11/16/1995 (2)
......
~ ~. . ~. .
,:
, "
. 11
T. I. . ,~. . ..' . I I ".
o
h \
~11)
COMMISSION
City Commission Minutes
, ........
, \__J
Date ~. 1'1- 1t9S-
r' - D31
. .
v
l.f,~:', '
~\C ,
,""'
"
ACTION AGENDA. CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION MEETING
Thursday, November 16, 1995 ~ 6:00 P.M. - Chambers
Welcome. We are glad to have you join us. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then
state your llillIl.e and address. Persons speaking before the City Commission on other than Public
Hearing items shall be limited to 3 minutes. No person shall speak more than once on the same
subject unless granted permission by the City Commission. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY
REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING,
SHOULD CALL 813/462-6684.
1 . Invocation
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Service Awards
4. Introductions and Awards
5. Presentations:
a) CNN - Tourism Campaign for Clearwater
& Clearwater beach
6. Approval of Minutes. Regular Meeting
11/2/95 & Special Meeting 10/25/95
(canvass)
1. Commissioner Thomas. (end of meeting}
2. Mayor.
3. 1 award presented.
4. None.
5. Direction for staff to investigate forming
partnerships to pursue advertising on CNN.
6. Approved 11/2/95 as corrected; 10/25/95 as
submitted.
7. Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda
. Jeff Morrey objected to proposed extension of landmark Drive.
.......-"*"'~,
I ;/
........... James Warn~r expressed concern about Sand Key beach renourishment efforts. Requested City
dialogue with County ra protection of exposed seawalls. Plnellas County representative to attend
12/7/95 meeting.
Fred Backland thanked Commission for approving reclaimed water project on Island Estates.
Requested feasibility study re burying power lines at same time.
Herbert Sommerson urged letter writing campaign by citizens and businesses to Governor and
legislature re Sand Key beach renourishment.
Dr. James Carazola expressed concern the City has cut a 30' swath to start the Landmark Drive
extension.
Tom Sehlhorst requested approx. $40,000 waiver in City fees and State surcharges to develop 11
pieces of property.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn-in.
Not Before 6:00 P.M.
Administrative public hearings:
Presentation of issues by City staff.
Statement of case by applicant or representative (5 minutes).
1--11/16/95
1
'"
if..~.." '+.>j . I . \". >
j ,
i
I
,~
,'~ Commission questions.
Comments in support and in opposition 13 minutes per speaker).
Commission questions.
Final rebuttal by applIcant or representative (5 minutes).
Commission disposition
8. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #5922~
95, #5923-95 & #5924-95 - Annexation,
land Use Plan Amendment to Industrial
limited & Il Zoning for property located at
2021 Sunnydale Blvd., Clearwater Industrial
Park, part of lots 6 & 7 (Morgan Tire & Auto
Inc. and Don Olson Tire & Auto Centers, Inc.,
A95-23, lUP95-28)
9. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #5926-
95, #5927-95 & #5928-95 - Annexation,
land Use Plan Amendment to Residential
low & RS-4 Zoning for property located at 7
Dorado Place, Sec. 24-29-15, M&B 11.07
(Roy S. & Renae Sachse, A95-24, lUP95~29)
10. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #5929~
95, #5930-95 & #5931-95 - Annexation,
("""" land Use Plan Amendment to Residential
,~ Urban & RM-a Zoning for property located at
20162 US19, Sec. 18-29-16, M&B 44.04;
and Approve a Transfer of Development
Rights from Parcel 2 (Sec. 18-29-16. M&B
44.04) and Parcel 1 (Sever Park, part of lot
3) to the "main" motel site (Sever Park, all of
Lot 21 (Asa J. & Katherine G. Lewis, A95-25.
LUP95-30)
11. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5909-
95 - Amending Sees. 28.10 & 44.08 to
delete the requirement that signs on vending
machines be regulated as wall signs
8. Approved. Ords. #5922-95. 115923-95 &
#5924-95 passed 1 st reading.
9. Approved. Ords. #5926-95, #5927-95 &
#5928-95 passed 1 st reading.
10. Approved. Ords. #5929~95. #5930-95 &
5931-95 passed 15t reading. Approved
transfer of development rights.
11. Approved as amended. Ord. #5909-95
passed 1 st reading as amended.
Variance & Rezoning public hearings:
Staff states and summarizes reasons for recommendation (2 minutes).
Applicant presents case. Witness may be cross-examined (15 minutes).
Staff presents further evidence. May be cross-examined (10 minutesl.
Public comment (3 minutes per speaker).
City Commission discussion, and may question any witness.
Applicant may call witnesses in rebuttal (5 minutesl.
Conclusion by applicant 13 minutes).
Decision.
U11/16/95
2
l-tJ' ".'" ,.'.. .
~
".12. Variance(s) to Sign Variances for property
located at 2545 NE Coachman Rd., Sec. 7-
29-16, M&B 11.05 IDecade Companies
Income Properties I Town Place Apartments,
5V95-44)
13. Public Heaing & First Reading Ord. #5932-95
- RS-5 Zoning for property located at 2370
Dora Dr., Rolling Heights Sub., lot 68
IThomas E. & Helen J. Vernon, 295-09)
14. Public Heaing & First Reading Ord. #5933-95
- RS-6 Zoning for property located at 501
Dora Dr., Rolling Heights Sub., lot 21 (Frank
J. & Minerva B. Antonielto, Z95-'O)
15. Public Heaing & First Reading Ord. #5934-95
- RS-8 Zoning for property located at 1404
Orange St., Sunny Park Groves, Blk G, Lot 17
(Carl B. & Rachel J. Lowe, Z95~111
16. Public Heaing & First Reading Ord. #5935-95
- RS-8 Zoning for property located at 1761
Cardinal Dr., Pinellas Terrace, Lot 68 less 5
3' (Gerald L. & Christine M. Penhollow, 295-
_"'" 12)
',....,.../17. Public Hoaing & First Reading Ord. #5936-95
- RS-6 Zoning for property located at 2353
Dora Dr., Rolling Heights Sub., Lot 8 (William
R. Moberley, 295-1 3)
18. Public Heaing & First Reading Ord. #5937-95
- RS-6 Zoning for property located at 2377
Dara Dr., Rolling Heights Sub., Lot 12
(Beulah C. Bailey, 295-14)
19.. Public Heaing & First Reading Ord. #5938-95
- RS-8 Zoning for property located at 1 700 EI
Trinidad Dr., Virginia Grove Terrace, Blk 2,
Lot 1 (Stephen M. Dutzar, Z95.15)
20. Public Hearing & First Reading Ords. #5856-
95 & #5857 -95 - land Use Plan Amendment
to Institutional & MPD Zoning for property
located at 1221 & 1256 Bay Ave., 323 &
325 Pinellas St., and 1225 Reynolds Ave.,
Westover Sub., Brk B, Lots 1, 2 & 17. C.
Perry Snell's Bluff View Ct.. Lots 22-24, and
S. J. Reynolds Sub.. Lot 8 (Morton Plant
Hospital Association, Inc. and Evmorphia M..
KraUs, LUP95-13, Z95-02)
,
'-111116/95
, ..
12. Approved 18 sq.ft. area variance to allow 2
entrance signs with an area of 42 sq. ft. each.
13. Approved. Ord. #5932-95 passed 1 st
reading.
14. Approved. Ord. #5933~95 passed 1 st
reading.
15. Approved. Ord. #5934.95 passed 15t
reading.
16. Approved. Ord. #5935-95 passed 1 st
reading.
17. Approved. Ord. #5936.95 passed 1 st
reading.
18. Approved. Ord. #5937.95 passed 1 st
reading.
19. Approved. Ord. #5938.95 passed 1 st
reading.
20. Approved. Ords. #5856.95 & #5857-95
passed 1 st reading.
3
~:~";""',
'-"',21. Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5946- 21. Denied.
95 - Clearwater Beach Planned Development
District Zoning for property located in City
Park Sub., part of Lot 7, 0.67 acre located on
E side of Poinsettia Ave., in center parking
isle of the Memorial Civic Center Parking Lot,
Sky Tower. L.C. site (City / Grogan, Z95-17)
Public Hearing. Second Reading Ordinances
22. Ord. #5943-95 - extending cable franchise
agreement with Time Warner Entertainment-
Advance/Newhouse Partnership to 2/1/96
22. Ord. #5943-95 adopted.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
CONSENT AGENDA (Items #23-30) - Approved as submitted less #s 23 & 28.
The following items require no formal public hearing and are subject to being approved in a single
motion. However, any City Commissioner or the City Manager may remove an item from the Consent
Agenda to allow discussion and voting on the item individually.
"."',,23. Contract to purchase a parcel of real estate containing approx, 1.345 acres located at 1454 S.
'........,..I Greenwood Ave., Sec. 22-29-15, from Asimeno Corp., for $84,000 plus expenses for appraisal
($400), environmental inspections ($ 7301 and title insurance ($ 690) bringing the total acquisition
cost to $85,820 'ED) - CONTINUED.
24. Contract to purchase generator service / maintenance to Diesel Energy Systems, Inc., largo, FL,
for the period 12/1/95-9/30/97, with 3 one-year renewal options, for $52,275.06 (GS)
25. Extension of contract for physical examinations and other medical services, with Family Care
Centers Walk~ln Clinics, largo, FL, for the period 1/1/96-12/31/98, for an est. $88,340 (HR)
26. C.O.#2 to 1995 Gunite Restoration Contract to Infrastructure Services, Inc. / ISI Operating Corp.,
Franklin, TN, increasing the amount by $47,880, for a new total of $404,071 and approve a time
extension of 20 days (EN)
27. Contract for Clearwater Harbor Directional Drm Force Main & Gas Main Installation to Hall
Contracting Corp., St. Petersburg, FL, for $2,697,109.30; and approve C.O.#1 reducing the
contract amount $480,322.72 for a new total of $2,216,786.58 (EN)
28. Authorize City Manager to negotiate with property owners to prepare a Development Agreement
regarding Vogel Property, landmark Drive, located south of Enterprise Road & east of proposed
landmark Drive extension; Refer to Clerk for advertisement for public hearings when City Manager
determines agreement is ready for public consideration (e?) - APPROVED.
29. Receipt/Referral - proposed Ordinance to amend Sees. 21.10 & 42.35 to provide for temporary
storage of recreational vehicles for lodging purposes at the Harborview Center (ep)
'. I
'-" 11/16/95
4
"':l .'":,:,,
~30. Appointment of Commission members to regional & misc. boards - Garvey - Florida Loague of
. _, Cities Board of Directors, Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council, Mayor's Council of
Pinellas County, ex-officio of Downtown Development Board, Chi Chi Rodriquez Youth Foundation
Trustees, St. Petersburg/Clearwater Economic Development Council, and Pension Advisory
Committee; Berfield - Suncoast League of Municipalities Board of Directors, PACT Board of
Directors, ex-officio of Downtown Development Board, Jolley Trolley Transportation of
Clearwater, Inc. Board of Directors, and Pinellas Planning Council; Thomas. Metropolitan Planning
Organization; Johnson - Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, Pinellas Sports Authority, and
Pension Advisory Committee; and Clark - Pine1las Suncoast Transit AuU10rity and Pension
Advisory Committee (CLK)
OTHER ITEMS ON CITY MANAGER REPORT
31. C-View Task Force (1M)
32. Authorize modification of streetscape
previously installed by the City and the eRA,
500 block of Cleveland Street (CPI
33. Summer Youth Employment Program - final
report's recommendations (CM)
34. First Reading Ord. #5940~95 - establishing
rates for residential & non-residential
,:) reclaimed water service to Island Estates,
Memorial Causeway & Clearwater Beach and
amending various sections of the Code by
referencing reclaimed water service (PW)
35. Contract to purchase real property located at
128 N. Osceola Ave. from the Greater
Chamber of Commerce, Sec. 16-29-15, for
$300,000 and pay related transaction costs
including environmental audit, boundary
survey and recording fees maximally est. at
$5,250, for an est. total $305,250, and
approve a lease-back of the property to the
Chamber for up to 12 months for total rent of
$1 (eM)
36. First Reading Ord. #5944-95 - Granting to
Florida Power Corp. a non-exclusive electric
utility franchise to occupy municipal streets
and rights-of-way in the City, for the purpose
of providing electric and power services;
prescribing the terms and conditions
accompanying the grant of franchise;
providing for severability of provisions; for a
period of 30 years (eM)
V11/16/95
31. Approved establishment of task force;
appointed James Martin, David Campbell,
Peter Caffentzis and Joseph Brown. City
Manager to appoint three technical members.
32. Denied.
33. Approved recommendations as amended.
Approved continuing with the contract.
34. Approved. Ord. #5940-95 passed 1 st
reading.
35. Approved.
36. Approved franchise. Ord. #5944-95 passed
1 st reading.
5
~,:" ,"
M;"'<' .I).' ,:' , ,
'i"l'"::,: ",'
~ , . I'"' .' ./ 'J"
,..,,'37. Advertising in Beach Views (eLK)
, <,.,7",\38. Legislative Package (eLK)
39. Other Pending Matters
a) Change in concept for 3rd floor of
Harborview Center
37. Continued to 12/7/95.
38. Approved as amended.
39. Other Pending Matters
a) Approved restructure of 3rd floor to
increase size of catering kitchen & finish
out remaining 4,000 sq. ft. for
management by Globe Facility Services
IGFS} for a banquet area.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
40. Other City Attorney Items - Attorney/Client session re Fisherman's Wharf scheduled for 9:00 a.m.
on 12/4/95.
41. City Manager Verbal Reports
City Manager will not return to work at City Hall until 12/4/95 as she will be on vacation and
attending a conference
40. Other Commission Action
Johnson expressed support of Oldsmar's concern ra fireworks. Letter of support to be sent.
..............,.
, )
~
Mart.
Berfield reported the City received $24,657 in extra income from Harborview Center Stein
Thomas indicated eRA Director had not predicted Stein Mart would reach $1 Q-million sales in
first year. Figure represents sales at mature location.
Thomas noted meeting not started with invocation and requested rules be followed.
40. Adjournment - 12:36 a.m. (11/17/951
,~ .
V11/16/95
6
\
\
~::~~'~..:-. . ~,'
, c
;j
~.
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
November' 6, 1995
Present:
Rita Garvey
Sue A. Berfield
Fred A. Thomas
J. B. Johnson
Robert Clark
Elizabeth M. Deptula
Kathy S. Rice
William C. Baker
Pamela K. Akin
Scott Shuford
Rich Baier
Cynthia E. Goudeau
Patricia O. Sullivan
Mayor/Commissioner
Vice-Mayor ICommissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Attorney
Central Permitting Director
Engineering Director
City Clerk
Board Reporter
The Mayor called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall. The Mayor led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily
discussed in that order.
<:J- ITEM #3- Service Awards
One service award was presented to City employees.
ITEM #4 - Introductions and Awards - None.
ITEM It 5- Presentations
aJ CNN - Tourism Campaign for Clearwater & Clearwater beach
Dick Kvale, CNN (Cable News Network) Senior Account Executive, said CNN has
broadcast successful tourism advertising campaign. He suggested Clearwater consider the
audience they wish to reach to attract tourists. He noted the population is aging, families
are smaller, and many parents now begin families later in life.
Mr. Kvale said the key to advertising is to keep it simple, interesting and make it
dramatic. He said CNN provides results for advertisers. He suggested at least six weeks
of advertising. He reported a tracking study done by Tennessee found 61 % of those who
responded via telephone to advertising visited the state. Advertisers on CNN are seen
throughout the United States and Canada.
. -..-I
mcc' 1 b.95
1
"/16/95
Mr. Kvale presented examples of CNN commercials.
commercials were long enough to tell a story.
He said 30 second
..........\
Mr. Kvale referred to CNN's airport network, located in hubs, that reach the
traveling public. He said advertising in this venue is flexible and advertisements can be
placed next to travel tips, etc.
The Mayor reported owners of beach hotel/motel properties have expressed an
interest in forming a partnership with the City to finance an advertising campaign.
Dr. Kenneth Rosenow said the Clearwater and Beaches Tourism Council has
analyzed the decline in tourism during the last several months and noted the cve
(Convention & Visitors' Bureau) has dropped advertising on CNN. He said CNN has a large
and diverse audience. He expressed interest in a partnership between hoteliers and the
City for this advertising venue.
Marysia Coates favored the proposed advertising. She felt it would be powerful and
a good value. She pointed out advertising to Canada would be a bonus.
Chuck Pollick said discussion needs to occur regarding funding to advertise
Clearwater on CNN. He noted a tourism director will be hired soon. He recommended
considering CNN and hoped the City Commission would move forward with this effort in a
spirit of unity.
.........
David Little liked the concept and thought it would be wonderful if Clearwater
advertises on CNN.
"---,,I
The consensus of the City Commission was to direct staff to review the proposal,
bring the partners together, and report back to the Commission.
Sam Kerkez said he was new to the motel industry. He was surprised so little is
done to promote Clearwater beach. He felt advertising on CNN was a good idea. He
noted many British visitors stay in St. Petersburg and are not aware of Clearwater.
In answer to a question, Mr. Kvale said the proposal could be modified to include
advertising in Europe, Latin America and Asia. He indicated the top international markets
for viewership are England and Germany.
ITEM #6 - Approval of Minutes
Commissioner Clark moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of
November 2, 1995 as corrected, and the special meeting of October 25, 1995, as
recorded and submitted in written summation by the City Clerk to each Commissioner.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM 1/7 - Citizens to be heard re items not 011 the Agenda
v
mcc11 b.95
2
1 1 '16/95
~. ~ ~. .
-,
J~ff Morrev objected to the proposed extension of landmark Drive. He expressed
concern citizens have not had the opportunity to address this issue and felt the project
would only benefit a developer. He expressed concern commuters will use the extension
as a short cut to McMullen-Booth Road. He did not think development of a park justified
the extension. The Mayor said the public can address this issue when an agreement with
the developer comes back to the Commission. Commissioner Thomas requested
forwarding resident comments to Engineering and the Parks & Recreation Department. Mr.
Baier said Saber Drive will not be opened to landmark Drive as part of this project.
James Warner, Sand Key Civic Association, reviewed efforts over the past three
years to procure beach renourishment. On November 21, 1995, he is scheduled to meet
with a representative of the Governor's office in Tallahassee.. On November 30, 1995,
250 residents will be bused to a meeting of the legislative delegation. He recommended
placing coquina rock in front of a mile of exposed seawalls. He indicated building
foundations now vibrate when waves hit the seawall. He suggested interacting with
Belleair Beach and Indian Rocks Beach to push for renourishment and requested the City
dialogue with the County to protect the seawalls. A Pinellas County representative will
attend the December 7, 1995, meeting
Fred Beckham, President of the Island Estates Civic Association, thanked the
Commission for approving the reclaimed water project on Island Estates. He requested
staff investigate the feasibility of burying power lines in conjunction with this project.
,... ".L~
.
Herbert Sommerson, Chair of the Beach Nourishment Committee, requested all
Clearwater residents support beach renourishment and predicted tax revenue s and tourism
will decrease if the beach erodes further. He expressed concern the Governor vetoed six
renourishment projects last year. He requested citizens, the City, Chamber of Commerce
and businesses to write the Governor indicating this project's importance. He urged
residents to attend the November 30, 1995, meeting of the Pinellas legislative delegation
at Ruth Eckerd Hall.
I
...~.
Dr. James Carazola expressed concern the City has cut a 3D-foot swath to start the
Landmark Drive extension.
Tom Sehlhorst distributed five bricks, stating they could be used as paperweights or
corner stones for the development of 11 pieces of property. He said he will assume the
risk and requested the City waive more than $40,000 in City fees and State surcharges for
occupational licenses, demolition liens, combination fees, property tax credits, variances,
state surcharges, and fees for water impacts, general services, plan reviews, conditional
uses, development impacts, and sewer impacts.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEM #8. - Public Hearing & First Readina Ords. #5922~95. #5923-95 & #5924~95 ~
Annexation, land Use Plan Amendment to Industrial Limited & IL Zoning for property
located at 2021 Sunnydale Blvd.. Clearwater Industrial Park, part of Lots 6 & 7 (Morgan
Tire & Auto Inc. and Don Olson Tire & Auto Centers, Inc., A95-23, lUP95-2B)
.~
mcc11 b.95
3
11/16/95
'.~' 1" ~ I. ~ ..
......~
,
The applicant has petitioned for Annexation. a Future Land Use Plan Amendment
and Zoning Atlas Amendment for 2021 Sunnydale Boulevard to receive sewer service. On
October 31. 1995, the Planning & Zoning Board unanimously endorsed the request.
Arthur Pollard. representing the applicant. said the request represents a win-win
scenario 8S septic tanks will be replaced by the Cit". sewer and the City's tax base will
increase.
Commissioner Clark moved to approve the Petition for Annexation. Future Land Use
Plan Amendment to Industrial Limited, Zoning Atlas Amendment to Limited Industrial (lL)
for Part Lots 6 & 7. Clearwater Industrial Park. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5922-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Thomas moved tq pass Ordinance #5922-;95 on first reading.
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call. the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
..............,.,
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5923-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Barfield movad to pass Ordinance #5923-95 on first reading.
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call. the vote was:
,-'
"Ayes": Berfield. Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5924-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Johnson moved to pass Ordinance #5924-95 on first reading.
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM # 9 - Public Hearino & First Reading Ords. #5926-95. #5927-95 & #5928~95 -
Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Low & RS-4 Zoning for property
located at 7 Dorado Place, Sec. 24-29~15, M&B 11.07 (Roy S. &. Renae Sachse. A95-24,
LUP95-29)
The applicant has petitioned for Annexation, a Future Land Use Plan Amendment
and Zoning Atlas Amendment for 7 Dorado Place to receive sanitation service. No City
sewer service is available for this property. On October 31. 1995. the Planning & Zoning
Board unanimously endorsed the request.
v
mcc11 b.95
4
11/16/95
Commissioner Berfield moved to approve the Petition for Annexation, Future Land
Use Plan Amendment to Residential Low. Zoning Atlas Amendment to Single~Famity
Residential "Four" (RS~4) for Section 24-29-15 and M&B 11/07. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
tI'~..r. ,~.
"\' .
r~
, ! The City Manager reported trash pickup will be via Lakeview Road and not by a
private street.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5926-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Johnson moved to pass Ordinance #5926~95 on first reading.
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
, "Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5927-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Thomas moved to pass Ordinance #5927~95 on first reading.
The motion was duty seconded and upon roll call. the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
':J
"Nays": None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5928-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Berfield moved to pass Ordinance #5928-95 on first reading.
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"NaysU: None.
ITEM #1 0 - Public Hearina & First Reading Ords. #5929-95, #5930-95 & #5931-95 -
Annexation. land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Urban & RM-8 Zoning for property
located at 20162 US 19N, Sec. 18-29-16, M&B 44.04; and Approve a Transfer of
Development Rights from Parcel 2 (Sec. 18-29-16, M&B 44.04) and Parcell (Sever Park,
part of Lot 3) to the "main" motel site (Sever Park, all of Lot 2) (Asa J. & Katherine G.
Lewis, A95-25, LUP95-30)
The subject property is a vacant lot approximately 200 feet west of US 19N and
south of Druid Road. The applicants wish to annex to construct a non-commercial parking
lot on the property.
The property is zoned General Retail Commercial and Limited Services (C-2) by the
County and has a Countywide Land Use Plan Classification of Residential Urban. It is
proposed to assign the property a City zoning of Multiple-Family Residential "Eight" (RM-B).
, ...""I
mccl1 b.9S
5
11/16/95
,-'~., The Countywide Future land Use Plan Classification of Residential Urban would not be
changed.
If the annexation is approved, the subject property will be part of the Suncoast Inn
at 20162 US 19N. The motel owners are in the process of purchasing this property. A
site plan for the combined properties has been submitted to the DRC (Development Review
Committee) for review. The proposed non-commercial parking lot would be a conditional
use if the application is approved.
Concurrent with the annexation of Parcel 2, the applicants are requesting a transfer
of development rights from both Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 to allow a total site development of
76 motel rooms, plus a manager's dwelling unit. Transfers of development rights must be
approved by the City Commission as provided under Section 42.06 of City Code. The
proposed transfer meets the requirements of this section regarding ownership and density.
The western portions of both parcels are wetlands. The east segments consist of
upland areas with varying elevations. Storm water quality treatment and attenuation will be
provided in the wetlands. A conservation easement will be provided on the west side of
the parking area to limit future development in the wetlands. The proposed development
will have a positive impact on the public interest and would deter the use of this
overgrown vacant lot as a camping ground for transients and a dumping area.
,
--..r'
Environmental Management recommends an application to rezone the jurisdictional
wetland portion of the property to "Preservation" be submitted prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the parking lot. The applicant has agreed to this request.
Staff recommends approval of the transfer because the guidelines for review of
Section 42.06(5l appear to be met. The subject property has unique conditions as the
parcels from which the development rights are being transferred are environmentally
sensitive (Sec. 42.06(5)(a)). No established standards are compromised by the transfer
(Sec. 42.06 (5)(b)). A public benefit is created because, after the transfer, the
environmentally sensitive portions of the site will be placed in "PreservationU zoning and
land use plan classifications to ensure their future protection (Sec. 42.06{5}{c)). The cited
policies of the Comprehensive Plan are forwarded by this transfer since environmental and
open space areas are preserved (Sec. 42.06(5)(d)).
On October 31. 1995, the Planning & Zoning Board unanimously endorsed the
request.
In answer to a question, Central Permitting Director Scott Shuford indicated the
motel would be expanded by the addition of a floor.
Commissioner Thomas moved to approve the Petition for Annexation, Future Land
Use Amendment to Residential Urban and Zoning Atlas Amendment to Multiple-Family
Residential "Eight" for Sec. 18.29.16, M&B 44/04, and approve a Transfer of
Development Rights from Parcel 2 (Sec. 18-29-16 M&B 44/04) and Parcel 1 (Sever Park,
part of Lot 3) to the "main" motel site (Sever Park, all of lot 2) as the guidelines for
'.~
mcc11 b.95
6
11/16/95
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
~, ~,
. '-...
"
review of such transfers as provided In Section 42.06(5) have been met. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5929-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Clark moved to pass Ordinance 115929.95 on first reading. The
motion was duly seconded and upon roll call. the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5930-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Thomas moved to pass Ordinance #5930-95 on first reading.
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Nays": None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5931-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Berfield moved to pass Ordinance #5931-95 on first reading.
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
'''~''',
',.._J
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM #11 - Public Hearina & First Readina Ord. #5909-95 - Amending Secs. 28.10 &
44.08 to delete the requirement that signs on vending machines be regulated as wall signs
This ordinance reestablishes the exemption of vending machine signage in the sign
code. Vending machine signage was not calculated as part of a property's overall signage
allowance until 1993, when the code was changed to require the treatment of vending
machines as "attached signs."
This ordinance change created a number of problems, especially the "double
jeopardy" created for properties which had encountered City sign amortization problems
and now faced a new attached sign requirement. This ordinance addresses this concern.
Both the Development Code Adjustment Board and Planning & Zoning Board have
unanimously recommended approval of this ordinance.
Commissioner Thomas suggested Sec. 44.08 (1 2) include the words "vending
machines." Mr. Shuford agreed to add that language.
. "
'~~
mcc1 1 b.95
7
, 1116/95
,''I
-', Commissioner Thomas moved to amend the language of Sec. 44.08 (12) to read
"Examples are signs on newsracks, gasoline pumps, telephone booths and vending
machines." The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Commissioner Johnson moved to approve exempting vending machine signage from
the attached signage requirements. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5909-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Johnson moved to pass Ordinance #5909-95 as amended on first
reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM #12 - Variance(s) to Sign Regulations for orooertv located at 2545 NE Coachman
fuL., Sec. 7-29-' 6, M&B 11.05 (Decade Companies Income Properties / Town Place
Apartments, SV95-44)
...~ r
The applicant is requesting an area variance of 1 B square feet from the permitted
24 square feet to allow two entrance signs. each with an area of 42 square feet. The
subject property, zoned Residential Planned Development 14, is west of US 19N on the
southerly side of NE Coachman Road. Tower Place is identified with a sign on each side of
the entry drive to the development. The signs are 75 percent larger than code.
..............i
Special circumstances support approval of the area variance. Town Place, a 17-
acre residential development, is close to the US 19N commercial corridor. The subject
property is separated from other residential properties to the West by Florida Power's right-
of-way. The existing signs are not out of scale or character with signs permitted on or
near US 19N. For example, the property across NE Coachman Road, developed with a
Wal-Mart, is permitted a sign area of 11 2 square feet. Most properties fronting US 1 9N
are allowed 112 square foot signs. The two Town Place signs are not oversized
considering the larger commercial signs allowed nearby. Strict enforcement of the code in
this case would place a h~rdship upon the applicant which would be great in comparison to
the public benefit derived from code compliance.
Wayne Shaw, representative for the applicants, verified photographs of the property
presented him by Mr. Shuford. Mr. Shaw said the property depends on drive by traffic.
The signs were installed when the property was developed. He asked that they be allowed
to remain.
David Little favored the application and noted a neighborhood agreement with Town
Place regarding care of the entrance to Coachman Ridge.
Commissioner Thomas moved to approve an area variance of 18 square feet from
the permitted 24 square feet to allow two entrance signs with an area of 42 square feet
'-.-J
mcc 11 b.95
8
11/16/95
.-..... each, on property identified as Sec. 7-29-16, M&B 11.05, for meeting Sec. 45.24
Standards for Approval, items (1) - (4). The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
ITEM #13 - Public Hearina & First Readina Ord. #5932-95. - RS-G Zoning for property
located at 2370 Dora Dr., Rolling Heights Sub., lot 68 (Thomas E. & Helen J. Vernon,
Z95-09) ,
This petition is for a Zoning Atlas Amendment for 2370 Dora Drive. This City
initiated rezoning is part of the Consistency Program. On May 5, 1994, the property was
annexed by the City with a land Use Plan Amendment to Residential low and Zoning
Atlas Amendment to Residential Planned Development -0 (RPO-D). The RPD-D zoning
district allows properties to be developed according to the Single-Family Residential "Six"
(RS~6) zoning district numerical and dimensional requirements. The City is etiminating the
RPO subcategories in correlate zoning districts with the land use plan in conjunction with
the PPC (Pinellas Planning Council) Consistency Program. The land Use Plan Classification
would not be changed. On October 31, 1995, the Planning & Zoning Board unanimously
endorsed the proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment.
Commissioner Clark moved to approve the Petition for Zoning Atlas Amendment to
Single-Family Residential "Six" (AS-G) for lot 68, Rolling Heights Subdivision. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
'~~''\
'.....,.}
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5932-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Berfield moved to pass Ordinance #5932-95 on first reading.
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call. the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM #14 - Public Hearin{l & First Readino Ord. #5933-95 - RS-6 Zoning for property
located at G01 Dora Dr., Rolling Heights Sub., Lot 21 (Frank J. &. Minerva B. AntonieUo,
Z95~1 0)
This petition is for a Zoning Atlas Amendment for 601 Dora Drive. This City
initiated rezoning is part of the Consistency Program. On May 5, 1994, the property was
annexed by the City with a land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Low and Zoning
Atlas Amendment to Residential Planned Development -0 (RPD-O). The RPD-D zoning
district allows properties to be developed according to the Single-Family Residential"Six"
(RS-G) zoning district numerical and dimensional requirements. The City is eliminating the
RPD subcategories to correlate zoning districts with the land use plan in conjunction with
the PPC Consistency Program. The land Use Plan Classification would not be changed.
On October 31, 1995, the Planning & Zoning Board unanimously endorsed the proposed
Zoning Atlas Amendment.
v
mcc11 b.95
9
11/16/95
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
-, Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the petition for Zoning Atlas' Amendment
to Single.Family Residential "Six" (RS.6) for Lot 21, Rolling Heights Subdivision. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance 115933-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Thomas moved to pass Ordinance #5933.95 on first reading.
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Nays": None.
ITEM #15 ~ Publi(; Hearing & First Readina Ord. #5934~95 ~ RS.8 Zoning for property
located at 1404 Orange St., Sunny Park Groves, Blk. G, Lot 17 (Carl B. & Rachel J. Lowe,
Z95~11 )
....._.~
This petition is for a Zoning Atlas Amendment for 1404 Orange Street. This City
initiated rezoning is part of the Consistency Program. On June 2, 1994, the property was
annexed by the City with a land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Low and Zoning
Atlas Amendment to Residential Planned Development -E (RPD.E). The RPD-E zoning
district allows properties to be developed according to the Single-Family Residential nEight"
(RS-B) zoning district numerical and dimensional requirements. The City is eliminating the
RPD subcategories to correlate zoning districts with the land use plan in conjunction with
thA PPC Consistency Program. The land Use Plan Classification would not be changed.
On October 31, 1995, the Planning & Zoning Board unanimously endorsed the proposed
Zoning Atlas Amendment.
Commissioner Berfield moved to approve the Petition for Zoning Atlas Amendment
to Single-Family Residential "Eight" (RS-B) for Lot 17, Block G, Sunny Park Groves. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5934-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Johnson moved to pass Ordinance #5934-95 on first reading.
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM #16 - Public Hearina & First Readina Ord. #5935-95 ~ RS-8 Zoning for property
located at 1761 Cardinal Or., Pinellas Terrace, Lot 68 less 5 3' (Gerald L. & Christine M.
penhollow, Z95-12)
This petition is for a Zoning Atlas Amendment for 1"761 Cardinal Drive. This City
initiated rezoning is part of the Consistency Program. On July 21, 1994, the property was
annexed by the City with a Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Low and Zoning
Atlas Amendment to Residential Planned Development -E (RPD~E). The RPD-E zoning
"'-'"
mcc11 b.95
10
11/16/95
Commissioner Berfield moved to approve the Petition for Zoning Atlas Amendment
to Single-Family Residential "Eight" (RS-8) for Lot 68 less the South 3.0 feet thereof,
Pinellas Terrace. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
'--.., district allows properties to be developed according to the Single-Family Residential "Eight"
(RS-B) zoning district numerical and dimensional requirements. The City is eliminating the
RPD subcategories to correlate zoning districts with the land use plan in conjunction with
the PPC Consistency Program. The land Use Plan Classification would not be changed.
On October 31. 1995, the Planning & Zoning Board unanimously endorsed the proposed
Zoning Atlas Amendment.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5935-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Thomas moved to pass Ordinance #5935-95 on first reading.
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield. Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM #17 - Public Headno ~ First Readina Ord. #5936-95 - RS-6 Zoning for property
located at 2353 Dora Dr.. Rolling Heights Sub., Lot 8 (William R. Mabarfey, Z95-13)
..~......,
This petition is for a Zoning Atlas Amendment for 2353 Dora Drive. This City
initiated rezoning is part of the Consistency Program. On July 21, 1994, the property .was
annexed by the City with a land Use Plan Amendment to Residential low and Zoning
Atlas Amendment to Residential Planned Development -0 (RPO-D). The RPD-O zoning
district allows properties to be developed according to the Single-Family Residential OfSix"
(RS~6) zoning district numerical and dimensional requirements. The City is eliminating the
RPD subcategories to correlate zoning districts with the land use plan in conjunction with
the PPC Consistency Program. The land Use Plan Classification would not be changed.
On October 31, 1995, the Planning & Zoning Board unanimously endorsed the proposed
Zoning Atlas Amendment.
,
----
Commissioner Thomas moved to approve the Petition for Zoning Atlas Amendment
to Single-Family Residential "Six" (RS-G) for Lot 8, Rolling Heights Subdivision. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5936':95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Clark moved to pass Ordinance 115936-95 on first reading. The
motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM #18 - Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5937-95 ~ RS-6 Zoning for property
located at 2377 Dora Dr., Rolling Heights Sub., Lot 12 (Beulah C. Bailey, 295-14)
'J
mcc11 b.95
1 1
11/16/95
.-,
This petition is for a Zoning Atlas Amendment for 2377 Dora Drive. This City
initiated rezoning is part of the Consistency Program. On September 15, 1994, the
property was annexed by the City with a land Use Plan Amendment to Residential Low
and Zoning Atlas Amendment to Residential Planned Development -D (RPD-D). The RPD-D
zoning district allows properties to be developed according to the Single-Family Residential
"Six" (RS-6) zoning district numerical and dimensional requirements. The City is
eliminating the RPD subcategories to correlate zoning districts with the land use plan in
conjunction with the PPC Consistency Program. The land Use Plan Classification would
not be changed. On October 31, 1995, the Planning & Zoning Board unanimously
endorsed the proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment.
Commissioner Berfield moved to approve the Petition for Zoning Atlas Amendment
to Single-Family Residential "Six" (RS-G) for lot 12, Rolling Heights Subdivision. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5937-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Johnson moved to pass Ordinance #5937-95 on first reading.
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield. Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
I,'~"'"
4~.'J"r1.f
ITEM #19 - Public Hearing & First Readina Ord. #5938-95 - RS-8 Zoning for property
located at 1700 EI Trinidad Or., Virginia Grove Terrace, Blk.. 2, lot 1 (Stephen M. Dutzar,
Z95-15)
This petition is for a Zoning Atlas Amendment for 1700 EI Trinidad Drive. This City
initiated rezoning is part of the Consistency Program. On October 6. 1994, the property
was annexed by the City with a land Use Plan Amendment to Residential low and Zoning
Atlas Amendment to Residential Planned Development -E (RPD-E). The RPD-E zoning
district allows properties to be developed according to the Single-Family Residential "Eight"
(RS-8) zoning district numerical and dimensional requirements. The City is eliminating the
RPD subcategories order to correlate zoning districts with the land use plan in conjunction
with the PPC Consistency Program. The land Use Plan Classification would not be
changed. On October 31, 1995, the Planning & Zoning Board unanimously endorsed the
proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment.
Commissioner Thomas moved to approve the Petition for Zoning Atlas Amendment
to Single-Family Residential "Eight" (RS-B) for lot 1, Block 2. Virginia Grove Terrace. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5938-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Clark moved to pass Ordinance #5938-95 on first reading. The
motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
'-.....,I
mcc11 b.95
12
11/16/95
'--..,
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM #20 . PUQlic HearinQ & First Readina Ords. #5856-95 & #5857-95 - land Use Plan
Amendment to Institutional & MPD Zoning for property located at 1221 & 1256 Bay Ave.,
323 & 325 Pinellas St., and 1225 Reynolds Ave., Westover Sub., Blk. B, lots 1, 2 &. 17,
C. Perry Snell's Bluff View Ct., lots 22-24, and S. J. Reynolds Sub., lot 8 (Morton Plant
Hospital Association, Inc. and Evrnorphia M. KraUs, lUP95-13, 295-02)
The subject property consists of three parcels currently zoned limited Office within
the Master Planning Area of Morton Plant Hospital. Two parcels, recently purchased by
the hospital, are on the northeast and southwest corners of the Pine lias Street and Bay
Avenue intersection. The requested Future land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas Amendment
are required per conditions of approval in the hospital's Master Plan. The hospital has a
contract to purchase the third parcet, north of Pinel/as Street, one block east of the others.
The present owner has agreed to the proposed sale and the purchase is expected to be
completed prior to second reading of the ordinances. The Master Plan Amendment is non-
substantial. Due to Future land Use and Zoning Atlas Amendments, this request is being
referred to the City Commission for approval, along with the request to change land use
and zoning.
~~... .\,
'''~
The parcels on Reynolds Avenue (existing home) and the northeast corner of Bay
Avenue and Pinellas Street (doctors' offices) will continue with their current uses. The
southwest corner of Bay Avenue and Pine lias Street will be used for additional interim
parking. There is an approved site plan for this site.
On June 1, 1995, the DRe (Development Review Committee) considered this
request. No objection was raised to incorporating the three parcels in the Morton Plant
Master Plan. However, the ORC felt additional changes should be made to the Master Plan
now because of concerns regarding the offset of right-of-way and traffic lanes on Pinellas
Street and S. Ft. Harrison Avenue. The ORe requested a commitment by Morton Plant to
correct this situation by modifying the Master Plan. A dedication of right-of.way or
easement is needed on the west side of the satellite parking lot for the Pinellas Trail. DRe
would like to see this Master Plan modification made at this time. In addition, some
changes are needed regarding the footnotes.
Central Permitting staff also requested clarification of the hospital's buffer
installation schedule. Staff understands buffers will be provided as development projects
are constructed, but some buffer areas do not have specific projects associated with them.
Staff needs clarification regarding these areas. The hospital has expressed general
agreement with the buffer installation schedule proposed by staff.
Morton Plant has modified its original plan to show the alignment of Pinel/as Street,
the Pinel/as Trail easement, and the footnote changes requested by the DRC. The
landscaping/buffer schedule staff recommends can be formalized as part of the Plan
\,..1
mcc11 b.95
13
11/16/95
Since they anticipate a major redesign program for the Druid Road parking lot, the
hospital wishes to complete the buffer on the south side of the parking lot simultaneously
with this construction. The Town of Belleair and staff do not object to this schedule as
long as the installation of landscaping is not significantly delayed. Adjoining neighbors do
not want any delay. If the landscaping can be installed by Spring 1996, staff would not
regard that as a significant delay.
through a letter of understanding between the hospital and City prior to final adoption of
the ordinances approving these changes.
On September19, 1995, the Planning & Zoning Board unanimously endorsed the
proposed Future land Use Plan Amendment and Zoning Atlas Amendment providing the
applicant submits a letter of understanding regarding a date certain for installation of
landscape buffering prior to final Commission approval.
\,,~)
Recommended schedule of buffer installation: 1) prior to issuance of certificate of
occupancy for the Powell Cancer Pavilion, landscaping directly associated with the Pavilion
shall be installed (along Watkins Road and on the west side of the Pavilion); 2) prior to
issuance of certificate of occupancy far the Heart & Vascular Center and associated
parking garage, all landscaping directly associated with the Center and parking garage shall
be installed. In addition, landscaping proposed far the personnel office shall be installed; 3)
prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for the Central Utility Plant and associated
parking lot, landscaping associated with the Plant and parking lot shall be installed. In
addition, landscaping proposed in the Master Plan along both sides of the S. Ft. Harrison
roadway shall be installed; 4) prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for the Jeffords
Street parking garage, all landscaping associated with the parking garage and along
Jeffords Street shall be installed; 5) prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for any
major improvements to the "Siples" site, landscaping associated with this site shall be
installed; 6) prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for any major improvements to
parking facilities along Druid Road, associated landscaping shall be installed. The wall to
be erected on other private property along the south side of the parking facility is not part
of this requirement and shall be erected in conformance with the agreement with the
neighbors prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the Heart & Vascular Center;
the landscaped buffer associated with this wall shall be installed simultaneously with the
wall in accordance with the variance issued by the Town of Belleair.
Mr. Shuford indicated staff asked Morton Plant to amend the Master Plan to clarify
the schedule for installation of certain buffers. The City wants landscaping installed in a
timely fashion. He indicated construction of the Druid Road parking lot in front of the
hospital will begin in the Spring with completion of the lot and requisite landscaping by
August 1996. He said several neighbors have expressed concern regarding earlier
installation of that landscaping but recommended allowing Morton Plant to follow this
schedule. He said the hospital has indicated they will install landscaping along S. Ft.
Harrison Avenue by the end of 1995. Staff favors this plan.
Emil C. Marquardt, Jr., representative for Morton Plant Hospital, said this request is
simple and involves adding three small parcels to the Master Plan previously approved by
, "-"
mcc11 b.95
14
11/16/95
Connie Mudano, a Belleair Commissioner, indicated meetings on this issue have
occurred over the past three years. She expressed concern regarding the schedulo of
buffer installation for the "Siples" site. Recent major changes in conjunction with Morton
Planfs merger with Mease Hospital have resulted in moving some offices to Dunedin. She
said she had been advised several office buildings and parking garages included in the
Master Plan will not be built. Ms. Mudano said issues regarding the new parcels and
landscaping should be separated. She indicated residents want landscaping installed
whether or not Morton Plant rebuilds the Druid Road parking lot. Mr. Shuford said it was
staffts intent to have landscaping instatled at that location by August 1996. He indicated
landscaping must meet Belleair's more stringent requirements. Mr. Marquardt agreed to
write a letter: stipulating the subject landscaping will be installed by August 1996, whether
or not the parking lot improvements have been made.
'.'
, e
,"
-', the City Commission. He has written a letter in agreement with staWs recommended
schedule of buffer instatlation. He said the hospital has done a very good job regarding
landscaping. Part of the newly installed wall is located in Belleair and he noted some
resident complaints regarding buffering. He felt it did not make sense to install
landscaping shortly before parking lot renovations destroy it. He said the hospital's board
has approved the expenditure to reconstruct the parking lot and install landscaping after
the busy winter season.
Wayne Siebol said residents have seen the plan that clearly outlines the nature and
intent of the hospital but requested a timetable.
, ,'do.)
....~,..
Commissioner Berfield moved to approve Application for Future Land Use Plan
Amendment to Institutional and Zoning Atlas Amendment to MPD (Master Planned
Development) for Lots 22, 23, & 24, C. Perry SneWs Bluff View Court; Lots 1, 2, & 17,
Block B, Westover Subdivision; and Lot 8, S.J. Reynolds Subdivision. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5856-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Clark moved to pass Ordinance #5856-95 on first reading. The
motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson. Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5857-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Berfield moved to pass Ordinance #58567- 95 on first reading.
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson. Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
The Commission recessed from 7:57 to 8: 14 p.m.
\..",)
mcet1 b.95
15
"/16/95
ITEM #21 ~ Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5946~95 ~ Clearwater Beach Planned
Development District Zoning for property located in City Park Sub., part of Lot 7, 0.67 acre
located on E side of Poinsettia Ave., in center parking isle of the Memorial Civic Center
Parking Lot, Sky Tower, L.C. site (City / Grogan, Z95~17)
The City Commission has entered into a lease agreement to allow the proposed
"Sky Tower" on Clearwater beach in the City-owned parking lot immediately across
Poinsettia Avenue from Clearwater Beach Civic Center. The tower height is 335 feet and
tower footprint is 51 5 feet. This lease agreement is contingent upon the representative of
the tower project, James Grogan, obtaining appropriate zoning and construction approvals.
Mr. Grogan has submitted a request for planned development zoning to address the
unusual and site~specific design issues associated with the project. At staft's request, two
separate concept plans were submitted for consideration. One plan maximizes parking by
providing 71 spaces (a reduction from the current 74), but does not meet minimum
perimeter landscaping requirements. The second plan meets landscaping requirements,
but provides only 48 parking spaces. Either plan can be approved as a planned
development.
"
_....)
City staff has reviewed this request and determined it meets the minimum
submission requirements of City Code and the applicable standards of approval (Sec.
40.674) for such requests. The site, however, does not meet the minimum area
requirements for a Clearwater Beach Planned Development District as the site contains
0.67 acre. The minimum area for such zoning is four acres. To approve this reduced area,
the City Commission must make a determination that deviation from the minimum acreage
is in the public interest. On November 14, 1995, the Planning & Zoning Board endorsed
this request by a 4-3 vote.
Mr. Shuford said a CPO (Commercial Planned Development) is needed to
accommodate the unique features of the proposed tower. He distributed Sec. 40.675 -
Standards for Approval for Rezoning and requested the City Commission pay particular
attention to 1) the available uses to which the property may be put are appropriate to the
property in question and compatible with existing and planned uses in the area; 7} the
amendment will not adversely burden public facilities, including the traffic-carrying
capacities of streets, in an unreasonable or disproportionate manner; and 9) the
amendment will result in enhancing the health, safety or welfare of the citizens of the City.
There will be further staff review of the project to assure it meets drainage and other
development requirements.
Mr. Shuford felt the quantity of convenient parking also will be an issue. He noted
the City owns a large amount of nearby public parking and between 1,135 or 1,158
spaces will be available. If parking spaces for the project are allocated on a per use basis,
800 spaces would be required. Not all spaces are convenient to the subject property but
he indicated the nature of the tower would attract pedestrian traffic. Competing uses
need to be considered. He reported staff feels the Standards for Approval are generally
met. He noted questions regarding Standard # 1 and suggested the Planning & Zoning
Board and City Commission need to decide if the project is compatible.
l~
mccl1 b.95
16
11/16/95
l)
. .
,
Commissioner Berfield questioned how tall the tower is without the flag pole. The
Mayor noted the flag pole is 60 feet tall.
. Mr. Grogan reviewed the history of the project to this point. He said the City
Commission had directed staff to pursue a lease arrangement and indicated the project had
to be relocated due to the Land Use Plan of the original site. He reported he said ttyes'I to
every change requested. Mr. Grogan indicated the tower can be moved later should this
site be needed for other development.
Harry Cline, attorney representing James Grogan, said this request is to rezone 0.7
acrB of property leased to the applicant. He noted staff has said the proposed
development meets code and the Standards for Approval. The Planning & Zoning Board
has agreed the rezoning is proper. He referred to Standards of Approval #1 and indicated
the proposed development is compatible with uses in the area because it is a tourist
oriented use. He said in regard to.#3, no special privilege would be granted as the City
had advertised for a tower via an RFP (Request for Proposal). He said the tower will be
self sustaining.
'\
. I
,~.
Mr. Cline noted parking on the beach is generally adequate except for certain peak
times. He felt the City Commission needs to determine if erecting the tower is in the
interest and welfare of the public. He believes the tower will increase the welfare of the
beach and benefit the community. He felt all criteria had been met for City Commission
approval. Mr. Cline said Mr. Grogan has met all Commission requests. He noted the
project has had a majority of the Commission's approval up to this point. He requested the
City Commission support that commitment.
Mr. Cline said some are concerned what the tower will do to the City's beach. He
noted communities with towers always feature those towers in advertisements. He said
continuous building has occurred on Clearwater beach and referred to the construction
cranes. He said they are the same height as the tower and have no adverse visual impact.
Ed Armstrong, attorney representing Dave Spalding, said his client has been a
Marina tenant since 1 9 50. Mr. Armstrong questioned Mr. Shuford who indicated the Civic
Center requires 89 spaces but only 74 parking spaces are in the adjacent lot. He agreed
the advertised size of the proposed development is .67 acres which is larger than the
5,000 square feet to be leased to Mr. Grogan. Mr. Armstrong expressed concern the City
may double count parking spaces for different uses.
In answer to a question, Mr. Shuford noted the FINA CPO is approximately one acre
in size. Mr. Armstrong reiterated the Civic Center parking lot already has fewer spaces
than required. He referred to a May 19, 1995, letter from Harbormaster Bill Held noting
the Marina is in a deficit situation regarding parking. He also referred to an April 5, 1995,
memorandum from Stephen Doherty to Bill Held that indicated a deficit of 259 parking
spaces already exists in that area. Mr. Armstrong expressed concern if the tower is
approved, Civic Center parking spaces would have to be allocated to three separate uses.
Mr. Shuford pointed out that shopping center parking spaces are allocated for patrons of
..........
mcc11 b.S5
17
11/16/95
Mr. Armstrong noted the tower exceeds the height limit on the beach by a factor of
seven. He questioned if permitting the tower would set a precedent. In response to a
Question regarding a private property owner making a similar request, Mr. Shuford said he
would not recommend erecting a tower in a residential neighborhood but may consider one
in a commercial area if enough parking is available. In answer to a question, Mr. Shuford
said landscaping for the plan approved by the Planning & Zoning Board does not comply
with the landscape ordinance. He felt the project complies with the concurrancy
management ordinance but stated it would have an impact. He said the Planning & Zoning
Soard indicated the tower would have a positive effect on the beach, would be a unique
attraction, would provide the City with a unique identify, and would provide an economic
development benefit for Clearwater beach business owners. .
'.'" many different stores. In answer to a question, he said new businesses are required to
provide parking. except downtown.
Mr. Shuford stated the structure's diameter is eight feet. He did not think it would
cause oppressive shadows on neighboring properties. Mr. Cline questioned if Mr.
Doherty's memorandum was precipitated because larger boats were being brought into the
marina without addressing parking. Mr. Shuford agreed.
.....\
r
.., ---....
In answer to questions from Chuck Pollick, a party in interest, Mr. Shuford said the
City Commission could consider the Standards for Approval to have been met. He said the
City received the application for this project on October 30, 1995, and agreed the project
has been considered for alternative locations over several months. Mr. Shu j' 0. J ;:)cated
approximately 25 staff members were involved with this project. Mr. Polllck questioned if
the Planning & Zoning Board had considered if the project was in the public interest. Mr.
Shuford stated the board had discussed that issue in terms of economic development. In
answer to a question, Mr. Shuford noted an Engineering Department study had estimated,
on average, 8% of the Civic Center parking lot is used. He noted Marina tenants had
expressed dissatisfaction because convenient parking is not available at that location.
Jim Graham, president of the CMA (Clearwater Marine Aquarium), said he supports
the project. He said the aquarium relies of tourism and felt the tower would provide
tourists with a destination. He indicated a shuttle between the tower and aquarium would
benefit both. The tower will provide minimal impact to the beach's infrastructure and the
narrow structure will not affect the vista. He expressed concern about the environment
and indicated the tower will allow people to view the area's topography. He said the
environment would be helped if .people are educated.
Ralph House, CMA volunteer. said he handles membership and attendance records.
He expressed concern attendance at the aquarium has dropped since 1993. He supported
this issue and felt the tower would help aquarium attendance.
John Doran, representative for the Clearwater Beach Association, favored the
proposed tower. He lives and works at the beach and felt the tower will be good for
Clearwater beach. He said the tower would provide the City with rental income, an
increased tax base, and focal point for tourism. He said the tourist attraction would be
\,~
mcc11 b.95
18
11/16/95
Jay Keyes said Clearwater beach calls itself a family destination but noted there is
little to do after dark that does not involve consumption of alcoholic beverages. He
expressed concern Clearwater beach businesses are in trouble. He did not think parking
would be a problem. He felt wind would not be a problem either because of the tower's
cylinder shape. He said this project would not cost the City any money. His house is one
of the closest to the proposed location and he did not think it would affect him negatively.
clean and quiet. He said the project would not cost the City any money and felt people
like towers. He agreed the Standards for Approval had been met.
David Little said he favors the tower. He noted the Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon
Task Force had identified a need for an attraction on the beach. He indicated the tax
appraiser has stated property values on Sand Key dropped because tourism declined. He
said the tower would be good for Clearwater. He said the 880 Mandalay building is 300
feet wide and 200 feet tall and noted Horizon House casts a shadow over many single
family homes on Istand Estates.
Fred Beckham said the Clearwater Marine Tower will be an appealing landmark that
will provide positive entertainment. He said the project would provide a positive benefit to
Clearwater beach businesses and increase property values .on Island Estates. He noted the
positive elements of the project and said the tower will be removed if it does not succeed.
He said. Mr. Grogan has met all the City Commission's requirements and recommended
approval.
"-
.....J
AI Lejewski strongly favored the tower. He said the project could generate
$150,000 in additional revenue for the City. He expressed concern regarding the local
failing tourism industry. He suggested funds generated by the tower could fund additional
tourism advertising.
Dr. Kenneth Rosenow said he totally favored the project. He said Clearwater
beach's primary industry is tourism and its decline needs to be reversed. He noted the
tower alone is not the answer and other projects need to be addressed. He said this
project could be part of the solution. He said ecotourism is growing rapidly and indicted an
alliance could be established between the tower and CMA for that purpose. He said the
size of his motel staff is down from 40 to 21 due to a decline in tenants.
Sheila Cole said tourism is the lifeblood of Clearwater beach. When tourism
revenues decline, the whole City feels the crunch. She was against the tower until she
understood the project. She said tourists will ride the tower and it will provide visitors
something else to do. She said the towor would provide the City with an opportunity to
make money. She requested Commission support.
Bob Bickerstaffe said he did not remember another opportunity presented to the
City that would help the tax base without costing tax money. He noted the tower will be
removed if things do not work out. He noted the Civic Center parking lot is not very active
and the tower would cover a very small area. He said the project has no negatives. He
favored the project.
-....'
mcc11 b.95
19
11/16/95
Bob Wright noted many high risk projects had been proposed in the past but noted
Mr. Grogan is taking the risk with this proposal. He said not one dime of taxpayer money
would be spent on the project and noted the great potential for income. He said small
beach businesses are hurting and indicated almost every group on the beach supports the
project. He requested the City Commission vote "Yes. tI
Doug Alderman said he has lived on Clearwater beach for eight years and has a
sincere interest in what happens there. He favors the tower as it will generate traffic and
revenues which is what the beach needs. He said the tower will give residents of the tri-
county a~ea a reason to visit Clearwater beach and provide the City with a great deal of
exposure: He said it was an extreme pleasure to work with Mr. Grogan whom he
described as a "class act. tI
Ed Armstrong said the City Commission will have to make two findings before they
can approve this project: 1) it is an overriding public interest to approve a CPO with less
than four acres and 2) it meets all Standards for Approval. He said, without CPO
designation, the project would require seven variances. He suggested it would be
unprecedented for staff to recommend approval of that number of variances. He
questioned the towerts impact and noted the tower would be taller than anything else on
the beach with the next tallest structure being 80 feet tall. He said the tower would be
out of character. Special privilege would be granted because the City owns the limited
number of beach parking spaces. He felt the project fails to meet the Standards for
Approval on several grounds and code requires all standards to be met.
\
J
,-....
Mr. Armstrong distributed an impact study prepared by King Engineering that
indicated the tower would result in an additional 696 trips per day. He said the deficit
level of parking on the beach would decrease ridership. He said parking spaces considered
for this project are farther than people will walk. He did not think the applicant has met
the burden for approval and expressed concern that a precedent will be set.
Commissioner Barfield noted the impact study would deny all future development
on the beach because of limited parking. She said most tower visitors would be staying in
beach hotels and could ride the Jolley Trolley.
Robert Binder expressed concern the tower would result in a carnival atmosphere.
He said this location is visible from his house. He requested the City Commission consider
what they are starting if they approve this. He stated he has had his car towed from the
Beach Dinar because no spaces were available in the Civic Center parking lot.
Steve Fowler, member of the Chamber of Commerce board of directors, said the
Chamber strongly opposes the project and is concerned it will result in a Coney Island type
atmosphere. He said the tower would not enhance the Tropical Seascape look adopted by
the CBBRTF (Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force). He strongly urged the City
Commission not to entertain this type of project on Clearwater beach.
v
mccl1 b.95
20
11/16/95
Desmond Buzzel said he had not made up his mind regarding the proposal. He
questioned if the tower would fit in with the Tropical Seascape theme. He expressed
concern the tower's height would attract lightning here, in the lightning capital. He
recommended the tower's structural integrity be verified before considering the issue. He
felt the tower is not exactly compatible with visitors' idea of Clearwater beach as a
destination of natural beauty. He did not think the tower was aesthetically pleasing and
said he was concerned the tower is old and has been in "moth balls" for a number of
years.
Commissioner Berfield questioned jf Mr. Fowler would stilt oppose the tower if the
flag pole were removed. Mr. Fowler said he would because of the massive scale of the
entire project. He said the tower does not represent the type of symbol he wants for
Clearwater. Commissioner Barfield questioned if other beach buildings were of similar
heights. Mr. Shuford said those buildings ara on Sand Key, not Clearwater beach.
Mr. Armstrong noted the tallest building on Sand Key is 210 feet which is the result
of a judge's order. He noted the island of Sand Key is separate from Clearwater beach.
He suggested close review of the Standards for Approval.
...._......f
Mr. Cline said the issue is difficult. He said the proiect is compatible with existing
uses on the beach. He noted the City Commission heard from many people on the beach
who indicated the project's importance. He said the project has received endorsements
from virtually every group on the beach. He said the project is in the public interest. He
felt if the City Commission considers the project's use, they will find the project
compatible. Mr. Cline objected to the King Engineering study presented by Mr. Armstrong
as he was unable to cross examine the research and results.
The Com":lission recessed from 10: 12 to 10: 15 p.m.
Mr. Cline said parking spaces arB not being double counted. He noted every
development on the beach relies on a some variance. He said the Civic Center parking lot
is rarely used. He requested the City Commission find the project compatible and that it
meets every Standard for Approval. He noted the Commission has the right to deny the
request but asked that the City Commission honor earlier approval of the project.
Commissioner Johnson said he had made it clear when the tower was first
proposed that he would support the project if zoning was acquired and no special
consideration was given. He said that did not happen. He indicated he had met previously
with most of those who attended tonight's meeting but noted most telephone calls he has
received were opposed to erecting a tower on Clearwater beach. He said concerns
expressed were that a Coney Island, carnival atmosphere would result and tourism would
not be improved. He said he has tried to keep an open mind and did not like the position
he is in. He said some will have harsh words for him and call him names, regardless of the
position he takes. Commissioner Johnson said after thinking about the proposal, he cannot
come up with any reason why he should vote in favor of the tower.
..........-'
mcc11 b.95
21
11/16/95
,. .
",
............
Commissioner Berfield said she also was uncomfortable with making a decision.
She felt the project met all Standards for Approval and said she would support the project.
The only argument she has heard for not approving it is "we don't like it." She said the
tower would be good for the community and noted it would not cost the City any money.
She further noted Mr. Grogan had guaranteed he would remove the tower if it is not
successful and move the tower if the Civic Center parking lot is needed for another
project. She said the City would be taking no risk with the project. She said all beach
businesses have special privilege and variances to exist. She agreed the tower's design
does not reflect the Tropical Seascape but questioned if anyone had asked Mr. Grogan if
that design could be incorporated. Commissioner Berfield said she did not understand why
so many residents are upset regarding the project. She said the City Commission has to
look out for the whole City and needs to find ways to promote tourism. She said money
from the tower could be used for that purpose. She suggested City residents give the
tower a chance and reiterated the project would not cost taxpayers anything.
Commissioner Clark said he liked towers but felt that was not the issue here. He
referred to the Standards for Approval and said the fact that the tower is a tourist
attraction does not make it compatible. He felt approval of this project would require
special privilege. He said most telling was the Standard requiring the project not to
adversely impact public facilities. He said he did not want the fishing fleet destroyed. He
felt a number of the Standards for Approval had not been met.
,I
......
Commissioner Thomas said he found in entertaining that the Chamber of Commerce
automatically votes against anything that will make money for City taxpayers. He said the
Chamber is a political organization and charged the City Commission is controlled by
people supported by the Chamber. He said taxpayers could make money on the project
but felt the final City Commission decision was political. He said a few members of the
Chamber of Commerce control the City.
The Mayor said this issue is not about the City versus the Chamber of Commerce.
She said she does not vote the way the Chamber wants her to vote and noted she has
been against the project from the beginning. She agreed the tower is incompatible with
the beach and indicated the majority of people with whom she spoke are adamantly
opposed to the tower. She said the project would have a negative impact on the beach
and does not provide an overriding public interest. Mayor Garvey said approval of seven
variances would result in a special privilege. She read from the surve'{ reporting what
people are looking for when they visit Clearwater beach and noted a tower-like facility is
not mentioned. She did not believe the project met the Standards for Approval and would
adversely impact public facilities.
Commissioner Berfield questioned why the City Manager had favored the project.
The City Manager said staff had favored it as a way to address tourism development and
permit an economic return to the City that would provide Clearwater with the ability to
fund other proiects.
v
mcc 11 b.95
22
11/16/95
The Commission recessed from 10:37 to 10:54 p.m.
~~ .. ' ,>
"
-...,
Commissioner Thomas said Mr. Grogan met every request made by the City
Commission and staff. He indicated Mr. Grogan met the City's Standards for Approval and
expressed concern the City has provided an opportunity for litigation.
Commissioner Johnson moved to deny the Petition for Zoning Atlas Amendment to
Clearwater Beach Planned Development District for City Park Subdivision, Part of Lot 7.
The motion was duly seconded. Commissioners Johnson and Clark and Mayor Garvey
voted" Aye"; Commissioners Berfield and Thomas voted "No," Motion carried.
Public Hearing - Second Reading Ordinances
ITEM #22 ~ Qrd. #5943~95 - extending cable franchise agreement with Time Warner
Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership to 02/01/96
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5943~95 for second reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Berfield moved to pass and adoPt Ordinance #5943~95 on
second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey
"Nays": None.
\
I
......~~ .
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
CONSENT AGENDA (Items #23-30) - Approved less #23 and #28.
ITEM #23 - See cage 24.
ITEM #24 - Contract to ourchase Qenerator service I maintenance to Diesel Energy
Systems, Inc., Largo, FL, for the period 12/01/95 w09/30/S7, with 3 one-year renewal
options, for $52,275.06 (GS)
ITEM #25 ~ Extension of contract for Dhvsical examinations and other medical services,
with Family Care Centers Walk-In Clinics, Largo, FL, for the period 01/01/96 -12/31/98,
for an estimated $88,340 (HR)
ITEM #26 - C.O.#2 to 1995 Gunite Restoration Contract to Infrastructure Services, Inc. I
ISI Operating Corp., Franklin, TN, increasing the amount by $47,880, for a new total of
$404,071 and approve a time extension of 20 days (EN)
ITEM #27 - Contract for Clearwater Harbor Oirectional Orill Force Main & Gas Main
Installation to Hall ContractinQ Com., St. Petersburg, FL, for $2,697,109.30; and approve
C.O.#l reducing the contract amount $480,322.72 for a new total of $2,216,786.58 (EN)
ITEM #28 - See oage 25.
......,)
mcc11 b.95
23
11/1 6/95
, "
,- ITEM 1/29 ~ ReceiPt/Referral ~ proposed Ordinance to amend Sees. 21.10 &. 42.35 to
provide for temporary storage of recreational vehicles for lodging purposes at the
Harborview Center (CP)
ITEM #30 - AODointment of Commission members to regional & miscellaneous boards:
Garvey ~ Florida League of Cities Board of Directors, Emergency Medical Services Advisory
Council, Mayor's Council of Pinellas County, ex~officio of Downtown Development Board,
Chi Chi Rodriguez Youth Foundation Trustees, St. Petersburg/Clearwater Economic
Development Council, and Pension Advisory Committee; Barfield - Suncoast League of
Municipalities Board of Directors, PACT Board of Directors, ex-officio of Downtown
Development Board, Jolley Trolley Transportation of Clearwater, Inc. Board of Directors,
and Pinellas Planning Council; Thomas ~ Metropolitan Planning Organization; Johnson -
Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, Pinellas Sports Authority, and Pension Advisory
Committee; and Clark ~ Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority and Pension Advisory
Committee (CLK)
Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted less
Items #23 and #28 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #23 ~ Contract to purchase a Darcel of real estate containing approximately 1.345
acres located at 1454 S. Greenwood Ave., Sec. 22-29-15, from Asimeno Corp., for
$84,000 plus expenses for appraisal ($400l, environmental inspections ($730) and title
insurance ($690) bringing the total acquisition cost to $85,820 (EO)
-""",/",-
"\
I
On July 20, 1995, the City Commission approved the FY (Fiscal Year) 1995/96
Consolidated Plan to increase home ownership opportunities, target residents of public
housing and residents with special needs. The proposed property purchase will enable the
Department of Economic Development to develop seven single family detached homes
targeted for sale to residents of CHA (Clearwater Housing Authority) and Project Self-
Sufficiency.
The City, CHA, CNHS (Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services), Tampa Bay
Community Development Corporation, and local lending institutions will work as partners
to plan, develop, market and finance this project.
Commissioner Berfield said she wanted it on the record that this item is only to
purchase the property. She said she would like to talk to CNHS (Clearwater Neighborhood
Housing Services) regarding development of the vacant property. She noted some lower
income residents are on the CNHS waiting list. The Mayor noted this purchase is to build
homes for the target group, Partners in Self Sufficiency. Commissioner Thomas
questioned the source of funds for this purchase. The City Manager said funding comes
from State and Federal grants provided for the purpose of providing low income housing.
Commissioner Berfield questioned if the City uses grant money to purchase the
property, will the City be reimbursed when the property is developed and sold. Deputy
'......,I
mcc11 b.95
24
11/16/95
ITEM #28 - Authorize City Manaoer to neootiate with orooertv owners to oreDare a
DeveloDment Agreemont reoarding Voael Prooertv, Landmark Drive, located south of
Enterprise Road & east of proposed Landmark Drive extension; Refer to Clerk for
advertisement for public hearings when City Manager determines agreement is ready for
public consideration (CP)
':',"
City Manager Kathy Rice said the property may be used for a down payment and its value
may be forgiven once the purchaser lives there for five years.
Robert Binder said he owns a business directly across from this property and
expressed concern the property is zoned General Commercial (CG). The Mayor indicated
the City's intent is to build low income housing. Mr. Binder expressed concern regarding
the purchase price and said he only pays $2,500 per lot.
Commissioner Thomas requested the item be pulled and reviewed by staff. In
answer to a Question, the City Manager indicated the environmental study on this property
has already been completed.
Commissioner Berfield moved to continue Item #23 to a date uncertain. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
-"
The City Code makes provisions for the City to enter into development agreements
with property. owners. The applicant wishes to enter into a Development Agreement with
the City to owners. The applicant wishes to enter into a Development Agreement with the
City to ensure specific contractual obligations are met by both the property owner and the
City and to gain vested development rights. The primary focus of the Agreement will be
on the following items: 1) annexation of the Vogel property, approximately 7.31 acres; 2}
dedication to the City a portion of right-of-way, which is essential for alignment and
construction of proposed Landmark Drive south of Enterprise Road; 3) A Residential
Planned Development consisting of approximately 33 single family detached residential
units based on the existing land use classification that allows a maximum density of 7.5
units per gross acre; 4) an 11,100 square foot one-story office complex zoned Limited
Office; and 5) the City allows a 50 foot right-of-way within the proposed residential
planned development.
.,"'eo.
Preliminary meetings have been held with the property owners' representative to
discuss the specific site plan details and anticipated obligations. The City Attorney's office
has determined the procedures as set forth in Code Sections 36.111 through 36.124 must
follow the sequence set forth in the Ordinance. This agenda item represents Step 2 of the
process outlined in the October 10, 1995, memorandum from Assistant city Attorney
Leslie OougaU~Sides. If the Commission authorizes the City Manager to negotiate, the City
Manager will provide the Commission with a report, and if at least three Commission
members wish to proceed, a tentative development agreement will be prepared for
Commission review.
Commissioner Barfield questioned if approval of this item only allowed the City
Manager to negotiate an agreement with the property owner and did not mean the City
~
mcc11 b.SS
25
11/16/95
. . ~ ,
~... --." ---".. .,. . - - -. .... .... .' . . I . . .,
\,:'.,
..-.... Commission had decided to extend landmark Drive. The City Attorney said that decision
has not been made but is part of what the Vogels want in the negotiation. She said the
City is not committed to build a road just because the City Commission has told the City
Manager she can negotiate with the property owner.
Commissioner Johnson moved to authorize the City Manager to negotiate with
property owners to prepare a Development Agreement and refer to the City Clerk for
advertisement for public hearings when the Manager determines the agreement is reedy for
public consideration. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
OTHER ITEMS ON CITY MANAGER REPORT
ITEM #31 - C-View Task Force (1M)
..tr.",
"
.,._1
The City Commission created and funded C-View TV to provide Clearwater
residents with immediate access to the deliberations of elected officials and information
regarding City departments and services. The government access television channel began
cablecasting on January 3, 1996. In July and August 1995, Bordner Research, Inc.
conducted three focus groups and one quantitative survey to determine market awareness,
expectations, and perceptions related to the channel. The Commission agreed to establish
an eighteen-month, seven-member advisory Task Force to develop policies and receive
input from citizens and technical experts during these early stages of operation. The City
Manager will appoint technically oriented members. Commission appointees will be
interested Clearwater citizens. Technical members may live outside the City but within
Pinellas County. The Commission will decide the number of members they will appoint.
Commissioner Thomas questioned the type of technical skills the City Manager
preferred. The City Manager said she wanted members who are technically
knowledgeable regarding certain types of equipment and aware of what is appropriate for
a government access channel.
Commissioner Clark moved to approve an 1 B-month C-View TV advisory task force
and that the City Commission would appoint four members and the City Manager would
appoint three members and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Commissioner Clark moved to appoint James Martin. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Commissioner Thomas moved to appoint David Campbell. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Commissioner Berfield moved to appoint Peter Caffentzis. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Commissioner Johnson moved to Joseph Brown. The motion was duly seconded
and carried unanimously.
, ...--
mcc11 b.9S
26
11/16/95
-~c
ITEM #32 ~ Authorize modification of streetscooe previously installed by the City and the
CRA, 500 block of Cleveland Street (CP)
The Church of Scientology wishes to modify the streetscape in front of property
they own in the 500 block of Cleveland Street (north side) to replicate, to the extent
possible, the historical streetscape that existed when the Bank of Clearwater building was
built. The Downtown Partnership requested the Partnership's Design Subcommittee, the
ORB (Design Review Board), and City staff consider this request with the City Commission
serving as the final local approving body for the proposal. The Design Subcommittee, the
Design Review Board, and City staff have reviewed the request and made several
modifications to the original design to accommodate the concerns and desires of each
reviewing group.
A site drawing was submitted that shows the proposal by the Church of
Scientology as recommended by the above groups. The proposal includes recessed
lighting of the building, replacement of existing street furniture with more traditional pieces
and installation of an additional downtown streetlight.
'''?;'' '\
"....)
City staft has reviewed the proposed bench and trash receptacle for durability. In
the interest of continuity in the downtown streetscape, staff will consider the same type
of bench and receptacle for use in Coachman Park as part of an upgrade to that facility.
All reviewing groups consider continuity in the streetscape as very important and have
determined the proposed treatment to be in keeping with the overall design goals for
downtown and consistent with the new Downtown Redevelopment Plan.
The proposed improvements on the north side of the 500 block of Cleveland Street
are to be installed entirely at the expense of the Church of Scientology; the church will
also coordinate the installation of these features with FOOT (Florida Department of
Transportation), owner of the right~of-way. Staff recommends approval of this streetscape
modification since it advances the design and aesthetic goals of the City for downtown
Clearwater.
The Mayor noted the City worked to create a cohesive streetscape program and
expressed concern a mishmash of designs not be permitted. Mr. Shuford said the
proposed improvements could be incorporated in the City's design guidelines. In answer to
a Question, he estimated the City had spent $600,000 on the downtown streetscape in
1989.
James Bond, representative for the Scientologists, indicated their plan is to leave
the pavers in place, remove the planter arrangement and replace it. The proposed street
lamp would match those already in use.
Commissioner Berfield referred to recent recommendations by the City's consultant
group that suggested a different type of street lighting and questioned if a follow-up had
been completed regarding that idea. Mr. Shuford said he would report back to the
.....".;
mcc11 b.95
27
11/16/95
Mr. Bond reviewed a brief history of the Scientologist's restoration of the old Bank
of Clearwater building and noted the great effort was expensive. When the project neared
completion, they felt the building would be further improved if the sidewalk in front
reflected the way it looked in the 1920ts and 1930ls. He said the brick planter currently
in place does not integrate with the restored building. He noted the ORB had no difficulty
with this suggestion. Mr. Bond said staff is considering trash receptacles for Coachman
Park simil:;lr to the ones proposed for this location. He said their plan to integrate the style
of the sidewalk with the refurbished building. He pointed out the brick planters originally
shielded pedestrians from traffic before parking was returned to Cleveland Street. He
agreed a complete streetscape design was needed and requested that the Scientologists
be permitted to implement this proposal at their own expense. If changes are made to the
streetscape, he agreed to modify the sidewalk at their own expense.
.'''c "
.-....
Commission regarding that issue. Commissioner Borfield expressed concerns the Church
of Scientology may have to remove the light shortly after they install it.
Commissioner Thomas said he likes the look presented and the rehabilitation of the
building but had a problem with permitting the Scientologists to do something others arB
not allowed to do. He said a decision needs to be made that addresses the whole street.
Mr. Bond said using the Cityts "main street" theme as a guide would preclude something
widely different from being incorporated. Mayor Garvey felt the timing is wrong.
Mr. Shuford questioned if the City Commission objects to the proposal to install in-
,....., grade lights. Mr. Baier said FOOT would determine if they would be permitted.
,~,,) Commissioner Thomas indicated he wanted to see a clearly defined plan before endorsing
that proposal.
Commissioner Thomas moved to deny modification of the streetscape previously
installed by the City and CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency). The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #33 ~ Summer Youth Emplovment Program - final report's recommendations {eM}
The PPIC (Pine lias Private Industry Council, Inc.) issued a report and made
recommendations regarding the City of Clearwater Summer Jobs Program 1995: 1)
allocate monies returned to the City from the 1 995 Summer Program to the program for
1996: 2) notify PPIC regarding the administration of the 1996 City Summer Program by
December 1, 1995; 3) allocate funds for an education/cultural activity; 4) allocate at least
$1,000 for the recognition luncheon for employers and participants; 5) pay 14-15 year
aids $4.25 per hour, 16-18 year olds $5.25 per hour and 19~23 year olds $6.25 per hour;
6) omit parent and participant surveys; and 7) fund the 1996 Summer Youth Employment
and Training Program.
Eleanor Breland, Director of Human Relations, requested comments regarding the
report and asked for approval of the recommendations.
\~
mccl1 b.95
28
11 {1G/95
','
. ~', In reference to Recommendation #1. Commissioner Thomas said he was not a big
proponent of the program and would "dig in his heels" if these funds are to be used to add
cultural events. Ms. Breland said older youths in the program visited a college in
Tallahassee the year before last to encourage interest in higher education. Commissioner
Thomas suggested visits to SPJC (St. Petersburg Junior College) and USF (University of
South Florida) would accomplish the same goat at a reduced cost. Ms. Breland noted the
City Commission would not allow a similar field trip last year.
Consensus was to approve Recommendation # 1) to allocate monies returned to the
City from the 1995 Summer Program to the program for 1996.
In reference to Recommendation #2, Ms. Breland said PPIC wants to be advised of
the City Commission's plans for next year by December 1995.
Consensus was to approve Recommendation #2) to notify PPIC regarding the
administration of the 1996 City Summer Program by Oecember 1, 1995.
In reference to Recommendation #3, Mayor Garvey said she would support it if the
college is specified. Commissioner Thomas felt this is a jobs' program and does not need
to provide cultural experiences. Commissioner Clark said he did not object to the
recommendation if the activity is limited to a trip no farther than USF. Commissioner
Berfield suggested the cost of the field trip come from the money returned from the 1995
Summer Program.
'~I,
........)
Don Rutledge, Program Coordinator for PPIC, said that adjustment was possible. He
indicated PPIC would like to use the money to add more young people to the program. He
reported $18,790 was left over from 1995. The Mayor stated the budget would not be .
increased just to allow PPIC to sponsor a field trip to an educational facility.
The maiority of the Commission approved Recommendation 113) to allocate funds
for an education/cultural activity.
Consensus was to approve Recommendation #4) to allocate at least $1,000 for the
recognition luncheon for employers and participants.
Commissioner Johnson questioned the types of work program participants do. Ms".
Breland said that depends on where the youths are placed. She indicated limited jobs are
available for 14 and 1 5-year aids. She said the difference in the rate of pay is due to the
age of participants and their job skills.
Consensus was to approve Recommendation #5) to pay 14-15 year aids $4.25 per
hour, 16~18 year olds $5.25 per hour and 19-23 year olds $6.25 per hour.
Mr. Rutledge said PPIC has proposed to cancel the surveys for one year. Ms.
Breland said PPIC is concerned regarding the time and expense involved with the surveys.
She said PPIC's goals required them to secure surveys from a certain percentage of the
parents of participants. Staff had to visit homes to meet this goal. Commissioner Thomas
\.~
mcc11b.95
29
11/1 6/95
~'~!'; .
..... felt it was important for parents to be involved in the program. Commissioner Johnson
noted the parents still had to be involved.
The majority of the Commission rejected Recommendation #6) and requested that
parent and participant surveys be continued.
Ms. Breland reported funding for the 1996 Summer Youth Employment and Training
Program has been budgeted.
I
Commissioner Berfield moved to approve Recommendation #7} to fund the 1996
Summer Youth Employment and Training Program. The motion was duly seconded and
carried unanimously.
Commissioner Thomas moved to accept the report with changes that include
limiting school visits to local colleges and continuing with parent and participant surveys.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #34 ~ First Reading Ord. #5940~95 - establishing rates for residential & non-
residential reclaimed water service to Island Estates, Memorial Causeway & Clearwater
Beach and amending various sections of the Code by referencing reclaimed water service
(PW)
, ~"\
_.,l
The City currently supplies low pressure reclaimed water service to four customers
from the Northeast WPC facility and two,customers from the Marshall Street WPC facility.
Customers pay a uniform rate of $13.77 per month per acre of pervious area for service to
this nopen space. tI
Through a petition process, property owners on Island Estates requested the City
provide reclaimed water service to their location, a logical extension of the City's reclaimed
water system. These customers cannot use shallow wells for irrigation due to their
proximity to saltwater and consequently rely on the potable water system for lawn
irrigation and other non-potable uses. Using reclaimed water on Island Estates could
decrease potable water consumption by approximately 650,000 gallons per day.
Reclaimed water is exempt from existing water restrictions.
This ordinance establishes reclaimed water rates for single family, duplex, triplex,
multi~family and open space reclaimed water service on Island Estates, Memorial
Causeway and Clearwater beach. It also revises miscellaneous sections of the Code of
Ordinances by adding references to reclaimed water, provides definitions, and clarifies
responsibilities of the City and customers.
The Engineering Department estimated a high pressure reclaimed water
transmission and distribution system to all of Island Estates would cost $4, 1 62,703. A
grant from the Pine"as~Anclote River Basin Board of SWFWMD (Southwest Florida Water
Management District) for $1,645,125 is anticipated. Another $l-million for this project
has been designated from the sale of City-owned property in HilIsborough County. The
balance of $1,517,578 is the customer share of project costs.
~
mccl1 b.95
30
11/16/95
.r- .,
~'.
Proposed monthly rates for each service connection provided on Island Estates are:
1) Single family, duplex or triplex - $18 per domestic water account; 2) multi~family ~
$4.72 per dwelling unit; and 3) open space ~ $70.25 per acre of pervious area. To
encourage customers to hook up to adjacent reclaimed water mains, a monthly
"Availability Only" charge is established for customers who do not roquest connection for
available reclaimed water service: 1) Single family, duplex or triplex ~ $14.70 per domestic
water account; 2) multi-family ~ $3.89 per dwelling unit; and 3) open space - $39.89 per
acre of pervious area.
Proposed reclaimed water rates are lower than lawn meter rates for potable water
except in instances of extremely low consumption. A single family customer using 1,600
cubic feet of reclaimed water each month would save more than $26 when compared to
current lawn meter charges. Rates are calculated to recover the customer portion of the
capital outlay for the reclaimed main extension as well as operating, administrative, billing
and maintenance costs. Charges for future reclaimed water service for Memorial
Causeway and Clearwater beach arB anticipated to be similar to Island Estates and are
included in the proposed rate schedule that will be reviewed annually and revised as
necessary. Reclaimed water rates should gradually decrease as more customers come on
line, reclaimed mains extend to other areas, and more customers share the capital outlay
portion.
-,,/
The proposed rates allow customers unlimited consumption of reclaimed water;
consequently, no meters will be installed initially. They may be required at a later date.
Investigations have shown that most new reclaimed water systems do not install meters
until the system demand approaches the available supply. No connection fee will be
charged the City to install its facilities to the point of delivery. Adoption of this ordinance
is recommended to enable potential customers to know the costs associated with this new
service in advance.
Commissioner Berfield moved to establish rates for residential and non-residential
reclaimed water service to Island Estates, Memorial Causeway and Clearwater beach and
amending various sections of the Code of Ordinances by referencing reclaimed water
service. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance 1/5940~95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Clark moved to pass Ordinance #5940-95 on first reading. The
motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM #35 - Contract to purchase real orooerty located at 128 N. Osceola Ave. from the
Greater Chamber of Commerce, Sec. 16~29-15, for $300,000 and pay related transaction
costs including environmental audit, boundary survey and recording fees maximally
~
mcc11 b.95
31
, , /16/95
Ann Duncan, Chamber of Commerce Board Chair, said the Chamber is happy to
have reached this point. She noted concern hf\rl b~~.i'l t:xpressed regarding the City's
current or.r.ur-:t:~;-; ;:,: ii F~ Cnamoer's new tacility and stated the Chamber did not intend to
collect any additional rent from the City for that use.
,'-""" estimated at $5,250, for an estimated total $305,250, and approve a lease~back of the
property to the Chamber for up to 12 months for total rent of $1 (City Manager)
On June 1, 1995, the City Commission approved a maximum offer of $300,000 to
the Greater Clearwater Chamber of Commerce for its headquarters property. Chamber
officials have executed a standard City purchase contract that provides: 1) the entire
contract is subject to City Commission approval, with the exception of the purchase price,
which was previously approved; 2) closing the transaction is contingent upon the Chamber
simultaneously closing its contract with Barnett Bank to purchase property at 11 30
ChNeland Street; 3) closing shall not occur sooner than December 8 nor later than
December 29, 1995; 4) the Chamber shall retain occupancy of the premises for up to one
year following closing far total rent of $1 under the Lease Agreement made a part of the
purchase contract; and 5) the lease requires the City to provide the Chamber with not less
than 180 days notice to vacate if the property is required for munIcipal purposes. It further
provides the Chamber may terminate the lease upon 30 days notice to the City. These
stipulations are incorporated in the lease in consideration of extensive remodeling the
Chamber will undertake prior to occupying the prooerty at 1130 Cleveland Street.
.'.""")
,,'t!!/:'
Bob Wright said the media has fabricated a great deal of misinformation regarding
this proposal. After researching this item, he indicated a fee simple deed exists. On
December 31, 1963, the City conveyed the property to the Chamber of Commerce but
reserved all right of reversion to the property. The City agreed to subordinate its claim to
the mortgage holder, meaning whoever holds the mortgage has first rights. Mr. Wright
expressed concern the building probably has asbestos which could cost upwards of $0.5-
million to abate.
David Little said the request was embarrassing as the taxpayers of Clearwater gave
the Chamber money to build the building as well as the property on which it sits. He
expressed concern the Chamber has spent a great deal of their resources on a PAC
(Political Action Committee). He noted the building is in sad shape.
Chuck Pollick said the $300,000 purchase price does not include addressing
asbestos removal. He expressed concern the Chamber opposed the Sky tower but
supported this expenditure of taxpayers' money. He recommended the City review the
building's asbestos problems before agreeing to the purchase.
John Doran said he was not adamantly opposed to the purchase but he did not like
it.
Dr. Ken Rosenow said the City Commission was elected to watch the taxpayers'
money. He said he resented this use of his tax monies and recommended the Commission
review the purchase carefully.
v
mec11 b.95
32
11/16/95
, ,
"
Commissioner Thomas said the proposal is repugnant. He expressed concern the
citizens gave the Chamber the land and money to construct the building and now the
Chamber wants tho citizens to' buy it back. He said the Chamber is a political organization
that works to elect members of the City Commission to do their bidding. He noted the
City Commission had voted to give $20,000 to the Tampa Bay Partnership without debate
last month when he was not present. He reported he gave $1 ,000 to the Tampa Bay
Partnership several months ago and never heard from them. Commissioner Thomas said
the Chamber wants to faze the City's main library and develop the bluff but the City's
development of the Harborview Center ruined those plans.
Commissioner Berfield questioned the presence of asbestos. The City Attorney said
the right to inspect the property is included in the contract and environmental and
boundary surveys have been scheduled. If asbestos is found, the City can choose not to
close. Commissioner Berfield questioned if the City would be responsible for the current
$ 1 00,000 mortgage if the Chamber does not repay it. The City Attorney said the reverter
would be subject to the mortgage that will be satisfied following the sale. Commissioner
Clark said he wanted the bluff back.
'\
I
~ r~'
~"
Commissioner Clark moved to approve a contract to purchase real property located
at 128 N. Osceola Avenue from the Greater Clearwater Chamber of commerce, legally
described as a portion of Section 16, Township 29 south, Range 15 East, as more
particularly described in Exhibit "A" of the contract, for $300,000, and pay recording fees
maximally estimated at $5,250, for an estimated total cost of $305,250, and approve a
lease-back of the property to the Chamber for up to 1 2 months for a total rent of $1 and
that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The motion was duly
seconded. Commissioners Berfield, Johnson and Clark and Mayor Garvey voted "Aye";
Commissioner Thomas voted "Nay." Motion carried.
ITEM 1/36 - First ReadinQ Ord. #5944~95 - Granting to Florida Power Corp. a non-exclusive
electric utility franchise to occupy municipal streets and rights-of-way in the City, for the
purpose of providing electric and power services; prescribing the terms and conditions
accompanying the grant of franchise; providing for severability of provisions; for a period
of 30 years (eM)
The ordinance expands the franchise fee base by including industrial customer sales
and eliminating the credit for ad valorem taxes and licenses paid by FPC (Florida Power
Corporation). This change will increase franchise fee revenue to the City by an estimated
$275,000, annually. If either FPC or the City, in the future, are adversely aftected in
terms of lost revenue (1 % or more) as a result of retail wheeling, franchise fees can be
renegotiated. The Franchise ordinance is for the non-exclusive use of the City's rights-ot-
way in accordance with other City ordinances and administrative requirements: permits,
licenses, notifications, etc. The ordinance allows for electrical competition dependent on
possible future changes to State law. The ordinance contains a revised Favored Nations
clause that provides the City the right to obtain the same franchise fee percentage and/or
base as any other entity in the company's service area. The City Commission must
approve any transfer of the electric franchise. The ordinance contains an audit provision
t~
mcc11 b.95
33
11/16/95
. f
. ........ that anows the City to conduct audits of the last five years of company activity. In cases
where errors Bre discovered, the ordinance allows for the reimbursement of audit costs and
the accrual of 10% interest on unpaid franchise fees. In a separate lease agreement, FPC
will lease to the City a parcel of land next to the Clearwater Beach Recreation Center. The
City has been using this property for a parking area and boat launching ramp in exchange
for paying the property taxes of approximately $10,000 per year. The lease agreement
will be for a 30~year period and require the City to make lease payments of $1 per year
without paying the property taxes. In a separate letter, FPC will indicate their acceptance
of this ordinance and their continued support to the City's local economy. FPC will
continue to work with the City regarding burying electrical facilities in accordance with the
applicable tariff approved by the Public Service Commission. The audit of the electrical
franchise fees' and utility taxes over the last five years resulted in the City receiving an
additional $17,888.23 of revenue.
Janice Case, Florida Power Suncoast regional vice-president, reviewed the
franchise's history and indicated Florida Power and the City have had a long partnership.
She said the proposed 3D-year franchise recognizes competition but solidifies the
partnership. She announced the Palmetto site will house the company's new telephone
operation and employees will be moved to this location. She noted Florida Power's rental
of property to the City adiacent to the Clearwater Beach Recreation Center is connected to '
the agreement.
. .
'\
I
~...-'"
Commissioner Thomas moved to approve the Florida Power Electric Franchise for a
period of 30 years and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5944-95 for first reading and read it by
title only. Commissioner Berfield moved to pass Ordinance #5944-95 on first reading.
The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Thomas, Johnson, Clark and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
,
Commissioner Thomas moved to continue the meeting past midnight. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #37 - Advertisina in Beach Views (eLK)
As letters were submitted today by the Beach Views and there has not been an
opportunity to review them, the City Manager requested continuing this item.
Commissioner Thomas moved to continue this item to December 7, 1995. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #38 ~ 1996 Legislative Package (CLK)
y
mcc1 1 b.95
34
11/16/95
'.,
. "" At Monday's Work Session, the City Clerk requested the City Commission
designate those issues they wanted to be considered top priority. It was suggested there
be two designations of strong support and strong opposition.
Consensus was to rank the following issues as high priority for support: 1) Memorial
Causeway bridge funding; 2) Sand Key beach renourishment; 3) water issues; 4) enclaves;
5) partial year assessment; 6) cruise ship sales tax; 7) child pornography; 8) government
attorney/client session; 9) ready to consume alcoholic beverages; and 10) handicapped
parking permits; for opposition: 1) local government mandates; 2) Professional Engineering
exemption; 3) municipal right to expand utilities; 4) presumption of disability benefits for
police; and 5) functional classification of roads.
\
I
...,...,,,'
General issues of support include: 1} bridge funding; 2) funding for program
addressing the needs of homeless persons; 3) gun control; 4) sales and use of fireworks;
5) amendment to public record law regarding mail; 6) prohibition of solicitation at polls; 7)
regulation of family care homes; 8) construction industry licensing board; 9) mangrove
protection; 10) fish & wildlife action plan; 11) bay habitats; 12) jet ski regulation; 13)
public service (utility) tax fuel cost; 14) municipal taxing authority; 1 5) flexibility to
municipalities; 1 6) high-mast lighting: operation and maintenance cost; 17) signage on
State roads; 18) revising penalties for specific misdemeanors from criminal to civil; 19)
sale or retitle of vehicles with unrebuildable titles; 20) clarify powers and procedures of the
Special Master; 21) cost recovery for code cases; 22) revision of statutory notice
requirements for the adoption of ordinances; 23) Florida single audit; 24) impact fees; 25)
alternative fuel vehicles; 26) one-call bill legislation; 27) solid waste recycling (flow
control); 28) amend requirements for advertising public hearings; and 29) regulation of
bingo.
General issues of opposition include: 1) solid waste collection, disposal & recycling;
2) definition of recovered material; 3) ad valorem taxes outside of municipal limits; and 4)
shifting program funding from the federal level.
Commissioner Johnson moved to accept the 1996 Legislative Package with top
priority support/oppose designations. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
ITEM #39 - Other pendinq Mat~!3rs
a) Change in concept for 3rd floor of Harborview Center
The initial design of the Harborview Centeris third floor envisioned a food handling
kitchen and full restaurant kitchen. As opening day approaches, it has been determined
that a full cooking and catering kitchen is necessary along with a restaurant kitchen to
meet the Center's catering needs.
Staff has re-evaJuated the Center's third floor and. with consultation by GFS (Globe
Facility Services, Inc.), has determined a larger space for the catering kitchen is needed.
The Center has had a large demand for the windowed 4,000 square foot area to be
~
mcc11 b.S5
35
11/16/95
Ms. Rice reviewed the background of plans for the Harborview Center's third floor.
She estimated annual revenues of between $98,000 and $131,000. Commissioner Clark
questioned the estimated income from the restaurant that was part of the original
proposal, Ms. Rice said that proposal had been for $60,000 per year for three years.
Commissioner Clark questioned if the proposal limited use of the kitchen to one caterer.
Ms. Rice said GFS (Globe Facility Services, Inc.) had made that recommendation.
Commissioner Berfield expressed concern that problems could result from designating only
one caterer. Ms. Rice said she would bring back a White Paper prepared by GFS outlining
the pros and cons of limiting banquet business to one caterer. Commissioner Berfield
requested the report include input from Ruth Eckerd Hall.
'., .:
. " rentable space as opposed to a fixed restaurant. Staff feels if a restaurant is needed later,
one could be constructed. This would provide the Center the most potential for flexibility,
rentable space, and income. The budget for this project was $600,000. Staff anticipates
this change may save $100,000.
The potential revenue for a year is estimated to be twice the anticipated revenue
from H leased restaurant. If the City Commission approves, staff will have Dean Rowe
design a larger catering kitchen and finish out the remaining space under the cost already
approved for the catering kitchen and restaurant.
"~-"'\
1 I
....."..,..
Commissioner Johnson moved to appiC'w'e a rRsuu~turing of the third floor of the
Harborview Center to increase the size of the catering kitchen and finish out the remaining
4,000 square feet for management by GFS (Globe Facility Services, Inc.) for a banquet
area and that the appropriate ofticlals be authorized to execute same. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The Commission meeting recessed from 12:29 to 12:31 a.m.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
ITEM #40 - Other City Attornev Items
Attorney/Client Session
The City Attorney requested an attorney/client session regarding the City versus":
Fishermants Wharf, et aI., be scheduled for December 4. 1995 at 9:00 a.m. Consensus
was to so schedule.
ITEM #41 ~ City Manager Verbal ReDons
The City Manager reported she will attend a National League of Cities Conference
after her vacation and will not return to work at City Hall until December 4, 1995.
!LI;M #42 ~ Other Commission Action
v
mccl1 b.95
36
11/16/95
. :" ":j"
~T)~~;"~~:' :: ~ '.',
.-,,,,
Commissioner Johnson referred to a letter from the city of Oldsmar requesting
support of an amendment to restrict the sales and use of fireworks. Ha notad this issue is
listed in the City's 1996 legislative program.
Consensus was to write a letter stating the City Commission supports the
amendment.
Commis~ioner Barfield reported the City received $24,657 in extra income from
Stein Mart in the Harborview Center.
Commissioner Thomas indicated the CRA Executive Director. Peter Gozza, had not
predicted Stein Mart would reach $10-million sales in first year as reported by the media.
He stated that figure represents sales at a mature location.
Commissioner Thomas noted the meeting was started without an invocation as
req'uired by City Commission rules. He requested following the rules in the future. He
offered a prayer to close the meeting.
ITEM #43 - AdiQurnment
The meeting adjourned at 12:36 a.m.
....-"JI~
\~~~
.
ATTEST: Clli"=~ l. !i. -..Q, .
\.l City Clerk
loner
v
mcc11b.95
37
11/16/95