06/23/1994 (2)
t.<.~ ...:.l \',,' . '..';
f:: .
-.:..;, "
'. .' .,' ., " ' :' .' '. " , ,,' r I '. .'.' . . , ..' . . , ~: . ' .": " ," . . ., . .1 '..,.. r' ,. ,
~, ,
, \
.~! ,
,
~ 'T' '
'.f \
~r~~~", Tt ......., - r._ ',:--. J,'
~ :.'.,
:::;(:. ;.'
~. ,C ; ,
{;p~'
.J:~~.' _.: ,:
~ J' ,....
DeAB
Development Code Adjustment Board
Minutes
,Date
'";I",,,~ .? 4 I' '':I
;I
, ,
'/o5it
J "
,
,'. ,
.....-.....~~4..P'0\i\l."l1~~~~~~"~"~r:d~(..'.t:;;.'lf!;{4;,'Jii,:.;:~:'t~~~
.. '., ~"il'i-. Oii'''ffl\lIW~ ~ ,", '
\ _~ I '......
, '
, ..' ~ t.~ ': < ~... " ~ . : ' ,. '-L
P.............:-;.J.,..;.: .~,....~~Fn,..,:;~.~:{.' I,:).~~J) .:~",,.,,~.:...,..;\;, > i'~ : ..:.;.... .' .... ',7 ~,' .
t,."I.llJ'~~:l~"'-' ~, ..... :j,Jf~'."."">;>' '..l ,? f~, .'.. ,', I.',
14 JS4:.;lJ.\:'.f{\;.l~t~:r:' ,'~~U~'.~J~j~ti~;~~~"('i~;l~~:-f./" ~:_)J ~.r~.';~.~.~~ ';'~:~'..
~~,,1r~l-~.~'~ ,--t!. ~'.; :~~~1~~t~t1f:~ .f~.,1 ~.,1r~ .;~ :'".~~".r~ ,~'r~ '~;~./"..':" ~:. :',~ .-,~; .,1' ..:.. : ~ ~ ~. '.
','
. ~~
L
. , ~, .
; ~:
.:: ' . ~ :
- :::,~ . ~
.J
. .~. .:' ,>'.
, "
" ,
. ~ "
I
~
"0
" '
.'
" '
, .",
I... ,
"
ACTION AGENDA - DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Thursday, June, 23, 1994 - 1 :00 p.m. - Commission Meeting Room,
City Hall, 3rd floor - 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida
To consider requBsts for variances of the Land Development Code:
I. Public Hearings
1. Teresa L. Malke, TRE for variances of (1) 18.5 ft to permit a lot depth of 66.5 ft where 85 ft is
required: (2) 15 ft to permit a structural setback from a street right-of-way (Jordan Hills Ct) of 10ft where 25
ft Is required; and (3) 16 percent to permit 39 percent front yard open space where 55 percent is required at
1472 Jordan Hills Ct, Jordan Hills, Lot 4, zoned OL (Limited Office) and CG (General Commercial). V 94-29
Action: Granted as requested,subject to the following conditions: 1) This variance is based on the
application for a variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and other
documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of the above
documents submitted in support of the request for 8 variance regarding the work to be done with regard to the
site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in this variance being null and of no effect and 2) the
requisite building pennit(s) shall be obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing.
2. Gilbert G. Jannelll (Funky J's Smokehouse Bar & Grill) for variances of (1) 2 ft to permit a fence of 6
ft where a 4 ft maximum height is allowed in a structural setback area from a street right-of-way (Park St) where
the property is not addressed from: (2) 3 ft to permit a fence and wall setback of 0 ft from a street right-of-way
(Park St) where 3 ft is required; (3) 3 ft to provide 0 ft of landscape buffer where 3 ft is required; and (4) 5
parking spaces to permit a restaurant expansion of 500 sq ft providing 0 new parking spaces where 5 are required
at 1343 Cleveland St, Overbrook, Blk 3, Lots 7-14, zoned CG (General Commercial). V 94-30
Action: Granted 8$ requested subject to the fol/owing conditions: 1) This variance is based on the
application for 8 variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and other
documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of the above
documents submitted in support of the request for 8 variance regarding the work to be done with regard to the
site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in this variance being null and of no effect; 2) the
requisite building permit(s) shall be obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing and 3) the
variances shall run concurrently with the occupation of the location by the applicant.
3. City of Clearwater (Plaza Park South) for a variance of 1.5 ft to permit a fence height of 4 ft where
a maximum height of 2.5 ft is permitted in a structural setback area from a street right-of-way (Pennsylvania Ave)
where the property is addressed from at 317 Pennsylvania Ave, Plaza Park, A Dedicated City Park, zoned OS/R
(Open Space/Recreation). V 94-31
Action: Granted 8S requested subject to the following conditions: 1) This variance is based on the
application for a variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and other
documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of the above
documents submitted in support of the request for a variance regarding the work to be done with regard to the
site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in this variance being null and of no effect and 2) the
requisite 'building permit(s) shall be obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing.
4. Joel & Francine E. Briskman for variances of 9.4 ft to permit a setback 15.6 ft from a street right-of-
way (Midway Island) where 25 ft is required; (2) 4 percent to permit a minimum open space for the lot of 31
percent where 35 percent is required: and (3) 10 percent to permit a minimum open space for the front yard of
30 percent where 40 percent is required to allow a 780 sq ft residential expansion at 66 Midway Island, Island
Estates of Clearwater Unit 3, Lot 4, zoned RS 8 (Single Family Residential). V 94-32
Act/on:
DenIed
OCAB Action
1
00/23/94
, ................ ~.
~"i.",'.""c<"'~,: ,/I~",~..",.-
F of' jt>,~ .. (tl ::"~",~~~/;'i~~i;";~(~~~'''''..':'~..
~" c .~ 'r' :.~;:;r~.J""" '. <' .
:----"""'>'''".'''.,.''';';o<'';:~ .i:'':''':::L~:',r'~\'(:ji:c\1~1'':~:~;::~ij..\';'~,;~:~;; ::;:':~'}/)'~9f:~;~ii;:~~;:;:t~t:.~J;~;~~.~:,!,~,~:> t.',:", '" ' , ~ ; ,
" . ~" ,',' . I." ..", .... ". .' " :' <. '\ ..,." " I, ,!', : " ".. ...' .... .", ~. ""," . "'.' ~'" \. ",.'~. ',: < ~ :,
"
'..\....... '
,~
o
i:
~ h' c
~.:~: r ,,'
>:)>' .:','
J,:"
. ",,-
" ..
../ .
': L_
'~
.(\
5. Alan H. TraUns for a variance of 5 ft to permit construction of home 20 ft from a street right-of-way
(Eldorado Ava) .at 1010 Eldorado Ave, Mandalay Sub, Blk 69, Lots 8 & 9, land fronting the gulf and riparian rights,
zoned RS 8 (Single Family Residential). V 94~33
Action:
Continued to the meeting of July 14, 1994.
6. Demetre Loulourgas (American Tool & Mould, Inc) for a variance of 5.5 ft to permit setback of 14.5
ft from a street right~of-way (N Arcturas Ave) where 20 ft is required to allow a new stairwell at 1351 N Arcturas
Ave, Hercules Industrial Park, Part of Tract A, zoned IL (Limited Industrial). V 94-34
Action: Granted as requested subject to the following conditions: 1) This variance is based on the
application for a variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and other
documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of the above
documents submitted in support of the request for a variance regarding the work to be done with regard to the
site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in this variance being null and of no effect and 2) the
requisite building permit(s) shall be obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing.
7. Henry M. Patenaude (Five Palms Motel Condo) for variances of (1) 10ft to permit a setback of 10ft
from a street right-of-way (Bay Esplanade) where 20 ft is required (2) 14.6 ft to permit 20 ft of continuous clear
space where 34.6 ft is required~ and (3) 19 percent to allow 31 percent front yard open space where 50 percent
is required to allow for the expansion of three units at 673 Bay Esplanade, Five Palms Motel Condo, zoned CR
24 (Resort Commercia!). V 94-35
Action: Granted 8S requested subject to the following conditions: 1) This variance is based on the
application for a variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and other
documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of the above
documents submitted in support of the request for a variance regarding the work to be done with regard to the
site or any physical strtlcture located on the site, will result in this variance being null and of no effect and 2) the
requisite buIlding permit(s) shall be obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing.
8. Michael J. at Dolores M. SuhozB for a variance of 2 ft to permit a setback of 5 ft from a rear property
line for a screened pool enclosure where 7 ft is required at 3017 N Oak Forest Dr, Forest Wood Estates, Lot 60,
zoned RS'6 (Single Family Residential). V 94-37
Act/on: Granted as requasted subject to the following conditions: 1) This variance Is based on the
application for a variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, SUIVeys, and other
documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of the above
documents submitted in support of the request for a variance regarding the work to be done with regard to the
site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in this variance being null and of no effect and 2) the
requisite building permit's) shall be obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing.
Tho following land Development Code Amendments were also considered:
Ordinance No. 5631~94 of the City of Clearwater, Florida, relating to the Land Development Code;
amending Section 35.11, Code of Ordinances, to revise the definition of personal services; amending Sections
40.284 and 40.304, Code of Ordinances, to provide for personal services as conditional uses in the limited office
and general office zoning districts; amending Section 41 .053, Code of Ordinances, establishing supplementary
standards for such uses; providing an effective date.
Act/on:
Recommended Approval.
II.
Approval of Minutes of May 26, 1994 - Approved 8S submitted
III.
Board and Staff Discussion
IV.
Adjournment - 3:40 p.m.
DCAB Action
2
06/23/94
~[r"'---~' ...: -----...."....,.",""J",;," ";,, ,;;..; c" 'i". ; '.:',i".),'~, :;;;\j\'":\d!~j ;~;;);';\;'; ;';:i,;i JE~ ki';/i;~ji;tl:/;';;f;~~
. + ., ~ .'. '. '. . -:'. ,.'. . . , ;; . . ,- .' ,-' .,,', .: .' . ... .":.
,I, ' .' .~.: .:. ~. ~. ; .
t~!:;:{ ,,',
'.
..~
. ,.~....
,
.'
;'"?,'
)" ..' ",
~.( .
,'t'.. '
;. ~i ~ '; ~ C I
<:::.~.' - .
,11."
i .r' ;, ~
~~~.~ . .
','/~" ;
. .,r,
,1- .
\.... "
)::<i~~':' .
-t t' ~ :- .. >
'd, ~.
-Of I ',"'.
..~ ~"\
. ~ :. . '
\. ..
\',:.0
it\',:.' ";
f6~~'::'" ,
(~ ~ \.': .'
\(:~. .
;'i; .,:': .
. .. I~ ~. '. C,
):., <.. ,
,:..'. .
~(~:~;: " ..
:fr;;'~.,\:.':. > : .
:tq;,\:..:, "
DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT BOARD
June 23, 1994
Members present:
Alex Pllsko, Chair
Emma C. Whitney, Vice-Chair
Otto Gans
~ohn B. Johnson
Joyce E. Martin
Also present:
John Richter, Senior Planner, Central Permitting Department
Mlles.A. Lance, Assistant City Attorney
Gwen J. Legters, Staff Assistant 1I
Patricia Sullivan, Board Reporter
The meeting was called to order by the Chair at .1 :00 p.m. in the Commission
Chambers of City Hall. Mr. Gans lead the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation. Mr.
,Pllsko outlined procedures a~d advised anyone adversely affected by any decision of
, the Development Code Adjustment Board may appeal the decision to an Appeal
Hearing Officer within two weeks. He noted Florida law requires any, applicant
" appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings to support the
appeal.
In. order to 'provide continuity, the items will be listed in agenda order although not
n~cessarlly'discussed"in that order. .
1 ~ Teresa L. Maika, TRE for variances of (1) 18.5 ft to permit a lot depth
of 66.5 ft where 85 ft Is required; (2) 15 ft to permit a structural
setback from a street right~ofwway (Jordan Hills Ct) of 10ft where 25 ft
is ,required; and (3) 16 percent .to permit 39 percent front yard open
space where 55 percent Is required at 1472 Jordan Hills Ct, Jordan Hills,
Lot 4, zoned OL (Limited Office) and CG (General Commercia!). V 94-29
;:J~\}.':''''''. . '. ~ . ,
~~~:,1>,.';. ~' " Senior, Planner 'John Richter explained the application In detail, stating the applicants
:~t\ \', ,',:', ,'wish to construct a,1, 706 square foot office building on a 0.48 acre lot that is 66.5
1~:L', , ' feet deep where 85 feet is required. Due to the substandard lot depth, it is difficult
Hj '.' " "
~t\.y~.. ,.,., to meet setback and open space requirements. Staff feels the requested variances
,t~gi>:',. : '. ' are warranted due to the lot's Irregular sh~per its substandard depth, and the intrusion
[:;;.:;'....'.. , of the c:ul.de~sac, an access road serving a single use to the south with no heavy
;:'::.~;:~>' '" ,tr~fflc 'anticipated. The proposed development will enhance the neighborhood's
.""0'
'"'{ .
"
:~'>;" ' ' ,
, .; ~.,' .
mlndc06b.94
1
06/23/94
,.',..,,' ",~",' '",,' ~~~~~ ~0~:~J~
~t=t~~:iHS;'r';i(~ ,.~,;",::::.<_;,~:\,:<:""::</",,:,,~:,,.' ,"::; " ":. ,,;< :<:... ': ,.' ". ': ",..,. ...C.. \. 1;,'., d~~Jtb:~ ~!,,~:,;~~.,~'it$,~::i.~?~t\t~;:f~k;
. ' ..... , . . '. ... . ., " ... . ~. '" .' :. . .. 4. ~'.'
.':J. ~:':. .' '.'.
fJ
~-;
,,~.:o
. ... \.'
"0
, ,
, , '
'appearance. Staff feels conditions are unique to the property and variances are the
minimum.
Mr. Richter reported access to the subdivision of eight lots 'is off Highland Avenue.
He noted the proposed building aligns with the front setback of the existing dental
hospital building north of the subject property. The neighboring animal hospital also
does not conform with the setback line.
Peter Lenhardt, the applicant, stated he and his wife purchased the lot many years
ago and held it in trust for their daughter, Teresa L Malke. He wishes to construct
a building to accommodate his real estate and investment business and staff of seven.
He reported his architect said adherence to requirements would limit the building's size
to 1,000 square feet; 700 square feet too small for his needs.
Concerns were expressed regarding the shape and size of the lots. Mr. Lenhardt
explained the lot was on a private drive maintained by the subdivision. The buildings,
all professional, cannot be moved back due to the church property to the rear.
Three letters of support were submitted for the record.
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, Ms. Whitney moved to grant
the variances as requested because the applicant has substantially met aU of the
standards for approval as listed in Section 45.24 of the Land Development Code,
more specifically because, the variances arise from a condition which is unique to the
property and was notcaused by the owner or applicant, the physical surroundings,
!rregular shape of the lot, and the existing cui de sac Intrudes into the lot imposes a
constraint on the applicant, the proposed development will enhance the appearance
of the neighborhood, and the request is the minimum necessary to overcome the
. hardship created by the site configuration, subject to the following conditions: 1) This
variance is based on the application for a variance and documents submitted by the
applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and other documents submitted in support
of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of the above documents
submitted In support of the request for a variance regarding the work to be done with
regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in this
variance being null and of no effect and 2} the requisite building permit{s) shall be
obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing. The motion was
duly seconded C;lnd carried unanimously.
2. Gilbert G. Jannelli (Funky J's Smokehouse Bar & Grill) for variances
of (1) 2 ft to permit a fence of 6 ft where a 4 ft maxfmum height is
allowed In a structural setback area from a street right-of.way (Park 5t)
, where the property is not addressed from; (2) 3 ft to permit a fence and
wall setback' of 0 ,ft from a street right-ofwway (Park S1) where 3 ft is
required; (3) 3 ft to provide 0 ft of landscape buffer where 3 ft is
mlndc06b.94
2
06/23/94
"~"""'4"~'li~""-" ,
~~~-- -. '
;:~(~~~{/~~~~;:;~,~.,>',:;.' ::,:~',' ::, '; ,:
.. ,. .. ..._..........._W_........1~M~..'C';W....}ici"-*.~:..e.~~';:.,~~~~.:::..1::..~41l1;1..'~:;.:I... ~.IIA. ::~.~.:... <~. ~:; . \, ~: ~:'I..:.'~':' ,."C{;.,.\. :...:::.",,' ."":",c,. .:. :..1)', :::.t.:_~ ./:;~>, c <:_~. .:... c. . .' . :i~'>..~::~?:~-il
. n', ' , .~~ ~"~~\~p~~.~t~ i~~. ,. I r~.'~~p~~f.:~~\';:-,.~.I~~~~~ ~~:~;!':'~~;~~.!r~~~+O:~~~,~J,';f;"~\~:::~~fli~;1'~~:J ~~'..l;\~ . ~. ~ ~~/tt. ~~~
. ';'.. ~.'. '.. . ,~. ., ~~.,d.'~.:"'1 .\......"'f.,;~,~~~l;"~~~~..:.~.(~".u :...,':\.}. ;,>:~ .\.:':ff~
i~f~:~ :' :' ,: ',.
..'1. .
()
'" .
:~('. f
, 'r,
.'.,'.
, ."
," ,
. .', ".
Y,,~ .
. '
~ j'
i~N)} ,
~~1.:"':~~'
}}):..;.{..
n;"\' <
!:;:::..:
f2!;'., "
:~.~~',~
~(:' " .
~l' .
.(~....'
.j...... :
J..-..,.......
:.;..;..,:.
V..' "
_lL':.'."
.',' .
..{(~:/. .
.~.. ';.;'
j... .
t..; .' ...
~ . :, +.,
::'::..: .
~,:o
i.'. .
" '
."V'
required; and (4) 5 parking spaces to permit a restaurant expansion of
500 sq ft providing 0 new parking spaces where 5 are required at 1343
Cleveland St, Overbrook, Blk 3, Lots 7-14, zoned CG (General
Commercial). V 94-30
Senior Planner Richter explained the application in detail, stating the applicant wishes
to redevelop the former Shell's restaurant, vacant for almost three years, into a 3,537
square foot restaurant with 120 indoor and 30 screened outdoor seats. Parking
regulations were discussed.
Regulations limit the fence height to four-feet, require a setback and buffer
landscaping where the lot adjoins the street right-of-way at the property's rear. The
higher fence is proposed to shield the restaurant' from the soup kitchen shelter and
residential properties to the south. The redeveloped site requires conditional use
approval and will comply with all other code requirements.
The application indicates no adjacent land is available for parking. Based on the
property's established use, staff feels an 11 % reduction in the number of parking
spaces is not significant and a six foot high wood fence will not adversely affect
neighboring properties. This request is considered minimal and necessary to per~it
the reasonable use of the existing facility. Staff does not support waiving the
requirement for a fence setback and placement of buffer landscaping in the right-of-
way.
" Discussion ensued whether a variance would be required for four or five spaces. In
response to a question, Mr. Richter did not feel the business' outdoor seating would
be affected by the proposed cafe ordinance.
Joe Brumett, the applicant, stated the original plans submitted to the City indicated
31 parking spaces. A later qrawlng with 30 parking spaces allowed 10 feet per space
, rather than 9. feet. He stated moving the fence line back would permit him to install
bumpers and improve the parking lot's traffic circulation. '
Mr. Brumett wishes to shield the parking lot from the soup kitchen. He stated
, indigents sleep and store their belongings in the landscaping. He expressed concerns
that without a high fence, panhandlers will harrass patrons In the parking lot.
In response to a question, Mr. Brumett stated in order to obtain a liquor license he
planned to develop a unique, covered, outdoor, screened area with picnic tables on
an existing slab. He indicated the restaurant will not be part of a chain and should not
suffer'the parking lot congestion Shell's did. He noted his conditional use permit was
approved unanimously by the Planning and Zoning Board.
mlndc06b.94
06/23/94
3
~i~~:-. 1""""'1IIM'~'~.:;;j,.-.&\~,.~'1' ....:,.I;"\....'}...~:. ,t'.~,.<..,..l ...... l.... . .::. ~......J:..i.,l ?~...~~~
.. ". . "'~rh~~.M~,.~l,\~!t,::.....:.~:~.;:.~~.;~t~f)('(t~:~B:~. //"1;~~';)~:.)~:;',...~,1~'..;";~';: '~.fr:;~./~~:';~~:rt~:t \~,:~~(....:j.~l(_; ,,'> cO'., :t:~i~;;!{.~..~.;~
'. . ~,. ~ .. t"s --;-,-'1": ;J.i-t:~J \lIIrt.i,..~~~~..~.J;}.{t'i!~t.~f ;...t!~,~{~~~1"'"7<-: :!'i~.~' /~..~: ">;.'i-=\d:J1.
}IT({j~(::':\i~'>/;>'':::''': . . ......' <, .: .. ,'. . -, " - ". ' n ~" " ,; f ,,;t,<~:' :"'~" '. , ~'i~!
. ., . . .... ;' .. .'.' . .' I '. . .' . . !'.... . I.,.....
""h< .
.~i- ~.' .
,-
n
Mr. Jannelll spoke in support of the application, stating his father purchased the
property in the 1950's. He supported development of this commercial zone and
expressed concerns regarding the trend of lowering property values.
Discussion ensued regarding upkeep of the landscaping on the far side of the fence.
It was felt the landscaping would not be necessary because of its location on a dead-
end street. They noted the applicant would be unable to view it from the restaurant
and check on Its condition.
o
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, Mr. Gans moved to grant the
variances as requested because the applicant has substantially met all of the
standards for approval as listed in Section 45.24 of the Land Development Code,
more specifically because, the variances arise from a condition which is unique to the
property and was not caused by the owner or applicant, and the variances are the
minimum necessary to overcome the hardship created by the lot size and the facilities
necessary for licensing purposes, subject to the following conditions: 1) This variance
is based on the application for a variance and documents submitted by the applicant,
inclUding maps, plans, surveys, and other documents submitted in support of the
applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of the above documents
submitted In support of the request for a variance regarding the work to be done with
regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in this
variance being null and of no effect; 2) the requisite building permit(s) shall be
obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing and 3) the
variances shall run concurrently with the occupancy of the location by the applicant.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
,..:.,
..
'i .
3. City of Clearwater (Plaza Park South) for a variance of 1.5 ft to permit
a fence height of 4 ft where a maximum height of 2.5 ft is permitted in
a structural setback area from a street rjght-of~way (Pennsylvania Ave)
where the property is addressed from at 317 Pennsylvania Ave, Plaza
Park, A Pedlcated City Park, zoned OS/R (Open Space/Recreation). V 94-
31
~~~:. .
Senior Planner Richter explained the application in detail, stating the applicant requests
approval of a 1.5 foot height variance to enable the City of Clearwater Park &
. Recreation Department to erect a 4-foot high, plastic coated, chain link fence within
a structural setback area from a street right~of-way. Clearwater is currently
renovating the subject property, a dedicated City Park. The City wants to erect the
fence to protect children on the playground from Pennsylvania Avenue traffic.
Residents of adjoining residential properties support this improvement. The proposed
'construction is for the public welfare. Staff feels the fence is a reasonable solution
. to ensure the safety of children at play in the park. The variance requested is minimal.
Granting It will not violate the general spirit and intent of the City Development Code.
,
.I, "
" c
~ ~ l ':', ~ .
," .
,-
, ",
o
..... .
mlndc06b.94
4
06/23/94
~~~V. ~ ~ . ~ " ' -- , -~'__'4"':~"'~"""h~'~V.j':!~;r:".~ '~":'~:;';'~;; ;.~ ';,:'~~:./,;:, ~;'d\"~~~h;':i ,:~, \ ~'r;:::I:.:~~,:,j ::::~~\~:~~:,~~~iA~ }1~t:f~14f.~~;.~~~L~~:}::".:. ;':: ":,:::ii~P
,i;~",'~/:~;;:,;,::,::":;: , ',' .':,'
. .' .' >. .... . . '.,: ..' ..'. .. ..' , '. . . . . . . . , ~ . . '. . . . '. '.' ~ . >'. . .
:~,: .~}::':."- '
T:"- ".
~. ,.
n
,--"
~. ,
'0
'.f .. .
'.:t~~ ': ~ "
~<' .
,,'c'
;, > I.: .
;, ..
.", '
'.",
. ','
r'
.",...
'. ~ ~ .
i.:
-,
, '
:'.'0
Art Kader, Assistant Director of, Parks & Recreation, representing the applicant,
described the unique park located In the middle of Pennsylvania Avenue. Even though
the City normally does not fence playgrounds, staff feels the need to provide a fence
here for safety purposes. He said the subdivision was platted years ago and did not
provide a right-of~way for the park.
In response to a question, Mr. Kader stated the playground is designed for smaller
children who will be protected from running into the street by the four foot fence. He
said the brown fence will compliment the earth tones used for the playground. The
board noted the difficulty of eliminating the double street.
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, Ms. Martin moved to grant the
variance as requested because the applicant has substantially met all of the standards
for approval as listed in Section 45.24 of the Land Development Code, more
specifically, because the variance arises from a condition which is unique to the
property and was not caused by the owner or applicant, subject to the following
conditions: 1) This variance is based on the application for a variance and documents
submitted by the applicant, inclUding maps, plans, surveys, and other documents
submitted In support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of
the above documents submitted In support of the request for a variance regarding the
work to be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site,
'will result in this variance being null and of no effect and 2) the requisite building
permit(s) shall be obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
4. Joel & Francine E. Briskman for variances of 9.4 ft to permit a
setback 1 5.6 ft from a street right-of-way (Midway Island) where 25 ft
Is required; (2) 4 percent to permit a minimum open space for the lot of
31 percent where 35 percent is required; and (3) 10 percent to permit
a minimum open space for the front yard 9f 30 percent where 40
percent is required to allow a 780 sq ft residential expansion at 66
Midway Island, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 3, Lot 4, zoned RS 8
(Single Family Residential). V 94-32
Senior Planner Richter explained the application in detail, stating the applicants wish
to build a 780 square foot addition of a bedroom and garage to the front of their
3,504 square foot, one story house. A 25-foot minimum setback from a right-of~way
is required for all development. The proposed addition will not meet the required
minimum 35 % open space for the lot, and minimum 40% open space for the front
yard. Variances to the minimum open space for the lot and front yard are not
minimal.
Staff ,feels the applicants have not provided evidence of any unique conditions existing
to ,Justify granting the variances and the proposed additions will constitute an
mlndc06b.94
5
06/23/94
mf';'~}~~~J:i;i."'~~'~~~-:~ r........l~~"~'1J.~~t.'":l...~..i~~:.;!.~_.;}f.n\~~t~_..~~ .~I~ :t!...:, :~:'::..'.., I~:''''. ~. t~: :,;;... ..~~:':.."' >.~.:I' ~<!.. : .~: I.,,; ': ..~ ~"~": ~ ;.'" '.;; ::'.' < '__:: :':;"'~~d: .~. I.': . j ~\~
~>~'~~~. ," '..
\
o
'.
~'.~
..'
::::0,
..i.~
, 'tJ
overdevelopment of the site. The need for variances is the result of proposed actions
created by the applicants. A reasonable use of the land exists, that being the current
single family, three bedroom residence an~ swi~mlng pool. '
Michael Myrick, contractor and representative for the applicant, stated the
construction will meet the style of the existing homes and neighborhood. He noted
the addition w11l not interfere with neighbors' sight view lines. He stated the need for
a garage was caused by the previous owner's conversion of the garage.
Joel Briskman, owner, reported he purchased the house eight years ago. He stated '
the family needs extra room because his parents are scheduled to move in due to poor
'health. He indicated it is too expensive to build a second story, and noted his
neighborhood consists entirely of one story homes. He said he already has four cars
parked in his driveway and neighbors have requested he build a garage.
Mr. Briskman sub.mitted copies of a front elevation drawing and three letters In
support of the application.
, The Board indicated the addition would constitute overbuilding on the property. While
~ympathy was expressed regarding the family's need for additional space, it was felt
the size of the property was insufficient for this project. The urgency of the request
for a garage was questioned as it was noted the family has lived without one since
'1987. '
Based upon the Information furnished by the applicant, Mr. Gans moved to deny the
variances as requested because the applicants have not demonstrated they have met
all of the standards for approval as listed in Section 45.24 of the Land Development
Code~ because no condition is unique to the property, no unnecessary hardship was
shown, the variances are not the minimum, and the granting of the variances would
violate the general spirit and intent of this development code as expressed in Sections
35.04 and 35.05. The motion was duly seconded. Upon the vote being taken, Ms.
Martin and Messrs. Pliska, Gans, and Johnson voted, "Aye." Ms. Whitney voted
"Nay." Motion carried.
5. Alan H. Tralins for a variance of 5 ft to permit construction of home
20 ft from a street rightMofMway (Eldorado Ave) at 1010 Eldorado Ave,
Mandalay Sub, Blk 69, Lots 8 & 9, land fronting the gulf and riparian
rights, zoned RS 8 (Single Family Residential). V 94M33
Harry Cline, representing the applicant, reported he had to withdraw due to a conflict.
, He r~quested this item be continued until the next meeting.
Mr. Gans moved to continue this Item to the meeting of July 14, 1994. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
mtndc06b.!:}4
6
06/23/94
,--,~~~t{~",;W~W.'Mt.~<'/'\i.;J;~~:t(~~:A~:~~;:;)~~~!;il~;t:'~i;,~''w~;:~ii1fr~~'(~.;':';'?f;";I:i:;~~f:i~<~;~,:1 :,:{,'::>.~,.;~: ""'~'~~ ,)~.
':. ~ '.' 'c.
f')
6. Demetre Loulourgas (American Tool & Mold, Inc) tor a variance of 5.5
ft to permit setback of 14.5 ft from a street right-of-way (N Arcturas
Ave) where 20ft is required to allow a new stairwell at 1351 N Arcturas
Ave, Hercule's Industrial Park, Part of Tract A, zoned IL (Limited
Industria!). V 94-34
Senior Planner Richter explained the application in detail, stating the applicant wishes
to construct a stairway from the office building's second floor for the employees'
safety.' The existing, enclosed stairway provides no exit to the front yard but the
proposed stair tower will permit employees to exit to the front yard. The construction
will align with the existing front setback of the adjacent property to the east and will
project 10 feet outward, encroaching on the front yard setback area. .Even though
two spaces will be lost, sufficient parking is available on site.
According to the application, the improvement will beautify the front area, meet Fire
Code requirements, and provide safety to employees in case of an emergency. The
applicant maintains the hardship Is based on the physical configuration and orientation
of the building that limits the stairway's position to its proposed location. Staff feels
the construction of the stairway is a reasonable solution to the problem of employee
safety. There Is apparent hardship placed o'n the applicant to construct the stairway
t~at warrants approval of the requested variance. The variance requested is minimal
to address the problem.
o
Larry Beard, representative for the applicant, reported approximately 60 employees
eat lunch on the second floor in the employee meeting room and lounge and noted the
danger associated with only one stairway exit. He indicated the property is in an
industrial area on an obscure side street with no through traffic. He said the tower
of stone and glass will Improve the front of the building and improve employee safety.
'.,
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, Mr. Johnson moved to grant
the variance as requested because the applicant has substantially met aU of the
standards for approval as listed in Section 45.24 of the Land Development Code,
more specifically, because the variance Is the mInimum necessary to overcome the
hardship created by reason of wanting to protect the employees In case of an
emergency to exIt the building, subject to the following conditions: 1) This variance
is based of' the a,ppllcation for a variance and documents submitted by the applicant,
. including maps, plans, surveys, and other documents submitted in support of the
applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of the above documents
submitted in support of the request for a variance regarding the work to be done with
regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site, will result In this
variance being null and of no effect and 2) the requisite building permit(s) shall be
obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
: c ~, .
r,'O'
, '
mindc06b .94
7
06/23/94
~:&~~~7-..... - .' . "---~~,",=-"",,,,,,,,.;,,,,,;';:';i"""",":,~:;;~,,iki.:ii;,ii,,;~,~~~~jN~.~;:Jt;i~,~~j~i~M~f;;i::'i:,'iij,;A~
. : ." , '., ~ , .., . - ..' ' . ", +'., :' . " .'. .,' .: .' . " ' , '. ","". ' '~. . .'
," '.' +!~. .:. '. ,"'. ",": :'~'.'.. " ....... ~ .... . ~..: .' '.. .....:..! ..... .,.'. .:..... .....~ .~ ..... ....',
_~~~~..~t,,1
Jit:~.~;,~~;/;;:;;.'i";>,",<,,' , ,', ',! ,<, . , '(':<', ,;,
r '. '.'
'.... 'r'
.'
,I'")
w .
0'
,
J"
.0
,,'
,
)'" .
q: C '.
,
, "'
;.... ''-.''
'.' , .
. '
" ,
:,':.....
.'T..'
. .
;. .
'.'/;
,
.1?: '.'c c
...'....";.
:>\,,: '
~+ "~ : c' : c
::':\;' T.
. 0'
, ~
. '.">. ..
J,;'; ,
!.~:.:; ,
~ \ L~:"
.)/:~. .
~: .~' .' '
'"'
- "
'/ '
7. Henry M. Patenaude (Five Palms Motel Condo) for variances of (1) 10
ft to permit a setback of 10ft from a street right-of-way (Bay Esplanade)
where 20 ft is required (2) 14.6 ft to permit 20 ft of continuous clear
space where.34.6 ft is required; and (3) 19 percent to allow 31 percent
front yard open space where 50 percent is required to allow for the
expansion of three units at 673 Bay Esplanade, Five Palms Motel Condo,
zoned CR 24 (Resort Commercial). V 94-35
Senior Planner Richter explained the application in detail, stating the applicant wishes
to construct bedroom enlargements to each of three units of this two story, 19~unit
building. According to the application, the property, developed as a motel, now
consists of condominium units. Each 380 square foot unit includes a living area,
bathroom, and bedroom area. The applicant wants to expand the bedroom area to
196.7 square feet. Seasonal residents will be the principal users.
The proposed expansion will encroach into the setback area from the street right-of-
way where the property is addressed. Open space requirements were discussed.
Staff feels the applicant has not provided evidence of a unique condition to justify
granting these variances. The need for variances arises from a situation created by
the applicant's action. There exists a reasonable use of the land, that being the
,current condominium building with 19 units and a swimming pool.
Harry Cline, attorney representing the applicant, stated multiple owners rent out the
individual units. Mr. Patenaude owns three. Mr. Cline noted the property was
,developed years prior to current code. He reported balconies along the building's
south side were added in the 1970's. In comparing the size of the small bedrooms
. '
with those at nearby hotel properties, Mr. Cline stated doubling the room's size would
prOVide minimal space needs for 'seasonal visitors.
For the record, Mr. Cline submitted photos of the subject property. He stated the
building was constructed forward on the property and the addition will not further
violate the front setback. He noted non compliance elsewhere on the property to the
clear view setbacks adopted In 1980. Mr. Cline said the second floor balconies have
afforded those bedrooms added space. He indicated there would be no increase to
" ,the impervious surface as the addition will be no larger than the existing concrete '
slab. He stated the owner was not attempting to increase density. He wished to
modernize the units.
Mr. Cline responded to a question regarding the common area, stating the Five Palms
Board approved the addition into the common area. For the record, he submitted a
copy of the agreement.
mindc06b.94
06/23/94
8
. -+_._-~~t:u;;":,t', ~.~.c~f1".~...:....I.... .,I_,..~.... ;.... oi'. .,.P..... " .".<;-. . . '" ; :'.:"}. ':'.'C ,:> ','. . . I .' :"':::"{~
. ~ '''1:~101~~'hWoL.'tsl.''''.i.:;';~''I~4}~.:t;.::;'if..:.i,i~~,...r.4~i:::..'io'~ .\'~':"~~-~ ~',"';+)~~r.~it;~. !")!,~':1 i.:""I7-';(' P:i>'~'~' ,. tl~ii;"_~J-l:!,.-f:I~>'!1"~ .:';. . ....~<~<s.!;JI!.
, - m,'V-,~" ;,'.' ,'. , '" .. >, l-''',''. ",' " ,,-r;""'"' '1" . h '". .;,~
" '. - . ,: '. .. . ' ....: T. .-.+:-<., 'I:'''''~~~ .~~~'f.:v;f~~'~~~';"'~~~~,l-1~~i':-':I-;'~..v.lilt~:1_'l':: ~~~'"7~1;
.: ..... ~. , . '. ~ .' 'c' .' -, ...'/1 ~'\' ....'c.... ...~~ry~~....'
, ,
'. ':, I' .. .' '. . . . ~. " '. .' '.'
?/r'
n
" ,
"0
: > .
c ,
,.....
fi;;'
hc'"
~~,~':
~~;. .
~' . . ,
~~:. '.' '
I"';.
) "
.....>
,.'
"
-'
',."
<:.!
::0
.:,. .'
. ,.'
Henry Paternaude, owner, stated he does not want to sell his units but wishes to
better accommodate his guests, who are mostly elderly. The bedrooms now barely
hold a queen size bed with little room for luggage. He noted the balconies provide no
protection on the patios from Inclement weather. He wants to offset the
disadvantage of his units being closest to the parking lot and furthest from the water
and pool. He stated rents will remain the same as those charged for other units.
In answer to a question, Mr. Paternaude indicated he purchased the units eight years
ago. Discussion ensued regarding whether or not the units are treated as
condominiums. Mr. Paternaude stated rules forbid permanent residency.
One letter In opposition to adding more bedrooms was read Into the record. Mr. Cline
pointed out the application was to enlarge existing rooms; not add more rooms.
Discussion ensued regarding the small size of the existing bedrooms and the benefit
of upgrading an antiquated development. The Board expressed concerns regarding
additional owners requesting similar variances even though these additions are located
on the ends of the buildings away from the scenic waterfront.
Based upon the Information furnished by the applicant, Ms. Whitney moved to grant
the variances as requested because the applicant has substantially met all of the
standards for approval as listed In Section 45.24 of the Land Development Code,
more specifically, because the variances are the minimum necessary to overcome the
hardship created by the fact that this unit was built in the 1950's and the bedroom
Is too small and they want to add on the bedroom, subject to the fOllowing conditions:
1) This variance Is based on the application for a variance and documents submitted
by the applicant, inCluding maps, plans, surveys, and other documents submitted in
support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of the above
documents submitted In support of the request for a variance regarding the work to
be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site, will result
In this variance being null and of no effect and 2) the requisite building permit(s) shall
be obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing. There was no
second.
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, Mr. Johnson moved to deny
the variances as requested because the applicant has not demonstrated he has met
all of the standards for approval as 1isted in Section 45.24 of the Land Development
Code, because no unnecessary hardship was proven; the request for the variances are
based primarily upon the desire of the applicant to secure a greater financial return
from the property; the granting of the variances would be materially detrimental or
Injurious to other property in the neighborhood; the granting of the variances would
substantially diminish or impair the value of surrounding property and the granting of
the variances would violate the general spirit and intent of this development code as'
expressed In Sections 35.04 and 35.05, The motion was duly seconded.
mindc06b.94
06/23/94
9
~~~~~~t.IIll:.oN'''''V' ~..__._-'
~~X~:::?~~\;.>,:\;.. '::. " ",', ,':',,', ,- :;,
. -..._,--..-..--.......Ilf'.....~lA:;....'J:.:.l"':..... ',:...-....~' .'..'':.' .::. '".d " >.."\ " _. . ',' .,.: ~ :. 1. .I....~~.
~~{>4;"Il:~""..>"'l\""~.o{lo~t""""".,,t,!..i..~(~~'\..'\""~:" .~"',.w~_...\",'~ .,.., ,f,:.:J:.: '~~.JJ.-:.tJ.' : "'~'~'..:'. J i'~ ~~~f
1.1. .. \ ~~~.4~;~~~_'.~.j:-~~~~~.{.~'!..P;I~';..~~,~~.~~?k~:;~( ;.~i\~;.,~./;l..':..:~J~.: :\?t.~A.j
. . ... ~.... r~i~ t .'~ .".. t' , ~ t. r '. t...
i,. ".
. ..". . . .. .., . ." '. '. . '.. '.. . '.'"... .' .... : . . .. .' .
t":!M : ~
'.:,; .
rJ
..,C
1'<'
. " .
. '
1',
,'-
,<
"
'f,,!' ,..
~ '. : .
'1' .
-,
'I ;.
l' " '.
, .'.
::0"
" ."Fc
"
~: .
.1:<.
L c .
:;1,:
,;. F'
.;.
'".' .
.','
.., '.
" ,
It was noted by the Board that the impact on the clear view and open space was
minimal and the property contained enough green space to permit similar additions to
each unit. Concern was expressed that patios added to the enlarged bedrooms would
create a negative Impact.
Upon the vote being taken, Ms. Martin and Mr. Johnson voted, II Aye." Ms. Whitney
and Messrs. Plisko and Gans voted "Nay." Motion failed.
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, Ms. Whitney moved to grant
the variances as requested because the applicant has substantially met all of the
standards for approval as listed in Section 45.24 of the Land Development Code,
more specifically, because the variances are the minimum necessary to overcome the
hardship and enlarge the bedroom area in the units, subject to the following
conditions: 1) This variance is based on the application for a variance and documents
submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and other documents
submitted In support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of
the above documents submitted in support of the request for a variance regarding the
work to be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site,
will result In this variance being null and of no effect and 2) the requisite building
permlt(s) shall be obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing.
The motion was duly seconded. Upon the vote being taken, Ms. Whitney and Messrs.
Pllsko and Gans voted, "Aye." Ms. Martin and Mr. Johnson voted "Nay." Motion
carried.
8. Michael J. & Dolores M. Suhoza for a variance of 2 ft to permit a
'setback of 5 ft from a rear property fine for a screened pool enclosure
where 7 ft is required at 3017 N Oak Forest Dr. Forest Wood Estates,
Lot 60,' zoned RS 6 (Single Family Residential). V 94-37
Senior Planner Richter explained the application in detail, stating the applicants wish
to construct a screened pool enclosure behind an existing single family residence, five
. feet from a rear property line where seven feet is required.
The applicants contend adherence to the seven foot setback will place the screen
enclosure directly on the south side of the pool inhibiting egress. The decision to
move the pool deck five feet from the rear property line is due to the applicants'
concern for free movement around the pool and the safety of pool users.
The Traffic Engineer has no comments regarding the request. It was indicated the
variance requested is minimal. Staff felt granting the variance will not have any
adverse impact of the adjoining properties.
Dolores M. Suhoza, the owner/applicant, stated the two foot variance she requests
is based on a safety issue. She noted if the standard setback Is followed, the screen
mlndc06b.94
10
06/23/94
~P,,-tt.1.~I~h#""" '..::-.t4d'~,~':::2."." ,..,. "'~'Y,"" ...j'''\.ft '.~I,' t ,l 'o{~ .' ': ~".... ." '\ ,,,-,.. ~\h+~.;.-liJ,t-....~........--
-~w..'tj,\i~~\l:li.w~~i'~~i,.rt;:~~;..\t~-1i.\':/i,i-tJ1;jj".:.II...lir...',~,;.lo......'~
;~~}::;:t,:,:~,. ::i ;', , '" ' : ';, ' ,
.- --, ,"""" ~"'~-''''',tt~:"';'~:;;':;J;,,:~~'~~~';Z~~ ~"{.t~~.'i;"~)?-~~;f~~0;~\~~ii ~;~,~~'i'; :~:, ~:;,~;)~,,!~~~~
':.~~~:.~::::
r)
'........
',0,
, ..
"
" .
~. . :
, ,
. '
,< '
, '
'.'
'0,
.::.:
~~;1::':~. .,~-j, .~.~ ",
would border her pool's edge. Ms. Suhoza expressed concern regarding the danger
children may face if egress Is blocked on one side of the pool.
In replv to a question, Ms. Suhoza stated her wish to have the enclosure installed at
the edge of the two-foot wide deck on the pool's south side. She reported her small
pool Is near completion.
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, Mr. Johnson moved to grant
the variance as requested because the applicant has sUbstantially met all of the
standards for approval as listed in Section 45.24 of the Land Development Code
subject to the following conditions: 1) This variance is based on the application for
a variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys,
and other documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance.
Deviation from any of the above documents submitted in support of the request for
a variance regarding the work to be done with regard to the site or any physical
structure located on the site, will result in this variance being null and of no effect and
2) the requisite building permit(s) shall be obtained within six (6) months from the
date of this public hearing. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The following land Development Code Amendments were also considered:
ORDINANCE NO. 5631-94 (cant from 06-09-94) of the City of
Clearwater, Florida, relating to the land Development Code; amending
Section 35.11, Code of Ordinances, to revise the definition of personal
services; amending Sections 40.284 and 40.304, Code of Ordinances,
, to provide for personal services as conditional uses in the limited office
and general office zoning districts; amending Section 41.053, Code of ,
Ordinances, establiShing supplementary standards for such uses;
providing an effective date.
Senior Planner ftichter reported the Planning Director stated all regulations regarding
parking associated with the use would have to be met. .
Mr. Johnson moved to recommend approval of Ordinance 5631-94 to the City
Commission. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
II.
Approval of Minutes '
Mr. Johnson moved to approve the minutes of May 26, 1994, as submitted. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
III. Board and Staff Discussion
,Concern was expressed regarding the delay in receiving Minutes.
mindc06b.94
11
.06/23/94
~"~l
. ., .
;!." ~4:~'~~--:-'~ -~---'~~~l'JiI~~'~',*~~~,,~~ .0 .~,; ;:.<:..,f\,,:.~",' !f.it.c;j:. ~I; ~l:. I' .'> .:~.:J...,":<:,.:.:'-!"5.. i ,:'. .....":..f .~.~ ". ....,~. .' <':...:'
. ..... ".. .,. .. ~ l .... .... . '.. ,*i.-~~"'''t~~'\';~~'''A.A1~;n,i.Wi{,",~~k{.~'-i..~~1~.tY~.J.4:ll~~'.~~ri~~~'.1.f;\.!.1~~'~!.~~v.\"",)t.~i"::'_~('~:!.!~;'~,rh.::;;'J:::~.<..:~..~,.~,,~.:.~;
. c.,.. ~. ..". " . J. '. . , . ~~'.;-J'V:'._nr..~. ,,.ot...r-~.J.~"'. ,~.. a....-.I 'G.~_.~~ "..'"r;... :..l ,.. 1.< ..~"_
. .~,' . : . . : " .. . : . '" '. ~ ::, ". ' ". '. ':,'~, "" : '., . . .... ". " .~.~. . ,...... : " . . '.. ~
: I
~ft;"'~":. ~ ./:.~:., .~~ ..; ::-:: :
~ ."; "
, ....
" .t'{
o
/
The need for staff to deliver packages to Board members instead of using the mail
was questioned. Mr. Richter stated he would review ways to complete the reports
faster.
Mr. Pliska's disclosure of conflict of interest regarding case V94~28 at the
June 09, 1994, meeting was read into the record.
Allied Discount Tire's appeal of the Board's decision regarding installation of an
awning was reported.
','
'. :~
Ms. Whitney and Mr. Johnson reported they will be unable to attend the
July 14, 1994, meeting. Mr. Gans reported he wili be unable to attend the
,July 28, 1994, meeting. Mr. Pliska reported he will be unable to attend the
August 11, 1994, meeting.
~~~.' "
'1.,.
i.'f:.
," .
;'~~J/. r I" .
';:;~,:' "
~~;~>c 'c
,1':"/ '::,
i:J~'.~'.
~~>:::,:
1~:,:,/'
~J::'~'> . :~
~,::~., .', , ."'. .
i':~' (
~~>'\"Atte.t:.~~.", ,
;{k: :",::' : " ':" ';' Board Reporter .
Ij';'~/"q:" .
J~l. "', ,'.,.. '. ,
f.~:';,:;:' "., '" ". ' , .
ar -' '.. ...' " '
~f/:'..'~..;,<'. :" ):' ',. ,,::'. "
,~}"!,\:,,,/:,: .:'.., : "
~:..'1. " . .
~t~7:':,";~:: ,:'>."..: , , ..,';' , ,
~{~,:..,":': ',:'mlndC06b,94
'IV.
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 3:40 p.m.
Chairman
12
06/23/94
'/(I.~'~ -~- ....~jJ.!.i..~.!rJl..;.J_::'~.. .' . ,. .....''''- ,~. ,',,' ';. "'. ,... . ~ L~'.L';~'.""'. ';>':-~T.. ..p \.;i-'o.i.:.i.......~.f'"";"..,...
. >.'. . - ~~U{ktliaJ.j;)Y.~~t.'L.-t~'*(I~I~~l~~~~~.>~~~~..;,.".:..{.~~;.;;~I~~:~L~4. ~'\.'1f~.... :.p :;f':!\.;' .~ ,..i-i'~.~i' ',c
\"..~' , .,.,.".., ,'" ,.' .' .',' ".. ".-- '..'; ',.'. '" ,:' \""""'U'''f4f>..O:~,~",,~ffiF...'I; \. '&'ll:..~?r,t. '; . "/l;.'
'91t'" "~. ':""" , ".+, " \ '.. ."" '. ." . ..: . I ,',. "', ' , '~JjJ-:'... ~"o I ftl""i
~~~~~i1~~ii:;;in;Ei;~::i<:K';:',:~::, \;;,,;,;')h;\,];:;: ';~:)' : '. ....; ,. . . :..... . . . .. .... ;' ", . '.' ..... <i: :, '. ,".,", . '" .' .:
I" ..".-tol' ..
, ,
:. t' . '. '. : .......... :. > : ',. .:, . . " ." .. .'