08/19/1999 (2)
, \,
, ,
,. .
.~. ..
.~ . L_~JI
'.~ ,> .
L ~<
:1 \,
"
~:~~\f."; ..~,....,'
.+~'... ,~ .
,.; '.
." '.
, '
~" .
,
'.,
. ~ .' i
~ ",
....i
. .'
t.":' ,
.e'
.~~t. .'
r", ' '
1;;",. .
~~:;,,~\C~ ~c
k::.~,
~i;. :':: '.n
~{F,~'.', ,
~ ~," ! .
~ ," .
" . .:. ~ .
~ '
; ~ - ~
(,.
~;~f',',<:
:;.......< . I
. ''':'~'.I '. '
~:.' '. '. '
l\',;':.' ,,: : ,,', , \ "
~t::,~':, ",:
\2i\:;,(:;'; , ,.
i"t,,' .
:}!,;:. )',
'"u. .
?,:.:.
d "
"
"
, "
~';: j.;' .
., <j;
, ,0
.;c
< ~".
t, '
":' .
. ,
,(" . I
j"':
, ,
- ,
, ;
;..~.'
~ f' 't' :""". .; ~ . . '. : ! ~
, ; .', >' -"'. . ~ '. >
"
". .
.,.
,.
, ,
COMMISSION
Date
City Commission Minutes
I,
~/3
I'
" "
". ,'"
I . I . ~ : -: ." .... .', ...;....
'.,j,\;l:,'.':'.' .
'. .c. \"
;.J.
.' 10,"
", );.~1:. I "..,~ . .
'.. ~ . > ,. I :~
',' .
., .
r : . .
~ .
,I. oJ-
t.
. .
().
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
August 19, 1999
Present:
Brian J. Aungst
Ed Hooper
J. B. Johnson
Robert Clark
Ed Hart
Mayor/Commissioner
Vice-Mayor/Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
,.
, .
Also present: Michael J. Roberto
Bob Keller
Bill Horne
Pamela K. Akin
Cynthia E. Goudeau
Patricia O. Sullivan
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Attorney
City Clerk.
Board Reporter
., :
The Mayor called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall. The invocation
was offered by Rabbi Arthur Baseman of Temple B'Nai Israel. The Mayor led the Pledge of
Allegiance. .
,
'.
To provide continuity for research. items are in agenda order although not necessarily
discusse~ in that order.
C) ITEM #3 - Service Awards
Five service awards were presented to City employees.
ITEM #4 - Introductions and Awards
0) Fire Team of the Quarter - April to June 1999 - A-Shift - Fire Station 45
ITEM #5 - Presentations
0) Representative Leslie Waters - Legislative Report
s'.
Representative Leslie Waters distributed a summary of legislative issues addressed
this year. She will post staff regarding issues that impact the City"
The Mayor presented her with an award for providing positive representation.
b) Recognize Leadership Group
Members of the Graduating 1998/99 leadership Group were introduced.
'0
mcc08b99
1
08/19/99
.')
< ~ I'
'i
/"""")
'''"
u
,:<". >"
ITEM #6 - Aooroval of Minutes
Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of
August 5, 1999, as recorded and submitted in written summation by the City Clerk to each
Commissioner. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #7 - Citizens to be heard re items not on the Aaenda
Tom Sehlhorst wished to provide comment when the Community Development Code
is reviewed.
Robert Aude, Clearwater Housing AuthoritYt presented a $30,092.82 check as
payment in-lieu of taxes.
John Tassanari said the City should treat all citizens fairly and not discriminate
against the poor.
Anne Garris opposed private development on the bluff.
Doua Pollard questioned access to the new bridget opposed the roundabout, and
said new beach nightclubs would attract adult tourists.
Early Sorenson requested staff encourage adult businesses on Gulf~to-Bay Boulevard
to relocate to Code designated areas.
O'Neal Jacob opposed development on the bluff and beach.
Fred Thomas recommended the East and SPJC (St. Petersburg Junior College)
libraries merge to form the City's Main Library.
John Doran spoke in support of the City Manager.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEM #8 - Public Hearina & First Readina Ords. #6429~99. #8430-99 & #6431~99 -
Annexationt Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Suburban & LOR Zoning for property
located at 2892 Union St., Sec. 32-28-' 6t M&B 43.06 (Larry & Marcella Wing (A99-
11 HPLD)
The applicants have requested annexation and zoning of Residential Suburban for
2890 and 2892 Union Street to obtain water and sewer service. Upon annexation, the
applicants plan to subdivide the property. The COB (Community Development Board)
unanimously endorsed the request.
Larry Wing, applicant, stated he will develop a very nice subdivision.
mcc08b99
2
08/19/99
. . I ..' .. ... ~. : ... ~, . . :. ". . . I .; : . . ~ . I .:
""I
';.'...'.
e
e
o
;. .
Commissioner Clark moved to approve the Petition for Annexation, land Use Plan
Amendment to Residential Suburban and Zoning Atlas Amendment to low Density
Residential (LOR) for M&B.43/06. The motion was duly seconded and carried un.animously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6429-99 for fIrst reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Hooper moved to pass Ordinance #6429-99 on first reading. The
motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
~'Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hoopert Hart and Aungst.
ItNays": None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6430-99 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Johnson moved to pass Ordinance #6430-99 on first reading,
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hoopert Hart and Aungst.
"Nays::: None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6431-99 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Clark moved to pass Ordinance #6431-99 on first reading. The
motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper, Hart and Aungst.
"Nays": None.
ITEM #9 - Public Hearino & First Readina Ords. #6432-99, #6433-99 & #6434-99 -
Annexationt land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Urban & lMDR Zoning for property
located at 2854 Saint John Dr., Virginia Groves Terrace 5th Add., Blk C, Lot 13 (Russell &
Sydney Jacobs (A99-12HPLD)
The applicants have requested annexation and zoning of Residential Urban for 2854
Saint John Drive to obtain water and sewer service. The COB unanimously endorsed the
request.
Commissioner Hooper moved to approve .the Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan
Amendment to Residential Urban and Zoning Atlas Amendment to Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) for Lot 13, Block C, Virginia Grove Terrace, 5th Addition. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6432-99 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Johnson moved to pass Ordinance #6432-99 on first reading.
The motion was dUly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
mccOBb99
08/19/99
3
.J
i,"
o
~
"Ayestt: Johnson, Clark, Hooper, Hart and Aungst.
"Nays": None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6433-99 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Hart moved to pass Ordinance #6433-99 on first reading. The
motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
.. Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper, Hart and Aungst.
"Nays": None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6434-99 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Hooper moved to pass Ordinance #6434-99 on first reading. The
motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Johnson, Clarkt Hooper" Hart and Aungst.
"Nays": None.
ITEM #10 - Public Hearino - orooosed amendments to Clearwater Comorehensive Plan;
approve sonding to appropriate reviewing agencies (PLD)
The City Commission adopted the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan in 1989 and
adopted the EAR (Evaluation & Appraisal Report) with recommended changes in January
1998. Additional changes more accurately reflect current conditions. The COB
unanimously recommended approval of amendments and transmittal to the FDCA (Florida
Department of Community Affairs). Following public hearings, staff will forward the plan
to State and regional agencies for comment and recommendations. The City Commission
will receive COB recommendations regarding these comments prior to the final public
hearing and adoption of the plan. An executive summary of proposed amendments is
attached as Exhibit A.
Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the proposed amendments to the
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, and transmit to the appropriate reviewing agencies. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #11 - Public HearinCl - Res. #99-38 - Relating to ,Community Revitalization;
designating that portion of Clearwater Beach bounded by Mandalay on the Eastt the Mean
High Water Line on the West, Baymont to the North and Papaya to the South, as a City of
Clearwater Revitalization I Redevelopment Area (CA)
According to Charles Siemon, of Siemon & Larsen, the central Clearwater beach
area contains many poorly maintained properties near the end of their economic life. Small
motels no longer can compete with destination resorts offering popular amenities.
mccOBb99
OB/19/99
4
, ""'"'\
.'
o
, ...J
~t...J"'~"
"
With the exception of the marina, the public realm is not attractive with narrow,
uneven sidewalk often blocked by dumpsters. The central beach area is subdivided into
small parcels, which are difficult to develop. Contemporary development requires on-site
parkingt outdoor cafd seating, arcades, etc. Currently, homes converted to commercial
uses are sandwiched between larger structures. The area has little off-street parking.
Developing small parcels is economically unfeasible and would not provide a return on
investment. .
In central beacht a 2-acre redevelopment parcel would require approximately 8
parcels of land. The patchwork of ownership makes assembly practically impossible as
"holdouts" can obstr.uct efforts. With no off-street loading facilities, deliveries are made
over the curb from public rights-of-way. Many motels feature back-out parking. Compared
with other Florida beachfront destinations, Clearwater beach has relatively weak economic
conditions, which especially affect off-sand motels. Central beach commercial properties
have significant vacancies and tenant turnover. Even Pelican Walk is experiencing
. declining rents and occupancy. The beach features few quality establishments.
The Strategic Redevelopment Plan for Clearwater Beach identifies the 2 blocks west
of North Mandalay between the Clearwater Beach and Hilton Hotels as priority
redevelopment areas. North Mandalay, the traditional retail street on the beach, is
jeopardized by declining rents and high vacancy rates, factors that risk private investments.
Current development includes small motels and strip retail centers. Flood elevation
requirements may justify rehabilitation along the west side of North Mandalay.
Dry-sand access is a major factor of economic suc~ess. Of 22 parcels in the priority
redevelopment areas, only 9 front the gulf. A public right-of-way separates most
properties from the beach. Mr. Siemon suggested the northlsouth Gulfview right-of-way
. could be vacated if assembly of adjacent properties makes direct access to the right-of-way
no longer required.
Mr. Siemon reviewed the requirements of the City's land assembly ordinance. A
private developer must control at least 60% of land for a proposed development in a
designated area before community assistance can be sought to exercise eminent domain.
He recommended the Commission designate the proposed central beach area for
revitalization/redevelopment. Studies over the past 10 years have identified these parcels
as needing assembly for contemporary development. He said redeveloping this area would
meet community objectives related to beach and economic development.
Fourteen residents spoke in opposition to the resolution.
In response to a question, the City Attorney said legal precedent supports the
proposed action. Concern was expressed the proposed taking of property will benefit a
developer rather than a public purpose. Mr. Siemon said redevelopment is a public purpose
and will benefit the community by eliminating non-conforming conditions. The objective is
to revitalize the community, not enrich the developer. Eminent domain action requires just
compensation. The developer must demonstrate a bone fide offer has been made. The
City Attorney recommended the City have the property appraised independently so the
mcc08b99
08/19/99
5
f)
Commission can determine if unaccepted purchase offers had been based on fair market
value. Mr. Siemon said property values would not be affected by this Commission action.
In response to a question, he said if owners are unwilling to sell their property, fair market
value is based on just compensation as stated In the State's constitution.
In response to a question, Mr. Siemon said the fair market value does not include
the value of tenant businesses. Affected businesses remain the property of the business
owners and can be relocated. Concern was expressed relocation costs for small business
owners are not compensated. Mr. Siemon said leasehold agreements determine tenant
benefits.
In response to a question, the City Attorney said if the City Commission approves a
development agreement and authorizes a condemnation taking, the initial quick take action
,would take up to 4 months. If subject property owners take the matter to court, final
resolution will take a while. The reasons beach revitalization is necessary were reviewed.
It was recommended staff provide relocation assistance to displaced business owners. Mr.
Siemon said it is not unusual to provide relocation assistance to avoid litigation. The City's
special counsel in the taking action will not be appointed until the City Commission directs
staff to move forward. The City Commission will determine if offers are bone fide.
Commissioner Johnson moved to deny approval of item #11. The motion was duly
seconded.
.!~ Concern was expressed that while revitalization is needed, this approach may be too
f"'d draconian.
,..)
Upon the vote being takent Commissioners Johnson and Clark voted "Aye";
Commissioners Hooper and Hart and Mayor Aungst voted "Nay." Motion failed.
Concern was expressed that if this is not approved, a promising redevelopment
project will not be pursued.
Commissioner Hooper moved to designate that portion of Clearwater beach bounded
by Mandalay on the east, the mean high water line on the westt Baymont to the north, and
Papaya .to the south as a revitalization/redevelopment area. The motion was duly
seconded. Commissioners Hooper and Hart and Mayor Aungst voted "Aye."
Commissioners Johnson and Clark voted "Nay". Motion carried.
The City Attorney presented Resolution #99-38 and read it by title only.
Commissioner Hart moved to pass and adopt Resolution #99-38 and authorize the
appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll cal/,
the vote was:
nAyes": Hooper, Hart and Aungst.
"Nays": Johnson and Clark.
Motion carried.
mcc08b99
6
08/19/99
'..
~ ;.:. T~~ ;.:
l~. '
;f, . ,
'.
,
''1
" ,....i
~, .
~d ,
. :
.0
.()
I'
~
J
:( ).e
. . ;CO T
c ~ '.'. ~:. : (
,,' "
The Commission recessed from 8:13 to 8:35 p.m.
Public Hearino - Second Readino Ordinances
ITEM #12 - Ord. #6417-99 - Amendments to various sections of the Community
Development Code
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6417-99 for second reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Clark moved to pass and adopt Ordinance #6417-99 on second
and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
UAyestl: Johnson, Clark, Hoopert Hart and Aungst.
"Nayslt: None.
ITEM #, 3 - Ord. #6437-99 - Relating to Public Beaches; amending Sec. 22.21 to amend
definition of ItSafe Bathing Limitll and to include definitions of "Public Beach" and ItSand
Key Public Beach;tlamending various other sections in Ch. 22
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6437-99 for second reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Hooper moved to pass and adopt Ordinance #6437-99 on second
and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll callt the vote was:
"Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hoopert Hart and Aungst.
.
"Nayst': None.
ITEM #14 - Ord. #6438-99 - Relating to fines for illegally parking in a parking space
designated for persons who have disabilities; amending Sec. 30.061 (7) to increase the
penalty for violation of disabled permit only parking
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6438-99 for second reading and read it by
title only.
One citizen spoke requesting the fine be increased even greater.
Commissioner Johnson moved to pass and adopt Ordinance #6438-99 on second
and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper, Hart and Aungst.
"Nays": None.
mccOBb99
7
08/19/99
.'" . r. , .'. . . ' "
. I:
~
,.
()
o
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
CONSENT AGENDA (Items #15-25) - approved as submitted less #15 (first title) & #21.
ITEM # 1 5 - Approval of Purchases oer 07/20/99 memorandum:
Central Parking Systems - See page 9.
Volt Sciences, Inc., extension, installation of gas mains & services at various locations
throughout gas system, 09/30/99-12/31/99, funding was approved 09/17/98 (GAS)
Pinellas County Solid Waste Management Department, solid waste disposal used by Parks
, and Recreation, 08/20/99-09/30/2000, estimated $26tOOO (QOL)
Jimmie's Wrecker Service, 2nd & Final extension, towing servicest 11/01/99-10/3112000t
estimated $55~OOO (GSS)
Genuine Parts Company, first extension, motor vehicle equipment parts & services,
08/22/99-09/21/2000t estimated $850,000 (GSS)
ITEM #16 - Interlocal AQreement with Pinellas County for joint management of an
Economic Analysis for north central portion of City, commonly referred to as Hercules
Industrial Area, $12,500 (ED)
ITEM #17 - Aporove recommendations of Technical Review Committee for allocation of
Fiscal Year' 999-2000 City of Clearwater Social Services Grants Program funds in the
amount $65,000; approve proposed funding contract form (HM)
ITEM #18 - Authorize City Manaoer to renew one-year aareement with Pinellas County
Sheriff's Department to provide latent fingerprint examination and related services, as well
as crime scene service~ including evidence and property storaget 10/01/99-09/30/2000,
for $373t 712.30 (PO)
ITEM #19 - Addendum to AQreement with School Board of pjnellas County, continuation of
School Resource Officer program for 1999/2000 school year at Clearwater High School &
Countryside High School (PO)
ITEM #20 - Lease Aareement with RSGN. Inc., as Lessor, for premises located at 1217A
N. Ft. Harrison Ave., (Old Clearwater Bay police substation) 10/01/99-09/30/2002, at
annual rental of $7,260 (PO)
ITEM #21 - See Paoes 9 & 10.
ITEM #22 - Work Order with McKim & Creed for engineering services re Disinfection
Facility Design - Northeast APC Facility, $119,000 (PW)
mcc08b99
8
08/19/99
., "!
./
')
.~
(~)
('(,a
~
ITEM #23 - First Amendment to Harborview Center ManaQement Anreement, extending
term with Globe Facilities Services, Inc., for '0/01/99-09/30/2002 (eM)
ITEM #24 - Authorize Settlement - Charles and Gloria Johnson v. City of Clearwater (CA)
ITEM #25 - Confirm 09/09/99. 10:30 a.m. to 1 :30 o.m.t to begin review of Policies &
Rules of Procedures
Commissioner Clark moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted less Items
#15 (first title) and #21, and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #15 - Approval of Purchases per 07/20/99 memorandum:
Central Parking Systems, extension, month to month parking system services at Clearwater
Beach, ending 09/30/2000, estimated $325,000 (PW)
A citizen spoke in opposition to the contract's extension and requested the service
be bid.
Public Works Administrator Rich Baier reviewed contract requirements. The
extension adheres to each requirement. With construction planned for new beach parking
garages, it was impractical to bid out the extension. Contract costs, which had remained
flat for 3 years, were increased due to a change in the scope of services; closing times
were extended from 10:00 p.m. to , :00 - 1 :30 a.m. In response to a questiont Mr. Baier
said staff is considering alternative ways to manage beach parking before next summer.
Commissioner Hart moved to approve a month-to-month extension of parking
system services on Clearwater beach to Central Parking Systems. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #21 - Contract for Gulf to Bav Blvd. median landscaoinQ & irriQation IOld Coachman
Rd. to Belcher Rd. & westward) to Morelli Landscaping, Inc., $110,087.18 with option to
continue with Phase 2 of project for not to exceed $85t877.82, for total of $195,965 for
both phases (PW)
Project scope provides all labor , materials, equipment, supervision, MOT
(maintenance of traffic), transportation, and services necessary to remove soilt 1-foot deep,
from median planting areas, replace it with clean fill, and install landscaping and irrigation
according to specifications, which include warranties. Phase 1, upgrading the 7 medians
between Old Coachman and Belcher Roads are FOOT approved. Project costs are based on
estimates.
In response to a question, Mr. Baier said the pilot program to update Gulf-to-Bay
Boulevard is complete except for the artwork and light installation. Landscaping in the
median was delayed while FOOT (Florida Department of Transportation) considered
extending a turn-lane. The 3 phases of median landscaping will extend from US 19N to
mcc08b99
9
OB/'9/99
r.
o
.~:)
o
Missouri Avenue via Court Street. The City Manager Indicated the subject contract is
funded by the recreation budget. In response to a question, Mr. Baier saId except for a
possible grant from Sam's Club, staff has been unsuccessful in enlistIng Gulf-to-Bay
Boulevard businesses' support in maintaining the medians.
Commissioner Johnson moved to award a contract for Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard
Median Landscaping & Irrigation (Old Coachman Road to Belcher Road and westward) (98~
0152-EN) to Morelli Landscaping, Inc., of Clearwater, for $11 Ot087.18, which is the
lowest responsible bid received in accordance with the plans and specifications, with an
option to continue with Phase 2 of the project for the not to exceed sum of $85,877.82,
for a cumulative total of $195t965 for both phases and that the appropriate officials be
authorized to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
OTHER ITEMS ON CITY MANAGER REPORT
ITEM #26 - Uodate reaardlna Beach Entrvwav (Roundabout) Proiect leM)
The project is on target for completion in mid-December. Transportation & Drainage
Director Gary Johnson reviewed plans developed with business owners to remove
sidewalks by the Marina after hours. Changes to traffic patterns have proved successful.
One citizen recommended project changes. One citizen questioned if conduit was
being installed underground in case it is found to be needed in the future. Staff responded
this is being done~
,
ITEM #27 - Amendment to Waiver Aareement with. Charles and Ypapanti Alexiou, property
owners at 7 Rockaway Street, and National Water Sports Inc., to add a tow ride which
seats 5 people (MR)
In October 199', the City entered into a waiver agreement with Charles and
Ypapanti Alexiou, owners of Frenchy's Rockaway Grill, Inc., 7, Rockaway Street, and
National Water Sports, Inc. The agreement allows a corridor for watercraft to traverse the
restricted swimming area. The proposed amendment will only add a tow ride to existing
activities. The ride seats five people and will be towed behind existing rental craft.
Harbormaster Bill Morris said the waiver agreement and related Ordinance resulted
from a legal settlement related to the property owner's riparian rights. The property owner
is responsible for notIfying swimmers when boats enter the corridor and waiting for
swimmers to move out of the way.
Commissioner Hart moved approve an amendment to the waIver agreement with
Charles and Ypapanti Alexiou, property owners at 7 Rockaw~y Street, and National Water
Sports, Inc., and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
mcc08b99
'10
08/19/99
. i '. ..." :.... .",. . . ' ..', ".
~
,> ~~. J
ITEM #28 - Approve selection committeets rankinq of consultants (#1 - Parsons
Engineering Science, #2 - Harvard Jolly Clees Toppe Architects, #3 - Tampa Bay
Engineering, #4 - Camp, Dresser & McKeet #5 - Bitterli & Associates Architects, and #6 -
McKim and Creed) for more detailed engineering and financial analyses for two beach
parking garages; authorize staff to negotiate a scope of services and contract with top
ranked firm (PW)
On June 3, 1999, the City Commission approved the Pier 60 Lot Plus and Pelican
Walk sites for parking garages and authorized staff to move forward with more detailed
engineering and financial analyses. Of the Cityts 7 engineers-of record and 5 architects-of-
record solicitedt the City received 6 letters of interest. The firms made presentations to a
selection committee, which ranked them according to past experience in parking garages,
creativity, financial expertise, architectural/structural expertise, and traffic operations
expertise.
.~
mcc08b99
11
08/1 9/99
In response to a question, the City Manager indicated after the consultant contract
is finalized within 45 dayst City Commission discussion of design issues can be scheduled.
In response to a resident recommendation, the City Manager indicated a referendum
might not be necessary. Opposition was expressed to constructing a parking garage at Pier
60.
t.l:~\
\l:1~;'
Commissioner Hart moved to approve the selection committee's ranking of
consultants for more detailed engineering and financial analyses for 2 beach parking
garages, and authorize staff to negotiate a scope of services and contract with the top-
ranked firm. The motion was duly seconded. Commissioners Johnsont Hoopert Hart, and
Mayor Aungst voted "Aye"; Commissioner Clark voted "Nay." Motion carried.
ITEM #29 - Amend proiect scope for Drew Street Widenina oroiect; approve transfer of
$550,000 from S.R.60 Corridor Enhancement capital project to Drew Street Widening
capital project (PW)
Drew Street is a primary east-west corridor between US 19N and US Alternate 19.
. Between Highland Avenue and NE Coachman Road, the road has no center turn lane and
narrow 9-foot wide lanes. The project will add a 14-foot center turn lane and widen travel
lanes to 11-feet. As a joint project with FOOT, the City pays design costs and FOOT pays
construction costs. Pinellas County has completed a similar project between NE Coachman
Road and US 19N.
To minimize creating non-conforming residential lots due to required right-of-way
takings, it is proposed the project limits be reduced to between Saturn Avenue and NE
Coachman Road. The change in the project's scope results in a $292,966 Supplemental
Design Work Order to include: 11 revision of all roadway, signalization, and signage and
marking plans to reflect new project limits; 2) modification of drainage and utility designs
and revision of drainage and utility plans; and 3) modification of a SWFWMD (Southwest
Florida Water Management District) permit. A $286,140 Supplemental Design Order
includes: ,) relocation and enhancement of the Corona Avenue school crossing as
~
""'''II)
(~~
'J
requested by Pinellas County Schools for improved safety; 2) revision of traffic signal
orientation and addition of a pedestrian crossing at Drew Street and NE Coachman as
requested by the City; 3) review of right-of-way taking "cure" plans for compatibility with
design plans; 4) incorporation of "as~built" information from Highland Avenue and Drew
Street east of NE Coachman construction projects; and 5) revision of utility relocation plans
to separate gas from water and sewer as required by FOOT.
A funding shortfall of $493,056 has been identified. It is necessary to transfer
$550,000 to the Drew Street project. Due to FOOT permit constraints, portions of the SR
60 corridor beautification enhancements are no longer planned. With costs related to those
enhancements exceeding $1-million, staff recommends $ 5 50,000 be transferred with no
adverse impacts anticipated on the Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard project.
The City Manager said public meetings are scheduled in September for the
community abutting Drew Street between Duncan and Highland Avenues to discuss road
construction plans. The widening project for the commercial section east of Duncan will
move ahead. Should the project be curtailed west of Duncan, a substitute project could
take years to fund or could never be considered. Concern was expressed drainage
problems west of Duncan Avenue will not be repaired if this project is amended. As FOOT
would save significant money if this project is amended, it was recommended the agency
repair the subject drainage problems.
Jack King, FOOT representative, said the Drew Street widening project is under
funded by approximately $6-million. At this time, the department cannot offer alternative
services, such as resurfacing. In response to a question, Mr. Baier said public meetings will
gather neighborhood comments regarding issues such as sidewalks, lighting, and other
factors. He indicated some property owners in the commercial area will not sell their
rights-of-way willingly. Staff is working on cure plans. Mr. King said the drainage needs of
the Keene Road extension must be identified before a pond location can be determined.
One resident recommended a project change.
Commissioner Clark moved to amend the project scope for the Drew Street
Widening project and approve the transfer of $550,000 from the SR 60 Corridor
Enhancement capital project to the Drew Street Widening capital project. The motion was
duly seconded. Commissioners Johnson, Hooper, Clark, and Mayor Aungst voted "Aye";
Commissioner Hart voted "Nay." Motion carried.
ITEM #30 - Fire Task Force
Discussion ensued regarding the size, makeup, time limits, and goals of the task
force.
Commissioners will be contacted for nominations and recommendations and an
agenda item will be developed.
Item #30 was postponed to the next meeting.
mcc08b99
12
08/1 9/99
" ,.
j,. . '._'.". l I . , ", '. .
'1
ITEM #31 - Amendment to Siemon. Larsen contract
A RFDQ (Request for Developer Qualifications) has been drafted to solicit interest in
development of the bluff area between Cleveland and Drew, Ft. Harrison and Clearwater
Harbor, Cleveland and Pierce, and Osceola and Clearwater Harbor. By consensus, the City
Commission directed staff to proceed.
Staff recommends contracting Charles Siemon, of Siemon and Larsen, to lead
negotiations with the selected developer, due to the firm's experience, relationships, and
expertise. The scope of work covers specific tasks from finalizing the RFDQ to
recommending a ranking of development teams to the City Commission. The City may
terminate the contract with 10 days written notice.
Nine residents spoke in opposition of a RFDO and bluff development.
One resident spoke in support of the RFDQ.
r'"\
......,.)
Commissioners expresoed a desire to make the bayfront better. It was stated that
downtown development needs a jump-start. It was felt the City must explore ways to rid
the bluff of the unattractive concrete that covers much of it. Concern was expressed an
advertisement in today's newspaper was misleading and that 2 signatories had voted
against extending the green space in. Coachman Park. It was suggested a good public use
could be identified. A concern was expressed that other major projects need to be
completed.
Commissioner Clark moved to approve a contract with Siemon and Larsen not to
exceed $66,480 in conjunction with the Downtown Request for Developer qualifications
and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The motion was duly
seconded. Commissioners Hooper, Clark, and Hart and Mayor Aungst voted "Aye";
Commissioner Johnson voted "Nay. II Motion carried.
ITEM #32 - Penninqton, Moore, Wilkinson. Bell and Dunbar, P.A., 3rd of 5 extensions,
state lobbyist services, 10101/99-09/30/2000, estimated $55,000 (eLK)
In 1996, the City Commission chose the Pennington Law Firm to provide State
lobbying services based on their response to a RFP (Request for Proposals). The contract
provides 5 annual renewals at the City's option. According to his August 17, 1999,
memorandum, Peter Dunbar indicated two of the firm's clients pose a potential for conflict:
1) Florida Outdoor Advertising Association and 2) Time Warner. Potential conflict in the
2000 session with Time Warner relates to the Commission considering a wide range of
cable and telecommunications issues. No pending outdoor advertising issues have been
identified that could cause a conflict. Should a conflict develop, the City will be notified
immediately and the Commission will be asked to provide direction whether to retain
someone else to represent the City in that matter. The City can retain someone else to
represent if for that issue and deduct that cost from the fee to be paid Pennington.
,)
mcc08b99
13
08/19/99
,e
','
" ,
'I
,~
The City Attorney stated staff had not requested Commission direction last year
regarding retaining outside counsel after the Pennington Firm had notified the City
,regarding a conflict of interest related to pending billboard legislation. Staff will provide
alternative recommendations to the City Commission should future conflict occur.
Mayor Aungst stated the City Attorney had opined that his employment with Time
Warner did not constitute a conflict in this matter.
Commissioner Johnson moved to extend the contract with Pennington, Moore,
Wilkinson, Bell and Dunbar, P.A., Tallahassee, in the estimated amount of $55,000 for
State lobbyist services, during the contract period October 1, 1 999 through September
30,2000, and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #33 - Other PendinQ Matters M None.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
ITEM #34 - Citv Attornev Items - None.
Commissioner Johnson questioned if a response to Glen Johnson1s letter was being
prepared. Staff indicated it was.
Commissioner Johnson requested information regarding the impact of the new State
homestead exemption for seniors.
Commissioner HooDer will provide updates regarding actions of the new US 19 Task
Force considering intersections and median cuts.
Commissioner Clark reflected on the accusations directed at the Commission
tonight.
Mavor Aunast complimented the City Manager's Office and Legal Department for
improved communications.
,:J
mccOBb99
14
08/19/99
,"
~\
",:,1.:"
; .>'
. ~ ",
, \'
\:~ . .
"1. 'f:'.,
...: '
~; ~ ".' ~ h.
"
,,'
" ~.
,I
" ,
1t(~'~~i~!!;: ~i'"!~~J ~;~)J i/ ~:f)!: ~},; :.:':, ",:' ":' '.
~,/"),, ,,' "
r'~:O'
'I:', .
P}. ,".. .' .
:,:".:. ,~.... '
,i-l, ~ ' ' ".
~:'" r ~ ~
",'1-
, ~ ' I'; .
,\;' ,
"
. ':'
. ~. i' . .
. ~... . :.
, ~\':.
.. ,
>. ,\ c ~ '.
" ,'.'.
.,' ,e,
",
",
" '
. 'f.t."..
. . ~ C T
Mavor Aunast said it is necessary for staft'to follow the chain of command.
" 1
,Xl
ITEM #37 ;, Adiournment
, ' ,
The meeting adjourned at 10:24 p.m.
"
~'1~
- -8YOrT~mi1.sl ner-~
HI ~ ,I
I
1 '
'. .,
.'! "
','
,
, '.
" , '"
I
" !'
" ;
I Q 'i. '.I
'"
"
: ,
'i
,0
mcc08b99
15
68/19/99
Exhibit A to 8/19/99
'l<h:' .,'
. .. . '. > -l ~
~
: ~ . "J
,~'". ~'
Executive Summary
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
I. Urban Design and Historic Preservation.
Revised 'Goal2t Objective 2.3t and Policics 2.3.1 -2.3.4 are proposed 'to address the need
for increased focus on historic preservation and urban design as required by the Evaluation
and Appraisal Report. The new objective and related policies can be found on page 9 of
the draft Future Land Use Elcment.
II. Traffic Calming, Bike and Pedestrian Access.
Objective 2.5 and Policies 2.5.1 - 2.5.3 are proposed to address transportation and land
use issues discussed in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. The new objective and
policies are found on pages 10 and II in the draft Future Land Use Element.
III. Mixed Use and Planned Development Techniques.
C)
Objective 2.2 and Policies 2.2.1 - 2.2.3 are proposed to address the need to focus on
innovative development techniques that are compatible with the surrounding environment
as indicated in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report and required by Rule 9J-5.006(4)(c ).
The new objective and policies are found on page 8 of the draft Future Land Use Element.
IV. Community Development Code
, ,
Objective 3.2 and Policy 3.2.1 are proposed to reflect the new Community Developmcnt
Code and the zoning districts found therein. These revisions are found on pages 12 - 16 of
the draft Future Land Use Element.
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
I. Traffic Circulation
Objective 5.5 and related policies on pages 8-16 are proposed to be amended to reference
the lcvel-of-service. backlogged and constrained road listing compiled by the Pinellas
County Metropolitan Planning Organization. The listing is proposed to be deleted from
the Goals. Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
'-.)
Objectives 6.3 and 6.4 on pages 20 & 21 arc proposed to be amended to reference the
transportation improvement program of the PineUas County Metropolitan Planning
Organization. The listing is proposed to be deleted from the Goals, Objectives and
Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
't.
.:::' 'I
o
,"'1';,.11 .
II. Mass Transit
Objective 8.2 and related policies on page 2S arc proposed to be amended to coordinate the
Major Investment Study for Pincllas County with all of the appropriate agencies.
Objective 8.4 and related policies on page 27 arc proposed to promote mass transit through
various coordination of plans and agencies.
III. Aviation
i.
: .,
The goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater Airpark are proposed to bc primarily
amended to rcference the rcvised aiport master plan to be adopted(page 27).
IV. New Transportation Element
;
F:
Goal 12A on page 31 is proposed to indicate the City's intention with providing the
required multimodal transportation analysis by October I, 2000 in accordance with State
Statutes.
. '
, .
!,,'
P, .
:'!!'
I '
HOUSING ELEMENT
f'
I. Housing Rehabilitation and Neighborhood Preservation
0,
Several policies throughout the Housing Element are proposed to include greater focus
upon housing rehabilitation and neighborhood preservation. Objective 13.6, policy 13.6.1
and 13.6.8 were revised to address these issues. These revised objectives and policies can
be found on pages 8 and 9 of the draft Housing Element.
II. Affordable Housing
Very Low Income households are included in the analysis of affordable and available
bousing throughout the draft Housing Element. Additionally, Objective 13.2 and Policy
13.2.3 are proposed to better address affordable housing needs. These revised objectives
and policies can be found on pages 3 and 4 of the draft Housing Element.
'III. Jnfill Development
Policy 13.1.2, on page 2 of the draft Housing Element, are proposed to better reflect the
Residential Infill Projects as found in the Community Development Code.
U"".,.
" ,
2
tf," ~ "I. ,
.' . .,
"" . I
I'
;,,(')
"' h.~ .("''')''
SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT'
I. Wastewater Facilities
",'
Objective 14,2 OJ1 page 3 is proposed to be amended to addrcss the continued need to
improve the visual appearance and odors associated with wastewater facilities as set out
in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. .
ll. Interceptors (Trunk Lines)
: ~ t
'"
Policy 14.3.6. on page 5 ofClearwaterts Comprehensive Plan was clarified to focus on the
condition of interceptors (trunk lines) throughout the city as required by the Evaluation and
Appraisal Report.
>.
./ ;~
":l
\'
m. uPackage Treatment Plants"
Policy 14.3.2. on page 5 addresses the issue of the encouragement of areas that require
sanitary and sewer service as the result of closure of "package plants" to connect to the
City's sewer system.
IV. Annexation
,.0
Policy 14.3.2. on page 5 is proposed to be revised to encourage annexation ofarcas that
desire to be connected to the cityts sewer system as required in the Evaluation and
Appraisal Report.
V. Force Main Crossings
Two major force main crossings were replaced in Clearwater Harbor as indicated in the
Evaluation and Appraisal Report, however a related policy can be found on page 5 in
poliey 14.3.5.
VL New Pump Station
The Evaluation and Appraisal Report discussed the need for a new pump station and a
short force main connection in the area of Lake Chautauqua and McMullen-Booth Road.
The City has undertaken major pumping station replacements and upgrades throughout the
city as discussed on page 1 of the Sanitary Sewer Needs Summary. Policy 14.3.5. on page
5 can also illuminate the measures taken to address the requiremcnts.
VII Other Changes
, .
Agencies that were renamed arc explained throughout the sub-clement.
u
3
Policies 15.6.3. and 15.6.5. both on page 13 are proposed to be amended to reflcct the
requirements in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report.
c' \.
"
~;, .
. ,r-")
. ._,....\.;:,
SOLID WASTE SUB-ELEMENT
I. Increased Education for Curbside Separation
:. I
9bjcctivc 15.6 on page 12 is proposed to be modified as per required by the Evaluation
and Appraisal Report to increase awareness and education for the city's curbside
. separation program.
II. Citi~n Participation nnd county cooperation (or toxic waste disposal
ID. Visual Appearance for Dumpsters and Recycling Containers
Objective 15.1 and policy 15.7.1. are proposed to be added to the Comprehensive Plan to
address the visual appearance objectives of the city.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT
I. Utilization of both Natural and Man-made Wetlands for Stormwater Storage
'-, /~.
, ,
"-'
Policy 16.3.2. on page 18 is proposed to stress the City's deep commitment to utilizing
both natural and man-made wetlands for stonnwater storage as required in the Evaluation
and Appraisal Report. Policy 16.3.6 on page 19 is proposed to be added to emphasize the
city's commitment to the prcservation of wetlands.
n. Treatment of Stormwater Runoff
The Evaluation and Appraisal Report indicated the need for the City of Clearwater to
explore new techniques for the treatment of Stonnwater runoff. Objective 16.5. on page 21
is'proposed to address this requirement and all of the policies on pages 21 and 22 are
linked to this objective in many related aspects.
m. Other Changes
As required by 9J-5, the term Drainage was officially struck from the text and replaced
~th the teoo Stonnwater Management.
:
"
(j;J
4
<,
"
. ..:
.' , . ..
o
POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AOUIFER RECHARGE SUB.
ELEMENT
I. Reclaimed Water
Policy 18.5.7. on page 32 is proposed to be added to the Comprehensive Plan to address
the continuance and extension of reclaimed water within the City of Clearwater.
D. Potable Water Conservation
"
.~: ~ . >. .
Policy 18.2.6. on page 28 and policies 18.6.2., 18.6.3. and 18.6.4. on page 32 arc
proposed to address the requir~ments set forth in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report
regarding the use of reclaimed water and the implementation of potable water
conservation.
"
:'. .
m. Other Changes
Many agencies were re-named as it was commented upon throughout the clement.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
I. Coastal High Hazard Area
, O.
Objective 19.2 on page 3 modifies the definition of the Coastal High Hazard Area to
reflect the current definition found in the Florida Statutes. This objective's policies are
proposed to include disaster mitigation initiatives.
II. Public Beach Access
Objective 19.3 on page 4 is proposed to be amended to include the various transportation
initiatives that provides improved access to Clearwater Beach.
III. Coastal Redevelopment
Objective 19.6 on page 6 is proposed to coordinate redevelopment activities in coastal
areas with the Comprehensive Plan and other disaster mitigation plaps.
IV. Coastal Resources
00al20 and related objectives and policies (pages 7~1O) are proposed to be amended to
better delineate the need for development review. stonnwater management and water
quality monitoring along the coast. and beach restoration and renourishment.
o
5
Objective 21.5 and related policics on pagc 14 & IS arc proposed to provide better coordination
of improving hurricane evacuation routes and public shelter capacity. '
> : ~ .. ~ ~., '.
~
'. ~. ~ :
V. Water Dependent Uses
Objective 21.2 and related policies on pages 11-13 arc proposed to bettcr delineate State
requirements for prioritizing watcr depcndcnt and non-water dependent uses and
coordination with appropriate agencies.
" '
J ,.' I
VI. Hurricane Evacuation
"
I '
CONSERVATION ELEMENT
" '
I. Ongoing Conservation Activities
"
The proposed Conservation Element amendments better reflect ongoing programs and
coordination with various agencies.
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
I. Park Facilities
o
Objectives 24.1 and 24.3 are proposed to be IDTlended to better ensure resident's needs are
being served with various park fucilities as stated on pages ,3 and 6. Policy 24.3.1 is
proposed to be amended to review the service guidelines for recreation facilities.
,)
L, ,
II., Open Space Beautification
Policies 24.4.2, 24.4.10 and 24.4.11 are proposed to be amended to address beautification
efforts in open space areas. gateway corridors and other areas identified in redevelopment
plans including UOne City, One Future." These modifications can be found on pages 8 and
9 of the proposed Recreation and Open Space Element.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
I. Annexation
Objective 27.1 is proposed to be revised to better reflect the City's need for coordination in
the effort to annex tlle existing enclaves. 'This revised objective can be found on page 6 of
the draft Intergovernmental Coordination Element.
II. Tampa Bay Estuary Program
,~)
Policy 26. 1.6 is proposed to be added to reflect the need for coordination regarding this
Program. The new policy can be found on pag.:: 3 of the draft Intergovenunental
Coordination Element.
6
~.> J' ;'>:.
cl '
"
<.r' , .
, , f~ ,.
., ,
: ~. . .
;,", . \
, '
.'
. ,?'; , >
.
, ..',.
, .'
LI'
. . ~,
-: ~'. : '
, ""I', "
'. ,
,
c . I" , I
.', ;. .
..... '
'c' . : I
!,', ". .j", ..i
~T'p"jn..r:'..+":t'\: ~:" .. '<I "!-"i'~.... ~.+,.,' ,I
, ..-' '
, ,
',' ~ .J:;' ~ ,_ f' . + ;.
Ie
o
~.~~..~~J
" '
.,' ......' <,'
III. Coordination with School Board
c Policy 25.1.1 is proposed to be added to reflect the City's interlocnl agreement with the
, Pinel1as County School Board.' The revised policy can be found 'on page 2 of the draft
, Intergovernmental Coordination Element. c ',.
I
I
IV~ Statutory RequirementsfChanges
, ,
Chapter 163.3177(6)G) F.S. revised the Intergovernmental Coordination Element. Pages 7
nnd 8 in the draft Intergovernmental Coordination Elcment reflcct new goals, objectives.
and, policies, added . in response 'to the statutory changes. These changes include the
, folloWing: '
'<'<. "
, ,
,I
.,,"
','
"
:~,,:, '," ':"
" ' "" I,
I~l.i\' ;:,c
r/; r,~,
~~+.' .. +:'.. .. ",
j't'.'.' I~ ',. 't+: .
\:~~: .~::.".
'" '
1 '
':,;' G""
'. ", '. ~
, . ' .
".' .
.c, J
'",' .
"
, "
.t....
I,
'. . . ~.
. '
/. . I
,;0
\ . ' ,
: :'1
.
Dispute resolution process ,
Joint processes for collaborative planning on population projections, school
siting. concurrency. and problematic uses.
Identification and coordination of special districts in Pinellas County.
.
.
,,'
. ..
7