05/14/1998 (2)
.c i
;,' .} :
I.', :.
~I ,.:' ':<::;J."'~.r~!H i'~'.
< ,> . ", ~ ,." ~ .
H'
".' .",. ",';,
:t:c' "
."J ..;..l<!"
" '.
. ,
~; . ~
. '
. "
,:?~ .
~.I: ~
~. ft"
..,... ..
,. ..
. I... '
'~, ~.~ '
"
'.
',1
c ;: ~
t .,.: I.
'., ',.
.,.
I'
. I ~: .
DCAB
j' ,
t
. i
1
,
,\
I
I
, .f
, I
,
.......DevelopmentCode Adjustment Board
Minutes
"
:{/\: ' '. '..:, .
Uf:~\~:,J,'. ,
)\~~\/:
~""; I: ."." >'
~ :.. ::' ,
,"
.1
;:
. ,'~ I
':'
.
,Date
"
"
..
I,
~J...
(}?O?
._~ .q~.""""""',,, ,', "'~' ........H .,,~-~ ,"~'~'
'U'", ~,~.'~ ,:~I;t
.I.'~ ..! "~"i'~> ,..'.: ,. ..~:, 1',< ,', ..... ,= \,,' ~ ... ~ '..
., .
. .
,~
DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT BOARD - ACTION AGENDA
, CITY OF CLEARWATER
May ~ 1998
Call to Order at 1 :00 p.m., Pledge of Allegiance, and Invocation
ITEM A - Time Extension Requests
A 1) Robert L. Root, TRE, for a vegetative buffer variance of 25 feet to allow a zero foot wide
vegetative buffer strip where a minimum of 25 feet is required at 2436 Enterprise Rd, Sec
31-28-16, M&B 12.05, zoned RM 16 (Multi-Family Residential). VR 97-32
ACTION: Granted a one-year time extension to May 8, 1999.
ITEM B - Continued Variance Requests - None.
ITEM C ~ New Variance Requests
C1) Doualas M. & Shama L. Paradowski a setback variance of 2 feet to allow a shed 3 feet
from the West property line where a minimum setback of 5 feet is required at 2315
St. Charles Dr., Morningside Estates Unit 2, Lot 221, zoned RS 8 (Single Family
Residential). V 98-40
€i'
ACTION: Continued to the meeting of May 28, 1998
C2) Werner-Donaldson Movina Services, Inc. (Business Records Management, Inc.) for the
following (1) a setback variance of 19 feet to allow a new building 1 feet from the Maple
Street right-of-way where a minimum setback of 20 feet is required: (2) a setback variance
of 9 feet to allow a new building 1 feet from the East property line where a minimum
setback of 10 feet is required; (3) an open space variance of 7.1 percent for the lot to
allow 7.9 percent of open space where a minimum oi 15 percent is required; (4) a building
coverage variance of 5 percent to allow a new building that will increase the total building
coverage to 65 percent where a maximum building coverage of 60 percent is permitted; (5)
a parking variance of 7 spaces to allow 3 spaces where 10 parking spaces are required;
and (6) a landscape buffer variance of 4.05 feet to allow a 0.95 feet wide landscape buffer
strip along Maple Street where a minimum of 5 feet is required at 1143 Eldridge St., New
Country Club Addition, part of Blk "0", zoned IL (Limited Industrial). V 98-42
I
i
t
i
j
~
!
I:";
ACTION: Granted as requested subject to conditions: 1) variance is based on application
for a variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and
other documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation
from any of the above documents submitted in support of the request for a variance
regarding the work to be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the
site, will result in this variance being null and of no effect; 2) the requisite building permit
shall be obtained within one year; 3) prior to issuance of a building permit, a landscape plan
shall be submitted to and approved by the City's Environmental Official. The plan shall
provide landscaping across the front of the property along Eldridge St. The landscaping shall
be installed in accordance with the plan prior to approval of a final inspection and shall be
adc05a98 1 05/14/98
:~
continuously maintained or the variances shall become void: and 4) prior to issuance of a
building pormlt, stormwater detention shall be provided in accordance with the requirements
of the Public Works Department.
C3) The CeDeot COrD.. Porpoise Pool & Patio, Inc., and Clearwater Depot, Inc. (Pinch A
Penny) for a height variance of 3.33 feet to allow a wall 9.33 feet high where a maximum
height of 6 feet is permitted at 651 Court St., Court Square, Blk 13, Lots 7 thru 9, part of
Lot 6 together with Magnolia Park, Blk 13, Lots 10& 11, part of Lot 12 and vacated alley,
zoned UC[C-2} (Urban Center Core-2). V 98~43
ACTION: Granted as requested subject to conditions: 1} This variance is based on the
application, testimony, and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans,
surveys, and other documents in support of the request. Deviation from any of the above
documents regarding the work to be done, to the site or any physical structure located on the
site, will result in this variance being null and of no effect; and 2) The requisite building permit
shall be obtained within one year.
C4) Scott & Ruth Hale/lCC International, Inc. for the following (1) a setback variance of 10
feet to allow a monopole tower 50 feet from the East side property line where a minimum
setback of 60 feet is required; (2) a height variance of 70 feet to allow a monopole tower
120 feet high where a maximum height of 50 feet is permitted; and (3) a height variance of
2 feet to allow fence 8 feet high where a maximum height of 6 feet is permitted at
1496 Belleair Rd. (Proposed), Sec 23-29~15, M&B 33.05, zoned CG (General Commercial).
V 98-39
f~
'.(~r!
ACTION: Continued to the meeting of May 28, 1 998
ITEM 0 - Land Develooment Code Amendments - None
ITEM E - Minutes Aooroval - April 23, 1998 - Approved as submitted
ITEM F - Board & Staff Comments - Discussion
Adiournment - 2:33 p.m.
," ""~
. . '-"
adc05a9B.
2
05/14/9B
~ . ........ '.. ~,
. ..' . ~l
~
DEVELOPMENT CODe ADJUSTMENT BOARD MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
May 14, 1998
Present:
William Schwab
William Johnson
Mark Jonnatti
Ron Stuart
Shirley Moran
Leslie Dougall-Sides
John Richter
Gwen legters
Chair
ViceRChair (departed at 2:24 p.m.)
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Assistant City Attorney
Senior Planner
Board Reporter
The Chair called the meeting to order at 1 :00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the
Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance, review of meeting procedures, and explanation of appeal
process.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily
discussed in that order.
ITEM A - Time Extension ReQuests
.
A 1) Robert L. Root. TRE, for a vegetative buffer variance of 25 feet to allow a zero foot
wide vegetative buffer strip where a minimum of 25 feet is required at 2436 Enterprise Rd,
Sec 31-28-16, M&B 12.05, zoned RM 16 (Multi-Family Residential). VR 97-32
The applicant requested an unspecified time extension in a letter dated May 3,
1998. No reason was given. The applicant was not present and was not represented.
Staff outlined the request briefly, recommending approval of a one year extension.
Member Johnson moved to grant a one year time extension, to May 8, 1999 for
VR 97-32. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM C - New Variance Reauests
C1) Doufllas M. & Sharna L. Paradowski a setback variance of 2 feet to allow a shed 3 feet
from the west property line where a minimum setback of 5 feet is required at 2315
St. Charles Dr., Morningside Estates Unit 2, Lot 221, zoned RS 8 (Single Family
Residential). V 98-40
This property, in an established subdivision of single story homes with well-
maintained yards, has a non-permitted, 6 x 8-foot storage shed in the home's west side
setback. Staff feels conditions do not support approval. The shed is visually discordant,
visually crowds the neighboring home, and is viewable from the adjoining public. street
right-ot-way. The shed does not visually integrate with the neighborhood. Staff feels
approval will negatively Impact. this neighborhood.
mdc05a98
1
05/14/98
!
!
f
i
\
l
I
!
I
j
~
~
Douglas Paradowski, owner/applicant, disagreed with staff's analysis. He submitted
photographs of a variety of neighborhood sheds, visible from the street. He said he poured
a concrete slab for the shed, garbage cans and air conditioning unit, and plans a six~foot
stockade fence to screen this utilitarian area from street view. He needs the shed to store
dangerous items out of reach of his two small children so he can store their toys in the
garage. He is at the limit of impervi.ous area for his property, and could not relocate the
shed without tearing out the slab. He said he talked to his neighbors about the proposal,
and none wished to be involved. His homeowner association declined to send a letter of
support, but is looking at changing deed restrictions to allow sheds In yards. Fence
variances Bre not needed for the proposal as presented.
No verbal or wrItten support or opposition was expressed.
r"')
,. ~ H
1',lut;'
Board discussion ensued regarding code enforcement efforts in the neighborhood.
In response to a question, Mr. Paradowski acknowledged his error in not obtaining a permit,
but said he had taken the salesman's word that he knew of no restrictions on building the
shed. Concerns were expressed regarding: the proposal's flagrant violation of the setback
requirement; adequate space for the shed exists in the back yard; lack of neighbor or
homeowner association support; setting a precedent for more unwanted activity city-wide;
and tearing out the concrete slab to move the shed. Ms. Dougall-Sides noted mllch of the
property is paved. She pointed out every property owner must understand when the point
is reached that the owner must decide how much to build on a property. Rather than
approve this request because other non-conforming sheds exist, it was suggest to pursue
code enforcement activity for the sheds depicted in the photographs Mr. Paradowski
submitted for the record.
Member Johnson moved to continue V 98-40 to the meeting of May 28, 1998, to
,allow time for staff to determine how many shed violations exist in the neighborhood,
collect input regarding the homeowner association's position on sheds in side setbacks,
and work with the applicant to identify a more appropriate shed location on the subject
property. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
C2) Werner-Donaldson MovinQ Services, Inc. (Business Records Management, Inc.) for the
following (1) a setback variance of 19 feet to allow a new building 1 feet from the Maple
Street right-of-way where a minimum setback of 20 feet is required; (2) a setback variance
of 9 feet to aI/ow a new building 1 feet from the east property line where a minimum
setbaCk of 10 feet is required; (3) an open space variance of 7.1 percent for the lot to
allow 7.9 percent of open space where a minimum of 1 5 percent is required; (4) a building
coverage variance of 5 percent to allow a new building that will increase the total building
coverage to 65 percent where a maximum building coverage of 60 percent is permitted; (5)
a parking variance of 7 spaces to allow 3 spaces where 10 parking spaces are required;
and (6) a landscape buffer variance of 4.05 feet to allow a 0.95 feet wide landscape buffer
strip along Maple Street where a minimum of 5 feet is required at 1143 Eldridge St., New
Country Club Addition, part of Slk "0", zoned IL (Limited Industrial). V 98-42
J
This property is developed with a 7 t800.square~foot storage building adjacent to the
west property line. Six variances are requested to construct a new storage building,
identical in shape and size, adjacent to the east property line. Staff feels conditions
support approval. This neighborhood, compactly developed with industrial buildings and
mdc05a98
2
05/14/98
" :,.
~ , ., ,'<c.,.. il' c~I, ,,\,.' ,...~J..l",:."'i,,, :,', (,..",.....c~.'
, >: \l~.' ..,.~:.,..~;::.....:,:. ,...::.~.:.,...:~.':~: ..... · i ,':. ;:O;':,......,~.:.;.,..::'i:. ;.:..'.... :,,} ;.:/;.;~~..:;.i.::.~..:..'..?: ::::~:.:.\: :'::.:~:':..'-'::-.. :. ': . . . :.f...,' ... ..... :.'./' ': .' :" >' :.' .,.' . " . ". ....' ", .,: " .: . .. i. ;,:' \ : '; ,'; ,; I.',,::: >", .." :
.;;,;' " <' . :'. ....." :i, if.. '. ,'::':, '; "'\, 'f' ._. f"'" ::P'I~.'.. ','..:.::. ~;.,.. :;.;:.'.':,) (.(3,),. ;,~. ,:,,::,.\):';. '. ',)'y.,\,..,':~.::~..:.:"J":? :', <:{:
."<' ," '... ~ '. " "". ~ ; " , . ,,' ". . , ,I
~
uses, is nearly devoid of vegetation. The proposed construction provides an opportunity to
improve this property and neighborhood. New landscaping will front the property along
Eldridge Street. Investment in this industrial area will be favorable for the City. Approval
will not adversely affect this area.
. Tom Nash, attorney representing the applicant, said the applicant understands and
supports meeting staff's recommended conditions. The proposal will improve area
conditions. In response to questions, Mr. Nash said sufficient parking exists for employees
of this document storage facility and it is unlikely outsiders would come to the facility.
No verbal or written support or opposition was expressed.
(.;i'~.i
. (O.t,.f'
"'. ~.l"
Member Johnson moved to grant the variances as requested because the applicant
has substantially met all standards for approval as listed in Section 45.24 of the Land
Development Code, subject to conditions: 1) this variance is based on the application for a
variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and
other documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation
from any of the above documents submitted in support of the request for a variance
regarding the work to be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on
the site, will result in this variance being null and of no effect; 2) the requisite building
permit shall be obtained within one year; 3) prior to the issuance of a building permit, a
landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City's Environmental Official.
The plan shall provide landscaping across the front of the property along Eldridge St. The
landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the plan prior to approval of a final
inspection and shall be continuously maintained or the variances shall become void; and 4}
prior to issuance of a building permit, stormwater detention shall be provided in accordance
with the requirements of the Public Works Department. The motion was duly seconded
and carried unanimously.
C3} The Cepeot Corp.. Porpoise Pool & Patio. Inc.. and CJearwater Depot, Jnc. (Pinch A
Penny) for a height variance of 3.33 feet to allow a wall 9.33 feet high where a maximum
height of 6 feet is permitted at 651 Court St., Court Square, Blk 13, Lots 7 thru 9, part of
Lot 6 together with Magnolia Park, Blk 13, Lots 10 & 11,' part of Lot 12 and vacated alley,
zoned UC[C-2] (Urban Center Core-2). V 98-43
This property is developed with a restaurant and retail shop. The property owner
proposes to develop a picnic area south of the retail shop, separated by a 9.33-foot
monument paneled with granite veneer etched with the Ten Commandments, U.S.
Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Declaration of Independence. The monument will screen a
trash compactor. To enclose the trash compactor, the property owner proposes to
construct a 9.33-foot masonry wall on the north side. Staff feels conditions support
approval. The wall will be the same height as the monument, will enclose the compactor,
and screen its view from aU directions. Approval will enhance safety near the compactor,
improve the property's appearance by screening objectionable views, and will not adversely
affect any other property owner.
o
Robert Aude, architect representing the applicant, said construction of the entire
park will coincide with construction of the dumpster enclosure.
mdc05a98
3
05/14/98
,
l
!.
I
I
1
\
~
No verbal or written support or opposition was expressed.
Member Moran moved to grant the variances as requested because the applicant
has substantially met all standards for approval as listed in Section 45.24 of the land
Development Code, subject to conditions: 11 this variance is based on the application for a
variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and
other documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation
from any of the above documents submitted in support of the request for a variance
regarding the work to be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on
the site, will result in this variance being null and of no effect and 21 the requisite building
permit shall be obtained within one year. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
C4) Scott & Ruth Hate/lee International, Inc. for the fol/owing (1} a setback variance of 10
feet to allow a monopole tower 50 feet from the east side property line where a minimum
setback of ,60 feet is required; (21 a height variance of 70 feet to aI/ow a monopole tower
120 feet high where a maximum height of 50 feet is permitted: and (3) a height variance of
2 feet to allow fence 8 feet high where a maximum height of 6 feet is permitted at
1496 BeUeair Rd. (Proposed), See 23-29-15, M&B 33.05, zoned CG (General Commercialt.
V 98-39
.~
...
This item was heard at the beginning of the meeting. Three variances are requested
to construct a 120-foot monopole telecommunications tower on this undeveloped property.
Staff feels the tower will visually impact the City and pose safety concerns during high
winds. Staff recommends continuing this application to allow the applicant additional time
to address these concerns and provide supporting documentation.
The applicants' representative, who was not sworn in, requested to hear staff's
recommendations before deciding whether or.not to request a continuance. Assistant City
Attorney Dougall-Sides said she received a call from the applicants' attorney immediately
prior to today's hearing. The representing attorney discussed with Ms. Dougall-Side the
possibility of continuing this case for two weeks and meeting with staff to explore the
concept of co-locating the antenna at another site owned by FOOT (Florida Department of
Transportation.) The representative read a list of conditions she wanted attached to any
continuance, to ensure a timely hearing. Ms. Dougall-Sides reviewed alternatives available
to the applicant, stating staff is agreeable to work toward the applicants' objective.
Discussion ensued regarding continuance. Assistant City Attorney Dougall~Sides
acknowledged applicant time constraints and reviewed provisions of the 1996
Telecommunications Act, requiring an expeditious hearing. Members of the public present
to speak to the item expressed concerns many did not receive notice of this hearing and
feared they would miss any notice of a future hearing. Public hearing advertising
requirements for Development Code Adjustment Board and Planning and Zoning Board were
discussed.
Member Johnson moved to continue Item C4, V 98-39 to May 28, 1998. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
~
05/14/98
mdc05a98
4
,..
,."
. ;,~
.,
~'
Normal agenda order was restored and discussion ensued regarding Item C 1 .
Member Johnson left the meeting at 2:25 p.m.
ITEM D - Land Develooment Code Amendments - None
ITEM E - Minutes ADoroval .. April 23, 1998
.j
I
Member Stuart moved to approve the minutes, as recorded and submitted In written
. summation to each board member. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously. Member Johnson was not present.
ITEM F - Board & Staff Comments
Mr. Richter reported the staff report format is being improved to key into the
standards for variance approval.
!
,..
In response to a question, Ms. Dougall-Sides said the board imposes a time limit for
obtaining appropriate permits because code does not specifically address time .frames for
construction. The board needs to determine whether an applicant intends to proceed with
construction in '8 timely manner and impose conditions accordingly. General discussion
ensued regarding the property addressed in today's Item A 1.
.;;i\""
t'-::;,.::I
Staff was requested to inspect a completed telecommunication tower on Virginia
Street for possible code violations. A suggestion was made to incorporate
telecommunication towers with church structures, such as steeples. An ordinance was
suggested to require building material suppliers and home improvement centers to post
notice that permits may be required.
The board praised staff's, efforts to work with property owners along Eastland
Avenue and landmark Drive to move fences back from property lines and landscape the
exterior for a more attractive appearance.
Consensus was to continue board member introductions at the beginning of the
meeting.
. Adiournment
The meeting adjourned at 2:33 p.m.
.-J~.;U!d-
Chair / .
Development Code Adjustment Board
Attest:
'~.
t1;,~
Board Reporter
::J
mdc05a98
5
05/14/98
,t ,
'," ~: , ,1
. '.>
,,'
." "
.,' 1- T
. .1,
" " " " "',~",, ~ '" '.":~:',:;' ': .' I. " ',' " ,':: ~'" " ~.. :". ",:" ~ '''J .:_r:.~ r., :'~":'~',.. :,,' , .', " . ~: .. ~ < ;.: ":," , ':', : " ; . " ',' " " , ': " ,>.,,',.:;.,'.' , :', .' .',' .. ~ .. ' , " , ~ " ~. " ~; I"" , " :', : ',',..,' ',',,' '.:": ,::: ":..
. ,
FORM 88 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST NAME-I'IRST N.I\,ME - MIl)OLE NAME
5~(4rt (/(0/] tv
.)MAILlNO ADDRESS
;'0 fj,..ew st
CITY
e.. Ie ctrwt1;fe (
PATE ON wmc VOTE CURRED
,. c(
f,'"e 11f( ~
COUNlY
~ ('lIT [] COU/I.'TV [] OTIIER I.OCAI. AGENCY
N....ME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION:
e ~ rwtltel'
MY POSITION IS:
[] EI.E(jIVE
AI>J>OINt I\'E
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B 1X fl8 s/tt.f 'tfj.
V 1r.1z,
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, chy, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board,
council, commission, aUlhority. or commillee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented
wilh a voting conniel of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a connict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form
before completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
.'....") A person holding elective or appointive count)'. municip.'ll, or olher local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure
.', ,.': which inures to his special private gain. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited (rom knowingly voting on a measure
which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained (including the parent
organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he is retained); to the special private gain of a relative; or to the special
private g{lin of a business associale. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357. F.S.. and
officers of independent special tu districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibiled from voting in that capacity.
For purposes of this law. a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son. daughter. husband. wife, father-in-law. mother-in.
law. son-in-law. and daughter-in-law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property. or corpora Ie shareholder (where lhe shares of the
corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the siluations described above. you must disclose the connict:
PRIOR TO TH E VOTE BEl NG T A K EN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on
which you are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this (orm with the person responsible (or
recording the minutes of the meeting. who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However.
you must disclose the nature of the connict before making any attempt to influence the decision. whether orally or in writing and
whether made by you or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY AlTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH
THE VOTE WLL BE TAKEN:
. You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt 10 inOuence the decision) with the person responsible for
recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes.
· A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
· The (orm must be read publicly atlhe next meeting after the form is filed.
CE fORM ID. 10.91
1'.I\,CjE I
'. I < , , . ",0,'.',' ,..,.<
~:~":',, :,.\,_1, \" '<";',', .: ~". ~. ,</,,-, .'):, ,( ..'. t :>":"1 '! ,,' " i', '....
." "."'~". '.,'."::'..".'~:"',:,'~,"'..":.":"..'.:'.:": ....\.-.;: '. -' . ',~::. <",,:'.: .:,:,: ,,e,.,,,, ',.' ";,. ;., .,
.' ~. ~ ." , '<:' ':';' ". ',',:..:, '.: ,c\ ; +, ~ . , .. ' ,._. . . . ,
'....1.\:: '.' "'~ ',.., ~,.':::',~','\":d\':'j.." j ...~:..: ~,::.,' '."'"1"' '" . '. ..
:-':.>..,~.~,:',:';:.."'!'/'. :.:.,... ..,:..:,<:.,.:;-"";:'=<;:,.:.::<>>,.;:...:'.:.".:.~<~:~ ':':':?I:.;.,::::.~;~>"'::.:'::.:'~.;;.'. , ....,
~ .. ,/... ,.,' .' , . ~,r~,.." .;c:. . , 1\ ....... ,I,... .
" ..'.'. ,,'J': .,::.",;., .'. :.;. " . ..>1::.;1',.::.:': J."I,,'
,. I'. '.f![ '.." .." 't.
:: ".F,:':,:;:. . :\',.
/ .l" \
r;" ',"
.':':,1
.()'.:;..,\,::::
"",
:'. ,;.,- ./
.. ~ '.'
., I"
,..', "'" '>,\'"
, .
. \.c
.': I
",', ,
.' . ~ (,
;'." , I..;
';, '. "', '
. ,
" <:
, ,
,"
" . ; (..
. ~ ~
.{
.\'.:. ,..
.'"f:
.1,
',. t "
"
IF YOU MAKE NO AlTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DEC(~ION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION ATTHE MEETING:
· You must disclose orally the nature of your connict in the measure before participating.
· You must complete the form and file it within I S days after the vote occurs with t~e person responsible for recording the minutes of
the mecling, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be providcd immediately to the 01.\1&.t:
members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. r-"
I.
f( tf) IJ
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
/JIct y /1-
/
, 19 rct :
,'ihlt/;'I
.herebyd~clo~~aton
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
_ inured to my special private gain;
_ inured to the special gain of my business associate,
_ inured to the special gain of my relative,
.K- inu~ed to the special gain of Cl9/lt/CJ-e", fiC(/ ~ //en-l-
whom I am retained; or
_ inured to the special gain of
is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of k connicting interest in the measure ~.a1ollows: f
r: 6 aJl,., e t/;;, -es elf) &VOl' ft!)f q, e aMfe:r: liJ r t)
4ff /:c.&(.1'/ I.
, by
, which
rA€-
....,;r"-"-.
,
"
~ tY<cie.1I V q ~ -L(fjJ .
Wl(n €r ~ f) /))vJdS6\'1 n Jdvtr1j
S Vc S' I nc .
jL 5}Jf
~1/1(qc(
Date: Filed
~~
Signature
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES ~112.317 (1991), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED
DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAYBE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOW!,
IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUcrIOI~
SALARY. REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED S5,000.
CE FORM 88. 10.91
rAGE 2