03/04/2003 (2)
,
. .
. " .
.' " ~
, .
.' . .
.
...... CHARTER' '..'
......... ...... ..REVIEW......
I . ." .
.... .... ". . COMMITTEE..
MINUTES .
. .
.. ..'
. "
" , .' ....
. . .
. .
." Date_ . '.03/D4- /03' >.'
. . ,
. >; . . .
. ,.
'.' .
. .
. "I: . . <" ."
. ,
I, .
, ,
,.
. .
. t . .
. . .' '
'. I.
. .
. .. .
. .
, .. . I
. ,
,. .
, .
. '.
. .
.' . <
, -, .
. ,.
. .
. .
, . .
. . .."
. . . .
. . I .
....
. , ,
. .
. . .
. ,
, l. '., . I
. . . > .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .' .
; \ .
. , , ", ,..' " . 'L' . '.' ' . : ; . .' '. ' . . , " . . ....", , . . '. . ... ~ " , ~ '.
.
.
e.
CHARTER REVIEW COMMIITEE MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
March 4, 2003
Present: Daniel Dennehy
Melody W. Figurski
Thomas D. Calhoun
Katherine Elliott Cole
John Doran
William Joe Fisher
Nicholas C. Fritsch
Isay M. Gulley
Timothy A. Johnson, Jr.
Jay F. Keyes
Jay Edwin Polglaie
Lawrence (Duke) Tieman
Also Present:.. Pamela Akin
Cynthia E. Goudeau
Rosemarie Alfaro
Brenda Moses
Chair - departed 5:51 p.m.
Vice Chair
Committee Member
Committee Member - arrived 4:35 p.m.
Committee Member
Committee Member - departed 5:51 p.m.
Committee Member
Committee Member - arrived 4:35 p.m.
Committee Member
Committee Member
Committee Member
Committee Member
City Attorney
City Clerk
Administrative Analyst
Board Reporter
The meeting was called to order at 4:30 p.m. at City Hall.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order alth9ugh not
necessarily discussed in that order.
.ITEM #2 - Approval of February 11. 2003 minutes
It was remarked that Rule #4 and Rule #7 of the Rules of Procedure were contradictory.
It was explained that as the review of various Charter sections progresses and some sections
may be related, the Committee wanted the ability to change previous actions or motions should
they feel it necessary.
. Member Figurski requested the page number be deleted in sentence one, page two.
under Item #5 of the February 11. 2003. minutes, as some members' copies of the Charter
reflect different page numbers.
Member Johnson moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of February 11,
2003. as changed. The motion w~s duly seconded and carried unanimously.
. ITEM #3 - Rules of Procedure
Member Johnson moved to approve the Rules of Procedure (Rev. 2/13/03) as
submitted. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Charter Review 2003-0304
1
03/04/03
'I . f ~' ~, "' ! , . ' ~ '. " . I. . . '" _ ( .' I,' ,'.. ...,' .
" '" \ . " .,.... ',. . ~ J' . . l" .' . ' , ; .' ,\., , '. " " " I ~' .'. . J
. ITEM #4 - Article I
It was suggested that the first sentence of paragraph one of Article I under Section 1.02.
Corporate Boundc~.ries read II.. .charter takes effect. The City may change its...'.
Member Figurski moved to approve Article I as submitted with the above change. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
..
.
ITEM #5 - Presentation bv Dr. Susan MacManus
Dr. Susan MacManus distributed a handout from the Executive Director William H.
Hansell, Jr., ICMA (International City/County Management Association) dated August 2001
entitled Municipal Form of Government, 2001 Trends in Structure, Responsibility, and
Composition. The surve.y is sent to municipal governments in an effort to obtain comprehensive
information on forms of government and related operations. In response to a question, she
said some larger governments do not always complete the survey.
Dr. MacManus presented information regarding muniCipal government structu.res in the
United States and in Florida. She said structural changes are not a common occurrence. Only
21 governments out of 176 or approximately 120/0 of all Florida cities have tried to change their
governmental structures. . Mayor/Council type governments tend to be in place in bigger cities.
She said there is no perfect one size fits all form of government. She said. Florida has a
Charter review process, whereas other states do not. She said the ICMA data does not
. distinguish between st~ong and weak mayor-council governments. Dr. MacManus reviewed 1)
form of government by. population size; 2) four types of Mayor-council forms of government; 3)
three types of Council-Manager forms of government; 4) the minimal number of attempts to
change the structure or form of government since 1996; 5) successful structural changes in
F!orida in the past five years; 6) the role of department heads and chief elected officials and
how they are selected or appointed in some types of government; 7) length of terms; 8) number
of positions on various councils; 10) council member salaries; 11) frequency of council
meetings; 12) citizen authorities, boards, and commissions; 13) council member election
methods; and 14) three types of council Member At-Large election structures.
In response to a question, Dr. MacManus said any city with a population of 250,000 or
more is considered a Ubig city". She said there are many hybrid forms of government in Florida.
She said unless there has been a scandal or corruption, very few cities have changed their
governmental structures. She said there is no correlation between form of government and
size of budget or tax base. City Manager tenure in Florida is generally three to four years. In
response to a question, Dr. MacManus said in a Council/Manager with Empowered Mayor form
of government, the Mayor sits and votes with the Council.
Dr. MacManus said the pure At-Large form of government is rare. The Mixed
(combination) form of government is gaining ground. It includes some At-Large and some
Single Member Districts, particularly in communities with larger groups of minorities. She said
the trend in Florida is to appoint department heads rather than elect them. Who appoints them
depends on the form of government. She said the switch to term limits was in the early 1990s.
Citizens routinely vote for term limits and to keep them once in place. The predominant number
Charter Review 2003-0304
2
03/04/03
.,.,....\ ." '.,' .~."~, .'....' f"', ""'",.:' ~. ".", '.',., . '~L .'.\' '.'"
.
.
.
of Council members Is five. The number of Council members often increased from five to
seven members when governments shifted to Single Member Districts. The predominant
pattern in Florida is to meet twice a month In a formal session. Florida greatly uses citizen
authorities, boards, and commissions. Officials' terms are generally staggered. There has
been a larger increase over the last ten years in cities with Mixed/Combination systems versus
Single Member Districts. The At-Large form of government tends to occur in smaller cities and
is popular in counties and school boards. In diverse communities, At-Large-systems have been
somewhat abandoned for another type of government such as Single Member District or Mixed.
In response to a question, Dr. MacManus said there is no correlation between dysfunctionality
and a Mixed system. She felt personalities pay a larger role than structure when a government
is dysfunctional.
In response to a question, Dr. MacManus said she did not have data on the highest
compensated City Council of the same or similar size as Clearwater. She said she could check
with ICMA regarding how many communities in the last five years have switched to a strong
mayor form of government. She said it would take approximately one half day to determine the
percentage of minority Councilpersons in Florida. There is no data regarding the types of
government in cities currently in a redevelopment mode or that have recently undergone major
redevelopment. It was questioned whether a Strong Mayor form of government ever has been
the driving force for major redevelopment. ,Dr. MacManus said in her study of who loses
elections in Florida, it appears that being on the wrong side of growth is a key factor. Dr.
MacManus said there is no data regarding a trend or the number of Council members per
capita. .
In response to a question, Dr. MacManus said districting is a formal process. Some
jurisdictions in Florida must abide by Section 5 of the Justice Act, however Pinellas County
does not. She said she did not think that districts had to be determined prior to a referendum
for single member districts. .
In response t9 a question, Dr. MacManus said the major advantage of a Strong Mayor
government is accountability. The disadvantage is the Council is.intimated or fears the Mayor
or CAO, especially since that position has an inordinate amount of input into policy or budgetary
process. She said the structure of govern.ment is far less important than personalities. She
emphasized that although a very strong personality could be intimidating to the rest of the
Council, other Council members, employees and the media provide great checks and balances.
Dr. MacManus offered a list of suggested readings and encouraged everyone to contact
Ms. Goudeau with any questions, comments, or requests.
Commitfee members thanked Dr. MacManus for her presentation.
ITEM #6 - Questions and Answers
One member stated he. had difficulty obtaining the Charter on the'lnternet. He will
contact staff regarding the matter.
. Charter Review 2003-0304
3
03/04/03
.' .,..,: . . ,l' . I .' . I..... f' : , .'
. ITEM #7 - Settina Aaenda for March 11. 2003 Meetina
. Ms. Goudeau said at the next meeting, the agenda would entail discussion of forms of
government, including strong Mayor versus Council form, length of terms, At~Large versus
Single Member Districts, etc. .
Ms. Goudeau said the' minutes from loday's meeting probably would not be ready for
approval at the next meeting, as it is only one week from today.
Ms. Goudeau will provide larger copies of the charts presented in Dr. MacManus'
presentation.
ITEM #8 ~ Adiourn
. The meeting adjourned at 5:54 p.m.
. , .
~""
~'~^
Chair~" . ~ ~
Charter Review Commi~
Attest: .
. ~~l.jL -~.'~..
..
".
.
. ;1
"
"
. ,
"
.'
o .
"
.
Charter Review 2003-0304
4
. 03/04/03
,.