Loading...
FLD2009-03013 - 101 Coronado Dr - Holiday Inn ExpressFLD2009-03013 101 CORONADO DR HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 267A ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED : .03/03/2009 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS STAFF REPORT: DRC CDB: CLW CoverSheet STAFF REPORT BEING EMAILED BEFORE Spm ON THURSDAY, MAY 14, 2009 LETTERS RECEIVED .~ 7Ap62t09- ()'3 0/3 r:3 ~ If-o?' .J From: Subject: Date: To: Rosie & Jerry Zirbel <jrzirbel@wi.rr.cont> May 19 plannIng meeting May 18,20091:13:48 PM EDT wayne. wells@myclearwater.com otJ6 . ,6 MrWellS I am a Wisconsin resident who has been vacationing at the Sea Captain Resort on Clearwater Beach nearly every year since 1982. in recenl vears. I have been dismayed by the transformation of Clearwater Beach from a family friendly vacation destination to one where the "mom and pop. motels have been torn down and replaced with high rise luxury condominiums and hotels. I have also nohced the many empty store fronts and restaurants that depended on the weekly turnover of tourists that these "mom and pop" motels orovided. While I am sure these luxury condos have increased your revenue, they have not been friendly to your local businesses and tourists. It has recently come to my attention that there are now plans to build another high rise hotel nearly on top of the Sea Captain Resort. The proposed height of this hotel is completely out of character with the surrounding properties and would loom over the Sea Captain Resort and cast a large shadow over the property. This would adversely affect the quality of the vacation experience that the Sea Captain Resort has provided for so many years. While I am not against progress ( if this is, indeed, progress) I think several options should be considered by the Planning Department before approval for this new development is given. The height of the proposed hotel is just too high. It could be reduced significantly if the five floor parking ramp was removed from the plan. There appears to be many vacant properties very nearby that could be developed to provide the necessary parking required for this hotel and should be considered. While this may add some extra cost to the development, it would make the hotel more consistent with surrounding properties and more aesthetically appropriate for that area of Clearwater Beach. In addition, all set backs should be maintained Placing a building of this proposed size just 25 feet from a property line is just too close and would have an adverse affect on the residents of the Sea Captain Resort Please consider all stakeholders in your planning and maintain the family friendly reputation that Clearwater Beach has worked so lonq Ellld hard 10 obtain Gerald Zirbel /\:'(\;,;\.i0,-:1-),:::: \/\ii 2009-05-18 13:50 p.brennan 860-889-7409 >> 727 399 0558 P 2/2 PAUL C. BRENNAN 88 RlcIpwood Drive Norwielt~ CT 06361-7313 May 18, 2009 Wayne WeDs, PIInnina Departmetlt City of CJnrwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue C}earwatcr~ fL 33756 Dcar Mr. WeUs: 1 haw just received information reprding the properties ItOUDd the Sea Caplain Resort on The Bay. My wife and I .. conccmcd vUitwJ to 1he Sea Captain, a weU maintained IDd deJightfuJ vacation apot - a place the city of cteanwater IhouJd be very proud to Mve in its area. We were quite amned when we read of the way the owners of the Sea Captain are being treated with the propoeed development of higb.nse hotels and balconies lookiog down onto the Sea Captain tepfttJ. Sunshine, views end air quality will cettainly be affected, as well as the sea- life of the fish, ctI:., in the vicinity. . We silardy hope the PIaDnios Bo.rd wiD 8M IbIICh Ihoupt to its decision, and will tHe into consideration tho Sea Captain's long time dedication to their visitors and also the Clearwater BelCh area. Sincerely, Paul C. Brennan Is From: "Bob & Doreen" <I'obert.tytler@sympatico.ca> holiday Inn Date: May 18, 2009 7:13:57 PM EDT <wayne. wells@myclearwater.COfTI> Ce' <SEACAP100@AOLCOM> To P1anning Depl City of Clearwaler. Our faniIy have been Intonned of the plans to build a Holiday Inn Express dIrecIIy In front of the Sea Captain Resort on Devon Drive. Is this progress or a step back? As winter visitors to Clearwater Beach for 15 years we feel saddened at the changes ~ haVe seen over !he last few l 1lIe famIy .,~ Is slowly ~&lIIree"'''1g wiIh the ~ buiIcIIv; on the beach -MandaI8y A~.(1s 1here anyone ... lhem?) . . We spend our money in ca- A.. Beech on Groceries, gBSOIine.do81ing......-....t mII8Is. Hlirwls... ___ on I1eIMrinB.alllo ~"" trips. WI the people i11he HoIidIIJ 1m spend money in lIown ~ criy in lie HoIlII? The Sea C8pUI MoIBIIs one of the ... fBmIy- run,farriIy -orien4IlId Reeorts left on hl ~ wiIh no fihcxtage of REGUlAR visitors. MIs.Doreen TylIer. From: "Deanna Bryant" <deanne.bryant@verizon.net> Sea Captain . Date: May 18, 20097:08:16 PM EDT <Wayne. wells@myclearwater.com:> C c: <Seacap 1 ()()@aoI.COOl> 1 Attachment, 0.9 KB Dear Mr. Wens, We 819 dismayed. 10 say the least. that the beautiful Sea Captain property is in danger horn the proposed development plan filed by DECADE CQMPANIl INCOME PROPERTIES. . As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT who stay __ weeks ll8Ch re-. we beI&we lhIIt 'he ..0P0I$Ud pIm, if 8IfIIl"MMI, wi! t.- . siron!; negative aff8cI on the quaIily of our own perscnaI -.:aIion in Ita .. of CIB8rwlIIIlr o-:h and C8US8 .. to consider Ie8ving a..-w s.ch .... 14 .Ylil8f'S of enjoying this illCledible resort. The See CaJlIain Resort pnMdes . quality t.niIy environmilnI wiIh WIllI kIIpt rooms. irnmlIc:uIlIIB grounds. oubtant management, and has m8int8ined the dl8rader of ae.waw a-:h while making impro.e.nellls to inslnl 0lll'ICinJed nation-wide anention horn satisfied visitors. Thallhe ~ of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT hils gone to 00. '. .., gnI8lleng1hs CNW the yews to providlt... OtA:lltI.dllO expelieilCe br guests or CIelrNablr Beech 9gefJI5 to '- gone oonoIIoed by those oonsidering this dIMIIopment proposeI. Wa wish to STRONGlY OBJECT to this propotI8I as totally unsuitable fer the footprint being corlSidered In! adjacent to The See Captain Resort Sincerely. Gerald Bryant Deenne Bryant =rom: "Bob & Doreen- <robert.tytler@sympatico.ca> Holliday Inn Express. Jate: May 18, 2009 7:31:44 PM EDT <wayne. wetls@myclearwater.corTl> r('. <SEACAP100@AOL.COM> Wayne 'M!Is, Planning Depar1ment.CIy of CIea...alet. We have been WI...1il1g to the Sea Captain Resort on the Bay for the last &fteen years, and have et10Yed the frienlIy atmosphere cA CJearwater much. It is once more-sad to see "Corporate America- distroying the charming, well run. family business. If this deveIopement is allowed to go ahead wi backs. hight ......ces etc.. when lee is a much beIIIr Ir:lt dr8dIy ~. lwould renind me 01.. poor ~_..... d8Iighn 01.. origiI clrde comming oer the ceo 18 r8)'. lie consIrUdion blJnders on ..~ and..empty ~ ~ ........ on ~ On the other hand-perhaps lie councI shedd appnMt this new de.aIopement and the nISI cA us wit... our buIinea ~. RobertD.Ty1Ier . May 18 09 03:24p Vance Rose 2057527946 p.1 FROM THE DESK OF KAREN ROSE FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FROM: Karen Rose Chris Foley COMP ANY: SwimKids DATE: 5/18/2009 RETURN FAX Nt.:MBER: 205-752-7946 TOTAL NO OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 3 PHONE NUMBER: 205-799-9713 (cell) JtR: Rexibfe-Bevelopment&V1lriance, associated with Decade Compulie5 Income Properties ~ URGENT 0 FOR REVIEW o PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY o PLEASE RECYCLE NOTF..SICOMl.ffiNTS: Attn: Mr. Chris Foley Attached are two letters that were sent to Wayne M. Wells, Planner for the Gty ofOearwater, Rorida. The second letter attached, from Mrs. Lynn McColl, was featured in the Oearwater Guette on Thursday, May 14, as a letter to the editor. Thank you for your time, ~~e . May 18 09 03:24p Vance Rose 2057527946 p.L Lynn McColl 520 Avalon Place Tuscaloosa, AL 35401 205-292-4526 May 12,2009 My family has been vacationing at Clearwater Beach for over thirty-five years. We originally came to Clearwater Beach with our four young children who have since married and blessed us with thirteen grandchildren. They all love Clearwater Beach as much as their parents when we first took them. Our entire-family takes~at-leas~B&'-t:rip-to the beach together every year as a minl-family reunion and to relive the memories of years past. There is a special charm and warmth in the Clearwater Beach community that is so very difficult to fmd anywhere else in Florida today. Earlier this spring when we had all flown in to Tampa from four different states to go to Clearwater Beach for one of our annual trips, we got some disturbing news. For as far back as I can remember we have stayed at the Sea Captain beach motel. During our recent ten day visit to the beach, we discovered that larger towering hotels are threatening to destroy the quaint beauty and charm of our favorite vacation spot. I support the rights of property o""ners to develop their properties as they choose, but not when it violates existing laws and regulations that were established to protect the beach community that we love so very much. Please don't allow the neighbors of the Sea Captain to infringe upon our special place by granting them the variances that could make Clearwater Beach a tunnel of concrete structures that destroy your unique beach community. It would be a shame to see that special place in the beach community become like so many other Florida beaches that are overbuilt. Once it starts, there is no turning back. It would break. my family's hearts to leave Clearwater Beach as our favorite vacation spot. Please don't grant the variances that would destroy a very special place we have loved for years. Sincerely, L'I~fvf:~ Lynn McColl May 18 09 03:25p Vance Rose 2057527946 p." May 8, 2009 I am ~Titing this letter after a recent trip to Clearwater Beach where I enjoyed the casual, relaxed atmosphere and lack oflarge-scale developments on the beach. I have been a visitor to the beach for many years and while not opposed to the development of the "New" beach, what I read in the paper recently was disturbing. Granting of variances, while most appear to be small, represent things that will last a lifetime--once you grant one variance you are locked in for years. Both the Zoning Commission and the City Council need to be aware that beach zoning variances can never be taken back! The zoning variance for the Coronado-Devon Drive property before the Zoning Commission on May 19th addresses changes that will affect the beach for years to come. I can only hope that the Commission will look at what they are about to vote on and realize that it will affect future generations, not just citizens and visitors for the next few years. Granting both setback variances and density variances, while generating short term revenue for the city will ultimately make Clearwater Beach equivalent to the South Florida East Cost and v.-ill drive people to other areas. As a Zoning Board, please do not be short-sighted and make a decision based on what is good for the city today, but instead what is good for the city in the many years to come. I have a real problem with an out-of-state developer coming in and asking for variances that will help make him and his company make money and then sell off and leave town. He will be gone and not only the Zoning Commission and the City Council, but the citizens of Clearwater and visitors to the area will be left v.i.th the mistakes made and the precedent set to grant the same variances to everyone who applies in the years to come. At issue are the variances being requested that allow him to greatly increase the density allowed on this property-300% even! His request looks like a textbook request for over-development! There are other properties on the beach for this size development that would allow for appropriate distribution of the density via additional surrounding property. Everyone can say that each case is an individual case, but as we all know, once such variances are granted, legal precedence typically establishes that they will be granted each and every time. I would hate for this Council and Zoning Commission to think in 20 years that they had sold their soul to big developers, and they had singlehandedly ruined Clearwater Beach. As I stated above I am all for the development of the beach, but not when it means selling one's soul to do it. This proposal is trying to squeeze a Sears Tower onto a postage stamp lot. Setback and density variances are there for a reason-to protect and not unfairly ignore the citizens of the beach, the citizens of Clearwater, and our future generations. Thank you, 1aV1~~ Vance Rose SwimKids, Inc. P.O. Box 2365 Tuscaloosa, AL 35403 205-752-7946 OY13/20B9 03:20 5195955675 SHR I r.,.,p I.",IDR,,':' PA6E 01 May 18, 2009 TO COB, Michael Delk, & City Commissioners Dear Planning Board and Community Development Board: This letter addresses the negative impact of DVA 2009-00001 on surrounding properties. The Clearwater land development code and flexible standards are designed to minimize negative impact of proposed development projects while promoting beach and tourism development. The addition a Holiday Inn Express to our beach community appears superficially on the outside to be a worthwhile development. Unfortunately, the location of the property and small lost size purchased for this development, does not allow for such a project without substantial negative impact on surrounding properties and community. The DVA 2009-00001 project proposal negatively impacts a prime boutique hotel property with strong repeat business consisting of families who return for stays of several weeks at a time. These patrons continue to return to the Sea Captain annually for over 20 years. This negative impact reduces sunlight on surrounding properties, Increases levels of dust and debris. as well as increases pollutants into Clearwater Bay. These impacts will affect the patronage and value of the surrounding properties and minimize enjoyment of the Sea Captain Hotel. This boutique hotel property has a strong customer following who value its unique outdoor setting. The pool, the sun. and the beauty of the nearby marina. boats, and bay are enjoyed by guests, visitors, and the owners of the surrounding affected properties. The proposed Holiday Inn Express ten story building constructed on such a small lot will not exist without negatively compromising surrounding properties and patrons who frequent these nearby bu.sinesses. To our knowledge, no one from the planning board has visited the Sea Captain to evaluate the impact of the proposed hotel development. Further due diligence on a property development of this size is necessary. Sun, sand, water, and beauty are all reasons people return to Clearwater Beach. These attributes should be respected and protected for nearby and affected property owners. We strongly recommend additional project modifications to address these issues of property influence and impact. A more compatible, less obstructive project must be adopted for the proposed development. In promoting tourism on Clearwater Beach. we must strive to maintain repeat tourists and the integrity of the beach communily. Driving and established clientele base away due to property shading and loss of sunlight, decreases enjoyment in surrounding properties and quality of life. This is not the answer. Rather a balanced and modified approach to this project development must be addressed. ~;ncere~I.~~ .....- .'-- ~ .__,- _7-- ~'::'--:;;:?- . .....- ,..- ~ .,;;--~------ ..-.Y Dr. Dert'tifert, Dr. John Eifert, Dr. Karen Rose, Bob Eifert, Jim Eifert, and their families Thirteen employees Thousand of visiting and returning guests Sea- L) -- L.4#.- ~'6~ It::) ~ ~~ tUt t4e ~ 40 Devon Drive ~ Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767 Phone 727-446-7550 800-444-7488 Fax 727-298-0100 ~ rJAJ tffw V P//h~ 1U ~ lf5M-vjlU~v1-4J (b II ~lf . ~~J/.pd70 tl}~,v/1J ,~ a~f?~.~-J I ~lu-VU M~ pd-~ 1Ju.~ -tU ltuJ-/ ~f)&-f ~;J-J. SEA CAPTAIN RESORT ON THE BAY 40 DEVON DRIVE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 PHONE 727 446 7550 800444 7488 FAX 7272980100 We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we believe that the proposed plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of our vacation time in this area of Clearwater a-each:TheSea. Captain Resort provides a quality family environment with Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME Ruth Kemp ADDRESS 2839 Bonneville Ct. NE Grand Rapids, MI 49525 COMMENTS: Mr. Wells, my name is Ruth Kemp. I have been traveling to the Clearwater Beach area since the 1960's. For decades, I have considered the Sea Captain Resort Motel to be my second winter and spring home during the breaks afforded my by virtue of my occupation as a public school teacher in the state of Michigan. As a retiree, I can now extend my time at the Sea Captain by weeks each year. For years, I have decried the massive changes to the Clearwater Beach ambiance. You seem bent on changing the very essence of the reasons my friends and I choose the Gulf s best beach area: we want a family-friendly, AFFORDABLE place to unwind, dine, relax, and most of all walk your beaches! The gigantic high rise properties have killed the "mom and pop" entities, leaving in their wake unaffordable (and empty) condo units and middle-class values. Your beautiful beach walk is partially hidden by the growing high rise south of the parking lot. I realize you have factions fighting for your approval of their proposals. To destroy the unique quality of the Sea Captain property is to continue to destroy the middle-class visitors' ability to choose a venue that offers so much more than a rental unit. The Sea Captain's strengths involve: an incomparable setting, superb service, COMPLETE access to grounds and the pool area (without hundreds competing for space), a caretaker whose pride in workmanship is evident daily, and an owner who knows us by name (yes, there is a "Cheers" presence in your city) and appreciates our business with him. If you allow the proposal for the Holiday Inn to proceed, you will have struck another blow to those of us who seek quality at a still-affordable price. My friends (dozens) in the Fort Meyers area are moving away to end the ever-increasing prices and the congestion caused by the very projects you are considering. PLEASE, consider what you want of Clearwater Beach - check the rosters of property changes/demolitions in the past twenty years (by the way, where IS the former Holiday Inn? I believe that beautiful property is still an empty lot). You will not find the Sea Captain name on any of those lists. Please do something RIGHT for your tax-paying resort owners whose rooms are always rented, not on speculation, but because of their consummate care of their clients. I hope that you give MORE consideration to the Sea Captain than to a corporation which has so often changed property locations and has deserted your Sand Key Bridge area. Continue to let your loyal owner and his guests enjoy all the reasons which draw us to your part of Florida. Let other cities deal with unoccupied units and ruined beachscapes. There is MUCH to be said for tradition and quality; I hope you choose these over any POTENTIAL increase in revenue. This fragile economy should provide the final reason for denial of unacceptable variances on property next to the Sea Captain. Sincerely, Ruth Kemp ,............. ........... ,.....,. May 15,2009 Wayne Wells Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave Cle~,F133756 RE: Variancc for Decade Companies Income Properties Tuesday May 19, 2009 1:00 pm Mr. Wells: I have been a resident of Pinellas County since 1958. I was raised in Clearwater and have since moved to Palm HarboT in 1978. I have resided in the sarne location in Palm Harbor since moving here. Being raised in Clearwater I have always had a very strong dedication to Pinellas C01mly and feel that Clearwates Beach is truly a very unique, beautiful place to eqjoy and is stilJ part oftbe taxes that 1 pay to live in PineDas County. Many of our family and friends that come to Florida always look forward to their vjsits to the beaches of Clearwater. . This letter is in regards to the variance that has been applied for the Holiday Inn Express and pmking garage. I have.beeo very involved in the Sea Captain Resort since 1980. Tbi! location is very weU maintained and many families have made the Sea Captain Resort a yearly reunion as well as a wonderful family, friends and visitor place to visit. TbcSea Captain still makes their guests feel safe and gives them the small hotel which is being pushed out of the market. How do you think these guests will feel seeing 8 100 foot bni~ Jurking behind them with these new people sitting on the balconies staring down at than? The other obstacle that 1 see is the effect of a building utilizing every square foot of thc property being next to a plopc:rty that still has the ability \0 have greenery, regular parking and a beautiful seawall for their guests to utilize as well as a beautiful place to see from the watcr as the Joca1 boats and sighting seeing boats pass by. Clearwater's image to the tourist is so very important to maintain repeat visits. This entire piece of property. Decade Companies as well as the Sea Captain Resort should be considered. This could be developed as one property to create a beautiful waterfront development instead of one ovcrstated property next to an older but welt maintained property. Tbe City of Clearwater needs to consider the final result not just :receiving some new revenue without the evaluating the final esthetics of the property. 1 am opposed to this development and hoJle that the City of Clearwater will reconsider granting a variance that will be an eyesore as weJJ as a deterrent to the Sea Captain Resort. Sincerely, Linda Dciclunan Page 1 0[2 Subj: Date: From: To: Fwd: SEA CAPTAIN RESORT 5/15/200910:37:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time meifert@tampabay.rr.com seacao100@aol.com Begin forwarded message: > From: "Ron Doughty" <rdoughty@cac.net> > Date: May 15,200910:22:08 AM EDT > To: lIlmary ann eifertlll <meifert@tampabay.rr.com> > Cc: <wayne.wells@myclearwater.com> > Subject: SEA CAPTAIN RESORT > > > Mr. Wells here are our comments regarding the Sea Captain Resort and > the new Holiday Inn Express. > TO: HWaynaWells; & Sea CaptaifF Resolt-of-CleatWater~Beach- > > > FROM: Ron & Cathy Doughty > 2399 Red Wings Dr. > Brighton, Mi. 48114 > > > My purpose in writing this letter is to inform the City of Clearwater > that we object to having a Holiday Inn Express built near the location > as descripted to us. I am a member of the ZBA and Planning Commission > of the Charter Township of Brighton, Mi. We feel the request for > variances are SELF imposed, and should not be approved. > > We have been coming to Clearwater Beach since 1980, and make two trips > there almost every year. We enjoy the beach area, spend money on > food, entertainment etc. We don't like the current trend as to the way > Clearwater beach is going. This 100 ft. Holiday Inn would further > take away from the family type of resort area, block the view, and > harm the bay waters. The Sea Captain is a well managed, clean, well > kept business, and a good citizen for Clearwater Beach. We feel that > a new box store type hotel would further take away from the family > business style, thus less business for the current attractions there.. > More traffic is something that is NOT needed there. > > I assume a 'flexible development' is similar to our Commercial PUD. > This is supposed to help surrounding business, the developer, and the > City of Clearwater. It appears to us the only party being 'helped' is > the developer. > > In conclusion. We feel the developer has the right to develop his > property per the current zoning ordinances, however not at the expense > of the Sea Captain, NO Holiday INN > > > THANKS > > RONALD & CATHY DOUGHTY > > 2399 RED WINGS DR. > > BRIGHTON, MI. 48114 S~t11T(hv M~v 1 h ?OOQ AnT. SFAf'A Pl 00 SEA CAPTAIN RESORT ON THE BAY 40 DEVON DRIVE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 PHONE 727 446 7550 800444 7488 FAX 727 298 0100 We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we believe that the proposed plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of our vacation time in this area of Clearwater Beach. The Sea Captain Resort provides a qmility family environment with Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME Ruth A. Vander Weide ADDRESS 2315 Radcliffe Village Dr SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 COMMENTS: Dear Mr. Wells, I am writing to object to the approval of the Holiday Inn Express at the former site of The Sunny Motel and the Port Vue. For various reasons, I believe this would negatively impact the area. I have been coming to Clearwater Beach and to The Sea Captain hotel for at least twenty years now and I usually come two to three times per year. The hotel and its staff are impeccable and The Sea Captain is affordable. I have seen the changes in Clearwater Beach over the years, and while I enjoy the beautiful beach and the new beach walk, I am also dismayed with the new high rise buildings going up right along the beach. This takes much away from the ambiance of this city. Clearwater Beach always used to have a family atmosphere and now with the ritzy new buildings and the vacant properties where other new high rise buildings had been planned and are now seemingly abandoned, Clearwater Beach is increasingly losing its charm. Adding another tall building at the site you have proposed would not enhance the area, either. lam greatly concerned that my quality of vacation time and those of other guests who frequent The Sea Captain would be greatly diminished with the addition of the Holiday Inn Express so close by. The height and density for this area of the beach does not fit with existing properties and with what makes this a charming place to visit. I do not come to The Sea Captain to be overshadowed by another high rise building; I come to relax and enjoy the marina and the bay where sea grasses grow and the manatee and dolphin frequently swim in the area I come not to be bothered by the busyness of another tall hotel and its guests and parking garage right up next to The Sea Captain. I come to haveA pleasant atmosphere where.Lcan-enjoy~all-TheSea~Captain's impec<;ably kept grounds and to be able to sit in the sun by the pool, not to sit in the shade of the Holiday Inn Express. Indeed, I do not understand why the city would consider this a good spot for this hotel when it does not fit in with the other quality mom-and-pop hotels along the back strip while the former site of the Holiday Inn is vacant and has plenty more space to build on rather than encroaching on The Sea Captain. I do consider myself as one who has paid taxes over the years to Clearwater Beach and do enjoy being able to stay there, shop there, frequent the local restaurants and enjoy a quiet, spacious, and serene place to stay. I especially have enjoyed the beautifu) setting and wonderful people who work at and own The Sea Captain. They are considered friends by me and many other "regulars." My Michigan friends and I have been ambassadors for Clearwater Beach and many of our family members and friends have also come to experience the quaint and lovely beach and city that is Clearwater Beach. The 100+ room Holiday Inn Express and parking garage clearly does not belong on The Sunny Motel and The Port Vue properties. It would change so many things that are good. Please consider my request and others and do not grant this proposed development plan to go forward. Consider, instead, what Clearwater Beach means to the people who go there for vacation. Consider also the people who work there and own hotels and have been there for years. Newer and bigger does not always mean better, especially when designed in the wrong space. Thank you for considering my request, Ruth A. Vander Weide TU: Wayne Wells Page 1 0[7 1 Wells, Wayne From: Ron Doughty [rdoughty@cac.net] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 10:22 AM To: 'mary ann eifert' Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: SEA CAPTAIN RESORT Importance: High Mr. Wells here are our comments regarding the Sea Captain Resort and the new Holiday Inn Express. TO: Wayne Wells, & Sea Captain Resort of Clearwater Beach FROM: Ron & Cathy Doughty 2399 Red Wings Dr. Brighton, Mi. 48114 My purpose in writing this letter is to inform the City of Clearwater that we object to having a Holiday Inn Express built near the location as descripted to us. I am a member of the ZBA and Planning Commission of the Charter Township of Brighton, Mi. We feel the request for variances are SELF imposed, and should not be approved. We have been coming to Clearwater Beach since 1980, and make two trips there almost every year. We enjoy the beach area, spend money on food, entertainment etc. We don't like the current trend as to the way Clearwater beach is going. This 100 ft. Holiday Inn would further take away from the family type of resort area, block the view, and harm the bay waters. The Sea Captain is a well managed, clean, well kept business, and a good citizen for Clearwater Beach. We feel that a new box store type hotel would further take away from the family business style, thus less business for the current attractions there.. More traffic is something that is NOT needed there. I assume a 'flexible development' is similar to our Commercial PUD. This is supposed to help surrounding business, the developer, and the City of Clearwater. It appears to us the only party being 'helped' is the developer. In conclusion. We feel the developer has the right to develop his property per the current zoning ordinances, however not at the expense of the Sea Captain, NO Holiday INN THANKS RONALD & CATHY DOUGHTY 2399 RED WINGS DR. BRIGHTON, MI. 48114 1-810-227-6356 5/15/2009 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Rosie & Jerry Zirbel Urzirbel@wLrr.com] Sent: Monday, May 18,20091:14 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: May 19 planning meeting Mr Wells, I am a Wisconsin resident who has been vacationing at the Sea Captain Resort on Clearvvater Beach nearly every year since 1982. In recent years, I have been dismayed by the transformation of Clearwater Beach from a family friendly vacation destination to one where the "mom and pop" motels have been tom dovvn and replaced with high rise luxury condominiums and hotels. I have also noticed the many empty store fronts and restaurants that depended on the weekly turnover of tourists that these "mom and pop" motels provided. While I am sure these luxury condos have increased your revenue, they have not been friendly to your local businesses and tourists. It has recently come to my attention that there are now plans to build another high rise hotel nearly on top of the Sea Captain Resort. The proposed height ofthis hotel is completely out of character with the surrounding properties and would loom over the Sea Captain Resort and cast a large shadow over the property. This would adversely affect the quality of the vacation expelience that the Sea Captain Resort has provided for so many years. \V11ile I am not against progress (if this is, indeed, progress) I think several options should be considered by the Planning Department before approval for this new development is given. The height of the proposed hotel is just too high. It could be reduced significantly if the five floor parking ramp was removed from the plan. There appears to be many vacant properties very nearby that could be developed to provide the necessary parking required for this hotel and should be considered. While this may add some extra cost to the development, it would make the hotel more consistent with surrounding properties and more aesthetically appropriate for that area of Clearwater Beach. In addition, all set backs should be maintained. Placing a building of this proposed size just 2.5 feet from a propeliy line is just too close and would have an adverse affect on the residents of the Sea Captain Resort. Please consider all stakeholders in your planning and maintain the family friendly reputation that Clearwater Beach has worked so long and hard to obtain. Gerald Zirbel Waukesha, Wi. 5/18/2009 MRY-18-2009(MON) 09: 33 MHPI Inc. (FRX) 8d 782d1l855 P 001/001 peboYtlVt L. sobolesJ<eL iJRIGINA. :>r:f?FI\!l:r MAY 18 20f1:J 'LANNitl/t. Ci . 2/TY OF :; . I:PARTM(NI ClFAI<WATFf;' May 18, 2009 W syne Wells Director of Planning & Community Development Board City of Clellrwllter 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Fl, 33756 Dear Mr. Wells, Please accept this letter as STRONG opposition to the requested variance for the high-rise structure at the corners of Devon Drive and Coronado Drive on Clearwater Beach. Previous construction and traffic pattern changes have given little consideration to resident.~ living on Devon Drive, Raysidc Drive and Rrightwatcr Drive. During pcak fraine, it is very difficult for us to come and ~o from our homes. These ch:~nges h2ve created UNSAFE conditiOI1S in the event there is a need for fire or ambulance service. It would be irresponsible to allow construction that would most ccrtainly exacerbate the already unsafe conditions when the additional adverse effects t'rom the opening of the Hyatt is still unknown. T realize that we are few relatively speaking, but we should be given more consideration than we have been ~iven in the past. For Clearwnter to allow this situation to become more unsafe for our neighborhood would be unconscionable. eborah L. Soboleski 191 llevon Drive Clearwater, FL 33767 Dr. and Mrs. F. David Hemerick 192 Devon Dr. Clearwater, Fl. 33767 Community Development Board City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, Fl. 33758-4748 Dear Mr. Chairman: Weare requesting that the Board not approve the Flexible Development permit by Decade Companies Income Properties to permit the 108-room accommodation at 105 Coronado Dr. and 35 Devon Dr. Our single-family residence is at 192 Devon Dr. Weare very concerned that the over- whelming density and height variances requested and the subsequent increase in traffic will substantially affect access to our property. The level of traffic at that intersection has already exceeded a level of acceptable service and the Patel property has yet to be re- developed. I am also requesting that the hotel density reserve units not be granted. The Flexible Development plan request with limited setbacks and step-backs does not qualify for participation in the Beach by Design plan. The proposal is just too big for the lot size and will over tax an intersection t.'1at already has an inadequate level of service. Thank you for your consideration regarding this matter. Sincerely, . ~ I - <q],Sr'" Wo~;'{, ~~~~~ Myra & David Hemerick cc: Mayor Frank Hibbard ~. D. ~(C~~~[E [.-.:1..' I --1/1 In' '.1 'I .' :, / ; I l , MAY I 8 2009 . / I U ,- . . _./' L PLANNING & OCv't:Lu ..::NT sue Ci"-;-Y ,fER Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: WAYNE WALTON [wlw43pw@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 9:39 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Proposed Holiday Inn Express near Sea Captain Resort Dear Mr. Wells: Weare writing in response to the proposed Holiday Inn Express immediately next to the Sea Captain Resort. It is our understanding that said proposed Holiday Inn would be approximately 96' tall. Having stayed at the Sea Captain in excess of 12 years, it is our believe that the sun would never shine on the Sea Captain Resort after 1 :00 p.m. One would certainly think that there is available commercial property that could accomodate a structure such as the proposed one that would not affect an otherwise charming vacation spot. Sincerely, Wayne and Patricia Walton 1467 Chestnut Grove Rd. Salem, OH 44460 (330) 332-1060 5/17/2009 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Shelley Dibble [shelley? _30@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 5:31 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Sea Captain Subject: Rebuttle Against New Motel Complex My petition is attached. Shelley Hotmail@ has ever-growing storage! Don't worry about storage limits. Check it out. 5/17/2009 SEA CAPTAIN RESORT ON THE BAY 40 DEVON DRNE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 PHONE 727 446 7550 8004447488 FAX 7272980100 We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we believe that the proposed plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of our vacation time in this area of Clearwater Beach. The Sea Captain Resort provides a quality family environment with Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME ADDRESS Michelle Dibble 121 East 33rd St Holland, Mi 49423 Chris Dibble 121 East 33rd St Holland Mi 49423 Jenna Vander Zwaag 121 East 33rd St Holland Mi 49423 Heather Vander Zwaag 121 East 33rd St Holland Mi 49423 Dave Tinholt 55 East 33rd St Holland Mi 49423 Gaylene Tinholt 55 East 34th St Holland Mi 49423 COMMENTS: We have been staying at The Sea Captain for a number of years and love the area and the surrounding community. We always used to stay at the Sun West Beach motel and fell victim to a high rise. Clearwater beach needs the small mom and pop places like Sea Captain. They are friendly, the rooms are very well kept up and the grounds are maintained beautifully. We feel the view will be spoiled if a high rise that tall goes up next to them. It will tower over and shadow over Sea Captain. Clearwater beach has enough high rises and motels in the area. c\) , c;~ \ JRIGINA> ~"r-r-Fl\f1;:r r"AY 16 200n '!../~NNIN\:1 UtPARTMENI ':rTV OF CLEARWATER We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we believe that the proposed plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of our vacation time in this area of Clearwater Beach. The Sea Captain Resort provides a quality family environment with Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME ADDRESS G60R6G ., f'vtfiR-G4R (;;1 Tv! C J..-LtC t<.; E. '54 CROP7+Jt;AD CR{;;S,C~rJT iJ€LLSrllJ-L.. 7\}oR..TH LAf\J AR.. k5H I RE SCDTLA'~D (.A.. K COMMENTS: 1 . d 14n~ aU~lanb:;H~r ~SE:60 60 91 h~W 8SS0-66E(L.2L.l (727)399-0558 p. 1 Ma~ 16 09 10..35a J acqueline Ruhl ~tt CU.lV~s A. V ander Weide ADDRESS 2315 Radcliffe Village Dr SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 [MENTS: Mr. Wells, writing to object to the approval of the Holiday Inn Express at the former site of The IY Motel and the Port Vue. For various reasons, I believe this would negatively cd the area. 'e been coming to Clearwater Beach and to The Sea Captain hotel for at least twenty ;; noW and I usually come two to three times per year. The hotel and its staff are :ccable and The Sea Captain is affordable. I have seen the changes in Clearwater ;h over the years, and while I enj oy the beautiful beach and the new beach walk, I am dismayed with the new high rise buildings going up right along the beach. This takes h away from the ambiance of this city. Clearwater Beach always used to have a -- ~-'.:~~ ,.,.;' ORIGiNAl !?FCl=NH t~AY r Q1DOn ,'LANNil'lG DH'ARIMENI CITY OF CLEARWATER 49546 : of The ly wenty 'e ter ~,I am > takes 1 r-- f~(' '- F L Ma~ 16 09 10:35a Jac9ueline Ruhl (727)399-0558 p.2 family atmosphere and now with the ritzy new buildings and the vacant properties where other new high rise buildings had been planned and are now seemingly abandoned, Clearwater Beach is increasingly losing its charm. Adding another tall building at the site you have proposed would not enhance the area, either. I am greatly concerned that my quality of vacation time and those of other guests who frequent The Sea Captain would be greatly diminished with the addition of the Holiday Inn Express so close by. The height and density for this area of the beach does not fit with existing properties and with what makes this a charming place to visit. I do not come to The Sea Captain to be overshadowed by another high rise building; I come to relax and enjoy the marina and the bay where sea grasses grow and the manatee and dolphin frequently swim in the area. I come not to be bothered by the busyness of another tall hotel and its guests and parking garage right up next to The Sea Captain. I come to have a pleasant atmosphere where I can enjoy all The Sea Captain's impeccably kept grounds and to be able to sit in the sun by the pool, not to sit in the shade of the Holiday Inn Express. Indeed, I do not understand why the city would consider tins a good spot for this hotel when it does not fit in with the other quality mom-and-pop hotels along the back strip while the former site of the Holiday Inn is vacant and has plenty more space to build on rather than encroaching on The Sea Captain. I do consider myself as one who has paid taxes over the years to Clearwater Beach and do enjoy being able to stay there, shop there, frequent the local restaurants and enjoy a quiet, spacious, and serene place to stay. I especially have enjoyed the beautiful setting and wonderful people who work at and own The Sea Captain. They are considered friends by me and many other "regulars." My Michigan friends and I have been ambassadors for Clearwater Beach and many of our family members and friends have also come to experience the quaint and lovely beach and city that is Clearwater Beach. The 100+ room Holiday Inn Express and parking garage clearly does not belong on The Sunny Motel and The Port Vue properties. It would change so many things that are good. Please consider my request and others and do not grant this proposed development plan to go forward. Consider, instead, what Clearwater Beach means to the people who go there for vacation. Consider also the people who work there and oV\'ll hotels and have been there for years. Newer and bigger does not always mean better, especially when designed in the wrong space. Thank you for considering my request, Ruth A. Vander Weide ORIGINA "?I=CFMr t"AY 16 200D "LANNING Ul:/'Ai?;., CITY OF CLEAI?\NA:.. MR. & MRS. CHRISTOPHER C. MARIANI 193 DEVON DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33767 May 14, 2009 Community Development Board A TTN: Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 Gentlemen: We respectfully request the Board deny the Flexible Development Permit requested by Decade Companies Income Properties to permit the 1 O-story, 108 room building at 105 Coronado Drive and 35 Devon Drive on Clearwater Beach. We are residents of Clearwater Beach and live at 193 Devon Drive. As you may know, the current traffic level at that intersection makes it virtually impossible to turn onto Devon Drive now. We are very concerned that the approval of this vast density and height variance would make it even more difficult to gain access to our property given the even greater increase in traffic were this variance approved. Once the Patel property is redeveloped, a building of the height requested will create a virtual cavern on Coronado Drive. Weare also requesting that the hotel density reserve units be denied. We believe the Flexible Development Plan request, with limited setbacks and stepbacks, does not qualify for participation in the "Beach by Design" plan. This entire proposal is simply too large for the lot size and will greatly increase traffic at an already overtaxed intersection, not to mention make access to our residential neighborhood even more difficult. Certainly this developer is entitled to develop his property, but he should not be granted special permits and should be required to stay within the Code. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, {~~-&~~~ -Christopher C. Mariani a~d"1. r- -- ~ (C ~ ~ \# ~ Kymm N. Mariani MAYI8ml 0 Ma~ 18 09 02:26p Jacqueline Ruhl (727)399-0558 p. 1 ~t\- W-~M~ SEA CAPTAIN RESORT ON THE BAY 40 DEVON DRIVE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 PHONE 727 446 7550 800 444 7488 FAX 7272980100 ORIGINA, "FCEMr MAY 18 2009 "'LANNING DfPARTMENJ CIJY OF CLEARWATER We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we believe that the proposed plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of our vacation time in this area of CleaI'\\iater Beach. The Sea Captain Resort provides a quality family environment with Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME ADDRESS to"\.4 \Lcth~ ~l ~, WlUfYU'\\l\\'\L ~. \V~. n.... lpolllff '.{v'\.~ ~\ \l\:scl U)~V\U u.'l 12-n-ktjUL, lL lpO~lO We.. \NuL. ~ t~ -b ~l.UJ:bA ~ ~ \t\IoB . ~ \XJ.(~. 0\Jl.l ~ ~~4.~ Wux.. CfI>>'\ ~ ~I ~~~~~ ~ck~'~. \\At ~ U~ +~ \~ S\o.D~ ~S~ ~ ~ 4W.- 5~\~-.w~ <\'IkI.S. w... ~ COMMENTS: ~ -I () A4 Mu.\ W~~~~~=--j'2' ~_ jJt tii~!~ ~ ~~~~sz. ~~~~.~~~~ ~~~tJ>>~~~~. . . \\~m~ o\ot;~ -\-W. U~ Vb -\-l.u.. ~ ~ ~~ _\\!>AL ~+ ~lL llxaJ~ ~ .~ ~ Du-tYLDAD..ol. . WL ~ ~ -\v ., V"~ ~ -~p~ ~,,~ Vb -\1.\J- ~~ j)A..t\ ~\)W'J. Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Bob & Doreen [robert.tytler@sympatico.ca] Sent: Monday, May 18,20097:14 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: SEACAP100@AOL.COM Subject: holiday inn To Planning Dept. City of Clearwater. Our family have been informed of the plans to build a Holiday Inn Express directly in front of the Sea Captain Resort on Devon Drive. Is this progress or a step back? As winter visitors to Clearwater Beach for 15 years we feel saddened at the changes we have seen over the last few years. The family atmosphere is slowly dissapearing with the high-rise buildings on the beach -Mandalay Ave.(is there anyone in them?) We spend our money in Clearwater Beach on Groceries, gasoline,c1othing and restaurant meals. Hair cuts and snacks on the marina,also occasional fishing trips. Will the people in the Holiday Inn spend money in town or only in the Hotel? The Sea Captain Motel is one of the few family- run,family -oriented Resorts left on the beach with no shortage of REGULAR visitors. Mrs.Doreen Tytler. 5/18/2009 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Bob & Doreen [robert.tytler@sympatico.ca] Sent: Monday, May 18,20097:32 PM To: wayne .wells@myclearwater.com Cc: SEACAP100@AOL.COM Subject: Holliday Inn Express. Wayne Wells, Planning Department.City of Clearwater. We have been comming to the Sea Captain Resort on the Bay for the last fifteen years, and have enjoyed the friendly atmosphere of Clearwater Beach very much. It is once more-sad to see "Corporate America" distroying the charming, well run, family business. If this developement is allowed to go ahead with these set-backs, hight allowances etc., when there is a much better lot directly opposite, it would remind me of the poor judgement and desighn of the original traffic circle comming off the causeway, the construction blunders on the overpass and the empty concrete moausoleums residing on Mandaly! On the other hand-perhaps the council should approve this new developement and the rest of us will take our business elsewhere. Robert.D.Tytler 5/18/2009 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Dex15@aol.com Sent: Monday, May 18,20097:48 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Variance 5/19/09 1 :00 Please find my letter of objection to be considered for the variance 5/19/09 1 :00 Linda Deichman A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. S!'!jLY.Q_ur~j!LJ_UJiL2__Ea~y Stepst 5/18/2009 Se4 ~ ~e<UVtt fUt, tk g'~ 40 Devon Drive Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767 Phone 727-446-7550 800-444-7488 Fax 727-298-0100 l~tr ~{l1fJL~ ~ 4 5 l' ~trf' L-e- rl'A- '1. (S'L~ ~oo9 / 6S~e)(" c\'\ \s o~~' e-~4l,..A"') \)~~, \1....... Q~ ~~ Cll1J ~ ~ ~ ~. ~.J.- J --s: \-...w.<-. \,.....,.... ~ k:-.. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~(J~ ~t:L ~)~\ott^1 ~~ ~ VI) ~ we- ~ ~ k k ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ or b- ~ ~ ~~ ~ 4 AiL ~ cJ ~ ~~}k~I-l~ ~~~ }k.,.x ~ ~ ~h.u- c.", ~. V <N" "'1, )t...- ~ ~ ~~~~k~~~~~ ~r}.j,--JL L ~~ ~ ~ w~ kn ~"-4~~)Ls-wJl~r .lk ~ ~ "\/) >L- ~ ~ ~ 0{- ~ ~ ~. 1)-. W.W~S Sea, ~ iee46'tt tm tk i$'49 40 Devon Drive Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767 Phone 727-446-7550 800-444-7488 Fax 727-298-0100 1 ~ t1..- \.,- ~ ~ ~ ~ k r-1--lJ. ~L~~~k ~"""-~ ~'^- ~ ~~~~v-1L-~~ ~, ~~,~~'~~~~~ ~~ J- ~ w- L ~ ~ -- ~ ~~ ..J-~ ~ ~ ~v-, ~ -..k ~ ~~~. l~ ~ <:...... ~ '", "-- Ir"-<J 'i ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ",,-}t- ~ ~-v\:. ~ ~ ol~ 4- ~~- ~4..l1- ~~ ~ ~ t,-~ + ~ ~ ~ ~}W--,;JJ ~ ~.}1.. ~ I ~ ~ .,.....\( ~ \0><- W L-.... 'ik -0 ..>CJ- ~ ~ ~~ ~>.-J..~~ ~ 1L~ ~ ~~~~~l....te..l+~ ~ ~ ~~ ~. 1. ~ ~ """i!- ~.\;- h w-e ~ ~ w.J ~~ ~ i-G-~. ~~ L.. NJ.-: ~ ~ ~ (L ~L ~ ~L,' .\k~~~c0 ~'~~l~ ~wlJ J.~ ~~l\L., ~ ~ }lL.W ~s ~ ~, 'i~ ~ lL-L We. the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE .., Page 1 of2 Subj: WePETITION (1) Date: 5/15120094:49:42 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time From: jngaitQ@grnail.com To: seacap100@aol.com SEA CAPTAIN RESORT ON THE BAY 40 DEVON DRIVE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 PHONE 727 446 7550 800 444 7488 FAX 7272980100 We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we believe that the proposed plan If approved \\'ill adversely affect the quality of our vacation time in this area of Clearwater Beach. The Sea Captain Resort provides a quality family environment with Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME John & Susan Gaito ADDRESS 22 Country Meadow Drive,East Greenbush NY 12061 !"'", COMMENTS: We are opposed to the proposed development plan filed by the party listed above for the following reasons: . The natural envirement for the Manatee and the sea grasses in the bay will ultimately be destroyed. . The impact of the increased traffif flow especially at the Devon and Coronodo intersection will cause major congestion. . The ambiance of the natural beauty and the pristine beach will also be affected. . NOT all change is progress. . There are already too many hotels and condos (hi-rises) that are for the most part uninhabited.Are more needed????? . As a long time visitor to Clearwater Beach WE OPPOSE THIS PROPOSAL. Thank you, in advance for your consiseration 0_~_ ._.J _ lito" ___ 1, .....n.r\n. A f'\1 . C''--' A r--.. " 1'\1 AI\ . \}J , W <tJ \ ~ SEA CAPTAIN RESORT ON THE BAY 40 DEVON DRIVE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 PHONE 727 446 7550 800 444 7488 FAX 7272980100 We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we believe that the proposed plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of our vacation time in this area of ClearwaterBeach; l'he Sea Captain Resort provides a quality family environment with Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME /' 1~ qUE C9MMENTS: M 0.) r F{. *J/~ 7=A~I\..J'G li-Av't;;. 6t;{;"AJ ~ /1'0(; tV (fl!tfLf./Jff71'=:((' 'I3(Y1r>J! 6 VAf TlcrJ 'FCJI? cJ V&;?- r-:/'PTLI (1{-AIL$ I -:i- IIU'l:: r'. VIA I N C~ /0 Tn I~) A (2A.-c.r-; 1- {J IL Tf-! I !2~c L ll- 1112-':;', iAj [; f(tJALLLf 5ErrL.t--:D //1 (;-lIS Rr--~'L'i;'T /lFTtf<.'- Lc' iNtf /1 pl-flt!& 70 S:Tf/t.( LA.Jfft:t..J THe DV/Jrs r:i- THe- ,,/]/I/1/))JIIJ{1--:; l.uE;2.? 1\/\./16[- J1!0 eY/7fr'r Pit- t7F-- If/V)) /j(jU') (jUT: CUe 'PLA/'J 10 V/lC:./fTIt):J III 7?i t-~ S'f A {..:t:! PTA IIV RE0l2_T f1 s/.-.o N ~ I) $ /2. f: ffJ. 17 I IJ SAw [j ( L (h!J / NTA I kJ (~j) -;&741'11/l-cy r.'l/?/t; (' fT{j) 1i'''J rJ ((? --t.1 /!/l Lt I'JT ' Sea" ~ if:e4<Vt-t 04 tk g'49 40 Devon Drive Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767 Phone 727-446-7550 800-444-7488 Fax 727-298-0100 ~ 60.,gA ~S CJLb KA \..fJ -/S<\ fl.A. C~ ~A~::AOJJ seanANq 6-~~' ..::D =\/ :5 \;" / JV\CXc'ov'V\ 10\-$0\<:8 --\ r l>Je ~ e,2V~~ v~ N W:tlv i'-.a \Ae.AJS y~CWc\ '-:3 ~ \C)ult6 ~ cP G\ "\~\\~ ~ E4>~' 0= Gk:::-'~ -t=> ~ ~ c::::bp7Q1\....J ----J \.AJe.... ~v'e IC>=~ V\.s,V~ \A_~ (Cv~9. t:c~ ~V~ --...- Au\T0v\V\(Fo.\\), L>Je VVO-ve\ C\ \O\-\.V€:>f'VS o ~ kV\cW~ oY \ 1-tt\O bT -dl P?~\s.o o.vtAQ e-.d V02 ~ vvC\wS\.oo\ l;Q vOv\()JS fXA~B ov ~ w::v\ci FOv <S5lE:Y \~~ AMev\CQ c,- o_t\..OvEv 6Y~e o~ ~'-D.k- ~ ~ C1~WV\gQ \!\l\t... ~..r-H(J\If:SR --I- vJ2\~ 0--.E' v~~ VEVe. We IAo.V2.-Gt\8::> M~ vr \.,N\'C \.K.D EoOv"v'Q 02"4?\e. v02- V'lD.J0 C.Qi\S\ c:\.!;v ~s, c:v-d tcov v\-,--.cl--x\:Q<o \;;::0 ~. \,08 ~ Y-""9veE:Y ~ou vecCY\S\O-w ~~\~ o b ~ eA~ V-- ~\0 Cbl/\ vtoJ c!VQ 0 ,1" . \ iVlOV\C\\E>e CA.V dv,CJ--- . \AJc),U2v fVov1 0 - ck. ~~~~'--C-'" ~ b~\l:v1 ,,/\acP\\BV~ y~ ~o\t,- ----, We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we believe that the proposed plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of our vacation time in this area of Clearwater Beach. The Sea Captain Resort provides a quality family environment with Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME ADDRESS W'u.JA1V\ MAet~rJ ~cruMGONE::> (J~ V~ \.P~O k~ "f, ~ ~~ 0C. uj e\ ~ V\~~. COMMENTS: ~~ -f:sX\a~ 7~A Sea, ~ ilZe<UVtt fJH, tk Z'euf 40 Devon Drive Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767 Phone 727-446-7550 800-444-7488 Fax 727-298-0100 j)e.DJ(' ~v LJ~I($ M j vtCLtme (.,0; ~~ c:V( e)- H ('.l-.uck ~ I C-CJfY1 ~ to C\~wcJ-vr be-och eCIC-Yj ~~ w~&k VVl-.J h.u.sbCL-hd ~O(Je $C) 'J-- Wo-s u.)~ dJe-ep VZJ re-r ~a..-/-- We heaA'"d OUA'" fa.vc~ ~ p'~ l-1/\ t:he tA.S. A. 0as perho.-fs (Jo~ Co ~ Ouersha.-do0r?r. bJ C{ f/tJl1dJ InYl ~)<fJytkuJJ-/o-fe/ ~ LJe !:Ya.l/el rfrO/17 Seo/- )QA1c/ cu1.oI h4l/e b~ c100J SO -fOY ~g Jeo...rs t-Jd~ Ot..-l-f chJdrer, J- ~ us /0 hcUA".:5 p/t-/5 ';0 f::yQv'e / here a-nol Ue VeQ..$,OJ we (V)~e th~ lay J-IIJV IS t-Ae t-hoL:J/J- bhcJ- oJ- td~ el'\d 4- "J- all,;,5 w~ ,sf'J J ~ Seq G,pr,,-~ Hotel ~Sc' b"-e STaft 4t--e u:oYlJerful ~~)1d Yhos_f tJe/ccrn0; _ E~rj 'IC'.ct,~y c.U~ 1/I1eL/ people w no beCO-r77e ou.,.r ';yeL-Yld.s a-/I 6ho.se Ject--Ys ::.y<:J If ~e ole veJoprnenJ- Joe.s a-Aead 6Aeh I fecLY' ;Y w;lj b-e t:"'-e ertcl ~I- ttA? erq f~v- Cl /0 f ~ 4- pec7ple) 5~ / hope YOLl a-n. ~OlNY ~rnlY\. Jf-t!!sL C-D.A1 . -l-vYlc/ ;)- lA/} J~u-r hea.-v f c1 heo-y ~ 60 SH th~ hI5fo""~ be~~1 e..A"eq 4- :;C7LvY ~<<.J~ f~r us r-c YehA 1-0y' rVlOvYly Mcre yeCU's 10 CoYl-'lE R ~r'-rJ5 tlluy lM"') JLI LfUt/ku CD, \ . \ e~ . We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we believe that the proposed plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of our vacation time in this area of Clearwater Beach. The Sea Captain Resort provides a quality family environment with Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME ADDRESS G~R6E ., flv1ARGA!2(;;:T NC 1-uc klE , 5l..t CROPTH~AD CR(;-~c.~rJT 8€LLSH/J-'- 1\}oR..:iH LAI\JAR.k5H/.e~ SCC>TLA~D t4. K COMMENTS: SEA CAPTAIN RESORT ON THE BAY 40 DEVON DRIVE CLEARW A TER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 PHONE 727 446 7550 800444 7488 FAX 7272980100 We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we believe that the proposed plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of our vacation time in this area of Clearwater Beach. The Sea Captain Resort provides-aquatity family t:llvilOnmentwith Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME ADDRESS Michelle Dibble 121 East 33rd St Holland, Mi 49423 Chris Dibble 121 East 33rd St Holland Mi 49423 Jenna Vander Zwaag 121 East 33rd St Holland Mi 49423 Heather Vander Zwaag 121 East 33rd St Holland Mi 49423 Dave Tinholt 55 East 33rd St Holland Mi 49423 Gaylene Tinholt 55 East 34th St Holland Mi 49423 COMMENTS: We have been staying at The Sea Captain for a number of years and love the area and the surrounding community. We always used to stay at the Sun West Beach motel and fell victim to a high rise. Clearwater beach needs the small mom and pop places like Sea Captain. They are friendly, the rooms are very well kept up and the grounds are maintained beautifully. We feel the view will be spoiled if a high rise that tall goes up next to them. It will tower over and shadow over Sea Captain. Clearwater beach has enough high rises and motels in the area. . ~,~ ~s SEA CAPTAIN RESORT ON THE BA Y 40 DEVON DRIVE CLEAR WATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 PHONE 727 446 7550 800 444 7488 FAX 7272980100 We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we believe that the proposed plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of our vacation time in this area of Clec:u Wi:1tci Beach. The SeaCapta1n-Re~t)ltpwvidesa-flWllity family environment with Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME ADDRESS J~+rf~ w.)w 6)0 t:>RI~~LANb SJR. S).}i)~E.WOD~, -::L"l.. &b<.j.o,+ COMMENTS: VVE:. J..4 t\\JE. &t.t:.>J COlMJ NG J 0 CLc.AR.wf\T<::R. E.t:.f\GH peR. ov€:~ F6R,y V<E;f\Rs A)J.i) S<=-cSN AL6T ~ $yY)ALL ~cS~R.TS fE.PLACCJ) &)' ~/CI-J RISt: &UJLblJJGS. PLE.AS-~ €..SPE,cT -r lJlZ.. S.s. (:\ <: ~ p, "') )J S 'vJ J S I-J E s. TH E..)I f\ R E. T 4 e:.. 13E.~1 5 \n"'\ p. LL. R.6Soi.<T )f:.fT 6N TWE. &f.i'C H. TJJo\).sC\~SJS 0 F ~~LE. J-J 1\ l) ~ S}J -Soy €.!:J SJ f1 Y J ~ GAT -r}./ €- S <f. ~ c,l\ l:I A ) N avE,p- \J.JE.'Y~f\RS. -Att: W. W0l\s -h,0 510)..- Lf<Z las SEA cAPTAIN RESORT ON TIlE BAY 40 DEVON DRIVE CLEAR'W A1'ER BEkCH, FLORIDA. 13767 PHONE 727 4467550 800 444 7488 FAX 727 298 0100 We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed d~elopment plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES. hs.ite<\uent guests of THE SEA CI\.?TAlN RESO\t1':.v.Jc he\ie'le th~ the \')to\>O~ 'Plan. If approved will adversely affect the quality of ,Qur vacation ti~e in this area of Clea~ Beath. The S.ea Captain Resort provides a q~ty family environment-with Well kept rooms aDd grounds' and has maintained the char8cterofCICarwater,Beach..' ',: NAME . ADDRESS ~r~n jf!LeJ wlJJ))(e5ha, IV;:: 5 31g~ 9' ,,' "#~fl""';'>-~'!S:' e 0 -Hze ~ ./,,,,:p""'" . .. .... ., . . . ,,' ..... . d! .'. . flitM r;oJns tU1 IUJJLly i ~osphg/'e . . . . ~/I' ~~q:~fn~d--t W%;;:jOxt; ht:r/n::n~ ;C:1;/1fJ I' wfJ.AJ;f;--/D /Jg f/.e.aP the. IUje ImpdSOl1tU hig/1- (' /5 ~ c)Jd./ J1 s., IJ/.e. f;aw-, bfOlfi9 kc 1!JUIj, ff-Opk io Ike ~ ea.p fMi1 iW-t.tUI S~ Wi-!GI1$CJ:..;f;~ -/rJO eI1.Jo led -fh is tJfmosf?here. Wh~.1'-. sJJ3!:!f-'A ftF tn.e ulq MUj I/a(tles . IJ-tt . IV. WELLS SEA CAPTAIN RESORT ON THE BAY 40 DEVON DRIVE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 PHONE 727 446 7550 800 444 7488 FAX 7272980100 We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we believe that the proposed plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of our vacation time in this area of Clearwater Beach. The Sea Captain Resort provides a quality famijyenvironment with Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME ADDRESS ~~ S-Ib~h /.~/'~~5"/OD7 ~. .-~( ~1&s.ie-~4 _ . -- '<>0 . CO<illOO7 COMMENTS: II Nt IJtE w l-h, -("(€ L 51-401.'- l () Nv T AF fALL ~ /l -n+*~ ~J' ->TltJRlti <; ~ 51"0 vL P v $ If" -r H f::( C 19 1-'1131 N€ f> FeJc -r P /t.1 tV T &~ -("/-I IE OLQ t-lo"-~ LS ..". ~ U../ - ~e 0 ~ s ~ "'-\> ~~ JlIIlUId.Y 16, 2008 Language Ans 7;8 Traditions BYeIy 3pting bft:a\ I go 10 Ckar ...,diu ~ F1mide. My fBmUy end my grandpareo13 always stay at the Sea Captain on the mariJJa. 1 always watch boats go by and dolphins jump in the mArina..l have been going ever since I ~ two. The Sea Captain is a small ~ wbete every one comes back: to, which means everybody Jcnows- each othcr.llike the Sea Captain tor many reasons. First of all I love fi~hl"g, and since there is a IDALina rigbt, next door, I can go wn"l with my grandpa off the pier. Another reason I lave the Sea ~;n is bec8lu:e they have slwftleboard. Sbnfflp.board is a game where you ~ pucks aDd try to get a high Jl1JIDbeI'. 1be first one to get to one hundred .",- wins. Also, the Sea Captain bas a ves:y nice healed pool. Ckmwaia' Beach is my filvorite vacation spot because ofthC beach. Sometimes if I wake up early I can go knock on my grandma's door and she will come walk the.~ . . with me and help me find sheDs. The beaCh is very fuJi. There is so rmrh to do tbere like out. The beach also has a pierdJBt is ver.y long. You CIIl fJJ ~ or wB!Ch the a.wesome sunset. 1be beach is wbere I speDd most oftJlf time. ~:. rock. 1'1...1.:.. a-..;"-".:. iD 1bc..... oceIB 1NIIIU, p\..,mg ill - -- areftA ~. "...-t While we are there we go to a very fun place called Tarpon Springs. It is filled with lots of cheesy sponge sto~ and lots of games and activities. Also in Tarpon Springs there are boat toW"S to dive and pick sponges. Tarpon Springs is known for it's food and Paul's is the place to go if you like slDimp. All together Tarpon Springs is very fim. / - // /-', ./ . / .. , - ::. C'-.'~);- "'.. :- ~:~ Ck-...... is baownfirirs ~ aad my g.lA.~fpe ~ 1bat so he..... DID on R deep !;eft fishing boat.. 1'hitt ia so fun beaIuM you addl big fisn aNi then yon get to eat 11: Jaia" tbat nigBL MY smndpa aod I ai.so iave. CiO.IUest 011 who QIJ1 QIich,~ mosi. fish (he ~ ~ mwin). ~Be8 ti9bb!g is 9ne ofmy ~...._.~ tmn~ woo "Wh,'e in Ciearwatec. !1}r :.6mu1y a!wa.ys goes to a ~taU{1lI1t called Frenchies while down in Clearwater. It is very fun. It is Jib a triday) s but aU Ush. Also in Frencbies there is a fwmy sign that ID.'JS &.\'3J:e ofBilrjRattler. Everj'One thinks it is a rattl~~n.'lk~ .::0 they open the box lecy slowly aDd they see a rattle like a baby usesl llrenchies is very yummy aDd funny. . -----.... - ;.?~. .;. ," 'T.~t#'1.-i~.' :~.lf..: ...~... ~~'J~~;~:l' .,.;~.; .';;~~...: '~~r;;::'~~ l:.~...::"":~t.':.-:-. . ':":.; Sometimes I play cards wi1h nrj grandma and ~:f,. O".rcr vacation 1 get SO ;:<;:':'.:~~;:';;, "', ':' :"'<::, ~.:;'~p';'~~ ~. ouch attention fiom my ~ and it is very fun. Ovemll Clearwater is SO fun and ," ::-; \"': .,-,~~"'f(;;:,~ .".-' ..~:'~!$'.!:::c..;~~ here .is so much,to-de it ~a- gets boring no matter how llWly times I go aOO th&t ~ wI!,)' :~;.:~;~~~~ t is my favorite vacation spot I I 05-14-09;02:17PM;KENNETH W SMITH PRO. CORP, KENNETH W. SMITH BARR]STER & SOLlC[TOR TELEPHONE (613) 267.5910 TELECOPTER (6!3)264-0769 e-mail: kenwsmith~on.aibn.com BY 1~AX 1-727-562-4865 AN.p BY Ir-MA.IL: wayne.wells@myclearwater.co~al, City of Clearwater Planning Dept. 100 S. Myrtle Ave. . Clearwater, FL 33755 Attn: Wayne Wells, Planning Dept. Dear Mr. Wells: ;613 # 1i 1 27 FOSTER S'1"RBET F.O. HOX 1S7 PR1tTFl, oNTARlO K7H 3E3 ~~. RIGINAt. REGENED ~aY 14 2ooa r'LANNilJ~ t"3EPARTMENT CRY OF CLEARWATER May 14, 2009 ate: Proposed Redeveloplment of corner of Devon and Corronado (1'ormcr site~of'Ihe Sunny Motel and The Port Vue) As a long time winter visitor to Clearwater Beach it has been brought to my attention that the above-referenced properties are the subject of an application for coz~stxuction of a 10$ room Holiday Inn Express situate above afour-level parking garage. I understand that the height of the proposed structure will be nearly 144 feet. I further understand that balconies will look put to the east and to the north, and that a request has been submitted to reduce the easterly sideline set back to an alarming 2.5 feet from the adjacent motel property. This would effectively place amulti-level parking garage only a few fPPt away from occupied motel rooms ~- an environmentally unhealthy and unacceptable situation. The inevitable noise factor must aiso be considered. 1 amp of tl~e opinion that such a developz`oeut flies izt the Face of the character of the area. The adjacent motel property together with several residential properties adjacent to it will be virtually devoid of sun for long stretches of time each day, as will large portions of the marine basin with the resultant adverse effects on marine life. Traffic at the intersection of I.7evon and Coronado is extremely heavy at times and the presence of the proposed development would only serve to exacerbate a problem that already exists. I would ask that this correspondence be tabled into consideration at the Community Development Board Hearing scheduled for Tuesday, May 19`s, 2009. Yours sincerely, KENNETH W. SMITH pROFES~~ RATION- /~~ ~ ~J Per: Kfez~neth W. mrth /jm May 13 D9 11:10a Jacqueline Ruhl [7271399-D558 ~_2 SEA CAPTAIN RESCIRT ON THE BAY 40 DEVON DRIVE CLEARWAT'ER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 P~ICJN'E 727 446 7550 840 444 7488 FAX 727 2ss oloo ~~RIGINA- RECEIVE MAY 14 2000 'WNNINC~ ~7EpARTMENT ~~IN 4F CLEARWATER We, the undersigned, wish to objeet to the proposed development plan ~"i~ed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROI'ERC'.II~,S_ t~ freque;nt guess of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we heiieve that the ptaposed plan If appzoved will ad~versaly affect the quality of ouz vacation time in this area of Clearwater Beackt. The $ea Captain Resort provides a quality family environment with WeII kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME ~-+ n c~2 l~[i ADDRESS ~u~, 1Q~ ~. r Z 'd LIZZ ~°N ~°~ ~~- J OWO'~aa~!3 °y°~ W~07,~~ 6001 'bl '~pW May 13 D9'11:iDa Jaayuelinc Ruhl (7271399-0558 p.2 flRIGINp-r. ~c~n~c SI A CAPTAIN RESORT ON THE BA.X 40 DEVON 1~RIVE MAY Z ~ 20~~ CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 PHONE 727 446 7550 800 444 7488 ~''~`'Ni~v~ utwAar~n~Nr FAX 727 298 O 100 ciN ~ cttnRwA1ER 1~Ve, the undersigned, wish to abject to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOZvIE I'RDk'C71;5. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we bei~EVe that the proposed plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of ~ oux vacation tithe in this area of Clearwater Beach. The Sea. Captain Resott provides a quality family environment Frith Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of CIearwater Beach. ~ AME AbDRESS ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-, .~~-. ~ 'd LIZ'°N aWa'~'a~!3 °4°~ WdIZ~~ 6002 '~l'~pW Mai 13 09`11:10a Jacqueline Ruhl [727)399-0558 p.2 URiGINAi RFr'E!~!E!~ SE11 CAPTAIN RESORT ON THL S3A~'' MAY ~. ~ 2OOJ 40 DEVON DRfVE CT~EA.1tWA'1'Ekt BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 "~N~vIN~ utNARrn~Ef4r PHONE 727 446 7550 $p0 444 748$ rm' of CLEARWATER FAX 727 29$ 0100 We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE CaMFANYES INCOME PROkER'f1ES. :Ss frequent guests of TH13 SEA CAPTAIN RESORT; we believe tl-at flue pxoposecl plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of ~ our vacation time in this area a#' Clearwater Beach. Tha Sea Captain Resort provides a quality family envirottCpent with WcI! kept rooms and grounds and ins maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. COMMENTS: '~ C~~ `E~C~~ 1]r. ~o~~~+n~~n~ a~ ~~ ~ hey' h t ~~ ~e met 0. cue til <-'~e. -tl~~. ~1 S ~' 1~ ~, (~~ ter S ~ ~~ ~~ ~ In ~ ~e.caC1~1 ~~~~ ~-~-Y>~.rS, ti 'd CIZZ '°N OWa `~aa~!3 u4°~ WdIZ~~ 601 'til '~~W NAME ADDRESS Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jeanne Silverberg [jojeesilver@charter.net] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 9:57 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Proposed Development Plan by Decade Companies Income Properties Dear Mr. Wells: My wife, family and I have been vacationing in Clearwater Beach at the Sea Captain for over twenty years. We consider the Sea Captain our winter home. An eight story building west of the Sea Captain would shade the Sea Captain's pool. My grandson wouldn't like to swim in a shaded pool and my wife and family couldn't sunbathe watching him. We would have to find another winter home outside of Clearwater Beach. Four stories of parking ramps within fifteen feet of the rear of the Sea Captain will ruin the view of the rooms on the west side. Having a hotel the size of which is being considered abut up to the Sea Captain is intolerable and certainly not conducive. to a relaxed vacation. Tall, high density buildings should remain along the Gulf. Building them inland would adversely change the family vacation destination and relaxed character of this section of the Beach. The Sea Captain has a reputation of being one of the best, small family owned resorts in the area. It has always been maintained at the highest level and, therefore, brings a clientele which benefits the commercial community of Clearwater Beach. Please reject the Decade Companies proposal and keep Clearwater Beach a family friendly destination. Sincerely, Jeanne and Joe Silverberg 2802 Arbor Dr., #1 Madison, WI 53711 5/15/2009 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Harry and Lynda Traini [traini@rogers.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 8:39 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: SEACAP100@aol.com Subject: Concern re Holiday Inn Express Development. Please find attached a copy of our letter that is currently being mailed to you with our signatures. Since the meeting is next week we were unsure as to whether or not it would arrive in tiime. Harry and Lynda Traini tiaini~a,ro gers. com 519-936-7613 5/14/2009 SEA CAPTAIN RESORT ON THE BAY 40 DEVON DRNE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 PHONE 727 446 7550 800 444 7488 FAX 727 298 0100 We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we believe that the proposed plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of our vacation time in this area of Clearwater Beach. The Sea Captain Resort provides a quality family environment with Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME ADDRESS Harry Traini 187-2025 Meadowgate Blvd London, ON Canada N6M1K9 Lynda Traini 187-2025 Meadowgate Blvd London, ON Canada N6M1K9 COMMENTS: We are not the long time visitors as some of the others that have been coming to Clearwater for many more years but we felt we had found an oasis in Clearwater Beach that we could continue to return to for many years. We are very disappointed that Clearwater has taken to replace the many small motels with monstrosities that not only destroy the integrity of the beach but also eliminate family run and owned motels that have been the cornerstone of the beach for many years. Evidence is the many empty motels that now dot the landscape of the beach. It would be much more worthwhile to see changes further to the south where many abandoned motels lay vacant rather than destroy one that is a home for many of us. Page 1 of 1 Welis, Wayne From: Ruth Kemp [kemper@altelco.net] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 10:59 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Sea Captain Resort Mr. Wells, attached please find my letter of support for the Sea Captain Resort. Thank you for reading my letter, rk 5/14/2009 SEA CAPTAIN RESORT ON THE BAY 40 DEVON DRIVE ORlGlNAI. CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA 33767 4ECENEQ PHONE 727 446 7550 800 444 7488 ~~AY ? 4 ~~G FAX 727 298 0100 ~'W~viViNG i~EFAf2tMETVT vliY ~ CL~WAtER We, the undersigned, wish to object to the proposed development plan filed by DECADE COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES.. As frequent guests of THE SEA CAPTAIN RESORT, we believe that the proposed plan If approved will adversely affect the quality of our vacation time in this area of Clearwater Beach. The Sea Captain Resort provides a quality family environment with Well kept rooms and grounds and has maintained the character of Clearwater Beach. NAME ADDRESS Ruth Kemp 2839 Bonneville Ct. NE Grand Rapids, MI 49525 COMMENTS: Mr. Wells, my name is Ruth Kemp. I have been traveling to the Clearwater Beach area since the 1960's. For decades, I have considered the Sea Captain Resort Motel to be my second winter and spring home during the breaks afforded my by virtue of my occupation as a public school teacher in the state of Michigan. As a retiree, I can now extend my time at the Sea Captain by weeks each year. For years, I have decried the massive changes to the Clearwater Beach ambiance. You seem bent on changing the very essence of the reasons my friends and I choose the Gulf's best beach area: we want afamily-friendly, AFFORDABLE place to unwind, dine, relax, and most of all walk your beaches! The gigantic high rise properties have killed the "mom and pop" entities, leaving in their wake unaffordable (and empty) condo units and middle-class values. Your beautiful beach walk is partially hidden by the growing high rise south of the parking lot. I realize you have factions fighting for your approval of their proposals. To destroy the unique quality of the Sea Captain property is to continue to destroy the middle-class visitors' ability to choose a venue that offers so much more than a rental unit. The Sea Captain's strengths involve: an incomparable setting, superb service, COMPLETE access to grounds and the pool area (without hundreds competing for space), a caretaker whose pride in workmanship is evident daily, and an owner who knows us byname (yes, there is a "Cheers" presence in your city) and appreciates our business with him. If you allow the proposal for the Holiday Inn to proceed, you will have struck another blow to those of us who seek quality at astill-affordable price. My friends (dozens) in the Fort Meyers area are moving away to end the ever-increasing prices and the congestion caused by the very projects you are considering. PLEASE, consider what you want of Clearwater Beach -check the rosters of property changes/demolitions in the past twenty years (by the way, where IS the former Holiday Inn? I believe that beautiful property is still an empty lot). You will not find the Sea Captain name on any of those lists. Please do something RIGHT for your tax-paying resort owners whose rooms are always rented, not on speculation, but because of their consummate care of their clients. I hope that you give MORE consideration to the Sea Captain than to a corporation which has so often changed property locations and has deserted your Sand Key Bridge area. Continue to let your loyal owner and his guests enjoy all the reasons which draw us to your part of Florida. Let other cities deal with unoccupied units and ruined beachscapes. There is MUCH to be said for tradition and quality; I hope you choose these over any POTENTIAL increase in revenue. This fragile economy should provide the final reason for denial of unacceptable variances on property next to the Sea Captain. Sincerely, Ruth Kemp May 8, 2009 Anchor Mini Mart Marlyn Tracey 207 Coronado Drive Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767 727 446 3737 City of Clearwater 100 Myrtle Street P.O. Box Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 RE: Decades Companies Income Properties Coronado Drive, Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767 Dear Michael Delk, This letter is in response to the article printed in the St. Petersburg Times, May 7, 2009. I own and operate a very small store on Coronado, I'm very concerned about the set backs for the new Holiday Inn Express. I'm opposed to them. I will be in California the week of May 19, 2009 attending my daughters' graduation from law school. I will not be able to attend, but want you to know that I am opposed. I am seeking an attorney who will represent me in this matter. Thank you, Marlyn Tracey/Anchor Mini Mart n ~~iJ V ~.l MAY 8 ~l9 ~' ;~ ~ P~gNNING & DEVELOPP."ENT c. ~~ or~...!~~~;rs°r .TES May 12, 2009 T0: City of Clearwvatew Planning and Development ATTN: Mr. Wayne Wells and Mr. Michael Delk and Ms. Cynthia Cioudeau Fax: 727 562 ~ 4865 Dear Mr. Wells, Mr. Delk and Ms. Goudeau; This pax is a follow up to my attempts to reach you by phone earlier today. I wish to formally request a postponement of the meeting to discuss proposed development of the corner property at 101 Coronado Drive and 35 Devon Drive, DVA 2009-00001 l am requesting a continuance, as l am only just receiving notice of the 5/19/09 meeting at this time. 1 am an affected owner of the adjacent Sea- Captain Property, living in San .Diego, CA. and wish to be present at the meeting. Please contact me at your earliest convenience, as 1 reallZe tilde is of iue essence. Sincerely; -~ -~' -~. J r. Robert ~ifert 4306 Newport Ave. San Diego, CA. 92107 ~l`B.1 WE gaol. com (619) 788-7550 -~ i _ rF,~ s~~ f ~~ a ~~ t ~ ..~ _ , s . ifs, ~ ; , r i. '! C pp~~ ~~' _- Cc: Mx. Harry Kline, Attorney rn ~r...~ i rv~innn n.ir~n ~r^ rinnnr nr rn rr •~r Cra (a71raT/era May 12 09 04:08p Vance Rose 2057527946 p.1 ~,~'-~- ~, 5 ~ ~iN'I.M ~1 DS Where !earning to swim is FUN. ~~.~ -~~a-U819s To: Wayne M. Wells, Planner Frorrc Vance Rose Fax: 205-752-7946 ~9~ 2 Phonee 205-792-6033 Date: 5!12/2009 Re: Flexible Development & Variance, associated with Decade Companies income Properties D Urgent O For Review ^ Please Comment ^ Pleese Reply ^ Please Recycle • Comments: Attn: Mr. Wayne M. Wells, Planner Attached you will find a letter concerning the recent discussion of the development on Devon and Coronado Drives. Please take this into consideration when detrberating on this matter. I appreciate your time. Direct your attention to my letterhead for any contact information that may he needed. Thank you, Vance Rose t7RIG11VAL RECENED ~~AY l 2 Z~O~ ?~i9V11'v~ DEPARiMENI' city ~ CLEARWAT~R P.O. Box 2365 • Tuscaloosa, AL 35403 • Phone & Fax (205) 752-SWIM (7946) ............... ~, ........~.,.,.. ,..., ~ ...... ...... ........... ... t........v~ ...... ..,............, .b................,.......v .,...... beach, the citizens of Clearwater, and our future generations. Thank~you`, Vance Rose SwimKids, Tnc. P_O. Box 2365 Tuscaloosa, AL 35403 205-752-7946 May 12 09 04:09p Vance Rose May 8, 2409 2057527946 p.1 i~~21GItvA~ ?ECt~v~"' €~~~ i r` 1lj1;:1 ?ttlrv~vb~~v U~r~AKlh/iEIVT CITY OF CLEAFtWATER I am writing this letter after a recent trip to Clearwater Beach where I enjoyed the casual, relaxed atmosphere and lack of large-scale developments on the beach. I have been a visitor to the beach for many years and while not opposed to the development of the "New" beach, what I read in the paper recently was disturbing. Granting of variances, while most appear to be small, represent things that will last alifetime-once you grant one variance you are locked in for years. Both the Zoning Commission and the City Council need to be aware that beach zoning variances can never be taken back! The zoning variance for the Coronado-Devon Drive property before the Zoning Commission on May 19~` addresses changes that will affect the beach for years to come. I can only hope that the Commission will look at what they are about to vote on and realize that it will affect future generations, not just citizens and visitors for the next few years. Granting both setback variances and density variances, while generating short term revenue for the city will ultimately make Clearwater Beach equivalent to the South Florida East Cost and will drive people to other areas_ As a Zoning Board, please do not be short-sighted and make a decision based on what is good for the city today, but instead what is good for the city in the many years to come. I have a real problem with an out-of--state developer corning in and asking for variances that will help make him and his company make money and then sell off and leave to~~vn. He will be gone and not only the Zoning Commission and the City Council, but the citizens of Clearwater and visitors to the area will be left with the mistakes made and the precedent set to grant the same variances to everyone who applies in the years to come. At issue are the variances being ~..,,n, , ~ ~_~ »___, z.-.,... ~,. ~~., ° ~o ti,o ~enc;ty aii~vu;ed nn finis »mnerty-J~JtJ%o eveuc regllesteu uia~ a-ivw uiui w gr.%a~-y iu:.r°v?wv u~.. ~ r--r ~ His request looks like a textbook request for over-development! There are other properties on the beach for this size development that would allow for appropriate distribution of the density via additional surrounding property. Everyone can say that each case is an individual case, but as we all know, once such variances are granted, legal precedence typically establishes that they will be granted each and every time. I would hate for this Council and Zoning Commission to think in 24 years that they had sold their soul to big developers, and they had singlehandedly ruined Clearwater Beach. As I stated above I am all for the development of the beach, but not when it means selling one's soul to do it_ This proposal is trying to squeeze a Sears Tower onto a postage stamp lot. Setback and density variances are there for a reason to protect and not unfairly ignore the citizens of the beach, the citizens of Clearwater, and our future generations. Thank you, Vance Rose SwimKids, Inc. P.O. Box 2365 Tuscaloosa, AL 35443 205-752-7946 FROM THE DESK OF LYNN IviCCOLL ' Ywr,rvirvU DEPARTMENT ~i~~ cA~Q FACSYMYLE TR.A.N3MI'rTAL SY•Y~~T TO: F~U~: Wayne M. Wells, Phnnet Lylm McC:oil COMPANY: AA't'F»'-. City of ClearaPater Plasiair~g & 5/T2/2009 Development KI.C.IF.IPT FA3C 1JUMSpA• TOTAI. 230. of YACUL-S 1NCLU DING COVER: 727-562-4865 2 RE: ~1~1-ble Development and Vatiance, in as5ociatimn.'ovirh Decade Company Fncome ~'mperries PJ URGENT E( FOR REVIEW ^ PLIASB COMMENT ^ PLEASE REPLY ©PLEASE RECYCLE NOTES/COMMENTS: Attached is a letter Uo Mr. Wayne M. Wells, Plannex `oPith the City of Cleaswatet Planning and D~elo~anenr Department. Pleas? rev-i~r this infnrmatic~rl and eansider ii m your decision regarding the nevi development on Coronado and Aevan Drive. My contact infotxnation can be found on tkle attached letter. i nani~ you iox your time. 520 AVALON PLACE - TUSCAI.OOSA, AL 35401 - 2D5-292-4526 ~~RIGthlA~ r-. Lynn McCo~~ 520 Avalon. Place Tuscaloosa, AL 35401 2Q5-292-4526 ~~-:, ~ ._ crrr OF CI.~ARWATER May 12, 2009 My family has been vacationing at Clearwater Beach for over thirty-five years. We originally came to C:lexrwater Beach with our four young children 'who have since married and blessed us with thirteen grandchildren,. They all love Clearwater Beach as much as their parents when we first took them. Our entire family takes at least one trip to the beach together every year as amini-family reunion and to zelive the memories of years past. There is a special charm and warnath in the Clearwater Beach community that is so very di~eult to find anywhere else in Florida today. Earlier this spring when we hard all flown in to Tampa from flour diffcrcnt states to go lu Clearwater Beach for one of our annual trips, we got some disturbing news. For as far back as I can remember we have stayed at the flea C'.aptain beach motel. During our recent ten day visit to the beach, we discovexed that larger towering hotels are threatening to destroy the quaint beauty and charm of our favorite vacation spot. I support the rights of properly owners to develop their properties as they choose, but not when it violates existing Taws and regulations That were established. to protect the beach eammunity that we love so very much. Please don't allow the neighbozs of the Sea Captain to infringe upon our special place by granting them the variances that could make Clearwatez $each a tunnel of COnCrCtc structures that destroy your unique beach cocntuur~ily. l:l would be ~ shame to see that special place in the beach community become like so many other Florida beaches that are overbuilt_ mince it stazts, there is no turning back. It would break my family's hearts to leave Clearwater Beach as our favorite vacation spot. Please don't grant the variances that would destroy a very special place we have loved for years. Sincerely, ~.~ : . Lynn N~cCo~~ 03/19/015 07: a5 FAX 0001 GRiGINAt ~~ p~/2ECENED R lrlhll ~ L- ~~U~ PLANNING t~EPARTMENT . CITY OF CLEARWATER May 13, 2009 Mr. Wayne Wells Planning Department Dear Mr. Wells, We have recently heard of a proposed plan to build a 108 room Holiday Inn Express. and parking garage at the corner of Coronado and Devon. We are very much against yet another "high rise" hotel on Clearwater Beach. We have been coming ;to "the beach" for about 25 years and it has changed too much already. The small homey feeling is going fast. We have been staying at the Sea Captain Resort for~about '! 8 of those years. The new proposed hotel will certainly affect us-with a large shadow on the property and the sea grasses there. In addii:ion it would be far #oo close to the back of the Sea Captain Resort property, There is already so much traffic in the area. Please keep Clearwater Beach a family oriented beach and not give the large hotels and condos free reign. Tom and Joyce Skocz ' 233 High Street ~ Fair Oaks, Pa 15[:703 f 1W {)lyr-'O~l ~ . CfJb fs 13 y~-O? )1 ROBERT C. PERGOLIZZI, AICP, PTP PRINCIPAL SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Mr. Pergolizzi has conducted numerous transportation studies and land development feasibility studies in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco, Hernando, Collier, Sarasota, Lee, Manatee, Polk, Walton and Citrus Counties. These studies include site impact analyses, traffic engineering and traffic operations studies, travel time studies, parking studies, transportation analyses for DR! submittals, roadway capacity analyses and alternative corridor/alignment studies and impact fee studies. He also prepares signal warrant studies and signalization plans in accordance with MUTCD and MUTS procedures and access permits in accordance with FDOT and local government regulations. Mr. Pergolizzi has also served as a transportation planner with the Hillsborough County Metropolitan Planning Organization where he prepared reports to assess traffic impacts of amendments to the Long-Range Transportation Plan. He is familiar with the latest transp0l1ation software including FSUTMS, Highway Capacity Software (HCS), FDOT QLOS Software, SYNCHRO, SIGNAL 2000, PASSER and TRANSYT-7F. He has also served as land use consultant and expert witness for various land use plan amendments, rezonings, conditional use and variance hearings for Clients in the Tampa Bay area. SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE Land Use/Zonine · Lowe's/Publix - Pinellas Park · Waterchase - Hillsborough County · Suburban Lodge - Largo · Cypress Cove Townhomes - Hillsborough County · Oak Valley Townhomes - Hillsborough County · Oak Park - PinelIas Park · Walgreens - Pine lIas County · Pinellas Expo Center - Pinellas Park · Park Place Townhomes - Pinellas Park · St. Petersburg College EPICENTER - Largo · St. Petersburg College Health Education Center Expansion - Pinellas Park · Cumberland Trace Townhomes - Largo · Roosevelt Commons Office Park - PinelIas County · Hidden Bayou Townhomes - Pinellas County · Skylark Plaza - Pinellas County · Palmbrooke Townhomes - Pinellas Park DRI Traffic Studies · Northwood DR! Traffic Analysis · Park Place DR! Traffic Analysis - Clearwater . River Ridge DR! Traffic Analysis - Pasco County . Heritage Pines DR! Traffic Analysis - Pasco County . Timber Pines DR! Expansion - Hernando County . rCOT Center DR! Traffic Analysis - Pinellas County · Mitchell Ranch Plaza DR! - Pasco County · Crossroads Mall DR!- Largo . CORPOREX Business Park - Hillsborough County · Beacon Woods East - Pasco County . The Grove at Wesley Chapel DR! - Pasco County Roadwav Corridor Plannine:/Alternative Systems Studies · Lynn Turner Road - Hillsborough County · Drew Street - Clearwater · Belcher Road Extension - Pinellas County . Keene Road (CR 1) Extension - Pinellas County . City of Tarpon Springs Traffic Circulation Element Update - Tarpon Springs . Gateway to Clearwater Beach/Causeway Boulevard/Roundabout - Clearwater · DeCubellis Road - Pasco County . Gulf Trace Boulevard - Pasco County Traffic Operations Studies/Desie:ns/Sie:nalization Desie:ns . MPO Transportation Plan Amendment Studies - Preparation of numerous studies for roadway plan amendments. . BaywalklMid-Core Traffic Analysisffraffic Signal Design - St. Petersburg . GulfBoulevard/W. Gulf Boulevard Traffic Signal- Treasure Island . GulfBoulevard/112lh Avenue and GulfBoulvard/l1 ill Avenue Traffic Signals - Treasure Island · Venetian Residential Development - Sarasota County . Wal-MartlSam's Club - Traffic studies for rezoning and FOOT permits for numerous facilities in Pinellas, Hillsborough, Pasco, Manatee, Sarasota, Lee, and Collier Counties · Suncoast Lakes MPUD - Pasco County · PelTine Ranch Road Analysis - Pasco County · Clearwater Communi~ Sports Complex - Clearwater . Thurston Groves 102R A venue and Ridge Road Improvements - Seminole · RiverWalk at Manatee River Plantation - Manatee County · Valrieo Road/Wheeler Road Traffic Signal - Hillsborough County · Morton Plant Hospital Master Plan - Clearwater Campus · Palm Harbor University High School - Pinellas County . Madison A venue/Gould Street Improvements - Clearwater . Bryan Dairy RoadlEckerd Corporation Traffic Signal - Pinellas County . Bryan Dairy RoadILongwood Drive Traffic Signal - Pinellas County . Clearwater Mall Transportation Analysis - Clearwater . Trinity Town Center - Pasco County . Rooms to Go Distribution Center Expansion Traffic Analysis - Lakeland . Broadway Avenue/Williams Road Intersection Improvements - Hillsborough County . SR 580/Summerdale Drive Signalization Plans - Pinellas County . The Lakes at Lucerne Park - Winter Haven . The Lakes at Lam'el Highlands - Lakeland . Miller Road / Lumsden Road Signalization Plans - Hillsborough County . Morton Plant Hospital- Axelrod Pavilion Access Permits . Numerous access pelmits for commercial and residential projects throughout Florida, Parkin!! Studies . Frenchy's Rockaway Grill- Clearwater Beach . Post Comer Pizza - Clearwater Beach . Outback Steakhouse - Clearwater Beach . Roma Square Shopping Center - Clearwater . Mandalay Grill - Clearwater Beach . Morton Plant Hospital - Clearwater Travel Time Studies . S1. Anthony's Carillon Outpatient Center - Pinellas County . Community Hospital of New Port Richey - Pasco County . St. Joseph's Hospital North- Hillsborough County . Lakeland Regional Medical Center - Polk County . Bayonet Point Hospital - Pasco County . Martin Memorial Medical Center - Maltin County/St. Lucie County . Morton Plant Hospital - Pinellas County · St. Joseph's Hospital South - Hillsborough County · Baycare SE Pasco Hospital - Pasco County . Poinciana Hospital Medical Center - Osceola CountylPolk County EDUCATION Master of City and Regional Planning, Rutgers University, 1987 Bachelor of Arts, Environmental and Urban Studies, Montclair State College, 1985 Successful completion of 128 hours of training conducted by the Federal Highway Administration and the Florida Depaltment of Transportation on Urban Systems Modeling, Transportation Planning and Site Impact Analysis Graduate course work in Traffic Engineering, University of South Florida PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION American Institute of Certified Planners #9023, 1991 Professional Transportation Planner #133, 2008 AWARDS 1990 Florida Institute of Transportation Engineers Past Presidents Award for Technical Paper submittal Unsignalized Intersection Analysis on Florida's Divided Arterials MEMBERSHIP IN PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners Institute of Transportation Engineers American Planning Association LargolMid,Pinellas Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors - Florida H.S. for Accelerated Learning-Pinellas County Campus Board of Directors - Tampa Bay Junior Lightning, Inc. Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ __ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 07/11/2008) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Decade Companies Income Properties MAILING ADDRESS: 135SS B1ShOpS Cotlrt, Ste 345, Brookfield, WI 53005 PHONE NUMBER: 262-797-921 S FAX NUMBER: __ _ __ _ -- -- CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Decade COmpanleS IriCOme PI'OpertleS List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: Kelth ZayaC, PE, RLA LEED AP• Keith Zayac & Associates Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 7O 1 Enterprise Road East, Ste 404,_ Safety Harbor,_FL 34695 -_- __ PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 72']-793-98SS CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: keith~a keithzayaC.COm B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: Holiday Inn EXpreSS PROJECT VALUATION: $12.0 Million STREETADDRESS 101 & 1 OS Coronado Drive ---- __ _ ___ PARCELNUMBER(s): 08/29/1S/15606/000/0141; 08/29/15/00000/320/0200, 08/29/1S/17550/002/0012_ PARCEL SIZE (ages): 0,72 ~ PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 31 X418 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment A _ _ _ _ _ PROPOSED usE(s): 1081imited service overnight accommodations DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Spec~cally identify the request .(include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specfic use, etc.) See Attachment B _ _ __ I:1Holiday Inn Express Clearwater BeachVPennitslCily of ClearwaterlFlexible Development (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc t DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO x (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) !~ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attachment C 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Attachment C 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons. residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Attachment C 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Attachment C 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment C __ _ _ __ __ 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attachment C __ I:1Holiday Inn Express Clearwater Beach\Perrnits\City of Clearwater\Flexible Development (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) '~ Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specfic Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or mod cation of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stonnwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Stonn Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ^ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ^ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ^ All adjacent streets and municlpal storm systems; ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area inGuding top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan inGuding all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ^ Proposed stonnwater detention/retention area including top of bank, tce of slope and outlet control structure; ^ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMI L (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable '~7 ACKIV)6WLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stomtwater plan as noted above is included -" __ Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) " SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; '~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ^ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4° DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees;. LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; 0 PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; r ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; I:\Holiday Inn Express Clearwater Beach\PertnitslCity of ClearwaterlFlexible Development (FLD) 2008 07-1 t.doc ', G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): __ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and waterlines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening _ {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenltabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; _ -- 31,418/0.72 20,000/0.46 31,418/0.72 Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 53 36 - Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; - 36 108 Gross floor area devoted to each use; 69,208 a/c sp. Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; 108 112 Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces 8 driveways, expressed in square feet 8 percentage of the paved vehicular area; 17,381 29,847 5,935 Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; 35 89 Impenneable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and 0.90 0.95 0.60 Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 0.70 _ __ 1.0 2.2 REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %: X 11); ~ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; I:\Holiday Inn Express Gearwater Beach\Pennits\City of Clearwater\Flexible Development (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of 7 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage, and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, spec cations, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, inGuding botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, badcfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'h X 11); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 %z X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) -Ut~V ~ ~jt}g/Idt'fP~ '~ COT''1~. Sllvt] ~~ ~~~-ro~v . ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed onto remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall inGude the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'/: X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. I:\Holiday Inn Express Clearwater BeachlPeimits\City of Clearwater\FlexilNe Development (FLD) 2008 07-11.doC K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or hislher designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ^ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Sedpn 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowle ement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Ca ulations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are r wired by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpip and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with t/h(e 2004 Florida re Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Acknowl Bement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow CalculationsNVater Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this app ' ation are true and accurate to the best of my knowled an authorize City representatives to visit and photogra , h the roperty described in this application. I~ ~' 1 ~ 1~-~.1~- 11:x? .,~^.~.--.~_--.. Signature bf prgpejty owner or representative l~i5c.enSin Wakk~sl,~, STATE OF~1.CRtDA, COUNTY OF~WNEL~49- S rn to and subscribed before me this f (p f~day of ebfuG r" , A.D. 20 U ~(o~~r by f r• ,Who IS~w~ ~ ~Crjmyu/~{{0~_~ produced ````~~~'bQQQ~rrr •~~rf(~ as ide'TitificaSren. ~r c~ Notary lic, d ~ ACKERh1AN My com fission expires: ~~ - ~- Q ! ~ _ , C:\DOCUME-1\ADMINI-1\LOCALS-11Temp\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 7 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: Decade Companies Income Properties 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record t81e holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 101 & 105 Coronado Blvd. 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 108 overnight accommodations. See Attachment B for complete list -- --_ 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Keith E. Zayac, PE, RLA, LEED AP as (histtheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representativ visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), he un ersi ed authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. % n Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner I.J~C.~'n~o~J STATE OFft9R~BA; CO ~ ~2 J t G.u- C~_ UNTY OF-PM~Etb4$ t. avi~ GJ(QcB'x . 11 Be fore me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State o fF~r+d~, on this ~~ lh day of rr G / 1'e~~UQr _ ~Q/ personally appeared ~e~'Fr{,~ Kcte~ICI~C-'~ who havingbe~ _~`'~ ,( P Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. a ~O e~/~~r~~ i ~ BETTY '~ ACKERA.IAN Notary Public SMignat '9j~ g~~: Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: ~~' ~' Uf _~~itl__~~'r - C:\DOCUME-1 WDMINI-1\LOCALS-11Temp\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-1 t.doc Page 8 of 8 .",. ,. , CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE#: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: ; Clearwater u~ ~ Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 Q SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION Q SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans Q SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPLICATION (Revised 10/14/2003) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Decade Companies Income Properties MAILING ADDRESS: 13555 Bishops Court, Ste 345. Brookfield. WI 53005 PHONE NUMBER: 262-797-9215 FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: EMAIL ADDRESS: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Decade Companies Income Properties (Must include the names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) AGENT NAME: Keith Zavac. PE. RLA. LEED AP: Keith Zavac & Associates. Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 701 Enterprise Road East. Ste 404. Safetv Harbor. FL 34695 PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS: 101 & 105 Coronado Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment A PARCEL NUMBER: 08/29/15/15606/000/0141: 08/29/15/00000/320/0200: 08/29/15/17550/002/0012 PARCEL SIZE: 0.72 (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: 108 limited service overniaht accommodations (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF ANY RELATED REQUEST(S): See Attachment B (approval of a development to include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ..lL- (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) ~ " B.2 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-606.B) An application for approval of a development agreement shall be accompanied by the following (use separate sheets or include in a formal report): ~ ~ STATEMENT OF THE REQUESTED DURATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT,WHICH SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN YEARS DESCRIPTION OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES THAT SERVE OR WILL SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT; DESCRIPTION OF THE USES DESIRED TO BE PERMITTED ON THE LAND, INCLUDING POPULATION DENSITIES AND BUILDING INTENSITIES AND HEIGHTS; INDENTIFICATION OF ZONING DISTRICT CHANGES, CODE AMENDMENTS THAT WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL WERE TO BE APPROVED; , , ., ~ ZONING AND LAND USE CATEGORIES OF ALL ADJOINING PROPERTIES; COMPLETE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL OWNERS OR PROPERTIES ABUTTING OR LYING WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS CURRENTLY LISTED IN THE COUNTY RECORDS AS OF ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION. c. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A) '$ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR PROVIDE OWNER SIGNATURE ON PAGE OF THIS APPLICATION D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-606.G) -a Provide the following contents to the development agreement, as follows: . Contents. The approved development agreement shall contain, at a minimum, the following information: a. A legal description of the land subject to the development agreement. b. The names of all persons having legal or equitable ownership of the land. c. The duration of the development agreement, which shall not exceed ten years. d. The development uses proposed for the land, including population densities, building intensities and building height. e. A description of the public facilities and services that will serve the development, including who shall provide such public facilities and services; the date any new public facilities and services, if needed, will be constructed; who shall bear the expense of construction of any new public facilities and services; and a schedule to assure that the public facilities and services are available concurrent with the impacts of the development. The development agreement shall provide for a cashier's check, a payment and performance bond or letter of credit in the amount of 115 percent of the estimated cost of the public facilities and services, to be deposited with the city to secure construction of any new public facilities and services required to be constructed by the development agreement. The development agreement shall provide that such construction shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy. f. A description of any reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. g. A description of all local development approvals approved or needed to be approved for the development. h. A finding that the development approvals as proposed is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the community development code. Additionally, a finding that the requirements for concurrency as set forth in Article 4 Division 10 of these regulations have been satisfied. A description of any conditions, terms, restrictions or other requirements determined to be necessary by the city commission for the public health, safety or welfare of the citizens of the City of Clearwater. Such conditions, terms, restrictions or other requirements may be supplemental to requirements in existing codes or ordinances of the city. j. A statement indicating that the failure of the development agreement to address a particular permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve the developer of the necessity of complying with the law governing said permitting requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions. k. The development agreement may provide, in the discretion of the City Commission, that the entire development or any phase thereof be commenced or be completed within a specific period of time. The development agreement may provide for liquidated damages, the denial of future development approvals, the termination of the development agreement, or the withholding of certificates of occupancy for the failure of the developer to comply with any such deadline. I. A statement that the burdens of the development agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of the development agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the parties to the development agreement. m. All development agreements shall speCifically state that subsequently adopted ordinances and codes of the city which are of general application not governing the development of land shall be applicable to the lands subject to the development agreement, and that such modifications are specifically anticipated in the development agreement. .~ E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) {:J SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; CJ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; CJ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required; t6 '\l. TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines.) - please design around the existing trees; & LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY. GRADING PLAN, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ~ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; (* Note: Per Section 3-911, all utilities shall be located/relocated underground) All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ~ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of dwelling units proposed; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses. b REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y. X 11) and color rendering if possible; CJ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Invento ; re ared b a "certified arborisf', of all trees 8" DBH or , .. G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ,:1 LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) Indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, Including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e,g, conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes, o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) (color rendering if possible); o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are,in issue (e,g, Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project j BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y, X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required I. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) ~ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required), o Reduced signage proposal (8 Y, X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application, J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) ~ Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan, Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement K. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my ~\Wf... authoflz~'ty representatives to visit and photo~ it",'{p~~&"lfI descnbed I this application /r:o'\ ~-o'('~ , Ir !i ~ , Ii ... ~ I I' f ~ BETIY * ~ i ' JJ ~ ACKERMAN t 1 : J. ) 1^- ~ ,~~f SlgnaliJre of p operty owner or representative ~I "11'r- ,/,,;,'.~.: -'t. <.- OF ~. '-'":,,i.=' ) I\\\\\\\:;~~.:,-''''''''~ / W,S((h1Sin WII{Iu!S~ STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINRLAf: Swo%, t~ and subscribed before me this~ day of II/A+ ,A.D, 200Q to me and/or by ~ L ~1' v ,WhOl js persona y known has produced =~IIJ('{ D.cIU' (b.( r as identification, 1/-1-01 Pa e 4 of 5 jIJ-- L. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Decade Companies Income Properties (Names of all property owners) 1 That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location) 101 & 105 Coronado Drive 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) See attached description requests 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint Keith E. Zayac, PE, RLA, LEED AP as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; L~" Property pW+le:~ I I 1 propert1own1rJ, , STATE OF FLOIpDA~j WI S(.OY1SI.fl COUNTY OF ~IN[LlAS l{)Ct~kt~k ~'''\\\''>\\i\, ' ;~\l-f\'{ pu))l~rl l<J;s~;" re me the undersigned, an officer duly cormlilS0Jli la he Statr of~n this ~ dOo'J personally appe~';;:: f (If I' y Depo es and says tha~she fully understa1s th contents of theida th z "". , SrnY ,:r ~ >.: ~ _. Yo :f.' ". ACKERMAN 1; ~. ~ ~. " .;>.:::- 'Ji~/:' . . ~ ~-;. 1'1' "-/j .- " cS~ .:iF rl;t,~ t f-:.~ ~ ':; \ I..;;;:~'"- l,\\\"..;,....,<~ day of ho having been first duly sworn II ~ My Commission Expires !I./.69 s: iPlanning Df'partmcntiAppJir.'at;of] Forms l,dDvnlnprnonf rnv;pw:dr:vc!opment agrcrmrnf applicat;o(J3. doc Page 5 of 5 Development Agreement Application - City of Clearwater ATTACHMENT A HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION NORTH PARCEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Begin at the Southwest corner of Water Lot 1, CITY PARK SUBDIVISION, according to map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 37, of the Public Records of Pinellas CITY, Florida; run thence West along the East-West Center Line of Section 8, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, 15 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 5°32'30" West along East right-of--way line of Coronado Drive 16.26 feet; thence South 84°27'30" East, 100 feet; thence North 5°32'30" East, 78.06 feet; thence Northwesterly along existing concrete seawall 113.38 feet, more or less; thence South 6° 10'00" West, 82.63 feet; thence South 4°25' 11 " East, 25.74 feet to the Point of Beginning. AND: Begin at the Southwest corner of Water Lot 1 of CITY PARK SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 37, Public Records of Pinellas CITY, Florida; and run thence West along the East and West Center Line of Section 8, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, 15 feet to the Easterly line of Coronado Drive; thence South 5°32'30" West, 16.26 feet, for the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue South 5°32'30" West, 100 feet to the Northerly line of First Avenue; thence South 84°27'30" East, 100 feet along the Northerly line of First Avenue; thence North 5°32'30" East, 100 feet; thence North 84°27'30" West, 100 feet to the Point of Beginning. SOUTH PARCEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The North 100 feet of the West 110 feet of Lot 1, Block B COLUMBIA SUBDIVISION according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 60 Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Attachment B Description of Requests (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a 108-room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to lot width along Devon Drive/First Street from 150 to 100 feet (north side) and from 150 to 110 feet (south side), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 to five feet (to proposed building) (north side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 to 1.15 feet (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 to five feet (to proposed building) (north side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 to eight feet (to proposed pavement) (south side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 to zero feet (to existing pool deck) (north side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 to 2.52 feet (to proposed building) and 7.22 feet (to existing pool deck) (north side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 to five feet (to proposed pavement) (south side of Devon Drive/First Street), and an increase to the building height from 35 to 89 feet (to top of roof deck), under the provisions of Section 2-803.I. (2) Increase of the permitted density by the allocation of 72 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design. (Related to DVA2009-00001) Attachment C General Applicability Criteria 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. West: The property to the west includes an unpaved parking lot which has been approved fora 150-ft tall resort hotel. North: The property to the north is Clearwater Harbor and the City Marina. East: The property to the east includes an existing two story hotel and parking lot. South: The property to the south includes a one story hotel and parking lot. The scale, bulk, coverage and density of the proposed project are in keeping with the Design Guidelines set forth in Beach by Design for the Small Motel District. The proposed mid-rise limited service motel project maintains the existing use, maintains a maximum height below the 100-foot maximum and decreases the ISR from the existing 0.90 to 0.60. This provides substantial green and landscape areas. The north parcel includes the motel, parking garage and maintains an existing pool and deck overlooking the City marina. The southern parcel includes surface parking, stormwater pond and 39.5-foot green buffer from Coronado Drive. The proposed project will enhance this area of the beach in a number of ways, including: • Removal of an existing older hotel not consistent with Beach by Design criteria. • Construction of a new motel consistent with new City code and Beach by Design criteria. • Upgrade in landscaping from the existing non-existing condition, to areas of planting and grassed open space. • Providing a flag motel to Clearwater Beach. • Setting an example in a Beach by Design district that has not had much redevelopment. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development maintains an existing appropriate land use according to Beach by Design with amid-rise motel that caters to families and established clientele. The project includes adequate off-street parking and significantly expands the green area within the parcels. The new project will provide a positive example along the east side of Coronado Drive to serve as a catalyst for redevelopment of mid-rise limited service motels with off-street parking. This will have a positive impact on the value of the adjacent land and also provide clientele for the surrounding restaurants and retail shops. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The limited service motel maintains the existing use and does not introduce any new businesses that may adversely affect the health of persons residing or working in the area. The safety of the neighborhood is enhanced by the construction of additional sidewalks within the adjacent rights of way connecting the existing walks along Devon Drive and Coronado Drive. The existing driveways along the arterial Coronado are being removed and replaced with two driveways along the secondary street Devon Drive. The proposed structure will comply as required with applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The project includes 108 limited service motel rooms that require by City code a total of 108 parking spaces. The project provides 112 parking spaces which allow for 1 parking space per unit plus 4 spaces for staff including manager, desk clerk and two housekeeping staff. The existing driveways along the arterial Coronado are being removed and replaced with two driveways along the secondary street Devin Drive to provide access to the parking garage and surface parking. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity proposed for development. The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal at this north entry to Beach Walk and South Clearwater Beach. The architectural style integrates a tropical modern design which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for the small motel district. The limited service motel development maintains the existing use of the property and is consistent with the properties to the east and south. The property also transitions the height of buildings from 150 feet approved to the west toward the maximum 35 feet allowed for detached dwellings within the LMDR area along Devon Drive (which is not part of Beach by Design). 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent. properties. The building includes enhanced design elements on the facade as required by Beach by Design including adequate windows, vertical and horizontal plane changes and recommended color palette. The acoustic and olfactory impacts are minimized by providing the majority of the parking within an enclosed parking garage. Hours of operation will be 24/7 which is consistent with surrounding properties catering to the tourist industry. Attachment D Applicable Flexibility Criteria 1. With the exception of those properties located on Clearwater Beach, the parcel proposed for development shall front on but shall not involve direct access to a major arterial street unless no other means of access would be possible. The project access will include one driveway to the north parcel from Devon Drive accessing the parking garage located below the motel units. A second driveway will connect to Devon Drive and provide access to the surface parking lot on the south parcel. The parcel proposed for development will front on Coronado Drive, which is a major arterial street. The existing driveways along Coronado Drive will be removed. 2. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance. The proposed building height of 89-feet above BFE provides for a new modern Holiday Inn Express motel that replaces dated existing two and four story hotels that has exceeded its useful life and includes almost no landscaped areas. The proposed plan also removed existing impervious area and increases the green area by 8,400 square feet which included landscaping and grassed areas. The existing driveways that currently connect to Coronado Drive, a major arterial street, will be removed and replaced with two driveways on Devon Drive. In addition, the south parcel includes the development of a surface parking lot providing relief from taller buildings approved on surrounding parcels and creates a vista to the Bay. 3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is apart of an approved comprehensive sign program. A comprehensive sign program will be submitted for approved as a separate package addressing signage locations, height and size. 4. Front Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life. The front setback reductions requested along Coronado and Devon will allow the building facades to be located within approximately 5.0-ft from the public sidewalk facilitating access from the Beachwalk enhancements to the front desk, and encourage appropriate massing to match approved projects across Coronado Drive. The proposed first floor lobby provides an access point from the public right of way to the lobby on the fifth floor. Since the project is located within a flood zone, active building space cannot be provided. b. The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and appearance. The reduced front setbacks for the north parcel allow the design of a fully enclosed parking gazage under the proposed motel, and the maintaining of the existing pool azea. The northwest corner of the pazcel has been left undeveloped to provide a landscaped azea and sign location adjacent to the pirate ship and other vender azeas along the bayfront. The southern pazcel provides additional code compliant surface pazking and normally dry stormwater treatment for the site. The location of the pazking is set back over thirty feet to facilitate upgraded landscaping along Coronado Drive. c. The reduced setback will not result in the loss of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan. The existing site currently has 3,076 squaze feet of open landscaped azea. The proposed project provides 12,608 square feet of open landscaped azea. A large landscape azea is proposed within the front setback along Coronado Drive along the northwest corner of the pazcel to serve as a gateway to the Beach Walk azea. The reduction in the front setback on the north pazcel consolidated the building onto one of the two pazcels and allows a 39-foot front setback on the second pazcel to pavement, which provides for a normally dry stormwater pond as well as upgraded landscaping. 5. Side and Rear Setbacks a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles and/or personnel. It is anticipated that emergency vehicles will not access the property, but rather stage in the adjacent right of way due to the small size of the pazcels. The south pazcel is accessible through the pazking lot driveway, and does not require access through the side setbacks. The northern pazcel allows access through the pool deck as well as Devon Drive to the sides of the building. b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and appearance. The reduced side setbacks for the north parcel allow the design of a fully enclosed parking gazage under the proposed motel, and the maintaining of the existing pool area. The side setback reduction is due to dimensional requirements of a double loaded driveway and separate access ramp. The southern parcel provides a double loaded surface pazking azea requiring a minimum width of 60-feet to be code compliant. The side setback was reduced to provide additional azea in the front setback to for stormwater and landscaping. This area is visible from the right of way and Beach Walk. e. The reduction in side and rear setbacks does not reduce the amount of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan. The existing site currently has 3,076 squaze feet of open landscaped azea. The proposed project provides 12,608 square feet of open landscaped area. A large landscape area is proposed within the front and side setback along Coronado Drive along the northwest corner of the pazcel to serve as a gateway to the Beach Walk area. The reduction in the side setback on the north parcel consolidated the building onto one of the two parcels and allows a 39-foot front setback on the second parcel to pavement, which provides for a normally dry stormwater pond as well as upgraded landscaping. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Section 3-501 as applicable. a) Density: The project maintains an overnight accommodation density of 50 units per acre plus additional unites are being requested from the Hotel Density Reserve via a development agreement. b) Height: The height of the building is maintained below 100 feet above BFE. c) Design, Scale and Mass of Building: 1. Buildings with a footprint of greater than 5000 square feet or a single dimension of greater than one hundred (100) feet will be constructed so that no more than two (2) of the three (3) building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. For this purpose, equal in length means that the two lengths vary by less than forty (40%) of the shorter of the two (2) lengths. The horizontal plan measurements relate to the footprint of the building. The overall length of the building along the west and east sides is 154-feet, the north is 82-feet and south side is 86-feet rounded. The height to the roof deck is a maximum of 89-feet and the height to the top of the parking garage wall is 37 feet. The heights at the north side are the same as the west and the heights along the east side are the same as the south. The ratio of the long dimension and the short dimension of the building at grade 100:44, i.e. the shorter side is 44% of the longer. See attached ezhibit for non-rounded enact dimensions. 2. No plane of a building may continue uninterrupted for greater than one hundred linear feet (100'). For the purpose of this standard, interrupted means an offset of greater than five feet (5'). Along the west side the building there are two indents, one near the south end, 5'-0" deep by 6'-10" wide at the stairs and one at the elevator lobby, 5'-0" deep x 9'-0' wide. Along the east side there are two bump outs, one near the south that extends out 5'-0" x 11'-0" plus, these will be used for mechanical rooms on the second, third and upper levels of the parking garage. A second bump out is located near the north end of the east wall of the parking garage that extends out 5'-0" x 7'-2" plus, this area will be used for mechanical and maintenance closets. Note that the east side of the building steps back at the fifth floor above the parking garage for a distance of 18'-0". This step back extends vertical for the balance of the building. 3. At least sixty percent (60%) of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. For the purpose of this standard, an elevation is that portion of a building that is visible from a particular point outside the parcel proposed for development. The west elevation has 75% glass and architectural elements and 10% of the gross elevation is open into the parking garage. The north elevation has 79% glass and architectural elements and 12% of the gross elevation is open into the parking garage. The east elevation has 70% glass and architectural elements. The east wall of the parking garage will not have openings due to building code requirements. And the south elevation has 62% glass and architectural elements and 37% of the gross elevation is open into the parking garage. 4. No more than sixty percent (60%) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above forty-five feet (45') will be occupied by a building. However, in those instances where an overnight accommodations use on less than 2.0 acres that has been allocated additional density via the Hotel Density Reserve, no more than seventy- five percent (75%) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above forty-five feet (45') may be occupied by a building unless the property is located between Gulfview Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico, then no more than 70% may be occupied by a building. • Area of project parcels = 31, 419.96 SF • Theoretical maximum envelope = 1,728,138 CF, based on 100-feet above elevation 13.0 BFE. • 75% of maximum envelope above 45-feet from grade = 1,296,103 CF • Percent of building envelope above 45-feet = 41.76% of allowable envelope. • See attached exhibit for exact dimensions. 5. The height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. The building height is maintained at less than 100-feet to provide a buffer between the 150-foot tall buildings along South Gulfview and the properties to the east. The height and mass of the building have been kept to a minimum since the motel is a limited service motel without banquet halls restaurants or conference centers. The mass of the building allows for landscape buffer areas as well as an enhanced landscape area at the northwest corner of the property adjacent to the tourist attractions and water oriented tourist services to provide an eastern gateway landscape enhancement. This will complement the proposed signage and landscaping associated with the Clearwater Beach Hotel proposed on the west side of Coronado Drive. 6. Buildings may be designed for a vertical or horizontal mix of permitting uses. The building will be designed to provide a moderately priced waterfront family style motel with a pool and limited services. d) Setbacks: The building is set back a minimum of 13.5 feet from Coronado Drive pavement and 21.0 feet from Devon Drive pavement. 7. Lot area and/or width: The reduction shall not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity. N/A project lot width complies with code. The lot width reduction is due to existing parcel conditions. The building height of 92-feet is within Beach by Design criteria for the small hotel district within Beach by Design, and provides a buffer from the approved 150-foot tall hotels along the beach to the areas east of the project not within the Beach by Design area. The southern parcel does not include a structure, and provides relief from the surrounding hotels across Coronado Drive to the areas outside the Beach by Design limits. 8. The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm Area, have a hurricane evacuation plan requiring the use close when a hurricane watch is posted. The development agreement will include the hurricane evacuation plan. 9. A development agreement must be approved by the City Council...... A development agreement has been enclosed in the submittal package and will be processed with the City Attorney to meet requirement a through c. ROOF DECK POR110N OF BUILDING NEAR NORTH END 59' 96' SOUTH SIDE ELEVATION GRADE 96' GRADE 53' 13' ~ 94' 13' 9 EAST SIDE 82' wo BUILDING PERIMETER AT 37' ABOVE AND UP o 86' rn ~ 58' ~ ~ 0 0 z cn ~-! I WEST SIDE 41' I-- 95' 24' ~- 1 ROOF DECK z w 0 F- z lol 1519 LOWER EDGE OF BALCONIE 7' NORTH SIDE ELEVATION GRADE ROOF DECK w z 0 U J Q m 59' o~ BUILDING FACE STEPBACK LINE w~ U a w EAST SIDE ELEVATION 18' GRADE '~ 25' EAST SIDE I w BUILDING FOOT PRINT AT GRADE ''~ ~ 82' ~ ° 86' ~ ~ 0 0 z cn WEST SIDE l S4 ~ BASIC BUILDING DIMENSIONS DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN ROUNDED TO NEAREST FOOT WEST SIDE ELEVATION ~_ pR pp pSep e~/`p/ Nc ,s9 pF T yeoRe /coo Mncq~ Mq pR0 qk/MUM B I iNUM eU/ PFRT Y C/~y U/~ p/~G (%yc , fS F~~~ppF ~~ppf THEORETICAL MAXIMUM BUILDING ENVELOPE (45 FEET TO 100 FEET = 1,728,138 CF) (75~ OF MAXIMUM ENVELOPE = 1,296,103 CF) PROPOSED BUILDING = 541,215 CF ( 41,76% OF ALLOWABLE i i i / HGLIDAY INN EXPRESS R E S O L U T I O N No. 74 - 143 ~.0~6 TV~7~~ ~~ WHEREAS, the Department of Transportation of the State of Florida, through its TOPICS Program, is realigning and widening the intersection of Mandalay Avenue (SR 60) and Marianna Street, in the City of Clearwater, Florida; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to utilize in this project certain parcels which are designated "park" on the Plat of City Park Subdivision and which previously have not been used for that purpose; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that this realignment project is to the best interest and advantage of the City and the general public and that said designation is not necessary nor required; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, IN SESSION DULY AND REGULARLY ASSEMBLED, AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the "park" designation on all parcels as set out on the Plat of City Park Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book Z3, page 37 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby vacated and set aside, Z. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to record this Resolution in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th c Attest; . C'it s1~';~Prk 0 c _, ~._ -. CNn _ ~ .. R 8i1 +NoOrn ~y+YII »~ 11i f :~~~ ~ .~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ri~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ ~~ ~_ ._._---~~,,.~,,~a ,:~.~ r ~~ m r m .~ o .o -a ~ o ~~Tr~__ `~ I, !:; I rrn.. I . < 4 i4 f: b ~~ ~ 1 TiORIS "' s°14Gf3TH s~ ~{7UTI"I ~11LLIAF~ F. IJIILL~ I! ~AFCHffECT H~L1DA'~ Ihll11 EXF'FiEa~ 33~6~ HE~lDEFI EL ~ ste 1~7 YC71~QRiADO DRlVC ~{ T/a?sfiFA, FLC~IDA 3~~'~-2~7t3 CLEAI~INATER ®EAC:H, FLP.7F`lGA +y S / R J d z .1 .. M"\Vr Mu_..n lY~\MUA2.5\KW'~PW M[+t M ~. .-r--. -. f/~/SW. ~0]..SdJ165Y.._._~.._- ~\ ~_% K'~.. ~SS m ~....e..=._.~ d ~~~ A n ~~~yjj ~ ~*} f"' EAST ELEYA71Qt~ BCAL,.E~ 1/8',1,-0• FINISHES -COLORS CONCRETE/MASONRY WALL WITH CEMENTITIOUS A FINISH PAINTED WITH "SHERWIN WILLIAM" 'HEARTS OF PALM LRV 54%' "SW 6415" A CONCRETE WALL PANELS WITH CEMENTITIOUS FINISH PAINTED WITH "SHERWIN WILLIAMS" 'HEARTS OF PALM LRV 54%' "SW 6415" STRUCTURAL RETANGULAR PORTION OF B CONCRETE COLUMN WITH CEMENTAOUS FINISH PAINTED WITH "SHERWIN WILLIAMS" 'RICE PADDY LRV 67%' "SW 6414" FLAT CEMENT ROOF TILES B FINISH PAINTED WITH "SHERWIN WILLIAMS" 'RICE PADDY LRV 67%' "SW 6414" SEMICIRCULAR PORTION COLUMN WITH C ALUMINUM FRAME AND IMPACT RESISTANT D CEMENTITIOUS FINISH PAINTED WITH "SHERWIN WILLIAMS" ' ANTIQUE WHITE' "LRV 74%' SW 6119" FASCIA C CEMENTITIOUS FINISH PAINTED WITH "SHERWIN WILLIAMS" ' ANTIQUE WHITE' "LRV 74%' SW 6119" LIGHT GREEN TINTED GLASS STOREFRONT SYSTEM, COLOR TO MATCH "SHERWIN WILLIAMS" 'EXTRA WHITE LRV 85%' "SW 7006" PTAC AIR CONDITIONING UNIT WITH EXTRUDED D ALUMINUM GRILLE WITH COLOR TO MATCH STOREFRONT FINISH. 42 INCH HIGH ALUMINUM GUARDRAIL WITH D STAINLESS STEEL AND CLEAR GLASS 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL AT ROOF DECK G OPENING INTO PARKING STRUCTURE COLOR TO MATCH "SHERWIN WILLIAMS" 'EXTRA WHITE LRV 85%' "SW 7006" D STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING WITH COLOR MATCHING "SHERWIN WILLIAMS" 'EXTRA WHITE LRV 85%' "SW 7006" 0 L ~~ b'J 1 and ioN ~~ ~~ N Z - N- G T a9 z 1 II T16lT I (~J 8 UOtyny~J L1 ~N mMt7 ~~ O'b0 O Kr ~A m~'yC ~ N n ~ a CJ ~ ~ n ~ O ~ ti ~ U ^00'OYAYSN IIaa MMM B B86-E6L (LZL) ~x) 'S3.LtlIJOSStl '~ OtlAtlZ H,LIHX aenaoaa.9a~Nr ai ou9naN9oua ~/ ~ ~ h _ + ' iV. ~ ~ 11 .sr/ ../zll ,~ yeyygy .~.T.. __ (lP0 ' 3d/NO OO YNO NOS luN.a.gyp.yi .y~-'• ~ ~ ~----- . 19p e0 iv6 9.9-1949LI4Yrt~io iv 9~r9in ~ vNUrmw+sorslN O, 6aaw~cviw~9s6~= - ~ •, :'~ ~ + F >o F'T~~ ~~io9j" r'9ral'is LapL G's.xol'iv 909TL lov m'61'ie snot :nude Nano ivaoa •^ ~ o 9ev1'dS trYR NS a'ol'i66LW9L Iasi oe'al'ie zr[vz Naav BrLOV,YddLw T'a01 .~.. ' ' ~ .... "~ Y -F'+' f - iasm s 'ire LxaL:ro6lNValaer.+~ao'aanuev s. ' Y ' ~ R .. ar ie 9a ZL ~ c Las6L .rsnoNwtrre MNI'i5066@l>IZl'W'iv 94vlt IJV ZL'01'i66LVlt Y3lN 316Yd0 a0 ~.~..r ' amu vava auB'LL YI 4 - - p s Sr tA 3 aovda zLL anode 96L m80d0lId ~ NgavnJllJ 9)IOIaVd'64 E' '~}f:l ~ \~/ 6D30 fOOa1W Ol3fBNQlf11 ~dQld ~ \ 'L1'Of3f(Df+Ellflde ^ -.._ u(s+ ~ I~io9+mi. -'~ - ~ ~¢ \ ~" ~ ~ • L J 1 ~-R ~u r ~-sr~ •+ --_ L y ~ I YID .~wn ~-u >~ 1~o'a oL li arc 'li 6L 1NUgel aas ' ~ ~ - - _ _ - _ Y ,I (7 Ore Oal li 66tlL 'Ji 6L S1LV31306 5{Sf~'Sii M ' l ' l ~ - ' ro e Da ai are li9L iNLaoN lNCtli ly'ore oa7 ai a6'x 'aisL fae aaoai aawdcwd aa+rgan ,aowd Nuws m ! , „ : •• H ~I r - 1 , E ; o _ ~' (onmrle Bvt li 6L tNaaob aas ° ~a s, ~ f°'+y~. ~~ " ' r,Lwd,ood'a61.-a ~ cr< o ~ IoNim6re zrz lioL tasval aas t l „~ a,,.~,m ~ .~q ~) ~al~ Iabafii~s li sL iHllge)1NOai IONIOVil6 13"00Y' 'list fa83x7 ~ I~uL/~ ~ ' (wl ~:,^~.o .~ ~: .~ d t aa9+noaa oasd~N~~ ~ c ~ ~ .~.v.w 4 •.1G'iS.8C.Q1rJ T/101 me3m 69ria vaonww~aiaaarraawu ~avwlcaNn wauvaonwooalaNwlaaros 3enaaeoiana6'9 w o ` o + ~' +' i~ olaw ( wio n v uidwri~,ot~~ 3en auaeaw ~~`-NOXY631alNO\.f 2BBe3b"IMa 3aRONVl3tlflali ' ~ ,_„ ~~••. ~~ 1 • C ~I (lPWY,LY/ Au /e_IMkY O Y N O M O ~ lgy~~~.J_= J ~y ~, ~I r.. ' J _ =A f i 1pNfgl l ~DNiNOZ 6 nzcc wanii M3aMW1Vi1J r~"'`I„-: .i%: ~ ~ 1 'l.+w + awn awNOaoo wL °N°"'t _ tivL00009sL5l~fli~d .e+n9s L-W (J. T+ ~ v inNVa :se~loaraoaraNe.v ~ 1 _ •°'••• wNl vWPV.e1eLW ..:•J7il' ~ {[ ilNeaugNa 996a69eR VUlIOHVdWIl ~ ~ ~t ~: ~ ~ 69t 3LI11B',N Y3LV1~pBbV 9~B111W 3WMtq.I~XaM't j t ~f~ ~re sa¢9tvICLU idf5~7,f~si raL 3urro "on°0%N~v d~il a°'^avl JJ3IMQIY X BiTIM'i IM1lM 39.111}]aN~YY L S6b®[ (!1~ .rq vvvvfvL(tzJ faeN V 110WYIIA13dIe L6YalNle'aW30YW 386fdtl3lNd Lea :I~aaN'YI3drJeOM or+'ciiN0006vvovAaz NUa,1 oNaz 9LiCl6alAi) 96665 M~11 W 6AM YIl33+OQIB 919311116 Jalg08dONe1B 99961 831N3dlltld 3NOOM e31NVdMIOJ 30YJ30 3YYNaaNMO'L IYJIdAl Cdu) 37Y7S ~/IdwO ~-.l :mss V:9lV 3dv]SONYI a0e13lNl . . 313toNLn a3somad ~ ~~ ~{. '~ r 11N3T3AYd 1T'Nd9Y 0350dDad ANYONIgB Ala3dOad - - ,1. ON303-~ ~ .`~~ ~LL ~- i t .Ln .L.we nr w. I.6 ..v ..w..9 M-9 :ACS.... w...~~..i s~ ~.., { '. ~ w+.nw ~ oI~.V1 . cw.....rt -.vi W....+i w."4M'.1. rM'.. W ~QfJ iL ~rp° r• Y ~. fJ` is ..'°'j 1. "•J u y~~~TTT O+1 ~ Ie -__ '°' ~ RL~-~~~ `I ~ ^~--r_~- . rte. ~~ `wi 9Q4F 1: ap' annvMC acnl.e { C7f7:'~'~~ z:7f:l'1S~' m I~./ .~ can iTO-I71MA00 OR/VE RM/-oFgy lbb /11"AN~cR/ ~~ .______,__sw_____. (~ _~~ PROPOSED PLlWT LIST --~ ~ ~.. ~~~- ( ~ ~d.w..~. ...a.. R..~ ..._I..n,~... wcrnsstwc L wace/ncnlY[ .wnnwc KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. I~z~~ ~v~-9xae E. STE X01 LAFETY xARBOE~E H69f Y.LLITMSATAO.COY uT rnv~a °o ww,: ~aa ~ ~aw~~ ox°o wx ~ _~ ~~`~~~ fX W U ~ O C] ~ m m O m (rx1n, ~ W ~~ ~ 0 ~ a~ p U ? ~ ~ O L NOT FOR I ~C9 OF ~ O V$TRUCTION +7~ ~~ 'Lr ~~1 w L. ~ ~wi~u LW (M.) `/ v L~N.II~M Z'JCROMA00 OR/VE`J T~ I ~~ i 1. ~_~~ ~i ,r 'i; ~_' '1y"i iP, ~~a}P, '.~~ 1r;f` n, i~ ~. ..._:~~~~ r _ r~"r"... ~ ~ Ciear+rater' Firo 8, R~cu• a ~;~- ~ - 81 G Franklin Street ~. Ciear~vatsr, Florida 3315G =,.~'~~1;•.f. 1`T~LIt~~~ Public ~,iarks Adnlinistrat3en - Englneoring Depar~•~cnt ~~~ ~i00 S. Myrtle ~4venue, Suite 2G0-• Clearwater, Fior)da 3x756 , r-z-~, ;tir`~9~~-nr r--r,+'~- gig r.- . ~.`~~G ~ .kJ. YS~~i +Y .~r~>.' i~ tSda~ '' vH 1 r ~H r ~' *~ :. `~~Y~ t~t~ ~ e~ 1 •. ~ ..~-.f.f:a~. a s .iii yi Y awe ~A~~T'd~N~d~'7"`. jRevised 03!29i~G~j "tfds !~-art~s`leei 15 rert~irad to be ~t~mitted ~ end approved by t~ Autil4rity Hating Jurisdicton (ANJ) prior to DRC neetiriy ~r~r ar.y project that 9s mrre than 3 stories ar rrara lh2r~ gq te~pt in height atRVe the ~ovwst Fire Dept vzi:icl~ access point or ar any ht"~9.* pro~eG Via: -ti~iil rewire ar 1~.atom:~5c 4tiet Siardpipe Sy;~um and:br Rre P~rri~ be~re aM~ ,~crtr,its for rew building corEstr~~ction, buudin!~ exp~si~n ar Lire h;ydrar~ts vni! be'i wed t;y the C;tq c! Gearw~er. informatjan and ~esigr rnus! comply ~„'~~ Pcrida Autitiing CodPn Chacfer ~ - F'sre Frof~ction Syster.~s Florida F~*e Pr~svtin!ic:r Code to i:nCude 2pplico de NFPA Code (NFPA 1, 13, 13th, ') 3E, 13R. 't4, 'i5, 2C~, 2~+'! an:i ? 1%.2 Annex H) tint A.N;`uVk TAI-1 i ln~~~ilati~ri, FiEld Testing 2r1d la4air-tertan~ of Pi*e I-lydraits, - _ ~t r'ro)ect !vartte PfaR ~ ~'lEiV MOTEL I'rojec`, Aderrss; 101 & 10~ C:ORC-N.4~0 S'T'REET C1:EAR''v~~ATER, FL M -~ Lc,r.:.~,tinn ct t+l~are~ Fire Hydrant: Coronado} Dr~ &: 15t Street Hydrant ~: #35 Sl~~ ~~t'+~JaterNlain Supplying Fire Fia~r. ~!` Looped Syste+r~ or Oeacl rnd WaterMaln?_ ~a-~ed ~tatic::_ ii4 p~ Resicual: ~3 psi Pi^iot: 4~ psi Fcaw: 1130 - __--9P~ 7istancs of Pest C?auges Ratative try t`?e Base of tha h~~r, Hor,'zontal X00 Ft. u~srital EievaOon G Ft •-±yutrert Test Candut~tcXi by. f;ity of` Clea:l~,~ater P~~lic Utilities, ~Vatez l~epartmer~t i,irc!ude/h~x3Gii ~~;)y aY r'+GtiiaE rest Swal} ~'.,.~ Area # Clt~s~frcetlon Descrip~~n of Hazard P,•utecled (L.omrt~oc~.yD~scr?p(kn, Srat~;eHrr~hr an7N~arg81116!Y, ?fappric&tsre,~• Hat~I Li t Hazard Hi h Rise Hate1 .1'~~kir1_g,~Ar°e~ ~• )rduiazy Hazard- park..iz~ CYar~, a---- - ~,. Ah~c4.;d;17i0r,~7r J1'~P.rst ^+eces~:,~'y Page 1 .,r 3 d~ryy, /'+ pp~h 3~ r,~ ~'r~"~- ~ ~Fr~.w~7i~,~~,~A4~r1~ ~IE' :+;,~.. ~~ + {~ ,'_._..~.,...~~.~#., ~y ~ ~ a~."~`x+,_y;,ur;~"v.~ R~n''~ :fix t ~~~""~y.3","`.~c+T°»w;]/,{Y `~,~~"~ ~ y~. ~r~ M v;~ -_ ......~..._.._........._....._..__. '"...t__1;- >, ,, F...~......:_.._a:'Yd .~,,,__~_. .. .X use +AwT ~i`r._C t~'~.~~ A.r;.e # ;~'}~s!e,;, i;,o& .Ar~H ;'sa. 't ; pr;rr~,'ty (,rpm;Y! /.~~s;~e Hosa (tlprnJ Ou!s~rse t±cist' i;~nrr~ :arid •~i e.___ --Cass I~__. .~_.... ~- ~~~~~~rri at 1 ~0 psi at triost ren:~te ~_ -- .-_.~ _..~_._._ _____ _w _. _......_.____ .~._ ~ _W__ . _~ol" of~siandprp~ and ~rja~.~ic;?ial r !. * "I`l~re standee daxt~ar3c9 is ~i~ ;~ - -- ..--.._~. ~ _{_._.___.._.._._. _ _~x~est fir;= flow ciematia tsvs~rc, eat ~aa1l have. _ ~`~zau~at t~;~.in~ ,.the ~i.r~ n~m~ Eir 1 s_+!{~o „Prated. >rl~u~~ will 1 l~~ 7x_p r . 4 F~+eh 4dr.-HUOnci ~hr;ets ~` Necrsssa~'Y ~"c~Ta' !Vt~ci~:d Fre ~~w ~fv.F'_r.} 75 ~.pn~ Is ~;xiyirly SySkerri Suil~,lyS;.,ffderlf b vle~f N F.F F.'aovei` Nco ~ Yes .~'.}+'t~.'tt7i rc~,7~:orte»t :'ip~,J}cabla NF~'A Slunc~arC1 l'i~~rin4der~sterr~ _-- NFPA 13 ~c1G~ Ed, standpipe ti~'~sten~.___ '~rl»i~',~ I~ 2U~3 l~;d. ire Pum Y 1Vl~~'~4 2U 1.99'9 Ec'. .l".~r n R arx r Ana! the sts l.` Poec;es:~ ~- i` =ro;t; Inuu!;es Firt; F'tarrtp, S~a~F~' jriw Fa!l~iti!r~~: ~` i~~~r L~~`r'on ar~c.° ~C';erAp~pl~ca;~e Ccu~s or Situ#>:.s F`re P_,rnp ir,ftmtaurrt: PUa7!~ CaNa;iiy•` 75r(1 .^-:4~'n tZBtnu 4~i'6iS.IT9: ~ I ~ ~~ ~~,;-JItE'. ~ti,rc3jye Yailll~c'~IJc'1C1~}% t~i'j: xL'$ ~I~U!!1 t3rR$~.:rF3 Pressure ~ 1 ,`rJ`,~ Flow: $'~ ~.~ ~~1~ ~9I ~~ r ~j~'~ ~; ~~ ~ ,_.~`.~Sy~.~;~:>:a?f~~.,~'lYy1~R31'I, X'~•~' i ,~ Si r: <w _ W:a t ~'r`~~ ~ ,, ~ , vw. ' ~ ;'"~. ~ y ,~~ r~re;',arer ~~me: -- J.4.?~-~[ES :tip. C'fJ=-~ ~r3:~, P.I/. ~-----_-__ ..___.._ .,~._.._..~ .~ , Ga~-~panY t~am~ 3:~.lu~S IVC. C;U`R~ ~ P.E. P.4 airtc kd,:;re:~s° ~9 % /S F3~ Y~:;:~ilU ;~T~. G:.iiy: ~.~'ir:.E• CI'7Y s t a ~4 : F.I.,tl.4'~ 1 LEA _._.___.~__ _ _ ~l a . ~1 s ~ 7 ~----~.r~..------ _ , aa~a2 d' 3 W 1, iw1.11~ i•~'~j ~~ ~.~ i ii ~~~r ~.'~ ~~Yri~A~' !~?G~. ~,b~ i'~- c~ ~5~~,~~. ~-ur:~lU UIf.L1~1G~ ~'NUL G.`, `.,~~ `, `\ ~.;'~ .I --. y --' ~!~- ~ %, ~, :~f, °'.; ('3:1;x-'.>L't FJUl: (JcY, Stl3-t'96 Fi~E Sf;FE; Y !NC d~si g r,~f res cafe ty-i r~ 4. cam P. Gi 130X 173 Cl.k;f~R'il1fATEF~. ~~~ 337&~ 2~-523-' 8~D3 A SERV aCE __.~ ~'inr~ra Ragiat.ra•~:ar: ~ X791? f _~___~ ~_ 2977h B~,Y1~E~ R:%AD ,i:? \,\ .^s '- ~~ ~:~ ~ ~a ~•~ cry r=, ra tr ~.~ ,~~ .~~~ <, ,, Jr~i~ f~Jt;r~~~, H' ~C.!R7'VlEb'~ HC r ~1.. u:.il~:~ir,t3 f~i01'~i. ~.ocaton 1Ji ~ ?~5 CC~~O(r'A[~~.~ Ln ~v~tern cT~aNUrlr~E= C~~'i,. ~ f N/A ~:LE~,i~VU~I?`F~F~, FL ~:! C~7 4rr,7 <.:b a ~ ~; ~a u.:: ;~= ,~.. ~ ~~ •~ ~~ fir. rc,r,; dor Drr~.~•orne V•:v 4.i.,n.•afnn Ir.,. tJr„~~.~ ~~+°~ t,9 fiov~l, .. °.-. r. ~, i IC f. fi~nV7 ~-~~i: JADE ~y'f IhrL:. P~t~B ~~ ~-ii i-'~~~~~~i4~;r~ ~3CITr!- ~...,A..~. Cate Ozl'7fJ9 ._a_.~.__..„.._.. xx~y~Al~l.I~ l,ssr~cv I. b1E!:~Rr13, rare s~vr~:7 N~3rte - °C~ft'.'tiiIE4ti :irJ^.'~'L L~atp - 3!7!dUi?i+ :.,,c;ari~~n - i.0: ~ 1:~5 ~Jf.ONAC'.`% G:i CLEAROIA':'~,R, e'L Ei~t!a'?i.n!1 - N'JTc;i., S+S%@ql N~>. - S4r~D2IPr Contras*^r - +;I~pt~ar~C No. - N+'A ~~ 1 ' uI r r 7~ ~._?YP.OiJ SCOTT i~°?',v l!lC~ ~]C . - !'2 :'c, rin~:i~.y - tVPPA-ls LTGf^T HA~AUC` 6 R 5~'~:'N'1'L~!L l:i .. '~C ; ^;eC'A. . ~ t~a~.rrru.ler of ~'t~~n~i~^.i~~es i t l f%} ~ i ( } 9 ! i q `~ ;:%fi~c.ifi:: k~.zi~ng hiaci2 key ,~, Late E Float a~, 'ion Mv~t I.~ut1~:t - 5vU Gp~r.-. .. _- Sy'StE.r:? T}ape "9 ~r.~s aC Tov Mc:4t Outlet - 1CQ Ps.. (X} Wet i Dr.p F~~>h kor Ea. ?idditicr:a~i tand•p~ - ~_iC) GX,u, G "'clal Adr:it:oral "_cc~+~ - ?~~0 G~~!tt E L1°~.+~tl~;: „C. iii~i?es?: Outlet -- 5fi' -C' feet S HcsF ',!alvw ::<~:,ra~tlo:r 1 1/7.'" ;X72 l%2• t t:iM~'r :a ::~~+Lc'e ;kfT i .' Y:i ( IIII r_,' ta~,r ~ : r} C'ai.~~,c:' at1,':': ':~~.1T~ RByLire~ ;:, 1) e5i Re~I.a ~e~ 56 ~~~ ':"v':^t. SIL~~m«r~' ..-Fcc_cr iJssd: C;~~ex•hc~~~.d L2C U'n~er,'round 1~~ 'Hate: F'1r~~ Test F?zmia r?dt.a: T'ark ox n.eser~~roir: :' ~[7r1'.t! 7X~ T:~St. r'lc,~!' Vi`u'~'ii~ L~.dT:'~~. Gap. !"~1, ~'12`?. ~: r~~u"tit' tr'~.i! - 6~ @ Psi 115 F. R.E.^iclu«1 I,i'8I) - 5.3 F;le?~~ 12 P:E11 Flc«a (G~r+,j - 213 Prove Flow G;~,rn c r;l.evatiar: - F' Lr"%ir~ii`^,: MY'J~k~e"' #'i :;:~CR'1'LD nT CO:~Cni~7C d UE''JC>1~ ST~iEE",.' fSF:F' AT'I'~~HED _ ^7Af-'~ j :utr.r•~e :,~ Zi1fr~~,~~-:.cr:; C71"1 r?F C'LI;~~,RWuT~:~r. t9ATc~A. D EPAF.R`MEtJi Y f`r.r„r,,r+ur Prw~ramc h„ Hur~:a'1r ~nr Rnu?a 151 .hlin+rhnrn fil L: I ICQ nar•,n~~ ~p~ ~ r7a e 021 i t1~a ''~fiy VtJater Supply: G i -• : S?'iC F'rasSt~fF~ F4 GZ ~ Resic;~tai Pressure: ~>s Gt - tiPSiCiual Fiokt.! : t 1;i(7 City Water Ad t~steci to Pump i; tlei ic~r rf - ~ie~4, - ~tose Flt;w P,-! -Adjusted St~tc: 52.8113 A2 - ASR Rcsid :43.1767 (~ 750 :~3 - AcfJ f~eS,r-r 32.1 ~ 1 i25 G•l ~ 1` 18 P 1 E8 R 154 E 1:{? ~z~ S ~i 12 i.d 98 R 84 %J Q6 28 74 a ti..,~ i r,v:.i "14UU i tit7~ F~OVV (fit ^ 1 85 j 3~Q~ ~,j~; . C-ada: P4 - Pump Raga Pressure -j 1~. P2 -Pump Rated Flaw ; ~0 P3 -Pump Pressure ~~ AAax Flow . 74 T5 P3 -Pump (U;ax Flow _ ~ 1 725 tdit?~ Residual Flaw 9 = 292'.31 City ~'Iraier ~ 150°~o et ~u~r~p = 253 ~9~ Demand ~ -~_~ D1 - Fe~,atic;r i)2 -System Fl~r;~,+ 4? 47Fi 75L D2 -System Pressure 1 S5.n9~? Hose Ad) City Hose ~ C3ernan~f j - -- D3 - System Dmar,r ~ 7~__~ , -~a~i}f Marglr-4 ~.~%~ ~~.~ ~ ^ a~ ~,~~- I - - ~-+ _ ___ - ~` ;- _ ~_ _ ~ ~ ~..~. -- ~'- -- - - ~ + P2 -- __._ ----_~__ -- ---~~--- -- f ---- - ~---- --~--- ---- - - ----- ~__ _.-_ _._,~ - -- _.v._ ~ -- - - ------- 4 i-- -- _ - - - - --__--.- c ~~,~-_ __~ ~. -__ --------- __--------- - _ ----- --- - __~ `_.. _ F-- -- I_ __ ---- - ..-V. -.~.--~L" ~.~..__ _ _~. _- - __ __~.~-~".~ -- _.__.. __.~.~.__~_ - - ___.- __ ~ _..- _.__ F_.y _J -t -- - l ~ --~ ! ------} ------____. _ _ --_- ~ -- ! - - __ ~_-I --- v A -- ~_~ -_ -_~ `~"~ 2 -~ ~ ~ - - - _. ~ ~__. -- __ __ _i_ _ - R~1 - - "~ _~ ---- A3 ~_`~ - ---- ___.. ___ - t ---- -- -__-~ --~ ~ - f ~ I ~ --_--_- - --.__~.. - __~. -- -_ ___.__-- ._ - ~ , I ._~. - - -- ------- -- - -- - ~ f ?f )tl d oll ~~ 7n u nn . ~.,., ~ ---- - - -- - -- ~ . , ~~t Computer I'rograrns h; Hyrira(e~~ Inc. ~coute 1? ~ VL°iadham N.N. 13~A Q~~JP,7 a.. __ _ ~~ ri _: .. al+~ FINE? ~~afrt3~', 1rIC. Ct:,. h~i n.ynJ`, ~ 1~ I. ~.'i f lOW ~I~~f ~;'i'~! ~~~t ~~~'~.TY ~r~'c. ~ Fagg :~ ti! ,PVPTV~E:L'J H~J ~ ~L Date u227Q~ <~a r+~sa ~ r 3 ASV 5^r 's0 $6C ESQ 750 ~s;i PM„4N s ,.. larir- TES7 '30 C:nn:n~~i~r Prnnrarr: hs~ N~~~1r:atnr-!.~; F?nida ^,1i 1.1 F,~~.~Vh..n. n~ t.~ i sin n~a~,p; N! PQR i ~'!FV'r t~J~~!- Wage 4 CJdtF? c~221C~~ - ' E=~:bna LP.~enr Ab~~ev. ,d:3me ~ ,. , ____ - ,., ---- fi i; - + i t ;~ tq ?8 1FS ?n -----.. 2~t _ _ Fs Gene~c s~rft~•~~y V live „ i. f~ n ~ -' y ~ ~ 3 + a 4 S tc~ G ~ ri ~a ~ -~~ 12 ;s Zi c~ a n c r „ , J Generic: Gate b'alue 4 0 ti f) t7 n ~ ~ ' E t ifi 1~ 1 fi 18 ~ 2 27 35 dfo d~~ `,C~ - &2 . Genetic Si~~ir?~ Chr~k iffy 4 S 5 7 ~ ' 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 'f0 t1 ' T eta' Flour Tt~ru T~•F ;~ 4 ? ~ $ i0 t4 !6 t? i5 t8 t~ 1~ 2:2 c? 32 45 15 6~ 7(i i~7 S^e Oft ;s 13`J :• _ ?5 3C; 35 ;iG b0 7i 81 yi i;)1 is?1 .-° :i ~ t Vl,ity J~tr~rri~t~ ~,' .~, Dianne±er l1r.ts Inches i4 ~: L~n~th Drifts Feet ,_._. ~"!ow' ~inifs t~'S Qailo^u per tJ;inute 1 ~r£'S~sff+ l.Sr:ltS P't3t.rlcls ~apr Square ~nCh ~}mn.,*,~r Rrograms yy Hydratec tnc. Route t ~1 Windham M.H. USA C}30g7 ,. _ .., ..--- .!T~ ._ ._ ~~l' !'i:P `„~~r~gql;;:yp, lilt. ~~, I~ _ ~,~;~~h~ _ 4 ~~~~~~J~r~ J ~~l.~til~r st.+i~'ll'T":al'y - J~/~~~IvV!'~n~ F1hE S,~:F~.~_Y ItJC. ~ F~gE 5 M. P~I,~TVI~VV ~E~TEi_ Date 022700 I`dOde F18vc":(C~~ K-i=8tii Pi c7r1 Flovr G~ersify Q:~d PttiSS ~'~ _ A,ctu~i Actu:~l _._ _. Freq. 3 9[,r' 114,83 n,~ faCS1 9~ t7 1CQ,0 rig SJQ.a, 2 ~5 0 104..'2 na 3 ~;~;.L? i 15.34 na 4 12.() 154.19 n~ Fn„P~~ '2 U 155.09 ne P ~r':PI 1?. C 43.Di n9 5 1 .u 43.42 na hFu I~~~xrm~~rt1 ~telocity is 3.51 and it occurs in tha pips t~etween nodes HOS1 and ?. /',.mnr.f or Grnnr~mr f.{; i.dvN~aeo~ Inn ~J n;e~a • {h ii...-ln ~x n. ~i i..l 1 ~C.{ ,^'~I1R? . - _._ ... _. .- .,-- -.. ,~... ~~~, .roc, .. ~~~~ ._,_~__. ... ri~~! C~l;~ulat,~r,s .. '~~"z~f1-'J'~tf!liams FI~'c~: SArr~7Y Id'dG ~ wGr~c-.-., n F1! F'C!~1"1Cl~':L' HCTE1. (7~fe O227U~9 WM__..Y N'+~ ~~ Via: iri#tr;y Pipe 1't Pt ~.F;#. „~., GC ~tr1~~5 ~'G' ~L' a,~w.*.~ NOIeS •,~,:~tr ~',ii~1t ~it l~1~'Ft E~IV !_.', ~Gt~3f ~# f/,rr F~ ~ti.2 2501.00 2.469 1 T 12.(} 0.33() ^ ,; : •i -r' 7 ~::#a •° 25^u.OC~ #o ;2G U.~J 12.UOC- U.G J ~S~~.Ci t1.2•!/~ _r Q 1~.J~(J 7.FJ~+~ __ VPi 1~ 75 5 ti, s1 4,26 1 T ` 26.' ? 3 4 G7.54G ~ri4: £ s3~ 4G ~12V / ~ y iV [ ; 1 L.V.Jv L.~~}:JC,1( ( y (x}.1.7 3 ~5C C~ (l J151 U.C ;~3.5Cii Ct,5p7 Vei - . _ . 5,63 C~ {;+ 2'~,:;,Ut~ 11`~ 340 K ~actu~` = 23.23 • HUB s SGJ.f~U 2,`59 'i E 3.(: G.33~O 1OG.U0G : {:2at 500 CO . .r ' 2G J.0 F,.OOU C1.u SuO.O O.T,'r 8 ~ .. ... . 0: `~ _-_ ._._. 6.:s3C ... `t .91 i3 ._ -- - ... __ - - .. Ve! - _ ._. 33.51 2 G.C~ 4.26 2~ ?.0.334 1OZ~25O _ 104.9 i 6 to "2Ci '. ~ 2.&:33 26.96' t7.C ~~L~C .0 0.0545 a.O 1 a ~ .~ 17 1 J.424 Ve! = i ~ .25 3 2~~G.t70~ 6.35i 4~ 7Q 411 7u.95O 195.340 ,~. 12G 0.{~ 7G.4 ;1 3F.3bG 4 ~ 7~U: 0 ~J,U1G~4 G.Q 15v.3Ci1 ~.47'~~ Ve! = 7.55 ^ try ':20 ' S 4G.23a• 52.(SC°S 0,0 (~,~'r~Cl r 5~0 U U.'J164 t~..Q 54 £1J8 __~ O.9t'1 ._ _ .__.__._. 'J'ef = -_.. ._. -__. _. 7.50 _ . a. cf _.-w..__. _ __,,.75Ci,CCJ ~~55.07~~ K F~CtOC ~ b;7,2L ~V$~E?nl iJF!?1c3;'1C1 !'''reSSaCE '! J~j.l.7~f C;~;r?tir~i~ati~n F'I'es~~urF ...~.._._ _ _._. ,.. _- --- . __ -.--- _._-._ __.. w _... _ . _--_ 158,UU? __.__.._ . ______ _._. _ . Pressure ~...1 Pump Outset _ - .~.__~__ 1~h 06; ._ __. _-_.... _ . . F'~essure f~rnrr~, f'um~~ Curve -1^5,U~7O ~ressu•e t~` F~~r:~~lrret _--- ----_._.~ _._._--_ -- 43 G67 ;;API G.; t~.357 1c~ 1.7,r;C:~ 3.580 43..0157 5 'r'"=G.OQ ~;,G?64 C1.C1 2?.163 G.34ir Ve! = 7.5~~s 5 0.0 x.;57 u~ 8$.C11w 517(?~s 43.41~.~ to 12G U.C~ 8$.0114 4.r'b, 1~~~ 75(10' _ - C_C18.~ .... _ .._. _0:0 ._.._ - -- ~39.7i`~ .. .. ._2,29x._. .... _ _ ,_1iel=_. __ i•58 f_~. ~. r 0.0 ~ t; 1.~ ~ C~ 4 ;sv4 I n 5C,G4C1 ~ -4 5U ,~ sty 140 4f= 8i~ 318 °4.6~tC~ G.433 l=fixed (css - U~ T~~-f~ t~;.i _ .. .. _ ~J.'~`i44 _ _ ..._----.. _..__ ~ U,iJ ._ __ ..__ '134 Ci4(1 __ ~ _.... 1 C . ,4G __.~___ ..__ .._ . _ . Vet ~ B 0; n n ~.,~ _ 75!~_iN~_. __. _. _.. __ ._.._ _ _...._ _. _. -..-..-- -_ .._ _ . f':~-~'~7 K ~'act~ur .~ 9;'. '7 ~~~., r.~+r+, fa Gir~nra,a: F.~: tib. rirater Inr C~r.,.~„ ~, ~, .~ vin.. ~ti:, -:..- s, r..; r ion :u~-t~7 ' L's• r sr ~ I i~ J +~ I ~; ~~ I ~: I~~ . ~. ~aT 11'71 ~. ,1 °~•7417.J - - J i~ _1 _ ~ . __ ~. a 9.~ +~ 4 f~ f tocn~rr.~.. I ~r.ti 731-08 REPORTS HOLIDAY INN BEACHSIDE CLEARWATER, FL STORMWATER REPORT May 4, 2009 Prepared By: Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 (727) 793-9888 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA STORMWATER NARRATIVE Existing Conditions The total project drainage basin boundazy includes two parcels of land totaling 31,418 square feet. The existing conditions include 28,342 square feet of impervious azea and 3,076 square feet of open space. Both pazcels drain directly to the boundary limits of the project site with no stormwater treatment or attenuation. Proposed Conditions The northern pazcel of the project includes 20,418 squaze feet of project drainage basin azea. The proposed motel includes a stormwater vault within the pazking garage to provide stormwater treatment of the first 3/4" of runoff from the project site. The stormwater vault dischazges through a modified "E" inlet control structure and through a 15" underground conveyance pipe. The pipe dischazges through the existing seawall to Clearwater Bay. The southern pazcel of the project includes 11,000 squaze feet of project drainage basin azea. The proposed improvements include a paved pazking lot and stormwater pond. Upon treatment of the first %Z" of runoff from the project site, the pond dischazges via a modified "E" inlet control structure. The control structure is connected to an existing inlet within the Coronado Drive right of way via a proposed 15" pipe. The control structure vertical weir attenuates the post condition peak dischazge from the 25 yeaz 24 hour storm event so as not to exceed the precondition peak discharge. The pre-condition CN number was calculated based on %Z credit for the existing impervious azea within the south pazcel. CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 Req'd Treatment 2 Attenuation HI Express Parcel B 731-08 STORMWATER CALCULATIONS 4/13/2009 Acreage Square Feet 1/2 inch Cu Feet Acre Feet 0.253 11,000 0.5 458 0.011 <Amount needed to treat FDOT ZONE VI: Tc=60 min i=3.7 inches per hour C existing calculation: Square Feet C 5000 Existing impervious area (sf) @ 0.49 2450 Existing gravel areas (SF) @ 0.50 0 0 Existing pond area (sf) @ 1.00 0 6000 Existing pervious area (sf) @ 0.20 1200 sum 3650 0.33 <Existing C C proposed calculation: 5300 Impervious area (sf) @ 0.95 0.95 5035 0 Gravel areas (SF) @ 0.5 0.50 0 2663 Pond area (sf) @ 1.0 1.00 2663 3037 Pervious area (sf) @ 0.2 0.20 607.4 sum 8305.4 0.76 <Proposed C Volume needed = tiA (Cp -Ce) t 3600 i 3.7 A 11000 Cp 0.76 Cu Feet (Acre Feet) Ce 0.33 1424 0.033 <Volume needed for storage Pond Treatment Elevation 3.77 Water table 2.5 Pond Bottom Elevation: 3.50 Area of Pond at Treatments 1,842.00 0.04 K sand ermeabil ,ft er hr : 0.21 rea of Pond at Bo ttoms 1,615.00 0.04 Side Sloe 4 Safe Factor dimensionless : 2 Increment 0.50 lavg V AVG. FLOW AREA OF AVERAGE 4T ET E h~ Ah TOTAL ENGTH THR HYDRAULIC OND SOTTO FLOW FLOW INCR. TOTAL ELEV. TOTAL HEAD INCR. HEAD VOLUME OND SOTTO GRADIENT A=(L)(h) Q=KiA (Q1+02)/2 TIME TIME (NGVD) (ft) (ft) (cf) (ft) i=h/lag (ft`) (cfh) (cfh) (hrs.) (hrs.) 3.770 ........................................... 1:020 ............... 0:014 . 467 2.00 0.510 0.0 0.0 0 0 3.757 ......................... 1:007 ............ ............. 0.0135 . . 442 2.00 ............................. 0.503 1615.0 85.3 ........................ 42.67 ........................ 0.581 ........................ 0.581 3.743 ........................................... 0:993 ............... ..................... 0.0135 . ......... 417 2.00 ............................. 0.497 1615.0 84.2 ........................ 84.77 ........................ 0.291 ........................ 0.872 3.730 ........................................... 0:980 ............... ............ 0:0135 . .. ...... 393 2.00 ............................. 0.490 1615.0 83.0 ........................ 83.62 ........................ 0.293 ........................ 1.164 ...............3.716 ......................... ......0:966 ............ ............... ...,..,0:0135 . ..... .. . 368 2.00 ............................. 0.483 1615.0 81.9 ........................ 82.48 ........................ 0.295 ........................ 1.459 3:703 ....................... 0:953 ............ . ...... 0:0135 . ..,.,_._.....,. .............., 344 2.00 ............................. 0.476 1615.0 80.8 ............:........... 8133 ........................ 0.297 ........................ 1.757 .3:689 ............... 0:939 . ............ . .............. 0:0135 . ............... 320 2.00 ............................. 0.470 1615.0 79.6 ........................ 80.19 ........................ 0.300 ........................ 2.056 3 676 ........................................... 0.926 ................. ................... .0:0135 . . 296 2.00 ............................. 0.463 1615.0 78.5 ........................ 79.04 ........................ 0.302 ........................ 2.358 3.662 ........ ......................... 0:912 ..... . . ............. 0:0135 . ......... 273 2.00 ............................. 0.456 1615.0 77.3 ........................ 77.90 ........................ 0.304 ........................ 2.663 3.649 ......................... . . ... 0:899 ............... . . ................. 0:0135 . . ........... 249 2.00 ............................. 0.449 1615.0 76.2 ........................ 76.75 ........................ 0.307 ........................ 2.970 .3:635 .............. 0.885 ................. . .............. .0:0135 . .......... 226 2.00 ............................. 0.443 1615.0 75.0 ........................ 75.61 ........................ 0.310 ........................ 3.279 S 622 ......................... 0:872 ............ ............. ,0.0135 . . 202 2.00 ............................. 0.436 1615.0 73.9 ........................ 74.46 ........................ 0.312 ........................ 3.592 .............. 3.608 ......................... ..,._,.0:858 ............ ..................... ......., 0:0135 . . 1 79 2.00 ............................. 0.429 1615.0 72.7 ........................ 73.32 ........................ 0.315 ........................ 3.907 3:595 .............. 0.845 . ................. ................ ,0:0135 . . . ..._.......,.. . .,...........,. . 156 2.00 ............................. 0.422 1615.0 71.6 ........................ 72.18 ........................ 0.318 ....................... 4.225 3 581 ........................................... 0:831 ............ . ................ .0:0135 . . . 134 2.00 ............................. 0.416 1615.0 70.5 ........................ 71.03 ........................ 0.321 ....................... 4.546 3:568 .............. 0.818 ................ .................. .0:0135 . . 111 2.00 ............................. 0.409 1615.0 69.3 ........................ 69.89 ........................ 0.324 ........................ 4.870 3 554 ......................... .0 804 ........... .................. .0.0135 . ........ . 88 2.00 ............................. 0.402 1615.0 68.2 ........................ 68.74 ........................ 0.327 ........................ 5.197 3.541 ........................................... 0 791 ................. ............. 0:0135 . 66 2.00 ............................. 0.395 1615.0 67.0 ........................ 67.60 ........................ 0.330 ........................ 5.528 _______ 3 _527 ---------- __ _0.777 ------- .............. 0.0135 ------- . 44 2.00 ............................. 0.389 1615.0 65.9 ........................ 66.45 ........................ 0.334 ........................ 5.861 3.500 0.750 ___ 0.000 . 0 ................ .................. .2.00 . .............. -------------- 0.375 1615.0 .. . 63.6 ------------ 64.74 ----------- 0.678 ----------- 6.540 . ........................ ............... POND TREATMENT VOLUME RECOVERS IN: 6.5 HOURS NOTE: A SAFETY FACTOR OF " 2" IS APPLIED TO "K" 4 Weir Calculations Q existing C existing i 0.310615 0.3318182 Width of weir (ft) Weir factor 1.08 sn 0.092 Width of weir (inches) 1.1 A 3.7 0.253 Q 3 1.122368923 0.310615 6 Pond Elevation Summary TOB = 4.75 ft Top of Control Structure = 4.24 ft Weir Elev. = 3.77 ft Bottom Elev. = 3.50 ft 5 Elevation of weir 3.77 Stage-Storage-Perimeter PfOjeCt Name: Holiday Inn Express Parking Lot Pond Project Number: 731-08 Designer: kez Date: 4/1012009 Comments: Treatment: 0.50 in/12 x 11,000 SF = 458 CU-FT Ins) Ift) In') Area ~ Top of Bank(TOB): 2,663.0 Elevation: 4.75 Volume: 2,674 Area ~ Design High WaterIDHW): 2,235.4 Elevation: 4.24 Volume: 1,425 Area ~ Design Low WaterIDLW): 1,841.4 Elevation: 3.77 Volume: 467 Area ~ BottomlNormal Water Level(BOT/NWL): 1,615.0 Elevation: 3.50 Volume: 0 STAGE AREA VOLUME STAGE AREA VOLUME TREATMENT Inl In2) In') Itt) 1n2) Ift') VOLUME: 467 ft' 3.50 1,615.0 0.0 4.13 2,139.0 1,173.1 3.53 1,636.0 40.6 4.15 2,160.0 1,226.9 ATTENUATION 3.55 1,656.9 81.8 4.18 2,180.9 1,281.1 VOLUME: 958 ft~ 3.58 1,677.9 123.5 4.20 2,201.9 1,335.9 3.60 1,698.8 165.7 4.23 2,222.8 1,391.2 3.63 1,719.8 208.4 4.25 2,243.8 1,447.1 3.65 1,740.8 251.7 4.28 2,264.8 1,503.4 3.68 1,761.7 295.5 4.30 2,285.7 1,560.3 3.70 1,782.7 339.8 4.33 2,306.7 1,617.7 3.73 1,803.6 384.6 4.35 2,327.6 1,675.6 3.75 1,824.6 429.9 4.38 2,348.6 1,734.1 3.78 1,845.6 475.8 4.40 2,369.6 1,793.1 3.80 1,866.5 522.2 4.43 2,390.5 1,852.6 3.83 1,887.5 569.2 4.45 2,411.5 1,912.6 3.85 1,908.4 616.6 4.48 2,432.4 1,973.1 3.88 1,929.4 664.6 4.50 2,453.4 2,034.2 3.90 1,950.4 713.1 4.53 2,474.4 2,095.8 3.93 1,971.3 762.1 4.55 2,495.3 2,157.9 3.95 1,992.3 811.6 4.58 2,516.3 2,220.6 3.98 2,013.2 861.7 4.60 2,537.2 2,283.7 4.00 2,034.2 912.3 4.63 2,558.2 2,347.4 4.03 2,055.2 963.4 4.65 2,579.2 2,411.6 4.05 2,076.1 1,015.1 4.68 2,600.1 2,476.4 4.08 2,097.1 1,067.2 4.70 2,621.1 2,541.6 4.10 2,118.0 1,119.9 4.73 2,642.0 2,607.4 4.75 2,663.0 2,673.8 Stage-Storage-Perimeter PIOjeCt Name: Holiday Inn Express Vault Project Number: 731-08 Designer: kez Date: 3!2/2009 Comments: Treatment: 0.75 in/12 x 20,418 SF = 1,276 CU-FT (n') In) In') Area ~ Top of Bank(TOB): 1,276.0 Elevation: 5.25 Volume: 2,233 Area ~ Design High WaterIDHW): 1,276.0 Elevation: 4.70 Volume: 1,531 Area ~ Design Low WaterIDLW): 1,276.0 Elevation: 3.50 Volume: 0 Area ~ Bottom/Normal Water Leve11BOT/NWL): 1,276.0 Elevation: 3.50 Volume: 0 STAGE AREA VOLUME STAGE AREA VOLUME TREATMENT In) In2) In') In) InZ) ln') vol.uME: o ft' 3.50 1,276.0 0.0 4.38 1,276.0 1,116.5 3.54 1,276.0 44.7 4.41 1,276.0 1,161.2 ATTENUATION 3.57 1,276.0 89.3 4.45 1,276.0 1,205.8 VOLUME: 1,531 ft3 3.61 1,276.0 134.0 4.48 1,276.0 1,250.5 3.64 1,276.0 178.6 4.52 1,276.0 1,295.1 3.68 1,276.0 223.3 4.55 1,276.0 1,339.8 3.71 1,276.0 268.0 4.59 1,276.0 1,384.5 3.75 1,276.0 312.6 4.62 1,276.0 1,429.1 3.78 1,276.0 357.3 4.66 1,276.0 1,473.8 3.82 1,276.0 401.9 4.69 1,276.0 1,518.4 3.85 1,276.0 446.6 4.73 1,276.0 1,563.1 3.89 1,276.0 491.3 4.76 1,276.0 1,607.8 3.92 1,276.0 535.9 4.80 1,276.0 1,652.4 3.96 1,276.0 580.6 4.83 1,276.0 1,697.1 3.99 1,276.0 625.2 4.87 1,276.0 1,741.7 4.03 1,276.0 669.9 4.90 1,276.0 1,786.4 4.06 1,276.0 714.6 4.94 1,276.0 1,831.1 4.10 1,276.0 759.2 4.97 1,276.0 1,875.7 4.13 1,276.0 803.9 5.01 1,276.0 1,920.4 4.17 1,276.0 848.5 5.04 1,276.0 1,965.0 4.20 1,276.0 893.2 5.08 1,276.0 2,009.7 4.24 1,276.0 937.9 5.11 1,276.0 2,054.4 4.27 1,276.0 982.5 5.15 1,276.0 2,099.0 4.31 1,276.0 1,027.2 5.18 1,276.0 2,143.7 4.34 1,276.0 1,071.8 5.22 1,276.0 2,188.3 5.25 1,276.0 2,233.0 Holiday Inn Express (Clearwater Beach) Traffic Study Prepared by E~i~sa~rct$ J~u~-.u~erz ~ QeeaGiate~s, .~rtc. 4846 Trinidad Dr. Land O' Lakes, FL 34639 March 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pace Section 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................1 Section 2. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS .:............................................. 1 Section 3. FUTURE CONDITIONS .......................................................................................4 Section 3.1 Trip Generation ..........................................................................................4 Section 3.2 Trip Distribution ........................................................................................5 Section 3.3 Background Traffic ....................................................................................5 Section 3.4 Study Area .................................................................................:...............5 Section 3.5 Future Traffic Analysis ..............................................................................7 Section 4. CONCLUSION .................................................:.....................................................8 LIST OF TABLES Paee TABLE 1 Existing Intersections Analyses Summary ............................................................1 TABLE 2 Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis ..................................................................4 TABLE 3 Trip Generation .....................................................................................................4 TABLE 4 Future Intersections Analyses Summary ..............................................................7 TABLE 5 Future Roadway Capacity Analysis .........................................:............................7 LIST OF FIGURES Pace FIGURE 1 Project Location ....................................................................................:..................2 FIGURE Existing Traffic .......................................................................................................:3 FIGURE 3 Project Traffic Assignment ..............:......................................................................6 APPENDIX Appendix A: Concept Plan & Methodology Appendix B: Turning Movements Counts Appendix C: Existing Intersections Analyses & FDOT Generalized Tables Appendix D: Trip generation Appendix E: Future Intersections Analyses Section 1: Introduction A Holiday Inn Express proposed is in Clearwater, Florida. This property is located west of S. Gulfview Boulevard, along Coronado Drive. The Holiday Inn Express will have 108 rooms. It will replace a 22 room motel. The build-out year of the project is proposed to be 2010. The project location is shown in Figure 1. The methodology statement, including the concept plan, is included in Appendix A. The purpose of this report is to perform a detailed transportation analysis, which will evaluate the adjacent roadway network and intersections. Section 2: Existing Transportation Analysis Turning movement counts for the intersections were collected during the PM (4:00 PM - 6:00 PM) peak periods on a typical weekday (Tuesday -Thursday) of anon-holiday week at the three locations which are S. Gulfview Boulevard @ Hamden Drive, S. Gulfview Boulevard/Causeway Boulevard @ Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive @ Coronado Drive. The counts were taken from the Clearwater Beach Resort & Hotel project performed by Florida Design Consultants, Inc. Counts were adjusted to peak-season conditions based on FDOT's seasonal adjustment factors for Pinellas County. The hard copies of the turning movements counts are included in Appendix B. Table 1 summarizes the intersection delay and LOS for the PM peak hour. Figure 2 illustrates the existing turning movement counts at the intersections. For unsignalized and signalized intersections, the latest version of Highway Capacity Software (HCS+) was used for analyzing delay and Level of Service. The existing intersection analyses are included in Appendix C. Table 1-Existing Intersections Analyses Summary Intersection PM Peak Hour Type Delay sec/veh LOS S. Gulfview Boulevard @ Hamden Drive Signal 23.4 C S. Gulfview Boulevard/Causeway Boulevard @ Coronado Drive Signal 15.0 B Hamden Drive @ Coronado Drive Two-Way Stop 7.9 A Note: Level of Service of the major street left turn movement is presented jor the unsignalized intersection y 4 ~ K f' ~, f, ~ tJ Causeway Biqa ~ . ~~ ~` _,, - ~ ~ ;5 ~ h; ~ ~~~. ~~'warU Passeye 699 ~ 5p ~, ~ _ ~, ri a k~ 3 S' m. '} ~ .~~ ~ ~.' ~, ~ ~ u"'~_,. - 999 ~ _ *~ ~. x ,~F s p ~ ~ TS ~Y aYway $~~~ &i2U09 Google -1Nsp data ~2~d9~'e~k HOLIDAY INN PROJECT LOCTION FIGURE 1 ~ ~ - ~ n ~ '` ~`1 ~f w., {, Project Sit ~~~~~,: ~;~ r ' A ~' ~ s~ \y ~ to ~°"y~' ',~~ °'~.~. i °~`''4 .~ iy ~ fa~i v s~e ;ice yG,r ~; ) 1 r~~ _ ~ lb m En9h4'uate~ Dr a ff ~_ ~~~4~y a r Q >~f IIb. ~ ~ .... - ..- p ~ey~~de~r__ ~;C::: 2 181 03 1 N.T.S. 268 25 ~ 7 523 n O O z z o it d z ~ v 188 293 ~ ~ 11 415 335 G7 C r C 2 19 j r < t d J 1 414 ~ 333 56 35 379 353 25 J ~ 174 156 HOLIDAY INN PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING TRAFFIC FIGURE 2 3 Road facility limits were defined in the Methodology Statement. Table 2 provides the existing year link analysis for peak direction traffic flow. Capacities from the FDOT's Generalized Tables were used for link analysis and are included in Appendix C. The level of service standard for both roadways are Level of Service D. Table 2: Existing Links Analyses Roadway No. of PM Peak Hour Capacity Capacity Available_ Lanes Traffic EB/NB WB/SB EB/NB WB/SB EB/NB WB/SB Gulfview Boulevard: 2UL Roundabout to 293 188 760 630 Yes Yes Hamden Drive Coronado Drive: 4DL Brightwater 335 415 930 1140 Yes Yes Dr.to Hamden Drive Coronado Drive: 2UL Brightwater 335 415 420 530 Yes Yes Dr.to Gulfview Blvd. Section 3: Future Condition 3.1 Trip Generation Traffic volumes generated by the proposed development were estimated using the appropriate rates provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7'~ Edition. ITE Land Use Code 310 was used for the Hotel land uses and the net trip generation is shown in Table 3. No internal capture and pass by was applied. Trip generation from existing 22 hotel rooms was subtracted to get the net trip generation. (Hotel was used as a "worst case.") Detailed trip generation calculations are included in Appendix D. Table 3 : Trip Generation AM Peak PM Peak Land Use LUC Intensity In Out Total In Out Total Daily ,. Hotel 310 108 37 24 61 33 30 63 882 Existing Hotel 310 22 -7 -5 -12 -7 -6 -13 -180 Net Trips 30 19 49 26 24 SO 702 3.2 Trip Distribution The project traffic has been distributed to the roadway network based on manual distribution and existing counts. Based on the existing traffic counts, 51 % of the project traffic would travel to/from south of the project site and the remainder (49%) from the north. Project traffic distribution is shown in Figure 3. 3.3 Background Traffic The existing traffic count was increased by a growth factor up to the project's build out date. Based on a discussion with the City Staff, a 2% growth rate was applied to the existing counts. 3.4 Study Area Links: Gulfview Boulevard :Roundabout to Hamden Drive Coronado Drive :Causeway Boulevard to Hamden Drive Intersections (PM Peak): Coronado Drive @ Hamden Drive Gulfview Boulevard @ Hamden Drive Gulfview Boulevard @ Coronado Drive 1 1 N.T.S. 1 10 PROJECT SITE O O y O d a v z 0 z n r Driveway 1 to ~ 20 D 13 22 li 14 10 Driveway 2 13 L HOLIDAY INN PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC FIGURE 3 3.5 Future Traffrc Analysis As no committed improvements were identified in the vicinity of the project site, the future scenario analysis was performed with the existing geometry. Table 4 and Table 5 illustrate the future year analysis scenario for the intersections and links, respectively. The ratios of V/C were checked to ensure they were equal to or less than 1.0 for all individual movements. Future turning movements at the identified intersections and the print outs of the analyses are included in Appendix E. Table 4 -Future Intersections Analyses Summary Intersection PM Peak Hour Type Delay sec/veh LOS S. Gulfview Boulevard @ Hamden Drive Signal 24.4 C S. Gulfview Boulevard/Causeway Boulevard @ Coronado Drive Signal 15.9 B Hamden Drive @ Coronado Drive Two-Way Stop 8.0 A Driveway l @ 1~ Street Two-Way Stop 8.4 A Driveway 2 @ 1~` Street „-•- Two-Way Stop 8.1 A ,~~r. ~r~r~ ~~ oervrce of me mayor sneer refit turn movement is presentedJor the unsignalized intersection Based on the analysis all the identified intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable level of service. The project driveways are expected to operate at an acceptable level of service without any exclusive left and right turn lanes along the access roadway, which is ls` Street. Table 5: Future Links Analyses Roadway o, o PIvI Pe$k Hour Project Traffic Total Traffic Capacityy Capacity Available anCS Background 'Traffic ` EB/NB WB/SB EB/NB WB/SB EB/NB W$/SB EB/NB WB/S13 B/NB WB/SB Gulfview Boulevard: Roundabout to 2UL 305 196 1 1 306 197 760 630 Yes Yes Hamden Drive Coronado Drive: Brightwater Dr.to 4DL .348 432 14 13 362 445 930 1140 Yes Yes Hamden Drive orona o r-rve: Brightwater Dr.to 211E 348 432 14 13 362 445 420 530 Yes Yes Gulfview Blvd. Note: 29o Grornth Rate -nes arx~tie rl There is capacity available on the roadways adjacent to the project site. It is anticipated that the links are expected to operate at an acceptable level of service during the build out year of the project. r ,. Section 4: Conclusion The purpose of this report was to perform a detailed transportation analysis for the Holiday Inn Express project. The adjacent roadway network is expected to operate at an acceptable Level of Service with the project traffic in the year 2010. All the identified intersections and project driveways are also expected to operate at an acceptable level of service in the year 2010. No exclusive left nor right turn lanes are recommended at the driveways. ~l ~ ;~ -. ,. _ . Elizabeth Rodriguez d~ Associates, Inc. Holiday Inn Express Clearwater Beach Traffic Study Addendum April 2009 4846 Trinidad Drive Land O' Lakes. FL 34639 (813)545-3316 email: Elizabeth Rodriguez(/emaiLcom 1.0 Introduction On April 16, 2009, the developer's consultant met with City of Clearwater staff regarding the traffic study for the Holiday Inn Express-Clearwater Beach. Staff requested that- rather than calculating background traffic by applying a 2%/year growth rate to existing counts, the consultant used the 2% growth rate coupled with the "layering" of vested traffic from the Clearwater Beach Hotel and the Aqualea. Staff also asked the consultant to examine the left turn queue length for proposed driveway one, to determine whether any queue would interfere with the adjacent signalized intersection. 2.0 Background Traffic Adjustment City of Clearwater staff sent the consultant project trip generation and trip distribution from the Clearwater Beach Hotel and the Aqualea. Project trips from those hotels; inflated background trips; and Holiday Inn Express project traffic are shown in the "Attachments" section of this report. Also included in the "Attachments" section of this report, are the revised HCS analyses, which have been updated using the new background traffic. The delay at the study area intersections has increased, because of the increase in background traffic, But, all intersections are still operating within the adopted LOS standards. Tables 4 and 5 from the original report are included, herein, and are updated to depict the new background traffic. Table 4 -Future Intersections Analyses Summary Intersection. T e ~ ~ yP Delay -- ~ (sec/veh) ~ LOS Gulfview Boulevard @ Hamden Drive I Signal 26.7 _~ C Gulfview Boulevard/Causeway Boulevard @ Coronado Drive Signal 1 27.3 ~ C Hamden Drive @ Coronado Drive Two-Way Stop ~ 12 ' B Driveway 1 @ 1 g` Street ~ Two-Way Stop , 8.4 I A Driveway 2 @ 15f Street _ _ Two-Way Stop i 8.1 ~ A PM Peak Hour Table 5 -Future Links Analyses Roadway No of PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Project Traffic :Total Traffic -Capacity Capacity Available Lanes EB/NB I WB/SB - _ - - EB/NB ~ /SB EB/NBIWB/SB EBlNB WB/SB ~ EB/NB WB/SB Gulfview Blvd.: ~ 2UL 305 tl 196 306 ~ ]97 760 ~ 630 ~ 1 ~ 1 Yes Yes ' Rol undabout to Hamden Dr. 1 ; _ _ i ' ~ - --- 1 ~ --~---- ~ --- - I L - - - -- - -- I Coronado Dr:: - 4DL ~ 363 444 ~ 14 13 ~ 377 ~ 457 , 930 i 1140 ~ 1 Yes Yes Bndgewater Dr to Hamden Dr. i __~ ~ -- ~ -~- i ~ _~ Coronado Dr : 2UL 363 4 457 i 420 530 14~ 13 377 ~ Yes Yes Bridgewater Dr. to Gulfv~ew Blvd. _- ~ --- I ~ -L _ _ ~ ~ i- ~-~_ - I _ . _ L__ , ___ ~ ~ ___ - 3.0 Driveways Queues Relative to Intersection The HCS+ (unsignalized) printouts for the two driveway are included. As they show, the 95% queue lengths are almost negligible. So project traffic backing up into the adjacent intersection should not be an issue. 4.0 Conclusions The issues that were raised in the meeting have been addressed and the study area transportation facilities are expected to operate within their LOS standards with the inclusion of project traffic. Attachments Legend - Background (2008) -Holiday Inn Express Project - Clearwater Beach Hotel - Aqualea ~ ~ < ~ (D~ 196 05 9 cab, n O O O 12 ~ 4321 13 188 45 I i 91 523 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ 37 1 i 121 7 ~ 544 ~ 10 __~ 11~ ~10 22 O N ~ N i NTS !~ 40 15 2 348 20 ~ 14 ~J 15 346 14 30 58 v ~v~~ ,~ v ti"~ ~i3 30 ~,~3 367 ?s~ !_, X62 ~~~ ~~ ~, _ ~8r- Attachments Two=Way Stop Control Paige 'I~o~T_~......: ,. file:IfC`EUser~iTanzina AtqueLAppDatelt.ocaltiTer~ptu2kC5t15:tmp 2t1712(~9 __ TwaWay-Stop C~ntroi Pie i of ~ HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.3 Analyst: Agency/Co.: Date Performed: 4/28/2009 Analysis Time Period: PM Intersection: Coronado Drive@Hamden Drive Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 Project ID: Holiday Inn East/West Street: Coronado Drive North/South Street: Hamden Drive Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ~ 4 5 6 L T R i L T R Volume 375 88 60 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 394 92 63 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median TypelStorage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ~ 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 1 456 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 480 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade ($) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m} {vph) v/c 95~ queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level NB SB Westbound 1 4 ( 7 8 9 LT I 394 1540 0.26 1.02 8.1 A TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY of Service Eastbound ~ 10 11 12 I LR 481 993 0.48 2.70 12.0 B 12.0 B HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.3 Analyst Agency: Date: Period: Project E/W St: 2/25/2009 PM ID: Holiday Inn Gulfview Blvd. Inter.: Gulfview Blvd.@Hamden Dr. Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Year 2010 N/S St: Hamden Dr. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I L T R i No. Lanes ) 0 2 0 LGConfig I LT Volume 126 162 Lane Width - 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 Westbou L T 0 1 T 181 12.0 nd I Northbound R - L T R I 1 - 0 0 0 R - 411 - 12.0 1 0 1 I Southbound 1 ( L T R 1 I I I 1 0 0 I I L LR 1 1447 36 - 112.0 12.0 1 I o I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A 1 NB Left Thru A A 1 Thru Right 1 Right Peds X X - Peds X WB Left - SB Left A Thru A 1 Thru Right A 1 Right A Peds X X - Peds X NB Right i EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right A Green 15.0 40.0 38.2 Yellow 3.5 3.5 3.5 All Red 5.5 3.8 7.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 1570 3523 0.13 0.53 14.0 B 14.0 B Westbound T 621 1863 0.31 0.33 30.0 C 14.1 B R 1128 1583 0.38 0.71 7.0 A Northbound Southbound L 563 1770 0.84 0.32 48.7 D LR 504 1583 0.08 0.32 28.6 C 47.2 D Intersection Delay = 26.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C secs HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.3 Analyst: Inter.: Gulfview Blvd.@Coronado Drive Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: 2/25/2009 Jurisd: Period: PM Year 2010 Project ID: Holiday Inn E/W St: Gulfview Blvd. N/S St: Coronado Drive SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I L T R I L T R I L T R i I I No. Lanes I 1 0 1 I 0 0 0 i 0 2 0 LGConfig 1 L R I ( LT Volume 1280 26 I 18 712 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 I I 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 I i I Southbound I I L T R ( I I I 0 1 1 I I T R 1 I 660 188 I 1 12.0 12.0 1 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru I Thru A Right A I Right Peds X i Peds X WB Left 1 SB Left Thru i Thru A Right I Right Peds X I Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right A I WB Right Green 15.4 19.0 Yellow 3.5 3.5 All Red 3.8 4.8 Cycle Length: 50.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 545 1770 0.55 0.31 15.6 B 15.4 B R 488 1583 0.06 0.31 12.2 B Westbound Northbound LT 1112 2925 0.70 0.38 15.0 B 15.0 B Southbound T 708 1863 1.00 0.38 50.0 D 42.1 D R 488 1583 0.41 0.31 14.3 B Intersection Delay = 27.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C -Not a Survey- -Not to Scale- CORONADO DR CORONADO DR DEVON DR DEVON DR HAMDEN DR HAMDEN DR SECOND ST SECOND ST THIRD ST THIRD ST AERIAL MAP Owner: Decade Companies Income Properties Cases: FLD2009-03013 DVA2009-00001 Site: 101 Coronado Drive (including 105 Property Size: 0.72 acres Coronado Drive and 35 Devon Drive) PIN: 08-29-15-15606-000-0141 Atlas Page: 267A & 276A 08-29-15-00000-320-0200 08-29-15-17550-002-0012 CDB Meeting Date: May 19, 2009 Case Numbers: FLD2009-03013 (Related to DVA2009-00001) Agenda Item: E.4. (Related to F.1.) Owner/Applicant: Decade Companies Income Properties Representative: Keith Zayac, PE, RLA, LEED AP, Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Address: 101 and 105 Coronado Drive and 35 Devon Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a 108-room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to lot width along Devon Drive/First Street from 150 to 100 feet (north side) and from 150 to 110 feet (south side), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 to five feet (to proposed building) (north side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 to five feet (to proposed building) (north side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 to eight feet (to proposed pavement) (south side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 to zero feet (to existing pool deck) (north side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 to 2.5 feet (to proposed building) and 7.22 feet (to existing pool deck) (north side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 to five feet (to proposed pavement) (south side of Devon Drive/First Street), and an increase to the building height from 35 to 89 feet (to top of roof deck), under the provisions of Section 2-803.I, and approval of a two-year development order; and (2) Increase of the permitted density by the allocation of 72 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Resort Facilities High (RFH) BEACH BY DESIGN CHARACTER DISTRICT:Small Motel PROPERTY USE: Current Use:22-room motel and vacant land Proposed Use: Overnight accommodation use of a total of 108 rooms (150 rooms/acre on total site, including the allocation of 72 units from the Hotel Density Reserve) and approximately 1,500 square feet (0.048 FAR on total site) of amenities accessory to the hotel at a height of 89 feet (to roof deck) Community Development Board ? May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03013 ? Page 1 of 12 EXISTING North: Preservation (P) District City Marina SURROUNDING South: Tourist (T) District Retail sales and Overnight ZONING AND USES: accommodations East: Tourist (T) District Overnight accommodations and City parking lot West: Tourist (T) District Temporary City parking lot ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.72 acres is located on the east side of Coronado Drive at the northeast and southeast corners of Devon Drive. The site is comprised of three parcels, two on the north side of Devon Drive and one on the south side of Devon Drive. The northern portion of the subject property is currently developed with a 22- unit motel at 101 Coronado Drive (Port Vue Motel) and vacant land (formerly a 16-unit motel). The vacant area is presently being used for construction trailers for the Hyatt/Aqualea project (301 S. Gulfview Boulevard). The southern portion of the subject property is currently vacant land (formerly a 15-unit motel), also being used for construction trailers for the Hyatt/Aqualea project. The City?s beach marina exists to the north of the subject property. The Sea Captain motel is located to the east of the northern portion of the site. A City surface parking lot is located to the east of the southern portion of the site. Retail sales and overnight accommodation uses exist to the south of the subject property. The property to the west of this site has been approved by the CDB and City Council for the development of a 450-room hotel. All prior uses on this property to the west have been demolished. Currently a temporary City parking lot occupies this property. Development Proposal: The proposal is to construct a 108-unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 150 units/acre, which includes the allocation of 72 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design. This is the first hotel to be placed on the Community Development Board agenda since the amendment of Beach by Design in July 2008 creating the Hotel Density Reserve as a means to encourage the construction of new mid-size, mid-priced hotels on the beach in response to the loss of hotel rooms since 2002. Also on this CDB agenda is a companion Development Agreement (DVA2009-00001) that must be approved by City Council, which provides for the allocation of the 72 units from the Hotel Density Reserve. This Development Agreement provides for mandatory evacuation/closure of the hotel in the event of the posting of a hurricane watch including Clearwater Beach by the National Hurricane Center, which also complies with Beach by Design criteria. The applicant indicates room rates for this hotel will be in the mid-$100 to mid-$200 range. This proposal complies with the Beach by Design criteria to access all rooms through a lobby and internal corridors. The hotel is proposed on the northern portion of the site north of Devon Drive and is proposed at a height of 89 feet from the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the roof deck. The first four levels of the hotel will provide a total of 94 parking spaces, with driveway access on Devon Drive. There is an entry lobby on the ground floor providing access to the elevators. This proposal retains an existing ground-level pool located to the north of the hotel building adjacent to the City marina. There also exists a deck/dock extension of the ground-level pool into the water of the City marina, being retained under this proposal. The main lobby and registration desk is located on the fifth floor, which will monitor the ground level pool via cameras. The fifth floor also provides amenities for the hotel guests of approximately 1,500 total square feet (meeting room and exercise room) and 15 hotel rooms. Floors 6 ? 8 provide 20 hotel rooms per floor. The ninth floor provides 18 hotel rooms. The tenth floor provides 15 hotel rooms, a rooftop pool and a small tiki bar. Full kitchens are proposed in 12 hotel rooms (11.1 percent of the total number of rooms), which is Community Development Board ? May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03013 ? Page 2 of 12 below the maximum of 25 percent allowable under Beach by Design. The top of the tiki bar will be below the maximum District height of 100 feet, in compliance with the restriction under the definition of building height for rooftop occupancy structures. The ramp to obtain access between parking levels is located on the east side of the building. All parking garage levels will be open on the north, west and south sides, but the garage will be closed (solid wall) on the east side due to Building Code requirements. Balconies are provided for guest rooms facing north and east, but guest rooms facing Coronado Drive will not have balconies. The main exterior color of the building is a light green (heart of palm). Wall accents and the entry roof tiles will be a lighter shade of green (rice paddy), while the circular columns and facia will be antique white. The window frames, railings and metal roofs will be white. The building is proposed to be set back five feet from the Coronado Drive and Devon Drive property lines. The proposal includes a zero side setback from the north property line in order to retain the existing ground-level pool and pool deck as an amenity for the hotel guests. The proposal also includes a 2.5-foot side setback to the east property line, measured to two building bump-outs designed to break up the linear façade on the east side of the building, as required by the Beach by Design design guidelines. The maximum width of these bump-outs is approximately 22 feet. This 2.5-foot side setback is also for only the first four floors that are the parking garage. Protruding columns from the face of the wall are set back a minimum of 6.1 feet to the east property line, while the majority of the east wall of the building is set back approximately 7.3 feet. This eastern wall of the building is also not set back continuously from the ground to the top of the building, but rather the building steps back from north to south. The northernmost 47 feet of the building is at the setbacks mentioned, but on the fifth through tenth floors the first guest room steps back 8?-10? from this eastern wall face. The southernmost seven guest rooms are further stepped back an additional 5?-2?. Therefore, a majority of the building at the fifth floor and above is set back approximately 21.3 feet from the east property line. The proposed 89-foot building height for this project transitions building height from the highest on the west side of Coronado Drive (Kiran Grande ? 150-foot maximum height) to the detached dwellings to the east of this site (30-foot maximum height). A surface parking lot of 18 spaces is proposed on the southern portion of the site south of Devon Drive, with driveway access on Devon Drive. This surface parking lot has been designed meeting the front setback from Coronado Drive and the eastern side setback. Setback reductions for this surface parking lot are requested on the south side and on the north side from Devon Drive. A stormwater retention pond is proposed between the parking lot and Coronado Drive. A City parking lot is located to the east of this proposed surface parking lot. The applicant is requesting a two-year development order due to market conditions. Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4-407 specifies that an application for a building permit must be submitted within one year of the date the CDB approves the project, unless otherwise specified under this approval. Density: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 50 overnight accommodation units per acre. Based on the 0.72 overall acres zoned Tourist District, a maximum of 36 overnight accommodation units are permissible under current regulations. The proposal also requests 72 hotel rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve, adopted as an amendment to Beach by Design under Ordinance 7925-08. The overall density for this project is 150 overnight accommodation units/rooms per acre, which meets the maximum established in Beach by Design for projects that have acquired units from the Hotel Density Reserve. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The overall proposed I.S.R. is 0.60, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Community Development Board ? May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03013 ? Page 3 of 12 Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum lot area for overnight accommodations can range between 10,000 ? 20,000 square feet. The overall existing site is 31,418 square feet of lot area. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for overnight accommodations can range between 100 ? 150 feet. For the northern portion of the site, the lot width along Coronado Drive is approximately 225 feet and along Devon Drive the lot width is 100 feet. For the southern portion of the site, the lot width along Coronado Drive is 100 feet and along Devon Drive the lot width is 110 feet. The lot width reduction does not produce a building that is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity. The existing two-story motel to the east at 40 Devon Drive is approximately five feet from the common property line. Other existing motels and retail sales buildings are located very close to property lines. The approved but not yet constructed Kiran Grande hotel across the street at 100 Coronado Drive will have two towers at a height of 150 feet joined by a connecting wing at a height of 95 feet. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum front setback for overnight accommodations can range between 0 ? 15 feet and the minimum side setback can range between 0 ? 10 feet (structures on corner lots must meet front setbacks along rights-of-way and meet side setbacks adjacent to the other property lines). The proposal includes a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 to five feet (to proposed building) (north side of Devon Drive), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 to five feet (to proposed building) (north side of Devon Drive), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 to eight feet (to proposed pavement) (south side of Devon Drive), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 to zero feet (to existing pool deck) (north side of Devon Drive), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 to 2.5 feet (to proposed building) and 7.22 feet (to existing pool deck) (north side of Devon Drive), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 to five feet (to proposed pavement) (south side of Devon Drive). With regard to the proposed development on the north side of Devon Drive, the building will be set back five feet from the Coronado Drive and Devon Drive property lines, within the flexibility range and where the minimum five-foot wide foundation landscape area is being provided. The proposal includes a zero- foot side setback from the north property line. This setback reflects the applicant?s desire to retain the existing ground-level pool and pool deck as an amenity for the hotel guests. The proposal also includes a 2.5-foot side setback to the east property line. This setback is measured to two building bump-outs designed to break up the linear façade on the east side of the building, as required by the Beach by Design design guidelines. The maximum width of these bump-outs is approximately 22 feet. This 2.5-foot side setback is also for only the first four floors of the parking garage. Protruding columns from the face of the wall are set back a minimum of 6.1 feet from the east property line. The majority of the east wall of the building is set back approximately 7.3 feet from the east property line. The eastern wall of the building is not set back continuously at previously mentioned from the ground to the top of the building, but rather the building steps back from north to south. The northernmost 47 feet of the building is at the setbacks mentioned, but on the fifth through tenth floors the first guest room steps back 8?-10? from this eastern wall face. The seven southernmost guest rooms are further stepped back an additional 5?-2?. Therefore, a majority of the building at the fifth floor and above is set back approximately 21.3 feet from the east property line. From a design perspective, the proposed setbacks must be reviewed in relation to the dimensional requirements for parking lots and the need for building structure in relation to the east/west 100-foot lot width. In order to provide a double-loaded drive aisle (18-foot long parking spaces on either side of a 24-foot wide drive aisle) with a necessary two-way, 24-foot wide ramp between floors, a width of 84 feet is necessary and leaves 16 feet for building structure and setbacks to property lines. The proposed design represents an efficient parking area where foundation landscape requirements adjacent to streets have not been reduced. Community Development Board ? May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03013 ? Page 4 of 12 With regard to the proposed development on the south side of Devon Drive, the surface parking lot will be set back 39 feet from the Coronado Drive property line, exceeding the minimum front setback requirement. The parking lot will also be set back 10 feet from the east property line in compliance with the minimum side setback requirement. A five-foot setback from the south property line to the backup flair for the end parking spaces is proposed. The pavement for the parking spaces themselves complies with the side setback requirement. Based on the desire to provide parking in excess of the minimum Code requirements to ensure adequate employee parking and based on the dimensional requirements for the width of parking spaces, the parking lot is proposed at an eight-foot front setback from the Devon Drive property line. The City parking lot to the east of this proposed surface parking lot was approved at a front setback of 15 feet. The proposed eight-foot front setback from Devon Drive provides a more efficient off-street parking area by providing adequate parking spaces for hotel employees. There is no perimeter landscape buffer requirement in the Tourist District; therefore there is no loss of required landscaping. Due to this southern portion of the project being a surface parking lot, it is acknowledged that the reduced setback does not contribute to a more active and dynamic street life, but the need for adequate parking is a more significant factor. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the maximum allowable height for overnight accommodations can range between 35 ? 100 feet. The proposed building is 89 feet in height from Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the flat roof, which is below the Code maximum. This site is located within the Small Motel character district of Beach by Design, which does not prescribe any maximum heights for this area. Good planning practice is to transition building heights from a compatibility standpoint. The Community Development Board approved the Kiran Grand overnight accommodation project at 100 Coronado Drive on October 21, 2008, with a 150-foot building height (Case No. FLD2008-05013). The detached dwellings on Devon Drive to the east of this site are zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District where the maximum building height is 30 feet. The proposed building height for this project transitions building height from the highest on the west side of Coronado Drive to the detached dwellings to the east of this site. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum required parking for overnight accommodations is one parking space per room, or a minimum of 108 parking spaces. The proposal includes constructing a total of 112 parking spaces. On the southern portion of the site, 18 surface parking spaces are proposed. On the northern portion of the site as part of the hotel, a total of 94 parking spaces on four floors in a parking garage are proposed. From an amenities standpoint accessory to the hotel, the proposal includes a meeting room of approximately 1,050 square feet and an exercise room of approximately 450 square feet, or a total of approximately 1,500 square feet. There is no restaurant proposed within this hotel. With such minimal amenities, the provided parking appears adequate for both hotel guests and employees. This proposal will take driveway access from Devon Drive for both the northern and southern portions of the site. Existing driveways on Coronado Drive will be removed. Sidewalks will be constructed for the site frontages along Devon Drive. A small portion of the existing public sidewalk on Coronado Drive has been constructed on the subject property. An easement for this encroachment will be required prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. There will be mechanical equipment located on top of the flat roof of the building for the common areas of the building. The parapets surrounding the roof are only one-foot above the roof. Depending on the location of such mechanical equipment in relation to the outside walls of the hotel, the parapet may be insufficient to screen Community Development Board ? May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03013 ? Page 5 of 12 the mechanical equipment and additional screening may be required. This will be reviewed at time of the building permit submission. In-wall individual air conditioners will be provided for each hotel room and will blend in with the façade of the building. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the driveways on, and the street intersection of Coronado Drive and Devon Drive, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20- foot sight visibility triangles. The hotel building is proposed within the sight visibility triangles. These encroachments have been reviewed by the City?s Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable, given the circumstances of this site. Shrubbery planted within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-911, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines for this hotel will be installed underground on-site in compliance with this requirement. There exist overhead utility lines within the right-of-way along the north side of Devon Drive and along the east side of the southern portion of the site. The proposal will underground these existing overhead lines along the site frontage on Devon Drive. Electric panels, boxes and meters are proposed to be located on the second floor of the parking garage adjacent to the southern stairwell. To ensure views of these electrical equipment are minimized, since the walls for the parking garage at this location are not full walls, this electrical equipment should be painted the same color as the building. Landscaping: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District for this overall site. This proposal complies with the minimum five-foot wide building foundation landscaping along Coronado Drive and Devon Drive, which will be planted with a variegated pittosporum hedge with wedelia groundcover, together with cabbage palms. Landscaping assists with softening and reducing building massing to both pedestrians and motorists. There is a large landscaped area on the north side of the proposed building and west of the existing ground-level pool. This proposal complies with the interior landscape area requirements for the surface parking lot on the southern portion of the site, placing landscaping around the perimeter of the parking lot for screening of the parked vehicles and providing trees appropriately spaced for shading of the parking lot and for visual appeal. Two live oak trees are proposed on the west side of the surface parking lot, while cabbage palms are proposed on other sides of the parking lot. Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize hotel housekeeping staff to remove trash from units and transport the trash to the dumpster(s) housed in a storage room on the ground floor of the hotel. On trash days, hotel employees will place the dumpster(s) outside the building in a trash staging area for truck pickup. After dumping, hotel employees will roll the dumpster(s) back inside the building out of view. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City?s Solid Waste Department. Signage: The proposal includes a freestanding sign located on the northern portion of the site adjacent to the City marina. This freestanding sign should be designed as a monument-style sign, match the exterior materials and color of the building and be a maximum height of four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program, in accordance with the flexibility criteria of CDC Section 2- 803.I.3. Attached signage must meet Code requirements. Additional Beach by Design Guidelines: Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical Community Development Board ? May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03013 ? Page 6 of 12 or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building footprint is approximately 12,875 square feet. The project?s overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately 154 feet along Coronado Drive and 86 feet along the Devon Drive, while the vertical plane is approximately 96 feet from grade to the top of the tallest roof. None of these dimensions are equal. Modulation of the building massing, especially on the eastern façade, also provides considerable dimensional variation. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. The west façade of the building has been designed with a linear dimension of approximately 95 feet for the ?center? portion of the building. The southern stairwell is indented breaking the linear plane on the south side. An indentation at the elevator lobbies breaks this linear plane on the north side. The east façade of the building has been designed with a linear dimension of approximately 95 feet between bump-outs from the parking garage levels one through four. At the fifth through tenth floors the northernmost portion of the building extends southward 47 feet before the first guest room steps back 8?-10? from this eastern wall face. The southernmost seven guest rooms are further stepped back an additional 5?-2?, which represents a linear façade of approximately 94 feet. The south façade length is approximately 86 feet for the first through fourth floors, reducing to 72 feet for the fifth through tenth floors. The north façade length is approximately 86 feet. Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The applicant has calculated the west elevation at 75 percent with 10 percent open to the parking garage, the north elevation at 79 percent with 12 percent open to the parking garage, the east elevation at 70 percent, with no openings for the parking garage due to Building Code requirements, and the south elevation at 62 percent with 37 percent open to the parking garage. Section C.4 provide that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelop located above 45 feet be occupied by a building. The applicant has calculated the overall proposed building mass between 45 ? 100 feet at 41.76 percent, approximately two-thirds of the maximum permissible. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board ? May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03013 ? Page 7 of 12 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use (hotel) with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent 2 Density 50 units/rooms per acre 108 units/rooms X 1 (maximum of 36 units/rooms) (150 units/rooms per acre) Impervious Surface 0.95 0.60 X Ratio Minimum Lot Area 10,000 ? 20,000 sq. ft. 31,418sq. ft. X 2 Minimum Lot Width 100 ? 150 feet Northern portion: X West: 225 feet South: 100 feet 2 Southern portion: X West: 100 feet North: 110 feet 2 Minimum Setbacks Front: 0 ? 15 feet Northern portion: X West: 5 feet (to building) South: 5 feet (to building) 2 Southern portion: X West: 39 feet (to pavement) North: 8 feet (to pavement) 2 Side: 0 ? 10 feet Northern portion: X North: 0 feet (to existing pool deck) East: 2.5 feet (to building) 2 Southern portion: X North: 8 feet (to pavement) South: 5 feet (to pavement) 2 Maximum Height 35 ? 100feet 89 feet (to flat roof) X 2 Minimum One parking space per unit/room 112 parking spaces X Off-Street Parking (108spaces) 1 Includes 72 units/rooms allocated from the Hotel Density Reserve pursuant to Beach by Design 2 See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board ? May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03013 ? Page 8 of 12 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.I: Consistent Inconsistent 1 1. With the exception of those properties located on Clearwater Beach, the parcel X proposed for development shall front on but shall not involve direct access to a major arterial street unless no other means of access would be possible. 2. Height:X The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance. 1 3. Signs:X No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign program. 1 4. Front setback: X a. The reduced setback shall contribute to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and appearance; and c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan. 1 5. Side and rear setbacks: X a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles and/or personnel; b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and appearance; and c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan. 1 6. The design of all buildings shall comply with the Tourist District site and X architectural design guidelines in Section 3-501, as applicable. 1 7. Lot area and/or width:X The reduction shall not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity. 1 8. The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm X Area, have a hurricane evacuation plan requiring the use close when a hurricane watch is posted. 1 9. A development agreement must be approved by the City Council pursuant to F.S. X §§ 163.3221--163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4-606 if the development proposal exceeds the base density and/or base F.A.R. established for the underlying Future Land Use designation. The development agreement shall: a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to alternative density/intensity, and as amended from time to time; b. Be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court pursuant to F.S. § 163.3239, with a copy filed with the Property Appraiser's Office, and a copy submitted to the PPC and CPA for receipt and filing within 14 days after recording; and c. Have its development limitations memorialized in a deed restriction, which shall be recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County prior to the issuance of any building permit for the overnight accommodations use. Community Development Board ? May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03013 ? Page 9 of 12 Consistent Inconsistent 1 See analysis in Staff Report. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 1 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 1 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 1 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 1 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. 1 See analysis in Staff Report. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of April 2, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact. The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 0.72 acres is located on the east side of Coronado Drive at the northeast and southeast corners of Devon Drive/First Street; 2. The site is comprised of three parcels, two on the north side of Devon Drive and one on the south side of Devon Drive; 3. The proposal is to construct a 108-unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 150 units/acre, which includes the allocation of 72 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design; 4. A companion Development Agreement (DVA2009-00001) that must be approved by City Council is also on this CDB agenda is, providing for the allocation of the 72 units from the Hotel Density Reserve; 5. The hotel is proposed on the northern portion of the site north of Devon Drive and is proposed at a height of 89 feet from the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the roof deck; 6. The proposed 89-foot building height transitions building height from the highest on the west side of Coronado Drive (Kiran Grande ? 150-foot maximum height) to the detached dwellings to the east of this site (30-foot maximum height); 7. The first four levels of the hotel will provide a total of 94 parking spaces, with driveway access on Devon Drive; Community Development Board ? May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03013 ? Page 10 of 12 8. The proposal includes setback reductions from all property lines on the northern portion of the site; 9. While the proposal includes a setback of 2.5 feet from the east property line, a majority of the building at the fifth floor and above is set back approximately 21.3 feet from the east property line; 10. A surface parking lot of 18 spaces is proposed on the southern portion of the site south of Devon Drive, with driveway access on Devon Drive; 11. The proposal includes setback reductions from the north and south property lines only on the southern portion of the site; 12. The proposal includes constructing a total of 112 parking spaces, exceeding the minimum requirement of 108 spaces (one space per room); and 13. There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law. The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-803.I of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design; and 5. The proposal is compatible with the adjacent land uses. APPROVAL Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends of the (1) Flexible Development application to permit a 108-room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to lot width along Devon Drive/First Street from 150 to 100 feet (north side) and from 150 to 110 feet (south side), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 to five feet (to proposed building) (north side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 to five feet (to proposed building) (north side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 to eight feet (to proposed pavement) (south side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 to zero feet (to existing pool deck) (north side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 to 2.5 feet (to proposed building) and 7.22 feet (to existing pool deck) (north side of Devon Drive/First Street), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 to five feet (to proposed pavement) (south side of Devon Drive/First Street), and an increase to the building height from 35 to 89 feet (to top of roof deck), under the provisions of Section 2-803.I, and approval of a two-year development order; and (2) Increase of the permitted density by the allocation of 72 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2009-00001); 2. That application for a building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than May 19, 2011, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4-407; 3. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 4. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 5. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, ownership of the deck/dock on the north side be verified and documentation of any lease of the submerged lands be submitted to the Planning Department; Community Development Board ? May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03013 ? Page 11 of 12 6. That the freestanding sign be a monument-style sign, be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building and be a maximum height of four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 7. That the books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with the Hotel Density Reserve criteria of Beach by Design as allowed by general law; 8. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, existing overhead utility lines within the right-of-way along the north side of Devon Drive be placed underground and electric panels and boxes on the second floor of the parking garage be painted the same color as the building; 9. That the bicycle parking/storage area on the ground level of the parking garage be for hotel guest convenience as an accessory use only; 10. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, an easement be recorded in the public records for the sidewalk along Coronado Drive partially on the subject property; 11. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 12. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 13. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and the Fire Department be addressed. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: __________________________________________ Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map ?? Aerial Map ?? Zoning Map ?? Existing Surrounding Uses Map ?? Photographs of Site and Vicinity ?? Community Development Board ? May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03013 ? Page 12 of 12 S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Coronado 0101 - 0105 Holiday Inn Express (T) 2009.05 - 5.19.09 CDB - WW\Coronado 0101 Staff Report.doc Community Development Board ? May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03013 ? Page 13 of 12 1 37 59 11 1 15606 12 45 13 -Not a Survey- -Not to Scale- 25 Pier 60 1 City Marina WATER LOT 1 180 Adm. 170 Rest 160 Atta (14) 150 17550 59 A 74 106 101 78.4 101 1 101.68 100 GOVT LOT 3 1 59 57.8 70 101 35 1GOVT LOT 4 59 44129.06 45 93 46 100 47 Overnight Temporary 90 91 92 178.84 100 1 Beach 100 2 88 City Parking Accom SEE SE07-29-15 FOR PARCEL INFO 115.24 102 90 2 105 59 40 100 Lot 128 104.21 3 45.94 FIRST ST 60 CORONADO DR 60 3 94 60 4 Detached 202 60 98 35 City 48 49 4 41 5051 94 Dwellings 95 96 97 2 1 5 Parking 100 Temporary 201 5 52 B 207 Retail Lot 98 City Parking 1 6 6 212 Sales HAMDEN DR 99 Beach 209LDCTR Detached 53 Lot 7 7 Overnight 8 110 17550 Dwellings 213 100 215 9 54 Accommodations 217 112 218 8 10110 116 1 35 2 219 55 216 50 DEVON DR 120 11 70 Detached *SEE PLAT FOR DIMENSIONS 221 9SEE SE07-29-15 FOR PARCEL INFO 124 12 102 109 4 Overnight 70 128 13 3 Dwellings 130 224 56 52 115 14 132 35 103 134 Accommodations 117 136 10 Detached 119 50 225 53 121 229 57 125 Dwellings 104 127 51 229 17568 228 Overnight 129 11 230 230 50 131 50 Overnight Accommodations 1 49 Beach Detached 2 135 48 12 Accommodations 70 THIRD ST 60 47 Dwellings 301 46 60 300 251 45 44 Overnight 58 1 301 105 300 60 1 Accommodations 59 35 304 106 305 70 2 EXISTING Owner: Decade Companies Income Properties Cases: FLD2009-03013 DVA2009-00001 Site: 101 Coronado Drive (including 105 Property Size: 0.72 acres Coronado Drive and 35 Devon Drive) PIN: 08-29-15-15606-000-0141 Atlas Page: 267A & 276A 08-29-15-00000-320-0200 08-29-15-17550-002-0012 SKIFF ST BAYMONT PROJECT -Not a Survey- -Not to Scale- AVE AVE DR SITE SAN MARCO SHORE DOLPHIN PAPAYAST POINSETTIA EAST MANDALAY Marina Pier 60 Blvd Causeway Way SR-60 FIRST BLVD ST DR DEVON SECOND ST DR THIRD ST GULFVIEW DR CORONADO BRIGHT WATER DR FIFTH ST S. HAMDEN BAYSIDE DR LOCATION MAP Owner: Decade Companies Income Properties Cases: FLD2009-03013 DVA2009-00001 Site: 101 Coronado Drive (including 105 Property Size: 0.72 acres Coronado Drive and 35 Devon Drive) PIN: 08-29-15-15606-000-0141 Atlas Page: 267A & 276A 08-29-15-00000-320-0200 08-29-15-17550-002-0012 Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2009-03013/DVA2009-00001 Date Requested: April 3, 2009 Date Requested for (date): April 17, 2009 Maps Requested Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering Legal Description Survey Map with Proposed Site Highlighted IN ADDITION TO THE REQUESTED MAPS, PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WE HAVE PROVIDED IS CORRECT AND ACCURATE. Thomas Mahony, Geographic Technology Manager_______________________________ Signature Map Name Owner: Decade Companies Income Properties Cases: FLD2009-03013 DVA2009-00001 Site: 101 Coronado Drive (including 105 Property Size: 0.72 acres Coronado Drive and 35 Devon Drive) PIN: 08-29-15-15606-000-0141 Atlas Page: 267A & 276A 08-29-15-00000-320-0200 08-29-15-17550-002-0012 1 T 37 59 11 1 I 15606 12 13 45 -Not a Survey- -Not to Scale- 25 1 WATER LOT 1 180 Adm. 170 Rest (14) 160 Atta 150 17550 59 A P OS/R 74 106 101 78.4 101 1 101.68 100 GOVT LOT 3 1 59 57.8 70 101 35 1GOVT LOT 4 59 44129.06 45 93 46 100 47 90 91 92 178.84 100 1 2100 88 SEE SE07-29-15 FOR PARCEL INFO 115.24 102 2 90 59 105 40 100 128 104.21 3 45.94 FIRST ST 60 CORONADO DR 60 3 94 60 4 60 202 98 48 35 49 4 5051 94 41 95 96 97 2 1 5 100 201 5 52 B 207 98 1 6 6 212 LMDR HAMDEN DR 99 53 209LDCTR 7 T 7 8 17550 100213 110 2159 54 217 112 8 218 10110 116 1 35 2 55 50 219 216 DEVON DR 11 120 70 *SEE PLAT FOR DIMENSIONS 221 9SEE SE07-29-15 FOR PARCEL INFO 12 124 102 4 109 70 13 128 3 56 5214 224 130 115 35 132 103 134 117 10 136 50 119 225 53 121 57 229 104125 51 17568 229 228127 11 129 230 50 230 50 131 1 49 2 135 48 12 70 THIRD ST 60 47 301 46 60 300 45 251 44 58 1 301 105 300 60 P 1 59 35 304 106 305 70 2 ZONING MAP Owner: Decade Companies Income Properties Cases: FLD2009-03013 DVA2009-00001 Site: 101 Coronado Drive (including 105 Property Size: 0.72 acres Coronado Drive and 35 Devon Drive) PIN: 08-29-15-15606-000-0141 Atlas Page: 267A & 276A 08-29-15-00000-320-0200 08-29-15-17550-002-0012 View looking NE at northern portion of subject property on N View looking SE at southern portion of subject property on S side of Devon Drive (including 101 and 105 Coronado Drive)side of Devon Drive (35 Devon Drive) View looking E at deck/dock on N side of northern portion of View looking N at City Marina N of northern portion of subject property (N of seawall)subject property View looking E from Coronado Drive at N side of Devon View looking N at Sea Captain Motel (40 Devon Drive) E of Drive (northern portion of subject property on left)northern portion of subject property 101 Coronado Drive (including 105 Coronado Drive and 35 Devon Drive) FLD2009-03013/DVA2009-00001 Page 1 of 2 View looking S at City parking lot at 41 Devon Drive (E of View looking SE along Coronado Dr at retail sales and overnight southern portion of subject property)accommodation uses S of southern portion of subject property View looking S along Coronado Dr at Hyatt/Aqualea project at View looking SW at temporary City parking lot at 100 Coronado 301 S. Gulfview Blvd and temporary City parking lot on rightDr (site of Kiran Grande hotel project) View looking W at temporary City parking lot at 100 Coronado View looking NW at intersection of Coronado Dr & S. Gulfview Dr (site ofKiranGrande hotel project)Blvd (Pier 60 parking lot in background) 101 Coronado Drive (including 105 Coronado Drive and 35 Devon Drive) FLD2009-03013/DVA2009-00001 Page 2 of 2 11-tJ fJW'1-tl '3 0/3 ~r1:J 5'-$-09 /9 Cj:/6 /5 I ~ i t J ~ I ;,- ~ i ! ~ ~ ~ > , . . Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting 13&25 ICOT Blvd.. Strite 60S Clearwater, Florida 33760 Pbone, (727) 524-l8t8 F..: (727) 524-6090 l!O 40 0 SCAlE:, "-eo' Sea Captain Motel 2008 Aerial Photograph EXHIBIT j E >to J Beach by DesiQn ;..-.-..- -.....-..-" ~. _~ ...._.....::.. ...~'-~... _.1 ." r-"r f.' ~ ~'.t i !"~~. , ;I :t:... f f II' l- i- - _.~-. _"":"'--"''=':;':'_~~;-'~~~ . I . :.-) ........4 4,.--::-': .c. -.....- -'. '. ,....." ......... -.. -'. "'"--. -............ F. Small Motel District The area to the east of the Beach District is an area of small motels, many of which have established clientele. The Small Motel District reflects a common paradox of beach front communities -- improvements which were constructed in a different time before jet travel and air conditioning -- with limited on-site amenities and off-street parking. In many parts of the country, these kinds of units have evolved into residential uses. However, the relative intensity of adjacent / land uses and the volumes of ..-- north south traffic have maintained the current condition between Harnden and Coronado. Beach by Design contemplates that the existing improvements in the Small Motel District will be sustained over time. Although the existing improvements may not represent the theoretical "highest and best" use of this area, the relatively good condition of most buildings and the economic value of the existing Beach by Design: A Preliminal)' Designfor Cleanva/er Beach improvements make it difficult, if not impossible, to anticipate significant land assembly, demolition and new development. Brightwater Drive is also developed with small motel uses with building conditions and transient populations similar to those found along Harnden and Coronado. Brightwatcr's location on the Intracoastal Waterway, in between two other stable residential "fingers", makes it riper for redevelopment. Beach by Design calls for the redevelopment of Brightwater with land uses and building mass which are compatible with the residential cul-de- sacs to the north and south. Mid-rise townhouses and timeshares between 2 - 4 stories above parking are contemplated. Additionally, consideration should be given to the development of a shared parking facility along the street to provide some of the required parking that will be associated with redevelopment. 21 EXHIBIT Cityof J [ 3 a x. 21 City-oICleanvater. Florida EXHIBIT I Ex. ~3( ~ ) . .. - ''''''-- . I Beach bV Desiqn structure. Given the urban nature of Clearwater Beach as well as the extent to which the existing parcels of land are configured or "broken-up", the assemblage of a parcel of land large enough to generate 120 rooms at the current base density or under the CPA approved alternatives, is very unlikely. On average, between three and five separate parcels would need to be acquired to amass just one acre of land, and at least ten parcels would need to be acquired to amass three acres of land, and in most scenarios some segment of those ten parcels would be separated from the balance by a right-of-way; thereby making the development of a hotel difficult at best. In order to overcome the constraints upon hotel development on Clearwater Beach due to the economic disparity with condominium development, as well as to facilitate the restoration of those lost mid-size, mid-priced hotels, Beach by Design establishes a Hotel Density Reserve (Reserve) of 1,385 hotel rooms. The allocation of hotel rooms from the Reserve shall be made through the approval of a development agreement with the City of Clearwater with said allocation being strictly controlled. In order to be eligible to draw units from the Hotel Density Reserve, a development would have to incorporate, meet, and/or abide by each of the following: .:. Those properties and/or developments that have acquired density from the Destination Resort Density Pool are not eligible to have rooms allocated from the Reserve; .:. Those properties and/or developments that have had density transferred off to another property and/or development(s) through an approved Transfer of Development Rights (TOR) application by the City after December 31, 2007, are not eligible to have rooms allocated from the Reserve; Beach by Design: A Preliminary Designfor Clearwater Beach .:. A maximum of 100 hotel rooms may be allocated from the Reserve to any development with a lot size less than 2.5 acres. Those developments with a lot size greater than or equal to 2.5 acres may use the Reserve to achieve a density of 90 hotel rooms per acre. However, in no instance shall the density of a parcel of land exceed 150 units per acre regardless of whether it has received benefit of transfers of development rights in addition to the Reserve, or not; .:. Accessory uses inconsistent with amenities typical of a mid- priced hotel shall require compliance with the base FAR requirements of the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use category; .:. No hotel room allocated from the Reserve may be converted to a residential use (i.e. attached dwelling); .:. The maximum building heights of the various character districts cannot be increased to accommodate hotel rooms allocated from the Reserve; . ....... . .:. When both the allocation of hotel rooms from the Reserve an~d' : . . the transfer of development rights (TOR) are ~tilized as par: o. . .' . . . a development, only hotel rooms brought In to the proJect. .':'. .' . through the TOR process are eligible to be constructed above' '.' . the otherwise maximum building height, but only provided that all TOR criteria are met; .:. A legally enforceable mandatory evacuation/closure covenant that the overnight accommodation use will be closed as soon as practicable after a hurricane watch that includes Clearwater Beach is posted by the National Hurricane Center; .:. Access to overnight accommodation units must be provided through a lobby and internal corridors; 55 Per Beach By Design Page 55. Lot size of less than 2.5 acres may be allotted no more than 100 rooms from density pool. Applicant Lot size is .72 (rounded to .75 for simplification) Minimum lot width allowable under code is 100 (on a scale of 100-150) feet Applicant's lot width is exactly 100 feet Per code Applicant is allowed 36 units per current density Requesting 72 from density reserve pool for total of 108 If assign a value to Beach by Design criteria of2.5 acres = no more than 100 rooms from density pool That equals (=) 40 rooms per acre .75 X 100 = 30 rooms per acre Using this method you would arrive at 66 rooms for the Applicant's project as opposed to 108. ~ N 0; '!1 8 ~ "' en ~ " ;J .0 ~ g' I 9- "' 9 e Q; b :0: co :B :if u ill ~ z ~ >' STREET LEVEL Ex ~. CD (J) PROPOSED HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS 10 STORY EXISTING PORT VUE 3-STORIES OVER PARKING Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting Engineering. Planning. Transportation . Permitting 13825 ICOT Blvd., Suite 605 Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 r--- I") I I 12.5' Ft I 7' 5' PARKING GARAGE SEA CAPTAIN 2-STORIES N N SEA CAPTAIN MOTEL COMPARATIVE BUILDING HEIGHTS SCALE 1"=20' & Req. SB Prop. Line REQUIRED 15' SETBACK :>: ... ~ ; i "" oj '" ~ ~ '" c ~ ~ '" ;;; e OJ -0 :>: c l u 3! ~ ~ ;: REQUIRED 15' SETBACK REQUIRED 15' SETBACK , Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting 0 13825 ICOT Blvd., Suite 605 Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 REQUIRED 10' SETBACK SEA CAPTAIN MOTEL GROUND FLOOR REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS SCALE 1";::30' EXHIBIT J & t . . ~ "0 .,; .0 ~ !f;f g> ~ s "' ~ e ~ >: c ~ .. u .. ., ~ "' ~ ;: JIIIltI'llllllll1JiC Req., SB - HI _-Pro. SB REQUIRED 15' SETBACK ~ Prop. Line REQUIRED 15' SETBACK PROPOSED 5'_ SETBACK >: <( '" ~ ~ e:i V; I I REQUIRED 15' SETBACK PROPOSED 5' SETBACK Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting 13825 TCOT Blvd" Suite 605 Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 PROPOSED 2.5' SETBACK PROPOSED 7.3' SETBACK REQUIRED 10' SETBACK PROPOSED 2.5' - SETBACK o SEA CAPTAIN MOTEL GROUND FLOOR SETBACKS TO BUILDING EXHIBIT SCALE 1'=30' EXHIBIT 'I a f)( t ( a) CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP ---0.-- ....~- .~~4 FUSTER II ~ NlCHOI.S I ~ROSCH WU~ST WOU'[ ~ B CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MAY 2, 2008 - -.-- ----..... --"--"'-" ----...-- EXHIBIT ;. Jf i f)( 7