CONSULTANT SERVICES PERTINENT TO PARKING NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER
I
I
AGREEMENT
FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ~ day of j)ocy. ,200 I,
by and between the City of Clearwater, Florida (CITY) and Urbitran Associates, Inc.
(CONSULTANT).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS the CITY desires to engage the CONSULTANT to perform professional
services pertinent to such work in accordance with this Agreement; and
WHEREAS the CONSULTANT desires to provide such professional services in
accordance with this Agreement; and
WHEREAS the CITY selected the CONSULTANT in accordance with the competitive
selection process described in Section 287.055 ofthe Florida Statues, and based on
information and representations given by the CONSULTANT in a proposal dated
October I, 2001.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits which
will accrue to the parties hereto in carrying out the terms of this Agreement, it is mutually
understood and agreed as follows:
1.0 Proiect Understanding:
Urbitran Associates, Inc. (Urbitran) in association with Chance Management Advisors
(CMA) understands that it is the desire of the City of Clearwater to complete a Parking
Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study for Downtown Clearwater. It is also our
understanding that the area of study will be bounded by Drew Street to the north, Myrtle
A venue to the east, Chestnut Street to the south, and the Bayfront to the west.
October, 2001
rA
() 2 ..~. ,~, Iy-," "
.> ."
/
(;)
I
I
2.0 Proiect Scope of Services
The following is the phased approach for the project:
2.1 Phase lIProject Kick-Off Meeting
We propose to start this by conducting one (1) project kick-off meeting with
representatives of the City of Clearwater to clarify the objectives of this study, set
milestone meetings, reconfirm the study area, interview key stakeholders identified by
the City of Clearwater, and set protocol for establishing contacts, lines of communication
and transfer and distribution of information.
2.2 Phase 2/Parking Supply and Demand Analysis
After completion of the kick-off study a review of previous studies completed by the City
of Clearwater and an update of relevant studies to accurately reflect the current utilization
and projection of future demand will be completed. This will be accomplished by:
1. Verifying on-street and off-street parking demand within the study area (private
and public sector).
2. Identifying turnover and parking duration characteristics of on-street and off-
street parking within the study area (private and public sector).
3. Identifying and comparing the current parking demand with the present
supply/utilization and determine deficit and surplus parking areas.
4. Identifying frequencies of illegal parking occurring within the study area.
S. Identifying current and future parking generators in and around the study area and
assessing their impact on existing and future parking inventory within the study
area.
6. Conducting shopper, employee, and business owner parking surveys and
gathering input from stakeholders identified by the City.
7. Conducting two (2) public workshop meetings to obtain valuable public input on
parking issues, real or perceived, to gain consensus on parking alternatives and
future decisions.
8. Meeting with the City of Clearwater representatives to review preliminary data.
The data collected will be analyzed and synthesized to determine a comprehensive
overview of the parking requirements needed to meet the goals for maintaining and
enhancing economic growth in the study area.
2.3 Phase 3ffraffic Impact Analysis
The traffic analysis will focus on identifying traffic operational issues and constraints as
well as potential improvement opportunities in downtown Clearwater associated with the
October, 2001
2
rA
I
I
planned reconstruction and realignment of the Memorial Causeway Bridge connecting
downtown Clearwater with Clearwater Beach.
The resulting access changes to and from the new bridge can be expected to affect traffic
circulation and operations on roadways and intersections in the vicinity of the bridge.
Additionally, the new bridge will result in the realignment of Court and Chestnut Streets
resulting in the elimination of parking lot #15 and reconfiguration of parking lot #22 near
the County courthouse.
We will approach the traffic study area as being a subset of the larger study area
identified in the kick-off meeting to include the roadways and intersections that stand to
be potentially affected by the planned road closures and realignment, and by the
realignment of the bridge itself.
Two traffic-related scenarios will be studied:
1. A "typical" summer weekday or weekend (Saturday or Sunday) scenario or,
2. An event-related scenario (such as the Jazz Holiday in mid-October or the Spring
recess in March-April) on a weekday or weekend day
As directed by the City of Clearwater at the initial project kick-off meeting, we will
establish a traffic study area and identify the analysis scenario that best addresses the
project issues and concerns.
The baseline traffic condition will be established using a combination of existing data as
well as new data to be collected. We will request and obtain all recent traffic data
(counts, roadway inventory, signal timings, etc) from the city and determine their
usability for this study vis-a.-vis the analysis periods (i.e., was the data collected during
the appropriate time).
We will also collect new data at critical intersections for example along Drew Street,
Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue. In addition, traffic conditions at selected critical
locations, such as bridge access points will be videotaped for future reference and use
throughout the study. Pertinent roadway features such as roadway widths; number of
lanes, pavement markings will be verified in the field.
Traffic flow maps will be prepared for the traffic analysis scenario showing turning
movements at critical study intersections within the traffic study area. Capacity analyses
will be performed to establish intersection capacities, levels of service and other
appropriate measures of effectiveness for the baseline condition using standard practices,
procedures and analysis tools.
October, 2001
3
rfj
I
I
Plans for the new bridge will be examined to identify the access modifications, planned
roadway closures and/or reconfiguration and new bridge alignment. Based on the access
changes and roadway modifications, we will identify potential alternate roadways to
which traffic can be expected to shift either to access the new bridge or because of
planned closures. In identifying alternate roadways, we will examine roadway and
intersection capacity, adjacent uses and route directness.
Traffic shifts will be quantified and the baseline traffic flow maps will be revised to
reflect Future Traffic Conditions associated with the changes in access and roadway
configuration.
In addition to traffic impacts, the impacts of these modifications on parking will also be
addressed.
Based on the location and extent of potential traffic impacts, we will identify and
recommend appropriate traffic mitigation strategies to improve traffic flow and reduce
congestion. Among the types of improvements we will examine are roadway re-striping,
signal timing changes, channelization, modification of traffic control devices, turn
prohibitions and street direction changes. The effectiveness of these measures will be
quantified and presented using the proposed traffic simulation model.
In addition to vehicular capacity improvement measures, we will also identify the need
for and effectiveness of the potential for traffic calming measures, improved signage,
enhancements to pedestrian facilities, and improvements to transit facilities and
emergency vehicle access. We will also investigate opportunities to incorporate
pedestrian-friendly design features at the terminal points of Drew and Cleveland Streets
that could provide an enhanced gateway treatment for Downtown Clearwater.
As part of this phase, we will also examine previous report recommendations for a Park
and Ride system linking beach parking with lesser used downtown parking areas through
the use of a shuttle system. This evaluation will also include our recommendations on the
feasibility of a light rail station for downtown to beach transit. Issues such as cost,
methods of funding, usage, effectiveness, scheduling, and public acceptance of such
systems will be reviewed.
2.4 Phase 4/Site(s) Selection
Once we fully understand the magnitude of the parking demand inherent to a particular
site or sites identified by Phase 2/Parking Demand and Supply Analysis we will be able
to focus on site selection.
Our first task will be to thoroughly understand the particular site, or sites, characteristics.
This will enable us to gauge the massing potential and impacts on the adjacent
October, 2001
4
(i>
I
I
surroundings. We will examine the site's topography, property boundaries and
immediate adjacent uses. From this study, we can begin to assess the opportunities for
access and egress to a proposed facility and the possible traffic impacts. We will also
conduct an analysis of major fatal flaw issues, which are essential to the viability of each
concept.
Our next task will be to begin to understand the dynamics of the property or parcels
geometric layout. From this review, our staff will layout multiple design alternatives,
which will function on the site. For example, we will determine whether a two bay or
three bay garage is appropriate, or if angled parking is necessary to meet design criteria.
We will also factor in the means of access between floors: sloping parking ramps, speed
ramps, helical ramps, multiple garage entrances utilizing topographic site opportunities,
the openness of the garage perimeter to avoid costly ventilation requirements and a host
of other considerations. All of these factors and others are considered while laying out
the simple single line diagrams of the structures.
Once this work has been completed, our next major and critical consideration is the
various structural systems most appropriate and cost effective to each particular site
concept. Structural alternatives to be reviewed include: pre-cast concrete; cast-in-place
concrete with or without post tensioning reinforcements; steel framed structure with cast-
in-place decks; and proprietary systems, which maybe cost-effective to the geographic
area. The preliminary structural system selection affects the parking layout and overall
dimensions of the structure but need not be finalized at this time unless the site or design
is very constrained and little flexibility exists, or the design is specifically related to the
expansion of an existing garage; in which case it is very likely the existing structural
system will be utilized.
Upon preliminary selection of the structural system, approximate column grid locations
will be developed. This along with vertical grade change (ramps and slopes) within the
garage will be reviewed to determine where pedestrian stairs, elevators, and security
factors will be considered. All these factors will be reviewed in the concept designs
supplied by our team.
2.5 Phase 5/Feasibility of Additional Parking Facilities
The feasibility of constructing additional parking garages will be based not only on the
parking needs assessment, but also on the City of Clearwater's financial condition and
ability to absorb the cost of additional facilities. In this task we will perform the
following:
1. The areas of parking deficiency will have been identified and confirmed in Phase
2. These areas will be compared with vacant properties available for garage
construction, or properties that the City could purchase as construction sites.
October, 2001
5
tIJ
I
I
Certain sites identified in the Downtown Clearwater: Our Downtown master plan will
be verified for feasibility. The sites will be. discussed with the City as this analysis
proceeds.
2. Estimated construction costs will be developed, using team expertise tempered by
Florida typical design standards and costs. Desired operating characteristics will
be discussed with the City, and then operating costs will be estimated. Available
City financing methods will be discussed, and interest rates and amortization
periods established. Any special considerations (e.g., debt cap, City bond ratings,
required reserves, etc.) will be identified through discussions with City
representatives. Once these issues have been resolved, debt service will be
calculated.
3. Parking rates for projected facilities will be developed, based upon existing rate
structures in the area of the sites and the City's typical rate increase patterns.
Revenues will be projected for at least five years, as will expenses.
4. Up to three (3) pro forma will be developed for potential garage sites. Each pro
forma will be based upon a set of assumptions about revenues, operating
expenses, financing and debt service, and facility use. The assumptions will
accompany each pro forma so that the City may understand how figures were
established, and use the pro forma later if assumptions change.
5. A determination of the feasibility of each project will be made in conjunction with
the City. If each garage must stand alone in terms of being financially self-
supporting, this will be evident from the pro forma. If, however, feasibility is
based upon the ability of the entire parking system to be self-sufficient, or if the
City is interested in subsidizing a certain garage because of potential economic
development benefits, the discussion must be widened to establish "feasibility".
The financial analysis described above will be a forecast of how a potential
garage would perform financially, but the feasibility of it being constructed may
be a decision that is based on additional variables important to the City.
6. An implementation plan for constructing any additional facilities will be
developed, illustrating any property that must be purchased, an estimated schedule
for development, and the financial performance of the facilities.
2.6 Phase 6/Parking Management Plan
Ideally, a parking management plan should make full use of empirical parking
performance indicators, scientifically gathered and measured against industry standards,
in order to properly assess existing conditions. This approach ensures that the
appropriate strategies are applied to observed conditions or programmatic deficiencies.
October, 2001
6
t.P
I
I
For example, without definite knowledge of violation capture rates for overtime parking
infractions, sampled parking turnover indicators and average durations may lead to
improper conclusions about the appropriateness of the surveyed regulations. Likewise,
inappropriate conclusions regarding parking policies may be reached without a proper
assessment of the many factors that contribute to an area's "parking equilibrium". These
factors include the on and off-street parking prices, the ticket fine and penalty structure,
and the relative effectiveness of ticket processing and collection program strategies.
The following outline identifies study elements contained within this phase of the project.
Off-Street Parking
1. Review current off-street parking operational hours as they relate to peak and
non-peak parking demand periods. (Demand periods obtained through a sampling
of turnover and duration in identified areas in the downtown business district).
2. Review current occupancy rates.
3. Review of rate structures, including the feasibility of "special event" parking rates
versus free parking.
4. Review staffing levels and determine effectiveness.
5. Review and evaluate existing revenue control equipment and procedures.
6. Review any current merchant validation parking programs and evaluate feasibility
of new programs.
7. Evaluate the loss of current parking inventory caused by the new Memorial
Causeway Bridge alignment (Lot #22 & #15).
8. Evaluate the feasibility of shared parking usage with downtown religious
institutions and other private and public sector parking inventories.
9. Identify and evaluate seasonal fluctuations in parking demand.
On-Street Parking (Parking Meter Program)
1. Review current parking meter equipment, inventory, and placement.
2. Review hours of operation of on-street parking meters.
3. Review on-street parking rate structures and time limits.
4. Review loading zone policies and provide recommendations for future use.
5. Review current on-street parking operational hours as they relate to peak and non-
peak parking demand periods. (Demand periods are obtained through a sampling
of turnover and duration in identified areas.
Parking Enforcement
1. Review existing parking enforcement policies (i.e. free parking for "special
events") and procedures.
October, 2001
7
riJ
I
I
2. Review staffing levels and determine effectiveness of performance.
3. Review feasibility of centralizing administrative oversight of enforcement duties
to Parking System from Police Department
4. Review the current methods of parking meter enforcement to include the hours
and days of patrols, the number of enforcement officers deployed, the type of
summons issuance equipment being utilized, and the overall effectiveness of the
operation
5. Evaluate any additional enforcement efforts such as booting, towing, or scoffiaw
programs.
6. Review the type of equipment currently in use, and evaluate its effectiveness and
reliability.
7. Assess the method of coin collection, security procedures for coin handling, and
controls in place for tracking the assignment and safeguarding of vault and upper
housing keys
Parking Administration
We will evaluate the existing organizational structure as it relates to service delivery to
include:
1. All revenue and expenses.
2. A review of cashiering procedures and policies.
3. A review of cash collection procedures and existing security measures.
4. Examination of existing management software to determine the effectiveness in
providing data in an acceptable format, and report generating capability.
5. A review of the number of employees and level of responsibility.
6. A review of public service hours of operation and staffing levels.
7. A review of the City's web site for information regarding downtown parking
information and make recommendations.
8. A review of special event operating procedures and provide recommendations.
9. Overall operational expenses
10. Revenue and incentive programs
11. Number of employees
12. Competitive entities (private and other parking operators)
13. Equipment and software
14. Maintenance efforts
15. Privatization levels and opportunities
16. Level of customer satisfaction with service levels currently provided
One (1) site meeting will be required to investigate and review the conditions and
systems listed in this phase.
October, 2001
8
f;
I
I
2.7 Phase 7/Draft Report
Upon completion oftasks one (1) through five (5) our team will produce six (6) copies of
our draft report which fully outlines our findings. Our report format will be submitted in
8 Y2 X 11 format containing full color graphs, charts, photographs, renderings, and/or
schematic designs.
2.8 Phase 8/Final Report and Presentation
After delivery of our draft report to the City of CleaIWater, we will meet with City of
CleaIWater officials to gather their input and comments regarding all aspects of the report
to date. After receiving this valuable input, our team will incorporate the required
changes to produce and deliver our final report and presentation.
3.0 Proiect Schedule and Team Members:
3.1 Project Schedule
Based on approval of this agreement by the City of CleaIWater City Commission on
November 1,2001, completion of this project will be as follows:
Phase l/Project Kick-Off .......................... 10 days
Phase 2/Parking Supply and Demand Analysis. 45 days
Phase 3/Traffic Impact Analysis . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ... 45 days
Phase 4/Site Selection
45 days
Phase 5/Feasibility
60 days
Phase 6/Parking Management ....................
90 days
Phase 7/Draft Report
150 days
Phase 8/Final Report
160 days
October, 2001
9
fIJ
I
I
3.2 Team Members
Team Members assigned to CITY project by the CONSULTANT shall not be
removed from the project until alternate personnel acceptable to the CITY are
approved in writing by the CITY. Team members are identified as:
. Richard Matarangelo, Project Manager
. Brian Bartholomew, Deputy Project Manager
. Barbara Chance, Principal (Chance Management Advisors)
. Michael Horodniceanu, Principal-in-Charge
. Atma Sookram, Senior Traffic Engineer
. David Sampson, Transit
4.0 Client Responsibilities
It is expected that the City of Clearwater will be responsible for the following:
1. Provide access to areas required for any necessary inspection or survey.
2. Provide all available parking information available and applicable record drawings,
specifications, and other relevant data (preferably in electronic format).
3. Designate a representative, or representatives to act on the behalf of the City of
Clearwater for this project.
4. Examine documents submitted by the Consultant and promptly render City of
Clearwater input pertaining thereto to avoid unnecessary delays in the progress of the
Consultant's work.
5. Provide all base maps in electronic format (Auto Cad 14 or later) if available.
It is understood that the Consultant has the right to rely upon the accuracy and
completeness of all data furnished to it.
October, 2001
10
f{)
I
5.0 Fees
5.1 Basic Fees
I
The above-described Scope of Services shall be delivered based on the following fee
schedule:
Phase l/Project Kick-Off Meeting
Phase 2/Parking Supply and Demand Analysis ., ..... ...........
Phase 3/Traffic Impact Analysis .... ..................... .........
Phase 4/Site Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Phase 5/F easibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Phase 6/Parking Management . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .
Phase 7/Draft Report
.............................................
Phase 8/Final Report
.............................................
PROJECT TOTAL
...........,.........................................
5.2 Payment
$ 8,000
$20,000
$15,000
$15,000
$20,000
$10,000
$ 5,000
$ 5,000
$98,000
CONSULTANT shall bill CITY upon completion of each step as described in the 5.1
Basic fees. CITY agrees to pay after approval of the City Project Manager under the
terms of the Florida Prompt Payment Act F.S. 218.70.
5.3 Additional Services
Services requested of Urbitran or Chance Management Advisors, which are not described
in the scope of services for this study, will be billed at the prevailing hourly rates
attached, based on the specific professional discipline required. Any additional work
requested, which is not in the scope of services covered under this agreement, must first
be authorized in writing by the City of Clearwater before the start of any requested
additional work can proceed. The Hourly Rate Schedule in effect for this agreement is
our most current standard rates and is included with this proposal (Exhibit "A").
11
rP
October, 2001
I
I
5.4 Reimbursables
The following reimbursable expenses are included in this agreement:
. Blueprints, computer prints for Parking Consultant's/Engineer's internal work
. Travel and out-of-town related expenses (mileage, subsistence, hotel, etc.)
. Long distance telephone calls
. Photographs, reproductions, telecopier/fax services, courier services, and express
materials
The following reimbursable expenses are excluded from the expected reimbursable
expenses related to this project and shall be billed to the City of Clearwater at actual cost
plus 10% administrative fee should they be determined necessary by the City of
Clearwater as the project progresses:
. Other consultants, models, and special presentation materials
. Fees and expenses for securing approvals from governing authorities
. Blueprints and computer prints for approvals, other consultants, or public agencies
6.0 TERMINATION
6.1 The CITY, at its sole discretion may terminate this contract by gIvmg
CONSULT ANT ten (10) days written notice of its election to do so and by
specifying the effective date of such termination. The CONSULTANT shall be
paid for its services through the effective date of such termination. Further, if
CONSULTANT shall fail to fulfill any of its obligations hereunder, this contract
shall be in default, the CITY may terminate the contract, and CONSULTANT
shall be paid only for work completed.
7.0 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
7.1 Workers Compensation and Employers Liability. The CONSULTANT
operates as an independent contractor and shall procure and maintain, for the life
of this Agreement, Workers Compensation Insurance covering all employees
with limits meeting all applicable state and federal laws. This coverage shall
include Employers Liability with limits meeting all applicable state and federal
laws.
7.2 General Liability. The CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain, for the life
of this Agreement, General Liability Insurance. This coverage shall be on an
"Occurrence" basis. Coverage shall include Premises and Operations;
Independent Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual
Liability. Coverage shall be no more restrictive than the latest edition of the
October, 2001
12
~
I
I
Commercial General Liability policies of the Insurance Services Office (ISO).
This policy shall provide coverage for death, bodily injury, personal injury or
property damage that could arise directly from the performance of this
Agreement.
The minimum limits of coverage shall be $500,000 per Occurrence Combined
Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability.
The CITY shall be included and identified as an Additional Insured under the
policy/ certificate of insurance.
7.3 Business Automobile Liability. The CONSULTANT shall procure and
maintain, for the life of the Agreement, Business Automobile Liability
Insurance. The minimum limits of coverage shall be $500,000 per Occurrence
Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage
Liability. This coverage shall be an "Any Auto" type policy. Coverage shall be
no more restrictive than the latest edition of the Business Automobile Practices
of the Insurance Services Office (ISO).
The CITY shall be included and identified as an Additional Insured under the
policy/certificate of insurance.
7.4 Professional Liability Insurance. The CONSULTANT shall procure and
maintain for the life of the Agreement, Professional Liability Insurance. This
insurance shall provide coverage against negligent acts, errors or omissions by
the CONSULTANT in the performance of this contract. The limits of coverage
shall be $2,000,000.
7.5 Indemnify. The CONSULTANT agrees to defend, save and hold the CITY, its
agents, assigns and employees, harmless from all claims or causes of action,
including costs and attorney's fees, and all judgements whatsoever, involving
personal injury, bodily injury, death, or property damage, arising out of any
negligent act or omission, or the violation of any federal, state or local law or
regulations by the CONSULT ANT, its subcontractors, agents, assigns, invitees
or employees in connection with this Agreement.
7.6 Supplemental Provisions. The insurance coverages and conditions afforded by
the above mentioned policies shall not be suspended, voided, canceled or
coverage reduced except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified
mail return receipt requested has been given to both the CITY Public Works
Administration and Risk Management Offices of the CITY.
October, 2001
13
iP
I
I
Certificates of Insurance meeting the specific required insurance provIsIons
specified within this Contract! Agreement shall be forwarded to both the CITY
Public Works Administration and Risk Management Offices of the CITY and
approved prior to the start of any work. After review, the Certificate will be filed
with the City Clerk as a part of the official contract file.
Receipt and acceptance of the CONSULT ANT Certificate of Insurance, or other
similar document does not constitute acceptance or approval of amounts or types
of coverages which may be less than required by this Agreement.
In lieu of providing the CITY with copies of its insurance policies, the
CONSULTANT agrees, with ten (to) days of a written request of the CITY, to
make available for inspection and the taking of notes any original policy of
insurance that is required by the terms of this Agreement.
Any of the following CITY representatives will be permitted to inspect the
policies on insurance: any member of the CITY'S legal staff or the CITY'S
outside legal counsel, City Manager's staff, Risk Management staff, or the CITY
COMMISSION. The policies of insurance to be produced will be made available
at the offices of the CITY in Clearwater, Florida.
8.0 INTERESTS OF PARTIES
CONSULTANT covenants that its officers, employees and shareholders have no
interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would
conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services required to be
performed under this Agreement.
9.0 PROPRIETARY MATERIALS
Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall transfer, assign and make
available to CITY or its representatives all property and materials in CONSULTANT'S
possession belonging to or paid by the CITY.
10.0 ATTORNEYS FEES
In the event that either party seeks to enforce this Agreement through attorney at
law, then the parties agree that each party shall bear its own attorney fees and
costs, and that jurisdiction for such an action shall be in a court of competent
jurisdiction in Pinellas County, Florida.
October, 2001
14
(P
I
I
11.0 STANDARD CONDITIONS
This agreement shall bind the respective parties hereto and each and all of their heirs, and
successors, and assigns.
October. 2001
15
~
I
I
Acceptance of the foregoing agreement and execution of acceptance of said agreement by
the CITY as Client, and the Consultant, as evidenced by the signature by duly authorized
officers or representatives of both parties in the space provided shall thereupon constitute
the services agreement, effective upon execution of both parties.
Brian J. Aungst
Mayor-Commissio er
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
By: ~""B.~"lI:
William B. Home II
City Manager
Approved as to form:
Attest:
~,c~
e C. Hayman
Assistant City Attorney
~,~'~'JIJdt; ~ (!bAh
O~Cynth . Goudeau
1) City Clerk
(Acceptance by CONSULT ANT)
Witness
Or Attest:
Accepted and Executed at our N.Y.,
New York Office
Date
/I I/){ /0/
I I
~~
Michael F. Horodniceanu, Ph.D., P.E.
President
October, 2001
16
~
I
I
EXHIBIT" A"
URBITRAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES*
Principal
Associate Principal
P~bngOperntionsAnwy~
Chief ArchitectJPlanner
Senior ArchitectJPlanner
ArchitectJPlanner (II)
ArchitectJPlanner (I)
Chief Landscape ArchitectJPlanner
Senior Landscape ArchitectJPlanner
Landscape ArchitectJPlanner (II)
Landscape ArchitectJPlanner (I)
Chief Trnffic Engineer/Planner
Senior Trnffic Engineer/Planner
Trnffic Engineer/Planner (il)
Traffic Engineer/Planner (I)
Chief Civil Engineer
Senior Civil Engineer
Civil Engineer (II)
Civil Engineer (I)
$200.00/hour
$150.00/hour
$ 125.00/hour
$ 130.00/hour
$ll5.00/hour
$ 90.00/hour
$ 75.00/hour
$ 130.00/hour
$115.00/hour
$ 90.00/hour
$ 75.00/hour
$ 130.00/hour
$115.00/hour
$90.00/hour
$75.00/hour
$ 130.00/hour
$115.00/hour
$ 90.00/hour
$ 75.00/hour
October, 2001
1
I
I
EXHIBIT" A"
URBITRAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES*
(Continued)
Chief Structural Engineer $130.00/hour
Senior Structural Engineer $1 15.00/hour
Structural Engineer (ll) $ 90.00/hour
Structural Engineer (I) $ 75.00/hour
Electrical Engineer $ 85.00/hour
CADD Technician $ 60.00/hour
Technical Typing $ 45.00/hour
Technician/Surveyor $ 35.00/hour
*Effective Through December 31, 2001
October, 2001
2
I
I
EXHIBIT "A"
Chance Management Advisors
Hourly Rate Schedule
Principal $205.00/hour
Senior Operations Consultant! $ 130.00/hour
Project Manager
Planner $ 85.00/hour
Senior Analyst $ 80.00/hour
Analyst $ 60.00/hour
Support $ 50.00/hour
October, 2001
3