10/25/1984
. .'
,
", . \ . '. \., ."d; /
. .-...,
OFFICIAL
:f~
. ,.,!}
M 1 NUT E S
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CO~~ITTEE
October 25, 1984
Members Present
/
~", .
Elizabeth S. Haeaeker, Assistant City Manager - Chairman
Nick Lewis. Fire Marshal
John Rooks, representing the Public Works Department
Edward Bethel, Building Director
Keith Crawford) Traffic Engineering Director
Cla.ude Howell, representing the Utili ties Department
Paula Harvey, Planning Director
Art.Kader, representing the Parks and Recreation Department
~.
!~
Also Present
'Sumner Waitz, Waitz and Frye Eng.
John Miele, J. L. MaBon of Fla.
Frank Krafsig, representative for Woodlawn Terrace Condos. (Custer)
Jay Custer, representing Woodlawn Terrace Condos.
Tere~ce'Jennings, representing City of Clearwater
"'. I
, ,
..
I,' +
~, ",. .r........~
".':':J . .
':::. '. 'The
~:>. . the
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~/;"
J.".~ .
meeting was called to order by Elizabeth S. Haeseker, Chairman, at 9:00 A.~I'J in
Operations .Center Conference Room.
<,' ,.
1.'. Sprin~ Lake, located at Keene Road and Virginia Avenue.
.'(J~ L. Hason of Floridat Inc.) (Approved with conditions at
'. RDC mee t ing of December 6,. 1983.:.l
. MAJOR PLAN CHANGE
MAJOR PLAT CHANGE
", .,
.' . . ~ > .'
'>~':. ::'.
I. ' ,~ _
~F.:~ "
" .
'" Mrs. Uaeseker stated that comments would be made on both items and there would be two
motions made after the comments.
". .: . <'.
Edward Bethel - Stated he had two concerns: (1) The site plan should show a wall, and
. 'there is not one shown; and (2) the Building Dept. will need a copy of site lighting
.for the final building set. Mr. Waitz replied that (1) Paula Harvey has been. given the
criteria regarding the wall and it is being prepared; and (2) Florida Power has completed
the ,site lighting plan and he would get a copy to Mr. Bethel.
;(. ~)'Kei~h C:awf~ - Stated concern with the. w~ll being 'built so vision would be ~mpa~red
;~::- ... :.com1.ng l.n and out of the property. Mr. Ha1.tz stated the wall would. be a comb1.llat1.on of
y/> . '.>. pi.1aster and cedar panels; and J basically, they will be setting back 2 ft. from the lot
<~'.'. ,. property line. He further stated thatJ for all practical purposes) they would be continuing
,.\. the',wall to the intersection and probably do a 4SQ angle across the lot for the visual.
-1-
RDC
.'
"1::'
.~
.-.......
Mr. Crawford also questioned whether the streets would be private or public, and
Mr. Waitz replied they were private.
,..--., Claude Uowell - Stated Utilities Dept. would have the Rame comments previously made
concerning Spring Lake, emphasizing that there would be NO parking on the streets.
Paula Harvey - Stated as a reminder that there is a certified site plan for this project
already on file for this plan, with the following conditions: (1) A private covenant be
filed with the plat to preclude parking of nny motor vehicle, recreational vehicles, or
boat on the street surface, (2) The final plat be recorded no later than Jan. 19, 1985,
(3) the ISP zoned ar~a be subject to separate site plan review prior to its development,
(4) all easements be granted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, (5) a
detailed site plan for the internal project recreation Brea be approved prior to its
construction, (6) a detailed plan for the proposed wall and landscaping along Keene Road
and County Road 34 accompany the certified site plan, said wall not to be located closer
than five feet to the right-of-way, (7) the requisite initial building permit(s) be
procured no later than January 19. 1985,and all requisite certificate(s) of occupancy
be procured within two (2) years from the date of issuance Ort the initial building permit.
Further comments that the Planning Department had w86-aR~~bjection to ~elocation of
the recreation area; and Mrs. Harvey would recommend that, if the Connnittee approves the
plan changes, that the same conditions of approval continue with the aite plan.
Mr. Waitz mentioned that the changes were (1) lots adjusted, (2) numbers changed, and (3)
pulled back 25 ft. in order to accommodat~ D.E.R. because of the water line.
Art Kader - Had no comments, other than the park fees have been met and approved with
conditions of the ROC meeting of 12/6/83.
, .~
'. OT~:.;;J
No further discussion ensued, and Mrs. Hseseker asked for a motion to be made.on the
Major Plan Change.
. Paula Harvey moved that the Major Plan Amendment for Spring Lake be approved subject
to the original conditions of approval by the City Commission on January 19, 1984.
,'.
, ;
Discussion on the Notion: Paula Harvey stated that the Hajor Plan Change would not affect
the een~o~~-er-{e~ml/and the developer would still have two years from the last certification.
timcframe
Keith Crawford seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
TION
Paula Harvey moved to recommend that the Major Amendment to the Preliminary Plat for
Spring Lake be approved subject to the original conditions of approval by the City
Commission of January 19, 1984.
'.'
The motion was seconded by John Rooks, and the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Waitz questioned if it would be necessary to revise the engineering plans to make the
lot numbers correspond with the lot numbers that are shown on the new certified site plan.
John Rooks stated that revised plans were not neededj but the easements were ,needed.
Mrs. Haeseker commented that ,they shouldn't be receiving any certificates of occupancy
until ~he plat. is filed. ..
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.,. 2. Woodlawn Terrace Condominiums located East of Nyrtle and South of R~ Norton Park
(Custer)
. . ':-.~
'oJ
COMMUNIT{ IMPACT STATEMENT
-, .
, ,
c-
":',',,'
. "
Nick Lewis - No Comment
~ " c
.,'
"
.', .
-2-
RDC 10/25/84
:." 'I
'cC'
, ' , .. ".~,"" '~ to,,' :1\ ,l'"l'"lj' :,,',j:,', I ,:l "j", ,I,.:'..~ '.','\',~' '-'. iI";':, :',~'
~
I
/""'"
John Rooks - No comment.
" rJ
Edward Bethel - No comment.
Keith Crawford - No comment.
Claude Howell - See written comments (Attachment No.2)
Paula Harvey - O;mrented that a letter of compliance is needed stating that the developer
is in accordance with what is written in the Community Impact Statement, and that the
project will be developed in accordance with what is provided for in the C. 1. S.
Art K~der - See written comments (Attachment No.3)
There was no further discussion on the Community Impact Statement.
MOTION Paula Harvey moved to recommend approval of the Community Impact Statement for
Woodlawn Terrace Condominiums subject to the following:
A. The submission of an addendum which identifies
(1) the correct water line size along Woodlawn;
(2) that provides a statement regarding the availability of natural gas and) also)
(3) makes reference to both ordinances regarding recreation land and recreati~n
facilities and open space fees; and, also, 1
'i .,~
" /")
. I
. . -----
B.
That a letter of compliance be submitted by the developer.
John Rooks seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
.'.
~. "
;.'.
r'
FINAL SITE' PLAN
~. ,j
Nick.Lewis - Commented that there is a ,problem with the water distribution layout, as
the lines need to be looped. Mr. Lewis referred the developer to Claude Howell of the
Utilities Department.
. ..
>~
";; ~
j~,l,:
'~ "
. '. ~'
I'c.
\.
, .
~ : '
+,c
Claude Howell - See written comments (Attachment No.4). A further comment by Mr. Howell
was that a 10 ft. easement will be required over all the water mains in the complex, up to
and including meters and hydrants. Mr. Howell further stated that he would work with the
developer in trying to get an easement along the west side of the property to put a water
line in that location. Mr. Krnfsig stated that the neighbbring property owner did expect the
easement.
John Rooks - See written comments (Attachment No.5)
.:
.::j.'
:~ ~.
'+,'
,. ,
.,'
'1
Edward Bethel - Noted that there may be a problem with the openings because of the di$tance
from the lot lines. The developer should check Table 600 and 400 of the Building Code and
talk with the Building Plan Examiner in the Building Department. The final plans should
have site lighting plans.
',','
I,'';',
,I'
I."~.
-:1\
,'I",
: <~
.. .
','
....n
'.'
'.
'.~ 1,-
, ~..I.
Keith Crawford - Made the following comments: (1) State law requires three handicapped
parking spaces for a parking lot of this size and signs to be installed (Mr. Crawford
furnished Mr. Krafs~ with sample of sign), (2) the parking area will take up more than the
'1% of the property, which is shown on the plan (this only allows for 20 sq. ft. of parking
space instead of 200 sq. ft.) (3) the walkways should be shown on the site plan, (~) the
d~iveway at Woodlawn should meet the street at 900 angle, (S)parking spaces should be
i~creased to two per single family. Mr. Crawford questioned if the easement needed is
a'drainage and utility easement or a right-of-way easement. John Rooks stated that it is
~ draiit.age and uti! ity easement..
.'. ~.,
.,
~ . I
,I.'
~;:'.:,:
,~~ ~
.It
i;::';::z,'';:;}:;;,Vi:)<::;-:i /:::";(:?,:; ;; l>,' ,,:: :L'fi:~: i,' : ;::? 2:;. \:., " <~;;'i ':", ,i,', "',, .. '. " "
.",' l' '",,' ,'~;" i.;: , ":", ,-''. '.' .'C >; '. , " ' , " \" ,\- '., ,. , "--" " ,- ":" ?7Xi . . ,;}\:('-';it:\.rii;}&i.,':',' ' ..",' '
:'~:~~:,',:1~.:..,;iii;~i:~'t't :.'\t::j,.~,:.:"~'~,!!';,:{,(;l':;,"l~:t::t/~},,,'i~'};';:"" '.., ' ".'::"~.!,~,;,:p:,;,:, '<i'" :, : :'i ',', '. ,,' ",', .,E ,:'..'j ,'::':, 1".-'" \'~':'
.\' ,.... '{ ,'-;r..,.. .. '..~>,:..:~':,..{~:. "'. '.,." ":;}~'~::i~:i~:;'....,)~\'~.:;:}:~:~:~.;.:(i)'\::~~;',;:./~~:;..; ,,:. '. ......::' ,", ,...:!',:>
, ',> ;1', i,~ " ,:' ,.' ,:.' '~"."" ,';.' "?.".~i :...'~. ",'.' I" " " ,," · '" '" ,," , "'.. '" ' ,',' :'; '. :f;,:!,';Il;~1:::::r' " .;,
r. '.~':;:;\~,::':','\:;'~:;>i~:FhL.: ':;>::'.' ..' ..' '; i '''::, ,..:,,'~ ..'.i,..}/;';,. '. .;:. " ,.,,' '"
""fr)'",'.:~ ,.,,~...,.1"..,II' '. .' f..... , 'i':'., . .,. .'. ,., f
\: <,~.;:.....i.:,\ ..,~.:;{".z.:.",,,,,'..;.:'."'~!":.:.!'..::.~...'.'.'.:......:,',..': r.'c::' ',:E.' ." ::.1,',).. '-L" .' ;',:.,0" ~.,'.' ", ~ ,:[,' .!,
I ';,:':'i,'::: ';' ' , r · .." ,,' ' ',:;'i"/;:"!;\:;';:,rt: - ':~;',;, I, " "
",::.,'i.-:~:'.. ,~::., .,1.1''':'.'.,1'/ ' " " >" " "":" ":"",,~, I,',: ~ 1 >. ,,"c ",': :,", ,'. ""'1'.,,:> '
"
.'
,~
I
.---
~
.,t
Paula Harvey - Stated thllt the following informlltion will be needed on the site plan:
(1) the building height must be shown in (eet. (2) they must indicate on the plan whllt
the maximum number of units in n row will be, LInd thi s cannot exceed six I (3) show tho zoning
of the adjacent property'on ~he site plnn, (4)' the opace between buildings cannot be less
than the building height, or 20 ft. I whichever is granter, (thera might be II problem of
separlltion between two of the buildings), (5) this project will require approval by the
City Commission as they are requesting II transfer of density from the RMA area to the
RM12, (6) also a note that at the time of Preliminary Review by the City Commission, a
statement be provided that the Public Works Department is requesting that a letter be
provided 'from the developer stating that a t such time right-of-wllY is necessary for
Myrtle Avenue it will be given to the City by the developer.
.'
Art Kader - See written comments (At tachment No.6)
There was no discussion on the Finnl Site Plan.
MOTION Pauln Harvey moved to recommend approval of the Final Site Plan for Woodlawn Terrace
Condominiums based upon n finding of this Committee that the plan conforms with the design
guidelines for site plan review, subject to the following:
A. Changes to be made on the plan prior to certification;
.',
(1) building heights be shown in feet;
(2) maximum number of units in a row not to exceed six;
(3) the adjacent zoning be shown on the plan;
: :?>\
(4) that the owner's name be shown on the site plan;
.! ' ..........-'~
(5) that building separation not be less than the building height, or 20 feet,
whichever is greater;
(6) that the water system be redesigned to provide a complete loop system and be
approved by the Utilities Department;
(7) that handicapped spaces be shown;
(8) that the figures regarding th~ area utilized in parking be changed, and any
resulting coverage figures be revised;
I,..
:,,/
(9) that the entrance area to Woodlawn Street be adjusted to meet at 900 angle; and
,
r ,.
'.
;."
(10)al1 internal walkways be shown on the site plan;
','
B. And that the following conditions be noted on the plan at the time of certification:
(1) that a 10 ft. easement be provided over all of the water mains up to and
including meters and hydrants;
(2) that a 69 ft. drainage and utility easement be given along the western side
of the property;
"~
."J
(3) that the wet pond be designed and constructed in accordance with City requirements;
" .
II, . ~..
::-~ . , '. ~ .
.~
(4) that a letter be provided from the developer to the City stating that at such
time a right-of-way is required for Nyrtle Avenue that it will be given to the City;
k:;" .
~>:il':~ . .
: \' ': c.
~.~. ......
(5) that the warranty deed for the park land to be dedicated to the City be given prior
to the certification of the aite plan; and,
\:", .'. .," '.,1': t,.: !,~.., ".' ~.:,', ,I :.:, ,~!':j ',' , 'l~""." ,'.;: ':i ,i\..', \ ,', I,. ';.:, "" ,,,\,,.t"~,~ '~:'.".('l,'.':;"....':, :' '.' ",j' ',L'. , ", ': ",l, ,,,,,.,' : '" "
,{ ,
..-....,
,"-'"
c.
That the requisite initial building permits be issued within six months from the
date of City Commission approval and the project be completed within two years from
the date of issuance of the initial building permit.
f)
John Rooks seconded the motion. and the motion carried unanimously.
Discussion ensued regarding deeding land to the City for right-of-way purposes. Mr. Krafsig
commented that Mr. Custer would have his attorney research the law before authorizing him
to deed the land to the City for right-of-way. ~Krafsia also complimented the Conunittee
and the City employees for their helpfulnC!IlB whil€? he has b~cn working on this project.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Northeast Water Pollution Control Plant.
MAJOR PLAN AMENDMENT
Terry Jennings of the City of Clearwater, Public Works Dept., Engineering, explained
that the plans are basically for on equipment building for a filter;(which is an
addition to the treatment process) and entry drive to the building, relocating the
chain link fence.
Nick Lewis - No comments.
John Rooks - No comments.
Edward Bethel - Stated the Building Department will need shoring drawings.
()
Keith.Crawford - Questioned whether a parking area was needed.
Claude Howell - No commen~B.
',: .t
Paula Harvey - Stated the following information be put on the plan to be certified:
(1) identify that the owner is the City of Clearwater; (2) identify Lhat the zoning
if3 IIpl!, Public Land; (3) indicate that there is no requirement for parkingi (4) indicate
what the area is in the building, and the square footage of the paving going into the
road; and, (5) what the total ownership is for the treatement plant area (calculation
of total. acres.)
Art Kader - Questioned the need for beautification around the building. Mr. Jennings
stated a code has been included in the project for the Parks Dept. for landscaping, etc.
. MOTION
Paula Harvey moved to recommend approval of the ~Iajor Plan Amendment for the Northeast
Treatment Plant to prov1de tor a Northeast ~'llter and ~ffluent Pump Station, based upon
a finding of this Committee that the plan conforms with the design guidelines for site
plan reV1ew SUbject to the tol1owing:
A. The information requested by the ~lannlng uepartment be provided on the
site plan prior to certitication;
.(\ (l) need to identify that the owner 1.8 tne Cl.ty of Clearwater;
l2) need to identify that the zoning 1S "1''', l'ubhc Land;
..<)
lJ) indlcate that there 15 no requlrement tor parking;
'. .
,
(4) indicate What the area lS 1n the OU1lding, and the square footage
ot the paving going lnto the road;
, ~ .
" .
: ~ '
'.
,. '
, , '
(5) what the total ownershlp 1S tor tne treatment plant ares) {calculation
,of total acres.)
RDC.lO/25/84
,!" '.'
u'
(i~~:}~f~l:~:~:>~.;':":' :.... ",1
,1J r'
/~.. .
.~~:; " .
~ ~ :
'J:' ~
~ ' I
'('.'
','
"\':' '.
;',~I;'~
::~._ r ~,.~:i
l{":' ,
;':~::
,;0 .
,.
," . ~ ......":;r
t.,
"
,.........."
~,
t
'-ll
D. ,Tho requisite initial bUilding permit be issued within six months trom
the date ot Ulty Manogar approVBl nnd the project completed within two
years from the date ot issuance ot the initial building permit.
\,
John !taoks sQconded the mot loon . Bnd tIle motion UllB carried unanimously.
.,~ .'
~; ~ < .' .~: I
If1:.
);:.:,'
.: 1
KdwBrd Bethel questloneo Whether a threshold inspector would be available on site.
~r~ Jennings-stated that Briley. Wild and Associates will have a threshold inspector
on the'site and operate under Uuildlng llept. sanction. and that Mr. Christiansen of
the Huilding Dept. had been contacted.
:.' ',:
;\:.~," .'
,. . ":;
-----~------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:;,
,'.
The meeting was adjourned.
?;J ".
\;.', "'.
.\r ",
. ~", : : .
~ . ~ , :
~::'" :' .. .
~.~,< .:",
I' :':"."
,~~ ,:: H '; .~.
" .
~,i~h;.,;'>,\: :,;;: ' '
~tn;,:~t'~,~~' '",.'i/<"., ;". ,.',
"'''-'J'~'' '...,-.'
~~~!}<. ",
1., ".~ .,'. "'",
rJ,:?"."':",:", ":';,
y:: ~~,"', ". '. ' ,
t-l\-:;~.:': _ ' '.
w\';' '...'t. "~:I:,~.. ' '.,
c, "
'.,
.,....
""\..,, .:.' ,.
"
.' .
: ~ '.,
" .
. . '. " ~ . '
. co,
.': ~. I .
,"
, ,
, ,
. L . ,~ >
, .~'. ..,
l /' ..': .,. "./ ..'.:'..:.'. ',./'
.~\~\A:', CT...'~, .
1'1. :t" . .,.' '. . . " ~ ,. : .. ~ .. .
:~~2j~'..>,~'-.i;:,'~,:...< ',:', , ':' ,": :'..,. "'.' ,:.'" ::: '
l~"e " ','" ..
~~~~::::.;; .':: ':\ .:'.~', ",:, '~':';"~ ,. ..'..;: ,:. ,.'
~~il~:{,\\.:.l~:>';'., ':..,:'"
iH'..... .'.(. T'I,l' .'" j .
1~1i\~,1~'.D;;,/;;,{~;:,";'... '. '.. ." '.
.;
CHairman
'.....,
" ,
\ ~ .
". I,
" '
:':' \. ) ~':;~
,'j>
':'.< J
'I,
",
"(.'.t
,',
,I
.,
'.
,.' ,
" ,
, i.'
,,' i.'
,J .'
"
.,
. :','f.
~;t
.~ ~ c
'1
'I
-b-
RDC .10/25/84