05/01/1995 (2)
. ': ' . . ~ . ~ . ~. . .
'~(:\':;".'
, ',"
. L" .,:U ~~
, ',J
,-;".
'_H'
,"
. ~
'/
'J,
:.::( .
;,. '..
~ .' ..
',:: ."
,;
~().o/!~..!~.'~' '.. 'c'I~::":'"'i .c....., H.. .
." ", '. "\.~),' "'. : ,
.'.' ".,'
". \' ,.',. ,
" .. ...... ..('... .:..~:.u~
"
~
'.'I
WORKSESSION
City Commission Worksession Minutes
n,
t-"'"
~I
Date
-1- //~
;:)
',;.1
. , j ".... '.' . . ";
~':'...'""'-'::. .
,.
'..'
"""""\
{
CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION
May 1, 1995
The City Commission of the City of Clearwater met at City Hall with the following
members present:
Rita Garvey
Fred A. Thomas
Sue A. Berfield
Michael R. Dallmann
J. B. Johnson
Mayor/Commissioner
Vice-Mayor/Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Also present:
Kathy S. Rice
William C. Baker
Pamela K. Akin
Scott Shuford
Rich Baier
Cynthia E. Goudeau
Patricia Sullivan
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Attorney
Director Central Permitting
City Engineer
City Clerk
Board Reporter
The meeting was called to order at 9:24 a.m.
'..~
t,:> Service Awards - None.
The Commission recessed to meet as Pension Trustees at 9:24 a.m. and
reconvened at 9:29 a.m.
PRESENTATIONS
Redevelooment of Courtney Camobell Beach - Chuck Walter. FOOT Proiect Reoresentative
City Engineer Rich Baier referred to a recent Florida Department of Transportation
(FOOT) proposal to terminate public access to the Clearwater section of the Courtney
Campbell Causeway and redesign it to address erosion concerns. The City Commission
had requested staff develop an alternate plan to permit Clearwater to take over
responsibility for the beach. The City's safety concerns include liability issues related to
the combination of watercraft, vehicle parking, children and beach activities.
Chief Engineer Terry Jennings said the City's plan would request FOOT to move
their proposed four-foot high rock rubble away from mean high water so beach area would
remain. A shell parking area behind the revetment would be high enough to see the water
and still meet stormwater requirements. A section of the lot would be paved and a ramp
constructed over the revetment to meet ADA access requirements. A rest-room and
pumping station would be built and trash facilities provided. Neither watercraft nor jet skis
would be permitted. The project would cost an estimated $100,000.
L..wiI
minws05a.95
1
05/01/95
" , , '."" . '. ' . '. , - .' .
. . ' . .'
~~,~<.., "
oj .~.
~
I
Mr. Baier reported FOOT plans to construct a deceleration lane at the beach area's
access regardless of the City's decision. He recommended against the project. While 250
- 300 cars currently park at the causeway beach on sunny days, the plan would provide
parking for only 75 - 80 cars. He noted public concern regarding the mix of parking.
sunbathers, and playing children. Mr. Baier indicated it was not prudent to expose the City
to added liability.
It was recommended that staff contact Senator Latvala and suggest he work with
FOOT regarding his concerns for the beach and that the State forbid watercraft access
along the causeway. A concern was expressed that no controls currently exist.
Chuck Walter, FOOT engineer, said the State approached the City regarding this
project because they feel the beach is a City "amenity. It He predicted sand migration
would continue eroding the beach. Mr. Walter said providing parking for beach visitors is
outside FOOT's mission. It was suggested other State agencies, such as the Park Service.
take over the causeway beach. An opinion was expressed that vehicle license plates
indicate most causeway beach patrons are Hillsborough County residents. Mr. Baier said
he would forward the staff's plan for the State's use.
Consensus of the City Commission was to follow staff's recommendation.
Information Station Exoress - Don Maaaard
,.~
l .~....
Don Maggard, Information Station Express (lSE) Sales Consultant, said ISE operates
kiosks in Welcome Centers at four Florida gateways: 1-75; 1~95; 1-10; and US 231. The
touch screen of the Interactive System for Tourism, Attractions and Reservations (STAR)
allows visitor access to information about tourist related services, local events and general
Florida information. ISE employees are available daily to assist visitors in the use of the
system. The name, address and telephone number of every hotel/motel in the State is
included in the data base. Information on properties that advertise in the system can be
accessed according to room rates, specific amenities and location. The auto-dial feature
for direct reservations requires a participating property have an (800) numbEH'. Mr.
Maggard recommended the City purchase the "Gold" package that includes a 30-second
full-motion video seen at the Welcome Center kiosks every five to seven minutes.
In answer to an inquiry, Mr. Maggard said ISE is fine tuning a system that could be
used in local Welcome Centers. A request for a presentation regarding the establishment
of a mini system in the City's Welcome Centers was made.
Concern was expressed that the City's investment would be of llttle value jf local
properties did not participate. Mr. Maggard reported 18 Clearwater properties have signed
up for a plan. The Gold package cost for four kiosks is $1,500 monthly. In response to a
request for an incentive discount of 25%, Mr. Maggard offered a 5% discount Vision
Cable's offer to produce the video was noted. Suggestions for the film included a
helicopter fly over of the Memorial Causeway, Marina, Pier 60, etc" a voice over, a
streamer, and an area map noting Clearwater's location 90 minutes from Disney World.
~~
minws05a.95
2
05/01/95
. . ~ '. .. .' r> " . L .' ..,"..' ,
:cr/ ,',
~
I
Mr. Maggard said most Clearwater merchants have chosen to advertise in the 1-75
and 1-10 Welcome Centers. A suggestion was made to advertise in all four Centers,
especially the East Coast entrance on 1-95. Another suggested the City first try one or two
locations. If the film includes enough information, potential visitors will find Clearwater. It
is up to local business owners to decide their level of investment. Mr. Maggard stated the
system tracks the number of phone calls to a motel property. Concern was expressed that
the advertising's effectiveness cannot be monitored.
It was recommended that the City take the lead and do something for tourism. Mr.
Maggard indicated no other City has signed up for the service. Concern was noted that
small operations could not afford the advertising rates.
Deputy City Manager Kathy Rice said staff would present a plan to the Commission
after analyzing the marketing plan and budget. Concern was expressed that marketing
efforts be directed to smaller motel properties. Ms. Rice reported the goal of the City's
new tourism plan, due July 1, 1995, is to better focus on marketing tourism. The plan
includes City Commission input and direction.
Desian Review slide show - see Design Review Item on page 1 2.
ED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Public Hearina - Res. #95~3a - adoDtina the Enterorise Zone Str~teaic Plan
.";4t
The Enterprise Zone Strategic Plan includes: 1) descriptions of community goals; 2)
descriptions of coordinated efforts for revitalization; 3) descriptions of poverty and general
distress; 4) verification that contributing organizations participated in the planning process;
5) commitments from the governing body to enact local and fiscal regulation incentives; 6)
identification of local and private resources available in the nominated area; 7) indications
of how the tax incentives and local, state, and federal resources will be "used in the
nominated area; 8) identification of funding requested under any State or federal program
for the proposed revitalization efforts; 9) identification of the baseline, data and benchmark
for measuring the success of the strategic plan; and 10) implementation strategy.
Mr. Ferri said the volunteer Enterprise Zona Development Committee was formed
last October and met every other week since December. Mr. Ferri said if the State
approves the City's Enterprise Zone, specific ordinances need to be adopted.
Approximately $19~million worth of incentives will be available to zone businesses over the
1 O-year life of the Enterprise Zone. City costs will be $3~mjllion, or $300,000 per year in
tax breaks. He said the plan was developed as a team effort by many volunteers. He said
the plan is competitive with the five other applicants. He noted details regarding utility tax
credits do not need to be defined at this time.
Concern was expressed regarding the proposal to include every qualified tract in the
20ne, especially areas in the Community Redevelopment Agency (eRA) district. It was
suggested that redevelopment plans focus on a limited area. Mr. Ferri indicated
development in the Enterprise Zone will be market driven although staff can focus on one
area. He said 70% of the City's cost would be for businesses in the CRA part of the
\~
minws05a.95
3
05/01/95
f.~", .
'-
Enterprise Zone. Staff proposed a large zone to address State criteria requiring inclusion of
residential areas as the legislation links job creation for residents with business and
residential development. The City's work with housing improvements, the area's size and
the City's relationship with local agencies offering social and human services help
strengthen the application. Mr. Ferri said the estimated annual cost of $30,000 required
for one additional staff member may come from economic development funds. Concern
was expressed that this program will be expensive to administer and will require an
additional cost center. Mr. Ferri said zone properties in the eRA district will be lent funds
to pay their eRA taxes. Mr. Ferri said properties in the proposed Enterprise Zone are
declining in value at a rate of 6% per year while infrastructure costs increase.
Concern was expressed about imposing an Enterprise Zone on the CRA district. Mr.
Ferri said Enterprise Zone businesses in the eRA district will still pay taxes. The
Committee recommended providing graduated abatements. The loan will be equal to the
abatement and the business will pay taxes. Concern was expressed regarding the
Enterprise Zone's impact an the CRA and the fact that two organizations will be providing
incentives for the same area. Ms. Rice noted that 70% of the zone's commercial
properties will be disqualified if the eRA district is removed from the Enterprise Zone. Mr.
Ferri indicated this is a one time opportunity.
(.:,;."
It~~~~1
It was suggested that a smaller Enterprise Zone be approved. Ms. Rice said State
officials have indicated the City may be able to do something about the area encircled by
the proposed zone jf the Enterprise Zone is approved. It was noted the City can do many
things without an Enterprise Zone. Mr. Ferri said the Pine lias Private Industry Council
(PPIC) will work with the City and businesses by placing area individuals into jobs. In
response ta a question, Mr. Ferri said staff would provide help with loan applications.
Concern was expressed that the Enterprise Zone, as first proposed, offered a great deal
more flexibility regarding its size.
Mr. Ferri said the CRA is not like an Enterprise Zone. He said the only forgivable
loans relate to those used for abatements and the City is not responsible for pay back
should those loans default.
The majority of the Commission agreed the Enterprise Zone should be reduced,
leaving a zone of six census blocks north of Drew Street. It was suggested that the tract
including the Sunshine Mall be included if the areas do not need to be contiguous. A new
resolution will be addressed on May 4, 1995.
Second Readina Ord. #5815~95 ~ creating the City of Clearwater Enterprise Zone
Develooment Agency
After adopting Resolution #95~37, the City Commission needed to create a public
body corporate and politic to be known as an Enterprise Zone Development Agency
(EZDA). The agency shall be constituted as a public instrumentality, and the exercise by
an EZOA of the powers conferred by this act shall be deemed and held to be the
performance of an essential public function.
The powers and responsibilities of the EZDA are: 1) to employ staff, subject to
t~
minws05a.95
4
05/01/95
.. F', . , . ~. . ~'. ., '
>I." ..
.--
t:~,~
y
funding availability; 2) to assist in the development and implementation of the strategic
plan for the Area; 3) to oversee and monitor implementation of the strategic plan for the
Area; 4) to adopt a set of bylaws to govern meetings and other activities; 5) to file with
the City Commission and with Florida's Auditor General, on or before March 31 of each
year, a report of its activities for the preceding fiscal year, including a complete financial
statement; 6) to make quarterly reports to the City Commission evaluating progress in
implementing the strategic plan for the Area; 7) to identify and recommend to the City
Commission ways to remove regulatory barriers; 8) to identify to the City Commission the
financial needs of, and local resources or assistance available to, eligible businesses in the
Area; 9) to review, process, and certify applications for State enterprise zone tax
incentives pursuant to SS 212.08(5)(g); 212.08(5}(h), 212.08(15),212.096,220.181,
and 220.182; 10) to provide assistance to businesses and residents within the enterprise
zone; 11) to promote the development of the enterprise zone; 1 2) to borrow money and
apply for and accept advances, loans, grants, contributions; 13) to appropriate such funds
and make such expenditures as are necessary to carry out the purposes of this act; 14) to
make and execute contracts and other instruments necessary or convenient to the exercise
of its powers under this section; 15) to procure insurance or require bond against any loss
in connection with its property in such amounts and from such insurers as may be
necessary or desirable; 1 6) to invest any funds held in reserve or sinking funds, or any
funds not required for immediate disbursement, in such investments as may be authorized
for this act; 1 7) to purchase, sell, or hold stock, evidences of indebtedness, and other
capital participation instruments; 18) to invest in community investment corporations; and
19) to submit to the Florida Department of Commerce prior to December 1 of each year a
complete and detailed written report summarizing the activities of the fiscal year.
Prior to the area being designated as an Enterprise Zone by the Florida Department
of Commerce, the City Commission must create an EZOA pursuant to Section 290.0056 of
the Florida Statutes, Florida Enterprise Zone Act of 1994.
The City Attorney said the ordinance has been amended to modify the powers of
the EZDA requiring City Commission approval. It was suggested the EZDA should only be
granted the first four or five powers and the remaining powers remain with the City
Commission. The City Attorney will provide draft legislation by May 4, 1995, that divide
the powers into administrative ones for the EZDA and financial ones for the City
Commission. The City Attorney indicated the Commission would retain power #12.
According to State Statues, EZDA members are called commissioners.
Concern was expressed about creating a new bureaucracy and opposition was
voiced regarding a larger work force. Mr. Ferri said with one additional staff member, his
department will work with other local agencies and handle the work load. His staff is
already doing much similar work.
Res. #9545 - aooointing the Board of Commissioners of the Enterorise Zone Develooment
Agency (EZDA): desianatina Chair & Vice-Chair
After the EZOA is created, the City Commission shall, by ordinance, appoint a board
of commissioners of the agency that shall consist of not fewer than 8 nor more than 13
commissioners. The City Commission must appoint at least one representative from each
minws05a.95
5
05/01/95
.. , , ,.'
. I , I ,I. . . .
. .
.V,.C!,.'" ,
, .
-
of the following: 1) the local chamber of commerce: 2) local financial or insurance entities;
3) the businesses operating within the nominated area; 4) the residents residing within the
nominated area: 5) nonprofit community.based organizations operating with the nominated
area; 6) the local private industry council; 7) the local code enforcement agency; and 8)
the local law enforcement agency. The terms of office of the commissioners shall be for 4
years, except that, in making the initial appointments, the City Commission shall appoint
two members for terms of three years, two members for terms of two years, and one
member for a term of one year; the remaining initial members shall serve four-year terms.
The City Commission shall designate a chair and vice chair from among the commissioners.
A vacancy occurring during a term shall be filled for the unexpired term. The importance
of minority representation on the agency shall be considered in making appointments so
that the agency generally reflects the gender and ethnic composition of the community as
a whole.
The Commission concurred that mandatory positions should be designated as four
year terms. EZDA commissioners will be voted on by occupation, not name. Because of
the ten-year limit of the Enterprise Zone, it was recommended that service be limited to
two terms. Concern was expressed that EZDA commissioners should be City residents.
The Commission recessed from 11 :38 to 11 :47 a.m.
FN FINANCE
.,k\
"+~'":f't
(Cont'd from 4/20/95) Contract with Ravmond James & Associates. Inc.. to be City's
Financial Advisor for a oeriod of 3 years
Seven firms responded to the City's December 21, 1994 Request for Proposal (RFP)
for expressions of interest from financial advisors. After the initial evaluation by the
Financial Advisor Selection Committee, the top four firms made formal presentations, The
Committee then selected Raymond James & Associates, Inc., as the top ranked firm. Fees
for Raymond James, hired as the City's Financial Advisor in 1989, remain the same as in
the original agreement. The City can terminate the agreement any time by providing
Raymond James with SO-days written notice.
Finance Director Margaret Simmons said Raymond James scored first on both the
oral presentation and written evaluation. Concern was expressed that in the past,
Raymond James had to be pressed to negotiate a better deal for the City and should act
like the City's "hired gun. U
GAS GAS SYSTEM
Change Order to Joint Proiect Agreement with Pine lias County to install natural Qas mains
durina imorovements to Tampa Road, increasing the estimated labor cost to $267,000
On August 1, 1991, the City Commission approved this Joint Project Agreement
(JPA). When the project was delayed until 1994, Pinellas County developed a new JPA
form which the City Commission approved on January 18, 1994, including the same
estimated labor and material costs from the 1991 Agreement. The Clearwater Gas System
~
minws05a.95
6
05/01/95
I , . '. -. ,"'" 51 ' " . ~ J \
j<;--:' /" '.
--.
(CGS) has had to revise its project estimate to reflect current prices. Estimated labor costs
have increased from $135,000 to $267,000. Material costs have increased approximately
$5,500 to $40,000.
Concern was expressed that these estimates had not been updated in 1994. Chuck
Warrington, Gas System Managing Director, said that error should not have occurred.
GS GENERAL SERVICES
purctwse of 1 street sweeper from Florida Municioal Eauioment, Lakeland, FL, for
$95,890; financing to be provided under city's master lease-purchase agreement with
Barnett Bank of Pinellas County (Consent)
The street sweeper replaces another vehicle used by the Public Works Department
in its street sweeping activities. This bid represents the lowest one submitted.
Concern was expressed that proposed stormwater improvement through increased
street sweeper action has not occurred. Public WOiks Director Gardner Smith noted the
Commission had decided not to buy two additional street sweepers. It was recommended
that storm water regulations be reviewed.
MR MARINE
~.i::~
'1!>:'1~if
License Aareement with National Ocean Service. National Ocean and Atmosoheriq
Administration to maintain and ODsrate a permanent tide station on Pier 60, far a period of
10 years from date of last signature, with options to extend the agreement for subsequent
10 year periods (Consent)
On January 24, 1991, the City reached a five~year license agreement with National
Ocean Service (NOS) and National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), with
options for subsequent five~year extensions, to allow NOS to operate and maintain a tide
station on Pier 60. After the old pier was demolished, the station was not reinstalled. This
new license agreement allows NOS to locate east of the liT" on Pier 60 and operate a tide
station with a small stainless steel enclosure and 20-foot meteorological tower to hold
equipment. NOS will use the station for tide predictions, tidal analysis, storm surge,
nautical charting and navigation. At their expense, NOS will install an electronic sign
displaying air and water temperatures, wind speed and direction inside the Pier 60 bait
house. With 90~days' written notice, either party can terminate the agreement.
In reply to concern regarding the electronic sign, Ms. Rice noted the moving sign
will be inside and is not covered by the sign code. Concern was expressed regarding the
tower and possible additional instruments. The City Attorney will amend the agreement's
language to state all changes in instruments must be approved by the City Commission.
PR PARKS AND RECREATION
Purchase/install reolacement Dlavnround eauiDment for Del Oro Park & Marshall Street Park
from Park Structures. Inc., for $42,631.28 (Consent)
y
minwsOSa.95
7
05/01/95
.. ~ ..' . , ~, . .' ., .. . . t' ~ "
.1\'"
.....
The City's Capital Improvement Project was established to replace worn-out
playground equipment in the City's 27-playgrounds. Inspection and maintenance programs
assure the equipments' safety and determine the replacement schedule. For Fiscal Year
(FY) 1993-94, staff earmarked substandard equipment for replacement at DelOra and
Marshall Street Parks. These major play centers, installed more than 10 years ago, are in
poor condition and do not meet ADA accessibility requirements. The recommended
equipment, geared to preschoolers and children between six and eleven years old, is
constructed of steel and plastic with stainless steel hardware and contains a transfer
module for disabled accessibility.
It was reported that the park rest-rooms do not work. Concern was e,<pressed that
equipment in other parks is in worse condition. In reply to a question. Parks & Recreation
Director Ream Wilson stated a large park, such as Crest Lake Park, may have more
equipment. He judged that this equipment is in worse shape that others. Ms. Rice noted
the equipment being replaced does not meet ADA requirements. A list of playground
equipment, including the scoring, was requested. Mr. Wilson indicated his department
adheres to a replacement schedule based on monthly and annual inspections of equipment
condition.
The Commission recessed from 12:20 to 1 :00 p.m.
(Cont'd from 04/20/95) Assionment of lease from PGA Tour Associates-I. Ltd. to Balboa
Enterorises. Inc., for the PGNs interest as "Lesseel' under lease dated 11/12/85, between
the Chi Chi Rodriguez Youth Foundation (Lessor) and PGA (Lessee)
~;,~ On November 1 2, 1 985, the City entered into an agreement with the Chi Chi
Rodriguez Youth Foundation, Inc. to lease City property on McMullen-Booth Road to the
Foundation for educational purposes and the construction and operation of a public golf
course. On the same date, a "Lease" was reached between the Chi Chi Rodriguez Youth
Foundation, Inc. and PGA Tour Associates-I, Ltd., to sublease part of the land on the east
side of McMullen-Booth Road for the construction and operation of a golf driving range
(Family Golf Center). The agreement's initial term was through November 12, 2000.
Automatic extensions have added 10 years to the te(m, now running to 2010. PGA Tour
Associates-I, Ltd. may not assign their interest under the lease to another party without the
written approval of the City and Chi Chi Rodriguez Youth Foundation
Beryl Artz, Vice President of CCA Golf Center-Clearwater, Inc., has requested the
City approve the assignment of the lease. Mr. Artz indicated a group of investors has
offered and will assume the remaining term of the lease with plans to add batting cages, a
miniature chip and putt course, and other improvements.
Mr. Wilson stated that Balboa Enterprises was no longer interested but a new
group, MJM, is interested in assuming the sub-lease. Money from the sub-lease would still
flow to the Chi Chi Rodriguez Youth Foundation. He noted PGA Tour Associates-I, Ltd.
reported they are backing out of the lease because of financial problems. Mr. Wilson noted
the property needs attention. Concerns were expressed that Chi Chi leased out valuable
City property for a profit. Mr. Wilson indicated Chi Chi subleased the driving range in
return for money.
'''en;;
minws05a.9S
8
05/01/95
, .' '.. . ' .
'. . I
. ~ . .. . , . ~
;t"..L' "
ilL "~ ' "
'!
e_,
Questions were raised regarding the reference to a general partnership in the
original agreement and when did CCA become a general partner. Concern was expressed
that the original lease had been violated. The City Attorney was requested to see it there
has been a breach of contract and analyze possible ramifications.
It was noted a developer has expressed interest in the land on the east side of
McMullen-Booth Road for a shopping center complex. The developer's offer included the
relocation of the Police Department. A suggestion was made that the City take over the
property for possible development and pay the Chi Chi Rodriguez Youth Foundation
$60,000 a year for the remainder of the lease.
The City Attorney noted the lease has a termination clause that requires just
compensation for investment in the property and relocation expenses. If Clearwater
becomes the sublessee, the City would be obligated to abide by operational requirements.
Mr. Wilson said that Chi Chi had indicated the driving range facility is important beyond the
revenue it provides the youth foundation. He reported the driving range and club house are
open and the ""putt-putt" course is closed.
Concern was expressed that the lease includes a requirement that the lessee
maintains the property. It was requested that the City's Real Estate department value the
property. A suggestion was made for staff to contact the Chi Chi organization regarding
their feelings on the other issues involved.
It was questioned if another area property was available for the Police Station. The
,;~,,;,\ difficulty in relocating the pistol range was noted. Opposition to constructing a shopping
~~f~1r center on the property was expressed.
It was noted that JJM formed MJM. Interest was expressed in the financial
situation of MJM and the condition of the property. Concern was expressed that Chi Chi
did not receive all of the profits from this donated land.
It was recommended this item be pulled.
EN ENGINEERING
{Cont'd from Q4/20/95} Agreement for professional enaineerina services with Post.
Bucklev. Schuh & Jernigan. Inc., for a term of 5 years
On February 13, 1995, the City Commission reviewed and approved the ranking of
consulting engineers for negotiation of a contract for engineer of Record. In accordance
with Florida's Competitive Consultants Negotiation Act, staff negotiated with the top
ranked firm, Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan. Inc. (PBS&J), Tampa, FL. to prepare a five-
year consulting contract for execution by the City Manager and City Commission.
Concern was expressed regarding PBS&J's involvement with a County project on
Sunset Point Road. Mr. Baier reported that PBS&J was the construction engineer inspector
and did not design the project. It was noted that many assertions in a recent letter were
incorrect.
,
\..J
minws05a.95
9
05/01/95
.. .
,'.
...........~
Mr. Baier said staff determines when assistance from PBS&J is required based on a
project's size.
CP CENTRAL PERMITTING
Public Hearino & First Reading Ord. #5769~95 ~ LDCA orohibitinQ oarkina on front lawns of
single familv, duolex and triolex U$es, including any unpaved portion of street r-o.w
adjacent thereto (LDCA 94-'5)
This code amendment was prepared in response to requests from homeowner
groups, the code Enforcement Review Task Force, the Planning & Zoning Board, the
Development Code Adjustment Board, and the City Commission. If adopted, the ordinance
will: 1) make it unlawful to park on a front lawn in a residential neighborhood or on the
grassy portion of a street right-ot-way. Violations will be enforceable through the issuance
of parking tickets, and 2) existing regulations affecting the parking of boats, commercial
vehicles, recreational vehicles, etc., in residential neighborhoods will be relocated from
Chapter 42 to Chapter 30 in the Code of Ordinances to aid enforcement and permit the
issuance of parking tickets.
On August 22, 1994, a 1 Q-member citizen focus group reviewed parking on front
lawns and the ordinance. Consensus was: 1) parking on front lawns in residential
neighborhoods is a problem the City should regulate; 2) parking should be allowed only in
appropriately designed and constructed spaces including spaces constructed of mulch,
gravel, or other durable materials: and 3} issuing parking tickets to violators is the preferred
means of enforcement; enforcement should occur on a complaint basis only.
~"<,,\
I i
...':o.t' The Planning & Zoning and Development Code Adjustment Boards recommended
approval.
On April 11, 1995, staff met with the North Greenwood Association (NGA) board to
discuss the ordinance's impact on that neighborhood. Board members expressed concern
the ordinance would impact smaller lots and substandard setbacks. The NGA suggested
the following options: ,} exempt substandard properties from the provisions; 2) provide a
streamlined, no cost, minor variance type program to allow exemptions on a case~by-case
basis; or 3) postpone enforcement action in North Greenwood for two years to allow time
to "catch up" to the rest of the City through redevelopment and code enforcement
activities. After two years, the City could investigate whether enforcement is desirable.
Staff agrees potential problems may impede implementation of the ordinance on
substandard properties but feels exemptions should be on a case~by-case basis. The
ordinance is not part of the land Development Code, and is not subject to regular variance
procedures. A separate exemption or "minor variance" type program could be established
as part of the implementation procedures.
Staff agrees with postponing enforcement in North Greenwood until after the
effects of the City's comprehensive redevelopment/code enforcement program are realized.
After the number of substandard properties are reduced, enforcement could be initiated.
Staff suggests postponing second reading to allow staff time to develop the recommended
enforcement program.
y
minws05a.95
10
05/01/95
, .," I, ,"~," - ~ . '. ~ '"".. . I ",' . . . /' " " ,~ . ~
,:t. "~'
-~,
Concern was expressed that staff concentrated on North Greenwood as the only
neighborhood with potential conflicts when South Greenwood and the beaches will also be
affected. Central Planning Director Scott Shuford said North Greenwood has a large
number of substandard lots. When the City starts enforcement of the ordinance on a
complaint basis, many people will be affected. Mr. Shuford stated enormous support
exists in the community for the ordinance, even in North Greenwood where they have
asked for additional time. He presented a drawing of a typical 50 foot lot and noted a 30
foot wide paved platform would accommodate three cars in front.
It was noted that most neighborhood associations support the ordinance. Concern
was expressed regarding the ordinance's impact on less fortunate residents. Mr. Shuford
noted street parking will continue to be permitted where allowed.
(CoOt'd from 02/02.03/16. & 04/20/~5) Public Hearing & First Readina Ords. #5741~95 &
#5742~95 - Land Use Plan Amendment to Commercial General & CPO ZQnina for oroperty
located at 509 Bavview Ave. and 508 Meadow Lark Lane, Town of Bay View a/k/a
McMullen Bayview Sub., Blk 3, part of Lots 1 &. 2, and S 1/2 of vacated street abutting N
side of lots; and CPO Zoning for property located at 509 Bayview Ave., 508 Meadow Lark
Lane, and 3009 Gulf to Bay Blvd., McMullen Bayview Sub., Blk. 3, part of Lots 1 & 2 and
Bayview City Sub., Lot A, and vacated street r~o~w between Lot A and Lots , & 2' of
McMullen Bayview Sub. (R. Roy Meador, LUP93~43, Z93-54)
('~")
..~~t
This item was continued from the April 20, 1995 Commission meeting by applicant
request and without objection from Bayview neighborhood residents. The applicant met
with area residents and staff understands some concerns wore addressed in the proposed
revised site design, although not all concerns were fully covered. If the Commission feels
the proposal can be approved, the first ordinance reading will need to be continued to
allow any modifications of the site plan. Staff does not support continuance unless the
Commission favors the request.
Meetings between the applicant and residents regarding site design modifications
resulted in a proposed site plan submitted on April 14, 1995. The plan shows a smaller
percentage of the site being rezoned to CPO and a residentially-zoned portion of the
property's south side retained to serve as additional buffer. This residential area conforms
to RS-6 zoning lot size requirements.
It was noted that P&Z has not had an opportunity to review the recently submitted
revised plan. Mr. Shuford indicated the new plan is less intensive than the last one P&Z
reviewed. He noted negotiations have occurred between the applicant and neighborhood.
Mr. Shuford noted the plan may need to be changed if the driveway must be modified. He
indicated staff is seeking City Commission direction
LDCA - Sign Code Uodate (WSO)
On September 17, 1992, Clearwater's sign code underwent substantive change to
coordinate with Pinellas County's'sign ordinance standards. Since standardization.
ministerial and enforcement efforts have revealed areas warranting adjustment. Most are
minor. Prior to presenting an amending ordinance, staff requests Commission input
w
minws05a.95
11
05/01/95
'. '.' I :' I . f . ~ . .' . . '," .' '.,' '. .
't "
.' -----\
regarding: ,) number and sizes of flags, and heights of flagpoles; 2) sizes of political signs
in residential neighborhoods; 3) standards for placement of sandwich board signs
downtown; 4) restrictions affecting vehicle signs; and 5) the number of permissible
message changes on electronic reader boards and multi-prism signs.
Mr. Shuford indicated staff recommended a reduction of the size of political signs in
residential neighborhoods. He also suggested the City limit the number of flags based on a
property's size. Concern was expressed that limiting the size of flags based on zoning
districts will create additional work for staff. Mr. Shuford said a cumulative total for flag
area wlll be established. He said problems with adjoining properties with different zoning
can be addressed through the variance process. Mr. Shuford recommended grandfathering
flag poles and establishing a short amortization for flags.
Opposition against limiting American flags was noted. Mr. Shuford indicated the
ordinance addresses all flags, not just the US flag. The City Attorney said the ordinance
cannot treat flags differently based on their message. Mr. Shuford indicated a need to
coordinate regulations with the Design Review Board. He noted a vroposed kiosk on
Cleveland Street will be discussed at the May Downtown retreat. Concern was expressed
that use of sandwich boards Downtown is tacky.
Mr. Shuford expressed concern regarding commercial vehicles parked in front of
businesses as signage. He recommended reader boards not be permitted to change their
messages more than eight times a day. It was suggested that movable reader signs could
replace sandwich board signs.
,.,~
t:,~~"
0} ,: ~
Staff will return to the City Commission with specific proposals.
(Cont'd from 4/20/95) Public Hearina & First Readina Ord. #5817~95 - LDeA re Design
Review Board (LDCA 95~O1) (CP)
This amendment to the Land Development Code establishes a Design Review Board
(ORB) for nonresidential sections of Clearwater beach (as an implementation measure of
the Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force report), for downtown (to facilitate
implementation of the design grant programs) and for the North Greenwood commercial
district (to facilitate implementation of the design grant and zoning incentive programs).
This ordinance replaces the North Greenwood Design Review Committee regulations and
establishes a seven-member board to implement the various existing design guidelines or
those to be developed by the ORB, including the Tropical Seascape design guidelines for
Clearwater beach.
Under the proposed ordinance, design review will be voluntary, except for grant
applicants, in downtown and North Greenwood and mandatory on Clearwater beach. Staff
supports CRA Director Peter Gozza recommendation for a mandatory approach downtown.
The scope of ORB review will be limited to building plans for new buildings, building
additions and facade alterations requiring building permits, and sign plans for which sign
permits are required or requested. ORB will also provide poliCy~tYPB input on design and
development issues regarding Clearwater beach, downtown, and North Greenwood,
including the development of design guidelines.
..
minws05a.95
12
05/01/95
.,...., ..l ..
, "''.
Mr. Shuford suggested the Commission may require the guidelines be mandatory in
each area. He presented a slide presentation to show how simple changes in design can
make a difference. Concern was expressed that all guidelines have not been established.
Mr. Shuford indicated the ORB may be more effective if it has a hand in developing the
guidelines. Ms. Rice noted guideline recommendations may differ if they are mandatory.
Concern was expressed that the City Commission may have to hear a large number of
appeals. Mr. Shuford said the number of appeals will not be great if word gets out that the
Commission supports the ORB.
Concern was expressed about establishing mandatory guidelines. Mr. Shuford said
after strong public participation at association and public meetings and newspaper
advertising, the support for mandatolY guidelines on the beach seems strong. It was
suggested that guidelines for all three areas be either mandatory or voluntary. It was
noted the ORB will have jurisdiction if guidelines are mandatory. Concern was expressed
that nothing will happen if the guidelines are not mandatory. The majority of the
Commission agreed guidelines for all three areas should be mandatory.
Mr. Shuford said staff does not propose that interior improvements to trigger a
design review. In some programs, interior improvements can count toward the grant
match.
The Commission recessed from 2:47 to 2:54 p.m.
CM ADMINISTRATION,
f:~~ Direction re disoosition of the Tree Farm Prooertv
A City tract, bounded on the south by Airport Dr., on the west by the Keene Rd.
right~of-way, on the north by the CSX railroad and on the east by a line along Arcturas and
Hercules Avenue, contains Clearwater's Executive Airpark, Clearwater Golf Park, the City's
Fleet Maintenance facility, a Public Works Complex and a 5. 73~acre tree farm. The tree
farm has not been active since 1993 and the Airpark Authority has expressed interest in
expanding onto that property to expand facilities and increase Airpark revenues to render it
more self~sustaining. The Airpark will have difficulty reaching self~sufficiency within its
current crowded boundaries.
Pinellas County's Engineering Department sent a written request that the City
allocate part of the tree farm for stormwater detention necessary to construct Keene Road.
Pinellas County's road construction project is desirable and will positively affect
Clearwater. The preliminary pond site covers the northern half of the tree farm property.
For $1 per year, the Florida Military Aviation Museum requested the City lease the
entire tree farm site plus two acres to be added later, and construct an access road to
serve the site until Keene Road is completed. The museum's request included numerous
other valuable considerations.
The tree farm is valued at $100,000 per acre, for a total value of $575,000. If land
is provided for the County project, half the acreage will remain available for Airpark use. If
\--.,1
minws05a.95
13
05/01/95
. . ; , . I ~ . . I . . I' / . . ' " ' \ . . . I < . . .
.~CII.'
-.
the museum can function with part of the property, they continue as an interested party.
Staff feels any arrangement with the Aviation Museum should be structured as an outright
sale of the property for a predetermined appraised value.
Assistant City Manager William Baker said the Engineering Department has also
requested the tree farm site for a materials testing laboratory. It was suggested they
consider the old Parks building.
Opposition to leasing the land to the Florida Aviation Museum for $1 a year was
voiced. It was noted the priorities for use of City property must be based on City need. It
was suggested that part of the property can be used for a pond site and part for Airpark
needs. Concern was expressed regarding Airpark expansion.
It was suggested that the Florida Aviation Museum work with the County and that
the museum's planes could be parked on the land until it is needed for construction of the
road. Concern was expressed regarding possible squatter rights. Mr. Baker suggested
offering 8 different temporary location.
Consensus of the City Commission was to agree with staff's prioritization. This
item will be placed on Thursday's Consent Agenda.
Prooosed Site Plan for renovation of 3~acre site at base of Pier 60; presentation as to
elements of proposed renovation; & direction requested re further activities; location of
Beach Pavilion
t:~'~
11...'1'!1
The City Commission instructed staff to remove all structures and features on the
three~acre tract at the foot of Pier 60 on Clearwater beach. Plans once included a possible
tower restaurant as a site focal point. The Commission noted its desire to remove the
landscaped entrance mound and indicated the proposed pavilion should not be located
within the Pier 60 site due to its proximity to the Holiday Inn Surfside.
Several considerations have arisen since the Commission's early instructions.
Locating tbe pavilion outside the three-acre tract will impact the adjacent parking lot with a
Joss of parking spaces and revenue. Several parties have indicated the issue of proximity
to the Holiday Inn has dissolved and the pavilion should have a "beach aura." Gerri
Raymond. President of Sunsets at Pier Society. has requested to sell commemorative "path
stones" to generate revenue for the City and Society. Sara Zaleski and others oppose
removal of the landscape mound.
James Grogan has submitted a proposal"to construct a 335~foot observation tower
whose description appears to simulate the Commission's original concept for a tower on
the site. The proposal brochure describes four possible business deals, information, and a
pro forma.
Mr. Baker stated current plans include removing the existing buildings and pool to
permit a view of Pier 60 from the road and creating a passive park with a covered
playground and concession stand. The contract to raze the structures is about to be let.
He noted landscaping on the north side would separate the park from the Holiday Inn. It
y
minws05a.95
14
05/01/95
: . : . . > ~. , . <, . ' I ~. ~'. \ . 1'..
't'!;:" , '
-..,
was felt a vista of the beach and Pier 60 is important even if the berm must be removed.
Mr. Baker suggested the berm could be replaced later if the Commissioners choose. The
majority of the Commission agreed to remove the berm.
Mr. Baker referred to plans to locate the pavilion on the sand. The majority of the
Commission agreed with the proposal.
Mr. Baker referred to a proposal from James Grogan regarding a tower that would
not compete with current beach attractions. A potential for laser shows exists and the
tower could produce an annual income of $2.5~million. The tower could be located
anywhere on the beach with pedestrian traffic including the Mandalay or S. Gulfview
parking lots. Concern was expressed that the tower not be located in the Pier 60 park.
It was noted the tower is 20 years old and a request was made that the
manufacturer report on the tower's tolerance for local salt conditions. A new tower was
estimated to cost $7.3~million. Mr. Saker reported the tower would be renewed and noted
the elevator is the only complex part of the tower.
. Concern was expressed that Tampa would not permit the tower to be erected and
that the projected figures seemed untenable. It would be impossible to run at full capacity
daily. Questions regarding the figures were raised.
i, ~;;"...,
""!\'~,
It was noted that people are attracted to towers and a suggestion was made that
staff research the proposal's feasibility, but not ~t the Pier 60 location.
Mr. Baker referred to a proposal from Ken Hamilton to develop the park as an
enterprise with a larger concession stand and deck, a Volleyball Hall of Fame with a
Welcome Center and trolley stop, and an open-air pavilion. Ms. Rice noted concern that
the City would have to extend the opportunity to others to bid on this proposal if the
Commission were to consider it. The City Attorney concurred. Concern was expressed
that the park remains under City control and a suggestion was made that this plan could be
considered for another beach location.
As other proposals might exist, it was suggested an RFP be Jet to attract some
revenue producers. It was noted an opportunity exists for the City to receive revenu,e from
the concession stand and pavilion. A concern was expressed that the ice cream stand
remain until a replacement is constructed. Consensus was to proceed with the plan for a
passive park including the pavilion. The ice cream stand will remain until its replacement is
erected. The drop off lane will remain and parking will be permitted.
Concern was expressed regarding replacing the pool. Ms. Rice indicated that would
be addressed during budget discussions. Mr. Baker noted the pool is in poor condition and
not heavily used.
{Cont'd from 04/20/95} Budoet for leasehold imorovements 1 5t & 3rd floors. Harborview
Center restaurants
\riJ
minws05a.95
15
05/01/95
'.. ~
~
The $9 ."-million approved for the Harborview Center construction project will
accomplish everything defined in the project's scope and includes the rear glass atrium,
escalators and column removal. Continuing financial consideration relative to the project,
includes a proposed lease under current negotiation with Pickles Plus Restaurant that calls
for the City to fund $80,600 for the infrastructure serving the restaurant, i.e., heating, air~
conditioning, plumbing, electrical, etc., and an additional $100,000for walls ceilings,
finishes, lighting, doors, etc. with the $100,000 finishing costs to be reimbursed to the
City over two five-year periods. Another party has expressed interest in a larger third floor
restaurant with costs estimated at $136,000 for infrastructure and $164,000 for finishes.
"'("l'~ ~. .' ,<
f'1'
Approval of this item will allow installation of the basic infrastructure serving both
restaurants while negotiations continue. Funds necessary to finish the restaurants will be
requested as lease negotiations come to fruition. Funding will be provided by a mid~year
budget amendment transferring $216,000 in unappropriated retained earnings of the
Special Development Fund.
"'\.:"}
r
.~1Tl.":1~
Mr. Baker reported a shell will be constructed for the third floor restaurant. Ms.
Rice indicated all the furnishings and fixtures are included for Pickles Plus, including the
salt shakers. Mr. Baker noted if Pickles Plus does not renew after five-years, the City
keeps the equipment. In reply to a question regarding an earlier payback arrangement, Ms.
Rice noted the lease has not been finalized. She said a similar deal may be negotiated for
the third floor space. Concern was expressed that the leases for neither restaurant call for
providing catering services. Ms. Rice said the budget does not contemplate constructing a
catering kitchen. The City is not negotiating with anyone regarding the third floor space.
Construction work beyond Uwhite space" will occur downstairs once the lease with Pickles
Plus is finalized.
Concern was expressed that the restaurant may leave before the lease is complete.
Ms. Rice stated the City would own everything and is working on termination clauses. It
was recommended that Pickles Plus provide a letter of credit. The item is to be amended
to only include funds needed for the shells. Funds for the finishes will be approved once
leases are negotiated.
CA LEGAL DEPARTMENT
OTHER CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS
Uodate of status of occuoationallicenses for adult businesses
Assistant City Attorney Robert Surette said Clearwater's ordinance has not been
amended to reflect recent decisions and proposed legislation will need to pass
constitutional muster, The ordinance attempts to incorporate recent constitutional
decisions.
Discussion of occuoational license revision
Mr. Surette said the revision places constraints on the time period in which the City
must issue or transfer a license. He referred to page 3 and noted language deals with the
~
minws05a.95
16
05/01/95
.' . . .' " , ' ~ . I.. .
.' , I I'
,W',:">:: ,
....,t
.-,,\
right to revoke or deny the issuance of an occupational license. Grounds are established
with specific tanguage to build a defensible procedure. Mr. Surette referred to page 5
which imposes time constraints as occupational licenses cannot be revoked forever.
Merchants have the same protections as a First Amendment speaker.
The City Attorney noted this discussion is to introduce the Commission to the
materials. First reading is not scheduled for May 4, 1995. Mr. Surette noted the City has
four active legal cases regarding this issue. He said he would report the impact of new
legislation on those cases before first reading.
Mr. Surette referred to pages 6 and 7 and noted disqualification provisions for
applicants are established. Criteria for denial of First Amendment activities are limited to
sexually oriented offenses although no Supreme Court case has determined if a local
government can deny an applicant a license based on that. The Commission and City have
been aggressive in regulating activity within City establishments. Ms. Rice questioned if
current difficulties relating to licenses for non-sexually oriented businesses are being
addressed and fixed. Mr. Surette indicated they are and the ordinance includes a
disqualification for those who have been subject to court supervision within the previous
three years.
.::;;t....
....
'"'>"i
Mr. Surette said the remainder of the ordinance establishes time constraints.
provisional licenses will not be limited by a time frame. If reasons for disqualification
appear on a report, the applicant will be notified of the grounds for denial and can appeal
to the City Manager. Time constraints on the appeal process are also included. The
ordinance is complex because the City is attempting to regulate business with a taxing
device. Ms. Rice indicated the ordinance is important to address as it has needed an
update for a long time.
Consensus was to have first reading on May 4, 1995.
City Manager Verbal Reports
$chedulino Meetinos
1) StrateQic {'Ianning was scheduled to follow the City Commission Work Session on May
30, 1995.
2) The CIP was scheduled to follow the City Commission Work Session on May 15, 1995.
3) The Walk~Thru of the Harborview Center was scheduled for 5:00 p.m. on May 1 B,
1995.
The Downtown Partnershio Meeting Retreat will take place on May 13, 1995 at the Junior
League Building on N. Ft. Harrison from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Ms. Rice recommended
Commission representatives, Mayor Garvey and Commissioner Barfield, plan to attend the
afternoon session from 1 :00 to 5:00 p.m.
Baroaining Agreements
y
minws05a.95
17
05/01/95
~. I . \ ; '. ..
" '. / fC' ,
,\"r!~ .;l'\
. '. ",.
--."
,
Ms. Rice reported tentative agreements have been reached with ail four City unions
and reviewed a handout. Highlights include a four percent one~tjme bonus, two three-
percent raises over the next three years and a step increase between Steps 9 and 10 was
added. The number of sick days was decreased from 15 to 12 over three years and the
cap for sick day accumulation for new hires was lowered to seven months. Concern was
expressed that lower caps were not instituted for employees who had not reached their
caps. Ms. Rice indicated sick day accumulation for current employees is frozen at the cap
in place when they were hired. All employees have a cap and the rate of accrual will be
slower.
Ms. Rice said the Pension plan was settled with the 2.75 multiplier. She
recommended the City hire Lee Dehner, the Union's lawyer, to draft language for the
pension plan to be reviewed by the City Attorney. Ms. Rice said she had agreed to bring
to the Pension Trustees a request for payment of Mr. Dahner's fee for the negotiations. A
leave pool using vacat;on time only has been established for each bargaining unit. She
noted the unions will take the contracts to their groups for ratification before it is returned
to the City Commission.
Commission Discussion Items
(Cont'd from 4/17/95) Commission Rules (including Work Session or9ceduresl
'~"'''\
{ "
'r.~,!,.
It was requested that all language referring to Monday Commission meetings be
removed. It was noted CRA meetings will occur before the first Monday Work Session in a
month. It was noted that references to the City Clerk are included in the City Charter.
The City Attorney recommended dividing Commission Rules into Meeting 'Rules and
Administrative Rules. She and the City Clerk can draft a proposed list of rules for
Commission review and approval. The Commission concurred.
It was proposed that time could be saved at Work Sessions if Commissioners note
their concerns via memorandum prior to the Work Sessions.
It was requested that the rule requiring the Vice Mayor to be advised when the
Mayor is out of town be deleted. Consensus was to remove that rule. It was noted it is
important for City emergencies that the Mayor be required to notify the City Manager when
leaving town.
Rule 20 was addressed. The City Attorney noted the City Charter refers to
absences and this rule defines "absence." She stated it was important that this language
be defined. Rule 21 defines excused absences.
The City Attorney indicated the rules need to address Closed Door Sessions.
Rule 8 indicates the City Commission determines which staff members will attend
the meeting. It was felt this was a City Manager prerogative. Consensus was to delete
Rule 8.
--
minws05a.95
18
05/01/95
, ~"
. ",... . .. . .'
~,' ,
,
,',
"
:1
"
. ~.,' ," \' \'
&\ff'; I " ;"" " ,,'," ' '" '
flt~~,:{;{~:X:~~ ~~,.~.: ~''''::'. . ~', ,.
",." :.
, '
: 1 -. ~ \~'1
j .~
o
Work Session rules will be incorporated in the Commission rules. Concern was
expressed that the public is not permitted to comment an items during Work Sessions.
The majority agreed no change to the rule should be made.
Commissioners Berfield and Thomas requested copies of Work Session minutes.
The remaining Commission indicated they do not need them.
Volunteer Recoqnition Proaram
Concern was expressed that the Commission should, have input and select
recipients of the Commissioner's Award. An oversight had caused Commission members
to not be informed of the identity of last year's award winners. It was noted a committee
chooses the winners from a list of nominees. The majority agreed the program should
remain as it is as long as special care is taken to apprise Commissioners prior to the
awards ceremony.
Other Commission Action
Mavor Garvey expressed concern that the RFP for the East End project be a joint
project with the eRA and the City. It was noted the CRA's Executive Director's
compensation is tied to that project.
Commissioner Johnson questioned where funds from the $7,500 Local Assistance
Planning Grant would go. Ms. Rice indicated in the General Fund.
i,tI~.,
\~ Commissioner Johnson questioned who makes decisions regarding grants to North
Greenwood. Ms. Rice indicated the City Commission makes those decisions.
Adjourn
The Commission adjourned at 5:34 p.m.
,j
. " ~
V
minws05a.95
19
05/01/95