Loading...
FLD2009-03012 - 1888 Betty Ln N - Stevens Creek Subdivision FLD2009-03012 1888 N BETTY LN TEVENS CREEK SUBDIVISIO PLANNER OF RECORD : WW ATLAS # 260B ZONING: MDR LAND USE: RU RECEIVED: 03/03/2009 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: ~T STAFF REPUKT DRC: CDB: _W CoverSheet CDB Meeting Date: MaY 19, 2009 Case Numbers: FLD2009-03012/PLT2009-00001 Agenda Item: E2. Owner/Applicant: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Representative: Ronald E. Spoor, Land Development Manager, Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas Coun Address: 1888 N. Betty Lane CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a 51-lot subdivision for detached dwellings in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with a minimum lot area of 4,019 square feet, a minimum lot width of 40.9 feet (measured at the front setback line) and a reduction to the front setback requirement from 25 to 19 feet (to building), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-304.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 51-lot subdivision for detached dwellings. CURRENT ZONING: Medium Density Residential (IVIDR) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND Residential Urban (RU) and Preservation (P) USE CATEGORY: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant (formerly a 61-unit attached dwelling complex) Proposed Use: 51-lot subdivision for detached dwellings EXISTING North: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and Pinellas SURROUNDING ZONING County AND USES: Detached dwellings South: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District Detached dwellings and Attached dwellings East: Institutional (I) District Public school West: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and Pinellas County Detached dwellings Community Development Board -May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03012/PLT2009-00001 -Page 1 of 7 ANAi.YSTSr Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 8.89 acres is located on the south side of Sunset Point Road between N. Betty Lane and Pineland Drive. The property was previously developed with a 61-unit attached dwelling complex (Homer Villas), which was demolished in July 2008. While the buildings were demolished, the roadways within the property have been retained for use in the proposed subdivision. There is a jurisdictional wetland area for Spring Branch Creek along the northern property line with a Preservation (P) land use designation. The properties to the north within the City are zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and are developed with detached dwellings. Properties to the west within the City are zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and are developed with detached dwellings. A majority of the properties to the north and west of the subject property are presently located within unincorporated Pinellas County and are developed with detached dwellings. Properties to the south are zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and are developed with seven detached dwellings fronting on N. Betty Lane and an attached dwelling complex (1770 N. Betty Lane). Property to the east is zoned Institutional (I) District and is developed with a public school. Development Proposal: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County proposes to redevelop the subject property with a 51-lot subdivision for detached dwellings. This project will provide affordable housing for families. To accomplish such affordability, the applicant is striving to reduce the cost of the development by providing reasonably sized lots to accommodate typical Habitat dwellings and by utilizing the existing infrastructure, including the streets, water mains and sanitary sewer lines. The location of this existing infrastructure requires reductions to development standards within the MDR District, including minimum lot area, minimum lot width and minimum front setbacks. The proposed Stevens Creek Drive will be a private street 28 feet in width and will be maintained by a homeowners association. Public sidewalks will be constructed on both sides of the street within easements. Existing water and sewer lines are either located within the proposed private street right-of--way or are located adjacent to the right-of--way within proposed utility easements. Forty-two (42) of the 51 lots will take driveway access from Stevens Creek Drive. Five lots (Lots 29 - 33) will front on and take driveway access from N. Betty Lane. Four lots (Lots 48 - 51) will front on and take driveway access from Pineland Drive. A tot lot (Tract B) is proposed as an amenity to this subdivision, located between Lots 41 and 42, and will be maintained by a homeowners association. The redevelopment of this property with a detached dwelling subdivision will be consistent with the majority of the surrounding development, which are primarily detached dwellings. This detached dwelling subdivision will be compatible with this surrounding developed character and represent an upgrade from the prior attached dwelling complex that was demolished in 2008. The redevelopment of the subject property is otherwise impractical without the proposed deviations to minimum lot area, minimum lot width and front setbacks, and such flexibility will be a benefit to the surrounding area and the City in general by providing affordable housing for families. The Preliminary Plat for this subdivision complies with the design standards of the Community Development Code. A Final Plat will be required to be approved and accepted by City Council prior to recording in the public records. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): In the Residential Urban (RU) land use category, the allowable I.S.R is 0.65. Compliance with this requirement will need to be demonstrated on the site plan with each dwelling when applying for building permits. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to the Community Development Code (CDC) Table 2-302 for the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, the Minimum Standard Development for detached dwellings requires a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 50 feet. This Community Development Board -May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03012/PLT2009-00001 -Page 2 of 7 proposal is being processed as a Residential Infill Project due to the front setback reduction of 19 feet, in order to place an adequately sized dwelling on these lots. Under the Residential Infill Project use, there are no minimum lot area or lot width requirements. The applicant is proposing a minimum lot area of 4,019 square feet and a minimum lot width (measured at the front setback line) of 40.9 feet. To produce affordable housing in this project, the applicant is striving to reduce the cost of the development by providing reasonably sized lots to accommodate typical Habitat dwellings and by utilizing the existing infrastructure, including the streets, water mains and sanitary sewer lines. The depth of the lots on the south side of the southern leg of Stevens Creek Drive is limited to 95 feet, and where the developable area is further limited by an existing 15-foot wide drainage and utility easement along the southern property line. The lots on this southern side are proposed at a lot width of 42 feet, producing the 4,019 square-foot minimum lot area requested under this approval. There are only 121ots, or 23 percent, out of the total 51 lots in this subdivision with a lot area less than the normally required 5,000 square feet. Lot width is measured at the front setback line. There are 30 out of the 51 total lots (58.8 percent) with lot widths less than the normally required 50-foot width. Most lots are internal to the subdivision, but five lots (9.8 percent; Lots 29 - 33) do front on N. Betty Lane. Lots in the surrounding area are developed with a minimum 50-foot lot width. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2-302 for Minimum Standard Development, the minimum setbacks in the MDR District for detached dwellings are 25-foot front, five-foot side and 10-foot rear. The proposal includes a reduction to the front setback from 25 to 19 feet, which requires processing this application as a Residential Infill Project. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing infrastructure, including the streets, water mains and sanitary sewer lines, which limit the depth of lots on the south side of the southern leg of Stevens Creek Drive. The proposed front setback of 19 feet is to porches on the front of the dwellings, where the front of the garage will be setback approximately 27 feet in order to provide one parking space within the driveway so that vehicles do not hang over the public sidewalk. Given these circumstances, and the purpose to provide affordable housing, the reduction to the front setback is appropriate. The applicant has indicated on the plans that many of the lots will be able to meet the required front setback of 25 feet, depending on the floor plan chosen. Maximum Buildin Height: The maximum building height in the MDR District for detached dwellings is 30 feet. Due to the proposed reduced front setback for this subdivision, this application is being processed as a Residential Infill Project, where the maximum building height is listed at 30 - 50 feet. The applicant has indicated that this proposal will maintain a maximum building height of 30 feet, which is consistent with the MDR District standards. Minimum Off-Street Parkin: Two parking spaces are required for detached dwellings in the MDR District. The proposal is to provide two parking spaces for each dwelling, one in the garage and one in the driveway, which is consistent with Code requirements. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-903.H.1, air conditioning and similar mechanical equipment is exempt from the side and rear setback requirements, but such equipment must be screened from view from streets and adjacent property. Outside condensing units for air conditioners will be placed adjacent to the side or rear of the dwellings. Screening requirements will be reviewed during the building permit process. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1908.A, all on-site utility lines must be placed underground. This proposal will comply with this requirement. Solid Waste: Each dwelling will be provided a black barrel for solid waste disposal. The applicant has indicated these black barrels will be stored exterior to the dwelling. CDC Section 3-201.D.1 of the Community Development Board -May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03012/PLT2009-00001 -Page 3 of 7 Community Development Code requires these black barrels to be screened from view from streets and adjacent properties. Provisions for walls, fences or other appropriate screening materials will be required with the construction of each dwelling. Si rgtia~e: There are presently no proposed subdivision signs for this property. Should any such signs be desired, appropriate provisions in the Sign Code must be met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issue associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the detached dwelling subdivision proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-301.1 and 2-304: Standard Pro osed Consistent Inconsistent Densi 7.5 du/acre 5.74 du/acre X Minimum N/A 4,019 square feet X~ Lot Area Minimum N/A 40.9 feet (measured at the front X' . Lot Width setback line Minimum Front: 10 - 25 feet 19 feet X~ Setbacks Side: 0 - 5-feet 5 feet X Rear: 0 -10 feet 10 feet X Maximum 30 - 50 feet 30 feet X Hei ht Minimum Two spaces per dwelling unit Two spaces per dwelling unit X Off-Street Parking (one in the gazage and one in the drivewa ) ~ See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board -May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03012/PLT2009-00001 -Page 4 of 7 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-304.G (Residential Infill Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity or other development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function X which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access X or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913: Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, I X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent .with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adiacent properties. Community Development Board -May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03012/PLT2009-00001 -Page 5 of 7 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of April 2, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code,. finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following fmdings of fact: 1. The 8.89 acres is located on the south side of Sunset Point Road between N. Betty Lane and Pineland Drive; 2. The property was previously developed with a 61-unit attached dwelling complex (Homer Villas), which was demolished in July 2008; 3. The surrounding area is primarily developed with detached dwellings, although an attached dwelling complex is located to the south and a public school is located to the east of the subject property; 4. The applicant, Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County, proposes to redevelop the subject property with a 51-lot subdivision for detached dwellings providing affordable housing for families; 5. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing infrastructure, including the streets, water mains and sanitary sewer lines, where such location of this infrastructure requires flexibility with minimum lot area, minimum lot width and minimum front setback standards; 6. The proposed Stevens Creek Drive will be a private street 28 feet in width and will be maintained by a homeowners association; 7. A tot lot (Tract B) is proposed as an amenity to this subdivision, located between Lots 41 and 42, and will be maintained by a homeowners association; 8. The proposal includes a minimum lot area of 4,019 square feet and a minimum lot width (measured at the front setback line) of 40.9 feet; 9. The proposal includes a reduction to the front setback from 25 to 19 feet, but additional front setback will be provided to the garage door to preclude a vehicle parked in the driveway from overhanging the public sidewalk; 10. The Preliminary Plat for this subdivision complies with the design standards of the Community Development Code. A Final Plat will be required to be approved and accepted by City Council prior to recording in the public records; and 11. There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issue associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-301.1 and 2-304 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-304.G of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the requirements for Preliminary Plats in Sections 4-704, 4-705 and 4-709 of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Flexible Development application to permit a 51-lot subdivision for detached dwellings in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with a minimum lot area of 4,019 square feet, a minimum lot width of 40.9 feet (measured at the front setback line) and a reduction to the front setback requirement from 25 to 19 Community Development Board -May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03012/PLT2009-00001 -Page 6 of 7 feet (to building), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-304.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval fora 51-lot subdivision for detached dwellings, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That the following minimum setbacks apply to this subdivision: a. front: 19 feet to porches and additional setback be provided to the garage doors to preclude vehicles parked in driveways from overhanging the public sidewalks; b. side: five feet; c. rear: 10 feet; 2. That the maximum building height be 30 feet; 3. That black barrels stored exterior to the dwelling and outdoor mechanical equipment be screened from view from adjacent streets and properties; 4. That, based on the provisions of Section 3-804.E and the prevailing lot pattern of the surrounding area, the maximum height of the fence proposed along the rear of Lots 10-17 be three feet. Additionally, gates must be installed in the fence for Lots 10, 11, 16 and 17 to allow for the mowing of grass within the rights-of--way by the abutting lot owners; 5. That sidewalks be provided on both sides of Stevens Creek Drive; and 6. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit to construct the subdivision improvements, plans be revised to comply with all requirements of General Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and the Land Resource Specialist. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Wayne .Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ^ Location Map ^ Aerial Map ^ Zoning Map ^ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ^ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S.•IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next CDBIBetty N 1888 Stevens Creek Subdivision (MDR) 2009.05 - 5.19.09 CDB - WWIBetty N 1888 Staff Report.doc Community Development Board -May 19, 2009 FLD2009-03012/PLT2009-00001 -Page 7 of 7 Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-562-4504 ~ Email: wayne.wells(f~myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ^ Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; Reviewed building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). ^ Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director; Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted .preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). ^ Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Dept. of Planning and Development, Bradenton, FL June 1984 to March 1989 Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variancPS and app Pals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; Supervised six employees; Prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; Investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section -Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). ^ Planner I Alachua County Dept. of Planning and Development, Gainesville, FL June 1980 to June 1984 Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern -Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; Drafted ordinance revisions; General research. ^ Graduate Assistant University of Florida Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Gainesville, FL 1979 to 1981 Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; Coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. ^ Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Primarily prepared graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1% years; Worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section = m O u m ST ~ ~ ''.' .:5G '?:•': E'i o N ~ a COMMODORE ST PORT . „( ' y......'.'41F'..... w IDLEWILD ~ ~"• '°~`'~~'G1ft~ Q W i ST o o_ ~ U ~ ~.,.. ~~ a , D C9 = a -° i z ~ ' o z ~ '-'I o GRANADA ~ WOODLAWN a .ERR RD J IVA ST SEDEEVA C .-~~. ,,'.fj . ':{, DR SEDEEVA CIR S ('.'..:::'.B.~EIfLE1~ILl::i ~. .~~s..-r.-.~....... _ :.'...';...:•: T.If{f~ ~:'::~.~r."'•~.'F.T.'• k to m R O H O. ...:ur ..'.,~{ .......... m Q ~''3R(ER4L7#V~l'.J'-i'.'.:..u~~' '''.i.V:-i: }:.'':..':: ?:.':::':i.';::j O" ' 2'„i.. 4....:.. WILSON RD SUNSET POINT O RD CI~=SF~.•.~r.'..".:'i:~q'.:~""`•" •""""`""""~"""""""' m F ... '.;.:.:. F~' ~ ~ ' SUNSET ~ ~ Z ..?:< .• :~: .:. SPRING LA ~ S Q Fti ~~ s P O a m '~ •:. t? ::: :,:: F.`: .,....,'::':i •;i;':;t`~.. ...vlSra';:':wA~:~ ~ : ~ rrT--HAMES m LA--~~ p py ~ ~ :;._.... :~• :..:.:...:.: ~ z' :'::::'::: 1 W o JOEL o: O >.~~ a :.:.:.:.. ~..:. .{ r : ~ ~ ~ _ . . . j:r r:": •': :r}/1: ::; °;.`'...; ~ M BENTL EY J¢ O`~ Ra ~~;: , :' ;.:i.: i:':~:`':' :: c1 c~.oi,~, PROJECT OTTEN r-. T y ~- ~: ~ :::::.....:.: `~.::; 4:..' '.:::::;?:::..: . :''~ •~F.;, _ s;.:~ .~ P~'.'. '~ SANDY SITE A t': '.-'9 HEAVEN SENT LA c ~ G~LY w ~' 3 q . , . ~::';i_, ~ (ii::::: ' MARY L RD r ,..;..::;::, SA `:..:: ~... ~ ,y' TERRACE RD "`"~'-` ••. '•," ~ ST O Z a Q ~ O ,p (. ;~..,,. ~ FAIRMQNT 4.'~~~:....... j r:i .;:f W r'3 ~ ' "~' ~ ST ~ (j ...':::::.J: c t_::.__: FAIRMONT ST BECKETT ¢ ~ Id O Q.. ~~. " .;.:: :::. e .. y::~. ti ST w PARK WO BECKETT ST l D Q OD LOCATION MAP Owner: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Cases: FLD2009-03012 P LT2009-00001 Site: 1888 N. Betty Lane Property Size: 8.89 acre s PIN: 03-29-15-00000-420-0140 Atlas Page: 2608 - a -_ ,.. - 79031 2 ~ 11 1L3 ~3 ~ 8 7 ~.~ ~~.:' ~. 6 7~ : I 1 - .~ ~~ ~ ~ 1s ~~~. ~~~~i,o1 ~° .~,~ ~ ml 1so11 ~~" ~ ~: ~~ ~ Y9~ m ~ m SUN {,: N ~ :~ r-~ 60 459.5 1 " ~- 2 3 q ~, 1251 .S 6~,., _ t89 ~ ~ - 416151 18Ff4 17 - ~ ~~~~ ®~,~11~1i-® a^~®r~ 8 - ~~ 7878 8]8 ~ 1876 15 " ~ 85Q` 9 f 20 .7 iaz4s 18g2 _ 8 ~ ~ 1 13a~ ~a~a 10 is5 - _ ~ ~ ~ zi 1aac; 1a7a F I I '° ~~~~ o f: t- ~. _ 1 23. - l 0~1;~. ~ laso m 7847 13 1 I _2a i a44:, - 1-1 .',~ _ - ~f .: j.:.28 "83,'8 c~Oo ' - 1637 15 L ~* ~ ~ - 1864 1862 ~ ~ 46 313 A ~~ ~~STA;V . / ^ ~/ Yti i '• . ~~ ' $' .1 ~ ~. m of jT~ ~ ~4 12µ,, ~ ~e 9 I 3 ~"1 t 14 187 , - "F5 I)R ~ . ~ {,832 Y$23 ' - .- ,. ~~ 1826 1821 ~ ~ ~,~ _. '.¢ ,. .~. :r. 171822 :: 58.19.' ~' 1884 m 0 m 1863 1858 1 1836 2 1830 3 ~ 1 24 a I `~~1a 5 ~ L '2 6 1806 7 1800 i so sa ZONING MAP Owner: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Cases: FLD2009-03012 PLT2009-00001 Site: 1888 N. Betty Lane Property Size: 8.89 acres PIN: 03-29-15-00000-420-0140 Atlas Page: 2606 ~~~~- a d s~ :. <Yp ': c ~:;r:~: = ;:; ~ A ~ _ ? 3 a s ~~ s : 1251 ®' ~ 60 sa6~s~ X8, 5 . . .. ,®~ 5~ ~ 416~ ~~® ~y 1881 ' T1 } e~~~ngs ®~®~ ~'~®p® 1884 ®® ~ a2 ~=;~~ '.~gr$.; ':.::::' '." ': Public ~r8 School ~a~ 187s '~ . a$sv 6. ~ l ~0... 1848 188 m .= 18'57 72I ~ ~ .. 1; 1 48 ~ 1874 ,-c - .. -- ells as4a c ~ - l2 f: ~: ~ 23.. :;.. 184: ~ 1860 ~ ~ w' ... .. 18d~ 73 .....::..: _. k... ` .. . ...~':.-. 1840 1 y ~ ui ~ , , t Reed 1~3 .. ~ 1883 ~ , ::::: M /yi - is (~ ~ . .~ `~S:~.J '~ ~ 27 1864 1882 50462 1858 .~ ^~'/ ~j ~ .:: ~/I~l/'l.~ J/~~/ ^F} i ,.. § 31346 Deitach~de ~ ' ~ ~ a ~ t ~ a. ~2^ dv~ellin~o T8Y9 :: ~ . : c'.:: : 2 ' ~ ~ Attached r Z Public . 1, 2::.: : :: .::i:: ~.:. : , . _elr.. C ~ dwellin s 3 I 1 24 J School g ~ 1 i4. ~ 4 Mi ~ta m :;"-:a ::f8~1:-: .~ ..... ......... a . 1812 ~ '.;:`J~:.? :: >:'1:'. X61826 ._ = ~°,::~ ~ 171822 ~~f _. -, _,., lso sa EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Cases: FLD2009-03012 PLT2009-00001 Site: 1888 N. Betty Lane Property Size: 8.89 acres -- __. PIN: 03-29-15-00000-420-0140 Atlas Page: 2608 View looking E at southern leg of proposed Stevens Creek Drive ~~ .' ^~ ~ ~: '~ ~ ~ ~'. View looking N along Pineland Drive at proposed subdivision (Lots 48-51 on right; rear of Lots 10-17 in background where fence is located) 1888 N. Betty Lane FLD2009-03012/PLT2009-00001 Page 1 of 3 ~_ E ~w View looking S at existing cross street within proposed subdivision (roadway to be removed) View looking W at northern leg of proposed Stevens Creek Drive View looking S at western leg of proposed Stevens Creek Drive View looking S at W side of property from approximately Lot 12 '.t e. .', ~, ~ .. View looking S along W side of N. Betty Lanc at detached dwellings south of subject property n~« ~'"". .- ~~"'"~~ ti ~"' . ~ ~ '~~; View looking S along N. Betty Lane from northern leg of proposed Stevens Creek Drive (subject property on right) .. ..~_ View looking E from subject property at public school property on E side of N. Betty Lane 1888 N. Betty Lane FLD2009-03012/PLT2009-00001 Page 2 of 3 View looking N along N. Betty Lane from northern leg of proposed Stevens Creek Dive (subject property on left) View looking SW at attached dwelling complex to south of subject property (1770 N. Betty Lane) ~ ~ a ~i1i ~' -~ r t5` -- View looking N from Vista Way at existing homes on W side of Pineland Drive and W of subject property 1888 N. Betty Lane FLD2009-03012/PLT2009-00001 Page 3 of 3 t., ~:, '- _..: s~~ _..a:-. .a _. Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project (Revised 07/11/2008) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Barbara Inman, Executive Director, Habitat for Humanity. of Pinellas Cou MAILING ADDRESS: 3071 118th Ave N St Petersburg FL 33716 PHONE NUMBER: X727) 536-4755 FAX NUMBER: (727) 209-2191 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Habitat for HUmanlty Of PlnelleS COUnty List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: Ronald E. SpOOr, Land Development Manager MAILING ADDRESS: _3071 118th Ave N., St. P_eter_sburg, FL 33716 __ __ PHONE NUMBER: (727) 536-4755 ext 218 FAX NUMBER: (727) 209-2191 'I CELL NUMBER: (727) 776-2960 EMAIL: land@phfh.org B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Stevens Creek Subdivision 1888 Betty Lane 03-29-15-00000-420-0140 8.89 PROJECT VALUATION: $ 7,000,000 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 387,255 Pinellas County, Florida. Please see Exhibit "A" of Warranty Deed PROPOSED usE(s): Single Family Detached Residential DESCRIPTION of REQUEST: 51 Single Family Detached Residential Houses Specifically identify the request Minimum 4,019 square feet lots (include number of units or square Minimum 40.9' wide lots footage of non-residential use and all -- requested code deviations; e.g. Reduce Front setback from 25 feet to 19 feet reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) C:\Documents and Settings\derek.tergusonwesaop~pianning oepi wmis ~~ ~o~Rr~~~t~~~~a~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~..~~..• ,• .. , ~~~ -• Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO J (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ^ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) _ D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ^ Provide complete responses to the six (li) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The existing multi-family residential development on the site was a public housing facility and will be replaced by sing a amt y e ac a rest en la eve opmen o ma c wl surroun Ing slug a amt y o s on a no an wes iy demand a ~Pnior rent The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The adjacent properties, which are single family residential and a senior housing complex are similar, compy~b~le_ develo meet. The new sin le famil develo meet is like) to im rove the values of surroundin ro ernes. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The existing single-family homes and a senior housing complex on surrounding adjacent properties will benefit by e rep acemen o a pu Ic ousing comp ex y a slug a amt y su Ivlslon w ere In Ivl ua omeowners wl bavP a veSted_.u]feiPCt in the rnmmttnity 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The road, curb and gutter of the existing multi-family development will be utilized for the redevelopment to _ .. __ «_ _..._a:..,..J......1.-.nmon+ /R9 ovic+inn to 51 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed single-family cinale-family homes and a homes will be consistent with the surround of 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Visual -New single-family homes; Acoustic -negligible differences over existing multi-family development; Olfactory - single amity residential has no a verse odors; hours of operation -residential existing, residential .prnposed~o-noticeab C:\Documents and Settingstdernk.terguson~DesMOp~planning dept fortes 07061Ftesidential tnfill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBiV11TTAL RE(~UiREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) ^ Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. The project by Habitat for Humanity will provide affordable housing for families. To keep the homes affordable, Habitat would tiiiz t>g~xistinginfi"astructare~includingthe-streets-v~'aterrrrain~nd-sanitary- tike-tcrreduce the-cost-ofth~developmenrbYr~ mg-t sewer lines. The depth of the lots at the south property line utilizing existing street is limited to 95 feet depth including a 15 oat easement or city utI Ides; an ence t e nee to request variance or sI ewa on one sl e o t e roa an con se ac . The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) The existing site was a public housing multi-family residential complex that essentially depressed the surrounding grope va ues. rea -ng a or a e sing e- aml y rest en la omes wou a In armony wl a jacen The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Single family residential is permitted within the MDR Zoning District of the City of Clearwater. Less than 5,000 square foot lots and less than 50 foot wide lots are permitted under Flexible Standard Development. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Ad'acent ro erties are sin le-famil residential and a senior housin com lex which are com atible with the proposed single-family residential project. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. QlonrnPnt ~^~ill add affordable single-family homes to ~n area ~^~hi~~^~a~pleviou_ iv o ~~'led by ~rtblic housing. Individual homeowners are more likely to take a vested interest in their community. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The demolition of the existing public housing multi-family residential project and creation of affordable sing e- aml y ousing wl a o o Is In I se an en ancemen o e arm an uric ion o e sakPoan~peg ~ sommt_lnt_h~~na the City `~'' ter ~ ~^~hole Individual homQowners arP more likely toy interest in their communities. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justfied by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County is requesting the reduced lot size and lot width, allowed,within the exl a an ar s eve opmen or a curren zoning o u I Ize a exls Ing roa way an u I I les ore uce ~.,,, mnna afTnrdahle housing Tha current zoning allows uo to 15 units/AG The pTS+ooSPd density is only 5.74 units/acre. C:1Documents and SeHings\derek.ferguson\Deskiop\plaPage 3 of $ s 0708\ResWential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-1 t.doc E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ® A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. A{I applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area daes not qualify as an exemption to this requirement ^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ^ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ^ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ^ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including ail calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ^ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): ~_ stormwater plan as noted above is included Stonnwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAD NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPL CATION MUST BE REISUBMIITED AND SIGNIF CANT DELAY AN MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ^ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ^ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and vrithin 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; Included with Boundary Surve~r and Site Construction Plans. ^ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ^ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; Shown on Cover Page. ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; NIA ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); Included with Site Construction Plans. ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; N/A C:~Doruments and SettingslderekfergusonlDesktoplplanningdept forms 07081r2esidenlial Infdl Project (FLD) 200e 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A} ~ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _ North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; _ All dimensions; _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; _ All existing and proposed points of access; N/A All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including _ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas _ and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening _ {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; N/A Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; N/A Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level One (flexible standard development) and Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is _ required for any parking garage requiring a Level One (minimum standard and flexible standard) or Level Two approval. m SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED _ Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the _ number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, _ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; _ Building and structure heights; _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 6c1 REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/: X 11); ~ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; _ All open space areas; _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; C:1D000ments and Settings\derekferguson\Desktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2006 07-11.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ^ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): NfA. All existing and proposed structures; _ Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; _ belineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required _ tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and _ percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ^ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (B'/: X 11); NIA. ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive N/A. Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ^ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; All sides of all buildings; _ Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; ^ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8'/: X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS 1 Section 3-1806) NIA. ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8 '/: X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:~D000ments and SettingsWerekferguson~Desklop~planning dept forms 0701iV~esidentiat Intill Project (FLD) 20D8 07-1 t.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ~ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ^ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ^ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement ~ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine 'rf any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ~ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/waterstndy requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/VNater Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. ~~ ~~ Signature of property owner or representative Barbara Inman, Executive Director STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before me this qr'r day of M,4~ct~ , A.D. 200 to me and/or by P,A~-a3r~1 tuiti~~ ,who is personally known has produced o.^.w...wr.w~•.mane.: as identification. i~7 Notary public, ~~ I~/-f~tl~ a1C ^ My commission expires: ; • ~... ^ .................„....^^.^^....„p..^.+t C:\DOCUmenls and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept (omu 0706\Residential Infill Proled (FLD) 2D08 07-1 t.doc Page 7 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 1888 Betty Lane 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible Standard Development to construct a 52-lot single family detached residential development. 4. That the undersigned (has have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Ronald E. Spoor, Land Development Manager as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6 That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City . representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and o ec a~L~-t~-t a Y-~-~- Property Owner Property Owner , ~f'~13~('~' 1~i1'\AfV ~Xtc:i3T \V£ ~JrQ-LC:~TUr Property Owner roperty Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this ~ rw day of ,.np~G~~ ZGO~i personally appeared ~ ~ /.~6A2A 1NMM1 who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. .u ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~a~~~NHH~N1~Ni1~Mn V ~~~~~~~/~~ AMY P. REEK ~ ~~ ~' r Oaalr~ pD0007i3T =_!~1 ~~i ~i ~ ~M'/~p1Z ~ Notary Public Signature m F1~Ads ~r~' Inc ; ~ Lo . L v) My Commission Expires: 7 t N o a C:\Documents and Settings\den~c.ferguson\Desklop\planning dept forms 0708U2esidential Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 8 of 8 LL Planning Department CASE #: ° Clear~va~er 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY: Clearwater, Florida 33756 (Staff Initials) Telephone: 727-562-4567 DATE RECEIVED. ~ Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION (Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets) ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN FEE: $200.00 (Not required if submitted as part of an FLS or FLD application) ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE OF $600.00 NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION (REVISED 04/24/07) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AGENT AND PLAT PREPARER INFORMATION: (code section a-zo2.a. and a-7oa.A.) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PLAT PREPARER: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Barbara Inman, Executive Director of Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County 3071 118th Ave N., St. Petersburg, FL 33716 727 / 536-4755 FAx NUMBER: 727 / 209-2191 EMAIL: Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Ronald E. Spoor, Land Development Manager 3071 118th Ave N., St. Petersburg, FL 33716 727 / 536-4755 ext. 218 FAX NUMBER: 727 / 209-2191 727 / 776-2960 EMAIL: land@phfh.org Cumbey & Fair, Inc. Attn: Pankaj Shah, P.E. 2463 Enterprise Road Clearwater FL 33763 727 / 797-8982 FAx NUMBER' 727 / 791-8752 NIA EMAIL: shah@cumbe _ r.com Page 1 of7 ~. PP~~%F'~SEi~ ~E°Efi'El~~I )e~E~~~ lf~f°(~P~t~~A`ti(Q€~: (code sc-coon 4-262.x) PROJECT NAME: S I REST ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED USE(S): Stevens Creek Subdivision B 03/2 fi R9 PROJECT VALUATION: $ PARCEL SIZE (square feet): in Pinellas County Florida. [Please see Exhibit A Single famiiv detached residential. C. PR®~~P ®C ~~~kf't:~~~~G~BE~: (code section ~-2o2.a.s) ® SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSUP.ANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PP.OPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 3) ~®~rYeen ('~Q) c~laoes c~~ t6-~e ~t-e6~azosraaCy ~~a~ sG`asVl ~e s~o~rrno4ted. Ti Eae prelar~aor'IS~g/ ~Cs~ sfr~a~l Eye ~rc~~ree6 by a se~~e~ml', ss'c6no~e~~, ls~dsca~e ~rv;Evutee~ mrr es~c~ucoceP dJr~v~~ to a sc~~e n©~ s~aa60~o- tlhavl d~A cc>IC6-o ecgeosls ~Q0 veet (1:1®®), sl~va91 ~®~ excee~- ~~" ~ 3C~" ~v~odl a~cOt~o7e ~~ve ~®8Q©~d6r~~ 6rvgdsctil~€a®~a: I ITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDP.ESS AND I ELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; IDENTIFICATION CLEAP.LY STAI ING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PP.OPERTY, U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-Or-WAY AND EASEMENTS; PROPOSED S I REET NAMES; NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOLLOWING: THE OVERALL PLAT; EACH LOT; STREET RIGHTS-OF-VVAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS; COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY; NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE. I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the properly described in this application. . ~ '~~~ Signature of properly owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this i `; "' day of i:t~~ _ i=~ , A.D. 20 ~~ ` to me and/or by 3a r2i^ ~., ^~~ i rJ +~,~ ;~,,~! ,who is personally known Fias- {~rodused a~l~entlfrcatton. ,, , I ~~;! Notary public, ~ My commission expires: ~~'~' ~ ~"' ~ _~' ~:a nmonunmemmmm a~~, ~irvl~®~A4r~°~Q~~ae ~~` v ~~ 712 m m ~~~~s, e t ~„H eeea mmff C: (Documents and Settingslderekfero sonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Preliminary Plat 04-24-07.doc Page 2 of 7 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRIiVT full names: I i Habitat Tor Humanity of Pinellas County 2. That (1 am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 1888 Belt Lane 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request fora: (describe request) Preliminary Plat for a Subdivision 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Ronald E. Spoor, Land Development Manager as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; ~ That fl/wel. the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner Barbara Inman, Executive Director of Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas County Property Owner Properly Owner ((~~ CC ~°~, ~~AV~~L ~~ ~~®~~®~9 C®o_9@d~ ®F @~@~9ELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this . ` I day of .? - , ,~ ~ , j ,; :;~„~~~~f who having been first duly sworn ~ personally appeared - Li _ ~ - Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the a-riidavit that he/she signed. oao.me~o...~. r~..=....®.eeo~e.e~ooa~ sore ~ P Pe~f`~FC a~''~NA" C'~~7~`P _ G s ~ Notary Public Signature Fit i~ ~., ~ ~e~ vaeuoe.o.•aeeeoeeoavoocve~nR~ i Rode veee oeameoe ~ ~ f Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: ~! ' ' ~ - - ! ' C:IDocuments and Settingslderekfere sonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Preliminary Plat 04-24-07.doc Page 3 of 7 CITY OF CLEARWATER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING,100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"d FLOOR PHONE: (727)-562-4747 FAX: (727) 562-4755 INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL OF FINAL PLAT INSTRUCTIONS The final plat shall be suitable for recording at the office of the clerk of the circuit court. It shall be prepared and sealed by a land surveyor registered by the state and shall conform with the requirements of Florida Statute, Chapter 177, and the requirements of this subsection. It shall be drawn at a scale of one-inch equals 50 feet or other scale determined appropriate by the city engineer. The overall sheet size of the plat shall be consistent with the standards established by the clerk of the circuit court for recording. Each sheet shall be provided with a one-inch margin on each of three sides and athree-inch margin on the left side of the plat for binding purposes. Eighteen (18) copies of the Final Plat shall be submitted. INFORMATION REQUIRED ON THE FINAL PLAT IN A FORM SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY SHALL INCLUDE: NAME OF PLAT; LOCATION OF THE PLAT BY U.S. SURVEY SYSTEM AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE, COUNTY AND STATE; NAMES OF EXISTING STREETS ABUTTING OR GIVING ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED PLAT; ALL PLAT BOUNDARIES BASED ON AN ACCURATE TRANSVERSE, WITH ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR r~i.r, ~r r~int poi ioc r1c ci ~ru Q(11 IAIIIn~V CvID\/CV CI-141 1 n~nT Ex(`EEn FINE Fn(1T DIIVIEIVSIOIVS SHOVVIV. ERrwrt yr ~iv~.~.v.wr~u vi ...wv~ ~ wv~.vr.~ FOR EACH 10,000 FEET OF PERIMETER SURVEY; ALL BLOCKS, LOTS, STREETS, CROSSWALKS, EASEMENTS AND WATERWAYS, WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PLAT, ALL OF WHICH SHALL HAVE ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR DIMENSIONS GIVEN AND ALL RADII, INTERNAL ANGLES, BEARINGS, POINTS OF CURVATURE, TANGENTS AND LENGTHS OF ALL CURVES, SO THAT NO DIMENSIONS OR DATA ARE MISSING WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FUTURE LOCATION OF ANY OF THE CORNERS OR BOUNDARIES OF BLOCKS, LOTS OR STREETS, AS LISTED ABOVE. WHEN ANY LOT OR PORTION OF THE PLAT IS BOUNDED BY AN IRREGULAR LINE, THE MAJOR PORTION OF THAT LOT OR PLAT SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A WITNESS LINE SHOWING COMPLETE DATA, WITH DISTANCES ALONG SUCH LINES EXTENDED BEYOND THE ENCLOSURE TO THE IRREGULAR BOUNDARY SHOWN WITH AS MUCH CERTAINTY AS CAN BE DETERMINED OR AS "MORE OR LESS", IF VARIABLE. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE NEAREST HUNDREDTH OF A FOOT. TRUE ANGLES AND DISTANCES SHALL BE DRAWN TO THE NEAREST ESTABLISHED OFFICIAL MONUMENTS, NOT LESS THAN THREE OF WHICH SHALL BE ACCURATELY DESCRIBED ON THE PLAT. THE INTENDED USE OF ALL EASEMENTS SHALL BE CLEARLY STATED; CURVILINEAR LOTS SHALL SHOW ARC DISTANCES, AND RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING. RADIAL LINES SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED. DIRECTION OF NONRADIAL LINES SHALL BE INDICATED; SUFFICIENT ANGLES AND BEARINGS SHALL IDENTIFY THE DIRECTION OF ALL LINES AND SHALL BE SHOWN TO THE NEAREST SECOND; ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINES SHALL BE SHOWN WITH DISTANCES, ANGLES, BEARINGS OR AZIMUTH, POINTS OF CURVATURE, POINTS OF TANGENCY, POINTS OF REVERSE CURVATURE, POINTS OF COMPOUND CURVATURE, ARC DISTANCE, CENTRAL ANGLES, TANGENTS, RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING OR Page 4 of 7 AZIMUTH, OR BOTH; ALL EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY PROVIDED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES OR UTILITIES, AND ANY LIMITATIONS OF SUCH EASEMENTS; ALL LOT NUMBERS AND LINES. LOT LINES SHALL BE MARKED WITH ACCURATE DIMENSIONS IN FEET AND HUNDREDTHS OF FEET, AND BEARINGS OR ANGLES TO STREET LINES; ACCURATE DESCRIPTIONS OF ANY AREA TO BE DEDICATED OR RESERVED FOR PUBLIC USE WITH THE PURPOSE INDICATED THEREON; TITLE, DATE OF SURVEY, GRAPHIC SCALE OF MAP AND NORTH ARROW. THE BEARING OR AZIMUTH REFERENCE SHALL BE CLEARLY STATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT IN THE NOTES OR LEGEND; PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENTS SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA; EACH PLAT SHALL SHOW A DESCRIPTION OF THE LANDS PLATTED, AND THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE THE SAME IN THE TITLE CERTIFICATION. THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE SO COMPLETE THAT FROM IT, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE PLAT, THE STARTING POINT AND BOUNDARY CAN BE DETERMINED; THE CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S CERTIFICATE AND THE LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AND SEAL; ALL SECTION LINES AND QUARTER SECTION LINES OCCURRING IN THE MAP OR PLAT SHALL BE INDICATED BY LINES DRAWN UPON THE MAP OR PLAT, WITH APPROPRIATE WORDS AND FIGURES. IF THE DESCRIPTION IS BY METES AND BOUNDS, THE POINT OF BEGINNING SHALL BE INDICATED, TOGETHER WITH ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES OF THE BOUNDARY LINES. IF THE PLATTED LANDS ARE IN A LAND GRANT OR ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE SUBDIVISION OF GOVERNMENT SURVEYS, THEN THE BOUNDARIES ARE TO BE DEFINED BY METES AND BOUNDS AND COURSES. THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE TIED TO THE NEAREST GOVERNMENT CORNER OF OTHER RECORDED AND WELL-ESTABLISHED CORNER; ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY PLAT TITLE, PLAT BOOK AND PAGE OR, IF UNPLATTED, LAND SHALL BE SO DESIGNED. IF THE AREA PLATTED IS A REPLATTING OF A PART OR THE WHOLE OF A PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLAT, SUFFICIENT TIES SHALL BE SHOWN TO CONTROLLING LINES n,-,~.~r. r..~ -rl Ir rnnl Irn nl nT Tn oco~A1T n1.1 r1\/C[71 AV T~ RE ~A~DE ANfI REFEREnI(F T(l THE /~1"~'C/1KIIV V VIV I f7C C/-1RLICR rLY11 I V r u vvn I r-u r v v u ~~ ~ REPLATTING SHALL BE STATED AS A SUBTITLE FOLLOWING THE NAME OF THE PLAT WHEREVER IT APPEARS ON THE PLAT; ALL LOTS SHALL BE NUMBERED EITHER BY PROGRESSIVE NUMBERS OR, IF IN BLOCKS, PROGRESSIVELY NUMBERED OR LETTERED IN EACH BLOCK, EXCEPT THAT BLOCKS IN NUMBER ADDITIONS BEARING THE SAME NAME MAY BE NUMBERED CONSECUTIVELY THROUGHOUT THE SEVERAL ADDITIONS; PARK, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PARCELS SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED; ALL INTERIOR EXCEPTED PARCELS SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND LABELED "NOT A PART OF THIS PLAT;" THE PURPOSE OF ALL AREAS DEDICATED MUST BE CLEARLY INDICATED OR STATED ON THE PLAT; WHEN IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO SHOW CURVE DETAIL INFORMATION ON THE MAP, A TABULAR FORM MAY BE USED. THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION SHALL ACCOMPANY THE FINAL PLAT: A TITLE OPINION OF AN ATTORNEY LICENSED IN THE SATE OR A CERTIFICATION BY AN ABSTRACTOR OR A TITLE COMPANY STATING THAT THE COURT RECORDS IDENTIFY THAT THE TITLE TO THE LAND AS DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON THE PLAT IS IN THE NAME OF THE PERSON EXECUTING THE DEDICATION. IN ADDITION, A DOCUMENT ENTITLED CONSENT TO PLATTING OF LANDS AND PARTIAL RELEASE OF MORTGAGE Page 5 of 7 SHALL BE FILED TOGETHER WITH THE FINAL PLAT FOR EACH PERSON OR CORPORATION HOLDING A MORTGAGE ON ALL LAND INCLUDED ON THE PLAT, WHERE SUCH PERSON HAS NOT SIGNED THE FINAL PLAT. THE TITLE OPINION OR CERTIFICATION SHALL SHOW ALL MORTGAGES NOT SATISFIED OR RELEASED OF RECORD NOR OTHERWISE TERMINATED BY LAW; CERTIFICATION BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR THAT THE PLAT REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY THAT INDIVIDUAL, THAT ALL THE NECESSARY SURVEY MONUMENTS, LOT SIZES AND LOT DIMENSIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN THEREON, AND THAT THE PLAT COMPLIES WITH ALL OF THE SURVEY REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 177 AND THIS DEVELOPMENT CODE. IMPRESSED ON THE PLAT AND AFFIXED THERETO SHALL BE THE PERSONAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE TO THE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR INCLUDING THE REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE SURVEYOR, BY WHOM OR UNDER WHOSE AUTHORITY AND DIRECTION THE PLAT WAS PREPARED; A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PLATTED LANDS. HOWEVER, A NEW BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR A REPEAT IS REQUIRED ONLY WHEN THE REPEAT AFFECTS ANY BOUNDARY OF THE PREVIOUSLY PLATTED PROPERTY OR WHEN IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE ON THE LANDS TO BE REPLATTED OR ADJOINING LANDS. THE BOUNDARY SURVEY MUST BE PERFORMED AND PREPARED UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF A PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER PRECEDING THE INITIAL SUBMITTAL OF THE PLAT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODY. THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT RESTRICT A LEGAL ENTITY FROM EMPLOYING ONE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PERFORM AND PREPARE THE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND ANOTHER PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PREPARE THE PLAT, EXCEPT THAT BOTH THE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND THE PLAT MUST BE UNDER THE SAME LEGAL ENTITY; CERTIFICATION THAT ALL REAL ESTATE TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID; EVERY PLAT OF A SUBDIVISION OR CONDOMINIUM FILED FOR RECORD SHALL INCLUDE ANY REQUIRED DEDICATION BY THE APPLICANT. THE DEDICATION SHALL BE EXECUTED BY ALL OWNERS HAVING A RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND BEING PLATTED, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED. ALL MORTGAGEES HAVING A RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND PLATTED SHALL EXECUTE, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED, EITHER THE DEDICATION CONTAINED ON THE PLAT OR IN A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT JOINING IN THE RATIFICATION OF THE PLAT AND ALL DEDICATION AND RESERVATIONS THEREON IN THE FORM OF A CONSENT TO PLAT FROM ALL MORTGAGE INTERESTS ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. WHEN A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND HAS BEEN PLATTED AND A PLAT THEREOF BEARING THE DEDICATION EXECUTED BY THE DEVELOPER AND nooon~ini n~ THE CITY ueS BEEN SECURED Anin RErnRnEn Ini CnnnpLlAniCE !^.~!TH TH!S D!VlclOni ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC AREAS SHOWN ON SUCH PLAT, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, SHALL BE DETERMINED TO HAVE BEEN DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES STATED THEREON, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY SEPARATE ACTION BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO FORMALLY ACCEPT SUCH OFFERS OF DEDICATION; ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED PRIVATE RESTRICTIONS AND TRUSTEESHIPS AND THEIR PERIODS OF EXISTENCE SHALL BE FILED AS A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT AND REFERENCE TO SUCH INSTRUMENT SHALL BE NOTED ON THE FINAL PLAT; AFTER A FINAL PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED, THREE PRINTS OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHOWING THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED SUBDIVISION CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND A COPY OF THE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR COMPLETION OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY ENGINEER BEFORE SUCH PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED. FINANCIAL GUARANTEE: UNLESS ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED, AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL ACCOMPANY EVERY PLAT WHICH IS TO BE RECORDED TO ENSURE THE ACTUAL SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OF ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN NOT MORE THAN TWO YEARS FOLLOWING THE DATE OF THE RECORDING, OR ONE YEAR IF SIDEWALKS ARE THE ONLY REQUIRED IMPROVEMENT TO BE COMPLETED FOLLOWING THE DATE OF RECORDING. AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS, AS APPROVED BY THE CITY Page 6 of 7 ENGINEER, AND MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE INCREASED IF THE CITY ENGINEER DETERMINES IT APPROPRIATE, AND MAY BE REDUCED FROM TIME TO TIME IN PROPORTION TO THE WORK COMPLETED, AND MAY TAKE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FORMS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY: CASH, TO BE HELD IN A SEPARATE ESCROW ACCOUNT BY THE CITY; OR AN IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT WRITTEN BY A BANK CHARTERED BY THE SATE, THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, OR ANY OTHER STATE OF THE UNITED STATES IF THE BANK IS AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY MANAGER. THE LETTER OF CREDIT SHALL INCLUDE AMONG OTHER THINGS, AN EXPIRATION DATE NOT EARLIER THAN ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ISSUANCE; A PROVISION REQUIRING THE ISSUER OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT TO GIVE AT LEAST 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CITY PRIOR TO EXPIRATION OR RENEWAL OF THE LETTER; AND A PROVISION THAT THE LETTER IS AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED FOR A PERIOD OF TIME EQUALING ITS ORIGINAL TERM IF THE REQUIRED NOTICE IS NOT GIVEN; OR A SURETY BOND ISSUED BY A SURETY COMPANY AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE. THE SURETY BOND SHALL INCLUDE, AS A MINIMUM, THE PROVISIONS REQUIRED FOR LETTERS OF CREDIT. Page 7 of 7 SUNSET POINT ROAD ,~ , ' • ® o 0 ® ~ t -, n ~ for Flumanity of Pinellas County J 7 C~ P'~~ ~7 iill7~ -' ~[,L71 ~1 d \ i 'il" f' + Lr' ~ ~l S O PM DT ~ ~ _ . , . coLOx ~~p ~_ 4 3 2 1 5 6 10 '~ 8 T TR,4CT 'A" ,~ ~ ~ ~ 34 ~~ GR~ 11 STEVENS 33 35 36 Q ~ 37 32 ~ 38 ~ W 0 12 41 40 39 31 m ~ 13 Z ~ Q W STO MWAT .PO ND Q 30 Z ~ Q 0 14 TRACT 'B" rorLOT ~a Z 15 ~ 42 43 44 45 46 47 28 16 STE!/ENS CREEKDR/UE TR,4CT °A" 1T 78 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2T 48 49 50 51 CUMBEY & FA/R /NC FILE 2463 ENTERPR/SE ROAD CLEARWATER, FLOR/DA 33763 Construction Exhibits 018C-STEI~ENS CREEK-COLOR EXHIBIT. dw PHONE. (727) 797-8982