FLD2009-03010 - 22 N Ft Harrison Ave - Ristorante in Pizza - April 21, 2009
(
FLD2009-03010
22 N FT HARRISON AVE
RISTORANTE IN PIZZA
PLANNER OF RECORD: S K
ATLAS # 286B
ZONING: D
LAND USE: CBD
RECEIVED: 03/02/2009
INCOMPLETE:
COMPLETE:
MAPS:
PHOTOS:
STAFF REPORT:
DRC:
CDB:
_WCoverSheet
~.
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
Owner/Applicant:
Representative:
Address:
April 21, 2009
FLD2009-03010
E.2.
Anna Tsafatinos
Piero Caramello
22 North Fort Harrison Avenue
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to permit a restaurant in the Downtown
(D) District within an existing building with zero off-street parking
spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-903.C.
CURRENT ZONING:
Downtown (D) District
CURRENT FUTURE LAND
USE CATEGORY: Central Business District (CBD)
CLEARWATER
DOWNTOWN
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
CHARACTER DISTRICT:
Downtown Core
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use: Vacant
Proposed Use: Restaurant
EXISTING
SURROUNDING ZONING
AND USES:
North: Downtown (D) District
South: Downtown (D) District
East: Downtown (D) District
West: Downtown (D) District
Office
Office (Vacant)
Office
Parking Lot
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The O.lO-acre subject property is located on the west side of North Fort Harrison Avenue, approximately
180 feet north of Cleveland Street. The subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and
the Downtown Core character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and consists of
a vacant 5,188 square foot building and no off-street parking spaces.
Development Proposal:
On March 2, 2009, a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application was submitted for the
subject property. Under the development proposal the existing building, a Spanish Mission style
constructed in 1924, will be remodeled for a restaurant use with aesthetic fac;:ade improvements
consistent with the Design Guidelines set forth in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. It is
noted that the proposed reduction in off-street parking is the basis for the submittal of the proposal as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application.
Community Development Board - April 21, 2009
FLD2009-030 10 - Page 1
.#
The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community
Development Code (CDC) is discussed below.
Intensity: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum allowable intensity
is a floor area ratio (FAR) of 4.0 within the Downtown Core character district. The proposal is in
compliance with the above as it has aFAR of 1.24.
Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, those properties
within the Downtown Core character district that are not along Cleveland Street shall have no maximum
height restriction. The existing building measures approximately 25.5 feet from the average existing
grade, and this height will not be modified with the proposal.
Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-903, within the D District, off-street parking
for restaurant uses is required to be provided at a rate of five to 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross
floor area. Therefore, the existing building requires 26 - 78 parking spaces. However, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, the minimum off-street parking requirement is as
determined by the Community Development Coordinator based upon the specific use and/or the Institute
of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual standards.
The subject property consists of no off-street parking spaces due to the building footprint occupying the
majority of the parcel. As a result, a deviation to the minimum off-street parking requirement has been
requested and the applicant has provided the following justification for this request:
"A Parking Demand Study was prepared concerning the parcel at 22 North Fort Harrison
Avenue in February, 2009. That study reviewed the available parking in Downtown and found
1,094 spaces available for their patrons. The total number of spaces was based on the Garden
Avenue Garage with 250 spaces, the Station Square Garage with 100 spaces, the Coachman
Pnrlrinrr Jrat ,,.,ith 7^ 1 C'n/Jr>oC' tho rit" 1-1nl1 nrt....lriYlrJ- lnf ,,.,ill, 7 17 >>'Info....o,! con,,/>oC" rr.....,I rr.fl-.n...
.... ....., ''''''''6 ..va. ,,,....,. ...VA u1"&A-..........uJ ..,........ ........-....J ................... y.....' '.....'..6 .""" ,,,,,..,. ......1 I ""'-',,'-', """ oJJ-'w.....f;.,.J ....,....... V I.".. C-,
metered spaces throughout Downtown of 366 spaces. This more than 14 times more than we
need ".
Staff concurs with the above findings that the proposed restaurant has ample parking spaces readily
available for their patrons.
Code Enforcement Analysis:
There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issue associated with the property.
CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN:
Downtown Desil!n Guidelines:
The Downtown Design Guidelines identify both appropriate and inappropriate direction with regard to
various elements associated with new construction and renovations in the Downtown. A review of these
Guidelines within the Plan was conducted and the following applicable items were identified:
Community Development Board - April 21, 2009
FLD2009-030 1 0 - Page 2
..
Building Design:
The Downtown Design Guidelines state buildings shall have a distinct "base," "middle" and "cap." The
existing building has a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap." The first floor projects out from the second
thereby forming the "base." At the transition from first to second floor, or "base" to "middle", there is a
traditional Spanish Mission style arch. The "cap" is formed by a cornice consisting of corbels and a
mansard tile roof. The restoration depicted on the proposed architectural renderings result in a substantial
upgrade to the building achieving consistency with this Guideline.
Architecture:
The Downtown Design Guidelines state that a variety of architectural styles exist within the Downtown
and the Guidelines should not prescribe anyone architectural style as being the most appropriate.
Buildings in all six Downtown character districts represent a broad range of styles typical of trends of the
late-19th to mid-20th centuries. The proposed exterior renovations incorporate Spanish Mission style
architecture typical of older Florida downtown districts. The subject building is one of the original
structures that define the character of Downtown Clearwater thus complementing the fabric of the
surrounding area.
Facade Design:
The Downtown Design Guidelines state all fayades of a building should reflect a unified architectural
treatment with an architecturally prominent entrance. The proposed primary fayade architectural
elevations provide a projecting cornice at the transition of the upper wall to the roofline, a terracotta tile
mansard roof, a projecting base terminated by Mission Style relief at the transition to the middle, and
corbels within the cornice thus providing articulation resulting in visual interest and variety on the
primary fayade. Additionally, the rear fayade will be painted and black iron style lantern fixtures will be
installed on both facades to provide night -time illumination. While some effort has been made to provide
an architecturally prominent entrance, more emphasis is necessary. It is therefore attached as a condition
of approval that more architectural features be added to the entrance prior to issuance of any exterior
building construction permits.
Roof Design:
The Downtown Design Guidelines state that roof forms are one of the most highly visible components of
a building. Not only do roofs provide a vital function but they contribute to and are integral to the overall
building design through the use of distinctive, defined styles and decorative patterns and colors. The roof
design of the subject building includes a terracotta tile mansard roof trimmed below with corbels thus
resulting in a roof consistent with the style of the building.
Color:
The Downtown Design Guidelines state the number and type of building colors should be appropriate for
and consistent with the architectural style. The proposed building colors are appropriate for the
architectural style of the building and consist of a medium terra cotta color, Ember Afternoon 106-4, for
the base; a light terra cotta color, Casabella 102, for the raised stucco base, the banded stucco treatments,
and window frames; and light brown color, Wenge AF-180, for all shutters, cap molding and corbels.
Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies:
A review of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan was conducted and the development
proposal has been determined to be consistent with the following Visions, Goals, Objectives and
Policies:
Community Development Board - April 21, 2009
FLD2009-030 1 0 - Page 3
..,
Vision: Quality urban design is critical to new construction and renovated buildings.
Vision: Downtown Clearwater is a major center of activity, business and governments.
Objective lA: All development within Downtown shall further the Goals, Objectives and Policies of
this Plan and shall be consistent with the character districts, the design guidelines and
the Downtown (D) District.
Objective 1 E: A variety of businesses are encouraged to relocate and expand in Downtown to provide
a stable employment center, as well as employment opportunities for Downtown
residents.
Objective 2H: A variety of parking solutions for motorized and non-motorized vehicles shall be pursued
to support redevelopment while maintaining ease of access and parking throughout the
Downtown.
Objective 3D: Redevelopment is encouraged to create a vibrant Downtown environment containing a
variety of building forms and styles that respect Downtown's character and heritage.
Policy 1:
The Downtown Design Guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for
renovation, redevelopment and new construction in Downtown with which all projects
must be consistent.
Policy 2:
The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design
review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision
of character district in which it is located.
Downtown Core Character District Policies:
No Downtown Core District Policies are applicable to the development proposal:
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria
as per CDC Section 2-903 and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan:
Standard
Pro osed
Consistent
Inconsistent
Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.)
4.0
1.24
x
X
Maximum Building Height
None
25.5 feet
Minimum Off-Street Parking
Xl
See above discussion with regard to Minimum Off-Street Parking.
Community Development Board - April 21, 2009
FLD2009-030l0 - Page 4
"
"
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as
per CDC Section 2-903.C (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent
X
Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development'or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;
or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of
a working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
distri ct;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number ofthe following design
elements:
o Changes in horizontal building planes;
o Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses,
pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
o Variety in materials, colors and textures;
o Distinctive fenestration patterns;
o Building stepbacks; and
o Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and appropriate distances between buildings.
Community Development Board - April 21, 2009lFLD2009-0301O - Page 5
X
of
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level
Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913.A:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity.
Consistent
X
Inconsistent
X
X
X
X
6.
X
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its
meeting of April 2, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward
to the Community Development Board (CDB).
Findings of Fact. The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and
requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to
support the following findings of fact:
1. That the 0.10-acre subject property is located on the west side of North Fort Harrison Avenue,
approximately 180 feet north of Cleveland Street;
2. That the subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business
District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. That the subject property is located within the Downtown Core character district of the Clearwater
Downtown Redevelopment Plan; and
4. That the proposed building must comply with all applicable Design Guidelines set forth in the
Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan.
Conclusions of Law. The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the
following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the applicable provisions of
the Design Guidelines as set forth in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan;
2. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Visions, Goals,
Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Core
character district;
3. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the applicable Standards and
Criteria as per CDC Section 2-903;
4. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Flexibility criteria for a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per CDC Section 2-903.C; and
5. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the General Standards for
Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913.A.
Community Development Board - April 21, 2009
FLD2009-0301O - Page 6
"
Based upon the above and subject to the attached conditions, the Planning Department recommends
APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a restaurant in the Downtown (D)
District within an existing building with zero off-street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2-903.C.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits for exterior renovation, a proposal be submitted to
and approved by the Planning Department which provides architectural treatments to the primary
entrance consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines;
2. That future change out of roof top mechanical equipment is integrated into the design of the building
through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements;
3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all outstanding comments of the Fire Department
shall be addressed; and
4. That the final design and color of the building shall be consistent with the architectural elevations
approved by the CDB.
r/l 5/l! fl. /)~H
Prepared by Planning Department Staff: J Y C . (l I.
A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:
o Location Map
o Aerial Map
o Future Land Use Map
o Zoning Map
o Existing Surrounding Uses Map
o Photographs of Site and Vicinity
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)\Pending caseslUp for the next CDBIFt Harn'son N 0022 Ristorante In Pizza (D) 2009.04 - CDB - SK\Ft Harrison Ave N 22 - Restaurant Staff
Repon.doc
Community Development Board - April 21, 2009
FLD2009-030l0 - Page 7
J
Resume
A. Scott Kurleman
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
727-562-4567 x2504
scott.ku rleman (a),mvclearw ater .com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
. Planner III
. Planner II
August 2008 to present
June 2005 to August 2008
Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and
regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual,
variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to
determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings.
Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City
officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and
presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings.
. Land Resource Specialist
City of Clearwater
June 1996 to June 2005
Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with
City land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to
pnC'l1rp t'h-:lt ......llJ1nt .....,..\#:)+0..,...;')1 ~'f"'IC"tlJlllor1 ......0.'1'" t1,o. .....""......'1"'1""\'70.,..1 In'f'''lr1''',..'''''......o _1,.",..,. .....o-.--.n..:_'" ~_ no ha.....l...l,."F ......--_....,.~---
""'.1..1.1..:"'....1.""" u.u...." P.l.U..UL .U.H.&.I."""....u......l J..U.t.:>I.U.U.VU. 1-''-'.1. U.I.'-' u.pp.l.V V \..1\.1 .l.a.U\.1~\.Ia..p\.I p.la.l.1 .1V.l..I..I.Cl.U.1.:J .1..1..1. a .I.1vClILlIJ 5.lVVV1112:;
condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of
Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to
monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree
permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical
tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on
public and private properties.
. Account Manager
Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc.
Groveland, FL
1993 - 1996
Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan.
Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and
private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers
regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees.
. Licensed Marketing Representative
Allstate Insurance Company
Clearwater, FL
1991 - 1993
Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance.
"
,
. Store Manager
William Natorp company, Inc.
Cincinnati, OH
1983 - 1991
Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for
teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment
maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared
for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products.
EDUCATION
GRADUATE - Certificate: Community Development, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA,
TAMPA, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing.
BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA.
Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management
AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA.
Graduated 1998. Major: Management.
AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER,
Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in
Arboriculture.
ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414.
..
-...
i
East Fa'rade of subject property.
West fa'rade (rear) of subject property.
East Fa'rade of subject property.
Alley just west (rear) of building.
Adjacent property to the north.
22 North Fort Harrison Avenue
FLD2009-03010
AERIAL MAP
Owner:
Anna Tsafatinos
Case:
FLD2009-030 10
Site:
PIN:
22 N Ft. Harrison Avenue
16- 29- 1 5-23814-000-01 22
Property Size:
Atlas Page:
0.10 acres
286B
~ 55 ~ ~~ 6J ~~
l1 ......
t-' 1 15
...- ---, 1 6 4
~50~ ---1 I
~
l 8
~ B
- - ---
20 0:(
15 9
3 0:( - - --
o -;-= =-: =-, - - - ..... 10
~ - - --
11
4 20358 CI) _~_- i _
L- _ ---1 0
112 CI)
."
I
12B
100
3B
- ---, I
_ ---1 1
1 36
-------- ~
0:(
0:(
5
UJ
o
CI)
o
~
v ~ --~---
A \ 4 I
400
I
I
1
I
I
- - - _I _ _ _ _ _ _
:) D
----~4 ,L
.---:- -r --,
~ ~793- ---1 55
5
o
Owner: Anna Tsafatinos
55
344{S) ~ 55 -
35
g g
345(5) ..1L
''")23 195 128
g 0 126 12i
I ~
- -
~ m ~
'tl,lft N
ill 11i
150 195 ~
347_15
M II ~
M 101
N
10
173.83 III 1
174(5) ~I 174 "'~ t-iZ---
, I II 44 451
1 I 16 42 UJ ~
21 1 ~ 119 I 1B ~:~ . I 40:SO 1F
o 1 1 <0 '" 17~115 3B 0:( I-"'---
I'" 1 I ~ ~I liT 14 ~~ ~ ~}
~ LAURA ST ~ I ~b
~ a:: --
1 ~ I ~ ~ I." L 26 a:: ~
,I ... 1 ... ~ l
1 1....2 ?;!I:X: ~
7 1 B 9 10 11 ... 6
II Ill:.- a:: --
lB 0 7
4716 ~ 15-
--. 7B
1-5_0
'" 395\
FI 55
1
1 2
I
,
3 , 5 6
... ---tl
:13114
L-1;.<o ~ ~~ '"
'"It- ~ -q.'O;to'<'t- "O;t- ~
\'!
01 0
~. ~
~ CLEVELAND ST g
;.:~~ ",0 70
~I"'''' ~
8
3 I '1
I 1
~
23 14
- - - -
22
- - - -
21
~] t.1 _
17 4
g
20
----
19
ZONING MAP
Case:
Site: 22 N Ft. Harrison Avenue
Property Size:
PIN: 16-29-15-23814-000-0122
Atlas Page:
B , 7
-l} -,- ~ -
- - - I- - - 124
10 1 5 ~~~
- - -" - - T
3~ 12
~'
- - T
4 11
1
'"
0:;
1
35 0
- - -
2
~
0:(
1 ~
1 Q
B a::
(0134 ~
___I_~
12B
0:7
---, ,
---1 1 6
1
...
~2~
3
4
(\l OC\l (OCOO
(0 &j~ ~~fR
15
2
'" "-
0:; 1 fi!
11 I 10
9
~
o
5 5\
~
~ I", jg
~r---=
6 1 7 B~
... 1 024
~~~I fi! "'26
"''''''' I "'2B
15
PARK ST
2
~... -l--,
~2~1--.J
11 10' 9
FLD2009-030 10
0.10 acres
286B
--
50 133 ~"
--~.
~ ~
~1 ~
~--~ ~
. ~
r -,...;..
1 4 1.8
-~-,j
1~ ~~ ia
~.~
I...~~
~5~~
~
~
29.29
5
~
~
!1l
!
...
1;l
~
0<0
f5~
~
86<0
50
~
o
<0
I
I
4 1 3
- Q - 601
13
1 2
IL-
I
,
101 1
Q
-~ '
~
\
A
o
.c
"-
co
I
::s '" SEMINOLE ~
10 0 / fill I~D CJ [f !
w ELDRIDGE ST ~ ~
~~I 1111 I~~ ~E L-J c:J
MAPLE c;::::::::: D ==
~ Ifj D~D ~
1] OD~DD
D 0 I 11/ I 0 ~~O> 0 D
D ~;o D D~I II~';['E I ~
~ ~ ~ HENDRIC~ D I I
CAURA ~D D D DD~I ~ I
CLEVELAND
gDiD .1 ,,,,.I D~u ~ 0
PIERCE ~ ST ~O~I I D:'D~ ~
D~D~' I [~rD ~IERCEiD
FRANKLIN ST I- ~:3
COURT ST CJ I ~I D D ~ ~;
~~D-a"t:J D r~h~ ~
ROG'''~D 0 DiD ;.:.:';"' "I [j 0 cJ"
:. TURNER
~D D ~ 0 I I
Peach
LOCATION MAP
Owner: Anna Tsafatinos
Case: FLD2009-03010
Site: 22 N Ft. Harrison Avenue
Property Size: 0.10 acres
PIN: 16-29-15-23814-000-0122
Atlas Page: 286B
..
"
128 iil
--,
_ ---1
100
38
1 36
~
c:(
5 c:(
....
@
0
CI)
0
:c::
~ --~
A \ 4 I
400
I
I
I
I
_1-
o
-~"L
<:> l-r-,
~ ~79.:i.---1
55
344(5) "t 55 35
iil
34S{S)
195 12
iil 12
8i
N
ill 118
195
347.15
_!._L..!_ 50
9 I 6
.... 12
10 I 5 12
120
- -"- - T
~0t 12
I
T
4 '1
I
....
....
....
35 (2)
- -'
128
0:7
-, ,
---1 ,6
,
55
~ ~
10
174(5)
I 119
21 IS
l"t I
::I
I
I
7 I 8
I
I I 15
1 2 3 I 5 6 78
I r-~ ---tJ l'l 5-.::.
iJ14
81 ~ L OO<:>~OO .... 39:5
"t "t l"t"t"t"t"t"t~ 4~ 55
~ CLEVELAND ST iil
2
r-
~2~
3
.... <:>~
.... ........
.... ........
<000<:>
..........,
............
15
:g~~1 .... t-.. ....
.... t:l lri
............... - .... I
2 11 I 10 9
- - - -
17
4
-~
5 :5
7
~
~~~I ....
............
15
PARK ST
~r- -tl-,
L22~'---1
11 10' 9
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
.... 70
.., 55 @j t-..OI 01
.., ........ ~8
"t"t
r-- -, 15 4 11
~50~ ---1 I I
~ ~
~ 8 23 14
20
c:( 15 9 22
3 :s - - --
0-r= 10 21
0 - - --
-, ~ 0_- ~ _ 20
4 20358 CI)
L _ ---1 0 19
112 CI) - - --
Owner:
Anna Tsafatinos
Site:
:iI
Case:
22 N Ft. Harrison Avenue
Property Size:
PIN:
1 6-29- 15-23814-000-01 22
Atlas Page:
FLD2009-030 1 0
0.10 acres
286B
5
'"
'"
1-;1 ~~ ~
33
2
r-
~5~
",<'J'I-
~
~
~
::s
8:g
<0<0
N
....
86 <0
50
....
<:>
<0
4 3
~ - 601
1~2
I",
I
'"
101 1
Q
~
~ Clearwater
-~
u~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727.562-4865
-22 N FT HARRISON AVE
FL02009-03010
RIS10RANTE IN PIZZA
zoning: 0
atlaS# 2868
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated. stapled, and folded into sets
:.J SUBMIT FIRE PREll MARY SITE PLAN: $200.00
U SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
ORiGiNAL
Rt!CE1VJ:D
i~\hl{ (: 2 ,JOY
~LANNl.Jt; ~fV.JT
!'~IW OF ClEAR~A9
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 07111/2008)
~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT~
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: ._.A 1\1\t;.""]:"'$~~~A.,.I\?~____.__ ....... ...
MAIUNGADDRESS.b~ 1St\\J~ '1.s \"'vl~ .1 L\~r\oJPl.~tfl,..7>~]h7
PHONE NUMBER: .. 7.J7......Y'iL- J.\{,bD. ..... FAX NUMBER:.''-~L~_4't~.?>.c. 5.'L
CELL NUMBER EMAIL:
PROPERTY QWNER(S):
List ALL owners on the deed
&~ l\",,-:rsc;:~:bf1;oo~
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
i?t~Q C3!fI!Jlf..':t.LzzL//l. .
i~ 31 -S135HrN<=li!..IJikt~. c..vL.i:;:?'/)& tu.I1~. J=C.
12 } . C((}0::t 60 . L... ' FAX NUMBER:
EMAIL: . .U1cittU.k'?<R~
7 ........... {:,......
::; 3> ttfi
/)",( -.
f/ yQ.jl.co .....t
:~:E:~::EED DEVE~;=~ (C;~ S~t~:::~ VALUATION $ $0. bOO -
.......... ...../ .
STREET ADDRESS . ..~....~._.E1:...tio.r_r:.;.s~:2.."L..._.... _. . ...._....___.__.__.___.........................
PARCEL NUMBER(S): . _ J~IQ~ItSI?:}'5J.~..1 Q'S>.J2lg.Jh~~........_--_...._....._........ _
PARCEL SIZE (acres):L!.~.t?o... >- C. '. PARCEL SIZE (square feet): ...11 'l21f/bt{ .....
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: .~~~\ !1~~tI~.f>~'V1*"~~..~o-t'\. _.~L._Lo \:1.... J-a.. ~.l~. ...
PROPOSED USE{Sl:.!.n~y~~V:.~....l.~nt.n~__R~_.~ ... 43. ft.~ ..'V.LN[h C",C
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
Specifically identify the request
(Include number of units or square
footage of non-residential use and all
requesteo code deviations; e.g.
reduction In required number of
oarkinq spaces. specific use. etc.)
/!
,(jet
..:
-: t/ ~..' /f ;>
:t,.,;~'
.," I
'{-;;"4- ~- ~\
\I.o!.,..
'/ ' --- ,
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER d;' DEVELdpM~NT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO.)tC (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY. DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 7)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved. in detail:
'1. The proposed development of the lanel will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage. density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
: r
.... rt.~::::'''?k:ti::~.'~f,~:~~~~:t~:,~,~:~::,~:~'':~0;;~i~"f
1 '0'" I
(lee //J/!Q.{il,.'jC':t.!v\PJ.
2.
The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof,
-"-Y~{2,_ .CtN N?-vtr'~~U.t'V'(~" i"?~{L .kLt:t:.h~~-:~r.~~~dfi~~i ..c;.::;::.~.~~C1L'~? .L~vtC(. II-
~...c ; W"" I~J \.0 . ,> _ r, L,." I.i..... .. .. A ~ \"7 P , ~ ,~ \. ,f.. .1-
~tc;J1..::, '-, ~-::''',,;>r'''"f(.J .....7.c<"'. kit,,"'''-ltJ J'',-L.~::),}.kfl;;..,:;:c'~ ,."'. .'14:.....~". .,'~-8 r~J".'.rC'.~,
Lr~-<':' ~~ ."'~v', '\""VllJ~~~:L:~..y-,1 t!~<>v.""\ f~"...>~4f~~'6;"l'(jlvf <c~c,:~/j0-:\..:l.q~luj~ V:s.a.S ~
3,
The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use,
i '\. /
'....._~t 1. ,/ , . ! I I' 1 _, _ < /.J/ ~ ....~ ,) / _ _ ,,' " I
11-""-" c..;';',\.}.Id,{)B!rk,,-:.,;r .J,.~J.// _~iI i.t:ck:d'.?'",/ .J\.&t.-!t L"'.L ~)C-l ~ co (j~'\CLLJ C"~i~~f:J. v~:fP
'f1~::0~{~.- J~..!). . c:,d"'L.~~~_~'!~kJj.,
4.
The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
~I I I i I ~ \) .
JJ.::,. ..C ~\ai,t~. .r 'i.::"~'ll..:e:J'~, ,. :+l"!~:~~/k"~ l'lJ~{JS.
. {G (~'.{J {~. ?f<. '. ~..d.- c"./.i. ..' <:.:...1..' .U., ,._' ~', .' ~ . \.. \ -' ; . k i~Lo C
\ I 'r'< P(4J';:':"';.::.,--:jCl,Gv L:=
"".; "~
:>1',-) \
..,i':?__lg~'r:)fc;~!2L'- "' ._~rD.J: ~{A.I\.f!,"<~, .~'3..
o
ORIGINAL
RI!CEtveP
5, The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposeVtARteQ~~OO
,-t5"... . t.Q:~,-t:-..1.) cCt: ~.~ + t:;; 9,(~J\::c:-.~d...~"b:t2~I'^' ,,+t-L Ci. ."-Sic.C..' ..... 'lAN~S ~MiMINT
\., , CMY OFC[EARWA~t(
6, The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects. induding visual. acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties, , '
Ie Ii' i I If' I i. I! \ '-~ r--., \!. I
.' . e~-\Y v '/ 9,::\.J.~_ _C,,-(X:J~<Y~S...._.ezc,!A()v6:t~,. ,9~~f?'::L! ,__j1~-:~.i~~L!~?"''?o, ~i~~__L_:~J:-:-:.,,~l.9d-f.. .9",::+15,~ts
~'v''- (;:,Qv1A~fqli'etYL(12,..,~~,>l-L '- cc,,1/ Cc:'C{(''S,
) ;,,-/Lrl.../')
\../" l
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria)
1.
Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INF1LL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is
achieved, in detail:
The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this
zoning district.
_.::r~e-..e V { { ~-!._.a..rL1_~!~~.~e.. oee v p i fir ~ ~_?B':ti.L~:t~._~l..JJ.~._Slk_,___:BA.';.:"~L~
. !' \ ,_;~ .,.. \.. L.. " I "'1-,)9 ., , ; .' " I
... .u~LV:\'f?.__...R~ tv~1::... ~ I . l~ V'.J1.\""__-V...!lu~_~____.Ef'~~.Y~_>:::L~CL't=~__...~
-r t .' r1
The~:v:~:~~\to:r~:~~~:1I b: :nsis::t w~ {:~~~:~-~~ policies of the comprehen~e PI:r~--~~~:;~:~-~:--~~~-~:~:ral
purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
~~-k () 1 ! ~ '.c I I I tJ{ -d.!, +/..(".....;">\1.1.('; j:__
I ~ '" t:r '3dL[9....i1-~L.Jj...;;LS'~~ <.::0 "t.S,S'/f'#l1-__~L.c:'::\.-.l.l:~_C.:J:2i e.c...- i V'IW '-^J'L~_....:f-~~.
_.LA VI sJ 4- Hs w t:H--1b:L_ _C1~l~':e,,:d- ~. () NhJ t:; .__.._.________ .___..___
o
2.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
_::r1\o/~Jd]fL b~-!11L~;1r "+lL:k--2;}~-,-tk",t;' "'~'1'?J~_,*
._._.L::tc!f--t?t_c.ev~:"""'Jl~~-L.1.dL~.r~ -,' . .........._........q___.._....__._____. . rJ_______
'J
4.
Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. I ,
__:1. - -kef'..Q li.aL_b~."__~'t!,M1Y.k~LjYHf_!.c:.(!-t-..J!.fJ"'.::L- ~ ol i' ~ c..~1:__.._kt)l!o.!'.~~A./l._-t!..-~__~s..--
\. tl " ' . ~ ~ ' U-
_:=:;-Ll2.0::'\ '~1L....\SJ---flJ-"t'po.Jr~:S:L--'!...~'~, j . ,rCt-vv{;.,._.____._. __"" __.__.._. . ___....._.._.__.._._
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
c. The development proposai accommodates ihe expansion or redeveiopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides. for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
'_~1hL--Ll.se......t~.~d~~ '^ 1 .1-k,\\ ~~.J~~_[.ls:. i.,hl..1:!,""-..a.Pf2[J!.0,.,,jS_._.ORlGt.~__
i . RBCEIVED
6.
. .______._...__llliAfLQ..gJiLOt_
Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on deml~~
the following design objectives: . ~f(OfCli=AR\tn'A'b
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties ror' uses
~:rmitted in this zoning district; J.. . J. J .L N
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the-;stabli~hed or ~~erging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
o Changes in horizontal building planes;
o Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices. stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
o Variety in materials, colors and textures;
o Distinctive fenestration patterns;
o Building stepbacks; and
o Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed develop'ment provides for appropriate bufferS,enhanced landscape detign and appropriate distances between buildings.
~. I wt~t; wJd tot- f'",fie;t-t",)rI!:!f,~~oP~~:Jlzk~:;;~"P"~s
~~n.cc _ .q._crr..._"'f,,~,..i&~~ T~(!_ gxy ...no. :~..L,,_ r. . ,"".1 /J.:k!:..- t1tjfI00.~.u.-..
fv1flV;:jL.. f:JC~A:~t~/l{l r"LipCU'-r,... () ______________________
S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\Development Review\2008 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 3 of 8
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
o A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
o If a plan is not required. the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
o At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
o Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
o Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
o All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
o Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and oullet control structure;
o A narrative describing the proposed stormwaler control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
o Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
o Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
o COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFVI/MD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o CKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
I
... Stol111water plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
~ , >~,'lv
o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
o
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater). and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
y..)
o
TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborisf, of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of
such trees;
I .
:: fA-.....(.......J
o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
." . ,.~ . .. or.. r._' .< 'L ~.' ~ . . .
v, 'u. 'V ."', no 'v" ''''' VI I IV'
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
'lv.,....-j
I
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
1')4.,:..':<
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
,..t" ..?
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable:
.;?1 :)
...
- -
-
RBCEIVED
MAR 0 2 2009
PLANf\lt.Is ~f\/"1
em' OF ClEARWAR
S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\Development Review\2008 Forms\Comprehensive lnfill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 4 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
ii:f1Qintilsrlng bar scale (minimum scale ona inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
All dimensions:
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of ali PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbackS;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
deseriptiCh and location of understory, ground COver vegetaUon and wildlife habitats,etc; Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use. areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
{per Section 3-201 (D)O) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facil1ties;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a
Level Two approval.
CJ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
EXISTING
REQUIRED
PROPOSED
Land aiea in square feet and acres:
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented In tabular form with the
number of required s?4\ces;
Total paved area, Induding all paved parking spaces & driveways,
expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (LSR); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11);
o
FOR DEVE:LOPMI!NTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additiOflal inlOrmation On site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimem,iioned);
Building anQ strlJctural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
ORIGINAL
Rf!CEIVEO
MAR 02 2009
'lANNIN5~~T
CittY OF C[EARWA'9
S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\Development Revlew\2008 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All existing and proposed structures:
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales. side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing:
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site. by species. size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size. description, specifications, quantities. and spacing requirements of all
existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a pr~vio\J~ d~velopment apprQYi\l1 (e.g. CQnoitions impO$l;lO by thl;l Community Ol;lv~lo{.lment Board);
I rriga tion notes,
u REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11);
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
:I BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information:
All sides of all buildings
Dimensioned
Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations)
Materials
ORIGINAL
RHCEIVED
HAR 02 2009
'LANNIN. ~~A\JT
CIfY OF CltAR'WA9
o
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8 Yz X 11
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area. height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required),
Q f"teduced signage proposal (8 Y, X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
$:\PI",nning D\lpartmen!\Appliqati9n Forms\Development Review\2008 Forms\Comprehensive lnfill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 6 of 8
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
o Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or hislher designee or if the proposed development:
Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour andlor 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (lTE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
o Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
. "-c"'~,_ roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
/'/ <,' .. .., ,'" ',' if' 'r
v/ .~f', )~:: / (". Traffic Impact Study is not required,
~N - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
:~~ AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONSI WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe andlor fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20. NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) eRJGTfJAL
RI!CEIVED
J ..., 2 ,\"09
1'/,'\1\ '. LU
P1AN~&~~W~T
IN THE REQUIREMEN,.cJ6~FAC~\~~~
SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
o
Acknowledgement of fire flow calculationslwater study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Fire Flow CalculationsM'ater Study is included.
&:;,e Flow Caloul"oo"",le, Study ;, 001 ,eo';''''.
.. ION 1- IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS
CALCULATIONS! WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize9iW .repr.esentatives to visit and
photograph thttPfOpe~.5!l?~~bed in this application.
,:~;~"..~C;;;;~//;~
C ~-~~ ~<.::.::.:...-::?__/ /
Sig~atur~o~ r~'p';e~~~,;i;1'" :~~~
,. 'l)' I , ", r" ,. '"
l 1 ,r: ;-, / ;~ (,~ f I f\<} t I \- / , - ~
'-..../ 'J.... I . ',~
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
S.~~m to and subscribed before me this:;) 7 dC\y of
.. n: k'...:> ," ,H-~. ? L I , A.D. 20 C) (I to me and/or by
I , who is personally known has
produced U i\J J lnJ t c-'U IZ 0 Ptj~
'1 fir. J. .1,(..:;(3S identification, :..r3c e,,~. j..,",>~')\ \ (t.,....... ..J- \ c 'l r f~i...
.. . .... . ~tr:~~lk~i;,?'.::;;i.2r;~'t}j-/~~ .
My commission expires: ...............
r............................... INS ;,
· OA9930' .
I C1 iI. /" ; ~~I~lhl' Comm# DDO~ :
1\-.- -s., .
S:\Planning Department\Applicalion Forms\Oevelopment Review\2008 FOrmS\COmprehe. : oJect~~.' S;.YO.; 1.dj: C
Page 7 6f 8 : -a.,;", .,f F~rill!l "'eI9iJ A!IiII1" 1;$
: ...............uu.Utf.If'..UU.
. .
...__-Ai... 'J ,'" '.'
j t.;;- ~'.. !'- ..,
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
... t\1'\i\JS.~:b.JI't\yS
ORIG1NAL
RBCEMD
j~Ii'\~ 02 2009
-'LAf\lMNs ~""r
CJfY OF CfEARnt- -. ---
vv'A'9
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names:
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
Q';)
N.ti){t8o,rc ;-SSQ^ A'll. C.\~~\,.1C\.~it:.:"~3.~ /s:S'
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
.[)iy\l}r=l- _Li'5-Qj./.~Jr'?k1 P~H Pi.€h!. {': ,(/j i'S/i ~ij~!'!./_!
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition:
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application:
7. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
.-...,,-
~ .;Li.#..,;',.;::~.~{/~.:.t~~.Jj.:;:.&~-'_:,.~.
Pi:oP'e"rty Owner
...""........-> ,'_..,---.,..
Property Owner
Property Owner
.. . _"H .. . ~
Property Owner
5T ATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this
day of
personally appeared
having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Seal/
",\"~V':6/~""
"':111. ..~,..
t~~..i. -~. ':'~"';
i~~;......~;~~i
a~'" n~~;l~''''
CHRISTiNE.). CASE
":tY (:UtV1t.:1\SS~\1\\i :!r DU ! O{fJ09
EXPiRES. August 2u, 201 J
;...<.-'t
Notary Public Signature
My Commission Expires:
._-----~.,-_.-~.-.,_._.__._,.-....~ .._----,-,.-~-_..._' ~. .
to' - ill/ "1" :~,.) ?:7 tr-~~
S:\Planning Department\Application FormslDevelopment Review\2008 Forms\Comprehensive Intill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 8 of 8
To:
1) City of Clearwater staff, Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager
2) Community Development Board
From:
Project manager assistant, Jennifer Lindsay, for new fine Italian restaurant (name TBD)
Location: 22 North Ft Harrison, Downtown Clearwater, Florida 33755.
REQUEST: We are requesting that we be allowed to make deviations to the existing
parking standards, i.e. reduce the amount of parking spaces we would normally be
required to supply our patrons if we were constructing a new building. This is NOT new
construction; it is a remodel of an existing building within the Cleveland Street District.
DOCUMENTATION: We understand that for our restaurant we would normally be
required to supply 15 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet in our building. This figure
would require us to supply about 67 spaces. Our building has no parking associated with
it other than city garages, lots and off street parking meters.
Per the FLS application we have done a study using an approved methodology by the
Community Development Coordinator of the areas surrounding the building and have
found the following options for our patrons. Please see attached map as documentation.
1. The Garden Avenue Garage. This garage has 250 available public parking spaces.
100 spaces sold monthly. 50 spaces sold per day in addition to monthly and is
open 24 hours per day.
2. The Station Square Garage. This garage has 100 available public parking spaces
and is open 24 hours per day. This garage is set to open between 3/13 & 3/27.
3. The coachman parking lot. This lot has 261 available public parking spaces and is
open 24 hours per day.
4. The City Hall parking lot. This lot has 117 meters available for public parking and
is open 24 hours per day.
5. Additionally there are 366 metered parking spaces in the Downtown Clearwater
Area.
This brings the total number of spaces readily available for our patrons to 1,094. This is
more than 16 times the amount we are required to have.
CONCLUSION: We feel this is acceptable and should be backed by representatives from
the City of Clearwater and approved by the CDB.
Thank you,
Jennifer Lindsay
about: blank:
From: <Stephen.Sarnoff~myClearwater.com>
Date: April 6, 2009 3:13:47 PM EDT
To: <ienniferlindsaydesigns~gmail.com>
Cc: <Scott.Kurleman~myClearwater.com>, <Tom.Glenn~myClearwater.com>, <Mark.Beerv~myclearwater.com>,
<Michael.Prvor~myClearwater.com>, <Joe. HiII~myClearwater. com>, <Theron .Johnson~myClearwater.com>
Subject: RE: solid waste for 22 n. ft. harrison ave.
In response to your inquiry concerning options for container placement and solid waste service to the
above address the following summary applies. You have made us aware of the difficulties of allowing the
container to remain in the parking lot. The alternative placement that we can offer is to have a container
placed in the alley. The condition of the pavement in the alley will not allow the use of our containers with
steel wheels. In addition the limited alley width will limit the size of the container to a size of three yards.
This container will continue to be shared with Chic Realty whose cost will not be increased. We are going
relocate and replace the two yard container with a three yard container with pneumatic wheels supplied by
you. As discussed we will provide the information to you about what wheels to purchase and once we have
them we will be able to install them and place the container in the alley. Please contact Joe Hill at 224-7803
for that information. Once we install the 3 yd container and the restaurant opens we will service the
container twice weekly. If we observe that the service level is insufficient we will increase the weekly
schedule as needed.
From: Jennifer Lindsay [mailtQi~l~m!ferljDds~ydesi9.!J~@gmaih~Q.r:nJ
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 2:29 PM
To: Sarnoff, Stephen
Subject: solid waste for 22 n. ft. harrison ave.
Steve,
Regarding solid waste plan for 22 N. Ft. Harrison. This is keeping the existing shared dumpster but
moving to alley with addition of pneumatic wheels.
Thank you for your help on this. Please send the overall plan/statement to me as well so I can send
to the architect. This is needed by lOam tomorrow as the architect must include the exact specifics
with the FLD application.
Thank you,
Jennifer
Jennifer Lindsay Designs
p. (727)647-5588
f. (727)585-5692
ht!1>1LwW\I~!!!lifel'lil1.!.lsavdcsigr!~..c:oln
10fl
4/7/2009 11:07 AM
C
,
REAR ELEVATION
A
t
o 00000
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~p~~~~~~~~~~p~~~~~~
10 I!~ ~O DO D~ DO DO ICO 1~ DO DO DO 00 ~; O~ DO [)O [)D J~ i:l0 [)O fi~ i:l0 [)O ~J i:l0 [)O [)D ~~ flO [)O DO Il~ C3~ [)O [)O ~~ 1)0 flO [)D j~ ~O [)O li~ C)~ [)O
l~ ~I. o.q ~O De:..o DO ~t:toLl ~O DO DO D(]::.il ocr ~O ('.0 c.["~O rID Plt:-.[I 1\0 f"~ n~ i.l~ r'llJ r-l;.O clD ('10 r-,t;-,.. 1:"10 r-.O_I)I;.~I) I'!IO.~D c..[ ':)1) ~O r-,(I~.. ~~ 1'\0
, . ,
, .
, 2T -6" A..
TOP OF MANSARD ~
25'-6" I
--------~~~
ROOF DECK ,
~..
..
fP~~
~
I~I~I
t
t
FRONT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
D
.
.
lRIM COLOR #1
BEN' MOORE-CASABEUA 102
BODY COLOR
PAlNT-EMBERAFTERNOON 106-1
TRIM COLOR If2
BEN' MOORE-WENGE Af-1BO
Q'.{)" I
- - - - - - - GRADE~
Piazza
Italian
Restaurant
CLEARVVATER.
FLORIDA
C
ISSUE DATE:
REVISlONS
MARK DAlE
1/2lii2OO9
DESCRIPllON
B
CHRISTOPHER PHIWP MrL..L.ER. ARCHrrECT
UCENSE NUMBER AR 91601
2200 ClARINE WAY N. DUNEDIN. Fl
DATE STAMP:
A
ISSUE:
PROJECT NO:
CAD DWG ALE:
ORAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
ELEVATION
SHEET OF
C COPYRIGHT METRO ARCH. & DESIGN, AlL RIGHTS RESERVED 2008
~----
I
'W
I~
....I
!~
I~
,0
,8:
w "'iw
III ..z
(,) -.-
C 0:: Z ,....I
::> w Iffi
(,) ll. ,I-
W ~ I~
I- Z
w ::::i ,(,)
0:: Z I~
(,)
z <C W
'....I
0 :I: I<i!
(,) (,)
r--~--
I
B
92'.q
4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L
_u
1//
It
_ :J
/
/
= f
L
IJ~ 1
J 5 1
1
I---- I
~ I
E 1
il
" 1
- 1
I I
1
- 1
i 1
1
~ 1
---~
~
IIY DRY
II STORAGE
~
COOLER
III
Itl
DP
1--
~OVEN
'M'
1
1
=d
1
I
I
,-lL____________J
1
1
1
1
1
----- -1- ---,
~I ~',
L___, '
" '
" I
" I I
1 I
1 I
1 I
1 I
/ I
/ /
---_/ /
I /
1 r----cI /
---- -1- --_/
1
I
I
I
I
1
1
_ _Ii _ __I
g
8
---
/
~ GENTS
I
1VT
- ~" GENTS OJ
\ .
----l
..
D
If\
~i
f
/
<::
"
\
____i
I
I
I \ 1
I ",- I
I ()- n i ~ j II ~ fJ, H fJ, a i
I
~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----=41
~
g-'tl
~
~
~
E
~
~
XD
~
=
:):
KITCHEN
-
r-
j
~II
I'? ~
!~
~
o
; ~
z
2l
~
::c:
::41
I r::::-'
v
DISHWASHING
nl ~ [m]
lP1
EXISTING SITE PLAN WITH REMODELED INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN
DATA;
1. SITE AREA = 4200 Swan! Feel or .0964 Aa8s
2. ALL REQUIRED SETllACKS = ry
3. GROSS FLOORAREA=33971ST FLOOR + 1994 2ND FLOOR
roTAL GFA = 5391
4. EFFECTIVE FAR = 1.36
5. EXISTING BUIlDING HEIGHT = 'Jlf+/-
A
NOTES
0-_____--0_____
y
LADIES
~
BAR SCALE 'i.I
ffi
10
20
I
w
~
z
o
en
a:
0::
<(
:I:
l-
ll.
Z
Piazza
Italian
Restaurant
22 N. FTHARRISONAVE
CLEARVVATER.
FLORIDA
C
ISSUE DATE: 1I25l2OO9
REVISIONS
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
1
B
1
CHRtSTOPHER PHIlUP MIUER. ARCHnECT
lICENSE NUMBERAA 91601
2200ctARINE WAY N. DUNEDIN. R.
DATE STAMP:
A
ISSUE:
PROJECT NO.
CAD DWG FILE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
ITE PlAN W/FLOOR PLAN
A 1.01
C COPYRIGHT METRO ARCH. & DESIGN. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2008
SHEET OF
4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRE STAIR
C2J
OFFICE
MECHANICAL
/
I
c
SEATING
/'
/
I
/'
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L__________
8
/
f
OPEN TO BELOW
/
f
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REMODELED SECOND FLOOR PLAN
A
BAR SCALE
o 1
-
ffi
10
20
I
Piazza
Italian
Restaurant
CLEARVVATER.
FLORIDA
c
ISSUE DATE: 1~
REVISIONS
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
1
B
1
CHR1STOPHER PHR..UP MIUER. ARCHrTECT
lICENSE NUMBER AR 91601
ZD) ClARINE WAY N. DUNEDIN. R.
DAlE STAMP:
A
ISSUE:
PROJECT NO:
CAD IlWG FILE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
ITE PLAN W/FLOOR PLAN
A 1.02
C COPYRIGtIT METRO ARCH. & DESIGN, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2006
SHEET OF