The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2009-04015 - 1740 Weston Dr Well 1.1 - WTPS 1 & 3 Well Field ExpansionFLD2009-04015 1740 WESTON DR WELL 1.1 W1~PS 1 & 3 WELL FIELD EXPANS~O PLANNER OF RECORD: S K ATLAS # 261 A ZONING: OS/R LAND USE: R/OS RECEIVED: 04/02/2009 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC CDB: CLW CoverSheet CDB Meeting Date: May 19, 2009 Case Number: FLD2009-04015 Agenda Item: E. 1. Owner/Applicant: City of Clearwater Representative: Michael Quillen Addresses: (1) 1740 Weston Drive; (2) 1571 Cleveland Street; (3) 2634 Sabal Sprin s Drive;14) 1840 Airport Drive; (5) 1700 Belcher Road;~6) 1709 Keene Road; (7) 3024 Eastland Boulevard; (8) 2784 Enterprise Road East; (9) 2775 State Road 580; (10) 2698 Fifth Avenue North; (11) 1515 Cleveland Street; (12} 2630 Sabal Springs Drive; and (13) 600 South Evergreen Avenue. CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit Utility/Infrastructure uses in the Open/Space Recreation (OSlR) District, the Industrial Research and Technology (IRT) District and the Institutional (I) District as Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Sections 2-1404.A, 2-1304.C and 2-1204.A. CURRENT ZONING: Open/Space Recreation (OS/R) District, Industrial Research and Technology (IRT) District and Institutional (I) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND TTCE f`ATy'~l~1DV~ Recreati0^,~Ope.^, Space ~ ~v~), Traiarupvrt?,t:^viu vTtiii~y (Ti v j, Institutional ()), Industrial Limited (IL) ANALYSIS: Development Proposal: On April 1, 2009, a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application was submitted for Utility/Infrastructure uses (water production wells) at 14 sites throughout the City of Clearwater. On May 6, 2009, the applicant withdrew the request for a water production well located at 1475 North Hibiscus Street that had previously been advertised. Under the current development proposal 13 water production wells are proposed to be located on various City owned properties. As a part of the City Master Plan, the City of Clearwater Public Utilities is making every effort to supply more potable water from local resources rather than relying on regional water suppliers. The proposed water production wells are being developed according to the Florida Administrative Code and Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) regulations. Site location for water production wells is complex due to strict requirements of the Florida Administrative Code. Per the Florida Administrative Code new water production wells that supply a public water system shall be no closer than 200 feet from any on-site sewage treatment and disposal systems. They shall be located no closer than 100 feet from other sanitary hazards that pose a potentially high risk to ground water quality and public health and shall be located no closer than 50 feet from other Community Development Board -May 19, 2009 FLD2009-04015 -Page 1 sanitary hazards that pose a moderate risk to ground water and public health. Additionally, the sites should be "in area free from", or at least not subject to, inundation with surface drainage and floodwater. In other words, the water production well sites should be above a 100-year flood plain. Impermeable Surface Ratio (ISR) is being met on all sites, as the 368 square foot developed area is located on sites ranging from .052. acres to 73.17 acres. Likewise, all the proposed water production wells are meeting any applicable structural setbacks. Both SWFWMD and the Department of Homeland Security restrict any screening or landscaping around the proposed well site. SWFWMD restricts landscape areas from being installed near the well site as the landscape material will invite pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers to leach into the groundwater, thus contaminating the area. To prevent any tampering with the water production wells, the Department of Homeland Security restricts any visibility barriers that would obstruct the view of the well. Visible above ground will be telemetry antennas, a maximum of 45 feet in height; piping and gate valves approximately nine feet in height; electrical components completely screened in cabinetry, approximately six feet above ground; six foot high green vinyl clad chain link fencing; and security lighting approximately 16 feet above ground. All the above ground components will be located on a 16 foot by 23 foot concrete pad. The proposed water production wells will withdraw water from the. aquifer, that water will then be transferred to City Water Treatment Plants to be treated and become drinking water. The water will be withdrawn using a motor and submersible pump. As the motor and pump are located below ground there will be negligible effects acoustically and there will be no odor from the proposed wells thereby eliminating any olfactory effects. The City of Clearwater currently has 19 active water production wells throughout the City. The wells being utility infrastructure and part of the City's water system, they are thus comparable to other utility infrastructure such as light poles, backflow prevention devices, water treatment towers, traffic signals and power poles. Most all of the existing utility infrastructure projects are visible from street rights-of- ways and are accessory to the principal use of the properties. There have been no impacts on adjacent properties from the existing ly active water production wells since their inception five years ago. Pursuant to the Community Development Code (CDC) Sections 2-1403.G (OS/R), 2-1203.M (I) and 2- 1303.Q (IRT) any above ground structure, other than permitted telecommunication towers and utility distribution lines located on or along a rear lot line, shall be screened from view by a landscaped opaque wall or fence which is at least two-thirds the height of the above ground structure, landscaped with trees which will five years after installation substantially obscure the fence or wall and the above ground structure. Additionally, CDC section 2-1403.G (OS/R) states that no above ground structures are located adjacent to street rights-of--ways and the utility/infrastructure facility shall be accessory to the principal use of the property. It is noted that some of the proposed water production sites do not comply with the above criteria; thus the filing of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application. The 13 water production well proposals will be discussed individually below: 1740 WESTON DRIVE, WELL 1-1 Well 1-1 is located on 0.52 acres approximately 140 feet south of the intersection of Otten Street and Weston Drive. Current zoning is Institutional (I) and the future land use category is Transportation/Utility (T/LT). To the north, west and east are residential properties with open space to the south. The site currently has a water storage tower of at least 75 feet in height. The site is currently secured with a chain link fence with barbed wire. The proposed well will be accessory to the principal use of the property and will not be located along a rear lot line or adjacent to a street right-of--way. Community Development Board -May 19, 2009 FLD2009-04015 -Page 2 1571 CLEVELAND STREET, WELL 1-2 Well 1-2 is located on 37.10 acres at the southwest corner of Cleveland Street and Lake Drive. Current zoning is Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) and the future land use category is Recreation/Open Space (R/OS). To the north and east are residential properties with commercial to the south and open space to the west. The site is Crest Lake Park and this well will be located on the far northeast corner of the park. The proposed well will be accessory to the principal use and not located along a rear lot line; however it is adjacent to a street right-of--way and visible from adjacent properties. 600 SOUTH EVERGREEN AVENUE, WELL 1-3 Well 1-3 is located on 25.60 acres located at the southwest corner of Turner Street and South Evergreen Avenue. Current zoning is Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) and the future land use category is Recreation/Open Space (R/OS). To the west, east and south are residential properties with Institutional (1) zoning (school) to the north. This proposed well will be located in the center of the park and not located on a rear lot line, nor adjacent to a street right-of--way or visible from adjacent properties and will be accessory to the principal use. 1515 CLEVELAND STREET, WELL 1-4 Well 1-4 is located on 37.10 acres at the southeast corner of Cleveland Street and Glenwood Avenue. Current zoning is Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) and the future land use category is Recreation/Open Space (R/OS). To the north, east and west are residential properties with commercial to the south. The site is Crest Lake Park and this well will be located on the far northwest corner of the park. The proposed well will be accessory to the principal use and not located along a rear lot line; however it is adjacent to a street right-of--way and visible from adjacent properties. 1709 KEENE ROAD, WELL 1-5 Well 1-S is located on 10 acres at the southeast corner of Flagler Drive and Keene Road. Current zoning is Industrial Research and Technology (IRT) and the future land use category is Industrial Limited (IL). To the north, west and east are industrial uses, to the south is the Clearwater Airpark runway. 1840 AIRPORT DRIVE, WELL S1R We1151R is located on 73.17 acres located approximately 700 feet east of the intersection of Keene Road and Airport Drive. Current zoning is Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) and the future land use category is Recreation/Open Space (R/OS). To the north is open space, to the east is the Clearwater Airpark and to both the south and west are residential properties. The proposed well will be accessory to the principal use of the property and will not be located along a rear lot line; however it is visible and adjacent to a street right-of--way. 1700 BELCHER ROAD, WELL 80 Well 80 is located on 6.19 acres at the northwest corner of Logan Street and Belcher Road. Current zoning is Institutional (I) as is the future land use category. Located on the subject site is a Clearwater Fire Station. To the north and south are industrial uses, to the west is a retention facility and to the east are residential properties. 2634 SABAL SPRINGS DRIVE, WELL 3-1 Well 3-1 is located on 23.01 acres located approximately 190 feet west of the dead end of Sabal Springs Drive. Current zoning is Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) and the future land use category is Recreation/Open Space (R/OS). Located on the subject site is the Countryside Community Center and Sports Complex. To the north, east, and south are residential uses and to the west is a Progress Energy easement. The proposed water production well will be located at the far southern end of the complex. Community Development Board -May 19, 2009 FLD2009-04015 -Page 3 The proposed well will be accessory to the principal use of the property and will not be located along a rear lot line or adjacent to a street right-of--way. 3024 EASTLAND BOULEVARD, WELL 3-2 Well 3-2 is located on 0.96 acres approximately 100 feet east of the intersection of Burntfork Drive and Eastland Boulevard. Current zoning is Institutional (n as is the future land use category. To the east, north and west are residential properties and to the south are office and commercial uses. The proposed well will be located at the far southwest corner of the parcel. 2784 ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST, WELL 3-3 Well 3-3 is located on 6.80 acres approximately 400 feet west of the intersection of Frisco Drive and Enterprise Road East. Current zoning is Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) and the future land use category is Recreation/Open Space (R/OS). To the north, south and west are open space and to the east are residential properties. The proposed well will be located near the center of the site and will be accessory to the principal use of the property and will not be located along a rear lot line and is not adjacent to a street right-of--way, nor visible from adjacent properties. 2775 STATE ROAD 580, WELL 3-4 Well 3-4 is located on 7.50 acres approximately 580 feet east of the intersection of Countryside Boulevard and State Road 580. Current zoning is Institutional (I) as is the future land use category. Located on the subject property is the Countryside Library, the Countryside Fire Department and a wastewater treatment plant. Residentially zoned properties surround the parcel. The proposed well will be located on the eastern half of the parcel located just west of the existing water storage towers. 2630 SABAL SPRINGS DRIVE, WELL 3-5 Well 3-5 is located on 23.01 acres located approximately 190 feet west of the dead end of Sabal Springs Drive. Current zoning is Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) and the future land use category is Recreation/Open Space (R/OS). Located on the subject site is the Countryside Community Center and Sports Complex. T o the north, east, and south are residential uses and to the west is a Progress Energy easement. The proposed water production well will be located at the northwest corner of the complex and will be accessory to the principal use, and will not be adjacent to aright-of--way but will be along the rear lot line. It is noted that the subject well site is located in a densely wooded area of the park. 2698 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH, WELL 79 Well 79 is located on 6.80 acres approximately 210 feet north of the intersection of Chatauqua Avenue and 4`~ Avenue North. Current zoning is Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) and the future land use category is Recreation/Open Space (R/OS). To the north and east are open space, to the south is residential and to the west is a drainage easement. The proposed water production well will be located interior to the site and will be accessory to the principal use, will not be adjacent to aright-of--way, nor along the rear lot line. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the properties. Community Development Board -May 19, 2009 FLD2009-04015 -Page 4 COMPLIANCE WITI3 FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-1404.A, 2-1304.C and 2-1204.A (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of sunrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is pemvtted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street N/A N/A parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and amactive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: O Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board -May 19, 2009 FLD2009-04015 -Page 5 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual. acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of May 7, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB). Findings of Fact. The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That one of the subject properties is located on 0.52 acres approximately 140 feet south of the intersection of Otten Street and Weston Drive; 2. That one of the subject properties is located on 37.10 acres at the southwest corner of Cleveland Street and Lake Drive; 3. That one of the subject properties is located at the southwest corner of Turner Street and South Evergreen Avenue; 4. That one of the subject properties is located on 37.10 acres at the southeast corner of Cleveland Street and Glenwood Avenue; 5. That one of the subject properties is located on 10 acres at the southeast corner of Flagler Drive and Keene Road; 6. That one of the subject properties is located on 73.17 acres located approximately 700 feet east of the intersection of Keene Road and Airport Drive; 7. That one of the subject properties is located on 6.19 acres at the northwest corner of Logan Street and Belcher Road; 8. That two of the subject properties are located on 23.01 acres located approximately 190 feet west of the dead end of Sabal Springs Drive; 9. That one of the subject properties is located on 0.96 acres approximately 100 feet east of the intersection of Burntfork Drive and Eastland Boulevard; 10. That one of the subject properties is located on 6.80 acres approximately 400 feet west of the intersection of Frisco Drive and Enterprise Road East; 11. That one of the subject properties is located on 7.50 acres approximately 580 feet east of the intersection of Countryside Boulevard and State Road 580; Community Development Board -May 19, 2009 FLD2009-04015 -Page 6 12. That one of the subject properties is located on 6.80 acres approximately Z10 feet north of the intersection of Chatauqua Avenue and 4"' Avenue North; and 13. That the subject properties are located within the Open/Space Recreation (OS/R) District, Industrial Research and Technology (IRT) District and Institutional (I) District and the Recreation/Open Space (R/OS), Transportation/Utility (T/CT), Institutional (I), Industrial Limited (IL) Future Land Use Plan category. Conclusions of Law. The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per CDC Sections 2-1201, 2-1301 and 2-1401; 2. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Flexibility criteria for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per CDC Sections 2-1404.A, 2-1304.C and 2-1204A; and 3. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913.A. Based upon the above and subject to the attached conditions, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit Utility/Infrastructure uses in the Open/Space Recreation (OS/R) District, the Industrial Research and Technology (IRT) District and the Institutional (I) District as Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Sections 2-1404.A, 2-1304.C and 2-1204.A. Condition of Approval: 1. That the final design of all structures be consistent with the plans approved by the CDB. Prepared by Pianning Department Staff: -~- ~ ' A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ^ Location Map ^ Aerial Map ^ Zoning Map ^ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ^ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Weston Dr 1740 -City Wells (OSR,I,IRT) 5.7.09 DRC - SK\1740 Weston Dr -Wells- Staff Report.doc Community Development Board -May 19, 2009 FLD2009-04015 -Page 7 Resume A. Scott Kurleman 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4567 x2504 scott.kurleman(a~myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Planner III Planner II August 2008 to present June 2005 to August 2008 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. Land Resource Specialist City of Clearwater June 1996 to June 2005 Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with City land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to tL ,.~~1...-~ ~_~..1 a,.tl ,..l ~L .. ,] /___.7__.,___ 1___ 1_ 1~1___ e11JlAre L11QL ~J1CLlll 11IQ.1G11[f.l 111JLQ11GLL per U1G approveLL 1C111LLJl~QYG p1Q11 relllallls lIl a. Ilea.lLlly growing condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on public and private properties. • Account Manager Cherry Lake Farms,lMG Enterprise, Inc. 1993 -1996 Groveland, FL Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan. Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees. Licensed Marketing Representative Allstate Insurance Company 1991 -1993 Clearwater, FL Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance. • Store Manager William Natorp company, Inc. 1983 - 1991 Cincinnati, OH Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products. EDUCATION GRADUATE -Certificate: Community Development, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHFLORIDA, TAMPA, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Graduated 1998. Major: Management. AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER, Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in Arboriculture. ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414. CITY OF C~ LEARWA"1~ER -- Pn;l~ :)Prl(.li I3i,~: -f~--4~, (,I-Iu~:+>: AI~1=1.. ~"I~,FUi,A l~: ~~-~, -f~ \fl~~ltll'.\i. tilill\l(.L~ f~l Il.lil\(~, f~1ll 1(1I Ill ,,\f~;ltli: ,-~\i`.'•.i I':, ~I Il~f ~_'lf, (,Lli:\R\tal-CL;, Fl~rl:ll,\ ii ~,!~. l l Lrl'IU,>l: (^'-I 5r•. ~- I-;I) F\>; I-?~I ;t,'-~-~; May 6, 2009 A. Scott Kurleman Planner III, ISA Arborist City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: WTPs 1 & 3 Wellfield Expansion Project Phase I- Well Installation Well site 52R Dear Mr. Kurleman, City staff has determined that Well 52R at 1475 North Hibiscus Street will no longer be eon.ctni~ted. 1 hereby request that this well he excluded from the Flexible Development Application, FLD# 2009-04015- If you have any questions, I can be reached at (727) 562-4750 or at email address Michael.quillen(a~myclearwater.com . Sincerely, h Michael D. Quillen, P.E. City Engineer City of Clearwater LETTER'S RELIEVED 4 Bernard P. and Veta W. 2583 Burntfork Drive Clearwater, FL 33761 May 9, 2009 Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director -Community Development Board Dear Mr. Delk, ~~~~~~ ~Yfz~e ~ , P l I LANNING & DEVELOP~~IENT SE''.,Ir_S c~~ c~ _~~ ,.~Y^r~TFa My property of 2583 Burntfork Drive is located approximately 75 feet from proposed well No. 8. I am an interested party who is filing written notice of objection with the planning director and city clerk prior to the hearing. I am very concerned with the well pumping excess water from the aquifer which could create an underground cavern that cannot support the ground above causing it to collapse and resulting in a sink hole, We have enough Sink hnle5 in Fl4rirla v~ithni~t arlriinu a well in tho ~nnfincc of ~ nniohh~rh~~d. 1 .o .. .. ....... ... .......... .......b. am also concerned with the well pumping excess water that will have effect on my own irrigation well which supplies my sprinkler system. Therefore, I am objecting the proposal of well (8j and holding the city of Clearwater responsible for any effect or damage the well may have on my property. Please note this is a letter of protest for your agenda file. Sincerely, Bernard P. Brennan GJ~~~~~~~ _ Veta W. Brennan ~~ ~~ Cc: Steven Fishman, Attorney at Law P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 ' ~ n' .-- i~~C~J~~~~'~~ MAY f i Zt109 L ~ ~~ Patricia Cooper 3048 Eastland Blvd., Unit C-202 Clearwater, FL 33761 Telephone: 727-796-7990 Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director Community Development Board ~ 2 City of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 i Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 W PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARVV,4TER RE Potential Well Digginq at 3024 Eastland Blvd. Letter of Protest and Request That Item NOT Be Placed on the Consent Agenda Dear Mr. Delk: In response to the City's Notice of Public Hearing set for Tuesday, May 19, 2009 at 1:00 PM regarding the above matter, I called your office and spoke with Mr. Michael Quillen. Following is my understanding of our conversation: The well will have a 10' x 20' concrete pad with a 6' chain link fence around it. Above ground will be showing a pipe in and a pipe out. The pump will be installed underground. There will be no actual building on the site, and there should be no ordor or noise, since everything is being built underground. I expressed concern that you could possibly be pumping an excessive volume of water off site to sell to other Clearwater residents. Imperial Oaks Condominiums where I reside has its own irrigation wells used for watering of the onsite landscaping. He explained that most likely our wells were originally drilled at no more than 100' deep into available surface water, and that the City would be drilling much deeper up to 150' feet, through the layer of clay, directly into the bedrock limestone aquifer, thus by passing the water source now being used by Imperial Oaks. I then expressed a further concern with the possibility of the City's excessive water pumping from the limestone aquifer, which could possibly in the future create air pockets in the aquifer which could potentially cause ground settlement when an underground cavern cannot support the surface above, thus opening a hole without any warning. Mr. Quillen explained to me that the water levels in the limestone aquifer are monitored by other governmental agencies so that this problem most likely would not occur. I inquired as to the number of times per year the aquifer level is monitored, and he was not sure of that information. Mr. Quillen explained that engineering reports grid engineers would be available at the May 19 hearing for discussion and review by concerned property owners. From the enclosed plat sketch of the buildings at Imperial Oaks (10 buildings with 166 property owners) and the photos of where the City has the approximate site marked for installation of the well, you can readily see that the well is "in our backyards." Are there any other park sites nearby that the City could consider for its wells? I am also providing courtesy copies of this letter and attachments to the Board of Directors of the Imperial Oaks Condominium Association and am requesting that the Board also file a letter of concern to put the City on notice with regard to any future potential problems that may arise as to our water supply being depleted and any possible ground settlement on our property. I am also providing copies to other property owners who may have received the Notice of Hearing and am urging them to file Letters of Protest for your file and to attend the May 19 hearing. Please place this letter in your tiie on this matter as a Letter of Protest and Request and That This Item No Be Placed on the Consent Agenda. I do plan on attending the hearing if time permits. Very truly yours, Patricia Cooper Attachments: Plat Sketch with Approximate Well Site Photos of Site CC: Board of Directors Imperial Oaks Condominium Association C/o Community Accounting and Management 40347 U. S. 19 North Tarpon Springs, FL 34689 CC: Other Interested Property Owners r Q r~'f ..r _m c .~ W 0 3 ~ 2601 0 '~ 2666. .~ a i 25$9 >_ ~; ~~~ T N 9tSNOP CREEK PE?MD I ;101 f-J02 F-'y},j F~008 F~J00 F.Jto t 76, F. 1' ms i'.;)D5• 2 70B f ;10T - 7K17 F7G5 F.ZW F203 f 708 1701 F~70E F209 F,710 t t0, f~t02 F~t0.7 fiOs Ft05 f,rp8 f+Ot F~,oB F16p F~ItD _ _ - TNi~[TI1T(.T~ T~ ; n:211 G, `~ n 101 !~ _ w702 6108 G107 Gt08 G105 G,W 41W Gt02 GtO+ w102 ' w2ro G70a 6367 670E G205 G7M 4203 4202 G201 C w,w _ w20+ - H~,Oi - w705 ~~ ~/~ D wtaa ~q0 i FAVILUON .._ ~Q N 10C L_J ]soS[. KtblS _ w 207 w,OJ w26e 320, 1702 12W }20! 1207 }208 }2ps }308 w100 w20G l101 }104 },O~ 3IW }165 }!O8 }107 }tp8 - M,OY s~l w310 h 116 .,o{yGS DRAIE SAl1TM ` ~ Clpe~ tt08 1105 t,0+ rtW x103 trot G2fl7 LL7 ' 1107 2:,07 s705 t2o+ 1703. 1202 t702 Glob 1707 1308 City Parcel clop -. c.aos c Iov C lOS C ~ 'Q Gig7+ C-Iq~ c:20? ~.,~ c7o1 cro1 proposed Weil Site E lot 4 ~o~ E•i03 E•107 E•703 E•10.1 E2W E 10s E•20S e E t05 E 708 F. tOfi E•307 E~t07 E•708 E 108 E-7pi 6 tog D 701 b,0, P207 D 101 DXU P I0J Dios D 104 D705 _D Digy yD n7oe _} 612M -j D20/ DIw 6208 b, 08 .1t 430D D2t0 D „o azu, afol &702 D dt07 B.SOJ stagy 8366 ~~a A7pt ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ;Id, ~.e03 41 ~ ~ ~~ e EASTLAND B~UIEVARD ~.. ~~ t 4~ `J .._ a~h~. J~k'~ f r2'. ~ F, a;_,- -- w.. 't i M t Yea. ( !t '~ ~+ ~ ~4~ r'1 ~~, aril ~~ ~ +~ { 1 ~rV4 ~~ ~~~~' '' ~ ~ ~~~ a 7 ?~, r 1 f ::~~4 f,'~ e~ ~;`~ „ ~ `. ({ J~ ^~' fa h~r rl~f ~f ,-`t{ P~(A4,;X ~~ ~r ~' ~ ~ /.~ r,,, r~ + 4. '~• Jll r e,: ~Y % i '',L ~ ~j ~~~ti ~ k. a~ t, 1'~_i: q u b~: ~ /. t / , ~ A~yyy .-(t ; 7 C ~ ice, ~ , {,~• ~ 1~ N W~ J k t ~ > ^,~ i { ,'~ .FYI r~~ ~~~~ ti:'r. }. i N } ,a,,. _ .r° .:a Y ' Y,', '._ ~ ~t ~' ~•r~ii f~+ E 1 A ~ B J ~ ~ A, . ,.i ~g y Nnn ~' 'f Hwy 1 1 SCE-•N~~ ~y ' t~ s f ~~~f ~~ ~` ~ -- ~~ y<'t ~~~ ~j ,1 r:A S.i ~-: :s :i Page 1 of 1 Kurleman, Scott From: gshellenberger@msn.com Sent: Monday, May 18,20093:38 PM To: Kurleman, Scott Subject: Letter of Objection Scott, Attached is a written Letter of Objection to the City's proposed request to add 14 new wells. Some of the residents of our community that have signed the letter also plan to attend tomorrow's Community Development Board meeting to discuss this topic. We plan to have one spokesperson make a very short oral comment in addition to the more detailed letter attached. If you have any difficulty reading the attached document, please send me an e-mail and I could fax it if necessary. Thank You Gary Shellenberger 5/1912009 Letter of Obj ection To Permit Utility/Infrastructure Use on Land Previously Zoned for Other Uses Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clerwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 After receiving a Notice of Public Hearing on this matter, several residents in our neighborhood met to discuss our mutual concerns with this project. After much discussion we determined that we were not in favor or allowing this change in land use for several reasons. This letter outlines our concerns and questions, and notes our objection to the City of Clearwater's request to allow the creation of 14 new water production wells in land previously zoned for other uses including Open/Space Recreation. Insufficient Notification of Potentially Affected Residents First we, object to this re-allocation ofland use because most residents that may be potentially affected by this change have not been notified and are unaware of the potential impact to their homes and utility costs. US Geological Surveys have shown that sinkhole development has occurred as far as 1- mile from local well fields (Reference 1). "The effects of pumping on sinkhole development near the Section 21 well field illustrate the general relation between aggressive pumping, ground-water declines, and sinkhole development. Within 1 month of increasing the pumping rate, 64 new sinkholes formed within a I-mile radius ofthe well field." Other environmental issues that may affect local residents large distances from the proposed wellheads include the potential for lowered water levels affecting residential shallow wells used for irrigation. Since the Notice of Public Hearing on this matter was only sent to residents within 200 feet ofthe proposed new wells, and there has been virtually no review or discussion of this project in public newspapers, most residents that are potentially affected by this action have not been informed by the City. Potential for Saltwater Intrusion US Geological Survey (Reference 3) discusses the problem of salt water intrusion on fresh water supplies near coastal regions: "Saltwater intrusion is a major threat to the freshwater resources of the coastal areas in southeastern Florida. There are three primary mechanisms by which saltwater contaminates the freshwater reservoir in the Page 1 of6 unconfined, surficial aquifers of the region: (1) subsurface movement of seawater (lateral large-scale intrusion), (2) seepage of seawater from tidal canals and streams, and (3) upward movement of connate saltwater (water remaining from the time of deposition) from lower formations due to well- field withdrawals. All three mechanisms are driven by the lowering of freshwater levels in the surficial aquifers. However, the effects of the last two mechanisms (seepage and upward movement) generally are limited to relatively small regions, whereas lateral intrusion affects a much larger region ofthe aquifers." Further information on salt water intrusion can be found in Reference 4: "Saltwater intrusion can happen in three different ways. The first method (depicted in a diagram on pg. 58) involves saline water from the coast slowly pushing back the fresh inland groundwater. Horizontal intrusion is caused by excessive freshwater pumpage, which relieves the pressure on the saltwater, thus allowing the isochlor to move inland. "Drawing down" of freshwater also contributes to this form of intrusion. During drawdown, freshwater moves down toward the wellhead, allowing saltwater to rush in -- the saltwater is, in effect, "pulled" in to take the place of the freshwater. Drawdown is essentially a local phenomenon around wells with a saltwater source in close proximity. Pumpage can also pull saltwater up through an effect called "upconing." As water moves toward the wellhead, saltwater in deeper aquifers rises in a process resembling an inverted funnel. "If you're real close to the coast, it doesn't make sense to have a real strong pump age demand," says Mike Slayton, deputy executive director of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), "because that can not only cause saltwater to move in laterally, it can actually pull the saltwater up to you. "" Tampa Bay Water has analyzed the potential water supply for the entire Tampa Bay Region. The map shown below from Reference 5 outlines the type of potential water supply that is available in the region. It should be noted that this report primarily shows that the potential water supply in Pinellas County is basically brackish groundwater. This is not to say that there is absolutely no fresh water in Pinellas County. That of course is not true, but it does indicate that there is a very limited supply of fresh water, and increased pumping of that water could result in further salt water intrusion to what fresh water that is available as noted by References 3 and 4. In discussing the potential of sinkhole development, Reference 6 provided by the City Engineer Mike Quillen, noted that: "Throughout the (City of Clearwater) wellfield's history, there have been increasing concentrations of chlorides (salts), causing a decrease in Page 2 of6 wellfield production to 3 MGD over the past decade (prior to 2002) to maintain acceptable water quality." This clearly verifies that salt water intrusion is a serious potential problem for the Clearwater fresh water supply. It also raises concerns that additional wells may not be able to produce the anticipated water supply for residents due to environmental reasons. . BrackishGroundwa . Fresh Groundwater . Reclaimed Water . 8eawaterDesalinati . Surface\AJatet · What analysis has the City completed to evaluate the potential of salt water intrusion on these new wells? · What assurances are there that the lower level of contaminated water will not be compromised causing "up-coning" into the fresh water supply vertically vs. horizontally? · Has anyone reviewed the history of drilling wells and the negative impact those wells had on the fresh water supply in Clearwater? Page 3 of6 Potential for Lowered Water Levels Even though we have been assured by Mike Quillen of the City that additional wells will be strictly monitored for environmental impact by SWFWMD, it is unclear as to whether any analysis has been done to determine what a "substantial negative change in water level" really means. Many residents in the vicinity ofthe proposed well locations use shallow wells for irrigation. Ifthe proposed new City wells results in lowered water levels, these wells will go dry, and the residents will be forced to use City water for irrigation. As the City does not presently offer any access to reclaimed water in our neighborhood, the irrigation needs of these residents will actually increase the amount of potable water used by these residents. This would be a direct conflict with our community environmental needs to reduce overall water consumption. · What reserves has the City included in its budget for mitigation of claims from residents regarding loss of water from their existing shallow wells due to this project? · What plans does the City have in the budget to provide reclaimed water free of charge to residents whose shallow wells cease to function due to this project? On the other hand, if SWFWMD monitoring of the water levels results in reduction or cessation of pumping from the City wells, then the new wells result in no or limited additional water capacity for the City. The City's own long range plan notes that: "The City also maintains a water use permit issued through the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) to pump an average of 6.25 million gallons daily (MGD) from its nineteen active wellheads. In 2007, the actual average pumpage from the City's wells is was approximately 5 MGD." · What were the reasons for this shortfall of pumping from the City's existing wells? If it was a result of SWFWMD monitoring of environmental conditions, what research indicates that the proposed wells will be any different? · Has the City obtained a new water use permit from SWFWMD for these proposed wells, or are the new wells constrained by the existing 6.25 MGD authorized rate? Potential for Sinkhole Development Even though the US Geological Survey (Reference 1) directly correlated ground water pumping to the development of sinkholes: "New sinkholes have been correlated to land-use practices (Newton, 1986). Induced sinkholes are conceptually divided into two types: those resulting from ground-water pumping (Sinclair, 1982) and those related to construction and development practices." It has also been shown that this problem may be managed to some degree by controlling the rate of water pumped from a specific well (Reference 2) Page 4 of6 Design elements that reduce sinkhole development include "pumping at relatively low rates, distributing the total pumpage from the wells over a large area and causing only small water level changes in shallow irrigation wells." · What reserves has the City included in its budget for mitigation of claims from residents in the case that design elements fall short of projections and sinkhole development becomes a problem? It should be noted that the sinkhole analysis from SDIEnvironmental provided by Mike Quillen from the City, Reference 6, is based on the assumption of a permitted pump age rate of 6.25 MGD. · lfthe City has a new water use permit from SWFWMD that authorizes a higher pumpage rate, has the City updated their sinkhole analysis accordingly? · If the permitted pumpage rate stays at 6.25 MGD, what significant benefit do the new wells provide over the 5 MGD that was pumped in 200n Financial Issues Financial and Other Concerns: · Where will the revenue come from to drill the wells, build the structures and maintain and monitor their performance and will this adversely affect our already depleted ability to fund services like fire, police and emergency operations? . How will ongoing monitoring of the wells be paid for? · What impact will these new wells have on our city water bills? · What liability does the city assume and what remedies will the city provide in case of dry wells, sink holes and/or other unforeseen environmental issues? Up to what distance from these wells will the city claim responsibility for these unforeseen issues? · Does the city have liability insurance to cover costs of any environmental impacts? · Does the city carry or will they carry insurance for damage to our existing shallow well water supply and/or damage caused from sink holes or other problems as a result of these efforts? · Has the city obtained a legal opinion letter from counsel regarding their liability for damage to the environment, homes, loss of free water from shallow wells or other impacts not yet identified? We object to the addition of these wells proposed by the City of Clearwater and feel that the City should be implementing policies that emphasize conservation and utilization of reclaimed water rather than policies that encourage more use of our fragile fresh water supply and the potential permanent damage to that supply. Page 5 of6 Sincerely, Gary & Janet Shellenberger 2671 Luce Dr. West Clearwater, FL 33761 Karen & Joe Hahn 2533 Anderson Dr. West Clearwater, FL 33761 Harold & Margi Becker 2678 Luce Dr. West Clearwater, FL 33761 Larry & Elaine Cornillaud 2830 Haverhill Dr. Clearwater, FL 33761 Terry & Barbara Muntges 2808 Luce Dr. North Clearwater, FL 33761 Linda & Doug Metzler 2534 Anderson Dr. West Clearwater, FL 33761 Louis & Karen Zagar 2835 Anderson Court Clearwater, FL 33761 Judy Rubsamen 2528 Anderson Dr. Clearwater, FL 33761 Dale & Peggy Windsor 2684 Luce Dr W Clearwater, FL 33761 Sean & Angela Kelly 2665 Luce Dr. W. Clearwater, FL 33761 Daryle & Sarah Jones 2540 Anderson Dr. West Clearwater, FL 33761 Jim & Cheryl Roberts 2677 Luce Dr. W. Clearwater, FL 33761 Chip & Kathy Seidel 2813 Anderson Dr. South Clearwater, FL 33761 References Reference 1: http://fl.water.usgs.gov/PDF files/cir1182 tihanskv.pdf Reference 2: http://Vvww . tampabaywater. org/ documents/facilities/midpinellasdesalination/Brac kresponse. pdf Reference 3: http://fl.water.usgs.gov/Miami/online reports/wri964285 Reference 4: http://americancityandcountv.com/mag/govemment saltwater intrusion floridas Reference 5: http://wVvw .futurewater.org/images/MasterW aterPlanMap.ipg Reference 6: "Assessment of Potential for Sinkhole Formation due to Pumpage in the Vicinity ofthe City of Clearwater's Wellfield", SDI Environmental Services Inc. Page 6 of6 EXPERT WITNESS RESUMES ' 4 v- M~KIM~CREED BS, Civil Engineering, University of South Florida Professional Licensure PE/FL/52017 Affiliations WEF Florida Water Environmental Association AW WA SEDA, Affiliate Jeffrey Bowe, PE Director, Project Management Summary Mr. Lowe has more than 24 years of experience in utility engineering projects in both water and sewer. Mr. Lowe's experience encompasses: water supply, treatment and disposal; reclaimed water pumping, transmission and distribution; wastewater collection, treatment, pumping and disposal; and utility infrastructure and relocation design. Mr. Lowes project management experience, includes plamning, preliminary engineering, modeling, final design, estimating, QA/QC reviews, permitting, bidding, and construction management and observation services. Selected Project Experience Water Supply Treatment and Distribution Water Treatment Plants 1 and 3 Wellfield Expansion -Phase 1, City of Clearwater, FL: Mr Lowe served as the Senior Project Manager. The City of Clearwater intends to construct four new wells in the Water Treatment Plant (WTP) No. 3 area, and five new wells in the WTP No. 1 area. Each well is targeted to produce approximately 0.25 million gallons per day. The additional proposed water production will require the modification of the City's existing Water Use Permit issued by the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD). This project includes the initial efforts associated with the Water Use Permit data collection, ground water modeling, permit application and response to requests for SWFWMD for additional information. The first phase includes design efforts related to the development of nine new wells anal the engineering and hydrogeologic services. during test well construction and testing. Wellfield Relocation/Expansion -Phase 2, City of Clearwater, FL: Project Manager for services work associated with; the site reselection for the three wells; design, construction, testing and analysis of the additional new well for WTP No. 3; development of standardized well construction documents for the installation cif all new wells; relocation of the four unused permitted wells (Wells 51R, 52R, 79 & 80); and refurbishment of the existing three wells (Wells 23, 68 & 69). In addition, Phase II includes the additional Water Use Permitting, data collection, ground water modeling, permit application. and response to requests from the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWIVID.) Phase II includes the design, bidding and construction phase services for the additional raw water piping to interconnect the new wells to the respective Water Treatment Plants. Wellfield Maximization Water Supply Treatment and Distribution Engineering Assistance, City of Clearwater, FL: Project Manager. Clearwater's raw water supply well field system is comprised of 23 wells, of which 19 are currently in operation. Due to the rising cost of purchasing water, the City is making significant improvements to their wellfield to maximize the capacity of the system. The improvements include mechanical and water quality testing, video taping, cleaning, and replacement of the pumps in several of the existing wells. As part of the well maximization work, McKim & Creed provided technical assistance for evaluating City wells 23, 53, 58, 77, 78 and 81. Evaluation included: well site visits, operating parameters; monitoring discharge pressures, drawdown levels, and discharge flows; electrical cabinets and communications equipment; & motor, pump and column pipe at We1153. McKim & Creed also furnished design and construction plans and specifications for the replacement of We1181; provided permitting; final inspection and prepared Engineers Certification for submittal to the DOH. www.mckimcreed.com EdUCatlOn ' ~ Lovd~ 2 ,~ M KIM~CREED We1178 and 23 Cleaning and Pump Replacement, City of Clearwater, FL: Project Manager. T`he City of Clearwater's We1178 is part of the Wellfield network providing raw water to the City's Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant No. 1. The well experienced a reduction in production and an increase in drawdown. To investigate the reduction in flow, McKim & Creed visited the well site and made suggestions to regain productivity. McKim & Creed proposed to hydraulically clean the well, upsize pumping capacity at We1181, and upsize the pump and motor at We1178. This work includes the design, construction and a complete computer simulated hydraulic model of the existing system to develop parameters for the selection of the new well pump for We1178. In addition, Well 23 also had minimal drawdown and low chlorides and maybe able to provide increased capacity with no net impact to the water quality. This was verified by conducting a specific capacity test and analytical testing to assure that increased production from this well will not impact the production of the other wells in the network. This model will be utilized to assess the potential impacts from the nine proposed wells in the City's Well Expansion project. Reverse Osmosis Plant Filter Upgrades and Evaluation, City of Clearwater, FL: Mr. Lowe served as Client Manager and provided QA/QC for the project. The City of Clearwater Water Treatment Plant No. 1 was experiencing problems with its multi-media filters. The problems included malfunctioning valves, inaccurate flow measurement, unbalanced hydraulic loading on the filters, incomplete backwashing and air scour, and the need for manual operation during backwashing. This work assignment included data collection, field testing, and discussion with the City and the filter manufacturer to determine the problems associated with the filters, design and operational modifications that improved the operation of the filters, drawings and technical specifications for bidding, and a written standard operating protocol for backwashing and maintenance of the filters. The goal for the multi-media filter improvements project was to allow for efficient operation of the filters and to reduce the operational staff time spent to manually operate the filters. Water Treatment Plant No. 3 Generator Replacement Project, City of Clearwater, FL: Project Manager. The City of Clearwater operates three Water Treatment Plants and 19 water supply wells. Each of the water plants function both as treatment facilities and ground storage reservoirs. Reservoir No. 3 consists of two 5 MG storage tanks, chloramination facilities, and four high service pumps. At present the flow from Pinellas County averages 7 MGD and the flow from the wells total 1.21vIGD. Reservoir No. 3 was serviced by one 250 KW standby diesel generator, which did not meet the Florida Administrative Code (FAC) Chapter No. 62-555 requirements for continuous standby power allowance for delivery of drinking water that meets all primary and secondary standards while delivering peak daily demand of the system. McKim & Creed designed the replacement of the existing generator with a new unit along with. the Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS), wiring, fuel tank, generator day tank and generator enclosure in order to meet the FAC requirements. East County Wellfield Expansion, Manatee County, Bradenton, FL: Served. as Technical Advisor. Due to an increase in permitted capacity, along with the County's challenges in meeting its potable water demands, the County needed to install new production wells in the East County Wellfield. Initially, two new wells are proposed to be constructed and it is anticipated that a total of five new wells will ultimately be constructed. McKim & Creed is providing engineering services for the design, permitting, bidding and construction phase services that includes the design of two new production wells, pump houses, generators, and electrical and instrumentation. www.mckimcreed.com ~, ,vt MCKIM~CREED taupe 3 Alafia River Pump Station Backwash Evaluation, Tampa Bay Water, Tampa, FL: Served as Technical Advisor for engineering services for the evaluation of the Alafia River Raw Water Pump Station and intake screens. The pump station experienced successive backwashing that would last from 1 to 1 1/z hours. During this period, the pump station capacity reduced by approximately fifty percent due to the configuration of the station.. This reduction in capacity affects Tampa Bay Water's ability to utilize this water source during high flow events, which are essential to meeting the overall water plan. The goal of this project was to evaluate the operation of the pump station. intake screens as it pertained to the backwashing of sediment from the screens, and to recommend a course of action to minimize station down-time during the backwashing process. Since the Alafia River Pump Station. is unmanned, as part of this project we evaluated the current instrumentation systems and determined options to improve the capability to remotely monitor and operate the facility. Fawn Ridge & Lake Park Ammonia Storage Tanks and Feed Pump, Hillsborough County, Tampa, FL: QA/QC. McKim & Creed prepared civil, mechanical, structural, electrical and instrumentation and control design documents along with an engineer's opinion of probable construction costs. Improvements for this project included the extension of the concrete slabs and walls of the existing containment areas around the new storage tanks and the replacement of the existing wood frame roof with a structural steel system. At the Lake Park WTP, one additional ammonia feed pump skid and associated chemical piping and controls was also required to meet the new flow capacity. Design, bidding and construction phase services to house three existing sodium hypochlorite tanks within a butler style enclosure was also provided along with the permitting services to secure necessary construction permits from the Hillsborough County Health Department, Hillsborough County Building Department and the Southwest Florida Water Management District. Water Storage Tank Modifications -Capri Isle, Pinellas County, Clearwater, FL: Client Manager, Technical Advisor, QA/QC. Project includes design, permitting, bidding and limited construction phase services for the recommendations outlined in the final Engineering Report for the work efforts identified at the Capri Isle Pump Station. The scope of work includes an increase to the pumping capacity of Capri Isle Pumping Station on Treasure Island; modifications to the Capri Isle Pump Station to operate in aflow-through mode with variable frequency drives (VFDs); and the addition of automation controls. After review, the County elected to do the improvements to decrease water age and simplify the operation of the station. This effort involves expanding the hydraulic model to include the evaluation of the existing Madeira Beach pressure control valve, and the Oak Hurst and Logan Stations. Reclaimed Water Pumping and Distribution Reclaimed Water Master Plan Re-evaluation (2006), City of Clearwater, FL: Project Manager. The City of Clearwater has expanded its reclaimed water systems to serve residential, commercial and open space areas of the City. As system expansion continues, the development of cost effective projects is becoming increasingly difficult. This project reviewed the current determination of priorities and system development plans and determine if alternative approaches to project area determination are appropriate, and what impacts changes to the program would have on reclaimed water utilization, capital expenditures and enterprise funding. McKim & Creed also assisted the City in the development of a plan to accomplish field reconnaissance of the targeted project areas to update the estimates of existing shallow and/or deep wells and lake withdrawals being used for a source of irrigation and provide supervisory oversight of the plan. www.mckimcreed.com ~'~,i- .1.Y.IC.~1~~~REE~ Lowe ~l Skycrest Reclaimed Water System, City of Clearwater, FL: Client Manager and Technical Advisor. This project encompasses the Skycrest neighborhood, located south of Overlea Street to Gulf to Bay (SR 60), and west of Belcher Road to Saturn. Avenue. The reclaimed water system will be served by a new interconnect transmission system which will connect the City's eastern reclaimed water system to its western system. As such, the system will also interconnect the City's three wastewater treatment plants thus increasing the ability to move reclaimed water to areas of high demand and dispose of plant effluent. This project's pipeline effort includes the design of approximately 17,3001inear feet of transmission piping and 52,500 linear feet of distribution piping. To meet peak demands, the project also includes the construction of a new RCW storage tank and pump station to be centrally located within the City. The City owned property containing the reverse osmosis plant has been selected as the location for the new station and tank. McKim & Creed is providing, hydraulic modeling, preliminary and final design, permitting and bidding services for this project. Change Order number one included services for 8,200 LF of survey and 4,1001f of pipeline design, hydraulic modeling and CSX pipeline crossing permit. Morningside Area Reclaimed Water System, City of Clearwater, FL: Client Manager and Technical Advisor for this particular project area which includes the Morningside neighborhood. The reclaimed water system is to be served by transmission. piping currently constructed. as part of the Drew and Union Streets Reclaimed Water project. Additionally, The Oaks condominium complex will be connected to the existing transmission piping constructed as part of the Harbor Oaks Reclaimed Water System, to serve the complex with irrigation and cooling tower water. The project includes the design of approximately 12,000 linear feet of transmission piping and 32,000 linear feet of distribution piping. The system extension into the Morningside area will provide 590,000 gallons per day (gpd) to 700 residential, nine commercial and two recreational customers. The reclaimed water will offset approximately 350,000 gpd of potable water and groundwater used for irrigation. Drew and Union Streets Reclaimed Water System, City of Clearwater, FL: Provided technical Assistance for the pump station. T11is project included the design of new transmission and distribution systems to expand reclaimed water service along Drew Street and along Union Street in eastern Clearwater. The expansion along Drew Street allowed reclaimed water service to such sites as St. Petersburg Junior College, Carpenter Field, and E.C. Moore Park. The extension along Union Street provided service to Sylvan Abbey and residential customers in the Elysium subdivision. Reclaimed Water Remote Lakes Control Valves, City of Clearwater, FL: Project Manager. The City of Clearwater operates aCity-wide reclaimed water system serving several golf courses and recreational sites along with residential and commercial customers. The golf courses served. include Clearwater Golf Course and Countryside Golf Course and the recreational sites include Chi Chi Rodriquez Golf Course and Driving Range [east of McMullen-Booth] and the City soccer complex on McMullen Booth Road. With the exception. of the soccer complex, these sites receive reclaimed water from transmission mains alto open lakes. Water is then withdrawn from these lakes by the customers' irrigation pumps. The control of flow into the lakes was controlled by a mechanically operated lake level. control valve. In order to provide improved ability to control flows and pressures through-out the system, McKim & Creed designed new control valves with remote control capability to allow the City to make adjustments to the discharge rates and the times when these lakes are filled. McKim & Creed also developed revised operating protocols for these system control modifications, control panels, control programming and configurations to interface with the existing SCADA system. www.mckimcreed.com ,v- M~KIM~'CREED lav~re 5 Reclaimed Water Storage Facility Site Selection, City of Clearwater, FL: Senior Project Manager. McKim & Creed provided services to support the ongoing expansion of the reclaimed water system and service areas in the City of Clearwater, additional storage capacity was required to maximize the utilization of reclaimed water and to meet peak hour demands of customers. The Reclaimed Water Master Plan identified the need for a new ground storage tank and pumping station to be located in the central portion of the City's reclaimed water system. Potential sites for the facility were identified and evaluated for this project to determine a recommendation for the most suitable site. The project also included the evaluation of identified sites for use as a storage tank site, the development of a public involvement process to seek input on alternative sites, determination of site configuration requirements, and zoning and site permitting issues. Wastewater Collection, Treatment and Disposol North Water Reclamation Facility Expansion (NWRF) Basis of Design Report, Manatee County, FL: Project Manager. The County, in preparing for expansion, desires to outline a more detailed basis for plant expansion to include more detailed project scope and process component definition, identification of equipment and process component options, project schedule including design, permitting and construction timelines, permitting requirements for Federal, State and County permits required, consolidation of current CIP items as appropriate, and updated estimates of project cost with associated cash flows. The report provided a Basis of Design Memorandum for the facility to be utilized to scope the design phase work and to enable permitting of plant expansion. North Water Reclamation Facility Phased (NWRF) Implementation Plan, Manatee County, Bradenton, FL: Senior Project Engineer. Manatee County's plan to expand the North Water Reclamation Facility (NWRF) requires modification due to the significant change in the population growth rate relative to the last few years. The Master Plan for the NWRF and the recently completed Basis of Design Report outline an expansion of capacity from 7.5 mgd to 15 mgd to be implemented in a single phase capital improvement project. The more recent forecast for growth and resultant required capacity expansion estimates the N WRF capacity will be exceeded in 2015. Therefore, the County required a revision to the implementation plan that will phase the design and construction. of the plant expansion such that the expanded capacity will be achieved in advance of the expected population growth. McKim & Creed developed a revised implementation plan to phase the project in order to meet the County's growth needs and financial planning needs. In light of the recent slowdown in population growth within the County, an interim expansion to 11.25 mgd is being planned. Water Reclamation Facilities Lake Filtration Evaluation, Manatee County, Bradenton, FL: Served as Technical Advisor and QA/QC. The County operates reclaimed water storage lakes at the North Water Reclamation Facility (NWRF), the Southeast Water Reclamation Facility (SEWRF) and Southwest Water Reclamation Facility (StNWRF). The reuse quality water is stored in the lakes until it is needed for irrigation via the MARS (Manatee Agricultural Reuse System.) The lake filters at the three facilities were designed. to screen the water from the lakes prior to disinfection and subsequent transfer into the MARS. The lake filters at the SEWRF and NWRF are experiencing operational problems. In response the County diverted the majority of lake water through the flocculation tanks and subsequently through the process wastewater filters at each of the facilities. In order to arrive at a solution for the issues associated with the lake filters, and avoid potential operational difficulties or overload of the plant filters, the County requested that McKim & Creed provide engineering assistance to perform an evaluation of the lake filtration systems. www.mckimcreed.com 4 i'~„-.IYi~Ct1M~'~~EL',~ Lowe b North Water Reclamation Facility (NWRF) 11.25mgd Expansion, Manatee County, FL: Technical Director. McKim & Creed is providing engineering services for the design, permitting, bidding and construction phase services for the North Water Reclamation Facility (NWRF) Expansion - 11.25 MGD. This project includes the design of the components needed to expand the facility to a permitting capacity of 11.25 MGD. Services include surveying, permitting, mechanical design, structural design, electrical design, instrumentation system design, architectural design, landscaping design, bidding services, construction phase services and project close- out and certification. Meadowcrest Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion, Hoyle, Tanner & Associates, Inc. (HTA), Citrus County, FL: Served as Client Manager and Technical Director. McKim & Creed provided process design evaluation, detailed plant design, permitting, and bidding services for the expansion. A detailed process evaluation was conducted to review biological process options, pre-treatment options and filtration and disinfection options that would minimize capital costs for the County while achieving reuse quality effluent with an expanded capacity from 0.5 mgd to 2.0 mgd. The evaluation included detailed review of Modified Ludwig Ettinger (MLE), Step Feed, and expansion using the existing Bardenpho process. The evaluation concluded that the Step Feed approach could result in substantial savings in required footprint and recycle flow infrastructure. McKim & Creed completed the process design on the facility. The design provided for future expansion from 2.0 MGD to 4.0 MGD in phases. Meadowcrest Wastewater Treatment Plant Dewatering Improvements Construction Services, Citrus County, FL: Project Manager for this project which included developing a Basis of Design Memorandum reviewing several technologies for Citrus County's Meadowcrest WWTF to replace their vacuum drying beds and final design services for the selected technology. The report reviewed using rotary screen thickener, screw press or centrifuge for aerated sludge dewatering. As part of this effort, on-site pilot testing results were also reviewed. Based on the results of these reviews, the BODM recommended using a single centrifuge as the primary sludge thickening technology and retaining the existing vacuum drying beds for aback-up. The final. design included a 50 gpm centrifuge capable of providing 18-22% solids located on a new elevated structure to allow the sludge hauler to drive underneath the equipment with room to add a future structure anal parallel train in the future. This project amendment includes the construction services for a new sludge dewatering system for the County's Meadowcrest Wastewater Treatment Plant. Woods of Weddington Wastewater Treatment Plant, Infinity Partners, Weddington, NC: Senior Process Engineer for McKim & Creed who provided engineering design services for a wastewater treatment facility to serve a proposed sustainable residential development consisting of approximately 200 lots. The client originally planned to construct an on-site sewer collection system to serve the facility and then pump the wastewater into the Union County Municipal Sewer Collection System for treatment. However, a recent moratorium disallowing the construction of any new sewer connections, a private on-site wastewater treatment facility to serve the proposed development was necessary. McKim & Creed performed necessary preliminary investigations, including performing geotechnical investigations and topographic surveys, to assess facility logistics. McKim & Creed subsequently designed a biological wastewater treatment plant which included filtration, UV disinfection and chlorine injection capacities so that reclaimed water could be beneficially reused for irrigation of common areas and dedicated reclaimed water dispersal areas on each individual lot. www.mckimcreed.com ~ ,~ ~~~KIIVI~CREED io~a~~ Miller Road Master Pump Station, Hillsborough County, Tampa, FL: Project Manager for McKim & Creed who is providing preliminary engineering, final design., and bidding phase services for the existing Miller Road site in the interest of reducing the discharge pressure at this station the County is interested in constructing a master wastewater pump station at the Miller Road site. The site will need to be rezoned for this purpose and the pump station will need to be capable of transferring 10,680 gpm at a discharge pressure of approximately 60 psi. The pump station will be designed as a three wet well configuration similar to that proposed for the Nature's Way pump station. Dale Mabry Filter Feed Screw Pumps & Grit Classifiers Evaluation, Hillsborough County, Tampa, FL: Project Manager. The Dale Mabry WWTP facility provides wastewater treatment for the north central. portion of Hillsborough County. Currently, the grit classifier and filter feed screw pumps at this facility are experiencing advanced wear and corrosion and the east grit classifier has been placed out of service. The County is planning a full replacement of this equipment with new technology in a future Capital Improvement Project. In the interest of addressing the short term restoration needs, this project includes preliminary engineering services to meet with the Grit Classifiers and. the Filter Feed Screw Pump Station manufactures and evaluate the restoration of this equipment. The teclulical report provided an overview of the existing conditions and offered recommendations for corrective action to to achieve full operation and meet Class I reliability. The final report also included a review and estimate for construction time and cost to implement the recommended repairs. DeKalb County WWTP Value Engineering Review, Parsons, Lithonia, GA: Project Manager and Senior Process Engineer for McKim & Creed who provided Engineering Services for Value Engineering Review for the DeKalb County WWTP Basis of Design Report being prepared. by Parsons Water & Infrastructure. McKim & Creed did participate in the review of the proposed design of the facility at the BODR stage of the project, which focused on the process/mechanical aspects of the proposed facility. Experience prior to joining McKim 8 Creed McKay Creek Wastewater Transfer and Reclaimed Water Booster Pump Station, Pinellas County, FL - In association with the South Cross Bayou VVRF improvements the McKay Creek WWTF was decommissioned. Prior to taking the facility off-line a 15 mgd wastewater transfer pump station would need to be constructed. Provided Project Management and Technical Direction for this project. In conjunction with the wastewater transfer pump station, an 18 mgd reclaimed water booster pump station with 5 mg storage tank was sited at this location. The wastewater transfer pump station consisted of a three duty and two jockey inline horizontal centrifugal pumps with VFD's to accommodate the entire range of flows from 150 gpm to over 10,000 gpm. The reclaimed water booster pump station was comprised of three 450 horsepower vertical turbine pumps with VFD's. The design also included chemical feed, chlorination with sodium hypochlorite, standby power, on-site lift station, reclaimed water strainer station, and a regional control room. The building was designed with a Key West architecture to blend in and enhance the surrounding neighborhood. Assisted Pinellas County with Public Meetings and technical assistance to the Board of County Commissioners on this project. www.mckimcreed.com ~ ,~- I~I~KIIVI~CREED lo~~,e s Senior Project Manager: Coordinated client and project needs, sub-contractors, design disciplines, and desil,Tn team members. Supervised, supported and mentored project staff engineers, designers and drafters. Tracked project budgets, schedule and prepared monthly progress reports. Supported department marketing needs and took lead role in preparing proposals and presentations. Assisted with personnel reviews and new hire interviews. Pasco County Wastewater Facilities Plan: Project Manager for a study to review the County's current approach to wastewater treatment and make recommendations to reduce the cost for treatment, maintenance, and operation associated with collection, treatment and solids handling. Report included modeling and analysis of the County's wastewater, reclaimed water and solids handling systems. West Pasco Wastewater Collection System Facilities Plan: Project Manager for a study to review the impacts to the collection system associated with consolidation of the County's western wastewater treatment system. Study included modeling and analysis of the County's wastewater infrastructure and made recommendations to accommodate consolidation of the wastewater collection system and projected flows. Shady Hills Sub-Regional Reuse Facility Expansion: Plant and Process improvements including expansion from 2.0 mgd to 3.5 mgd, addition of pretreatment odor control system, anoxic basins, internal recycle pump station, final clarifier refurbishment, deep bed filters, high service reclaimed water pump station, rapid infiltration basins, sludge holding facilities, operations and maintenance buildings, residuals management facility thermofeeder and thermoblender conveyance systems improvements, electrical transfer switch improvements and full instrumentation and plant operating system. Odessa Sub-Regional Reuse Facility Expansion: Plant and. Process improvements including expansion from 0.3 mgd to 1.0 mgd, addition of influent equalization basin, influent pump station, anoxic basins, internal recycle pump station, final clarifiers, traveling bridge filters, chlorine contact basin, effluent pump station, sludge holding facilities, electrical/instrumentation building, and full instrumentation and plant operating system. SR54 Utility Relocations, Magnolia to I-75: Utility relocation design, permitting and construction services for 2.5 miles of 10-inch force main, 10-inch reclaimed water main, 16-inch water main and i/z mile of 10-inch gravity sewer. Old Pasco Road Utility Relocations Phase I, Overpass Road to SR 52: Utility relocation design of 2.5 miles each of 10-inch force main, 10-inch reclaimed water main, 12-inch water main, 1.5 miles of 15-inch gravity sewer and detailed design of a master lift station. Old Pasco Road Utility Relocations Phase II, Quail Hollow to Overpass Road: Utility relocation design of 2.5 miles each of 10-inch reclaimed water main, and 12- inch water main. County Line Road Utility Relocations, US 19 to Shady Hill Drive: Utility relocation design of 2.5 miles of 12-inch water main. Moon Lake Road Utility Relocations, Ridge Road to SR 52: Utility relocation design of 5 miles each of 12-inch force main and 16-inch water main. Design also includes design of 5 miles of 24-inch wastewater transmission main. www.mckimcreed.com V~ :I~I~KIM~'CREED Lowe 4 Redington Beach Purnp Stations 76, 77 & 78 Relocations: Project Manager for the relocation of three pump stations located in the Town of Redington Beach. Project included preliminary evaluation of system conditions, inflow and infiltration analysis and development of preliminary engineering report. Project includes development of construction documents, permitting and construction phase services for two duplex pump stations and one triplex station with integral metering station and telemetry. Solid Waste Operations Pump Station 201 Relocation: Project Manager for the relocation of the Bridgeway Acres Waste-to-Energy Facility on-site triplex lift station. Design included preliminary engineering report and analysis to consolidate other onsite lift stations. Scope was expanded to include design of PS 201 and consolidation. of two existing station into a new standard. lift station. Project includes development of construction documents, permitting and construction phase services for two duplex pump stations with standby power, integral metering station and telemetry. Ulmerton Road Utility Relocations, US 19 to 49th Street: Utility relocation design and permitting services for 1 mile of 4-inch - 8-inch force main, 6-inch - 8-inch reclaimed water main, and 1,000 linear feet of 18-inch gravity sewer. Ulmerton Road Utility Relocations, El Centro to US 19: Utility relocation design and permitting services for 1 mile of 4-inch - 8-inch force main, and'/z mile of 8-inch gravity sewer. Glen Arven Utility Adjustments: In association with a the City's roadway improvements project, prepared utility adjustments for approximately 1 mile of 4-inch - 10-inch potable water main. Summerfield Reclaimed Water Transmission Main Project: Three miles of 16-inch. reclaimed water transmission main, 2 miles of 12-inch reclaimed water distribution main and a reclaimed water metering station along Big Bend Road from US 41 to Balm Riverview Road. Southern Hills Plantation Potable Water and Imgation Master Plans: Preparation of potable, waste and reclaimed water master plans for a planned community consisting of 743 single-family residences, 256 multi-family homes, 65 acres of commercial outparcels and an 18 hole golf course and club house. Irrigation Mater Plan included analysis of commingled reclaimed water, groundwater and stormwater for onsite irrigation and pond augmentation.. Potable Water and Irrigation Pump Stations: Design of 2,100 gpm horizontal centrifugal packaged potable water booster pump station with standby generator and telemetry for interface with City of Brooksville. Design of 4,500 gpm vertical hirbine packaged pump station, reclaimed water supply station, irrigation water transfer valve, golf course supply station and stormwater pond augmentation supply stations. Wastewater Lift Stations: Design of three wastewater lift stations with standby generators and integral telemetry system for interface with the City of Brooksville. www.mckimcreed.com ~1lI~KIM~CI~EED BS, Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University Professional Licensure Professional Engineer, FL Professional Engineer, NC Professional Engineer, SC A. Street Lee, PE Water/WastewaterSnuth Group Manager Summary As a Vice President and Project Manager with McKim & Creed, Mr. Lee oversees a variety of civil engineering and water-oriented projects. His responsibilities include coordination, design and preparation of plans for municipal, governmental, industrial, development and commercial projects. He has designed water systems and wastewater sewer systems, sanitary sewer pumping stations, developed stormwater drainage and detention systems, performed hydrology and stormwater studies, landscape design for parking facilities, roadway design, and provided plans for landfill expansions and erosion control systems. Mr. Lee has established many long-term relationships with customers and is noted for his ability to plan and design projects that fit within the customer's valid requirements, time frame and budget. Selected Project Experience Water Supply Treatment and Distribution Reservoir No.1 Water Treatment Plant Construction Services, City of Clearwater, FL: Principle-in-Charge. This scope for this project involved Construction Services for Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant at Reservoir No. 1 site in Clearwater. In October 2003, the City of Clearwater completed construction on a reverse osmosis water treatment facility that enables the City to boost water production, lower the unit cost of water, minimize future water rate increases, meet tougher state and federal drinking water regulations, and improve the quality of drinking water. The City has invested $8.1 million in water supply improvements, which include wellfield rehabilitation, pipeline construction, and the $5 million water treatment plant. McKim & Creed was responsible for automating the facility's system except for the chemical process and Dual media filters. Included in the project was graphical interface (SCADA), which allows the operator to click on a particular item in the process and the screen will appear with more detail. Erie Road Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Pilot Plant Study and Basis of Design Report, Manatee County, Bradenton, FL: Principal-in-Charge. Manatee County was exploring the development of additional water supply from ground water resources to augment potable water supply during seasonal conditions, provide water supply redundancy, and to assist in meeting existing and future water supply demands. The Pilot Study phase of this water supply development project has been completed. The result of the Pilot Study indicates that a 3 mgd Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant can be constructed. at the pilot site location. Subsequent to the completion of the Pilot Study, a Basis of Design Report was prepared. for the proposed 3 mgd Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant. Results from the Pilot Study were utilized to determine treatment plant components, site layout and pre-treatment requirements. Design of the first phase of the Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant are underway, and includes production wells and approximately 18,000 feet of raw water transmission main. www.mckimcreed.com ~ Education ,,~ M~KIM~CREED lee 2 Clearwater Arsenic Management Action Plan, City of Clearwater, FL: Project Manager. The City of Clearwater operates a 3.0 mgd Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant that treats groundwater for local wells. The treatment process produces a waste stream that has levels of arsenic were likely to exceed new arsenic limits in the State mandated Industrial Pretreatment Program. In response to the need for seeking cost effective solutions and management of the arsenic in the water plant residuals and concentrate waste stream, the City identified a need to develop alternatives to manage these increased levels of arsenic. This work included developing a clear understanding of the current and possible future regulatory conditions, establishment of goals and objectives for arsenic management, initiate the development of alternatives to reduce levels of arsenic to below current and impending waste stream limits, identify impending FDEP requirements, identify requirements for residuals management and disposal, and identify preliminary estimates of cost. As a result of the evaluation the City was able to revise the allocation of arsenic at the Marshall Street and Northwest AWTP's to provide a less stringent arsenic limit at the water treatment plant. Recommendations for improved operations of the plant backwash system were included in the final MAP to aid the City in maintaining compliance with its pretreatment program. Water Reclamation Facilities Lake Filtration Evaluation, Manatee County, Bradenton, FL: Served as Technical Advisor and QA/QC. The County operates reclaimed water storage lakes at the North Water Reclamation Facility (NWRF), the Southeast Water Reclamation Facility (SEWRF) and Southwest Water Reclamation Facility (SWWRF). The reuse quality water is stored in the lakes until it is needed for irrigation via the MARS (Manatee Agricultural Reuse System.) The lake filters at the three facilities were designed to screen the water from the lakes prior to disinfection and subsequent transfer into the MARS. The lake filters at the SEWRF and NWR.F are experiencing operational problems. In response the County diverted the majority of lake water through the flocculation tanks and subsequently through the process wastewater filters at each of the facilities. In order to arrive at a solution for the issues associated with the lake filters, and avoid potential operational difficulties or overload of the plant filters, the County requested that McKim & Creed provide engineering assistance to perform an evaluation of the lake filtration systems. Phase 1 Water System Computer Model, Sarasota County, Sarasota County, FL: Project Manager. Principal-in-Charge .McKim & Creed developed a complete Water System Hydraulic lvlodel of the County's potable water system. The pipe network and system configuration was developed using existing GIS mapping of the water system and was augmented by updating the transmission systems that have been added or modified since the GIS mapping was last updated. All pumping stations and storage components were detailed in the hydraulic model to allow extended period simulation of the water system under different supply and demand scenarios.Sarasota County prepared a Water Supply Master Plan to identify and evaluate potential future water sources to meet long term demands. McKim & Creed utilized the hydraulic model to aid the County in understanding impacts to the transmission systems of bringing on various water supply sources. McKim & Creed also utilized the hydraulic model to address numerous operational issues identified by the County related to disinfection effectiveness. Recommendations were prepared to outline improvements to system operation www.mckimcreed.com ~ ~,- M:~4M~CREED lEE3 and system configuration to provide optimal delivery of water to meet current and future demands. McKim & Creed provided live model demonstrations to County Water System. Managers. Wellfield Optimization and Reservoir 1 Water Treatment Plant, City of Clearwater, FL: Principal-in-Charge .The scope for this project consists of three tasks. Task 1 includes completion of wells history review, completion of the revised wellfield optimization plan, preparation of bid documents and hydraulic modeling. Task 2 includes basis of design and final design for monochloramine system at Reservoir 1, refine water treatment plant basis of design and water treatment plant final design documents and completion of the water treatment plant equipment procurement package. Task 3 includes bidding phase services. Water Storage Tank Modifications -Capri Isle, Pinellas County, Clearwater, FL: Principal-in-Charge. McKim & Creed is providing design, permitting, bidding and limited construction phase services for the recommendations outlined in the final Engineering Report for the work efforts identified at the Capri Isle Pump Station. The scope of work includes an increase to the pumping capacity of Capri Isle Pumping Station on Treasure Island; modifications to the Capri Isle Pump Station to operate in aflow-through mode with variable frequency drives (VFDs); and the addition of automation controls. After review, the County elected to do the improvements to decrease water age and simplify the operation of the station. This effort involves expanding the hydraulic model to include the evaluation of the existing Madeira Beach pressure control valve, and the Oak Hurst and Logan Stations. Hexarn Road Water Treatment Plant, Hernando County, FL: Principal-in-Charge. McKim & Creed assisted the HCUD in siting the proposed WTP and provided the design engineering for the WTP and the associated water transmission main necessary to connect the new facility with the county s existing water distribution system. The Hexam Road WTP includes construction of two (2) wells with associated pumps, piping, controls and well house buildings; construction of a 2 MG ground storage tank, high service pump station, disinfection facility, standby power equipment, yard piping, sitework, electrical systems and instrumentation. Water Treatment System Improvements, City of Clearwater, FL: Principal-in- Charge .The City of Clearwater has been cooperating with Tampa Bay Water for the development of an expanded water supply from the City s wellfields. In order to expand the water supply, system improvements were required including reha- bilitation to the wells, expanded raw water piping and new water treatment facili- ties. McKim & Creed provided technical consulting, technical review, design of the conversion to a new disinfection process at Reservoir No. 1 and new disinfection facilities at Reservoir Nos. 2 and 3. The technical reviews were intended to assist the City in evaluating the appropriateness of each project component and assisted the City staff in planning for changes in the operation of the water system. Because the com~ersion to new disinfection processes would cause changes to the taste and odor of the public water supply, McKim & Creed also provided public notification services to the City. www.mckimcreed.com ~' ,~ IVI~K[M~CREED Lae 4 Pinellas County Instrumentation Control and Monitoring Master Plan, Pinellas County, FL: Principal-in-Charge. Pinellas County Utilities operates an extensive infrastructure system that includes water transmission and distribution, wastewater collection and treatment, reclaimed water distribution, and solid waste collection and disposal systems. The facilities that provide these services need to be continuously monitored, controlled, maintained and secured. McKim & Creed provided an overview of the SCADA system architecture, software/hardware configurations, network communications requirements, customer response and dispatch management systems, database management solutions, central control room conceptual design and required improvements at the major PCU facilities and remote monitoring and control sites. The Final Report that included the final systems configurations anal hardware/software selections, schematic illustrations of Operations Control Center Layout, budgetary estimates, and implementation and phasing plans. Gretna, Eldridge, Linden/Deer Water Treatment Plants, Hernando County, FL: Senior Project Engineer. Hernando County Utilities Department (HCUD) purchased the Spring Hill utility systems doubling+ the size of the County's water system. The improvements to each WTP include construction of a 2 MG ground storage tank, high service pump station., disinfection facility, standby power equipment, yard piping modifications, sitetvork, electrical systems, instrumentation and demolition of existing facilities. Gretna. WTP also includes new well pumps, piping, and controls for the two recently installed wells, and a new well house building for each. Reclaimed Water Pumping and Distribution Falkenburg to South County Reclaimed Water Main Design/Build, Hillsborough County, FL: Design/Build project for reclaimed water main beginning at the Falkenburg Wastewater Treatment Plant and ending at US 41 near Pembroke Road, where it will be connected to an existing 24-inch reclaimed water main. The scope of the McKim & Creed portion of the project consists of the design of 78,000 feet of 24-inch reclaimed water main with major water crossings at Alafia River and Bullfrog Creek, hydraulic modeling and surveying. Reclaimed Water Interconnect Project, Pinellas County, Pinellas County, FL: In order to expand their reclaimed water distribution system, Pinellas County Utilities entered into separate agreements with the cities of Clearwater and Oldsmar for a total of 3.8 MGD of additional reclaimed water. McKim & Creed provided hydraulic modeling, design, bidding and construction phase services for the reclaimed water transmission mains, high service pump station, ground storage tank and installation and programming of SCADA systems necessary to connect the City of Clearwater's Northeast Water Pollution Control Facility and City of Oldsmar's reclaimed water system to Pinellas County's north region reclaimed water distribution system Skycrest Reclaimed Water System, City of Clearwater, Clearwater, FL: The City of Clearwater is expanding its reclaimed water system to serve its residents with water for irrigation and other non-potable uses as outlined in the 2007 Reclaimed Water (RCW) Master Plan Re-Evaluation dated May 2007. This project encompass- es the Skycrest neighborhood, located south of Overlea Street to Gulf to Bay (SR www.mckimcreed.com ~ v ~~I~ M~CI~EED ~~~ 7 60), and west of Belcher Road to Saturn Avenue. The reclaimed water system will be served by a new interconnect transmission system which will connect the City's eastern reclaimed water system to its western system. As such, the system will also interconnect the City's three wastewater treatment plants thus increasing the ability to move reclaimed water to areas of high demand and dispose of plant effluent. This project's pipeline effort includes the design of approximately 17,300 linear feet of transmission piping and 52,5001inear feet of distribution piping. To meet peak demands, the project also includes the construction of a new RCW storage tank and pump station to be centrally located within the City. The City owned property containing the reverse osmosis plant has been selected as the location for the new station and tank. McKim & Creed is providing, hydraulic modeling, preliminary and final design, permitting and bidding services for this project. Additional servic- es included 8,200 LF of survey and 4,1001f of pipeline design, hydraulic modeling and CSX pipeline crossing permit. Manatee Agricultural Reuse System (MARS) Pump Stations, Manatee County, FL: Work assignment for design, permitting, bidding, construction phase and final certification services for three Manatee Agricultural Reuse System {MARS) pump stations (63rd Ave, Rye Road, and Spencer-Parrish). As part of the expansion of Manatee County's reclaimed water system serving the agricultural customers east of the I-75 corridor, McKim & Creed was asked to design three new pumping facilities. The first booster pump station is located at 63rd Avenue and has a capacity of 12.4 mgd. The second booster station in located at Rye Road and has a proposed capacity of 11.3 mgd. The third station is a re-pump station at Spencer- Parrish and has a capacity of 4.0 mgd. The Spencer-Parrish site also includes a 3.0 MG storage tank. McKim & Creed was responsible for the preliminary and final design, bidding services, and construction services for all three facilities In addition to detailed design services, McKim & Creed updated the hydraulic model. for the overall MARS systems, developed updated demand for costs, and prepared operation protocols for the facilities to be placed in service. McKim & Creed also provided siting and land acquisition services to the county for the three pump station sites. North to Southeast Reclaimed Water Transmission Main, Manatee County, Manatee County, FL: McKim & Creed was responsible for the design of 83,000 linear feet of 30-inch ductile iron pipe reclaimed water main as part of the Manatee Agricultural Reuse System (MARS). The project also included the design of 30-inch directional bores and a pedestrian bridge over Upper Manatee River. Morningside Area Reclaimed Water System, City of Clearwater, FL: Client Manager and Technical Advisor for this particular project area which includes the Morningside neighborhood. The reclaimed water system is to be served by transmission piping currently constructed as part of the Drew and Union Streets Reclaimed Water project. Additionally, The Oaks condominium complex will be connected to the existing transmission piping constructed as part of the Harbor Oaks Reclaimed Water System, to serve the complex with irrigation and cooling tower water. The project includes the design of approximately 12,000 linear feet of transmission piping and 32,000 linear feet of distribution piping. The system extension into the Morningside area will provide 590,000 gallons per day (gpd) to 700 residential, nine commercial and two recreational customers. The reclaimed water will offset approximately 350,000 gpd of potable water and groundwater used for irrigation. www.mckimcreed.com ~ s,'~~,i ~CiV.1Vt~~l\~~~ Lee G Drew and Union Streets Reclaimed Water System, City of Clearwater, FL: Provided technical Assistance for the pump station. This project included the design of new transmission and distribution systems to expand reclaimed water service along Drew Street and along Union Street in eastern Clearwater. The expansion along Drew Street allowed reclaimed water service to such sites as St. Petersburg Junior College, Carpenter Field, and E.C. Moore Park. The extension along Union Street provided service to Sylvan Abbey and residential customers in the Elysium subdivision. WastewoteUSewerTnatment and Disposal North Water Reclamation Facility Expansion (NWRF) Basis of Design Report, Manatee County, FL: Project Manager. The County, in preparing for expansion., desires to outline a more detailed basis for plant expansion to include more detailed project scope and process component definition, identification of equipment and process component options, project schedule including design, permitting and construction timelines, permitting requirements for Federal, State and County permits required, consolidation of current CIP items as appropriate, and updated estimates of project cost with associated cash flows. The report provided a Basis of Design Memorandum for the facility to be utilized to scope the design phase work and to enable permitting of plant expansion. Meadowcrest Wastewater Treatment Facilities, Hoyle, Tanner & Associates, Inc., Citrus County, FL: Principal-inCharge. this project consists of a 0.5 MGD advanced treatment facility that incorporateT a Carrousel treatment unit, vacuum assisted sludge dewatering beds and a land disposal system for effluent. The project required extensive coordination with the County Utilities Operations staff and the Plant Staff to keep the existing plant operating at capacity during the construction phase. The facility was designed to be expandable, in phases, to a total capacity of 2.4 MGD as the flows increase. Also included as part of the project was the complete reconstruction of the master pump station serving the plant. Manatee SWWRF Primary Clarifier Emergency Effluent Pipe Replacement Manatee County, Bradenton, FL: The pipe exiting the grit removal units in the headworks at the Southeast Water Reclamation Facility (SWWRF) experienced a pipe failure and subsequent leakage. In response, Manatee County completed an emergency by pass piping project that replaced the failed pipe and installed a permanent bypass. The specific pipe that failed was apre-cast concrete cylinder pipe and similar to Manatee County's Southwest Water Reclamation Facility's (SWWRF) primary clarifier effluent line 54-inch diameter pipe also installed in a similar situation. In the interest of circumventing an emergency shut-down and repair, the County decided to replace the 54-inch diameter primary clarifier effluent pipe to ensure that no accidental failure of the pipe would allow raw sewage to leave the SWWRF site. This project provided a permanent solution to replace the pipe system and elected to install an elevated channel to convey effluent from the primary clarifiers to the aeration basins. McKim & Creed, PA provided emergency design and construction phase services to install a ne~v elevated channel from the primary clarifiers to the aeration basin splitter box. As part of this design, the existing RAS line was redirected to the new channel. www.mckimcreed.com V M~KIM~CREED Sewer Master Planning Services, City of Palm Coast, Palm Coast, FL: McKim & Creed provided the design of a sewer master plan and for wastewater collection needs for the area along A1A on the ocean-side of the Inland Waterway. Tasks in- clude, team meetings, data collection, defining potential system users, population/ flow projections, wastewater system capital improvements plan, hydraulic model development, final report Sorrento Woods Sewer System Evaluation, Sarasota County, Sarasota County, FL: Provided engineering consultant services to evaluate changes in the Sorrento Woods STEP system as well as the adjoining lift station and force main sewer system configuration to improve system hydraulics and minimize the odor problems. McKim & Creed's evaluation looked at possible re-routing of wastewater flows and the potential to locate new lift stations in order to minimize and control odors and corrosion within the system. McKim & Creed utilized the proprietary sewer system modeling software, FORCEMAIN, as well as the data supplied by the County, to developed two (2) hydraulic system models, one of the Sorrento Woods subdivision and. one of the South Service Area. These models were used to evaluate system travel times and pipe line velocities under the current system configuration. Several options for improving the Sorrento Woods STEP system were considered for this evaluation. McKim & Creed presented these findings in Final report including recommendations for system improvements. Mission Valley Boulevard Master Lift Station, Sarasota County, Sarasota County, FL: Principal-in-Charge. McKim & Creed provided design, permitting, bidding and construction services for a new Master Lift Station and 1,400 LF of associated 6-inch force main. The new lift station is a 1200 gpm duplex submersible station with on- site stand-by generator set in a weatherproof enclosure. Other features include an odor control system, site fencing, landscaping and an access drive. Southeast WRF Facility Expansion Plan, Manatee County, FL: Manatee County's Southeast Service Area (SESA} is currently undergoing rapid growth east of I-75. The SMR development made a request to the County to allow them to construct a 36-inch force main to the Southeast Water Reclamation Facility (SEWRF)sending send approximately 11-MGD of additional flow to the SEWRF which had been ex- panded to 11-MGD. McKim & Creed assisted with the evaluation of the long-term potential of the SEWRF site to accommodate the process components necessary to treat the additional projected flows by County Planning and SMR and to address the impact of storage by the roadway and the increased plant flow. Northeast Advanced Pollution Control Facility Organics Expansion, Clearwater, FL: A new Internal Recycle Pump Station was designed with two submersible pumps, each driven by its own variable frequency drive to phase out existing screws pumps due to high maintenance costs. Each pump has a design capacity of 10,000 gpm. Space is provided for six more pumps of equal capacity to be added as existing screw pumps reach their useful life. A newControl Building was designed and constructed to house the MCC's, VFDs controls and instrumentation and emergency generators. New chlorine contact chambers were also designed. The new tankage provides for required contact time and avoids future damage to motor controls and filter components to the corrosive environment. A new bulk sodium hypochlorite system designed under a separate contract provides chemical feeds for chlorination and dechlorination of treated www.mckimcreed.com ~'' MCKIM~CREED effluent. The new structure provides the wet well for the new reclaimed water pumping equipment. Wastewater Treatment Plants Five-Year Capital Improvements Plan, City of Clearwater, FL: Project Manager responsible for the preparation of t11e Five-Year Capital Improvement Plant for three of the City's wastewater treatment plants (Marshall Street, Northeast and East plants). The project invoh~ed review of Opera- tions and Maintenance Performance Reports; review of existing facilities relative to Building Code changes; review current treatment process relative to recent and proposed environmental/water quality regulatory changes; review current and an- ticipated wastewater flows and wastewater characteristics to determine if process units or changes are needed in the future. Marshall Street Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade Program, Clearwater, FL: Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade Program: The existing Marshall Street 10 MGD facility was redesigned as a five-stage Bardenpho process using the reno- vated existing tankage. This facility is now the largest diffused aeration Bardenpho plant in the United States. The project involved substantial site improvements, renovation of existing works, new treatment additions, filtration, chlorination, dechlorination, and final effluent dissolved oxygen enhancement. Sludge dewater- ing facilities, a maintenance and control building, as well as a deep well influent pump station were also designed and constructed. A centralized odor control system was designed for the influent head works and sludge handling operations. Construction services and resident construction observation was provided by McKim & Creedalong with a new Operations and Maintenance Manual for the new 10 MGD Advanced Wastewater Facility. Alline Avenue stormwater Pumping Station, Phase I, City of Tampa, Tampa, FL: Principal inCharge. The City of Tampa requested McKim & Creed develop a design for an Alline Avenue stormwater Pumping Station (ASPS). The project area is bounded by MacDill Avenue, Asbury Place, West Bayshore Court, and Bayshore Boulevard. This area has experienced stormwater system overflows not only from runoff during rain events, but also from high tide surges. A stormwater pumping facility will help to alleviate some street flooding and move the stormwater more quickly to the outfall. In Phase 1 of this assignment, McKim & Creed will provide preliminary design services including; topographic survey; stormwater system development; level of service analysis; and the preparation of a Basis of Design Report (BODR) that will include the preliminary Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost. Phase 1 will represent the 30% submittal anti be utilized as the basis of design for the Phase 2 and subsequent phases of work following City's acceptance of the BODR recommendations. www.mckimcreed.com ~ ,~, MCKIM~CREED www.mckimcreed.com David A. Wiley, PG ~`~~ ' i..B ~ i -G~ _,~_ Dave Wiley's experience with LBG includes design, operation, and analyses of aquifer tests, safe yield analyses for ground-water withdrawals of major public-supply well fields, computer model development, calibration and verification for major public-supply well fields and mine dewatering operations, ground-water monitoring, sampling and analyses for hydrocarbon contamination, technical assistance in the preparation of applications for water-use permits, development of state water plans, brackish ground-water studies for R.O. process, R.O. well design, well-field management plans, aquifer storage and recovery (ASR), environmental site assessments, analyses of rock mining operations in a coastal area, project management, long-range planning, surface-water management, Contamination Assessment Reports, remediation design, transport modeling, wetland enhancement, surface-water management, technical presentations, project and personnel management, budget development and management, artificial recharge, well rehabilitation, technical review, salt-water intrusion studies and expert testimony in hydrogeology. Dave Wiley's experience with the SWFWMD included design, performance, and analyses of aquifer tests, computer modeling to predict local and regional impacts as a result of ground- water withdrawals, water-use permit review, geophysical field work; including logging and resistivity surveys, supervision of well installation and sampling, supervision of the evaluation of public supply permits, design, testing and permitting of injection wells. Extensive experience included study of hydrogeologic formations in Florida, monitoring of ground and surface-water impacts as a result of major well-field withdrawals, design and analysis of aquifer tests for major public-supply well fields, project management for projects dealing with impacts on the water resources as a result of large regional ground-water withdrawals. His experience also includes direct communications with other regulatory agencies and government entities; testimony before the Department of Administrative Hearings, Florida, as an expert in hydrogeology; rule development for the review and issuance of consumptive-use permits. EDUCATION Associate in Arts Degree, 1978, from St. Petersburg Junior College, Clearwater, Florida B.A. in Geology, 1980, from the University of South Florida Graduate courses at the University of South Florida, 1980 and 1981 f2EGISTRATION Certified Professional Geologist by the American Institute of Professional Geologists Registered Professional Geologist by the States of Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Indiana and Tennessee Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc. David A. Wiley, PG (continued) TECHNICAL SOCIETIES Association of Ground-Water Scientists and Engineers (National Ground Water Association) American Water Works Association SUMMARY OF PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2008 to present: Sr. Vice President and Director with Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc., Tampa, Florida 2003 to 2008: Vice President and Director with Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc., Tampa, Florida 1991 to 2002: Senior Associate with Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc., Tampa, Florida 1985 to 1990: Hydrogeologist at Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc., Tampa, Florida 1980 to 1985: Hydrogeologist at the Resources Regulation Division at the SWFWMD, Brooksville, Florida 2 Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc. David A. Wiley, PG (continued) SPECIFIC EXPE~ENCE ~1 GROUN®-W~1'ER SUPPLY Spring Hill, Florida A detailed hydrogeologic impact analysis report was prepared in support of an application for a public supply Water Use Permit. Athree-dimensional groundwater flow model was developed to evaluate drawdown in the surficial and Upper Floridian aquifers at the proposed permitted quantities. The drawdown information was used to assess potential impacts to adjacent users, wetland levels, and movement of the freshwater/saltwater interface. A well field management plan was developed to minimize drawdown impacts, and a water level monitoring plan was prepared. The permit was approved with the requested increase in withdrawal rates. Hernando Countv. Florida A wellhead protection zone model was prepared for three new supply wells at Spring Hill, as required by the county's wellhead protection ordinance. The evaluation was performed using an analytical ground-water flow/particle trace model. A prohibited use survey was performed within the model delineated protection zones, and technical support was provided at County Commission meetings regarding the well sites. Tampa Bay Region, Florida Managed a testing and evaluation program on three regional well fields. Data from geophysical logs, video surveys, and pumping tests were used to evaluate the performance and condition of 65 production wells. A report was prepared that provided an evaluation of the condition, productivity, and water quality of each well. A plan for rehabilitation and well field management recommendations was also prepared. Spring Hill, Florida Design, construction, and testing of water supply and water level monitoring wells at Spring Hill. Construction and testing specifications were prepared for two water supply wells and two dedicated water level monitoring wells. Construction oversight was provided during critical construction and testing procedures. An eight-hour step drawdown test was performed on the supply well, and the data were analyzed to calculate aquifer transmissivity and optimum pumping rate. Geophysical logs were interpreted to delineate producing intervals in the well. Citrus Countv, Florida Prepared WUP renewal for Florida Water Service's Sugarmill Woods facility. Per capita water uses and projected needs were calculated, and adjacent users information was compiled. Hydrogeologic impact analysis included preparation of a ground-water flow model to evaluate drawdown impacts, and a trend analysis of water quality data. Citrus Countv, Florida Prepared WUP renewal for Florida Water Service's Citrus Springs facility. Per capita water uses and projected needs were calculated, and adjacent users information was compiled. Hydrogeologic impact analysis included preparation of a ground-water flow model to evaluate drawdown impacts, and a trend analysis of water quality and water level data. Marion Countv. Florida Prepared WUP renewal for Florida Water Service's Marion Oaks facility. Per capita water uses and projected needs were calculated, and adjacent users information was compiled. Hydrogeologic impact analysis included preparation of a ground-water flow model to evaluate drawdown impacts. Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc. David A. Wiley, PG (continued) SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE IN GROUND-WATER SUPPLY (continued) Marion Countv, Florida Design, construction, and testing of a water supply well at Marion Oaks. Construction and testing specifications were prepared. Construction oversight was provided during critical construction and testing procedures. An eight-hour step drawdown test was performed on the supply well, and the data were analyzed to calculate aquifer transmissivity and optimum pumping rate. Geophysical logs were interpreted to delineate producing intervals in the well. Sarasota, Florida Project manager and principal investigator for the evaluation of ground water conditions in and around the City of Sarasota. Evaluated ground-water quality, levels and effects due to pumping through the use of athree-dimensional model. Also, assisted in the design of reverse osmosis (R.O.) wells and evaluated pumping tests. Project management for the evaluation of ground- water conditions around the City's Verna Well Field and the development of a three- dimensional, 5-layer model to determine impacts on the City's wells as a result of regional pumping. Evaluated the development of salt water from the Florida aquifer for the softening process at the treatment plant; evaluation of ASR for treated waste water. Also provided permitting assistance and expert testimony for the City's well fields. St. Petersburg, Florida Project manager and principal investigator for evaluation and testing of existing supply wells. Activities included geophysical logging, borehole videos, pumping tests and awell-field management plan. Other activities for the City have included evaluations of conditions of lakes in the region, environmental augmentation plan development, domestic well investigations and continuous interaction with the SWFWMD and WCRWSA. Hillsborough Countv, Florida Project manager and principal investigator for the investigation of ground-water supply potential beneath the Cone Ranch property northeast of Tampa. The investigation included the permitting, construction, testing and monitoring of Floridan aquifer wells and a hydrogeologic evaluation of the area. Activities also included preliminary well-field design and the development of athree-dimensional ground-water flow model to assess impacts from pumping at approximately 50 million gallons per day. Orlando, Florida Project manager and principal investigator for the development of several new well fields for OUC and expansion of several existing facilities. The project included well design, construction and hydrogeologic testing of numerous wells capable of producing 5 - 7 gallons per day wells. Clearwater, Florida -Project manager and principal investigator for the development of the safe yield at five large public supply well fields for the WCRWSA. The investigation included the review of ground-water levels, state regulatory criteria, pumping rates, permitting criteria and hydrogeologic characteristics. Analysis and results represent aworst-case scenario based on a 1 in 20 year drought Lee Countv. Florida -Project manager and principal investigator for an evaluation of present and future public water supplies for the Lee County Utilities Department. The investigation included evaluating existing well-field sources, hydrogeology of the county, water-use permits, potential sources of contamination and ground-water flow modeling. After all hydrogeologic and water-use data were reviewed, the modeling was performed to determine potential future resource areas. Also, evaluated potential for developing brackish ground water for R.O. treatment and evaluated potential for ASR using surface water. 4 Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc. David A. Wiley, PG (continued) SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE IN GROUND-WATER SUPPLY {continued) Dunedin, Florida Project manager and principal investigator for the evaluation of the City's well field system. Activities included evaluation of salt-water intrusion, pumping tests, statistical analysis, modeling and permitting. An investigation was also performed by constructing test wells to locate a source of brackish ground water to supply the City's Reverse Osmosis Plant. Finally, a well-field management plan was developed that included the use of existing wells and new brackish water wells. Dunedin, Florida A ground-water investigation using the dual-tube drilling process to identify potential sites for developing brackish water. Five sites were tested and found favorable for designing and constructing wells for providing water to the City's R.O. plant. Orange County, Florida Project manager and principal investigator for the development of a new public supply well field in Orlando, Florida. The project included the evaluation of existing well characteristics and test data, new well design, construction supervision and hydrogeologic testing of five 5-million gallons per day wells. Hillsborough County, Florida Project Manager and principal investigator for an evaluation of hydrologic conditions and relationships in the area of the three City of St. Petersburg Well Fields. The investigation included the evaluation of ground-water levels, streamflow, lake levels, historical development, historical rainfall, pumpage and factors affecting hydrologic conditions. Drought, drainage, development and drawdown (ODs) are the primary factors. A surface-water management program was developed for the study area. Sarasota, Florida Project Manager and principal investigator for a well rehabilitation project at the City of Sarasota's Verna Well Field. The project included redevelopment of 30 year old wells through the use of a reverse air rotary drilling rig and acidizing. All wells were pump tested prior to the redevelopment work, geophysically logged and video surveyed. After the redevelopment work, the wells were pump tested again. Positive results were obtained by significant increases in specific capacity. Clearwater, Florida Project Manager and principal investigator of a project for the Tampa Bay Water involving the inspection and testing of domestic supply wells in the Tampa Bay area. Activities included inspection of pumping equipment, determination of well construction characteristics, water quality and yield characteristics. The project included the evaluation of hundreds of wells. Clearwater, Florida Project Manger and principal investigator for Tampa Bay Water's Well Mitigation Program. When Tampa Bay water outsourced the administration of the construction portion of the Program, he assisted in developing the procedures for the revised Mitigation Program that includes management of drilling contractor operations. He currently reviews and approves invoices from contractors and reports from LBG staff. Mr. Wiley also has extensive field experience related to the Mitigation Program. He has conducted initial site visits, which includes field mapping, preparation of site plans, researching property ownership and signing access agreements, has performed field inspections of drilling contractor activity and final inspections. Preliminary well evaluations have also been conducted that include downhole video surveys, pumping tests and water sampling. The final inspection included an evaluation 5 Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc. David A. Wiley, PG (continued) SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE IN GROUND-WATER SUPPLY (continued} of well equipment and water quality analysis using field methods. He is familiar with the public supply permitting process and has completed several applications for the well construction and operation of limited use and other public supply wells. Hillsborough Countv, Florida Principal investigator for hydrogeologic services on a combination surficial rehydration/artificial recharge project. The project includes the use of ground-penetrating radar, installation of soil borings, core sampling and analysis, aquifer testing, hydrologic monitoring, ground-water flow modeling, particle tracking and solute transport modeling. A risk assessment was required because the sources of water for recharge are a canal that captures storm-water runoff and reclaimed water. The recharge area is located at a potable supply well field. Desoto Countv, Florida Project Manager and principal investigation for a value engineering study of an ASR well field expansion design. This ASR well field is an important element of the water supply for the Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority. Water is withdrawn from the Peace River, treated, piped to an off-stream reservoir and then injected down wells for storage in the Floridan aquifer. The water is then withdrawn from the ASR wells during times of high demand. LBG found cost savings in the well field expansion design through this value engineering study. Desoto Countv, Florida Principal investigator for assisting engineers with the Peace River Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority and their Water Alliance in Developing a Water Supply Plan. The study included the evaluation of a number of water utilities and their respective supply sources and demands. Water sources included, fresh ground water and surface water, reverse osmosis, and fresh water and reclaimed water ASR. Pinellas Countv, Florida Performance and evaluation of MITs for injection wells at the South Cross Bayou and McKay Creek WWTPs. The work included full time field supervision by a Professional Geologist, geophysical logging and tracer analysis. Orlando, Florida Assisted the City of Orlando's engineering consultant in performing a feasibility analysis of injecting and storing treated wastewater into the Upper Floridan aquifer. The project included a detailed evaluation of the hydrogeologic framework, aquifer characteristics, water quality and FDEP regulations. Dunedin, Florida LBG assisted the City in performing a preliminary feasibility analysis for the use of Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) with the City's treated waste water. The evaluation included a detailed evaluation of hydrogeologic conditions aquifer characteristics, water quality, modeling, area water use, FDEP regulations and cost. St. Petersburg, Florida Performed continuous evaluations regarding the City deep injection well program for treated waste water and for AST of the treated water. Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc. David A. Wiley, PG (continued) SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE IN GROUND-WATER SUPPLY {continued) Pinellas Countv Provided technical assistance for the investigation of a long term water supply for the Solid Waste Resource Recovery Facility. The project included a feasibility analysis for developing a ground-water supply and utilizing ASR with reclaimed water from the City of St. Petersburg. A testing program was prepared and approved by the SWFWMD. SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE IN GROUND-WATER CONTAMINATION Arcadia, Florida Conducted ground-water soil contamination and remediation that resulted from leaking underground fuel tanks at the City's motor pool. Also performed assessment of fuel lines and closure of several underground fuel tanks. Bay Countv, Florida Represented Gulf Power Company in an investigation to identify sources of elevated radiological activity in ground water in the vicinity of a fly ash disposal pond at an electric generating power plant (Plant Smith) in Bay County (1995). Regulators with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) suspected that radionuclides leached from fly ash were the sources of high gross-a, gross-,B, ZZSRa, and 228Ra in ground water. Laboratory analyses of core samples demonstrated that surficial sediments have naturally-occurring high concentrations of the parent elements uranium (U) and thorium (Th); results of leach tests indicated little potential for release of radionuclides from fly ash; and plots of chloride vs. gross-a and gross-,6 showed a high degree of correlation between total dissolved solids (TDS) and radiological activity. Bainbridge, Georgia Oversight of operation and maintenance of free product recovery system at a storage facility of a petroleum pipeline company. Dunedin. Florida Conducted ground-water soil contamination and remediation that resulted from leaking underground fuel tanks at the City's motor pool. Periodic reporting was completed and new above ground tanks designed and installed. Escambia Countv, Florida Represented Gulf Power Company in a second investigation involving the occurrence of elevated radiological activity in ground water in the vicinity of a stormwater runoff pond at an electric power generating plant (Plant Crist) in Escambia County (1998). Regulators suspected that ash was the source of the radioactivity. Laboratory analyses of sediments indicated high concentrations of U and Th in clays, and nonparametric sign tests supported the conclusion that the U and Th concentrations in local sediments were higher than normal for sedimentary rocks of that type. Column tests showed that radionuclides were leached from sediments but not from ash. Guayama, Puerto Rico Provided technical assistance in the development of a contaminant transport model to determine movement of contaminants. Also, simulated effects of ground-water pumping from a proposed remediation system. Hillsborough Countv. Florida Project manager and principal investigator for the assessment of potential contamination on proposed well-field property as a result of an adjacent phosphate processing plant. Activities included monitor well site selection, design of deep and shallow wells, supervision of construction and well development. Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc. David A. Wiley, PG (continued) SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE iN GROUND-WATER CONTAMINATION (continued} Hillsborough Countv, Florida Project manager and principal investigator for the assessment of potential contamination on highway right-of-ways. Activities included regulatory file reviews, monitor well construction and sampling, underground storage tank removal, surface geophysics and initial remedial actions. Lake Tarpon Groundwater Nutrient Study Goal of the project is to perform ground-water monitoring to refine nutrient loading estimates to the lake and to better evaluate the effects of nearby septic tanks on water quality. Twenty- three monitoring wells were installed to depths ranging from 20 to 40 feet below land surface, ground-water samples were collected and analyzed for a number of Cations, Anions and Nutrients. Additionally, samples were analyzed for the analysis of isotopic nitrogen ratios (15N/14N). Slug tests were conducted on monitoring wells to establish the hydraulic conductivity. LBG compiled, reduced, analyzed, and interpreted data so that computation of surficial aquifer water and nutrient fluxes to the lake could be performed. This was accomplished in the form of a model that adequately depicts nutrient flux to Lake Tarpon. Basis for the model was from collected water level, hydraulic conductivity data, and chemical analysis data. The groundwater flux from the surficial aquifer system (SAS) to the lake was calculated using an analytical model. The data analysis and modeling assisted in determining the relationship of land use to nitrate loading. Lakeland. Florida Project manager and principal investigator for environmental site assessment of existing shopping center to be remodeled in Lakeland, Florida. Investigation included a Phase I site assessment, testing for radon in air, sampling for asbestos containing materials and review of dry-cleaning operations. Orlando, Florida Conducted supplemental contamination assessment of petroleum product discharge resulting from leaking underground storage tanks. Project involved monitor well construction, ground- water sampling and reporting. Pasco Countv, Florida Project manager and principal investigator for a rock mining operation in coastal Pasco County, Florida. Investigation included the design, construction and testing of a monitor well. Sampling of new and existing monitor wells for analysis of salt-water intrusion due to dewatering operations. Development of a water balance and pumping rates for the mining operation were determined to assist in obtaining awater-use permit. Fuel storage and use areas were also investigated for contamination and assistance provided in obtaining a discharge permit from the FDER. Pasco/Hillsborough Counties Project manager and principal investigator for the performance of initial remedial actions and contamination assessments in association with underground storage tank removal. Investigations included the review of regulatory records, construction and sampling of monitor wells, review of aerial photography and inspection of domestic well records. Pembroke Pines, Florida Responsible for operation, maintenance and monitoring of remedial system addressing chlorinated solvent contaminated soil and ground water at a dry cleaning facility. Preparation of monthly NPDES reports and annual status reports. Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc. David A. Wiley, PG (continued) SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE IN GROUND-WATER CONTAMINATION (continued) Pinellas County, Florida Project manager and principal investigator for preliminary contamination assessments at numerous gasoline stations in Pinellas County, Florida. Activities included sampling of existing monitor wells, supervision of construction of temporary monitor wells, ground-water flow directions and receptor surveys. Pinellas County, Florida Project manager and principal investigator for a preliminary contamination assessment of former mobile home manufacturing company in Palm Harbor. Investigation included a site assessment, the installation of temporary monitor wells, sampling and analyses of ground water for potential contaminants. Quantification Of The Role Of Shallow Groundwater Nutrient Enrichment On Exporting Nutrient Into The Lower St. Johns River Basin The objectives of this project were to describe shallow groundwater quality existing under 4 predominant land use patterns: natural forest; row crop agriculture; residential development on septic tank waste disposal systems; and land disposal of domestic waste and identify the potential sources of nitrogen and phosphorus in shallow groundwater in the selected areas. LBG compiled and reviewed existing data from a number of sources, identified 17 sites and installed 50 monitoring wells for sampling and water analysis. Groundwater samples were collected on a quarterly basis during and analyzed for a number of cations, anions nutrients and other analytes. Additionally, samples were collected for analysis of isotopic nitrogen ratios (15N/14N). Slug tests were conducted to evaluate the hydraulic conductivity of the sun`icial aquifer. LBG used a combination of geochemical diagrams and statistical analyses to identify similarities and differences in water quality between and within the four land use groups. Richton, Mississippi Project manager and principal investigator for the evaluation of well decommissioning opera- tions near two salt domes in south central Mississippi. Activities involved the review of area hydrogeology, well construction, geophysical logs, reports on nuclear repository potential, ground-water models, plugging procedures and results and calculations for vertical and lateral movements of fluids through the natural ground-water system. Review meetings were held with the DOE and the state regulatory agency and recommendations made for necessary mitigation due to the potential for contamination migration. Sanford, Florida Directed the assessment of soils, sediment, ground water and surface water at a former Manufactured Gas Plant. Soil borings and monitoring wells were installed. Water ad soils were analyzed for VOC's, PAH's and metals. A water supply well survey and historical aerial survey were also performed. Sanford, Florida Performed operation, maintenance and monitoring of remedial system addressing petroleum impacted ground water. Prepared quarterly status reports. Sarasota, Florida Conducted ground-water contamination assessment activities at municipal facility constructed on former landfill. Developed a monitoring plan for the facility following the conclusion of the site assessment. Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc. David A. Wiley, PG (continued) SPECIFIC EXPERIENCE IN GROUND-WATER CONTAMINATION (continued) Sarasota, Florida Conducted ground-water soil contamination and remediation that resulted from leaking underground fuel tanks at the City's motor pool. Periodic monitoring and reporting was also completed. Sarasota, Florida Project manager and principal investigator for environmental site assessments on two tracts of land in Sarasota. Investigations included site assessments, sampling of existing wells, review of local, state and federal regulatory records, review of aerial photography, inspection of domestic water well records and review of activities on adjacent properties. St. Petersburg. Florida Project manager and principal investigator for a preliminary contamination assessment of previously developed property in St. Petersburg, Florida. The investigation included a site assessment, review of potential impacts from adjacent properties, review of local, state and federal regulatory records, construction of temporary monitor wells and analyses of ground water for potential contamination. Titusville, Florida Directed a contamination assessment of soil and ground water associated with area of former underground pipelines for transporting No. 2 fuel oil at the Indiana River Power Plant operated by Orlando Utilities Commission. Assessment activities included the installation of soil borings, deep and shallow monitoring wells, soils analysis, ground-water analysis, pumping tests and a domestic water supply well inventory. Based on the results of all assessment activities, the site qualified for no further action status with the state of Florida DEP. Venice. Florida Performed assessment of ground-water quality associated with monitoring programs at Lake Venice Golf Course. Variance was obtained from the FDEP on iron concentration based on ambient conditions. Venice, Florida Developed ground-water monitoring program for the use of reclaimed water associated with the Bay Indies Subdivision. 10 Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc. ~ O r ~ 31 32 ~ 33 ~ ~ 34 ~ N ~" 1 n ~ 116 117 V X ~ I ¢ I39 40 41 2 3 4 5 6 ~ Z 18251 113 ~ 4 -~ 15 Q g5 6 7 99 aoo(s~ ~ o 2 2 r ~ „2 18ii9 14x0 ~ 1822 ~ 1821 ~ 1448 18$3 ~ I 1 BENTLEY ST 1a 111 ~ ~ 1oo bL ~~ ~ e~ N N 7 18V/ er a M 44 I ~ 1824 110 09 109 4 101 1801 5 108 107 103 102 O6 105 104 1812 363(6) ,~A OTTEN ST ~ S .~. e'1 " ~ "~ 1796 ~ ~ ~~. v~'i : " ai ~ ro ;~~~ v~ .- te r. ~iy,;?:•~~;: "~ ~ 78 45 " T• ~ `.a -.:~° ~ ~ ~. ~ " 1765 ~ 2 3 4 ~.-. 5 6 ,.~ 7 8 g crgr, `..: :'• ';'1 ~6't.;: 7 6 ,°5.'{°,:e 4 3 2 .. .,.. :'.;t:.::;: 2 =4~".':';~' ~ 10 11 '•t~~~~~~',;i 13 14 15 16 .e}- ~ .a- ^ " 10 1780 ;t,"x~~,`;~,. .~l- ~ . •:...°~+. ~ ate- ~ •~- HE EN SENT LANE 1436 ~.•_.,.~,• ~ - " a h .- ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~" •`• ,':1785.•': i a .. v .. v v a .. .. ~y ~ ~ 455.6 ~ ~ " 8646 ;2#,','`~'~ ~'; 23 22 21 20 19 18 I 17 -~ NDYLN 2s 2s z7 ~ 2s .3d~:•:•:'",~~'•~:ai. ..~':°; ~..'~?:,.;,i; ' ."9 1759 ~ ~ ,..,.,, x9028 i. ``.i..`.~;'°:'•,iti;.g .- a :,.;:,q.;':;•::_ 17,,~,Q: .;:,.. ~ : :, , . a . •.' ~~ 40 39 38 '~, :t'~: 7 ~ 1751 3 i3&:,i::. 35 34 33 u 9 Y -.. 636(6) .. ° .,,,- 1745 D ~ ' `~~~ 10 ~ ~ ~' - ::': Exisrirv~ Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1740 Weston Drive Property Size: 0.52 Acres PIN: 02-29-15-00000-330-0200 Atlas Page: 261 A 1;::._:?•~::;';ii:~::i:r'rr:•:, ~.:~~a 8~ftp.M tY ~ ,.~:. ~, ~ ~ KRUSE © z ":'~+" ~ Hghland a •W ~~`:`: ' j':~}"•} {C i:'••:•j WILSON "'' " i'. ` : ' " =~'` r~ ~ O l. , . : ' : . : • . ; . Rp z ERIN LA ~ ElIiA8ETH ~ :••.••,: ~:,:^=~..~ = SUNSET POINT RD PROJECT SITE ~-:~. _ _~;.,.~ ~, ..•,~,'r~ ~ ~;-7 ?.~ ~ SPRING LA i'."=''. ,; y;ast]I~TH c] p p ' •; THAMES LA '•t'^~ O , . I i n~ ~ JOEL LA :.~~~ ~~ ~ : "" w r .a u u~ :~'~:_ X ~ (3ENTLEY U O ~,, ,,.SST ~.,. GREENLEA 3 ~ . '.~ - HEAVEN ~CA~9LYN C ~ ~ d SENT LA t7 ~ m .~ SANDY LA y-; I [ r ~ .' f ~ ~ ~--:-~~u ~ m O "eV.f ~ ~ - '.S SANDY LA 1' ' ~. L- m , Rp MARY L ~~~ ROSEMbNT DR d ~ ~ ~ a ~ T E ~ .,a '.., ~ 9D•r ~ ~ ~ ~~~ 191~FE ,,,,~^ UNWOOb ~ F ~ ~ ~ x ~ ' .. '•d .'n>' o '' '9 ~ FAIRMG~VT ST >~~~,.,,,i.,3 LOGAN ~ '~ ~~ ~' j a # ~ FAIRMONT ST ~ ` 5 PARKWOOD ~ ~~ `~ w .dpi' .' us ~~ ~ w "~.: 'f`'' ~..;~ ~ C7 WOODBINE j:r'° ~.' ; : '' ~(( _ , ~ ~ SHERD `. ,f •.;{~R SPRING,~1,}J~t,~_,, I ST ~ SPRINGDALE ~ ~ , t~ ~ D O ~ ~ >7 GENT , ST C7VERLEA ST /~~ ~ ;' •.,,. . ENGMAN ST DR ~ ~~ f LOCATION Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1740 Weston Drive Property Size: 0.52 Acres PIN: 02-29-15-00000-330-0200 Atlas Page: 261 A LN v2 ~ ieo V 10 1780 l (16> ~,roa 15 0 1~ a4 'E3 v ° v v __ ^ o $ a 31 ~ ~ ~ Q 116 32 33 I 34 ¢ 117 39 X40 41 2 3 I y 0 1825 1 113 1 4 15 Q 95 g 7 99 ~ , 112 ^ ~ °' V `O v 181~J `~ lg7p 1822 ~ 1821 1449 181 ~ 14O BENTLEY ST 451 1 111 ~ ~ 100 rnI ^ ~ 1808 J ~ ~ ~ 7g41 v ~ 110 09 109 4 101 1801 5 108 107 103 102 O6 105 104 LMDR °,' ^ M ~ v 1796 so 1 2 3 4 78 1 45 1765 ~ - 5 6 7 8 9 HE EN SENT LANE 1-' 1 ~• L8646 J 1751 9 ~ ~ 10 OS/R 636(5) ~~ ~i v Z 400(5) a 2°, 2 I 1824 1812 363~s) ,~a i~78'1::.^ 2 :~y~,';?:.;:. 10 11 t~s~?.`':° 13 14 15 16 •' b,•, cp N P O cp N :~Y: ~••',;I~, YNLN ^ ~ ;. i'l;='~;' ~ m ~ ~ m ro rn R ^' V Q Q P f2d{;';;~.; 23 22 21 20 19 18 ~ 17 25 2s 27 28 29 ':,.,;..=Y:f=,°.. a;r,.•;.:,: ~ ~ v 9028 ~ °~ . '; ~' ;~ 4758 1759 Q .P- ~ .~<r'"r.....-r: ~;~•,.,.?:.'<:::-, ZONING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1740 Weston Drive Property Size: 0.52 Acres PIN: 02-29-15-00000-330-0200 Atlas Page: 261 A ~, s ~~ ~ ~ ~,; ~.'~ Well 1-1, 1740 Weston Drive- Looking West. FLD2009-04015 WELL 1-1, 1740 WESTON DRIVE Well 1-1, 1740 Weston Drive-Looking East. „$. .~ ~YW k~ ' .~ ^ lx' ~ ~_ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ a ^^ '. r ^ ~ ' 1 ~~E'klK S ~ ^ . r -. -~ • ~ ~1 r, ~ ~> . ~ _. . ~. ,: it .. ARVARI}~$s ~ 4 s : ~~ ~4' ~ : € *., c. .~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ., a ~ ~~ ~ ~•DARTMOUF S~ ~ ~ .. ` ~ i ' i `A'~ ~ .Fa .~ ~-3 ~lw.. 14 ~ ~~ -~ yy ~~ 3~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ry ~ it `~~ } '-+( -' i + t ~~ 4 ~~ Y~ ~ kl #. ~._ R i' ,K ,~. ~ I~p ~s ~ _ ~S ~. .+. .~ ~ ~ a:v. ~ M L ` ~ ` • .. Y~ ~ F/ ~/ r t .. ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3,. ; ~ ~ i.: " f y~ t ~ t ~~• t• / a~~ Y\ ~ r y~. ~ ~_ it j{_~~~'~,~,, ~ y r~ ~ ~/ } ~, ~ 4 ~ + r ~ .. WI ' .«.. '~~'~~pp ~AK,T s ... .,-.R~.7~..mF._a....~.-.......... ]~. R ., ~_ ~... .,. ~c~-- Y "'~i !I'~ ~ l.8. ~ ' ~ i • - • -• • - • - ~ 11. 1~1 - - - • • -- ••- - 1 - • 11111 1 / 11 ~ • '••- ::: Y }_ tl' °o r ] (~ n ;: ~ ~ h +a h M h ~ N ,6 I ,~, M ,b a ,~ h ,ol „ h h ma ]o ap am dp 50 1~ ' o ~+ 'al„a4 ~ t~ r m ~ r ~ h .. h I .. h ~ .. ..1 ~ ~ ~ ~p is .. I ~ ~I~ ~f~ CLEVELAND ST Mho ~ ~, ~ ~ ,1] 1 ' 1 d s .I, 1 ,~ 2. ~ '~ 4w~s~ 1 I ~~ ~ ~ ? o z ^ 2 I 5 a ~ 1 ~ z z3 Q 1 1 2 3 0 I s 6 ] e •~dr~ 11 3 n 1 I I ~ ~, - W , - d , I Mh ~ A 21 ~ ~ ,9 1 ,] 16 15 13 ,d `„ l a ~ 1 1 1 0 5 m Q J 22 2, l ~ 1 e ] a ld 3 2 , n g I 6 _ t9 ~ ~ ._ 11 1 _ ~ 'J ~i~ $ ~ 2 4 _ N ~ q Im m ' „ I e 1] ~ q ~- 1 ~ °f a 201 9 1 ,6 105 z 5 1 1] a s l ' 1 ~ ~ •. `~ , 1 1 2 205 ,s ~ ~ 2 ,0 2 3 1 z, N ro 1 ,~ ,] 1 - - - 211 ~. ^ ,6 1 0 " 2 'd d I „ ~ 6 I s ~ _ ~I 0 ~ 21512 205 LS ~ ~ I 201 Park M M O) ~ ^ 201 ,1 ~ I I °D I i CREST - I , ~ 5 1 20 21 2) 3 2- 6 ] I a 110 2 30 2 209 I w ~ 3 3 3113 _ ~ $ LAKE 2113~~ 213 1 1 I NI ' I'] I,a N I ~ ~' '" ° 31 3150 n 0m aplp 215 ~ I"'" I r M I r r . . ® 5 ~ 3 a M ~1 ~ +] , 40 3 6 n 301 ~ 301 I,a 3~ 2 3 325 ] 32 a 309® ,z ; - - d 3318 z, 315 © O 31 2 s~1 - 333 9 _ L / ~b~ ~ s / 337,6 m `~ qp1 0 40 ~ 401 0 ,s 403 e/ ] 34311 ,e 4050 0 40 .,fib ,~ 40912 ,] 4 0 *' - 13,3 ,6 ~~~ ~e~ 1 I I 1 -1 I ~O f0 f0 ~f0 fOpp ~- ~ ~ COURT ST .. ~ ~, h M n~ ~I ~ h m ~ ~ ~- h ~ m I I 3 2 11 I .- .- ~ 1~~ h I ro ~ m M o o .~. I^- ~ , 2 3 ,e al 21 22 1 2 3 0 rt } . ~ ml ~ ~ ~ EXISTING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1571 Cleveland Street Property Size: 37.10 Acres PIN: 14-29-15-00000-210-0100 Atlas Page: 288B FOREST a ~ RD > Cir ~ PINEWOOD AKWOOD ~ ~ RIDGEWOOD ST ¢ ~ ~ ~ m Q ~ ¢ ~ ~ e o o CRESTVIEW ST D ~ ROSE SOD w O z ` z ~ > Q ~ ~ ~ d ^ PROJECT SITE GROVE o ~~ ^ ~ L~J ^ ° ~~ ~~~~ ^~v ~~ °~~ ~v ~ w ~~ PARK ~ CLEVELAND y ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ w 4ace PIER HARVARD ARTMOUTH } ST T d FRANKLIN Cz D D ` D DEDE L~~ SA~ 5T C~ COURT ST ROGERS SR-651 ST GULF-TO-BAY BLVD SR-60 w ~ Q d U d ~ ~ a d ~~ T~ PINE ST ~~ ~ S7 (7 ~ J } V TURNER MARI(lnl R7 = ~ t) ~ u~ a w ~ d JASMINE ~ ¢ WAY JASMfdE WAY Keystone Ct ,,~,:,:. ,,, .., ~ocArioN Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1571 Cleveland Street Property Size: 37.10 Acres PIN: 1 4-29-1 5-00000-2 1 0-0 1 00 Atlas Page: 2888 ~ ~ ~ O ]1 Q~ ~ 19 O 18 p N 18 ' 15 0 1 140 ip t~l 11 B ] B 5 O O N pl<D o A m b ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~, N ~ b ~ b ~ 19 ~, ~ ~~,~ 4 DR ' ^ ~~ ~ ~, ~ e s .~ ~ ~ u1 ,^ 24 ~ may, 1 ~ ~ ~ _ ~ z ' , , , 5 5 2 2 ~ 1 ~ 2 3 4 5 6 ]~ 8 q ~ Q^ O~ ~~, 11 3 22 1 1 _ I ~ 4 1 ~ A 21 ~ 19 I i] 18 15 U 13 _ b p ~ 1 ~ ~ 8 20 22 21 ~ ® ~ fi , ~. e , ] , 8 10 19 9 b 4 3 1 10 - - N m _ 11 ,e l ~ s v v z 11 - ' ~ ~_ ' ~ 'b c~ ~' 8 1] ~ F ® 201 12 105 2 S I '] B q ~ It 10 p p 9 18 ' 1 205 ~ b 2 0 10 is 3 I Y1 p 19 18I 1] ~ - ~ 211 b N 1s it 14 4 ~ b s s 205 LS ' 4 ~ 215 12 h13 201 Park s cti 201 b 1 I ^ ~ ~ b ~ v ' z9 ~ CREST n - I ~ z9 z1 30 ' n - r 205 s s ~ z _ ] ~ 6 ~ 19 2 30 z 209 ~ ~ ~ N b 3 30 1 311 3 ~ LAKE 211 3 m ZO p ~ + ' ~ ~ 1] ,6 ~ ~ v 213 4~ b°^b 10 ~ ~ N M a 4 31 315 4 2s 215 .- ~,-.- .- ~ o ao - ® s ~ 31 ~ ~ , n ~ p ^ ~4 323 6 z3 301 O b 301 I18 2 3~ 3 325 ] 32 zz 309 © O' 12 - - ~ 1 8 21 315 © O 31 Ls~i 333 9 4A q 337 ~ 40 ~3 ~ O40 401 O / ,o iq OS/R e/ 343 11 1e `~ 405 O Q 40 ] ~b9 ,~ ,z ~] 403 411 1 9 12 /~ 413 ,3 ~ ~ ^ _ 16 ~ 15 3 ) 4 I 8 O 8' ] I p ~ - 8 ~ 9 10 13 ^ ' 00 tpb O Ici t0 b b ~ + 11 ON O p p0 '^b ~' ® C R h ~ ~~ h m u7 ~ h ~ ® ® I 1 ^ ^ I ^ ^~ I h ~ b ~ nn t` l n m 3 2 11 2 1 3 18 20 21 Z2 1 2 3 4 ^ 1 '[~ `+~ •j^ b l ~ b b ZONING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1571 Cleveland Street Property Size: 37.10 Acres PIN: 1 4-29-1 5-00000-2 1 0-0 1 00 Atlas Page: 2886 FLD2009-04015 WELL 1-2, 1571 CLEVELAND STREET Well 1-2, 1571 Cleveland Street- Looking East. `. w ~ ~ !Z'i ~ ~ t ~ d - i •. , '~ z'~ .y 1 ~' r~ '~~ ~ ~Cf~$H~~SE DRS ~ _ ..•.. 1 ~. ~ ~ j~ir~$~.i. ~. r ~ '~' . "1 ~~~ M J} + ~r~ ~ R ~^. ^.^~^1~^1~~^~ 4 eF ~ (.. +~~ ~ IY~~ ~~ ~ ' ~ r s + ~ ~ ~ ;? ...(~ y ' > ~5 Y 1 ` t 3 ~z~a .i. ~l ~ ~ ~ ~, ~.. i ,!I ^ i . ~: ,t ~ r w '~ ~~, ~ ~~ ~„~ 1. ~ ~~ ~~, " _ a ~ ~r.~ t J ,, ~; 5~~~~ ~ ~ "t~~~~~st•sl~~~&.~~r 3s~ 'fy ~ l1E6Q~ RJR; ~' ~ ~ ~;- s ~ ~ - i . j ' • - • -• • - • - ~ 11. 1~1 - ~ ••• • • ~ - ••- - 1 - • .11111 / 111 ~ • '••- ~/ ~ ~, Ry ~O ?j ~~ ~~5 2825 ..... ......... .:..:....,.. 280 ~. ,~ '0~ 27 4 ~: -~ L -J -'"..,.....:'- .Z79 r-~ .tip Lxiz J 8th AVE ~ n' O N z77 " : zrh avg .. `=. : ' .:. . ~ : :: O 27ss •:;2 7 . . . . . . ~ a7 z„ , 2664 26ss BAL SP R ~E, _ ,, - ~ _ / ~ `O - - 27s~ .y ~ ' . ~ ~E~~ - T _ ~ `L~° ~ ~saz~ -'x675 ~ ~ . .~ - ~ I P E~ ~ 1~ 6 0 \ ti ~ 2707 " 2665 ~ `L6 \ ^,„,sE~ s _ P ~~ ~ ~ ` 61~ \ ti ... .. . ~ N - BE ~ Q N ~ Pia 49 ~'..... .:.. ... .. ... :.:~': .. .... Lsezao J 2705 \ \ P ZONING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2634 Sabal Springs Drive Property Size: 23.01 Acres PIN: 29-28-16-00000-220-0400 Atlas Page: 21 1 A y , ' ` ? WES~ .~RbOK t-~ 4 CLUBHOUSE DR N EsLsticra. ::Cce •~' .::::• '':.: ST. ANDREWS m 61va ~ -:.~ q COUNTRYCLUB w v ~~~ '•` ~¢'.'AUiaiim"i a~ :':>..:..:...IZ~T1kN~IQ:~~YE?....., .:;.•,...;...•..,{,~ p ~ r- A~F` , ~ WESTCHESTER p BLVD :,~ D v a • m J ~d U ~ ~ mo~kPt ° .. •' ,... ~'"'~• CLUBHOUSE DR S r- z• ` ~ ~ .. _ . ~ i•+ 1 PROJECT •.. . :~ ; ..: : '- . . SITE '~ ..:: • •. ~'~~" : -: •. . . 1 . °s z tl9 a Dr Ne ' ~ . rr W . ., ..,...: •7 ~ SABAL SPRIN( ~ ~ . SPRINGS . , a ~ ~ ~°°~ ~ . is iii 5R:•5$0 • d o ~ QC ~ a ~~P z i ~O~ER ~~ ~ p,N ~O~ Y\~~~ 0 Fo'~ PANES ~,~~ / e ~~~ ~~'- ~ ~~ y G~~S ~~~~ ~~ w OR b~~ CEp~ <_ I~ a O 3 ~ ~~ U ~ w ~~ G° OR o ~ O ~ O = ~ Q J ~ LUCE vDR m ~ 0 ~ G,ZTREE CIR v W OGN~RYg~O U Qt~Q' w ~ ~ S G ~ ~ ~ LUCE FOX FAR r G~ Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2634 Sabal Springs Drive Property Size: 23.01 Acres PIN: 29-28-16-00000-220-0400 Atlas Page: 21 1 A '~/ ~, °T ~-a'.:•'.::~~:1.~ g::.:• ~ ' ~~':~soEV:' 18 1 N ~ L619 s ~.y6 N r~~~ 24 a "N 299 y ~ e :~;.°; E.^`::;~,:9'~.::;.._ ~.~p '~"'^' ~~' : ~: °: .•i: .• .i.. "': - ~...,:. i ~ '~ 12 , .a 291 x~ a~ m^ ~ W 12 _• ~ a .. 1 . Q 0~ N N N N Off s 907 i C:~QfhAllG~.'ti'".' '.: ~ ? : A "> H D r~ ~ ~ ~ ti N N N ITV N ~ pa '° e a0 ~ n rte. N N '.' ~ ~ . • d - - ' , e `e] B a Qp z ~ s n ...... .. ~ . ...1.. , . ,.... ~ 1r}~h A (~~', .Y ,e ~g 2 ~' ZS ~ ~ : ss s, q a s ~ 2836 x ,~ ~5 L:ro J 0 6 ~ ~~ .~fG~ ry ` : X2830 ~ 0 'LB,~G~ ~/® ~ " .: .. ~ - - ~ 5 / COQ ~ ~~ b G ~ g2A Z 2 ~ i :xeaz ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ . .,.w. i ~- ~ °~ .. - - - - - - $ ~ 6Z5 , ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ . - _ 2S$0' - _ 280 r- ~ ~ ?7 r-~ ° `L `nz J 8th ~1 tl ~' ' te ` ~ j ~ :~7.~ r . --~ ....E9S.3 ~:2i 7rn;dy~ O z7ss ,.z. z-~ 2664 2666 BAL SP R ~E, _ ~ _ ~ N~ _ ~ ?761 h w ~ ~Ea ~ - - -- - ~ tib ~~ 'r'Eazaa 'f675 ~ ~ ~ 2701 26651 `L6 • ~,„~E, x .. o ~ ~ ~ ~ \ Z6~1 • ry „~ - ; : - ~E~ ~ ~ :~ J ~ ~ a 2705 ..... ... .. ...:.~ .. :.. .... .... ~ • ~'XISTING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2634 Sabal Springs Drive Property Size: 23.01 Acres PIN: 29-28-16-00000-220-0400 Atlas Page: 211 A gam? ~ 1~ .~ "~M , \' i~. FLD2009-04015 WELL 3-1, 2634 SABAL SPRINGS DRIVE We113-1, 2634 Sabal Springs Drive -Looking South. aw tn'Y. Y.a w~ +~y.ST.s, ter t _ ~ ~„~i~ .y~y~~_: We113-1, 2634 Sabal Springs Drive. Well 3-1, 2634 Sabal Springs Drive. ~ 1 , .r ..~ • ~Ya ~ ~ 'G ~ ~f' v ~~ ..Y f~j ~ ~~ ( ~.p .. , ~ k ~. ~ ~¢ tr.F t ~ r ~ ~ , ~ ..~ ... ~ 1 'R&. ~ i ~E '~ ,~ ;T . ~, t.. ~ . ~ ''~ r tbs. ~'~y.i"~ • x 3 ~ y ~ ±,y ~ . Y, _ ~ r~ ~ , r ' ~,r.: ~ ~. y ~ dew L ~ r ,~k . i ~ ~ ~ .~ .. r 1111 ~ ~. i r r +~ I ~. ' :f 'L ' . °'' " -~ J` ~} R \^ ~ ~ ~ 4uM:.::S~JHPr':. . a.r :,.# .+! +»~' ~r+La~ _ L..r , dilly pp r ~; p ~ .l ~ ~ ~ ~ r... ^ Nei. ~ a ~' =~ ~ r ~ Y~ l"~~l~A " ~~~ s°1~Y.I p ,' ~ }~ s ~ ~ ~ a t .~ ~ H ~ „ ' ~R• " .~ea.A~~fwP.M~+ ) ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ref = ~ FG R'r~ • x~`~v"~ ~ ~~'+'^°k • ~. st ~r ~e. ^ ,~:. -. I 1 i ~„r 1J1~ ~SF{ _ 1 • ~ i ., }, ~ ~+~~ !~j * ~ t q , ~ - ~ ~ ,~ ~ ® nn I'[~ t R ~f „~ >~ ~ ~ ,ey .. .mot ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ 'y : ~ . 1 Y eaL ... ~ .rt ~ - ~y . ~ 1 ~ ~ i'~ •• ~ - ~ •~- ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ • ~~~~ i~' L 3 31S 135 ~Q . ~....1a, ~y; P ~ 142.7 ~ ~ I 1309 1 . ~ , .. ... : ~ ' ;•~ : 1 ~ ,.;A, to a 1 ~ •- 1301) - I 130 ® •. I<. n L l s.:_y,,. i 1 ' 1- - - - - - - - - - 122 ~ '. '. ~ '• ' . . .. - - - - x. p - - - ~......,:::. ;:~: •,. ~ 1221 m 0 _. N . , 1228 ktr.. E; ,2, •°N ~' 1212 ~ •,~, •',1? v. _, c 1180 O ~ - N 1152 ~J 1 /~ .°~ N ve}mo a :'11 a4 ' N N ~ - N N 1124. . 1084 O .•. ~8 ~ ~ NNVt`{WV gg gg ~$~ 1058 O ~ I =^~ ;555; ' ~ ~ ~,~_~~.o~~.a~ ~ .. 8 I 1028, yr' - .. ..;,. ~.. a ~1 20 ra:'• ':~'•'~ir ~ 9.,,. O 3 1000' 5g ~1001 ~.: ~ •,~,•,~ N ~ ~ ` ~ I l 901 - -+ J - -1 1~.~` ri "• J 8 '~ ~t l I ~ m m m m as _ p...P9,~.a,r., ~ L 1 ~-J rty .~igcM"u m ~..,~,~.»,,,.,• 701 0 8 0 J 0 13oe3op looaool$ ` ~ ~ 1401'20$1101 906 11 X 551 7 1$08120 1Q8' 018 ~ ~ _ L'~ J 8080-a081 40150870 I I ~1f4 m r ~ vs L J 0 0 ~'' ~ ~.... ~ 208 2008 501 7 m m mm m m`°O 101 103p1 30830180 r N m0 V p~ .~ ~ N d~ '~~ _ 5 Q 514 p N N ro oa m mr'°1~ro~i °o 1 ~- m •• m w ~ ,•~ w m m m ~ 1 1 ~ ,, - o. ~- ' F ,' 2 0 ' 1 .. - I ~ S r-, ~" I• O ~ n e~ r_ 0 N N w 4 n. °° ' ~ $ " N ~ OJ W m - ...._.... 8 -o ~ A 3 „ "~. N ' ~' 1 3 " "1 0 315 3 .I= ~ A Exisr--v~ Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1840 Airport Drive Property Size: 73.17 Acres PIN: 12-29-15-00000-320-0100 Atlas Page: 280A ~, ST u ~~~w d u j j LED LA S a a ST z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J ST vi PALMETTO ST k(FtJNFT!-I Z W R10GEW000 ~ a ~ ~ I I` "'` ~, ~ ~ ~ ... :: z ~rtEft+~rUO.D ST ? >... -TY .:;ANY: ~~'•_ AIRPORT OR o~ tree O IoW 4 ~ GILBERT °~ Clr MG6C INL EY 1-WR DIN G S eL SR-590 Owner: City of Clearwater Site: 1840 Airport Drive PIN: 12-29-15-00000-320-0100 Atlas Page: 280A ST ST GRAND AVE ,`:: WEAVER PARt~ DR ~, w \ \ Lantern \U\ L~L PROJECT SITE RILYN sT ~~ a ° ~ 6~ MCkINLEI' HARDING PLAZA ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~,~~~ ST ~ ~ HAROING a~00P ~ PLAZA U ^ DREW ST LOCATION Case: FLD2009-04015 Property Size: 73.17 Acres . Y W . :. .. ~ ' 15-I 1351© ~~~•- `~-~~ ~~:, $..' ~ ~•.~ : . :: i~ ~i~ .•. 1309 ~ p l I . " ~ a I ~~ . aQ 1301 - J ;'~'•.. ._ ~ l O^ ^ OS/ I :. '.::•:•g..::. ~ d ? ~ ~ _~ y I~ a _ _ 130p ~'.:~: I, ' - _ L _ _ .. _ ... ... .. . -.140.1:: ll z 1227 °'_J , 1z21 h ;:rte:;;,;..,'.;,',; ~. . p 1 N N "1226 ~N R2 N O~ „6° O O .: - ... ~• IR T N 11s2 ~-~ L~J 1 AA K• O N ~Ch , 1124: ~ ff II~~ N N NNN ~ 4 p , 108 p .- - ':~: 99 ;~b ~ ~ _.. 1056 p R ~ I ~, s~~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~. ~..oa.~~..: 1028 ~ ~.. °°~ ~ ' pl l I ~ ~ ~ p ,0°, ~ 901 I _ ~ I -J _1 "° -, 8g}= 8®~ I .. .,.~ .. m m m r.~~_,....,t,.x. p R _ p `~ p 1308130' 1008100180 , ' 1401120Q1101 90s 551 7 1d061201~r10601 ~ X43 ~~ -~ 601 `,n_J 1solsos i 401508 70 rl I-I r cg~ ~ tee" m 1 7o 10~~1 60 LJ ~w> ~ ~ ~ 52 ~. 0 N ~ ~ ` 8 O 514 r ~ MDR N N N 6 q 4 ~ °o ' 0 q 5 an ~8 ~~ A W' ,I T .-2 8 8 - ~ N p ~ ~ ~ N o N ~ ~ O 4 2 b o~ ~ V Q A N N ~ I ~- ° r ~ ~ Q' w A ~ h N cp b n. O O N ~. h ' n328 to n N N , n m m q o o .- N ^ ~ A g ~ q 31 ^ ` 4 315 ~ ~ ' . 0 0 3 2 8 2 ^ ^ . L° 0 0 s ZONING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1840 Airport Drive Property Size: 73.17 Acres PIN: 1 2-29-1 5-00000-320-0 1 00 Atlas Page: 280A FLD2009-04015 WELL S1R, 1840 AIRPORT DRIVE Well 51 R, 1840 Airport Drive -Looking North. Well 51 R, 1840 Airport Drive -Looking West. ~~ r t r " + ice, E ~~~~ ;~y 7~ fi {fi -. ~ ~',~4 -^ a I\ z _: t t ~ I~ .~~ .:~ _, + .~.~~ '! s ~ ~~~ t r t ,~ • 1_ T t ~_1 r ~ !' r. ~ _..: ~•h R ~ ~~ * ~ "` >F ~~,~ v £_~ r~ 1S'' ark; AERIAL Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1700 Belcher Road Property Size: 6.19 Acres PIN: O1-29-15-16488-000-0130 Atlas Page: 262B ~ ~a~:~~iw isas~ i~+r ry CALUMET ST .,. ... ~:.:z;~~5~'. a $ '~ ^ '~ 1750 ? _° N N N z2 i ~ ~ 1748 1749 O ` 06214 ~ 1 1758 23 _ 42 53 •: ~ 1745 ; :' i ~i 1750 1741 17 12 3 1744 Q 40 55 2 Q ~ 174 - - - - ~ ~ 1735 3s ss Z W = - - 1734 O = Q 1733 1 V J 1732 ~ 38 57 - W - - - ~ m 1729 1 Z Z 1728 37 58 - - 1725 29 36 59 - - 1.T2 1721 ' 1>} 30 35 60 13 - -17-16 1717 1716 31 34 61 32 0 33 62 N ~+ so 1711 ,~ S LAGOON CIR noo ~ S o ^ : 55 N IN N 165 1164 163 162 161 `9' 6]0 1 . c.:: ':: ...:.. ..:............... .. . ... 57.5 55 1888 -. .:.°..r ......... .. °....:::.: O 1886 1884 • ; .• :.r::.::.•.•::::~.:-': •.. ~.::. .. 1682 • 1880 1878 1525 1878 1674 Exisr~N~ Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1700 Belcher Road Property Size: 6.19 Acres -- ------ PIN: O1-29-15-16488-000-0130 Atlas Page: 262B I Sunset Grove La a 3'. ~~ U Q 'i'. I rnkirra w d ;, ~. a ~ ,.-~.....g SUNSET POINT ROAC ° z ALBRIGHT DR p p p p p Z - TH AME S ST O J ~ O = >- Z U w J ~ U C7 ~ O z -~ Q } w ~ m ~ o_ ~ ~ Q < w J W m VANDERBILT VANDERBI VANDERBILT DR ~ ~ - ~~ ~ ~ _ Q 5 ' ANOR BLVD N : ~ ~. W ..f m.... , _ _.fiPBE~L r : ~ t ~ _ ; oro ~"' : . `fi .~g L - ~ ~ ~ H~V 7~ '~ ~~ ~ y.~.iau _. Site: 1700 Belcher Road Property Size: 6.19 Acres PIN: O1-29-15-16488-000-0130 Atlas Page: 262B Well 80, 1700 Belcher Road -Looking North. FLD2009-04015 WELL 80, 1700 BELCHER ROAD Well 80, 1700 Belcher Road -Looking West. Well 80, 1700 Belcher Road -Looking South. ~, F , ,. .... M ~ . _~~~~ °„ i t r ~ ._. ~. .. r :f ,' ~ .. a `k f~ ~ y~.. . - ~ ~ Yw: Y I ~j F ,: ~ ?, ~ , x ' a '~~~. ~' ~ 4 ~ Owner: City of Clearwater AERIAL Case FLD2009-04015 Site: 1709 Keene Road Property Size: 10.00 Acres PIN: 01-29-15-70164-300-2501 Atlas Page: 262A 1748 $ ~ ... . ......., ' 3 ' : ~: ~:::: .. . 1742 g.; `;°; } ~ •.;:: ~: ~ :°. ...; 1 .. :, I o z . ---- ~ I ~.tgd z z ~ . f ~ ~3 . } . . f. . .~y G~ I Q . ...: . .. . x . LL s .. JEI~B~,AR~. I. ,~y1l' ~k`- ~ ~;d~ST FLAGLER DR ~ W ~ z Y ~ 130.34 ~ ~i ` ~ ~ n " I ~~ '.C I Oi I ~ _- ~ 70164 g L J 670 297 50 27 26 so 5° ~ ~ r H H ~ ~ ~S 7? l~ N h IB 14 25 1501 Q i0 - - - ~ 14192a W '~ ~o W W 141 3 Y J 2 Z W 1411 zz 0 1405 2~ I ~ ~ ~ Owner: City of Clearwater I I ~ I :f' I ~ v I I i I I I \ I I I 80TE: SUB #70164 DOES NOT I I I I I O I I STANDTRDIZED PARCEL Fq :LD HAS BEEN SHIFTED TOII I \ I I EXISTNG Case _ I I I I I I 6 I Ir 1850 170182 I I O I ~ I I I t SPACE I I I FLD2009-04015 Site: 1709 Keene Road Property Size: 10.00 Acres PIN: O1-29-15-70164-300-2501 Atlas Page: 262A - - - - 174 '~ : , L D 3 .: - ` ~ : . 174@ ~ I a ' : ' s 17.3 . ;: : •.: °.•: ; :' :: (' Q ~ j~ :: ~~' ~~ . • FLAGLER DR ~ W ~° z ~:OR~T Y ,~.~ ~ z ; •. C~~ ~ ~ s I O I I L70164 ~ ~ I ~ ~s~o z7 26 ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - I " IR T ~ - ~ I I I ~? ~ I I I o I O ' 2 , ~ I ~ I ~ 6 I 1~5 I I I - 1~ 1 ' ~ 0182 I 141f5 I I I I I I O J W 3 I T l ~ I I ~ 141Ft1 22 I DOTE: SUB#70164 DOE NOT FO I OW STANDARDIZED PARCEL FqR I I 0 _ _ _ LO I IELD HAS BEEN SHIFTED TOILE 1 SPACE I 1!~ z1 I I I ~ I ~ ` ~ ~ !!-J~R , ~ ~ ZONING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1709 Keene Road Property Size: 10.00 Acres PIN: O1-29-15-70164-300-2501 Atlas Page: 262A <+.,,~ t _~ ~~ _K ti l-5, 1709 Keene Road -Looking East. Well 1-5, 1709 Keene Road -Looking FLD2009-04015 WELL 1-5, 1709 KEENE ROAD Well 1-5, 1709 Keene Road. . ~ ~4 1w 3. y - 11 ~` 1' 7 ~'~ 3 ~'n f~l 1 ~~~' ~ ~ ~`'~' K; ~ :n° ~ ~ « ~ ,, ,~.~.~, ~: ~~ ~ r 1' 1~1~i:i'I /~IJf~ hl 1117 ' i - .~. ~ - •t. .., ...~....~ ~. f~ _ w • A~ ,r ~ Y/ ~' ~; AERIAL Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 3024 Eastland Boulevard Property Size: 0.96 Acres PIN: 28-28-16-00000-330-0700 Atlas Page: 223A tz I ~ N ~'v 11 O 0 10 ~ 9 ~ M ~ S ~ ~ ~ I CO o L 40 2837 ' "~ ` z a ^~ M i 'f M 3038 ~ 4t n PHASE II z 2 O 2631 c M I °p ~ 2625 ~' w ~~ M rn h Q 42 I ^ M ~ 5 3040 I Z 3 4 Y 2819 I Q' 43 281 ~ N I - - - - - - - ~'~~ 1 ~Og4 6 ~ 2613 c I ~ s ~so ~ as "' I 9 O ry py o~ ~ 280 ,-~e-, ~ `~ I b 8 m 5 41956 I I M I 16 ~. - _ ~ ~ ~ I 6 ry ~5 h 10 46 I ryy9 9 2801 3044 ^ PHASE I I 14 ~'9j1_ y0y 2594 2595 a 0 "~ I I~ ry 19 0 ~ tt o `ti w o M I ~ ryy ryy0 e`' y ~' 2589 I ~ ry ry~ ~ t z 4s I ~ t a ryy b e 15 ~ 25 ~ ryy 6o N 3030 0 ~ 49 M ~ I 16 0 ~ ryyy ~s~ t s h ,9 'yp 1, j ^ ~ N EASTLAND BLVD ~ 16 ,9 ~~f - o a 704 6 Q~ `S N ^~O ~ 162 ~~ 'o0 16F O M ~ S \NFp 2570 2588 ,~ o 5A~ o Q ~G~~ o P ~iD~ 19 O ,Oeyl o '~ 6o n ~ 2582 530 t6 18 25 61653 N r, ' ' c N h N y 2529 L ~ ~,~ S~,` 6 ad s~ ry yryQpc y~ bJ ry e ry ry ry EXISTING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 3024 Eastland Boulevard Property Size: 0.96 Acres PIN: 28-28-16-00000-330-0700 Atlas Page: i 223A °L~ ti~ N U ~ pR ~ ~ k N '~ O FN lC WICK DR m ~ O DR t o° 3 o° c o Mq y FA IR CT ,f~ LUCE DR a~ DR ^ North Ct 0 U o ~ 1 LL i !n / } #,'. Oakbrook i ~ ~, ~. ,, 'I 'f sld~ LOCAi70N Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 3024 Eastland Boulevard Property Size: 0.96 Acres PIN: 28-28-16-00000-330-0700 Atlas Page: 223A N o CASCADE v DR ~ g > U ~ Q Haverford ~--~ f1r ~ Y Z O O!- z y% G j a Oxbow DEER RUN N p~ ~ z OFF O~ ^ a '~' O ^ ~ ~ O v ~ O ~ o ~o~ ~G2 (~ ~ ? 2 SWEETGUM WAY g m ~ DEER RUN S I ~, PARKCREEK DR O w C~ EzJ w w w N U ~ Z Z O > > m W j ¢ a ~ ~ U SABER DR 1z I "~ N 11 ~ 40 ~0 10 g 8~ 7 v I CO 2637 v m rn O L ~ o ~ 3038 n a 41 PH ASE II 'Z, Z 2631 ~O ~ o I °p ~ 2625 `~ I o ~ o ai 42 ^~ ~' M M Q 2 3 4 5 Y 2619 3040 I I 43 2618 Q I ?6.~ 1 3og4 6 ~ S 7 2613 0 M _ _ ~ _ I 2 609 ~ 3~ fi 1 1 O o ~ 260 . d Q 1 r 8 ~° m ry6o~ 45 1956 ~ o I 16 o9y o 0 3 ~ I 6 `L 15 10 L~ ,LSAT 9 v 46 2601 n~ u 3044 lllll~l\ ~ ~ HASEI I ~ 14 .9 9'S 20 `1y 3 2595 47 ~ `~ "' M I 1 11 ~ 9 M I 9 ' h~ ryh I~ `L ~~y ~ ~ 12 2589 I 0 14 ~y0 OiQ 48 r L I 0. 15 ~h0 yo 2583 N 3030 49 ° o I 16 tiy~o ~ 25~~ 19 ! `~ ~ ~ Q~ 17 N 18 q ~~` ]04 6 Qw ~+ ~p ~ M 0 N C M p0 16 ~ p p 7 ~~SZG2LN O O 2570 2566 E yp'1 0 $ pP~ 2 Nye 19 ~96't O 6~ N N 2562 25 N N Zy3o 18 ~ 18 61653 ~ _1 ~ N c,S`'sc,0 `~ ?s x'06 ° ~ ~p2 `Ly tia~c 2529 oa `'s~` tiryyti~,,a a by ZOI+IING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 3024 Eastland Boulevard Property Size: 0.96 Acres PIN: 28-28-16-00000-330-0700 Atlas Page: 223A FLD2009-04015 WELL 3-2, 3024 EASTLAND BOULEVARD We113-2, 3024 Eastland Boulevard -Looking South. ~-,~ ~ . ~: Well 3-2, 3024 Eastland Boulevard - I.eokii~~~ Wcs[. ` - ~ ~~ /f': ~ V~hF .. ! Well 3-2, 3024 Eastland Boulevard. s; yy ".'1 a y •~ J ~ ~' }'' T tY , _ 4 k /4 K c~ t. ,i ,1~ I 11"1 `fi, -.~~ Y~ i( ~7i^. ~ h~~~~~ ~'r~~ ~L _ ~!~ ~ ~/ ,~?I" ~ T ~ ~. '' ~, . ,_ ... ~ + sd x -~ ~ ryR ~ a1 s ~K~ ~~ x" 1 r } ~- x ~ i fIr'4 - f' ~~ 1 •~ r S ~" ~ ~C , -. ':.fit .'!~ ' r: .. ~,., « .I l l . ~ ~ ft~.. i. ~ . . ~ . 1 1 ~_ ' ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ p ,~* ~~, r;r v'~i~ AERIAL Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2784 Enter prise Road East Property Size: 6.80 Acres PIN: 29-28-1 6-00000-3 1 0-0 1 00 Atlas Page: 233A c N 60 55 47 ~ f/~ ~` 65 64 ~ 2525 v 2521 V 2519 ~ ~ a 2515 251 ~ 6 (55) qE 66 63 ~ 2 2509 3 2513 251 ~ 57 45 67 62 Q 4t Q N 42 2503 250 2507 ry 43 68 58 61 ~8p~ ~^ ti ~ N N N 40 ~~ 1. 01 69 60 59 1 N 39 eoa ss 38 35 36 n ~ ~~ ~ EE 29-28-1 FOR ~0 N 2714 N ~ 34 8~~ ti h N q N 9 495 48 28g~ 32 53,OJ 37 ENTERPRISE RD E N N ^ 9 8 h N N N aNo L3625 ~ ip ~ N 2440 m 2791 1g1 ti so ~ ~ ~ N N z n 11 ~ 9 2434 34 Exrsrirv~ Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2784 Enterprise Road East Property Size: 6.80 Acres PIN: 29-28-16-00000-310-0100 I Atlas Page: 233A ~ LUCE /DR N ~~ m ~ ~ p ,.TREE CIR U W o Z S~prc v GOVNZRy U Q~P W ~ LUCE 0~ Haverfc z ~ FOX FIRE ~ c ' ~ _ G a 2 a HAVERHILL DR O PROJECT BARKS ~~~ ttt- G~ ~ o ~~~tiF ~~o~ ~N o ~~ < SITE NP'VE Heatherwo d North G~ m DEER RUN N Z N O ~ GOttOnW00 ~ Gt ~ Z O~~R O~ r ~ O o a Cedar view Ct N O v O o Wa' syti Ott- o ~ j > O ~-1 ~~ o Y Z, p SWEETGUM WAY g ~ m ~. ~ ~ So6~h m = x ~ O O DEER RUN S Cypress Bend Dr Mane Gtoc~aGt ry PARKCREEK DR O w ENTERPRISE RD E ~JtJ -~ ~ N NEPSPN v ~ ~ o o P ¢ w w zo U ~ Q Q m O ~ w ~ LL Q ~ SABER DR >- w ~:_, Z U - - - ¢ O w ' .SItPF$T!'~~RM ~ Q w FOURTH AVE ~ N ~' w i a THIRD AVE Imo„ HILLCREEKCIRS ~ es" a ~:r ~ ~K~ P1 a FIRST AVE N _ ;,'''~ '•` } .... ,. LOCATION Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2784 Enterprise Road East Property Size: 6.80 Acres PIN: 29-28-1 6-00000-3 1 0-0 1 00 Atlas Page: 233A r~ so 55 ~ 47 ~ _ ~ 65 c v 64 ~ 2525 I ~ _ v 2521 2515 V 2519 2518 Q 56 (55) z ~ 4E ~ _° 66 63 ~ 3 2513 2 2 45 2509 2512 ~ 57 41 67 62 Q Q N 42 m 2503 2506 2507 6, 43 68 61 58 2 O ~' 8 ~ ~~^ r~ h h N N 40 1 ~ N 69 LMD s0 es ADS/R ~ ti ~o~ N 39 003.55 36 35 36 ^~ EE 29-28-1 FOR ?~ ti ~ ~ N 2714 ~ 34 L1i~DR ~ Sao ~, N N N 9 495.48 28035y 32 31 53 0> E ~~~ N N h 9 $ /R _ ~7 1 L3625 ~ p~ N N N m 10 rn ^' L 2440 ~ 2791 ~ ,~~0 N 60 s2 r~ 2N ~ 11 34 73 2434 ZONING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2784 Enterprise Road East Property Size: 6.80 Acres PIN: 29-28-1 6-00000-3 1 0-0 1 00 Atlas Page: 233A FLD2009-04015 WELL 3-3, 2784 ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST 1' a., a ~ ~ ., --~~~-r;. f 5 ~ ~~~' ' ~ 14 a ^J ~ t ~ ~ ~1~ ~~ J ~~ A ~~ ~ '~~ ~ ,~:, ~+~ r r J r ~: ~., ~ _ R _; ! ~ ..' 1 ,. ~+ ~. ~~ ~` ~f ~1 ~^ I ~s 'v '~ AERIAL Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2775 SR 580 Property Size: 7.50 Acres PIN: 29-28-16-00000-310-0100 Atlas Page: 21 1 A i as ~ 4 ~ ; c~ / 2712 ~ / 2708 z 5 Z / PHASEI 270 0 0 1 2 ? N 2713 /l 12641 ~ N 8 t5 ~ 6 7 i 20 m / 2717 2721 2725 C SR 580 ~ ,~ v r 255.2 168.79 d24 29 120 6° 891 N e 119 N 120 ~ n O N N 118 288 ?sg1 ssi e s oa 117 4 5 6 7 8 287 ~ ~' ~w a ~ 3 ~~ N N N 9 116 Q ~, ~ ~ ?)s ~ 2673 2672 U '~ ti 2 „ ^ 2887 10 tt5 ~ ~ 2155 1js ~'~~ N N ss 2688 2160 ~ 1 1s 26 25 24 a ~' ?>s) 27 288 11 2881 114 2860 ~ so n bry 0h ^ ~Q~ so ?>3,' 2s W 2854 ~ N ~ ~ `~ ry C~ 28 285 U 12 tt3 ^'-. w ~ ~ 2ss O c ~ 215 ~ QQ ry1g1 zs 22 W t3 ,~~, 213? 21b9 ~ ~ 2849 N tt 11 ,~ 2139 r, 98240 ~ ^a a h h N ~ 31 30 28 21 21 = U t4 112 ti ti ~ 16~ Q 2843 .., A ~i 275q 2•j1rOry ~ 2837 1 06 1 2731 "` 2752 31N ~o is to7 c o 2729 ^„'~ ~b ~' y~ _, rn ^' 2 s0 N N ry ti^ ?>~ 1 ~ 98255 ,y1 ti~ 7sq -li7ss ~~~~, ~ 0 2136 ry~ti s 8 ~ a HAV ERHILL DR 2135 ?S N N EXISTING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2775 SR 580 ---- - Property Size: --- 7.50 Acres ---- --- PIN: 29-28-1 6-00000-3 1 0-0 1 00 Atlas Page: 21 1 A :er. ;~ ;'z t • ' ... .., ~ .r. .,., ,e .,. . ~ .. " q.. ., • ur t~~,. DR ?'~ z G m ~jFW W '~----~ ~~ o DR o ~ O ~ 3 a i ~ LUCE v m a 0 REE CIR ~ L ~/ ~m ~~ U W pE v $~ GO JN-tRY U Q~P w ~ LUCE O FOX F~R~ ~ G~ a a HAVERHILL DR G~ BARKS ~~ VER~,O>' 0 NP H th rwo d North ~ Owner: City of Clearwater 0 SABAL SPRINGS PROJECT ea e SITE °~ Cottonwoo N Cedar vfew Ct W S ~-~,~ O gti0 ~D "~ CO ~~ WIIyDIA/G ~G ~ a° " ~ Z O N >` U_ (Qn m = = IJJ ~ Cypress Bend Dr o G~ Locarioti Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2775 SR 580 Property Size: 7.50 Acres PIN: 29-28-16-00000-310-0100 Atlas Page: 21 1 A i °° ~ 4 27 o ~IDR 27>2 2706 y Z c 6 Z / PHASEI 2707 2 - 2 l ~ p0 Z 8 y 2713 / L 12641 ~ 6 N 15 ,~ m l 2717 2721 2725 7 SR 580 ~ 25~~~68 ~9 ~ ~3o-2691 42429 ~ N ~ 119 120 0 N Q n N T 1 118 268 2gg1 ssi.e 5.03 117 4 5 6 7 8 2678 3 ~-' a, ~ N `~ N N 9 116 ~' 0 h 43' ~ 2's2 ~ 2673 2672 W U `V ti 2 .- ^ 2667 10 115 ~ 275 ?jss 8 `'6~ ~ ~ N N 60 2666 ~ Z16p 1 ~Sp 26 R 2j 6) 27 266 11 2661 114 2660 ~o 6o N ,Pry h ea h ~ ~~`S~ 23 W 2654 n ' ,~ ~ ~ `L ,~ ^'~ w ~ -' 28 265 265 ~ 12 ~ V 2655 113 o ~ Z751 2,31 29 22 W 13 ~ 2731 21 b9 ~ 2649 ~ 11 ,5 2739 ~ 98240 ti~ ^p ~~ N N ~y ~ 2644 213 30 21 V 14 112 `~ ~y ~ N ~ ~ 275a y0 21ti16ti Q 2643 a 2637 1os 1 2731 2752 31 ~0 15 107 0 2729 ^^ry P r- -~ v N °' so °°' ~ N ry 2j ti ti ,~~ 1~ 98255 ~~fia ^ ~ ~ ry~ti ~`''2~ ?,2 ~ v36 2 ~ a HAV ERHILL DR a ~2S 2738 N H ,~ ZONING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2775 SR 580 Property Size: 7.50 Acres PIN: 29-28-1 b-00000-310-0100 Atlas Page: i 21 1 A FLD2009-04015 WELL 3-4, 2775 STATE ROAD 580 We113-4, 2775 State Road 580 -Looking South. ~~•~-1 ~.~ Well 3-4, 2775 State Road 580 -Looking South. Y T' p 4 ~i!~7 .,~;. Ll~l'Ll'1=1~ISL I:L' L" r .ice ~ _ ; ~ Y ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~a ~~ ~.: ,~~ ~ +M1~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ tt~~1 ~ t: +'y ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~~ .. - :~ t - ~ ~ - 3 ~ .l+~tl ~~~j p r i ~- s y ~ `>• ; 4 ~~ a ~~ r•a E. tp.~7 ~~ 3 ~ y ~'F + . + f 4'k ~ ~..k~ a~ 7.f.: ~ e a~ : t gyp.. i !~ ,~'"~~~~°tl ~,y' ~. ~i `'~T "!.. ~i.A ~ ^'~„ +~ .~.° 4 ~'~i ~ • f ~ d y _ $ r ~ . i^ e'. 5 ~ `~ AAA •'T ',~y~`ax`'. d'r. Y < 2 ~'l y ~ xy T X44 ° 'T'E~ 4 ...thy ~ 6'1~ e ~ M + ~~ n ~,l~ ~' tl" Jj ~ ~ $ ~ .Mir `^'S~,_ -~4 ~~ t~ f ~... .~ .A~r ~ ~e~~'A .i~r n ~w. 'a •.e .,~~t s #1 ~ ~~ #1 ~~ ~.~ rl[ >k f f ~y t~ ~{ 4 ~.. r 31x_ ' R 1 a 5 p k'~ ~~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~# '~ ~ ~ - V Tra . 7}T' ~ .ty, C~ ~~ '~~ ~,r ~ is ~'. ' d ~ ~ ~~ ~ . , :` 'l .~ •~ ~~ s ~'~~*'] ~ ,; i + ~ , a ,~ p ~t~i ay.. r ~9 ,~ * k.~~~ ~, $..,~ 1 1 ~~ 1~ _ ~- ~ J 1 ~ ~ ;~ ~t irc , ~, we ~~k~~~~~ 6 e ~ 'f . F . 'h AERIAL Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2698 Fifth Avenue North Property Size: 6.80 Acres PIN: 32-28-16-00000-210-0500 Atlas Page: 233A N n26 /" ~~6- ENTERPRISE RD E z z z 30 103^$) N O ^ ^ ^ 30 60 ^ DRAINAGE ASEMENT r~ ^ I ~ ~ ~~ 7034.8 • h I I I 4 l I I I I I I I I I 4 \ W yg10g ~ 26 125 124 123 (22 121 120 119 I 18 I 17 116 I 15 I 14 ']~' r 1.0 9' ~ ~ I : ~' ~ j 1 d 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 7 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 '.~ t~ '3 ) d ; y.. ~' I I I I I F u, I 25901 : .5 25897 Q N I I I I I I I I °. t •`: { 25889 ~ a,,.~. ~ ~ 25881 FOURTH AVE N ~ ~ = .~. -,~ ~-- ' 25877 25873 ( ~ I I I l i , 25869 I I I I I I I I I :,;.'.'~<•.;,:;.,_I„,.,,';s.•,,r:~,,,; •, 25865 ., . {•, •;•: .; •':'::'_ .',`r.°. EXISTING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2698 Fifth Avenue North Property Size: 6.80 Acres PIN: 32-28-16-00000-210-0500 Atlas Page: 233A BARKS ~ ~ Np,VEEi~~~"~ Heatherwo d North ~ `~ G~ a ° z 2 ~^ o a G ~ Cottonwoo ~ Ct i `~ Cedar view Ct w S ~~°~ O ~ o q~0 O p uvi E LL l ~ PROJECT D ~ w,NOi ~o°° y SITE ~~~ o o "G M z o S 0 L `-° a v u~i ~ with m = _ ~ ~ o Cypress Bend Dr o Marrye ~ - A ~- ~ ~ Owner: City of Clearwater G~or\a G~ ~O ENTERPRISE RD E v~ o PNEPSP~j Z = a ~ o o ~ w ~ ,~ m SABER LocA~-ro~u Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2698 Fifth Avenue North Property Size: 6.80 Acres PIN: 32-28-16-00000-210-0500 Atlas Page: 233A N /~ 1120 Q 2 X h ~ 2 0 103$(5) N 0 `1J ~/R O ^^^fffifffll^^^ffflfffifffllffflflrfffllffff^^fff~^~fff~~ftf~f~~~faff~~~~ff~~f~flty ^ ^ ^ ^ a ~ fio ~ ^ ^ DRAINAGE ASEMENT ~ r~ ®S/R L ~1 1034.8 ^ 9tih - - r -r -~- n~ , - •- r - e r 20 119 I 18 I 17 116 I 15 I 14 _t~ I ~~ ,'~ ~ $ _~ , ~ -, _, - '159g~9 26 125 124 123 122 121 I I ~ ~` '~ 1 al 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 17T ~~]]9 10 111 12 I 13 :~('~ 3 .fd ~ W-. --Y~ f.~ 25901 ~ ~Z I ; ~ , I I I f , f I I ; l.1J 25897 I I ; . ,, ~ 25889 •;': ; z5a61 ~ FOURTH AVE N ~ 25877 I f I -~-'•;':1-• -~ •-~ 25865 I I I f f I I I I :~•.'t.~•`, i ~9 .,. l ZONING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2698 Fifth Avenue North Property Size: 6.80 Acres PIN: 32-28-16-00000-210-0500 Atlas Page: 233A FLn2oo9-o4o~s WELL 79, 2698 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH Well 79, 2698 Fifth Avenue North. ~v ~~o i z 1I h -~. -- _.--~ !~ ~1~•_- Y . ~~ AERIAL Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1515 Cleveland Street Property Size: 37.10 Acres PIN: 1 4-29-1 5-00000-2 1 0-0 1 00 Atlas Page: 288B ~i R c ] y ~ ~ ~ zb rp H .F $ ,6 I ,b 'b '~ 1al ++ m e ] c em h y D tp h h h s c ' c ,]vly,sq r y •. .- h y .• ~. I e- ., .- ..I y b 'n t~ ~p ,9 ' n r y I b ao11o a ~- r r CLEVELAND ST r ~ r ~- e- e ~ z My1. ~ y ~ ~ I 1 a1, 0 5 .1 1 1 y y +" 24 s ~o~s1 •- ~ •• ~ 1 ~ z r. 1 , , 2 5 ~ 1 z 11 z3 ~ 1 ~ tlz 'I' S 6 ] I IB 9 I Q~ W ~ 4 1 2, I Y m ,3 My ~, p 5 zo t9 I 1] 16 12 21 1 Q 15 10 a i a ~ 1. 31211, ° o ~) y I ~ I fi ,9 ~ , 11 __ , ~ s a a z 1 ~- 4 a ] - - e ~ ~ n ~` I , © Iro ^ ~}' ~` 1 N M ro ~- I g' ~ °f 201 9 1 ,8 ] 105 z s l fi 6 s l 1 ~ ? ~" •. , 2 1 205m s 3 I za za 2 1 1- - - 20 211 „ 2 ,a 2 _ _I z, N m I I '~ m 1~ n 11s ~ I fi 5 ~ I ~I a ~ 21512 13 201 Park 205 LS ~ ~ 1 M M p~ .- ^ 201 .b. I m I I e $ CREST ,I - I r i m z, 30 _ _ 28 _ z] 3 _ 1 ~y~~. 5 6 ] 1 8 110 2 - z 2 2 ~ 1 1 N 2 3 3113 ~ $ LAKE 2113 11 213 ~ NI ,s 1 I ,] n I M I ~ ~ ^ 31 315a ~ 1 m 215 "1"" ~ m m .- .- .~ >a 5 za 3 $ M ~I ^ , ] 3 5 z3 ~ 3010 301 I'e z 40 S~ 13 325 32 zz ~ 309® O' ,z - - ~ < a 2, ~ 315 © O 31 Ls~i - 333 s ,q~ s / ~A`~s ~ 33710 m _ 4 4409q ~ ~ O40 401 O i 6/ ] 343 ,t s 15 4 3 405 O O 40 .~A ~ 409 ,z ,] 403 , 9 ~ 3 1313 ~"Tl~4 _ s 15 !~ 1 O V ~ f01 - ~- ~I~m ~M1q N M a- ~- ~- ^ l~~ m ODro µkp ~- ~- F'i` .- y ~ COURT ST ~ ~I ~ y y y M n~ y y e1 ~0 y 1 I e, I^ m a - m ~ ~ I ^1 h I m ro tyn M c o l " 3 2 1 I , 2 3 19 m 21 22 1 2 3 4 r1 ~ y ml ~ ~ ~ Exisri-vG Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1515 Cleveland Street Property Size: 37.10 Acres PIN: 14-29-15-00000-210-0100 Atlas Page: 2888 FOREST RD Clf _ ¢ ~ ~ PINEWOOD OAKWOOD Q ~ RIDGEWOOD ST O W = ¢ O] j Z U m j ~ ~ ~ o CRESTVIEW ST R05~ WOOD w O ? y W a W 'a ^^^ ^ ^^ d ^ PRSITECT GROVE LAURA ~ sT ~v ~ PARK ~ CLEVELAND y ~ ~ Q d o Place PIERCE ST g HARVARD ~^ aARTMOUTH } 5T Y sT w ~ FRANKLIN CT D ^^ DEDEL~ SA^^ ST ^ C /~ \ II , \ COURT ST w^~ d ROGERS 1 SR-65 ^~ ST > ~ GULF-70-BAY BLVD SR-60 ~ > > 'Q ~ > Q w PINE ^~ ^ TURNER O S7 ST ~ in ~ ~ ~ TURNER MAR1f1N C7 x u ~ ~ O > ~ a w ~ ¢ JASMIfdE ~ a WAY JASMNdE ^ WAY Keystone GY - __ _ t fi'r' ' ~' 9 '' LOCAi70iV Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1515 Cleveland Street Property Size: 37.10 Acres PIN: 14-29-15-00000-210-0100 Atlas Page: 2888 ~ ~ ~ O h ]1 O~ <V h 19 O tg V ilk t6 I 15 14O 13~ 12 I 11 B ] 6 5 1 O 18 O 1] I 16 N R b o V b h ^ ' ^ ^ I ^ N h ^I h r b ~ ~ ~ n 19 "' I b bblb V~ ep DR y z ^ ~ ~ a I, I a 6 I I . la I ~ ,^ 2d ~ ~o~a1 , ^ `' p 4^ k- ° I ~ 5 a I I z 1 a Ma a z z3 1 1 2 3 q 5 I fi (~y W W ,ip ~(~ Q~OV 1F0 Of 11 3 1 22 I ] 8 I 9 V^' V~ ^I ~ ' C _ t q 1 I A 2t p t9 I 1] ifi 15 13 14 I V' f I 11 6 p 22 21 m I P v ' e sl, i , 91 Vf b b I 6 10 t9 d 3 t 10 - - ry b 11 0 ~ a a _ z 11 _' ~ f .~1 ~J ~ t ~ I m `D ° I s ,] ~ I 4 ~ ~ ~ .- s 1 201 9 .. is 12 105 z s 16 ~ s 9 I , to I I 2 205 10 15 23 ~ 2 3 -I 21 p 19 16I 1] I I - - 10 - 211 N b ry 1fi I ~ 11 id q I b tp ( ([1 6 6 205 LS I ^~ I m~ a ~{ °^~ 215 ,z ,~,3 201 Park M 201 ~ b ^ I b oI by ~ CREST - ~ I 1 1 26 P 205 s s I ] e p z1 30 __ zx 30 2,Qj z _ I I m z 30 z 209 I 3 30 311 p 3 LAKE 211 3 zo I t I t I n Its 1 3 213 ~~O b ry~ N I ~° q 31 315 d ~ q 215 •~ L-.- ._ I ,0 ~ I 10 <o z ® s zq 31 ~ m ~ m 1 „ I ~ ~4 323 s 23 301 O O 301 I18 z 325 32 309 01 3~ 3 ] zz © ,z _ _ q 331 s n 315 ® O 31 Ls73 t/1 333 9 pq / '~b$r9 / 337 to p t9 ~ O /R ~3 ~ O40 401 O s/ 343 tt to 40 IJ 405 O O 40 ] ~9 „~ 1z n 403 411 ~`0 ~4.~13 ~,a CS- t6- 3 I 4 I 5 6 I] 1 12 /1 13 vy~N T~ t6 ^ ` 00 ~ O bb ,p t0 IcA O b I ~ <pb 1p I10t D 6 9 10 ONFt ~O ^~b (NOS ^ ® F' C A b ^ I I ~ I I ~^ ~ ~ ~ I' m I ~ ~ m ~ I ~ ~ ~~ O o I ~. ao h h ^ ^ ] 2 I t 1 2 3 ~ Nh b b b b t9 20 2t 22 1 2 3 d 1 j' ~ ~^ I ZONING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 1515 Cleveland Street Property Size: 37.10 Acres PIN: 14-29-15-00000-210-0100 Atlas Page: 288B FLD2009-04015 WELL 1-4, 1515 CLEVELAND STREET Well (-4, 1515 Cleveland Street -Looking West. Well 1-4, 1515 Cleveland Street -Looking West. i tk 4.. _ _ `~~7 ~m. ~.., ';ir,'~ ~ U.. I ty:. ,pr. Owner: City of Clearwater Site: 2630 Sabal Springs Drive PIN : 29-28-16-00000-220-0400 az ~~ ~v~ z z ~:. (l i~ r ~~ n~ 7 ~; {~t''f ~ ~~~ -~ AERIAL Case: FLD2009-04015 Property Size: 23.01 Acres Atlas Page: 21 1 A *:i ,K #~ r~i~ rr- "~~ ~ r y~ ~~' ~~ y /c d GPI ? i ~D~ER tic. SAN ~~~~ ~~ tee ~~~ ti PANES ciR ~ ~ ~~ ~<'- s ~t'- G~~S ~~~~ QJP\~ o~ NoCCOW T N~ ~e~~ mb~~~_ ~~ CEDAR e ~p~C ~ o m DR ~<~~0.. ~iFw ~ ~° w ~_ ,~ ~ DR ~ ¢~ 2, LUCE vDR J m Q. S`D~ G,ZTREE CIR U W vNZF>,Y ~ ~,~' w ~ 5 C~ EU Q ~ ~ LUCE D FOX FAR ~ G~ LOCATION Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 2630 Sabal Springs Drive Property Size: 23.01 Acres PIN: 29-28-16-00000-220-0400 Atlas Page: 21 1 A a s ~ ~ ,a ,. ,a , ~~) 29 4 29 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ 4 ~ o 8 N N ~ N C ~ 2 2911 ~ ~ ~ n279,n r ~ a N 290 ^ ~ ? z 29 6 ,°o ~ 8~~ ~^ m ~ m r a N N N A ~ 2g~j7 iij }• '.253x: i ~; •i<,vJw:';:•:?::ii.;N::i!;:.'...:;m?:;cjii,.~':•::t.r _., / i • ~ .... ~ OS/ , 28~ 8 ------ 25 $ Za I ~ 1 _ ----~~ °f.25573~: ~;•t;.:,`,•~•:°`.`:`' €'::'•``•" 280 e "' 27 ::i; i!4~a i J.,';•;•;: ~,::,•,.:'.: t; ;':; i;: ': , X279 ~ . ~ L'~ J O' N •''?i277 ''i.'L%1' ;~y.~,:.i,,}: ~'.:.. ~ 2765 •.>s2: • . . 2 BAL SP R P„,sE, zssa 2sss _ ~ ~ 27 61 / . ~•..` .-. `{': :r : ; X675 . a : ,~ • ; ::::. :• :~: f~••}'t;: •'i7; :::: r:: •. •.•.'. - ~ _ ~ , ' ~ - -r - ~ez~ " \ r~' e~- ~ J ~ ?701 ,'i::{:•.:: :.. i~f.::;~;.Y:• :•.:', '':'•, •' ' ~ . . 2665 O ~ ~ ~ 26 „ N / _ o~~ N ~ ~ 749 - vzw 1 ~ 2705 L J ~ ZONING Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 ~ ~, CLUF~HOIIS~ DR.,S ~ N N _ _ ~~ N N N fT'+ N ~ ~ m 6 A ~ a s ~ ~8 2 B ~ . 786 ~. gk s 2 8 ::•: .~r ~ 'L'~~..':".'• 2836 ~ $ 2 ~ .. ,,., Q r - -t ~ L J 8 ~~ l~/ ......•.•.,.... (G 2830 2 : ' : . i gzn Site: 2630 Sabal Springs Drive Property Size: 23.01 Acres PIN: 29-28-16-00000-220-0400 Atlas Page: 21 1 A ~~~.t Well 3-5, 2630 Sabal Springs Drive. Well 3-~, 2630 Sabal Springs Drive -Looking East. FLD2009-04015 WELL 3-5, 2630 SABAL SPRINGS DRIVE Well 3-5, 2630 Sabal Springs Drive -Looking West. Well 3-5, 2630 Sabal Springs Drive. ~ ~ ~ s ~' ~ ~ ~ . ,_ ,y .> ~ ~'. 1 _. - sR - x `~ f. S ~ ~ ~ ra ~~ T jj..,,.. { ,r ; r r ~ .;,, f . } nn~~qqpO C7Gr~S [[~~T y:E.~ c E _ r ~'' ' ~ ~ w _ .. ., ~ , _ s_ ~~ .. ~ ~. ~ : t~ .. ; ~' .. r J .~ ~ ~ ROGEI~S ' ~ - t~1.4NE t .. R ST ~ d ~ ~ ` ~ ~ _ .. _ ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ TURI~E~R:~T ~ ~ . ~ , " ~' • ~ y ~ n. ! ~ A .: ~ ~ w eys ~ ; ~ ^ - rmw ~N ~ ~ ~ ' ~.;. y, ..> ^ _ j.- _ .:. i ~ ~. f i. y Q • _~ 4(~ -y "' ~ a V) F''+L' T ~1{~ ,. . . ,- v $3. ~ ~ ~ r 42 a0 ~ ~ 3s ~ ,~ I ~i'~ kj ~ h~'~I t'~ O CCURI s' ~. ~~e~ Alm zz^ 5' I 5 R~,GER~, ~~ e I i,I,s~ -~~4-I -s ,a ~ , I ~ -81 .- z ~ - qo~- r ~ o 141 , z z 2 ° ~„~ ,3 1 100 ,ar g 0 ////~~V/~ s>o~s, I ~ ~ I ^ O~/ 1 ~ g ~ ~ '3 ~ ,»~ ° ~ I °v ,o l g 16^ ~'a~e n 10 1?O 1qv 1s ~ Q a a ~ ~ ROGERS ST ^I I~~ 16 1 ~ ^~I^,^^~i^^~I^ h 1 1 2 3 4 16 l fi ] g g ~~ I I o a ~ ~ a 10 9 8 ] 6 F 011 X12 13~ 14^ 150 O Q R V V d TURNER ST _ ~°~ ~ ~ a _ Laisso _I ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~^,~ 604 6 61 18 1]' 16^ 15 14 13 12^ 11 10 ~ I8 5 611E ~ 61 s 6q g 4 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 I 8 9 ~ 615 ~ M 227 ~ ~ `~° 612 13 3 61 M 10 o 9 e 6 v ] v 6 1 3~ ]4.. 15~ O r O ~ ~ ^~^~ ~ sz a P/NE ST >a spa 1~ 6~1 ~ 62 h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n M ~_ ~] $ 18^ 1]^ i6^ 15 ^ 13 1 11 p A W 70 1280 ~4 70 l i z 3 a s 6 ) g y W N O O I o' o' M r] ~ M n M 710 r 1 I to I a l l s ~ ] v 6 ~l I ~I t# ~I d td^ V 150 V NN N NN NNN NN s 4 3 z 1 80 14 15 16 1] 18 <O N W ~ N N 81 n n 101 M ~ 16 80 8011 1 ~ 80310 g0 803 ~ r1 ,m '~` `r Z] 26 '1 100 1s n 805z z 8 80511 ~ 80 805 80 ~ z 80€ c7 67 a o 16 80 8093 80 809 81 809 `* f se 3 12 zs 36 3 80 ®09 ~ ,~ ~ g ~7 11 1 15 81 Y1"14 813 813 a 81 81313/~-za 81 31 m ZOIVIN V Owner: City of Clearwater ;Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 600 South Evergreen Avenue Property Size: 25.6 Acres PIN: 15-29-15-00000-410-0100 Atlas Page: 296B J ~ ~--~I a ST U ~ w~ ~~ ~ PARK ST w g ~ PARK ~ ST d d o a J z Y z m 4 ST PIERCE j p Evergre Q ~ ~ K<i ¢ g ~ ~ ~ W U Z en Place J ~ 2 c PIERCE ST ST -~ Q ~ O Z C FRANKLIN9 ST Q CIR Q m PROJECT FRANKLIN G~~ ~ DE LEON ~ ` A9~ ST ~ ST SITE SANTA ROSA ~'~ SR-595 SR 60 SAN J~ T ~!L C - H ROGERS ST °'~ ~ COURT ST SR-651 w O ~~ Q ROGERS ST GULF-TO-BA Q ~ Z O N a Cir a Z r ~^ O '< w U w ~ TURNER U ~ U U J~U~~ W W w PINE ~ ST o ST O ~ w p > z LA Q J I~1 z ~~I I I 1 U rq ~ DRUiD Rm ~1 w = O' ~ > ¢ W ~ Q 5 ~ JASMINE U WAY p ~ ¢ JASMINE W AY J O~ ~~ Z W Ja min W _ ~ MAGNOLIA Q DR ~ ~ ~ ~ w e Ct W Q > Q M ~ ~ W ~ MAGNOLIA ~ ~ ~ W U w ~ W ~ g L LOTUS PATH LOT US PA T H J > Y = C7 ~ c J _ LOTU 2 Z ~ O 2 8 4 Z ~ a JEFFORDS Z ST JE ~ ~ D ~ ~ D 4 rq, ~ BARRY g w ST BARRY ST BARRY ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '4 Pi'''g TUSCOLA ST = LOC~4TION Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2009-04015 Site: 600 South Evergreen Avenue I Property Size: 25.6 Acres PIN: 1 5-29-1 5-00000-4 1 0-0 1 00 Atlas Page: 296B a ~~ 7~ N q1 ~ / qo V ~ ~ 42 ~ ~ ~ / 3g /3] R 2 I ~~~~i r rP' it 2 N r r .-+~ Sdj N ~s r ~h , aIM I ~ d ~2 ERS, ~~ N 'I ~+-I~ I - 5 8 a8la~~I ,g -5 2 I 19v' 116 R ~ e .- e ] 9 9 I 10 111 I ,z 8 r - -~ _ _ L31960 J s ~ ~ Q ~g 6 ~$ 811 ~~ 61 C' g ° ~~ i 13 61'~ a 62 J 13" 8~1 ~ 82 caw m s f~ D ~ ~ 7~ 1280 ~4 70 r ~ ~ sszso ~ $ a°~-qy o~ ~ay°n no>n vox. $ rn w n rT M 1") lot r. ~ to 5 q 3 2 100 1] _11 15 1fi 1] 19 ifi eD n ~ o°~p ~ _ ~ ~ r' 81 _._ 1s Owner: City of Clearwater Site: 600 South Evergreen Avenue PIN : 1 5-29-1 5-00000-4 1 0-0 1 00 . ~ ~a ®~ ~ a ~ ~ ' ~ 40 ~ a n ~ ul z z I M M r g~ ~ 13 I ~ ~I' ~', em~l I ? ~ 1 R 7 ~ ~ e ~ r 16 I s I a L1868 11 itr tm tN 15°D ~ ~ r r ~ ROGERS ST $ h ~ h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~^II,^~. ~.^~..^~ 10 9 g ] 6 I 1 W F ` 6 ] , I Z I 3 1 q 16 ~~ I I ^ ~ I g g ~ ~ ^ ~ V p Oit av' 12 1C v 1^ v 15^ v I 65: ~ ~v q ~ ~ ~ 804 ,6 ,] ~ ,6 ,6 ^ ,q M ,3^ M ,z M r, ,6 B 1 815 2 M 3 M 4 5 zz~ fi `~ ~ ~ q g ~D M g 612 .- ~ r ~ 10 9 8 ] 6 c c ,~ 0 ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ e~ ~ g ~' YINE 5T ~ ~ rn h ~ v~ n ~ n o° ~ r n ~ ~ r ~ r 1g i] i6 15 13 12 11 71])4 A UU I 1~ 2N h 3~ h ° b 5 ~ 6 ] e g I ~ .°~- .`~- ~ ~ ~ ~ 710 I 10 I I .`r- I a ~ ] r 6 I l 0 tar 1~ ~I v a •- ~ ~ g °~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ 801 1 ~ 8036 80 ~° 803 ~ ' „° '!. 3 ^ " ~ "° .v- n za 1 805 z 8 4 8051 ~ 8 805 80 ~ 2 8~ 809 8 809 8 809 ~ v7 ^ ^ a 3 Z 25 3] a 80 8 ~ ii° M ~1~q q 81 8133 ~ 81 a, 813 16 „ ~~isriti~ Case: FLD2009-04015 Property Size: 25.6 Acres Atlas Page: 2968 g = B TURNER ST h ~ 809 y ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ r ~.r, m:}x~ ~, .. ~, ,~.'~ ,h 4" Well 1-3, 600 South Evergreen Avenue -Looking West. FLD2009-04015 WELL 1-3, 600 SOUTH EVERGREEN AVENUE Well 1-3, 600 South Evergreen Avenue- Looking West. Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ^ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ^ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ^ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: X200.00 ^ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 07/11/2008) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: C.t ~ Y _ ~ Lt-~-_~~W~--tom p MAILING ADDRESS: _ 1~ t~_L_t1 ~~(~_~~_~~~ ~ Ci-~-f\~w-~~ ~~2 ~ -_ L 33 ~7S ~ PHONE NUMBER: (--T2~) ~(~ .. ~u5 ~~ FAX NUMBER: ' CELL NUMBER EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): C'~ ; ~ L7 t= ~~~ ~~? w~-iL LZ I List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: N~1 U-h\t= l_ V;V1t_LC- ~ ~ ~, L MAILING ADDRESS: (?~j, (.1,t7X LI~-)Q~a_ Cl-t,~.li~-t1 ~E: t?_\_~~ 335 PHONE NUMBER: 117 ~) r) 62 _ ~~_~~ FAX NUMBER: (`~L~) ~~ 2 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: rr~tGl~~c\r2.~ , G G~~ B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: ~.lTQS ,( v- 3 - W G-lam F~cl_O ExP~\ivSiur~ PROJECT VALUATION: $ 3 S I<j ~ Z~~l. ~U STREET ADDRESS P4'-~~~ <<-~ - Pcl~~sc ~ PARCEL NUMBER(S): SG ~_ ~X}fit%~C ~ " /~ " PARCEL SIZE (acres): PARCEL SIZE (square feet): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: St= L -A ' ~-a.Crl nn ~. N' i S PROPOSED USE(S): PrZUDUc~\UN 1.JELl_~ ( V i i ~~ i Y tN c~~+ST~'UC' ~v t?~ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square ~~ footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) i='X4t t ~r i ;, 1~~' C:\Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) `LS SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ^ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. ___- _ _ 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. . ;, ~~ -- _ r x-~ ~ l r~~ , -I c- 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. CC:_X+1.1.13.1__1 ~~~-~ _ ___ 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. __ _ __ -- _ 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. -_ - _._ C:1Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 2 of 8 i WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ^ Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use andlor development standards set forth in this zoning district. EXi_I1C"~l!_ D 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent wish the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district _ r ~, 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. ~~11 ~~- n ~, 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ^ Changes in horizontal building planes; ^ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ^ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ^ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ^ Building stepbacks; and ^ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. --. -i ~ ; C:\Documents and Settingslderek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ^ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. Aii applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ^ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt ^ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ^ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ^ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of ail structures; ^ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ^ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ^ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ^ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ^ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): _ stormwater plan as noted above is included stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ^ SIGNEO AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; t~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ^ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ~~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ^ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; t,j j ~ ^ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; >J~:A ^ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); rv %A ^ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; N 'q C:\Documents and Settings\derek.fergusonlDesktoplplanning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infiil Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) I^ SITE PLAN vrith the follovring information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; ~ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ~ All dimensions; ~ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; ~ All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including ~/ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; ~- Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Seciion 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: ~ /A EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; -- _. _- Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surtace ratio (I.S.R.); and -- Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: N i /~ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; _____ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; C:\Documents and Settingslderek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) /~_ - c ~ C, ^ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ~ ~ ~ ~~ All existing and proposed structures, t, ~~ {-; t r'~ ~ 1 __ Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; __ __ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ^ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/~ X 11); ^ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ^ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information: All sides of all buildings Dimensioned Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) I /{~ Materials t" ^ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 '/: X 11 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) IJ ~~ ^ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ^ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ^ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ^ Reduced signage proposal (8'/Z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT "A PROJECT ADDRESS: WELL NO. ADDRESS PARCEL NO. Zonin District 1-1 1740 Weston Drive 02-29-15-00000-330-0200 OS/R 1-2 1571 Cleveland St. 14-29-15-00000-210-0100 OS/R 1-3 S. Evergreen Ave. 15-29-15-00000-410-0100 OS/R 1-4 1515 Cleveland St. 14-29-15-00000-210-0100 OS/R 1-5 1709 Keene Rd. 01-29-15-70164-300-2501 IRT S1R 1840 Airport Drive 12-29-15-00000-320-0100 OS/R 80 1700 Belcher Road. 01-29-15-16488-000-0130 I 3-1 2634 Sable Springs Drive 29-28-16-00000-220-0400 OS/R 3-2 3024 Eastland Blvd. 28-28-16-00000-330-0700 OS/R 3-3 2784 Enterprise Rd. East 29-28-16-00000-310-0100 OS/R 3-4 2775 SR 580 29-28-16-00000-310-0100 I 3-5 2630 Sable Spring Dr 29-28-16-00000-220-0400 OS/R 79 2698 Fifth Ave. North 32-28-16-00000-210-0500 OS/R EXHIBIT "B" DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for construction of 13 new production wells within the Open Space/ Recreation District (OSR), Institutional (I) District, and the Industrial, Research, and Technology District (IRT) with set backs that meet Florida Administrative Code, Section 62-555.312 as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Community Development Code Section 2-1204.C, 2-1304.C, and 2-1404.C; as well as a waiver to landscaping requirements where the existing landscape materials would be determined to be an acceptable perimeter buffer, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G. EXHIBIT "C" GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. All of the proposed wells are located in City's owned properties, most of them are in parks and have a 100-foot set back from private properties, there will be no impacts on adjacent properties. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed wells, with such a small footprint (12' x 23' typical), are part of the City's water system. They are comparable to other utilities infrastructure such as power poles, light poles, traffic signals, backflow prevention devices, etc... The City currently has 19 active wells around the City. Most of them can be viewed from the road or from residential houses. For example, Well 23 on Highland Ave. is just in front of the town homes, Well 58 on Moore Haven Drive is in an open space and in full view of the homes across the street. Many others are in view of residential properties including 65, 66, 74, 75, 78, all of which are near Frank Tack Park. There is no evidence that the existing wells have any impacts on the value of the adjacent properties, therefore, there is no reason to expect that these wells will have a negative impact upon adjacent properties. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed wells will be part of the drinking water production system for City of Clearwater. The. wells will be withdrawing water from the aquifer, that water then will be transferred to City Water Treatment Plants to be treated and become drinking water. There are no chemicals used at the proposed well sites, electrical components are completely secured in cabinetry, sound is minimal and thus the development of the wells will not adversely affect the health and safety of adjacent residents. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion N/A S. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the Immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development The wells are Utility infrastructure and part of the City's water system. They are comparable to other utilities infrastructure such as power poles, light poles, traffic signals, backflow prevention devices, etc..., therefore they are consistent with such utility infrastructure around the City. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including Visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed wells are designed using the same standards for a production well that we have within the City. A production well consists of motor and pump being in the well "hole", some above ground piping, electrical panels, telemetry antenna, and lighting inside a chain link fence. Olfactory- Normal operation of the well involves water being df•awn_from the well using a motor and submersible pump. The water is transmitted through the piping to go the water treatment plant to be treated, therefore there will be no olfactory impacts. Acoustic- The only potentially significant source of sound during normal operation of a well are the pump and motor which are down in the well ,therefore no significant acoustic impacts will occur. Visual -The wells are Utility infrastructure and part of the Ciry's water system. They are comparable to other utilities infrastructure such as power poles, light poles, traffic signals, backflow prevention devices, etc... The City currently has 19 active wells around the City. Most of them can be viewed from the road or from residential houses. For example, Well 23 on Highland Ave. is just in front of the town homes, Well 58 on Moore Haven Drive is in an open space and in full view of the homes across the street. There have been no instances of complaints in the last five years for any of our existing wells. There is no evidence that the existing wells have any impacts on the adjacent properties, therefore, the proposed wells are expected to be the same and will not have a significant visual impact. EXHIBIT "D" FLEXIBLE CRITERIA Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPEMNT PROJECT CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development of redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. -According to F.A.C., wells connected to Public Water System shall meet one of the following requirements: 1. Ownership by the water supplier all land within 100 feet of the well 2. Control by the water supplier of all land within 100 feet of the well via easements, lease easements, or deed restriction that appropriately limit use of the land; 3. Well head protection, zoning, or other land use regulations that appropriately limit use of all land within 100' of the well; or 4. Other appropriate means. All 13 wells are meet the No. 1 requirement. Also see attached section of Florida Administrative Code. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. As part of the Master Plan, the City of Clearwater Public Utilities is making every effort to supply more water from local resources instead of relying on the regional water supplier. The proposed wells will help the City produce more water and will not adversely impact the integrity of adjacent residential neighborhoods, diminish the scenic quality of the City of Clearwater or negatively impact the safe and efficient movement of people and things within the City of Clearwater. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed wells, with such a small footprint (12' x 23' typical) and located within City's properties, will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The proposed wells, with such a small footprint (12' x 23' typical) and located within City's properties, will not make adjoining properties suffer substantial detriment. S. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; The proposed wells will become City of Clearwater's utility infrastructure and are located in City's properties without changing the property zoning districts. b.) The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c.) The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d.) The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e.) The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f.) The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexible with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking area justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a.) The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; The proposed wells, with such a small footprint (12' x 23' typical) and located within City's properties at least 100 ft away from private properties, will not have any effect on adjacent properties. b.) The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; N/A Prior to 5/11/09 at Noon. Explain the requirements in choosing a site location for the wells. Can some be located in such a way that adjacent properties will not view them? Siting a well is complex due to the strict requirements of the Florida Administrative Code. Per F.A.C., "new wells that supply a PWS shall be no closer than 200 ft from any on-site sewage treatment and disposal system. New wells shall be located no closer than 100 feet from other sanitary hazards that pose a potentially high risk to ground water quality and public health and shall be located no closer than SO feet from other sanitary hazards that pose a moderate risk to ground water quality and public health. " Specifically, we looked at sites that are at least 200 ft away from septic systems, 100' away from sanitary sewer, and SO ft away from storm detention/retention ponds. Also the sites should be "in area free from, or at least subject to, inundation with surface drainage and flood water. " In other words, the new wells sites should be above a 100 year flood plain. City owned properties were looked at first, and those that can meet these requirements were selected. Most of them are in City's parks and tucked away so that adjacent properties will not view them. A couple of the sites are not as hidden as the others; however, adding new landscaping is restricted around the well, besides there are others wells that in view of residential properties including 65, 66, 74, 75, 78, all of which are near Frank Tack Park. There is no evidence that the existing wells have any impacts on the adjacent properties. TYPICAL WELL LAYOUT