Loading...
01/23/1992 (2) , , ' DCAB DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT BOARD Of U3r.z., I , . ~ /- cfO/ , r DATE' , f'. '\ DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT BOARD January 23, 1992 Members present: Thomas J. Graham, Chairman John W. Homer Alex P1isko Emma C. Whitney Absent: Otto P. Gans, Vice~Chairman (excused) Also present: Miles Lance, Assistant City Attorney Scott Shuford, Planning Manager Mary K. Diana, Assistant City Clerk Gwen J. Legters, Staff Assistant II The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 1:07 p.m. in the Commission Chambers of City Ha 11. He ou t 1 i ned the' procedures and adv i sed that anyone adversely affected by any decision of the Development Code Adjustment Board may appeal the decision to an Appeal Hearing Officer within two weeks. He noted Florida law requires any applicant appealing a decision of this Board to have a ',,~~,., record of the proceedings to support the appeal. In order to provide continuity, the items will be listed in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. I. Public Hearings 1. Andrew 0 and Patricia K Rackstein for a variance to permit a three ft high chain-link fence in setback area adjoining waterfront at 167 Bayside Dr, Bayside Sub No 4, Lot 14, zoned RS 8 (single family residential). V 92-06 Planning Manager Shuford explained the application in detail stating the applicant wishes to construct a three-foot-high chain link fence in a setback area adjoining a waterfront to secure the property for his dog. .. Andrew Rackstein, owner and applicant, stated the proposed fence will match an existing fence on the west side of the subject property which extends from the house to the seawall. The fence is needed to contain his Labrador retriever. In response to questions, Mr. Rackstein indicated he feels the three~foot height will be sufficient for his purposes and the adjacent property owners to the east have indicated support of the application. \...,./ DCAB 1 01/23/92 ($:., \,"-. .- '-.' Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, Mr. Homer moved to grant the variance as requested because the applicant has substantially met all of the standards for approval as listed in Section 137.012(d) of the Land Oevelopment Code subject to the following conditions: 1) the fence shall be only three feet high, shall be of chain link construction, and shall be constructed as indicated on the site plan and 2) the requisite building permit shall be obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Request Qranted. 2. James A Jr and Sherral A Martin for variances of (1) 2.95 ft to permit dock width of 25 ftj and (2) 2.5 ft to permit boathouse 17.5 ft from an extended side property line at 145 Devon Dr, Bayside Sub, Lot 43 and land to bulkhead, zoned RS 8 (single family residential) and AL/C (aquatic lands/coastal). V 92-07 Planning Manager Shuford explained the application in detail stating the applicant wishes to construct a boathouse on an existing non-conforming dock which was constructed prior to the current Code. He indicated there is no objection from the City Harbormaster. Assistant City Attorney Lance arrived at 1:15 p.m, Thomas Nash, attorney represent; ng the app 1; cant, i nd i cated the reques tis rni nor, the boathouse will maintain the integrity of the neighborhood and a hardship exists due to the placement of the dock. Concerns were expressed regarding whether or not the adjacent property owners signed the county dock permit indicating approval of the application. Mr. Nash said confirmation has not been received from the estate owning the property to the east and indicated the property owners to the west have no objections. Robert S. Ress, representing the applicant, said the boathouse will have a roof and no sides, as county regulations prohibit structures of this nature to be enclosed. Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, Mr. Homer moved to grant the variances as requested because the applicant has substantially met all of the standards for approval as listed in Section 137.012(d) of the Land Development Code subject to the requisite building permit being obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Request Qranted. 3. Ultimar Development Corp/USX Corp for a variance of 5 ft to permit construction of stairs seaward of Coastal Construction Control Line (C.C,C.L.) at 1520 Gulf Blvd, Sec 19~29-15, part of M&B 43.02, zoned B (business). V 92-08 Mr. Graham declared a confl ict of interest with regard to this case and Mr. Pliska assumed the chdir in the absence of the Vice-Chairman. The applicant was advised he required the approval of all three voting members for approval of his request. DCAB 2 01/23/92 . ~ -', ~', I" j ,..1.',' , " ~ .... ....,' . ~ J, '1,.- '~ I" . :, f ":, '. . '.,... '.' j . " " .',." . ',; t" , \ " "1.ff..' ,"" Planning Manager Shuford explained the application in detail stating the applicant wishes to construct wooden stairs seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CeCL) to permit public and private beach access. He indicated the app 1 i cat i on will requ ire State approva 1 resu It i ng in add it i ona 1 time be i ng needed to obtain the necessary permits, In response to a question regarding whether or not the stairs could be built of concrete, it was indicated there is difficulty getting such an appl ication through the State permitting process as concrete is considered to be shore hardening. Steve Seibert, attorney representing the applicant, stated the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) permit has been obtained to install beach access stairs. In response to questions, Mr, Seibert indicated the appropriate codes relating to handicapped standards will be met and the stairs will not have open risers. Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, Ms. Whitney moved to grant the variance as, requested because the applicant has substantially met all of the standards for approval as listed in Section 137.012(d) of the Land Development Code more specifically because, the variances arise from a condition which is unique to the property and not caused by the applicant; and the variances are the minimum necessary to overcome the hardship created by making access to the beach at mean high water possible subject to the conditions: I) all necessary permits and variances shall be obtained by the applicant from other applicable State and City review agencies and boards and 2) the requisite building permit shall be obtained within twelve (12) months from the date of this public hearing. The motion was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken, Ms. Whitney and Messrs. Homer and Pliska voted "aye"; Mr, Graham abstained. Motion carried. Request qranted. The meeting recessed from 1:34 p.m. to 1:52 p.m. II. Stormwater Presentation by Tom Miller Public Works/Environmental Assistant Director Tom Miller presented an overview of the activities of the Environmental Management Group relating to stormwater management and the associated fees. He indicated this is a comprehensive issue which can be addressed in greater detail at a future meeting and distributed handouts prepared by Budget Analyst Tina Wilson outlining the revenues and expenditures to date relating to the stornfl'./ater utility fee, Mr. Miller summarized the watershed program and the primary benefits of better resource management; pollution control, public edification, aesthetics, improved water quality, identifying flood hazards and reducing flood insurance costs. Discussion ensued regarding the stormwater utility fee and the funding sources for stormwater management projects. OCAB 3 01/23/92 Concern was expressed that information presented at the January 10, 1991 stormwater utility fee presentation regarding the funding sources for stormwater projects once the, fee is implemented may have been inaccurate. A question was raised as to whether the utility fee would support the entire storlTMater operation or if money would continue to be received from ad valorem taxes to help fund stormwater projects as in the past. Staff was requested to provide a transcript from the January meeting. Mr. Miller said the stormwater utility fee is an attempt to equitably distribute expenses regarding water quality projects to ensure that everyone pays a fair share and to re 1 i eve the burden on the genera 1 fund. He; nd i cated some stormwater projects are funded through various funds outs ide the ut i 1 ity fee such as the Transportation Fund. A question was raised whether the monies collected from the stormwater utility fee are applied to the district from which they are collected. Mr. Miller said a plan would be developed for each individual basin. Concern has been expressed regarding how the county is dealing with enclaves. Mr. Miller said the State of Florida is in the process of analyzing county and municipal ordinances relating to water quality management. Mr. ,Miller said each developer's operation needs to be looked at before a solution can be determined. He said an audit would be done to track where the monies from the stormwater utility fee are going. Staff was requested to provide a copy of the audit when available. (:~.:,,',: Discuss ion ensued regard i n9 the C; ty' s street sweep i ng po 1 icy, retent; on pond pollution and better methods of storm drain maintenance. f{:\J; Mr. Miller said staff is looking to develop an environmental circular. III. Election of Chairman and Vice-Chairman Mr. Homer nominated Mr. Pliska as Chairman. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Mr. Plisk9. was elected Chairman. Mr. Homer nominated Mr. Graham as Vice Chairman. Mr. Graham declined the nomination. Mr. Graham nominated Ms. Whitney as Vice-Chairman, The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Ms. Whitney was elected Vice-Chairman. DCAD 01/23/92 4 ,\ ;". OJ,. . '. ~ ~ " ., , ',. 0' ' I. '. , " '. . i 4'" J. + . > . .'.. : ','" ", . , ' . ' j i r"'--"\.. + IV. Board and Staff Discussion Assistant City Attorney Lance reported a State Hearing Officer overturned the Board's August, 1991 decision to grant setback variances for a triplex to Don Curtis Pierson, Mr. Lance indicated the order could settle a long-standing dispute between Mr. Pierson and his neighbor. Mr. Homer departed at 2:45 p.m., Discussion ensued regarding concerns that variance fees be in keeping with the type of variance being requested. Various criteria were suggested for use in setting fees. V. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 2:51 p.m. ChgQ~ (' \ ,~.~./ ATTEST: ~/~ Assist , ity rk, ' .....,-" DCAB 5 01/23/92 ."' ", > ~. .. ' "" I ~ . I. < . ~, .... ~, .. ~," . ~ ,'. ,'. ~ ..' ~ " " , "r : . . ., . ., > ,I,..". I ~ . . I FORM 88 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS ...~..."- . NAME OF IIOARlJ, COUNCil. COMMlssro~, AUlIIOIlITY. OR COMMITrEf. P-t P~. CDUNn' o (DUNn 0 O1I1(R I,QCA\. A());:',n' NAME OF l'OUlICAI. SUUl)IVISION: (;LI3ACcu --; c MY 1'0SITlO~ IS: [J (I.(CIIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 88 This form is for use by any person sen'ing at the county, city, or other local level of government 011 an nppointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committce, It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who arc presented with a voting connict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whclher you hold an electivc or appoil1live position. For this reason, please pay close attcntion to the instructions 011 this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form, -- INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143. FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elt:ctive or appointive county, municipal, or other IOCol1 public officc MUST AUSTAIN from vOling on a measure which inures to his special private gain, Each eh:clcd or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures \0 the special gain of II principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained (including the pllrent organi7.ation or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he is retained); to the special private gain of a relativc: or [0 Ihe special privatc gain of a business associate, Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec, 163.356 or 163.357, F,S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a onc-ncre, one-votc basis arc nOl prohibited from voting in lhat cilpacily. For purposes of lhis law, a "relative" includes only the officer's rathcr, mother. son. dnughter, husband, wife, father-in-law. mother-in- law. son-in-Ia\\', and dllughter-in-raw. A "busincss associatc" meullS any person or entity engaged in or e;lrrying on ;\ business enlerprise with the officer 115 a partner, joim venturer, coowner of propert)'. or corporale shareholdcr (where Ihe shares 'of the corporalion Me not listcd on any national or regional slock exchange), ' ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition 10 abstaining from voting in 111(: silualions descrih~d uho\e. you must dbduse the connie!: PRIOR TO TItE VOTE BEING TAKEr-: by publicly slating to the ;lssembly the nalure of your interest in the mea'iure on which )'ou arc ahsl.lining front voting: alld WIHUt'\ 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by compkting. and liling thi!. form with the persoll rcsponsibh.: for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorpomte the form ill llw minutes, APPOINTED OFFICEnS: Although you must ah~l"in from vOling in lhe situ,llions describeLl nbo\'C, you otherwise may participate in these matters, IIcmcvcr, you must disclose the nature of the connicl heforc making UlIY attempl to inlluence the decbion. whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction, IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY A1TEMPT TO INFLUENCE TilE DECISION PRIOI~ TO TIlE MEETING AT Wlllell TilE VOTE W1.L BE TAKEN: ~",_r' . You must complete ;Illd liIe this form (beforc making all)' allelllpt to innuellcc the decision) recording the minutes of the mecling, who will incorporate the form in the mil1lJles, . r\ copy of the fmm must he rr~)\'ided immediatcl>' to the other members of the lIgeney, . The form lIIUsl he read publicly al Ihe /le:\t meetin~ Hfler the form is filed, with the persun respo/lsible for cr H>lH.1 ~u . lIl.lJI 1';\(;(: I IF YOU MAKE NO AlTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECJSION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: · You must disclose orally the nature of your connict in the measure before participating. · You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the \'ote occUrs Wilh l,he person responsible for recording the minUl'lf~l lhe meeting. who must incorpomte the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be pro\'ided immediate]y to the ~t . members of the agency. and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICERiS INTEREST I. -(hdlP7~' S' ~). 0J1:'1'A.;, /~ . hereby disclose thut on /- 0/ . 19~t;.. (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) _ inured to my special private gain; _ inured to the special gain of my business associate. _ inured to the special gain of my relative, . 0nured to the special gain of h"~..; J./v J f /A/f,~7 //] whom I am retained; or _ inured to the special gain of is the parent organi711tion or subsidiary of a principal which h..s retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my eonnicting interest in the measure is as follows: , Id td-- ~<'//? .(;'>>,.,;- , by . which f k4't/4. hoe-d.',,} /~-/;/~ec.-( b.--r -//:<- C7LU/lt:?L- 5 ~ \ I '-....... (' /t~- /-h~1-e 12;J~//7 ~'.v.s..-zC"L ~ 1- ~7 - y-z:, Date Filccf . NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORJl)A STATUTES ~112,317 (1991). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQl;:>-,Y DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND f\IA Y BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF TIlE FOLLO\\'.. ...i: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPl.OYMENT, DEMOTION. I~EDUCTlON IN SALAH Y. RJ;PRIf\IAND. Ol~ A CIVIL PENALTY 1'\OT TO EXCEED S5.000, ('I: !'OIBI ~B. 11).<11 ,.", ". I ' tt ". , i ..~~~ ACTION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT BOARD Thursday, January 23, 1992 - 1:00 p,m. - Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 3rd floor - 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida To consider requests for variances of the Land Development Code: I. Public Hearings 1. Andrew 0 and Patricia K Rackstein for a variance to permit a three ft high chain-link fence in setback area adjoining waterfront at 167 Bayside Dr, Bayside Sub No 4, Lot 14, zoned RS 8 (single family residential). V 92-06 2. James A Jr and Sherra 1 A Mart in for variances of (1) 2.95 ft to permit dock width of 25 ftj and (2) 2.5 ft to permit boathouse 17.5 ft from an extended side property line at 145 Devon Dr, Bayside Sub, Lot 43 and land to bulkhead, zoned RS 8 (single family residential) and AL/C (aquatic lands/coastal). V 92-07 3. Ultimar Development Corp/USX Corp for a variance of 5 ft to permit construction of stairs seaward of Coastal Construction Control Line (C.e.C.L.) at 1520 Gulf Blvd, See 19- 29-15, part of M&B 43.02, zoned B (business). V 92-08 II. Stormwater Presentation by Tom Miller III. Election of Chairman and Vice-Chairman IV. Board and Staff Discussion V. Adjournment DCAB I. Public Hearings 1. Granted as requested subject to the fo 11 owi ng cond it ions: 1) the fence sha 11 be on ly 3 feet high I shall be of chain link construction, and shall be constructed as indicated on the site plan and 2) the requisite building permit shall be obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing 2. Granted as requested subject to the requisite building permit being obtained within six (6) months from the date of this public hearing 3. Granted as requested subject to the conditions: 1) that handicapped access shall meet ADA standards; 2) all necessary permits and variances sha 11 be obta i ned by the app 1 i cant from other applicable State and City review agencies and boards and 3) the requisite building permit shall be obtained within twelve (12) months from the date of this public hearing II. III. Elected: Pliska; Vice Whitney IV. Chairman, Mr. Alex Chairman, Ms. Emma V. Adjourned at 2:53 p.m. 1 01/23/92