03/18/1991 (2)
. .'
. - ~
'"
.,
.~;:J:~
:':' ?r~ ::;>,;l(~;! ;,;,;.;;, i'~'\.';'.i\,\~,:.. ";: :t;,
I', I:'
c.r.
,~
).
. . ~ .~ .
"
',.
,,<~,..'."
.. ~ I
'WORKSESSION
".".'.
~l,:::i': ~
l~ I..'",
;~. ,:.' .
~: 4'"
'f. ~
City Commi~sion Worksession Minutes
l' ~
'.'
:' >,
" ;. ~ '. .
1)/;'/,,::,
'j
;...:!.
.;; "
. <, .
. J ~ "
."
",
Q"
:'Jj~:ate
"
;icC,
"
,I'
i. ....
,.
~\ :c".
',1
,
./
I
l
l
I
I
I
"j ," ~
.<.'
. "
,'{.'
'.
"
""4"
{,~, l
." I ~.
~... j ,
~
/.
I '
"
:,.
"
'.'
:, ~
1- .
"
C.'
; ,
':.,
, ,
"
"':.'
"'0
t:'
:,.., .
"'.t
!. ,'.
. .t-.
..,
,i.~: I .
. ~', \ '. / .
~~~'I'I-'!;": -i." I '.\ ~ ~t "'j ~ .~; c . . ~,. )~v. -:'.J)~.,L .~,~~ :f:,..<...."',;:.;..~~ :t:
,., :(t(~';-1. t'~i'rt r'-;;.I.....-:~f\.'Mf~,'~ .
0"1' Vri.(l~"'l' ";~I",~I"w 1 '. . '. ,. .
'~ . ./.}l ~'. ~tf ",1 .J.~"I .' . c' f. C .'. ." . \. < .', ' .
. 'f,;~. 'r ... ~ .,.......:....;-~; J": ;:1 " :. ~',:,
"
. ~t;..
; ,~Lj,,;; ~;~ ~ :,~):!,,~,;'~:f.',~.;:~~,;'~ ~~.;.:/;;: i~;),~,,:;:,}~';~:~<\:'~U:(;':;r<:L/{.~i:;>'~';'{~:(i:);: ;{}, :~). ( ':::'.:;';'.
. ~:,.>~~;',~l..
, I
. ~. r
I.
:.'1....:.c'.' ., +"\
.'
'. '
....
,
Michael J. Wright
M.A. Galbraith, Jr.
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Manager
City Attorney
City Clerk
I'
'J
CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION
March 18, 1991
:. .
The City Commission of the City of Clearwater met at City Hall with the following
members present:
:''j :
Rita Garvey
Richard Fitzgerald
Sue Berfield
Lee Regulski
William Nunamaker
Mayor/Commissioner
Vice8Mayor /Commissi oner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
" '
i.:\
Also present:
':; f
,'1,'
, '.
.....
..'"
'. '
. "
The meeting was called to order at 9: 16 a.m.
.. .. ~.
Service Awards
:.,
.'....
. ..'
:',' .
..j \;
'"
..,
. .~.
, . ,
.".,
.:.
On February 18, 1991, the Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force submitted its
final report. Art Deegan, Chairman of the Task Force, reviewed the report. Major items of
recommendation are as follows: 1) a tram to transport people to the Beach using the
emergency access road: 2) a concession area with a new architectural theme; 3) a resort
zone along Gulfview Blvd. with a 15 MPH speed limit; 4) one-way pairings on other
streets; 5) a redevelopment area to include a shopping, eating, and entertainment complex;
6) a low profile parking garage; and 7) a bay front boardwalk. The Task Force's vision '
statement can be found on page 5 of their report.
'. , ,~, ': ~
" I'
..~ :j 1. .
.l. :
. ~ "
~ '. \
, '
'"
Mr. Deegan stated six areas studied would affect the environment. He noted
common agreement that the Beach has strong points to build upon. Drawbacks include
traffic and transportation, zoning and regulatory environments, separate rules for the
Beach area, and a lack of year round day and night time activities. To address these
concerns, a planned redevelopment and a traffic study is needed, a theme should be
established, and a tourist attraction developed on the Beach. Obstacles include Federal,
State, and local codes, self8interest, and competition from other attractions.
. 'l::~'~:
:. ~ . I
'1:':,.
" ,
""'"\,'
'.',~'." .
(,;)
minws03b.91
1
03/18/91
, :
"1',
, "'.
'. I ~ .
'.
'-"',1.
, I.':
,',.;;,;'
I: .: .' ~
, :.' .~.' ..
,,' ,.
~ I b"
.',
" ,c, " ~ ';: ~\ : . 'II ,~
, ~ i' . \0- '.
< ' : .,i,' c ~ .
J,l.
" '
..L. ,....
....1.
- .'. . ~-(
:'
~" , '
,; :
" ,.' 'f.... ' . '. i . . ~ ' , . ", . . '. ,'. ,..... " .'j :, , ., t ;' ;. ,'. '" " '.' . " ,
,,' . .;, ',", '... " .. ,,' ":: .::.'.:" ..,..':, :/,~t'. '~,:,\"" 'I. p', ,.";'
.', ! . .:' '~ ".::,<, '.' , '. ,.', :,:.~,:':',.,':",,:.<,:" ::', -::;,:. '::".': .: : ' ", , i.,; . :".': 0:', ".; ';': .:;.'.' :.,.I~ ~'", .;',,':{
~, . .p'.....: .,..: 'I '. '.,:~ , ;" " . " , . . .... . . " ~ . r:' .': . '
"',.:.', :':,:",>\:" ," ::;," ~',' '"., ": ;:', :.,..,(;::,:: 'i/',,~'::.i~\,'~<:,'i <S. i:, '. :,,'..3.:: .
',,'"
. " <, . ',~ . , < .. ' . ~ J .. . '
. :,:/'/:2}'?;",'~:c':;;(','" ....".... .'>,
. " " : ,'':'. :':",:~::; .
, I l.. . ... "~ ' .' . .
. '.:' . ':. . ~'P',,~ . " J , ,'. .' .,
~.. . ,. :' ',~ ." .-
" .,'.\, : :: ,j' : .'. ., .
,..:" ':':':,.' ..,:\:'...., '. /
" ,\ ' . ~ .; , . <
'" .1
.;'." ';,."
. ~, '
'~""
.', .,
" ,
Further discussion ensued regarding the ability to dictate themes and requiring
people to meet certain standards. Mr. Deegan indicated it was felt if the Commission
promoted the theme, people would follow. He stated there were already oxamples of
peoplo coming to the Boards with drawings incorporating the "Tropical Seascape" theme.
~
A 'question was raised regarding access to the parking funds to help pay for some
improvements. The City Manager indicated most of the parking funds are obligated.
, A question was raised regarding the rationale for recommending an increase in
density for the small hotels. John HOlner, member of the Task Force, indicated small hotel
operators face difficulties in making ends meet. Increased density would increase their
profitability.
A concern was expressed regarding the greatly increased values of beach
properties. Mr. Homer indicated it depended on where the property is located and the
problem is more involved than that, He stated there is a high turnover in ownership due to
many finding their businesses are not feasible. He noted the development of a trend
toward obsolescence. He recommended the Commission approve pursuing the
architectural theme, a minimum lot size, and reduced parking requirements.
Commissioner Regulski expressed a problem with increased density. Mr. Homer
stated the Task Force suggests making it economically feasible to tear down and rebuild
on the Beach. He stated the Land Development Code changes in 1 985 made properties
nonconforming.
It was stated that provisions for planned unit developments are in the Code to
encourage property consolidation and redevelopment. Further discussion ensued regarding
the need to have property owners redevelop their properties.
~~
Questions were raised regarding who was to adopt the theme and impose the
recommended restrictions and regulations. Mr. Deegan indicated the Task Force
recommends the City Commission adopt the theme, "One Small Place of Enchantment,"
and coordinate the development of a uTropical Seascape" architectural theme which has
not yet been defined. He stated the Seastone Resort and Clearwater Beach Hotel would
be the focal points. He recommended another task force be designated to define "Tropical
Seascapen and suggested the Downtown standards could be used as a model. The
responsibility for implementation was questioned. He stated the government could provide
certain incentives but suggested there was a need to broaden the scope in defining
responsibilities and opportunities than those included in the report.
John Graham, member of the Task Force, stated they recognized the property
owners are responsible. However, they could not identify economic incentives. He stated
the redevelopment will not occur overnight and will be a long process.
Questions were raised regarding what economic incentives were recommended. It
was also suggested that bonus points could be provided which would allow for greater
floor area ratios. In response to questions about the tram, Ken Rosenow, member of the
Task Force, stated it could be run privately or by the City, however, they did not
;.' ,;~
~
minws03b.91
2
03/18/91
The meeting recessed from 10:36 to 10:48 a.m.
~
recommend it be part of PST A. The tram, linking Downtown with the Beach, would meet
the long range goal of reducing beach bound traffic. It was hoped that riding the tram to
the Beach would be more attractive than driving one's car.
Questions were raised regarding a need for culverts under the causeway to address
pollution, and if environmental engineering studies addressing this had bean completed.
Mr. Deegan indicated the Task Force could not locate any comparable studies. He noted,
however, culverts have been constructed under smaller causeways in other parts of the
County.
Questions were raised regarding the Downtown location of the tram station. There
was a suggestion it tie in with the proposed development at the East End (Annex)
property.
Consensus of the Commission was for staff to review the report and come back
with recommendations regarding implementation.
Uodate on MIA/POW Ceremony
~~
'L'.:~l1
Ed Mazur presented a picture of Lt. Donahue who is to be adopted as an honorary
citizen of Clearwater. He stated he will meet in Tallahassee with the Veterans Affairs
Committee on March 21, 1991. The City ceram'ony to recognize Clearwater citizens still
Missing in Action and to adopt Lt. Donahue will be on March 30, 1991. He stated the
ceremony is being publicized. He requested Lt. Donahue's picture be displayed in the City
Hall lobby. '
Presentation - Clearwater Beach Traffic Study reoort oreoared bv Wade-Trim. Inc. -
establish a public hearing date to receive public input on the proposals listed in the report
The City hired Wade-Trim, Inc., a firm specializing in traffic engineering, to study
and prepare recommendations to improve traffic flow and reduce or eliminate the number
of Police Aides required for traffic control during peak periods on Clearwater Beach.
Wade-Trim reviewed the conditions and recommended altering traffic circulation and
pedestrian facilities and supplementing the informational sign system, The study
proposes: 1) Implement a one-way pair street system between Coronado Drive and South
Gulfview Boulevard and Harnden Drive and South Gulfview Boulevard, following one of
three alternates; 2) Install and/or add to the existing informational sign system; and 3)
Remove and eliminate the existing sidewalk and on-street parking along the west side of
South Gulfview Boulevard and relocate pedestrian traffic to the west side of beach
parking.
The study provides detail on how each of the recommendations would be
accomplished. Wade-Trim, in addition to on-site review of the traffic problem, has met
with the Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force and the Police Department to receive
their ideas and input concerning traffic solutions. Staff recommends a public notification
procedure similar to the one used by the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) for
information on the Clearwater Pass Bridge, be used to advise the public of details of the
~
minws03b.91
3
03/18/91
I
l
I
I
t
i
Alternate A is the recommended alternate as it maintains two-way traffic on
Gulfview Blvd., is easier to facilitate, and friendlier to traffic flow. Alternate B is not
recommended as one-way traffic flow on Gulfview would be difficult for the business
community. Alternate C is the most inexpensive but most prohibitive for the community.
He stated turning Gulfview Blvd. into a one-way road would make it more difficult for
residents to reach their homes. Mr. Lovis elaborated, stating most Police Aides direct
pedestrian traffic. Overhead walkways were considered but were found to be expensive.
Along S Gulfview Blvd., six Aides now keep people off the sidewalk next to the road. He
stated this is one reason for recommending the sidewalk's removal. If that was done, a
bus lane could be installed and a buffer of landscaping planted. Alternates Band C could
use the existing roadways.
~
engineering proposal and to record public comment. Comments received would be
summarized and a final recommendation submitted to the City Commission for
consideration.
The streets involved in the traffic circulation' pattern are the responsibility of three
jurisdictions: FOOT is responsible for Memorial Causeway (SR 60) west to its intersection
with Mandalay Avenue; Pinel1as County has jurisdiction over South Gulfview Boulevard
from Coronado Drive to the Clearwater Pass Bridge; and the City of Clearwater is
responsible for the other streets.
David Gilderstern of Wade-Trim reviewed the purpose of the study indicating the
current traffic control program is working but is costly. He stated Police Aides focus a
great deal of attention on pedestrian traffic.
Dave Lovis of Wade-Trim stated their review of the existing program considered a
mechanized system with overhead signs, however, this would be, too expensive and labor
intensive.' Wade-Trim reviewed possible improvements to the existing sign system and the
present traffic circulation. Their finding that many'young people congregate in the area of
the Holiday Inn Surfside and McDonald's caused them to consider one-way pairs on north
Beach, They reviewed a draft of the cruising control ordinance and, as more than half of
,the Aides control pedestrian traffic, Wade-Trim reviewed the pedestrian traffic flow.
.-.~
r .~,t:~"
. . ~I~
The three alternates they proposed include: .Alternate A) S Gulfview with two-way
traffic, Coronado with one-way south, and Hamden Drive with one-way north. This '
alternate will require widening at Coronado by the Days Inn. In response to a question, it
was indicated this widening would be within existing right-of-way. In response to
questions, Mr. Lovis indicated the plan is conceptual and no detailed engineering has been
completed; Alternate B) S Gulfview with one-way south and Harnden with one-way north
would result in a traffic pattern as close to the existing program as possible; Alternate C) S
Gulfview with one-way south and Coronado with one-way north.
Alternate A, the selected recommendation, cost $20/000 to $30,000 more than
Alternate C. However, the importance of the traffic flow to the residences makes it worth
the extra expense.
A question was raised regarding what would be accomplished jf 10 to 20 Aides still
were needed. Mr. Lovis indicated it would make the traffic pattern easier for pedestrians,
~)
minws03b.91
4
03/18/91
The City has completed the subaqueous crossing of the Anclote River. To extend
Clearwater's Gas System to serve the rest of Northern Pinellas County, it is necessary to
install approximately 7,500 lineal feet of 6 inch gas main from the existing terminus at
Alternate US19 to US19 via Old Dixie Highway and Becket Way. It is in the best interest
of the Gas System to position itself for the majority of the existing commercial accounts
located on US19. Installing this main will put the Gas System closer in a better position to
enter Pasco County in the future.
~
decrease accidents, and the one-way pair would take some traffic load off of S Gulfview
Boulevard.
A concern was expressed that speeds increase on one-way streets and pose a
danger for back-out parking.
Otto Gans, representing the Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force, stated they
were pleased with Wade~Trim's conclusion but felt it did not go far enough. He suggested
there also be a recommendation for one-way traffic patterns on the north beach. Alternate
, ,
A's main concept is to take care of the pedestrians and provide a 10 - 15 MPH resort zone
with many crosswalks. .
In response to a question, the City Manager indicated the study did not include
north beach as Police Aides were not used in that area. It was stated a public hearing
regarding the proposed traffic circulation on the Beach would be held on April 18, 1991.
It was requested the cruising control ordinance be brought forward at the same time.
Extension of contract for rental of OBaers of varvina caoabilities with Pac-Tel Paaina, St.
Petersburg, FL, for the period 04/01/91 to 03/31/92 for $13,781.28 (AS)
(,
Paging equipment is utilized by 13 City divisions to contact employees during and
outside normal work hours. This is the second extension of the contract awarded in
April 1989, a'fter competitive quotations. Even though costs have risen 15% in the past
two years, the vendor has agreed to extend the original price. Informal quotations
received by Purchasing indicates local paging services have increased approximately $1.50
per unit per month above prices submitted in 1989.
In response to questions, it was indicated pagers are used by the Police Department
to contact off-duty officers and in the Administrative Services Department to contact on-
eall personnel.
Contract to install a 6" gas main north of the Anclote River from Alternate US 19 in
Taroon Sorinas to Bovee Comoany, Clearwater, FL, for an estimated cost of $42,438.30
(GAS)
Five potential commercial accounts and one subdivision are located adjacent to this
proposed pipeline construction. Central Park Lodge has already been secured by Gas
Sales. The Gas System operates to achieve at least a 14% rate of return on line extension
investments. The Central Park Lodge account alone should provide a 16% return on
investment of the requested line extension, Currently, the Gas Sales Manager is along the
u
minws03b.91
5
03/18/91
..
.
'I.;.
. .
, .
.' ,
.' ,
.' ~
r ",,',
~ \,~
'<....
: '.~.
1
pipeline. Securing St. luke's Eye Clinic would increase the rate of return on investment to
29%. '
" .
The estimated cost for labor is $42,438.30 and materials is $59,463.85 for a total
of $101,902.15.
," "
! ~ .':
,I:: .
. ~. . ~
"
.: .......
This request is for labor only. The purchase of pipe materials was approved on the
September 6, 1990 agenda.
\.1'"
',' .
", ....
: . : ~ . :'
\', :.
.,/.~,,\ :'.
. I'.:
:'(';',;.
. In response to a question, the City Manager indicated the payback period for gas
extensions is seven years. He stated a Gas System business plan is being developed and
will be forthcoming. A question was raised regarding what procedure is followed if a new
development requests gas lines. Terry Neenan of the Gas System indicated that once the
feasibility is determined, the City sales stoff approaches the developers to convince them
to install gas lines. The City Manager reported when Florida Power builds a facility, they
install gas lines tljust in case. U .
./ ~ : ~
I.'"
.:':.:, ~:
::~:,',r
Contract for roof reolacement and installation of additional roof decking columns for the
McMullen Tennis Complex to Birchard Construction Co., Seminole, FL, for $28,150 (GS)
, '
'.: .
" J: .,'
.~) ,,,.; ~:'.
:'," I
. ~. " '<II c,_
. 1\'
Bids were solicited and received for the roof replacement and installation of
additional roof decking support columns for the McMullen Tennis Complex. Due to the
structure's ago, the existing roof members are sagging and damaging the roof surface.
The roof structure requires the construction and installation of four additional support
columns. Upon completion of the structural modifications, the entire shingle roof will be
~, replaced.
......~.........
...... .
: '.; '. ~\~. <~
. ..1'
.t>','. "
",'. ,...
, ,
. . . "
:.::: .,1
. ~ : I' " :.:
/,"'t'.',:':
~' <,:i ::. ':
Bid specifications and drawings for this project estimated the cost of the roof
replacement and installation of additional support columns at $27,000,
:.. ~,;\. I . ..':'
':',"",::
.' +.',
.. ,
:.: :,~'.:).
In response to a question, Floyd Carter, General Services Director, indicated only
one bid was received due to the uniqueness of this roof. He also reported termite and
carpenter ant problems have been resolved.
~ . II . j
~ _:, . '., :.,
: 'l ....,'
I,> ..-: ;'
""li:; ,::
",. . h~.
Contract for the installation and purchase of two disk drives. two 12-foot shielded 81
Cables and a 36~month extended warrantv to Diaital Eauioment Corp" Tampa, FL, for
$48,692.88 (GS)
:.;: :':,,'
. :1".
....:l. )
'.' I ;'1
: ~ !,',., :'.
.' .;<.:,(
.;.: '~';'
On September 15, 1988, the City Commission approved the purchase from
Diagonal Data Corporation, Minneapolis, of a MicroVAX computer (manufactured by Digital
Equipment Corporation) and General Equipment Maintenance (GEMS) Software package
including a Fuel Dispensing System. The GEMS and Fuel Dispensing Systems were
needed for Fleet Administration to properly track City vehicle maintenance and fuel
consumption. The MicroVAX computer doubled the storage capacity to maintain
appropriate history and the Radio, Parks, and Building and Maintenance databases.
:r! . ~: I ."~'.
.'. ,',1 J
.~: .\: '~~
: ,':,;.:,)'i
, . .:. ,~. ,
.': I,:.;" ~ .'
.. ,
.,'> .
'. .....
'.<":l',:;..
The present four disk drives from Controlled Data Corporation (CDC) store memory
and instructional software. These drives were purchased upon the recommendation of the
vendor (Diagonal Data) and were chosen due to financial considerations.
I . .'
........:.,..
. . . .
..' .
'.,
..... .','
'\'. ..
--
6
03/18/91
, ' ... . . .~'
minws03b.91
. . ..'~
.....
'.:',: ~ +.
:', ',',< :.::. ,
\ ': . " ~. ':...'
, "
::::;1'.,:.-.:,
I....'.:
. ,"'..,:
'. ~. '., ' .: ~
.... '.:: '1.:.',;
". . '.'j'
,,'::,~/,;'>(\,::"::;' :::1., ,',:'..,::.'.., ':' ,", '.',', "",:. .':,
, : ,; ".' '''':,'.",',..,..,:::,.:::','.:,.:':(',.i,.:,':.,>.,::..',"'::,::':-,".".';',:' ,
. . ,t. ~ .' ~: ~. .:,' '.' :,'",',,'.,:;,,:,: '::,:.'; . .:. :', ,
':>'::.'::,:,:;',:..,::'.../,' ::,;:. ", . .. " .. ,': ". h .'"
I...:....,. l'.'l '. ':'.
I h., ~ ,
. ~:- ~ .
I .l"
. i. ..":, ...
.'
.', ;".1 :...
,'. . .
'. '
/.\'
'..+'
'. ", ",:..,,:,:.\: ..,'0' .,' ,....::.
\ .:. :. . '.'" ~: ;....; I J, '.:.' < " ~.
'1'. .",.
.,'
.'
"
, '
, '.,
..... .
. .', "
. \" , .','
.'J'
'. '
1<,'" '
'. ~ ' " ' ,<
,:,"
',:., ,I. :', ,f,
, '. ';:':,
:"'~+7j<"i:: ':::: ':'~""""I'.
, ~ ~
< :,'~
',' I
:/"." .
',,,/
".'",
. :'.. .".'. 'Pi' , '.
,:-.,.,',,'.,
:':,:; :::',:-. t.., : " .',
, !'
, ,
/'. t '.
. ". ~" :
"":7"~:
,'<,1 .
,":.. '
" '.
'",'.
.\:
" .
. ~ ' \
"",:.,""
:' '.1
:'.
'".. '.~:'I i":. ~1<, '/ 'i"
,:,:,),; ,::'(':' .'..'., ; ;
}j. ..,. \ t.' ~
..',' ,
The City Manager questioned how many alternates had been considered. Ms.
Chase indicated four configurations had been attempted.
~
Since the installation of the drives, the Fleet Maintenance computer has
experienced approximately eight weeks of downtime and equipment file corruption during
the last 18 months, and it has lost approximately four months of Closed Work Order and
Transaction History files due to the unreliability of the COC disk drives. Data files were
damaged on many backup files as well. Diagonal Data spent many hours, at no charge,
analyzing the files, and attempting to restore files from different backup sets while trying
to rebuild the system. The downtime, lost data, data recovery, and reliance on a system
that may crash at any time has severely impacted the efficiency of the Fleet Maintenance
operation.
File restoration during equipment failure had to be performed manually. Diagonal
Data spent three weeks on this problem in the early summer of 1989, On
February 19, 1990, the City experienced another three-week crash. Although data
restoration does not fall under the Software Maintenance Agreement, Diagonal Data made
two separate trips to Clearwater involving 1 a-days of their time and expenses
(approximately $8,000). On July 30, 1990, the City again experienced disk drive
problems. During this crash, the system was down for one week and Diagonal Data
restored the corrupt data files from backup files at no charge. Since the original computer
was installed, the disk drives and controller boards have been replaced numerous times,
Due tO,the unreliability of the CDC drives, Diagonal Data recommends and the DIS
Manager concurs that the City purchase two DEC disk drives, two 12-foot shielded SI
cables, installation, and an extended 36-month warranty from Digital Equipment Corp" at
a total cost of $51,692.88 less a $3,000 trade.in discount for the four CDC disk drives.
(The capacity of the two DEC disk drives exceeds that of the four CDC disk drives.) The
(~, reliability of the DEC disk drives should alleviate future computer crashes..
Laura Chase, Data Information Services Manager, stated the four CDC drives were
purchased due to them being less expensive. She reported the vendor has stood behind
the drives and, at this point, the contract is fulfilled. She believes, however, that the
system will continue to have problems and recommends the purchase of the new drives.
Contract for the ourchase on one Ford FM350 Cab and Chassis Truck to Duval Ford,
Jacksonville, FL, for $12,356 (G8)
At its FY 1990/1 Budget Hearing Meetings, the City Commission approved the
purchase of a one-ton, Ford F-350 Cab and Chassis (4x2) truck as an additional vehicle for
an additional supervisor for the Recreation Facilities Division of the Parks and Recreation
Department. This supervisor physically maintains and repairs City-wide recreation facilities
(e.g., ball fields, playgrounds, etc.)
Questions were raised regarding waiting and purchasing this truck when other
vehicles are needed. Ream Wilson, Parks & Recreation Director, indicated his department
is currently renting a vehicle from the Motor Pool. He stated the truck is needed for
supervisory crews which also carry tools and materials to work sites.
u
minws03b.91
7
03/18/91
In response to excessive traffic volumes on Countryside Blvd., and the proposed
overpass construction along US 19 in that area by the Department of Transportation (DOT),
the City approved a design contract with Tampa By Engineering in January 1988 to design
the widening of Countryside Blvd. from Belcher Road to SR 580. With funding for the
project in the Penny for Pinel1as Program, the completed construction plans and permit
approvals were updated during Fall 1990. Preliminary bid and utility conferences have
been held and utility relocation is currently in progress by General Telephone and Florida
Power. This project will provide for the construction of an additional outside lane on both
(~l sides of the present roadway plus intersection improvements. Horizontal and vertical
. ,.< alignments are to be maintained in the new construction except for the median changes
necessary to accommodate proposed dual left-turn lanes at US19. The construction
contract allows 12 months for project completion and requires the contractor not work in
the immediate area of Countryside Mall from Thanksgiving until after January 1. During
this time period, the contractor will work in other areas of the project.
I
I
~
~. . .
".:
: .:
..
. '. ~
,~~, >
....j
'.\'\
....
'/:':
,1' ,
.,'
.'."
":',.
~ ... ',I,
\'~!
:D):
'I' .
, ,
i.'''.'
.:i....
,'.
';'1\'
, "
'i'
":'::
: I: ~'"
:.:;....,::.
','" .
.~:.~ ,!,).
: ~ '.'
>';",.
.,'.
,,:')':
.~ . ,,'
\ .=
~ ,". ~.
", !,,'.'
,
""1
,',
(,",
....1',.
" '
'.'
...: I'
',' .
.... . ~~
.'.;,
~
. .
. ,"\'
:.' ..':
",
........
.:. ,::' ';~
~ '"''
I,.';' ,
I" " '
~.::. :.'
" . ',"
. {.:
.: 'I'
"
" .'
;:..' '.'
. .' .',
. ,r ".",'.1
. .' ~ :. : ~ .Il :-" , .
, , '":'1.:,,
~ "'l:~:.l,. .\.'. ' : ~
:"~:.
'. ,.
Contract to eurchase a heavy duty chiDeer for the Storm water Utilitv section of Public
Service from Vermeer Southeast, Orlando, FL, for $16,710.23 (PW)
This piece of equipment is a new item for use by stormwaler utility personnel to
chip branches and trees removed from the banks of ditches and creeks, in order to provide
better water flow. It will be easier to transport the debris in chip form, rater than in
branch or log form. Wood chips can be used by the City, rather than being disposed of at
the landfill at major expense.
The City Manager pointed out that this is not the low bid but is the only bid that
meets specifications.
Contract for Countryside Boulevard Widening to R E Purcell Construction Co.. Inc., Ozona,
FL, for $1,559,277.68 and approve an interfund loan in the same amount from the central
insurance fund, bearing interest at the cash pool rate, to be repaid with Penny for Pinellas
collections in FY 1998 (PW)
In the January 24, 1991, Agenda Item which revised the Penny for Pinellas Budget,
this project was specifically identified for interim funding with an interfund loan from the
City's Central Insurance Fund. This will enable construction to begin immediately whereas
funding would otherwise not be available until FY 1998. Accordingly, the City proposes a
loan from the Central Insurance Fund to'the Special Development fund in the amount of
$1,559,277.68. Interest at the cash pool rate will be payable annually out of Per)ny for
Pinellas collections. No principal payments will be due until FY 1998, when the entire
unpaid balance will be repaid out of Penny for Pinellas collections in that year. This loan
repayment and the annual interest was anticipated and included in the amended Penny for
Pinellas Project list approved by the Commission on January 24, 1991.
A question was raised regarding the sidewalks, It was indicated this was a utility
relocation. The City Manager reported the bid has come in under the anticipated budget.
A question was raised when the State would award the .contract for the overpass.
That information was not available at this time.
minws03b.91
03/18/91
8
F , 'J '
.. ,,' .
'..: :.l' ':.,;.;.
t.. .
~. '.' ~ > : :.' :' .. :' ." I. i.; '; ..j '. c;', , .' . . L ': .'.,"..,.;.\... ..,... ' . '.
. . ~. .. ., '... :. :.. l ... < < r .' . I. 1\ , .'. ",' .
.'.',',,' .'"..:..,.:',' ..'.':..;",.>. ," l.' .,.:.. , r... ..,....' ..' . ....;.
, f' . l' ' . c'j ',: :'." :,'!", ',..: '.;. ,....~: :.;," '. :,:.,''':' ';~;. , .....,.. '.,: " ; . f..' : . . ;., .. . '.
,. :.;,',1'::'" >:.:..;::;::,:<".:-::::,::,:,,::'.i', . , .. ..., . '.' ::,,,:.' '. ,", .''i'.
;' ....c ;': . < ',':.':'.' ~" ' :.:'. ~:~'.: ;;\.~~. '.' ';" .: ::',C'j :"'..' .:,i...::.'..,'-":,:,.(.~.,..:"",.I~.;'.'.:.,':.:,:.'":",:",,,,','~~, ':.'...,",::' :>.:::,~ :',~ "." ;,>'. ':,\:~~:" " ,', ',<,:: :'.. ,,',;"'"
:,'"".",',',':. :':", . , ,..., . , ...~"..:_:,':, ,~"""':,,,:':'\",'.,~' r'-. ,. .' "
. :. I' , ,:.. ;'.' ....' , ., < . '.. '. ..' " .': ,,':'
.' .,.,..:' ,," ,,':...':,:,'.,',:',.,.. " <>/;::.':;"; .;.' '.U.:,; :\..";,
"1,
. ',':<', . I.
. ..1., :':, _~'. .: . c .\',; ,.' . ,
. ;,:;.'.:,:; :;\: :':,,:'.
. ' I .. ',: .. . ':" ,:' .f!':" "'.: ~
.~
Contract for modifications to Rockawav Pier to Hendrv Com., for $292,800 (PW)
.,~ !
This project will rebuild Rockaway Pier located near 534 Mandalay Avenue on
Clearwater Beach. The work consists of the removal and replacement of 16 existing
concrete pile caps, 295 lineal feet (6,097 square feet) of concrete pier deck and modifying
existing piles to receive new concrete pile caps for the new concrete pier deck. Forty-two
existing concrete groin pile assemblies will also be modified. The project includes the
City's first sea turtle protection plan. developed as a requirement of the Florida Department
of Natural Resources (DNR). The lighting design incorporated in the handrails instead of on
elevated standards. will provide for pedestrian safety. but will not attract turtle hatchlings
away from their path to the Gulf of Mexico.
~, .'
~ f:"
This project also provides for an attractive repair to existing groin slabs beneath the
pier which were a part of the original pier on this site. It is believed these slabs helped
trap the sand which formed the existing beach. They continue to protect the beach from
potential erosion and, should be left in place. The groin slabs will be cut off to a normal
seating level and fitted with board seats to provide a series of short benches in that
pleasant, shaded area under the pier.
. ',',
.\ ~.
. ,
The work area will be fenced by the contractor. One pedestrian access point will
, be provided under the pier through the life of the contract.
I:
I. ,
, '
'.
. ..
The City Manager pointed out this construction extends the pier only 30 to 40 feet
into the water. William Baker, Public Works Director, indicated the cost had been
anticipated at much less. It was not felt that $300.000 was a lot to pay for an
(~ observation platform.
Ouestions were raised regarding the accretion of the beach and how to make sure it
is maintained. It was questioned if the piers or groin slabs could be left in the water to
stabilize the beach even though the deck of the pier was not replaced. There was some
concern that this may be dangerous.
.' ,
".; ~
,"I.
, ,
".,
, ,
~J. .~ ":
. "
",
'"
. -!.
:"'-:1;
.:l,'
;'f
Mr. Baker indicated DNR had requested the City remove the groins. however, the
Public Works Department had argued against their removal. It was stated the only interest
was in preventing the washing away of sand, Mr, Baker stated he would have to see if
DNR would permit just the pilings and the groins to remain.
. .,>
, .
;".',1:
< ;
'.;'.1:.
;...., '
, ,
., '.
This item was pulled from the agenda.
, ~, ':
,.',-
\ ;.~
Purchase of lots 8 and 9. Moase and Harrison's Sub.. Blk 1. from Eula Coooar. Theola F
HOllston and Richard A Mvers for a total price of $50,900 (PW)
",
.. '.1
'./ ::
.1.'
This item was pulled from the agenda.
',0
:'...1
Purchase of lot 10 and the W 33 feet of lot 9. W F Hughev's Sub.. Blk 1 , from Truman H
Sims and Ruth YounQ for a total price of $50,900 (PW)
, :" ~\:
".;'
This item was pulled from the agenda.
'.'.
'., :
>:'.,'1
~ '. :. "
t' '-H}
~
9
03/18/91
minws03b.91
'..
: ....
'"
~,~lr-:I'
I' ')
~; .
~ , ..
, . '~
. '
: ....J
" '
I, .:' I,.
:,; .....' }.",':,:,'::,"(,:\ ,,:.,) ;':.>'.:::'!,: .
::.,.:,..l,':. ~~,'.>! :-:;:.,'.. .' ,,'" ~:.'.'..~ <'.,,;. '..,' '.',"
.' ,... ...,
. .:; ~'I " . . '~. " ,,' r,: ,! . ~
, ~, 1., .. .. . , : .">::. '," :. . :', , ',. ',' .
. .L. \1',.:. c .: '\.', " :':
, .,.. ,':<, :-'.' '.,:,:' I :,' ~.~''','''',: .::,"~:,:,:/..:...'."
l~ '. ", :' ~', ,
" .
. .. ' ' ~
..
.';.:::'
'I:"
. \ ,: .~:
".:. ',':1'> I. 'I'
" ~ .. . ': ~
" ,
, "
... r',I.,
.' '.
:1'.
....:>r:'
','
" .1.'
-
......
. ,.. ,,.
~". . .
':;~'"
....
..
.; ~"',
,'L'
.: ~...
. \~' .
.':
-,
':-0.'.<'
'.-
I,,'
I
I
, I
,.
" .
" .
.'j. "
.' ,
. . ~ .' .' .. .,' :.
'. ,
}.....::....
~
Contract for Pierce/Franklin Street Parking Lot to Overstre~t Paving Co. Largo, FL. for
$44,822.55 (PW)
The City of Clearwater proposes to construct a 55-space parking lot (52 standard
and 3 handicap spaces) at 635 Pierce Street. This property, known as the Dimmitt
Property, is on the south side at Pierce Street across from the Police Station and runs from
Pierce to Franklin Street. This project will provide employee parking at the Police Station
where parking has become critical. The facility has been designed to allow expansion to
the adjacent vacant property to the east, when additional spaces are required,
The City Manager stated closing on this property is to occur Wednesday. It it does
not, this item will be continued.
letter from Southwest Florida Water Manaqement District (SWFWMD)
,-t.,.,,-
(' ,~~)
-,"
The City Manager reported chlorides are increasing in the City's water due to the
drought. Therefore, the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) has
requested a proactive program to reduce water consumption and thereby reduce chlorides
occurring in the City's well fields. He stated the City has had to cut back on its pumpage
rate and purchase more water from the County. In 10 ot the 14 wells, the City has
accomplished the required chloride levels. The City must now document its enforcement
rules and produce a plan to further decrease chloride levels. He stated the reclaimed water
project is a part of this and would be a giant new infrastructure. He stated only sworn
police officers currently can ticket for water violations. However, also giving code
enforcement inspectors this authority is being pursued, The City Manager stated this is
not as onerous as it sounds.
Public Hearing & First Aeadina Ords. #5068-91 & #5069,91 - land Use Plan Amendment
to Industrial and Il Zoning for a parcel located on the S side of lakeview Rd., between the
Seaboard Coastline Railroad and the S. Myrtle AVe. intersection, lake Belleview Addn., Blk
2, Lots 17-27 (Rehm LUP90-21, Z90~091 (PL&D)
The request is for a land Use Plan amendment tram Commercialrrourist Facilities to
Industrial and a zoning amendment from CN (Neighborhood Commercial) to IL (Light
Industrial).
The property is presently developed with two buildings and a portion of a third
building. Building 111 is located on lots 17 through 22, Building #2 is located on lots 23
and 24, and Building 113 is located partially on lots 26 and 27 with the remainder of the
building located on lots 28, 29, 30 and the vacated right'of-way of First Avenue. Lots 28,
29, 30 (including a portion of Building #3) and the vacated right-at-way for First Ave. are
already Zoned Il and carry a land Use Plan designation of Industrial. Existing uses in
Building 111 are offices, a skin care center and counseling services, Building #2 is a candy
factory and Building #3 is used to sell used retail equipment and supplies (Liquidation
Enterprises), The parcels subject of this request were zoned General Commercial prior to
the adoption of the new land Development Code (lDC) in 1985.
\J
minws03b.91
10
03/18/91
~
i.;'"
~" .
:,:/
JI.
: -: ;~:
: '
, .'
., '
<\
,';",
.... :
.:."
"
',~ ;.
;.; .
I"
.,i"
. :-.~~
~: ;
(~:~)
~';i
, ";.
i: .::",
",Ii.
....,-
,',
,',
';,'
:. " ~ .
. /L..
',1"1.
..'."
',,",
.:','
. r: : ~
.' I";
" ,
, "
,'OJ:
":''.;'.
(.~
'. . ~,
l, ~':~ .
~ " I
,',
j .: '. >~
y
..~ '{ ,
, ",.
. "
< :", ,~
,'. ..
"I ,~:
,," ,"'
The City owns the vacant land east and south and proposes to use it for right-of-
way for the Myrtle Avenue extension. The City Commission, at its meeting of November
15, authorized a study to determine the proposed extension's precise configuration. The
proposed extension will be a five-lane, urban section roadway. It appears the proposed
extension will not affect, or will only minimally affect, the subject property. The study
authorized by the Commission, is behind schedule and has not been completed. Since
precise information about the roadway's location is not available, and it is not the
applicant's fault that the study has not been produced, the staff is continuing to process
the request because, based on the best available information at this time, the roadway
extension will occur and will not significantly affect the subject property. It should be
noted that the roadway extension is shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Complications could arise if the railroad crossing required for the Myrtle Avenue extension
results in the need for a bridge; this might prove prohibitively expensive.
When the extension of Myrtle Avenue is completed, it will serve as a logical
terminus for the requested IL Zoning and Industrial Land use designation. The road will
separate the subject property from the residential areas to the east. Mainly for this
reason, staff feels the request is appropriate. However, if Myrtle Avenue were to not be
extended, staff's recommendation would be to deny the request because current zoning
serves as a logical transition, "stepping down" from industrial to neighborhood commercial
to limited office. Consequently, staff recommends "holdingtl the second reading until the
roadway extension study is completed.
The existing warehouse on lots 17, 18 and 19, Blk. 4, Lake Belleview Sub., south
of the subject property is presently in the RM-8 (Multiple Family Residential) Zone and
designated Low Den'sity Residential on the Land Use Plan. The residence located on lots
14, 15 and 16, Blk. 4, is directly south of the warehouse. No matter what configuration
the proposed roadway extension takes, this will become an isolated use. Therefore, if the
subject request is granted, it is recommended that whatever property remains in this area
(bounded by the railroad, Lakeview Avenue, the Myrtle Avenue extension and the City
owned property to the south) should ultimately be rezoned and the Land Use PJan
amended to reflect the total parcel in Industrial designations.
On March 05, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of the
request to change the Land Use Plan designation to Industrial by a vote of 5-1. Further,
they recommended staff amend the LOC to provide a very light industrial district and
include this property in this proposed zoning district, changing the Zoning Atlas
accordingly. The applicant indicated his willingness to accept a less intense zoning
classification once one can be developed.
Jim Polatty, Planning & Development Director, reiterated that the Planning & Zoning
Board's recommendation for approval is based on the development of a less intense
industrial zoning designation. Discussion ensued regarding the district not being in
existence and the need to know what will be happening with the Myrtle Ave. extension.
Due to these concerns, this item will be continued.
,
(
I
I
l
I
I
I
\
\
t
,
minws03b.91
03/18/91
11
," .
< (<" . ./
. ~':., ,', '.
'. , .: " ' . '. . . .' . ,'. ' ,.: . ilL . ..... . ~ ", ".., .. '. l
: '! : ::;.' ','~..' I :, ::"':,; :':. . '. " " : I .:. '.. ", ~ ,. . . . , .' .' l: '. ,'.:. .' .. , 1 I : . , ';'" . .
.,' .,:,:' I:." '"",;:,1 . ""1,::::.:::.':':..';.:::,;.. ;,-':.:;::,~:-',': . " :,".'. .",. '>::
. . "., . ,>:::.. .:". :.' . ;:'>.: '. ,":.':. ~,',', ,:,:....,.:."". ':...\,..'.,:_:':...,!:';,.,.:'.,~.,,'..I.'.'..:.\.,.'..,.::~,:., ':.,'"",1.",. ; <';, :"':'P:" ....;\.
",'" .... .. .- ,~i",:::'\,.:','~,:..;/.:,::::<)...~_. .' '. ,::-',' '. :"':':"'~:<;. "
, .' : . . .' : ..' :' .. ~,' ~ I '.. ,.". ... ,
:t'.,:I:.:"': .... .. "(::: :1.:"
'r} f' ," .' .:": :': \! ~( . ,\" : .. . . I
'. ,,-'.';,.:':',': .,...,...., '...., '.' \, . .
'.' '. ,,' . /1. .:',';..
........ .... ,'. ....,;.
. . ;' I' ~. ..' '. .' . . "..: I. :..
, ".',:
'.'
",
<'..' :'
" :......,.,
.,.:', .,'
.... .
,I:.
", .'j
',.,"\ . '\,1
..... ,
. .;".;
.:', ," '.
:. :, I
" "
:. ,':
. '1. <
'. .
. ~ . . ~ . :' .' ,
Staff has gathered that information and on that based their recommendation for a
change in the fee schedule proposed in Ordinance 5076-91. The major changes include
the plan examination fee (page 2), permit fees (page 3), and house move/remodeling (page
4).
~
Public Hearina & First Readinq Ord. #5086-91 - LDCTA - establishing public recreation
grounds or parks as a permitted use, establish comlTlercial and office uses associated with
marina facilities and alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with marina facilities as
conditional uses (PL&D)
This proposed amendment expands the conditional use requirements for marinas in
Public/Semipublic (P/SP) Districts to allow the uses currently associated with the City's
public marina, including commercial and office uses and alcoholic beverage sales. The
amendment would also establish recreational grounds as a permitted use in
Public/Semipublic Districts.
The Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended approval of this
amendment at its March 5, 1991 meeting.
Confusion was expressed regarding the difference between "associated with,"
"ancillary," and "accessory." Clarifying language is to be developed,
(Cont. from 03/07/91) First Reading Ord. #5076-91 - Relating to the building code;
amending Sec. 138.07 to revise schedule of permit fees and charges; amending Sec.
138.071 to revise definition of "combination permit;1l amending Sec. 138.10 regarding
filing fees for appeals; amending Sees. 112.1 (A) and 2204.2 of Standard Building Code
and Sec. 11 O(B) of Standard Mechanical Code re: filing fees for appeals and fee for house
moving permit (PL&D)
.,.,rr)'
f''>':~
'~t'
The City Commission has previously considered increases to the building permit and
inspection fee schedule that are revisions to Section 138.07, Permit Fees and
Miscellaneous Charge. The Commission requested staff to develop information relating to
cost of commercial permits, residential permits, and the comparison of these increases to
other jurisdictions.
Two policy decisions are the basis for the existing fee schedule and the proposed
changes. First, the proposed fee schedule is based on Commission policy statement cc-54
which states, "Fees for building and other permits shall be established at levels which will
attempt to recover costs of the Building Department (exclusive of any costs reimbursable
from sources other than City funds)." This proposed fee schedule, unlike previous fee
schedules, comes closer to having each permit and the aggregate of all fees pay for the
cost of the service provided. The second policy is the inherent bias in both the existing
and proposed schedules in favor of residential and remodeling through the relatively higher
new construction and commercial fees. It is common in building permit and inspection fee
schedules that new construction is charged higher fees than remodeling and additions. In
fact, commercial rates are higher than residential in Pinellas County, which sets a cap on a
single family unit. The trend is to develop a greater balance between the residential
~
minws03b.91
12
03/18/91
~
r:J
~('~.
..
~;;;';..";~
. compared to commercial foes and remodeling compared to new construction. The effect
of this trend is to ensure new construction does not subsidize remodeling and additions.
The estimated number of permits, fees generated, and construction value has been
determined for FY 199011 based upon statistics comparing the number of permits, fees
generated, and construction value for FY 1989/90 to the first five months of FY 1990/1
(See attachment A). Although the estimated number of permits for FY 1990/1 is expected
to increase by a small percentage, the construction value on which these permits are
generated is expected to decrease by approximately 53%/ and the related fees generated
is estimated to decrease by 31 % from $886,812 in FY 1989/90 down to $608,608 in
FY 1 990/1 at the current fee schedule.
In order to cover the inspection and permitting costs of the Building Department,
$830,000 of fees must be generated in FY 1990/1 (See attachment B). Because the
City's estimated revenues of $608,608 for FY 1990/1 will not cover costs, staff proposed
an increase in building and inspection fees, (Attachment Ordinance 5076-91).
,Next fiscal year, estimated revenue under the proposed fee schedule is expected to
be $873,000 based upon the average percentage increase of fees for new construction,
remodeling, and additions presented in the ten eDse studies in Attachment C labeled "Fee
Comparison on Real Permits," Planning and Development staff is projecting next fiscal
year wl/l be average, one characterized by more remodeling and additions and less new
construction as available vacant land is built out.
Attachment C labeled "Fee Comparison of Real Permits," shows ten examples of
permits. The case studies describe the current City approved permit fee, the proposed
permit fee, and the approximate average cost of providing the service. based on the City's
total cost and the number of inspections and permits issued last year. Although the
proposed fees will increase the costs of single family and commercial remodeling by more
than 100% / the proposed fees still do not cover to cost of providing the services. This
basic inequity in the system is recognized County and Statewide. New homes and
commercial construction inequitably support building inspection and permitting costs.
The proposed fee for combination permits under $50,000 will increase
approximately 130% for residential remodeling and additions based on case studies 1. 2/
5, and 6. The difference in the increase between commercial and residential is based on
commercial paying plan review fees.
The proposed fee increase for combination permits over $50/000 of approximately
27% for new residential single family, 5%'for commercial, and 15% for apartments is
based on cases 3, 4, 7, 8, 9; and 10. Residential and commercial rates differ because of
the plan review fees.
A qu~stion was raised regarding whether or not building permit activity should be
downsized. Vie Chodora, Building Official, stated remodeling is complicated and requires
the same amount of inspection. Due to Clearwater being built out, remodeling is
increasing. Jim Polatty, Planning & Development Director, pointed out there are more
permits for remodeling but for lesser amounts.
minws03b.91
13
03/18/91
. . ~ '
In response to questions, Mr. Polatty indicated the second free standing sign is to
be removed.
'J
A question was raised regarding the progress in cross training inspectors so they
, can complete multiple inspections in one trip. The City Manager requested the Planning &
Development Director provide this information.
(Cont. from 03/07/91) Variances to the Sign Reaulations; located at 25191 US 19N, Sec.
32-28-16, M&Bs 32.08 & 32.10, zoned CH (Dimmitt Cadillac, SV91-02) (PL&D)
This item was continued from the February 7, 1991 Commission meeting to permit
the applicant to modify the variance request and from the March 7, 1991 Commission
meeting due to applicant schedule conflicts. The request was modified and readvertised,
, and is more fully described below.
The previous request for four variances has been reduced to two: 1) a variance of
17.3 square feet to permit a total of 129.3 square feet of property identification signage
and 2) a variance of 16.5 feet to permit a pole sign of 36.5 feet in height.
City Code permits a maximum pole sign area and height in the Highway Commercial
(CH) district of 11 2 square feet and 20 feet respectively. The existing sign was allowed to
be moved from the applicant's previous location on South Ft, Harrison Ave, to the current
location in March 1986, contingent upon its removal in five years or the obtaining of a
variance to allow its continued existence. The applicant's request was triggered by code
enforcement action requesting compliance with the removal condition.
(1.~)
, .~'J
In support of the request, the applicant indicates that: a) the sign is setback a
considerable distance from the US 19 pavement (there is a large right-of-way in this area);
b) the signs are compatible with surrounding signs and uses; and c) the signs are the
minimum necessary to identify the subject property, given conflicts with power lines, trees
and light poles in the vicinity. The staff has also had conversation with the applicant
concerning the proposed "urban interchange" project (US 19 improvement project) and its
effect on the signage question.
Variances to the Sion Regulations: Workplace located at 23666 US19N, Sec. 6-29-16,
M&Bs 41.01,41.02,41.04,41.05,41,06, together with Blackburn Sub., part of Lots 1
and 12 (Branch Sunset Associates, Ltd. SV91-06) (PL&D)
Due to Planning staff error, this variance request was overstated in the newspaper
ad; the ad should have addressed a variance 97 square feet to permit a 225 square foot
business identification sign, rather than a variance of 128 square feet to permit a 256
square foot business identification sign.
The applicant requests approval to add Workplace signage in the blank panel space
on each of two existing 298.2 square foot property identification (pole) signs located on
the Sunset Point 19 Shopping Center site, zoned CC (Commercial Center). At the same
time, the applicant requests approval to retain the existing 225 square foot Workplace
business identification (walt) sign.
Q
minws03b.91
14
03/18/91
I
i
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
1
r
, .
I~
Currently the subject pole signage identifies /ISunset Point 19/1 (the largest portion
at the top of the sign) and below it, Publix, Eckerd, Circuit City, and the Sports Authority.
The Workplace signage will be placed below The Sports Authority sign.
On March 24, 1988, the applicant requested approval of a variance of 97 square
feet to permit a 225 square foot business identification sign to be constructed on the wall
of the Workplace business. The Development Code Adjustment Board (DCAB) approved
the variance.
On November 10, 1988, the applicant requested approval of the following
variances: 1} of 212.4 square feet to permit a total of 596.4 square feet of property
identification signage, tow signs each 298.2 square feet, where a maximum of 384
square feet is allowed; and 2) to permit alteration of a nonconforming sign (the subject
property identification sign). DCAB approved the request subject to the conditions that the
signs be brought into conformance with the Code on or before October 13, 1992 (the
, amortization date), there be no messages erected on the space frame, Workplace may not
be placed on this sign unless they conform to current sign code with the sign on the
building, and a sign permit being ,obtained within 6 months.
d"')
(~}:-~~
'~:1;~
On June 8, 1989, the applicant requested the elimination of the
November 10, 1988 condition regarding the Workplace sign restriction, to allow a sign
identifying Workplace on the two pole (property identification) signs. DCAB denied the
request because the applicant had not demonstrated they had met all the standards for
approval as listed in Section 137.012(d) of the LDC because,there is no condition which is
unique to the property, no unnecessary hardship was shown, and the hardship was caused
by the owner or applicant. Also, at the meeting, DCAB denied a variance of 128 square
feet to permit 256 square foot business identification wall sign for The Sports Authority.
The applicant states the variance is small and unique due to the location of the
roadways and the locations of the store fronts (approximately 600 feet from US 19), and
that it is consistent with ott,er requests at this site. DCAB clearly stated in the denial that
this is not the case. To reiterate, the applicant has not demonstrated he met all of the
~tandards for approval as listed in Section 137 ,012(d) of the LDC because there is no
condition unique to the property, no unnecessary hardship was shown, and the hardship
was caused by the owner or applicant.
Based on staff review and analysis of the information contained in the application,
the request does not appear to support the Standards for Approval of LDC Section
137.012(d).
In response to questions, it was indicated the previous variance granted for the
attached signs was based on this business not being included on the pole sign.
Alcoholic BeveraQe Distance Seoaration Variance for prooertv (Rose Garden Restaurant)
located at 348 and 348 1/2 Coronado Dr., L1oyd-White-Skinner Sub., Lots 118-119 (Maika
AB91-06) (PL&D)
1~
minws03b.91
15
03/18/91
Staff recommended against granting the conditional use request because the
property was located in an area generally comprised of motel and apartment uses and did
not have frontage on Gulfview Blvd. . The Board was not as concerned about the
property's location and felt since it involves the conversion of a single family residence,
rather than a motel, the proposed use would not contribute to the "motel conversion
problem" on Clearwater Beach. The (P&Z) Board, in approving the conditional use request,
expressed concerns about converting motels to restaurant and retail uses. However, the
Board recognized the subject conversion as being a conversion of a single dwelling unit to
a restaurant, with this distinction being the critical factor in the granting of the request.
~
The applicant is requesting approval of two separation distance variances to allow a
new 2-COP establishment. A variance to the 250 foot separation requirement as
measured from a residential (R-281 zone ,is required since the use is located in the CR-28
zone. A variance from the separation distance requirements for similarly licensed alcoholic
beverage establishments is also required as Julie's Seaside Cafe (2-COP) is located on
adjoining property. An interior floor area of 1,069 square feet is proposed for the
,restaurant use. A single family residence will be located at the property's rear; this
residence 'is existing and is proposed to remain. The proposal meets the mixed use
formula requirements for the CR-28 district. Off-street parking requirements for both uses
also appear to be met.
A variance to the minimum number of seats allowed for on-premise consumption is
required; City code requires a minimum of 50 seats, while 36 are proposed. The purpose
for the 50 seat minimum requirement appears to be to limit the potential for small scale
alcoholic beverage sales establishments. The applicant has indicated that, while he can
place 50 seats in the proposed esta blishment, he would prefer a less crowded. seating
arrangement more conducive to the type of establishment he,intends to run. The
Development Code Adjustment Board (DCAB) had this item scheduled for the
March 14, 1991 meeting.
~
~"Y
... .~i
The Planning and Zoning (P&ZI Board approved the requisite conditional use permit
for'this use on February 19, 1991, subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant
shall procure a building permit and occupational license within six months of this public
hearing;' 2) There shall be no package sales; 3) The applicant shall obtain approval of a
seating variance from the DCAB; 4) The applicant shall obtain approval of any separation
distance variance(s) from the City Commission; and 5) The business closing time shall be
11 :00 p.m.
Given the package sales prohibitions and the hours of operation conditions placed
on the conditional use, staff does not feel the seating variance will create circumstances
favorable for a l1hole-in-the-wall" tavern type use of the kind that the ordinance is intended
to regulated. City code requires a 51 % food/nonalcoholic beverage sales ratio for the CR-
28 district, so the use is properly regarded as a restaurant and not as a tavern or bar.
Mr. Polatty reported the Development Code Adjustment Board approved the
variances as they saw this as a restaurant, not a bar, He stated evidence can be
requested from the establishment to prove it meets the 51 % food sales requirement of a
~
minws03b.91
16
03/18/91
3) Art Versus Slgnage. Staff is running into numerous cases of murals or paintings
that draw attention to a business establishment, The large balloon painted on the
Spyglass Motel contains a depiction of a person in a balloon holding a spyglass. The
spyglass is such a minor part of the mural, it is difficult to consider this an advertisement
for the motel. This example is complicated by the depiction of balloons on the pole sign in
front of the motel. Frenchy's Restaurant (Saltwater Cafe) has various murals painted on
the building; some contain drawings of fish served at the restaurant but in a natural setting
rather than on a bun. In these two examples, should the paintings be considered art
(which is permitted), or are they considered to be signs? Given the resort nature of the
Clearwater area and the festive atmosphere such signs create, staff suggests taking a
broad approach to this issue and restricting murals only when the connection between the
artwork and the business is completely unambiguous.
~
restaurant. In response to a question, it was indicated they will meet the parking
requirements.
Alcoholic Beveraae Distance Separation Variance for oroosrtv (Britt's Beachside Cafe\
located at 201 S. Gulfview Blvd., L1oyd-White-Skinner Sub., Lots 48-52 and Lot 98
(Stanislaw, Budzinski AB91-07) (PL&D)
In a letter dated March 20, 1991, George W. Greer, attorney for the applicant,
requested a continuance to June 6, 1991, due to the denial of the parking variance by the
Development Code Adjustment Board.
Sign Reaulation - Interpretations & Amendments (PL&D)
Staff, in continuing its sign inventory/amortization program, has identified several
additional interpretations that need to be considered by the Commission.
1) Property Identification Signage versus Business Identification Signage. In
attempting to distinguish between property and business identification signs, staff has
used the following methodology. If there is a pole sign on the property, staff has
considered that to be the property identification sign. If there are two or more wall signs
on the property (and no pole signs), staff has considered the larger of these wall signs to
be the property identification sign, with the smaller sign(s) as business identification signs.
t:f~A
~..l1'
2) Business Identification Signs. Occasionally, staff will find businesses with
separate business establishments located in one building. Although the businesses may be
related, with separate ingress and egress, the business are considered to be separate. An
example is Albertsons grocery and liquor stores where the liquor store has separate ingress
and egress from the grocery store and can be closed off entirely from the grocery store.
Other cases include interconnected establishments (such as a garden store at K-Mart or
Home Depot). In these cases, the businesses cannot be physically separated and are
considered to be one business establishment for business identification signage
allowances.
;,'~
~;;
minws03b.91
17
03/18/91
,
\
I
I
!
I
I
1
j
I
'~
'.o ,~>
.',
....>.
"
" '
:.'~'.':
.:. , ~.'
:'.\~'
"
'\' ,
~; . '
'. .
:..>t
" '
~. I.' \
",
. "'.
+. I'
" .
~~
~~~l'
":jO"
""
....
. ' ,
,)..:;!-
.'. .
::~.::,~ ~,
. . ';. ~.'
, .'
. /...:
. ~ . ......
.,
':
:'..,"1.
;, ': ~;
,I":"."',
:: ~.
. "
,,:,....
\/J
'..
.','}
.,"\
. "
.......
I;,
~ .: j.
'",',
~ I" : \. '.
" 1 _". . \,
'I,
'.
,... ,
, :
4) Three-Dimensional Signs. Three-dimensional signs are not allowed under the
City's sign code. Several landmark signs will be required to be removed, including the
"pencil" and ','horse" signs on Drew Street and the upiano" sign on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. No
. e~ceptlons to this requirement are being made by staff.
5) Signs Located In Rights-of-Way. Staff found a number of signs, particularly at
Clearwater Beach, that have been erected in City right-of-way. Since these signs are
located on publicly owned right-of-way property, staff is not considering them eUgible for
variances.
6) Signs on Fences. Signs on fences are being interpreted as though they were
ground signs. They will be subject to the same size and height limitations of ground signs.
7) Menu Signs in Windows When menu signs are located in windows, they are
counted toward the maximum 20% of window area permitted to be covered by permanent
window signs. . Menu signs in windows are not permitted to exceed two square feet in
area.
8) Public/Semipublic Uses. Section 134.008(1 )b. of the sign code allows
exemptions for signs erected"... for the control or direction of traffic and other appropriate
public purposes. II Since what is meant by "other appropriate public purposes" is not
clearly specified (e.g., does this apply to a school or office building signs?), staff, in
preparing letter to properties in Public/Semipublic districts has not tried to distinguish
between government uses and nongovernment uses. Therefore, if a sign for a
governmental agency exceeds the size allowed in the Public/Semipublic district, a letter
identifying the nonconformity will be mailed.
Consensus of the Commission was to agree with these staff interpretations.
(Cont. from 03/07/91) Res. #91-5 - Requesting that water resource project funding levels
be increased by Plnellas-Anclote River Basin Board of Southwest Florida Water
Management District (SWFWMD) (CA)
In response to a question, Mr. Baker indicated the City would like to request
Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) funding for some City projects.
Concerns were expressed that SWFWMD had not done much in the City of Clearwater.
Mr. Baker indicated the $50,000 for the DelOra project had not been accepted by the City
from SWFWMD.
Other Commission Action
Commissioners Regulski and Nunamaker expressed concern regarding complaints on'
the way the Police handled a call from a tourist whose car had been broken into while on
the beach. '
Adlournment - The work session adjourned at 1 :25 p.m.
minws03b.91
03/18/91
18
" \>
>: ..'
'. '". "
. .' L .'. ~ . 1'- . ,f' . . .
" '.', :,;,\f-
.....
:,:.,.':" ....,-,::.':, ....,::,:';...' .<:.'",:.....;'.; ..:';': '~::,: ::':';;'.'I"~.::;::~":
"" ,'" :.,:....',':..:"...:~.:,:..:::,'.'::',::"'-/.,: ..',;':,'
"0"1" '.' :.,.... . ",p'." ,'c' :i'i:'':',: ,.;:i" :.. .,.+'
. ~ ", " \ .<
"
",! !
1
r <'.
L. "
. ..". .,."
I I", '. ~ I ",. ..,. I' ~ ',' ,.. ' ':," I . <
. ~". .... ~ I. '. . I. . .
..::~::: ':' ..:' ':. ';, '".,..:-;::,'.::;".".'...::.,.:,.~,'.',;:.,.<>,.,:".
'<','" 'tIc,"'
.., '. ...... :t'. ",",
.!~.'.' :.<,"l~: I'>~...,I""':":I>.
,1'11
,.( '.,'
j"
,I., f"
. . . ~ ~ .
"I J.:
, " .
. ..', ", ,; '.
. <'1
-,I....
'. ", .~.">. j'
, I
..
:' "
, ;:.
'..,'.
.. .
.'
.,' :,.......>
. . ~ I I . 4'
, " :. ~
...
;".
, '.