09/11/1997 (2)
~,'.. .~-.~...,: ,r.,,:,.' ~"..",'. 1..:./,."..,',:'.'.:. '.,..:..........,~:..':..:':'\ :f'".::.:. r.' ,~.. : '4.".:" ',.:. ..'.'" . I ..' :'. " ...." ......:,
'. 'f ~ . '
t'
T' I.
, .'
~ '.' ,. .
, j, ..
'1' I'. ,..:
,.:':i: ~:.': ~ : ": : '::'\(~:";:; ""': '.'?~~'..;...f;(~'~:~.:,l~~:l ~'"
, h.' -( )1\.-\
. '<.' . . : .. '.J.' ;'~". .'i.. ('... I :" I". , >, r
, I
DCAB
Development Code Adjustment Board
Minutes'
,D"ate
SeptC:\,^-\n~
\ \
\091
)
,~l~
'f ' .,
, "
,I,
" , '.1
I,
~~-~ ~.,...~,:.::7~~~::~~-':"~.~~~.~~..~: .;,..... .--..':"::.r~---.....'-7~~_I._..._~I.-~__.L&..._M--.-..'
.. \.i; JJ '::r~-J: ...~... ~:'I~"Ll~.~
I" '''i:,~.~)ju'. .,I.J.:,.I.,n:t;..... 1..,11}V
..~Ji1,l"ii~ :.,." '. .~c'.': '~\'V~L":'C.ll' ,fi~.'!'F ,;..~
-i1:J.Xfi/.'.."'l,c" :o'q.." 'v'h..~',~' I>
Ilj;.-~,.; ,.I.;'.J+~~c~~~ j'~;~'., ,~., ~"!'-~~<..'\ ...':. ::.
......~~"..,,~~...;:~~.ij'2'.~.~fV '1If\-..:,;o2>~ ~'.';"\L' /;1l1..;<'....;~.:..;'; \ ~
'. ' . · ."l~l 1'\oI;,~'iG;rI-'};.'~.r:a,~IDtt~fr /.fi~l:N l;.~7 ':.
, ,:~:
,.
.....
.. ,
~
I
.',,:/
~. I
"i~, ,~
.. :'
.'..,.
,~. ,
~.. "~: ~
""',:
,
~ ,.~ ,:-
"c~1
",'
, "
"
, "
.,..,
,','"
) . ,~
/ .i
H' ~ I'
. :. ~l "t'
"'':7'::'
, ~ . ,
,'i,
. ,:~ ,
....,..'
.. ~..'
"">'
: ::'"
., .
.'
'; ',: ~
. ',".~ I
"',~:' ,
"".
. ,
:, ~""
',' ,:c; ~
';:, ~ :(i.:
;'1..
.~ ~j ~:,'
.J.:, ~
.'.,
. I..
:~;: ~/
~:)
,:~::.).'.
.1':;
, ".
~, '.
',:E~'~:{
',.'J'.
\ ,'t
::; ~,~~:,
. of" .~"
:,:: ~'~:j'
<:./
,:. 't'
'/,~;<
::,i:;',.:
~ I ,,: .'
. ".="
".'",
.', .
<"; .'
, '.
'".;
't: ';
,',,' '.
,in :.
'.,' ,~ :. ~
. '.'
, . ~i '~ '
. I'..'
\."
" .
d.'!',;t
.'. ~,
o
\~c"':,~
:.. "".
".
"."
......"\',.:
'....
. /'....,
. .,'
. .~ '. :
:' ,',~
"'.
"
':.
i.,
DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT BOARD - ACTION AGENDA
Thursday, September 11, 1997
Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
C. New Variance Requests
C1. Nadine R. Smith the structural setback variance required to permit a screen enclosure
within the structural setback from a street right-of-way (Arlington Place) at
2248 Hemerick Place, Palmetto Terrace, Blk 8, Lot 6/ zoned RS 8 (Single Family
Residential). VR 97-53
ACTION: Approved subject to the following conditions: 1) These variances are based
on the variance application and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans,
surveys, and other documents submitted in support of the applicant's variance request.
Deviation from any of the above documents submitted in support of the variance request
regarding the work to be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the
site, will result in these variances being null and of no effect; 2) The requisite building permit(s)
shall be obtained within one year from the date of this public hearing; and 3) Foundation
plantings shall be provided to soften the encroachment of the porch into the setback area.
Specifically, landscaping shall be installed on the northwest and northeast sides of the
porch within 30 days after completion of the porch.
C2. Church of Scientoloay/Flaq Service Oraanization, Inc. (Sandcastle Retreat) the rear
waterfront setback variance required to permit an enclosed deck within the rear
waterfront structural setback from Clearwater Harbor at 200 North Osceola Ave., See
9-29-15, M&B 43.07, zoned UC(B) (Urban Center Bayfront). VR 97-55
ACTION: Approved subject to the following conditions: 1) These variances are based
on the variance application and documents submitted by the applicant, including mapsj plans,
surveysj and other documents submitted in support of the applicant's variance request.
Deviation from any of the above documents submitted in support of the variance request
regarding the work to be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the
site, will result in these variances being null and of no effect; 2) The requisite building permit(s)
shall be obtained within one year from the date of this public hearing; and 3) An affidavit
authorizing James Bond to represent the applicants shall be submitted to Central Permitting.
C3. University Hiah Eauitv Real Estate Fund -11/Jean F. Shellina, TRE/TM Clearwater
Realty. L TO (Lowe's) for the following variances (1) the structural setback variance
required to permit a new building within the structural setback from the North side
property line; (2) the structural setback variance required to permit a new building
within the structural setback from a right~of~way (Enterprise Rd); and (3) for a fence
height variance to allow fences to exceed the maximum height of 6 ft at
26990 US 19 N, See 30~28~ 16, M&B 31.04, 31.03 and part of 31.02, zoned CC
(Commercial Center). VR 97-56
ACTION: Approved subject to the following conditions: 1) These variances are based
on the variance application and documents submitted by the applicant. including maps. plansj
surveys, and other documents submitted in support of the applicant's variance request.
Deviation from any of the above documents submitted in support of the variance request
regarding the work to be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the
DCAB ACTION 1 09/11/97
" l",
.. ;':::.'~'.';:;'./(i" .f' i>:":: :"~ '4,> ......,.. , ...... ,~;;", ": . ." ..... '. : ....'... ',;:. ",:
.l:~\.'9"f'i-
,~: ~ ~:':' :':"~/:';;
, I
, :,' :',~:"~~\:; ;W;~~:);;~"\'r'~;! ;: ';',< "C,; .' . :
I,. ' \,'t,:
I :. ,', -". ~. '" " " ,
"
~
, ". -I,"
~
. . ~ (..
site, will result in' these variances being null and of no effect; and 2) The requisite building
permit(s) shall be obtained within one year from the date of this public hearing; 3) A landscape
buffer averaging at least 10 feet in width shall be provided adjacent to the Enterprise Rd.
right-of-way; 4) Upon review of the site plan by the Development Review Committee, City
staff shall carefully evaluate the architectural detail and landscaping to ensure that a
pleasant view of this property is provided' from Enterprise Road; and 5) The fence around
the storage area shall be 10 feet in height; the fence around the garden area shall be
20 feet in height.
Minutes Approval..;. August 28. 1997 ~- Approved as submitted
Board and Staff Comments - Discussion
,1. Election of Officers - Re-elected Otto Gans as Chair; William Schwab as Vice Chair
Adjournment - 2:10 p.m.
o
o
.t.... ,
DCAB ACTION
2
09/11/97
{jNr:~~"..~,;;}~/'\:!:~~C;' :':';
, :'.. "~:: " ,,'..:' '. :' .', ~' ,~ . :':' \' : ~ ~,. j ~' ,., f'. ~'. .;,..' ~ ~ .'..: :', /. .: _.J.~:": . : ~ . -.' . . ~" '; " . . ..... ',' : .' 't ,. " " ~' . .' : ,.J ~ : 'r' .. \.,' ',' '1,", i ' , ~: "..'. :"", , " , ... , .. ,'. . ~ '.
, .
., ,
~
DEVELOPMENT CODe ADJUSTMENT BOARD
CITY OF CLEARWATER
September 11, 1997
Present:
Otto Gans
William Schwob
William Johnson
Mark Jonnatti
Ron Stuart
Chair
Vice Chair
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Leslie Dougall-Sides
John Richter
Gwen Legters
Assistant City Attorney
Senior Planner
Board Reporter
The meeting was called to order at 1 :00 p.m. in City Hall, followed by the Invocation,
Pledge of Allegiance, meeting procedures and explanation of the appeal process.
To provide continuity for research, items are listed in agenda order although not necessarily
discussed in that order. .
C. New Variance Re.quests
tM.if6
'~?~1'
C1. Nadine R. Smith the structural setback variance required to permit a screen enclosure
within the structural setback from a street right-at-way (Arlington Place) at
2248 Hemerick Place, Palmetto Terrace, Blk B, lot 6, zoned AS 8 (Single Family
Residential). VR 97-53
Mr. Richter presented background information and written staff recommendations, stating
the applicant wishes to build a new screen porch on the north side of the single family home.
He detailed the property location, site conditions, and setback requirements. Staff felt
conditions support the request and recommended approval with three conditions.
Nadine Smith, the owner/applicant, stated she has owned her home for 19 hears. She
wishes to screen the porch to enhance outdoor enjoyment.
,0
No verbal or written support or opposition was expressed.
Member Schwab moved to grant the variance as requested because the applicant has
substantially met all of the standards for approval as listed in Section 45.24 of the land
Development Code, subject to the following conditions: 1) This variance is based on the
variance application and documents submitted by tha applicant, inclUding maps. plans, surveys,
and other documents submitted in support of the applicant's variance request. Deviation from
. any of the above documents submitted in support of the variance request regarding the work to
be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in this
variance being null and of no effect; and 2) the requisite building permit(s) shall be obtained
within one year from the date of this public hearing; and 3) Foundation plantings shall be
provided to soften the encroachment of the porch into the setback area. Specifically,
landscaping shall be installed on the northwest and northeast sides of the porch within 30 days
after completion of the porch. The modon was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
mdc09a97
1
09/11/97
.:' ..(....:..:'.._' ;',.',.-,'.....";. ;",: ',':. '..;':'.:;<;:'.\:>\.',:,;.:i,':,':.::.i::',\.:~~'::';..<:.,'::..~::.:.;:.\.L..-: .::.::.:>.",..:..:.'.: .~'...,':.:.<:\:.:.:>.:.:.<,<...:''';..'.'.~',':'.".,;~,~',>'~.:': ;.<..~.,.:., ,.:, .,: '.. ':,,'" ,.. ",.,;: "
.'.".' . ' ,.. \', ,..,'.. '.l~I.' :',.' .,-..", ,."., ':'". t-~-.. . \." \':"
, . ,0'.' "\..' ,"l' a . . ,....; '.',~ ,,' .f ',., I~ '.~\. ,>' ,,~','
<,t.
t1
/1,'
,'.
:: l~
I( ,
,.
.,e,
" .
"', ~
'.'.
~<:.:
:.,:.t"
,'II'",
':";',
"'.
~'. ~ " ; .
'.', , ..
: ;:'.
~:': ,:
:'.':"
~ ... ,
~ '~..:~,
.: "
~;~!;:
...' '~'{
.~.~ ~ ,;
. '. \':
,'>I~'
I'...
. ~ ,.
;{. ~,:'
~~~':<
..'J
.,
,\ ~ ...
'," ,
~ . ~ \
.~ ;'
;. i;:~
" ,
.~' i ~r.
. .,..
""41,
.i,'.
,. ,
. , ~ '.
':"..'
.';';;,
" "
:':. .1
,':1.".
\. '0,
.~~\! :,. '
. ,
", I
'1\<.:.;
',.:';::;.
. :.~"
;1...,
~:) :
. ~ ' ;
..' ,
I'. .
:~1.,: ;
'. ,
,..,...
I.t.,.:
.:,
, ,} '. ~ '
"
~:: '.. '
:-. .~'
. ..
'.':,..:
.;'j.
.~':.. l.
o
\,{'"
I.',
-:1,'
"
',"',IJ
.;,'.
','\ .,.'.'.,
C2. Church of Scientoloav/Flag Service Orqanization. Inc. (Sandcastle Retreat) the rear
waterfront setback variance required to permit an enclosed deck within the rear
waterfront structural setback from Clearwater Harbor at 200 North Osceola Ave., Sec
9-29-15, M&B 43.07, zoned UC(B) lUrban Center Bayfront). VR 97-55
Mr. Richter presented background information and written staff recommendations, stating
the applicants wish to enclose an existing deck for use as part of an existing restaurant, on the
west side of the property near the sea wall. He detailed property location, parking and setback
requirements. Staff felt conditions support approval of the request and recommended approval
with two standard conditions. In response to questions, Mr. Richter said the intent of the
waterfront setback requirement is aesthetic, to preserve open space and view. Flood plain
requirements to do apply to this proposal.
James Bond spoke on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Bond was advised to will need to file an
affidavit of authorization with the Central Permitting Department allowing him to speak for the
applicants. He submitted an artist's rendering of the proposed enclosure, stating standard
commercial grade construction will be used. The deck floor will be elevated to match the
restaurant floor level. The deck is to be completely enclosed for a more exclusive dining area.
Another deck often used by parishioners exists to the south of the restaurant. He explained the
multiple uses in the restaurant, for courserooms, counseling, and dining. The restaurant is a
part of the religious retreat and will not be open to the general public. He explained setback
requirements to not allow for expansion of any other part of the restaurant. He responded to
questions regarding use of the south deck.
No verbal or written support or opposition was expressed.
Member Johnson moved to grant the variance as requested because the applicant has
substantially met all of the standards for approval as listed in Section 45.24 of the land
Development Code, subject to the following conditions: 1) These variances are based on the
variance application and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys,
and other documents submitted in support of the applicant's variance request. Deviation from
any of the above documents submitted in support of the variance request regarding the work to
be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in these
variances being null and of no effect; 2) The requisite building permit{s) shall be obtained within
one year from the date of this public hearing; and 3) An affidavit authorizing James Bond to
represent the applicants shall be submitted to Central Permitting. The motion was duly
seconded cmd carried unanimously.
In response to questions, Mr. Bond said he will submit his affidavit of authorization within
seven days.
C3. University HiQh Equity Real Estate Fund -11/Jean F. Shellinq, TRErrM Clearwater Realtv,
L TO (Lowe's) for the following variances (11 the structural setback variance required to
permit a new building within the structural setback from the North side property line; (2)
the structural setback variance required to permit a new building within the structural
setback from a right-of-way (Enterprise Rd); and (3) for a fence height variance to allow
fences to exceed the maximum height of 6 ft at 26990 US 19 N, Sec 30-28-16, M&B
31.04, 31.03 and part of 31.02, zoned CC (Commercial Center). VR 97-56
mdc09a97
2
09/11/97
,.,
.,
~ ~':
"."
....:
,~
.
Mr. Richter presented background information and written staff recommendations, stating
the applicant proposes to redevelop an existing shopping center with a new Lowe's home
building supply store. He detailed setback and fence height requirements in relation to the
proposal. Staff felt conditions support the request and recommended approval with four
conditions. In response to questions, Mr. Richter clarified locations of new fences, stating he
did not see a problem with adding a condition specifying the proposed fence heights. He
affirmed a good portion of the existing shopping center is being torn down to accommodate the
new store.
.,"
',.;:
'. "
,,:
".,1.".
"
,.
,\ >;
,.::
',: ~'
Ed Armstrong, attorney representing the applicants, outlined the applicant's proposal to
purchase the portion of the shopping center immediately south of an existing K-Mart store, and
demolish the existing structures. An existing gas station, seafood restaurant, and medical clinic
will remain on their respective outparcels. He submitted three color photographs of a
completed center in Tampa, to give the flavor of the proposal. The applicant will seek
conditional use approval for an outdoor garden center. He detailed the business and commercial
uses existing in the surrounding area.
. :,!,
.'\.
.C.."
.Lq
:. ".:
:'.'.."
,">',.
:,'}'.
;', ': ~
,'"
".,.....
Steve Henry, with the engineering firm representing the applicant, referred to a site survey.
He pointed out where buildings will be demolished, what will remain, how the Lowe's building
will be situated, site access, landscaping and stormwater retention. He responded to questions
regarding the increase from 40 foot to 60 foot setbacks along Enterprise Road, changing from
angled to 90 degree parking, and property ownership. He stated sufficient parking will exist for
all businesses on the site, including the outparcels. He responded to questions regarding
vehicular access, and traffic circulation. He said driveway width was reduced to accommodate
a sidewalk and ten foot landscaping buffer on site. The sidewalk could not be placed in the
(:, right-of-way without reconfiguring existing drainage ditches.
Tom Wilkinson, site assessment manager for Lowe's, responded to questions regarding
driveway width, loading and unloading, storage bays, staging, lumber areas, and general
storage.
, .',
.,
.., ,,:.~
~ L. . .
.tt ~
:;'::
:::'.~.:
, I ~ .'
" i;
:,' ':.\
.' ,
'.,
)':",
,"',"
" '..~:'
"0'
,>'1~' i
" .
pl.
!,! ':.r
'10 _ ~ ~
General discussion ensued regarding attention to architectural detail, ensuring a pleasant
view from Enterprise Road, and installing signage oriented toward Enterprise Road. Board
members noted the project is ambitious, and long overdue. Mr. Henry related the history of
home improvement centers in Florida. Staff was requested to coordinate an overall site
improvement effort with the principals of this location.
"..'
::,';,'.,
. ';i'
..,".;
.. ~.. I
::;.~ ~~ ~
~, .. ~ i
1,\:,<
.:,'...
',~' ..'
';,.;.'
;:;::.:'
'j.-
~ ,:
.:
Mr. Armstrong summarized the proposal is consistent with existing development, is an
appropriate and fair addition to the community, and the proposed fences are extensions of the
building consistent with other home improvement centers in the City. He noted only a parking
garage and two retention ponds are south of the subject property. He clarified for the record,
the applicant is requesting a ten foot high fence for the rear storage area, where a four foot
fence is allowed. A 20 foot high fence is requested to enclose the proposed garden center
where a six foot fence is allowed. The applicant was cautioned to avoid unapproved storage
and display outside the fences.
,~ " ':'!
,':":,
.,',,',,'
;' ';:". ~
. :':~'.:
No verbal or written support or opposition was expressed.
~. I
.,..c.
"'c
o
mdc09a97
3
09/11/97
" ,
, ,
.. I
., ,
:',. .
. ,t.~..
T. , , , ~<. '.'
'. ~..... v.,.~_"l"l';,."";~,.,.,..., :' "> t;.,"~ '.
'j'
,.
.' .' ~
'" ' .:. ~.; II . I .
r)
..;~
(,~
~
,.
, . ~ .,~ " ~ .~
, .'
One member indicated the setback variances are appropriate for a commercial property.
While the fences are of greater magnitude than normally seen, the proposal does not encroach
as far into the Enterprise Road right-of-way as the K-Mart structure.
Member Schwab moved to grant the variance as requested because the applicant has
substantially met all of the standards for approval as listed in Section 45.24 of the land
Development Code, subject to the following conditions: 1) These variances are based on the
variance application and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps. plans, surveys,
and other documents submitted in support of the applicant's variance request. Deviation from
any of the above documents submitted in support of the variance request regarding the work to
be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in these
variances being null and of no effect; and 2) The requisite building permit(s) shall be obtained
within one year from the date of this public hearing; 3) A landscape buffer averaging at least
10 feet in width shall be provided adjacent to the Enterprise Rd. right-of-way; 4) Upon
review of the site plan by the Development Review Committee, City staff shall carefully
evaluate the architectural detail and landscaping to ensure that a pleasant view of this
property is provided from Enterprise Road; and 5) The fence around the storage area shall
be 10 feet in height; the fence around the garden area shall be 20 feet in height. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Minutes Approval - August 14, 1 997
Member Schwab moved to approve the minutes as submitted in writing to each member
by the Board Reporter. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Board and Staff Comments
Ms. Dougall-Sides reported the City Commission has approved appealing the Ken Marks
case to circuit court.
Election of Officers
Member Johnson moved to re.elect Mr. Gans as Chair and Mr. Schwab as Vice Chair until
Mr. Gans term on the board expires January 31, 1998. The motion was duly seconded and
carried unanimously. Otto Gans and William Schwab were declared re-elected as Chair and
Vice Chair, respectively.
Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 2:10p.m.
Chair$~ #
Development Code Adjustment Board
Attest:
1h~J ,:~;~
Board Reporter . :;
mdc09a97
4
09/11/97
> ~ ~,.', ~. .
, .,