07/18/1995 (2)
. . . .' . . I . . . .' '. . .' .' .~ ' " . ~.' . .' '"
~:;:.
.,
"
"
;~
(
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD - ACTION AGENDA
~, Tuesday, July 18, 1995
. ,
Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
A. Approval of Minutes ~ June 27, 1995 -Approved as submitted.
B. Requests for Extension, Deferred and Continued Items
1. (cant. from 6113195) Faith United Church of Christ, Inc to permit child day care at 2401
Drew Street, Sec 18-29-16, M&B 12.02 and Eastwood Terrace 3rd Addition, Blk F, lots 1, 3-
6, zoned P/SP (PublicJSemi Public). CU 95-38
ACTION: Approved Item Bl subject to the following conditions: 1) The requisite building and
parking lot permits shall be obtained prior to installation of the modular building and no
later than six months after the date of this public hearing; and 2) tile perimeter landscaping
requirements of Sec. 42.27 shall be provided prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy/use.
2. (referred by Commission 5104/95) 509 Bayview Ave and 508 Meadow lark lane, McMullen
Bayview Sub, Tract A, Blk 3, Lots 1 & 2 and south 1/2 of right-of-way to the r)orth (R. Roy
Meador) Z 93-54; lUP 93-43
ACTION: Endorsed Item 82 to the City Commission
, ("~I;
~
3. (cant. from 6/27/95) R. Roy Meador, Trustee of the R. Roy Meador Revocable Living Trust to
permit utility facilities; detention pond at 509 Bayview Ave & 508 Meadowlark Lane, Town
of Bayview Sub a/KIa McMullen's Bay View Sub, Blk 3, part of lots 1 & 2, zoned RS 6 (Single
Family Residential). CU 95-45
ACTION: Approved Item 83 for a conditional use for a retention pond (utility facility) on Lots 1
and 2, Town of Bayview, subject to the adoption of the requested Future Land Use Plan
Amendment to Commercial General and Zoning Atlas Amendment to Commercial Planned
Development.
1
i
1
I
4. (cont. from 6/27/95) 1221 & 1256 Bay Ave, 317, 323 & 325 Pinellas St, and 1225 Reynolds
Ave, Westover Sub, Blk B, lots 1-2 & 17, C. Perry Snell's Bluff View Court, Lots 22~24, and
S.}. Reynolds Sub, Lot 8 (Morton Plant Hospital Association and Evrnorphia M. KraUs) Z 95-
02; LUP 95-13
LUP: From Residential/Office General 10 Institutional
lONE: From OL (Limited Office) to MPD (Master Planned Development)
ACTION: Continued /tern B4 to the meeting of August 15, 1995
C. Conditional Uses:
1. luVerne M. loken, TRE to permit congregate care at 2780 Drew St, See 08-29-10, portion of
M&B 34.04, zoned RM 16 (Residential Multiple Family). CU 95-46
ACTION: Approved Item Cl subject to the following conditions: 1) The requisite preliminary
plat certification shall be obtained within one year of the date of this public hearing; 2) the
requisite site plan certification shall be obtained within one year of the date of this public
hearing; 3) the requisite building permit shall be obtained prior to tile start of construction,
but no later than three months after the date of certification of the preliminary plat; and 4)
the requisite certificate of occupancy sh<111 be obtained within two years of this public
hearing.
.~
P&Z ACTION
Page I or 2
07/18/95
. 10<<1
" ," ' .. I ",,' , . . . . . ". ' ' ,~ _,' . ~'. T --:- ,
f'l~";'-;' . :',- . 'ci : ' " '~ :
r' .
l
,
, . .1;." c: "~;'/',",
, ~ '.
, ~ !'.
'.,
"\
\
D. Annexation, Zoning, land Use Plan Amendment, Land Development Code Text Amendment
and Local Planning Agency Review '
f
f
I .
\
~
I
"
I
i
I.
1. Downtown Redevelopment Pkm - Pete Gozza, eRA Executive Director.
ACTION: Endorsed Item 01 to the City Commission
2. 109 Meadow Lark lane 8, Bayview City Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1 & 2 and abutting alley to the
South (Lisa A. Kadlec) A 95.14; lUP 95-16
LUP: Residential Urban
ZONE: RS 8 (Single Family Residential)
3. 1531 Stevenson Drive, Stevenson's Heights Sub, Blk B, Lot 7
(Thomas L. Booth) A 95-15; lUP 95-17
LUP: Residential Low
lONE: RS 8 (Single Family Residential)
4. 412 Oakmount Road, Oakmount Sub, Lot 2 and abutting right-of-way
(Fred O. Clark, Jr & Valerie P. Warren) A 95-17; LUP 95-19
LUP: Residential Low
ZONE: RS 6 (Single Family Residential)
...~
'~J
5. 1236 Kapok Circle, Kapok Forest, Lot 14
[Waldemar W. Sario & Lynn Hassell (Attorney-in-facO] A 95-18; lUP 95-20
LUP: Residential Low
ZONE: RS 6 (Single Family Residential)
6. 1238 Brookside Drive, Meadow Creek Sub, Blk C, Lot 10
(Roger K. & Gayle K. Coulter) A 95-19; LUP 95-21
LU P: Residential Low
lONE: RS 4 (Single Family Residential)
ACTION: Endorsed Items 02 through D6 to the City Commission
7. 1969 Sunset Point Road, Pinellas Groves Sub, SW 1/4, part of Lots 1 & 2
(K.D. Sauder TRE & K.D. Saudp.r, Trust), Z 95-03
ZONE: From Neighborhood Commercial to General Commercial
ACTION: Endorsed Item 07 to the City Commission
8. 705, 707, 709, & 711 Jasmine Way, Magnol ia Park, Blk 31, Lots 2, 3, 4 & 5
(Rhoda S. Smolensky & Rosemary S. Kornreich). Z 95-04
lONE: From Neighborhood Commercial to Commercial Planned Development
ACTION: Endorsed Item DB to the City Commission
E. Chairman's Items - None
F. Director's Items - None
G. Board and Staff Comments ~ O;scussion
H. Adjournment ~ 5:02 p.m.
\J
P&Z ACTION
Page 2 of 2
07/18/95
(", .
.~ ~,
. ... .c ...c,r<~
, c .
,}. "
~~~~.~j;,~.,', .'
-i",> '.
~~
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
July 18, 1995
Members Present:
Kemper Merriam, Chair
Jay Keyes, Vice Chair
Robert D. Bickerstaffe
Edward Mazur
john Carassas
Brenda Nixon
Bernie Baron
Also Present:
Sandra Glatthorn, Manager, Central Permitting
Gwen Legters, Board Reporter, City Clerk Department
The Chairman outlined the procedures for conditional uses and advised that anyone adversely
affected by a decision of the Planning and Zoning Board, with regard to conditional uses, has two
weeks from this date in which to file an appeal through the City Clerk Department. Florida Law
requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings to
support the appeal.
In order to provide continuity, the items will be listed in agenda order although not necessarily
discussed in that order.
(,:,,;,,>\
'"oI~
A. Approval of Minutes - June 27, 1995
Member Merriam questioned page 3 of the minutes regarding inclusion of staff condition #5 in
the Kapok Pavilion motion (CU 9447). It was indicated consensus had been to include the
condition, amending it to read, "Kapok Pavilion shall police the parking lot to ~ nuisance
behavior..." .
Member Carassas moved to approve the minutes of June 27, 1995, in accordance with copies
subm itted to each Board member in writing. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
B. Requests for Extension, Deferred and Continued Items
81. (cont from 6/13/95) Faith United Church of Christ, Inc to permit child day care at
2401 Drew Street, Sec 18-29-16, M&B 12.02 and Eastwood Terrace 3rd Addition, Blk
F, Lots 1, 3-6, zoned P/SP (PublidSemi Public). CU 95.38
Ms. Glatthorn gave the background of the case and presented, in writing, the staff
recommendation. She stated this item was continued from June 13 to allow the applicant time
to relocate the proposal to the southeast corner of the site in response to concerns expressed by
. the neighbors. Staff worked with the applicant to accomplish this and recommended approval
subject to two standard conditions.
-..-I
mpz07a.95
Page 1 of 8
07/1 B/95
c"r;~
, '. . . ~ ..~ . . '. , ~ . .'. " , . I' .' -' L ~. . .' " >
:?~4~\; -~ .
"
. -....
Paul Hall, representing the child care center Board of Directors, outlined the changes to the
proposal. He stated the play area will be fenced with chain link, the drive widened and perimeter
landscaping provided. He agreed with staff recommendations.
Vangie Mosich, President of the Board of Directors and Pastor David Charles Smith spoke in
support of the application.
The applicants were commended for coming back with such an excellent plan.
Member Bickerstaffe moved to approve Item B 1 subject to the following conditions: 1) The
requisite building and parking lot permits shall be obtained prior to installation of the modular
building and no later than six months after the date of this public hearing; and 2) the perimeter
landscaping requirements of Sec. 42.27 shall be provided prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy/use. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
82. (Referred by Commission 5/4/95) 509 Bayview Ave and 508 Meadow lark Lane,
McMullen Bayview Sub, Tract A, Blk 3, Lots 1 & 2 and south 1/2 of rjght~of~way to the
north (R. Roy Meador) Z 93.54; lUP 93-43
Ms. Glatthorn gave the background of the case regarding previous hearings, site plan changes and
conditions. She enumerated the Development Review Committee1s (DRC) recommended site plan
changes and presented, in writing, staff recommendations.
"".,.)
\.A'lo.
'~+
Member Mazur expressed concern with having alcoholic beverages available where gasoline is
sold. It was indicated the beer. and wine sales portion of this application is a part of the site plan,
becau!>'e it is a planned development, not a separate conditional use. For clarification, it was
indicated a conditional use for the retention pond was requested as a separate item due to the pond
extending into the residential lot to the south.
Harry Cline, attorney representing the applicant, displayed a map of the site. He described how
each of the previously expressed concerns has been addressed. He displayed a second map of the
site as it would appear under a Commercial Planned Development (CPO) zoning. He stated they
worked extensively with the City forester regarding the location of the retention pond, and 19 of
the 20 trees on the site wilt be saved. Landscape buffering is to exceed the requirements. Mr.
Cline said the estimate for building the requested eight foot masonry wall along the southerly
boundary was over $14,000 and was not feasible. He stated a six foot wooden fence will be built
instead. Other concerns addressed were reconfiguration of the gas pump islands, narrowing the
driveway and relocating a dumpster.
Discussion ensued regarding location of the retention pond. In response to a question regarding
the exact placement of the pond, it was indicated the legal description is on the site plan.
Two citizens spoke in support of the application as follows:
William S. Connolly, owner of the adjacent property to the east, felt the applicant has done
everything asked of him and should be allowed to improve his property. .
~
mpz07a.95
Page 2 of 8
07/18/95
~t(':'"
I~
~
Rohert Roy Meador, Jr., the owner/applicant, stated the subject property has been in his family
for 50 years. He said no one accepted his offer to donate the house on the southerly lot and he
had it demolished. He wishes to be able to improve the property and reviewed his efforts to
satisfy neighbors' concerns.
Eleven citizens spoke in opposition to the application as follows:
Breck Parker, area resident, expressed environmental and historical concerns. He stated a $7,000
estimate for a masonry wall was faxed to the applicant. He gave a brief history of the houses and
property owners in the vicinity and Commission action regarding the site.
Sherry Collins, area resident, expressed concern with neighborhood safety for her daughter. She
stated she has worked with her neighbors to reduce the number of transients and drug and alcohol
related problems in the area.
Charles Martin, 20 year area resident, distributed copies of a historic resources survey prepared
by Howard Hansen. Mr. Martin indicated the neighborhood has declined.
Jack Alvord, area resident, spoke regarding property ownership and responsibility of government
to observe its own laws. He listed other applications granted against the wishes of Bayview
residents. He complained his water well was cut off when the old McMullen house was
demol ished.
f:,l~~i\
'1!'1~~"
Terry Dopking read a letter from Brian P. Mullen, who could not attend. Mr. Mullen requested
these hearings be held at night. He felt a bigger gas station was not needed, would not create jobs
and would encourage more transients. Ms. Dopking expressed concerns regarding rezoning,
alcohol sales and the safety of her children.
Mary Alvord referred to a chronology of the gas station she said was contained ill the case file.
She opposed the rezoning, naming numerous groups which have spoken and petitioned in
opposition. She cited specific standards for approval she felt were being violated.
Barbara Sartor, Dunedin resident, stated her mother is an adjacent property owner to the south.
She indicated there are strong memories of the area and they did not want to see it degenerate.
Mary B. McMullen, adjacent property owner, opposed the rezoning because of the proximity to
her back yard. She wished for a better plan that would enable her to better enjoy her home.
Dennis Grinstead, adjacent business owner, opposed the land Use Plan amendment, indicating
the proposal was not appropriate for the property. He expressed concern the proposal would put
his small grocery store out of business.
In response to questions, Mr. Grinstead stated he carries a full line of groceries and convenience
items. He said his prices are competitive with those in convenience stores and all of his business
comes from the neighborhood.
~
mpz07il.95
Page] of 11
07/t8/95
'; ,
;;'.' ,
;...~
Early McMullen Sorenson, area resident, stated he hopes to live here all his life. Reading from
the Code, he expressed concerns the rezoning is not compatible with the area. He did not feel
the proximity of the two residential lots to Gulf to Bay Boulevard poses a hardship for the
applicant. He cited examples of how other similarly situated residential properties have dealt with
the matter. Mr. Sorenson described conditions existing on the surrounding properties and how
the proposal affects them.
Allan Stowell, Clearwater resident, expressed concern the application violates the Cilyls
Comprehensive land Use Plan. Reading from the Code, he stated the standards for approval are
not being met. He read from a letter written by Attorney John Hubbard concerning violation of
the zoning standards. Mr. Stowell displayed a map highlighting the proposed rezoning, stating
it is not in the public interest and is incompatible with surrounding Uses.
Mr. Hubbard's letter was submitted for the record at the request of the Board.
In c1osing, Mr. Cline responded to the concerns of the opposition, reiterating how each is to be
addressed. He displayed a map of the Gulf to Bay Boulevard corridor, demonstrating the
application is in line with zoning in the area. Concerning placement of the proposal in a more
northerly location, Mr. Cline indicated setbacks cannot be met and again recounted Mr.
Mayberry's extensive review of the site.
I.""')
~.
In response to questions Mr. Cline pointed out the land into which the pond extends belongs to
the applicant. He expressed the view that zoning is intended to be transitional and should change
slightly as goals change over time. Concerning the historical nature of the neighborhood, Mr.
Cline pointed out the Fina station has been there for 50 years and the owners are entitled to some
ability to maintain it. He stated the remaining residential lot to the south, though irregularly
shaped, has single family zoning and meets code. In response to a question, Mr. Cline stated this
project is site specific and any other construction would be subject to Board approval.
Concern was expressed this seems to be a massive project for the small number of pumps
involved. Clarification was requested.
Jim Smith, President of the Co-op Oil Company, responded to questions. He stated Rich Baier,
the City Engineer, advocated the proposed configuration to avoid traffic stacking up into the right-
of-way. He said there will be three pumping units with three hoses on each side, for a total of 18
hoses. The diesel pump was eliminated due to environmental concerns associated with use of
the fuel. He estimated 15 percent of his revenue comes from alcoholic beverage sales. While
he agreed drinking while driving is a problem, he felt the ability to sell alcohol was necessary for
the business to remain viable.
.~
Board members in support of the request felt the applicant could not have done more to mitigate
any impact to the surrounding properties. The plan to improve, not expand the existing business
was felt to be common sense. While it was agreed a gas station is not the best use in a residential
area, it was indicated that use exists in many places and should not be required to move out to
accommodate the neighbors. It was noted the applicant has done everything asked of him to
protect the neighborhood and the environment. No reason was found for the project not to
proceed. .
mpz07a.95
P.lge 4 of 8
07/10/95
83. (cant. from 6/27/95) R. Roy Meador, Trustee of the R. Roy Meador Revocable living
Trust to permit utility facilities; detention pond at 509 Bayview Ave & 508 Meadowlark
lane, Town of Bayview Sub a/k/a McMullen's Bay View Sub, Blk 3, part of Lots 1 & 2,
zoned RS 6 (Single Family Residential). CU 95~45
'-\ While not rejecting the proposal as a whole, members not in support of the request expressed
their reservations. Opposition to selling one or two cans of beer to drivers was voiced. It was felt
the project does not align with the Comprehensive land Use Plan. Concerns were expressed the
application does not support the standards for approval. The impact of a commercial property
encroaching into a residential area was protested. Concern was expressed with splilting the lots.
It was felt approving the application would compromise the Board's commitment to serve the
public and set an unwanted precedent.
Member Carassas moved, concerning Item B2, to endorse the Future Land Use Plan amendment
to Commercial General and Zoning Atlas amendment to Commercial Planned Development as
requested. The motion was duly seconded and, upon the vote being taken, Members Keyes,
Nixon, Carassas, and Baron voted "Aye"; Members Merriam, Mazur, and Bickerstaffe voted "Nay."
Motion carried.
,''''''''j
......,.
Member Carassas moved, concerning Item 83, to approve a conditional use for a retention pond
(utility fadlity) on Lots 1 and 2, Town of Bayv;ew, subject to the adoption of the requested Future
Land Use Plan Amendment to Commercial General and Zoning Atlas Amendment to Commercial
Planned Development. The motion was duly seconded and, upon the vote being takent Members
Keyes, Mazur, Nixon, Carassas, and Baron voted "Ayel!; Members Merriam and Bickerstaffe voted
"Nay." Motion carried.
84. (cont. from 6/27/95) 1221 & 1256 Bay Ave, 317, 323 & 325 pinellas St, and 1225
Reynolds Ave, Westover Sub, Blk B, lots 1 ~2 & 17, C. Perry Snell's Bluff View Court,
lots 22-24, and S.J. Reynolds Sub, Lot 8 (Morton plant Hospital Association and
Evmorphia M. Kralis) Z 95~02; lUP 95.13
LUP: From Residential/Office General to Institutional
lONE: From OL (Limited Office) to MPD (Master Planned Development)
Member Mazur declared a conflict of interest with regard to this case.
In a letter dated July 17, 1995/ Emil Marquardt, requested a 3D-day continuance to allow time to
clarify certain aspects of the Morton Plant Master Plan.
Member Keyes moved to continue Item 84 to the meeting of August 15, 1995. The motion was
duly seconded and upon the vote being taken, Members Merriam, Keyes, Nixon, Carassas, Baron
and Bickerstaffe voted "Aye"; Member Mazur abstained. Motion carried.
C. Conditional Use Applications
'.-J
C1. luVerne M. loken, TRE to permit congregate care at 2780 Drew 5t, See 08~29-16,
portion of M&B 34.04, zoned RM 16 (Residential Multiple Family). CU 95~46
mpz07a.95
Paga 5 of B
07/\8/95
~~..:": ':.
.-" Member Nixon declared a conflict of interest with regard to this case.
l
Kenneth Burke and Ruth Phillips, representing the applicant, addressed the Board. Mr. Burke
stated Mr. and Mrs. Phillips already operate two congregate care facilities in Palm Harbor. Due
to their high quality care and excellent reputation, they are expanding to meet the needs of their
new residents and referrals. They feel the proposed location near an elementary school and a
nursing home is perfect for the project. He stated the operation will be a good neighbor and
benefit the community. The facility will have space to serve up to 90 elderly people with
everything but medical care. He stated 24 staff members will assist each 36 beds. He pointed
out the request meets the standards for approval and requested favorable consideration.
Questions were raised regarding the number of beds and the number of rooms. Mr. Burke
responded the plan provides for ten private rooms with one bed each and 40 double rooms with
two beds. He did not foresee many couples using the facility, stating residents would more likely
be roommates. The rooms are not considered .'unitsll, as they consist of bath and sleeping
quarters without kitchens. Discussion ensued regarding the parking calculations.
Eight letters of support from doctors, professional guardians and customers were submitted as part
of the application packet.
No one was present to speak in support or opposition to the request.
(:,,'.i,,"h
~rl"1
Member Keyes moved, concerning Item Cl, to approve the conditional use as requested subject
to the following conditions: 1) The requisite preliminary plat certification shall be obtained within
one year of the date of this public hearing; 2) the requisite site plan certification shall be obtained
within one year of the date of this public hearing; 3) the requisite building p'ermit shall be
obtained prior to the start of construction, but no later than three months after the date of
certification of the preliminary plat; and 4) the requisite certificate of occupancy shall be obtained
within two years of this public hearing. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
D. Annexation, Zoning, Land Use Plan Amendment, Land Development Code Text Amendment
and Local Planning Agency Review
1. Downtown Redevelopment Plan - Pete Gozza, CRA Executive Director.
The City Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) retained a consulting group to prepare a
Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Copies of the proposed plan were submitted for Board review.
It was indicated such a plan must be reviewed for consistency with the City1s Comprehensive
Plan.
Mr. Gozza outlined the key points and displayed a map highlighting details of the proposed plan.
He stressed the plan is still in the conceptual stage and is open to changes and suggestions.
Mr. Gozza responded to questions regarding street layout, parking access and use density.
Additional questions were raised regarding means of accessing the proposed bridge, Harborvlew
Center and the Pinellas Trail. Mr. Gozza indicated this is a conceptual land use plan and the
-./ traffic patterns have not yet been addressed.
IllpzOla,95
Page 6 of 8
07/18/95
i}j,I.' ", '."". '0
. .1/ ,~. . J','
I .. ~. .
f~rt;r\ . :
,'" ~ \. '
.~ Discussion ensued regarding placement of the Pinellas Trail, and building a hotel on the
waterfront. One suggestion was to have a Coco Walk in Clearwater, similar to the one in Miami's
Coconut Grove, which was proposed for Ybor City. Mr. Gozza stated in response to questions,
they are considering condominiums and office buildings, with the tallest being 15 stories.
Discussion ensued regarding development of a downtown lake and development of the
surrounding property. A suggestion was made for the City Commission to first consider
developing the lake and letting the market forces take over the commercial development. In
response to a question, Mr. Gozza stated this is the last time the plan will be presented to the
Planning and Zoning Board before it goes before the Commission.
Mr. Gozza indicated the consultants will prepare an executive summary of the plan and provide
a camera ready copy to the City. He stated staff has reviewed the plan for consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan and recommended endorsement to the City Commission.
Member Keyes moved to endorse the Downtown Redevelopment Plan to the City Commission.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
02. 109 Meadow lark lane B, Bayview City Sub, Blk 2, lots 1 & 2 and abutting alley
to the South (Lisa A. Kadlec) A 95-14; lUP 95~16
lUP: Residential Urban ZONE: RS 8 (Single Family Residential)
l:,V{f.j
~
03. 1531 Stevenson Drive, Stevenson's Heights Sub, Blk S, Lot 7 (Thomas L. Booth)
A 95-15; lUP 95M17
LUP: Residential Low lONE: RS 8 (Single Family Residential)
04. 412 Oakmount Road, Oakmount Sub, Lot 2 and abutting right-of-way (Fred o.
Clark, Jr & Valerie P. Warren) A 95-17; lUP 95-19
LUP: Residential low ZONE: RS 6 (Single Family Residential)
05. 1236 Kapok Circle, Kapok Forest, Lot 14 [Waldemar W. Sario & Lynn Hassell
(AUorney-inMfact)] A 95-18; lUP 95-20
LUP: Residential Low lONE: RS 6 (Single Family Residential)
06. 1238 Brookside Drive, Meadow Creek Sub, Blk C, lot 10 (Roger K. & Gayle K.
Coulter) A 95-19; lUP 95-21
LUP: Residential Low ZONE: RS 4 (Single Family Residential)
No one was present to speak in support or opposition to Items 02 through 06.
Member Mazur moved to endorse Items 02 through 06 to the City Commission, as requested.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
~
D7. 1969 Sunset Point Road, Pinellas Groves Sub, SW 1/4, part of Lots 1 & 2 (K.D.
Sauder TRE & K.D. Sauder, Trust). Z 95-03
ZON E: From Neighborhood Commercial to General Commercial
Olpz07a,95
Page 7 of B
07/18/95
. ' ,<
~\w:x,,:;; "
"
,';
) Ms. Glatthorn stated the applicant is requesting a less restrictive zoning to operate a beauty
.....' school. It was noted the application will not require a Future land Use Plan amendment. Staff
recommended endorsement.
Member Keyes moved to endorse Item D7 to the City Commission. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
08. 705,707,709, & 711 Jasmine Way, Magnolia Park, Blk 31, Lots 2,3,4 & 5 (Rhoda
s. Smolensky & Rosemary S. Kornreich). Z 95-04
ZONE: From Neighborhood Commercial to Commercial Planned Development
Ms. Glatthorn gave the background of the case and presented, in writing, the staff
recommendation. She stated the applicants purchased four lots adjacent to their approved Adult
Congregate Living Facility (ACLF) and wish to incorporate these lots with the facility under a
single site plan and zoning district. She said the applicants have plans for a new parking
configuration and indicated a Future Land Use plan amendment will not be required. Staff
recommended endorsement subject to a declaration of Unity of Title.
Pat Shaughnessy, representing the owner/applicants, responded to questions. He stated a
walkway between buildings is a type of breezeway and a parking lot at the rear is being converted
to green space. Mr. Shaughnessy complained air conditioning units are being stolen from the
property under its current layout.
~
"3'
Member Keyes moved to endorse Item 08 to the City Commission subject to a Unity of Title
being recorded prior to the certification of the site plan. The molion was duly seconded and
carried unanimously.
E. Chairman's Items - None
F. Director's Items - None
G. Board and Staff Comments
Member Merriam requested clarification of the rules for speaking in rebuttal.
Member Mazur requested an analysis of the parking requirements for elderly care facilities.
Discussion resumed regardi ng the parki ng calcu lations j n Item B 1 .
H. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 5:02 p.m.
u
A .J
ttes t : { . ." .' .
. :}l-1,,y-JJC~;<<~j tj.}~
Board Reporter 17
mp1.07il.95
Page a of fl
07/18/95
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR 7 J~. If
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
~"Ml Of. llo."llll,I.'Ol'N('U., CllMM I~~l(\:\. 11\11 HOIU n. Ok COM M 11111
~ l~ ~ 2 '
s1-:
11110 HOIIJUI, rOIJNCJl~ (' ~IMISSIO~. All111Ukll \' Uk C(lM~t1 . H 01>
WIIICIlI S[IH'r.IS A tINITOI':
i\-("IH 0 COlINIY 0 OTlI!'1l. l 0('111. AG[N("\'
('011"''"'
Pi!'\ ~ (a.s
,., "~1I. or l'OI.I1I{'/l1. Stlllm\'I~I(lN.
~a.:tL
M \' J'llSI110N Is. I _ /
o u.n:rtVE IV AI'I'OINTlV!:
WHO MUST FILE FORM 88
This rorm is for lIse hy nny person serving atlhe counl)', cilY, or other 10ClIIlevcl of government Dllan appointed or elecled board,
council, commissIon, authority, or cOll1l11illec. It t1pplies equally to lHl'mbcrs of advisor)' and non-advisory bodies who me !1reSenler.!
wilh" \'olin!: conflict of inlcresl IIIldcr Sct:I;OIl 112.31"3, florida SlalUICS. '
Your responsibilities under the law when f:leer.! wilh:1 measure in which you have n connict of intereSI will vary greatl)' depending
on whether you hold an eleClive or appointive position, For this reason, please pay close alieni ion to Ihe inSlructions on this form
berore compleling the reverse side and filing lhe form,
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
~~.'.\ A person hOlding elcclive or appointive count)', municipal, or olher local public office MUST AUSTAIN from voting on n mcnsurc
,..,..1 which inures to his special privale gain. E.1ch elected or appoinled 10c:1l oflicer also is prohibitcd from knowingly voting on i1 measure
which inures 10 the special gain of a principal (olher Ihan a government agency) by whom he is relained (including lhe parent
organiZAtion or subsidinry of:1 corporate principal by which hc is relained); to the special private gain of a relalive; or 10 the special
, private gain of a business nssociate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under 51.:c, 163,356 or J 63.357, F.S., and
officers of independenl specinllilX disl ricls elected on a ,one-acre, one-vOle basis arc nol prohibited from voting in lhal capacity,
.
For purposes of this Jaw, a "relativc" includes only the officer's father, mOlher, son, dnughler, husband, wife, father-in-law, mOlher-in-
law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A "business associale" means nny person or entity engaged in or carrying on n business
enterprise with the officer as a ptlrtner, joint venlurer, coowner of prOperl)', or corporale shareholder (where the shares of lhe
corporalion arc not listed on any nalional or regional stock exchange), .
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition 10 abstaining from vOling in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE DEING TAKEN by publicly Slating to the assembly the nalure of your inlerest in the measure on
which you 3re absl.1.ining from voting: and
WITHIN IS DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible (or
recording lhe minutes ofthe meeting, who should incorporate the form in lhe minutes, .
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Allhough you must abstain from voting in the siluations described above, you otherwise may participate in these mailers. However,
you must disclose lhe nature of lhe connict before making any allemplto innuence lhe decision, whether orally or in writing and
whether made by you or al your direction. . . _. . _ .
IF YOU lNTEND TO MAKE ANY AITEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECIS!ON PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH
THE VOTE WLL BE TAKEN:
.. ," .: .
· You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to innuencc th~ decision),.wilh the person responsible, for
'~ ;', rc~o.r~ing the minutes of l,he, meeting, who will incorporate ~hc form in t~e .minule,~. "... '. " . . ',:' . ~, f . '. ';., 0
. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the olher members of the agency. . ..': , to .
_ ~....The form must be r~d publicly al the neXI meeting after the form is filed,
~
, CE FORM 8B. 10.91
o\j~
IF YOU MAK F '\0 ATITM "T 1 0 I' II.UE:'-;C1: 'I II E DECI~IO:\ E.'\<:f'.PT It\' PISCllSSI()~ ,\ r '1111, 1\\ EETlr-:(i:
· Y(llI mU~1 dl"l'ltl~l' l'r..lly lilt' nalure "f ~<Iur omnicl in Ih~ nll'a~\ltt' r.....fllll' p,tllicip"lIl1b.
· You mu!tt t'OI11pkl:: the fm'm ;Illd fd~ it \\ilhin 15 daY' after the \Oll' (Il'('\lrS \\ith Ihe rH:r~lln rnpllll~ihlt, fllr rt'Cl'ldillt: the I11jlHll.~r
the mt'etin~, who must int:nrp01'ltc lhe furlll ill lhe minutes, t\ ell!')' of thc form llIml he plll\'l<kd immcdiatel)' 10 Illl'( .1
I1lcmbcrs uf the agclIl'~. and Ihe form I1lIlSIIx' read puhlicly althc IIc~llI1ectitlg aftt'r Ihe form is flh:d.
SURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEnEST
7//Z
I
,197'~
I, , helch)' Jisclose Ihat on
f2.. is fJ\'c.~
(u) 1. !,ncasure ca He <I" will C1ll11l' hl'fOll' my agency which (chcl'k 0111.')
~11TClI \0 lilY special priv:uc gnin:
~red 10 Ihe special gain uf my hu!tincs~ aSSl1,iaIC,
_ inured to Ihe special gain of my relalivc,
~..ed to Ihe special gain of -:) f~-( 30 'Y\.....~ Pnt-c.t-t ,~
whom I am retained: or
_ inured to the ~rcdall!ailt of
is the parem organir;llion or subsidiary of.1 principal which has rctaincd me.
(b) The measure bcfbrc my agency and thc nature of illY connicting intcresl in lhe measure is as follows:
~ ~ ~ CheLF) ~JI
~;:{ ..4 { L<-.t-e ~::f ~ ;:J V- Z- . ;
lv~~~V-~(~~~
~tV~~~~'P~
w ~ ~. ~ =J- r-- "'-"- 7G> ~~-
~~/~~~~LU~~
-fi; 1"0 - ~
(~~) l~ C.jJ q5-Lfh
D.?4;)1 5
, by
, which
NOTiCE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES ~11:!.317 (1991), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY RI;: ~EI'
DISCLOSU RE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY DE PUNISHED DY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLL~IN(
IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION
SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR ^ CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000,
rr ..nt~'" t;. H . ,,'.rH
. y~u must complete and file this form (before making ~ny aw:mpt to inOuence the decision) with the person
V .'. re7~rding the minutes or ~h~ meeting, who will incorporate the form in t~e minut~s. "'.'. . " , . " :
. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency., . .
_ ...._The form must be rrod publicly Ilt the next meeting after the form is filed.
FORM 88 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR '?lrJ/~(
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC, OFFICERS
I "~1 :\"'" . IlkS1 :\MII -"'IIPll ~"\II
:-'''Ml f' f\U"'H).l'0l!1'\(')L.l'OMMI~~11I',A.\11110 ",Okl'OMMlllIl
'PJa~r1" 2o",~ ~
11l~ IHMIW. ('VVNCII,. CUMMI:>SIWol. Alll110 II \ Ok {,OM"" n H- (l~
Wlllelll S[1l. \'I. IS A If'''IT ot':
('IIY 0 COil,..' \' C Oml'1l1 or"., A(;l'''I('\"
:\ "'cJ;;:~1::7;1;'llIN.
M \ f'o~lllllN 1:-. 4
o l:l.1.("IIVI:
\.....-
(;.3tJ
AI'I'O\I'll\'l:
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for lIse by an)' persoll serving ntthe COUllt)', dIY, or other locallcvcl or govcrnment all an nppointed or elected board,
council, commission, authorilY, or corlllnillc:c. It t1pplic:s equally 10 mcml>crs of advi~ory and lIon-advisory bodics who arc prescnted
wil h a voting conflie! of interest ullucr Se(,:'tioll 112.3 lolJ, Florida SUI! llles.
. . ,
Your responsibilities under the In\\' when faced with a mensllrc in which you 1\.lV'C a'connicl of intcrest will vmy greatly depending
on whether )'ou hold an e1eclive or appoinlive position. for this reason, please pay close atlcmionlo the instructions on this form
before compleling the reverSe side and filing the form.
. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMP~IANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
('i' A person holding electivc or appoinlive counl)', municipal. or olher IOc.'l1 public orfiec MUS,.. AUST AIN from voting on n measure
.t,. which inures to his special private gain. E..'\ch elected or appoinled local officer also is prohibited from kllowingly vOling on n measure
which inures to lhe special gain of a principal (01 her Ihan n government agency) by whom he is retained (including the parent
or,ganiz.l1ion or subsidiary of a corporalC principal by which he is retained); to Ihe special private gain of a relative; 01',10 the spccial
. private sain of a. business associate. Commissioncrs of communit)' redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or J 63.357, F.S., and
officers of independent special tax districis elected on a .one-acre, one-vote basis arc not prohibited from voting in lhat capacity.
For purposes of this law. a "rcJ:llivc" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughler, husband. wife, father-in-law, mother-in-
law, son-in-law, and daughler-in-Iaw. A Mbusim:ss associate" means any person or entity engaged in or emrying on a business
enterprise with lhe officer as a parlner, joinl vcnlUrcr, coowner of properl)', or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the
corpor-nion arc not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from vOling in the situalions described above. you must disclose the conflicl:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE DE1NG TAKEN by publicly staling \0 the assembly lhe nature of your interest in the measure on
whieh you arc abstaining (rom vOling; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS b>' completing and filing this form with the person responsible for
rC'Zording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in lhe situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these mailers. However,
you musl disclose the nature of the connicl before making any allempt to inOuence the decision, whelher orally or in writing and
whether made by you or at your direction. . ,._ . . . . , ....... ., .
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY A1TEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH
THE VOTE WLL BE TAKEN:
" .:
responsible. for
. I ~
.I' . . , ~ . . .
. / (. '
~
. CE FORM Sil. 10.91
over
I
\'
IF YOU M/\KF:'\O Ar!'FMI'THl 1~"l.ljESCT 'lll[ I>ECISIO:\ D,C.TPT I\Y PISCUSSIO:'\ AI '1111 MEETIr\(j:
, '\.
· YOll mlll>1 dIM.:hl~e orally It\~. n:il\Jr~' l,r ~l~llr l"Ilnflicl in 'till' nH',l~\lrl' I,dnrl" r:lIlkip;IlIllI:.
. .
· You mm,l Clllllpll.t~. I he f ~H 111 a lid flit: it \~ it hi II I ~ da ~ ~ :Ir~ 1'I 1111: \'nl~ occur!'. \\llh I he pl'l ~,111 Il'~p\lll~\l~lt' I'm n't'or ~l ill~ I he mill\l;.-""'r
the mee Img. \\ Iw must IIlt:Mpomle the furl11 III the tlllllUles. A cupy 0/ thc 10 rrn 'T\U~1 Iw Illll\' IIii'd llllllwdlall:ly 'll Ill<' I j
nlcm~rs of Ihe a~l:Ill'Y. amllhe form musl he re.1l1 pulilidy allhe llc.\lllleeling aCll'r Ihe form is f,ll'd.
-_. ~
I
I,
fI>hllt~b
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFfiCER'S INTEnEST
;V) If Z V 12- ...:T12-;- he I c by tl isel ose tha t un 7 /1 k'1
I I
,I9tfr
(a) A measure came ur will coml: hrfore my :lgelle)' which (ched: (1m:)
_ inured 10 Ill)' special private ~ain:
~ inured 10 the special gain (If my bmine'is associate,
_ inured 10 Ihe spec;.d g:lin of 111)' relallve,
--$:. inured 10 the special gain of IV1D~Tt:I AI fJ LJI ~ r HU51" J r~ (.,
whom I 3m rcwined: or
_ inured 10 the speci:1I gain of
is the p:ncnl Orj;ani7nlion or subsidiary of a principal which has rClaincd me.
(b) The mC<lsure before my ngehc)' nnd the nalure of illY conniclin~ intercSI in lhe mcasllre is as follows:
In-
, .
, whicll
J a- d- ~J: f; 41~!Lf 1tL'i/
~~ ~ -wblt--!/-~~~
~ 4 ~ ~ i} #".~&:-/ +V
. ^.
..........j
On" Filf;gjf r
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES SII::!.31? (1991), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY RE~' ",,'.Er:
DISCLOSURE COt\STITUTES GROUNDS FOR At\D M/\ Y DE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLL~N(j
IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION 1>
SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENAL TV NOT TO EXCEED 55,000.
...t. ...,....'H,. t It 'I' f') 1