. ~' ~. ~, ~; ,~ ,; ,~' . ~ ~~~ ~ z OZ ~' ~ m0 ~vr ~ m~ ~~ ~ N v~ A ~ ~ ~ Z ~~ PI 5H 'IRU55 6RN'B IRU55 BRN'L PIN. PLR ~N. PLR ~ l~Y~"i2 JLGPE FRONT EI.EVP~TION 3 UNIT 6UILDING - rrGAI.E I/8" = {'-On i 3-4~~"i25LGPE P6WGLA55 nw~Le RoaP '~•6~ TRU55 6RN'6. ~TRU~fi BRN'G. MRILUS 3C PN5H 4~ PIN. PLR. 51tXC0 / TR41 ~4°b 4CFET o'•o' ~ t~N. FLR. n~ 0~ ~ ~ ~m ~ ~GD ~~ D ~ ~ Z ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ r •«6 ~ _ 4 ~ 94 ~ 4 + i F ~~~fi~ 6ti N'y1t4 ~ N ~ .»X ~~ ~Fj I,y Y . ~~d 7. Yk .F et i~~h~ ~G. +~' ~,~~f~^~y '4r t b' t { • e`~ . ~~y ;J* f. t., tY. +1V~ ~. p~r Y~ r.i ~~ ~ i~ f}. T~~ Iii ~ ~ '. t _; f/' •' _ __ -, (~ a ~ ~ `~ ~ ~~ i~ ~~ ~f r ~ ~~ v ~~~ ~~-~ ~~` 5 ~!* ,~ !_ ~, ~.. max.: -: (+ , ~ . ~' 6~~'1 _, ~~ ~~ ~ j~'~.~`Yt~r~.~r„ r~,~-`!.'.., .., ~S~y ~_., ~ ...».J~.. ~~~"! a` 14. r.-~~' ~ ~5( ~~ j~u~ .. f f ) `~a ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ h p~ ~ ~~ ~~ YF ~ i t ~ ~ ~" ,` t, `.~ ~ ~ ,. 4 ~ .,~ t! ,. ~, ~° ~ i 6~4 FLA_hiJiNG DE°ARTMENT May 15, 2007 Mr. Ronald Letize 1928 Velencia Way Clearwater, Florida 33764 ~.:; , ~r~ r~ _ ~~ _ ,"OST ~3FFiCE .~G.X G74~, CLEA.RWATER., FLGRIDA 33'j8-47~tg 1/fTJ:~'~C:FA?, ~+ERViCLS 13UII.D.i~:G~ ~OCi ~~OUTi-I MYRTLE flVENUE, CLEARWATER~ rt,GRIDA 33756 TF.LEPHO:dE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2006-09049 / PLT2007-00005 -109 S. McMullen Booth Road Dear Mr. Letize: Please be advised that as per our letters of May 1 and May 8, 2007, the above Flexible Development application (FLD2006-09049) for the property located at 109 S. McMullen Booth Road has been withdrawn based upon a failure to bring the application into complete status. With regard to the Preliminary Plat application (PLT2007-00005) submitted on May 7, 2007, this application is also being withdrawn and a refund of the application fee (plat only) will be made. If you should desire to pursue this development proposal in the future, then new applications and submittal fees will be required. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, -Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: ~_ohert. teffticirn,~erz~~IVatet•. cons ~'arrJ ~ ?rEt;ARD, 1t2AxoE: ij={r~~ ~l~_, ~~_qhi, IIOi)*ICTLA1EhiEE~: J.~. JOHNSO(Y, COUI`?CiLiF'IEMBER ~31i.L lO~i50t':, ;.~OUl`I;;ILh.1Eiv!I:<Et "`` C[+1-tLEN A.. pETERSEN~ COUI~CILIviF.i~4BER ~~ '~:(?JP~ ~.A2:'LiJ~'.^.'iENT FIND iirFlliT~~ATI'%i; f~CTiGN ~PIlPLOYER" ~. ~n PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 8, 2007 Mr. Ronald Letize 1928 Velencia Way Clearwater, Florida 33764 ~: ~y~~ ~~~ ~~~~.~~~ ~ POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2006-09049 / PLT2007-00005 -109 S. McMullen Booth Road Dear Mr. Letize: The Planning. Department is in recipt of your application for Preliminary Plat approval submitted on May 7, 2007 (PLT2007-00005), associated with the existing Flexible Development application (FLD2006-09049) for the property located at 109 S. McMullen Booth Road. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the Preliminary Plat application is complete. However, the associated Flexible Development application remains incomplete, and as per Neil Thompson's letter dated May 1, 2007, unless a sufficient resubmittal is made prior to May 15, 2007, this application will be withdrawn. Once withdrawn, a new application and submittal fee will be required in order to pursue this development proposal. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.te tci>m ~clearnvate~~.com PP.AriK HIBBARD, MAYOR .]OHN DORAN, COUPdCIL~fEC:fBE[. J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER ~:IIt1. JONSON, COIJNCILMEMBER. ,tr~~ CAREEN A. pE'1'ERSEN, COUNCII.MEMBER ~~1~,QUAL EMPLOYIvfENT RrlU AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER~~ r rn, ,- r.. ~ - `r~: ~l,a ,,i,;;;., ~~~'~~ ~ ~a ~ ~; A '~- N j , '`',~ ~~,~+ ~~rur i ~, 4c-,~ -_r. __ ,,~ a ~,~~ ~~ac :;D ~°~~~ ~i~~aone~~fp~~O~S PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 1, 2007 Ronald Letize 1928 Valencia Way Clearwater, FL 33764 ~ ~. PCSI ~EF1CE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUN1C11A1, SERVICES BiJILDJiJG, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (J27) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 RE: FLD2006-09049 (LOCATED AT 109 S. McMULLEN BOOTH) Dear Mr. Letize: There has been no activity (re-submittal) with regards to the above referenced case. This application was deemed incomplete on 9/27/2006. Absent resubmittal prior to 5/15/2007 this application will be WITHDRAWN. Once withdrawn a new submittal and fee will be required to pursue this development. Please contact Neil Thompson at 727-562-4557 should you have any questions. Sincerely, _~~_._. v~ Neil Thompson Development Review Manager FRA,\~K PCIBBk12D, MAYOR ~GeIiJ "i~GRAN, COiJiJCI1MLitiIBER ~.B. JCENSO[V, COUNCILIvIEMBER ~RILI.,~Oi~ISON, COi1NCI!i~tEidBER CAREEN A. PE'I'ER$EN, COUNCILMEIv1BER '~EQT1r;L .~Iv[i'LO'fT~.~ENT' AriD APFSRMATIVE ACTION EMFLOYER" ~~ ~* 'l~Q7EA~4~' Zoning Condition Conditions Associated With FLD2006-09049 109 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD John Schodtler 727-562-4547 09/26/2006 ursuant to Code Section 4-202.A a Tree Inventory is required. It shall be prepared by a certified Not Met arborist of all trees 4" DBH or dreater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such ' trees. Provide two copies. 09/2 06 Clarify. Are the townhomes to be platted fee simple with the land or as a condo plat? If fee Not Met simple provide a Preliminary Plat application. 09/27/2006 Clarify. It is unclear through the application and the plans as to what is proposed of John's Not Met Parkway. It appears to have been used to calculate denisity, but the plans show setbacks being measure from the southern side of it. 09/27/2006 Response recd September 29, 2006, indicates the lot is a corner lot and is vacant on the date of Not Met ,\~ the adoption of the development Code. -Clarify how this lot was a corner lot and how it was N vacant on the date of the adoption of this Development Code. The lot today is not a corner lot, nor vacant. Provide complete responses to the eight Flexibility Criteria for attached dwellings in the LMDR zoning district: 1.The parcel proposed for development is a corner lot and is vacant on the date of adoption of this Development Code; 09/27/2006 Provide complete responses to the eight Flexibility Criteria for attached dwellings in the LMDR zoning district: 4. No more than two dwelling units front on a single street; 09/27/2006 Provide complete responses to the eight Flexibility Criteria for attached dwellings in the LMDR zoning district: 5.The development of attached dwellings does not require the removal of a protected tree; 09/27/2006 Provide complete responses to the eight Flexibility Criteria for attached dwellings in the LMDR zoning district: Provide complete responses to the eight Flexibility Criteria for attached dwellings in the LMDR zoning district: 7.The buildings are consistent with the architectural style of existing dwellings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; Not Met Not Met Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 1 ',r .. '.: APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: OF ~ RE(,c,VE® ;"~P 2~ 200 I~'I.~iNNINO DEP~-RTMEN' OITY OF CLEARWATER 1. The parcel proposed for development is a corner lot and is vacant on the date of adoption of this Development Code, 2. The buildings are designed with the front setbacks on both streets. 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. 4. No more than two dwelling units front on a single street, 5. The development of attached dwellings does not require the removal of a protected tree. 6. The dwelling units are contained in no more than two buildings. 7, The buildings are consistent with the architectural style of existing dwellings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ,. .. ,, ~ ~1.. ., . , .. ,, u :z r Section 2-204. E. RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from intensity and development standards. Applicant's Response: The proposed redevelopment of the parcel would be a Flexible Standard process were it not for the informal status of John's Parkway, an undedicated but developed access road to residential properties to the east. If the right of way was dedicated the lot would qualify as a corner lot meeting the criteria for FLS consideration. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. Applicant's Response: The addition of the attached dwellings in the configuration proposed will add diversity and thereby stability to the market value of abutting properties. The existing mix includes small lot detached residential and mobile homes. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Applicant's Response: Attached dwelling at appropriate densities are permitted uses 4. The use or mix of uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Applicant's Response: Adjacent uses include small lot detached dwelling and mobile homes. The additions of small scale (2 & 3 unit) attached dwelling are compatible, not conflicting with the use of the adjacent residential units 5. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Applicant's Response: 5 units divided into two attached dwelling structures of 2 units and 3 units provide for efficient use of the land with appropriate setbacks and open space around the structures for enhanced landscape opportunities. That layout and design improve the immediate vicinity offering variety to the housing offerings of the City. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Applicant's Response: Duplicate. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and oft=street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Applicant's Response: This application does not seek flexibility with regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking. ®RIGIN/~L ~`t- ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ :~;._ PWNNING DEPARl•iviENT CITY OF CLEARIIVNTER Clearwater September 27, 2006 Ronald Letize 1928 Velencia Way Clearwater, Fl 33764 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM VIA FAX: No Fax RE: FLD2006-09049 -- 109 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Ronald Letize The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-09049. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. ~~ Pursuant to Code Section 4-202.A a Tree Inventory is required. It shall be prepared by a certified arborist of all trees 4" DBH or dreater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. Provide two copies. Clarify. Are the townhomes to be platted fee simple with the land or as a condo plat? If fee simple provide a Preliminary Plat application. Clarify. It is unclear through the application and the plans as to what is proposed of John's Parkway. It appears to have been used to calculate denisity, but the plans show setbacks being measure from the southern side of it. ~4. y Provide. One color copy and 13 black and white copies of all building elevations with ~~ dimensions, materials, and colors labelled. 5. Provide complete responses to the eight Flexibility Criteria for attached dwellings in the LMDR zoning district: 1.The parcel proposed for development is a corner lot and is vacant on the date of adoption of this Development Code; 6. Provide complete responses to the eight Flexibility Criteria for attached dwellings in the LMDR zoning district: 2. The buildings are designed with front setbacks on both streets; 7. Provide complete responses to the eight Flexibility Criteria for attached dwellings in the LMDR zoning district: 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height; 8. Provide complete responses to the eight Flexibility Criteria for attached dwellings in the LMDR zoning district:. 4. No more than two dwelling units front on a single street; 9. Provide complete responses to the eight Flexibility Criteria for attached dwellings in the LMDR zoning district: S.The development of attached dwellings does not require the removal of a protected tree; 10. Provide complete responses to the eight Flexibility Criteria for attached dwellings in the LMDR zoning district: 6. The dwelling units are contained in no more than two buildings; 11. Provide complete responses to the eight Flexibility Criteria for attached dwellings in the LMDR zoning district: Provide complete responses to the eight Flexibility Criteria for attached dwellings in the LMDR zoning district: 7.The buildings are consistent with the architectural style of existing dwellings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; Letter of /nconspleteness - FLD2006-09049 - 109 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD ~. `~ CITY OF CLEARWATER > L~a,l I,i~,t~r PLANNING DEPARTMENT - MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ~ 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 - WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM September 27, 2006 12. Provide complete responses to the eight Flexibility Criteria for attached dwellings in the LMDR zoning district: 8. The parcel proposed for development is not located in a designated Neighborhood Conservation District; or if the parcel is within the boundaries of a designated Neighborhood Conservation District, the lot area, lot width and setbacks are not less than 90 percent of the average lot area, lot width and setbacks of all improved parcels of land which are located within the Neighborhood Conservation Immediate Vicinity Area and the height does not exceed 120 percent of the average height of buildings and structures located within the Neighborhood Conservation Immediate Vicinity Area. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies,ofthe application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Monday, October 2, 2006 (12:00 noon). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner II Letter o/'lnco~npleteness - FLD200h-09049 - I09 MCMUGLEN BOOTH RD Tree Inventory Bayside Town homes 109 S. McMullen-Booth Road Clearwater, Florida October 23, 2006 Prepared by: Alan Mayberry, Consulting Arborist For: Gus DiGiovanni The following report is submitted by Alan Mayberry, Consulting Arborist, and includes findings that I believe are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in the field of Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and my report is factual and unbiased. This report is the property of Mr. Gus DiGiovanni and will not be given to other entities unless so directed. Tree Canopy Analysis and Preservation Strategies The subject property is a former single family residential lot and the tree canopy is comprised of a mixture of native and exotic trees and palms. Several trees and palms are high quality and are worthy of preservation. In particular, three live oak (Quercus virginiana) trees, #1, 10 & 19 in the following inventory warrant serious 'considerat'ion for preservation. Tree Inventory Data A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could ' lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four codes and also has a comment section. The following is an explanation of the data used in the inventory: Tree# -location -Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the field. Size -Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If there is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the nazrowest area, . below the fork. Palm species are measured in feet of cleaz trunk (C.T.). Saecies -Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter. ®RIGIIW4L RECEIVED acs;: 2 ~ 200G ,.,._~ PI.P~NNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Condition Rating -The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities, decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and attachments, i.e., well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs. included bazk. Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's. overall energy system measured by net photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health will have a vasculaz system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2) crown density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the tree is making and storing energy. The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any unique features. The rating scale is 0-6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen. Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as follows: 0- A dead tree 1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1 ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). Atree with a rating of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury or property damage. 2 - A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as codominant stems with included bark at or near the base, lazge cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown dieback, cracked/split scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or soil pH problems. A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the problem(s), can be treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considerable amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the condition rating. 3- A tree with average- structure and systemic health and with problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average appeazance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved'if possible. ~- A tree with a rating of 4 has good structure, and systemic health with minor problems that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive appeazance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees GRiGiNAL RECEIVED ~~~' 2 9 ZOOG PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY ®F CLEARWATER exhibiting scars. old wounds. small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particulazly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. A tree with a_ rating of 4 is valuable to the property and should be preserved. 5 - A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure. its preservation. 6 - A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior - qualities in regazds to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown ratio. form (balanced crownl. overall aesthetic appeal. size. species, age and uniaueness. A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an undisturbed azea equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (I.S.A.I Certified Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree. Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It may also have recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree. NOTE: A tree inventory is tvaicallv valid for 3-5 years. However. events such as drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance and severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely. remedial maintenance can upgrade the value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely affected, have the tree insaected by a qualified International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist. Note: Whenever possible it is advised to adhere to inventory recommendations when selecting trees to be preserved. For example, trees rated 4.0 and higher should be preserved if at all possible, while trees rated 2.0 and lower. should be removed unless otherwise noted in the inventory. Trees rated 2.5 aze generally recommended for removal unless remedial work is performed to upgrade them. Trees rated 3.0 and 3.5 are average trees that have good potential and warrant serious consideration for preservation but not to the extent that site plan modifications are necessary. When work of an arboricultural nature is recommended in the inventory it should be performed directly or under the supervision of a competent International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~, PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY ®F CLEARWATER `This tree inventory was conducted on October 21.2006. The weather was clear with good visibility. Per Citv of Clearwater reauirements the tree inventory will provide an overall condition rating for each protected tree species that is 4" in trunk diameter or greater at 4.5' above grade and each protected palm species with a clear trunk (CTl of 10' or greater. 't'ree Inventory Tree # Size Species Rating 1. 44" live oak (Quercus virginiana) 4.5 2. 10", 12" Jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia) 2.0 3. 22' CT queen palm (Syagrus romanzo~anum) 4.0 4. 10" multi-stem crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) 2.5 5. 22" laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia) 3.0 6. 7" live oak 1.5 7. 8", 18", 22" jacaranda 1.5 8. 18' CT queen palm 0.0 Comments: dead tree 9. 22' CT queen palm 4.0 10. 50" live oak 4.0 MOTE: The survey has located Hunk trees which are a noxious exotic tree that is exempt from tree ordinance requirements. They will be noted in the inventory because they are shown on the survey but will be rated as 0.0 as they are not protected. 11. 12" punk tree (Melaleuca quinquenervia) 0.0 12. 16" water oak (Quercus nigra) 2.5 NOTE: Trees preceded with an asterisk (*1 denote trees that are on adiacent property but are required to be surveyed as they will need to be protected during construction as their root systems enter the subject property. They will not be factored into the mitigatior~RI~I~E RECEIVED C.~ ;. r ~``-~ ~ 9 2006 PLANNING DEP,gRTIViENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r requirements and their condition rating enclosed by parenthesis to denote that they are not' applicable. * 13. 16" live oak (2.0) Comments: On adjacent property. 14. 21" pecan (Carya illinoensis) 3.5 15. 20" punk tree 0.0 Comments: Exempt species 16. 14" camphor (Cinnamomum camphora) 2.0 17. 12'CT queen palm 2.5 18. 18' CT queen palm 3.5 19. 29" live oak 4.5 20. 27' CT queen palm 3.0 21. 25' CT queen palm 4.0 Comments: Palms #20 & 21 are attached at the base and if they will be relocated on site they should be moved as one palm. 22. 28' CT Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata) 4.0 Comments: A valuable palm that could be preserved in place or relocated on site. 23. 10" crape myrtle cluster 2.5 24. 12" crape myrtle cluster 2.5 25. 20' CT queen palm 0.0 Comments: Dead palm 26. 11' CT queen palm ~ 2.5 27. 14' CT queen palm 3.5 28. 10' CT queen palm 2.5 ORIGINAL RECEIVED , ~~=~ 2 ~ 200E ~ . _, PLANNING IiEPARI-Iv'IE~1T CITY OF CLEARVI/~TE~ 29. 11' CT queen palm 2.5 30. 22' CT queen palm 3.5 *31. 12' CT queen palm (2.5) Comments: This palm is located on adjacent property 32. 25' CT queen palm 0.0 Comments: Dead palm 33. 36" laurel oak (3.0) Comments: This tree is located on adjacent property. *34. 16" jacazanda (0.5) Comments: This tree is on adjacent property. *35. 16" Australian pine (Casuarina spp.) (0.5) Comments: This tree is on adjacent property. *36. 18" Australian pine (0.0) Comments: This tree is on adjacent property. 37. 23' CT queen palm 1.5 Comments: Ganoderma conks on base indicates disease. 38. 25' CT queen palm 3.5 39. 30' CT queen palm 4.0 40. 10" crape myrtle cluster 2.5 41. 30" punk tree 0.0 Comments: An exempt species 42. 22" punk tree 0.0 Comments: An exempt species ORIC~IN~4L RECENED "~~ ~'~~ 2 9 200E PLANNING ®EF~,~R~rrnt~T CITY OF CCEARVV~4TER J 43. 12" crape myrtle cluster 44. 28' CT queen palm 4S. 28' CT queen palm . 46. 20' CT queen palm 47. 26' CT queen palm 48. 1 S' CT queen palm Comments: Dead palm 49. S" -camphor tree S0. 22' CT queen palm S 1. 23' CT Senegal date palm S2. 22' CT queen palm S3. . 21' CT queen palm *S4 20' CT queen palm Comments: This palm is on adjacent property. SS. 6", 6", 10" jacaranda S6. 18" silk oak (Grevillea robusta) Comments: Hazardous tree, remove as soon as possible S7. 20" silk oak S 8. 20' CT queen palm S9. 1S' CT Senegal date palm 60. 36" punk tree Comments: An exempt species 61. 18" punk tree 2.0 4.0 1.S 3.0 3.S 0.0 1.S 2.0 2.S 2.S 3.0 2.S 1.0 O.S 1.S 2.0 3,.0- 0.0 0.0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED rr~~ 2 9 ~00~ ~. ~o PLANNING DEPHRi-`d~ENI OITY OF CLEARWATE~= Comments: An exempt species 62. 24" punk tree Comments: An exempt species 0.0. ORIGINAL 17ECENE® cry 2 ~ 20Q~ ,..~.o ~LANNIN(~ I)~PARTMEiVT CITY OF CLEARINATF~ s~oare.tal ~•rta s t JOHNS PARKWAY =• ~D li' t91°•'* PAYla31~f[ O _ .50 8 ~ r ~ ~'..,..5. ~;",, ~' M ~~. ;,~ ~ 1 .3 . .. ,. ,. ~ .y ~ . o~aw. r ~'. y ~. l~wU HA.1 .aim ~icl J~ /.~ 'sa~~ ' '~ r rn .^ ~saa Y '° 9. 2 ~ , .:F' ;6~ ~ ~~~ . EO' , 'k F ~ I `;• ane~`~/~~ NWT. • r _ '~ .~ to F `Se n ~ ~ ~ ~; - 120 ~' 1 ~~' ~ O ~ ~M 4f 5YK ~ a, ~~ ~ 10 r~ r r :ry 9 t ~I ~ 1~+~ ~ I t ~F.IWPLLIO rr~~-r a ~ •~~ 12 S _ ~~ i ID -,~i 2 20 a ,) ~: aaumY t: _ ~I ~~ ' Z" HIB '0• ~, 2 NWT1 fi ~ t ~"~ I"`~ ~ ` ff. ?210 1V1 ~~ ~~, ~~~.., goy ~1 } ^'~ nKm'., '' ~ tir ._ ...J'T~~ F {r i ~ t fG• n a.am u aoa • ..u~ nw r~ arru M ASMNLT -A1R1t11T I ~ 6 ~ YNVIATTCD IIOMOMr OID LWOBCAPT ~ wry. .r.«.~r~...w~r.. w.w. ~~ ~-..~~ xc ~.. ~.~._.._.......w... TR6: RD7eCnOH oerrn ~ ....»....~... ~~~ :'1' ~" _ :.t++~v r FI! ;~ ~j~ ~rw wun.r nr~ ~(~AL IRFIGATION ~ e rw ~ mn o W fur a- ~~ ~ _•~.~~ -._ ~~. _ W~LLI ~~ ~ O L ~ o ~~, ~- ~ i r ~.. Q ~ N tlowrlou s7Ar IeAO ~n aNt DRIIMI NG1D oer~a : ~ ~ ~ U PIa~R w .fir a.~r e~.r .r.+... ~ ~ s r.....r. ar a a...... o:.w ~.. . IY~~r. IY~. ~~. M` Mir. d~ D1 r iu r.~ '^' ri'.i~.e ~ o.~. 9 y~ ~L G w ~ ~ ~ •n.+warr ar .~7 > e n~. wr.w. rr~ ~r.wr.w.. a.. ~` M • w~r~ IIW. l.V. irM.N~ a~ yr~. +wr sr..wr.wy. a.. " i e~a.~ i.~:.o e w a.. d ~..:.. _d w a...,...rr ~ D A LAND'S CAPE "'° ARCHIiECT3 ir~c~,nor rme ovm ~ w~`w°10~.`: n'.°°'.Ha~ ve®.mmaw Fa>3) T~HOt'/ LNUp Ytmmn m CmRtA~aMYm ~ ~oew aem s~~ i ~ - ~ a-o~ L 1 Clearwater July 12, 2007 Ronald Letize 1928 Velencia Way Clearwater, F133764 CITY ®F CLE~ _RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER. COM VI.A FAX: 727-797-8928 RE: FLD2006-09049 -- 109 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Ronald Letize `The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-09049. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August 02, 2007, in the Planning Department conference room -Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments maybe generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562-4557 or y-e i ~ o `i'~wm~s~ ~ /r1 y c~ ee~.t cJo~t . Ca»'~ Sincerely yours, ~a Neil Thomason Development Review Manager Letter of Completeness - FLD2006-09049 - 109 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD Clearwater Fax Cover 1Vlemo CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 TO: Ronald Letize FAX: (727) 562-4865 FAX: 733-0083 FROM: Neil Thompson DATE: 7/12/07 TELEPHONE: TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4557 EMAIL: neil.thompson@myclearwater.com SUBJECT: 109 McMullen Booth, FLD2006-09049 MESSAGE: Completeness determination and DRC date NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING TIIIS PAGE): 2 ''yy", '~~ ty '~ - ~ til+• ~ z Q,r a~ A Q S ~.~~ri Conditions Associated With FLD2006-09049 109 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 07/24/2007 Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 562-4773 1. Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #108. 2. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved Florida Department of Environmental Protection (D.E.P.) permit for the installation of the sanitary sewer extension. 3. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will remove/relocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as part of this development, including reclaim water meters. (No meters shall be located within any impervious areas.) 5. Provide a dimension on the site plan indicating that the sidewalk is to be 4-feet wide. 6. Align side walk on east end of property to connect with sidewalk on neighboring property to east. (This will require relocation of an existing utility pole at applicant's cost). 7. Applicant shall show all city details applicable to this project. The City's Construction Standards and Utility Information can be found on our web site: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/Production/stddet/index.asp . 8. Provide City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards manhole Index #302, pg. 2/3. 9. Use City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Sidewalk Index #109, pg. 1/3. 10. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all applicable impact and installation fees. Payment for the backflow prevention device is paid to Utilities Customer Service in the Municipal Services Building located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. 11. Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ductile iron pipe shall be installed on the service side of any backflow preventor device. 12. Locate on the "Grading, Storm Drainage and Utility Plan", a sanitary sewer cleanout approx. 3-feet from edge of pavement and include City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #305, pg. 1/3. 13. Proposed sanitary system will be private and will not be maintained by the City. Accordingly, sanitary manhole shall not have the words, "City of Clearwater" on the manhole cover. 14. Applicant shall pay all applicable sewer and water impact fees prior to issuance of the building permit. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy: 1. All unused drive aprons and/or parking surfaces shall be removed entirely by the contractor, at the applicant's expense. Adjacent street right(s)-of-way are to be restored with new sidewalk and sod as required. 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Print Date: 08/29/2007 Not Met CaseConditons Page 1 of 3 FLD2006-09049 Environmental Condition 109 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD Sarah Josuns 562-4897 Not Met 07/19/2007 No Issues. Fire Condition Leonard Rickard 562-4327 x3078 07/13/2007 Provide fire hydrant at entrance. PRIOR TO CDB 07/13/2007 Provide 30' turn radius at entry instead of the 25' shown. PRIOR TO CDB Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 Not Met Not Met 07/24/2007 Tree #19, 32" oak is shown to be preserved, however, the two story building, proposed storm pipe Not Met and grade changes are too severe. Relocate the buildings and pipes to preserve this tree. Provide prior to CDB. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 07/19/2007 The site data table needs to be corrected to reflect the number of existing dwelling units along Not Met with the number of proposed dwelling units. A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562-4752 07/18/2007 The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board: Not Met 1. Johns Parkway is a substandard road, which may not have enough capacity to handle the discharge from the proposed pond. The homes that are east of McMullen Booth Road may be flooded when a major storm event hits. There is an existing inlet in the east right-of-way of McMullen Booth Road, please tie the pond outfall pipe into this system. 2. Provide a detailed drainage report which includes, but is not limited to the following: soil report, double ring infiltrometer soil test at the proposed pond, and a 24-hour drawndown table that is based on results of the double ring test. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. 1. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit. 2. Provide a swale along the east property line, and show a clearer cross section with actual elevations. General Notes: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit same data as submitted with this application for review. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562-4930 07/20/2007 How will SW and recycling be handled Not Met needs turn around can not be serviced as drawn CaseConditons Print Date: 07/31 /2007 Page 2 of 3 FLD2006-09049 109 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 07/19/2007 Show that a 17 'long scaled passenger vehicle can enter and exit the individual driveways. Not Met 2. All driveways shall have a depth of 19' measured from face of garage to the first edge of roadway or sidewalk if any. 3. Provide stop sign with stop bar per current M.U.T.C.D. standards. 4. Provide truncated domes/ ADA ramps per FDOT Design Standards, Index #304 where sidewalks end at the roadway. 5. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 07/24/2007 Rear building elevations indicate sliding glass doors. Please clarify if decks/patios are intended as Not Met the area is limited for all units and units 2 & 3 deck or patio placement would be precluded because of rear setback limitations. Print Date: 07/31/2007 CaseConditons Page 3 of 3 FLD2006-09049 Environmental Condition 07/19/2007 No Issues. 109 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD Sarah Josuns 562-4897 Fire Condition Leonard Rickard 562-4327 x3078 07/13/2007 Provide fire hydrant at entrance. PRIOR TO CDB 07/13/2007 Provide 30' turn radius at entry instead of the 25' shown. PRIOR TO CDB Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 Not Met Not Met Not Met 07/24/2007 Tree #19, 32" oak is shown to be preserved, however, the two story building, proposed storm pipe Not Met and grade changes are too severe. Relocate the buildings and pipes to preserve this tree. Provide prior to CDB. Parks ~ Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 07/19/2007 The site data table needs to be corrected to reflect the number of existing dwelling units along Not Met with the number of proposed dwelling units. A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of ~ building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562-4752 07/18/2007 The following shall be addressed prior to Community Development Board: Not Met 1. Johns Parkway is a substandard road, which may not have enough capacity to handle the discharge from the proposed pond. The homes that are east of McMullen Booth Road may be flooded when a major storm event hits. There is an existing inlet in the east right-of-way of McMullen Booth Road, please tie the pond outfall pipe into this system. 2. Provide a detailed drainage report which includes, but is not limited to the following: soil report, double ring infiltrometer soil test at the proposed pond, and a 24-hour drawndown table that is based on results of the double ring test. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. 1. Provide an approved SWFWMD permit. 2. Provide a swale along the east property line, and show a clearer cross section with actual elevations. General Notes: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. At building permit application, applicant shall submit same data as submitted with this application for review. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562-4930 07/20/2007 How will SW and recycling be handled Not Met needs turn around CaseConditons Print Date: 08/29/2007 . Page 2 of 3 FLD2006-09049 Solid Waste Condition 109 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD Tom Glenn 562-4930 can not be serviced as drawn Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 07/19/2007 1. Provide stop sign with stop bar per current M.U.T.C.D. standards. Not Met 2. Provide truncated domes/ ADA ramps per FDOT Design Standards, Index #304 where sidewalks end at the roadway. 3. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 07/24/2007 Rear building elevations indicate sliding glass doors. Please clarify if decks/patios are intended as Not Met the area is limited for all units and units 2 & 3 deck or patio placement would be precluded because of rear setback limitations. a5~~~~ Print Date: 08/29/2007 CaseConditons Page 3 of 3 Clearwater Fax Cover Memo CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: Ronald Letize FAX: 733-0083 FROM: Neil Thompson DATE: 7/31/07 TELEPHONE: TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4557 EMAIL: neil.thompson@myclearwater.com SUB.TECT: 109 McMullen Booth FLD2006-09049 MESSAGE: 8/02/07 Development Review Committee Meeting Comments NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): ~i~g~~u ~H~+Y ,,~~, -. -.~-_ ~~~ i'!.~ i y; ~~~'~ZEA~~~`• Conditions Associated With FL®2006-09049 109 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 07/24/2007 Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 562-4773 Not Met 1. Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #108. 2. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved Florida Department of Environmental Protection (D.E.P.) permit for the installation of the sanitary sewer extension. 3. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will remove/relocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as part of this development, including reclaim water meters. (No meters shall be located within any impervious areas.) 5. Provide a dimension on the site plan indicating that the sidewalk is to be 4-feet wide. 6. Align side walk on east end of property to connect with sidewalk on neighboring property to east. (This will require relocation of an existing utility pole at applicant's cost). 7. Applicant shall show all city details applicable to this project. The City's Construction Standards and Utility Information can be found on our web site: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/Production/stddet/index.asp . 8. Provide City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards manhole Index #302, pg. 2/3. 9. Use City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Sidewalk Index #109, pg. 1/3. 10. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all applicable impact and installation fees. Payment for the backflow prevention device is paid to Utilities Customer Service in the Municipal Services Building located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. 11. Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe shall be installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ductile iron pipe shall be installed on the service side of any backflow preventor device. 12. Locate on the "Grading, Storm Drainage and Utility Plan"; a sanitary sewer cleanout approx. 3-feet from edge of pavement and include City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #305, pg. 1/3. 13. Proposed sanitary system will be private and will not be maintained by the City. Accordingly, sanitary manhole shall not have the words, "City of Clearwater" on the manhole cover. 14. Applicant shall pay all applicable sewer and water impact fees prior to issuance of the building permit. . Prior to Certificate of Occupancy: 1. All unused drive aprons and/or parking surfaces shall be removed entirely by the contractor, at the applicant's expense. Adjacent street right(s)-of-way are to be restored with new sidewalk and sod as required. 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer or land surveyor registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to~ construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. CaseConditons Print Date: 07/31/2007 Page 1 of 3 Jul. 12 2007 11:34AM Jul. 31 2087 89:48AM r: r t r r t r w r r i i 1 •'f1i .,,,. DOUBLE RING INFILTRATION TESTS AND AUGER BORINGS 109 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA BTL JOB N0.5005-06-2581 SUBMITTED BY BTL ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. P. O. BOX 15718 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33684 HILLSBOROUGH (813) 884-0755 PINELLAS (727) 733-9347 PASCO (727) 846-1703 FOR DIGIOVANNI HOMES, LLC 163 BAYSIDE DRIVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33767 PREPARED July 17, 2006 C»tIGIIIiIAL RECEIVED e ~P 2 ~ 2005 ~LAIVIVINCy UEpARTtViEIV~~ CITY ®F CiEAR-/U~T~R ~'''~''^ 11 JJ~~ 1111 1L~~~11 11111 ~l'~11 ~Y ~~~~ ~~~o g~~ ~ ~ 9 -- 5802 N. Occident Street ~ P.O. Box 15718 ~ Tampa, Florida 33684 (813) 884-0755 -Hillsborough (727) 733-9347 -Pinellas (727) 846-1703 -Pasco / (813) 886-5377 -Fax July 13, 2006 Digiovanni Homes, LLC 163 Bayside Drive ~ Clearwater, Florida 33767 Attn.: Mr. Augustus Digiovanni Re: Double Ring Infiltration Test and Au er" Boring 9 109 McMullen Booth Road Clearwater, Florida BTL Job No. 5005-06-2581 Dear Mr. Digiovanni: Q7RIGIIVAL RECEIVED `~~~ 2 9 200~i E~~IIVING ~Ep~1RTMER9T CITY OF CLEARWATER BTL Engineering Services, Inc., has completed a double ring infiltration (DRI) test including an auger boring at the referenced project site. This report describes site conditions, testing methods and the test results. Please feel free to request any further information or clarifications that may be needed. Thank you for choosing BTL Engineering Services, Inc., to perform .this subsurface investigation. We would be pleased to assist you further in other phases of geotechnical engineering and construction testing as project needs develop. Sincerely, BTL ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. Larry D. Gordon, Executive Vice President Attach: ° j -7-/T-O 6 Edward ^u. Zi an, P.E. Vice Presid t FL: Registration No. 53451 Geotechnical, Materials & Structural Engineering ~ .Foundation Design ~ Forensic Foundation Engineering Materials Laboratory Testing ~ Construction Testing Services Sinkhole Investigation t Double Ring Infiltration Test and Hand Auger Borings 109 McMullen Booth Road Clearwater, Florida (BTL Job No. 5005-06-2581) Prepared for: Digiovanni Homes, LLC 163 Bayside Drive o Clearwater, Florida 33767 C7FtiGlIV,4L iRECEIVED ~' ~ ~ 2 ~ 2000 ~~i~~oN~ u~~pA~r~n~r~~ cis ®F E:tE~Rw,~r~~ July 2006 w r ^ G w Executive Summary The following is a summary of investigation results; more detail is provided in the report and appendices. Item Description Project Name: 109 McMullen Booth Road, Clearwater, Florida Location: Site is located at the southeast corner of McMullen Booth Road and..,~ohns Parkway in Clearwater, Florida. Purpose of Investigation: To determine soil classification, groundwater depth and ESHWT for drainage design. Subsurface Conditions: Urban soils found at site locations. DRI Test Results An infiltration rate of 9.7x10-3 cm/sec was found in the DRI test. ~71:IGlNAL REOEIVED r~~P 2 9 200 PLANNING I~EpARTMElVT OI7Y OF GLEARWATER DRI Test and Auger Borings - Digiovanni Homes, LLC 109 McMullen Booth Road -Clearwater, Florida BTL Job No. 5005-06-2581- July 13, 2006 2 i i 1. Authorization and Scope of Testing Mr. Augustus Digiovanni requested our services during telephone conversations and correspondence with BTL staff. Authorization for our testing was by ,_, acceptance of our Proposal Number 06-175, dated July 6, 2006. The DRI test and auger borings were performed on July 11, 2006. Test locations were established by BTL personnel using information furnished by the client. The test locations and GPS coordinates a.re shown on the attached boring location plan. Z. Purpose The purpose of the borings was to determine shallow soil conditions to be used for drainage design by others. Note that conclusions discussed in this report may change subject to actual site conditions found during construction. It is recommended that your design staff be advised of the results of this investigation, since the conditions disclosed and the recommendations contained herein may affect proposed design and construction. 3. Site Description The investigated site is located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road south of Johns Parkway in Clearwater, Florida, h th t _.__._GHERRY ~N_..~ Invee `, _>pw~ s C)RIGINAL RECEfVED ass own on a map rose . o~~.,~aW~.,. ~ ~r ~ • ~,.;~ ~ ~ ZO~a ewlaa~OxmM sn.n wn u9M1006. 0 84 ie0 lb 3l0 .ao .w : ~ ~ • 1 ~~.,.~ oA~,~ ~--ANfVI~(; DEEARTNtE ClTI° OF C,tEARVI/ATE DRI Test and Auger Borings -Digiovanni Homes, LLC 109 McMullen Booth Road -Clearwater, Florida BTL Job No. 5005-06-2581- July 13, 2006 3 ~.. N r r i 4. Auger Boring The auger boring was selected as the primary method of soil sampling for this project. The equipment and test procedures used are in general conformance with applicable provisions of ASTM D 1452. Briefly, the test borings are performed as follows: A rotary drilling flight auger is used to advance a borehole of approximately four inches in diameter to the desired depth. A baffle or "fishtail" drilling bit is most commonly used to cut and feed the soils to the auger stem for advancement to the surface. Upon reaching the desired penetration depth, the soils are classified in the field by color and texture. Further testing of soil properties may be performed in the laboratory. Utilizing the procedure outlined above, samples were taken at each stratum interval (noted by color and texture) and carefully recorded. 5. Estimated Seasonal High Water Table Soil classifications, water levels (recorded at the time the borings are drilled) and estimated seasonal high water tables (ESHW'1-) are shown on the appended boring logs. Table 1, shown on the following pages, provides groundwater table information, ESHWT and National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) map information. ESHWT information obtained in the field corresponds well to information found in NRCS map. ~7L71GINAl. 2ECFIVED ~~P 2 9 2006 13LANNING ®EPAI~'iFVIEld1' Cl I~(®F CLE,/~~e~ DRI Test and Auger Borings - Digiovanni Homes, LLC 109 McMullen Booth Road -Clearwater, Florida BTL Job No. 5005-06-2581- July 13, 2006 4 1 1 1 1 C Table 1, Water Table Data Borin 9 Depth to Water NRCS ESHWT Observed ESHWT NRCS Soil Group NRCS Soil Number (feet) (feet') (inches) Number Type Below 4.5' Not found in HA-1 depth of 0 -10 depth of 8 Urban boring boring Below 4.0' Not found in DRI-1 depth of 0 - 10 depth of 8 Urban boring boring ' +/- 6 inches 6. DRI Test G C 6.1 Test Method The Double Ring Infiltration (DRI) test consists of driving two open cylinders, one centered inside the other, into the ground and partially filling both rings with water to a constant level. The rings used in this test were 12 and 24 inches in diameter. After embedding the bottom of the rings six inches below the ground surface in the proposed pond the rings are leveled and water is released into both rings and held at a constant head of twelve inches for a period of 30 minutes. Following this saturation period the time for the water level to drop 1 inch in the center ring is recorded at 15 minute intervals. The water level in the outer ring is maintained at a constant level throughout the test and after each interval water is added to the center ring to bring the water level back to its original position. This procedure is continued until a constant rate of drop is obtained and a minimur~RIGIIV'A9. time of two hours has elapsed. RECEIVED PI.RNIVIIVG DEPARTMENT CITY ©F CLEARWATER DRI Test and Auger Borings - Digiovanni Homes, LLC 109 McMullen Booth Road -Clearwater, Florida BTL Job No. 5005-06-2581- July 13, 2006 5 M t.i ~.~ u L 6.2 Double Ring Infiltration Test Result The DRI was performed on July 11, 2006, at the surface. The infiltration results are shown in the following table. Test Number Infiltration Rate in/hr ft/day cm/sec DRI-1 13.7 27.5 9.7x10'3 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~~~ 2 ~ 205 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DRI Test and Auger Borings - Digiovanni Homes, LLC 109 McMullen Booth Road -Clearwater, Florida BTL Job No. 5005-06-2581- July 13, 2006 6 i 1 1 ~r~mfij2 ROAD HA-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I G. N. c L d N 0 Notes: 1. Water Table Not Found 2. Estimated Seasonal High Water Table Not Found Legend: Fine SAND ®RIGINAL RECEIVED ~P~ 2 ~ zoos A>:._. pj.ANNING i~EPARTMENT C1N OF CLEARWATER `~. ~~~ ~' nginceawg ~er®iccs, ~nce ~--=_ " 5802 N. Occident St.,Tampa, FL 33614 P.O. Box 15718, Tampa, FL 33684 Phone: (813) 884-0755 Fax: (813) 886-5377 Silty Fine SAND © Silty Fine SAND w/roots Sandy CLAY Project: 109 McMullen Booth Road Project Location: Clearwater, Florida Project Number: 5005-06-2581 Client: Digiovanni Homes, LLC Drawn By: VL Checked By: EZ Figure No: 1 of 2 Date: July 12, 2006 a ~ r r r i i i 1C" S~ 231E POND D RI-1 1 v Notes: 1. Water Table Not Found 2. Estimated Seasonal High Water Table Not Found ORIGINAL RECEIVE® ~~~ 2 ~ 2~~6 PLANNING i~EPARTIVIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Legend: Fine SAND Silty Fine SAND © Silty Fine SAND w/roots Sandy CLAY ".` ~~~ ~' ngineering .~er®ices, inc. C~ ,:..~ , _ 5802 N. Occident St.,Tampa, FL 33614 """'-"~~ P.O. Box 15718, Tampa, FL 33684 Phone: (813) 884-0755 Fax: (813) 886-5377 Project: 109 McMullen Booth Road: Project Location: Clearwater, Florida Project Number: 5005-06-2581 Client: Digiovanni Homes, LLC Drawn By: VL Checked By: EZ Figure No: 2 of 2 Date: July 12, 2006 r r s r w w s i 3 ! m SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 "=20'-0" ION NOR~}-i sae773e'E.(c) IB2.az'(cy JOHNS PARKWAY a u oZ 4' CONC. SIDEWALK __ 0 30' T1X„:...,, :4~~.., ~)( ~T Sc 3 <r r„Ye:: ;:: / i ~ // HA-1 :ya° TMN i .>, /, K ~ $ 'M O D ~ ~ yf` „~ N ~ '80N ~„~~`;' N.887o'32 w.(w) 181.09•(W) :u .~ .J,,;, ,c,o . ~,' Y ~T ..+ / ®RIGINAV. RECEIVED ",~~a 2 ~ Z~O~ ~L~fVNING r3E~ART~ViEi~T CIN O~ CtEAR~NATER ~ HAND AUGER BORING ~ DOUBLE RING INFILTROMETER GPS BORING NORTH WEST HA-1 27.964330° 82.708420° DRI-1 27.964105° 82.708256° Sh..}: 1 of 1 ProJwh 109 MoAlullen Boo4h Road Dorn Clearwater, Florida 08/11/08 Droro Ch.eltd qeA: V.L E.Z. Olglovannl Homse. LLC Bor[aQ Looatioa Plea ~ ~ Job Numb.n C,, ~~'.~~.~ ~~' ~n~sn~~.1?3°~ng ~~er^sTi~C~es} ~n~c. 5005-OB-2581 ~~ 5802 N. Oeold.n} S}nul P.O. Box 15718 Tampa. FloAda 33684 Scal.t (813) 884-0753-Mlllsborouph (727) 733-9347-Pimlla. (727) 848-1703-Pasco / (813) 888-5377-Fax NOT T[7 SCALE M r CI 1 t w w w t ~ ~ ll ~ 1~ngineering .~er~ices, ]InCe ~ P O B Borehole Lo HA-~ g' ~ . . ox 15718, Tampa, FL 33684 J ~ ~ J 5802 N. Occident St.,Tampa, FL 33614 Project No: 5005-06-2581 _ _ Phone: (813) 884-0755 ® ~' Fax: (813) 886-5377 Pro ect: 109 McMullen Booth Road ~ Address: Clearwater,, Florida Client: Digiovanni Homes, LLC AASHTO .c a .n° Description. ~ M145-91 (2000) ~- ~ ~ Remarks. o E cn ~ ~ 'Classification ~ _ w 0 Ground Surtace 0.0 1 I 1 I I Dark Gray Silty Fine SAND with trace of z z I 1 roots and shell A-2-4 1 -1.1 ~ "r^ ~ Dark Gray Silty Fine SAND with roots w "'-' up to '/:' in diameter and trace of shell 1 7 A-2-4lA-8 Dark Grayish Brown Fine SAND with 2 trace of roots _2.2 Brawn Fine SAND A-3 -2.7 3 .' Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY with trace of roots -3.7 A-2-6 4 Grayish Brown Sandy CLAY with trace of roots -4.5 End of Borehole 5 6 7 ORIGINAL a RECEIVED ~~~ 2 ~ 206 s ~LANNIN~ I)EPARTIVIEN'~ C1TY OF CLEARWATE~ 10 NOTE: GWT -Ground Water Table 11 ESHWT -Estimated Seasonal High Water Table WT -Water Table NF -Not Found 12 Drill Method: Hand Rotary Driller: K. Wilkinson Hole size: 3" Drill Rig: Hand Auger Date: July 11, 2006 Datum: Ground Surface Drill Rod: Bucket Auoer I nratinn• Sao Rnrinn Plan cNee~• ~ ,.c ~ r r G ~' ~ ~ ~ ~° ~n~~~~g ~~~~~5, ~~~ P O B 157 8 ` Borehole Log: DRI-~ . . ox 1 , Tampa, FL 33684 ~ ~~ 5802 N Occident St Tam a FL 33614 P . ., p , ro%ect No: 5005-06-2581 _ Phone: (813) 884-0755 Fax: (813) 886-5377 Pro ect: 109 McMullen Booth Road ~ Address: Clearwater, Florida Client: Digiovanni Homes, .CLC AASHTO ~° Description ~ ` M145-91 (2000) ~ m Remarks o ~ ~ ~ Classification ~ _ w 0 Ground Surface 0.0 `~~`^ ~ ~ Dark Gray Silty Fine SAND with roots I ~ ' (grass) _0.5 A-2-4/A-8 z z I I Dark Gray Silty Fine SAND with trace of ~ ~ 1 I I roots and shell A-2-4 ' -1.2 w Dark Gray Fine SAND with trace of roots and shell -1.8 2 Dark Grayish Brown Fine SAND _2 2 A-3 Grayish Brown Fine SAND -2.7 ~ :':::`~: ... ':::: ; : ;' Light Brownish Gray Sandy CLAY A-2-6 End of Borehole 5 6 7 ORIGINAL a RECEIVED c~~ ~ ~ zoos s PLANNING a~EPARTIVIEi~`e CIN OF CLEARWi4Tf"~ io NOTE: GWT -Ground Water Table 11 ESHWT -Estimated Seasonal High Water Table WT -Water Table NF -Not Found 12 Drill Method: Hand Rotary Driller: K. Wilkinson Hole size: 3" Drill Rig: Hand Auger Date: July 11, 2006 Datum: Ground Surface Drill Rod: Bucket Au er Location: See Borina Plan ~hAO+~ ~ .,f ~ • , ~ y, _~, STORM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES JOHNS PARKWAY CLEARWATER, FLORIDA • SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29S, RANGE 16E PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR DIGIOVANNI HOMES, LLC 163 BAYSIDE DRIVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33767 ORIGINAL RECEIVED CEP 012006 PLANNING DEPARTfVIEN~' CITY OF CLEARWATER JULY 2006 ,,ase,~;~i-~~~ ~r~ ~~ . r~ ~ti,. .t C .. or ~ ~ ` ,yP , ~ ~ a ~ ' to t ~ x w ~~~~ ~ ,;~",r ~ %~~ - Total Drainage Area - Existing Conditions: STORM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS = 0.50 Ac. - Paved Areas = 0.06 Ac. @ c = 0.95 - Open Areas = 0.44 Ac. @ c = 0.20 "c" _ (0.06)(0.95/2) +(0.44)(0.20)/0.50 = 0.23 - Proposed Conditions: - Building & Paved Areas = 0.34 Ac. @ c = 0.95 - Detention Area = 0.05 Ac. @ c = 1.00 - Open Area = 0.11 A~. @ c = 0.20 "c" _ (0.34)(0.95) +(0.05)(1.00) +(0.11)(0.20)/0.50 = 0.79 - Stage/Storage Relationship -Detention Pond Stage Surface Area Storge Available EI. (S. F.) (C F ) 17.00 245 0 17.50 454 175 18.00 703 474 18.50 984 922 19.00 1,299 1, 544 19.50 1,646 2,364 20.00 2,022 3,401 - Water Quality Treatment Volume Required: Q = 0.50 x 0.5/12 X 43,560. = 908 C.F. Required Storage EI. = 18.48 Set Weir Slot Inv EI. @ 19.50 (see plans) ORIGINAL RECEIVED CEP o 1 zoos PLANNING DEPARTi~iEIVN CITY OF CLEARW,4TER i '. H1®DRET HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT -RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH METHOD Project Name : BAYSIDE TOWNIiOMES - 25 YR. PRE Contributing Basin Area RunofF Coefficient C Time of Concentration Rainfall Depth Storm Duration 0.50 ac. 0.23 15.00 min. 9.00 in. 24.00 hrs ORIGI(VAL RECEIVED CEP o ~ 2oos PLANNING DEPARTMEN'C CITY OF CLEARWATER Analysis Date: 7/26/2006 ,~" n i.' ® O // ~~ ~ Vo v F'--1 ~~ ~ v ~~ ~~ ~~ o.oa3 o.oa2 0.04 ~ 0.04 0.039 0.038 0.037 0.036 0.035 0.034 0.033 0.032 0.031 0.03 0.029 0.028 0.027 0.026 0.025 0.024 ~ 0.023 0.022 °c 0.021 ~ 0.02 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.016 0.015 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.01 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 O.DO4 0.003 0.002 0.001 0 iv ~i it a 14 is 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Tlme (hrs) Qpeak: 0.0431 ds Time of peak: 0.3 hrs Vtotal: 3,729 h' 7ii~ 1~ ~• a A~ ~$ HYDROGRAPH :WAYSIDE TOWNFIOMES - 25 YR. PRE if T' I~IODRET HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT -RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH METHOD Project Name : BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES - 50 YR. POST Contributing Basin Area 0.50 ac. Runoff Coefficient C O,~g Time of Concentration 15.00 min. Rainfall Depth 10.50 in. Storm Duration 24.00 hrs ORIGINAL RECEIVED CEP 012006 Pl~-NNING DEPARTIVIEI'VT CITY OF CLEARIIVATEi< Analysis Date: 7/31/2006 r= y ^ ~ J o m ~ ~' ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ f~ ~z m O m fib v~ 0.17 0.765 0.16 0.155 0.75 0.145 0.14 0.135 0.13 0.125 0.12 0.715 0.11 0.105 0.1 0.095 U 0.09 x.085 ~ o.oa 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 I HYDROGP.APH : 9AYSIDE TOWNf10MES - 50 YR. POST e ~~ 9~ ~ ~. ~' 0 ;tY ~~/ ~ t _ _ ., ,,, w is 76 18 17 18 t9 20 21 22 23 24 Tlme (hrs) Opeak: 0.1728 ds Time of peak: 0.3 hrs Vtotal: 14,941 M ~ - r MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PROJECT NAME : BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES - 50 YR. POST HYDROGRAPH RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS INCLUDED Pond Bottom Area Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL Pond Length to Width Ratio (L/W) Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table Elevation of Starting Water Level Elevation of Pond Bottom Is there overflow ? Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity . Factor of Safety Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/E~Itration Trench Time Increment During Storm Event Time Increment After Storm Event Total Number of Increments After Storm Event Runoff Hydrograph File Name: 0624~ost.RAT Time of Peak Runoff: 0.25 hrs Rate of Peak Runoff: 0.17 cfs Hydraulic Control Features: Groundwater Control Features - Y/N Distance to Edge of Pond Elevation of Water Level Impervious Barrier - Y/N Elevation of Barrier Bottom 250.00 ft2 3,534.00 ft3 1.50 9.00 ft 14.50 ft 17.00 ft 17.00 ft Y 0.20 27.40 ft/d 2.00 41.10 ft/d 0.23 1.00 2.00 hrs 12.00 hrs 6.00 Top Bottom Left Right N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 .. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ORIGI(VAL RECEIVED vEP 012006 Analysis Date: 7/31/2006 CITY OF CLEARWATER L ` MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS ~ PR07ECT NAME : BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES - 50 YR. POST ~ CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW (ft3) 00.00 - 0.00 14.500 0.000 0.00000 0.00 14.500 0.09232 0.09661 2.88 17.605 0.10090 0.00 0.10387 4.88 18.026 0.10359 0.00 0.10331 6.88 18.451 0.10509 0.00 0.10686 8.88 18.854 0.10908 0.00 0.11131 10.88 19.230 0.11244 0.00 0.11357 12.88 19.533 0.10927 69.40 0.10497 14.88 19.607 0.10153 470.73 0.09805 16.90 19.627 0.09559 990.82 0.09315 18.90 19.635 0.09121 1 554.70 0.08927 20.90 19.640 0.08775 ~ 2150.10 0.08623 22.90 19.644 0.07922 2 768.90 0.03714 34.90 18.282 0.02944 2 768.90 0.02173 46.90 17.485 0.01806 ~ 2 768.90 ORIGINAL RECEIVED vEP 012006 PLbNNING DEPARTIVIEI~~' CITY OF CLEARWATEI2 Analysis Date: 7/31/2006 r MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS ~ PROJECT NAME : BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES - 50 YR. POST ~ CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW (ft3) 0.01439 57.93 17.000 0.01232 2 768.90 0.01025 70.90 16.581 0.00896 2 768.90 " - 0.00767 82.90 16.300 0.00681 2 768.90 0.00594 94.90 16.082 2 768.90 ORIGINAL RECEIVED Maximum Water Elevation: 19.644 feet @ 22.90 hours Recovery @ 57.932'lours '` `~" * Time increment when there is no runoff PLANNING DEPAR' ENT Maximum Infiltration Rate: 8.330 ft/day CITY OF CLEAR TER Analysis Date: 7/31/2006 +~ ' - r. MODRET ELEVATION VS OVERFLOW RELATIONSHIP PRO]ECT NAME : BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES - 50 YR. POST Structure Type: SHARP CRESTED Crest Elevation 19.50 ft Crest Length 0.50 ft Coefficient of Discharge 3.31 Weir Flow Exponent 1.50 Number of Contractions 2.00 Design High Water Level Elevation 20.00 ft ORIGINAL RECEIVED 5EP 412006 PLANNING DEPARTMEN?' CITY OF CLEARWATEI~' Analysis Date: 7/31/2006 ~~. .,. a u Z° E 0 ^ ~' O Z ~ m ~ n ~ ~ m G7 ~ F--A m - ~ ~a o v 4';1 Cfl .Y'? j :~ ._ ._ ..., ca 3U Tlme (hrs) Total Volume Infiltrated = 11,400 ft' 35 40 45 50 55 INFILTRATION : BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES - 50 vR. vosT }. v, INFILTRATION : BAYSIDE TOWNHOMES - 50 YR. POST J Z G~i Z OZ (7, ~ mp ~~ o ~~ a~ ~ ~ ~~ o v~ -~ m ~ Z --t 19.; 19 18.5 c c 0 i m W 18 17.5 17 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 i6 18 20 22 24 28 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52~ ~Sd 5s ~.~~~o ~~~~~~ Max Water Elevation = 19.64 ff i Y n~ ~ z ~~ z O~ m -~ ~p n ~ ~ m G7 m Q ~-' D ~ ~ D ev O v ,- -:, ~ ,1= ~, Q~ .e' f~k ut I tIV I IVN F'UNU SURFACE AREA TABULATIONS SCALE: 1" = 10' 20.00 2, 022 S. F. 19.50 >, 646 S. F. 19.00 1, 299 S. F. 18.50 984 S. F. 18.00 703 S. F. 17.50 454 S F. 17.00 245 S. F. ~ _ ` ,~ C~ 1 r t r y r r r ~111~ DOUBLE RING INFILTRATION TESTS AND AUGER BORINGS 109 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA BTL JOB N0.5005-06-2581 SUBMITTED BY BTL ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. P. O. BOX 15718 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33684 HILLSBOROUGH (813) 884-0755 PINELLAS (727) 733-9347 PASCO (727) 846-1703 FOR DIGIOVANNI HOMES, LLC 163 BAYSIDE DRIVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33767 PREPARED July 17, 2006 ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 0 ~ 1006 PLAiVNiNG DEPARTiVIENl' CITY OF CLEARWATER ;~ ~ ~ - ~~ ~ ~ 9 ~o ~~~~ 5802 N. Occident Street ~ P.O. Box 15718 Tampa, Florida 33684 (813) 884-0755 -Hillsborough ~ (727) 733-9347 -Pinellas (727) 846-1703 -Pasco / (813) 886-5377 -Fax July 13, 2006 Digiovanni Homes, LLC 163 Bayside Drive Clearwater, Florida 33767 Attn.: Mr. Augustus Digiovanni Re: Double Ring Infiltration Test and Auger Boring 109 McMullen Booth Road Clearwater, Florida BTL Job No. 5005-06-2581 Dear Mr. Digiovanni: ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~FP o i 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLdARW,gTEr~ BTL Engineering Services, Inc., has completed a double ring infiltration (DRI) test including an auger boring at the referenced project site. This report describes site conditions, testing methods and the test results. Please feel free to request any further information or clarifications that may be needed. Thank you for choosing BTL Engineering Services, Inc., to perform this subsurface investigation. We would be pleased to assist you further in other phases of geotechnical engineering and construction testing as project needs develop. Sincerely, BTL ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC, Larry D. Gordon, Executive Vice President Attach: ~~ ~ :~~ Edward ^u. Zi an, P.E. Vice Presid t FL: Registration No. 53451 Geotechnical, Materials & Structural Engineering .Foundation Design Forensic Foundation Engineering Materials Laboratory Testing ~ Construction Testing Services ~ Sinkhole Investigation ~ ,. , ~: Double Ring Infiltration Test and Hand Auger Borings 1 109 McMullen Booth Road Clearwater, Florida i (BTL Job No. 5005-06-2589) Prepared for: Digiovanni Homes, LLC 163 Bayside Drive o Clearwater, Florida 33767 ORIGINAL July 2006 RECEIVED SAP 012006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~. . r w Executive Summary The following is a summary of investigation results; more detail is provided in the report and appendices. Item Description Project Name: 109 McMullen Booth Road, Clearwater, Florida Location: Site is located at the southeast corner of McMullen Booth Road and..Johns Parkway in Clearwater, Florida. Purpose of Investigation: To determine soil classification, groundwater depth and ESHVVT for drainage design. Subsurface Conditions: Urban soils found at site locations. DRI Test Results An infiltration rate of 9.7x10-3 cm/sec was found in the DRI test. ORIGINAL RECEIVED aEP 012006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARUJATER DRI Test and Auger Borings - Digiovanni Homes, LLC 109 McMullen Booth Road -Clearwater, Florida BTL Job No. 5005-06-2581- Jul 13, 2 y zoos 1. Authorization and Scope of Testing Mr. Augustus Digiovanni requested our services during telephone conversations and correspondence with BTL staff. Authorization for our testing was by acceptance of our Proposal Number 06-175, dated July 6, 2006. The DRI test and auger borings were performed on July 11, 2006. Test locations were established by BTL personnel using information furnished by the client. The test locations and GPS coordinates are shown on the attached boring location plan. 2. Purpose The purpose of the borings was to determine shallow soil conditions to be used for drainage design by others. Note that conclusions discussed in this report may change subject to actual site conditions found during construction. It is recommended that your design staff be advised of the results of this investigation, since the conditions disclosed and the recommendations contained herein may affect proposed design and construction. 3. Site Description The investigated site is located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road south , of Johns ~, Parkway in Clearwater, Florida, ,~ as shown on the map inset. ems oamm. s.n.o.. usa mos. o w im zao am .oo +eo ,...~.~ .w,..rwr om tmn~w ®RIGINAB. RECEIVED "EP 012006 PLANiVING DEPARTI~ CIiY OF CLEARWA'. DRI Test and Auger Borings -Digiovanni Homes, LLC 109 McMullen Booth Road -Clearwater, Florida BTL Job No. 5005-06-2581- July 13, 2006 3 ~.. r - ~. 4. Au er Borin 9 g The auger boring was selected as the primary method of soil sampling for this project. The equipment and test procedures used are in general conformance with applicable provisions of ASTM D 1452. Briefly, the test borings are performed as follows: A rotary drilling flight auger is used to advance a borehole of approximately four inches in diameter to the desired depth. A baffle or "fishtail" drilling bit is most commonly used to cut and feed the soils to the auger stem for advancement to the surface. Upon reaching the desired penetration depth, the soils are classified iri the field by color and texture. Further testing of soil properties may be performed in the ~~ laboratory. Utilizing the procedure outlined above, sam les were taken at each P ~ stratum interval (noted by color and texture) and carefully recorded. 5. Estimated Seasonal High Water Table Soil classifications, water levels (recorded at the time the borings are drilled) and estimated seasonal high water tables (ESHVVT) are shown on the appended boring logs. Table 1, shown on the following pages, provides groundwater table information, ESHVVT and National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) map information. ESHVVT information obtained in the field corresponds well to information found in NRCS map. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ,; SEP ®x.1006 PLANNING DEPART~EIVT CITY OF CLEARWATER DRI Test and Auger Borings - Digiovanni Homes, LLC 109 McMullen Booth Road -Clearwater, Florida BTL Job No. 5005-06-2581- July 13, 2006 4 ,~ r r Table 1, Water Table Data Boring Depth to Water NRCS ESHWT Observed ESHWT NRCS Soil Group NRCS Soil Number (feet) , (feet) (inches) Number Type Below 4.5' Not found in HA-1 depth of 0 -10 depth of 8 Urban boring boring Below 4.0' Not found in DRI-1 depth of 0 - 10 depth of 8 Urban boring boring +/- 6 inches i 6. DRI Test 6.1 Test Method 1 ~~ The Double Ring Infiltration (DRI) test consists of driving two open cylinders, one centered inside the other, into the ground and partially filling both rings with water to a constant level. The rings used in this test were 12 and 24 inches in diameter. After embedding the bottom of the rings six inches below the ground surface in the proposed pond the rings are leveled and water is released into both rings and held at a constant head of twelve inches for a period of 30 minutes. Following this saturation period the time for the water level to drop 1 inch in the center ring is recorded at 15 minute intervals. The water level in the outer ring is maintained at a constant level throughout the test and after each interval water is added to the center ring to bring the water level back to its original position. This procedure is continued until a constant rate of drop is obtained and. a minimum time of two hours has elapsed. ~ ORIGINAI. RECEIVED ~~~ ~ ~. 200 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DRI Test and Auger Borings - Digiovanni Homes, LLC - 109 McMullen Booth Road - Geanvater, Florida BTL Job No. 5005-06-2581- July 13, 2006 5 .r 6.2 Double Rin Infiltrati T g on est Result The DRI w as performed on July 11, 2006, at the surface. The infiltration results are shown in the following table. Test Number Infiltration Rate in/hr ft/day cm/sec DRI-1 13.7 27.5 9.7x10-3 [.I o ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 012006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATE~ . DRI Test and Auger Borings - Digiovanni Homes, LLC 109 McMullen Boofh Road -Clearwater, Florida BTL Job No. 5005-06-2581- July 13, 2006 6 ~. (. i ~ 1 ~r~ofij2 ROAD HA-1 i i I i i i i i i i i L G N c L d N 0 Notes: 1. Water Table Not Found 2. Estimated Seasonal High Water Table Not Found Legend: Fine SAND ORIGINAL RECEIVED 5~P 412006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER j "; (---" -'-_ ~~~. ~ngin~ering ~er~ic~s, 1(nce C ,', 5802 N. Occident St.,Tampa, FL 33614 '~"""""'^° P.O. Box 15718, Tampa, FL 33684 Phone: (813) 884-0755 Fax: (813) 886-5377 ^t Silty Fine SAND © Silty Fine SAND w/roots Sandy CLAY Project: 109 McMullen Booth Road. Project Location: Clearwater, Florida Project Number: 5005-06-2581 Client: Digiovanni Homes, LLC Drawn By: VL: Checked.By: EZ Figure No: 1 of 2 Date: July 12, 2006 ~. r r i i i i i i i i ~r~F~l~ POND DRI-1 C N G L ;= C d N Notes: 1. Water Table Not Found 2. Estimated Seasonal High Water Table Not Found ORIGINAL RECEIVED 5EP 012006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER i~~ ~~~~ :_~ " ~~~ ~' ngineering s~er~ic~s, ~nce .~ .~ . 1 ~_ 5802 N. Occident St.,Tampa, FL 33614 - P.O. Box 15718, Tampa, FL 33684 Phone: (813) 884-0755 Fax: (813) 886-5377 Legend: Fine SAND ^I Silty Fine SAND o ©Silty Fine SAND w/roots Sandy CLAY Project: 109 McMullen Booth Road: Project Location: Clearwater, Florida. Project Number: 5005-06-2581 Client: Digiovanni Homes, LLC Drawn By: VL Checked By: EZ Figure No: 2 of 2 Date: July 12, 2006 ~. r i w w i x SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 "=20'-O" elan NORTH S89Z758'E(C) 19262'(C) JOHNS PARKWAY ~c ASPlIALT Sc APRON ,sD' DAK „--;~, z O '%°'~ K ^.~? A ~ c~ O ~ ~ a ~: `~'~~ $ e c° 30' ,~ HA-1.~ - ~:~we. j ~ J ,~ • TION ARF~, ~ "~ DRI-(Jt RDMWA~T 4 CONC. SIDEWALK S„ ~~~,.m,~ ......_.. .. ~... :a -~ / ORIGINAL RECEIVED ~ HAND AUGER BORING 5EP ~ 1 ZOOU QQ DOUBLE RING INFILTROMETER ,t PLANNING DEPARTMEN~~ ~f.;., `;,~;,, cPs ,; -- CITY OF CLEARWATEP `~~~• ~~~v; " ,;- -, ,. BORING NORTH WEST HA-1 27.964330° 62.708420° DRI-1 27.964105° 82,708256° Sh~~t: ProJwf: TiNr. 1 of 1 109 MOMullan Booth Road HorinQ Looation Plan 'r ~ ~j DaM Clearwater, FlOridO Jeb numb~n I- ~~~~ -ld$1~Q1~1~'L'~~~:~~~ ~'e~l~'('Jp S.Il'C~, 0811X08 5005-08-2581 I' 5802 N. Oooldent SfnM P.O. Box 15718 Tampa. FloAda 33684 0ain dwx~d pad: Scale ~ (813) 884-0753-nillsborouph (727) 733-9347-Pindlao V.L E.Z. Diglovannl Homas, LLC NO7 TO SCALE (727) 848-1703 Pc•oo ~ (813) 888-5377-fax 4~ ~ ---~ [I 1 A A w ~~ ~ ~~~~ll. engineering ~eiwices, ][nc. ~' Borehole Log: HA-7 P.O. Box 15718, Tampa, FL 33684 ~~ J 5802 N. Occident St Tampa FL 33614 Project No: 5005-06-2581 J ., , ® Phone: (813) 884-0755 =~--®~ Fax: (813) 886-5377 Project: 109 McMullen Booth Road 'Address: Clearwater, Florida Client: Digiovanni Homes, LLC - AASHTO - a o ~ Description. E ~ M145-91. (2000) F- ~ ~ Remarks o ~ ~ Classiftcation m ~ _ cn w. 0 Ground Surface 0.0 I I I l I I Dark Gray Silty Fine SAND with trace of z z I I roots and shell A-2-4 1 -1.1 ~ ''`r' ~ Dark Gray Silty Fine SAND with roots w '~ up to'/:' in diameter and trace of shell -1.7 A-2-4/A-8 Dark Grayish Brown Fine SAND with 2 trace of roots _2.2 Brown Fine SAND A-3 -2.7 3 ;' Yellowish Brown Sandy CLAY with trace of roots -3.7 A-2-6 4 - Grayish Brown Sandy CLAY with trace of roots -4.5 End of Borehole 5 6 7 ORIGINAL RECEIVED 8 ~~r- 0 1 ZoQ6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT y CITY OF CLEARWATER 10 NOTE: GWT -Ground Water Table 11 ESHWT -Estimated Seasonal High Water Table WT -Water Table NF -Not Found 12 Drill Method: Hand Rotary Driller: K. Wilkinson Hole size: 3" Drill Rig: Hand Auger Date: July 11, 2006 Datum: Ground Surface Drill Rod: Bucket Auoer L~ratinn' SPP Rnrinn Plan Qhcc+• 1 of 1 i N.: Y r ~` n C ~li L s.q ~_ ~~'~ ~>~~~~r~g ~~~~~5,1~~. Borehole Lo DRI-7 ~' P.O. Box 15718, Tampa, FL 33684 J ~ ~~ 5802 N. Occident St.,Tampa, FL 33614 Project No: 5005-06-2581 Phone: (813) 884-0755 ® Fax: (813)886-5377 Project: 109 McMullen Booth Road Address: Clearwater, Florida Ciient: Digiovanni Homes, tLC AASHTO s ~ Description ~ M2000)1 a~ ~. Remarks o ~ ~ Classification ~ w 0 _ Ground Surface 0.0 `"r' ~ ""' Dark Gray Silty Fine SAND with roots A-2-4/A-8 ~ z ~ (grass) _0,5 _ z f I Dark Gray Silty Fine SAND with trace of 1 I I roots and shell -1.2 A-2-4 ~ w Dark Gray Fine SAND with trace of roots and shell -1.8 2 Dark Grayish Brown Fine SAND _2 2 A-3 Grayish Brown Fine SAND -2.7 _ t .... Light Brownish Gray Sandy CLAY A-2-6 4 ~ • - -4.0 End of Borehole 5 6 7 8 ORIGIf~Ah RECEIVED CEP 011006 9 PLA~IVING ®EP ART~EhIp' CITY OF CLEARW ATER io NOTE: GWT -Ground Water Table 11 ESHWT -Estimated Seasonal High Water Table WT -Water Table NF -Not Found 12 Drill Method: Hand Rotary Driller: K. Wilkinson Hole size: 3" Drill Rig: Hand Auger Date: July 11, 2006 Datum: Ground Surface Drill Rod: Bucket Au er Location: See Boring Plan _ Sheet: 1_of 1