12/11/1991 (2)
CEB
MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
DATE
I ~/; / /cr;
02 7 - c2/y:
. . . ~. . ,',., '
:,. .. '. . .
r~OI,
MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
Meeting of December 11, 1991, 3:00 p.m.
Agenda
Action
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(At the time a case is heard and date set for compliance the Board shall, at the same
time, set the fee to be assessed in case of non-compliance.)
Case No. 48-91
Case No. 56-91
Case No. 60-91
( 'Case No. 62-91
10,,"+0-....
Case No. 63-91
Case No. 64-91
Case No. 65-91
National Advertising Company
22726 U S 19 North
(Land Development Code)
Continued from 11/27/91
C & L Conti/A & E Labricciosia
653 Mandalay Avenue
(Life Safety Code)
Continued to 1/a/9?
Comply by 1) disconnecting
existing gas service to
equipment and provide no
occupancy to those units on
2nd floor by 12/16/91, and
2) remove and relocate pool
equipment and heater from
under stairwell no later than
1/30/92
Richard R Dimmitt
25191 U S 19 North
(Land Development Code)
Complied priorj if repeats
violation, may be fined
$200/day fQr each day of
repeat violation
Withdrawn
Lokey Oldsmobile, Inc
2355 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
(Land Development Code)
Complied prior
James A Jefferson
1255 Byron Avenue
(Public Nuisance Code)
Roger 0 Haber
615 Phoenix Avenue
(Land Development Code)
Comply within 10 days
(12/23/91)
Comply by applying for permit
within one week, and pick up
permit within three days of
of notification of issuance
John Holsbrook-Consolidated Bank
about 1180 S Gulf Boulevard
(Land Development Code)
To be continued to 1/8/92
Continued to 1/8/92
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Affidavits of Compliance
Accepted Affidavits
Case 91-6-2 #J. Robert Cooper
600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Case 91-6-2 #3 New York Guardian Mtg Corp
501-503 North Saturn Avenue
Case 91-8-1 #7 Goldie M Reid
, 1347 Hibiscus Street
,
--.-
HCED/cbn1211.91
12/11/91
1
~Affidavits of compliance cant.
Case 91-8-2 #4 Bessie M/Mary L Singletary
about 900 Palm Bluff
Accepted Affidavits
Case 91-8-2 #7 Willie R Bryant Jr
1107 Pennsylvania Avenue
Case 91.-9-1 17 Dolly Caloroso
1492 Byram Drive
CBse 91-9-1 #8 Donna G bpaduzzi
1 South Hercules Avenue
Case 91-9-1 #9 Arnold 0 Leifer
409 South Comet Avenue
Gasa 93...9-? #1 ~nr.k Streot
300 Feather Stree Drive
Case 91-9-2 #2 New Friendly Village. Inc
2110 Drew Street
Case 91-9-2 #4 SCG Mortgage Corp
508 Gilbert Street
Case 91-9-2 #6 Robert L Taylor
about 707 Pennsylvania Avenue
Case 91-9-2 #8 Richard S Truesdale
about 1404-1406 N Madison Avenue
(~;)case 91-10-1 #2 Patsy Cravens
1446 Court Street
Case 91-10-2 #1 Lisa J Lessmeier
2047 Sunset Grove Lane
Case 91-10-2 13 Kenneth or Diane Quinlan
1166 Brook Road
Case 91-10-2 #4 Richard A Berard
1316 Overlea Street
.]
Hcr;;a/cbn12n.91
12/11/91
NEW BUSINESS - None
ADJOURN - 4:45 P.M.
'_/
2
f7:-~
/',
~~..j
'''---"
MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
December II, 1991
Members present:
William Murray, Chairman
William A. Zinzow
D. Wayne Wyatt
Stephen D. Swanberg
Stephen Gerlach
Absent:
Bruce Cardinal, Vice-Chairman (excused)
Louise C. Riley (excused)
Also present:
Miles Lance, Assistant City Attorney
Andy Salzman, Attorney for the Board
Cynthia E. Goudeau, Secretary for the Board
In order to provide continuity for research, the items will be listed in agenda
order although not necessarily discussed in that order.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 3:00 p.m. in the Commission
Meeting Room in City Hall. He outlined the procedures and advised any aggrieved
party may appeal a final administrative order of the Municipal Code Enforcement
Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County. Any such appeal must be filed within
thirty (30) days of the execution of the order to be appealed. He noted that
Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to
have a record of the proceedings to support such an appeal.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Case No. 48-91
National Advertising Company
22726 U.S. 19 North
(Land Development Code)
Continued from 11/27/91
Miles Lance, Ass i stant City Attorney, stated the proposed sett lement agreement
was not approved by the City.
Ed Armstrong, Attorney for National Advertising Company, requested this case
be continued to the January meeting to allow additional time to prepare a defense.
~tr. Wyatt moved to continue Case No. 48-91 to the meeting of January 8, 1992.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
MCEU/mlncb12a.91
1
12/11/91
(" "
Case No. 56-91
C. & L. Conti/A. & E. Labricciosia
653 Manda1ay Avenue
(Life Safety Code)
Mr. Conti, part owner of the Royal Canadian Motel stated he is not contesting
the violation. He has had a hardship in getting someone to relocate the heater due
to the location of the pool. In response to a question, Mr. Conti said he is not
conceding to the violation. He has owed the property for eleven years, and the
heater was replaced two years ago. He has kept the property in good repair, and he
had no way of knowing he was in violation. In response to questions, Mr. Conti
stated until he received the notice of hearing with the code section, he had to rely
on what the inspector told him about the violation, and he doesn1t know how to
correct the s ituat ion. He tried to get a contractor or someone knowledgeable
regarding pool heaters, but no one would give him a direct answer. He tried to
relocate the heater and was told it had to be ten feet away from all structures or
openings; this would place it in front of the building by the sidewalk. The Utility
Department recommended a plumber who could move the heater to this location; but
this would be costly and an eyesore, making the business suffer. Mr. Conti stated
he has contracted to have the heater changed next week. In response to questions,
Mr. Conti stated changing to a heat pump was suggested, but it was also stated his
pool may be too large for a heat pump to be effective.
In response to a question, Anne Blackburn, Fire Inspector, recommended 72
hours in which to have the hazard removed, and that they not be able to rent out
space on the second floor. In response to questions, she stated the original notice
was issued March 6th, and she reinspected at least six more times since.
In response to a question, it was stated the stairwell is in the middle of the
(~; building servicing both sides.
Mr. Conti stated a fire escape at one end would not serve all the rooms. He
stated the heater has not been used since last winter. He stated the gas serves
other equipment in addition to the hot water heater.
Discussion ensued regarding where the gas line needs to be disconnected to
render it safe, and the Inspector stated disconnecting the service is only a
temporary measure.
Mr. Conti stated West Coast Plumbing and Heating promised to start work this
week indicating more, time is needed.
Discussion ensued regarding the need to disconnect the heater immediately as
it is a life safety hazard concern.
Mr. Wyatt moved that concerning Case No. 56-91 regarding violation of Section
17-3.2.1 of NFPA Life Safety Code 101 as adopted by Section 93.21 of the Clearwater
City Code on property located at 653 Mandalay Avenue aka Mandalay Unit #5, Block 84,
Lot 6, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal
Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 11th day of December, 1991, and based on the
evidence/ the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of
Fact, Conclusions of Law/ and Order.
HCEil/mincb12a,91
2
12/11/91
~(', :J; '" ~ .:. f.,' .:.... ~"",;, ."1 :. ; '~.. :" .~ 1< ... ,0': .1 . /' \~'. ~ r;" .: ';1 : !~:..~ 'r '.' ~ .; . /r r:'; :. ~:":. . ~~, :~- ,'.', -: ~ :.' ;., l, ::r~;,""'~.~ ,..; "~ ;~ : ~ : ',:: ...1:" ,~. ~ ~ _ ~~ ..':.' '~... "~" :'.1/ .' ,ri" :. .. ;.! . '0 I 1 ~.. ;jj" ',I " . + .:......../ ....: r~ . ; ~, .~. ',: '.....,... .~ :/' :'
(; "
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Anne Blackburn, Fire
,~ Inspector, Mr. Conti and Mr. Labricciosia, and viewing the evidence, it is evident
that the space beneath the stairwell, which provides the only exit from the 2nd
floor, is being used to house gas pool equipment and heaters.
The Conclusions of Law are: C. & L. Conti and A. & E. labricciosia are in
violation of Section 17-3.2.1 of NFPA Life Safety Code 101.
It is the Order of this Board that C. & l. Conti and A. & E. labricciosia
~~all comply with Seelion 17-3.2.1 of NFPA Life Safety Code 101 as adopted by the
Code of the City of Clearwater by 1) disconnecting the existing gas feed to the
equipment and provide no occupancy to those units on the second floor by 12/16/91,
and 2) removing and relocating pool equipment and heater from under the stairwell
no later than 1/30/92. If C. & L. Conti and A. & E. Labricciosia do not comply
within the time specified, the Board may order them to pay a fine of $250.00 per day
for each day the violation continues to exist past the compliance due date. If
C. & L. Conti and A. & E. labricciosia do not comply within the time specified, a
certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records
of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any
real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida
Statutes. If the violation concerns real property, the recording of a certified
copy of this Order shall constitute notice to any subsequent purchasers, successors
in interest or assigns of the violation and the findings in this Order shall be
binding upon any subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the
real property where the violation exists. Upon complying, C. & L. Conti and
A. & E. Labricciosia shall notify Anne Blackburn, the City Official who shall
inspect the property and notify the Board of compl iance. Should the violation
reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a
subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may
request a further hearing before the Board. Any aggrieved party may petition the
Board to reconsider or rehear any Board order resulting from a Public Hearing. A
Petition for Rehearing must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary
no later than thirty days after the execution of the order and prior to the filing
of any appeal. Upon receipt of the Petition, the Board will consider whether or not
to reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence
in determining whether to grant the Petition to Reconsider or Rehear. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Case No. 60-91
Richard R. Dimmitt
25191 U.S. 19 North
(Land Development Code)
No one present to represent violator.
Geri Doherty, Code Inspector, stated Dimmitt, on occasion, will park cars on
the grass in front of their business. She first observed cars on the grass October
24, 1990; notice was sent October 30th and compliance was obtained November 5, 1990.
The violation reoccurred October 12, 1991, she verbally notified them of the
violation. Photographs were taken October 30th, and a notice of recurring violation
issued. Ownership of the property was verified through the Pinellas County Property
Appraiser1s office. She submitted City composite exhibit A, photographs of the
property.
.... .~.
HCEO/mlncb12u.91
3
12/11/91
In response to a question, it was stated a ticket was not issued as the Board
has the ability to impose substantially stiffer fines.
~ Mr. Zinzow moved that concerning Case No. 60-91 regarding violation of Section
135.004(c)(I) of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 25191 U.S. 19 North
aka M&B 32/10, Sec. 32/28/16, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard
testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 11th day of
December, 1991, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board
enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Geri Doherty, Code
Inspector, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City exhibit A -
photographs of the property, it is evident that vehicles have been parked on the
grass without approval and inconsistent with the City Code, that this condition was
corrected and recurred. It is further evident that the condition was corrected
prior to this hearing.
The Conclusions of Law are: Richard R. Dimmitt is in violation of Section
135.004 (c)(1).
It is the Order of this Board that Richard R. Dimmitt shall continue
compliance with Section 135.004(c)(1) of the Code of the City of Clearwater. If
Richard R. Dimmitt repeats the violation, the Board may order him to pay a fine of
$200.00 per day for each day the violation exists after Richard R. Dimmitt is
notified of the repeat violation. Should the violation reoccur, the Board has the
authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. Should a
dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing
before the Board. Any aggrieved party may petition the Board to reconsider or
f) rehear any Board order resulting from a Public Hearing. A Petition for Rehearing
\w must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary no later than thirty days
after the execution of the order and prior to the filing of any appeal. Upon
receipt of the Petition, the Board will consider whether or not to reconsider or
.' rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence in determining
whether to grant the Petition to Reconsider or Rehear. The motion was duly seconded
and carried unanimously.
MCEB/mlncb12a.91
4
12/11 /91
Lokey Oldsmobile, Inc.
2355 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
(Land Development Code)
Complied prior
Mr. Zinzow moved to withdraw Case No. 62-91 as compliance has been obtained.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Case No. 62-91
James A. Jefferson
1255 Byron Avenue
(Public Nuisance Code)
Vicki Niemiller, Code Inspector, stated ownership of the f'eferenced property
was verified through the Property Appraiser's office, notice was sent certified and
regular mail, and the signed certified receipt was returned. She first inspected
the property October 31st at which time it was posted -and photographed. City
submitted composite exhibit AI a photographs of the property. The property was
reinspected this morning and the white ford and a trailer frame are still on the
property without current registrations.
Case No. 63-91
(' :'
~""". '
Mr. Jefferson stated he just uses the trailer to sit on, and the Inspector
informed him he still needs a current registration.
In response to questions, Ms. Niemiller stated in addition to the neeu ior
current registrations, the trailer frame has to be moved out of the setback area.
She stated the trailer would be legal when registered and may be stored behind the
setback.
Mr. Zinzow moved that concerning Case No. 63-91 regarding violation of Section
95.04 of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 1255 Byron Avenue aka
Ardmore Place Replat, Lots 61 & 62, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard
testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 11th day of
December, 1991, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board
enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Niemiller, Code
Inspector, and Mr. Jefferson, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City
composite exhibit A - photographs of the property, it is evident that there exists
debris in the form of unlicensed vehicles on the above referenced property.
The Conclusions of Law are: James A. Jefferson is in violation of Section
95.04.
It is the Order of this Board that James A. Jefferson shall comply with
Section 95.04 of the Code of the City of Clearwater within 10 days (12/21/91).
Upon failure to comply within the time specified, the City Manager may authorize the
entry upon the property and such action as is necessary to remedy the condition,
without further notice to James A. Jefferson. The City Commission may then adopt
a Resolution assessing against the property on which remedial action was taken by
the City the actual cost incurred plus $200.00 administrative cost. Such cost shall
constitute a lien against the property until paid. A Notice of lien, in such form
as the City Commission shall determine, may be recorded in the Public Records of
Pinellas County, Florida as other liens are recorded. If the owner takes remedial
action after the time specified, the City Commission may assess the property the
$200.00 administrative cost. Such cost shall constitute a lien against the property
until paid. Upon complying, James A. Jefferson shall notify Vicki Niemiller, the
City Official who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance.
Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further
hearing before the Board. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Roger Q. Haber
615 Phoenix Avenue
(Land Development Code)
Rick Rosa, Code Inspector, stated the fence at the above referenced property
was erected without a permit, and the posts and stringers face the adjoining
properties. He sent notice of the violation on November 8th by certified mail, and
the signed receipt was returned. He verified ownership through the Pinellas County
tax rolls. He submitted City exhibit A - photographs of the fence, and B - a
diagram showing the time frame of when different areas of the fence were replaced.
The Inspector recommended compl iance by requiring a permit be obtained within a week
and that the fence be removed or turned around within two weeks.
Case No. 64-91
MCEO/mlncb12il.91
5
12/11/91
r' ,
...~ ,.
Mr. Hober, in response to a question, stated he does not agree he is in
vio1ation. He submitted exhibits A and 8, a diagram and photographs of the fence.
He stated when the fence was installed in 1972, a permit was not necessary. He just
repaired what has been in existence for sixteen years. He stated he completed
replacement of the fence in May, 1990, and questioned why it is a problem now.
In response to questions regarding grandfathering, John Richter, Development
Code Manager, stated provisions for grandfathering allow existing nonconformities
to continue, but do not allow rebuilding to prolong the life of the nonconformity.
This fence was replaced in three phases, each without a permit and without meeting
orientation requirements, thereby creating a new nonconforming fence. He stated the
code is not specific as to whOrl il permit is l'cquired when replacing a cert~in
percentage of fence.
Mr. Wyatt left the meeting at 4:09 p.m.
Mr. Haber expressed concern regarding his constitutional rights, and
questioned the appeal process.
Discussion ensued regarding the hardship of turning the fence around to meet
orientation requirements; and it was stated the code does not require the fence to
be turned around, just that a finished side face the neighboring properties.
Mr. Zinzow moved that concerning Case No. 65-91 regarding violation of Section
136.016(b) of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 615 Phoenix Avenue
a/k/a Suburb Beautiful Sub., Block E, south 45 feet of Lot 7 and north 30 feet of
Lot 6, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal
Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 11th day of December, 1991, and based on the
evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of
Fact, Conclusions of Law, And Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Rick Rosa, Code
Inspector, and Roger Haber, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City and
Defendant's exhibits A & B - a diagram of the fence and photographs, it is evident
that Mr. Hober failed to apply for a permit to replace the fence at the above
referenced property.
The Conclusions of Law are: Roger O. Hober is in violation of Section
135.004 (c) (1 ) .
It is the Order of this Board that Roger O. Hober shall comply with Section
136.016(b) of the Code of the City of Clearwater by applying for a fence permit
within one week, and picking up the permit within three days of notification of
issuance. If Roger O. Haber does not comply within the time specified, the Board
may order him to pay a fine of $10.00 per day for each day the violation continues
to exist past the compliance due date. If Roger O. Hober does not comply within the
time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in
the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute
a lien against any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to
Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. If the violation concerns real property, the
recording of a certified copy of this Order shall constitute notice to any
HCEO/mlnc~12ij.91
6
12/11/91
subsequent purchasers, successors in interest or assigns of the violation and the
findings in this Order shall be binding upon any subsequent purchasers, successors
in interest or assigns of the real property where the violation exists. Upon
complying, Roger O. Hober shall notify Rick Rosa, the City Official who shall
inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should the violation
reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a
subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may
request a further hearing before the Board. Any aggrieved party may petition the
Board to reconsider or rehear any Board order resulting from a Public Hearing.
A Petition for Rehearing must be made in writing and filed with the Board Secretary
no later than thirty days after the execution of the order and prior to the filing
of any appeal. Upon receipt of the Petition, the Board will consider whether or not
to reconsider or rehear the case. The Board will not hear oral argument or evidence
in determining whether to grant the Petition to Reconsider or Rehear. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
John Holsbrook-Consolidated Bank
about 1180 S. Gulf Boulevard
(Land Development Code)
To be continued to 1/8/91
Mr. Zinzow moved to continue Case No. 65-91 to the meeting of January 8, 1992
as service of the notice of hearing has not been obtained. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
Case No. 65-91
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
() Affidavits of Compliance
Case 91-6-2 #1
Robert Cooper
600 Pennsylvania Avenue
New York Guardian Mortgage Corp.
501-503 North Saturn Avenue
Goldie M. Reid
1347 Hibiscus Street
Bessie M./Mary L. Singletary
about 900 Palm Bluff
Willie R. Bryant Jr.
1107 Pennsylvania Avenue
Dolly Caloroso
1492 Byram Drive
Donna G. Spaduzzi
1 South Hercules Avenue
Case 91-6-2 #3
Case 91-8-1 #7
MCEU/ml nc:1I12a. 91
7
12/11/91
Case 91-8-2 #4
Case 91-8-2 #7
Case 91-9-1 #7
Case 91-9-1 #8
\ '
"-'"
Case 91-9-1 #9
Case 91-9-2 #1
Case 91-9-2 #2
Case 91-9-2 #4
Case 91-9-2 #6
Case 91-9-2 #8
Case 91-10-1 #2
Case 91-10-2 f.Il
Case 91-10-2 #3
Case 91-10-2 #4
Arnold O. Leifer
409 South Comet ,Avenue
Mark Street
300 Feather Tree Drive
New Friendly Village, Inc.
2110 Drew Street
SCG Mortgage Corp.
508 Gilbert Street
Robert L. Taylor
about 707 Pennsylvania Avenue'
Richard S. Truesdale
about 1404-1406 N. Madison Avenue
Patsy Cravens
1446 Court Street
Lisa J. Lessmeier
2047 Sunset Grove Lane
Kenneth or Diane Quinlan
1166 Brook Road
Richard A. Berard
1316 Overlea Street
Mr. Zinzow moved to accept the Affidavits of Compliance in Case Nos.
91-6-2 #1, 91-6-2 #3, 91-8~1 #7, 91-8-2 #4, 91-8-2 #7, 91-9-1 #7, 91-9-1 #8,
91-9-1 #9, 91-9-2 #1, 91-9~2 #2, 91-9-2 #4, 91-9-2 #6, 91-9-2 #8, 91-10-1 #2,
91-10-2 #1/ 91-10-2 #3, and 91-10-2 #4. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS - None.
ADJOURN - The meeting adjourned at 4:44 p.m.
Attest:
r n,\U\.L~ [ ~. {) '- '"
~ary
MCEEl/mlncbl2il.91
8
12/11/91