Loading...
04/25/1985 c:;: ' '. '," ,'" , ;.~~:: ' ,,' , " ';'~ <.'J ~, ~ '. " c '" ' '>"':'-'0 ' 'c_," ......, ' ,~ . . " . '. ' j,.., .' ' ",:,'. ' ',,-,, '. ' .~;: ':.: ' <", J I:. .! ~, : : 1'.- : 4', ~;. ;,~,' ~ ; ~:' .. (" '~:.:\.:'iiA ' 'r'v' \t~:(':;. . ~ ,.' " ,', f~..;:,r;:'i: ,< , .. ~ :j//' :; ',: ~~ .', ".' .' ." ~V;j~~/'::":,t~ ;. Ii ..-... , " r"1 o I' FIe 1 A I. MINUTES RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE City of Clearwater, Florida 'April 25 ~ 1985 /" 'MEMBERS PRESENT: , Elizabeth Haeseker, Assistant City Manager~ Chairman Nick Lewis~ Fire Marshal Victor Chodora~ Building Department Robert Maran~ Public Works Department , Keith Crawford~ Traffi~ Engineering Director Cecil Henderson, Utilities Department . John Richter, Planning Department Ream"Wilson~ Parks and Recreation Director If , " , NON-MEMBERS PRESENT: 1. I ,Phil Davidson, Tampa Bay Engineers Ralph Coxhead, Developer Crest Subdivision Victor D. Chambers, Planner Crest Subdivision , 'Sumne'r Waitz,' ~~a;'tz & Faye 'The meeting \'Ias called to order by Chainnan Haeseker at 9:10a.m. in the Operations Center Conference Room. The"minut'es of the regular meetings on March 28 and April ll~ 1985 were approv~d as submitted. ' ITEM #1 -,THE CREST SUBDIVISION, Courtesy Review (located on the West side of McMullen-Booth Road, approximatel~ 1500 feet North of Union Street.) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT " . " " ,"" NiCk Lewis: Water lines and hydrant placement must be shown when site 'plan, is ,submitted. Hydrant distances to be no greater than 600' apart. , Vic Chodora: No' corrment. " Bob Maran: Presented written comments outlined in Attachment #1. Also suggested continuing the 'subdi vi si on plat review until the areas of concern to Environmental Management can be worked out. Cecil Henderson: Questioned if Karen Wilson felt that the problems could be , worked out. Bob Maran responded that it was her feeling that with the loss of'sever~l lots"the problem could be resolved satisfactorarily l\ , , " ", t, ,;. \; "...", r. "},.f '. C'::\:.. ~l " , ;!..,. .~,'.'~ . . . . ~' ."\ : (.':. .. ;~, ~~~:/ ):: ;. , " :" , I ,." .' I," !..' .: '" ", .1': .', Pi' . "(,,, ... '.,'. .'~ " .;;: ~ . . . ~:'. :~:) ~\r:' '. . ... ,', ,'. '" ,\ ~ .", . ;~.~" :.'~, ',~ . ' ~ j...:t:' " : i~~;.: ,". t:~~:~!~,~.I".: ,'." /~) .-.... Resource Development Cornnittee Meeting April 25, 1985 Page Two Mr. Davidson commented that they had the State DER on site and Pinel1as County Env1ronmental,and they basically didn't have a problem with what the developer proposed for the development of the property. Maran Mr./WeAae~seR further commented that the roadway pavement must be 241 wide rather than 20'. The developer questioned if there would be any problem with altering the center line to avoid removing two trees, one of which is a 3611 oak tree. Mr. Crawford responded that this would not cause any problems. Kei th Crawford: Tra ffi c Engi neeri ng' s convnents were as follows: 1. Questioned how service and emergency vehicles will enter the subdivision since it will require a card for entry, and how service vehicles will turn around as the cut in the median is not large enough for a car to turn around. 2. On the platting of lots, it is the City's policy on private streets for the property line of lots to come out to the center of the ROW so that somebody owns the property. 3. Detention area that is basically someone's side yard, questioned what would prevent someone from filling the detention area in? Mr. Davidson replied that it is under easement that is addressed in the deed to the lot. Cecil Henderson: Presented written comments prepared by the Utilities Department (Attachment #2). Additionally, the Utilities Department would want a la' easemenVup to and including all hydrants and meters. over water mains' John Richter: There needs to be a through access somewhere. Ideally it should be on a boundary line between two subdivisions. It is Planning's concern that some of the lots would not be buildable by the time setbacks would be applied to the property. If lots are to be 16,000 square feet, that being the case, the City's zoning that would apply to the property would be nothing less than RS-100. RS-100 zoning requires a 3D' setback from the streets, 20' from rear property lines and a mininum width of 80' measured at the setback line. Also would like to see lot line dimensions, setback lines, and lot dimensions. , :' Ream Wilson: Presented written comments prepared by the Parks Department. (Attachment #3) MOTION: Cecil Henderson moved to continue the Preliminary Subdivision Plat. Motion seconded by Robert Maran and carried unanimously. ~ijFr(y,: ~ . ":..' <,', :' ::::::~~'1; '~';'." ;", ,",', '. ..-... r ,-, c Resource Development Committee Meeting Apri 1 25 t 1985 Page Three ITEM #2 - TRECO OFFICE COMPLEX {located on South side of S.R. 580, North of Daniel Street. FINAL S IrE PLAN Nick Lewis: Vie Chodora: Department. No comments. Presented written conments prepared by the Building (Attachment #4) I .) Bob Maran: Presented written comments prepared by Engineering (Attachment #5). Additionally commented that one of the retention ponds appears to be on the highest ground on the site and asked that the developer review this. Keith Crawford: Thought this plan had been approved several months ago and questioned why the plan was back before the Committee. Mr. Waitz responded that it had gone to a hearing officer at the applicant's request and the hearing officer approved the plan as presented. Mr. Crawford had requested the entrance to be off Daniels Street and the request was denied by the hearing officer. Mr. Crawford felt he' should have been present at the hearing to present his reasons for the request. The part of the property on Daniels Street is in residential zoning and that part of the property can't be used as a parking lot unless a special Adjustment and exception is granted. This request went before the Board of/dtist Appeali ~ . . and they denied the use of the property for parking. This decision was then taken before a hearing officer. Mr. Crawford felt he should also have . been present at the Board of/~t Appeal~ hearing to present his position~djustmentand Mr. Crawford restated the reason for his request to have the main entrance off Dan;els Street was that it is directly across from Countryside High School which is already a highly congested area and he felt there was no reason to add to the already high traffic in this area. It is Mr. Crawford and the Board's feeling that when the zoning in this area is changed from residential this should be looked into again. Mr. Waitz felt the developer would be more than happy to have the entrance off Daniels Street if there would be any way for it to be done. Mr. . Crawford further commented that dimensions for parking are missing, but when he scales it he feels the area is short. Also, parking spaces are marked 18' and that needs to be changed to 19'. Cecil Henderson: This project is in a County water service area, and county water is available. The dumpster location appears to be fine. .~'O :'" ::) r~ ,,-... I " o Resource Development Con~ittee Meeting Apri 1 25. 1985 Page Four r.",' (.{., ' John Richter: Requests the plan to show where the sign for the development will be placed. Landscaping will be necessary between S.R. 580 and the parking spaces. Under notes - land use classification on lots 2-5 is residential office instead of commercial tourist. Also, parking spaces need tQ be 19' deep rather than 181. Ream Wilson: Presented written comments prepared by the Parks Department. (Attachment #6) MOTION: Cecil Henderson moved to recommend approval of the final site plan for TreeD Office Complex based on the finding of this committee that the plan confonns with the design guidelines for site plan review subject to the following conditions: 1. Retention ponds be redesigned to meet City standards as required by the Public Works Director. 2. That parking stalls be correctly indicated to meet City minimum standards as required by the Traffic Engineering Director. 3. That the location of the sign for this complex be shown on the plan. 4. That landscaping as required between S.R. 580 and the parking lot be indicated an the plan. 5. That the loading space be correctly indicated at 300 square feet minimum. ~. ' " ';.~ ~t, '.':i:./ (.~: " .~.. . 'j :( .. 6. That the notes be corrected for the land use classification for lots 2-5 to indicate the correct residential office designation. 7. That the developer be required to pay the open space assessment prior to the City certification of the site plan. " 8. That the requisite initial building permits be issued within six months from the date of approval of the final site plan~ and all requisite certificates of occupancy be issued within two years from the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Motion was seconded by Ream Wilson and carried unanimously. There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:15 a.m. : I ~ . ,~ : I , ,~ ~ '. . i :;: :2)' :I:~'i '\." .~ ~ >. ~ ~ . . jt'. ~J..."' . ,.' f ", ;, ')~~I~ ,\ ~~, ~:. ~c~.;