Loading...
02/23/1994 . ~ , . , - " . . ',' . '. I . - .'. .' , ' ' . ~.,,, . N . " ' ~:} . ~+:'.~ .', . . ,~ . , "" '. I ' , , " ' , , ' , , ". \.' " , (; . .,' , "1'" '~""'-F~f{;l";:!",~(:",,:,,,,~::.,.~'-:Ir :'.::'":':,:.':'l./.:..,.....;. ,:,:<J,'" 'n, . ", . I '.: ' .' .'. ..:-' b,-;" ,,, , ' ".'. . , 1'1 ~,: . . " " LIBRARY BOARD , . . " . ~\.': t.' MINUTES ",' " . ...., . I' , , , . '. DATE R' rUllw'1 ,J:J IffY j- IE'S 9' , , . , , i 'I~l -j.' ,.1 '1" t I , . .' ~~"""."",:.,,....., .'. ,,"." . !.., . . .' . . ,- " . '. r-.. C I T Y 0 F C LEA R W ATE R Interdepartmental correspondence To; City commission Arlita Hallam, Library Director From: ' Copies: Library Board, Betty Deptula, Kathy Rice, Library Division Managers Date: February 23, 1994 Subject: Library Board and Staff Recommendation reo 25-material limit The Clearwater Public Library Staff and Board studied the following options and is making the recommendation at the end of this memo. Numbers of Materials (options): (1) Leave limit of library materials at 25, which, during the analysis in September, 1993, affected 151 people who had more than 25 items checked out at one time. (2) Raise the limit to a higher number (30, 35, 50), which would affect fewer people (six had more than 50 items checked out in the september analysis). (3) Rescind the 25-material limit. Methods to prevent profit-making orqanizations from takinq out large numbers of library materials (options): (1) Require anyone wanting to check out more than the limit to tell staff why they need a greater number of materials. If the reason is to provide a library collection for a profit-making business, staff deny the increase. If it is for another purpose (research, homeschooling, reading to own children, use in a public or non-profit organization), permit the increase. The limit for "approved" customers would be over-ridden on the computer database. (2) Post signs reading that "The Clearwater Public Library's collection is for use of individuals in pursuing their recreational and informational needs. Businesses are encouraged to use library services, but not check out collections of materials in order to provide library service to their clientele." (3) Require applicants to sign a statement that they will not use library materials to supplant business libraries. , :' ~ " : ~ ",.',., ' , '.. ", ' .'....:" ~ I .,.' \ . . 4,. .'. . . . : . . '" ,i'. ' . ... .;' .... ' " ' . . ' . .. ., ",," c . T"> , " .'. ':".JO'1~1~ '.'! ~..>:!' '< ;.'1:.. ....: ,"" "" '" '" \ " ~--- ~ , " , \"" .,:t Discussion: The Library Board again went on record as opposing any limit of the number of materials checked out on a library card. Staff are opposed to any limit, but feel that if the Commission is not willing to rescind the limit, it should be imposed equally upon everyone. The Library Board and staff discussed options for attempting to prevent the few "offenders" who do check out collections for their profit-making daycare centers, preschools, nursing homes, etc. The posting of a sign or requiring a signed statement on a library card application were perceived as a negative public relations technique in view of the small number of people we would be trying to affect. Requiring people who wanted more than the limited number to state their purpose for needing the additional items was also viewed by both groups as encouraging people to lie or "playing games" with the" public. None of the options are recommended. Recommendation: Rescind the limit of twenty-five library materials and impose no other conditions upon the use of the library materials checked out by library customers. " " 2