02/06/1992 (2)
. ,. 'I '" ' , " :' I . '.' , ' .' : . . , .' '. '" .... 'P, ',', .. -1. :.. ~
.
.
.
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
February 6, 1992
The City Commission of the City of Clearwater met in regular session at
City Hall, Thursday, February 6, 1992 at 6:02 p.m., with the following members
present: '
Rita Garvey
Sue Berfield
Lee Regulski
William Nunamaker
Richard Fitzgerald
Also present:
Michael J. Wright
M.A. Galbraith, Jr.
William C. Baker
James Polatty, Jr.
Cynthia E. Goudeau
Mayor/Commissioner
Vice~Mayor/Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
City Manager
City Attorney
Public Works Director
Planning and Development Director
City Clerk
The Mayor called the meeting to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
The invocation was offered by Pastor Oarwin Dovemuehle of St. Paul's Luthern
Church.
In order to provide continuity for research, the items will be listed in
agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order.
ITEM *3 ~ Service Pin Awards.
Three service pins were awarded to City employees.
ITEM 14 - Introductions and Awards.
A Citation of Appreciation was presented to Reverend Walter Campbell for
his service on the Community Relations Board.
ITEM #5 - Presentations
Ed Mazur. representing the National Forget-Me~Not Association, reported
on the progress in having the POW/MIA issue addressed. He presented a POW/MIA
flag and requested it be flown in Coachman Park. Jane Davis and Walter
OIReily spoke in support of continuing efforts.
Resolution #92~19 ~ urQinQ United States ConQress to pass House Resolution
4066 to request from certain countries information concernina American
servicemen missina in Southeast Asia durinQ the Vietnam conflict and to
require the heads of Federal Deoartments and AQencies to disclose to conQress
information concerninQ such servicemen and civilians
CCmtg
2/6/92
1
.
.
.
The City Attorney presented Resolution 192-19 and read it by title only.
Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass and adopt Resolution #92-19 and
authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly
seconded, upon roll call the vote was:
UAyesu: Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
ItNaysu: None.
ITEM 16 - Minutes of the Reaular Meeting of Januarv 16. 1992
Commissioner Berfield moved to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting of January 16, 1992, as recorded and submitted in written summation by
the City Clerk to each Commissioner. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously. .
ITEM 17 - Citizens to be heard re items not on the Aaenda - None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
An Agreement to Annex for the subject property was executed April 16,
1978 by Earl G. and Georgie Lee Blanton, the former owners of this parcel.
The Agreement was recorded on April 18, 1978, and should have shown up on any
title search when the property was sold to its present owner, Rush Janey. A
letter was sent to.Mr. Janey by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, on
November 3D, 1990, informing him of the city's intent to annex this parcel.
Mr. Janey was requested to execute the city's standard Petition for Annexation
in order to facilitate the annexation of his property. He has chosen not to
submit these forms, and the Planning and Development Department is therefore
submitting the Agreement to Annex in lieu of such petition in accordance with
the Agreement.
Mr. Janey was notified in the city1s letter dated November 26, 1990,
that his property would be zoned RM-12 upon annexation.
The city presently provides sanitary sewerage and potable water services
to the property.
The Planning and Zoning Board conducted a public hearing on this
annexation at its January 14, 1992 meeting. Nobody appeared in support or
opposition of the proposed annexation. The board unanimously approved the
proposed annexation.
Based upon staff review and analysis, the requests are in conformance
with the City.s Land Development Code.
CCmtg
2/6/92
2
.."
.
.
.
Commissioner Regulski moved to a~)rove the annexation, land use plan
amendment to medium density residential' and RM-12 zoning for the subject
property. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance 15164-92 for first reading and
read it by title only. Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass Ordinance N5164-
92 on first reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the
vote was:
UAyesll: Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
t1Naysll: None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance '5165-92 for first reading and
read it by title only. Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass Ordinance #5165-
92 on first reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the
vote was:
t1Ayestl: Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
IINaysll: None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5166-92 for first reading and
read it by title only. Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass Ordinance #5166-
92 on first reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the
vote was:
IIAyes": Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
llNaysll: None.
ITEM #9 - (Cant. from 1/16/92) Alcoholic BeveraQe Distance Separation Variance
for property located at 850 Bayway Blvd., Bayside Sub. No.6, Unit A, Blk 0,
Lot 12 and Unit C, 8lk D, Lots 13-15 (Resolution Trust Corp./Hollywood Federal
Bank AB91-23)(PLD)
This item has been continued several times at the request of the
applicant. Due to the number of continuances, City code requires some
Commission action at this meeting or the application is automatically voided.
I
This request is required because the proposed alcoholic beverage sales
use is in a CR-28 zoning district, which if! considered to be a residential
district for the purposes of alcoholic beverage sales. There is no proposed
use for the restaurant. This is a speculative request. The subject property
is located at 850 Bayway Boulevard and fronts on Clearwater Harbor. City
zoning requires a 51% food and non-alcoholic beverage sales with a 4-COP-SRX
license designation in the CR-28 zoning district.
On October 5, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Board approved the
conditional use permit associated with this request subject to the ten
conditions.
CCmtg
2/6/92
3
.
.
.
The subject property is located in the vicinity of several condominiums
to the south and east. These condominiums are located in the RM-28 zoning
district.
While numerous residents turned out to oppose the conditional use
applicationf the Planning and Zoning Board and City staff feel that the
aforementioned conditions will keep a "Oock of the Bay" situation from
occurring at this property: in particular, the 11:00 p.m. closing time will
limit the operation of the establishment to that of a restaurant.
The Planning and Zoning Board members noted that most of the objections
concerning the use involved parking and the closing time, however, parking is
not an issue that the Planning and Zoning Board considers and the board felt
comfortable that the closing time issue had been resolved through the
conditions.
The Oevelopment Code Adjustment Board (OCAB) denied the parking variance
associated with this request, but approved other variances regarding stair
towers and motel room size. Denial of the parking variance will doubtless
cause some modification to the applicant's overall pla~s for the property, but
staff is not currently aware of any precise plans beyond the restaurant use
associated with this request.
Staff recommended approval of the conditional use and variance requests
to the Planning and Zoning Board and DCAB because of the deteriorating nature
of the structure and the control over any operation provided by the
conditional use approval conditions. However, upon further reflection, staff
feels uncomfortable recommending approval of a speculative request.
Consequently, staff1s recommendation is to deny this item unless the applicant
can have the proposed operator of the establishment appear before the
Commission to discuss operational details.
Gary Welch, representing the applicant, stated that it is correct they
do not have an operator of the restaurant facility. However, he stated they
are back on course with a potential purchaser of the property. He feels there
are enough restrictions on the conditional use that the operator will not be
able to be detrimental to the neighborhood.
Audrey Thomas, representing a number of the residences close to the
proposed facility, submitted copies of a petition to the Planning and Zoning
Board which contained 200 signatures in opposition to the conditional use.
She requested unconditional denial of the application. She provided a history
of the property stating the original liquor licenses were issued prior to the
condominiums being constructed. She reiterated concerns of the neighbors,
particularly in regard to safety and not being disturbed in their homes.
Two citizens spoke ;n opposition to the request stating when the
facility is in operation, it is a nuisance to the residents.
It was reiterated that staff's recommendation to deny was based on the
fact that there is no proposed operator of the facility.
CCmtg
2/6/92
4
, "'... "," " . I. r' I" . ~ ." '" < ,": . . . '" ,':. . '. . ',',. ,", " , '. . J "
.
.
.
Commissioner Nunamaker moved to deny a variance of 250 feet to allow
alcoholic beverage sales within 0 feet from a residential zoning district.
The motton was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
This is an application for a variance of 197 feet from the 300 feet
minimum distance separation from a residential zone to allow the new Chuck E.
Cheese Restaurant to sell beer and wine for consumption on premise at the
Cypress Point Shopping Center. On November 14, 1991, the restaurant received
approval for a minor site plan amendment to expand the building to the rear
(east) of the shopping center making the minimum distance from a RS-2
residential zone 103 feet.
At its January 14, 1992 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Board granted
the conditional use subject to: 1) Prior to the issuance of any building
permits, a revised site plan shall be submitted to staff addressing the
conditions of approval from the November 14, 1991 DRC meeting; and 2) An
alcoholic beverage distance variance shall be obtained from the City
Commission.
A revised site plan has not yet been submitted addressing these
conditions.
All parking, ingress and egress is existing and is in compliance with
the Land Development Code.
No additional light, noise, and traffic will be generated that will
negatively impact the residential area to the east. The Chuck E. Cheese
Restaurants are family oriented and the granting of this variance will not
adversely affect the residents in the area.
Frank Stanon;s, representing the applicant, stated the reason for the
variance is a door at the back of the facility which is only for employee
access. He stated they have been looking for a location in Clearwater for a
year and a half and this is a large use comprising one quarter to one third of
an acre. He stated alcoholic beverages will be 6% or less of their overall
sales.
Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to approve a variance of 197 feet to allow
alcoholic beverage sales within 103 feet from a residential zone. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #11 - Alcoholic BeveraQe Separation Distance Variances for property
located at 150 Island Way, Island Village Shopping Center, Sec. 8-29-15, M&B
13.01 (Rite Aid AB92-04)(PLD) ,
The applicant is requesting approval of two minimum distance separation
variances for a new 2-APS alcoholic beverage license designation which permits
CCmtg
2/6/92
5
.
.
.
package sales of beer and wine. The establishment is an existing retail
pharmacy store known as "Rite Aid Discount Pharmacy '2671" located at 150
Island Way in the Island Village Shopping Center, which has been in business
under the current ownership since November 8, 1991. The applicant wants to
introduce a wide variety of retail goods including beer and wine to the store
to promote the company's retail policy.
Two separation variances are required due the subject property being
less than 300 feet of the church of St. Brendan and less than 200 feet of
another similarly licensed alcoholic beverage establishment, Publix.
The appli~ant's request for a conditional use permit was approved by the
Planning and Zoning Board at its January 14, 1992 meeting subject to: 1) The
requisite occupational license be obtained within six months from the date of
the public hearing; 2) The applicant shall obtain approval from the Commission
for the following variances: a) 245'7" to permit alcoholic beverage sales
541311 from a church zone and b) 200' to permit alcoholic beverage sales zero
feet from another 2-APS package sales establishment.
Enola Brown, attorney representing the applicant, stated the facility is
in a shopping center and is an existing location. She stated the alcoholic
beverage sales will be an incidental use to other products, only comprising 4
to 5% of their total sales. She stated Rite Aid feels it is important to
provide the same products at all stores. She wished to make the Commission
aware that the people who are opposed to the granting of the variance and the
conditional use have been spearheaded by the owner of the liquor store in the
shopping center.
Rosemary Zaleski, Island Estates Liquors owner, stated the liquor store
is her livelihood and if the variance is granted, there would be wall to wall
alcoholic beverage sales which would dilute the sales between the publix and
the liquor store.
One citizen spoke in opposition to the variance stating there were
plenty of places on Island Estates at which beer and wine are available.
Discussion ensued regarding whether or not there was a basis to deny
this variance due to the number of alcoholic beverage establishments in the
area.
A question was raised regarding whether or not a comment had been
received from St. Brendan's Church and Ms. Brown indicated she has been in
contact with them and they have no problem with the request.
Commissioner Regulski moved to approve a variance of 200 feet to allow
alcoholic beverage sales within 0 feet from a similarly licensed establishment
and a variance of 245.7 feet to allow alcoholic beverage sales within 54.3
feet from a church zone. The motion was duly seconded.
'\
CCmtg
2/6/92
6
. ,. ", . .. 1 I ~, ' 1;' _ . ..... 'I. . " ',' '. '. ' ~.~. I '.. '.. .' . ',' . . , . '."
., ':: '. ~~". . '". .' :~.. ....:...: " :. t '.: . ;.r. t'..:~..."~ ',~'. i'''' .;,' ..,:-..':.".... . '. '~."," .'., . "
.
.
.
Further discussion ensued regarding opposition to the request due to the
number of alcoholic beverage facilities in the area. It was stated the
economics of the number of facilities was not part of the consideration by the
Commission. Concerns were expressed that there are enough alcoholic beverage
establishments in the area.
Upon the vote being ta~en; Commissioners Regulski, Fitzgerald and Mayor
Garvey voted I1Ayel1, Commissioners Berfield and Nunamaker voted "Nay". Motion
carried. (See pages 24 and 25 for action to reconsider and schedule a new
public hearing.)
Public Hearing - Second Reading Ordinances
ITEM 112 - Ordinance #515Z-92 . code amendment adootino the 1991 Standard
Housino Code; applying the provisions of Sec. 308 to hotels, motels,
dormitories and lodging houses
The City Attorney presented Ordinance 15157-92 for second reading and
read it by title only. Commissioner Berfield moved to pass and adopt
Ordinance 15157-92 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded.
Upon roll call, the vote was:
I1Ayes": Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
t1NaysU: None.
ITEM #13 - Ordinance #5163-92 . Vacatino the westerly 1.5' of the easterly 10'
utility easement lying along the east side of Lot 90, Willow Ridge Replat less
the southerly 10' and northerly 5'(lams V91-14)
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5163-92 for second reading and
read it by title only. Commissioner Berfield moved to pass and adopt
Ordinance #5163-92 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded.
Upon roll. call, the vote was:
t1Ayes": Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
t1NaysU: None.
ITEM #14 - Ordinance #5167-92 - Amendino Sec. 76.21 to increase the
application fee for solicitors' permits
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5167-92 for second reading and
read it by title only. Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass and adopt
Ordinance #5167-92 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded.
Upon roll call, the vote was:
UAyestl: Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
IINaysll: None.
CCmtg
2/6/92
7
: .'\:
> ',' '. ,..;. ~ ...,. ... ,'~ . . I :. :'.';' '::.': : ....'
.
.
.
ITEM 115 ~ Ordinance IS168M92 - Amendina Sec. 61.~1 to set an application fee
for taxicab operators' permits
John Haggitt, attorney for CAM-JO/Clearwater Yellow Cab, stated they
felt the proposed fee is in line with the cost to process the operator permit
applications. He requested Item #28 be pulled from the Consent Agenda.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance 15168-92 for second reading and
read it by title only. Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass and adopt
Ordinance #5168-92 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded.
Upon roll call, the vote was:
UAyesu: Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
"Naystt: None.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
CONSENT AGENDA (Items #16-31) - Approved as submitted less Item #28.
Agreements - Approved.
ITEM #16 - Aoreements with The Golden Couaar Band Boosters. Inc. and The
Clearwater Hioh School Band Boosters. Inc. for the parking of automobiles at
this year's spring training season of the Philadelphia Phil lies (PR)
ITEM #17 - Aareement with Clearwater Festivals Inc. regarding the Fun n' Sun
Festival and the Fourth of July Celebration to be held in calendar year 1992,
$39,340 (PR)
ITEM #18 - AQreement with The Pepsi Cola Bottlina Co., Tampa, FL, to provide
six baseball/softball scoreboards for placement at the Eddie C. Moore Complex
and Ross Norton Park for a period of eight years (PR)
ITEM #19 - Lana Term Aareement for Palmetto Street Sediment Trap with FDER
(PW)
Bids & Contracts - Awarded.
ITEM #20 - Purchase of claim services (Run-Off Claims) from GallaQher Bassett
Services. Inc., for the period 10/1/91-9/30/92, at an est. cost of $36,649
lAS)
ITEM #22 - Contract for roof replacement at the Shuffleboard Club located at
1020 Calumet St. to Allstate Roofing, Pinellas Park, FL, for $26,900 (GS)
CCmtg
2/6/92
8
. , I -v' . .. .,\~ . . ., I' ~.,.. I '.- . :'.~ "', <. . I"
~..' ~.~ .
... 'c' ."
......,
.
.
.
I EM 2 - 1 1 u 1te Restoration Contract - Phase 2 to General Gunite &
Construction Company. Inc.. Florence, AL, for 117,347.03 (PW)
ITEM *25 - Approval of MarketinQ Campaian. developed bv Pearson. Thomas/LKW,
and Marketing Budaet for the RecyclinQ Pilot Program with an est. cost of
"$25,589 (PW)
Citizens & Staff Requests - Approved.
ITEM #26 - Revised Infrastructure Sales Tax (Penny for Pinellas)(AS), Drew
Street Widening. Missouri Avenue Widening and Intersection Improvements change
in funding year only: Haas Brothers purchase added as new project
share of the
ITEM #28 - See PaQe 9
ITEM #29 - Settlement of Claim - Meeter v. City, settle all claims for $80,000
Change Order- Approved.
ITEM #30 - C.O.#1 for the Clearwater Executive Airpark Shade Hangar
Refurbishment Contract to P.J. Callaghan Co.. Inc., increasing the amount by
$12,000 for a new total of $153,900 (PW)
Receipt & Referral - Received and Referred.
Commissioner Berfield moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted
less Item #28 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute
same. The motion was duly ~econded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #28 - Issuance of a re'Jistration for an occupational license for
IISuncoast Yellow Cab, Inc." '(eLK)
Suncoast Yellow Cab, Incorporated is contracting to supplement the
service of an airport limousine company which services Clearwater. Pursuant
to City code Section 71.01(c), registration of a current occupational license
from another jurisdiction must be obtained. . .
Suncoast Yellow Cab is currently licensed by Pinellas County. The
vehicles which will be used for the airport limo service are also being used
CCmtg
2/6/92
9
". .",,'
.
to supplement the Dart Van service at the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority
with insurance as required by code.
Section 61.07 of the code requires each taxicab company to use a
distinctive color scheme for all its cabs. The required proof of insurance
has been provided.
Jim Polatty~ Planning and Development Director, stated the issue which
needs to be addressed is the distinctive color scheme.
Ed Armstrong, representing Suncoast Yellow Cab, stated if the only issue
is color, they feel their yellow cabs with white tops do present a distinctive
color scheme.
John Haggitt, attorney representing Clearwater Yellow Cab, stated they
have no objection to approval as long as Suncoast Yellow Cab complies with all
provisions of the ordinance. He stated they do not feel the color as proposed
is distinctive as Clearwater Yellow Cab has cabs with white tops. He is also
concerned regarding Suncoast Yellow Cab meeting the insurance requirement as
they have only insured five vehicles to the limit provided in Clearwater's
ordinance.
.
Mr. Armstrong indicated the applicant has worked with staff to make sure
they comply with code. He stated all cabs which operate in Clearwater now or
in the future, will meet the insurance requirements. He reiterated the
proposed color scheme is distinctive.
Discussion ensued regarding how cabs are identified in general and a
concern was expressed that individuals should be able to tell that a vehicle
is a cab, not necessarily distinguish among the cab companies. It was
indicated each cab has to have the license visible in the car.
In response to a question, it was indicated insurance requirements vary
from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
Discussion returned to how to clearly identify taxicabs.
Mr. Armstrong indicated they are within their rights for the license as
they believe they meet the distinctive color scheme. If the Commission does
not feel it is distinctive, he requested they tell him what they desire.
Mr. Haggitt reiterated Clearwater Yellow Cab has cars that are yellow
with white tops.
The Planning and Development Director indicated pictures had been
provided to him of all the color schemes that Clearwater Yelrow Cab uses and
none show vehicles with white tops.
A question was raised regarding what the State requires for financial
responsibility and Mr. Plecis, owner of Suncoast Yellow Cab, stated they have
.
CCmtg
2/6/92
10
.
.
.
the State Financial Responsibility Certificate and have in addition, deposited
a $100,000 C.O. with the Division of Motor Vehicles.
Commissioner Regulski moved to approve the issuance of a registration of
license for Suncoast Yellow Cab. The motion was duly seconded. Upon the vote
being taken: Commissioners Regulski, Fitzgerald, Nunamaker and Mayor Garvey
voted UAyeU, Corrnnissioner Berfield voted nNayu. Motion carried.
The meeting recessed from 7:50 p.m. to 8:04 p.m.
OTHER ITEMS ON CITY M^NAGER REPORT
ITEM #32 - First ReadinQ Ordinance #5178-92 - amendinQ existinQ lease
agreement with the Chi Chi Rodriguez Youth Foundation to provide for City
guarantee of the first $1 million of their outstanding debt (AS)
The 1985 lease agreement with Chi Chi Rodriguez Youth Foundation
provides the City with the right of first refusal to assume up to $2,000,000
in outstanding debt which the foundation has obtained to construct the golf
course located on McMullen-Booth Road. With the balloon payment on the loan
coming due in Marchi the foundation contacted the City and requested the
City's guarantee be strengthened to include a firm guarantee in lieu of a
right of first refusal, as well as an increase in the maximum guarantee to
$2.5 million. The City's guarantee will apparently allow the foundation to
refinance at more favorable interest rates, and the additional $500,000 to be
borrowed will be used to purchase additional machinery, carts, and to complete
construction of golf course facilities.
Upon investigating this request, staff in conjunction with City bond
counsel determined the requested guarantee modifies the arrangement enough to
produce new City debt (actually contingent debt) which requires compliance
with state law and City Charter provisions. Further, such a guarantee cannot
be made from ad valorem tax revenues, and cannot exceed $1.0 million unless it
is first approved by the voters at referendum.
With these restrictions in mind, City bond counsel has drafted a lease
amendment and ordinance, which provides for a $1.0 million guarantee and a
right of first refusal on the remaining debt (not to exceed an additional $1.5
million). An ordinance is required for all City debt under Section 41.11(a)
of the code.
The golf course is currently operational and reporting operating
profits. In the event of foundation default on their debt, it is likely the
City would exercise its existing right of first refusal and assume operation
of the course itself. The language modification to guarantee the first
million may therefore only formalize a commitment which already exists.
Staff has reviewed the foundation1s request and the lease amendment as
drafted by the bond counsel. The foundation has agreed to reimburse the City
for bond counsel fees and to pay aff the remaining balance of $27,264 on a
1989 City loan used for transportation impact fees, out of the refinancing
CCrntg
2/6/92
11
," .,-,...... :: ':. ~ ,
.. .....
.....
. .,'
.
"..
. \'.,
"
.' 'I
, "
.;
.
,', "
: "~ :,-
.. I ....1. ~ .
.i~' .~. .t '. \ '
.
.\
"
proceeds. Staff endorses the request of the foundation and recommend~'
approval of the lease amendment as proposed.
Bill Hayes, representing the Foundation, provided a history Jf the
project stating the land was vacant when the City first approved "ts option
for first refusal. He stated the golf course is now in place wit" 57,000
rounds of golf being played each year. He is asking for this gual'antee in
order to be able to finish the project as the banks are asking fol' a firmer
commitment from the City. He is requesting a 15 year guarantee tu allow him
the greatest flexibility to negotiate the refinancing loan.
In response to questions, he indicated with the City's g:larantee, he is
hoping to lengthen the loan from 8 to 15 years and that the int~rest rate
charged would be 2 1/2 to 3 points over the T-bill rate. He stated he is
currently paying 11% interest and the length of time is the key issue.
It was requested a report be given regarding the educational aspects of
the Foundation. Polly Bateman, with the Foundation, stated they have three
programs currently in place: the afternoon school; the community service; and
the special kids program. She stated a fourth program will be a full public
school on the golf course geared toward middle school students of high risk.
In response to questions, it was indicated this is sanctioned by the public
schools and the plan ;s to serve 400 to 500 students per year.
Eight citizens spoke in support of the amendment praising the program
and how it helps children who have experienced traumatic and detrimental
situations in their lives.
Discussion ensued regarding the Commission's support of the program but
with concerns being expressed regarding an unrestricted guarantee for a
million. dollars.
A concern was expressed that it is not included in the documents that
the principal amount of the loan would be reduced on an amortization schedule.
Mr. Hayes indicated this is what is planned.
Discussion ensued regarding whether or not to reduce the arnount of
guarantee as the amount of principal of the loan decreases. Mr. Hayes
indicated it would be difficult for him if the guarantee is attached to the
amortization schedule and he asked them to consider guaranteeing the million
dollars for ten years and then reducing it by equal amounts for the remainder
of the loan period.
Concerns were expressed that there were no specific details regarding
the loan. It was requested these specifics be available before second
reading. Mr. Hayes indicated the banks are waiting to give him specifics
until they know what the City will agree to do.
Discussion ensued regarding whether or not a letter of intent would be
sufficient to provide to the bank at this time rather than a straight
guarantee.
CCmtg
2/6/92
12
:.'.0. .: ". " ,.: . . '"' t~ ,,'. ~...::;,',,~:: . "...., .~.,:,. .,1,.. ,,; :' "'.',"':.1 r-J. "'1 .,'
.. .'j" :J..~~l. '."", ,', ,.,'..,..:......; '. ;~, "J" ~ .'\/ .'1 ....~. ...~,::.::..~.:." ~,.........c~~::....,.'!',.... ..r.,." ;"
,.,','.... . ".' ,;,' ";..' .::,.~J;'.:,..':.; ,::.,:" "::~~""':" ,. . ","
'. ""'</.",,:'.\::":;::;:,j;!i\':";
.' .:'......../..... <.... It. .l':~..\..,:.......'.;...:.. " ~ . ,I ,:"t.. . . ,;~.:.\... 'j,j' :':~:~'" ..'.....,,:.. :,>,i,
, '. ". ',," ,,. ',,', , , . . ~f . .' . '. .. "" ' . , '.~.'(;. ; ,'.'. ."
, . " " ' .' :', ,. , " .! " .,', , , " "',. :.,:"..... "
"" " .': ,,' . ..,': · "'.;' .,:::., . .' . q:: . r ' q / " ,; ?'.::~..',.:','.:,.,:',.,:".'"~,,,,;. :..'\.:.,.......~:.'...' .!'....:.,'.,;.,'. ,'~.:.',:..,;.:'.:.~:.'~..::..'..,,:',:,:,,;,':I::,.::!:r.:,',..,:i,...',.:,.,....",.:;,'.',...,~.,::1 ",.....',~.,,',::'i,.,.'.~.:.,I:....:: ~.:.'.,:,."H,~.,..':.:'~::,',::':,::..:',~.f,.:.,~.:.':~'":;.~.:.....:,::.::::,,.:,..'.. :,"',~'."",':'~.,:'.('. '
. " . '.' . .. )'; ;;X:. .;\!f<'\;;::l ;/,.,::..'..:::...:.,'.~.,..,:.:..:,'...'.",".'::,..,',::.".,.:"~,,',....,...,..,,:~~'.~...,,.:::,.,::'.;:',::,..,.:,.';.~,~::.....~...:'..:.~:'....,,',.',.~.:...,.:',:,':,~:..,.~.~,;"~.t:~ ".~ ' . ,,' ' . . ' J .' , .',' ~ . .,.,' ': '.:. ': .::).,.:,'.,'.,',~,,::..:..,',':,.,. ':
:"ji:.({,!~;~i;.!t~[~!:}f.lt:~~[t:~~~.,::;~:.;'~(;{:f:i:;~~gi;;;;:r<:'::,;:::;>/;;:;; :L. '.,' . ....:: , .. ... . .' .' ",>' :::" : ' '. .' ' "
":',.: ~ .,r..'....~ "I~.'.' >,':,:.'-, '.:r.' / .', "
, ,... . ,! .' . ", \-. ,:'. ~. '.') - .. ..: . \ ',}
"~~:,'~':t/'i.~. "', !'" :';":..,'~' ..,,'.:>~~r;'::.:':/,\:~<~'. ,,'
.
.
.
In response to a question regarding why an ordinance was needed, the
City Attorney indicated bond counsel has indicated one is necessary to make
this amendment to the agreement.
Commissioner Nunamaker moved to authorize the issuance of a letter of
intent that Clearwater will guarantee, in the case of default, a maximum of 1
million dollars with the guarantee to last for nine years and from that point
on, the guarantee will be amortized out to zero over the remainder of the loan
providing the loan principal itself is amortized over a 15 year period and
this guarantee in no way pledges ad valorem tax revenues. The motion was duly
seconded.
In response to a question regarding from where the funds would be
obtained, the City Manager indicated that first he would review the budget to
see if there were monies that could be assigned and if not, it would corne from
non-appropriated accounts from the General Fund balance.
It was suggested the Foundation include a Clearwater representative on
its board. Mr. Hayes indicated he would pursue this idea.
A question was raised regarding a requirement in paragraphs 28 and 29 of
the original agreement that an inspection be done before the CO is issued. It
was indicated the permanent CO has not been issued at this time and the Public
Works Department is aware of the need for the inspection.
Upon the vote being taken on the motion, it carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5178~92 for first reading and
read it by title only. The City Attorney indicated in Section 2, the
reference to changes being able to be made by the Mayor or Vice-Mayor and City
Clerk or Deputy City Clerk needs to be deleted. Commissioner Fitzgerald moved
to pass Ordinance #5178-92 on first reading. The motion was duly seconded and
upon roll cal', the vote was:
IlAyes": Nunamaker, Fitzgerald and Garvey.
"Nays": Regulski and Berfield.
Motion carried.
lemental
In February, 1989, the City entered into a contract with Volkert &
Associates to furnish consulting engineering services consisting of a
federally-required PD&E study and Construction Plan design services. That
original contract was for a total of $812,660. During the course of the PD&E
study phase various regulatory agencies requested specialized oceanographic
data beyond that originally envisioned by the contract's scope of services.
CCmtg
2/6/92
13
. '....
pitt
.
\.',
.
. ....:j.: .,~
, >
. ,
';;~I ; :~.
'.4....
.'.
,.
,
'.
.
..' I
.j
...
, . ~ ",
oj.,
......
" t'
,
,.
, 'I \
n' .,
. '.
. ~ . " :' .
;', ,:'::>,~:: ...';,..
Consequently, the contract with Volkert was amended on three subsequent
occasions (12/7/89: 5/29/90 & 9/12/91) to accommodate these extra costs and
the total contract amount presently stands at $901.819.
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has recently signed the PD&E
environmental document which constitutes their Location/Design Approval (LOA)
and confirms that the FHWA will participate in the funding of the construction
costs. The receipt.of the LOA is the point at which construction drawings
usually commence.
In line with the fact that the beginning of design activities was
originally estimated to begin in September of 1990, Volkert now informs the
City that due to inflation, project refinements and changes in FDOT practices
since the 1989 original agreement, it will be necessary to effect another
Supplementary Agreement allowing payment for additional services and increased
costs. This agreement is for $84,225.34 for sub~consulting work consisting of
surveying, geo-technic~l, marine science, etc.: and $56,165.00 for work
associated with design plans: for a total contract increase of $140,390.34.
While it is the City's understanding that the FHWA has, through the PO&E
process, found the project to be worthy of funding and, as the federal lead
agency, has approved the project for future funding participation, individual
construction permits based upon the actual construction design are still
necessary from several agencies, including the US Coast Guard. It also
appears that the US Coast Guard continues to express a reluctance to endorse
this project, even at the increased 74 foot bridge height. The extent to
which the immediate authorization for Volkert to begin final plans and
specifications might be at risk in that design changes might still be
necessary, appears to be minimal when compared to the possibility of failing
to meet the time frames associated with the FDOT work funding schedule. It is
the recommendation of staff to proceed with the diligence necessary to meet
the FOOT time frame for beginning construction in 1993 rather than delay the
project design out of fear that the Coast Guard or others might cause the City
some extra expenses due to a redesign, and thereby miss the FOOT time
schedule.
There is $15,532.84 available in project 315-1-3468, Clearwater Pass
(Sand Key) Bridge Replacement. The remaining $124,857.50 is available in
project 315-1-3469, Sand Key Bridge R&R and a first quarter budget amendment
will provide for the transfer of these funds to the Clearwater Pass Bridge
Replacement project.
Discussion ensued regarding the percentage of increase proposed for the
amendment. It was indicated Volkert was agreeing to a 5% increase over a 2
year period for an effective 10% increase at the end of the agreement.
Concerns were raised in that the inflation rate has only been 3 1/2 to
4% and the delay in the contract is only 18 months.
In response to a question, it was indicated the actual delay is 23 1/2
months.
CCmtg
2/6/92
14
"'. ... .
.. . '. ~:," ,y ',,;' ".: '
. .'. :;, ," "",.'.^",'" ", .',.' ,.',. ,,' '.,
,,'I . . 'I' ".'.,/1,'".: '\.,'h':,>:, ..' ,~~""',:,,..". .,.,. . ,....
. .. ' :;'. ',,:,'~..,,-.,,',:
.'. ,,";:':, , .,;." .. .,:.,....;. . :', .,>,' ' " ')'
":;',i,~Ji/'f,~:",i'~?;;,';.i!:~"'~'l;;];:ii~'~t~"':;':)~~tWc/:." ,....,:.. ':':",~;':".' ,. ,~.':I: "',: . ,':: ":"" " ,'.:: :.'. ·
" . -" .,"'. ..,..,'.,~;,/..~..;, " ".
. ~ ' " ~,' ". ' , ~ I'
,. .' ' , : "'; " .', ',.. .'" -'. ..... "
,,:.-,:: :. ," ."
. .
........
. r' ~ .' .
, \ :.' . ~ .: . .... -' .\;'
,\ '
.' 1
. ;-1.\
';'''..
I,
"
"
'1 -.' '.'
.'.1 ,.".
r.,
" fl'; ,,' .",
. . . ~ . , '.j. I
" '" ' ,{,;... . , " <~ .":
":l' ," I. ': " "
'~,.., >~:,(:,:~,";:;"~::i;i~ll~i;~,";~:,r!;,i;:;':. ~\,,:?'\;<::,: :,: "J:; .:~,:" ",: : i,'::" "
.!
~ . ':
.',
.' '.L" "
" .
." ..
~., c.,
.. ':;,
l~ r'
I,
. ;t
"
III "1'
,.
:. 0[
..,
'.,
f
',.
...,.
~ '
, ,
" '
.. .,' ,'"
'. t.,., f '" '/'".
,i.:: i'-'~'''(i i:/,>: i~>'.: :::.;;
, ,.
~ . ,-' . " .'
?!':::;@i~:~\;ti~
,.I
.It' ~
: _: . "," ~"~ . . 'r , ' . . ... .' , . ,f',
.
.
.
Commissioner Berfield moved to authorize David Volkert & Associates,
Inc. to commence the preparation of plans, specifications and permit
applications for the construction of a new Clearwater Pass Bridge and approve
the supplemental agreement to the existing contract with Volkert & Associates
increasing the existing contract amount of $901,819 by an additional
$140,390.34 for a new total of $1,042,209.34 and that the appropriate
officials be authorized to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and
carried unanimously.
ITEM #34 - Reolat of lots 196 & 197. Clubhouse Estates of Countryside Unit
Four, a previously platted subdivision located on the SE corner of Countryside
Blvd. and Concord Court (Wolfe)(PLD)
The applicants are requesting approval to replat lots #196 and #197 of
the Clubhouse Estates of Countryside Unit Four to relocate the common lot line
between the lots. Both lots were originally purchased together and a single
family residence was erected over the common property line. Under the land
Development Code, this replat may be approved as an administrative lot
division, but since the Commission has previously considered the replat, staff
is seeking authority for this action..
The owners of the property now wish to move the property line to the
west to make Lot #196 a buildable lot. The proposed lots #196 and #197 meet
all area requirements of the land Development Code without the need for any
variances.
This same request was heard by the Commission on May 19, 1988 and was
denied due to questions regarding adequate lot area. adequate buildable area
for the structure and a pool, and compatibility with the surrounding existing
residential area. The applicant was not present to address these concerns at
that time. This request provides a sketch by the applicant1s surveyor which
attempts to address the questions regarding the setbacks, pool area, and other
concerns. As noted above, the replat would result in two conforming lots.
The member departments of the Development Review Committee have reviewed
this proposal and have no objections.
The Planning and Development Director indicated the same request was
heard in May of'1988 and denied by the Commission.
Rick Gresinger, attorney representing the applicants, stated that due to
no one being present at the hearing in 1988. some confusion was created. He
indicated the lot subdivision as proposed can meet code and subdivision
restrictions.
Discussion ensued regarding a ten foot easement. Gordon Killion,
surveyor who drew the hypothetical building on the property, stated it was not
an easement but rather depicts setbacks.
Norman Roffey stated his back yard abuts this property. He stated the
property has been vacant for a long time but has, lawn sprinklers and trees.
CCmtg
2/6/92
15
.
.
.
He stated the house has been for sale for over a year. He feels the intention
is to subdivide the land making it easier to sell the existing house and sell
off the existing land as a separate entity. He stated development on this
lot, which he believes would have to be two stories in order to meet the
square footage requirement, would devalue his property.
Discussion ensued regarding whether or not this request should be
approved when there are objections by individuals who bought into a
subdivision with lots platted as they currently exist.
In response to a question, Mr. Killion indicated the hypothetical home
which he has sketched on the lot is a one story building.
Mr. Gresinger also indicated a pool has been factored in which is not
required and that a larger than average garage is shown which does not
necessarily have to be there.
A concern was expressed that approval of this would result in a change
in the layout of the subdivision contrary to what someone bought in good
faith.
Discussion ensued regarding whether or not other properties would be
adversely impacted and it was stated a building could be built on the proposed
lot and meet code.
Concerns were expressed the code requires that in order to replat
property, the new size and shape must be appropriate for the intended use with
the side lot line perpendicular to the right-of-way and there are no
foreseeable difficulties in obtaining the permit.
Mr. Gresinger indicated there would be no hardship in getting the permit
and they do conform to the subdivision regulations and city code.
An opinion was expressed that the replat does not meet the standards as
the lot line is not perpendicular to the street and the shape of the lot would
be odd.
Further discussion ensued regarding what would be needed in order to
develop on this lot. Mr. Roffey stated he was concerned about the aesthetics
and he would be injured if this replat is approved.
Commissioner Nunamaker moved to deny the requested replat. The motion
was duly seconded. Upon the vote being taken; Commissioners Regulski,
Nunamaker and Fitzgerald voted UAye", Commissioner Berfield and Mayor Garvey
voted IINayll. Motion carried.
ITEM #35 - First Readina Ordinance #5177-92 - authorizing the City Manager to
approve and execute on behalf of the city, leases of space in the Clearwater
Marina building (MR)
Current city policy is that the Commission must approve all marina
CCmtg
2/6/92
16
.
.
.
building lease agreements. For several years the City has used a standard
lease agreement form with all marina building lessees. The marina building
space was advertized for rent and all proposals reviewed with the Marine
Advisory Board for a recommendation. The City Attorney, Risk Manager,
Assistant City Manager and City Manager then reviewed the Agenda Item prior to
it being submitted to the City Commission for approval.
On January 21, 1992, General Services Administration, which controls the
lease of bUilding space for US Customs, advised that eight of the nine rooms
currently rented on the second floor will be returned to the City on February
29, 1992. The City has several requests on file for the renting of building
space. Approval of building lease agreements by the City Manager will help
ensure the City is not losing revenue with empty building space.
This ordinance will authorize the City Manager to approve and execute
leases of space in the marina building, with the exception of space leased to
the US Postal Service, which will require Commission approval. The maximum
term of any building lease approved by the City Manager shall be three years
and rental rates will be kept consistent with the rates for commercial space
on Clearwater Beach. Rental rates of less than 100% of prior lessee shall
require approval of the Commission. The use of the premises shall only be for
the purposes specified in the lease agreement and the lessee shall not
sublease without prior written consent of the City Manager. The Marine
Advisory Board recommends approval of this ordinance.
Concerns were expressed that the City Commission should still make the
final determination regarding what businesses lease in the marina. Bill Held,
Harbormaster, indicated the Marine Advisory Board had recommended this change
when they questioned why they were reviewing proposed leases. He explained
the current process.
A concern was expressed that there had been problems in the past and the
Commission would prefer to remain in control of the leases. It was
recommended staff look for ways to streamline the procedures internally.
Commissioner Berfield moved to deny the requested amendment. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #36 - First Reading Ordinance #5176-92 - implementing twice weekly
irrigation restrictions: providing for enforcement of more stringent water
restrictions that may be declared by SWFWMD (PW)
On September 19, 1991, the Commission adopted Ordinance #5133-91
relating to a Water Shortage Plan and local enforcement of Southwest Florida
Water Management District (SWFWMD) water shortage restrictions. On September
1, 1991, the District relaxed its district-wide water shortage restrictions
because of improving hydrologic conditions. However, at the same time, the
District strongly" recommended to the four coastal communities (Clearwater,
Dunedin, Tarpon Springs, Belleair) that withdraw water from the local aquifer
that they implement local ordinances to further restrict water use. This
recommendation was due to concerns over the chloride or salt content of water
CCmtg
2/6/92
17
.
.
.
in the coastal wells. Clearwater is the only city of the four that has yet to
pass a local ordinance or resolution to restrict water use, Proposed
Ordinance 15176M92 restricts most lawn and landscaping irrigation to twice
weekly and establishes criteria for golf course irrigation. The ordinance
also provides for automatic enforcement of more stringent water restrictions
that may be declared by the governing board or executive director of SWFWMD
from time to time.
Clearwater's Consumptive Use Permit (CUP), when granted by SWFWMD on
July 25, 1989, inc1uded conditions that set limits and target levels for
maintaining or reducing chloride levels in the City's wells. The CUP allows
the City to withdraw water from the aquifer. As of December, 1991, eight of
eleven operating wells were above the chloride levels established by the
District. '
Because of concerns for hydrologic conditions in June, 1989, SWFWMD
designated Clearwater and all of Pine11as County as part of the Northern Tampa
Bay Water Use Caution Area. In January, 1991, the District added several
conditions to all CUP's within the Water Use Caution Area (WUCA) that focused
on expanded water conservation programs and data gathering requirements by all
water users.
Since January, 1989, areas within the SWFWMD have experienced a water
shortage. During this period, several levels of water shortage restrictions
have been implemented by the District and enforced by the City. When the
District relaxed its water restrictions in September, 1991, water consumption
in Clearwater began rising. During the first eight months,of 1991, water
consumption averaged 13.88 million gallons per day (MGO). This includes the
historic periods of heaviest consumption. Since September, when SWFWMO
restrictions were relaxed, consumption has increased by almost 0.7 MGD.
Because of increasing consumption and in an attempt to control chlorides
per CUP conditions, adoption of Ordinance #5176-92 is recommended.
It was indicated a letter should be sent to the County requesting they
also restrict water use.
Tom Hackett, Water Supervisor, indicated the ordinance allows two days
per week to water lawns. He stated this does not include restrictions on hose
bibs, car washing and other miscellaneous uses of water, this is strictly for
irrigation. Watering is prohibited between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. each day.
In response to a question regarding setting a maximum amount of time an
individual coul,d water, it was indicated this would be very difficult to
enforce.
Commissioner Berfield moved to approve staff's recommendation. The
motion was dUly seconded and carried unanimously.
CCmtg
2/6/92
18
- Demolition lien on ro erties located at 901- 03
.
One citizen spoke in opposition to the ordinance stating that SWFWMO had
violated his civil rights. The Commission indicated this was not the
appropriate forum for his complaints.
A citizen spoke requesting car washing be allowed and it was indicated
the ordinance does not restrict car washing.
The City Attor'ney presented Ordinance *5176~92 for first reading and
read it by title only. Commis~ioner Berfield moved to pass Ordinance '5176-92
on first reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote
was:
t1Ayesu: Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
IINaysll: None.
.
Properties located at 901-903 Beckett Street were inspected by the
Building Division and found to be structurally unsafe. The owners were
notified by Certified Mail of this finding and signed a waiver allowing the
City to demolish the structure and assess the cost against the property.
The City Attorney presented Resolution #92-5 and read it by title only.
Commissioner Berfield moved to pass and adopt Resolution #92-5 and authorize
the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded, upon
roll call the vote was:
t1Ayesll: Regulski, Nunamaker. Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
IINays": None.
Property located at 300 North Vine Avenue was inspected by the Building
Division and found to be structurally unsafe. The owner of the property is
deceased and the known heirs are minor children. The Building Official
ordered the structure temporarily repaired to prevent total collapse of it and
possible harm to neighboring properties, both public and private. The work
has been completed.
The attorney representing the heirs requested a continuance of this
item.
Commissioner Nunamaker moved to continue this item until the next
regularly scheduled meeting of February 20, 1992. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
.
CCmtg
2/6/92
19
.
Property located at 1015 LaSalle Street was inspected by the Building
Division and found to be unsafe. The owners were notified by Certified Mail
of this finding and the Court-appointed guardian of the owner, with the
approval of the Court, signed a waiver allowing the City to demolish the
structure and assess the cost against the property.
The City Attorney presented Resolution 192-7 and read it by title only.
Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass and adopt Resolution #92-7 and authorize
the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded, upon
roll call the vote was:
"Ayes": Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
"Naysll: None.
ITEM 140 - Resolution #92-8 - Demolition lien on ro ert located at 1200
North Fort Harrison Avenue PLD
.
Property located at 1200 North Fort Harrison Avenue was inspected by the
Building Division and found to be unsafe and unfit. The owners were notified
by Certified Mail of this finding and signed a waiver allowing the City to
demolish the structure and assess the cost against the property.
The City Attorney presented Resolution #92-8 and read it by title only.
Commissioner Berfield moved to pass and adopt Resolution #92-8 and authorize
the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded, upon
roll call the vote was:
IIAyesll: Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
lINaysll: None.
ITEM #41 - Resolution #92-9 - Demolition liens on properties located at
located at 901 901 1 2 & 903 Drew Street and 136 & 138 North Pros ect Avenue
PLD
Properties located at 901, 901 1/2 and 903 Drew Street and 136 and 138
North Prospect Avenue were inspected by the Building Division and found to be
structurally unsafe. The owners were notified by Certified Mail of this
finding and signed a waiver allowing the City to demolish the structures and
assess the cost against the property.
The City Attorney presented Resolution #92-9 and read it by title only.
Commissioner Berfield moved to pass and adopt Resolution #92-9 and authorize
the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded, upon
roll call the vote was:
.
CCmtg
2/6/92
20
.
"Ayesll: Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgeraldt Berfield and Garvey.
"Haysll: None.
While it appears that the "Countywideu Sign Regulations will not become
effective on a countywide level due to the sunset clause established in those
regulations, the County Commission should still be encouraged to apply the
"Countywidell regulations to the unincorporated portions of Pinellas County.
The proposed resolution expresses such a desire on the part of the
Clearwater City Commission.
It was indicated Clearwater conforms to the Countywide Sign Ordinance
with a few minor exceptions. It was indicated it was understood Clearwater
could still adjust its code to be in conformance.
It was reported the County Commission will consider the sign ordinance
at their meeting at 6:00 p.m. on February 18, 1992.
The City Attorney presented Resolution #92-17 and read it by title only.
Commissioner Berfield moved to pass and adopt Resolution #92-17 and authorize
the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded, upon
roll call the vote was:
.
"Ayes": Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM 43 - Resolution #92-14 - authorizin CSX Trans ortation Inc. to make
imorovements to the railroad crossina sianals at Vine Ave. PW
As finances permit, the railroad companies and Florida Department of
Transportation (FOOT) coordinate improvements to the railroad crossings
throughout the state. Annual evaluations of these crossings by FOOT Safety
Office prioritize crossing improvements based upon street and railroad
traffic, school bus usage, crossing sight distance, train speed, and numerous
other safety-related factors.
The Vine Avenue crossing has been identified by the FOOT as a priority
location for the installation of grade crossing signals. Currently controlled
by only a crossbuck sign, the crossing is on a skew and has a significant
hump, both of which complicate a crossing maneuver.
CSX Transportation, Inc. will install flashing signals at the crossing
at an estimated cost of $62,575.55, which will be paid by the FOOT. The
annual maintenance cost, based upon the currently accepted cost of grade
crossing control devices, is $1,404, of which the City would be responsible
for 50%, or $702.00.
.
CCmtg
2/6/92
21
, ".:. ' ':' ' . ',':>:~~,",:\~." .."'~ "'. -
."~""'I'~;~':":'-':' .:.:'.' ", ,~, ,"."..; '.' .". " ,..;.,'.> :"::~
. . . " ".' : " " " t ., '... '.' \ '..: ',' 'd, , ';' :." :. .;e,.
.' .~ c',I'. .. ;", ,::.,' ,.' . '" . ,',"":,'"',, ',':":',,,!::..;,'.,' "'.' ,--,),..,',>.',~ ',' ."',' .',','.' ,<'. ,'....'..:."':'.,,,,: ,:'."', .'.: , '
",'" ',' ",,>,,},:/:'<c;i;;:',~'.,','.{f,;:',:"i::, " " ,
'};,y:,> .'.. :,' ::i::,/~::>:'.'. " "." ,,:, ,{:;~:~: ':': : ,:;:', \,,?' 'E\::J~'r!~';!2~{;1'~~:i:;;~{,;UlJ'}';:'( ",' """,. :,
" ' . '. . .' .."." . . " , , ': . " '. ; .. , ",', , : j'-
~', :;", -': . , '. ' " -t ,.. . I :' ' ',,',' '.
,.-I_.".....,'_:.~..'t:.,...,;~.1.,.",.:.'..:,.,.~f...,'"..,:':..:.'" .; .,' " . 'l,t:,j',> "',..... 'l'~' J'
, ~ .,."';' :<;:,~':?;':::~;:,: ",", ,;';",_'" '.. : \" ' ".I",..."l
.:'.:....~ ," ~.'~.:11.l~.:~:. ~.~.:.,'.,',,' ,," "I;.
''',.", .. ",,',l, '.' .,'J . ',':''', t.
, " ~:,::~. ,\;:-J~:~",~{:V'>' ,~' " ,~.:,,':}i::;,:./t
;.\'
. ,', . ~ ::.
~ .' '.
-~ : \::
..,.....
, "
.'
.;.
.
':.'
<' ~.
, ;.=>
:. ;'"";'
",'of,
.."::'/t:
. '. ~ ,,...
:..:... : :",
";,' f
.
-,'
.,"
,"f ..
~: ". + . .'
j:
"
>:',:
\.. ::, f~' ~-:~.
.
, (. .~
,
~
. ~ ..,'1, .'
J.,:'
....'..
A similar agreement for the Vine Avenue Crossing was approved by the
Commission in late 1990, but was never executed by CSX Transportation,
apparently because of a pending increase in maintenance fees. The updated
fees exceed the fee originally approved by the Commission. CSX has requested
a revision af the Resolution to reflect the new maintenance fees.
Commissioner Nunamaker moved to approve the agreement with CSX
Transportation, Inc. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Resolution N92~14 and read it by title only.
Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass and adopt Resolution '92~14 and
authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly
seconded, upon roll call the vote was:
"Ayes": Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM '44 - Communitv Relations Board ~ 2 aooointments '(elK)
Commissioner Regulski moved to reappoint Heather Foderingham. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to appoint Jonathan Wade. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #45 - Historic Preservation Board - 1 appointment (Cl,K)
Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to reappoint Janet MacNutt. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM 146 - Parks & Recreation Board - 1 appointment (eLK)
Commissioner Regulski moved to appoint Gary Giordano. The motion was
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #47 - Other Pendino Matters - None.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
Resolutions
ITEM 148 ~ Resolution #92-4 - Requesting Pinellas County abate taxes and
discharge liens on property acquired for municipal purposes
The City Attorney presented Resolution #92-4 and read it by title only.
Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass and adopt Resolution #92-4 and authorize
the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded, upon
roll call the vote was:
CCmtg
2/6/92
22
.I~~. ~'/~,~,,1~.~
. ~ ... ,;. .:. ~ I 1- '. .. ,,'
, ", ," ,.,:';';';J'::q:,/j;~:~{i;::::;':
" I.
. '. .~"'.;,>~..I \ i'
,"
.}. ,-,'.,
...,..:
:., ,:
,
" '
\' '
, .'
;,"
.'
" ,
'.
,'.t.
, ,
, .,
,.,
. : ~
, .. .~,
> ~ ~ .~
;:1 '
.~ ~.
, '
, ,
. . f, " ~ .
. '(~. T:~ " > ,..
, ,;
\ ~
"
,I.
','\ /.
.
" ,
....
j'
,..
ic; ..If / .~:c ~:..
"Ic
. '
.
.
.
"Ayes": Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
UNaysu: None.
ITEM 149 - Resolution 192~lO - Dedication of easement and approval of
temporary construction easement for Pine11as County's widening of Gulf Blvd.
The City Attorney presented Resolution 192-10 and read it by title only.
Commissioner Berfield moved to pass and adopt Resolution 192-10 and authorize
the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded, upon
roll call the vote was:
"Ayes": Regulskit Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM #50 - Resolution #92-13 ~ Dedication of utility easements for Florida
Power facilities at City's Northeast Wastewater Pollution Control Facility on
S.R.580
The City Attorney presented Resolution #92-13 and read it by title only.
Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass and adopt Resolution #92-13 and
authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly
secondedt upon roll call the vote was:
"Ayes": Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM *51 - Resolution #92-15 - Assessing property owners the costs of mowing
or clearing owners' lots
The City Attorney presented Resolution #92-15 and read it by title only.
Commissioner Nunamaker moved to pass and adopt Resolution #92-15 and authorize
the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded, upon
roll call the vote was:
"Ayes": Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM * 2 - Resolution #92-16 - Supporting Surface Water Improvement and
Management Program (" SWIW'
The City Attorney presented Resolution #92-16 and read it by title only~
Commissioner Nunamaker moved to pass and adopt Resolution #92-16 and authorize
the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded, upon
roll call the vote was:
CCmtg
2/6/92
23
.'.
.
.
.
ItAyes": Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
ITEM 153 - Other City Attornev Items
The City Attorney indicated he has distributed Resolution N92M20 urging
the Florida Legislature and the Governor to enact House Bill 101 or its
companion Senate Bill 1080 relating to coastal building zone construction.
The City Attorney indicated the bill had already passed the House and
Senate. It was que~tioned whether or not the resolution should be changed and
he indicated this was not necessary.
The City Attorney presented Resolution #92M20 and read it by title only.
Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to pass and adopt Resolution #92-20 and
authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly
seconded, upon roll call the vote was:
I1Ayesu: Regulski, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald, Berfield and Garvey.
ttNays 11 : None.
ITEM #54 - City ManaQer Verbal Reports
The City Manager reported the Sun'n'Fun Festival will be held from April
18 to May 3 with the parade being on May 1, 1992.
He reported a proposed settlement with Barnett Bank regarding the
embezzlement of the parking facility funds. The bank will give to the City
$100.000 plus over $7,700 in interest in settlement of the funds embezzled by
Barnett Bank employees. In response to a question, it was indicated this
settlement relates only to this one event and would not prevent pursuit of any
additional embezzlement cases.
Commissioner Nunamaker moved to approve the settlement with Barnett
Bank. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM #55 - Other Commission Action
Commissioner Berfield questioned the status of the reply to the
Cle~rwater Beach Association and it was reported that a response should be
sent out in approximately a week~
Commissioner Fitzgerald expressed concerns regarding Item #11, the
alcoholic beverage variance for the Rite Aid arocerv store~ He stated at the
time of his vote he was unaware of a petition opposing the action. It was
indicated the petition was submitted to the Planning and Zoning Board in
opposition to the conditional use which they granted.
CCmtg
2/6/92
24
"',:. ". .t;~., . '".. I. '...;. '. .~_ .. \, "," :, :.:~'..:.' ..','"; ;"" I, '.:'
. _,':: ::';.' .,.,....: :,' :..~. .... I,; .:. .: ~ '. ,\.. L~",,:.~ _ . .. ~ . '.~ I .
.
.
"
':~
!r.
.
Commissioner Fitzgerald moved to reconsider Item #11 and to continue it
until such time as a new public hearing can be advertised. The motion was
duly seconded. Upon the vote being taken; Commissioners Fitzgerald, Berfield
and Nunamaker voted "Aye", Commissioner Regulski and Mayor Garvey voted "Nay".
Motion carried.
Discussion ensued regarding policy in the future to notify the
Commission of such submissions. "The Planning and Development Director
indicated that historically staff does not copy petitions and letters to other
boards to the Commission. It was stated that in the future any such petitions
and correspondence will be referenced in the background of the agenda item to
the City Commission. It was also suggested it be announced at the other
boards regarding issues that would still have to come to the Commission so
that people in attendance would be aware of that.
Mayor Garvey notified the public regarding the upcoming "Paint Your
Heart Dutil program. She stated they are looking for corporate sponsors and
volunteers. Hopes are to paint 20 homes of elderly, low income individuals
and 6 UPARC group homes have been included in this effort. She stated anyone
wishing to volunteer should call 462-6147.
ITEM 156 - Adiournment
The meeting adjourned at 10:56 p.m.
ATTES~j n f~[' '
,_.G Y lerk ,
.' -
lL
.
Dt!lP"I>~
:c
CCmtg
2/6/92
25
,:.:,~.j