04/06/1999 (2)i1
r
t
??
a?? ?
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MELTING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
April 6, 1999
Present: Gerald Figurski Board Member
David Gildersleeve Board Member
William Johnson Board Member
Edward Mazur, Jr. Board Member
Shirley Moran Board Member
Carlen A. Petersen Board Member
Alex Plisko Board Member
Also Present: Leslie Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney
Ralph Stone Planning Director
Cynthia Hardin Assistant Planning Director
Antonia Gerli Planning Manager
Brenda Moses Board Reporter
The meeting was called to order at 1:00 p.m. at the Municipal Services Building.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily
discussed in that order.
ITEM 1 - Adoration of Rules of Order & Procedures
Planning Director Ralph Stone stated the proposed rules of order and procedures for
the CDB (Community Development Board) meet the requirements of the Community
Development Code.
Article III, Section 4 - Staff and Legal Advisor to the Board
In response to a question, Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides said either
the City Attorney's office or outside counsel will represent the CDB. She anticipates
outside counsel will handle the task.
Article IV, Section 2 - Quorum and Vote
Consensus was to continue an item automatically if a 3:2 vote occurs.
Article IV, Section 3 - Conflict of Interest
Ms. Dougall-Sides said the code states that no board member shall engage in any
ex-partee communications. Investigations and site visits related to quasi-judicial matters
are permitted if disclosed at a public hearing and made part of the record. It was stated
language in the code related to conflict of interest disclosure needs to be amended. It was
recommended a statement be added to the agenda indicating board members intend to
conduct investigations and site visits when quasi-judicial matters are to be considered. It
was suggested the board adopt that as its policy.
;®
I=
Mcd04a99 1 04/06/99
Consensus was for staff to develop a disclosure form that includes a space for
board members to check if they had conducted any site visits.
Article IV, Section 4 - Order of Meeting
It was suggested allowing additional time under "Requests for Continuances."
Discussion ensued regarding how much time should be afforded the applicant. It was
remarked as each case will differ, it is difficult to identify time constraints prior to each
hearing.
Consensus was to provide applicants instructions when they file their application. If
an applicant should require additional time to present their case, they should notify staff in
advance when possible. The board will determine how much time is sufficient. Staff also
will include these instructions in Article V, Sections 1 and 2.
In response to a question, Assistant Planning Director Cynthia Hardin said "Board
and Staff Reports/Coinments" refers to staff submittal of special studies, updates, and
status reports to provide board members information that does not fit in a formal
application.
Consensus was to move "Board and Staff Reports/Comments" after "Appeals."
Article V, Sections 1 & 2 - Legislative Hearings & Quasi-Judicial Hearings
In response to a question, staff felt they should be provided the final opportunity to
speak in order to clarify any applicant misstatements. The policy will indicate the board
will not consider new information reported during summary remarks.
In response to a suggestion to add "opposing" to "cross examination of expert
witnesses by applicant," the majority agreed staff suggested language is sufficient. In
response to a question, Mr. Stone said it is intended for staff to act as expert witnesses.
The board will review staff resumes today. It will not be necessary to tender their
qualifications at each meeting.
Consensus was to limit group presentations to 10 minutes. It was agreed a
sentence be added indicating additional time can be granted for presentations if board
members do not oppose the request. Should a member object, a vote to allow additional
time will be required.
Article V, Section 3 - Appeals
In response to a question, Mr. Stone said this section includes standards regarding
Level One Development Orders. It was suggested a statement be added to the agenda
stating if the board does not pull a Consent Agenda item, the staff decision stands.
Discussion ensued regarding the location of quasi-judicial hearings for items pulled
from the agenda. It was felt as applicants prefer the process be expedited rather than
prolonged, they will be prepared at the hearing to provide all pertinent evidence, necessary
representation, and expert testimony. It was suggested the board conduct quasi-judicial
Mcd04a99 2
04106/99
hearings when the Consent Agenda item is announced, rather than at the end of the '
meeting.
Consensus was to review Consent Agenda items, then appeals pulled from the
Consent Agenda.
Article V, Section 4 - Continuances
Ms. Dougall-Sides said the Code states applicants can request and obtain a
continuance if any board members are absent. She suggested the board limit consideration
of requests for continuance to applicable requirements. It was recommended the applicant
be required to request a continuance prior to the scheduled hearing. It was suggested
continuance requests be announced and considered at the beginning of each board
meeting.
Consensus was for the Chair to ask all applicants in attendance at the beginning of
each meeting to announce requests for continuance. Applicants arriving late also will have
the opportunity to request a continuance prior the application being heard.
Article Vi, Section 2 -- Time Limits on Approval
it was requested sentence one read, "An application for a building permit shall be
made within one year..." It was stated this section intends to require that applicants apply
for permits and begin the project within a reasonable amount of time.
Article VI, Section 3 - Reconsideration or Rehearing
In response to a question, Ms. Dougall-Sides said anyone can request a
reconsideration or rehearing of a board decision, and it will be heard at the next meeting.
In response to a question, Mr. Stone said anyone can request an amendment to the
Community Development Code.
Consensus was to adopt the changes as indicated above.
ITEM 2 - Election of Officers
Member Gildersleeve moved to appoint Member Figurski as Chair. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Member Johnson moved to appoint Member Mazur as Vice-Chair. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The importance of not interrupting each other during discussions was noted.
The Chair's role was discussed.
Mcd04a99 3 04/06/99
1' 1 , i - - ,
ITEM 3 - Review and Confirmation of City Staff as expert Witnesses
Mr. Stone reviewed staff credentials that qualify them as expert witnesses. In
response to a question, he said Mark Parry is not a registered landscape architect. He stated
a caveat in the Code allows staff with bachelor degrees to review applications and code
regulations. While Mr. Parry will not sign and seal architectural plans, he will make
recommendations and review information with landscape architecture experts.
Member Gildersleeve moved to accept Ralph Stone as an expert witness in the areas
of planning in general, comprehensive planning, redevelopment planning, historic
preservation, environmental planning, and transportation-related issues. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Member Petersen moved to accept Cynthia Hardin as an expert witness in the areas
of urban planning and historic preservation. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
Member Johnson moved to accept Mark Parry as an expert witness in the areas of
environmental planning design and site plan review. The motion was duly seconded and
carried unanimously.
Member Gildersleeve moved to accept Sinta McCall as an expert witness in the areas
of land use and zoning, site plan review, neighborhood planning, housing, economic
development, and parks and recreation planning and zoning. In response to a question, Mr.
Stone said Ms. McCall is not a registered landscape architect. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Member Plisko moved to accept Antonia Gerli as an expert witness in the areas of site
planning, development planning, parks planning, and development review. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Member Plisko moved to accept Michael Gust as an expert witness in the areas of
traffic operations and traffic studies. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
Member Gildersleeve moved to accept Michael Quillen as an expert witness in the
areas of water resources, civil engineering, and hydraulic engineering. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Consensus was for staff to provide the board with resumes of staff who may appear
before the board to provide expert testimony on behalf of the City.
ITEM 4 - Board and Staff Comments
It was requested staff provide board members with standard language for the
Chair's introductory comments, motions, appeals, and recommendations.
Mcd04a99 4 04/06/99
In response to a question, Mr. Stone said staff reports to the board will include
enhanced graphics, aerial and site location maps, information on pertinent regulations,
background, and staff's rationale for recommendations.
It was noted the previous Planning and Zoning Board had requested staff use
language indicating "it appears the applicant has met all standards..," rather than
"applicant has met the standards..." Mr. Stone said staff will state if an applicant meets
ail standards. In some cases, the applicant may meet only part of the criteria. Staff tries
to reflect this status in the way the recommendation is stated.
In response to a question, Mr. Stone said CDB meetings will be scheduled once a
month. If the case load increases substantially, the schedule can be modified.
Discussion ensued regarding conflicts of interest.
Consensus was for the affected board member to leave the meeting room whenever
a conflict of interest occurs. It was stated in those instances, the applicant will not be
afforded the option to request a continuance because all board members are not present.
It was requested the agenda state no beepers, cell phones, etc. are permitted at
board meetings.
J
Mr. Stone said some glitches have been discovered in the new Code. Revisions will
be presented to the CDB for input.
Member Petersen reported she will be absent for the June meeting.
Member Gildersleeve reported he will be absent for the April 20, 1999, meeting.
ITEM 5 - Ad'ournment
The meeting adjourned at 2:56 p.m.
C air
Community Development oar
J.
Attest:
4?)W vvla?n] 02-OD
Board Reporter
Mcd04a99 5 04/06/99