4821-89.... v:.e; ... .. t? r '•s: •^l• .. . ,?-w^.,....i;s ." ,...^,..,,. .. ,-40 ..` :: 4;. _ e..,,y;
??{..>' " `•'4-fr "'txai r'.r73L;.'?-?...<»•r.;:?i.?. ;. , ;e ?•y?, e.b :nr,?=1,
..
•,r
",?yy 3
..., ??'•^? A. -...:..1.?3'3?leC::.1:,i?'::...°?s..,.. .`?ds.IrL?•sA7•'•:'°t« .-....°_. xCL?.,..tF _.-,t:?S?ReSt.n 2 S"
?s]?r.`is°t?•SKY:.ra°l:'ir.s?L-.?:?.lief'r?`.;:•.it\i..•)i:?????•?.'YSI????L,??????? .. a'.
.. _ .
?4J
j5 V 4 •.
}f iel?
c} S :i?4
. ' •K
1
D
AN ORDINANCE OF THE. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
REDEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY IN ORDER TO
EXCLUDE THEREFROM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF DREW STREET, IMMEDIATELY EAST OF
EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA,
UPON A FINDING THAT THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE
CRITERIA OF SECTION 171.043, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR
FAILURE TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE
COUNTYWIDE LAND USE PLAN UPON WHICH ANNEXATION WAS
PREDICATED; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater, Florida, has received a petition from the
owner'of the real property described herein requesting the City to exclude the
real property described herein from the corporate limits of the City; and
WHEREAS, the annexation of the property described herein by Ordinance
4761-88 was predicated upon the expectation that the proposed amendment to the
Countywide Land Use Plan for Pinellas County would be approved-in due course,
so that the property may be "developed for urban purposes" within the meaning
of Section 171.043, Florida Statutes; and
fwl_;ti
,s
WHEREAS, the nonapproval of the proposed amendment to the Countywide Land
Use Plan will mean that the property will remain undeveloped for an indefinite
length of time, and therefore the property will fail to meet the criteria of
Section 171.043, Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, all applicable requirements of Florida law have been complied with
in connection with this ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Pursuant to Section 171.051, Florida Statutes, the following
described property is hereby excluded from the corporate limits of the City of
Clearwater, Florida, and the boundary lines of the City are redefined to exclude
the following:
See Exhibit A attached hereto.
Section 2. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning Director
are directed to show the revised boundary of the City, following the exclusion
of the property described herein, upon the official maps and records of the City.
Section . This ordinance shall take effect December 31, 1989, if the.
proposed amendment to the Countywide Land Use Plan for Pinellas County relating
to the property described herein has not been finally approved on or before that
date; otherwise, this ordinance shall not take effect. Not earlier than the
effective date, but not later than 30 days after the effective date, the City
1
4 Yn.• '
..-'. ; . ,:'Ri'? - 4ir- .- ,..e ? x , . -. y ..,r .. »?._...?..,.. , , -'4+yl?y?'??,??.?y?^?:; ?o ?N';y •_ +: Y'.c4??t . • v v"; - 7
Clerk shall file one certified copy with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of
Pinellas County, Florida, and shall file another certified copy'With the Florida
Department of State.
PASSED ON FIRST READING.. June 1, 1989
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED June 15, 1989
" to arv y
Mayor-Commissioner
Attest: ,
14r?1
yn a .'_. ou eau
City.1drk,•
Approved.as to form and correctness:
A. Galbraith, Jr.
City Attorney
c gyp: } ; .fi.. ..
2
?. y "••1r ,?. 3. •4++?.?+ '?Il?. „•i.'??a-;i?'y'?•wl?,L?,',;".A t•7
.rj .. . ? «w??,r ?T? •'?'?"•I?:Mwf?si.1..4 ri.- f` . ,,,'.• H?•?
f ., .- ,w••?::`ai:'.:. M Iwo„ r.,- .' ,
- t •L'?xa^J
•
s '
? L
1 • i i
L '
That part of Section 8, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County,
Florida, described as follows:
Commence at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 8,
and run thence S 89°41'09" E, 437.74 feet (487.66 feet measured) along the
South boundary of Section 8; thence N 01°27'18" E, 50.01 feet to the North
right-of-way of Drew Street for the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence
continue N 01°27'18" E, 1288.16 feet to the 40 acre line; thence S 89°36'09"
E, 2234.09 feet along the 40 acre line also being the South boundary of
Brigadoon of Clearwater and Its extension thereof, according to the map or
plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 91, Page 35, of the public records of
Pinellas County, Florida; thence S 00°14'31" W, 667.85 feet along a line 50
feet West and parallel to the East boundary of said Section 8, said line also
being the West right-of-way of County Road 61 (Bayview Boulevard);
thence N 89°38'39" W, 688.51 feet along a 10 acre line; thence S 00°52'25"
W, 617.85 feet; thence N 89°41'09" W, 1566.03 feet along a line 50 feet
North and parallel to the South boundary of said Section 8, said line also
being the North right-of-way of Drew Street to the POINT OF
BEGINNING, together with the abutting right-of-way of Drew Street and
that portion of the abutting right-of-way of Bayview Avenue lying in the
Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 8, Township 29 South, Range
16 East.
12
t 1i
I
.•i
EXHIBIT A
1 '
r r, rv i. . ., _ _ .. ?' ? .. n ,. _v:1°... ? a»y}?as?.}p,.r<•d.liii '" , '^ ?•Y s
• ¢ :a V
:?<: .'i.i'T`v a:,;?"t+' E?.... _ r .I .. , r ''S•.?„?''^`?''.'-;, i? 7a ::°? r?, k ,
R -N,
t r
..rk::A, .. 'ariv...?1fv.+rir.iws?4.,F P?I.fwh• ?d? -',?>. '??,„, .:? -?"T,.".t`"'
yt? ",?•i??..",?!?. . ,.. ..... _ .-_ . ? .... . .... . ?... .. .. .. !1?C•M,t?•2rw...:,::.:.' ..I . , ,. ,.-.w_.?w-vitirSr.A9Y7'•Wk'CAifigfi,N4M.rhtys-Ai°.-.:S.,:f.a.ro.^?
I
r
l
'r
__+ a BRIGAg00N OF V
till.
?. v r++ 1
++.! ?r Q+rtl ??r' it 9t.3b ? ? '
s + + L/ //1r?/y + a + + 11rr,, 1 1
i ? V +L?J y? ? 1
? 1 Sf ?? ! + 1 1
' .un
1 '
X
i Y
Lt?
•)+Oi
A}1? P
P
r
y
O
r
V
1
1r
q
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
LAND LASE PLAN AMENDMENT and ZONING
OWNER 1 A LUP B8-'-3{
APPLICAHT11Rpw? 1 KEI wv3%-( qq ROBEQT? ' cr
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
h
LAND USE PLAN ZONING i MAR'S L4S-ot 9-4 144 01 c
c
FROM. L-oW DEWS'-ry cauliTY R 56•SG ACREs-
R651DEt•??' I14?-
• RIGHT OF WAY
TO MEDIUM 'DENS ay R l 6 PAZ-r 13AYvIEw Av IZ4
RES1D€u1.1A1. DREW ST ACRES C
PLANNING and'ZONING BOARD CITY COMMISSION
sF-UTION C) IS TOWNSHIP 'Zq S RANGE IG E ATLAS PAGE Fl6r,, 17 L1ER1 AL.
ZS Q
I t'' Single Family
n't?tl F
..
?: 1? y 1! X1)1! : e ..........
r' !? rt• i •. t.
vwl
w`i •rt?ri? C t YY\c0. +i!.:t?T;
??L?.F '. ??? •. ? ,}fir.. *s ?=±
,SUNSET
' LALLEY
'? ?{ •0110' ? :'lam. •t1yy's„l??y
,?>> .?,h. -•fest "`
..,, , _ .. .. '7 .. ':ri. ,Yp+!-9;?:. •r?....,..• •-t.,..a-., .c;r;e ;??w.x. ..r• y.??,y?
... .J::,I. - ,'. ??i<.,S»;y7" .W4•'?:i f?" e_T"S'y11,'r+l: iik``?'? nMb'.1?41 `h?y?jpf'.+{
r. ,?'et=i "i,> ,.'??'' :2:'? g '^?.r ,?. .\;,;; ?i;,;?,. -.,:W. f• 8? ?r 4?"?•?:
";?<? r..-'i , •;L a p?j (,. 3 : y,. q . 3. .+•r,;.':, ,., ? .w, ? , s ? a4:.f: ? ~N,, , ?
:R`'?,"-;c ~7E'? M:? .r ?^-•.?s?,r't ;.:c'. ?:r .`•'%;r.,•t ? ,:'?.. >° x.. ;?, ,ri:;?;. ,€' 'iaA'A:.,.Jx.•• ",£c. •,:
-'.?'IeSF???-?"`:2X???!h2.r,r.T?.tr^:.:?'.:?f:?;7?°:.._z?a...r?:".:??. s?, !i..._?. b.: .°ri?.. ...=5-f!^: ?. ..r .,..z?.CrY..Z-?:4"f....y.r<ir?,?fSs a'#..?.:_i'?i?.:?:?-:??•?:, .._1 ...?::,i;•.,1,?..; .,..+....._..'?,r.?yr_5.:,?.i?....+r..:`?.., r'?..G,S?:v'
IM
' a .
F, -r,.y ai'M,?"'It sr`i .v}?.w'.r1r
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO: Cynthia Goudeau, City Clerk
FROM: M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney k
RE; Ordinance 4821-89
DATE: August 14, 1991
"
You have asked me for an opinion as to the status of Ordinance 4821-89, which
"deannexed" certain property if the requested countywide land use plan amendment
was not approved by the county by December 31, 1989.
This relates to the "Island in the Sun Property" north of Drew Street, sometimes
referred to as the "Brown Kennedy, and Roberts Property."
The land use plan amendment application went to the PPC and the county, and it
appears that the county approved the requested plan amendment substantially, if
not completely literally, on November 7, 1989. The county approved medium
density residential for approximately 45 acres of this 56.6 acre tract, and
reservation for 13.6 acres or 11.6 acres--see the PPC's agenda memorandum,
attached, in which "11.6 acres" appears to be a typographical error). The
approval was with the understanding that a transfer of density of 7.5 units per
acre would be allowed from the preservation tracts. (I am assuming that "acted
to approve" means they approved the alternative recommended by the PPC.)
The property is currently shown on the City's zoning atlas as being in the City,
and in our RM-16 zoning district.
E , .
r I
+e
jrZ ;4
y?'
i
?
•f
;
,F .
kf
.
y 1?
In my opinion, Ordinance 4821-89 did not take effect because the requested plan
amendment was substantially approved. The property is within the city limits
pursuant to Ordinance 4761-88, which annexed the property..
MAG:a
Copy;
Steven M. Seibert, Esquire
• - ..?,.?a?? Sri. S ?,?rs?+?f?r..?. _ -_ ___ -_