11/19/2002 (2)
/..
,~ !i.
, ;.
/.'
i,.
,;
. l ~ .
,\
l; ~
",
; ,
~ +. I
\' ,
,C ~
~ , 1 ,
, "
,.,' .
:: <.
'I:,
'I;
.:tA\"
~. '.'
,"
,I,
, ,
" :\:
"
, "'\-',
,-1,'
" ,t'..
",1 '\
.,
, ,i",
, .' ~
,
, ,
f,~~<'~~:C'" 'I
1 l.'
",
.:.
~~i~~~p':":~.1.'.~"::~;~. ';/>~"~I)'fn..~.:~'~.
,
"
I, ':,
"~... :,'>~~.\"'; ~1I'l ..~
:.,.t> : :,.
'.'
{(: ..
1,',1,"
",
~"T ~.' " " , ,
','
"'C':'
. '
, .,
;.'~~:: ',;,.,. (', '
"
,....,
, ',:', .
"
. ~ , ~,l
, i ~
'... .' :L"
.~) ~~::;" T , j
}",:'::;\;'l', '., >\
::;,. ,I ~::' J . ;
~;~. "':J ,; > , '
,~. 'oc,. ~~. I' ' ..,
s~1;;:::~r,,?~,> "
~\J~~J>'.' ~ ~L'~ ':',c
r~ii;,?"'> ~::' ':
',~"fi .' ,,~ 'I'Jo . . . ~ :
d~ T<' ~
,{d,', \\,
."~..;,' : .,' ~ 1::, >
,.....:'\ ",::, ~\ ,.":' ,!::,~
Jl!', ,,:',;, ' ' '.'
j:;' j.~~" '.'
::/::~"',,'
~:o!". ~. ".,'
'.~' \
~'t~ (,1 :
~!"i,t
~ :: I
,.'
+OJ''"''
"I
; ,
)
I.
'(",',
. '
CDB
Crimm'uti'ity Development 'Boar,d 'Me~tin'g
':' ,':, , , , ' 'MINUTES'" ',",
"
, , }~ .
'.
. '.,
"
~ I. .
'I
,',Date
.t" )
',.
"
"
fJ'
.,
"
" .
I', '
't, ,I,
. .1:
. ~ '.'
I I I ~
,
. 'f.
'"
,I
;,:
J l ~,
"
"
,.
;f,
, ,
,\"
, .
','
~ I '.' I
.> '?
, ,;,
"
,,'
"
'"
'.,
I
fl".
"
, ~'.
II' I
. ~ I
" \"
"
'I '"
: i "< ~ "
( ',C., ",'
'; I~'::, .," I., \
~\\;e';'~~~il\ ','~' . ,J'"
.~:,: I, ," ,
.. ,
i: ~ .
"
, f
:,'\.., "
.{.~:.
, ,
" '
" ,
, ,
:I,T " .
, ,,'
r'
"
. I' :'
') ,
<"
,\
'!,'\::~~'+~.: ,I}'~'::,':
"
, '
r r,/19
, r '
'"
"
"
"
.'
'"
J ;.
.'
, .
,\
'\
",
to:J-
( 'J ~
'.
, I
.',
. "
",
1.
',\
I" 'j
:,'
"
,I,
"
"
,',
~)?
, '. ~ I
'\,
"
, \
"
"
, "
"
I'
..
" ....
v "!?
!'
I' . '
;,
"
'I"
~! "'
,
"
, "
,
, ,
,',
'; ".
I'
, ,
"
:,,' .
,
'J ~ ,
"2)
i, '>;
.. ,
", '",-
,',
, "
'..
'0';"':'
'"
I
c !'
ACTION AGENDA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING.'
CITY OF CLEARWATER
November 19, 2002
Meeting called to order at 2:00 p.m. at City Hall
A.' APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS: 9/17/02 and 10/15/02
ACTION: APPROVED 7:0 AS SUBMITTED
C. CONSENT AGENDA: (Items 1-8)
Item C1 was removed from the Consent Agenda.
1. ' Case: FLD2002-09031 - 14 Somerset Street Level Two Application
Owner: CBGAM, Incorporated.
Applicant: Uday Lele, White Sands, LLC.
.' Location: The 0.50-acre site Is located on the north side of Somerset Street approximately 150
feet west of Mandalay Avenue. '
Atlas Page: 258A. . ,
, Zoning:, MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District.
Request:' , '
,'Flexible Development approval to increase the height of a wall within the front setback along Somerset
Street from three feet to six feet under,the provisions of Section 3-804.A.1, reduce the front (south)
. setback along Somerset Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building), and increase the height of a building
with attached dwellings from 30 feet to 56 feet (as measured from base flood elevation), as part of a
Resldent!~llnfill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.F., .
, Proposed Use: A 15-unit condominium development within a single, six-story.,building 56 feet in height
(as measured from the base flood elevation). '
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
ACTION: APPROVED - 4:3 with Conditions: 1) That the density of the site be limited to 15
dwellings units (30 dwelling units per acre); 2) That the height be limited to 56 feet as measured
from base flood elevation; 3) That the final design of the buildings be' consistent with the '
conceptual elevations submitted or as modified by the COB; 4) That should addressing
stormwater Issues result In a site plan which is significantly different from the one approved by
the Community Development Board, the site plan must be resubmitted to the Board for review; 5)
That all Fire Department requirements, including gates with an approved emergency entry system
and a knox key box on the building for emergency egress; and 6) That all signage meet the
,requirements of Code.
acdb1102
1
11/19/02
, " . ",. .' ~ " . . r r... ..,.'.. ; ~ '. ....:.., 'r' I'; , ,~ ":', I' ..... . " ' i':..... I .. I':, ~ ( , : ' , ~: I \ . .' '\.' ','. ..... , ~ '. \ ~I' ,~ : >, ~ ',' ....", II ~ ~ ~ . ~,".. .,,';' ", \. '. : ',~. . '. "
;"..... .".... .~.,.:., .:' ""'.:,~' .\:+,.::1...,+....... ..,' ..t. '.,..I.....i..~~: ,'.'..;,.:...1. ,1,-. " 4..,..:: ',.j',to'\..,....:I. :~,:.'.:.','~~: ,;",.::
,.~
.;~)
'..
, .':,)
Item C2 was removed from the Consent Agenda.
2. Case: FLD2002-09029 - 1590 Gulf Boulevard Level Two AppHcation
Owner/Applicant: Belleview Biltmore Resort, Ltd.
Representative: Robert Pergolizzi, Florida Design Consultants, Inc.
Location: The 1.38-acre site is located on the west side of Gulf Boulevard, approximately 300 feet
north of Sand Key Estates Drive.
Atlas Page: 3118.
Zoning: C, Commercial DIstrict.
, Request:
Flexible Development approval to reduce the front (east) setback along Gulf Boulevard from 25 feet to '
five feet to pavement (existing), reduce the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing
building and pavement), reduce the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from
10 feet to 1.4 feet t6 existing pool deck. and reduce the requIred number of parking spaces from 108
spaces to 46 spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of ,
"Section 2-7048. ' ",
Proposed Use: The re-establlshment of a restaurant within the current structure with site improvements.
Presenter: Wayne Weils, Senior Planner.
ACTION: APPROVED ~ 7:0 with Conditions: 1) That use of this restaurant be In association with
the Bellevlew Biltmore Hotel and any change In association be evaluated for complementary
operational characteristics and parking demand, and may require approval by the Community
'Development Board; 2) That use of the pool, beach and restrooms/lockers be restricted to guests
of the Belleview Biltmore Hotel only; 3) That, prior to the issuance of a building permit, the ~fte
plan be amended to meet handicap parking space location requirements; 4) That signage be
limited to one monument sign, not to exceed six feet In height, with a design that is
, architecturally-Integrated into the design and color of the building; 5) That the landscape plan be
revised, acceptable to the Planning Staff. prior to the Issuance of building permits; 6) That the
drop-off drive be designated for one-way vehicular flow with appropriate signs and pavement
markings acceptable to the Traffic Engineering Department. prior to the issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy; and 7) That the fire sprinkler system be separated from the Cabana Club
Condominiums In a manner acceptable to the Fire Department, prior to the Issuance of building
permits. '
3. ANX2002-090 13 - 1607 Stevenson's Drive Level Three Application
Owner/Applicant: Jacqueline L. Walters.
Location:,0.18-acre located on the north side of Stevenson's Drive, approximately 90 feet west
of Stockton Drive.,
Atlas Page: 269B.
Request:
'a) Annexation of 0.18 acre to the City of Clearwater;
b) Land Use Plan amendment from RL, Residential Low (County) to RL, Residential Low ' '
Classification (City of Clearwater); and , ,
c) Rezoning from R-3, Residential Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density
Residential District (Clearwater).
Proposed Use: Single-family dwell1ng.
Presenter: Gina Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager.
ACTION: RECOMMENDED APPROVAL - 7:0
acdb1102
2
11/19/02
''''~.., I. ,f~':" ::. .. ,: . ..
,.' \ .',~.' ,'.' _, .'~. ",:..,.,.~ .~~,...',::.', ,_:":',:. :~I'~'I.'., "': :,",;,......,.,'..., .R' .',\,", ,...,.~ ....,.1,.......:.~:.~I.>.,.L.,.r.:..~:"...,~.. .\.,f...:'.~
,,- . .
t"'\
. , ~ <
. t' ~ .
:< ;
~ l .
" ')
~ : :1<<1
>' ',~
\~.
"
4. Case: ANX2002-09014 - 1370 State Street Level Three Application
Owners/Applicants: Ido Fischler & Daphna Fischler.
Representative: Kenneth H. Roush, P.E.
Location: 0.27-acre located on the north side of State Street, approximately 650 feet east of
Betty Lane and 640 feet north of Sunset Point Road.
Atlas Page: 251 B.
Request:
a) Annexation of 0.27 acre to the City of Clearwater;
b) Land Use Plan amendment from RLM, Residential Low Medium (County) to RLM, Residential Low
Medium Classification (City of Clearwater); and
c) Rezoning from R-4, Residential, One, Two & Three Family District (County) to MOR, Medium Density
Residential District (Clearwater).
Proposed Use: Single-family residential.
Presenter: Gina Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager.
ACTION: RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. 7:0
5; Case: LUZ2002-09008 Level Three Application
1285 South Fort Harrison Avenue & 609 Pinellas Street
Owner/Applicant:- Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc.
Representative: Emil C. Marquardt, Jr. '
, Location: 1.80-acres located on the east side of South Fort Harrison Avenue and south side of
Pinellas Street, approximately 620 feet north of Lakeview Road.
Atlas Page: 305B.
Request: ,
a) Land Use,Plan ,amendment from Industrial Limited (IL) to Institutional (I) Classification; and
b) Rezoning from IRT, Industrial, Research & Technology District to I, Institutional District.
Proposed Use: Parking spaces & existing office, and ancillary daycare fo'r hospital employees.
" Presenter: Gina Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager. .
ACTION: RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. 7:0
6.. Case: ANX2002.09015 Level Three'Application
3025 Cleveland Street; 3032 Eastwood Street; & 3036 Eastwood Street
Owner/Applicant: First Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc.
Representative: Thomas C.,Nash, II, Esquire.
LoCation: Three parcels, totaling 0.97 acre, located 950 feet south of Drew Street and 690 feet
west of McMullen Booth Road. .
Atlas Page: 292A.
Request:
Annexation of 0.97 acre to the City of Clearwater (companion case LUZ2002-09009).
, Proposed Use: Parking lot location for future place of worship on applicant's adjacent lot to the north and
east. '
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
ACTION: RECOMMENDED APPROVAL M 7:0
acdb1102
11/19/02
3
" ,~,. '. \ .' :".' ,~.}t.!_.:. "lf~':I~L ::' ""."":,;."".:,~,, I\';~' ,"~"'.~~";'.'L... ".:,...I~...~.'..,':,.~:'..,,'..':.'i..,1U I'.,.,...." I'."I",:.~.,_
, . , I . . ' , I ~
'~"
! :\~~l'--"
I.'.
,
,i..'c
"'1
'>, ~
. ,~ I '.'
>~: ,:.
, ,
. ~: ' :' c' '
'oj:: ,.
, .
.' ,
, "
::",1
. II '
':!c
...'(",..
,"".,
f~;':<~" ,
~..' . ~' I c
...c':,
J<, '
(:'<..
"
,~. .,
,,'i,
~ L ~.
, ,
, ,
, ','
,.,...,..)
~" . l
:. "'.,.,;,
:1'
: I
',' "
\,
. 'I" ;\~
' ~
"
, "
" '
,
, ,
....... '
" 7. Case: LUZ2002-09009 Level Three Application'
10 East Meadowlark Lane; 3001-3062 Chesapeake Street; 3025 Cleveland Street; 3039
Cleveland Street; 3032 Eastwood Street; & 3036 Eastwood Street.
, . Owner/Applicant: F.lrst Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc.
, Representative: Thomas C. Nash, II, Esquire. :
Location: Seven' parcels, totaling 9.22 acres, located 410 feet south of Drew Street and 520 feet
, west of McMullen Booth Road.
Atlas Page: 292A. "
,Request: (companion case ANX2002-09015)
'a) Land Us~, Plan smerJdment from Residential Urban (RU) & Residential Low Medium (RLM) to
Institutional (I); and " ' ':
b) Rezoning from Single Family Resldentfal (R-2) County, Mobile Home Park (MHP) & Low Medium
, Density (LMDR) to Institutional (I) District. '
Proposed Use: Parking lot location for future place of worship on applicant's adjacent lot to the north and
east. ' '
,', Presenter: Marc'A. Mariano, Planner.
ACTION: RECOMMENDED APPROVAL - '7:0
8. ' , Case: LUZ2002-09010 - 209 - 229 Windward Passage Level Three Application
Owner/Applicant: The Pools at Windward Passage Homeowners' Association.
Representative: Joseph W. Gaynor.: ,
, Location: Eleven parcels totaling 0.87'acre. located in the Commerclal/lsland Estates
Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District on the south side of Windward Passage,
approximately 450 feet north of Memorial Causeway. '
Atlas Page: 2678. "
, Request: ,
a) land Use Plan amendment from Commercial General (CG) to Residential Medium (RM) Category;
· arld ,'"
". b) Rezoning from Commercial/Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (CIIENCOD)
, , to Medium High Density Residential/Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District
. (MHDRJIENCOD) District.' '
,Proposed Use: Eleven, existing fee-simple town homes.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
ACTION: RECOMMENDED A~PROVAL - 7:0
" '
, acdb1102
4
11/19/02
" ~),.,'..,:"I..' .;,~'J' .,~'..~I..,. ....'.'1. i
.. . ... .,..<~a~"'.T'.'."'._4,,""n......,...\~..k":'" ~"""~"'''.''''''''''~_ ..._0.......'....
." ,'.. '( ,hi' "~1;''' .,,<.. ' t;.; I~,
",., .': _" :'l,,: '..'.'.~': ,t '.,~,~~I,...:, :' /, ~~". ',~.~.~ ",' I,,::\".'.~. ~':,:, ,'. ',' '; ','.' ~ ," ,.:,:. r'~. '1",' ':,' ..:;., ,'. ~'.:. '
. I ~
.' { .' '.' >1'"
.' ~. .. '
"'~
, ,'.'
':
..'.
'..
e., I ~ '
\' ,
I'. <,
"
',}" >:~. '. 'Le,
"
\,
C+",. 'I
....,.
~ .i
i,
.:~ I' l
(~ "
:," ~ I " ','
~>,:;'I>
"
:..-)
.....
, '
~, ~.
, ,
, "
~t I, t ~ > ,. .
(,lj':'. '
:',0
"
,,' ee
~ : I ~ I
C. NON-CONSENT AGENDA (Items 1-2)
, ,
1. Case: FLD2002-09026- 200 Brlghtwater DrIve Level Two Application
Owner/Applicant: Roland Rogers, Brightwater Townhomes, LLC.
Representative: William Woods. Woods Consulting, lnc,
Location: The 0.54-acre'site is located on the north side of Brightwater Drive, approximately
1.500 feet east of Hamden Drive. '
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request:
Flexible Development approval for the construction of multi-use docks (10 new slips) In excess of 500
, square feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601 . ' ,
, Proposed Use: The construction of a 1,355 square foot ten-slip dock to be located 35 feet from the '
,', extended side (east) property line' and a minimum of 105 feet from the extended side (west) property line
, " (Includes removal of two existing docks).
Presenter: Mark ParrY, Planner. ,
"ACTION: APPROVED -7:0 with Conditions: 1) That Plnellas County Water Navigation, Florida
, ,Dep~rtment of.Envlronmental Protection (FDEP), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Southwest
Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) 'permits be approved prior to the issuancl]! of
, building permits; 2) 'That a site plan indicating lighting on the end of dock to enhance navigation
,safety be submitted to and approved by, Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; 3) That the
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 303 standards for "marinas alid boat yards" be met to
'" the satisfacti,on of the Fire Department, prior to the Issuance of building permits; 4) That boats
, moored at th~se docks be for the exclusive use by residents of the Brightwater Drive,
, Condominhims and that there be no commercial activities at the docks (bait sales. vending, etc.);
,5) That the' proposed dock be used for the sole use of the owners and/or guests of,the
townhomas and not be permitted to be sub-leased; 6) That floating and dock-supported signage
be permanently,installed containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea
grasses and manatees in the vicinity; 7) That co'vered boat lifts are not permitted: and 8) That
slips on the east side of the dock will not be permitted to accommodate boats more than 25-feet
in length. " ' '
a'cdb1102
5
11/19/02
'.....,.". ,'J,.. :'. ,,' .:.,i ',~' I.', ',i," .: ~I.>'. ,Lj,., ......~, :'\1'1~' r.::...'~.,....};..;~ ",'.' '"'.,.,; ,.:,,'.i:~ :~. ',':
:t'''':':'~ ,,' ;~~,'~:'..,..' ,':;' ":','I~'" ':"J' ',.., L :":~".. ,'... : ,:,': I.. ',' .:, : ~:'. ~:',', .'.....':'4, :". '. ~;~,,~, ..:J,.',~'~ ~,.,IL'; I,:':' ", I ,:,.I......J,I:,~.,'~.'.,
, AiIPA,
, f, .:.~"
','
" . ~
, ,
",I
'j.'
"
:)
(j,
2. Case: FLD2002-09030 - 650 Bay Esplanade Level Two Application
Owners: Virginia B. Franks, Charles F. Raubeson, Emma R. Allson, and Jean and Walter
Koegler.
Appllcant: Radcliffe Development Company, LLC.
Representative: Robert Flynt., '
Location: The O.95~acre site is located on the northeast corner of Bay Esplanade and Poinsettia
, Avenue.
Atlas Page: 258A.
, Zoning: 1', Tourist District.
Request:
Flexible Development approval to reduce the required side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to
pavement), 'reduce ,the front (west) setback along Poinsettia Avenue from 15 feet to zero feet (to
building), reduce the front (east) setback along Bay Esplanade from 15 feet to zero feet (to building),
, reduce the front (south) setback along Bay Esplanade from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement) and ,
Increase the height from 50 feet to 65 feet (as measured from base flood elevation), under the provisions
of Section 2~803.
Proposed Use: A 28-unit condominium development within a single, seven-story, '65 feet in height (as
measured from base flood elevation). "
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. ,
ACTION: A~PROVED -7:0 with Conditions: 1) That the density of the site be limited to 28 '
dwellings units (30 dwelling units per acre); 2) That the final design of the building be consistent
, with the conceptu'al elevations 'submitted or as modified by the COB; 3) That the height of the
building be limited to 65 feet as measured from base flood elevation; 4) That should addressing
stormwater Issues result In' a site, plan which is significantly different from the one approved by
the Community Development Board, the site plan must be resubmitted to the Board for review: 5)
That all fire code requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; and 6) That all
slgnage comply with Code.
D. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS:'
The Frequent Users G'roup meeting and Improvements to the Planning Department web site were
" '
reviewed.
Members were requested to bring their Code books to the December m,eeting for updates.
It was requested staff develop a creative way to educate residents regarding the flexible
development process. It was suggested staff present several examples at the end of each,
meeting, should time permit. '
,The board's holiday luncheon Is scheduled at noon on 12/17/02 at the Harborview Center.
e ., . <
E. ADJOURNMENT - 5:36 p.m., '
acdb1102 '
11/19/02
6
T r............y~_\,.jl.~t~T........~-~q.,.....>~ r,"
, , < .. ... ~ '.l~
\:~: .:L~.' '''I'/':",,~ I~.I:,".:':'.~ "'~:.'.:.."'I'~"';lw.\ ~ ,.;.'....,,'~.:.....'..>.. ! ::".~' :......:'".,.,.......1,1'\...~.,~: 1:"1:. :.:,.~.;..,......:",'+.,... .~. .....,r.'I..~...~;.:~t.~.~:,.:..:..i;.::.
Q ELF..crIVE
"
~.
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by nny person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed,or elected bonrd,
, 'councH, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory nnd non-advisory bodies who are presented
'. with n voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143; Florida StntuteSt .
, ,
.'
YC?ur responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict. of interest.will vary greatly
dependinff on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay dose attention to the instructions on
this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. . .
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
, A porson holding elective or appointive co~nty. municipal, or other 10C1.l1 public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on D mensure
which inures to his or her special private gain or Joss. Each elected or appointed local officer,olso is prohibited from knowingly voting
C"~~IlDSure which inures to the special coin or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained
ci':'!.ll!!...ding thoparont organization'or subsidiary of.a.co.rporate principal by which he or she is retai~cd); to ~he special private gain or
10S9 of a relative; or to the special privata gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies
. under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357. F.B., and offi~rll ofin~epen~ent ~pecial tax districts ,elc<:t.cd on a one-acre, one.vote basis are not pro-
hibited from votingin that capacity. . '.
For purpoSes of this law, a....r~lntivc.. includes only the officers father, mother, son, daughter. husband. wife, brothc'r. sister. father.
in.law, mother-in.law. son-in.law. and daughter-in-law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on
a business enterpriJ;e with the (!ffic,er as u pnrtnerl joiflt venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (whero the shares of
the corporation are not listed on nny national or regional stock exchange). '
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*
.
.
.
.
*
.
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: .
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on
which you arc abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filillg this form with the person responsible for recording
the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
..
,.
.
.
.
.
.
*
.
,.
..
.
.
.
.
.
I
, ~POINTED OFFICEUS:
You must nbsWn from voting and disclose the conflict in the situations described above nnd in the manner described for elec~d om..,
cilrs. In order to pnrticipate in those matters, you must disclose the nature of tho conflict before maki ng nny nttnmpt to influence the.
dtlciuion, whether orally or in writing nnd whether made by you or at your direction.
IF .you IN'l'END TO MAKE ANY A'ITEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO 1'HE MEETING AT WHICH THE .
VOTE WILY" BE TAKEN: . ' " ,." ': .:rl::;~.- .~
, ~.:must cc:>>mplete und fi)~ this form (before making nny nttempt to influence the decision) with the person responsibhi:f~~ ',.' r
recording the minutell of the meeling. who will incorporntc the form in the minutes. ,
, :~.,: A copy of t.he fonn must bo provided immcdintcly to the otlwr members of the ogency.
. rhe form must be rend publicly at tho noxt meeting nRcr the fonn is filed.
.'
CE FOAM BB - REV. 1/95
PAGE 1
. . ' ,., ."1.'. .'. . . .
., !:1E:YOu MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECiSION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT'!'HE 'MEETING:
. . '.. ~. ~ '. ~ I
:.,:,.".~~OU 'rill~~t dJ~!o~ ~~~Jy t~o nB.tu~ of YO~,r. c:~~~ct in' ~ho mctlRure bero~ parlidpati ng. . , . . .
.~;=-- :You'must' comp)ete 'the form and filo it within 16 days nfter tho voto OCcum with tho person resPonsiblo for reCording tho ,~
;' minutes of tho mooting. who must incorporate tho form in the minuUts. A copy orthe form must be provided immediately ta.the
other members of the ogency, and the form must be rond publicly at the next meeting nfte~ thoforln is filed. '. .
, DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
I,])Prll b 0'. G I c.b sitS u::e"G . hereby disclose that on ~ l?1U b~
I'
2001.
-.I~_:
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
jnurod ta'my special privata gain or Joos;
, .
inured to the special gain or Joos army business associate,
inured to the special gain or Joss of my relative.
inurod to the special gain or loss of '
. \\rhom I am'retained; or
,by
I
j.
\
---;-0 inured to the special gain or loss of
'; is the parunt organization or subsidiary of a p.rincipal which has retained me.
- .
" ., h(b) The measnre before my ng'cncy and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows:
.. '
,
. which
.' 'I l
;
, .
PI6 A
~o
eet9A.~1 t90' . ~ ~ ITG1US c;,~' 7 (;)fJ Un..s e-q Av-BNbA'
':L ~Vhrro nrn; ARpWtQp:rj J rl~ ($Hil~T GM-'~ll+ Of- Ct.J3trfltl)lfr1f{?\'
UnvArlA1 ~MIl'OT CW7JILLb\ I ~ ff1;C-fJNUPb MPua.wi); ",:
f~rJPQ (}{l... e:,dt.I}J~ {6ecflG?lT CA-M,G- 7D ItNt3- ff;f4;oJ3rW1
~ f-; vVV1. GWLPW'1 (?(l.. W APG rra M... ~ ( I1A I L ~ l.J.Jfn" T Tl.> Av () fj)
MP~tG fJ1F CDtJPUtT.
(-~) :i
'......,/ '
oj .:
. ;.
.. ,r. S
, .
, ;
. . ~:! ~~;,.
. ~ i.
\.
Zl ~
.
..
,}
, \
.
.
,
~ ~
. . J
" tDRte Ftle~ ~.l
I[ h 1, f OJ-
I
Signature
.'
"1: ': UNDER PROVll3IONS OF FLORIDA STATurES U12.317, A EAILURE TO MAKE ANY: REQWtR.lE~DrSC( ':')p ,
,.l E'Q.oNSTITUTE~:~ttROUNDS FOR AND'MAY BE PUN~S!lED/BY ONE'P~'..MORE P~,:1'!iE4'6~~<!J.~;
, " I RCHMENT. REMbvAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYM"EtNT, DEMCJT'iON;\REDUCTION'm~r '
, ~ J SALARY,iREPRIMAND, OR A CML PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000~
! ,.' ...., '. . . .
I'
... "
..,OE.FORM 89. AEV..1195
p ^,ac'~ ;
.-... . . .. I.... -
..: 1,-.11',..: ", I :.. ~" 1,"'. ......... ,_ 'r.:'..' .~~':: '... . .;' .... -.,"w ;':.,'~.~.' ....... >,.....'... '.' ..:,.:.: .!','~', :....1.4.'. .,', '.:. '/"'.' ~4.:.,~.
, ' ,
. . '.,. ',. . .' "
>, 11iF...YQU MAKE NO ATtEMPt ro INFLUENCE THE DEClSION EXCEPT BY DlSC'USSION AT 'tHE MEETING: .
. I ., ~ '. t .... .. . '..
.'/ ," 'lII<"bYdu mUB.t disclofUl orally the nntum of your conflict in tho 'mcllBure befo~ participating.
. . h+ . 1: I' "._"
",,_ .~ :~:<<- 'You must' complete tho form and file it within 15 days after the vota occurs with tho person resPonsible for recording the (',
, , : minutes of the meett~g. who must incorporate the fonn in the minutes. A copy ofthe form must be provided immediately to-tho
, I other members of the agency. and the form must be rend publicly at the next meeting nftcr the form is filed.
.~ ,'I.
! '
,
.......... .
. ~.
,"
, DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
.I,])Pn'tO o. G,c..C>eR:.SLeeoi$' . herebydisc1oso that on ~ l?7ubc:tL-.
11
2ooZ.
.0-f9-_:
"
"
, :~ '
;. ,. . (a) A measure came or win come before my agency which (check orie)
:' ~ inured to my s~cinl p'rivate gain or loss;
,'. .
(_~,' ,_ i~ured to the sp,ednI gain or loss of my business associate,
" _ inured to ~he special gain or loss of my relative.
:\ :,
. '_ inured to the special gain or loss of
, Whom I am retained; or
.. .
. " " _ inured'to, the special gain or loss of
a . ~
;" ~ ~l ',is the parent organization or subsidiary ofa principal which hna retained me.
~ ;'~' ", (b).The measure oofore my ~ency nnd the nature of my conOicting interest in the measure is os ~ol1ows:
" J
:' j t
. ~ ' .
, ~ !
,by
\ c,"
. which
f f 1.
D~A
~O
~A~/f96 ~C?M:A- ITG'1US {p ~ 7 ()/D Co-rtseq- /<<6g,..bA
--:c ~Vo,-en Tlr\i5 N>P~~ 1 FI~T ($NTl~T CUJI?Clt 6f- CletrfU{)/J7f;-P\'
(;;(1; V MU1 PuM1\~ CH17IUb\ , ~ flU..-pfWA p[, AJ;PWA;rp-/;)
ff!::iJ.Jbr;rJ~ ~U- ~~C.I}J~ i6~LT CA-M,cr W JUA3" P~}JrL01
() <- vVtM (fWtf UJ!t eft. (;J A f) r; ((ZIIt.{,. ~ ( I1A f l. q WIt f.j T TD /nI P I 'j)
~r~tG'. Bf Cr;tJPtltT.
,.. ~': ~:'
. \.... ,..,/ ;,
, -
. .~ :
':
"
I.
\;
:' ~ j '.'~.'
"=-~. 11 .
;' ~
, \'
.~ r
. '
';. :t.
~,
}
.: ..,. t., .....,...~ ~
<.. .... ... ...... . ~
I
~
1
t s
I, . J
'. l.&... ~I.~;.l
hi/it Or
I
~J
Signnture
, 1-'.'1,. ""j'J i'
, ,'I J , ' . , . \ "" '. _..
,;' : UNDER pnO~.IONS O~ FLORIDA STATUTES ~112,317, A F.~LURE TO MAKE ANXR:E~Wtl1~D1\SC'" ""!it
,! S. , 'Et~ONSTITUTE~'lttROUNDS FOR AND ,MAY BE Pl!N~SHED liiy ONE.QR',J'vfORE O~;:'F~E!FO~~(!).wn. ,;:'
,i, ,ilCHMENT. REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICEiOR EMPLOYMifflT.'DEMdfiioN/\REDUC'l'ION'INN 0
~:,~Al.lAlly,!REPRIMAND, OR A CML PENALTY NOT 'fO EXCEED $10,000. ,:
,I · r....'... "~ . ' <
i' .t.OE.fORM 89. REV. 1/95
f~~./'.. :~.: .'
P'{~E'IP'; .
. .' ..r. .: 'Ii. . .:.~' '"+J !t"",~;>'~,, ~l' l~r.'r'; ,".,' ~:..:'.': ,'.1....';...< '~,' (,"~ \ '. '.~. . t,. ' ..~ ;,' ':.~ '~:' J .(.: ~ l' \' '.~ '. ~ .... .I,~.: . ~:: I., .~ ~ ,'f' . ~'. '.".' ~I,.)~.,".'i'\ '{ :~... r
...., .
1"'~~
. <~ .;'..
,',
. ~ ~',
, '
l\":-
. .\'}.
.~ ' "
\~.:';
:~';~~
I . t,
,;'..'"'
" ,. ~
\"
,t"',;
~. . . .
',",
.~' .'
'...,
1.1:
~ '( ~
/ '. . (>
:. ~ ':.
..;".'
H..': ;1.
:,' 'I
- ."
"
~: :':~>'
1" '.~~
(', .
f' :,
'I.;~,I; .
.J '.i\~
<:-' .!~~.
I': '~:"
':t:"!'
:.(1:,.;"
". ~,~.;:.
',1 ""\;~'
.. -""
i
../
',' . "'
.;:~).:.
" . ~ ~ .
~i~. <
, ,
:..:)::':I~
'~"{'>::',
r.:,:':t,:
>,;:.I~Y'
}}1;-;:
>",,:,:';:-/
;,~i.':!?'
,~:,"::':. ~:
. :','-'-..'-.,
., .
..r~' .' .
.:.' \. ~...:. '
:':):,:::';:;!)
:' . ~\:" ',:.
.i...... '.
" .':!'~ .
':\ ;;\;;~::,:
. :': ~\~.,
" ,
. i, ~'"
:\~>.";\,:
':'! ' ," "
.:%"
::,;,::J:>
;' :' '.'
';!:::.:,:.:
".'.' .
~. '4 . ,.:.,
"., \ " :' ~ .'
" , , ~
FORM 88 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY
, J
MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAS
NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION AUTHORITY OR c'.......
COMMITTEE '" DJ (
t J,....Je". D ,
THE BOARD. COUNCIL. COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR
COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
CITY 0 COUNTY 0 OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
NAME OF POLlT1C+AL SU81V1SION:
CJ~Y'"Wo'C "V
MY PosmON IS:
.:r r.
(%.3'1 \' c.b. .b V-
CITY _I C~NlY .
CI&\.rr/c:/TtJv tJ r):!!;.l~
DATE ON WH CH vorE OCCUREO ',,-:',"
) l
o ELECTIVE
POINT1VE
WHO MUST FILE FORM as
This fOfm is fOC' usa by tin poniOfI &9Ning at tho coonty, city, or othor loc3llovel of govemmont on an appointed or elocted board, council,
CClt'1lITIlsslo, authority, or committee. It apprlOS oquaUy to members of Qdvisay and noo-advisory bod"tOS who alO pcesentod with a voting
conftict of Interest lrIdor Sec:fion 112.3143, Florida statutes. ,
y~ responsibtTrties under the law when faced with a moasure in which you have a conflict of Inttlrost will vary groatly depending on whl3thcr
you hold go ~ or appolnfiv8 position. For this rcason, please pay close attention to the Instructions on this form before completing the
reva~ side and filing the foem.
INSTRUCTIONS fOR, COMPUANCE WITH SECTtOW 112.3143. FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding eIoctivo or .ppointivo count)', municlpal, or other local public offICe MUST ABSTAIN rrcm voting on a measure which Inures
to his spocial private gain. Each elocted or appointed local officer also is Pfohtbited from knowingly voUng on a measure wh,ieh inures to \he
spec:ial garn of a principal (othOr than a govemmont agency) by whom he is retain6d (rncluding the parent organ1zatiolJ or subsidiary Of(""
lXlfpOtatB principal by which he Is retained); to tho spe<:\al privato gain or a'rolative; or to the spoci;Il private garn of a business associal "
CommIssioners 0( community rodew>bpmont llgonclos unci<< Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S.. and officers of independent spocial tax districts
e~ on a ono-acro,'Of"Ie-vcte basis ~ro not,prchibitod from voting in that cap:lc!ty.
For purpo$OS'of this Iolw, a .relative. lncludos only tho offlCer'G f:aUlOC, mother, ~. daughtor. husb:lnd. wife. father-[n-Iaw, mothor.in-l:aw,
soo-in-law. and daughtor-ln-bw. A "business associato. means any person or entity engaged in or carrying 00 a business enterprise vlith the
Officof,0.5 a 'partoof, joint wnt\lror, co-oYmef of propol1:t, or corporate &iareholdor (Vihore the shares of the e<<poralion are not listed on any
national or regional stock exchange).
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In ackfrtion to abstaining from voting in the sitlJtltions described above, you most disclcr..o tho connict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTe BEING TAKEN by pubrlcly stating to the ;;as.sambly !he: nature of your interest in the measure on which you are
abstaWng from voting; .nd
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with tho person rosponslblo for rocording \he minutes
of tho JTKlOting, who should incorpo(ofta !he form in tho minutes.
APPOmTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting In tho situations dos.cribod above, you otherwise may participate in thoso matters. However, yOU
mus.t alSclor-...o tho natura of \he connict boforo mak.lng any attempt \0 Influence tho decision, whether orany OC' In writing and whether made by
you Of your alfoction. .
If YOU INTEND TO MAI<E ANY AliEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTI: WilL BE
TAKEN:
. You must comploto and fila Ulho form (bofero making any a"ompt to lnllutlllCO tho decision) with tho pCJrsorl rosponsible for rocording tho
minutes of the mooting, who will incorporlltO tho form In tho mInutes.
. A copy of tho form mU$t bo provldoo Immediatoly to tho other members of tho [Igoney.
. Tho form musl be load publiclY at the noxt mcotJng aftor the form is filed.
CE Form 00. \0.9\
PAGE 1
, .
~I :",,)
" ,
, ,
., ,
, "
.I,' ;."{;'.f',' ,. .''''c'''
,
/,'
r c. . . ~
/ :.
,!;:'
o
. ~,-..,'
, "'J
,,~)',
,__....~<.. I.,. fl' ." ~
IF yOU MAXI: NO AnEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT DY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
., You roost cr~ m,ly the Mbn of ~ com1k:t In the mcasuru bofOffl ptortic:Ipating. .
{
. You",,", _1l1o lomI ond 1\10 k - 15 _ - ... - ..,.... '"'" tho _ n>spon<iblo lot roconlOng tho .......... 01 "" j .
meeting, whO cpuGt Incorp<:nto tho form In the~. A copy of the form must be prcMdod Immo<fl3to1y to the other mombon of lhe
~. and the fonn Il1UIrt be road publ'dy at tho next mooting after tho fonn It filed.
"~':~~~URE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
I, UI'>rJ M..; )lJi J",. ',i;:"", ~ __ !hot""
(II) A measuro came or will come before my agency which (check one)
Inured to my special private gain:
Inured to the special oam d my buslnoss associate,
Inured to the spoclal gain of my rolative, .
''J' Inured to the speclaI gain of Be. \ \ e..." I e... vJ l3 ~ Lt m p r f..,I .~ f1.. t:- wtVJm 111m retainOd; ~
fllv1/t7L
I ,
..
Inured to the special gain of
organiza~ or subsldiary of a principal which has retained mo.
(b) The measure befura my agency and tho nature of my conllicting Interest in tho moasuro Is as follows:
, which Is tho parent
'~~~ft~~L_
t"'it;
r. u ".jJ_~}J.j
.,:~,1;qrr}j.""'-t.I
"1. ".
.~~.
)
, , :./1,';4' 'l--
Dato I
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 5112.317 (1991), A FAILURE TO 'MAKE ~Y REQUiRED DISCLOSUR~
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED B'f ONE OR MORE OF THE FOllOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVA
OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOITlON, REDUCTIONS IN SAlARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY
NOT TO EXCEED $5,000, (~
"
, ",
CE Form SS . 10-91
PAGE 2 '
"., 'I' " .~,'. ...., _".,.'..../ '1"-;,':' .~ ,'\.1; L'....lf..,..; ~,.:....~,a :at"o"j,'
/ . -..~... .
',' . (. , ;
\'_1..-1
~~.~ )'F/.'f;~ ~~.~t .~
\D.'-ft.e. ~ tv. ~ &.jf~~'.
~ '
',,- ._ ~ J.
"
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENce THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
F'i.~')
t ,"',', }
.... ~'j - ,~
. .
· You must cfl$dos.\.ro enl)' h r'Qbn of )'OlI' eom1lct In the ~SlJrO bo(O(o patticlpating. .
(.
o You muGt complete tho fonn and file It \'iitNl:l15 daya aft<< thG \'Ote ooan ~ the porson ~bIe for roeon:fing tho mlnutos of tho'"
mooting, who 'J'lUSf. inc<<ponlIte the fonn In the mInutoa. A copy 0( the fom1 must be provIdod Immod'l3lo{y to the othM mombo.... 0( th&
~, and the fonn must be 1m pubfdy at tho next mooting aftor the fonn ls filed.
. ~ :.~~.~ I ,j . ,
.i'~'~LOSURE OF LO<?AL OFFICER'S INTEREST
J, Jf.J.,p-J M"')vV .rr,i:~", ',herebrdioclooelhaton
(Ill) A ~e came or will come before my agency which (check one)
~ to my special privata gain;
Inured to tho GpOciaI gain or my bus1no:ss associate,
Inured to the spcclal galo of my relative,
y.... lOured to the special gain of B~ \ \ "-...V I ~ vJ t; ~ { t fY\ P r ~
II ~e:r / PL
I ,
.2
.
.~ f1- t:- whom I Qm retained; ~
Inured to the special gain of
org;!nlza~ or subsidiary of a priOclpal which has retained 1M.
" (b) Tho me3$Ul"8 before my Dgency and the nature of my COI"lfticting Inlof'ost In the moasure Is;as fol1c7Ns:
~ which Is the ~rent
I~ !t~ I~ "2--
Dato FlIed I . ,
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 5112.317 (1991), A FAILURE TO 'MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOS~~
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT. REMO
OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, OEMOITION, REDUCTIONS IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY
NOT TO EXCeeO $5,000.
CE Form 88 . \0-91
PAGE 2
,\,:; '~ ~ : :, .':: .: . . .', I.... '. :." I
. ,. :','.:..... I ~. : ' .~' , ~.. I. :,' ~ ',', .!'. . ; .~ :, '.~" ~ ~ + . .,~ J' . . " ~ '/' ~'. ~. . ; :' . ~ ..: I'):'," :. : .. ..:\ \'; : ;~"..- ."~ ~ ': : < ;. ' '~ ~, , ':'
. ;,
"
','l
"~~'U" ....1 ~,':,: ,~:.,~"I',j. 't t>:~~ .::,'.C; .'
':,' ". i,
i:
'~
"i'
1<,
. :';...'
.'c. '
..
"
, ~, , '~
",',
. / .
:.~ c i, ,,: '
I,:., .
(~'~;.:. .
'.l.'l I..r~' ~ ,
~, .;,; i. ~ . > .. ~ ,> . ~ , :'
','1<' ,
',.4 .
.~., . .
,i'~~ ; : ,:, "
:,.. .<. <
.l <. ,
., "
,I,~ ,,' '.
" ,
F>'" ": .
': "~)
\ '
,\ .. '\\;
.'1 .'
\ .,:
~', .
, ,.....~)
. . l'W!tJI . '
'0'
,...
h'
':':','~ ,"l,: "
'> I; 1'.'/
i~l~~;.\::. ~.~~.,:,>} .,
'COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
November 19, 2002 '
, Present:
carten A. Petersen
Ed Hooper ,
David Gildersleeve
Edward Mazur. Jr.
Shirley Moran
, Alex Plisko
John Doran '
. ,Kathy Milam
Chair
Vice Chair
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member - arrived 2:22 p.m.
Alternate Board Member....:. voting/non-voting
, .,,'
Also Present: Leslie Dougall-Sides
, .' Cyndi Tarapani
Lisa Fierce
Gina Clayton
Patricia O. Sullivan
Assistant City Attorney
Planning Director .
Assistant Planning Director
'Long Range Planning Manager
Board Reporter'
, .
, ' The Chair called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Invocation '
and Pledge of Allegiance. '
To provide continuity for research, items are In agenda order although not,
necessarily discussed in that order. ,,' '
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS
, Member Moran moved to approve 'the minutes of the regular meeting of September 17,
2002. as' submitted in written summation to each board member. The motion was duly ,
, seconded. Members Hooper. Gildersleeve, Mazur. Moran. and Pliska. Alternate Member
,M,I,lam, and Chair Petersen voted,"Aye." Motion c~rried unanImously.
, Memb'er Mazur moved to approve the minutes of the regular meetfng of October 15,
2002, as'submitted In written summation to each board member. The motion was duly
seconded.. Mer:nbers Hooper; Gildersleeve. Mazur, Moran, and Plis!<o. Alternate Member
Milam. and Chair Petersen voted "Aye." Motion carried unanimously.
mcd1102
1
\ 11/19/02
.... :.I.'~'."\, .,''::~ "; ,:'i ,.' ',....t'..'l... ,'..~~;1~" ' ',l,:,,:,t':l..;., ",II"'r.,';. ...:1':1-..." ;:.1.:" ~>.'.:;.."';~.lr,..',I'. ':.,
:;,..,..~~, ,'.:. kl......+,....,."....:'". .' I, .',., :' 'r""':"I'I"":''':':':'''\''::':'.:.'':,''~'~':':~:. ~"""::I' .I.'.~'.,..:'~.::..:r.'..'.,~'j..::,~:,
~
l . :1
, ,.
,I ..
.'
If '
.. \1
"
,\
"
rl\
t.,~$..J
u
'"-'"- ...! ..... ~. . ~
..
B. CONSENT AGENDA (Items 1-8)
Item C1 was removed from the Consent Agenda.
1. Case: FLD2002-09031 - 14 Somerset Street' Level Two Application
Owner: CBGAM,lncorporated.
Applicant: Uday Lele; White Sands; LLC.
Location: The 0.50-acre site Is located on the north side of Somerset Street
approximately 150 feet west of Mandalay Avenue.
Atlas Page: 258A. ,
Zoning: MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District.
Request: '
Flexlbl~ Development approval to increase the height of a wall within the front setback along
Somerset Street from three feet to six feet under the provisions of Section 3-B04.A.1, reduce the
front' (south) setback along Somerset Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building), and Increase
the height of a building with attached dwellings from 30 feet to 56 feet (as measured from base
flood elevation). as part' of a Residentiallnfill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.F.
" Prop'osed Use: A 15-unit condominium development within a single, six-story, building 56 feetin
height (as measured from the base flood elevation),
, Presenter: Mark T. Parry, ~lanner.
The D.50-acre site is located on the north side of Somerset Street, approximately 150
feet west of Mandalay Avenue. The site, initially developed in 1925, is located within a
transitional area on Clearwater beach, marking the boundary between single-family dwellings to
the north and multi-family and overnight accommodation uses to the south. The site Is located
. directly along the Gulf at Mexico. An unimproved right-at-way, Beach Drive, exists along the .
west site of the site. The site contains two structures with a total of nine hotel units. A two-st~ry
building, approximately 24 feet in height with approximately 2,263 square feet of area, is located
centrally on the property, and contains seven dwelling units. A second~ one-story building;
approximately 23.feet in height with approximately 1,922 square-feet of area, is located on the '
east portion of the site, and contains two dwelling units. There are parking spaces that are
,partially on the site and partially in the right-of-way.
The site is .located within the "Old Florida District" of Beach by Design.'which designates
the area for residential reuse with multi-family townhomes and condominiums. The Plan
recommends low to mid rise development. The character of the area is of modest attached
dwellings and overnight accommodations. There Is significant redevelopment potential In the
area.
The proposal includes the redevelopment of the site with a 15-unlt condominium building
of 62,692 square-feet and five stories above parking., The proposed building will be located
approximately 10 feet from the side (north and east) property lines, 25 feet from the front (east)
property line along Beach Drive (unimproved) 'and 10 feet from the front (south) prpperty line
along Somerset Street.
The applicant seeks to increase the height of a wall within the front setback from three
feet to six feet, reduce the front (south) setback along Somerset Street from 25 feet to 10 feet
(to building). and Increase the height from 30 feet to 56 feet (as measured from base flood
elevation). as part of a Resldentiallnfill Project. Attached dwellings under the Flexible Standard
Development provisions are permitted to ~e up to 50 feet in height and may have front setbacks
. mcd1102 2 ' 11/19/02
". T,
"t'. ",;:.",~ .,','"....:..,~:-,' ....:..;...,...~+ .'...:,~I. ,,':~,'..~f,I;": '.\..,....~...I_r,.".,..:~... "'I'..~.I.i '........,~ ,.:. J.'~~I'.' .."~..,:,..::-..'..,.,'...,'~.:,
~
,........
~ )
-
~
, ,
1 '
."
.. '
reduced to 15 feet. This site Is located within a flood zone (zone VE), and the requested height
Is 56 feet (as measured from the base flood elevation of 14 feet) with five floors above one floor
of parking. By Code, height is measure from base flood elevation. The front (south) setback
request of 10 feet and a height greater than 50 feet requires that the application be reviewed as
part of a Resid~nttallnflll Project request.
One level of under-structure parking will be provided and will Include 26 spaces that
exceed Code requirements of 23 spaces. Access to the' site Is proposed along Somerset Street
at two gated entrance/exits.
The Mediterranean architecture of the building will include neutral-color stucco,
te,rracotta color barrel tile roof, and a significant number of windows and balconies on all
elevations. The flat roof has been designed to minimize views of the mechanical equipment and
Incorporates the use of cupola-type enclosures. The building complements the vision of the
HOld Florida District." It will serve as an appropriate transition use from the more intensely
developed area to the south, consisting of a variety of overnight accommodation, retail,
restaurant and other non-resld~ntial uses, to the'single-family neighborhood to the north.
A white. aluminum picket-style fence, 42-inches in height, will be located around the
, perimeter of the pool, which is to be located along the Gulf side of the building. A masonry wall
will taper from six feet in height to four feet, extending from the south fa<;ade of the building on
either side of the main entrance. It will continue to the east and west along Somerset Street for
approximately 12 feet. The wall will have a stucco finish, painted to match the primary color of
the building. The wall is designed to screen the trash staging area and provide space for
building identification., An awning will cover the main entryway.
The landscape plan exceeds the requirements of Code. This includes a mixture of
various trees, shrubs, palms and annuals. A sidewalk, four-feet in width, will be provided along
Somerset Street. The sidewalk will include a distressed finish. The sidewalkwill connect with
an existing sidewalk to the east. It will provide for continued public access across the frontage
of the site to the Gulf.
Amenities include an in-ground swimming pool along the gulf (west side). Roof drains
will be routed through a proposed stormwater vault. which will include a filtration system. A
Code-compliant method of treating paved, vehicular use areas must be provided to satisfy
stormwater management criteria, prior to the issuance of any permits, and the applicant is
noticed that this could adversely impact the site design. As provided in Section 4-406 of the
Code, should addressing stormwater issues result in a site plan which is significantly different
from the one approved by the Community Development Board. the site plan must be
resubmitted to the Board for review. '
Fire Department requirements, including gates with an approved emergency entry
system and a knox key box on the building for emergency egress. have been noted on the plan.
Solid Waste Department requirements have been met. Trash will be collected within the
building and moved to a stagIng area by the complex staff on pick-up days.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on October 10, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible
Development approval to: 1) increase the height of a wall within the front setback from three feet
to six feet under the provisIons of Section 3-804.A 1; 2) reduce the front (south) setback along
, mcd1102 3 11/19/02
'.'\ '\'" ,1~1:~'I..I,"',~:.'t. ."::~""I' .'~.'. <...r:.";","I"~'; ,,' ~."..;~"I.~..II'~' r'} ; 'i.~........~ :~.~..l.. 'l';'"I,."J'> :.,;.... '".~.:...J...,....:..,..:,';..~..:.
:;,..."'.. ,'..,;'''', ..... "'-'~..,r " :~' ,'~,: 'I; '.' :j"_" :":' 1 ...,~.~./:~,,'.....: "~, ~'::-'I'" ... .\,I.<.'~ ~I ;..~., ..;l..~,'. ':,',.,.,,4:<,. ':~ "~. ."::.
"~
'.'
. '
~~,A:.
, '"V")
~
Somerset Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building); and 3) Increase the height from 30 feet to
56 feet (as measured from base flood elevation), as parl of a Resldenllallnfill Project under the
provisions of'Sectlon 2~404.F. for the site at 14 Somerset Street, with the following bases and
conditions: Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria
as a Residentiallnfill Project per Section 2~404. F; 2) The proposal is In compliance with other
standards in the Code Including the general applicability criteria per Section 3~913; 3) The
application is consistent with the "Old Florida District" In Beach by DesIgn; and 4) The
development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment
efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1) That the density of the site be limited to 15 dwellings units
(30 dwelling units per acre); 2) That the height be limited to 56 feet as measured from base
flood elevation; 3) That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual'
ele~ations submitted or as modified by the CDB; 4) That should addressing stormwater Issues
res~1t in a site'plan which is significantly different from the one approved by the Community
, Development Board. the site plan must be resubmitted to the Board for review; 5) That all Fire
Department requirements. including gates with an approved emergency entry system and a
'kno~ key box on the building for emergency egress; and 6) That all signage meet the
requirements of Code.
. Planner Mark Parry said the project has reduced the number of proposed parking
spaces to 26, where a minimum of 23 is required. It was stated the size of the proposed
development Is slgni~cant, in comparison to the small property.
Roger Larson, representative for the applicant, stated the project is consistent with
Beach by Design guidelines and concepts related to the Old Florida District. He said all parking
will be under the mld~rise structure. He said the current use features p~rking in the right~of~way.
He said setbacks will be friendly to pedestrian traffic. In response.to a question, he said the
development is not requesting the vacation of beach right-of~way. He said the building was
. designed to not appear "box~like." He said neither Beach by Design nor the Code defines the
height of a mid-rise. He said while high rises can be as tall as 150 feet, this project will be a
mid~rise, at only 5 stories above parking. He said the developer concurs with all staff
recommendations and conditions. In response to a question. he said overflow parking will not
be permitted to park in the right-of~way. He said the number of spaces to be provided exceeds
Code.
One person spoke in support of the project arid eight people spoke in opposition.
Assistant Director of Engineering AI Carrier said staff has worked with the developer to
meet City and SWFWMD (Southwest Florida Water Management District) requirements for
stormwater treatment. The project will use vaults to meet flood attenuation requirements and
swales for stormwater treatment. Currently, the property has no means to treat water.
Mr. Larson said current property setbacks are small. He said underground parking will
be constructed higher than the crown of the road, but will not cause flooding problems for
neighboring properties. He reviewed FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Authority)
requirements and stated that any residential development constructed on the subject property
would have to meet FEMA requirements, which would permit views of neighboring yards. He
said the project meets required ,set backs on the single-family residence side of the property.
He said the property will not 'feature dance bands and will be less noisy and congestive than the
current motel. He noted Code permits 30 units per acre. In response to a concern regarding
mcd1102
4
, 11/19/02
.; ,"" .,~"", ~ ,'~~: ;~~' ":"" . . I. ': ',,' > '~', ,,":.'~.': > u ....: ','1: ", . ~..,.... I" ~ ": ..; " :. ....~, "~: ,'\' ...' " :...'. >" ':',~ " t".,:j.~", ,...: .:-',
<<
~ ., .
',~
' ,.,
.;, .
,
>,
. .'1.
, .'
,,'
ro'T " .
<,
.'l'+
,',
. ' >,.
. '. ,
.', l .'
. '.:
.<,
".-. ,
',.~.,) ,
,,'
Q.
the development's location abuttfng a slngle~famlly residentIal neighborhood, Mr. Larson saId
the project meets Code's open space and Impermeable surface ratio requirements.
, It was felt the project would not be financially feasible wllhout the requested fiexlblllty
and proposed mass of the development. Concern was expressed the request would have a
negative Impact on the neighborhood's environment. It was stated the project will block views
from nearby homes. It was Indicated the mass of the buildIng Is too large for the sIze of the
property. Mr. Larson said no added density Is being requested. It was stated the project is too
large for the neighborhood. In response to a question. Mr. Larson said the requested setback
encroachment relates to the 30-inch balconies, not the main structure. It was felt the project is
, too tall to abut a slngle-famlly residential neighborhood. It was stated Code height restrictions of
. 3D-feet have a purpose. Concern was expressed approval of this development would set a
neighborhood precedent. .
In response to a question. Planning Director Cyndi Tarapani said the 3D-units per acre
density is a Countywide limit. Permitted denslUes are higher downtown. She reviewed benefits
of the project, indicating staff works to balance the needs of nearby residents with
redevelopment issues. It was stated a motel development on this property would permit more .
units and less parking. It was Indicated Beach by Design does not propose a several block long
transition, to" single-family residences. It was felt the proposed development would improve the
site. Support was expressed for'redeveloplng Clearwater beach. ' It was noted the projeCt will
Increase setbacks from current levels. In response to a question, Ms. Tarapanl said the 3D-foot,
height limit is In the Code, not in the "Old Florida" section of Beach by Design. It was
recommended ,this project, which abuts a single-family residential neighborhood, be limited to ,
,3D-feet in height. It was felt the reduction' of setbacks Is' not enough of a compromise to permit
, an extra 56 feet in height. ,It was recommended the board consider th~ project's impact on
su~rounding residents. It was stated the project would encroach on the neighborhood. It was
stated a 30~foot tall struCture would not be neighborhood friendly either.
Member Hooper moved to approve Agenda Item C1,- Case FLD2002-09031 with six
conditions, as listed. The motion was duly seconded. Members Hooper, Mazur, Moran, and
,Doranvoted "Aye"; Members Gildersleeve and Pliska and Chair Petersen voted "Nay." Motion
carried. Alternate Member Milam did not vote.
mcd1102
11/19/02
5
~~.'f.t...... ;;;;~~ y!, r:i!;/.:~ .t"~l.. ..;, ~!.. . t
" I-t
'.... '(..:; '. .' .':. ,'..'~' ~~ ...t~: I"~.'~""~~ ..",~,I :'1'1: 1';:;~",."...~!" '".,.,':>,: ,~,',:...,,:,.I..,'~..," .".:.".~::",~:.~..:,...,.~...: .~~. ...... ..i~..".'.,.:\:.:,'....':,~'
'~
""j
'.'Iot..,..,#'"
,.;)
......~~:'I:.. 'c'" . <
" ,
Item C2 was removed from the Consent Agenda.
2. Case: FLD2002-09029 - 1590 Gulf Boulevard Level Two Application
Owner/Applicant: Bellevlew Biltmore Resort, Ltd.
Representative: Robert Pergollzzi, Florida Design Consultants, Inc.
Location: The 1.38-acre site Is located on the west side of Gulf Boulevard, approximately
300 feet north of Sand Key Estates Drive.
Atlas Page: 311 B.
Zoning: C, Commercial District.
Request: '
Flexible, Deveiopment approval to reduce the front (east) setback along Gulf Boulevard from 25
feet to five feet to pavement (exIsting), reduce the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet
(to,exlsting,bullding and pavement). reduce the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to
pavement) and from 10 feet to 1.4 feet to existing pool deck. and reduce the required number of
parking spaces from 108 spaces to 46 spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704B.
Proposed Use: The re-establishment of a restaurant within the current structure with site
improvements.
presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
Member Mazur declared a conflict of interest.
The 1.38 site is located on the west side of Gulf Boulevard, approximately 300 feet north
of Sand Key Estates Drive. The site is irregularly shaped, having previously been part of the
Cabana 'Club residential property te the north as its clubhouse and "members only" restaurant
for the condominiums, built in the early 1980's. This parcel was conveyed separately in the
early 1990's, litigated and determined to be a legal parcel, and was operated as a public'
'restaurant until 1998, when it closed. The site was the subject of a land use plan map
amendment a'nd rezoning application in year 2000, proposed for Residential High land use and
HDR, High Density Residential, zoning district (Case #LUZ 00-05-08). The City Commission
de'nied that case on September 21,2000. The site is developed with a 10,502 square-foot
building) which is two stories over an open ground floor. The restaurant, on the second and
third floor, is 7,054 square-feet of enclosed floor area. On the third floor, a 1,916 square-foot
outdoor cafe overlooks the beach. A pool is adjacent to the restaurant building. The restaurant
building has separate restrooms and lockers for the pool and beach. The applit;ant plans to use
the pool and beach, including the restrooms and lockers, for guests of the Belleview Biltmore
Hotel only.
This site historically has been zoned commercial and is the only parcel on Sand Key with
commercial land use. Residential land uses dominate parcels fronting Gulf Boulevard. Portions
of property to the north ,are zoned B, Business DIstrict, as a result of a settlement agreement
with U.S. Steel on February 4, 1987, but with a RH, Residential High, land use. The only other
commercIal uses are In the 1201 block of Gulf Boulevard.
The applicant seeks to re-establish the restaurant use on this' properly, utlllzlng the
existing setbacl<s to building and pavement, for hotel guests and the publ1c. The building Is
situated along the north property line with a zero setback. The sile shares a common driveway
and drive aisle with the adjacent Cabana Club Condominiums, producIng an existing zero
setback to pavement. The parking lot pavementpresen'tly Is five feet from the front (east)
property line along Gulf Boulevard. The existing parking lot Is rive feet from the south property
mcd1102 6 11/19/02
~~".> .1(~'~>.'~' ': c
:. '_'~; ".~. ," "..n.~.." .:,I.'.:"~', I' ,; ',. ,',"',' I~I~':,". ','. "..r,..' :':, ~',:.'"~ .,'! : . ':' .:.' ',,'.'~"'.'. :=..': ~jl _,,,P':. ,,,",I ::,.' ,~I:. .... . ':',:..,.;.' ~,.' ,:,\)' ,', :~~.
, '
~
"..~,
. '~tHf}1
,:~
.\.,;'
line. The existing pool deck is 1.4 feet from the south property line. Compliance with current
Code setbacks would require removal of a portion of the existing building and much of the
existing parking, rendering re-use of existing improvements unfeasible and impracticable. While
restaurant uses are permitted as Minimum Standard Development, Flexible Standard
Development and Flexible Development uses in the Commercial District, this request is being
processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project because of existing site conditions
with respect to setbacks and parking.
The proposal includes a reduction in the amount of parking. Of 49 existing parking
, spaces, 46 parking spaces are proposed, including two handicap parking spaces not presently
provided. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the site plan will need to be revised to locate
the handicap parking spaces to meet Code requirements. Until it closed in 1998, a restaurant
operated at this location, open to the public, with no association to any hotel, and featured only
the 49 existing parking spaces. Based on ttie Code's more restrictive requirement of 15 parking
, spaces per 1,000 square feet, 108 parking spaces are required. On the low end of seven
spaces per 1,000 square feet, 50 spaces are required. The reduction in parking is appropriate
. given the Lise of shuttles via bus/van from the Belleview Biltmore Hotel for their guests.
Additionally, many,dwel1ings in high rise condominiums are within walking distance to this
restau~ant, further reducing demand for parking. The PSTA (Pinellas Suncoast Transit
Authority) trolley runs along Gulf Boulevard, with a stop immediately south of this property, and
. provides alternative transportation for beach residents and guests who may patronize this
restaurant.
The applicant proposes to upgrade the landscaping of the premises, enhancing the
visual aesthetics of the property. To provide additional plantings of trees along Gulf Boulevard
and within the site. the landscape plan needs to be revised and acceptable to Planning Staff,
prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant plans to operate the restaurant everyday
between 11 :00 a.m. and 11 :00 p.m.. except for special occasions such as New Year's Eve.
Pool hours of operation will be from 8:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
A monument sign Is proposed at the driveway entrance on Gulf Boulevard at a maximum
height to six feet. The sign should be coordinated with the design and color of the building.
Dumpsters will be stored out of view under the building and will be wheeled out to the staging
area for disposal:
The drop-off drive will need to be designated for one-way vehicular flow with appropriate
signs and pavement markings acceptable to the Traffic Engineering Department prior to
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.' The fire sprinkler system for the restaurant is currently
part of the Cabana Club Condominium's system. From a fire safety standpoint, the fire sprinkler
system will need to be separated from the Cabana Club Condominiums In a manner acceptable
to the Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. '
, The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review
Committee on October 10, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval of the
Flexible Development request to reduce the front (east) setback along Gulf Boulevard from 25
feet to five feet to pavement (existing), reduce the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet
(to existing building and pavement), reduce the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to
pavement) and from 10 feet to 1.4 feet to existing pool deck, and reduce the required number of
parking spaces from 108 spaces to 46 spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.8, for the site at 1590 Gulf Boulevard, wIth the
mcd1102 7 11/19/02 '
"...:~,.., ':'..,.,:,~,..7 ~~j,.,...,.: ,'..... 'I,',,~'~: ".~' ",7":' .,..~..tl.,'.. J" '4"1~"":'."~ I.:!,..'~.;-.I:,:i. /. ~ I..\'i.~~..,t,~:..... 'l"/~";:".::,'''_I''~''.~ '......:.:>.~~.;,.,:.
.:..,' ", :: f ~." ,;', :." I, . ': ' ", ~. ; ~, ." .,.,' . "... ,I . : " :'. j ;" " '.". , : ' . I '. ,; ,,', .' :,'. . '., ., ~ ,~ f' . : :. .',. . ., 'I . . ~ " ,,' ~ ~: I" ' ".; . : . ' . " . !, . " .' :.,,' ': , ",'.-t, . ~ ~,' j' . .,..... " .' ' ~. .' ~ ,:
~
,
~ . i '
: "
"
< ....ilI,
\.-Wtt1r1
,.:;)
,.
\ <
following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible .
Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.B; 2)
The proposal Is In compliance with other standards in the Code Including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3) The development is compatible with the
surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1) That use of thrs restaurant be in association with
the Bellevlew Biltmore Hotel and any changern association be evaluated' for complementary
operational characteristics and parking demand, and may require approval by the Community
Development Board; 2) That use of the pool, beach and restrooms/lockers be restricted to
guests of the Belleview Biltmore Hotel only; 3) That, prior to the issuance of a building permit,.
the site plan be amended to meet handicap parking space location requirements; 4) That
slgnage be limited to one monument sign. not to exceed six feet in height, with a design that is '
, architecturally-integrated into the design and color of the building; 5) That the landscape plan be
, revised, acceptable to the Planning Staff, prior to the issuance of building permits; 6) That the
drop-off drive be designated for one-way vehicular flow with appropriate signs and pavement
, 'markings acceptable to the Traffic Engineering Department, prior to the issuance of a Certificate,
of Occupancy; and 7) That the,fire sprinkler system be separated from the Cabana Club
Condominiums In a ma'nner acceptable to the Fire Department, prior to the issuance of building
permits. '
, "Senior Planner Wayne Wells said the applicant wishes to reopen the on-site restaurant.
The Belleview Biltmore Hotel plans to shuttle guests from their property to the beach, pool.
and restaurant. In response,to a question, he said the number of recommended parking spaces
is based on the number of spaces that have existed at this restaurant site for many years.
One person spoke against variances that would permit construction of a high~rise on this
sIte. It was st~ted that the reques~ was for a specific restaurant use, not a residential high-rise.
Robert Pergolizzi, of Florida Design Consultants, 'said the City Commission's previous
denial of a request to construct a high-rise on this site influenced the property owner's decision
to reestablish the restaurant.
Member Gildersleeve moved to approve Agenda Item C2 - Case FLD2002-09029 with
seven conditions. The motion was duly,seconded. Members G,ildersleeve, Mazur, Moran, .
Hooper. and Doran, and Alternate Member Milam and Chair Petersen voted UAye." Motion
carried unanimously. Member Mazur abstained.
3. ,ANX2002-09013'-1607 Stevenson's Drive Level Three Application
, Owner/Applicant: Jacq~eline L. Walters.
Location: O.18-acre located on the north side of Stevenson's Drive, approximately 90
feet west of Stockton Drive.
Atlas Page: 269B.
Request: ,
, a) Annexation of 0.18 a,cre to the City of Clearwater;
b) Land Use Plan amendment from RL, ~esldential Low (County) to RL, Residential Low
Classification (Crty of Clearwater); and
c) Rezoning from R-3, Residential Single Family District (County) to LMDR1 Low Medium
, Density Residential District (Clearwater). '
Proposed Use: Single-family dwelling.
Presenter: Gina Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager.
mcd1102
B
11/19/02
.;..... /;., ",:.' ';~, ,I '.:,~:., ' .,t ,'1: ",:.' .....,',.... ~ ... >',' ".t~'~ ~ .....,.....,., w. ". ,L: .~." '~':' '~c, .' ',', :",':" "', '..', :, ':, ," .,.', ..,.:~,','~. ~ ,4". "'!'" ,: :,'\:"',." ',' ,"; ~+",.'" :.' ,'~
~
"
,\
)'",
c.)
. ell
. ,~;)
"
The subject property Is located at 1607 Stevenson's Drive, on the north side of
Stevenson's Drive, approxImately 90 feet northwest of Stockton Drive. The subject site is
approximately 0.18 acre In area and Is occupied by an exl~ting single-famlly detached dwelling.
The applicant is requesting this annexation to receIve City solid waste service. The applicant
has been receiving water and sewer services from the City since 1981. The property is .
contiguous with existing City boundaries to the south and southeast, therefore, the proposed
annexation Is consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. It Is
proposed that the property have a Future Land Use Plan desIgnation of Residential Low (RL)
and a zoning category of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR).
, The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including solid
. waste, police. fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on the service
level.
The proposed annexation and the existing use are consistent with both the City's
Comprehensive Plan and tl1e Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as
'well as goals and policies. The existing and future use of this site as a single-family dwelling is
. consistent with the proposed LMDR zoning district. Finally, the proposed annexation is
consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing
City boundaries and is compact in' concentration.
, '
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of the
following actions: 1) annexation of the property located at 160-' Stevenson's Drive; 2)
Residential Low (RL) category pursuant to the City's'Comprehensive Plan; and 3) Low Medium
Density Residential (LMDR) z~ning district pursuant to the City's Community Development
Code.
AND
4: Case: ANX2002-09014 :""1370 State Street Level Three Application
, Owners/Applicants: Ida Fischler & Daphna Fischler.'
Representative: Kenneth H. Roush, P.E.
Location: 0.27 -acre located on the north side of State Street, approximately 650 feet
east of Betty Lane and 640 feet north of Sunset Point Road.
Atlas Page: 251 B.
Request:
, a) Annexation of 0.27 acre to the City of Clearwater;
, b) Land Use Plan amendment from RLM, Residential Low Medium (County) to RLM, ResidentIal
Low Medium Classification (City of Clearwater); and
c) Rezoning from R-4, Residential, One, Two & Three Family District (County) to MDR, Medium
, , Density ResIdential District (Clearwater).
. Proposed Use: Single-family residential.
Presenter: Gina Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager.
The subject property Is located at 1370 State Street, approximately 650 feet east of
Betty Lane and 640 north of Sunset Point Road. The subject site Is approximately 0.27 acre in
area and is occupied by a single-family detached dwelling. The applicant is requesting this
annexation to receive sewer service. The applicant plans to incorporate this property into the
Clearwater Village residential development, which Is to be constructed on the adjoining site.
The property Is contiguous with City boundaries to the north, east, south and west; therefore,
mcd1102 9 11/19/02
,,'.'.'::'~1":.":";: :t', .,.i~', :"'~.r .:"".'I'~.'.,r~I.~ ":;"'.,~',:".',.::' ~"++":'.,..t..,,~., " ";>!.~4,~. ,'0/'. p.'.;./"".,,~' :,~~.",,'."'-: '::":.,~.~::r'.:'~~'...~..'"
~
" ,
<~ .
"
. ,.-oI'".......f1\
" j
, 'I-f~"~
v
the proposed annexation Is consIstent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation
and eliminates an enclave. It Is proposed that the property have a Future Land Use Plan
designation of Residential Low Medium (RLM) and a zoning category of Medium Density
Residential (MDR). '
The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater servIces, Including sewer,
solid waste, pollee, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on the
service level. The property is already served by City of Clearwater water service. however,
when the property is redeveloped as part of the Clearwater Village proposal, the City will require
the developer to replace the existing two-inch (2") substandard water main with a new six-inch
(6") main.
The proposed annexatlon and the existing use are consistent with both the City's
Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as
well as goals and policies.' The existing use of this site Is consistent with the proposed MDR
zonhlg district. Finally. the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida,law regarding
. municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in
concentration.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of the
following actions: 1) annexation of the property located at 1370 State Street; 2) Residential Low
Medium (RLM) category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan; and 3) Medium Density
R~sidentlal (MDR) zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code.
AND
5,' Case: LUZ2002-09008 Level Three Application
1285 South Fort Harrison Avenue & 609 Plnellas Street
Owner/Applicant: Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc,
Representative: Emil C. Marquardt, Jr.
Location: 1.80-acres located on the east side of South Fort Harrison Avenue and south
side of Pinellas Street. approximately 620 feet north of Lakeview Road.
Atlas Page: 3058.
Request: '
a) Land Use Plan amendment from Industrial Limited (IL) to Institutional (I) Classification; and
b) Rezoning from IRT. Industrial. Research & Technology District to I, Institutional District.
, Proposed Use: Parking spaces & existing office, and ancillary daycare for hospital employees.
Presenter: Gina Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager. '
, This Future Land Use Plan amendment and rezoning application involves two parcels of
land owned by Morton Plant Hospital. 80th properties have a Future Land Use Plan
designation of Industrial limited (lL) and a zoning classification of Industrial. Research and
Technology (lRT). The applicant Is requesting to amend the Future Land Use Plan to designate
these properties Institutional and to rezone them to the Institutional (I) District to reflect their use
an~ ownership by Morton Plant Hospital.' ,
The parcel fronting on Pinellas Street Is vacant and is proposed to accommodate a new
84-space parking lot for use by Morton Plant facilities. The hospital's Information Systems and
Out Patient Billing Departments presently occupy the other parcel, which is located on South Ft.
mcd1102
10
11/19/02
'~,"'~ ','.".t'." :,";. ~",., . >~ ....'.':.,.:,' '.::.'.,.."t,:\.. .':":'~~'. :.~ ,.,J:~'.,. ',...J:,':.,,';.....~~:.: :..:'.': ;''-'0'';:':'' ...,..t'.....,..,.,'.....' ,.:~.~i,.<',"-.:.'..,
'~
<"
, ,
C)
I..q,)
Harrison Avenue. In the future, it is likely that a day~care center for hospital employees also will
b~ constructed on this site.
In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subject
to approval by the Plnellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the
Countywide Planning Authority. Due to the size of the plan amendment request, review and
approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs Is not required.
An amendment of the Future Land Use Plan from Industrial Limited (lL) to Institutional (I)
and a rezoning from Industrialt Research and Technology (IRT) to thelnstitutipnal (I) District for
the subject site is requested to Incorporate these properties into the Morton Plant medical
campus master plan. The subject site exceeds the minimum requirements for the existing and
proposed use of the property as office spacet parking, and a day-care center for employees in
, the future. The neighborhood is surrounded by hospital facilities to the north and westt medical '
offices to the south, and a warehouse and open space to the east. The proposed land use
amendment and rezoning wlIl be compatible with the existing neighborhood and consolidate .
Morton Plant holdi,ngs into the appropriate land use category and zoning district.
The proposed Institutional (I) Future Land Use Plan classification and Institutional (I)
, District is consistent with both the City and the Countywide Corilprehensive Planst is compatible
with the surrounding area, does not require nor affect the provision of public s8IVices, is
. compatible with the natural environment and is consistent with the development regulations of
the City.
, The Planning Department recommends approval of the following actions: 1) Amend the
Future Land Use Plan designation of 609 Pinellas Street and 1285 South Fort Harrison Avenue
from Industrial Limited (IL) to Institutional (I) and 2) Amend the Zoning District designation of
609 Plnellas Street and 1285 South Fort Harrison Avenue from Industrial, Research and
Technology ,(lRT) to Institutional (I). '
Member Hooper moved to recommend approval of Consent Agenda Item B3 - Case
ANX2002-09013, Item 84 - Case ANX2002-09014, and Item 85 - Case LUZ2002-09008. The
motion was duly seconded. Members Gildersleeve, Mazur, Moran, Plisko, Hooper, and Doran.
and Chair Petersen voted UAye." Motion carried unanimously. Alternate Member Milam did not
vote.
, The Community Development Board recessed from 3:52 to 4:01 p.m.
6. Case: ANX2002-09015 Level Three Application
3025 Cleveland Street; 3032 Eastwood Street; & 3036 Eastwood Street '
Owner/Applicant: First Baptist Church of Clearwatert Inc.
Representative: Thomas C. Nash; II, Esquire.
Location: Three parcels, totaling 0.97 aeret located 950 feet south of Drew Street and
690 feet west of McMullen Booth Road.
Atlas Page: 292A.
Request:
Annexation of 0.97 acre to the City of Clearwater (companion case LUZ2002-09009).
Proposed Use: Parking lot location for future place of worship on appHcant's adjacent lot to the
north and east.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
mcd 11 02 11 11/19/02
<. ~',,:, ~ ' j '.: ., ,~. ~: I', ,.:.
, "~,':: .. ."'~-4."~. ,.~I.;:, ..~ '.:' . ~, :'''.: ','\ : ,":', ,'...1 'i,.:i' : ":' : '....,. I :"1. ...'I.'~.. ,."",,' "...'..:"',~.L..,,.....L,.I:'.L: .f,..., :. ,', ",' .:...
:....~.
,,'
,.
.
. <,' ;c
,I
. ,'.
.r.") . '
, -""
\J
'~:r-"t,_.,;..): e'.~ :), . .,' :-c' c
Member Gildersleeve declared a conflict of interest.
This annexation Involves three'(3) parcels of land with single-family dwellings, tocated
950 feet south of Drew Street and 690 feet west of McMullen-Booth Road. Combined; these
properties are approximately 42,253 square feet or 0.97 acre. The properties are contiguous
with City boundaries to the north, south, east and west; thereforet the proposed annexation is
consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation.
. A compan!on application to change the Future Land Use Pla~ category of this site from
Residential Urban (RU) to Institutional (I), and to rezone It from R~2; Single Family Residential
(County) to Institutional (I) is being processed concurrently with this annexation request in LUZ
2002~09009 (see agenda item C-7).
The proposed annf3xation can be served by City of ClealWater services, including water,
sewer, saUd waste, police; fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on
the service level. The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive
Plan and .is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency
with existing City boundaries and Is compact in concentration. '
Based on 'the above analysis, the Planning Department'recommends approval of the
annexation of properties located at 3025 Cleveland Street; 3032 Eastwood Street, and 3036
Eastwood Street.
AND
7. Case: LUZ2002-09009 Level Three Application
10 East Meado'wlark Lane; 3001-3062 Chesapeake Street; 3025 Cleveland Street; 3039
Cleveland Street; 3032 Eastwood Street; & 3036 Eastwood Street.
Owner/Applicant: First Baptist Church of ClealWater. Inc.
Representative: Thomas C. Nash, II, Esquire.
Location: Seven parcels, totaling 9.22 acres, located 410 feet south of Drew Street and
520 feet west of McMullen Booth Road.
Atlas Page: 292A.
Request: (companion case ANX2002-09015)
a) Land Use Plan amendment from Residential Urban (RU) & Residential Low Medium (RLM) to
Institutional (I); and
b) Rezoning from Single Family Residential (R-2) County. Mobile Home Park (MHP) & Low
Medium Density (LMDR) to Institutional (I) District.
Proposed Use: Parking lot location for future place of worship on applicanes adjacent lot to the
north and east.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
Member Gildersleeve declared a conflict of interest.
The applicant Is proposing a place of worship campus and related educational facilities
on their adjacent parcels located at the corner of McMullen-Booth Road and Drew Street. This
, Future Land Use Plan amendment and rezoning application involves seven (7) parcels of land
located 410 feet south of Drew Street and 520 feet west of McMullen-Booth Road. The
properties are 9.22 acres in area, which if approved will make the applicant's entire campus
mcd1102 12 11/19/02
,~.:..,.:' ....., :"', ,:..'.'.'....;',",.~,::..~,.>'I./....:'.......".~".;., :~'.. ...:.,.'!.'.': ;\~,~,t~,~I<~:.... .~ '., .i",.~ !'~',';. . i:...,":.:-:.',: ,:.~',:'~',..,.;.:..".t''':'.:~.Jt
4&
~; "
"......
:r 'J
..-O;*1...;r
~
",,-II~, c"
approximately 26 acres. This application contains five parcels occupied by single-family
dwellings, three of which are vacated and two parcels occupied by eight. vacated multi-family
dwellings. All resIdents previously on the subject site have been relocated successfully with the
applicant's assistance. The applicant will remove all remaining structures on the subject site at '
Its own expense. A companion application to annex three of the five parcels containing the
vacated single-family structures into the City of Clearwater is being processed concurrently with
this land use plan and rezoning amendment (Case ANX 2002-09015).
Six parcels on the subject site have a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential
Urban (RU), while the remaining parcel's Future Land Use Plan designation Is Residential Low
Medium (RLM). The properties located In the County are zoned R-2, Single Family Residential
and properties in the Clty,are 'zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) and Mobile Home
Park (MHP). The applicant is requesting to amend the Future land Use Plan to designate all of
the properties Institutional (I) and to rezone them to the Institutional (I) District to accommodate
a parking facility to sLipport its future place of worship on the adjacent site.
. .
,In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment Is subject
to approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the
Countywide Planning Authority. Based on the size of this plan amendment request, review and
approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs is not required.
The proposed Institutional (I) Future land Use Plan classification and the In!?tltutlonal (I)
zoning district are well suited for the surrounding uses. The neighborhood is surrounded by
institutional and low medium density residential uses. The proposed parking lot for the adjacent
place of worship use will blend Into the existing neighborhood and serve as a buffer between the
low medium density residential and institutional uses to the north, south, east and west. Finally,
the proposed Institutional Future Land Use Plan classification and Institutional zoning district are
, consistent with the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, are compatible with the
surrounding area, do not require nor affect the provision of public services, are compatible with
the natural environment, and are consistent with the development regulations of the City.
The Planning Department recommends approval of the following actions: 1) Amend the
Future land Use Plan designation of 10 East Meadowlark Lane; 3001-3062 Chesapeake Street;
3025 Cleveland Street; 3039 Cleveland Street; 3032 Eastwood Street; & 3036 Eastwood Street
, from Residential Low Medium (RLM) and Residential Urban (RU) to Institutional (I) (pending
case # ANX 2002-09015) and 2) Amend the Zoning District designation of 10 East Meadowlark
Lane; 3001-3062 Chesapeake Street; 3025 Cleveland Street; 3039 Cleveland Street; 3032
Eastwood Street; & 3036 Eastwood Street from R-2, Single Family Residential (County), MHP,
Mobile Home Park (City) & LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential (City) to the I, Institutional
(City) zoning district (Pending Case ANX 2002-09015).
Member Hooper moved to recommend approval of Consent Agenda Item B6 - Case
ANX2002-09015 and Item 87 - Case lUZ2002-09009. The motion was duly seconded.
Members Mazur, Moran, Pliska, Hooper, and Doran, and Chair Petersen and Alternate Member
Milam voted "Aye." Motion carried unanimously. Member Gildersleeve abstained.
mcd1102 .
13
, 11/19/02
h~r' , .
./ ,. ,
'.~..'.'. -1':',I~."'r'~:"":~.~ 'l . ,~.,'l" ....~'....~:.....'~'~..: ,.' ,:.,'.'I:/.".~-,.: ':.'. ."-L,<~t" '.,~.: '.~'~,..:',~ '..:...'.,:.1.:.,..,..\,.1:.: 'i.I'~ ."':,'~'.'"
t~
;. \
j .
~>(.~
~. ')
....y,~.
u
8. Case: lUZ2002-09010 - 209 - 229 Windward Passage Level Three Application
Owner/Applicant: The Pools at Windward Passage Homeowners' Association.
, Representative: Joseph W. Gayn'or.
,Location: Eleven parcels totaling 0.87 acre, located In the Commercial/Island Estates
Neighborhood ConselVation Overlay DistrIct on the south side of Windward Passage.
approximately 450 feet north of Memorial Causeway.
Atlas Page: 267B. '
Request:
a) land Use Plan amendment from Commercial General (CG) to ResidentIal Medium (RM)
Category; and
b) Rezoning from Commercial/Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District
(C/IENCOD) to Medium High Density Residentialllsland Estates Neighborhood Conservation
Overlay District (MHDRlIENCOD) District.
Proposed Use: Eleven, existing fee-simple town homes.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
The 0.87 acre subject site is located In the Commercial/Island Estates Neighborhood
ConselVatlon Overlay DIstrict (C/IENCOD) and is occupied by two (2), two-story structures
housing eleven (11) fee-simple, multi-family residential units. In 1997, the site was developed
as a Commercial Planned Development (CPD), which allowed stand alone residential
development and was consistent with the underlying Commercial General (CG) Future land
Use Plan'designation. 'When the new Co~munity Development Code was adopted In 1999, the
. property's zoning designation was reclassified to the Commercial (C) District. and recently to the
Commercial/Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (C/IENCOD), making it
consistent with the Commercial General (CG) Future land Use Plan category. The
Commerclal/lsland Estates NeIghborhood Conservation Overlay District (C/IENCOD) does not
permit stand alone multi-family dwellings; therefore, this property Is a legal, non-conforming use.
The ap'plicant is proposing to amend the Future Land Use Plan designation of thIs property from
the Commercial General (CG) category to the Residential MedIum (RM) category and to rezone
It from the Commercial/Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (C/IENCOD)
to the Medium High Density ResidentIal/Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay'
District (MHDRlIENCOD), to render this site conforming.
In.accordance with the Countyvvide Plan Rules. the land use plan amendment is subject
to approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the
Countywide Planning Authority. Due to the density allowed by this plan amendment, review and
approval by the Florida Department of Community Affair~ is required.
An amendment to the Future land Use Plan from Commercial General (CG) to
. Residential Medium (RM) and a rezoning from the Commercial/Island Estates Neighborhood
Conservation Overlay District (C/IENCOD) to the Medium High Density Residential/Island
Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (MHDR/IENCOD) for the subject property
Is necessary to bring this exls,tlng non~conforming residential use Into compliance with the
Community Development Code. The neighbor~ood is surrounded by marina uses to the north.
northwest and east; a park use to the west; Clearwater Harbor to the south, and multi-family
residential to the northeast. The exIsting resIdential use blends into the surrounding
neighborhood and selVes as a transitlon between marina uses to the east and north and park to
the west. In addition, amendment to the Future land Use Plan category of thIs site will reduce
the permitted density In the Coastal High Hazard Area from 24 dwelling units per acre to 15
, dwelling units per acre. .
, mcd 1102 14 11/19/02
'.. . 4_' ~ t .. h. .
" .' " ,\ '..:",,~:.: "'I""'" ":; ,."'.' ,', ..~". .";". ,I ','.:', ".,,' .',' ;'1':':".:: . .....:..:.. .'~.. ..'.."'.',:..J : ..~..,~.I '-,.' '..... ", \,"~ .,~~'
~
"
'. ""
,
, ,
..
. ,.'
...."
:;:"""",l
\d
The proposed Residential Medium Future Land Use Plan classification and Medium
High Density Residential/Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District are
consistent with both the City and the' Countywide Comprehensive Plans, are compatible with the
surrounding area. do not require nor affect the provision of publlc services, are compatible with
the n~tural environment and are consistent with the development regulations of the City.
, The Planning Department recommends approval of the following actions: 1) Amend the
Future Land Use Plan designation of 209-221 Windward Passage from Commercial General
(CG) to Residential Medium (RM) and 2) Amend the zoning district designation of 209-221
Windward Passage from the Commercial/Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay
District (C/IENCOD) to the Medium High Density Residential/Island Estates Nelgh~orhood
Conservation Overlay District (MHDRlIENCOD).
Member Hooper moved to recommend approval of Consent Agenda Item B8 8 Case
LUZ200280901 0.' The motion was duly seconded. Members Gildersleevet Mazur. Moran,
Pllsko, Hooper, and Doran. and Chair Petersen voted "Aye." Motion carried unanimously.
Alternate Member MlIam did not vote.
C. NON-CONSENT AGENDA (Items 182)
1. Case: FLD2002809026- 200 Brightwater Drive Level Two Application
Owner/Applicant: Roland Rogers, Brightwater Townhomesl LLC.
Representative: William Woods, Woods Consulting, Inc. '
Location: The 0.54-acre site is located on the north side of Brightwater Drive,
approximately 1.500 feet east of Hamden Drive.
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zo'nlng: T, Tourist District.
Request:
Flexible Development approval for the construction of multi-use docks (10 new slips) in excess
of 500 square feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601.
Proposed Use: The construction of a 1,355 square foot ten8slip dock to be located 35 feet from
the extended side (east) property line and a minimum of 105 feet from the extended side (west)
'property line (includes removal of two existing docks).
Presenter: Mark Parry. Planner.
. The site was the subject of a Level Two, Flexible Development application reviewed and
approved by the CDB, (Community Development Board) on May 21, 2002 (case FLD 02~03-081
Brightwater Drive Condominium development). That application included a request to permit
'attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a reduction in the side (east and west)
setbacks from 10 feet to five feet (to building); reduction in the rear (north) setback from 10 feet
to nine feet (to pool); and permit parking that is designed to back into the public right80f8way,
under the provisions of Section 2-803 as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and
, , Section 381402 (C). The proposal inclLlded removing all existing buildings and pavement and
, constructing a 33.660 square foot building containing a total of 10 dwelling units, each unit,
approximately 3,366 square feet In area. The application also included removing the two
existing docks. Approval of the request Included a condition that any future dock meet Code
requirements.,
mcd1102
15
11/19/02
".~.:... ',..,:..'.....' "'I""":"'~ '.1,..-, .~: ,~, 1',~I.:.:..~'.:","",,: ,'.,' :"" .' .... ..1:. " .,~ '/1:: .... . ,". ~.~, :",~, ....,',: ,wI,'.' ',..~' ,..+. ;...~I::I."....';,.: ~.,.:'.'fl.::~
'., '
~
,-'''':ltj
. '~.J;~
WiI
, "'
The rectangular site is 0.54 acre located on the north side of Brightwater Drive,
approximately 1,500 feet east of Hamden Drive. It is In a highly developed area within
Clearwater beach and fronts Clearwater Harbor. The site is within the Small Motel District of
Beach by Design.
The site currently is being developed with a 1 O-unit, multi~family building. The site also
contains two docks. A 378 square~foat dock is on the west side of the site and 204 square-foot
dock is on the east side of the site. Both docks will be removed with this proposal.
, Section 3-601.C.3 of the Code requires docks more than 500 square-feet in area (in
association with a multi-family development or condominium) to be treated as a commercial
. 'dock' and approved as part of a Level Two, Flexible Development review. The applicant seeks
to construct a dock centrally located along the northern waterfront property line to include 10
slips for the exclusive use of Brightwater Drive Condominiums residents. The proposal includes
removing the two existing docks and constructing a 1,353 square-foot. ten-slip dock, which will
be 35 feet from the extended side (east) property line and a minimum of 112 feet from the
extended side (west) property line.
The proposal will serve as an accessory use to the proposed lownhome development.
The proposed dock will not be permitted to be sub-leased and is intended for the sole use of the
owners of each townhome and/or their guests. The increase in the square footage of the dock
will provide for a more viable project allowing each residential unit one slip. All 'other Code
requirement~ will be met.
. The proposed dock will be 148 feet In length or 24 percent of the adjacent 625-foot wide
waterway and should not constitute a navigational hazard. The dock will be constructed and
located in such a manner as to reduce or nearly eliminate any negative impacts upon the
natural marine habitat. The main portion of the dock will be outside any sea grass areas. All
portions of the dock extending over sea grass areas will be constructed of a material with no
more than 30 percent non~opaqueness, allowing adequate light to support existing grasses and
other plant life. The project will not result in any negative impacts to the natural environment.
, Prior to lssuance of buildlng permits for the docks, the applicant will need to show
compliance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards for "marinas and
boat yards" for the construction and operation of the docking facilities to provide fire protection of
boats moored in the slips. Floating and dock supported slgnage will need to be permanently
installed, warning boaters of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity. A Water
Navigation Permit and Department of Environmental Protection permit will be required to be
approved by Pinellas County and the State prior to issuance of building permits. In addition, the
Harbormaster will require a site plan, indicating lighting on the end of dock to enhance
, navigation safety, to be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to issuance of any permits.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on October 10, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible
Developm~nt application Flexible Development appro:val for the construction of multi-use docks
(10 new slips) in excess of 500 square feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601 for the site at
.200 Brightwater Drivel wit~ the following bases and conditions: Bases for Aooroval: 1) The
proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for docks per Section 3-601.C.3; 2)
The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3~913; and 3) The development is compatibl~ with the
mcd1102 16 11/19/02
Ii "."::"",1 .,\;.I~-....l'. '\..',}to...I: + \' ,!~;,"',I,.:,~,,: .....':,.:,"':,~,.:.'t,{~':'i,.",,',;,~~,.: .'..:,.:.:..';......:.'; ..:...'.~: .""~":""/;'I
,..... .', ,...w.~:.1 "'~" '.:' ': ':~',',:'._WI ,t,' .,." ~ ,'.:'."... .1, ,.r, "~:'~Ii"..-"..". ~~~' '.~. ..:./."...'. .. ..~I:'.'.';:.,...':,. :':,~..!Jl,t',.,::l'.:..
~
I'
."
: ,
/d:".~
";-""~'
I,
i:' ~ .
......,
"1 'c
surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1) That
Plnellas County Water Navigation, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). .
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD)
permits be approved prior to the Issuance of building permits; 2) That a site plan Indicating
lighting on the end of dock to enhance navigation safety be submitted to and approved by Staff
prior to the issuance of any permits; 3) That the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
30~ standards for tlmarinas and boatyardsU be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department, '
prior to the issuance of building permits; 4) That boats moored at these docks be for the
, exclusive use by residents of the Brightwater Drive Condominiums and tl1at there be no
. commercial activities at the docks (balt sales, vending, etc.); 5) That the proposed dock be used
for the sole use of the owners and/or guests of the town homes and not be permitted to be sub-
leased; 6) That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing
wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manalees in the vicinity;
7) That covered boat lifts are not permitted; and 8) that slips on the east side of the dock will not
be permitted to accommodate, boats more than 25-feet in length.
, In response to a question', Mr. Parry said the applicant had not indicated if boat lifts are
planned for the docks. In response to a question, he reviewed the recommended conditions of
approval, indicating commercial activities on the dock would be prohibited.
. Bill Woods. representative. said while boat lifts have not been requested, he did not want
to be precluded from requesting them in the future.
Two people spoke in opposition to the project. It was stated the developer had
committed to limiting the size of slips on the dock's east side so they would not accommodate
boats more than 25-feet in length. Mr. Woods agreed to the condition.
Mr. Carrier said the site plan identifies the locations of sea grasses. In response to a
question. Mr. Parry said tile dock will be 75% of the property's width. Future boat lifts would not
count toward the dock's square footage. Concern was expressed covers for boat lifts could
impede significantly on neighbor's water views. A condition prohibiting boat lift covers was
recommended. Mr. Woods agreed to the condition.
Marine & Aviation Department Director Bill Morris said the proposed dock meets the
requirement that it not extend more than one-quarter of the distance across the channel's width. .
. Sand bars are a problem throughout the harbor and are located off every peninsula and '
channel. The dock will force boaters to remain farther from shore than they currently do. In
response to a question, Mr. Morris said some nearby docks extend 100 feet Into the water.
Mr. Woods said two separate sealed reports were completed regarding the grass beds.
All new docks must meet current requirements. He said the replacement docks cannot be
constructed along the sea wall due to the 600 square-feet of sea grasses there. He said
environmental concerns dictate the dock's design.
Member Mazur moved to approve Item C1 - Case FLD2002-09026 with 8 conditions. as
listed. The motion was duly seconded.' Members Glldersleevej Mazurj Moran, Pliska, Hooper.
and Doran, and Chair Petersen voted "Aye:' Motion carried unanimously. Alternate Member
Milam did not vote.
mcd1102
17 .
11/19/02
, ,...., .:;, '. l L." ". ~. '. '~ :, ',:: ". ~.. . :'.' \~. 'c ',~ '. . .'.. ... ~. ',' "," .,~: i I.. ~.'," I ,,' :. .~, ,:; ': ',..:. , . ~ ,. . . ~',., .. '.: " 'I' ,., "" ,,' ,...,. ,'::'. r , ~ :: ." ,. ..' :. ~ ~ '!.. .. ~ ': ~',., : I " ." ,." : ':,.: .>
.,'~' ',I.:.~- ~'. ~:~'~t",~~., :'.,,~. I.,':., '_','.,I'.,>.:t~, ,:':',.. ~~,..', ...,>:..:., .~,,, ".,~::~"".".'.",.~"':";' .,... :':"",_."t.,,~,,'..';"."'."',:~ '."
. "I' ,
~
,Ie':"
; ,
",
"
,....,)
l.~~~
;:;J'
. .
... .
.. ~ .
2. Case: FLD2002-09030 - 650 Bay Espla'nade Level Two Application
Owners: Virginia B. Franks, Charles F. Raubeson, Emma R. Alison, and Jean and
Walter Koegler.
Applicant: Radcliffe Development Company, LLC.
Representative: Robert Flynt.
Location: The D.95-acre site is located on the northeast corner of Bay Esplanade and
Poinsettia Avenue.
Atlas Page: 258A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request:
Flex!ble Dev~lopment approval to reduce the required side (north) setback from 10 feet to five
feet (to pavement), reduce the front (west) setback along Poinsettia Avenue from 15 feet to zero
feet (to building), reduce the front (east) setback along Bay Esplanade from 15 feet to zero feet
" (to building), reduce the front (south) setback along Bay Esplanade from 15 feet to three feet (to
pavement) and increase the height from 50 feet to 65 feet (as measured from base flood
, elevation), under the provisions of Section 2-803.
Proposed Use: A 28-unit condominium development within a single, seven-story building, 65
fel?t In height (as measured from base flood elevation).
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
The 0.g5-acre site is located on the northeast corner of Bay Esplanade and Poinsettia
. . Avenue; The site, generally developed in the early 1950s, Is located within an older, residential
portion of Clearwater Beach and bounded by Bay Esplanade on the south and east and
Poinsettia Avenue on the west. The site consists of five lots each with one building. There are
a tota(of 23 residential units and four sheds ranging in size from 60 to 480 square feet on the
site. Two, single-story buildings each are located on the west and east sides of the site, and a
two~story building Is centrally located on the site. The five buildings comprise a total of 15,350
, square feet of gross floor area. One and two-story, multi- and single-famlly dwellings
characterize the neighborhood.
, The site is located within the special area redevelopment plan. Beach by Design: as part
of the "Old Florida" District. This area has been designated for multi-family townhomes and
condominiums of low to midrise. The immediate vicinity Is almost entirely composed of attached
, dwellings and small motels. Building styles generally rese'mble architecture from the 1950's and
appear to have been progressively expanded. Bay Esplanade. in this general viclnlty, is a local
street with no sldewall<s where many sites rely on the public right-of-way, to accommodate
perpendicular, back-out parking. Generally, the streets cape Is In need of redevelopment to
improve parking, pedestrian access, and Its aesthetic appearance. Beach by Design recognizes
site constraints of parcels in the neighborhood and difficulties of redevelopment.
, The proposal includes the consolidation and complete redevelopment of five lots. A 28-
unit condominium development is proposed within a single. 84,000 square foot building. The
seven-story structure will have six stories of living space above parking. The proposed building
will be located approximately 31 feet from the side (north) property line, between 16 and 24 feet
from the front (south) property line along Bay Esplanade. zero feet from the front (east) property
line along Bay Esplanade and two feet from the front (west) property line along Poinsettia
Avenue. The building will be at least 40 feet from any surrounding structure.
, The applicant seeks to increase the permitted height of a building from 50 feet to 65 feet
(as measured from base flood elevation) and reduce the front (east, west and south) setbacks
mcd1102 18 11/19/02
,':,... ',. '..:~: \. ..:.' ...1..... ",. ~.":'_, .W,"'","',;".,'", ':',....".:'i I "1, :",. .:,"... "'"'' ',,' ,.,., . ',.",.r~, :,-. .'" "~... ''';' ....1 :r-, .,' ".
"'~'
, '
, .'
" ,
,"
/-.'.1<)'"
"C
','
" ,
''l~
to between zero and three feet and reduce the side (north) setback to five feel. Attached
dwellings under the Flexible Development provisions of the Tourist District are permitted lo be
up to 100 feet in height with front and side setbacks reduced to zero feet. This site 15 located
within a flood zone (zone AE) with an elevation of 14 feet. By Code, height Is measured from
base flood elevation.
The historic Florida mission-style architecture of the proposed building Is designed wllh
authentic materials including clay tile, roofing, neutral-color stucco, cast stone trim and wrought
iron railings. Additio~ally. multiple roofHnes will serve to break massing. Rooftop garden areas
and significant balconies and windows are provided on all elevations. The building compllmenls
the vision of the "Old Florida District.tl A masonry block wall six feet in height finished to malch
the appearance and color of the building will be located along the north property line. A
matching wall will enclose the swimming pool. Staff is supportive of the height Increase due to
overall design of the building and site. The proposal compiles with the provisions of the
Intended character of the "Old Florida District" 'and Beach by Design. The development will
create a visuallYRinterestlng and attractive building, while reducing massing and scale.
, The under-structure parking will include 50 spaces that exceed Code requirements of 42
spaces. 'Access to the site Is proposed along the east and west sides of the site from Bay
,Esplanade and Poinsettia Avenue, respectively. A third access point will be located along the
south side of the site from Bay Esplanade. A driveway also is provided along Poinsettia Avenue
provided access for solid waste service and to access two of the unit's garages. All proposed
driveways will provide for two-way circulation.
, ' Currently. pedestrian activity is limited due to narrow sidewalks and a lack of landscape
buffering. The landscape plan exceeds the requirements of Code. This Includes a mixture of
various trees, shrubs; palms and annuals. A four-foot sidewalk will be provided along all streets
to enhance pedestrian access in the area. Amenities Include a swimming pool located at the
southw ~st corner of the site.
Preliminary stormwater design has been addressed. Should final design of lhe
stormwater system results in a site plan which is significantly different from the one approved by
the Community Development Board, the site plan must be resubmitted to lhe Board for review.
Fire Department requirements, Including gates with an approved emergency entry
system and a knox key box on the building for emergency egress, will be required to be
provided. Solid Waste Department requirements have been met. Trash will be collected within
the buildl,ng and moved to a staging area by the complex staff on pick up days.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on July 11 and August 15, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval of the
Flexible Development approval to: 1) reduce the required side (north) setback from 10 feet to
five feet (to pavement); 2) reduce the front (west) setback along Poinsettia Avenue from 15 feet
to zero feet (to building); 3) reduce the front (east) setback along Bay Esplanade from 15 feet to
zero feet (to building); 4) reduce the front (south) setback along Bay Esplanade from 15 feet to
three feet (to pavement); and 5) increase the height from 50 feet to 65 feet (as measured from
base flood elevatlon), under the provisions of Secuon 2-803 for the site at 650 Bay Esplanade,
with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Aoproval: 1) The proposal complies wllh the
Flexible Development criteria per Section 2-803.B; 2) The proposal Is In compliance with other'
standards In the Code Including the general applicability criteria per Section 3-913; 3) The
mcd1102 19 11/19/02
'r~~ t':"-:' ,..,.\.'. ~-'~"'~;~""I,'~l"'~:,''; l'~ '. \'" '\~"I"~'~I ,.....,~',',. .." :'," , :,'.:,II..~IL"';~ ",j~r .I;:'."',<'..'.~,ll,:',~ .I'~'''''..''';.'I''::' ~lH"\".:.,,,I.,;I.:.'."";. ',,..~ :~,','
..~i'. :-~,." ~.; ,1 ".. ,~,'" ,.,,:' .":"'~ '.,... ~', ~~' ',.. .' \.~" ....'~t>...,,1 l~'/'~",., _. ~ ,I!.'" .I,:'~ ' :.... ~ ",,: ': ';'."1:: ",I.: ,,;; ,'/I"~""I" '.:.' ..... ':,-
,.~
! ,,1
, ,
, '
""~!~\
I, ;1
'l.~~'
. ,
'. .
, "
u'
" . . f
application Is consistent with the "Old Florida District" in Beach by Design; and 4) The
development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment
efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1) That the density of the site be limited to 28 dwellings units
(30 dwelling units per acre); 2) That the final design of the building be consistent with the
conceptual elevations submitted or as modified by the COB; 3) That the height of the building be
Iimlted to 65 feet as measured from base flood elevation; 4) That should addressing stormwater
issues result in a site plan which is significantly different from the one approved by the
Community Development Board, the site plan must be resubmitted to the Board for review; 5)
That all fire code requirements be met, prior to the Issuance of any permits; and 6) That all
slgnage comply ~ith Code.
. Assistant Planning Director Lisa Fierce said staff had receIved one letter in opposition,
signed by two people, and one letter in support. signed by 150 people. '
Ed Armstrong, representative; said the project is cons;istent with Beach by Design
guidelines. Bob Audet architect, said the project's design is sensitive to the area and blends
with historic style bulldlngs. He said a driveway is planned along the site's one property line to
separate the project from neighbors to the north. He said the building has been moved as far
south on the property as possible. He said the design features offsets and building details,
consistent with Beach by Design. He said thei six-story section of the building makes up only
43% of the structure's footprint, and is intended to resemble a village. He said upper units
feature terraces. Lower units are 2-story townhomes. He said mission style building materials
will be used.
Four people spoke in support of the project and 5 people spoke in opposition.
Mr. Armstrong said the project meets the criteria for flexible development. It was noted
buildings up to 100 feet tall can be permitted in this area. The project was complimented for its
'design and sensitivity to the area., In response to a question, Mr. Parry said the owner has
agreed to install and maintain landscaping along some of the right-of-way. It was noted the
flexible development process requires "give and take" by developers and staff.
Member Pliska moved to approve Item C2 - Case FLD2002-09030 with six conditions
as listed. The motion was duly seconded. Members Gildersleeve, Mazur, Moran, Pliska,
Hooper, and Doran, and Chair Petersen voted "Aye." Motion carried unanimously_ Alternate
Member Milam did not vote.
D. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS:
Ms. Tarapani thanked those who attended the Frequent Users Group meeting. Annual
. seminars are planned. Staff was complimented on the program's format, which was well
received by, th,ose in attendance.
, 'Ms. Tarapani reviewed improvements to the Planning Department web site, which now
includes. Future Land Use Plan elevations and soon will feature Brownflelds and Enterprise
. Zone information. Staff soon will post drafts of plans, such as the Downtown plan. The City
Code also is accessible through the web site. but currently is difficult to print. Members were
requested to bring their Code books to the December meeting for staff to insert updates. The,
GIS (Geographical Informational System) Is updated as rezoning occurs.
mcd1102
'20
11/19/02
,,~. '1"1.:_ ."~,,'.~ L,:1j'I..:':..'."..., ......', I. ~'~,.:~.,.,~'."..."..'.~.,.,'(.~...J,I,:..I.:'
,",
..'. ,. ,~.~ , I"~ :,_ ....",\ ~.. ~. ". ~,.'I ,".:,:.' .,.." .-',' '." "..": ,'.,' :. ~, . '...." ~ ,.,.' '.,.,.,., ',.,.' 'i '. . . ,I .~'L: ',' ~,' ..' '~:,,: .... '. r"...".','
'c1 'J
, "
: l, 'l'
;, ",1. ..': .
.' \ ':
.. . >".,. \ ,
,\
.,., \ to', .' c
J .C "/
"i ..
'. . ,.,
'. . .
'n I ,
, ~ . ,"
. " \
~_I't_~r,,:~~.V~,}i)j.~:,\~,,J,.~.>< ~ \ '>.~ic;" :.~.:,:' ;':''',<j~':.~>~~':~1: '. .:. ~: .~ .:~. ~ J ."
" ' 'l. '
'1'~',~>,'i'l,,:' .'<,~.: c, . ~ '
~'l\;' ,',: ','" 'E. 'ADJOURNMENT
:;;.~i\~,:~' ,',
~:~'~,;:::",':;,',
~~...\.", '
~{:j1,\,i .' . ;......'
:V:.::,:;:, '.:'~ ,', <;:' ',' , '" ' ' 'Att~st: ' '
f;iT'~',~:.L/I c: :, ~'.:'.. .
~'f):L,.\.' I. :<' c
:.~~:>>~ :: :. :> > ' . "
:Y~~ :~/~ ;, ,Bo
f;""y"""
;l,./\~,:, ~,<>.
}.i},'<": ,;'
;L~..:,,:::, ,': '
I, ..,;' ,"
: . ,:, ~. ".. I ", I
c ~ ) < l..' <'
.. d .... " .,:
~:L",:'",:":':":' ,'," , " ,
T <+ ! ',t.:
:~,<,':' .:"",
~;~>.,~...: .~ "
}{\:,'" ,;', ,;>' ",'
F~','
,'. . , ' , mcd 11 02 '
t~v~)/2;;i " . ' '. .
&w"'"'.'f' , ' '"
ia~I~.;:~);h_.~.~;1:, '::1 ~J "."c ~. 1,";<, '
}.,
" ~ ' ,
.., .i
<,}jt . I
t-:. .'," "
:;/i,;:
':I""'~'
" ,
~,l ""q
~> ~. . :" ':.1 "
.'
~1i '. ,.." .
'r.,~' ,.'
~,'
t1;{,:';'!','
~~~~~:~~~':,~"~' ."
~r:'~::'::,':",I,,:,: ,"
'!~'~~.~;',: '.'.-, <,' .>,' :,'
.:~~ 'T")" ',:'
>.' '., .
. "\ ~, . .
~: ~ ! \: "'. .' ,
.' ,
, , ,
. ,~: I
. I":. ~ . < ~:. '
I... '
1,,'.1 :', '. '. of,'
'....' !
-;I~~'.: ~:.l ~ < . ,
..:.,~ '.. ; ~ .,
>::y:,:'" !;
",
;,
, . , "
Ms. 'Tarapanl recommended staff present at a future meeting a slide show of projects
, developed under the new Code. It was suggested staff present several examples at the end of,
ea~h ~eetlng; should time' permit. , "
" , "It was felt the City's ,Code is the best in Florida, but few 'understand the Code process. It
was recommended staff find a forum to communicate and educate residents regarding the
: flexible development process. It was felt it Is Important for staff to Identify what developers
receive and what they give up In the process. Ms. Tarapani said communication also Is
. Important with homeowners,and business owners. '
.,'. '
" The board's holiday'luncheon is scheduled at noon on December 17, 2002 at the
, . Harborview Center.' ,
,I
The meeting adjourned at 5:36 p.m.
'C~ 0 ~~~-j "
Chair,
Community 'D~velopment" Board
.1
. i .'
..
\'
. l. ".'>
, ".'. I
. ~' ',).. .
, \
, . I,'
. ,
, I
I '
. 'f .
, .
:4', .
'/,
, ' ,
" \.
',.'
" .
." I . ~
"
, "
, . ~
. !,
"
, ,
, ,
"
, . ,
" ,
" '
, '
21 '
11/19/02 '
, ,
," '><.
'.,' ,~', ." '.,'.. I..'~ ':,,'.~" ,." \~ "~:;~~..'.,. ...,',j, ,.:'.' ~~ ',~,,'.":.. I .', ~l ,,,:,~',~~'~".:a:".'ij.',