12/05/1991 (2)
~;~":)~~';.'~f:~:.".''':' ';
j' }' . ,
~ ~ ur+< ."
, .
.. ',>
. . ,
, .
.;. i ~
.'
. ,
'). .'
'\ ' f
\. ~,
.: ,.
. .'
'. ,
II
,. i - , f ~ I
, ,
I: I
'. '
~ I .
, '
, .
~ . . c , .
~:~~J):....;:'.':.:.':~,:.<;7~{i,.,~i':;;-,.;':',':~i':!",:.',' ~ . ,! [:';
'1
C'"
" .
f',,\
~I.
c..
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
December 5, 1991
. The City Commission, meeting'as the Community Redevelopment Agency, met in
regular 'session. at City Hall, Thursday, December 5, 1991 at 9:37 P.M., with the
following members present:
Rita Garvey
Lee Regu1ski
Sue'Berfield
William Nunamaker
Richard Fitzgerald
Absent:
Chairperson
Member
Member
Member
Member
Mary Vaughn
Also Present were:
Ex Officio Member
Michael J. Wright
M. A. Galbraith, Jr.
Cynthia E. Goudeau
Executive Director
City Attorney
Secretary
ITEM II. - AQreement between the City and the CRA reQarding the purchase of the
"Maas Brothers Property"
. On December 2, 1991, th~ City Commission as&igned th~ contract for the
.purchase of the downtown Maas Brothers property to the CRA. At that same meeting
they also authorized, a loan to the CRA for the ,purchase of this property with
certain conditions. The agreement being presented to the agency tonight
formalizes those conditions.
Member Fitzgerald moved ,to approve the agreement between the City and the
CRA regarding the purchase of the Maas Brothers property. The motion was 'duly
seconded.
A citizen spoke expressing concern that the Maas Brothers Task Force would
no longer be effective. . The majority of the CRA disagreed with this opinion
stating that by tHe CRA buying the property, it provided even greater flexibility
t~ the Task Force.
Upon the vote being taken; members Regulski, Fitzgerald, Nunamaker and
Chairperson Garvey voted "Aye", member Berfield voted "Nayll. Motion carried..
It was suggested action be taken that clearly defines that the task force
would report to the CRA as it would to the ~ity Comm~ssion.
Member Berfield moved to confirm that the Maas Brothers Task Force will b~
reporting to the eRA as it would to the City Commission." The motion was duly ,
seconded and carried unanimously.
CRA
1
12/5/91
, .
,~, ~ '
. I
.t."'n.'l'~"i!;~,.;J' "l'~".''':' '" , ,
~.':;,-. 1jt~&~. ",:~.~~IZo~\:'~~ "."..:t...~,:~..l'
m ~j;1i,''''''.<~''t.''''''''\.1I ~, \-, ~ I ,) ~ ~ .
~'~~~c;.",~;T' .: . \'~ ':.'.' ~,'(... C ~ : T.
~-W''''.'h>~J; ,,.~ . .> '"
~;?:l\:'~';:,~?~:';:::'::~::,'" ", ' ,
,I :'
"
, '
, , ,
'j,', .
.' "I"".,','
'.
'I
.. '
~~;<~'/,,: ~~/ . <;.'~ "
~ l' 1,.., "" , ' " I ,
~\':}',),,~~' .;,,",., '.,':,." ,"
t, .' , .<
~:;'i"i:;';\;:r ';';'~:'./"':/ : i\),i , ",: .,:
f~~.;..l'!.:. ~It" .."
i:iL, :,: " ,(~;j,)t?:;i1tJl:~~~fu;~0;\;ij ! :;:,:,};,.'
i~~....t.'lt1;..,..t~...::~,".>"-" ,~....". -':J..iJ'<"'j.,~,;t,...~~h'_~.., ,> )'"''
I
',,'
i, '
'"
,
: t,
'.' I
"
. . ,I
'/ '
'{
, < ~ ' \
:' . " .:<;~,~;"r;': ;~~~~
~ ' , .' '. , , I '0\" I ~ (~l);
. " ,~~, .J J", ...;: '~'l'~.'~ "," ':";, ,,:,--.;:} ~1
, ~,I, + "'~ ,'. . .~~, ...'1'L..~:tlm
I '~f",; . Ii' '. ~.':~>:c::c,"~(~ ':'~'~,:;.~f':~~~';
..,'iI f '.~~:;r.", :',:_".'."~I .',f~'~;~l~'1
} \ ,C ',...,.. . \ '>' ~~;, '1;,~i:~C ~
,',
, ,
C., ,!'} "
, .'
C':'
, '
..~. 0
, .Concerns w~reexpressed regardin~ liability and who stands behind the CRA.
It was indicated, the eRA ,has its own insurance policy as ~o-insured~and would
have the same, sovereign immunity as'the City Commission.
Further discussion 'ensued regarding the liability, and how this cost would
be, covered. Staff is ~oresearch and report.
~, :
ITEM II L
Ad.iournment:
The meetlng adjourned ~t 9:54 P.M.
.r ' ~ i..
ATTEST:
Q~[.&
S~Cfary '" .
.-P~ -
:'," (, ~.
i,\.
.' '
"
, .
" ,
( ." , .
.,
,. .
, '
',,' c. C
:1r'
'J
) "
j ,
. Tr.',
, !.
:' .'.
~;.! ,.
.~'~. C
~;;.c
"
\,CC:'
..
1o., ,
, .
"
I, ,
'J
'J .
, .
.j
.\
"
"
C-- ,
, .'
" '
, ,,/
or
'j
CRA
2
12/5/91
'\,
"~I '
,.. ,'\'J',,'''' .".' ."
~!7f~"Y{p~, .~';'~,,,,~,~!F/~:)l i';~"/:;Jl~.T~!~'
:F!&:;i; ~:\' '~~: ./,i:'.~{~~f;', F~~~i:;~;'~;y