11/30/1999 (2)
,
,\
,'j,e
'"
, "
'. ~ '
"'e'1,.,
.< H.
l,l':'
, '
~ .' '
,,',
~ ':', ~~: .' I
: ',~'"
:d<
I".
'... .
H~:1';:i~:,::. ~:"i..
..~~..~ u.
I,,'
r.<, I:
'i','
.....1"
~; 'i
'~ , '.'
U,',
'"
;,/ ,I
,;..,
e',.
,..
~ ',f.
~~' . "
, "
,','
::;"l,q .:,,'.t,
,. ~ .
~~l.e ,.
'1 ': .~
" , ' ~
" ,",
~ , I
~:':~':;\ .
~:"i~':'
:,
~,l;. >,.,'
,
'" ,
\..,',
~~..;/?" ;,,'
"::. ~"+c.~
~~:/< ::.~
~N;>,'.:",:\,;:"
+',.
-j.:.l.
t,',
'.,
'.e.J<
, '
" ~;
.'
)
I,
':!
',.,1
: 'i,'
" . '"
'i.
., ...'.
I
. ~ J.
, '
')0 ~~..e~ ,/.\~,...e~~,I~:
I'"~
"
.. "
,. ,.e, .> ."
"<'"
, ,~
.',
, "
:'t
.. ....
'i,i.
d,' "
'.'
",
. .'l: :.'::,.,-::: ~>',
:J
"
','
" .
,I'
, ,J
I
"
, "
~; ,
i';
"
, ~",
,!
'!' '..., "
:!.
,.
'I
.F'TF
Fire Task Force
MINUTES
'I
DClte:--N o\lomo- '30
, ' ' ~
' '
, . ., . ~
"
.i
')
.\ ':"
i
I'
I';r
(qq'l
, ;"
0( /0
. .
. . '.' ',. . ~ ..., . ,~ , . . , I' " '. , .' ~ I ~ I '. '.' '., ..., ,. ,." ; ,
I.' ,.' .
~. , " " ';. ", 1 ~ ~e (~, . ."
~; otT .
.!,: " c"
I>
, < "
\ '...
g
o
l":';' :;,
W
. '. ~
!"l:
" )
, ' ,
FIRE TASK FORCE MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
November 30, 1999
Present:
Bill Horne
Fran Briskman
Joe Calia
Joe Evich
Rowland Herald
George Krause
John Lee
Scott Nail
, Bill Schwab
William Sherman
Jean Stuart
Duke Tieman
Doug Williams
Absent:
Russ Kimball
Also Present:
Robert Lockwood
Wayne Hanson
Margie Simmons
Tina Wilson
John Carassas
Sue Diana
Brenda Moses
Chair (non-voting)
Task Force Member
Task Force Member
Task Force Member
Task Force Member
Task Force Member,
Task Force Member
Task Force Member - left 4: 11 p.m.
Task Force Member
Task Force Member
Task Force Alternate
Task Force Member
Task Force Alternate
Task Force Member
> Administrative Support Manager
Administrative Support Manager
Finance Director
Budget Director
Assistant City Attorney
Assistant City Clerk
Board Reporter
The Chair called the meeting to order at 3:02 p.m. at City Hall.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily
discussod in that order. '
ITEM 2 - ADDroval of Minutes of 11/09/99 and 11/16/99 MeetinQs
Member Schwob moved to' approve the minutes of November 9, 1999, as
corrected. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Member Evich requested the NovemiJdr 16, 1999, minutes on page 3, paragraph 4
be changed to read "... indicated no additional costs in his motion to include... II and on
page 1, paragraph 3, read "...budget increase is not 34%, but approximately 60%."
Member Krause moved to approve the minutes as amended. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
mft11 d99
1
11/301/99
!.
~
....~k~l
(~~,,)
'~
ITEM 3 - Fire Fee Prosentation - Robert Sheets
Robert Sheets with Government Services Group, Inc. made a presentation on the
Fire Rescue Special Assessment Program. He said fire rescue is one of the most visible
services a community provides. Everyone within the community accepts and appreciates
the critical nature of that service. People want to make sure when they call "911" they
receive service quickly. The Fire Department can ask for ad valorem increases or search
for other funding sources. Regulatory and inspection fees are charged by the City but are
negligible in regard to the overall fire budget. Transport fees for services jointly done by
the City and the County simply offset some costs. Traditionally, costs for fire services has
been determined by property values. Mr. Sheets presented scenarios that apply fire service
fees according to demand rather than property values.
Florida Home Rule allows local governments to find solutions to local issues unless
otherwise dictated in the Constitution or Florida Statutes. Case law criteria for special
, assessments; data components involved in conducting a special assessment;
apportionment methodology; proposed rates; 5) revenue scenarios; and 6) issues such as
exemptions, nursing homes, initial revenue collection were reviewed. To hav'e a valid non
ad valorem assessment in Florida, the City must prove that the service provides a special
benefit to property and the assessment must be fairly and reasonably apportioned. It
cannot be arbitrary. Assessments have been used for road improvements, sidewalks, solid
waste, stormwater, etc.
Mr. Sheets said the basic data components in the special assessment study were
based on call/incident data for calendar year 1998, the City's ad valorem tax roll, and the
fire rescue budget proposed for FY 1999/00.
The cost apportionment method uses the proforma budget and is based on historical
demand for fire rescue services. Based on the analysis, Clearwater's call demand was as
follows: residential (50%); commercial (26%); institutional (7%); and nursing homes
(15%). The parcel apportionment method uses results of cost apportionment and ad
valorem tax roll data to determine unit costs. Categories included residential and non~
residential (commercial, industrial/warehouse, institutional and nursing home). Parcel
apportionment for residential was based on dwelling unit and non-residential apportionment
was determined by using improvement area per building within square footage
classifications. A 50,000 square foot cap was applied per non-residential building.
Homestead, church, and 5011C) exemptions do not apply to non ad valorem assessments.
Mr. Sheets said the assessment budget differed from the fire department budget. It
nets out all potential revenue sources from the fire department's budget, but includes costs
to administer the program, the tax collector's fee for collecting the fee on the tax bill, any
contingencies for early payment, etc. The net effect was a $9 million assessment budget.
To cover the assessment budget using this concept, every residential homeowner
would pay $106 annually and commercial and non-residential properties within the 5,000
and 10,000 square foot classification would pay up to $1,242 annually for a fire fee.
Commercial property over 50,000 square feet would pay $12,415. The institutional
category includes churches, 501 (C)(3)'s that are fully exempt from property tax purposes
such as state, city, county, and school systems. Those figuref: assume no millage
mft11 d99
2
11/30//99
o
rollbacks, exceptions, etc. The City may choose to enact policy to exempt certain
categories from paying the assessment or buy down to a general classification. The City
would have to make a contribution from the general fund for anyone it chose to exempt.
Mr. Sheets said the City of Tallahassee has been charging the state, universities, cities and
county for fire/rescue services on utility bills in exchange for lower electric bills. The utility
companies have been subsidizing the City of Tallahassee1s generrll fund for years. Because
of deregulation, Tallahassee wants utility rates to be competitive in an open market and
has reduced its contribution to the general fund by $1 5 million to pay for fire/rescue, etc.
In response to a question, Mr. Sheets said hospitals' fees depend upon the
hospital's ownership. He said in every city where fire rescue special assessment studies
were conducted, nursing homes proved to be a high consumer of these fire/rescue services
because of the nature of their business. They do not hesitate to call 911 and use the local
fire/rescue services as their hospital and doctor resource. A concern was expressed that
as a cost of doing business, every business incurring these fees will pass them on to
consumers. It was remarked that tourists also would pay those fees.
Concern was expressed that fire and EMS call data was not separated in the
assessment study since industrial calls tend to be more hazardous and require different
services. Mr. Sheets said it is possible to separate that data. He said very few EMS calls
are received from industrial/warehouse properties. Fire suppression is generally dealt with
by building code standards and fire suppression mechanisms.
r--'
t\~
Mr. Sheets said under Florida Statute 197.323, the City must send a Notice of
Intent to the County Property Appraiser by January 1 of the year in which the City wishes
to use the tax bill collection method. A resolution must be passed at a public hearing by
the Commission prior to January 1 and advertised for 4 consecutive weeks prior to that
meeting. Otherwise, the City can devise a separate billing system for the fees.
Discussion ensued in regard to the timeframe and it was indicated the City could
request the County, prior to January 1, to extend the deadline to March 1, It was
remarked that property owners couldn't take advantage of tax deductions for non ad
valorem assessments.
Mr. Sheets said a non ad valorem fire/rescue assessment is a fee far a readiness to
respond. He said once a dedicated funding source is in place, it can never be used for
anything other than fire/rescue services. Fire Chief Rowland Herald said the City has the
authority to regulate public safety but is confined primarily to nonresidential structures.
Residential property owners da not always have the measures in place to ensure public
safety. Mr. Sheets was unsure of the percentage of residential properties not currently
paying ad valorem taxes.
Discussion ensued in regard to the ISO rating and Mr, Sheets indicated going from a
Level 3 to a Level 2 rating would not result in significant savings to residents. He said the
ISO rating was a criteria used by insurance companies to rate premiums. Fire Department
costs for personnel and benefits are more significant than for capital items. It was
remarked the fire assessment approach was to have everyone pay his or her fair share.
~ Concern was expressed opposition has been shown in sharing the burden. Mr. Sheets said
mft11 d9B
3
11/301/99
:'t. .', . ;
~ I~
~
r)
'-...-"
;,1
.I
,...
"~:.' '.
the City needs to decide If it is prudent to expend significant funds to collect minimal
assessments.
The meeting recessed from 4: 11 to 4: 18 p.m. Member Nail left the meeting.
ITEM 4 - Discuss Alternate Funding Sources for Fire Deoartment Five Vear Plan
Concern was expressed the window of opportunity has passed to submit a Notice
of Intent to the County if the City wishes to use the uniform tax bill collection method for a
fire fee. 'Mr. Herald said last year, when the initial fire fee proposal was made, the City
would have had to bill residents the first year at its own cost. It was noted it is still
, possible to use the uniform collection method. It was felt the public hearing process and
Commission approval could be accomplished if the County granted the extension to March
1. Concern was expressed in the task force proceeding with the uniform collection process
before it made its recommendations regarding funding options. An opinion was expressed
the City should have already sent the notice and informed the task force the procedure was
available.
Member Lee moved to direct the City Manager to send a letter to the County
requesting an extension to March 1, 2000 to use the uniform tax bill collection method.
The motion was duly seconded.
Concern was expressed in asking the County to extend the deadline before the task
force presented its recommendation. An opinion was expressed the City Commission
should be responsible for requesting the extension.
Assistant City Attorney John Carassas noted the Commission will meet in
December. The City Manager can ask them at that time if they wish to preserve the right
to use the uniform collection method.
Member Lee rescinded his motion. The seconder concurred.
In response to a question, Finance Administrator Margie Simmons said the following
fees are currently being levied on City property owners: 1) stormwater; 2) water; 3)
sewer; 4) reclaimed water; 5) solid waste; 6) recycling; and 7) gas.
Concern was expressed the fire fee has been the only funding source presented to
the task force. It was remarked that this is the first discussion that the task force has had
on alternative funding sources.
It was noted in doing the apportionment, Mr. Sheets did not use the weighted call
method, but considered a call "a call" regardless of the number of units and/or equipment
used to respond.
In response to a question, Chair Horne noted the task force has been provided
updated numbers for the five-year plan which include associated engineering costs. Some
undetermined land acquisition costs are not included.
mft11 d99
4
11/301/99
,(
.. ". ,~, .. '..' ',! .~, ~. "
, "
"
. I. . ,
'r~ ~~;,i :;~~!" ~.::,':':;~\\~fN\;,>~~?;;::;~:':i.' cf ~;:':';,:::<,;':r:' ',::;:: ,~j
;.
<";.',
~~,>.! 'e
\:,'~ ' ,. I', ~ <'I
, .'.
,. ,
:',I"T" ,
~~. . < .
, ,< f ,
e' > " .' ~ f .
". j'
'~,"G
:',,'. ,
F' "
" '
",
"
'.', .
, ,
~:~ ",
" ,
"'+" '
~~'.' " 'I
,\ ,:
I':'
"',
,:, ..: I .
:'.':
':,'i
:' e," " ~+
':".0
'u":'..,
:. . ,
, "
, "
.', ' '. , ,
'. ,,:' In response to a question, Chief Herald said the City could achieve an ISO level 2
" 'rati'ng, by adding one a~ditional fire station with accompanying apparatus. ' ,
: M~mber Brlskman indicated she had prepared a list of questions and 'would be
submitting the list. Task Force members were encouraged to submit questions prior to the ,
nex~~ meetin'g 'to give staff the opportunity to prepare resp'onses.
ITEM 5 - Adiourn
The meeting adjourned at 5:01 p.m.
"
~"'.......'. -
Chair' ,
Fire Task Force
: ,
Attest:
.~....,.
.. ~
'..'. ...... .~.~.~
~ "
., .
,\
i,
'\
q
. ~
mftl1d99
5
, I.
, ,
"
, 11/301/99' ,
, , '4 '. ~ . . ' ,r' . , . , ' . .. . I. r I.., . ~