03/03/1998 (2)
~
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING ~ ACTION AGENDA
Tuesday, March 3, 1998
,"
J '
"
, '.
..'
Call To Order, Invocation, Pledge Of Allegiance
Minutes Approval ~ February 1 7, 1998 - Approved as corrected
.. .,' .~.
l,,'
B. Requests for Extension, Deferred and Continued Items u None
C. Conditional Uses
:,",e
::. .:".<
/lle';\
~'.' ~ .,t."
C1. Eben D. & Janet C. Henson to permit replacing a nonconforming use (business office)
with another nonconforming use (adult day care) at 1298 Lakeview Road, Hanousek's
Sub, part ,of Lot 9, zoned RM 8 (Single Family Residential). CU 98-07
ACTION: Approved subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall obtain
the requisite building permit within six months from the date of this public hearing; 2) The
applicant shall obtain the requisite occupational license within one year from the date of
this public hearing; 3) As the proposal is less non-conforming than the previous use, the
applicant shall work with staff to determine whether payment of Pine lias County
Transportation Impact Fee is needed; 4) The parking area shall be restriped to provide five
parking spaces one of which shall be a handicap parking space in accordance with Section
42.34 of the Land Development Code and after consultation with the City Traffic Engineer;
5) Landscaping planters shall be provided along Lakeview Road in accordance with Section
42.27 of the Land Development Code after consultation with the City Environmental
Engineer; and 6) The applicant will remove the existing wheel stops located within the
Betty Lane right-ot-way.
,,'
....1.:
,:". .r
<....::
. ,
~::': '~1'
....1 '
.",:.~~: ~~. .
. , '
..+........
'; . :.:
. .' ~
~ :'
',; "
'. ;..
. ,
-.::;.:.':'
'c
. "t>.
......
i)..\\
.,L~:;,:
~:" ':;'.:':.:'
"\.....:.
.,/'" " .
-:;>-..' .
:'..:'~~
C2. Charles A. & Catherine Ie. Hines, Jr. (Flowerama of Florida, Inc.) to permit outdoor
retail sales, displays andlor storage at 2001 Drew Street, Central Park Resub, part of
Tract A, zoned CG (General Commercial). CU 98-08
ACTION: Approved subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall provide
landscaping materials within the existing unpaved strip of land located in front of the
building at the east end of the parking lot in accordance with Section 42.27 of the Land
Development Code; 21 The applicant shall maintain a paved pedestrian access area of 44
inches surrounding the display area; 3) All outdoor storage and displays shall be limited to
the display areas depicted on the plan.
.... .
.... ..
.::..~';'
. '
"', .
<<;:"
I" '.
I... i
, ',:.. ~,
I~ I '}.'
....:,'...
." '.'
,'.'
:,.. .
C3. Rabiie, Raim, Imer & Enver Tzekas. Trustee (Duke's Garage, Inc.) to permit nightclubs,
taverns and bars (change of business ownership) at 115 Starcrest Drive, See 1 3-29.
15, M&B 11.06, zoned CG (General Commercial), CU 98-09
ACTION: Approved subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall obtain
the requisite occupational license within six months from the date of this public hearing;
2) Sale of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to consumption on premises with no package
sales; and 3) All non-conforming signs must be brought into compliance with Section 44.51
of the Land Development Code within 90 days of the date of this public hearing.
'.,
:' I. .
j .1:'.,
.e '.
. '. . .~
...,....
"
:'<.';...
h '
:';':'"
..... .
. .'.
'~'.;, ~<
.,,,,':"'
" .' ~ :.
.' ,
../;'..
'..':
D. Annexation, Zoning, land Use Plan Amendment, Land Development Code Text
Amendment, and local Planning Agency Review
':. .'
",'.'1.,'
. ....
." ".'
.'. .
',' '.
w
pzact03a.98
1
03/03/98
.. .
......
"
::,' ~:(
'., .'
.. . . Ii.>
:," ~': ,>, '
,..e",
" .;..
~~:..~:....~;... e'.....~,..>., .....'.. " t..' (.1' ..1<: ,.... ..' ".~: .',. '. ". ,...... ., .."...... ,." I~ ."., < ' . ,...., t
, ..'. . , .. ",',' ,,".. ' , . " , ",' ".' ~ : :': ',,' ". ,'. "',, ':,: :'.: ,',;,,":',:,'.:,',.',:'-':,.:~'.,'::.,',':,',:,.'.:~'":~:,:"..',"~::.~,,::~',:~:','~,"":i;',":,:':,,:,'.:::,:,';'.:,~,!,:',:',:..,~...,..,'_:.::,','::'.::;',,',::.;::,,:,.,.':.,:~'.:,;..~.,'::'.'.::~,.'.'::,~,'.::.,,;,':.~,,',',:.:,::'.,'::~,,:':...,,!:.:::,':',',.,.,,::.,:.'::~':.~:',,:,:,';,::~.::::~,,:,:::;;,: : :,:.,",.;,:"'.'.c,,.:.',; '":,{,:,','",:,.,.,::',:,',.,;,~:,.l:,,,',,:,,'.:,,',,'.',',;,,:,'.,',:",',~,',' ~,:':.',:.';,:,~
i...................fii ..,.,'::,:" ./",.,':.:..'::,...\.....,..,:;. ;',';,:,.,::.:'~.'",:..,.,',~.,'.:.,,'.','.',~.:.:c:.,~:',:;,,',..:,..:...,:, ",',,:,:':~ :.,::' :,,',::,.:~,':,',':'..,:,,:,u,:,,',.:.',:,",;c,~, .\',',':.;,":,:,',',',',':,.,',',:':,',:.,:,~,.,:.,:'',.:.,..,..',:,.:,.,':, ..'/: '..;' .... ':'X:. . ,... . :/....;.;. '. . .
..,.;'>" ..' ..:' :,'.2:.: ::', . '<'
.' ; .;" .,',:/\,..:.',..,:'.-: ,',:", "':"': ,::.' ~':' :.:: t.: r I.:' ~ ,..', ')::1....':...::;:,,:':: li:-:J ,:',::.\,;.:,,'..'1:11..,:.',::::'. ",\...'..-: ,~::~,;,.: "~'~ :..."::>: ..'..:::; >,:' .:
, "
..i;. ,:, ':.:<'. ." {'..~<,'q I '~,' .' . . . ~
" l d:! ~ "\ '.' . . . . .
....' - . .. ' . ~'"'!' .. :- '. ~ :,' - , ,
,,'
. .' ,~
;r~'~, ': '
. ::- ~
i;.
. '.>
01 ~ 1404 Citrus St., Sunny Park Groves Sub, Blk D, Lot 19 and part of L'ot 20. (Kurt &
Sandra Shackelford) A 9B~04
ZONE: RS B (Single Family Residential)
ACTION: Endorsed to the City Commission
,~
'", ~ --~~
02.2160 BurnlceDr.,Glen Ellyn Estates, Lot 7. (Robert S. & Vicki Cyrl A 98-05
ZONE: RS 6 (Single Family Residential)
ACTIOI\t: Endorsed to the City Commission
"
,,'
03~ 1520 Stevensons Dr., Stevenson's Heights, Blk A, Lot 22. (Dolores Jelks) A 98-06
ZONE: RS 8 (Single Family Residential)
ACTION: Endorsed to the City ,Commission
" j
, ,
!....
"
{\ .
,.
04. 1734 Manor Ave. W,j Clearwater Manor, part of Lots 26 & 27. (John D. Fitzgerafd)
A' 98-07
. ZONE: RS 8 (Single Family Residential)
'J
ACTION: ' Endorsed to the City Commission'
05. 2077-2093 Palmetto St., Pinellas G~oves SE }'4, Sec 12-29-15, Lots, 3, 4, 5, 13, and
1,4. (Joseph & Cyrus J. Lowrey/Estate of Hertha B. Lowrey) A 98-08
ZONE: RM 1 6 (Multiple Family Residential)
ACTION: Withdrawn by Staff
. d, '. ~
" '
',' .'
I,
~','~
. I \~>>J11
Board and Staff Comments -- Discussion
c
Adjournment -- 2: 14 p.m.
, ,
,
,,'
\,;;,>;:)
".
pzact03a.98
, ,
,2
03/03/98
:,
r
I
~.. ~.~.~:.......u.... "t....t" ~ :..~ ,,:": ::;;~:! i ,.:~:c ...: ' '.;......:' _~ ~'.'
" ,,,
< ~ ,. 'r f ' ,;.
, "
. ~ "
, "
., " . :::~':,,:' 1.' :'
I," ":'::.:."',:,' ". ,~..':..~ "., .,>:. .~'
'. .. 1"' , " . C ".'~.
\ ,..
, I
, , '
, "
Pre'sent:
Douglas Hilkert
Gerald Figurski
Edward Mazur
Robert D. Bickerstaffe
Brenda Harris Nixon
Frank Kunnen
Rick Anderson
, Leslie Dougall~Sides
Steve Doherty
Teresa Mancini
Gwen Legters
Chairman
Vice Chairman
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Assistant City Attorney
Zoning Supervisor
Associate Planner
Board Reporter
,.~
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD'
CITY OF CLEARWATER
March 3, 1998
The meeting was called to order at 2:05 p.m. in City Hall, followed by the Invocation,
Pledge of Allegiance, meeting procedures and the appeal process.
To provide continuity for research, items are listed in agenda order although not necessarily
discussed in that order.
Minutes Approval - February 1 7, 1998
(:!...'l,
.'.w..,(tJI
The minutes were approved as corrected by the board.
B. Requests for Extension, Deferred and Continued Items -- None
c. Conditional Uses
C1. Eben D. & Janet C. Henson to permit replacing a nonconforming use (business office)
with another nonconforming use ladult day care) at 1298 lakevlew Road, Hanousek's
Sub, part of Lot 9, zoned RM 8 (Single Family Residential). CU 98-07
Mr. Doherty presented written background, staff recommendations, proposed hours of
operation, existing circumstances, landscaping, and parking requirements related to the
proposed use. As the request appears compatible with surrounding uses, staff
recommended approval with six conditions. Concerns were expressed with language in
three suggested I conditions: #3 pertaining to payment of the Pinellas County
Transportation Impact Fee; #4 requiring restriped parking spaces; and #5 requiring
installation of landscaping planters. The board wished to ensure it was understood the City
would provide assistance on a consultation basis, but would not provide physical or
monetary assistance to meet the recommended conditions.
Stephanie Matson, Applicant, outlined her proposal to provide day care for the elderly
and adults with special needs as an alternative to home care or nursing homes. Care-givers
will have the opportunity to drop off their cared-for people, knowing they will receive
u
mpz03a98
1
03/03/98
~
,....,~)
'''(l,.t
u
licensed care and socialization with their peers. She detailed features of the facility, adding
fully cooked meals will be provided along with many other amenities. The property is not
currently attractive, but she will paint, improve, repair windows, stripe parking, and install
permanent landscaping planters to create an asset and a much-needed opportunity for
Clearwater. In response to questions, she will care for adults aged 1 8 and over, or anyone
with special needs she can meet. She will name the facility, "Bridging the Gap, II to provide
daily quality care. She will start with 12 cared-for individuals, quickly building to her
maximum capacity of 24 to 30 people, according to state occupancy standards. She
understood and accepted the recommended conditions of approval, including the amended
language in conditions #3, #4, and #5.
In response to questions, Mr. Doherty said the City defers to the State's occupancy
standards. No occupational license would be issued before the facility was licensed by the
State of Florida Department of Children and Families. After lengthy discussion regarding
parking requirements, it was indicated the five parking spaces the applicant can provide are
not numerically sufficient, but no variance is needed because the requested use requires
less parking than the previous use. Staff felt the proposed facility will function adequately
to have no adverse affect on surrounding property owners. Discussion ensued regarding
existing non-conforming use requirements, use of parking by the applicant's four
employees, stacking space in the driveway, and likelihood that customer traffic would be
widely spaced throughout the day. Concerns were expressed by board members who
debated the appropriateness of recommended conditions #3, #4, and #5.
Member Kunnen moved to approve Item C 1 as requested, subject to the following
conditions: 1) The applicant shall obtain the requisite building permit within six months
from the date of this public hearing: 2) The applicant shall obtain the requisite occupational
license within one year from the date of this public hearing; 4) The parking area shall be
restriped to provide five parking spaces, one of which shall be a handicap parking space in
accordance with Section 42.34 of the Land Development Code and with the assistance of
the City Traffic Engineer; 51 Landscaping planters shall be provided along lake view Road in
accordance with Section 42.27' of the Land Development Code with the assistance of the
City Environmental Engineer; and 6) The applicant will remove the existing wheel stops
located within the Betty Lane right-of-way. Condition #3 was removed because payment
of a traffic impact fee, if required by code, will be based on historical need. Discussion
ensued regarding suggested amendments to the motion.
Member Bickerstaffe moved to approve Item Cl with staff's six recommended
conditions of approval. There was no second. Discussion continued regarding
amendments to Mr. Kunnen's motion.
Member Kunnen moved to approve Item C 1 as requested, subject to the following
conditions: 1) The applicant shall obtain the requisite building permit within six months
from the date of this public hearing; 2) The applicant shall obtain the requisite occupational
license within one year from the date of this public hearing; 3) As the proposal is less non-
conforming than the previous use, the applicant shall work with staff to determine whether
payment of Pine lias County Transportation Impact Fee is needed; 4) The parking area shall
be restriped to provide five parking spaces, one of which shall be a handicap parking space
mpz03a98
2
03/03/98
No verbal or written support or opposition was expressed.
~
in accordance with Section 42.34 of the Land Development Code and after consultation
with the City Traffic Engineer; 5} Landscaping planters shall be provided along Lakeview
Road in accordance with Section 42.27 of the Land Development Code after consultation
with the City Environmental Engineer; and 61 The applicant will remove the existing wheel
stops located within the Betty Lane right-of-way. The motion was duly seconded.
Members Hilkert, Mazur, Bickerstaffe, Nixon, Kunnen, and Anderson voted "Aye;" Member
Figurski voted J'Nay." Motion carried.
C2. Charles A. & Catherine K. Hines. Jr. (Flowerama of Florida, Inc.) to permit outdoor
retail sales, displays andlor storage at 2001 Drew Street, Central Park Resub, part of
Tract A, zoned CG (General Commercial). CU 98-08
Mr. Doherty presented written background, staff recommendations, existing site
configuration, landscaping, and parking requirements related to the proposed outdoor
display. As the request appears compatible with surrounding uses, staff recommended
approval with four conditions.
Concerns were expressed with staff's recommended condition requiring the applicant
to pay the Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee. 'Discussion ensued regarding
implementation the County ordinance, general fee schedule related to land use, and
contesting ,the fee schedule.
.,Si,~~
t..~...,.iJ
'C.4~. .
Cathy Hines, Applicant, said the proposed outdoor displays will include seasonal
themes and displays to make the store look festive and inviting to make customers feel
good. Outdoor hanging baskets with plants will need sunshine. In response to questions,
she said she understood and approved staff's recommended conditions. She has already
ordered the recommended landscaping materials.
Member Figurski moved to approve Item C2 subject to the following conditions: 1 )
The applicant shall provide landscaping materials within the existing unpaved strip of land
located in front of the building at the east end of the parking lot in accordance with Section
42.27 of the Land Development Code; 2) The applicant shall maintain a paved pedestrian
access area of 44 inches surrounding the display area; 3) All outdoor storage and displays
shall be limited to the display areas depicted on the plan. The motion was duly seconded
and carried unanimously.
C3. Rabiie. Raim. Imer & Enver Tzekas. Trustee (Duke's Garage, Inc.) to permit nightclubs,
taverns and bars (change of business ownership} at 115 Starcrest Drive, Sec 13-29-
15, M&B 11.06, zoned CG (General Commercial). CU 98-09
Mr. Doherty presented written background, staff recommendations, surrounding uses
in the retail complex. The applicant proposes to change the name from "Emo's Sports Bar"
to "Duke's Garage." Staff anticipates no adverse impacts on surrounding property. The
Community Response Team notes existing non-conforming signage must be brought into
compliance. As the request appears compatible wIth surrounding u~7s, staff recommended
d
V
mpz03a98
3
03/03/98
f
j
f
i
No verbal or written support or opposition was expressed.
~ approval with thl'ee conditions. In response to a question, Mr. Doherty said all non-
conforming signs mentioned in the report belong to the subject business only.
Barbara Elia, applicant, stated she will buy Emos Sports Bar and rename it after her late
husband who always welcomed neighbors to stop by for a beer in the garage. She wishes
to continue the theme in his memory. In response to questions, she will avoid confusion by
advertising as "a different sports bar."
Member Bickerstaffe moved to approve Item C3 subject to the following conditions:
1) The applicant shall obtain the requisite occupational license within six months from the
date of this public hearing: 2) Sale of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to consumption
on premises with no package sales: and 3) All non-conforming signs must be brought into
compliance with Section 44.51 of the Land Development Code within 90 days of the date
of this public hearing. The motion was duly seconded.
r..,-.1iii,a:)
\':"-.~: ~~j,.
Concern was expressed it is not appropriate to achieve sign code compliance by
conditioning conditional use approval as enforcement should be pursued through the
Community Response Team and Municipal Code Enforcement Board. Concern was
expressed imposing conditions unrelated to the conditional use process removes the
element of true choice for applicants who may feel pressure to accept such conditions
because they feel they must. Discussion ensued regarding the applicant's responsibility to
remove non-conforming signage from the property. Questions were raised regarding three
types of nonwconforming signs, whether the existing signs are grandfathered for the
property, and enforcement of the City's sign amortization program. Ms. Dougall-Sides
stated prohibited or illegal signs cannot be grandfathered. Mr. Doherty stressed the City
routinely reviews each property for code compliance as part of the conditional use and
other processes. Sign amortization ;s being enforced on a street-by-street basis as part of
other approvals. The board reiterated its request for staff to make recommendations for
code compliance in notes to the applicant, not conditions of approval. Lengthy discussion
ensued and consensus was to address the issue during board and staff discussion, below.
Discussion ensued regarding proposed amendments to the motion on the floor.
Member Nixon's request to withdraw her second was protested by Member Bickerstaffe.
Upon the vote being taken, members Mazur, Bickerstaffe, Nixon, and Anderson voted
"Aye;" Members Hilkert, Figurski, and Kunnen voted "Nay." Motion carried.
D. Annexation, Zoning, land Use Plan Amendment, land Development Code Text
Amendment, and Local Planning Agency Review
01. 1404 Citrus St., Sunny Park Groves Sub, Blk D, Lot 19 and part of Lot 20. (Kurt &
Sandra Shackelford) A 98-04
ZONE: RS 8 (Single Family Residential)
Mr. Doherty presented background information and written staff recommendations,
stating the applicant is requesting annexation to obtain City sewer service. The applicant
u
mpz03a98
4
03/03/98
I
r
I
t
I
f
~
!
02.2160 Burnice Dr., Glen Ellyn Estates, Lot 7. (Robert S. & Vicki Cyr) A 98-05
ZONE: RS 6 (Single Family Residential)
~, was not present and was not represented. One letter was submitted in opposition. No
other support or opposition was expressed.
Member Mazur moved to endorse Item 01 to the City Commission. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Mr. Doherty presented background information and written staff recommendations,
stating the applicant is requesting annexation to obtain City sewer service. The applicant
was not present and was not represented. No verbal or written support or opposition was
expressed.
Member Bickerstaffe moved to endorse Item 02 to the City Commission. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
03. 1520 Stevensons Dr., Stevenson's Heights, Blk A, Lot 22. (Dolores Jelks) A 98~06
ZONE: RS 8 (Single Family Residential)
~~
. !!J.d
Mr. Doherty presented background information and written staff recommendations,
stating the applicant is requesting annexation to obtain City sewer service. The applicant
was not present and was not represented. No verbal or written support or opposition was
expressed.
Member Nixon moved to endorse Item D3 to the City Commission. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
D4. 1734 Manor Ave. W., Clearwater Manor, part of Lots 26 & 27. (John D. Fitzgerald) A 98.07
ZONE: RS 8 (Single Family Residential)
Mr. Doherty presented background information and written staff recommendations,
stating the applicant is requesting annexation to obtain City sewer service. The applicant
was not present and was not represented. No verbal or written support or opposition was
expressed.
Member. Bickerstaffe moved to endorse Item 04 to the City Commission. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
05. 207742093 Palmetto St., Pinellas Groves SE Y4, See 12-29-15, Lots 3, 4, 5, 13, and
14. (Joseph & Cyrus J. Lowrey/Estate of Hertha B. Lowrey) A 98-08
ZONE: RM 16 (Multiple Family Residential)
This item was ~ithdrawn by staff.
[" '1
W
mpz03a98
5
03/03/98
1
j
I
I
!
I
f
~
,.... "'.
/. /:' <:"'.<" >~~~.t ~:::.~~<~.~),['. T \.~ :.
~ ,", . < .
Mr. Doherty responded it is not the City's intent to hold hostages, but to streamline
the development process by calling attention to the need for compliance with all codes
from the outset, instead of hitting applicants with more requirements later in the
development process. Deferring issues for enforcement by other entities is not time
friendly to the applicant. He stated in the future, staff's recommendations for conditions
will be tied to the general and supplementary standards for approval with code section
numbers referenced in the staff report.
.~ Board and Staff Comments
Concerns were expressed with staff having reverted to the practice of writing code
requirements as conditions, instead of addressing code compliance issues as notes in the
staff report. The board did not feel it was appropriate to recommend conditions to
, generate compliance with codes not related to the conditional use being requested.
Concerns were also expressed with recommending conditions when there is no code
authority to require what is being asked in the conditions, even when such conditions are
agreed to by the applicant. It was felt conditioning a use to mitigate adverse neighborhood
impacts would require proof that an adverse impact existed. It was suggested imposing
such conditions was tantamount to holding conditional use applicants hostage. Lengthy
discussion ensued and suggestions were made for resolving the controversy.
Discussion ensued regarding the difficulty for board members to maintain a
professional appearance while struggling to find appropriate language, working out
I'"~'.\\ differences, and discussing applicants' rights in the sunshine. A request was made to
, \;,~i' reschedule a board and staff planning workshop proposed by former Central Permitting
Director Scott Shuford for the benefit of new members, and to hash out differences in an
untelevised meeting. The request for a workshop was not supported as two board seats
are up for appointment or reappointment soon. Mr. Anderson withheld his opinions on
today's issues, but assured the board he is capable of participating in the decision-making
process.
Unanimous consensus was for all future staff reports to contain, in addition to
recommended conditions of approval, notes to the applicant as follows: i'The applicant is
advised an occupational license is required. The applicant is also advised the City of
Clearwater does not issue an occupational license unless the property complies with all
City ordinances. Issues on the subject property that do not appear to comply with City
ordinances are itemized below." Specific notes pertaining to landscaping, parking, lighting,
signs, etc. should follow. Ms. Dougall-Sides noted requests to change procedural matters
may need to be addressed through the interim department head.
Discussion ensued regarding information submitted at the last meeting regarding
substantial competent evidence. It was noted board members take an oath to support the
City's best interests. One member felt the best interests of the City were not served by
apprOVing a day care at Woodlawn church.
Ms. Dougall-Sides reported she has found varying court opinions regarding lay and
expert testimony. The indication is that lay evidence before a quasi-judicial body must be
~
mpz03a98
6
03/03/98
,,) I
":.:;:r:',,:;:::) p', C~ i ;\;:, ::\,::::,' ~\,:'::.~"", :, /:' ,';',
. ~ : , J . . . .: .. .~.
.c'<' ;".
. ...C!:.
"
" . \"
. ,
, 'j
.cr,
;. ""
~>,,:,"::'
fact-based or supported by documentation, not just the, speakers' opinions. The courts
have disapproved speculation, complaints, and "wanting to keep the status quo" as
reasons. However, she noted courts have found, opinions, based on visual or auditory
observations to be valid. She listed examples of types of testimony the board could
accept.
>- .
In response to a request, Ms. Dougall-Sides will look for a chart summarizing the
categories for legal non-conforming signs. Staff was requested to investigate and report on
enforcement of a City-supported County ordinance requiring three-inch~tall address
numbers posted on all businesses. Staff was requested to provide an updated list of City
departMent contacts, telephone and fax numbers.
Brief discussion ensued re'garding ,rules concerning change of ownership for properties
with non-conformities. ' ,
, Adjournment
, The meeting adjourned at 4:41 p.m.
(-'
, '
,:',' tfli'4l\
, .....fJ;/,
h Ir
Planning and Zoning Board
. i:~ ~,(/A0'
Bo~r Reporter-: ,'.
I,
Attest: ' '
I,
i.
'0'
mpz03a98
,7
03/03/98
i
1
,
\
~1;T"~~:"i:~~~1j:.:t.tt\~I;.:~.~:: / :':.{+t...J:\H~,~:."""'" v~~. t1,"! -.'.
" ,
. , '., I. , .'.~,. r: '.
. <, "
'. .' ~, '.
, '.' ~: '.
, "
I ,