FLD2009-02008 - 904 McMullen Booth Rd - The Brew Garden - March 17, 2009M
FLD2009-02008
904 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
THE BREW GARDEN
PLANNER OF RECORD: WW
ATLAS # 283A
ZONING: C
LAND USE: CG
RECEIVED: 02/12/2009
INCOMPLETE:
COMPLETE:
MAPS:
PHOTOS:
STAFF REPORT:
DRC:
CDB:
CLWCoverSheet
CDB Meeting Date
Case Numbers:
Agenda Item.
Owner:
Applicant:
March 17, 2009
FLD2009-02008
D.2.
Savoy LLC
The Brew Garden LLC
Representative: Jeff and Cassandra Fritz
Address: 904 McMullen Booth Road
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a nightclub with an accessory
sidewalk cafe in the Commercial (C) District within an existing 16,700
square foot shopping center with 100 off-street parking spaces and no
changes to the building or structure setbacks, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community
Development Code Section 2-704.C.
CURRENT ZONING: Commercial (C) District
CURRENT FUTURE LAND Commercial General (CG)
USE CATEGORY:
PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Restaurant
Proposed Use: Cafe with on-premise consumption of beer and wine,
including an accessory sidewalk cafe
EXISTING North: Pinellas County Detached dwellings
SURROUNDING ZONING South: Pinellas County Detached dwellings
AND USES: East: Commercial (C) and Retail sales and services; Attached
High Density Residential dwellings
Districts
West. Pinellas County Detached dwellings
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 1.599 acres is located on the west side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 150 feet north of
Terrace View Lane. The site is currently improved with an approximate 16,700 square-foot, multi-tenant
shopping center. A Starbucks restaurant operated within the subject tenant space and accessory sidewalk
cafe from October 2007 to October 2008, when the restaurant closed. The existing multi-tenant shopping
center is oriented toward McMullen Booth Road, with the rear of the tenant spaces facing west adjacent
to the rear yards of the detached dwellings to the west of this site. A one-way vehicular drive aisle is
situated between a solid fence along the west property line and the rear building face. Parking areas are
located on the north side of the northern portion of the building and east and south side of the southern
portion of the building. There are two driveways for this property, which exist in slightly different
locations than shown on the submitted site plan. The northern driveway is located farther north than
Community Development Board - March 17, 2009
FLD2009-02008 - Page 1 of 7
indicated, lining up with the northern parking rows' drive aisle. The southern driveway is located a few
parking spaces south of that indicated on the submitted site plan. There are no existing parking spaces to
the rear of the multi-tenant shopping center as indicated on the submitted site plan. While the submitted
site plan indicates 100 parking spaces, which is how the application was advertised, in reality there exist
82 parking spaces.
Detached dwellings exist to the north, west and south of this multi-tenant shopping center parcel.
Detached dwelling subdivisions wrap around this shopping center, but there is no direct vehicular access
(driveways) between the shopping center and subdivision streets. A retail sales and service use (Sam
Ash) is located to the east across McMullen Booth Road. A mid-rise attached dwelling development is
located to the northeast across McMullen Booth Road.
Development Proposal:
The applicant originally applied to operate this establishment as a restaurant. A restaurant is defined by
the Community Development Code (CDC) as "a use providing for the preparation or sale of prepared
food for consumption by customers primarily on the premises, including the subordinate sale of alcoholic
beverages for consumption on premises, but excluding facilities with prepared food service within
grocery stores and delicatessens." Upon review of application materials, there was staff concern
regarding the subordinate nature of the alcoholic beverage sales and the ability by the City to monitor
such. The CDC defines a nightclub as "any facility licensed by the State of Florida for on-premise
consumption of alcoholic beverages but not including restaurants." To address staff concerns regarding
whether the on-premise consumption of alcoholic beverages would be subordinate or primary in
relationship to food items, this application has been filed to permit the use as a cafe with on-premise
consumption of beer and wine, including an accessory sidewalk cafe. Due to the manner of how uses are
set out in the Zoning Districts in the Community Development Code and to meet advertising
requirements, the request has listed the proposed use as a "nightclub". Staff is not supportive of a
nightclub at this location, but is supportive of the use envisioned by the applicant with appropriate
conditions of approval to restrict its use.
The application proposes to utilize the existing 2,153 square-foot enclosed tenant space with an existing
476 square-foot sidewalk cafe where there was previously a Starbucks restaurant. The applicant is
proposing to utilize the same tenant space, not enlarging the enclosed floor area or the sidewalk cafe area
from that which exists today. Additionally, there are no proposed changes to other site improvements
(parking areas, driveways or landscaped areas). The site conforms to current standards for minimum lot
area, minimum lot width, impervious surface ratio (I.S.R.) and floor area ratio (F.A.R.) and no changes
are proposed. The existing building and pavement setbacks are nonconforming to current Code
requirements and are not proposed to be modified. The existing building height for this tenant space is
less than the maximum height for the minimum standard Code requirement. The shopping center as a
whole is presently nonconforming with respect to the provision of off-street parking. Based upon CDC
Section 3-1405 for shared parking and the existing/proposed uses, the subject property would require a
minimum of 98 off-street parking spaces, or 16 spaces more than presently existing. No additional off-
street parking is proposed as part of this application and the addition of any further off-street parking
would not be possible given the existing on-site improvements.
The applicant's concept for this establishment (The Brew Garden) is that of a high-end coffee cafe that
also serves select beer and wine. More than 100 different varieties of coffee, tea, ciders, hot chocolate,
Italian sodas and fruit smoothies will be offered. Desserts, pastries, cold sandwiches, salads, panini's,
bruschetta and cheeses will be also offered. Food and all coffee house items will be available during all
operating hours. The applicant will not offer for on-premise consumption more than beer and wine and
will not offer any enticing alcoholic drink specials (such as, but not limited to, ladies night, sink or swim
Community Development Board - March 17, 2009
FLD2009-02008 - Page 2 of 7
or quarter beer night). The proposed hours of operation are 6:00 am to 11:00 pin weekdays and 7:00 am
to 12:00 am on weekends. In order to be respectful of the detached dwellings to the west of this
shopping center, the rear door will be closed at all times (not propped open). There will be no music
played loud enough to impede low decibel conversation or reading activities indoors or on the sidewalk
cafe patio, as well as there will be no amplified music. The applicant is not planning any jukeboxes, pool
tables, dartboards or arcade games of any kind.
There is an existing building permit for dumpster enclosure(s) that was submitted for Starbucks but was
never issued, although the enclosure(s) were constructed (BCP2007-07293). The owner and/or applicant
should finalize this permit so that it may be issued and inspected.
Corn rehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-704, the uses allowed
within the Commercial (C) District are subject to the standards and criteria set forth in this Section.
Among those criteria established for the review of Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects is the
following:
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and
improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or
emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed
development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements:
Li Changes in horizontal building planes;
o Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos,
balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
C3 Variety in materials, colors and textures;
a Distinctive fenestration patterns;
a Building stepbacks; and
a Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and
appropriate distances between buildings.
As previously noted, the proposal does not contain any changes to either the existing shopping center
building or the off-street parking area, and while the proposal will meet some of the above criteria, it
cannot meet others without being required to modify the existing architectural elevations of the shopping
center. However, to require such changes simply to accommodate the proposed use for an existing tenant
space would be impractical and inappropriate.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the
subject property.
Community Development Board - March 17, 2009
FLD2009-02008 - Page 3 of 7
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The :following table depicts the consistency
of the nightclub proposal with the standards as per Tables 2-701.1 and 2-704 of the Community
Development Code:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Maximum F.A.R. 0.55 0.239 X1
Maximum I.S.R. 0.95 0.80 X1
Minimum Lot Area 5,000 - 10,000 . ft. 69,677 s q. ft. X1
Minimum Lot Width 50 - 100 feet 593 feet X1
Minimum Setbacks Front: 15 -- 25 feet Two feet (to existing X1
building); Five feet (to
existing avement
Side: 0- 10 feet North: Five feet (to existing X'
avement
South: Five feet (to existing X1
avement
Rear: 10 - 20 feet 13 feet (to existing X'
building); Three feet (to
existing pavement)
Maximum Height 25 - 50 feet (retail sales and 20 - 25 feet (to existing flat X'
restaurants) (25 feet for roofs)
nightclubs)
Minimum Off-Street 88 parking spaces 82 parking spaces X1
Parkin (per shared parking table
Figures reflect existing conditions on-site (based on the submitted site plan) that are not being altered or approved by the proposed
application.
Community Development Board -- March 17, 2009
FLD2009-02008 - Page 4 of 7
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of
the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-704.C of the Community
Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;
or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of
a working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off=street X]
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
f. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
g. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
h. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
i. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
? Changes in horizontal building planes;
? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses,
pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
? Variety in materials, colors and textures;
? Distinctive fenestration patterns;
? Building stepbacks; and
? Distinctive roofs forms.
j. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and aoorooriate distances between buildings.
See above discussion with regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria.
Community Development Board - March 17, 2009
FLD2009-02008 - Page 5 of 7
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level
Two Approvals as per Section 3-913.A of the Community Development Code:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2_ The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual. acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adiacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its
meeting of March 5, 2009, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move
forward to the Community Development Board (CDB).
Findings of Fact. The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and
requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to
support the following findings of fact:
1. The 1.599 acres is located on the west side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 150 feet north of
Terrace View Lane;
2. The site is currently improved with an approximate 16,700 square-foot, multi-tenant shopping center;
3. A Starbucks restaurant operated within the subject tenant space and accessory sidewalk caf6 from
October 2007 to October 2008, when the restaurant closed;
4. The application proposes to utilize the existing 2,153 square-foot enclosed tenant space with an
existing 476 square-foot sidewalk cafe where there was previously the Starbucks restaurant. The
applicant is proposing to utilize the same tenant space, not enlarging the enclosed floor area or the
sidewalk caf6 area from that which exists today;
5. The subject property is presently nonconforming with respect to the existing shopping center
building and off-street parking area not meeting the minimum required setbacks;
6. The proposal is to permit a caf6 with on-premise consumption of beer and wine within one tenant
space of the existing shopping center building, along with the accessory sidewalk cafe;
7. The proposal has no impact upon the following development standards: F.A.R., I.S.R., minimum lot
area/size and maximum building height, as they presently exist;
8. The proposed use will not exacerbate the existing nonconforming setbacks for the shopping center
building or the off-street parking area;
9. The subject property is developed with a total of 82 off-street parking spaces, which, as a whole, is
presently nonconforming with respect to the provision of off-street parking;
10. No additional off-street parking is proposed as part of this application and the addition of any further
off-street parking would not be possible given the existing on-site improvements; and
11. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Community Development Board - March 17, 2009
FLD2009-02008 - Page 6 of 7
Conclusions of Law. The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the
following conclusions of law:
That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-701.1 and 2-704 of
the Community Development Code;
That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-704.C of the
Community Development Code; and
That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as
per Section 3-913.A of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development
application to permit a cafe with on-premise consumption of beer and wine with an accessory sidewalk
caf6 in the Commercial (C) District within an existing 16,700 square foot shopping center with 82 off-
street parking spaces and no changes to the building or structure setbacks, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-704.C, with
the following conditions:
Conditions of A roval:
1. That this use (cafe with on-premise consumption of beer and wine) be limited to this tenant space
only. Any desired relocation within this shopping center or enlargement of floor area or sidewalk
cafe area shall require a new application for re-review by the CDB;
2. That the hours of operation be limited to 6:00 am to 11:00 pm weekdays and 7:00 am to 12:00 am
weekends;
3. That on-premise consumption of alcoholic beverages be limited to beer and wine (2-COP) and there
be no package sales in sealed containers of liquor;
4. That there be no enticing alcoholic drink specials, such as, but not limited to, ladies night, sink or
swim or quarter beer night;
5. That food and all coffee house items be available during all operating hours;
6. That the rear door be closed at all times (not propped open);
7. That there be no music played loud enough to impede low decibel conversation or reading activities
indoors or on the sidewalk caf6 patio;
8. That there be no amplified music;
9. That there be no jukeboxes, pool tables, dartboards or arcade games of any kind; and
10. That Building Permit No. BCP2007-07293 for dumpster enclosure(s) be finalized so that it may be
issued and inspected.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff: &4t3c 0q. L"
Wayne . Wells, AICP, Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
? Location Map
? Aerial Map
? Zoning Map
? Existing Surrounding Uses Map
? Photographs of Site and Vicinity
S. IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIMcMullen Booth 0904 Brew Garden (C) 3.17.09 CDB -
WWIMcMullen Booth 0904 StaffReport.doc
Community Development Board - March 17, 2009
FLD2009-02008 - Page 7 of 7
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756
Phone: 727-562-45041 Email: wayne.wellsna myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
¦ Planner III
Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL
November 2001 to Present .
As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible
Standard Development (staff level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats
before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and
Development Agreements before the City Council; Reviewed building permits for Code
conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information
(via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings).
w Zoning Coordinator
Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL
March 1989 to November 2001
Acting Zoning Director; Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City
Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of
Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments,
rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; Reviewed final site
plans and building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code
amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment
meetings).
¦ Program Manager, Zoning Branch
Manatee County Dept. of Planning and Development, Bradenton, FL June 1984 to March 1989
Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board
of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance;
Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail,
zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the
Code Enforcement Section; Supervised six employees; Prosecuted cases before the Code
Enforcement Board; Investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building
codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section -- Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones,
planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and
Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code
enforcement; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via
telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings).
• Planner I
Alachua County Dept. of Planning and Development, Gainesville, FL June 1980 to June 1984
Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and
Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; Assisted in
preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter
or predevelopment meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information
and Data Book; Drafted ordinance revisions; General research.
¦ Graduate Assistant
University of Florida Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Gainesville, FL 1979 to 1981
Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; Coordinated graphics for Jefferson County
Comprehensive Plan.
¦ Planning Technician
Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL
1977 to 1979
Primarily prepared graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1 %2
years; Worked on historic survey and report.
EDUCATION
Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not
completed), University of Florida, 1981
Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976
LICENSES & CERTIFICATES
American Institute of Certified Planners
American Planning Association, Suncoast Section
4.
rLU?
' DR
F?
ON DR
w r.T.+
C
O
2
rte. m
J g V Ruth Eckerd Mall Dr
Abbey
LEMONWOOD _ - - •-:r ?,
w..y
T
!tT
SAN ¢ JOSE
::: .:;;.:.. ... SAN PEDRO
?':;': "-''-' • =?Xt[?CE17.I6tM?LA::.;•::1 SAN ?• :.
:GR
.,? BERNAD INO
xa O
MATEO
PROJECT • ::::::+?:::: :.::? ;;
SITE
pV?
N
BORDEAUX LA g
v
CHAMBLEE LA a
-- ==- BAY LA
LOCATION MAP
Owner: Savoy LLC Case: FLD2009-02008
Site: 904 McMullen Booth Road Property Size: 1.577 acres
PIN: 09-29-16-00000-320-0100 Atlas Page: 283A
> .
AERIAL MAP
Owner: Savoy LLC
Case:
FLD2009-02008
Site: 904 McMullen Booth Road
PIN: 09-29-16-00000-320-0100
Property Size:
Atlas Page:
1 .577 acres
283A
_ .•5
,a pis i?V
j
- - - :[!';.-:: ;?;•:•:.;;;%:':":: 1099
V
-Jo
;2
•'
'
:
'
:
'
•
•
•
•
•'•
•:::
: :?. :
5.45
: 305
96
.
•:?8'..•. :I .
I:. • :'•:/:: 1+eIS) 207.
::'?:;:: •
.
'
'
•
r.•.:;..• : .?. •
_
'•"Sb;^i:i
.:;712;;::' I
53
HDR
54
207.
'
:. .;. r • .
:. r::..::?
:.
•
.
1
90,
":':
:
:
: 410
8
':
: "•
.
.
^.
.
.
:••f.'S??i:,
92
51
.3 A
46
:.:?r!'LY];J,'lf?.°i:I!}i:f.•.??:CC?:_:;;•:.:;;. i?•'';•:{•:•?_; f23
::::: ::::• R?3;::.:
i 92
:
\
.
. •
45
-
a
er1. rI t i ?, I `fir
:
r
.....•
rf'?'
.,. ; •'
..
t
?
',? r• ••
fi
(
.
:4::_::
.
? ::.3.%':f
44
: y ,r:•
".
43
%
?
?f `
7 :':Ji1Q?'•
?'?}r .• ':?A
:
'
??
'
?
••J:i
F
"'
i
X
•
.
.
.
: •
ir.
:
.
•
.
:,•r. I
.
r
,
' ::Iii • •:??':r '
.
•
•
!
.?,;.. ?,
?"c l•'::£h5 I
:
3.'+ :.r.:}::: :'561 ;:i •. ; •t.'?: ?
3
%' Rd•
.. : •• •
3
34 I 35 I 36 37 38
•
•
:." .... ...: i"::;: ;.::. .'? .:.!::JS::•:.:. ? 290 M M
•
:?
: ?. „? '
?t:'
.
::j
. ! 0
:•
n n
::.9:
::.
20&8
3
30 27
w
?
r
•:
f
'
29 28
..:.
.
ii y: ?
:
I
a{
?: :''
707
•?a
:'
i
'
?,
-
:..
I
- :
::
:
::
:
: .... ?
.:.. }
{q? tQ?
.: ?..; "':: i•i:r::a•; :;::'. 17
.
18 19 20 21 22
•.
..
•
•
_
I
- -
'•^: .?
:
'°11:: ::•i?3t• :•37.3 _ r:
•
tii •;°aR?:a i:: :i::'•it':
.
.
GRAND VIEW AVE
m
ZONING MAP
Owner: Savoy LLC
W Case: FLD2009-02008
Site: 904 McMullen Booth Road Property Size: 1.577 acres
PIN: 09-29-16-00000-320-0100 Atlas Page: 283A
i
?.
- ? d
•as+
:
- - v
99c r
- z
•. i
- Th
?
- -
- - - •:? 9098
Attached
??••? :•a Dwellings
?
45
¦ ~
:
'
'
.
'
?
.
.•
.
,
306.
;:?:
?y
.' ? ?• - - ::p : tai:. ?1?•+*
116(S) 207.5
53
207.5 54
?
.?
': !r'. '?': ?:• :•??••::".•: 180.6 `
'•'
' ': • ' •' • .., • ' .... 410.8 52
.:
7 •:
•
92
51
46
?:? :?••??.?i??:?' • ?:
:
Retail
V23 Sales and
45
Services
44
43
9
::.. _:' • :.'mil •:• '••? 6
.. }/_.•• tln .?+65':'
.
•`•ii:.:;:: :[i
}:•.
•
::f'
•
•:
•:::
E?
t
:::
`•
°
'
1
.
,
;
;.
..
.
.
;r.
:
[
i
:
=i
:'i:#? 33 34 J 35 36 37e? 380
g ? N M
- - ? F F
•i
}?
:
:
i
?i
i
M M
:i
'}i
i
"
'
•
^
?
[
?
?
r
•
:
.:
::
:
c:
,
;;,::•:;_;.•
: ?:•}
:
:
:
:•
:
;
:
:.
7
29o
ri
,
,
:
p?
Q SAN BERNA?/NO ST
4
?
•':1 ' ?:p • fs?:.. .
•
:
:737:
• : ?'
.
.
.
,
,
M F
::
:::• •'
9
.
.
Par Aing 2080
3 3T
- - ..1 2 30 27
Lot
707
J
18
1017 ?v
- - - - - - el ieu s 22
?J
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
Owner: Savoy LLC Case: FLD2009-02008
Site: 904 McMullen Booth Road Property Size: 1.577 acres
PIN: 09-29-16-00000-320-0100 Atlas Page: 283A
.....
View looking NW at subject property (904 is southernmost
unit in multi-tenant commercial building)
View looking W at sidewalk cafe area of subject tenant space
'~
~
)
View looking N along E side of subject property (McMullen
Booth Road to the right)
View looking NW at subject property (904 is southernmost unit
in multi-tenant commercial building)
View looking S at southern parking lot (detached dwellings to
the right and beyond fence in background)
Freestanding sign for subject property
904 McMullen Booth Road
FLD2009-02008
Page 1 of2
View looking N along W side of property (detached dwellings
to left)
View looking W at northern parking lot (detached dwellings
to right and beyond fence in background)
View looking E at attached dwellings across McMullen Booth
Road from subject property
View looking S at N side of commercial building
View looking NW at detached dwelling to N of subject property
View looking E at retail sales across McMullen Booth Road
from subject property
904 McMullen Booth Road
FLD2009-02008
Page 2 of2
Page 1 of 2
From: Delk, Michael
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 1:22 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: FW: The Brew Garden in Clearwater 33759
For File.
Michael L. Delk, AICP
Planning Director
City of Clearwater, Florida
myclearwater.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse Dougherty [mailto:3151dougherty@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 12:34 PM
To: Delk, Michael
Subject: Ref: The Brew Garden in Clearwater 33759
Michael Delk
727-562-4561/727-562-4865
Michael. delk(@myclgaztivater. corn
Hello Mr. Delk.
My name is Jesse Dougherty and I am homeowner and a board member in the subdivision of Del Oro
Groves, a community just south of Ruth Eckert Hall.
I'm writing in support of a local business that is attempting to open to the west of our community. The
business I'm referring to is The Brew Garden at the address of 924 N McMullen Booth Rd Clearwater
33759. r
I originally contacted Jeff Frits to welcome his establishment to the community and to offer him
advertising space on the Del Oro Groves web site (www.delorogroves.com). As the Del Oro Groves
Webmaster, I encourage local business to open and flourish by letting our residences know what is
available to them. We have a page dedicated to local dining establishments that has become very
popular with our residences.
Mr Fritz has explained in detail what The Brew Garden is, what his intentions will be, and hurdles that
are ahead of him from the City of Clearwater. From his explanation, I believe that The Brew Garden
would be a positive addition to the community. I do not believe that there would be any local opposition
to the opening of a European style coffee house/ Bavarian brew house. Furthermore, many of the
residence that I've talked with in the past week are very much looking forward to his establishment
opening. Mr Fritz has actually volunteered to attend our annual community picnic on March 14th and
give a brief overview of his business as well as bring along samples of coffee, smoothies, & pastries that
will be featured at The Brew Garden.
As you probably know that location use to be a Starbucks and was local favorite of our community,
since Starbucks closed we haven't had a local place to relax and congregate. We believe that Mr Fritz
establishment will fill the void that Starbucks left and will also be a source of revenue to the city not to
mention filling a vacant space and providing jobs in our area.
fi1e://S:\PlanninQ Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pendine cases\Un for the next CDB\Mc... 3/9/9-000
Page 2 of 2
Please consider granting Mr Fritz the necessary permits need to open his establishment.
Thank you,
Jesse Dougherty
3151 San Mateo Street
Clearwater, FL 33759
727-641-9660
file://S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\PendinR cases\Un for the next CDB\Mc... 3/9/2009
4 City Clerk: Cynthia E. Goudeau, IWC
City of Clearwater
PQ Box-4748
Clearwater, Fl 33758-4748
ay LT,C.requestr?g flexible development
%
Notice of Objection to the matterof
approval for a nightclub at 9E?41V1cu11 h Booth R3'Cleatvvater.
Taxi :resident in the neiglibe be, the Savoy plaza building. There: are
y
families with very oiu c14, adults who need peace sa they dan rest:-for
y $:-
worlt to provide for then 'Webs we are: poople. who bought oiuhouses
here so i?e could enjoy this peak ia-borlid'ozl`and'we:would very much like to
continue this.
of life will; romised for all
if a nightclub apens at this loci X;c9zn ...P
the residentsiiglitclubs are°n Bing a ISament irito neighborhoods;
loud music frow the estab ; 'stereos, loci disorderly c4nduet, W.
litter, some that would likely lam' ioiir yaxds, racing through our
neighborhood.
pp t;}n:.Qur effort to maintain our quality of life.
We would a reeiate the city's. lx0lp
Please deny the request.
Lavona Velasquez
901 Glop Oak Ave e
Clearwater; F133759
727-791-9299
.._xe
,4
gwater
I" L
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00
SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ ZO.r 0
CASE #: L17 r ZOa8 -
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Revised 07/11/2008)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
AP i7LICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PPLICANT NAME:
AILING ADDRESS: U v ??r
HONE NUMBER: T 1i 7 I;z . 1.;? 0d FAX NUMBER: 71z ? 1230 • ?J G7
ELL NUMBER -3 ? • Ol" -l &5-I EMAIL: if ell VIMc,) . E, M
ROPERTY OWNER(S):
cS
st ALL owners on the deed
? f' '?---
_,?W - - -
tGENT NAME: ?? ?,I? "421
4AILING ADDRESS: 7,* 12. •; '???ir/ri L Y!zk?, ? >
'HONE NUMBER: T 7 '77 a Qj jFAX NUMBER: -7?
'ELL NUMBER: -? 7,R- 92,74-6-o.1&- EMAIL: -
3. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: ?(Co?dee?Section 4-202.A)
'ROJECT NAME: &(--PROJECT VALUATION: ?$,,2? 4 ?g
STREET ADDRESS O O (/ ` 4• Gf ?S-?`? ,c `-,
DARCEL NUMBER(S): (J Q r
'ARCEL SIZE (acres): - PARCEL SIZE (square feet): w
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ?__•_--?._T_? -
PROPOSED USE(S): r L . U - --
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
Specifically identify the request (aS
(include number of units or square ??, ?? r2 !l
footage of non-residential use and all
requested code deviations; e.g.
reduction in required number of
parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
P
S:\Planning DepartmeriMpplication Forms\Development Review\2008 Forrns\Comprehensive Infill Pt eject (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 1 of 8
ll
_S THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (fDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UN
'ELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES- NO_ (If yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 7) _
F-
4
LL.
?a
z
o
S:\Planning Departmenl\Application Forms\Development Review\2008 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 2 of 8
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria)
2_ The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
pur e, intent and basic planning objectives of this Gode? and with the intent and purpose of this zoning istrict
,? - ? bus ? n - ? l I ?^? c?. C? J .?._
? n (?. E? f,t? i t'h (.?jOU, rYYI ??. t^ (?- Y?GQ W 1 ? /' l /1?S . _
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and or rly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
d2, 141
6 G? ? d YY?2 - . 0
4u n 7F
?rm I,
r Y"> r v C S t, h4,
t T?a
4. Adjoi ng properti s will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of tj-e propod development.
W_ 071101t) i h6A_ D er'?-? wol meseo w- bus;? ss a r)d del
Y)
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
objectives:
a_ The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use:
b_ The proposed us? would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs:
c. The deveiopment proposal accommodates the expansion or redeveiopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. ? ? proposed a provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a workin waterfront use.
rnI,\;n .? c,r??r. In,.,i„ 0? n.S?rf.?I??? oN??-, ?1P.(?j1?/ l,f?rll r?t?O
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, heigh`(and off-street parking are Justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b_ The proposed. development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; C
C. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area: ?
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substanti er2f
the following design elements: LLI .--1
? Changes in horizontal building planes: c ?4
? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, et W (V- C
? Variety in materials, colors and textures; t
O Distinctive fenestration patterns;
? Building stepbacks; and
? Distinctive roofs forms.
e4 he proposed developmen rovides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and approp ate dist nces between buildings.
S:\Planning Department\Npplication Forms\Development Review\2008 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 3 of 8
Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is
achieved, in detail:
The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction In impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement-
:1 If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations..
? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
? ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION -- IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4' or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
? TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist-, of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of
such trees;
? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
11 PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (le. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
? GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note- Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ?
O COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
m .
LJL
S:\Planning Department\Applicabon Forms\Development Review\2008 Forrns\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 4 of 8
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) a
C1 SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): COT y +t'`_ a ?
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; f ?".
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
All dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
(per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and
Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a
Level Two approval.
Q SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSE-D
Land arcon in, square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
? REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %: X 11);
? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building. and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
r--1
?V C
1.:..
C
?a
S:\Planning Department\Applicabon Forms\Development Review\2008 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
? LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
? REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11);
? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREME=NTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
? BUILDING ELEVATION DRNWINGS with the following information:
P ? O?GG
All sides of all b
ildi C"
u
ngs
Dimensioned C
Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) .-?
Materials
f
O REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on $'/, X 11
`
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806)
0 All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
J All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
J Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
3 Reduced signage proposal (8' X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\Development Review\2008 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 6 of 8
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801_C)
7 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
. Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the Citys annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual_
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
J Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
e 1? roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
_. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY:
'rovide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
my upgrades die required by the develuper due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
;prinkler, standpipe and/or fire pumo_ If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity- Complianr_.a with
he 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPP,13, KAPPA 14, NFPP. 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
] Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the followin F`
g):
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
Fire Flow CalculatlonsNVater Study is not required. C
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIJ_9!W OW'
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION ?iE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334, 7'
N. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
Signature of property owner or representative
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELL4S
Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of
A.D. 20 to me and/or by
who is personally known has
produced
as identification.
Notary public,
My commission expires:
S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\Development Review\2008 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 7 of 8
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: LA,U
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names:
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
1
75
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
r???
--.1i?i"
4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
f 1 "700- MC-2--- A /rte .rJr lf-0 / i 7
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner -'? Property Owner
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
cm
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this ?
personally appeared who
LL.
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Q OX m
Notary Seal/Stamp
Notary Public Signature
My Commission Expires:
S:\Planning DepartmentApplication Forms\Development Review\2008 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc
Page 8 of 8
property Appraiser General Information: 09/29/16/00000/320/0100 Card 1
Interactive Ma of this Co arable Sales
del Listin
Building 2 of 2
Data Current as of February 01,
2009
[11:10 am Monday February 2]
Nonresidential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print
Shopping Center Pro ert Use: 321
S 593FT OF N 603FT OF W 116FT OF E 275FT OF NW 1/4 OF SW I.A
L? 2008 Exem tions
Homestead: No Use: 0 % Ownership: 0 %
Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0
2008 Value
Comparable Sales Value:: $0
Build in Value er F.S. 553.844 Just/Market
Value: $2,115,000
Assessed Value/ SOH Ca : $2,115,000
Histo Taxable Value: $2,115,000
A significant taxable value increase may,
occur when sold. Click here for details.
Owner/Mailin
Address '
SAVOY LLC
924 MCMULLEN BOOTH
I RD
CLEARWATER FL
33759-3425
Pro er Address
924 MCMULLEN BOOTH
RD
Parcel Information
Book/Page: 13847/1989 Land Use: Stores (11)
Census Tract: 268.08
Tax Exempt: 0 %
Historic: $0
2008 Tax Information
Tax District: CW
Millage: 20.3578
Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00
Taxes: $43,056.80
Taxes without Save-Our-Homes cap: $43,056.80
Taxes without any exemptions: $43,056.80
Sale Date Book/Page Price gal V/I
9/2004 13847 / 1989 $2,200,000 M I
6/1987 6529 / 1166 $292,100 Q I
Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s)
Not Platted
2/2/2009 11:10
bltp://www.pepao.org/general mdet.pbp?pn-=16290900000320010001
Back to Query New Tax Collector uestion/Comment about this
Results Search Information ap reel .........-
09/29/16/00000/320/0100'
Building 1
1 of 4
r„
I=P.lr w w w .p%;Pnu.ui w jet u}U? Ly_uac.uuI
28 13117 ~ He Home Park - w/mix usage store(s) apts, etc
Single Building Store - Free Standing (not otherwise described) Laundromat, produce
1' 1 F320 shop, rental equipmment, pool and office supply, auto part, hardware, appliance,
k store, etc. _
clothing, jewelry,
Office, venience Store, Bar
i v?- som:IDa . mC1e an-Con
ma
Strip ore (
1 stai?ra . but a s jar f Y.
_ ood sty) ;
13 21 and/or R?e
22 Convenience Store (7-11, Circle K, Drive Through)
11 3
14 323 Supermarket & Superstore - Free Standing (Albertsons, Publix)
13 324 Department Store - Free Standing
?15 j324 Regional Shopping Center
F32 4 eighborhood/Community Shopping Center - one or more major stores and one or
16
more m- estep stores
-
X21 325 Restaurant, Cafeteria (Steak & Ale, Pizza Hut)
N,0 ' __
,33 325 Bar, Liquor Store with Lounge, Cocktail Lounge, Night Club (ABC, Crown)
22 326 oad Restaurant - Drive-In, Diner (McDonalds,, KFC, Lon John Silvers, etc.
F"jp
N? Fast Food g
2 3 .
i i Apartment _ above or in the
27 Store or
- ? Tyrone, rear
? etc.)
15 {328 Egcl osed Mall (Countryside, 1329 Wholesale outlet, Produce Wholesaler Manufacturing Outlet, Electrical Wholesaler
?' T Nursery, Roadside Fruit Stand, Florist Shop, Greenhouse, Landscaper, Sod, Sprinkler
j30 1329 System (Non-Agricultural)
General Office - Non-Profess?oa I One Story (Advertising, Travel & Employment
F17 X330 Agencies, Pest Control, Real Estate, Accounting, Title Co)
124 330 Insurance Company Office- Single or Multi-Story
23 331 Financial Institution - (Savings, Full Service Branch Bank, Loan Company, Mortgage
rY-,
Coneral Office Credit Services & Credit Multi-Story office Building P
ry redominantly Non-Professional
I1 S 332 Services
professional office Building -Singe & Multi-Story. (Predominantly Professional)
19 333 Medical, Dental, Legal, Vet. & Animal Hospital, Clinic, Architect)
_
17-._3
336 Post Office
Rental
27 339 Automobile Rental Agency, Used Car Lot, Trailer Rental, Truck & an
27 T 340 Boat Sale & Marine Equipment (Not Associated with a Marina) Mobile Home, Motor
1 Home, Travel Trailer Sale
X26 34C 1 Service Station - Full Service or Self-Service Gas
Automobile, Motorcycle, Farm Machinery, Tractor Trailer Dealership - Full Agency,
[27 F342 Sales & Service (Grant, Ross, Dimmitt, Toyota, Brooklet Tractor, Barney's
{ Motorcycles)
Auto Garage - General Repair (Radiator, Alternator, Battery, A/C, Tune-up, Body
27 F343 Shop) Marine Repair
27 year, Midas, Brako, etc. .
344 Auto Service Center (National) - AAMCO, Firestone, Good...
27 345 Car Wash (Automatic or Do-it Yourself)
I _f7r.
2/1/2009 3:2'_
FEB-26-07 09:13 PM ORIENTAL.RUG.BAZAAR
MKI
727 725 9545
c
VIT'A'
LEGAL DESCt2IP77Oh
PAR(--zL 1
The south 1,93 feet of the North 603 feet of the East 275 feet of the Norhwest 114 of the Somhwesr 114 of
Section 9. Towrlshlp 29 Souris. Range 16 Fast, Pinellas County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT the Last 157.5
fw #mrad deeded to PitwDas County by deed maxded in O.R. Hook 6334, page 1842, Public Records of
Pine[laq County. Florida.
PARCEL 2•
The. South 400 feet of the North 410 feet of the Fast 275 fed of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 114 of.
Srootion 9, 7'a n,* 29 South, Range 16 Fast, Pinellas County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT the East 157.5
feet thaaof deeded to Pinellas County by deed mu riled in O.R. Book 6334, page 1943, Public Records of
Pinehes County, Fbri&.
FURTHER LESS AND EXCEPT from PARCELS 1 and/or 2 above the foil4wing deserfbed tracts.
1. Existing dght of=way as sbown en the McMullen-Booth Road Maintained Right-of-Way Map as recorded in
Rrmd Mat Opok B. pegs 61, Public Records of PineUm Coturty, Florid&
I R*40ay as sa forth in Maintemm Affidavits recorded in O.R. Bgok 3461, page 791 road O.R. Book
3461, page 992, Puh1iO Records ofPinellas County. Flo ids.
Parcel numbers:
09129116100000132010100 and
09129116100000132010200
P.02
h4
F
4 '
a
r
F
r
1
k
1
S
r
l
f
i
77 777-
-
Q I
Q r.
1 Sxi-'!i SECTiOPt 4 .76yti/;VSHIP Z? SDUTH. ?1AiVGE G EAST<
un
IS i
coo. it
3 -
? I ? ? n 3 s ' ' :.1 r5 i,y++ix .r w.. mc.ru
- 77
Ln - ? ' e•rnrr.
-
l/t-.r^7 ? •.?+? u rinl Ar w q I??,? . ? yyY??....// ?. =??Yi??/?F??ur LaMi.°"or+u?•r?. ?__ _ - _ -__ ???.?}}??+++
ti ? ?r rlrlf? mod. R.Ar. .elrY• r -/ •-- ? - -
m ?. /?. r u.a .? ?, ?? ??. s ry Ik S Tfl L?6?
?? ?y?? AVBHD?:.lT
_:r?L rrerr?+Wiw ar.rr
ter... p}_ ?es„f - r.
L III v REM
SO
I--
EXHIBIT B
SHOPPING CENTER SITE PLAN IDENT YIN PREMISES
(attached)
® 2001 Starbucks Corporation
B-1 Revised June 2006
4'1
616
SIDEWALK
RETAIL
Mc CULLEN BOOTH ROAD - CR 593
SIDEWALK
LOADING ZONES
SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN
Kapok Kove & McMullen Booth Road
Preliminary Schematic 12ilW6
•. FEE-26-07 09:14 PM ORIENTAL.RUG.BAZAAR
y
0
ro
ro
r=?
P. 03
1'f4
ry
r
C
<
^C
L7
727 728 9:543
5" 17:E? /oi-9A/
L^
Iga
L
P?
p
r•
is
?I
!f
}
-114
Y (r
pis
rf?,° t3?( vfr9-???,,QE(?C1??4ED Tc?f L OPOLI 5'P,1CE
s7t aL .s1rc X14 A = 9??? sF
?,cr ,rr?,o .9FX 15 /0; 4516- F. R6w1,,4ED
/?87P SF PRo1?Z ED
PLAAJ
y PCP, !/.4RI.4NC'E ?Q,tr'llrEO ?rf?7fB8
J PER 1?.9?PIANCE a?',?1NTE? 8?c?/88
41EXHIBIT B-1
DIAGRAM OF PREMISES PARKING AND TRASH LOCATIONS
?i
(attached)
B-1-1
#
--
~"..
,. ~
.
,...'"
l
...
t"
l
~
PROPOSED
ROAD
EXIST. 50" DIA. Of,'"
7
~
McMULLEN'- BOOTH
2~'
30'
10
2
W 592,99
!E---- HEW Z'LIVE OAKSCTYP)
LAND5CAPE
7
7
,
\
,
\ : DlfMP5TER
'-,' Ell)5T 78"OIAOM\
'---+--EXI5T 46"QIAOA'" '\
,
,
\
,
,
I
I
-+-EXIST 34 "OIA. OAI'>
~
SITE PLAN
1'= 20'
SITE
LEGAL
Parcell
The South 19':1 fao t f h
of the NW 1/~ of e th: S~ ;,:orth 603 feet of the Eaet 275 feet
RllnQe 1& Eeat p. of Section 9. To....n6h~l' 29 South.
East 157 5 ; t .In:~ll1a County. Florida LESS and EXCEPT the
ri9ht-of-~tly ae: shown .::~he and LESS and EXCEPT the I!xistin9
Right-OI-Way !tap as rec:orde:C:~~l~::d 8~th Road !tainteiined
?ubhc: Recorda of Plnellas County. Flori~:~ Boo)o; 8, Page 61.
ClEAR'W;A lEft
Parcel 2
Tbe South 400 fe.t of t.h )I b
of th. JIll 1/4 of the SV ;, ort 410 feet of lh. Eael 2~ f..t.
Rang_ 16 E t 4 of Section gO' Tovnahip 29 South.
and also L~..;i.~ ;~:h~~~~ tbe Ea..t. 151.5 feet tbereof
Booth Road tlaintained 13 Ri bt.Of~ ....y .a .hoyn on lh. lfdtul hr.
Plat Book B. Pa e 61: Pub Way !lap.. reco~ded in Road
florida. LESsrigh:-of-vay oar l~c RRec;:; of Pin.Usa Count.y~
Public Recorda of Pin_UII& Count.;~' Florid;.PIlgee 791 IInd 792.
LOCATION MAP
8
,
I
I I
: I
,PROPOSE9
: 20' HIGl-\
I I
I I
, I
I I
I
I
1
I
ADDITldN
I
I
I
I
I
-'ll
-",
-;t
8
..
-'"
"
I
I
I
I
9300 SF.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NI
td G11
u ul
0:: 0::1
ct. ct.,
I
I
I
o
.n
593. 6"
!- EXIST 6' HIGH fEMC:'/'
$
-1=
6
-- s~_n.Jj?.sTER
SITE
9
9
12
DATA
tURRENT 20lHNG
TOTAL SITE AREA
TOTAL PAVED AREA
EXISTING BUlLDING AREA
PROPOSED BUILDING AREA
TOTAL GREEJt AREA
GREEN AREA IN VEHI CULAR AREA
?ARKHIG REQUIRE
RETAIL AREA
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRE
TOTAL PARXING PROVIDED
CG
69.677.5 SQ. FT.
39.172.5 SQ, FT.
7.400 SQ. fT.
9.3005Q. FT.
13.805 SQ. F'T.
4.320 SQ. FT.
1.59 ACRES
,..
11'
13_
20.
10_
16.700 SO. FT. 1000 x 6 100.2 SPACES
100.2 SPACES
101. SPACES
1\1\1\
-""""""
_R
Anthony Melkey
(813)9~2738
SHOPPES AT THE SAVOY
PHASE II
Clearwater.
924 McMullen Booth Rd.
Florida
DATE: T 12.88
EO.
<t.
If
If
If
If If If
If
EO.
sm ,18" SINGlE FACE-UTLtTTERS (GRt:EN)~
24" INTERIOR \I1NOOW LOGO
ELEVATION @ FRONT ENTRANCE
o 1 2 3 4 8 12
~
SIDE ELEVATION
o 1 23 4 8 12
~
~.
..,~
~
.~
.~
'~'.
=
SPECIFY COLOR
~,P'1'J:" GREEN)"
>
NOTE: SIGNAGEIS FOR CONTRACTOR REFERENCE
ONL y, SEP ARA TE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
WILL BE REQUIRED FOR SIGN AGE
1,_20070
EJ
NOTES:
CD STARBUCKS CONTRACTSDIREC1LY \11TH SIGNAGE
.CONTRACTOR TO PERMIT, SlUPPL Y AND INSTALL
SlGNAGL. S1GNAGECONTRACTOR TO VERIFY
Sli)NAGE CQMPlIANCE \11TH LOCAL CODES AND
OBTAINPERMIT.AND LANDLORD APPROVAL
(3)PROVlDE 3" HIGH BLACK ACRYLlG STORE
ADDRESSDN . GLAZING.
CD GENE;RAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE
\11TH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH
AND INSTALL ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT INCLUDING
ALL. CONDUIT, \\IRE, CONNECTIONS, AND
BREAKER AT PANELBDARO NECESSARY TO
SERVESIGNAGE
CD ~~:~~SCro~~~J~c~~ ~~~~b SrOO~E
GC AS NEEDED. NOTIFY STARBUCKS CM
IMMEDIATELY IF SHOP DRA\I1NGS OR
INSTALLATION IS IN DISCREPANCY \11TH
STARBUCKS ARCHITECTURAL. DRAWINGS.
CD .~~~~t~\~rl~HS~~D~~NJ~GEN~g~ TRACTOR
PROVlDING A MINIMUM SCHEDULING NOTICE OF
4\\HKSAND 1 WEEK,PRIOR TO SCHEDULED
DATE; OFINSTALLAnON. STARBUCKS CM TO
PROVlOE GC \11TH SIGN AGE CONTRACTOR
CONTACT INF.ORMATIDN.
I
1
Sl:lErt TITlE
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
SCALE: 1/4".1'.()"
(DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS)
SHEET NUMBER
AtO
5
( I ( <p -I ( I ~
- - - :!l1
~
.----w-- ~\
~
I I i I
D D D D ;== = =
I f-0
r '----
weST E,LEVATION
9
@
!3
7
~
~ lil,ll F~R SHPP ]111 Foe CI ths ~Iilll IIN~ IT Rld>Rllllli
~ ~ IfIIY~ . r< i\~
. JW
J? I'i -
~,,'I
~Iiill' _____! -d :
~~ -~
7
Su t ~ ho
-- ~ewpl_ shop
~ifI
I _ wll SAU DER' ~ CC LLE(
1:1 'WathoDds~
(I
~
ITlrfr1
,
ll!iil . ( 01 D ShOI Illl
07 \'\ ~
.~
1:0
J;A STl.l;LE VAT fO ~
. PLAM NOTES
i
III
I
1... 6... GIIL.Y. DOWMSPOUTS PAllITED.
2. 8" GilLY. GUTTER PAINTED.
3. panTED Bl.OCX.
4. EXISTlJrl6 BUILDING.
S. KETAl. CAJiOPY.
e..flETAL CAP TO ltATeN CANoPY.
7. SMOOTH STUCCO.
8. STUCCO CAP.
9. STUCCO SCORBJOIHTS.
10. SJfOOTH STUCCO COLUlUl5.
11.. 12 Jr 12 Jl6RBLE TILE OM COlIC. BLOCK.
12.1/." TEIIPERED TlllTED GLASS 1M AlfODlZED 6LUII. FRAIlE.
13. RE1.OC4TE FOUJtTAlN.
14'0 SlSOOTH STUCCO ~ CORe. BLK.
i !
IT!
~
'. IT
II I I ~
~ \~
II
~
I III T
II Iii
rfli
fI( ! /
~ 1III1
'"
I I I
i I
I I
-Q 0-
<;l
~
Ii:
I'
ii;
I-
I.
II
, I
' ,
i'l
1111',==
i
Ii ~
Ii
ill'
!I
/I
:1
Ii'
FLOO~ LiNE-
I
NO'RTHELEVATION
<QCALE.; ite' ""'0'
1
;;~-..
~ ", ',-,'- :-.'
.;-.
(r)
l.u t'-
-~\i
...~.~
t~
~~
.~
iJ.:ri
'(C(
.'~
'"
II-
.~ UtJO'/I'~3'"IE
_:t4'
'I' AftJI6Jir
5KJ:T/ 4
AANGE..i(Q
SECTION
~.
i TOWNSHIP' 'Z~ SDUTH.
Sf)!l. .
. 't9-~ tI'
..I.-IMt:MUlJ,.E1J7BOOIU, ".'~.;.,~;,;:.
~~r:.;;.~.. .~~. -...
'.'
.-".... ,,;.-- ~'-'
. . . ..~
/:J.~f<<""tffis,,,.(().45~.) . . .!II
(iJ(o,.NII"'. 41I'9;#,<)j~e,Ji:"""_;"
it!<<.
. - ,.;;/.
If.'
1/,
~,..,
~i
. ;~~::::.:"..,.;:".;,
'a
1~
,'/ '
t.;;, 1./
':.~
'"
';~
;"
sJ",f
....
It.,p
fl"1
U.fr
-:]
;1
,f'!
".J<'
1f9Plll/i.r
5Ob.If"~~1II (KAPOK 1UJt~iR8."", P./1)
!I~9''ZI'~'E (...._ T8REn '-8.41,P.41)
. Pl?lEVIOU$ I/IIU UUE
.,.oJ. s~ ..~ ~jlo ~~.1l-
1;<.<8 , ".AS !i'v. ~ I
-.
:-"
"'..
1'i~
"n
..' 4/1.05 ~1fI4-
::, 1,Oxt# 4bX~
~~ r ".85 44)xil5 -.,
,0,,1 ~
< "6~\
ft-~ $11.11
",..1 ""AA
'" I AD,Ift> ~>ftO 44)(JI
~.
.01
.~.4D ~..",
. -sa.
!6".
~,4$'" .. jo;<l"
..,..,~
~".,~
18",71
",.~
i"
~1X~~ f1J(~ ,..so . ""
"..
",.
"
<''''
"'.
-~
, :;,
CIWC.
t..P.
WilleS
'51.~$ ,'1~4fI ,'J(~ !J1.'!!IX'
Ale HI r</Kl l../.(/& PE/I ;,
OA. 8((. .334, RIMe
.KOCr. 8,1'80 5!Je.99' "
.....,) ~
6'.cS'COMt.StAB Klfn./ "3.00 ' -'Q'"
I:.p.c. TRAA/5;:DIl'Mt:t( ~ I . $././t.
~. .,7.?
'f i ~
.,
.1';
~1JC~O ,,~ i1rfol r;" ""l".,l
!8,80
..
~
4fJ;tI~
</....
.
ifXIl
A~PJlA(.r
PAV6l11el.lr
,~...
,,'"
PARCeL
Ie
~
WI
..'"
~&D't,
~'
, ./
j.y I"
~t:.&~ d4- .
.:. x~~.
. .1304
~J
~..
IgM~' xl~,1
~~,~'
,,>1
(1;5'oR-t.'b~" P1~
o,w'u. 4 M3'Ii,)
"X
l..rI' "{ M,O
40~
~ :;
ItAO'~
.f'.f
I"
",,-.. ~'1I(6tI:f~/UUU~.:aI~t .
1fJ.( ';'J
5fJ3.00' ".I
i'
I
l<' ..<1 ,t> r..1 K T E t? ,R ...:~ C r
~.
';J (5. ':" '7 f;). 14 of /':5
I . ~,
8t..WKET 1i4SEMliIJT "orc:
A 14' WiDe QI6TRIBUTfOl./ EASeMEAlT 7' c4CJ..I SlOe OF 7J.fc Ocl./lClILJIJE
9{ECO"'ffottI!JiFf:?pl'ff,;~~ ~"u ~%~'ft. t/J%.etdJ"M.Y IU$TI(/./Ir1EIJT
EEQ.
If /4' WIPE OISTRI8(JTlOIJ E:ASEM6tlT 7'6MJI GfOC OF THE tCNlCl?l.IAJE
?feJl!foJ1~/w;'1{1:If~urc;,.:'W:;l!f~'$If€ ~~,8Y fI./S,.,?tIAAcAJT
N
Tillie LEl!ielJO
G> (lCuoreG PU/JJ( TREE
B:. 0Ii"ure5 PII 1M TI?EIi
G oeU07e5 CAMPlJOI?
o DEJJ07e5 IillR TI?EE I
. OIiU=' OAK TIlEE'(A5 UurEO)
. OIi/Joreg 01l/ef(6 116 1J07Cf)
lJE-SCI{IPTIOIJ :
'Tp~rci';l' i
Th.Soutb 193 teet Qt" the~_ol'th 601 teet of the EAst '~"I6 t48t
of th.:IN.'1/4 .ot-:the Sit 1/4.ot Seotion~. TOWpshipzs-"SOutb.,",
Jle.r)9. 16 last. P,i".ll.. '~CJunty-, Plprida ,LESS AND. EXCE.~"-J:'.h8 .
. Bltat 1'~' 65 : _t..'; :tMJ'eot ~Dd' _ ~~ AND ~XCEPl" the; .x1.atlng.
r1!lbt....t....y. ,. 'lIbGlmon .eba MoHuUan-8ooth aoall~hl\I.Din""
"ll1!Ibt~~f-lf.~".~1I .. raco~tll 1l"l'1I Plat Book. 8. l'..!i....~i~.
~l~~:~eoOr:da:.~t' P~11'8 ,coun~:l(" Florid.. ,t" .
CERT/FfliO 70:
1(.0, !lAUOli/( A!I TRU57liE O. TilE 1<.0. StfUO<R TR(/8T
IWD
LISA 1<, 5AI/OlEI('
AJJ(J
ATTOij'tiEYS' JIIfE lU6l./R4~ec: .UIJO,I/Jt!.
~lJiJE/(. #064iJ AIJD PEARSE
,.11 ADO 7DPO TlfEt!'S
'1-14- lill. Ufat'lJ.4,#..AU.""u ......
I
!JOTE: %tu';J%,;,f;VtS:/of ff/LgeO
OIJ oecUPJlTIOIJ 0, ~/STIUIi'
5UaOtVISlouS.
(;tlllE:I" eo'
IUftS Dr 8UJ(IIJG5:
"'KAp(Jl( 1EIl1tACE- R6. S.,
P;$5. 14 115
~;
,Th~' 's_ou.t.b- .~9: '~"~',ot -the' tI~t.b' ,410 - feet of ~he. Eaa.t,' :~?~" tee.t,-I
ot:..the.~.l/l1_;o~.th.: 8N .lI~ .o~'S."C~t.91l .~.. ,Town_hip ~g."SQU.th~.._; .
..JI,a1:l9. _1~ ~,.~,'''.,LS8S. '~-.EX~~.th.' Eoat :J.$7.$ faot:~,tb.reo,e_:.
. and ..1..0 Ll!,S11. ad!lttnlJ .r.l'!1l>t-.ot-way... ilh,""" on tha. iIoH"H!iri" :.-
Bootll;Il'1~':""ln1;a1nacl R19l>t..ot-way Map. as r.corda<;l',' in"~.'H'_
PJat . ~k B,Page 61, _.-~bl1:c, :~ecorda _of. ~inel1.a._I:~~n~y.(. .'_:
Florid.,. ~.t"J.gbt-ot-.way' per_ O.R. 1461, Pages 79J.:_'A-Qd";7~2"-'-,
~blic.'B.COl'd.s 'ot_ _Pin.~j.U& 'CQunty, I'lori"da. . ~ " '5:.-':,. ',=-.."..;.
80UAJDAR.Y AAJD TlE--W SIJ/lfIEV
OFr.Il,
eAUDEIl!8.4VOV PROPERTY
EAST:
\.u t!
-:: l
~.~: 'l.,;.
~.:~~ "'-1'
,
\{ "
.......
tj.j
f, l'-.
\'i)
:~~ [t)
,.. r..
....; ....t.
^
'-1..
"4:
:~:(
1
11-0
:JET"X."IJJ
eli~flO4cJMJ6 O.5'J.lftil-l
~AJ~ /VA(.(.
SURVEYOR'S CERTIfICATE: -- ,
'1Iel'tIlY tlrtlfy tllat . bouIl4ary sur.ey of tho Pl'9perty
dooc:rl.f!Id JooI'lOf\ .....c_1,eUd under ll\lI ,uporylllonon
MiltJ', 1.7, thet tMre ... M encroachlllenU;, .xnptas .~~
iho,Wl,that the-Iu~ c_ltes w.lth the requl.......t$ of
Cbap\lr ~1""", F.R.C. '. n P\'. .
Dotl #AY/I: /98? ~~~~~~:"d.' ,
Sur'~rNo .n.,,'f"'; ,
CJ.EARWATli~
PRUIUIIG FDaI
I<EAlIJE.1U 9AfJOEIl
(011 BIJ/" Vlt!.N 6I'eC
8ECUAIIl &.UFF5J Fl.
.......
POJEUAS' CQtJAlT'{
I I APIlIROVlD ay:
~-O--
. .. UJJf6R4g
R.A. IMGINIiP' RBI: ....~
Pt.A. 1YOA"'k .
lET
D'
F(.()RrOA
LLDVERAS BAUR & STEVENS
COllaUl.T11II8 ElllGlIIQIla - LAl\I!I auavnoll!l
,...,,.'7...... '
Il1d u.I. 1~ ...
..I0Il..'
1!J407
--------
...."
"
\
\
. -'--~~-I~-
, "I' l3
i /11< -rE'Ii':I1~tS ,1.4 415 -I' ...."...... ........- ............-
r--r.K.4I1~' eoOt< 3 ,
_...-" I f'l.
..- I UaTe;' M4TER ""UP
I S,4L//mRY SewER
SC"RP'/C"E6' FCJI"f' T~
L/EW ,4pO/T/CJ-u'
SH',4CC 8EC"(U/,(/eC!~
m TH'e B'/'s77L/d
tJ'U/CO/U6 ~,RY.eE9
~I~ j---t- .___~"<::/v
k ~
\";
~~II.
t.",~
~" ~
~U~
~~~~
PC;V''''' "f"U1"'-'
"
---
/
./
Aft! A.ft/CCFU Ba1TH Rt?AL/ - t::'.R 59.3
((/~ MA/$TA"'Ut!r/OA/ BY aT~A'.5)
-----
'-
"
-~-
~-_..
- ..
, #tJf... .
" tl!Jft.'':,.
~/ttfl,ll ,
- -,---0 ~
. . ~1
- -::::----- - -- - - - ---
/'
/
\ I /
\ ! I
-"'_'="L \ I I ..
~... ----~~ .Ot. --____..c._~...
.. .' .;J) . : : .~_..
. '1."~/ . .,' I I 1//
" ,\ I . ~
fJL :!-
'- ~~::.:<l ,~:C' - /~::Y;-.$::C$;-:%::.-fjf~"<'
".~
>l~
~~
~~
~~ ,
~/f I
~~ I ~ I
~~ ~
h~; ~,
\;~ :~
\l::~ f~--
(-!.~"
~\t
t','" : "
~ II,
~ ,/'"
K I ~
~ : ~
~ ~ I ~
~V~
~ ' I "
~ ~i-~:
\ , ~~I
~\~ i~:
/2.
/0
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
,r'"
.;</
17-25 Storm.tater R!Quirements
F1Jtrlltion of the f1rst Iju of run-off has been provided
for by 1l1pOund'nent of the first "-" of run..off and perco-
lation of this water through the porous concrete pavement.
Q' 0.51 ~~'I~C~~~~~t~.F./AC. x ~. 926 C.F.
Storage requi red
926 C.F.
Storage provided
" This water will percolate through the pavement section in
}:no~n 36 flours. The required percolation rate 15 as
Deepest section to percolate. 0.60 feet
0.60 feet f 36 hrs. ., 0.0167' Ihr. rate required
(0.02"/hr. )
Soil per USOA .. S.C.S. soil survey Is UC (Urban land
~:i:~~a e~::~e~J :~~/~:. expected to have a percolation
OENERAl NOTES:
1. All ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON N.G. V. DATUM. CONTOUR
INTE~VAl " ONE FOOT.
2. AlL OIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, SUBJECT TO FIELD SURVEY.
3. THE LOCATION OF All ,EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IS APPROXIMATE.
4. All EXISTING UTILITIES SHAll BE LOCATED BY THE CONTRACTOR
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
5. A LANDSCAPE ANO IRRIGATION PLAN SMAll BE SUBMITTED BY
OWNER-DEVELOPER PRIOR TO FI~L SITE PLAN REVIEW.
6. ALL EXISTING UTILITY 'LOCATIONS ANE APPROxiMATE, TAKEN FROM
CITY ATlAS SHEETS, 'AS-BUILT" PLANS, AND FIELD tflfORMATlON.
THE CONTRACTOR SHAlL VERIFV THE LOCATION OF All EXISTING
UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
7. THE CDHTRACTOR SHAlL NOTIFY All AFfECTED UTIliTY COMPANIES,
BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COIf'IENCING
CONSTRUCTION SO THEY MAY STAKE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY
AND ALL FACILITIES THEY MAY RAVE AfFECTING CONSTRUCTION.
8. BOUNDAllY INf'ORMATION IS BASEY Oft SURVEYS. PROVIDED BY,.OI/NER.
~
, .-~
The - South 193 fe.t. Dt .the North 603 feet ot the. Bast '1i5 'teet
of the IIlf 1/4 of the SII 1/4 of SectIon 9, TownehIp 29. South,
RaftcJe 16 East, Pinellas county, Florida LESS AND EXCEPT the
laat. 157..5 f..t the.r~t and LESS AlfD EXCEPT the Dieting
riCJht-ot-vay .a .bovn on the McMullen-Booth Road Maintained
tight-at-Way Map _ r.corded in Road Plat Book -:s, paqe 61,
Public.!t&COrde of P1JMllas County, Florida..
~
'l'be SoOth 400 f..t of- the North 410 feet ot the Ea.t 275 teet
of the NIl 1/4 of the 811 1/4 of SectIon 9, Tcnmahlp 29 South,
Ranq. 16 East, LESS AND EXCEPT the East 15-7.5 feet thereof
and alBa LESS exi.tinq right-ot-way a. shown on the McMullen-
Booth Road. Maintained Right-at-Way Hap as recorded .1n Road
Plat Book S, P6CJ. 61, Public Records ot Pinella. - County,
Florida, LESS right-of-way per O.R. 3461, Pages 791 and 792,
Public Records ot Plne.llas County, Florida.
~l\0~pes it tRe ~IY0Y
\~;:.--- - =--=------~-=::=:-::::..-
\
~W-NO/T ~
/~er_r_...
1"~'":6PC. z&,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1--
......-
/' I
/
I
I
. _ _ 1. _ _t<'.....-...
, L_:" I
I I
I I
L_ _I- -
I:; .. I
~ .1 ;j~f.,
..- I'
I{,,(' -; ...
"'~"'-'-Y'
_________JL__
J.
:/'
/'
&
~
.~t'
--~.-
~r.'?
.~I(rq: :-
oj.. " ,."
(' r/J
...
~~ )
~~ ,
w , .3
$' ,
l
""1-- ---
.: 4
I
NOTE: SIGRAGE AND'FENtING PER!tITS
ARE NOT I NClUDEO HEREON AND
WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PER-
MITTING.
~~l~~an:::;~~e Rf1~~n~; run-off has been prov\ded
for by 1mpouncment of the first Js." of run-off and perco~
lsUon of this water through the porous concrete pavement.
Q" 0.92 Ac. x 43560 S.F./Ac. x~ . 1670 C F
lZ 1nches/ft. Storll9~ ~equired
1670 C.F.
Storage provided
This water will percolate through the pavement section in
less. than 36 ,hours. The required percola't1on rate is as
follows:
Deepest section to percolate "II" 0.60 feet
0.60 feet t 36 hrs. :. O.0167'/hr. rate required ~
(0.20"/hr.) If\.~'\
Soil per USDA - S.C.S. soil survey is UC (Urban land t\J~ ~
Astatula complex) and is expected to have a percolation .....\.f~ \';.1.'\.:'- -;.
rate in excess of 20"/hr. ~ ~,,'-~ ~~'" ~'f$.f~
~~ ;~~~ "- ~,~,
<<.~~. .l!lt~',y
,~~ ~~~~.'io)'
~~\V:,~~I ", .
\.\.\J
.....,...----.../
!!Qlli :~Cn~DL~~m~\~~l BE
AWAY FROM ANY ADJACENT
RESIDENTIAl AREA.
TABULATION OF HOTES:
1. Bufld1ng -area
2. Sidewalk area
3. Pavement area
4. ~en space
otil
0.316 Ac.
0.068 Ac.
0.880 At,
0.336 Ac.
1.60. Ac.
19.75J
4.25J
55.00J
21. OOJ
100.OOJ
NOTES:
......-rxisti';9 2onin9 CG
2. landscaping will be provided In
accordance with' City requirements.
A landscape ,and Irrl9atlon Plan
will be su"'l ttelt by others.
]I Includes parous concrete area.
ND DATE
REVIS'DNS
CKo.
IMPERVIOUS ARWDETENTION REQUIREilENTS:
tls~~~'d~~~a;.~_rvious Areas: 9320 S.F.
2. Asphalt or concrete
~aYement area
otal
~ at tIw [JJ~
G'~..w~/rc t:'~A/.s77f'U:'T/~tC/ .4:,4,(/
tX6W~ fl~ a:w.un' Fca.<"/PA
PUPARID FDA: APPROVED IY:
. ~.NV~H RooM'
. ,w8l!UFFI//EIY &,aea .&
C:CI!"A/If' 4CUFR>:
FCa:f'/OA >>~Q
~M!Yl/f)545 ~A!J
34174 S.F.
43494 S.F.
t:roD~~~~d~~:eI;~RlJel"YiOUS ArNS~3744 S.F.
2. Asphalt area/concrete 2960 S.F.
3. Porous' ('On('1"'(tte area
(38324 S.F.. O.A. x 501: I"1l. )19162 S.F.
TaU 1 35866 S. F.
Therefore, no significant increase_ in run~off is anticipated.
/,OOC.l' V" .oAHW/Ud1:!1
.:!fM!"Er'u a'""~R/pr/dV
,.. t:QM~/rl!" d:1usr.<'l:::'<1r/al./ ~.v
2. TY'P/t:'AC LAEr.4/c.-9
:J. S/Tc ~/tW SAR!/F/bf?;
LLOVERAS SAUR & STEVENS
CONSULTING ENGINEERS - LAND SURVEYORS
1"13-7".3115
3a10 u.s. 11 N.
o.
CUA.wAnA. Fl.OInOA :14111 a
/94t:7 7
r~.IJ~( 'fIrE !('a..!ff??f'q4T(~,(/) ;:>~tCI'~
Joe MO.