09/22/1992 (2)
l. ' ' . I '0 ',;, ,~ , . '. '.' '0, .,' . ,r..,., '. ~ , r".': "i I:~.' ,,," ,.. ~', ~ 1'" ',: ',.:,;',' , , ,
~~I:':}j' /; . .' '
,. . ,<
, .
, :
,
,.
, '
,l,,'.
..
.'
,\,. ,
i~.~ ' ..
.... ,.(.
.
. "
",
'. .t>~
r
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
September 22, 1992
The City Commission, meeting as the Community Redevelopment Agency, met in regular
session at City Hall, Tuesday, September 22, 1992 at 1: 13 P.M., with the following members
present:
t
Rita Garvey
Lee Regulski
Sue Berfield
Richard Fitzgerald
Arthur X. Deegan, II
Chairperson
Mem ber
Member
Member
Member'
Also Present were:
Michael J. Wright
Jerry D. Sternstein
Cynthia E.. Goudeau
Executive Director;
Economic Developm'ent Director
Secretary
': ~
i
ITEM l. - The Mayor called the meeting to order.
.,( '..
In order to provide continuity for research. the items will be listed in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that order.
ITEM II. - $3.000 Contribution to the Downtown Development Board for promotional activities
At its meeting on September 14, 1992,'Ms. Brenda Nixon made a presentation to the
Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) requesting an amount up to $3,000 for the purpose of
supporting her services contract with the Downtown Development Board (DDB). The funds were :
requested for the general purpose of providing for miscellaneous expenditures including the I
possible payment of utility deposits on Cleveland Street front properties, marketing support, etc.
Because the DDB has contracted with Ms. Nixon and has the responsibility for monitoring
the progress of this program, the DDB is the most logical body for determining the
appropriateness of these expenditures. The CRA can best support this program with a
contribution to the DDB in the amount of $3,000 for promotional expenditures as deemed
appropriate by the Board.
The Fiscal Year 1991/92 CRA budget will be amended to reflect the transfer of these
funds to the DDB.
,
Member Fitzgerald moved to award a $3,000 contribution to the Downtown Development
Board for promotional activities. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
(
minCR09b.92
1
9/22/92
t:: ~" .
r
,.,
..
ITEM 111. - Kravas Proosrtv
For the past six months, Staff has been involved in negotiations with William Kravas for
the sale of his property located at 61 6-626B Cleveland Street.
This property which encompasses a series of narrow bay buildings fronting on Cleveland
Street and a metered parking lot in the rear leased to the City is approximately 36,123 square
feet or .83 acres. The property is adjacent to Station Square Park, a mini-park recently installed
by the City of Clearwater.
Staff recommends purchase of this property for a variety of reasons. First, the retailers in
downtown have long argued for visible surface. parking. Since this lot is already metered and was
recently resurfaced, it would fulfill this request adequately. Should the CRA purchase the
property, staff would recommend the buildings be demolished and a curb cut be made to access
the lot directly from Cleveland Street. The meters which are currently in place are long-term
parking meters. It is recommended to change these to short-term meters to accommodate short-
term parking. Secondly, aside from the convenience and economics offered by the ready-to-use
parking lot, it is in the CRA's best interest to own the property adjacent to the mini-pa'rk. Should
this property be purchased by a private individual or group, there is no guarantee the uses would
be complimentary or compatible with the existing mini-park.
At the CRA meeting of July 13, 1992, purchase for a maximum of $10.10 per square foot
was authorized unless an appraisal determined the value to be less. The CRA commissioned an
appraisal by R.E. Marketing Consultants and their finding, dated July 24, 1992, estimated the fee
(~. , simple, "as is" ~arket value for the property to be $490,000.
It was requested the name of the purchaser on the contract be changed from the City of
Clearwater to Community Redev€Jlopment Agency. Concern was expressed over the possibility of
trcontaminated ground" and the City's Iiabllity. Mr. Kravas stated in the mid-50's the depot was
used for fruit shippers and a Gator Special on Saturday for football. For about the last 20 years
the .City has leased it for parking. Activity of the depot was approximately where the 1 st Florida
building now stands.
, C..
The Executive Director suggested closing the deal in escrow, contingent on a favorable soil
test analysis and clean environmental report.
Member Regulski moved to approve the purchase of Lots 4 through 10, Block 19 of Gould
and Ewing's Second Aadition to Clearwater Harbor, located at 616 through 62GB Cleveland
Street from William Kravas for a total price of $365.000, closing in escrow with the, final release
of funds upon the receipt of a clean environmental report. The motion was duly seconded and
carried unanimously.
The Executive Director asked for direction in regard to construction of a parking lot on the
Kr8vas property. He feels there is enough justification to approve the construction of the parking
lot without waiting for the adoption of the new Downtown plan.
minCR09b.92
2
9/22/92
"
J,
}I,.
, ..'
"
. 'I +
, ,
"
, , '
,C'.
Discussion ensued regarding what the CRA is allowed to do, The City Attorney concurred
that the pros outweigh the cons in this situation and recommended proceeding with the plan for
the parking lot. ,It was stateq the lease with Mr. Flowers needs to be addressed and it was
suggested Mr. Flowers is willing to move as long as he received some financial assistance from
the CRA.
"
I
I
I
r
Consensus was to give the Executive Director direction to proceed.
ITEM IV. Amend the aooroved 1992/93 CRA Budoet to reimburse the oarking fund $17 .300 for
lost revenues in order to all two hour "Free Parkinoll in certain City oarking lots and metered
street oarkina soaces for a three month trial oeriod effective 10/1/92
, The CRA has been requested to support the Downtown Development Board (DDB) project
to promote the downtown business area by attracting artists and galleries to the currently vacant
storefronts on Cleveland Street. Ms. Brenda Nixon has contracted with the DDS to promote this
program and she has indicated accessible free parking is important to the suc.cess of her
revitalization efforts.
Staff recommends free pa'rking be provided in the fOllowing locations: On street spaces on
Waterson, North of Cleveland; Garden, North of Cleveland; Park, from North Ft. Harrison to East;
and the Kravas and Park Street lots. It is estimated this "free parking" would impact the Parking
Fund in the amount of $17,300.
If,:,;.
~'jl
If it is decided to continue the free parking program on a permanent basis, it is
recommended the total long range impact on the parking system be assessed by an independent
qualified parking consultant as defined in the parking revenue bonds.
It was stated the free parking is needed for only a 75-day period, or October 15, 1992 to
January t, 1993. Ms. Nixon is also requesting the City provide more short-term parking spaces
close to the stores. It was suggested Traffic Engineering be asked to ascertain what additional
on-street parking could be availed in the downtown area, provided they do not change traffic
patterns, or take out any parking lanes out of the PSTA terminal, as these accommodate their bus
patterns.
Discussion ensued regarding including the Maas Brothers property in the free parking
program. It was stated this lot is neoded for long-term employee parking.
Staff was directed to investigate the possibility of additional downtown parking on street
spaces.
Member Deegan moved to amend the approved 1992/93 eRA Budget to reimburse the
parking fund $17,300 for lost revenues in order to all two hour "Free Parking" in certain City
parking lots and metered street parking spaces for a three month trial peri'od effective 10/15/92.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
(---
minCR09b.92
3
9/22/92
"
"..~. .:. ',;:",':, :,' .., ..:" ....~... ': . '",", ~:;.'.:: .. '.::. .:'.':.', '::..' .:.:::.i, ::.'.':' .'J;:~:: :':: " ..:, :::j: .. '."'. .:::::' .~..~,' .. ,': '":~.::' ...:: .:"',:"'.' ::::::::':::
~ "' ~. c ;r '-;11;" ., ) .
.,.
t\:{:~::~~ '. :':" .'.' ;;~ I :','.: 'I'
~~: '" , "
."j
~ I .
, ".\
,.
, .
~t~jj~e ~~::" . '. , i
. " :
. ,,'; ~. ~ : ,.."; ': ~ '" ' .:.
'. ~
, . ~. e >:\ ,... ,'"
: ':~
..
c\
ITEM V. - Schedule Goal Settine Meeting
Consensus was to schedule a goal setting meeting for Monday; October 19, 1992 at 9:00
A.M.
The Executive Director requested direction regarding the two proposals for the East End
project: 1) MAS Proposal for residential development, and 2) Lincoln Proposal, regarding the '
overall Downtown area.
Concerns ,were expressed that only one proposal for the East End was presented and that
the proposal for Downtown and the Bluff was inappropriate at least until after the 11/03/92
referendum regarding the Florida Gulf Coast Arts Center's use of the Maas Brothers property.
Concerns ~ere also expressed regarding the terms of the MAS One Proposal.
The Executive Director indicated the MAS One proposal was a starting point and that.
negotiation regarding the terms can take place. He suggested consideration be delayed until the '
CRA holds its goal setting meeting on 10/19/92.
.,
Concerns were expressed regarding "closing the door" on the Lincoln proposal for the
entire Downtown area. It was stated if a project for overall Downtown development was'to be
considered, others should have an opportunity to submit proposals.
,
,..' (-"')"
, ,
, ,i
Consensus was to delay consideration of the MAS One proposal until after the 10/19/92
Goal Setting meeting and to tell the Lincoln property group they are not interested in their .
proposal at this time. It was stated that should the Arts Center referendum fail, the issue of the
use of the Bluff would be re-opened. If it is decided to seek development of any or all of the
Bluff, the request for proposals will be open to all. '
j
l
I
.1
It was requested the "work" rules of the CRA be reviewed at the next meeting.
ITEM VI. - Adjournment
The meeting adjourned 2:23 P.M.
, ATTEST
.or.
./
"
c'
minCR09b.92
4
9/22/92