03/11/2003 (2)
.
" ,
, ,
....CHARTER.. .... .......
. .. .
... ..REVIEW..
, ,
. ,
'. ,
... ........ ....COMMITTEE. ....
, "
,MINUTES
, .~ I '. \ ,
.' . .
. ..... .... ... .. .... . .... . ... . ... .. ..
, '0
, ,
.. .... Date ....... ..... 03/U L03 ... .... ............ ........ .
" . . " .
, "
. ", .
, , ,
I' ."
. . . , ,
, 0
, '
, ' ,
, '
; I.
. '. ..'
"
< '.' .
,
I . , : .
"
1 I.>
., ., "\'"
, ,
. . .; < ,
, ,
, .
, ,
, ,
. '
, ,
. . I' . I.'.
."
, ,
, 0
, . '
, ,
, , ,
, "
, ,
, "
, . .'. .
, ,
, .
, ,
" '
". ". , , . ,". . \' , . ., . ' '!', 'I"" ' . ',' :," > " " .
.
.
.'
CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
March 11. 2003
Present:
Daniel Dennehy
Melody W. Figurski
Katherine Elliott Cole
John Doran
Nicholas C. Fritsch
Timothy A. Johnson, Jr.
Jay F. Keyes
Jay Edwin Polglaze
Lawrence (Duke) Tieman
Chair
Vice Chair
Committee Member
Committee Member
Committee Member
Committee Member
Committee Member
Committee Member
Committee Member
Committee Member
Committee Member
Committee Member
City Attorney
City Clerk
Administrative Analyst
Board Reporter
The meeting was called t~ order at 4:31 p.m. at City Hall.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that,order.
1
The Chair said the minutes of the March 4. 2003, meeting would be voted upon at the
next meeting.
The Chair suggested discussing the practical aspects of changing the form of
government prior to philosophical aspects. It was noted that unless there was a compelling
need to do so, it would be impractical to propose a change in form of government. It was
'remarked, the current form works better now than in previous years. It was remarked that in
some cities when the number of council members was increased, it became more difficult to
reach consensus and personality conflicts arose. .It was felt that current staff is competent and
Clearwater's Commission is composed of Commissioners with leadership skills.
It was felt that the five-member Commission works well in Clearwater. It was remarked
that the information provided by Dr. MacManus appeared to be biased toward the, Council-
Manager form of government. After review of Information from Dr. MacManus, it appears no
one form of government is clearly better than another. It was felt that regardless of the form of
government. the individuals serving on the Commission playa vital role in the City's
cohesiveness and success.
0,3/1103
:;' . , .'~'" r :', 'r ,~" ,I,' '..,I, "~I' '. ,'411\' "".,~ ~. . I _...~.," ,,' .1.. ~ ~".~ ".:"..\' '_, ,"\ . "',
Absent:
Thomas D. Calhoun
William Joe Fisher
Isay M. Gulley
Also Present:
Pamela Akin
Cynthia E. Goudeau
Rosemarie Alfaro
Brenda Moses
Item #2':' Form of Government
a.Strong Mayor V5. Council-Manager
Charter Review 2003-0311
.
.
.
b.
Districts vs. At-large
Dr. MacManus indicated it did not make a difference in representation in some cities
when the form of government was changed to single-member districts. It was felt structure has
not prevented minorities from being elected. Regardless of how districts were set up in
Clearwater, a minority would never receive the majority vote in a district. As one committee
member who felt strongly about districts was absent today, this topic c,ould be further discussed
at the next meeting.
c. ' Length of Term
It w,as felt that the first term of office is an acclimation period and that four-year terms
would be more practical. Four-year terms also would provide more stability to the Commission,
as three-year terms require a time-consuming reelection process, which could diminish a
Commissioner's.focus. It was agreed Commission seats should be staggered to provide
continuity. '
, ,
In response to a question, City Clerk Cyndie Goudeau said the Charter states that a
Commissioner may run for and if elected serve for two full consecutive terms. The
Commissioner could then run for and if elected serve two full terms as Mayor. However, the'
Mayor cannot run for a Commission seat for three years after his term as Mayor expires.
City Attorney Pam Akin said if the committee wishes to change the length of terms, the
Commissioners whose terms expire first would be affected by the change. The change would
not apply to existing terms. Discussion ensued and it was sLiggested that if the committee
decides to make a change with respect to length of terms, that staff provide options to the
committee regarding implementation of the change.
Member Johnson moved to recommend a Charter change that would include terms for
the Mayor and Commissioners to be four years each. where two Commissioners are elected at
a election, and two years later two Commissioners and a Mayor are elected, and that staff '
come back to the Charter Review Committee and present options to the Committee regarding
implementation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
d. Term Limits
Discussion ensued and it was felt abolition of term limits should not be recommended.
, Consensus was the Committee has carefully discussed and considered all the
information provided by Dr.' MacManus and has found no compelling reason to change the
current form of government. ,
In response to a question, Ms. Goudeau said years ago Commission seats were not
designated and candidates ~ran as a pack." The public tended to vote for only one candidate
and the system was changed to provide for better representation. It was remarked that there is
no perfect system.
Charter Review 2003-0311
03/1103
2
; . \, l' , , .' , l . " ... . . l' ,. , ' , 'j' , \' ,'. ' .',' , . ~. ~. ' . ' ~
.
.
.
In response to a question, Ms. Goudeau said the percentage of voter turnout in the City
has ranged from 80/0 - 500/0. In response to a suggestion turnout would improve if city elections
were held in conjunction with State or Federal elections, she indicated the Supervisor of
Elections had not allowed this with the previous election equipment because of space
limitations ~:m the ballot. Although the new equipment does not have those limitations there is
concern local elections could lose importance and voters become overwhelmed with large
ballots.
Item #3 - Set Agenda for March 25 meeting
It was requested that Section 2.01 Composition and Powers be discussed at the next
meeting.
Consensus was that no changes are necessary to Section 2.02 entitled Qualifications.
Concern was expressed that Section 2.04 C'ompensation and Expenses is a sensitive
area for the Commission, as it requires them to determine their own salary increases., It was
remarked that by placing the responsibility on the Commission for their own salaries, salaries
would remain reasonable. Ms. Akin said a salary study had been done and salaries were
increased. Ms. Goudeau said Commissioners 'also receive an annual increase without a vote.
The Chair stated that Sections 2.04 through 3.05 would be reviewed at the next
meeting. A definition of "advisory board" and "regulatory board" was requested. Ms. Goudeau
said the Community Development Board and the Municipal Code Enforcement Boards are the
only regulatory boards that possess regulatory powers and whose members are appointed by
the Commission.
It was remarked that Section 2.08 states that all meetings shall be public. Ms. Akin said
all meetings are public, except that a statutory exception provides that executive or closed
bargaining sessions and meetings to discuss settlement of litigation are exempt from that
provision. However, the decisions are made in public sessions. .
Ms. Akin requested that Committee members review Section 2.07(c) as it relates to
filling vacancies in the Mayorts seat to avoid problems that were experienced in other cities. It
also was requested the time frame in which the Commission is required to make an
appointment to fill a vacancy and the consequences of not doing so be reviewed.
Item #4 - Adiourn
,
',~
"""
,f .
The meeting adjourned at 5:36 p.m.
.\
Chaff' '
Charter Review Committee
Charter Review 2003-0311
3
03/1103
~ ',I", t. .'.~ .' '~", "~'., " \' ,.' ,. ". ,,' " .,', .'...,' ,,\ ': ,1',\ . '