11/18/1997 (2)
,,' :,t;(;;j~:iiJ! c.::
, I' .".,' I
" '"
"',
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING _ ACTION AGENDA
Tuesday, November 18, 1997
Call To Order, Invocation, Pledge Of Allegiance
Minutes Approval - October 21, 1997 - Approved as submitted
B. Requests for Extension, Deferred and Continued Items
B1. (cont. from 11/4/97) CamDbell land ComDanv to permit (1) vehicle sales, (2) vehicle
service, and (3) outdoor retail sales, displays, andlor storage at 1600 Sunshine Dr, Sec
12-29-15, M&B 12.01, zoned IL (Limited Industrial}. CU 97~61
ACTION: Approved subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall ensure
the requisite occupational license for any uses on the property shall be obtained within six
months from the date of this public hearing; and 2) The vehicles stored on the southeast
side of the property may be stacked no higher than six feet high and shall be screened from
view by a minimum three foot wide landscaping strip, subject to approval by the City
Engineer for areas within the rights-of~way, within six months from the date of this public
hearing.
C. Conditional Uses
~:)
C1. Ravmond P. Cassano (Willow Garden U.B.O. dba Auto Services & Arc Rent~a-Car) to
permit outdoor retail sales, 'displays and lor storage and vehicle service at 200 N Ft
Harrison Ave, Hayden's Estate Revised, Lot 1 and part of Lot 4 and * vac alley, zoned
UC[C] (Urban Center Core). CU 97-66
ACTION: Approved subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall obtain
the requisite occupational license within 90 days from the date of this public hearing.
C2. Tone 40 Ltd. (Dynamic Reproductions) to permit manufacturing and
wholesalingldistributing at 639 Cleveland St, Magnolia Park, Blk 20, Lot 13 and part of
Lot 2, zoned UC[C] (Urban Center Core). CU 97-67
ACTION: Approved subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall obtain
the requisite occupational license within 90 days from the date of this public hearing.
C3. Jami AI Salam. Inc. to permit vehicle sales and vehicle service at 1331 Cleveland St,
Revised Plat of Brookwood Terrace, Blk 6, Lots 3-8 and part of Lots 1, 2, 9-13 and %
vac street, zoned CG (General Commercial). CU 97-68
ACTION: Approved subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall obtain
the requisite occupational license within 90 days from the date of this public hearing; and
2) All proposed site lighting shall be directed downward, away from street rights-of-way and
other properties.
'u
pzect11 b.97
1
11/18/97
J ..'
.'
.
, . ,.""
',!" 'i"";;"," j';'>,:::,,';::\i> ::~U: ;;i\: .,' · '. .' . . ." .,.
:,; " :.' i ',,: ':':~;::~~:~~;:;:, ,::,',
.. I. " 4 ~.~ [ :. . I .' '.: ,~~ c::. '
~
..'r
,.
.:.' l .
,. ."
" '
I':'
,::>
,.'
"
o
.f ".
.'
; :'
'" .I
. <: ~ :;. ~'
; ; ~ t ;.
~.' ,
"Ii'
.", ..:':
,.'I. ..
, ,
" "
" '
. '..',
J
,0,
. Ijj
, ,
,"
. ....
, '
. ,
'"
~ ' ' ,
~ ~ ;..' . ~
'.: .','- ~ . . ~ r.
',', '.
>:.".',
, ,
" ,"
': "
'"
C4. Dominick A.& Karin S. lentrlcchia IPagano Auto Detail) to permit vehicle service (paint
and auto body) at 1200 N Myrtle Ave, First Addition to Palm Bluff, part of Lot i7,
together with Enghurst Addition, Lots 33-36, zoned CI llnfi1l Commerciall. CU 97-69
ACTION: Approved subject to conditions #1-#3 and #5-#8 imposed December 13,
1994 as follows: 1) The requisite occupational license shall be obtained within six months
following the date of this public hearing: 2} The applicant shall meet all supplementary
conditions of approval for vehicle service as provided in Section 41.053(30) of the City Land
Development Code; 3) There shall be no outdoor service or storage; 5) The site shall meet all
Sanitation Division requirements at all times; 61 All parts, used tires and other materials used
in the conduct of the business shall be stored indoors; 7} No vehicle service shall be
conducted between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., Mondays through Saturdays and
all day on Sundays; and 8) All site lighting shall be directed away from adjoining residential
properties; PLUS the following new' condition: #9) The applicant shall secure the requisite
building permit and occupational license within 6 months of the date of this public hearing
for the proposed paint and body shop.
D. Annexation, Zoning, land Use Plan Amendment, land Development Code Text
Amendment. and Local Planning Agency Review
01.#1 North McMullen Booth Road, Sec. 16-29-16, M&B's 21.16,21.17, & 21.18.
(Bricks Management & Real Estate Development) Z 97-09
ZONE: From RPD 5.8 to RPD 7.5 {Residential Planned Development)
ACTION: Endorsed to the City Commission by a vote of 4-1.
02. 1345 - 1357 Pierce Street, Tagarelli Sub, Blk 3, Lots 1-4, inclusive the West 34 ft of
Lot 5 (Tampa Bay Community Development Corporation) Z 97-10
ZONE: From RM 12 to ~PD 11 (Residential Planned Development)
ACTION: Endorsed to the City Commission by a vote of 3-2.
Board and Staff Comments w Discussion
Adjournment -- 5: 14 p.m.
pzact11 b.97
2
.11/18/97
. . '"
','
. " ': . : ' .~ I .'. ,.'
", ~ ):. .'f' .,". . . :0.'
.. E ' ~ ...: I.:, . . '" . .
f' t" .' ,.j. r :',; "
". ,.'. .... /::",.~/i/:"'::.';,:f'. "e':':.!;'<i;):i.,:; :;;:./' .
\,:1,',',. , "
. "
.' :' . ~
'~. : ~; :; /.'::.!. ,: '
:,:', ~. .
, :..
, ..
.:. ..".
,," ,."
',","
,__----A-:~
".;.,';'<"."
" ;~'I', ':. ~,.
. .'.~.'~ ~' :~. .
,'<' ,
':' ~. .'.' ? '",
'"
"
Absent:
Edward Mazur
Robert D. Bickerstaffe
Frank Kunnen
Douglas Hilkert
Gerald Figurski
Vacant Seat
Tony Shoemaker
Leslie Dougall-Sides
Sandy Glatthorn
Steve Doherty
Gwen legters
Brenda Harris Nixon
Chair
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Interim Central Permitting Director
Assistant City Attorney
Planning Manager
Zoning Section Supervisor
Board Reporter
Vice Chair
~
I ". t,
, "
.',' :..1.:." :',
" ',' ,J' '::'\-I . . , ;,., ',.", ~
.. I.. ',: .:J :
I. .~~ ',: ':, : .~. l," : \ ~ :
.' ~'. i :p, I' . +.' '~""I':"'- c 0.,1...' '" .
. . ~ \ :', I ~. :,~ :, ',', .. ~ .'
. I . . ~ <' . '. ..~. \".
~ . '.' L \ I, .'
, ,
\',~.~ ,; : :
.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CITY OF CLEARWATER
November 18, 1997
Present:
The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. in CIty Hall, followed by the Invocation,
Pledge of Allegiance, meeting procedures and the appeal process.
To provide continuity for research, items are listed in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that order.
Minutes Approval - October 21, 1997
o
Member Figurski moved to approve the minutes as submitted to each member in
writing by the Board Reporter. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
B. Requests for Extension, Deferred and Continued Items
81. (cont. from 10/21 & 11/4/97) Camobell land Comoany to permit (1) vehicle sales, (2)
vehicle service, and (3) outdoor retail sales, displays, andlor storage at 1600 Sunshine
Dr, Sec 12-29-15, M&B 12.01, zoned IL (Limited Industrial). CU 97-61
This item was continued from two previous meetings for the applicant to submit a site
plan adequate to address the issues. The Encore Vehicles, Inc. business refurbishes
vehicles for resale 'to automotive dealerships as a permitted use. The conditional use is
needed to allow the applicant to sell the remanufactured vehicles on site and perform
occasional car repairs within the building. Staff felt conditions support the request and
recommended approval with two conditions.
o
Max G. Battle, representing the property owner, related history of the property's use
and zoning. He expressed concern this request has been delayed twice due to confusion
regarding whether the use is grandfathered for the property. He stated the owner has no
problem with staff's recommended conditions, with clarifications. He felt a time limit for
obtaining the occupational license should not be imposed on the conditional use requested
by the property owner because the occupational license is the tenant's responsibility. He
requested clarification of the landscaping in condition #2. He stated the applicant will plant
I
mpz11~.97
1
11/18/97
I
;'1': 1
. . 1- ~ I .,""..
~
"."."
Ie'
~ :c
,',
(5
'~".'< ".
"'H"'
." .t'
~ '~, ".:
.: ,".i:
',;,..'
.:r
,',
" ~./
'\ "
.. "'
.:.....
e."'
,'''!jl.
o
'..
, .'
,,'
'1
,.,....:.;:.
,.: I'.:
., .:,.",
" ,
r','
'. "
landscaping materials outside the fence in conformance with City code with regard to
species, size and spacing. The plants will be allowed to grow and become an Integral part
of the chain link fence to screen and beautify Sunshine Drive.
In response to questions, Mr. Doherty and Ms. Glatthorn explained code requirements
for landscaping along the fence line and around the storage area, stating it is hoped the
shrubbery will be allowed to grow to six feet in height to screen the stacked vehicles. In
response to a question, Mr. Battle said the property owner can ensure, through lease
provisions, that the tenant complies with the maximum stacked vehicle height requirement.
Discussion ensued regarding parking, ingress, supplementary regulations for landscaping
design along the right-of-way, and whether there is adequate space to plant a tree along
the entrance drive. Mr. Battle understood the City Engineer must approve the landscaping
plan.
No verbal Of written support or opposition was expressed.
Discussion ensued regarding the request with concerns being expressed that abundant
landscaping should not be needed at this location within an industrial park.
Member Bickerstaffe moved to approve Item B1, deleting staff's recommended
condition #1 requiring occupational license acquisition within six months. There was no
second.
Member Kunnen moved to approve Item B1, amending condition #1 to indicate the
tenant must obtain the occupational license; amending condition #2 regarding landscaping
, to delete the width requirement and add a minimum six foot height requirement; and adding
a third condition. Lengthy discussion ensued regarding shrubbery requirements, whether
the Planning and Zoning Board may impose conditions on tenants, and whether the tenant
should be required to extend the hedge along the entire length of the property. As
discussion progressed, Member Kunnen explored several amendments to his motion.
One member questioned legal basis for conditioning approval to require a continuous
landscaping buffer, expressing concern applicants should not be required to exceed code
requirements simply because they are willing to do so. Mr. Shoemaker explained a City
Commission goal is to beautify the community as much as possible. When applicants are
willing to exceed minimum standards, it is encouraged and a recommendation is forwarded
to the board. One member felt encouragement should not be put in the form of a condition
which becomes a requirement. Mr. Battle said the property owner supports leaving the
landscaping provisions in the form of a condition to facilitate enforcement of his lease
agreement. Ms. Glatthorn clarified providing parking along the property line requires
meeting the landscaping code. If the applicant chooses to move parking away from the
property line, landscape buffering requirements will not apply. In response to a question,
Assistant City Attorney Dougall-Sides stated the conditional use runs with the property,
not the tenant.
Member Kunnen amended to motion on the floor to retain condition # 1 as
recommended by staff, amending condition #2 with regard to the vehicles stored on the
southeast side of the property. The motion was duly seconded. Members Bickerstaffe,
mpz11~.97
2
11/1 B/97
,~ '. '
. .~, ",.. .
.' "
~---~--
, ,,' .' '::',:,\:;' ::<:.:.;:':,::.<,.....,~,~\,~.:.<,.,;,,:-::~.~:'.:,:;.,..
.........\,.,,;:.:?:..:':,'";,..\,:::.'..,'~"::., ',," ':," ....:: >:,' '. ','
\:~~:\:" \ ~,~,..~.'..:..I..~....,.. ., . 't. "
..'
"~I,' .'~, ,:,.:.:.:.,:',I......,.,.:/..~ ..' I ,.~. .,..' . ~
, " ;., ,', ~'. . I" :''':'::'. I: '.:' ~ L,
":.'\';;'.,,' .' '..........: :':, .~ '.:..::;::X:~...:~:~:>;. ":,; ,/}{,;J::,'
",'f >,
...,":,.
.:;:.,
. .;,.,"
, ",i<
.:. f;'
".
. \~
.1
. "
" ,
.. ". ~
. ' . ~
~
Kunnen, and Hilkert and voted UAye;" Members Mazur and Figurski voted UNay." Motion faifed
as four affirmative votes are needed for conditional use approval.
Member Figurski moved to approve Item B1 subject to the following conditions: 1) The
applicant shall ensure the requisite occupational license for any uses on the property shall
be obtained within six months from the date of this public hearing: and 2) The vehicles
stored on the southeast side of the property may be stacked no higher than six feet high
and shall be screened from view by a minimum three foot wide landscaping strip, subject
to approval by the City Engineer for areas within the rights-of-way, within six months from
the date of this public hearing. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
C. Conditional Uses
C1. Ravmond P. Casmmf! lWillow Garden u.s.a. dba Auto Services & Arc Rent-a-Car) to
permit outdoor retail sales, displays and lor storage and vehicle service at 200 N Ft
Harrison Ave, Hayden's Estate Revised, Lot 1 and part of Lot 4 and Y2 vac alley, zoned
UC[C] (Urban Center Core). CU 97-66
Ms. Glatthorn presented background information and written staff recommendations,
listing staff's recommendations for meeting code as part of the staff report. The applicant
wishes to conduct a car rental business, aesthetically improving the property with a new
facade, new parking layout, and landscaping improvements. Staff felt conditions support
the request and recommended approval with one condition.
~~
Michael Ratcliff, representing the applicant, stated the former gas station site has been
an eyesore for a long time. The aesthetic improvements will mirror the 1950's vintage
,design of the Checkers restaurant across the street. He detailed traffic access,
landscaping, and parking requirements.
Member Bickerstaffe moved to approve Item C1, subject to the condition 1) The
applicant shall obtain the requisite occupational license within 90 days from the date of this
public hearing. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
C2. Tone 40 Ltd. (Dynamic Reproductions) to permit manufacturing and
wholesaling/distributing at 639 Cleveland 5t, Magnolia Park, Blk 20, Lot 13 and part of
Lot 2, zoned UC{Cl (Urban Center Core). CU 97-67
Ms. Glatthorn presented background information and written staff recommendations,
listing staff's recommendations for meeting code as part of the staff report. The applicant
wishes to conduct Dynamic Reproductions, a cassette tape reproduction business with
wholesaling and distribution. Staff felt conditions support the request and recommended
approval with one condition. In response to a question, Ms. Glatthorn said code requires
no additional parking for this downtown property.
Richard Tinkelenberg, representing the applicant, stated the proposal will have no
impact on parking, as the site contains adequate parking for the only two people associated
with the business. The facility will produce copies of audiocassette tapes with no retail
sales, noise, pollution, or any other adverse impact.
o
mpz11b.97
3
11/18/97
, II' " ",' .. .~,__~,.__.._..,..." ;,,:'," ' ' ',,' " , ..,' ,,',',', '
"
. . , I. ~~ ,
"
.'
cO,
~
No verbal or written support or opposition was expressed. One citizen questioned whether
manufacturing was appropriate in the downtown area, and how approval could impact
someone else asking for a similar use. Ms. Glatthorn responded other light manufacturing
uses exist in downtown Clearwater.
Member Figurski moved to approve Item C2 as requested, subject to the condition
1) The applicant shall obtain the requisite occupational license within 90 days from the
date of this public hearing. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
C3. Jami AI Salam. Inc. to permit vehicle sales and vehicle service at 1331 Cleveland St,
Revised Plat of Srookwood Terrace, Blk 6, Lots 3-8 and part of Lots 1, 2, 9-13 and %
vac street, zoned CG (General Commercial). CU 97-68
Mr. Doherty presented background information and written staff recommendations,
listing staff's recommendations for meeting code as part of the staff report. The applicant
wishes to add vehicle service and outdoor retail sales to his existing indoor retail vehicle
sales business. Parking lot restriping and landscaping requirements were discussed. Staff
felt conditions support the request and recommended approval with two conditions.
\~
In response to questions, Mr. Doherty said the site lighting condition is part of the
code's general standards for outdoor vehicle sales, for any new lighting. He acknowledged
the site plan and application contain different versions of the site layout. Staff will work
with the applicant on any small adjustments to ensure requirements are met and the
applicant is satisfied. Discussion ensued regarding the maximum number of vehicles
allowed for display, parking requirements and site constraints. It was indicated
handicapped parking is not marked on the site. The large scale plan is only being used as
an illustration of a potential parking layout, and the smaller of the two plans will prevail.
Don McFarland, representing Victor Nicci, stated a contract for sale of the property to
his client is in progress. The property has always been an auto sales/service facility. He
has discussed with the City Engineer site conditions and landscaping the west side of the
property. There is no intention of lighting the property above what already exists. He
agreed with staff's recommended conditions.
No verbal or written support or opposition was expressed.
Member Kunnen moved to approve Item C3 as requested, subject to the following
conditions: 1) The applicant shall obtain the requisite occupational license within 90 days
from the date of this public hearing; and 2) All proposed site fighting shall be directed
downward, away from street rights-of-way and other properties. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
C4. Dominick A. & Karin S. lentricchio (Pagano Auto Detail) to permit vehicle service (paint
and auto body) at 1200 N Myrtle Ave, First Addition to Palm Bluff, part of Lot 17,
together with Enghurst Addition, Lots 33-36, zoned CI (lnfil! Commercial). CU 97-69
Mr. Doherty presented background intormation and written staff recommendations,
listing staff's recommendations for meeting code as part of the staff report. The applicant
()
mpz11b.97
4
11/18/97
,',', ,; ,,::,' :,: ,": ~, :., -..: \ .' , ", ".', ,: ", : ::':;::. ," ':-" ',i' ,': :,,:,., >, ..' -:.,..',: ::", :,,: ,::":' <;/ :,:y ,'... \'.;,;,::.: :~i:~::,:,:: :'~',: ", ':': : ,;: :',.,~,:,< :;:; :,::. <:":':"':'~ :,.,..'::/:':,':,;,:';...: ".::.:::; ".':, ':' :,,;'...:' ,:.'::~>':, ',: :::: :~,;:: ,.~;,,>:\,.~,..;/: :"':,;':':::',:;::>~:,;-\:: \'~.
'_'" ,'" ",' ''',\.."" ,..,. ",' .."'..,~ .'" '~' "" , .. , ',....!,..\,..,. ,
,",:,';'. "," ' \':,' ", ,,":<": '-: ';'" :<' ':': '...>.,:,':,.':,;:..',:/:", :",::( :"\f~":": .:: :,",Q.:';' ,': ..",:<',.. ':' >:", .,;':f.:. '".::.:,<,:':':..::,,~' ;:"...:'/<':.::'.~,<.-::,';,r',,{-\~).: ,:::'}f'
11 ..n . . I .., " ...,'.' I" ".' '. . ., . ' > ~ .' '. . >,. , ". ..' ~," ~ /.. < . '.. ,'.'. ..' {
. ..... ,. j .. . ". . . I." .
I~
,
f~~'
u
.:T oj,t, ; ", .
~< '.' .' i- .
" .
wishes to establish Pagano Auto Detail, a paint and body shop, in conjunction with an
existing vehicle use. Paint and body work was prohibited by condition #4 of a previous
conditional use approval on December 13, 1994. Staff felt conditions support the request
and recommended approval with the December 1 3 conditions less #4, plus a new condition
requiring the paint and body shop occupational license within six months. Discussion
ensued regarding the need to obtain an additional occupational license for the paint and
body work.
Sam Pagano, Jr., the business owner, stated he has been in the body shop business in
Clearwater for more than 20 years. He must move due to losing the lease at his former
location. He will purchase the property instead of leasing so he can remain in the area. He
agreed with staff's recommended conditions, and understood the amount of work that will
be needed to bring the property up to code.
No verbal or written opposition was. expressed. One adjacent commercial property owner
encouraged the board to do everything possible to bring business into the area. He asked for
reconsideration regarding the recommended hours of operation, and welcomed any site lighting
spilling onto his property to discourage crime in the area. It was indicated the hours of operation
are more generous than the applicant requested.
Member Bickerstaffe moved to approve Item C4 as requested, subject to conditions #1-#3
and #5-#8 imposed December 13, 1994 as follows: 1) The requisite occupational license
shall be obtained within six months following the date of this public hearing; 2) The
applicant shall meet all supplementary conditions of approval for vehicle service as provided
in Section 41.053(30) of the City Land Development Code; 3) There shall be no outdoor
service or storage; 5) The site shall meet all Sanitation Division requirements at all times;
6) All parts, used tires and other materials used in the conduct of the business shall be stored
indoors; 7) No vehicle service shall be conducted between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00
a.m., Mondays through Saturdays and all day on Sundays; and 8) All site lighting shall be
directed away from adjoining residential properties; PLUS the following new condition:
#9) The applicant shall secure the requisite building permit and occupational license within
6 months of the date of this public hearing for the proposed paint and body shop. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
D. Annexation, Zoning, Land Use Plan Amendment, Land Development Code Text
Amendment, and Local Planning Agency Review
D1. #1 North McMullen Booth Road, Sec. 16-29-16, M&B's 21.16, 21.17, & 21.18.
(Bricks Management & Real Estate Development) Z 97-09
ZONE: From RPD 5.8 to RPD 7.5 (Residential Planned Development)
Ms. Glatthorn. presented background information and written staff recommendations.
The applicant is requesting a zoning change which will involve substantial revisions to a
site plan certified in 1987. The applicant proposes to rezone and replat vacant lots for fee
simple townhouses located on the west corner of Bayshore Boulevard and John's Parkway.
The proposed rezoning to RPD (Residential Planned Development) would enable
construction of 68 townhouse units. Staff recommended endorsement to the City
Commission of the proposed concept Plan and zoning Atlas Amendment as requested. In
response to questions, it was indicated and RPD requires submission of a concept plan to
mpz111r.97 5 11/16/97
I!:~'~ tlc'/. .1,' ",.'; 1. ~. .
,. ..l., ~:,' I .~..~_......._...-.~..__.,~..'....,~'..._ II, . I ". -I ,.' , ". .., .1 I, .... . , .' ,'.' ';:'
~
the City Commission, and a certified site plan to the DRC IDevelopment Review
Committee.) The concept plan has undergone courtesy ORe review, and will guide what
goes before the ORe in the future. A 24-foot private access easement is under review by
the Engineering Department.
(~
l.~ ,<
Marcus Vernon, prospective purchaser representing the applicant, questioned why
testimony is not sworn for rezoning cases. Ms. Dougall~Sides clarified this hearing is not
Quasi-judicial, but is for the purpose of obtaining the Planning and Zoning Board's
recommendation to the City Commission. For the record, Mr. Vernon objected to the
absence of sworn testimony, feeling the item should be handled as a formal quasi-judicial
hearing according to the Snyder case. He said the neighbors wish to raised a number of
issues which he will address in rebuttal, if necessary and relevant. In response to
questions, Mr. Vernon addressed the nature of vested rights on the property, outlined the
reasons for increasing density from 5.8 to 7.5 units per acre, and submitted copies of the
preliminary site plan. He detailed proposed cleaning of preservation and jurisdictional
wetland areas, creation of upland wildlife habitats, conservation easement and preservation
zoning, incorporation of the proposed 68 townhouse units, and mitigation of drainage
problems. Mr. Vernon responded to questions regarding the extent of the preservation area
in relation to the roadway. He stated the economic benefit of 68 units will offset the
expense of making the necessary environmental improvements to allow the units. He
explained how he proposes to create an upland habitat, reestablishing the mangrove stand.
The current plan was compared to the previous plan and discussion ensued regarding the
proposed encroachment into the wetlands. In response to a concern about addressing
water quality, Mr. Vernon explained at length the problems involved in co-mingling treated
and untreated stormwater runoff. Percolation ponds were proposed as an alternative, but
the location of such a pond is not known.
No verbal or written support was expressed. Attorney Patrick Maguire; representing several
nearby land owners, and contractor David Fellows objected to the item. Concerns were expressed
the proposal represents serious overdevelopment of the property, the preliminary site plan is not
accurate, and increased density is not a valid reason for requesting rezoning. Mr. Maguire
requested continuance of the item to ensure information submitted to the board is correct. Mr.
Fellows displayed a US Geological Survey map, demonstrating at length inconsistencies on the
applicant's preliminary site plan. He expressed concerns regarding drainage systems, erosion, soil
condition, and retention. Concern was expressed staff recommended approval and the Planning
and Zoning Board endorsed the previous application without being shown the reality of site
conditions. Mr. Maguire wished to demonstrate inaccuracies in the application that need to be
addressed before the request is acted upon. He related density calculations, stating increased
density will not enhance the environmental aspect of the property, nor be consistent with the overall
Comprehensive Plan.
Seven nearby residents spoke in opposition to the proposal, expressing concerns with
increased traffic impacts, increased stormwater runoff, flooding, increased density in an already
crowded area, compromising neighborhood Integrity, aesthetics and scale of the new buildings, and
negative Impacts on view and wildlife. One resident moving into the area in 1992 was led to believe
the subject property was not buildable due to preservation zoning. Existing City and County zoning
in the vicinity was discussed. It was indicated 78 signatures had been collected from opposing
resldentst but a petition was not submitted for the record.
o
mpz11".97
6
11/18/97
t}
~~
f ~','f~I;'
(;)
. ,
I
..-
Marcus Vernon responded to the opposition, stating for the record he unequivocally opposed a
continuance. He noted no expert testimony was presented. Addressing traffic impact, he said signal
timing, not traffic volume, is to blame because the road is rated in the C to D range. He discussed
his ideas regarding diverting stormwater runoff through the wetland. He indicated if the proposal
complies with land use standards, the burden is on staff or the opposition to prove the project is not
compatible with its surroundings. He noted the USGS map referenced by Mr. Fellows is not current,
and is an estimation of what was likely to exist. He said misrepresentation was an extremist
characterization, as documentation has been available to the public.
In response to questions, Mr. Vernon stated he is not vested, nor does he intend to imply he is
vested with any State agencies. Discussion ensued regarding accuracy of the site plans used with
regard to water tables and elevations, and rationale for increasing density in calculating the number
of units allowed on the property. Ms. Dougall-Sides did not agree that fitting the maximum number
of units on a site meets land use plan requirements, nor that the burden of proof is on the opponents
or staff. She stated the burden of proof the use is compatible is on the applicants.
Member Bickerstaffe moved to deny endorsement of Item D1 to the City Commission. There
was no second. Board discussion ensued regarding the item.
Member Kunnen moved to endorse Item D1 to the City Commission for 7.5 units per acre. The
motion was duly seconded.
Board discussion resumed and consideration was given to each of the points presented. It was
indicated jfwater quality, traffic volume, density requirements, and standards for approval have been
met, there is no reason to defer the item. While sympathizing the new neighbors who stand to lose
a beautiful view, it was felt "not in my back yard" is not a good reason for denying endorsement.
One member felt the City Commission should know substantial opposition exists to the intensity of
the project, and the public should be protected from this type of development. One member stated
an RPD is the best plan to preserve this particular area.
Upon the vote being taken, Members Mazur, Kunnen, Hilkert and Figurski voted "Aye;"
Member Bickerstaffe voted "Nay." Motion carried.
D2. 1345 - 1357 Pierce Street, Tagarelli Sub, Blk 3, Lots 1.4, inclusive the West 34 ft of
Lot 5 (Tampa Bay Community Development Corporation) Z 97H10
ZONE: From RM 12 to RPD 11 IResidential Planned Development)
Ms. Glatthorn presented background information and written staff recommendations,
stating the applicants are requesting rezoning and replatting of vacant lots to construct
eight affordable single family homes for private ownership by low income families. Staff
felt conditions support the request and recommended endorsement to the City Commission.
In response to questions, Ms. Glatthorn said the site plan has received courtesy DRC
review. The applicants will address concerns about drainage. Concerns were expressed a
14-foot wide asphalt driveway with no sidewalks is inadequate, and cutting corners to
save money should not include sacrificing public safety.
Greg Swartz, TBRPC (Tampa Bay Community Development Corporation) Executive
Director, presented the proposal as outlined by staff. In response to questions, it was
mpz11l..97
7
11/18/97
. ;, j'T .
.' ; ~ . ~l, ,<: :.~~','. 't'.' . :
,.', : ; ',t ,",'. '
,,-,
indicated a representative from General Home Development help develop the design. Board
concerns were expressed with lack of stormwater retention and sidewalks. Ms. Glatthorn
stated this development is unusual because it is a new approach to a small affordable
housing development. The applicant has met extensively with Engineering Department
representatives, who support the request. Sidewalks are provided in front of all but three
homes. Drainage requirements will have to be met. Staff respectfully requested
endorsement.
Member Kunnen moved to endorse Item D2 to the City Commission. The motion was
duly seconded. Members Kunnen, Hilkert and Figurski voted "Aye;tI Members Mazur and
Bickerstaffe voted "Nay." Motion carried.
Board and Staff Comments
Member Mazur expressed concern with being asked to make a recommendation to the
City Commission regarding RPD projects based on nothing more than a concept plan. He
felt it is difficult to determine when the applicant has satisfied requirements. He suggested
use of a SWFWMD map would be helpful.
Member Hilkert praised the new staff report format, where issues regarding code
compliance are written as notes, rather than conditions.
~
f.-rt:d
Member Hilkert announced the Planning and Zoning Board's annual holiday luncheon
will be held at noon on December 16, at the Peppermill restaurant. Staff was requested to
post notice.
Member Bickerstaffe expressed disappointment at having houses squeezed into parcels
to gain the maximum housing for low income families. He supports upgrading existing lots,
but will vote against overcrowding.
Member Figurski requested an opinion from the City Attorney's office regarding the
quasi-judicial hearing issue raised at the beginning of Item D 1 . Ms. Dougall-Sides will
process the request.
Adjournment
, The meeting adjourned at 5: 14 p.m.
air
Planning and Zonin
Attest:
~o6;kJ
o
mpz11h.97
8
11/18/97
'~4.'~~:"':~1 ~:~~:~, ,.,\; :~j,.;""",.~~"p~_,~~_,""""""'J~ .1r............~........ '.__"'fi-.-~.. ,,~~. . .