Loading...
03/05/1992 (2) . . . CITY COMMISSION MEETING March 5, 1992 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater met in regular session at City Hall, Thursday, March 5, 1992 at 6:00 p.m., with the fOllowing members present: Rita Garvey Sue Berfield Lee Regulski William Nunamaker Richard Fitzgerald Also present: Michael J. Wright M.A. Galbraith, Jr. William C. Baker James Polatty, Jr. Cynthia E. Goudeau Mayor/Commissioner Vice-Mayor/Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner City Manager City Attorney Public Works Director Planning and Development Director City Clerk The Mayor called the meeting to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance. The invocation was offered by Father Anthony Stratis of the Greek Orthodox Church of the Holy Trinity. In order to provide continuity for research, the items will be listed in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. ITEM #3 - Service Pin Awards Two service pins were awarded to City employees. ITEM #4 - Introductions and Awards Proclamation: Women's History Month - March 1992. ITEM #5 - Presentations Clearwater Bombers' Reauest for $20.000 Fundin~ Mitch Harter reviewed the history of the Bombers and their contributions to the community. He stated he feels they have a chance at the National Championship this year. He requested $20,000 to help fund this year1s operation. Frank Walther stated they also need a tarp, a batting cage, more bleachers, a roof over the bleachers and a storage room. Discussion ensued regarding the funds already raised by the Bombers. CCmtg 3/5/92 1 ~ ..',' .., .. .; . . .' :- . , . . . The City Manager stated if the Commission approves this request, he recommends it be funded from the General Fund Surplus. Commissioner Nunamaker moved to approve the $20,000 funding. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. A question was raised regarding the addit.ional items requested. It was stated most of these would need to be considered during the budget process for the next fiscal year. It was felt the cost of the storage room should be within the City Manager's authority for approval. It was announced that the Grand Opening far this year's season would be April 10, 1992. ITEM 16 - Minutes of the Reaular Meetina of Februarv 20. 1992 Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of February 20, 1992, as recorded and submitted in written summation by the City Clerk to each Commissioner. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #7 - Citizens to be heard re items not on the AQenda. Madeline Robinson, representing the Clearwater Jaycees, requested the Commission approve bungee jumping an Clearwater Beach during Spring Break. She stated the operation has agreed to provide some of the proceeds to the Jaycees which will provide much needed funding. Discussion ensued regarding whether or not this should be allowed on public property. It was suggested the Jaycees attempt to find a location on privately owned land. Consensus of the Commission was to support the City Manager's decision to not allow bungee jumping on City owned property. The Mayor indicated staff has responded to the letter submitted by Mr. Bolam at the last meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM 18 - (Cant. from 2/20/92) Public Hearing & First Readina Ords. #5169-92. 15170-92 & #5171-92 - Annexation. Land Use 'Amendment to Medium Density Residential and RPD ZoninQ and Review of Master Final Site Plan for Island in the Sun Mobile Home Park located at the SE corner of Drew St. and Hampton Rd., Sec. 17-29-16t M&B 12.01, 41 acres m.o.l. (Brown/Kennedy/Roberts A91-14, LUP91-15)(PLD, ~ This request is to annex an existing 315 lot mobile home park into the City under RPD zoning. The park has been fully developed under Pinellas County standards. Staff review of the site plan has not been completed, but will be within the next month. This annexation and land use plan amendment CCmtg 3/5/92 2 . . . must be submitted to Pinellas County and the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) before they can be finalized. Action by the DCA is not expected to be taken before June, after which time the land use plan and zoning amendments will be submitted to the Commission for second reading. The site plan, with any comments from staff, will be submitted to the Commission in April, and the Commission will have ample time to review and approve it simultaneously with the second reading of the land use plan and zoning amendments. The applicant's property contains approximately 41 acres. This parcel is included in an agreement between the property owner and the City executed on July 14, 1989. This agreement also covered 57 acres north of Drew Street owned by the applicants which has previously been annexed into the City. The property is contiguous to the City on its north, east and west sides and a portion of its south side. The annexation will not create any new properties within an enclave, but will reduce an existing enclave, and divide the remainder into two parts. The City presently provides potable water service to the property. Sanitary sewerage is presently provided by the property owners who have a private wastewater treatment plant north of Drew Street. The owners have retained a private engineer to examine the feasibility of connecting the entire park into the City's sanitary sewerage system. The development restrictions placed upon the property by the County include less restrictive setbacks and minimum lot areas than are permitted by the City's Land Development Code for RMH (Mobile Home Park) districts. It is proposed the applicants' parcel be zoned RPO with the City accepting the approved County site plan as the development plan for the parcel. This will constitute acceptance of the development as it now stands, and eliminate the need for future variances of presently existing non~conformities prior to being able to obtain permits for any improvements on lots with such non~ conformities. The restrictions in the site plan as approved by the City would become the development restrictions within this mobile home park. Staff has examined the area designated on the site plan as Retention Area 4 in the northeast part of the applicants' property to ascertain if it should be zoned as AL/I, Aquatic Lands~Interior. Staff recommends this area be addressed through approval of the site plan rather than separately zoned, as it has been by the County, and believes its designation as a detention area on the site plan will provide assurance it will continue to remain undeveloped and serve as a retention/open area. . The Planning and Zoning Board, acting as the Local Planning Agency, recommended approval of the annexation, zoning and land use plan proposals. With the recommendation that staff fully investigate the sidewalk easement shown on the site plan relative to right~of~way and utility needs along Hampton Road. Ed Armstrong, attorney representing the applicant, requested the land Use Plan designation be changed to Low Density Residential. He indicated the park is slightly over Low Density but this would allow them to complete the CCmtg 3/5/92 3 . annexation without going to the state for approval. The Land Use Plan can be changed to Medium Density when the City completes its changes for consistency. The Planning and Development Director indicated this would be agreeable. A citizen indicated there are 320 lots in the park, not 315 as reported. Discussion ensued regarding this discrepancy and it was indicated this would be resolved prior to second reading of the ordinances. Commissioner Nunamaker moved to approve the annexation, land use plan amendment designation of low density residential and a zoning atlas amendment to RPD for the subject property. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. . The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5169-92 for first reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass Ordinance #5169- 92 on first reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: t1Ayes": Regulski. Nunamaker, fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey. "Naysll: None. . The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5170-92 for first reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Berfield moved to pass Ordinance #5170-92 on first reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: lIAyes": Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey. "NaysU: None. The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5171-92 for first reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass Ordinance #5171- 92 on first reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Regulski, Nunamaker. Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey. "Naysll: None. ITEM"9 - Alcoholic Beverage Separation Distance Variance for property (Skipper'S Ice Cream Cafe and Eatery) located at 20505 US19N, Suite 101, Clearwater Mall, Sec. 17-29-16, M&B 32.01 & 32.02 (Trizec AS92-05)(PLD) T~e applicant is requesting a new 2-COP alcoholic beverage license designation which permits on premises consumption of beer and wine and no package sales. The establishment is an existing restaurant named "Skipper1s Ice Cream Cafe and Eateryll located in Clearwater Mall. According to the applicant, this establishment will operate as a full service restaurant, . CCmtg 3/5/92 4 '\ . . . serving food and ice cream. The applicant wants to supplement his food services with beer and wine. A separation variance is required because the subject property is less than 200 feet from another similarly licensed alcoholic beverage establishment, Schnickel Fritz. The property is presently zoned CC (Commercial Center) District. The subject property has an interior floor area of 2,000 square feet. It will utilize an indoor seating capacity of 100 seats which is the maximum allowable occupancy for this restaurant as determined by the Fire Marshal. There will be no outdoor seating. There are no additional parking requirements for a 2- COP beyond that required for Clearwater Mall. The proposed hours of operation are 7:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Mondays through Saturdays, and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Sundays. The associated conditional use permit has been approved by the Planning and Zoning Board subject to the following conditions: 1) The sales of alcoholic beverages shall be restricted to consumption on premises with no package sales; 2) The requisite occupational license shall be obtained within six months from the date of this public hearing; and 3) The applicant shall obtain approval from the Commission for a variance to the 200 foot separation distance from another similarly licensed 2-COP on premises consumption sales establishment. The police department has shown no negative comments regarding this establishment. In response to a question, it was indicated another 2-COP license had previously been at this location. Commissioner Regulski moved to approve a variance of 200 feet to allow alcoholic beverage sales zero feet from a similarly licensed establishment. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #10 - Alcoholic Severa e Se aration Distance Variance for property (Phar- Mar located at 1200 S Missouri Ave, Store #200, Sunshine Mall, Sec. 15-29-15, M&B 34.01 and Sec. 22-29-15, M&B 21.01, 21.02 & 21.12 (Taylor/Fusco Corp. AB92-06)(PLD) The applicant is opening a discount drug store at the south end of Sunshine Mall, and as in other Pharmor stores, wishes to sell beer and wine as a convenience to his customers (2-APS). Approximately 139 feet north of the drug store, the applicant will operate a liquor store with a 3-PS license. A conditional use permit was approved for the liquor store on September 17, 1991. No separation variances were required for this use. The applicant's two businesses are within the same structure and are considered to have separation of zero feet. There are no other package sales establishments within the mall. Previously, Rite-Aid, which operated in the mall, had a 2-APS license, but CCmtg 3/5/92 5 . . . they'have closed. There are three restaurants in the mall which serve alcoholic beverages, but do not provide package sales. The applicant states their usual store configuration is to have a liquor store in conjunction with their discount drug store, and to provide beer and wine sales at the drug store. The drug store is within 45 feet of Belleair Elementary School grounds, and requires a variance to the separation requirement of 300 feet. The school backs up to Sunshine Mall. There are two six foot high chain link fences, 25 feet apart, along the south side of the mall parking area which separate the school from the mall. The fence nearest the mall is on a concrete wall which varies in height from a few inches near Missouri to eight feet at the front of the mall, tapering back down to five feet at the west property line. The nearest public entrance into the applicant's store is just over 300 feet from the school's rear property. There are delivery/service doors at the south side of the applicant's building, 45 feet from the school's property. The fence on the school side has a vehicle gate which appears to be kept locked by the school. Access to the school is from Lakeview Road, which is 700 feet from the applicant1s establishment. Neither the police department or other staff have made any objections to the applicant conducting package sales of beer and wine at this location. The Planning and Zoning Board granted a conditional use permit for package beer and wine sales subject to the fallowing conditions: I} The sale of alcoholic beverages shall be restricted to package sales of beer and wine only with no consumption on the premises; 2) There shall be no deliveries between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.; and 3) The requisite occupational license shall be obtained within six months from the date of this public hearing. Jeff Hamilton, representing Phar-Mor, indicated they do not intend to sell cold beer and wine. One citizen spoke in opposition due to the proximity of the school. Commissioner Regulski moved to approve a variance of 255 feet to allow alcoholic beverage sales 45 feet from a school zone and 200 feet to allow alcoholic beverage sales zero feet from a similarly licensed establishment with the condition there be no sales of chilled alcoholic beverages. The motion was duly seconded. Upon the vote being taken: Commissioners Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald and Mayor Garvey voted "Aye"; Commissioner Berfield voted llNay". Motion carried. ITEM #11 - Public Hearin & First Readin Ord. #5181-92 - Pro osed Comprehensive Text Plan Amendments A~G PLD Several text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are needed to reflect changes which have occurred over the past year. First, increased development densities on Clearwater Beach have been recommended for consideration as an incentive for redevelopment in accordance with FEMA and state and local CCmtg 3/5/92 6 '-.'1 . . . standards by the Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force. Second, the Downtown Development Plan has been moved up in schedule due to recent, unforeseen property acquisitions; this necessitates adjusting several project schedules within the Plan, as well as making some amendments associated with the Downtown Development District Comprehensive Plan classification. Third, clarification of the intent behind Policy 19.1.1 (relating to the Coastal Construction Control Line) has been developed by staff. Fourth, adjustments to the Capital Improvements Element are necessary to reflect the current City Capital Improvement Program. Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to approve the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. The City Attorney presented. Ordinance #5181-92 for first reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Nunamaker moved to pass Ordinance #5181- 92 on first reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey. lINays": None. ITEM #12 - Public Hearing - Vacatinq Hart Street riaht-of-w8Y lying south of Harts 2nd Add., Blk 3, part of Lot 8, together with Lots 9. 10 and vacated alley lying between said lots and north of Jones Sub. of N;cholsons Add., Blk 3, Lots 6-8, and part of Lot 9 (Gangelhoff/Gulf Marine V92-01)(PW) The City Manager requested this item be continued. Commissioner Berfield moved to continue this item to the scheduled meeting of April 2, 1992. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM 113 - Public Hearing - Amendment to Final Statement of Community Develooment Objectives and Drojected use of funds for FY91.92 CDaG DrOQram Staff requested this item be continued so it could be brought forward with recommendations for HOME fund utilization. Commissioner Berfield moved to continue this item to the next regularly scheduled meeting of March 19, 1992. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Public Hearing - Second Reading Ordinances ITEM *14 - (Cant. from 2/20/92) Ord. #5178-92 - AmendinQ Chi Chi Rodriquez Youth Foundation aQreement The City Manager requested this item be continued. CCmtg 3/5/92 7 . Commissioner Nunamaker moved to continue this item to the next regularly scheduled meeting of March 191 1992. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM 115 - Ord. #5179-92 - First Quarter operating budget amendments The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5179-92 for second reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass and adopt Ordinance 15179.92 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded. Upon roll call. the vote was: IIAyesu: Regulski. Nunamaker, fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey. IINaysll: None. ITEM #16 - Ord. #5180-92 - First Quarter capital imorovement orogram budget amendments The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5180.92 for second reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass and adopt Ordinance #5180-92 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded. Upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Regulski, Nunamaker. Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey. "Naysll: None. . CITY MANAGER REPORTS CONSENT AGENDA (Items #17-36) - Approved as submitted less Items 20, 27, 28 & 31. Agreements - Approved. ITEM #18 - lease Aareement for marina buildinQ room 29 to Dockside Accountinp, P.A., for a five yea! period, 4/1/92-3/31/97, for a total sum of $10,500 (MR) Bids & Contracts - Awarded. ITEM #19 - Annual contract for purchase of various size steel qas pipe to L. B. Foster. Maitland. Fl, for the period 3/9/92-3/8193 at an est. cost of "$42.110 (GAS) ITEM #20 - See page 10 ITEM #21 - Contract for roof replacement at Fire Station #4 located at 1700 N Belcher Rd.. to The Dean Company. Clearwater. Fl, for $19,081 (6S) . CCmtg 3/5/92 8 . ITEM '22 - Purchase of one 1992 International 2wto~ Truck with Flat Bed. 4x4 Beac~ Model to Sun State International Trucks. Tampa~t for $43,591: financing to be provided under City's master lease-purchase agreement with AT&T Credit Corp. (GS) ITEM 123 - Purchase of five front-end loadina sanitation vehicles to Crane Carrier Co.. Tulsa. OK, for $656,935; financing to be provided under City's master lease-purchase agreement with AT&T Credit Corp. (liS) ITEM 24 - Purchase of 20 Plastic Shower Columns for Clearwater Beach public showers from Rotocast Plastic Products. Inc., for. 20,380 (PR) ITEM 1~5 - Amendment to consultina enaineering services contract with KinQ En ineerin Associates Inc. for the desi n af landmark Drive, authorization to pay 16,932 for services not included in the original contract and increasing the total to $171,932 (PW) . ITEM #26 - Contract for East Plant Outfall Construction Co.. Largo. FL, for $660,305 Citizens & Staff Requests - Approved. ITEM #27 - See page 10 ITEM 128 - See page 12 ITEM #29 - Cant. to 4 2 90 Res. #92-21 - Re etitive Loss Plan - Communit Cant. from 2/20/92 Inter-Ba Marine ITEM #31 - See page 12 Change Orders - Approved. ITEM #32 - C.O.i5 for the Stevenson's Creek Channel Improvements Phase I to Kimmins Contractina Corp.. Tampa. FL, increasing the amount by $55.565 for a new total of $1,339,330,42 (PW) Plans & Plats - Approved. ITEM #33 - Preliminary Site Plan for Pinellas County Utilities Building Downtown Clearwater ParkinQ Lot located between Park St. to the N, Pierce St., to the S and bounded by Ft. Harrison Ave. on the W (PlD) Authorize the DRC to approve the final site plan subject to: prior to review of the final site plan by the ORC, the landscaping shall be revised to meet the current requirements. . CCmtg 3/5/92 9 Receipt & Referral - Received and Referred. ITEM 5 - Pro osed LOTCA to allow veterinar offices and animal or boardinu facilities in the Commercial Center zoninq district . CITY ATTORNEY Agreements, Deeds & Easements ITEM 136 - Mutual Aid A reement for voluntar Officers Sheriff of Pinellas County Commissioner Berfield moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted less Items 20, 27, 28 and 31 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #20 - Contract for burglar and fire alarm service and monitorina for 1 vear to Maire Company. Clearwater. FL, at an est. cost of $13.140 with an option to renew for an additional year at the same pricing (GS) . Bids were solicited for burglar and fire alarm service and monitoring. The Maire Company was the only response to the bid solicitation. Randy Freibaugh, Sales Manager, National Guardians Security Services Corporation, has sent correspondence protesting this bid award. In light of this, the City Manager requested this item be continued. Commissioner Berfield moved to continue this item. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. In 1984 the Garage Fund purchased the 9.52 acre parcel fronting Hercules, just east of the Clearwater Executive Airpark, from the Campbell family. The purchase included seller financing over ten years at 9.5% interest. Three payments of $64,000 each remain to be paid in November 1992, 1993 and 1994. This property was originally intended for use as a site for , . CCmtg 3/5/92 10 . . . the new city garage. When the property on Grand Avenue became available at an attractive price, the Commission elected to locate the garage there instead and the Campbell property has remained vacant since that time. In 1989, the Solid Waste Fund purchased 9.99 acres, just north of Clearwater Executive Airpark from Pinellas County School Board. This property was intended as a site for constructing a new solid waste and recycling complex. Subsequent environmental concerns including the potential danger of birds interfering with aircraft have required the City to seek alternate locations for the solid waste complex, the most attractive of which seems to be the vacant Campbell property site owned by the Garage Fund. Even though the City will actually retain title to both parcels, it is important that ownership of the Campbell property be officially transferred to the Solid Waste fund to ensure proper enterprise fund accounting for the new solid waste complex. Since Solid Waste does not have sufficient cash to buy the Campbell property outright, the land swap is proposed. If Solid Waste assumes the remaining $192,000 of debt on the Campbell property, the Garage Fund's remaining equity in the Campbell property is $750,014. This is only $1,646 lower than the cost basis of the airpark school board site. In lieu of requiring the Garage fund to transfer cash in this small amount, its proposed, for accounting purposes, to consider this as a capital contribution from the Solid Waste Fund to the Garage Fund to complete the interfund property transfers at cost. The Clearwater Airport Authority has formally requested that the airpark school board site be transferred to the airpark for use as a safety zone and a possible runway extension. City staff is presently reviewing this request and any such subsequent interfund property transfer will be brought back to the Commission for consideration at a later time. The City Manager indicated he is scheduling this for discussion in late April. Marvin Moore, Chairman of the Airport Authority, stated he wanted to make sure that tonight1s action would not impact the possibility of the airpark obtaining the property. It was indicated that tonight's function was primarily to resolve an accounting problem. Commissioner Berfield moved to approve the interfund swap of 9.9 acres, currently owned by the Solid Waste Fund, known as the airpark school board site, for 9.52 acres, currently owned by the Garage Fund, known as the Campbell property; to authorize the Solid Waste Fund to assume the remaining $192,000 of debt on the Campbell property and authorize a capital contribution of $1,646 from Solid Waste to the Garage Fund to complete the transfer at cost in lieu of requiring any current interfund cash transfers and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. CCmtg 3/5/92 11 . . . 28 - Waiver of Lawn Meter Removal Fee for 90 da s retroactive to 2 1 2 Ordinance 15162-91 was approved by the Commission in January of 1992, increasing the water and sewer rates for implementation on February I, 1992. Within this ordinance was a modification to the existing lawn water rate structure, increasing the rates in order to encourage conservation. Also included was an increase in lawn meter removal from $50 to $70. Many customers were highly upset when they received their utility bill for the first time under the new rate. Some elected to have their lawn meter removed. A few of these customers became more irate when they discovered that the removal rate had also increased. This impact has created a very difficult time for Utility Customer Support Division personnel. It is recommended that a grace period of 90 days be granted in which a customer could have their lawn meter removed at no cost. This waiver of cost would be for removal only, not for downsizing. The waiver of cost would cover a 90 day period retroactively to February I, the effective day of the rate increase. Discussion ensued regarding concerns that people may not understand that it will cost them more to irrigate their lawns through the regular house meter than through the lawn meter. Concerns were also expressed that there was no provision for waiver or reduced cost for downsizing of lawn meters. It was also stated that one of the major concerns is if a person uses no water through the lawn meter, they are still charged for the lawn meter being there ready to serve. As an example, a 1 1/2 inch lawn meter costs $31.70 a month, even if no water is used through that lawn meter. Concerns were expressed that people would have their lawn meters removed and then find out that this was a mistake. Concerns were also expressed whether or not the waiver should be limited to single family homes. Commissioner Berfield moved to continue this item to the next regularly scheduled meeting of March 19, 1992 in order for staff to do some further investigation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM 131 - Letter of Support for the CHA purchase of the Hamptons located at 1099 McMullen-Booth Road (PlO) The Clearwater Housing Authority (CHA) is attempting to purchase the Hamptons located at 1099 McMullen-Booth Road. CHA staff has proposed that an existing housing authority affiliated private non-profit entity own and manage the facility after purchase. The letter of support is attached and mandates no legally binding financial commitments at this time. The CHA will possibly need a guarantee of the bond or mortgage by the City to finance the acquisition of this property. The waiver of the payment in lieu of taxes for CCmtg . 3/5/92 12 . . . the first five years is also another possible request. These requests will be presented to the Commission at a later date after the CHA determines the financial feasibility of this acquisition. ~HA s~att proposes the purchase as a highly cost effective way to increase the number of public housing units in Clearwater. Fifty-five, very low income, units are proposed. This;s greater than the fifty units in the existing Ralph Richards public housing complex. It is also the CHA's plan to gradually increase the number of units for the very low income once financing allows. The 275 unit facility is proposed to be divided between 55 very low income units, 170 market rate units and 50 existing units that were formerly assisted living service units. The complex was built in 1987 at a cost of $28 million and consists of 155 one bedroom, one bath apartments and 120 two bedroom, two bath apartments. The eight-story highrise apartment building has a lower level activity area which includes a restaurant, recreation hal', beauty parlof, woodshop, ice cream parlor, ceramic shop and additional unfinished fooms. There is also a swimming pool and covered parking. One potential interest the City has in this project is to use several rooms on the ground floor as a public recreation facility. The Parks and Recreation Director reports this is a beautiful facility which could provide needed social and recreational opportunities for young and senior adults. Further, he feels that existing staff could program the facility with the assistance of contract instructors. The owner of this facility is Resolution Trust Corporation. The asking price is $14 million. Howard Groth, Chairman of the CHA, stated federal funding for construction of elderly housing projects has dried up and last December, the CHA had established elderly housing as the number one priority. He stated due to S&l failures, this has caused problems for the Hamptons and the Resolution Trust Corporation has the building for sale. He stated this provides an opportunity to provide housing for the elderly. He stated the Hamptons is a magnificent facility and they are trying to take care of the problems of the elderly. He stated if it were purchased by a private corporation, their motive would be profit. He stated he wished the residents would sit down and talk with the CHA and they will be assured their interests will be protected. In response to a question, Mr. Groth indicated there would be no change in the quality of life of the current residents. He stated the facility is not completed with a bank and dispensary area not in use which the CHA would hope to complete. In response to questions, it was indicated 80% of the facility will be at market rental rates with 20% being subsidized. It was indicated the age limitations for the facility wou"d be 55 years of age for the rental units and 62 years of age for the subsidized units. CCmtg 3/5/92 13 ~ . ,~ , . ':"~.l . ' l ':.....,.. '., :'.' . .',:~'i..4~ <7';~,';.: '"" . .', : . ,. '.:. ,'", \....' .>_, . . . It was indicated the CHA would maintain the amenities of the facility. It has not been decided whether or not they would be limited to the residents. In response to questions regarding rental rates, Deborah Vincent, Executive Director of the Housing Authority, indicated the rates are determined by which services the residents choose but initial data would indicate the rental rates would decrease if the CHA purchased the property. Margaret Graff, representing the residents of the Hamptons, stated a number of letters have been submitted by the current residents in opposition to this. She stated more people are looking at buying units in the facility now that the parking problem with the Kapok Tree has been resolved and the legal dispute has ended. She stated when they purchased the property, they had been led to believe that an assisted living facility would be constructed. She stated the residents have not had an opportunity to review this proposal fully and they are requesting a decision be tabled to give them a chance to express their viewpoint. Discussion ensued regarding whether or not the facility would stay the same if private individuals purchased the property. It was stated there are 16 contracts for life care that would have to be considered by the bidders for the property. In response to a question, Ms. Vincent indicated the CHA intended to maintain the facility as a residence for the elderly. She also indicated that an assisted living facility would not be constructed immediately, however, it could be considered in the future. In response to questions, it was indicated the letter of support was not a necessity in order for the CHA to bid on the property. A resident of the Hamptons indicated the reason the facility was not fully occupied was the lack of the assisted care facility. He stated private investors will keep the people there. He indicated the residents are not looking for lower rents and the publicity regarding possible purchase by the HA will make marketing of the empty units more difficult. Discussion ensued regarding the bidding process and Ms. Vincent indicated the bid has already been prepared and they are simply asking for Commission support at this time. It was stated the CHA can act independently of the City and if the City does not approve'the letter, the CHA will go forward with the bid. Another resident of the Hamptons indicated the building was not suitable for what the CHA has in mind. He stated it was built as a retirement building and the residents there cherish their way of life. He stated the building would be 100% occupied if the assisted living facility were in place. A citizen spoke in support of the.current residents of the Hamptons stating that by supporting the CHAt the City would be reducing the tax base. CCrntg 3/5/92 14 . . . He stated the property should remain on the tax roll and that the people bought into the project with an understanding of a certain standard of living. Ms. Vincent indicated they are considering the purchase as they can purchase this facility for less than they could build a lesser facility. In response to a question, Ms. Vincent indicated they had looked at other facilities but none of them had met the CHA's requirements. Further discussion ensued regarding whether or not this facility was appropriate for the CHA's use. It was expressed that at least the CHA has a known track record. Commissioner Berfield moved to not provide a letter of support for the Clearwater Housing Authority's purchase of the Hamptons. The motion was duly seconded. Upon the vote being taken: Commissioners Berfield aod Regulski voted IlAye"; Commissioners Nunamaker, Fitzgerald and Mayor Garvey voted llNayu. Motion failed. Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to approve the letter of support for the Clearwater Housing Authority.s purchase of the Hamptons. The motion was duly seconded. Upon the vote being taken: Commissioner Fitzgerald, Nunamaker and Mayor Garvey voted "Aye": Commissioners Regulski and Berfield voted IINayt'. Motion carried. The meeting recessed from 8:34 p.m. to 8:46 p.m. OTHER ITEMS ON CITY MANAGER REPORT ITEM 137 - Examine and consider various suaaestions oertaininQ to Clearwater Beach traffic 0 erations and direction as to im lementation of an Commission choices reqardinQ alternatives PW The Clearwatef Beach Association has requested the Commission continue this item for two weeks. This request is based on their belief that staff presented the Clearwater Beach Blue Ribbon Task Force's position differently than the Task Force had originally presented it. They are requesting a meeting of staff, the task force chairman and the chairman of the Clearwater Beach Association traffic committee along with others. Fred Thomas, Chairperson of the Clearwater Beach Association, stated they have asked for the delay in order to allow them to meet with staff. The City Manager requested that if the item is continued, it be continued until April 2, 1992 as staff would not have time to prepare the item for the March 19, 1992 meeting. Commissioner Fitzgera'ld moved to continue this item to the regularly scheduled meeting of April 2, 1992. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. CCmtg 3/5/92 15 '. '. I .'", " . ...., ~..I.'.. I~I: ...._.' ",. .... .' d .' . " : ' . 1, . o~: '. I '" I . . . . ITEM 138 ~ Consider various alternatives and rate structures for psrkina on Clearwater Beach and the elimination of the subsidy from the ParkinQ Fund to the Bridge Fund effective 10/1/91 (eM) The City currently has 2,436 parking spaces on Clearwater Beach, of which 1,739 (South Gulfview and Rockaway lots plus others) are 50 cents per hour metered spaces, 447 (on street rights-af-ways and small lots not directly adjacent to the beach) are 20 cents/30 cents per hour metered spaces and 250 (Pier 60 lot) are cashier spaces at 75 cents per hour. Based on discussions at Monday's worksession, staff is recommending the Pier 60 and South Gulfview lots have $1.00 per hour attendant parking, all other beach lots be 75 cents per hour, the Sand Key lot be 75 cents per hour, meters on the beach currently at 20 or 30 cents per hour be increased to 50 ,cents an hour and that parking permits be sold allowing parking at Pier 60, South Gulfview and Rockaway lots for Clearwater residents for $65 for six months or an annual fee of $120. Parking permits currently sell for 50 cents per half day. $1 per day, $10 per month and $100 per year for the Marina and Civic Center lots. These rates have not been increased since 1983 and it is recommended these fees be increased to $1 per half day, $2 per day, $15 per month and $120 per year. Parking passes/permits issued for other lots will not be valid in the Marina or Civic Center lots. Regarding the Clearwater Pass Bridge Subsidy, the City collects the money from the 662 parking meters on the lots at the County owned Sand Key Park. Through its interlocal agreement with Pinellas County, the City remits 40% of the revenues to the County, retaining 60% for the City. During fiscal 88/89 the Commission approved the transfer of the City's share of the Sand Key Lot revenues to the Bridge Fund to enable timely defeasance of the outstanding Bridge Revenue Bonds and the elimination of the Bridge toll concurrent with the opening of the new federal/state funded bridge. Recent analysis of the Bridge Fund operating results by Dan Deignan. Finance Director, indicates the actual results of operation of the Bridge Fund have exceeded his earlier projections allowing earlier than originally anticipated defeasance of the Bonds. The subsidy from the Parking Fund is no longer needed to liquidate the debt. Betty Deptula, Assistant City Manager, indicated that on an operating basis, the parking fund did make money of $322,000 to $323,000 a year. She stated that due to several transfers to support other operations, the"fund shows a loss. Those operations which are funded by the Parking Fund are the marine patrol (discontinued January 1, 1991) for $15,440, the Jolly Trolley for $184,000, beach cleaning for $103,210, police beach patrol for $269,374, Clearwater Pass Bridge subsidy for $901601. As has been indicated. one of the recommendations is to discontinue the Clearwater Pass Bridge subsidy. In response to a question, the City Manager indicated the reason for the recommended changes is to raise the funds needed to cover the parking operation as well as cover the subsidies approved by the Commission. CCmtg 3/5/92 ~ 16 . . . Discussion ensued regarding the recommendation for attendant parking although it was more costly than metered parking. It was stated that attendant parking is more user friendly and there are no parking tickets to be given. It also allows for merchant validation of parking and resident passes and provides a bettef degree of cash monitoring. Concerns were expressed regarding accessibility with the major concern being everybody leaving the lot at the same time having a negative impact. It was stated that with the current recommendation, the need for a flat rate of $1 after 7:00 p.rn for Pier 60 lot would no longer be needed. In response to a question, it was indicated that cruising is not a problem during the day but traffic stacking is. David Little, Chairman of the Traffic Subcommittee of the former Blue Ribbon Task Force, stated the task force felt that higher fees would not be a problem when people parking there know they would not get parking tickets. He stated there is a need for more landscaping and there is a cruising problem in the parking lots. Attendant parking would control this. He stated people exiting the lots at the same time with attendant parking provides a better valve to control traffic. He suggested they look at the configuration of the parking lots and redesign them as stacking is a problem. ,Fred Thomas, representing the Clearwater Beach Association, stated they concur with the task force's recommendations regarding attendant parking. They suggest making the Pier 60 and South Gulfview lots into one lot and change the access point so that it does not create the stacking problems at the current entrance to the Pier 60 lot. He stated attendant parking does stop cruising and at spring break time. the hourly rate could be raised. A citizen raised a question regarding whether or not the meters would be taken out if attendant parking is instituted and it was indicated this would be the plan. Three citizens spoke in opposition to the attendant parking stating it is not user friendly, it causes backups and that the increase in the parking fee was not acceptable during these economic times. Discussion ensued regarding whether or not attendant parking is needed and it was suggested that the redesign of the parking lots be considered. The City Manager indicated it would take several months to accomplish if the recommendation is approved as recommended. He stated staff would come back in increments regarding attendant parking, redesign, etc. He stated they would plan to have this in place by June of 1992. Commissioner Regulski moved to approve the following changes in the Parking System: Pier 60 and South Gulfview Lots will provide $1 per hour attendant parking: all other beach lots will be 75 cents per hour metered parking: the Sand Key lot will be 75 cents per hour metered parking: meters on the beach currently at 20 cents or 30 cents an hour will be increased to 50 CCmtg 3/5/92 17 . . . cents an houri permits for the Marina and Civic Center lots will be increased to $1 per half day, $2 per day, $15 per month and $120 per year; parking permits allowing parking without paying the hourly rate at Pier 60, South Gulfview Of Rockaway lots will be sold to Clearwater residents for $65 for six months or an annual fee of $120: and, the subsidy from the Parking Fund to the Bridge Fund will be eliminated effective October 1, 1991. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM '39 - Reauest for Qualification for the East End Project (eM) The Request for Qualification (RFQ) for the East End Project represents a significant benchmark in the downtown revitalization process. Some years ago, City officials raised the prospect of using city owned property at the Annex site for development purposes. Over the past two years, staff has explored, analyzed and refined this idea. In 1990, the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) made the decision to commission a market assessment of the downtown. The Request for Proposal process which resulted in the selection of Hunter Interests Inc. of Annapolis, Maryland was accomplished in a public manner with input from interested downtown groups. In November, 1990, the Downtown Market Assessment was completed. This impartial study concluded that a mixed use project of 200,000 to 250,000 square feet would be successful in the downtown. The Market Assessment confirmed earlier demographic information. In January, 1991, staff began to assemble land in and around the Annex property already owned by the City. The objective was straightforward; to secure more regular boundaries and to have access to Court Street. The land parcel was expanded from approximately 15 acres to 20 acres. With the acquisition of the remaining parcels to form a corridor to Court Street, land holdings could reach 25 acres. The idea behind the RFQ is to generate interest in a "catalyst" project. A project of this nature has the potential of stimulating other development not only on the east end of the downtown but in the core and the western perimeter of the area. The project would be modest in size but, more effective in stimulating downtown growth than piecemeal activities that focus on vacant stores. National retailers have demonstrated a preference for being located in proximity to other retailers in an environment that has amenities and will attract people with a desirable product mix. There is no need for the Commission to endorse or commit to anything other than a solicitation of qualifications and later proposals and concepts. The City will reserve the right to accept or reject any and all proposals, either in whole Of in part with or without cause or cancel the RFQ. Clearly, no obligations for acceptance are inherent in the process. The redevelopment goals contained in the RFQ are designed solely to solicit interest. There is no promise of subsidy or inducement that would place the City on the same path taken by other communities. Instead, there is an emphasis on innovative planning and financial strategies and techniques. CCmtg 3/5/92 18 . . . The City Manager indicated that for the past 18 months to 2 years, staff has been trying to develop a plan to market the land at Cleveland and Missouri. He stated photographs and other graphics will be added to what is before the Commission tonight. Plans are to send this to the 47 developers who have already expressed an interest as well as others who may request it. He stated the RfQ simply solicits development interest to see what developers feel could be developed on the property. He indicated the CRA and Downtown Development Board (OOB) areas are about the same. He emphasized the only CRA money spent in this area, in the ten years that the eRA has been in existence, is the purchase of the CETA building. All other eRA funds have been spent further west on Cleveland Street. He stated he believes there is potential for the project and consultants and developers have affirmed this belief. Concerns were expressed regarding the inclusion of a City Hall being done by the developer. The City Manager indicated that decision has not been made and he feels the proper time for that decision is when all the variables are known. He again stated the RFQ simply solicits proposals. Jerry Sternstein. Economic Development Director, indicated the DDB has committed money to send out the RFQ and the City will have no out~of~pocket expenses in this regard. . In response to a question by a citizen, the Economic Development Director indicated the RFQ solicits qualifications and no development concept. He stated if qualified developers are found, a short list will be complied and they will be asked to provide development concepts. He stated the project ;s not driven by the City Hall. The City Manager indicated, however, if the City Hall annex property ;s developed. people in the City Hall annex will need a new site. Discussion ensued regarding whether or not the City Hall should be a part of the submittal. It was indicated that a new City Hall has been discussed for 15 years. Fred Thomas. representing the Clearwater Beach Association, stated the board of that association was unanimously opposed to the East End project and feel efforts regarding downtown needed to be redirected to the area between the Bay and Myrtle Avenue. Discussion ensued regarding the history of discussions for downtown and it was indicated this had been under discussion for a number of years. Mary Vaughn, representing the Oowntown Development Board, stated the DDS had coordinated a market plan to attract development to revitalize downtown. She stated interest has been expressed by more than 40 developers and the City needs to find out what they have to say. She urged the Commission to go forward with the RFQ. Marvin Moore. former City Commissioner, indicated that during his time on the Commission. the property around the annex was being acquired for CCmtg 3/5/92 19 . . . parking and not for a new City Hall. He also expressed concerns regarding a former black cemetery which had been in this location and asked that this be researched. The City Manager indicated this has been examined. Three citizens spoke in support of the RFQ stating it is time to get an indication of interest. Concern was expressed that perhaps the project was too small. Some concern was expressed regarding the selection process. The Economic Development Director referred to the flow chart with the agenda item and stated the RFQ has been written in such a way that it could become an RFP should the Commission decide it wishes to do so. He stated, however, there is nothing to which the City is being committed. A question was raised regarding a proposal of the City Manager to have a selection committee to review the proposals. The City Manager indicated he has not fully defined this, however, his thought is to bring together knowledgeable people that would not have a personal interest in the development to help review the proposals. He stated if this should be pursued, the whole process would be open to the Sunshine Law. Jim 8erfield, former City Commissioner, stated when he was on the Commission purchasing land around the annex was not presented as being for a City Hall. Discussion ensued regarding the history of property acquisition in this area. It was emphasized that no decision has been made regarding the City Hall. Some concerns were expressed regarding the timing of the project. Two citizens spoke in opposition to the RFQ stating that the timing was not right, the economic factors did not lend itself to development at this time and the citizens were not aware of the project. A petition was submitted in opposition. Oiscussion ensued regarding whether or not to go forward with the RFQ. It was stated that basically it is going out to find if there is anyone interested in developing the property. There are no commitments regarding this and no decision has been made regarding the City Hall. It was emphasized that money has been spent to assemble the property and that a study was authorized in 1987 or 1988 to see what was needed for a City Hall. Commissioner Nunamaker moved to authorize the issuance of a Request for . Qualification (RFQ) for the "East End" Project and authorize the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) to act as agent for the City Commission in the review and analysis of the responses to the RFQ. The motion was duly seconded. CCmtg . 3/5/92 20 . Discussion ensued regarding whether or not references to a possible City Hall should be removed from the RFQ and whether or not the eRA should be the agent for the City in reviewing the proposals. The City Manager indicated the real test will be the 90 days when proposals are being submitted and he indicated alternatives regarding City Hall will be presented. Commissioner Nunamaker amended his motion to delete approving the eRA to act as agent for the Commission. The seconder accepted the amendment. Upon the vote being taken on the amended motion: Commissioners Regulski, Nunamaker and Mayor Garvey voted "AyeU; Commissioners Fitzgerald and Berfield UNayu. Motion carried. . Property located at 603 - 603 1/2 North Garden Avenue was inspected by the Building Division and found to be unsafe. The owners were notified by Certified Mail of this finding and signed a waiver allowing the City to demolish the structure and assess the cost against the property. The City Attorney presented Resolution 192-11 and read it by title only. Commissioner Berfield moved to pass and adopt Resolution #92-11 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded, upon roll call the vote was: "Ayesll: Regulskir Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey. llNays": None. 870.00 Demolition lien on ro ert located at 602 Property located at 602 Alden Avenue was inspected by the Building Division and found to be unsafe. The owners were notified by Certified Mail of this finding and signed a waiver allowing the City to demolish the structure and assess the cost against the property. The City Attorney presented Resolution #92-12 and read it by title only. Commissioner Nunamaker moved to pass and adopt Resolution #92-12 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded, upon roll call the vote was: llAyes": Regulskil Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey. "Nays'!: None. . CCmtg 3/5/92 21 . ; .. , .' . . . located at 110 Property located at 1105 Engman Street was inspected by the Building Division and found to be unsafe. The owners were notified by Certified Mail of this finding and signed a waiver allowing the City to demolish the structure and assess the cost against the property. The City Attorney presented Resolution #92-18 and read it by title only. Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass and adopt Resolution '92-18 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded, upon roll call the vote was: llAyesll: Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey. ItNays": None. ITEM 143 - Contract for Marshall Street South Interceptor Sewer Replacement and Reclaimed Water Supply to KamminQa and Roodvoets. lnc'J Tampa. FL, for $2,764,670 (PW) The purpose of this contract is to provide for the construction of Phase 1 of the Marshall Street South Interceptor Sewer Replacement and the construction of a portion of the primary distribution system for the water reuse utility. The existing Marshall Street South Interceptor is approximately 40 to 60 years old and needs replacement due to its deteriorated condition and being undersized to accommodate present flow demands. The entire interceptor is proposed to be replaced or restored in three phases. Phase 1 will be the replacement of the interceptor from the Marshall Street Plant to Cleveland Street and runs through the middle of the Clearwater Country Club golf course. phase 3 is currently being restored in a separate contract using the Insituform process. Phase 2, from Cleveland Street to Missouri, is scheduled for construction next fiscal year. Installation of the system for water reuse provides an added benefit in that installation at this time will create the immediate availability of reuse water to the Clearwater Country Club. The project includes a temporary pumping facility at the Marsha. I Street plant for this purpose. The work has been coordinated with the Country Club and they have plans for the installation of storage ponds on the golf course to store the reuse water for irrigation purposes. The Country Club has sought this ability for many years. Approva 1 of the bid award wi 11 allow the project to begin in April 1992 and will be completed by February, 1993. The golf course will remain open for play during construction. . Commissioner Berfield moved to award a contract for the Marshall Street South Interceptor Sewer Replacement and Reclaimed Water Supply to Kamminga and Roodvoets, Inc. for $2,764,670. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. CCmtg ''. 3/5/92 22 . . . ITEM 144 - Plannina & ZoninQ Board - 1 appointment (eLK) Commissioner Nunamaker moved to reappoint Ed Mazur, Jr. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM 145 - Develooment Code Adjustment Board - 1 appointment (eLK) Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to reappoint Thomas (Jim) Graham. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #46 - Parks & Recreation Board - 1 appointment (eLK) Commissioner Regulski moved to reappoint Suzanne Claessens. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #47 - Other PendinQ Matters - None. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS Other City Attorney Items ITEM #48 - Stowell Settlement This case involves the City's efforts to obtain access to a sewer line which runs across Mr. Stowell's property. The City wished to have access in order to rehabilitate the line as it is becoming deteriorated and there is a possibility of breakage which would cause raw sewage to dump into Tampa Bay. This settlement is the culmination of a very long process of negotiation, including a mediation session. The settlement terms include some work on the City's part which it is willing to do as a matter of public health or policy even though not directly related to the work on the sewer line. The total package compares favorably with other available alternatives in terms of the time required and likely cost. Concerns were expressed regarding paying Mr. Stowell a sum of $27,500. The City Manager indicated the settlement is being based on what is considered to be the most cost effective settlement which could be negotiated under the circumstances. He stated if the Commission does not approve the settlement, he would then recommend they direct the City Attorney to take whatever action is needed in order to obtain access to the sewer line. The City Attorney indicated there would be two possibilities. One is to pursue the case in the appellate court which could take a year to a year and a half. He stated condemnation would take much less time but would be more costly. In response to a question regarding why he would not recommend appealing, the City Attorney indicated it would take a year and a half to process the case and the line needs the work at this time. CCmtg 3/5/92 23 . I . , . '. '_ . : ~ ~ '" . . '. " . '. ". L .. . . " 'r" . '.. . ~ . . . Discussion ensued regarding the options available to the Commission and the City Manager indicated that if the Commission did not approve the settlement, he would go back to the courts for a quick take on the property and in fesponse to a question, he indicated that he had no doubt that this would result in a much higher expense than the settlement. Concerns were expressed that the judge may not know of the likelihood of failure of the line and the City Attorney indicated the judge was aware of the circumstances. Commissioner Nunamaker moved to approve the settlement in the case of Stowell versus the City. The motion was duly seconded. Upon the vote being taken: Commissioners Nunamaker, Fitzgerald and Mayor Garvey voted "Aye": Commissioners Berfield and Regulski voted "Nay". Motion carried. ITEM 149 - City Manager Verbal Reports Legislative Report. The City Attorney reported on a Federal Senate Bill which will affect the administration of the Federal Emergency Management Agencies flood insurance. He stated a major portion of the bill would allow claims only for one event as it is felt that a large number of payouts are going to a small percentage of people. The "City Manager indicated staff will continue to track this bill and will keep the Commission informed. Elizabeth Deptula, Assistant City Manager, indicated there was an error on some phone bills in the last month in which people calling city offices were charged a dollar per call. GTE is working to solve the problem. The City Clefk has requested direction from the Commission regarding whether or not they wish to have a canvassing board meeting to certify the results of the March 10 election. As the March 10 election ;s Upiggybacked" on the County ballot, the City Charter allows for the County Canvassing Board's certification to suffice for the City election. Consensus of the Commission was they would accept the County Canvassing Board certification. ITEM #50 - Other Commission Action Commissioner Berfield questioned whether or not Mr. Jewell's letter had been responded to. The City Manager indicated it had. Commissioner Fitzgerald indicated that at the last Mayor's Council Meeting, they determined to set some meetings in north county. These meetings would be in Clearwater in June and in Tarpon Springs in December. He Questioned when a report regarding variance fees would be coming to the Commission and it was indicated it would be scheduled for the next meeting. CCmtg 3/5/92 24 " . Commissioner Nunamaker stated he felt that we should do whatever we can to address opening Dunedin Pass. The City Manager indicated the County has put in a request to do a Clearwater Harbor study which would be a hydrodynamic study of the harbor and the effect of the closing of the pass. JTEM '51 - Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 11:09 p.m. , , " ATTES~~~:2'.}J~. .p. ft. .:.....~ y Cle~k . .. .,.. .~ ' " . , \. I . \' '" "'J I \ 1.1 . , " - . . ,. " ~'. .. ~~i .- "I . ',' .,,' .~...... .~ .;{ ,~' " . CCmtg . 3/5/92 ,:\ . ,," . . L. ~)r.t . ; ':I,~'~~ . . ~ l;.: . <, .<.-.:~~.~~ . I ...f,j, "':l ..I.!:;~.i ...: ,.~.i '.. . <'::i: . -:" r ':.~*~ ... .. .':'~~,j:1,(::~ij 25 " ",