06/09/1994 (2)
~'..;J).\':'''''~~,~.-::: .~~>-.
.....'~ .
.,;....:' '.'
r~ ' . r
" I. " ~
;'.' .
.(,\'
,
~.
-\
".
2i-. .
~l~V~\';. ..<~.":. '.. ..'c
;".
.~. :
~ .. , .
'"
. ~I ...
. :,'
,: , ~
....... !
......
~.' .
'c~':(:
<jc..t .
r\{:;':
..~t~~~...~:,;,:.
:~I\'';:.'': :~. .
~~~~:~~.~.,: .:....,:
1~1.l.t.f. . cr.,.
}j~})~;~'i/:'
*-{7~..\, ~..' .'
r:~t4:.1 ."'~~i'~
tfh~.: ;..':.~ ~..
(,F\'I','c.'"
f%.~.'t"~.~~. : .,:c :. ~.
i-:~' ~',.. c'., . ..
11~H!,,'.
.lt~",,~,."".J. <t '. .'.c
.~~,,}.:.l: : .
1:t:r;:r:~:.',";, "::
t~..,;, ". ,\','
~;];~~~~~;.;::~. ~"',".,. ,
*'.r,.,.,/". ' ." ,
11?:,:f: ,,':' , .:. '. '
':\B1r<,:.:.:~':\':,: .
tik'~ ,1't. "",4,1.',' w "
X"tt'Jn~.:\'''~ ~'<." I . I. "
'1...:~1.~0::';~!c:':~:~, :' .. ,.
w1..".....,..,
r~~~~~;:~;: ':'?';:"~'
{J~fr' '." "
~I1~f(yf(~.;..:. :.,.,
~~J,)!.:", :<,...... '
. ':;tli't:~:,;.
;,iKT;: '
Vl'.1' =...',h,. . "
"~r'i{~.:.:.,'~. ::. '.' .
· ~'{i~;';;\,'
,t: ~) ;.:; ;: ..' ~
~~l~t~(.: ;~
. i (,:,'..'., -
~oJ",.'\.~'.~C'~' ~ .
~~~1.r.'~: . . , f!
, -,
. ,
.,..,,', .
"."""
DeAB
Development Code Adjustment Board
Minutes
Date
'';;/ tI~
/'''4.1
~
I00~
" "
, ,
- ..". _"':>.to'~~~:;.&;;~', :J",,~,;;"A:..,;c.,.j):::,,;:' i;~'i,:,,:'...r;':~'.~'h~~~;i~i~~
. '. .' ;VM...,....1....,.,._~...,:'...(.~"'~lI.~"'" , . ':
, . T' : f.~>
.' ~ f ' . T, l\
.' 'J.:
~ .~ . '1-' ~...'
".: "
..'r/c...._,..)
.,'. ."
, '.
,
.,
,. ~ .\
'.t: ."
. Ca' .'
",\. ,: ....: '~,r ,\ b:
:.~ .... ,'t' ~
~.' .
r .... .~. ~ .
~.
.
:'0
ACTION AGENDA - revised*
DEVELOPMENT CODe ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Thursday, June 9, 1994 - 1 :00 p.m. - Commission Meeting Room,
City Hall, 3rd floor - 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida
To consider requests for variances of the land Development Code:
I. Public Hearings
1 , Starboard Tower CUpper Cove Condo Association for a variance of 2 ft to permit a fence
height of 6 ft where 4 ft maximum height is permitted in a structural setback are.a from a street right-of-
way (Larboard Way) at 400 Island Way, Starboard Tower Clipper Cove Condominium, zoned RM 28
(Multiple Family Residential). V 94-24
Action: Granted 8S requested subject to the following conditions: 1) This variance is based on the
application for a variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and
other documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of
the above documents submitted in support of the request for a variance regarding the work to be done
with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in this variance being null
and of no effect; 2) the requisite building permit(s) shall be obtained within six (6) months from the date
of this public hearing and 3) the fence shall be properly maintained to ensure the aesthetic quality of the
neighborhood.
2. Socratis & Eugenia Paskalidis for a variance of 2 ft to permit a wall height of 6 ft where a 4 ft
maximum height is permitted in a structural setback from a street right-of-way (SR 580) at 2700 landmark
Dr, Wildwood of Countryside, Lot 47 less street, zoned RS 8 (Single Family Residential), V 94-25
Action: Granted 8S requested subject to the following conditions: 1) This variance is based on the
application for a variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and
other documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of
the above documents submitted in support of the request for a variance regarding the work to be done
with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in this variance being null
and of no effect; 2) the requisite building perm/Us) shall be obtained within six (6) months from the date
of this public hearing and 3) the landscaping shall be provided on the outside of the fence along the SR
580 right-of-way in' accordance with the perimeter landscaping requirements of Section 42.47.
3. John Schultz/McDonald's Restaurant for a variance of 3 parking spaces to permit a total of
o parking spaces where 3 parking spaces are required at 409 Mandalay Ave, Barbour-Morrow Sub, Blk
A, Lot 15 and part of Lot 35, zoned CB (Beach Commercial). V 94-26
Action:
Continued to the meeting of August 25, 1994.
4. Sanford Sandelman, TRE/Ninfa's Mexican Restaurant for a variance of 20 ft to permit a minimum
structural setback from the centerline of the right-of-way of US 19 of 155 ft where 175 ft is required at
19919 US Hwy 19, N, See 17-29-16, M&B 33.05, zoned CH (Highway Commercial). V 94-27
Action: Granted 8S requested subject to the following conditions: 1) This variance is based on the
application for a variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and
'other documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of
the above documents submitted in support of the request for a variance regarding the work to be done
with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in this variance being null
and of no effect and 2) the requisite building permit(s) shall be obtained within six (6) months from the
date of this public hearing.
DCAB Action
06/09/94
f:i.mUj;;.-on<;..:.;.......u.::.~ ~"'.I ..'~.~. :"~~"~~"\liJ.~""~"""""'..J~AA",i.)_.~:J~.'':''''~:'t..>~,.<. ' . ~ . . . ,.' ',.. L ,", :':':,,"":~~"'T:;
~~~~,itlt~J..,k~:;.1.i1,t~"lf..r'..,;..t~i.}.-.iIr,.~,,).""....t'{:.-.~.o-! ..., ~ 0; J ..'\'..."t1..;f.'....t;..:.",'.f.....r.;..vr~." ,.~ ...... .'. .' _ d " ..,. , ;~ ".,,' .... . ,h . T . . '.' 'w : :. -, ~ I. '" .~ " :..,.~-;I~
~~:.:.:~ '. - .:' '. .'. .. " .~:.,':. :.~'.,~: 'I .,:: ;.,:;..~;!;;~>j.;<~t~:.j~;;;i:':;:;(,;);!.:::V::~{:~:~;:\i~:;>';~~j;~,~,<).;~:t.'~~!~;+;~;;,:~f~:(~::,~tf:
. ,<'
~. .'~ ". ~ .
.;<>~/. . :' ; ,
1~~l~'~~ 'f'.~~~'; r
;N}~t:';;:;'i':' .,. ,.., '. :~ ,:';. .;. . .'. '
i i;~.~:;~. .
" ,
()
... ~..-j"
: . ~
. "
l:'"
.... :
;'~ . .
(.....
.
i': -: .~, "
....
,.:" .
,:"
....". .
:~;'~
,I: .',
~.. .': > I
i~.
1M')-
,,1t :..'
~~r', .~,
~1f,: .
,r;l~~: ,'.
iii'; .' .
~'r;. :.
.. ~.. .
,~ ~ :
~~.:<. '.~ :
:":n"
;~{~; : .
fl,t~;:: .
~:!. '
~;r>
~~r:I.:',,;:, .
.J-. ..,
w"'O'
...~..:, ~
/~; .
,~':".< "
L,I...,. .
.;-';'.
~ . ,. "
,I. .
.,
'''.,
5. City of Clearwater (Parks & Recreation) for variances of (1) 25 ft to permit 0 ft of waterfront
rear s~tback where 25 ft is required to permit raised decking and handrails~ and (2) 110ft to permit 72
ft of continuous clear space where 182 ft Is required to permit two raised air conditioning platforms at
69 Bay Esplanade, See 5-29-15, M&B 33.01, zoned OS-R (Open Space-Recreation). V 94-28
Action: Granted 8S 18quested subject to the following conditions: 1) This variance is based on the
application for a variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and
other documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of
the above documents submitted in support of the request for B variance regarding the work to be done
with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in this variance being null
and of no effect and 2) the requisite building permit(s) shall be obtained within six (6) months from the
date of this public hearing.
The following land Development Code Amendments were also considered:
ORDINANCE NO. 5631-94 OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING SECTION 35.11, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO REVISE THE
DEFINITION OF PERSONAL SERVICES; AMENDING SECTIONS 40.284 AND 40.304, CODe OF
ORDINANCES, TO PROVIDE FOR PERSONAL SERVICES AS CONDITIONAL USES IN THE LIMITED
OFFICE AND GENERAL OFFICE ZONING DISTRICTS; AMENDING SECTION 41.053, CODe OF
ORDINANCES, ESTABLISHING SUPPLEMENTARY STANDARDS FOR SUCH USES; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
*Action: Continued to the meeting of June 23, 1994
ORDINANCE NO. 5632-94 OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING SECTION 41.053, CODe OF ORDINANCES, TO ALLOW
. CONSIDERATION OF TEMPORARY USES I CONJUNCTION WITH OUTDOOR RETAIL SALES, DISPLA VS
. ANOioR STORAGE CONDITIONAL USES; AMENDING CHAPTER 41, DIVISIONS 7 AND 8, CODE OF
ORDINANCES, TO SIGNIFICANTLY REVISE EXISTING REQUIREMENTS FOR TEMPORARY BUILDINGS,
PORTABLE BUILDINGS AND TENTS, AND FOR TEMPORARY RETAIL SALES AND DISPLAYS;
AMENDING SECTION 42.34, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO DELETE REQUIREMENTS FOR TEMPORARY
COMMERCIAL PARKING LOTS AS FOUND IN THE SECTION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
* Action: Recommended approval
II. Board and Staff Discussion
III. Adjournment - 2:40 p.m.
, DCAB Action
2
06f09/94
. -~~W;~i&;~~'lt;Ii;'14t.~~!~'~,~~;ii;L4;)~~!~'J!~ ;~~f~::~j;:{t~~~i&~~i~tf~;~;~~~~%~0~~~~i~i~?:j:::~;f~;~,:SJ.:;~~tiJ:!,r--
. I
'" . '..' .' " .' ....,. . . . '. ", . . '. I ". . .' .
:' .".. . :..'.,... . .: .,', "" '.:. : '.' ". ~.~'o,...,' '0 ~ ' .... " ", . .'.........~'~ .....~ .:', .... :: ....
,,'t~.:::', " I:. """ '
f....'" ": , ", ,.
~~,~:,:: ' :-.' . , '
, ';.
. :'
.I, "
'J... ,
:'~
'. "....,.....
DEVELOPMENT CODe ADJUSTMENT BOARD
June 09, 1994
Members present:
Alex Plisko, Chair
Otto Gans
John B. Johnson
Joyce E. Martin
Absent:
!:.
.;
-: "
~~;<" ~ .-
'tF~;<::, ,
Emma C. Whitney, Vice-Chair (excused)
" Also present:
~:;,. ":,'
~~.>. :
~}"q
>~~,~"'.":.' ,
.,.:r';'" .": <
",I',.d,;.,. " .
t<'~r.-":' , ' 'The .meeting was called to order by the Chair at 1 :00 p.m. in the Commission
;~',:':' , : , ," ,"Chambers of City Hall. Mr. Johnson lead the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation.
~:i':; e ".. :,:Mr~ Pliska outlined procedures and advised anyone adversely affected by any decision
W'~;,:;" ': ';, o.fthe 'Development Code Adjustment Board may appeal the decision to an Appeal
'&:::':~:<' . Hearing Officer within two weeks. He noted Florida law requires any applicant
~V(:':,::.. .: ': 'appealing a,decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings to support the
yt:~.:, '; '," a'ppeal. , ' . '
~~F:~<::,'::,,' ,',",,'~.,', :" ",'" '
~(.:~,~ '": ,':,.. ,In order to"provide continuity, the items will be listed in agenda order although not
i'~:<':.,,::' .,:' .' necessarily discussed in that order.
~":.::.., -. ':'. . , . .. , ' "
~~fn:':,:',:,:'",'.': I~. ,Public Hearings
~I;:~;i{:,,;..'.',"'.' :~!i;:~~~ ~:~~Cu~~~~~rhr:~:~:~:~~:~~:~a~o~~:~~%~~!~~~;
f~~t?:.:,: ' : .';~ (Larboard. Way)' "at 400 'Island Way, Starboard Tower Clipper Cove
';~~~~;:;"',,.: . Condominium, zoned RM 28 (Multiple Family Residential). V 94-24
lJll:, qq,,,, ,
t;,j}~~'~':;,: .. .: .. .. ."
$~~~~"':'" '..Senior. Planner John Richter explained the application In detail, stating the applicant
~ifNt :",:;;': ,:', w,ishes . to 'construct a six foot high security fence on the west perimeter of the
1';::>/';>, \, ,',',' swimming' pool at Starboard Tower Clipper Cove Condominium In a structural setback
fJ:';>i~,:';,. ':' :' 'are~ from a,street ri,ght-of-way where the property is not addressed. A variance for
~;~,~~O',. :.:' mindC06a~94' 1 06/09/94
~~:, .':" + ""
it"';., ,~ . j: ": I
f~!;,": '
John Richter, Senior Planner, Central Permitting Department
Gwen J. Lagters, Staff Assistant II
Patricia Sullivan, Board Reporter
t',
r ... -~'''.u!lfii::l::iift;J.'''''''~f'':.:......;~~.t"h~'V:JIol\~..I;'~j"f:. '~H~' . . .. ,f" 'd~ '. '",'1' hi' '...< >\'1 . ~'... \i: ~....~,;...-,+..t'''''''~''''"''~'T'' "" ~ ,.,..,t',j:il'Jf
. H'!'. >. . ,:, " ~ .~ 1If1~~;aw~"iCE'.~~rA:IJ:~L::,~;f1 ~:t);k:~;" ,;..~\~...t~.;-~/"J";~);";~:i.'" ~..!,;,:...... ~o::. l'" :. '. ....l:...~'" .'~'.'\;~i.l;'. JJ/~j:l o""lt'll:~'"u>;'" ...~".;' "~"r ." ~~ ~~
. ,~'/~'~'~'~.~'."'~':: .'~' "..::',:; ':...;.,< . :' . '. ,'. ~~~;r;t.O~,qwJWj~-\'g;~ft;t,~':~~J~1~I~S J~ ,,'~~' ~ ":~n:.H;:I+~i1~';i':''i~~~~
~j':~t''''''''.~'''''"i. "r="i,qtJ.It"t+.:.,., \'.. ~" I''''~ :. < '.\ ",' '+0 ' " ~ ...."lllfi"~~~' I.. J~~/ ):f~~.Jll,\Tlr~
tt~~i~:~~i~:tt~;~:;lG~"':~::)~~~ .~:'~~::~~':I':-~:l;:.(,...~~~;:l~:'\";,;~.",~, ~.':.:<'> '.:~\:~,,<>..<"":',;~.-'! .:'.;; .'. "'.. ." '.' ~, ," .: 0'. -'~.'~.""; .' " . '. ,i '. ." ~i~J:~'(.II.t ~~;~t~~:4~;;f1~.
;, ,:: ,,;'.' ~,f,: : " .
"'\
, "
.. '
,\
i. :
':':0
,. "
,'" ,~ :' .
~::.' '.
"
"oj ~
~ :.
, "
.~:.< ~ ,
...,:.,.
'~..' ,
~ ~..~:. .
,t:':~." :
~.. '-;:.:
-t,..,.. '
'j ~ '.' .
1~j,~), '.' '
~'i ;.;. . '
~~ . .
.\d, '
~i,~~\,: '
,.\.,....
i.~>~,;: . ~ .
;,> ....
. '
"1.'+
;~".~
:~ ~
..'
:' ..
"
.,'.
c";' ,
" .,.'
'.'
" '. '.
:'," '
. "
,>, "
the existing six foot high PVC fence on the property's north side was granted
August 12, 1993. The six foot high fence to the south received a variance approval
on March 8, 1979. The pool area Is a shared recreational 'facility with the adjacent
Cutter Cove Condominium. The proposed fence will join the ones north and south of
the subject property.
The requested fence height Is needed to provide security. Staff indicated the
proposed fence will not block any driver's view of the street or sidewalk. The
variance requested Is minimal and the fence wi11 continue the existing height pattern
In the area.
Kenneth Devol, President of the Starboard Tower Clipper Cove Condo Association,
representing the applicant, stated they wish to replace a deteriorating fence built in
the 1970s.
Mr. Devol responded to questions, Indicating the new fence will match the others
already in place. He stated his condominium complex shares a pool with Cutter Cove,
a complex created by the same developer but owned separately.
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, Mr. Johnson moved to grant
the variance as requested because the applicant has substantially met all of the
standards for approval as listed In Section 45.24 of the land Development Code,
more specifically because the variance is the minimum necessary to overcome the
hardship, If any, subject to the following conditions: 1) This variance Is based on the
appUcatlon for a variance and documents submitted by the applicant, Including maps,
plans, surveys, and other documents submitted In support of the applicant's request
for a variance. Deviation from anvaf the above documents submitted In support of
the request for a variance regarding the work to be done with regard to the site or any
physical structure located on the site, will result in this variance being null and of no
effect; 2) the requisite building permlt(s) shall be obtained within six (6) months from
the date of this public hearing; and 3) the fence shan be properly maintained to ensure
the aesthetic quality of the neighborhood. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
2. Socratis & Eugenia Paskalidis for a variance of 2 ft to permit a wall
height of 6 ft where a 4 ft maximum height is permitted In a structural
setback from a street right-of-way (State Road saOl at 2700 landmark
Dr, Wildwood of Countryside, lot 47 less street, zoned RS a (Single
Family Residential). V 94-25
Senior Planner Richter explained the application in detail, stating the applicants wish
to construct a six foot high fence In a structural setback from a street right-of-way.
The applicants have lived on the property, a corner lot, for 14 years.
mlndc06a.94
2
06(09(94
~
..,,.
o
. .
~l :
...' ,
J.:', .
~ .: ~ '
",'1' .
ii,'
'" . ~ ,
".c
<~:'" :
.f.' ~
~;;~ . . ~.
< ,aI','
t.,<: '. ~'
"
.'('
:, ::\;', .
'1<: '
,..,
, ,
.'
(:~:. '. '
,'.."
.~
~>:o
' '
. '
\~
-\, .
" ,
~:" : .
',~ ,: , ,
.. ,
~ '"' .' .
.. .'
I .. ~
Mr. Richter Indicated a hardship is Imposed by the road project In progress on State
Road 580. The proposed fence height Is needed for privacy and noise abatement.
The Florida Department of Transportation's (FOOT) widening of State Road 580 has
resulted In property condemnation. According to the applicants, the FOOT moved the
property line 15 feet to the north of their property thereby eliminating a five foot
wood fence built parallel to State Road 580. FOOT proposes to uti1ize the condemned
area for sidewalks and green space.
Mr. Richter stated this Is a unique situation and the need for added security and
privacy Is justified. It was Indicated demolition of an existing fence would expose the
subject property to imminent danger. Staff feels the fence will not adversely affect
neighboring properties and the variance Is minimal. The public view of the fence will
be softened by landscaping.
When questioned about "imminent danger, If Mr. Richter felt the added height would
provide additional security for the pool.
Socratls Paskalidls. the owner/applicant, responded to questions, indicating property
owners built the original fences. He said the situation has become dangerous as the
road now runs closer to the house. He wanted to build a six foot concrete block wall
similar to his neighbors'.
Discussion ensued regarding the plight of all residential properties along State Road
58() that face similar circumstances. It was recommended the code be changed to
cover this fencing requirement so affected property owners are not inconvenienced
by the need to obtain variances.
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant. Mr. Gans moved to grant the
variance as requested because the applicant has substantially met all of the standards
for approval as listed In Section 45.24 of the land Development Code, more
specifically because the variance Is the minimum necessary to overcome the hardship
created by the FDOT widening of State Road 580 subject to the following conditions:
, 1) This variance Is based on the appUcatlon for a variance and documents submitted
by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and other documents submitted in
support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of the above
documents submitted in support of the request for a variance regarding the work to
be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site, will result
In this variance being null and of no effect; 2) the requisite building permlt(s) shall be
obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing and 3) the
landscaping shall be provided on the outside of the fence along the State Road 580
right-of-way In accordance with the perimeter landscaping requirements of Section
42.47. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
mlndc06a.94
3
06/09/94
~~~~.......-
. ,
. ~ . '
..----:""''"'"- ~.~..----------~~'\INI:~~.t..;.,:-";;w\-'-...~;...:"..'".t:.\j}i......:.t:_.i__3J~~.,:11.~.'.I,':.:".;,,~,,"'..,. . '< .~"L.+t..""'~:...;., ,..:.~~ ~',". ~'.. .,: :,..",:',~ '... ,..~r,~,;...:~~:;~\~.J
......... i.{~>.1., <"- '"...J-,.....~t ,!'...: 1!:Jt'.,~'!< \~ "(""{."u '.:l ':J.....N', ~....~I .\. \.~..:'.I't't;;.'.'~ ~'lllr'.:.:./~J.:.;;i.~,
. . " ",'..,~ \...:~!, r...~"t:.'.\~':("'::';'~I~':~"':"'''''';''''~ ~ ,w. l, {"'q,~
".1,.' L" ,. ,
,L.,i..::""::'~~':~:;">:~'< :'::", '
p.:.:-.
};'~ ",
,~
3. John Schultz/McDonald's Restaurant for a variance of 3 parking
spaces to permit a total of 0 parking spaces where 3 parking spaces are
required at 409 Mandalay Ave, Barbour~Morrow Sub, Blk A, Lot 15 and
part of Lot 35, zoned CB (Beach Commercial). V 94-26
In a letter dated June 9, 1 :394, Todd Pressman of Pressman and Associates,
representative for the applicant, requested a continuance until the City Commission
has the opportunity to discuss a proposed code amendment.
Mr. Richter Indicated a code amendment scheduled for receipt by the City Commission
on June 16, 1994, proposes to permit sidewalk cafes In this zone while exempting
parking requirements. If approved, the need for this variance request will be
eliminated as the prior arrangement to lease off-site parking will be negated. Staff
recommends continuance until the City Commission acts upon the amendment.
Concerns were expressed regarding the property's history and conditions imposed on
a previous variance request.
"
Mr. Johnson moved to continue this Item to August 25, 1994. The motion was duly
seconded. Upon the vote being taken, Ms. Martin, Messrs. Johnson and Plisko voted
"Aye. It Mr. Gans voted "Nay." Motion carried.
, I
:'0
.r'.. <
t:... "',
':'
4. Sanford Sandelman, TRE/Ninfa's Mexican Restaurant for a variance
of 20 ft to permit a minimum structural setback from the centerline of
the right~of-way of US 19 of 155 ft where 175 ft Is required at 19919
US Hwy 19, N, See 17-29~16, M&B 33.05, zoned CH (Highway
Commercial). V 94~27
<:'
, '
'.'
Senior Planner Richter explained the application in detail, stating the applicant wishes
to, construct an awning within the street setback at the new Ninfa's Mexican
Restaurant; formerly the Olive Garden. The existing building was constructed in
1980.
..t, .'
i ~:", .
~. !
.~ ~. '
The business Is scheduled to open in mid June 1994. According to the application,
an eight foot wide, nonconforming canopy was previously used to cover the waiting
, area for customers in front of the building. During renovation, it was damaged and
removed. No preVious variance had been granted. for the canopy.
- "
/':
l':'.
~ '.. '. ."
Ir' reply to a question regarding why a variance was now required when the previous
tenant had a larger canopy, Mr. Richter indicated the building was constructed under
the prior code.
l' ~ '.
, ,
~;~~ '
""/--,
L~ ~ "
~~:;.. :'
, "
~~:..'. :
. .
~ {~ '
'.'t~
'\~~. '*'
",
mindc06a.94
4
06/09/94
;. .
, .
..
~;~~',"~~' ..,~~_.~_._."
I . .~ t, ~ . .~ ". T " I
. '>. ~
~~~;:,X<'~\~~'-";;:"~:' :,.....,: .",}':'-',':: ,.;~, ".'
. .. -"'I'..---....tft.'".kjoll'_"i.~.,4-..V'i..ii-:...:j:".".,:. ,d~ -<J . '... ~ j, ~ ~,,:~., )~,.,' -: I '. ~. ~:' " '. .} ~'.. '/ r ., "...~.'. ~'" ',,";;':.,. ~ ' \' ( : ~: '....., I. ,~. .',~1;
-'.~"\.V'i-':"'~l....;,;,;.r....-ir).......l,.~..;i.J:..",~-',).~jh~~i'./" .,..,'.,../ .f........,f:' '.. .'''...:'.' L.,..r....I~.,'''I. t l ,."~h...~f:l.~
. ~ ...,t~"';';;.. ;'It "'~'~',r~V;1 .....i';'~~:;~... i:~\\".~ ~!'i r~.~f;{;:..I~:;'~~t:~~~!..,,~i:';'r" ,,' ~ ....~::O<~~~
'.
.. ,< , .' . ~.' ' . " .. .' . , . .~. '. '.. .,'. . I. . + '.' ' . .. + " ,'" r . , ' .
ll~" ,
'~
,',~o
' .
. .
,
..... "
t":; ,
'~" ..
f,>. CC .
'. ,.
/.: '
,
. .,,' '
"
~~~> .,~ " l
4:'
, ..
. ,
'.. . .~. '
'.,.'
" ,
Mr. Richter reported a hardship exists because the building cannot be moved to
provide the required setback. The operational area of the restaurant will not be
Increased. Without benefit of a variance, the applicant cannot place an awning of any
type or size on the building's front. The variance"is the minimum necessary to shade
the walkway and Improve the restaurant's facade.
Harry Cline, attorney representing the applicant, stated the new restaurant is part of
a large chain. He said the contractor who removed the canopy was present to testify
it was damaged when it was moved. He noted the proposed awning is smaller than
the previous one and will be supported by brick columns as it covers the entry walk
and protects the building and patrons. He felt this is a unique and reasonable use of
the property. He said the canopy will not be built for financial gain and will have no
adverse Impact on the visual corridor or driveway.
Discussion ensued regarding how traffic obstructions made access to this property
difficult. Mr. Richter said he would forward these concerns to the Traffic Engineer.
Discussion ensued. Consensus was that the canopy was previously a permitted use
and is within the spirit and intent of the code.
Based upon the Information furnished by the applicant, Ms. Martin moved to grant the
variance as requested because the applicant has substantially met all of the standards
for approval as listed In Section 45.24 of the land Development Code, more
specifically because the variance arises from a condition which is unique to the
property and was not caused by the owner/applicant and subject to the following
conditions: 1) This variance is based on the application for a variance and documents
submitted by the applicant,' including maps, plans, surveys, and other documents
submitted In support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of
the above documents submitted in support of the request for a variance regarding the
work to be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site,
will result In this variance being null and of no effect and 2) the requisite building
permlt(s) shall be obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing.
, The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
5. City of Clearwater (Parks & Recreation) for variances of (1) 25 ft to
permit 0 ft of waterfront rear setback where 25 ft is required to permit
raised decking and handrails; and (2) 110ft to permit 72 ft of
continuous clear space where 182 ft Is required to permit two raised air
conditioning platforms at 69 Bay Esplanade, Sec 5-29-15, M&B 33.01,
zoned OS.R (Open Space~Recreation). V 94~28
;;i\: ,:' Chairman Pliska declared a conflict of interest regarding this case. Mr. Gans assumed
:f\:' the chair.
, \:.. \ ~ "
.:: ~:: :'
~~~~
~li/i'.;',:,~.::: '>~;";~""',.', '
:::"0'
.,;~> \
, .
,.,
t/ :' .
"I'
mindc06a.94
06/09/94
5
...._----~---" '
, .. ----.....-4. ,,,,,",~,,;,,;~,~". " ,,~,,~;;. .\, ~ "'. ";'~":~;"':;";~::;~'\"~:~"~\'C~;,(~:~'"i~i':~,;,,;~,:~:~<i12~?;:';~,~,~>~< .J. :'};:,:,:} ~ ~:-.:,~\'}:~~
, ~, " "'" \, '". . .",
"
, . " . L .' . .',', ~..... " .' .' '.' .,' ' , " '. .':'. I ' " " L ,: . . >, ' ..,.',~, .' ~
'r.~: c'~~ .'
')
.'11
"
, '
"..,.
"
(
" '
\;
'. ,
" ~:, '
-"',:', ,
\1.:;. ..
~L';':, :, ,
~', ~. '
tl~:'~.;:. '
:k:,':>'~,
~":.':' ." ,
~f:~>
~':~ .': ~ .
~,i'
H'V: ,
}"' ~ " "
I~t.~.; (~ , . " ,
}t:~~~ ~ .: :'r
~t1; ,
:f:{':: .'
:I ~ j , " .
,: '
;f,:;,~
1,,'-1
i"
. "
~ , . ~ .
,. ,
Mr. Richter explained the application In detail, stating the applicants wish to construct
a raised deck with a handrail over an existing concrete platform to the sea wall. The
air conditioner units on platforms located two feet from the building will extend eight
feet from the building. Staff indicated a variance for these units appears warranted
due to the narrow configuration of the subject property creating an unusual clear
space requirement.
In answer to a question, Mr. Richter explained the deck will be south of the building
near the water and the air conditioning units will be on the east side in the clear
space.
Art Kader, Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation, representing the applicant as
reported the 45 year old building, first used as a hatchery, needs renovation. He
stated citizen Input was carefully considered. Plans for the building include
Incorporating the tropical seascape theme and constructing a raised wooden deck to
cover the old unused boat launching facility. The other boat ramp will remain as it Is.
He stated the other variance was required because of flood plain requirements that air
conditioning units be raised off of the ground.
Mr. Kader responded to questions, stating the City plans to renovate the entire park
to Mandalay Avenue and address the erosion problem across from the Yacht Basin
Apartments. He noted the beach community requested the City continue the new
landscaping across Mandalay to the park by the Fire Department.
Mr. Kader stated the City hopes to rent an overflow parking lot by the Beach
Recreation Center from Florida Power.
It was requested all plot plans furnished the Board Include directional information
(North) for ease of reading the drawings.
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, Ms. Martin moved to grant the
variance as requested because the applicant has substantially met all of the standards
for approval as listed In Section 45.24 of the land Development Code, more
specifically because the variance arises from a condition which Is unique to the
property and was not caused by the owner/applicant subject to the following
conditions: 1) This variance is based on the application for a variance and documents
submitted by the applicant, Including maps, plans, surveys, and other documents
submitted In,support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of
the above documents submitted in support of the request for a variance regarding the
work to be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site,
w'm result in this variance being null and of no effect and 2) the requisite building
permit(s) shall be obtained within slx (6) months from the date of this public hearing.
The motton was duly seconded. Upon the vote being taken, Ms. Martin, Messrs.
Johnson and Gans voted "Aye." Mr. Pliska abstained. Motion carried.
mlndcOBa.94
6
06/09/94
1S~~~~:..l,.,;.:.,~:;;;~l "~',:> .
~; .~'~iflitfiS~~;t~~;....t~",llt!~.~'r-"'''C~~:~tI.~;,''h:fM-ln~ '
, ., ': T.' ~ . ,. ~~. '. ..
...."....~~~J1.....:..i.......1.. .~...~;..;... ~~., .,F". .,,~, ,'.., ~ ..... ." ","'"14":, ... , . ._. ~.,: }".; , .' .:. :;:l.i\
", '.~~.t1",~....'1.l-~1.' '. l to, .~~'l <4~' 'J, .~ ,'" '".. ,,1~~~~.~ .....~'~ 't-Ff1~.. .'. roi' .. .', ,. . '1Tt'~!
. -.,'. , ., ".':. ....~~,;....'.:-~"l'-{~~'t:,~~:"~.,~.;:~JJirGA~~t~f~\I.~.<(~!t~.;~;,:.~~::i.~.Jf'~~<~, .~:. t\::i.
"'~~ . .
r)
.. ,
,
. ~",
'. ,
::1 .
"
" ,0
'.
, ,
" . ~
\::.;,
",' '
~.... ~,'
:'~' '. ,.
;~~t ,
t'..'~. .
~~-:~ '
;c. '
\:,' ,
'" :....
...\ ,.':
r~~;,~,: ,:.~:
.1,~....,' .
:~..\ ,~.. ~
J.' ~+;. :./
:ij~I', ~:, > ,
'r~:LY:,:.~. '" ~.
t:';'
~, .,
~;'.
';':'.11"
;';,' .. 'Yo
"'.'l,
< ,-.~,
" . '
:; ,
The following land Development Code Amendments were also considered:
ORDINANCE NO. 5631-94 OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING SECTION
35.11, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO REVISE THE DEFINITiON OF
PERSONAL SERVICES; AMENDING SECTIONS 40.284 AND 40.304,
CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO PROVIDE FOR PERSONAL SERVICES AS
CONDITIONAL USES IN THE LIMITED OFFICE AND GENERAL OFFICE
ZONING DISTRICTS; AMENDING SECTION 41.053, CODE OF
ORDINANCES, ESTABLISHING SUPPLEMENTARY STANDARDS FOR
SUCH USES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Senior Planner Richter explained the discussed ordinance in detail, stating the
proposed amendments are for the City's personal services uses in office zoning
districts. On March 3, 1994, the Commission directed staff to pursue a Land
Development Code amendment to allow certain personal services uses (specifically
beauty salons and barber shops) in office zoning districts. Staff developed an
ordinance that clarifies what personal services uses are and provides for these uses
in the Limited Office and General Office zoning districts as conditional uses.
Conditional use supplementary standards, established as part of this ordinance, ensure
specified personal services uses are compatible with both office uses within the
zoning districts and uses In surrounding districts. Staff clarifies the definition of
"personal service" by using more standard language describing the use in general
terms, and to add other specific examples of personal services uses consistent with
previous staff Interpretations.
Concerns were expressed regarding parking problems inherent to beauty parlor use.
The possibility of serious parking problems was addressed and it was strongly
recommended that adequate parking should be required. The consensus was to
continue discussion of this Item until June 23, 1994.
ORDINANCE NO. 5632-94 OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING SECTION
'41.053, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO ALLOW CONSIDERATION OF
TEMPORARY USES I CONJUNCTION WITH OUTDOOR RETAIL SALES,
DISPLAYS AND/OR STORAGE CONDITIONAL USES; AMENDING
CHAPTER 41, DIVISIONS 7 AND 8, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO
SIGNIFICANTLY REVISE EXISTING REQUIREMENTS FOR TEMPORARY
BUILDINGS, PORTABLE BUILDINGS AND TENTS, AND FOR TEMPO-
RARY RETAIL SALES AND DISPLAYS; AMENDING SECTION 42.34,
CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO DELETE REQUIREMENTS FOR TEMPORARY
COMMERCIAL PARKING LOTS AS FOUND IN THE SECTION;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
mindc06a.94
7
06/09/94
'&..~7~'i;;i;;,;]).~t:;:i<t....,,,,.', ,..~~~......'..",....~.__., ,
,~~~~~--,~......, , . .
~\;,;::::.'~:~'::.:/>',:::), ~',. .', ' ", ',: ... . ',' ".;: .'
. .._._,,-......._~"",..&..t.",..l .,Jv<.; ;.:.,;.;.;, .:^,~~",;;;;;", J:)~ ';:';;">'/,~'~:~rt":.:",,..:j~:~;;,,;'~~i~.;s,::~~r:~::~ "!";'~<:' ,:':', ,'.,,:': ;;;~.~
-..'.~: .,
r}
....." ~ ~
,',
, ,
\'
, '
.'
.. '
,....'
" '
"
, '
,"
.
i ~.. "
~~ ~ ' ,
i'", ',',
:-..' , .
~M . ,
; ,
:~'{",./: :'
~~>" '
~' .
.~r. ;
;~~ '.' :
,~{\',: ~ '
.. ~ . > ~
~,~ .'
';'" .
~ 'I " ,
~,:.~". '
". ,. . :
;(:' ,
X:~'.., :. '
,,'
''to", ,
~K;
It:::, ,
te'a
/~~w
... ',', ~
I"~"~ :
Senior Planner Richter explained the ordinance in detail stating the proposed
amendments are to the City's temporary use ordinance requirements. Sections are
combined into a single section dealing with temporary uses. Major differences are:
establish approval time periods for specific types of uses: locate all temporary use
information In a single code section; establish specific use requirements for types of
temporary uses; remove the City Manager from the appeal process; eliminate
restrictions on outdoor sales uses that prohibit tents and temporary buildings for such
uses approved as conditional uses; and address signage for temporary uses.
Mr. Richter explained Section Two was added and Section One, deleted. He noted
Central Permitting issues temporary permits for parking lots.
Mr. Richter said the ordinance will permit temporary parking by 1) Jack Russell
Stadium and 2) lots operated by and for the benefit of non profit organizations. The
penalty for a violation is $250 per day. Those who do not secure a proper permit will
be subject to a severe penalty.
The Board expressed concerns that permits are issued for longer than 45 days for
temporary commercial parking lots and recipients lease spaces to the general public.
Concern was expressed regarding the use of the former Gray Moss Inn property as a
parking lot. Mr. Richter stated he would forward this concern to the Community
Response Team.
Discussion ensued regarding deadlines for connecting water and sewer for tents used
as temporary housing and it was questioned who would verify compliance.
Mr. Ga~s moved to recommend approval of Ordinance 5632-94. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
II. Board and Staff Discussion
Ms. Martin questioned the assessment of triple permit fees. It was stated If permits
are obtained prior to construction, triples fees are charged as a penalty.
The progress of a house under construction at Sunset Point Road and Oak Ridge was
questioned as work has been stopped for some time. Mr. Richter stated if
construction Is not completed within three years, the house can be declared a
nuisance.
Mr. Richter distributed copies of the traffic and motor vehicle code regarding the
obstruction of driver's vision. A notice to trim or remove plants is included in Section
30.142. He reported complaints can be directed to the Traffic Engineer.
mindc06a.94
8
06/09/94
, , ' .~ "
~"'._____"~4""."""""""",-:, '. ..:t"" .:......'.~.. ~. " ,""l'. . I .. ..,':< ~. ", ,'H'.. ., .':'.....:
f"t,),.,,_.,. ..J-,.,....,;h~';..Mil;,:'r~}~;./>~~t:.j:;fi..,l:l~~1i~.~~;,"~r~., '~\.\,I :~~~.\;:;t,. {~' .'....~J... :tr{~
. "~ :> 1(,.,. .7. ~~.~~,.;hH'.':"l~1~r~.,:.~:.~;
"'~.f<"~'e '~,,;..,:,, ~~~~~""""(b.....a~~
, , .
, "
. 0 ~ ,
'. \ '
. . .. . . ..' . .., - .
. ." . . .,.... I. " '. '. ." .,... . .
, . , .
'. . '. . . . .' ..:. ..' . " . '.' . . , '! .., . . .' ~ . .', ", '! " . 'f ,. '. " '. . . . " . ,..... . . ' . . '
" ,
~~ l,:;: .>f, . ~ ~ .
'.' l
,'It ~ { 'J
,';'-, ~~, .
. . . ~ ~
';,'
.' "
~ ~, , ."
"
"
,',
':.':<
.,~'~; -:::.......)..,jJ...."J.,I,t:'~':t..:': ';; '~::r' .
. "~""\: ~-htl' . ...., .
J" "1' If.' .,~ ','q":' . .
1.~~~.t",rT;.. .,
, "
, .
':'.~ r ;') ~. ~ .
.1 ~~, '{!{I~
, ~ J. . ,
'.
1::.\: .. :.'
','
.~~; ,
, '
~,
t,.,
Concerns were expressed regarding plans for the Planning and Zoning Board to hear
variance requests. It was felt the value of an additional board's point of view Is
important.
"'0
: u >
Ii.' .
, ,~ .
"
.,'.
Emphatic opposition was expressed to the City Commission assuming responsibility
for hearing appeals.
"
'.....
~ i..
~'f...
'..'.I. .
III. Adjournment
~\.":'
~t1'; ~ l . ,
The meeting was adjourned at 2:40 p.m.
~~
, "
': ~ ,", '
9
06/09/94
" ,-
" ,
,I ' ~. ~ .
, ~~~, '.l"'::-7~~~~.ul~"'~~~~~\_~W~~'Y~f#~.
\~it~~g;i;Ji.:i1!i~}~;'8C~~~\:;jI.;;:.':*!\l::<;)~,.:.:;';;:;..~ J/,\::;:>',:: '~:~~,~~ ~ ~,;. '.:',:,~~, ;. <":: ',\,~,:.:' ",' e:: .: "<:~., ..:.~, ':". "<'1, ,:':: : '..~' ::~~~~~',',' ',' , ':", :"
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a connict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason. please pay close attention to the instructions on this form
i before completing the reverse side and filing the form.
;,
"
t
"
[,. .
"',
',l,- :
~I,'~ ','.'.
')' ,
'.0'.
" >'
:~,...: .,
.'
''),' .
, .~,I.
.' ,
, ' .
,
;lbJt:A-.J ~ /fV t/ (1-.;2? rp
FORM 88 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
lAST "AME- FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME
PI. I ~ 0 A 4;=""><
820 uJ VRU \D RD
CITY
C. t.€A(( w~
NAME OF BOARD. COUNCIl.. COMMISSION. AUTHORITY. OR COMMllTEE
P G I/GJ 'I1e?tJ.,. ~ I:? e- ,()P..HI~TI'1li}Vr 8r:YO tZP
TUE SOARD. COUNCIl, COMMISSION. AUTlIORITY OR COMMlnEE ON
WIfICU I SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
~ 0 COUNTY 0 OTlIER l.OCAI.AGENCY
tplfJ ~u.b.. S
COUNTY
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION:
t: I /Y 0 e~e:-Atz78VL--
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED
(p - - '1
MY POSITION IS:
I< APl'otNTIVE
C ELECtiVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 88
This form is for use by any person serving at the county. city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board.
council, commission. authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented
with a voting connict of interest under Section 112.3143. Florida Statutes.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143. FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding electivc or appointive county. municipal, or other local public office M UST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure
which inures to his special private gain. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure
which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained (including the parent
, organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he is retained); to thc special private gain of a relative; or to the special
private gain of a business associatc. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S.. and
officers of indepcndent special tax districts elected on a one.acre, one~vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity.
For purposes of this law, a "relativc" includes only the officer's father. mother. son, daughter. husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in~
law. son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner. joint venturer. coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the
corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange),
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above. you must disclose the connict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on
which you are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN IS DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for
recording the minutes of the meeting. who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
. .
Although you ,must abstain from voting in the situations described above. you otherwise may participate in these matters. However,
.you must disclose the nature of the conOict before making any attempt to innuence the decision. whether orally or in writing and
:whether made by yo'u or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH
THE VOTE WLL BE TAKEN:
. . You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to innuence the decision) with the person responsible for
recording the minutes of the meeting. who will incorporate the form in the minutes.
,. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
. The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
~;: CE FORM 80.10..91
I'AG E I
;~~~~~
:\. : . " ,~
{~t~; ,~:.J" :~, ' .": ,': :, :,' ;i'~...'.-
I;.~ ,:\ q
.., --___..~...............'-'-i..............&.lI'.f';---- ,. 0
--'''''VI ,,'.........'-....,;,;.. ;...i,~,;., ;"'";" '.:;: ~~~; ~ ;:'" i:~:~' ~ :.....: -:.~;... ';"',>~', 't.;:.;.;.<'.~:~ii,h~~.;;;';,~ .';\~.,J; ~'::;<; ':;'~, ,;',};.;'i~]'
,-'
. '1 '. .'. . '. . .'. I '~ t.; ", .',... '. .,' . .' ~.' ~. I. "~ .' . : '. '. j' :. .' .'. I I ~. : . :.. '.' ~ ". . ... , '. , :'. ' :
'. "'1
';(::;',i"
."~ .'; Ii.
.H::J:',.
\r~~ .~:,? ( .
',~ ,. ~;
~y~:~' .:;,
.~ " h .
, ':,'.,1 ~:. ~.:,
, .
. d 'I.
'.' :.~. ~.
.,: o~
-,)' ;
:; ~ T,':
!
IF YOU MAKE NO AlTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECJSION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
· You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
· You mus~ complete the f~rm and file it within I~ days af!cr the vote occurs with ttle person tCsponsi~le fo~ recor~ing the minutr~
the meeting, who must Incorporate the form In the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided Immediately to the oP. ' "
members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
I3Y fl/l Y At1-c;l" 7FZ.:rUIZ/lJt- ~
l~--1' Ye/2-S rt.-/~/L.'O 0 IT /J/Zu-f / Tl3""6 rs
I /
I.
A~€><.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
Pt...-l S ~O , hereby disclose that on J t.( Nt;1 '1
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
--lS.. inured to my special private gain:
_ inured to the speciaJ gain of my business associate,
_ inured to the special gain of my relative,
_ inured to the special gain of
whom I am retained: or
L ,_ inured' to the special gain of
is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
,.' (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as foJlows:
'f)(OJG~T'
. :. ~ ,
, rli<~,
r ,.' :," ,
. .' ~': '.' ;. '"
I' ~.
, .
. ".
... . ~ . 0
,~ ':,' I, .. ' . ,
:>" '. .j.. ":, ,;'~.:'.~':~ 'j. I ~
,..:,:,~,::'t,~,,'1 :;.1 f
Date Filed
Signature
t
.19~
, by
, which
,0
NOTICE: UNDER 'PROVU;IONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES ~112.317 (1991). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQ~.) I
DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OFTHE FOLLO~: '
IMPEACHMENT. REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION. REDUCTION IN
SALARY. REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5.000.
"cE FORM 88": 10+91
,- -;----' '-.:----lOoI._......
,',..... :. '. '
, .,~ ~.. ~.'. ,'1 >,'~ .,'''''~ .
"',
~ t ~.. ..._~.,.--...---.-_._--.... -r-" ,Y+.._~ .II, "
ijJ,~i0i~;;ff':,:':~.:~;:r:.</,.: :;)b :~, .... ):,:. ... ...... '.
"
. " . :'., ~,
I'AGE
'. ..
. ~,.,:
, ',., 'I
I,."