07/29/1991 (2)
;~" :~."? :,C, ~,:.~:7..'~.:" ':.. :. . '.
:,1 ..
':":T
; ,
. ~ " .
"t'<>. "
I ". .. >
.: '. . " J.'
.1', .' .
,
. ,
., ~r ~. ': ' >
~'.' :.; .
'.~.. ,
.'
:'.,1.; .
, ' '.. .: '., r." . ..;....~,:! : ~ :.'!~.... \> I' ,.\;; ~"~ -: '.' :"" ~ :......, : ,;<: I- ~ f :' 'c . "c ~. " ' '., r' ~ ~; ~ .~; .::.' \. ' . '.\': ~. c. '/, :: : < ,~. .....1. ~.' ": ~'1' " ! ,: :~ ~ .~: c' :: . , . ':': <: " ;.' .....,. . : ,': ;" <.', ;.'(;~' C:"':': ~ .'. ..I..~;:"," ."~, ~. . '"~I :~ '~; ., :', .t... ,",' i . .....!.~:' -Ir~""',. .1
1"........ . '." r .Jo ? \ > "." > 1 . ::.....v ,. . .' 'c. f~"-
J.
,~,
, ,
......~...
WORKSESSION
City Commission Worksession Minutes
o Date
J~/7L/3
. '~.
\.........!
. ~ . '. ." . I , . . ..... ' , .. .
;l~.~\.t- >:~ . c .
....,.
CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION
July 29, 1991
The City Commission of the City of Clearwater met at City Hall with the following
members present:
Rita Garvey
Sue Berfield
Lee Regulski
William Nunamaker
Richard Fitzgerald
Also present were:
Michael J. Wright
M. A. Galbraith, Jr.
Cynthia E. Goudeau
Three Service Pins were awarded.
Mayor/Commissioner
Vice-Mayor/Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
City Manager
City Attorney
City Clerk
The mayor called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m. and the following items
were discussed:
Presentation bv the National Estuarv ProQram
(I<;'"\~ Richard Eckenrod, Director, indicated the program has been set up as a
~~, partnership of local agencies to protect certain waterways. There are seventeen
national estuary programs throughout the country. The major mission of the
program is to develop a comprehensive program for the restoration of Tampa Bay.
He indicated once this long range plan has been developed, the other agencies
involved such as SWFWMD, DER and EPA will take over the implementation of the
program. Seventy-five percent of the funding for the program comes through the
federal EPA. The remaining twenty-five percent is equally divided between the
Basin Boards, counties and cities represented on the Committee.
Mr. Eckenrod indicated that Clearwater, having a seat on the Committee, has
some control over how the money is spent. It is proposed this be a four year
program to develop the plan and then the Committee be disbanded.
Discussion ensued regarding the program with concerns being expressed that
all communities in Pinellas County are not being asked to contribute to the
program and concern that this agency would duplicate efforts of already existing
agencies. Mr. Eckenrod indicated they tried to minimize duplication and this
agency ;s simply to develop a plan in a very limited term.
It was indicated the federal funding through EPA would not be available to
Tampa Bay unless they had the National Estuary program.
Further discussion ensued regarding the purposes of this committee and what
authority it would have. It was indicated the committee would come' up with the
.~~,
worksession
1
7/29/91
.1: ~ ....,.
.~ plan and suggest policies and it would be up to the other agencies to enforce
them.
!~)
'...........'
Additional concerns were expressed regarding duplication and that if the
City chose not to fund the $9,000 contribution, that it would loose its voting
seat on the committee.
Presentation by the Center Foundation
Mark Abdo, Executive Director of The Long Center, distributed a packet of
information to the Commission regarding the Centerl s budget and financial
situation. He indicated the Center has saved $61,000 through the use of
volunteers and that 88% of the users of the Center are Clearwater residents.
In response to questions, Mr. Abdo indicated the overhead for the Center
Lonsists of seven full-time people and volunteers are used wherever possible.
In scheduling use of the facility, he indicated each quarter the participating
agencies, as well as the general public memberships, sit down and schedule the
programming at the Center. They are working toward a balance between
instructional and general recreational time. He stated they are also considering
three month group and family plan memberships. They currently have over 4,000
public memberships. He reported they are also considering discount memberships
for use during non-prime-time hours.
Jeff Butler, representing the Clearwater Center Foundation, addressed the
Foundation's contribution to the operation of the long Center. He stated this
year's contribution appears to be down because the contribution from last year
was from fund raising, not from the endowment. He stated the endowment is giving
$120,000 to the Long Center.
A quest ion was raised regarding certain contributions being used for
capital improvement rather than going into the endowment and it was indicated
those donations were earmarked by the donator for the capital improvements.
Concerns were expressed that the City is being requested to fund the Center
Foundation by $86,000 more than it did last year. It was indicated that the
funding formula is based on the City's usage of the facility.
In response to a question regarding what would happen if the City of
Clearwater stopped using the facility, Mr. Abdo indicated that the Center would
continue but would have to raise fees and/or cut programs.
Presentation by the Pinellas Economic Development Council
David Knowlton, President of the Pinellas Economic Development Council
(PEDC)l stated they work closely with the Tampa Bay Partnership in attempting to
attract businesses that will generate jobs and improve the economy of Pinellas
County. He stated they are requesting additional funding in order to reach a
funding level equivalent to other economic development agencies. He emphasized
they worked closely with the Chamber of Commerce.
worksession
7/29/91
2
~\Y. :~'. " '. . , .
~-~ Anne Wilkins, representing the Chamber of Commerce, stated the cooperation
between the two organizations is good.
In response to a question regarding the PEDe's relationship with the
Pinellas County Industry Council, Mr. Knowlton indicated they work closely
together, do not overlap and compliment each other.
In response to a question, it was indicated they are making presentations
to other cities and requesting additional funding from them as well. Written
material regarding the council was distributed to the Commission.
In response to questions regarding relocation of businesses within Pinellas
County, they said their efforts in this regard had to do with expansions or when
a company was cons idering leaving the area. It was indicated the level of
activity is increasing and there are alot of inquiries coming from Canada. Of
the $541,000 budget, 92% of that comes from private funding. It was requested
that PEDe inform Clearwater of other cities' contributions.
The meeting recessed from 10:35 a.m. to 10:40 a.m.
Bankinq Services AQreement with Barnett Bank of Pinellas County for a period of
three years commencinQ 10/1/91. for an estimated amount of $73.266 (AS)
Fourteen banks were invited to bid for Clearwater's consolidated banking
business. Two banks responded, with Barnett Bank providing the lowest and most
responsive and responsible bid in accordance with specifications.
<)
,-.
6arnett Bank has served as the City1s primary operating bank for the past
fifteen years. The City has been extremely pleased with the quality and
timeliness of the service received. Any problems which have arisen have been
quickly and satisfactorily resolved. Barnett has proven they have the necessary
resources to effectively meet the City's extensive needs.
The estimated monthly cost of $6,105.50 is approximately 4% more than the
current fee structure for the estimated activity.
Dan Deignan, Assistant Administrative Services Director, indicated, most
probably, only two responses to this bid were received because municipalities are
not a high profit item for banks. He stated the City has used Barnett for many
years and that while there were some problems, they have been worked out.
Concerns were expressed regarding official bank ratings showing there being
problems with Barnett Bank. This will be monitored.
A question was raised regarding the lock box service. Mr. Deignan
indicated this is in Tampa and is used for the payment of utility bills. The
utility bills are mailed to that address and deposited in the bank that day. A
question was raised regarding whether or not it would be reasonable to have all
Barnett Bank branches as utility payment drop-off points.
worksession
3
7/29/91
. '. " . ,.'Il .
. r. . +
'I.:"t\; ;
,~--\ In response to a question regarding whether or not the $73,000 a year was
a set price, Mr. Deignan indicated that is the best estimate for the services
provided for the year.
r"~~
,w"
- allowin for refundin the 1983 Gas S stem Revenue
As a result of favorable market conditions, the City has been investigating
the feasibility of refunding the 1983 Gas System Revenue Bonds to generate debt
service savings for the system resulting from current, lower interest rates.
Due to recent discussions regarding expansion of the gas system into Pasco
County, staff proposes to use the savings together with funds remaining in the
original construction fund, for system expansion.
Costs of issuance together with estimated underwriters discount and bond
insurance premium, have already been considered prior to determination of the
projected savings referenced above.
With approval to proceed, the schedule calls for award of the sale of the
bonds immediately following second reading of the ordinance on August 15th, with
closing scheduled for on or about September 4, 1991.
Dan Deignan indicated this procedure is analogous to refinancing a
mortgage. He explained by refunding the bond issue, we will save debt service
costs. There are two options regarding how we would take that savings: one ;s
to spread the savings equally throughout the life of the refunded bonds, the
" other is to structure it so that the savings can be placed at anyone time during
the issue. Staff is recommending the savings be acquired during the first four
years of the bond issue and this money be allocated to expansion of the gas
system.
A question was raised regarding how this refunding would affect the
Commission's ability to reconsider sale of the gas system. It was indicated that
if the gas system were to be sold prior to the bonds maturity, they would have
to be defeased through the proceeds of that sale.
Res. #91-28 - Acce tin a franchise Safet Harbor Res. #91-21 for the ur ose
of furnishina natural Qas within the Citv of Safety Harbor GAS)
In 1991, the natural gas franchise with the City of Safety Harbor expires
subject to annual renewal until a new franchise is executed. Subsequent
negotiations have culminated in Safety Harbor's execution of a new ten year non
exclusive franchise with Clearwater Gas System, effective with the passage of
Resolution #91-28 by the Clearwater City Commission.
A summary of the essential differences between the current franchise and
the new franchise follows: Terms - the new is for a ten year period, the old was
for thirty years; Consent for sale - the new incorporates a right for Safety
Harbor to consent to a sale of the gas system with the option to cancel the
franchise agreement if consent is not granted: IIMost Favored" Clause - the new
incorporates the right for Safety Harbor to receive any benefit negotiated with
worksession
4
7/29/91
, .... ,~ '.', ......~~. .
. '
.~. another franchisee which they judge to be more favorable; System Expansion - the
agreement provides for a minimum financially feasible expansion formula in
determining whether to extend new service 1 ines. The current City policy
provides the option to expand services where the payback period is seven years
or less. This franchise agreement establishes a minimum four year payback
period. This minimum payback period is more conservative than current policy and
more favorable to the Clearwater Gas System while giving Safety Harbor a
reasonable assurance that service will be made available to residents; and
Franchise Fee - Franchise fees on gross receipts increases from the 3.5% in the
old agreement to 6% in the new.
It was indicated this agreement contains many of the same terms as in the
Dunedin Franchise Agreement.
In response to a question, it was indicated most of the previous gas
franchises had a three percent franchise fee but all are going to six percent at
this time.
'\
,
"-
.'-
Charles Hunsicker, Acting Gas Manager, indicated industrial customers are
exempt in order to give them an incentive to purchase gas from the City.
One-year contract, 10/1/91-9/30/92. to purchase periodical subscriptions and
serial standinQ orders to Ebsco Subscriotion Services at an estimated amount of
$69.000 (LIB)
The City employs Ebsco Subscription Services to maintain the Library
Systemls 600 periodical subscriptions and 275 annual and semi-annual reference
serials. Approximately $69,000 ;n expenditures are anticipated during FY91/92.
The service includes all interactions that normally transpire between
publisher and subscriber; i.e. orders, renewals, payments, problem solving, and
reports on subscription lapses and other changes. Ebsco contacts individual
publ ishers and negotiates the best avail ab le prices. The City payments are
distributed to many publishers, eliminating the necessity for the Library and
Finance Departments to process approximately 300 additional purchase orders and
associated invoices which result from direct transactions with publishers.
Ebsco is included on the State of Florida approved vendor list.
It was indicated we have been using this service for five to six years and
is on a state contract and therefore not bid in the traditional way. A question
was raised regarding how much of the cost was actually for the service and it was
indicated the $69,000 price does include the three percent fee. It was requested
that in the future, the service cost be separated from the product cost.
Lease AQreement with Edward M. and Ursula M. Metallo. d/b/a Marina Restaurant,
for a 5 year period. 10/1/91~9/30/96, for the total sum of $78,000 plus 10% of
the annual Qross sales revenues exceedinQ $144.000 (MR)
Mr. and Mrs. Metallo have operated the Marina Restaurant since April 10,
1990. Their lease agreement with the City expires on September 30, 1991. They
have made improvements to the restaurant during the past year.
worksession
5
7/29/91
, '0. . ,0 I ~ ". 0 ' . '. 'I 0 . . .
.{i'~
~ Under the terms of the lease agreement, the lessee will pay $15,600 per
year at the rate of $1,300 per month, plus 10% of the annua 1 gross revenues
exceeding $144,000 for a five year period. The lessee will be allowed to sell
cigarettes and promotional items such as T~shirts.
Questions were raised regarding Section 3 not being clear as to what is
being allowed to take place in the restaurant. This language will be clarified
prior to Thursday night1s meeting.
A question was also raised regarding whether or not it would be undue
competition to allow the restaurant to sell T-shirts. Bill Held, Harbormaster,
indicated that many establishments are sell ing T-shirts that promote their
business only and this is the type of T-shirts that will be sold at the
restaurant.
Lease AQreement for marina buildinQ rooms #31 and #32 to Carter Communications,
Inc.. for a 5 year period. 8/1/91-7/31/96. for the total sum of $18.000 (MR)
Marina building rooms 31 and 32 have been vacant since January 1991. The
rooms were bid out for rent by the City in February 1991, with no proposals
received.
~~,
"",,'.
Recently, the City received three proposals for the rental of the rooms.
Proposals were received by Carter Communications Inc., Mr. Larry R. Beard, CPA,
and Dr. David Petrik, dentist. All three proposals were reviewed with the Marine
Advi sory Board on the July 9, 1991. The Board recommended Carter Commun kat ions,
Inc'r doing business as a newspaper publisher (Beach Views) for the vacant rooms.
Under the terms of the lease agreement, the lessee will pay $3,600 per year
at the rate of $300 per month for a five year period.
It was reported the CPA withdrew his bid when he found that the marina was
asking $300 a month for each room rather than $300 for both rooms. The dentist's
proposal would have required major renovations, including an air compressor being
placed on top of the building. Therefore, Carter Communications was chosen as
the best bid for the leasing of this space.
It is essential to provide continuous hydrogen sulfide control for the
sanitary sewer system since. The use of a hydrogen peroxide turnkey system for
this purpose has proven to be very successful and cost effective leading the City
to restrict the bid specs to this chemical and feed arrangement.
The contract with Peroxidation Sytems would be for the third, fourth and
fifth years of a five year contract which was originally approved for one year
in 1989 and in 1990 for the second year of the contract. The Water Pollution
Control Division staff of Public Works believes this to be the most desirable
form of contract for this service. Costs for succeeding years will be adjusted
according to the chemical marketing reporter index as specified in the bid.
worksession
6
7/29/91
, . '. I,., ',..,. ", . "".", . \....... >
>.;,~', :>.
'-, A question was raised regarding whether or not signs indicating hazardous
materials at locations where this material is stored was causing undue alarm.
It was indicated the purpose of the signs was to deter people from disturbing the
material. Consensus of the Commission was to not change the signs at this time.
RankinQ of prospective consultinQ enQineers to prepare a Citywide Stormwater &
Watershed Mana ement Master Plan and authorize ne otiations with the selected
firms (PW
The water quality issue has been brought close to home by the recent United
States Environmental Protection Agency's National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES), Permit Application Regulations for Stormwater Discharges.
Hundreds of municipalities and private owners must now obtain permits for
stormwater discharges that can, be as small as construction activities on a five
acre site or runoff from a service station. Stormwater management programs must
be developed to include both structural and non-structural best management
practices (8MP), to meet both flooding and water quality requirements. A
comprehensive Stormwater and Watershed Management Master Plan ~Iill be necessary
to describe conditions in Clearwater, identify needs, list and prioritize Capital
Improvement Projects to meet water qua 1 ity and quantity needs, develop po 11 ut i 00-
abatement programs of a non-structural nature, address the EPA NPDES
requirements, and form the overall strategy for a healthier Tampa Bay and
Clearwater Harbor.
Bill Baker, Public Works Director, indicated permits are needed in order
for the City of Clearwater to use its water system and a lot has been
...'~;~ accomplished already, in that we have our financial element in place. EPA
~~ permitting will have some timeframes which will need to be met. It was indicated
the plan would be coordinated with the County and surrounding municipalities.
In response to a question. it was indicated this particular contract would
not be funded through the storrnwater fee as it had already been included in the
budget prior to the fee being established.
Clearwater representative on PSTA - 1 appointment (eLK)
The term of one of the two City of Clearwater appointments to the PSTA
Board of Directors expires 9/28/91. Mr. Donald Williams is the current appointee
serving this term. There is no statutory barrier for reappointment if the City
should desire to do so. Terms on this board are for three years. Mayor Garvey
is the other City representative on the Authority.
Questions were raised regarding whether or not there should be some
limitation on the length of time people serve on this type of non-city board as
a city representative. It was the consensus of the Commission to establish some
policy regarding this issue and that Mr. Williams should be informed that due to
the Commission wishing to limit the time, this could be his last appointment to
this committee.
'..'
worksession
7
7/29/91
. ". ~ ~' s . ~, . >' .... ,": ., . . , .... ~ ,'. . " . . :" .' ~. . ".
.-- Public Hearing & First ReadinQ Ord. #5107-91 - LDeTA - creatinQ Div. 23A within
Cha ter 135 Code of Ordinances establishin a new Research Oeve10 ment and
Office Park Oistrict (PLD
The proposed new zoning district has been developed to accommodate less
intensive manufacturing and research and development type uses than those
permitted in the Limited Industrial zoning district. Such a zoning district will
provide greater flexibility in addressing the need for industrial development in
the City of Clearwater.
Staff proposes us i ng th is d; str i ct incases such as the Gera 1 d Rehm
property on lakeview Avenue and the proposed conversion of a portion of the Park
Place development on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard from an office development to a
research and deve 1 opment project. These sites are located in areas near
residential neighborhoods and are therefore unsuitable for unrestricted
industrial development.
The permitted and conditional uses proposed for establishment in the
Research, Development and Office Park (RO) District, will be significantly more
compatible with residential, office and light commercial development than many
of those allowed in the limited Industrial District. Consequently, once the new
district is in place, the Commission will have greater flexibility in balancing
Clearwater's economic development and neighborhood preservation needs.
The following changes have been recommended by staff as a result of
discussions with potential users of the proposed district, the Planning and
\ Zoning Board and the Commission: 1) Two perhlitted uses (in Section 135.1523)
......." have been modified: a) uBus iness offices not principally dealing with the
general public" has been changed to read: "Business and professional offices
other than med i ca 1 off ices and c 1 in i cs. n b)" Process i ng or compound i ng of drugs
...." has been revised to read nprocessing, manufacturing or compounding of drugs
..."; 2) Three proposed conditional use standards for manufacturing uses have
been moved from that section to the Use Limitations section (Section 135.1525)
so that these standards will apply to all permitted and conditiona1 uses, rather
than just the manUfacturing use. Clarification of what is meant by outdoor
storage is also made. These changes are listed as follows: (6) No operations
or activities associated with the use shall be conducted outside any enclosed
structures. (7) Any emissions into the atmosphere associated with any use shall
be odorless and colorless, and pose no risk to the health and safety of persons
in the vicinity of the use. (8) No outdoor storage of any materials, products,
or wastes shall occur, other than occasional (not more than weekly) temporary (24
hours or less) storage of items received as or prepared for shipment; and 3) The
proposed condit iona 1 use standard concerning 1 imitat ion in size of de livery
vehicles has been deleted.
Jim Polatty, Planning and Development Director, indicated the lot sizes for
the Park place Development will be addressed through the amendments to their
Development of Regional Impact Statements. It was indicated that this amendment
would take care of the concerns of the Rehm Development.
worksession
8
7/29/91
. I ."'.."' \ ." "r".' ., ,,', ,.".,' ". . " .' ~ . ~ . , """ . . " " ". I '..", ," '"," '., . . ." .'
If,
,-, Concerns were raised that two acres is too sma 11 of a land area to
establish this type of district. Concerns were also expressed that the minimum
lot sizes were too sma 11. Consensus of the Commission was to change the minimum
district size from two acres to four acres and to address the lot size issue
after additional information could be provided. It was also suggested that
alternatives to addressing the Rehm Development be considered.
. ~ 11'...- "
I I
"--'
The applicant is requesting revision to a Sign Variance granted by the
Development Code Adjustment Board (DCAB) on October II, 1990 so that the signs
authorized at that meeting may be permitted to remain after October 13, 1992.
There are presently two pole signs for the shopping center on US19. One
pole sign is primarily for Silverburg Jewelry Company with a smaller signage for
Home Style Buffet. The surface area of this sign is approximately 56 square
feet. The sign survey did not cite this sign as being, in noncompliance. The
second pole sign on US19 is the sign in question. It is shown as having a sign
surface area of 128 square feet and a height of 30 feet. The appl icants content
that being limited to the signage size allowed in the Commercial Planned
Development (CPO) zoning (64 sq.ft.) places them at a disadvantage with other
shopping centers along US19. It appears that in granting the previous variance
for the size of property identification signage the DCAB utilized CC and CH
zoning signage criteria. In considering the actual use of the property and the
general intent of the Sign Regulations, signage based on the requirements for CC
and CH Districts appears appropriate for this site. (The Commission has
directed the Planning and Development Department to prepare draft amendments to
the Sign Regulations to address cases like this.) However, this still leaves the
questions of height of the existing pole sign, and the second pole sign on US19
for Silverburg Jewelry Company.
The present signage does not appear to be excessive for the given site
conditions, and the limiting of the center to two pole signs rather than one for
each of the four lots is in keeping with the intent of the Sign Regulation. Two
signs also appear appropriate as there are two entrances in to the center from
US19. If the Commission agrees to permit the existing sign to continue, then it
should be specified that such signage is for the whole center, and that
additional pole or ground signs along US19 will not be permitted for new or
future tenants.
According to Sec. 134.012(1)d., a pole sign which is permitted in a sign
area in excess of 150 sq.ft.shall be permitted a height of twenty-four feet.
Due to the pole sign in question being located in a depression and having its
elevation of 30 feet measured from the ground surface at the base of the sign
which is roughly five feet below the crown of US19 and three feet below the grade
of the Clearwater Collection parking lot, the existing sign does not appear
oversized or too high for the area. The additional height of this sign is due
to the man made topography to accommodate the drainage lagoon for the shopping
center. .
~......- '
worksession
9
7/29/91
The owner is requesting a revalidation period of three years. Previously,
this site has been the subject of numerous site plan amendments and reva1idations
dating back to September 16, 1982. Staff suggests that due to numerous
extensions granted that this revalidation period be eighteen months.
Final Commission action.on this original Final Site Plan for this property
requires that the Commission approve all amendments/revalidation to the site
plan.
.-~. To simplify review of future signage for the Clearwater Collection site,
it is proposed that a variance be granted for the site specifying that the
development is authorized two pole signs on US19 as currently exist. Any
alteration or replacement of these signs, other than face changes, shall require
a variance; and all internal signage shall be in accordance with the requirements
of Sec. 134.010(2) except that no signage on any wall may exceed 1.5 sq.ft. per
lineal foot of wall.
A question was raised regarding whether or not this issue would have to be
readdressed for Home Depot which is being constructed in the center at this time.
It was indicated that the variances for Home Depot would involve wall signs, not
pole signs.
Revalidation of Certified Site Plan for Clearwater 19 Industrial Park located on
the E side of U519 approx. 1.300' N of Drew St. r Sec. 8-29-16. M&B 32.02
(Kunnen) (PLD)
. "',I';",
-i~rt!l
",-,,'
This property ;s the subject of property condemnation for highway
improvements by the FOOT. However, this should have no bearing on the decision
by the Commission for the revalidation of the site plan.
A question was raised regarding whether or not this was the time to request
changes in the site plan. It was indicated that at this time, there is only one
building left to build and that is why the recommendation is to grant an eighteen
month revalidation as opposed to the three year revalidation requested. It was
also indicated that if the improvement to U519 are done, one of the buildings
would be lost.
Proposed amendment of the Lot C1earino Ordinance (PLD)
This ordinance has been prepared in order to streaml ine the process for lot
clearing violations. Staff identifies the following problems with the existing
process: 1) all lot clearing voilations are required to be forwarded to the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board (MCEB), whether the property owner contests the
violation or not, 2) the process takes too long; all lot clearing violations must
be posted a minimum of 21 days before the MCEB hearing, 3) inoperative vehicles
are allowed to be stored on residential properties for up to 30 days, and 4)
administrative costs normally exceed the $150.00 fee charged.
This ordinance would address these problems in the following manner: 1)
The MCEB would hear only those cases in which property owners elect to appeal the
work sess i on
10
7/29/91
'. '. , ' .' . . L i. ' '. -. ..... > .' . , '. ~. I .' . I
(I~l..l/ c.,"
,"--'"
, ..
notice of violation; 2) The minimum time required for posting of lot clearing
violations would be reduced from 21 days to 10 days. Within the 10 day period,
the property owner would be required to either clear the property or file a
notice of appeal to the MCEB. If the owner fails to do either, then the City
Manager may authorize entry upon property and take action necessary to remedy the
violation at the owner's expense. In addition, the owner would be responsible
for the payment of an administrative fee to offset staff costs for inspections,
notices, case preparation, communications, photographs, billings, and certified
mailings; 3) The 30 day grace period for storage of inoperative vehicles on
residential properties would be eliminated; and 4) The administrative costs have
been increased to $200.00 reflecting present actual costs.
John Richter, Code Enforcement Administrator, reviewed the current lot
clearing process and indicated this ordinance is an attempt to streamline that
process.
A question was raised regarding a code enforcement problem with the
fireworks establishment on Gulf-to-Bay. The City Clerk reported that they have
requested a rehearing of their code enforcement board case.
A question was raised regarding how it is determined that a vehicle is
abandoned. Mr. Richter indicated that if there is no current tag or if the
vehicle is inoperable, it is considered abandoned. He reported the ordinance is
including an increase in the administrative fee.
Other City Attornev Items
.~"""""."'I,,
\
\---' The City Attorney reported that an official decision from the Ethics
Commission regarding what constitutes a gift has been received. He stated they
do say official travel is not a gift but they have added a disclaimer at the end.
Second ReadinQ Ordinances
Ordinance #5109-91 - Annexation for prooertv located in Blackburn Sub.. parts of
lots 8 & 9 (Baker, et al. A91-02)
Jim Polatty, Planning and Development Director, reported this is the
annexation of the Celebration Station site. He indicated they have requested an
opinion from the Department of Community Affairs regarding the land being reduced
to under three acres in order to not cross the threshold which would require
state review.
''---."
Verbal Reports
1992 LeQislative PackaQe
Elizabeth Deptula, Assistant City Manager, indicated this is a very
preliminary draft and it was hoped to finalize this and get it to the legislative
delegation in time for them to be able to review it prior to beginning their
session.
worksession
11
7/29/91
. . \ . ,. .,.' \ I .....
.' ~. .
--......."
A quest ion was raised regarding under new issues, a item being added ca 11ed
"Qua 1 ificat ion of Appointees ". Consensus of the Commiss ion was this was not
within the Commission's jurisdiction and it was requested this item be removed.
A question was raised regarding an item regarding a recent attorney
general's opinion that candidates forums were under the Sunshine Law and
therefore I minutes must be taken. The City Clerk would 1 ike to have an amendment
proposed which would exempt candidates forums from this requirement. Consensus
of the Commission was to change that item to propose an amendment regarding this
issue.
Concerns were expressed that the item regarding supporting legislation for
alternative fuels, particularly compressed natural gas, should be to "encourage"
legislation. Consensus of the Commission was to do so.
Ms. Deptula indicated that Jim Massie, the City's lobbyist, was requesting
input regarding the Kenton Bill. Consensus of the Commission was to add this.
A question was raised regarding a proposal for front and back 1 icense
plates. It was indicated that it was felt there was very little support for
this.
I ~'."L,
'-/
A question was also raised regarding legislation prohibiting a person
acting as a church and giving themselves a non-profit tax exempt status.
Ms. Deptula indicated she would make the changes requested by the
Commission and bring the package to the Commission for formal action at their
August 15, 1991 meeting.
The City Manager reported the Phillies have requested that monies budgeted
for roof repairs at Jack Russell Stadium be provided to them and they would then
build an entirely new clubhouse. Staff is negotiating this. A concern was
raised regarding maintenance of the field and it was requested that this be
checked.
The City Attorney reported he had sent out a memo regarding the status of
the Pope lawsuit.
Other Commission Action
Mayor Garvey questioned whether or not the Commission wished to support the
Southwest Florida Water Management District in its proposal for year round water
restrictions. It was reported the City would be considering an ordinance of its
own. It was requested this wait until SWFWMO has made its decisions on its
restrictions. The Mayor questioned whether or not an additional report would be
received as a follow up to the interim report on purchasing and it was indicated
this would be done. She reported that in talking to St. Petersburg, regarding
the Florida Orchestra, that while they have not made a cash contribution, they
have forgiven $25,000 in debt for the orchestra. The Mayor proposed that a task
'worksess ion
12
7/29/91
.. ""\.: '. '\~~>:':": .
,'., . ~ ~ " .
.',
./.
., ,I . ~....
"
. "
,', .
.".. .,. .
~\.;.. > .~
~ ,'. .
.:~: c" .
y~, '..
/y'.:, " i K ,
" ,
~~,"~tt'-.f:::::f~, .);":.:"I:,l>~:?~~!~<'~ ;:"~", ~;,;::\~,:: :'<:,/ :~'~':.'<' ::: 1:?:':\.:;::-;: "'~ ~<,' :;', :,~' ", -. '
. -
. :', i... ~.\ ..:,~ ::, :::. ~ :' .:"t/ r
I " ~', . f::;'.' > r -':. .:: .
:,I,.~;" , .. . . >,
" .'r
~L ': ".J' 0 cr.. /,
~"., ,T,:....;'.~
./:
,
.............
force. be formed to study possible Uses' of the Maas Brothers site. This.task
force wou 1 d gather i nformat i on and input from the commun ity. There was no
general consensus at this time. \
Commissioner Fitzgerald questioned why there were no signs indicating that
the Countryside Boulevard widening project was a Penny for Pinellas project.
Staff will investigate.
The meeting adjourned at 1:05 p.m.
.......-.,.
,
I
o
" .
....._..~
worksession
13
7/29/91