06/01/1993 (2)
'.. " " ~" " , " I',,""". ,.'
';~,~', >'.,~,J. '
'.., '
: " . ..
, , .
" '
l' ,
':.,' '
" I,
, ' .
,,',' > . .
" ,
. ,
}""'......' L ~
. C, ,'.':" ";:'c._';';
o
WORKSESSION
City Commission Worksession Minutes
, C)
Date June ~. 1!H3
+- ;:L33()
"
"
\----)
. '. . -, \ , ~ , . , ' '.... " ", " -I ~ . .' L. " I . ' ".' .. .. 'oJ .,..: : . ',' .
"
, "
" ,
" ,
~,:;;'(
) """""
I'
CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION
Tuesday, June 1, 1993
The, City Commission of the City of Clearwater met at the Clearwater East
Library with the following members present:
Rita Garvey
Richard Fitzgerald
Fred Thomas
Sue Berfield
Arthur Deegan
Mayor /Commissioner
Yice~Mayor/Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Also present were:
Michael J. Wright
Kathy S.Rice
Elizabeth M. Deptula
M.A. Galbraith. Jr.
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Manager
Deputy City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Attorney
City Clerk
The meeting was called to order at 10:35 a.m.
1~~) Sorvlcp Awards
No Service Awards were presented.
State pI tbe long Center - Mark Abdo (WSO)
In a memo to the City Manager dated May 18, 1993. Parks and Recreation Director
Ream Wilson provided some background and a comparison of payments made by
Safety Harbor and Clearwater to the Long Center as follows:
November 20. 19136: The City Commission approved the purchase of 15 acres of
land on Belcher Road at a price of approximately $1.500.000.
December 29, 19R6: The City entered into an agreement with the "Clearwater
Youth Recreation Center. Inc." whereby the City leased the 15 acres to the Center
Foundation for the purpose of constructing and operating a public recreation and
education facility.
Julv.J99..0: Tho Long Conter was opened to the public.
AsulL1.9.1-t9.91: Tl10 1986 Agreoment between the City and the Long Center was
tormlnotod In fovor of n now "Looso Agreement,"
,,--/
It1 W ~(l(J^. !) J
0&10\193
.Fi,t...~
. . , . '. ',,' . ',' " '. ":, '... . : !' . ' , ' ,'.
f~
OJitob~r 21. 19l1: The City Commission approved a contribution of $250.000 to
the Long Center representing the City's fourth and final installment of a $1,000,000
commitment toward the Center's capital construction funding.
Under the original 1986 agreement, there were three "Participa'ting Agencies" of
the Long Center including the City of Clearwater, UPARC and Clearwater for Youth.
The new 1991 agreement provided for some updated information based on experience
with operation and Safety Harbor was added as a sponsoring agency. At the timo it
was added, Safety Harbor contributed $375,000 to the Long Center which
represented a per capita payment of $25.00 for each of the City's 15,000 residents,
Likewise, Clearwater's payment of $2,500,000 (for land and capital) also represented
a per capita payment of $25.00 for each of its 100,000 residents. Ongoing payments
that might be required of the sponsoring agencies include:
1. Rental Fees for Specific ~~ - The City of Clearwater rents approximately
945 square feet of office space for Administration, Supervision and Aquatics
personnel. At a charge of $1.50 per square foot, our annual cost of 1992/93 and
1993/94 is $17,016. Likewise, according to the Long Center's budget, Clearwater for
Youth will be paying $4.800. Safety Harbor $7,200 and the Center Foundation
$16,000.
<~:~/
2. Annual Operating Residua' Funding Obligation - This is the largest payment
required at the Long Center and is based on ItUser Hours. It A formula is identified in
the agreement whereby the difference between the Center's budgeted revenues and
expenses is called the It Annual Operating Residual Funding Obligation. It Based on a
"Historical Usage Report" maintained by the Long Center, each participating agency is
responsible for paying a percentage of this "residual. II For example, City of Clearwater
Recreation Programs involved 35.926 User Hours in 1991/92 which accounted for
77.27 percent of all user hours identified with the participating agencies. Therefore,
the City of Clearwater was responsible for paying 77.27 percent, or $191.927.08, of
the Annual Operating Residual Funding Obllgation of $248.385.
3. Increl11ental Cost ~ If a sponsoring agency uses the facilities of the long Center
outside the Center's normal operating hours, the sponsoring agency is responsible for
paying the incremental costs associated with said use. The City of Clearwater has not
had to pay any of these costs since the Center has given permission for after hours
uses to be controlled by our employees and contract instructors at no cost to the Long
Center.
4. F~cillty Rentals - This category is for short term programs of 12 weeks or less,
or for one or two day events such as a swim meet. dog show, etc. These events may
be conducted either by a sponsoring agency or by an outside organization. Rental fees
are paid directly to the Long Center rather than being recorded and paid according to
user hours.
mw~06A.93
2
06/01193
.u.t~; ..3 "'",
The agreement addresses the City's responsibility of paying its pro-rata share of
the Annual Operating Residual Funding Obligation as follows: "The City's obligation to
pay is subject to the appropriation of funds in the operating budget of the City for such
purposes in each subsequent fiscal year of the City; provided, that the City shall not be
obligated to appropriate ad valorem tax revenues for such purposes."
".......
n
5. Bepair and Replacement Sinking Fund - In accord with the agreement,
representatives of the sponsoring agencies jointly prepared a report setting forth the
projected costs of capital expenditures for repair and replacement for the next five
years. The report accounts for capital expenditures which are in an amount greater
than $5,000 and which are not otherwise accounted for as part of the Center's annual
operating budget. Participating agencies agreed to contribute to the fund on a
percentage basis. Items needing repair or replacement for the next five years are
estimated to cost $187,100. This amount was divided by five to arrive at an annual
cost of $37,420 to be paid each year by the participating agencies. Since the City of
Clearwater's percentage of use according to the "Historical Report" was 75.5 percent,
the City's contribution for 93/94 is estimated at $28,252.10. likewise, Safety
Harbor's percentage would result in a payment of $8,232.40 while Clearwa'ter for
Youth's obligation would be $935.50.
:J""
; '.
I
Mark Abdo, Win Elwood, Tim Bouchard, Kathleen Simon, Steve Hite and Fred
Fisher were present to address the Commission.
Mr. Abdo gave an overview of the center operations, stating membership was
originally forecast to be approximately 2,000; however, as of May 20, 1993, the
center has 4,200 members, 90 percent of whom are Clearwater residents. Since the
center opened in July of 1990, there have been 1.7 million user/hours and there were
47,000 volunteer hours in the last fiscal year. In the past 12 months, there have been
over 53,000 participants in special overnight events, using 1,500 hotel rooms and
generating $325,000 in revenue.
Mr. Abdo indicated some of the methods of building participation being considered
are a Friday night teen program, discounted memberships for off-peak users and baby
sitting for up to two hours. He stated although the total membership is 4,200, BO
percent of the members have used the facility less than ten times and building
membership is a means of increasing revenue. Student focus groups are being used to
make sure the program is on the right track for the community and to see if the long
range plan needs to be adapted. .
He stated a plan is in the final draft stage to apply for a $25,000 grant from the
Convention and Visitors Bureau, which considers the center as a tourist attraction.
Vision Cable has contributed $800,000 in time for commercials and video
presentations (to be used as marketing tools) featuring the swimming pool and Special
Olympics training.
mw~06A.93
J
Ob/O 1/9 J
','. / ' ' , ' , . ", ,",', ) l, ., ' " . .
/
r
o{',...
~
.'
Mr. Abdo indicated, due to the installation of cost-efficient lighting, electric bills
have come down for the Raymond James Pavilion and the maintenance building. Solar
heating of the natatorium can save 20 percent on the gas bill. He presented a copy of
the new newsletter format, stating the bike path route and a bus route map are to be
included.
j""'::,
"t~'
The 1993/1994 fiscal year budget process was explained and it was indicated
there are internal and external controls on the budget. Increasing the fees for group
memberships and offering volume discounts were discussed. There has been some
concern that On Top of the World residents had been paying a group rate for
memberships; however, they are to pay the individual membership rate in the future.
Group rates are to be offered to government agencies, businesses, churches and youth
organizations under 5013c. There was a $401000 increase in revenue and the
Foundation contributed $140,000. It was indicated a building endowment is needed
to make the project self-sustaining. The difference between the revenue and
expenditures is based on the percentage of user hours for last year. Mr. Abdo stated
the operating budget is very similar to last year's. He indicated money was added for
marketing and the number of salaried personnel increased from eight to ten; three in
administration, three in management and the rest in supervisory positions. An aquatic
manager position was cut and a recreation specialist, or aquatic technician position,
was added. A maintenance person was added in March and one part~time
maintenance position was changed to full-time. In response to a question from
Commissioner Deegan, Mr. Abdo stated the salary increase is built in at five percent.
Discussion ensued regarding the membership plan, with Mr. Abdo stating group
and three-month memberships are the key revenue generators. In response to
questions from Commissioner Deegan, Mr. Abdo explained membership is expected to
double next year due to an expected influx of visitors during the summer and an
ambitious active recruiting campaign. He responded to questions regarding
memberships, income from rentals, events, projected usage and marketing tools.
Commissioner Deegan questioned jf there will be a membership recruiting bonus for
current members and Mr. Abdo responded research ;s being done to determine what
type of incentive will work.
Discussion ensued regarding usage of the facility. Mr. Abdo explained three
groups of focus are groups frequently using the facilities, current members not using
the facility and non~members living within three miles. He listed the sources of
revenue associated with marketing, stating it is not unusual for sponsor membership to
go down due to people not wanting to commit for a year. Referring to a graph, he
recapped usage. In response to questions from Commissioner Deegan. Mr. Abdo
stated 76 percent of the members and 83 percent of the groups use the center less
than ten times per year. Forty-six percent of members have never used the center.
mws06A.9J
4
06/01/93
I'
.!
1.-:,: ','
,~ In response to questions from Commissioner Deegan, Tim Bouchard and Mr. Abdo
explained current financial assets, source of funds to run the foundation and add to the
endowment and disbursement of contributions. Mr. Bouchard stated since she was
hired, Kathleen Simon has increased fund raising dramatically.
In response to questions from Commissioner Thomas, Mr. Abdo indicated changing
the way usage is figured caused the numbers to appear lower for Clearwater for Youth
and other organizations, when they have actually stayed the same. He stated they are
now charging $1.00 per visit instead of $1.00 per hour.
Discussion with Parks and Recreation Director Ream Wilson ensued regarding the
cost per user/hour in City facilities compared to the figures for the Long Center. He
indicated there are several variables preventing a direct comparison. Commissioner
Thomas requested to look at the numbers and figure it out as closely as possible.
Commissioner Thomas raised a question of the Center wanting to change the
City's percentage of contribution. Mr. Abdo stated he is looking at the percentages
based on population instead of user/hours. He stated this will benefit Clearwater,
which will not grow as much, compared to other municipalities, such as Safety Harbor,
which has the space to grow more. Mr. Bouchard said this was proposed because of
concerns the needs of the community were not being met by only looking at the cost
per visit.
.':) Copies of a corrected sponsoring agency budget sheet were provided to the
Commissioners and discussion ensued regarding the calculations of the City's
contribution amount compared to the percentage of usage.
Commissioner Thomas noted a three-year increase in t~e City's contribution
amount and questioned when a turnaround will occur and a positive trend will begin.
It was indicated the Foundation is the key to the long range plan. When the
endowment reaches $3 million. the interest will fund the Center and the City's
contribution will decrease dramatically. Mr. Abdo stated he does not foresee the
City's contribution dropping to zero; however, he expects the per capita calculations
and increased users to have a positive impact on the revenue stream. Commissioner
Thomas requested to see projections of the anticipated positive cash flow, decline in
City contributions, and projected income as the endowment grows. Mr. Abdo stated
he will convert the numbers on the five-year plan from user/hours to population to
obtain these figures. Mr. Bouchard stated a plan, which is updated annually. shows
light at the end of the tunnel and he requested the opportunity to show this to the
Commission.
Commissioner Fitzgerald questioned how the decision was made to go to
population based figures. Discussion ensued regarding the effects on the operating
budget of using population instead of user/hours.
rnwsD6A.93
5
QU/D 1/93
. '" I' , " I. I . . .'. .' ',' " , . . . " '. , " ,: /
t~ '<
,.:~
Mayor Garvey noted the municipalities involved will have to agree to the concept
arid suggested holding further discussion until meeting with Safety Harbor. She stated
the key to increasing usage and revenue is to increase the programming. It was
indicated this will be a challenge until a way is found to encourage off-peak usage of
the facility.
Commissioner Deegan questioned who pays for a budget shortfall. Mr. Abdo
stated shortfalls are made up by the foundation, not the agencies. He said expenses
have been kept under control; however/membership revenue has not come in as
projected. Commissioner Deegan wondered if the projected membership revenues are
too challenging.
A meeting with Safety Harbor was scheduled for June 16, at 6:00 p.m. in the
Long Center. Staff is to confirm this with a memo.
Approval of City's participation in the proposed burying of power lines along Gulf Blvd. and
a!Jthorize staft to begin drafting all necessary ordinances and other dQcuments (AS-')
,}
''''j;~...-t.
...~. >..
The Sand Key Civic Association has requested assistance from the City in having
the Florida Power electrical lines buried when the County undertakes its scheduled
widening of Gulf Boulevard some time late this year. Under Puhli~ Service Commission
regulations, Florida Power is required to bury the lines provided that a third party
"applicant" is willing to pay the incremental costs of burying the lines, which would
otherwise be relocated above ground to accommodate the road widening. Florida
Power has tentatively estimated such incremental costs to be in the range of
$800/000 to $1,200,000.
The Sand Key Civic Association supports allocating the costs of this project to the
Sand Key property owners, using taxable value as a basis, and has requested the
City's assistance in accomplishing this. Preliminary estimates indicate a special
assessment of between $235 and $360 per $100,000 of taxable value would be
required to generate the necessary funds. The advantage of a special assessment is
the enforceability of collection via property liens, and also the option of the property
owner to defer payment over not more than ten years at an interest rate to be
determined by the City.
Even though the City's current special assessment ordinance would not permit a
special assessment for this purpose, staff believes a 1992 change in the state special
assessment law, as well as a 1992 state supreme court decision allows the City
sufficient latitude to amend its special assessment ordinance to accommodate the
request. The change in the law allows funding by special assessments of "amenities";
in connection with the widening of street. The court decision approved special
assessment based upon the property values, rather than front footage, of benefitted
properties.
mw~O(JA.93
(J
QUID 1/93
..' f . . : . . '. . .' . .,' ... . , '.
~.~~.~ .
..r~ In order for the City to assist with the financing of this project as requested. its
, ~
anticipated the following steps will be required: 1) amend the City's special
assessment ordinance to expand the definition of assessable projects to include
burying of power lines and also to allow assessments based on taxable values
(currently special assessments are only permitted on a "front footage" basis) and
2) proceed with the validation of City of Clearwater speCial assessment revenue
bonds for this project. Even though the dollar amount of the project is relatively
small, validation is advisable to protect the City against potential legal challenges.
Given Commission conceptual approval to proceed, staff anticipates that both
the amended assessment ordinance and the bond ordinance will be ready for first
reading on July 1 st, with second reading on July 15th. Following ordinance
approval, notices will be sent to all affected property owners indicating the exact
amount of their proposed assessments. In addition to the required public hearing,
the Sand Key Civic Association has indicated their willingness to support a
referendum of Sand Key residents prior to actual adoption of the special
assessments, should the Commission deem that advisable. Depending on the
timing of the bond validation process. and whether or not a referendum is
undertaken, final adoption of the assessment would likely occur in September or
October. In the meantime, staff will coordinate efforts with the County and Florida
Power to insure the project is neither initiated prematurely nor unduly delayed by
city efforts. .
...:.""....
'..,..,) Dan Deignan, Assistant Director/Administrative Services, outlined the request.
He said there are major commercial properties involved that will incur a
proportionately larger share of the costs.
Mayor Garvey questioned if the Sand Key residents have given their approval.
AI Lijewski, President of Sand Key Civic Association. indicated almost everyone on
Sand Key wants the utilities underground. He said a survey indicated the residents
of Sand Key would be willing to pay the incremental cost to get the lines buried if
applied on a fair basis.
In response to a question from Commissioner Thomas regarding the legality of
property assessment without a referendum, discussion ensued regarding the
procedures of amending the special assessment ordinance. Mr. Deignan stated
adding language about burying power lines and changing it to base the assessment
on the current assessed property value is needed. He indicated there was some
discussion regarding commercial properties paying based on front footage. After
the special assessment ordinance is amended, a preliminary property appraisal
would be needed. The property owners would be notified, a public hearing held
and the assessment revenue bonds process would begin. A validation hearing of
the bond ordinance would also be needed. The pros and cons of this concept were
discussed.
~.
mws06A.93
7
0&/01/93
Mr. Galbraith stated this project is still at the conceptual level and ;t is not certain
ad valorem property values will be used.
f~"
Commissioner Deegan suggested the Sand Key Civic Association have a special
mailing to determine what the majority of the property owners think about these
assessments. Various means of contacting the property owners with this information
were discussed. Staff is to obtain mailing labels for the Sand Key property owners.
Nicholas Karay, of Florida Power Corporation, stated in response to a question
from the Mayor that Florida Power is in favor of doing this. Commissioner Fitzgerald
questioned if there is a timing problem. Mr. Karay responded he will work with County
Administrator Fred Marquis to delay the start of the County's project until a decision is
reached regarding burying the lines. He agreed to coordinate scheduling with the
County and'make arrangements to get the necessary equipment ready.
Commissioner Thomas requested discussion of the validity of having a 20 to 30
vear plan of doing this throughout the City to protect power' lines from storms and
other damage. The Mayor did not agree. She felt it would complicate and delay
repairs.
\ "')
"'""'
Commissioner Deegan noted a previous proposal to mandate underground power
lines failed at the Public Service Commission. A compromise was reached to require
power companies to bury lines if someone else paid the costs. The Mayor indicated
that the municipality involved would have to pay, 'not to pass along the costs to the
property owners.
Mr. Karay stated the capabilities and requirements. of placing equipment
underground changes monthly.
The meeting was recessed from 12:21 to 1 :31 p.m. for lunch.
Mid-year budget review (AS-2)
a) Ord. #5402-93 - operating budget
b) Ord. #5403-93 - capital improvement program budget
The amended City Manager's annual budget report includes comments on major
variances and explanations of proposed amendments to the budget. Special detail
includes a summary of administratively approved change orders, a detail expenditures
budget for the Special Law Enforcement Trust Funds and the Commission required
report on Risk Management/Self Insurance Fund settlements.
The mid year budget report provides a significant amount of information on the
budget and finances of the City, much of it in summary form. The Third Quarter
budget review will update any additional financial changes whether acted upon or
postponed.
....-/
mwsOflA.93
8
06/01/93
'. . . ." .' '. . " . I \ ' ;. .~ .
~
jI ','
Budget Director Tina Wilson responded to questions from the Commission.
Commissioner Deegan questioned the $165,060 increase in the Legal Department.
It was indicated this increase was for unanticipated professional services for outside
legal representation and settlement costs. Commissioner Deegan requested a list of
where these funds were spent. The City Attorney is to provide an outline of the
expenditures.
Commissioner Thomas questioned, in another part of the budget, an increase of
$115,000 for settlement costs and felt it should be combined with the numbers for the
Legal Department budget. It was indicated the $115,000 was specifically for
settlements of self-insurance claims and was not related to the Legal Department
increase from the General Fund. Commissioner Thomas felt it would be beneficial to
track outside versus inside council. The City Manager indicated this is already under
discussion.
Commissioner Deegan questioned the creation of an Assistant Director position in
the Planning and Development Department. Discussion ensued regarding the
reorganization of management positions in that department. In response to a question,
Ms. Wilson stated the budget increase in Planning and Development was offset by
savings in other departments.
< ...~.,
'>-..-
In response to a question from Commissioner Thomas, Ms. Wilson stated specifics
of Police Department overtime are adjusted at mid-year; this report shows the bottom
line at the present time.
Discussion ensued regarding the Police Department having cut back the number of
traffic accidents being investigated, going from metered to attendant parking on
Clearwater Beach and the resulting decrease in revenue. It was indicated traffic safety
and revenue generation will be discussed when preparing next year's budget. Mr.
Wright pointed out a $13,000 stationary speed checking device is proposed to be
added to the capital budget. The device is needed to average traffic speeds over a
period of time and establish patterns around the City.
Commissioner Deegan asked if there would be a savings in dump fees because of
recycling. Mr. Wright stated the County anticipates doubling or tripli ng fees to retrofit
equipment to comply with the clean air act.
Library Director Arlita Hallam responded to a question from Commissioner Berfield,
stating new computer equipment is needed for the Library to go on the new Ross
financial system. Commissioner Berfield expressed concern that spending additional
money to link the departments to the system was not discussed as part of the original
purchase. She questioned how many other department will need more equipment
related to the financial program.
,
----
mwsObA.9)
I)
OhiO 1/9)
> .".. . I .' t.. .', 4' r .', .:.1.
'.'
.~. l." ..,
~
Jeff Harper, DIrector of Administrative Services and George Denty, Assistant
Computer Information Services Manager, responded to questions, stating about
$35,000 in additional hardware and snftware will be needed to bring 11 departments
on line. Mayor Garvey reminded the Commissioners that staff had been instructed to
put together a long~range plan to slowly work the City into a new computer system to
spread the financial commitment over a longer period of time.
Commissioner Thomas requested a workshop on existing and proposed data
systems and their compatibility within the City. Discussion ensued regarding the
dynamics of relocating computer systems into a consolidated City Hall and what
equipment is currently being used in various departments. In response to a question
from Commissioner Berfield, Mr. Harper stated there is a computer backbone in each
building. The problem with interconnecting systems is the expense of running the
necessary cabling between buildings.
In response to a question from Commissioner Berfield, Ms. Wilson explained $146,370
saved by the Fire Department was used for police radios and related equipment. .
Purchase of 3 Peterbilt 320 front~loading sanitation trucks from Metro.Tech EquiprJ1ent
Co.. Sarasota. FL. for a total of $359.742: financing to be provided under City's
master lease-purchase agreement witb AT&T Credit Corp. (GS-2)
,-'~:) Vehicles 2080.158 (1985 Mack-Leach), 2080.160 (1985 Crane Carrier) and
2080.177 (1987 Crane Carrier) are scheduled for replacement and were approved by
the City Commission during its budget hearings.
Bids were solicited for 3 front-leading solid waste trucks. Metro-Tech Equipment
Company and Crane Carrier Corporation submitted bids for this purchase. Five firms
did not respond to the bid solicitation for the following reasons: three were unable to
meet specifications, one was unable to bid due to the City being out of its assigned
territory and one vendor did not receive the bid package.
The Solid Waste Division requested' a demonstration from Metro~ Tech Equipment
Company of its Leach 40-cubic yard front-loading refuse truck. From March 8 through
March 18, 1993, a demonstration unit was provided and used by Solid Waste
personnel. After careful evaluation of the demonstration unit, the Solid Waste Division
recommended purchase of the Leach vehicles on April 2, 1993.
In response to a question from Commissioner Berfield regarding why one vendor
did not receive the bid package, Ms. Rice explained the City calls to inquire why
vendors do not bid. She said there are various answers and sometimes the vendors
say they did not receive the package.
...J
mws06A.9J
10
06101/9]
~:~': .
.j
\\
I~~
{Cant. from 4/1 [94) - Declare as surplus & approve SElIe of Library's Doll Collection
with receipts to be used to pu(cbase childreo's library material: permit the Greater
Clearwater PLlbHC L.ibrary Foundation to sell other items il'J the Flagg donation with
proceed s to be used tor Iibra ry purpos~s (LlB-')
The Library wants to declare as surplus a collection of 413 dolls which was
donated to the Library 53 years ago. Permission is requested to sell the collection on
consignment through a doll dealer, with proceeds being used to purchase children' s
library materials. The collection has been appraised at $ 15,152.00.
Permission is also requested for the Greater Clearwater Public Library Foundation to
dispose of other items which are with this collection. The seven boxes of
miscellaneous items include fans, shoes, postcards, shells, booklets and other trinkets.
The Foundation holds an annual auction which can dispose of these items with the
proceeds used for Library acquisitions.
After this item was discussed at the April 1 Commission meeting, the Library
Director contacted Southebyfsl in New York, to ascertain their interest in the
collection. On April 27, Sotheby's responded they were not interested in handling the
collection and they felt there is little market for these souvenir and national costume
dolls.
, ~')
~ ,~....
The Commission has had the opportunity to view the dolls.
Discussion ensued regarding this item. Because the City would be gambling on
whether or not any money wHl be gained from the.. sale of the dolls, Commissioner
Thomas suggested donating the collection to a museum or loaning it to other cities for
show. Mr. Wright felt if the collection could not stay within the City of Clearwater it
should be sold. Commissioner Deegan felt, and the general consensus was, the library
staff has already had to spend too much time on this. .
Five year lease with 2 five year renewal options with the United States Postal Service.
for the period 1 O/1/94~9/30/99. for $179.630 (MR-1)
The existing lease between the City of Clearwater and the United States Postal
Service for rental space at the Municipal Marina will expire on September 30, 1994.
The original lease was for ten years and included four five-year renewal options, which
locked in the annual payments to the City at $6,000. The lease covered 3,100 square
feet of interior space, approximately 294 square feet of platform, approximately
11,550 square feet of paved area, with ingress and egress via paved 20~foot and 33~
foot driveways, a paved 1 8-foot driveway, approximately 1 20 square feet of paved
sidewalks and approximately 192 square feet of landscaped area. The City was
required to pay all taxes, provide heating in all areas in use and to furnish air
conditioning equipment, which included service and maintenance.
'''--'".
mws06A.93
11
06/01/93
Harbormaster Bill Held detailed the areas of the building covered by the lease,
stating it provides for an increase of $30,000 to the City. In the renewal options, the
Post Office agreed to take over maintenance of the air conditioning system. Hestated
the square-footage rental rate gives the City good value for the property and it is
hoped the Post Office will stay.
i" .
,.
r~
This new lease will provide the City with $35,926.00 each year for the first five
years, $37,722.30 each year for the first five year option and $39,608.42 each year
for the second five year option. Rent is payable in equal installments at the end of
each calendar month. The lease covers 3,124 square feet of interior space, 367
square feet of platform, 595 square feet of ramp, joint use of all existing paved ingress
and egress, maneuvering area and sidewalk and use of six reserved parking spaces.
Heating system, air conditioning equipment, light fixtures, sewerage service, electrical
system, water system and water will be furnished by the City. The postal service will
assume maintenance of the HV AC system and pay all recurring metered utility charges
throughout the term of the lease.
The US Postal Service has been a good tenant of the marina and they are
considered to be the "anchor" for the marina building.
".''''''c,,\
I 'j
t!~
Discussion ensued regarding usage figures, the Post Office not having to pay
property taxes and the flood insurance rate for this warehouse type of building. Mr.
Held stressed the importance of having the Post Office to encourage occupancy by
other tenants and the rates for square footage were compared to those in similar
buildings. The Post Office was felt by the Commission to be a necessary service on
Clearwater Beach. It was indicated the contract does not provide for annual rate
increases.
Commissioner Berfield raised questions concerning utility hook~ups. Mr. Held
indicated the tenants do not have separate water meters and subleasing is not allowed
without City permission. Mr. Wright recommended changing that clause to permission
of the City Commission.
Commissioner Thomas questioned the responsibility for replacement of heating and
air conditioning systems. He stated an air conditioning system usually lasts five to six
years in the corrosive environment of the beach and he would prefer to see the tenant
responsible for the replacement costs. Discussion ensued regarding renewal rate
increases. While Commissioner Thomas favored using the Consumer Product Index to
establish renewal costs rather than having a fixed percentage of increase. Mayor
Garvey stressed the importance of keeping the space leased out.
Commissioner Thomas questioned the cost of remodeling the building and felt
ground-floor tenants should pay higher rates similar to the way it is done in the private
sector. Mr. Held stated $80,000 has been spent to redo sidewalks and the building
remodel open bid date is June 11, 1993.
mwsO&A,9J
12
or,/Ol/93
, . . '
, ~'. . ~.
, '. ' .'
~
Commissioner Deegan requested permission to sublet be included in the contract.
Public Hearing - Vacating E 3' of westerly 7.5' drainage & .utility easement for
Morningside Estates Unit3B. Lot 296 (Osorio V93-04HPW-11
The applicant has a pool structure which encroaches approximately 0.97 feet into
the easement and the decking another 1.93 feet. The applicant is asking that the east
3.0 feet of the platted easement be vacated.
General Telephone and Vision Cable have no objection to this request. Florida
Power objects to vacating the east 3.0 feet because they would not have adequate
area for their facilities. Florida Power supports vacating the east 1.0 foot.
This request has been reviewed by the various City departments and divisions
concerned with vacations. The City has no existing utilities within this easement. The
Building Inspector's office reports "the house was permitted and built in 1968 and the
swimming pool was permitted and built in 1980". This pool was constructed prior to
the recently instigated process whereby impending encroachments are more readily
discovered and precluded. The Engineering Division supports Florida Power' 5 concern
and objects to vacating the east 3.0 feet of the easement. Engineering is requesting
that only the east 1.0 foot be vacated. All other departments concerned have no
objections.
,~) The Public Works Director has reviewed the comments submitted by the reviewing
departments and recommends vacation of the east 1.0 foot as proposed by the
Engineering Division.
Commissioner Thomas requested clarification of the issue because he believed the
homeowner had followed all the rules in effect when the pool was built in 1980. Mr.
Baker stated no part of a pool has ever been allowed in an easement. He explained
there is frequently confusion with pool drawings when what is thought to be the
leading edge of the structure turns out to be the water line. He stated elevation
drawings showing the leading edge the are now required with pool plans. It was
indicated granting the one foot vacation would remove the structural wall from the
easement and solve the immediate problem. Any future work in the easement could
require removal of the decking, which might not be replaced by the utility.
Commissioner Thomas requested the property owner be made aware of this.
purchase of computer hardware from Access Computers. Oldsmar. FL. for $14.900.28
arnL.software from Micro Solutions. New Port Richey. FL. for $6.905 for a total of
921.805.28 (PW-2)
This purchase will provide a work station for the Real Estate Services Manager, a
CAD station for an Engineering Draftsman, a tape drive replacement for the
Engineering network, a replacement work station for the Environmental office, a
,,,,,-..,,
nlws06A.93
13
06/01/93
. ,
. . . ~, ,.. ,
". . . I' '. " '
"
,
r.~ <
t~
hardware upgrade for three existing drafting stations, two new copies of AutoCAD
drafting software for Engineering Drafting, Harvard Graphics software upgrade for
Engineering for four new copies of WordPerfect software for the new work stations
added to the network.
With this purchase, the Real Estate office, which currently has no computer, will
be provided with a work station; drafting personnel will have enhanced hardware and
software capabilities; the Engineering network will become more reliable and a non~
standard severely limited work station in the Environmental office will be replaced by
an advanced work station.
This project correlates with Computerization Long Range Plan numbers 9205 and 9024.
Bill Baker stated this proposal will bring the department1s CAD system up to date.
Commissioner Deegan questioned why the storm water utility fund is being used to
pay for this. He expressed concern with those funds being used for anything other
than the storm water development plan.
)
.
It-''''-
Mr. Baker indicated members of the Public Works department work closely with
the storm water utility management group, doing their drawings for easemen'ts and
drainage rights-of-way. The stormwater utility fund is therefore paying part of the cost
of the automated drawing equipment. He stated another agenda item will be coming
up to address this and he felt the Commissioners would be pleased.
Direction for ,Public Works Department to continue pursuit of comprehensive watershed
management plans for Clearwater thru the Mid-Pinellas Comprehensive Watershed
Management Master Planning Program and that cooperative funding be pursued wl1h
slate and regional governments (PW-3)
Unlike stormwater infrastructure that has defined ownership, watersheds are based
upon geographic and landform characteristics rather than political boundaries.
Therefore, contamination that may occur within one jurisdiction may adversely impact
another.
Comprehensive watershed management planning and the coordination of City~wide
plans are a requirement of State Water Policy (Chapter 14-70.420, F.A.C.1 and the
City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan (Goals 16, 17, 23 and 26).
A Mid~Pine"as Comprehensive Watershed Group comprised of the cities of
Clearwater, Safety Harbor, Largo and Belleair, Pinellas County and the Southwest
Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) has been established. The purpose for
this group is to develop a comprehensive watershed management master plan in the
Mid-Pinellas region, including Clearwater. The plan will define and develop goals,
mws06A.93
1.1
D&{O 1/93
.. . . .
'. . >, , "," , .'. . I j' It .' _ j ~
I'. .
." '.
~
assess existing conditions, develop and recommend affordable project/program
alternatives and assess program effectiveness. This planning effort will not duplicate
existing studies, nor wHl it interfere with the development of existing projects. It will
utilize those existing study efforts and incorporate ongoing storm water projects to
reduce comprehensive planning costs for Mid-Pinellas. If we do not take advantage of
the Basin Board matching funds, the City would be responsible for the full amount of
the planning. We would be missing key coordination elements since the basins cover
other cities and unincorporated county.
An interlocal agreement is being developed to identify study planning goals and
responsibilities. A copy of the current draft interlocal agreement is attached.
Cooperative funding with the Pinellas-Anclote River Basin Board has been requested
through Pinellas County for this project. The City-requested $1.3 million grarit would
be matched by $1.3 million of local funding.
At this time, the City of Clearwater has secured interlocal cooperation for this
project by guaranteeing payment of the local share, recognizing that much of the
existing studies and work completed in the basin represents a significant share from
"in-kind" service. However, other municipalities and Pinellas County are presently
considering financial cooperation. Southwest Florida Water Management staff have
recommended support for this project at the full amount requested and have ranked
this project sixth out of fourteen for funding. The PinelIas-Anclote River Basin Board
convenes on June 22, 1993 to consider District staff's recommendation of approval of
,-,.) the Mid~Pinellas Group's request and to determine the level of funding commitment
from the state.
It is critical that the City of Clearwater demonstrate its intent to move forward, in
good faith, with this initiative to develop a comprehensive watershed management plan
for those basins in the Mid-Pinellas region that contain much of Clearwater's political
jurisdiction. The development of a comprehensive watershed management master plan
has been endorsed by the City Environmental Advisory Committee.
The City Commission will continue to have ample opportunity to review this project
and determine direction. Subsequent to Pinellas-Anclote River Basin Board approval,
the various municipal and County Commissions/Boards and the State will have an
opportunity to approve the final interlocal agreement, anticipated before August, 1993.
Following interlocal agreement approval, a scope of service for consultant selection
will be provided for review monthly after consultant selection. Budget for this project
will continue to be reviewed annually. Completion of the plan is expected to take at
least 24 months.
Stormwater utility funds are available for the local share to match the state's
funding. We need to commit to SWFWMD that we will accept the monies now, so
they are assured they are funding project that will be completed.
'"---"
mws06A.93
15
06/01/93
. .
. '., ~. I.'. I . , '. . I ~,. > .
~~
Bill Baker addressed the issue, stating when the $3.00 fee was invoked, the main
interests were water quality and stormwater utility management. Part of the fund has
since been used for drainage, quality, sampllng and other considerations; however the
major amount of the funds still remain tor water quality, creating and preserving
wetlands and a stormwater management plan. There is an opportunity for SWFWMD
to put up $1.3 million for a stormwater management plan, if this amount can be
matched by the City. The plan is to include Dunedin, Clearwater and parts of Pinellas
County.
Commissioner Deegan was pleased to be spending the money in this manner and
said this is what the public thinks it's for. He questioned if the other agencies involved
are putting up their share of the $1.3 million.
The City Manager suggested doing this in-house and paying out of the stormwater
funds. Because of the enclaves, he stated every drainage basin is shared with other
jurisdictions, which makes it difficult to take a regional approach when there are
differences with other jurisdictions. Assistant City Manager Kathy Rice stated there
are problems getting the other jurisdictions to commit to putting up money without
something in writing as to what their participation would be; however, there is a need
for Clearwater to commit the $1.3 million to SWFWMD in order to proceed.
Tom Miller explained the interlocal agreement is in its third draft stage due to
changes by the City, SWFWMD and Pinellas County. Commissioner Deegan expressed
'~,___' concerns, the way the agreement is written, it would allow County and municipal
participation without putting up any money. Mr. Miller stated the other local agencies
were not interested in contributing.
The Mayor stated the issue at hand is whether or not the Commission will
recommend having the City continue to pursue this matter.
Mr. Wright suggested proceeding with the project wO'JJd give the City bargaining
leverage with State regulatory agencies in the future. Staff is to look at the language
regarding contribution of funds., It was felt in~kind contributions would not be
acceptable when SWFWMD wants hard cash.
Mr. Miller outlined the County's estimate of percentage of contributions as follows:
Less than 5 % from Belleair, 50 % from Pinellas County, 15 % from Dunedin, less than
%5 from Largo and 20% from Safety Harbor. He responded to questions, stating
Clearwater should be liable for less than half and the exact figures should be available
once the study is completed and it is determined whether or not all the players will
follow the guidelines of the study. It was indicated the matter is under Federal
regulation and whether or not other municipalities will build is not under the control of
the City of Clearwater.
'-'"'
mws06A.93
Hi
O(J/O 1/93
. . . : .... ~ . . .' . ~ .: '. _' w
. . . 4
i
;"', .'".
,
~
Disc\lssion ensued with regard to amending concerning the proposed budget for
the project and all parties agreeing to what is formally accepted and adopted. There
was also discussion regarding best management practices. It was indicated this item
would come back before the Commission by June 22 to make sure it is going in the
right direction.
Commissioner Deegan did not want to accept the agreement if it meant having the
City put up the entire $1.3 million. Ms. Rice explained SWFWMD has been involved in
discussions with the City and they understand the City wants to put up the money,
then try to bring in other participants. It was felt to be too difficult to carve the
enclaves out of the plan due to the many areas sharing the same basins. The City
Manager strongly recommended going forward with the more regional approach
whether the County participates or not. '
Commissioner Deegan agreed with approval of the recommendation to accept the
concept, but not the draft of the agreement.
Commissioner Berfield questioned if $2.6 million was an excessive figure and for
what it would pay. Mr. Miller responded watershed management combines water
quantity/quality and ecosystem studies, the level of service wanted within each basin
as well as fisheries and recreation. Ms. Rice stated there is a large amount of citizen
input regarding what they want for their $3.00 contribution. Mr. Wright indicated it
will enable the City to determine how dirty is the water and the cost to clean it; how
..
'...,,""1 to approach flood protection, what is needed to build and the cost.
"
In response to a question from Commissioner Deegan, Mr. Saker stated developing
the plan of action for Stevenson Creek cost about $40 thousand. Ms. Rice stated
there will be a report breaking down the costs.
A map of the drainage basin boundaries was presented, showing the territory
covered by the 13 basins involved, covering an area much larger than the City of
Clearwater. Discussion ensued regarding water discharge areas and how land usage
affects runoff into the water bodies. Staff is to provide a map of sample outfalls on
Clearwater Beach.
In response to a question from Commissioner Thomas, Mr. Miller indicated, while the
primary purpose of the project is to clean up the water locally, improving the effects of
drainage into local bays and harbors will ultimately improve water around the
peninsula.
Contract for Marshall Street South Interceptor Sewer Replacement - Phase 2 to
Rowland. Inc.. Pinellas Park. FL. for $585.635 (PW.4)
............'
mws06A.93
l7
06101/93
. ' '. . ~ , . .. . > I . . ~ .) '. ' . ._
<, .
~
r...
_ .. :., ~
',.-.)
The purpose of this contract. is to provide for the construction of Phase 2 of the
Marshall Street South Interceptor Sewer Replacement, south from Lady Mary Drive
(Between Cleveland and Pierce Streets) to the intersection of Missouri Avenue and
Turner Street. The existing interceptor is approximately 40 to 60 years old and needs
replacement due to its deteriorated condition and being undersized to accommodate
present flow demands. The entire interceptor was proposed to be replaced or restored
in three phases The first phase of the work has been completed, which was the
replacement of the interceptor from the Marshall Street Advanced Pollution Control
Facility to Lady Mary Drive between Cleveland Street and Pierce Street. Phase 3, the
Insituform restoration of the existing pipe from the intersection of Missouri Avenue and
Turner Street to the intersection of Greenwood Avenue and Lakeview Avenue, has
been completed. The work in Phase 2 is the replacement of the existing pipe and will
generally follow the route of the existing interceptor along the westerly side of
Stevenson's Creek to Turner Street and along Turner Street to Missouri Avenue.
The design was prepared by Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc. Five bids were
received on April 23, 1993 and the low bidder was Rowland, Inc., in the amount of
$585,635. The engineer's estimate was $750,000. Approval of the bid award will
allow the project to begin construction in June 1993 anrf will be completed by
November. 1993.
Mayor Garvey expressed concern with the magnitude of the backup documentation
provided in support of this item. It was indicated one member had requested complete
plans and specifications for all contracts being awarded. It has been standard practice
to give each member complete information. Discussion ensued regarding what
supporting documents are wanted by the Commission for contract items. Staff was
directed to provide a blueprint and basic general documentation. The specifications are
only to be provided if they are five pages or less. If more information is wanted, it can
be copied from a read file.
In response to a concern from Commissioner Deegan regarding the 20 percent
difference between the contractor's and engineer's bid estimates, Mr. Saker expressed
confidence in Rowland, Inc. He responded this work will not affect Stevenson Creek.
(Cont. from 5/20/93) First Reading Ord. #5387-93 - revisions to Ch. 52 re: tree
protection & Res. #93-32 - revising sch~dulj;3 of fees for tree removal permits. (PW-5)
The Public Works Department, Environmental Management Group is proposing
revisions to Chapter 52 of the Code of Ordinances regarding tree protection. The tree
protection ordinance was last revised in the early 1970's. Since that time, various
areas of concern relating to administration of this program have been encountered.
One area is unregulated overpruning or topping of trees resulting in the ultimate decline
of the tree. The proposed revisions provide additional tree protection requirements
relating to the pruning or topping of trees.
JTlwsObA.93
11\
06101/93
, . .
. . ,.' ., . : . I
. , . .~ . I. .' "'"";
J',., .
~~
Another area of concern is the City's inability to regulate or monitor the pruning of
mangroves. Due to recent changes in State mangrove protection rules, which
significantly limit the State's ability to regulate mangrove pruning, we are expecting an"
increase in this activity. The proposed revisions will now require City permits for any
pruning of mangroves.
In addition, it has become apparent that the revenues produced from tree removal
permit application fees are insufficient to recover the application processing costs. For
example, in FY 1991/92, the total revenues were $4,695.00, while the processing
cost to the City was $ 7 ,415.00. This trend has continued during the first half of FY
1992/93, with revenues of $1,472.00 and costs of $3,030.00. Consequently, the
present fee of $3.00 per tree is proposed to be increased to $15.00 per application for
up to five trees to be removed, plus an additional $3.00 per tree for every tree
removed above five trees. By comparison, the following list shows other
governments' basic rate structures:
Pinellas County
City of Tampa
City of PinelJas Park
City of Largo
City of St. Petersburg
City of Dunedin
$50.00 + $25.00/acre over 10 acres
$25.00 up to 3 trees, then $5.00/tree
$20.00 per acre, $40.00 over 1 acre
$20.00 unlimited trees
$10.00 unlimited trees
$5.00 unlimited trees
l"~')'
.~'"
In response to a question, Mr. Baker stated the City's rules regarding mangroves
are not more restrictive than the State's new rules and referred to the last sentence of
the ordinance title.
Commissioner Thomas requested more information regarding protection from
damage resulting from adjacent construction and old growth habitat preservation. He
referred to a letter concerning proximity to a tree's dripJine. Mr. Miller stated
. inspectors look at construction jobs to make sure unscrupulous activities are not taking
place and that the appropriate barriers stay in place around the trees.
Discussion ensued regarding time limits being incorporated into the ordinance. Mr.
Baker stated time limits cannot arbitrarily be decided, but are imposed based on
observation of specific activities involving impending damage to trees.
Commissioner Thomas suggested having an outside botanist or habitat expert to
review and sign off of on site plans. Mr. Baker stated this will be done with larger
jobs; however, can be handled in-house for smaller jobs. He said it is reasonable to
expect a 20-acre development to have its own botanist. Discussion ensued regarding
the legality of requiring an expert review and at what point this would be required. Mr.
Galbraith suggested the ordinance require the applicant to submit otl1er documentation
as may be required. It was suggested to delay first reading of the ordinance pending
language amendments. Consensus was to delay this item for four weeks.
,
-
mws06A.93
19
OlJlO 1/9]
\' ..
.' '
--
The meeting recessed from 4:09 to 4:18 p.m.
Reject ppe's alternative amendrT1~nt to a future land use plan of Residential/Office
General for part of Sec. 21-29-15. M&B 21.03. ]234 Druid Rd. (former Sipw
Restaurant); 8as. #93-33 reQuesting the Cit'{'s orjginal request to amend the
Gountywide future land use plan to Institutional be forwarded to the CPA for their
apprpval {Morton Plant Hospital Assoc. Inc. lUP92-22; Z92-13)lPLD-16)
This item is being reconsidered in order to respond to the Pinellas Planning Council
(PPC) regarding their recommended alternative amendment to the countywide future
land use plan of residential/office general instead of institutional as requested by the
City. In December 1992, both the Commission and the Planning and Zoning Board
approved the institutional classification. The ppe denied the City's request for this
classification and approved an alternative classification of residential/office general.
On April 21, 1993 the PPC, by a vote of five to six, failed to approve a request to
amend the countywide future land use plan to reclassify the former Siple Restaurant
site as institutional. The ppe then voted, by a vote of ten to one, to approve the
alternative PPC staff recommendation of residential/office general.
." i-
I,:~:~,)
"
On April 27, 1993, the City received notification from the PPC that they had
denied the requested amendment to institutional and had proposed their alternative.
According to the Countywide Rules, the City has 45 days in which to accept or reject
the proposed alternative, or to withdraw its request. If the City rejects the PPC's
alternative, the City's original request for an amendment to institutional will go forward
to the Countywide Planning Authority (CPA/County Commission) for their
consideration.
Planning and Development Department staff have discussed the issue with the
applicant. The applicant would prefer to have the Clearwater City Commission reject
the proposed alternative of the PPC and have the matter go before the CPA as the
original request despite the PPC recommendation for denial.
Staff recommends following the applicant's request because: 1) the adaptive reuse
of the Siple property is important for both Morton Plant Hospital and the City; 2) the
institutional classification is the preferred plan classification for this property since the
use is clearly hospital in nature; 3) hospital uses are only permitted in the institutional
classification; 4) no complicating code interpretations are made which would allow
expansion of other hospital operatior)s into areas not specifically zoned for hospitals;
and 5) extra control over site design is not n~eded to protect adjoining properties due
to private' deed restrictions limiting structure height and setback that the hospital has
negotiated with surrounding residential property owners.
mws06A.93
20
06/01/!}J
. , .... I ' ,. '. ~ . I' , , ' ... .' .
'.
:~.. ,;
.,'
,~ Planning Manager Scott Shuford, in response to a 'question from Mayor Garvey,
stated staff recommends appealing the PPC decision and felt the representative from
Morton Plant Hospital stands a good chance of getting the item through the County
Commission. It was indicated there is only one member of the PPC who also sits on
the County Commission.
In response to a question from Commissioner Thomas, Mr. Shuford indicated
execution of any agreement between WiHowdell residents and Morton Plant is probably
awaiting determination of this item. Commissioner Thomas felt an agreement should
be executed prior to rezoning and that the PPC ruling should be accepted. He
expressed concern that the hospital does not need another extension in this sensitive
area.
Mr. Shuford explained the issue regarding use of the land versus the specifics of
the building regulations, stating if the Siple property is being used as an accessory
structure to the hospital, it is a hospital use and requires institutional zoning.
)
.~.,,,,
Dave Healy, having addressed the PPC regarding this issue, was invited to speak to
the Commission. He reported the PPC reviewed the City's application and, while not
wanting to dictate to the City what should be done, did not feel a hospital use belongs
on this piece of property. It was felt the property is more suited to an office type of
use and OIL zoning does what deed restrictions would do related to elevation
requirements, etc. The main priority was to put the best land use on the property,
limiting potential future development. He stated the PPC wrestled with the issue of
limiting development as being compelling to the interests of BelJeair and the
surrounding neighborhood. The issue was thought to be one of neighborhood
planning.
Discussion ensued regarding the proposed institutional use and combining adjacent
parcels to create a large piece of property.
Mr. Shuford felt it would be appropriate to apply the consistency program to the
Morton Plant properties as a whole and not to have to rely on private agreements ,
between the hospital and adjacent property owners. Commissioner Thomas felt a need
to control and limit the expansion of the hospital.
Commissioner Thomas expressed a desire to have Mr. Healy present at Thursday
night's meeting and to notify Mr. Mariani representing the neighborhood residents who
'might WIsh to speak. Consensus was to place this item on the agenda before the
public hearings.
Variance to Sign Regulations for property located at 14 S. Ft. Harrison Ave.. Sec, 16-
29-15. John R. Davey's Resub.. Blk B. Lots 8. 9. 10 & N 1/2 of 11 and 21. 22 & 23
(Pinellas County Utilities Dept. SV93-1 2HPLD-6l
,
-..........'
mwsO&A.93
21
06fO 1193
. ..., " .
' '.'. ' .. . " '1 " I' " " t ",. .",_.
.. Jl. >.
f"r~ "~; :.:
i:
,~ The appUcant is requesting a variance to permit a new freestanding sign in the
Urban Center (Core) zoning district. Since this district does not permit freestanding
signs; the regulations do not specify any limits for height, area or setback. The
proposed sign is 72 square feet in area, 6.3 feet in height and setback zero feet from
the east property line and is located in the planter that contains a perimeter landscape
hedge. To place the sign in the proposed location, a section of the landscape hedge
will have to be removed.
The subject property is located on the west side of South Ft. Harrison Avenue,
approximately 130 feet south of the Cleveland Street/Ft. Harrison Avenue intersection.
The new sign ordinance is being uniformly applied to all signs in this zoning
district. The proposed sign is to serve as an identification sign for the Pinellas County
Utilities Building addressed at 14 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue. The building is setback
approximately 175 feet from that street. The existing perimeter landscaping and
interior trees on site obscures the attached signage from Ft. Harrison Avenue.
Individuals not familiar with the location of the building are not able to find the building
location from the given street address. The ineffectiveness of attached building signs
due to the setback and existing landscaping combine to create conditions that are
unique to this property.
'1...~.
Although the particular physical surroundings create a hardship for this property,
this request for a 72 square foot freestanding sign is not considered minimal. Property
identification can be achieved with a freestanding sign of less area. If the proposed
sign is modified as recommended by staff, the variance will be the minimum necessary
to overcome the hardship of identifying the property from S. Ft. Harrison Avenue.
Mr. Polatty stated there is a hardship because the applicant is not allowed a
freestanding sign; however is asking for too large a sign. Staff recommended approval
of a smaller (32 square footl sign. He referred to photographs of the landscaping and
recommended allowing the sign with a zero setback from the right-of-way.
Commissioner Thomas questioned the size of the double sign being requested. The
Mayor commented this is a temporary sign. Commissioner Deegan asked if this would
be granted to any other applicant in the same district. Mr. Polatty responded yes,
under the same conditions.
Discussion ensued regarding having a freestanding sign downtown. Mr. Wright
stated the application is basically the same as what is allowed on the beach for retail
businesses set back from the street. He indicated this is the back door of the property
at the parking lot. Commissioner Deegan noted the request is in an area where there is
an absolute prohibition of freestanding signs. Mr. Wright pointed out other properties
within the same zoning district, including the one at City Hall. where there are
exceptions to the prohibition. He stated this is a public purpose sign at the rear of a
property for which the main entrance is on a secondary street.
mw~06A.93
22
06/0 1/93
~ . \ ,
~~~~i{'
,..' .:. ~
\;'
l:j,
,~
Commissioner Deegan felt there should be a uniform application of the sign code.
He agreed with granting the request because the building serves a public service, not
because it is back from a maior street.
Mr. Polatty noted there was also a problem with landscaping and conditions were
imposed to limit the height to look more like a ground sign.
Commissioner Thomas questioned if the six-foot height is needed due to being
located behind a wall and the recommendation was clarified.
Land Use Plan Amendment to CommerciallIourist Facilities and CG Zoning for prorlilliY.
located at 1201-1215 Drew St.. Pagett's Estates Sub.. Lot 1 less S 65' and less W
151. 0.58 acres m.o.l, (Uhrich LUP93-19; Z93-08HPLD-7)
The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Drew Street and North
Missouri Avenue. The applicant wishes to have the option of the greater variety of
uses afforded under General Commercial zoning. The property does not have the
currently required landscaping between its parking area and the adjacent streets.
, ~l-o ')
"'-.,.~
The principal structure has a setback of approximately five feet form the rear
property line. Fifteen feet are required under the present zoning of Limited Office. Ten
feet are required in the proposed General Commercial District.
The existing number of parking spaces appears to be based on the requirements for
offices.
Mayor Garvey expressed concern with changing to commercial zoning along Drew
Street, indicating it could make the property more expensive when the City looks at
acquiring it for right-of-way for extending Missouri Avenue. It was indicated this
should not be a consideration at this point, as the item is only up for receipt and
referral.
Proposed LDCA re: nonconforming single family residences (LDCA 93-03)(PLD-13)
The Planning and Zoning Board, in considering both the Downtown Development Plan
and the North Fort Harrison/North Myrtle Avenue Zoning Study, has recommended that the
City Commission consider a Land Development Code amendment that would allow
nonconforming single family residences to be reconstructed if damaged or destroyed in
excess of 50 percent of their appraised value.
nlwsOGA.93
23
06/01/!)3
. '. '.' ..,. . l ' , :: ,.' ,. I
'.
...
~': ~ : .'
f'.',
.~
The City Commission, in authorizing the Downtown Development Plan and the
North Fort Harrison/North, Myrtle Avenue Zoning Study, directed staff to pursue this
matter.
The purpose of this amendment would be to allow these structures to be
. reconstructed even if they are not permitted uses in the zoning district in which they
exist. The ordinance will assist homeowners located in redevelopment areas in the
event that their homes are damaged or destroyed.
This code amendment should be reviewed by both the Planning and Zoning Board
and the Development Code Adjustment Board. '
In response to a question from Mayor Garvey, Mr. Polatty stated, under this
ordinance, a non-conforming property could be reconstructed as it was without having
to meet development requirements. Mr. Shuford said they are trying to make it
possible for homeowners to remain in a given area, jf they choose, when their home is
destroyed. Mr. Polatty stated the building and FEMA codes would have to be met.
Discussion ensued regarding whether or not a homeowner should be allowed to
rebuild in the same non-conforming footprint.
Proposed ordinance ~stablishin9 sigoage requirements for existing commercial &
j,._m\'1
~'::!'"'" industria I planned developments (PLD-14)
The revised sign regulations specify that commercial and industrial planned
developments will have their signage requirements determined by ordinance by the City
Commission. Existing commercial and industrial planned developments previously
were allowed a maximum of 64 square feet for freestanding signage and, typically, 15
square feet of attached signage for a freestanding business or 48 square feet of
attached signage for most tenants within a shopping center.
The revised sign regulations try to take into account signage allowed for
surrounding properties for commercial planned developments. This will eliminate the
need to allow additional signage through the variance process in order to accommodate
commercial or industrial planned developments located, for example, on U.S. 19. Staff
has recommended signage allowances for the five existing commercial and industrial
planned developments within the City.
Although this is not an actual rezoning, the City Attorney has recommended
treating the ordinance the same as a staff-initiated rezoning, since it affects the use of
land. This will require a minimum of 30 days notice to the affected property owners, a
quarter page advertisement and a public hearing by the Planning and Zoning Board
prior to public hearings by the City Commission.
J
mws06A,!l3
24
O(JOl/93
, . . " . ,'. '., ' , . '~ , . : ',. ..' w
.'
~:;~: '.
,~
Mr. Polatty stated the code requires signs to be specified ,in commercial planned
developments and referred to a chart outlining existing and proposed signs in the
district. Mr. Wright pointed out the Commission is being asked to designate sign sizes.
Commissioner Deegan questioned if the numbers on the chart correspond to what
is allowed in shopping centers. Mr. Polatty indicated sign variances could be needed.
Three year extension of Cooperation Agreement with Pin~llas County for utilization of
funding to be provided under the HOME federal housing program (PlD-17)
':.:)
In January, 1991, the Federal government approved major legislation to revise
funding for housing assistance. This bill had several components which addressed
diverse aspects of the housing delivery system. HOME, one component of this
legislation, provides funds for housing acquisition, rehabilitation, new construction and
tenant based assistance. Assistance may be in several forms such as loans, interest
subsidies and equity investments. Funds must be matched at the local level from non~
Federal sources and matched funds may not be recaptured from the program.
Matching fund requirements range from 30 percent for new construction to 25 percent
for rental assistance and moderate/substantial rehabilitation (matching contributions
may be in the form of cash from non-federal sources, real property, infrastructure
improvements, or taxes, fees or charges that are waived, forgone, or deferred).
However, matching funds are required only when HOME funds are drawn down for a
project.
The City of Clearwater and Pinellas County entered into a cooperative agreement
for the HOME program in 1991 which will expire soon. If the City Commission
approves the extension of this agreement, during the next three years, the City will be
entitled to a pro~rata portion of the HOME funding for eligible uses under program
regulations and will also be responsible' for meeting the matching funds requirements.
In the agreement, the City and the County agree to provide from its share of funding
the required set-aside funding for nonprofit agencies required by the federal law. The
funding is to be prorated according to the amount the federal government establishes
for each participating entitlement community in the consortium. If no entitlement
amounts are established for the participating cities of Clearwater and Largo, funds will
be allocated on the basis of 60 percent reserved for the City of Clearwater and 40
percent reserved for the City of Largo, after the entitlement amount for Pinellas County
has been subtracted from the total consortium funding.
In response to questions from Commissioner Deegan, Mr. Polatty indicated this item is
the same as last year, for a three-year extension. He explained the concept of
matching funds, stating there is no matching for the first year. State Housing
Incentive Program (SHIP) funds are proposed to be used for the first and second years,
as well as the third year if the program is still in effect. He said State funds can be
used when Federal funds are not available.
mws06A.93
25
0(,(0119]
~ . ' '. , .' , .' . : . .' . -. , . .' " . .. ~ . . > . . ' -
:I..~~ .
~ Presentation (e: Alcoholic Beverage Regulations. request for direction (WSOHPLD-18)
. '
At the May 3, 1993 work session, the Commission directed staff to provide
additional information concerning certain aspects of the staff's alcoholic beverage
regulations proposal. This information is provided below by type of issue.
Issue # 1: Equity between small businesses and large businesses. The staff
proposed to allow large, freestanding restaurants (4-COP-SRX licensed facilities) to be
exempt from the conditional use permit process. The Commission was concerned that
smaller, freestanding restaurants (e.g. 1-COP, 2-COP and 4~COP licensed
establishments) were being treated unfairly by having to go through procedural
requirements, unless located in a shopping center. One method to address the
difference between these types of establishments would be to define a restaurant as
an establishment which has a 51 percent or greater food and non-alcoholic beverage
sales percentage. Annual audits would have to be required to be submitted to the City
to insure compliance.
., ~ ~
:~.,.....~i
There are two problems with this approach. First, the parking requirement for
restaurants differs substantially from other alcoholic beverage consumption on~
premises establishments. Restaurants require 10 spaces par 1 ,000 square feet of
gross floor area, while other such establishments require 25 spaces per 1,000 square
feet of gross floor area. There will be a great temptation for smaller establishments to
declare themselves "restaurants" in order to avoid the more extensive parking
requirements whether or not they will actually meet the 51 percent food sales
requirement.
The second problem is the City can rely on .sJ:.a.le. enforcement of the 51 percent
food and nonalcoholic beverage sales requirements for 4-COP-SRX establishments, but
no such assistance is available for the other COP licensed facilities. This ~
complicate enforcement if violations of the 51 percent requirement occurred, but our
history with State enforcement indicates that the City will likely be the lead
enforcement agency.
Staff recommends resolving the issue so as to assist small businesses, but
minimize the potential f~r problems by: 1) carefully defining restaurant uses to
establish a 51 percent food sales requirement; 2) adding further requirements to
interior design to minimize the possibility of restaurants becoming bars and 3) allowing
smaller establishments to have the same parking requirements as larger restaurants
(ten spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area). The following definitional
language is suggested, with the added language underlined:
Restaurant: A busilless establishment providing for the preparation or sale of foocl
or drink for consumption by customers on or off the premises, but excluding
facilities for non-commercial and incidental food service within grocery store and
delicatessens. An establishment serving alcoholic beverages for consumption on
mws06A.93
26
OhiO IN]
. . '. .,.' . . '.
., . . . j. .-~ .'
~L:" ,
(A~
premises shall be considered to be a restaurant if 51 percent or more of the gross
sales receipts are for the ~ale of food ~nd nonalcQholic beverag~s and if not more
. than fifte~n (15) percent of the gross floor area of -.the establishment is devoted to
waiting areas. louoges. or entertainment areas.
Issue #2: Increase emphasis on discouraging overconcentration and proximity to
schools, churches, parks and residential zones. The Commission was concerned about the
fact that the staff proposal allowed exemptions from the 300 foot separation requirement
if certain site design conditions were met. However, the Commission also recognized that,
on occasion, exceptions to the 300 foot separation would have to be made.
There is no way to resolve this issue. It is impossible to have exceptions and strictly
adhere to a separation standard. Consequently, the staff has considered two alternatives
for addressing this issue.
The first alternative would be to simply require that facilities be located 300 feet from a
conforming church, school, park, residential zone or other alcoholic beverage sales use,
unless separated by a right-of-way of 100 feet or more in width. Under this approach,
there would be no way to avoid the 300 foot separation requirement or to provide for
exceptions.
/....")
~~-!
The second alternative would be to rewrite proposed staff condition b.3. to more
strictly control site design issues for uses located within 300 feet. The following language
is proposed:
"Located within 300 feet of a conforming church, school or park use, residential zone,
or other alcoholic beverage use, provided that the applicant specificallv mitigates the
potential negative effects of the use by meeting the following performance standards:
· Structure design - entrances, windows, exterior service windows and loading
entrances shall be oriented away from church, school or park uses or any residential
zones located within 300 feet of the subject property.
· Hours of operation - shall be compatible with surrounding uses; if adjoining residential
zoning districts, closing times for consumption on premises uses shall be midnight or
earlier.
. Provision of buffers - all perimeter landscaping standards of section 42.27 shall be met.
. Site design - the applicant shall specifically demonstrate that the site design, as
determined by such factors as building orientation, outdoor seating, outdoor
loudspeakers, parking location, buffers, site lighting, and access and loading area
design and location, is compatible with any conforming church, schoof or park use, or
residential zone located within 300 feet of the subject property. II
mws06A.93
27
QGIO "~n
. .
'.. .' ",. Q .. ' . .
~;i; '.
-
. ,
Staff recommends the r~vised standard of approval be utilized in order to retuln
both the ability to consider exceptions lllld provide for increased control.
Issue #3: Is the proposed 25 percent gross floor area allowance for alcoholic
beverage uses in shopping centers too great? Pursuant to Commission direction, staff
has researched the extent of alcoholic beverage sales uses in the Northwood Plaza
shopping center. This information is summarized in the following table:
NORTHWOOD PLAZA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES USES ll-
Use Floor Area Of Use % Of Total Floor Area
Winn Dixie (2-APS~ 1,000 Sq. Ft. * * 0.6%
Bentley's 14-COP-SRX) 6,000 Sq. Ft. 3.4
Hunan Garden (2-COP) 1,625 Sq. Ft. 0.9
Norton's Cafe (2-COP) 2,800 Sq. Ft. 1.6
Pickles Plus (2-COP) 1,500 Sq. Ft. 0.9
The Grape Escape (3-PS) 1,400 Sq. Ft. 0.8
'. .J.. ) Coral Reef Grill (4-COP-SRX) 3,550 Sq. Ft. 2.0
....~-:-:
Total , 7,875 Sq. Ft. 10.2%
. RETAIL PORTION OF NORTHWOOD PLAZA ONL V . DOES NOT INCLUDE OFFICE COMPONENT
.. USE AREA QNL V (39.915 so. H. . ENTIRE STOREI
Due to the above research, staff recommends reducing the percentage of alcoholic
beverage uses allowed in shopping centers to 15%, so long as the actual use area, not
the total floor area of a store selling alcoholic beverages, is used to determine overall
percentage of alcoholic beverage uses.
Issue #4: Change of ownership. The Commission was undecided as to whether to
permit changes of ownership to occur without conditional use approval. There was a
desire to be fair to new owners, and not judge them on the track records of previous
owners, but there was a separate desire to retain continued control over new
operations.
Staff submits the following information for the Commission to consider. First, if the
change of ownership ~ .D..Q.t require conditional use approval, the following controls
will exist:
mws06A.93
211
nf,/OI/9)
. . ' . ." '. .....'. . . ,',' . . . _' I I ,__
;.~,,\ F ".. :
~
· The new. owner will still be required to undergo a police background check as part
of the occupational license approval process.
· The new owner will still have to comply with all previously-established conditional
use permit conditions that pertained to the previous owner.
· The new owner will still be subject to City code requirements, including the noise
ordinance and laws against rowdy and reckless behavior.
· The new owner will still have to comply 'Nith all State alcoholic beverage
regulations.
Second, if the new ownership .d..o.e.s require conditional use permit approval, the
new owner wHl have to comply with a shorter review process than is currently the
case, and the reviewing board will have the opportunity to review the application and
quest!on the applicant, as well as the opportunity to modify or add conditions to
resolve any remaining compatibility problems.
..,
<")
""
Staff recommends the Commission choose between streamlining the review
process for new owners or maintaining current levels of control over new owners.
Given the Commission's general direction at the May work session that increased
control is the predominant concern, staff would recommend retaining the conditional
use permit requirement for new owners.
Issue #5: Which board should consider conditional use permits, and what should
be the avenue of appeal? These issues are considered together due to their
interrelationship. The current process has the Planning and Zoning Board reviewing
conditional use permits, with appeals taken to a State-appointed administrative hearing
officer. The original staff proposal was for Commission consideration of the
conditional use permit, with appeals taken to the Circuit Court.
Given general Commission direction that some other board besides the Commission
should hear the conditional use permit request, staff would recommend leaving that
review authority under the Planning and Zoning Board, the board most familiar with the
conditional use process. Concerning appeals, in keeping with general Commission
direction that maximum local control regarding alcoholic beverage uses be retained,
staff recommends that the City Commission hear appeals of Planning and Zoning Board
decisions, with further appeals occurring in Circuit Court. (NOTE: Under this
approach, an affected party, including the City Commission, could appeal the Planning
and Zoning Board' s decisions to grant or deny a conditional use permit to the
Commission.)
Issue #6: How should distance between an alcoholic beverage sales establishment
and a conforming church, school or park use, residential zone, or other alcoholic
beverage use be measured? The current procedure is to measure from the nearest
mwsO&A,93
29
or,/oll!)3
.. .
," . , . . , " .' ,. ~.,'
r~::7..', . .
ii '
..
point between the structure containing the use and the nearest property line of the
other affected property. This method of measurement creates problems for properties
that have more than Of"le alcoholic beverage use. A property line to property line
measurement would eliminate this problem, while creating a more stringent separation
requirement for uses located on separate properties.
Given general Commission direction that some flexibility should be provided to
properties containing more than one alcohollc beverage use, and that there be greater
controls for separating uses on different properties, staff would recommend going to a
property nne to property line measurement technique. This would allow a package
sales use to locate immediately adjoining a consumption on premises use in a shopping
center, but would require a greater separation between the same two uses if located
on separate properties, for example.
Issue #7: Should variances be permitted? The staff originally recommended a
conditional use permit standard that no variances be permitted for alcoholic beverage
sales uses. The Commission had concerns about possible exceptions that might be
desired. For example, the Beachcomber sign variance would not have been allowed
had the restaurant received conditional use permit approval under the proposed
conditions.
Given general Commission direction for greater controls over alcoholic beverage
uses, staff would recommend retaining a standard of approval that no parking or
~"::,;.) landscaping variances be permitted. This would allow consideration of other
variances, such as variances to signage, setback, height, and open space
requirements.
In addition to the above issues, staff would like to bring the following to the
Commission's attention. The staff informed the Planning and Zoning Board of the fact
that the Commission was considering revisions to the alcoholic beverage regulations.
Several Board members wanted the Commission to be aware of their concerns about
the package sale of refrigerated alcoholic beverages, especially at establishments
primarily serving motorists, such as gas stations. The Board members are concerned
about persons being "encouraged" to drink and drive due to the availability of cold
alcoholic beverages.
The City Attorney's office has advised that addressing this issue is a matter for the
State. The Board would be interested in receiving Commission reaction to pursuing a
ban on refrigerated alcoholic beverages on a statewide basis.
Mr. Shuford stated this issue is being brought back for Commission direction on
seven items. Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the review of how these rules affect
what Jay Keyes did on his property. It was indicated he needed a conditional use due to
a change of ownership.
mws06A.93
30
06/01193
. ..... ~' . I ;', . " L.... .. '.,
"
~f;:..~!' .
~
Commissioner Thomas felt, when changing ownership, the new owner should have
the same rights and obligations as the previous owner.
Mr. Shuford stated staff is working on ways to promote more equity between small
and large businesses.
Discussion ensued regarding the State procedures related to SRX license audits of
alcoholic beverage establishments. Mr. Wright stated State alcoholic beverage staff can
be called in if there is a problem.
Mr. Galbraith indicated State law allows regulation of operating hours and location
and stated there is a concern with going too far into the State's turf regarding
enforcement of food and alcoholic beverage sales
Discussion ensued regarding means of license enforcement within the City by
imposing stricter parking, noise, rowdiness and floor area regulations. Specific examples
of parking requirements were cited for various restaurants/alcoholic beverage
establishments around the City.
Commissioner Thomas requested adding discussion of the trip to Georgia related to
the Maas Brothers issue to Thursday night's agenda.
,.~~:,
I.
"
Commissioner Thomas requested a list of existing SRX establishments which would
be non-conforming under this proposal. He expressed concern with the
overconcentration of alcoholic beverage establishments and their proximity to schools,
churches, parks and residential areas.
Commissioner Deegan also felt it is necessary to limit the proliferation of alcoholic
beverage sales and stated item #3b should be eliminated from the proposal because it
does not limit multiplicity.
Discussion ensued regarding the theory of not allowing variances and how that
would affect the use of the Maas Brothers property as a trade and convention center.
Commissioner Thomas stated alcohol is going to be sold on the property unless it is
made into a park. He felt exceptions should be made and beer and wine sales should be
allowed at special outdoor events such as jazz concerts.
Discussion ensued regarding obtaining an alcoholic beverage permit without
obtaining a parking variance. Commissioner Deegan felt there should be some
exceptions to the 300-foot separation distance rule. Mr. Shuford indicated it is difficult
to apply the current variance standards to alcoholic' beverage sales and suggested the
possibility of setting up new standards for this purpose.
Commissioner Thomas stated he wants the rules to be tough as long as nice
restaurants have the opportunity to request variances.
mws06A.93
31
0U/OI'9]
I' \ . ~ ; 1_ ' " l, ... . ~ ~ . . . , . . < . .
I'
.1
1':6 "".' ',.
.~.~J..." . .
\~ ~<, '.
\:.:.
"
".
Commissioner Fitzgerald noted that a bar is not a restaurant and expressed
concern with making the rules so restrictive that restaurants have to go through
hoops to sell beer and wine. He did not want the rules to inhibit development of
an entertainment district. Commissioner Deegan felt the issue could be managed
by having different licenses for restaurants and bars. Mr. Shuford indicated that
exempting restaurants and allowing alcoholic beverage sales as a conditional use
causes difficulty because then everyone wants to be a restaurant. He felt a
distinction is needed between restaurants and bars.
(Coot. from 5/20/93) Public Hearing & First Readin9_ Ord. #5399-93 - amending
Sec. 42.24: to allow elevated air conditioning and light mechanical equipment
and associated decking in setback areas (LDCA 93-07HPLD-'9)
The City Commission has recently adopted an emergency ordinance allowing
air conditioning and mechanical equipment (and the decking and structural
components associated with such equipment) to be located inside setback areas
provided through access is not obstructed.
The proposed ordinance will permanently adopt into the Land Development
Code the same requirement included in the emergency ordinance.
.:....\
1:~)
The Development Code Adjustment Board considered the amendment on
May 3, 1993 and unanimously recommended approval.
The Planning and Zoning Board considered this item on May 18, 1993 and
unanimously recommended approval subject to the setback penetration not being
allowed in the clear space required for waterfront properties. Per Commission
direction, the drafted ordinance reflects the Board's recommendation.
Commissioner Thomas expressed concern that the amendment should not
apply to single family dwellings where the system could obstruct the view
corridor. Mr. Shuford clarified that the ordinance would only apply to
Commercial and Multi-Family.
flamp at City Hall (CM-21
A special work session was called for 5:30 p.m., Thursday, June 3, 1993, to
look at proposed ramp locations for wheelchair accessibility outside City Hall.
Community Relations Board - 2 appointments {CLK~')
There were no qualified appli'cants for this appointment and the item was
postponed until another eligibility list can be established.
mws06A.9]
]2
06101193
. ~ . . ~ . . .' .
. ..' ~ .. . . . ..
~~ !"-" "
_ City Mana-9~r Verbal Reports
Deputy City Manager Kathy Rice addressed the Commission regarding Dr. Graves'
proposal to the Commission relating to the Community Consensus Issue. She said, in
order to proceed, one goal setting meeting with Dr. Graves is needed. Ms. Rice
suggested the Commission put together a steering committee comprised of a meeting
facilitator, media liaison, commission liaison, historian and representatives from the
business community. She said City precinct maps will be needed and indicated the
next step would be to accept or reject the proposal.
Commissioner Fitzgerald indicated a local person was not wanted to present the
proposal and he questioned who will actually be doing the presentation.. Ms. Rice
stated Dr. Peter Graves will be the principle, review the demographic data, put
together the list of issues and prepare the forms. His assistant, Ruth Ann Bramson,
(who is based in Boston and has offices in Tampa) would represent him at the public
hearing. Dr. Graves would come back to review the results.
I "'"', t,
'"'"JoJA:~
In response to questions from Commissioner Fitzgerald, Ms. Rice stated the
Commission will decide who will be on the steering committee. She offered guidelines
regarding the selection, stating Dr. Graves suggested having as diverse a group as
possible. She suggested a Commission liaison, a business representative from the
Chamber of Commerce and someone from the African American Community would be
helpful on the committee. She said the historian would provide a chronology of events
and keep the activities in historical perspective.
Commissioner Deegan requested this item be placed on Thursdayts agenda and the
May 11 memo was copied to the Commission.
Commission Discussion Items
1 . Employee Human Relations Policy
Commissioner Thomas requested discussion concerning the City's Human Relations
policies regarding the rights of probational employees versus the rights of certified
employees. This discussion was related to the' dismissal of Richard Carroll from the
Fire Department. Mr. Thomas expressed concern with employees seeming to have no
protection under the law and no access to due process during the probationary period,
yet having too much protection by union and civil service rules after certification.
Kathy Rice stated the union did act on Mr. Carroll's behalf; however, decided not
to take the case forward. Mr. Carroll was given the opportunity to talk to Human
Resources Director, H. Michael Laursen.
Mr. Laursen stated Mr. Carroll was told he could talk to the City Manager, or have
someone speak to the Man.ager for him.
nlw~06A.93
]J
0&101/9]
. I . l , . '. + , ,'. .' .. I ,,' . '. I ~ . .
, " .
. .
, .
, ->.
}M~.t .
g:1:'.;; '. .
~. ~.:
.
Commissioner Thomas questioned the Ten Year Rule and the Employee List of Rights
and said he wanted to make sure everyone is treated the same.
2. Rules of Service for Boards and Committees
Commissioner Thomas expressed concern with City policy relating to the residence
requirements for board and committee members. He presented copies of a draft ordinance
dealing with the issue.
Mayor Garvey and Commissioner Fitzgerald did not feel there is any problem with the
existing policy.
This item is to be placed on the agenda for the next work session.
3. Monthly Report on Advisory Boards
Commissioner Thomas requested a monthly report and minutes on all Advisory Board
mp.etings, stating the boards would be more active if the Commission paid attention to
them. He suggested a trial period of 90' days to see if the boards/committees need to
exist.
Mayor Garvey stated, instead of a monthly report, a yearly summation of what was
accomplished by each board should be submitted and the minutes put into a Commission
read file.
,'''~')
'"~::f"1".
Commissioner Deegan stated copies of all the minutes should be submitted to each
Commissioner and no report was necessary.
Staff is to provide to the Commission copies of minutes of all City Manager and City
Commission appointed boards.
In response to a question from Commissioner Deegan, Mr. Wright stated the
Beautification Committee's flower and tree issue is scheduled for the next work session.
5. City Attorney Department Audit
Mayor Garvey expressed concern with regard to a perceived conflict of interest by
using the attorney recommended by Commissioner Thomas.
Staff was directed to agenda this item for the meeting Thursday.
6. Coalition of Homeowners request regarding Opposition to Increase in Incorporation Fees
The City Clerk stated the coalition wanted to use the City's lobbyist and the proposal
would impact small homeowners. The Mayor requested more information. Commissioner
Thomas expressed concern the increased fees would put the homeowners associations out
of business and felt it should be opposed.
rnws06A.93
34
06/01/93
{:~.,..:
~ $~..
-.i."
"
.
1. Meeting time for 6/14/93 Work Session
As Commissioner Fitzgerald will not be in attendance, it was suggested and general
consensus was to start the meeting at 9:00 a.m.
Other Commission Action
Commissioner Deegan referred to a letter to Bill Zinzow and expressed concern
with the increase of street gangs in the Tampa Bay area. He questioned Whether or
not graffiti on the Maas Brothers building had anything to do with gangs and if the
Police Department was doing anything in this regard. Mr. Wright indicated he will ask
the City Vice and Intelligence Division to investigate and report back to the
Commission. It was stated the graffiti has been removed.
Commissioner Deegan noted the number of police vehicle accidents for the first
quarter of 1993 equals the total of all accidents in 1992. He questioned what is being
done to prevent accidents. Staff is to investigate and report at the next work session.
Commissioner Deegan reported a concerned group is asking for the opportunity to
address the Commission regarding adult establishments. This meeting was scheduled
for June 28, 1993.
I, '''''\
1.r;r!
Commissioner Berfield questioned what is being done with regard to a May 25,
1993 memo from Virginia Ramos on Eldorado Avenue, expressing her frustration about
the ADA requirements related to the public beach access near her house. Mr. Wright
indicated staff is in the process of responding. .
Commissioner Fitzgerald spoke regarding the newspaper publicity of the speed limit
enforcement efforts in the Countryside area on Landmark Drive.
Commissioner Berfield spoke regarding a letter from Bill Zinzow regarding code
enforcement efforts related to signs advertising movies for sale at garage sales. The
letter is to be copied to the City Manager and the Code Enforcement Department.
Commissioner Barfield questioned a proposal submitted to Human Relations
Director Eleanor Breland related to Ervin's All American Youth club. It was indicated
the proposal did not meet the objectives for the program and Ms. Breland will be
bringing the issue back before the Commission fordirection.
Mayor Garvey stressed the need to put together the goals and objectives for the
Community Development Block Grant Agency prior to their review next year.
Commissioner Fitzgerald stated there a better report of their budget is needed in order
to measure their success. Ms. Rice stated the CDBG has their own ranking criteria.
mws06A.9J
35
QU/a 1/93
. ,.., . " , . . ~ " , . .:... ' " .' > .. + " .
, .
~f4:;:.:'/:...<..:.' ,.
rl~:'~'1~I: ..... ".
. n; . ~.. .
"
Commissioner Thomas distributed copies of correspondence related to the
probloms being experienced by the residents of Skycrest Village due to PST A rerouting
the buses in Clearwater Mall. He said new route has buses passing within 15 feet of .
the homes and has destroyed the tranquility of the community. He requested the City
Manager get involved and focus on the noise pollution ordinance.
Discussion ensued regarding the route change. Mayor Garvey stated more
information is needed regarding the costs to PST A of changing the route back the way
it was. 'Commissioner Thomas stated, before the route change. the mall had the
advantage of having greater foot traffic from bus riders; however, the Mayor indicated
the bus drop-off was not wanted at the mall's main entrance. The City Manager
1
indicated he did not feel the noise level is loud enough to violate the noise ordinance;
however, he will have staff look into this issue.
. ,
The City Manager requested direction regarding when to agenda the Maas Brothers
building feasibility study. Commissioner Thomas stated he would have a proposal from
his marketing research firm tomorrow. Mayor Garvey felt more time was needed and
suggested meeting in two weeks. This item will be placed on the agenda for the
meeting of June 17, 1993.
Commissioner Deegan requested to agenda discussion regarding the
Commissioners' reactions to the trip to Atlanta.
..I.li,"\
~J
The City Manager suggested the Commission consider the possibility of going to
weekly City Commission meetings and eliminating the work sessions. He stated
certain issues could be heard during the day and other issues (public hearings and
issues likely to have public input) could be heard in the evenings.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m.
.........'
mws06A.93
3U
06/01/93