05/30/1984 - Special
. .,' .-
, '
,
.~
t I ~
.'
'.
"
, "
\' '. .
I..
\ .:~
\.,'. '
~.: ': ': '
: '
, .'
..' .
t;: "
r~.: ~. ~ ~',
::.\~<'. T: '
. <
~!:i.
~\ ~.., >.
-j.ll '
\.;.~~:;,r.~:',
- ....J
\r":...
~~~1:~.~. ~:
~~~ :.: :.
~~L~~'\'.' ~ ~
, ,
Ir.:; ..
~~(;,';: .
, '~ ,_.
','
rl
OFFICIAL
"'-~
M I NUT Ii S
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CO~~ITTEE
SPECIAL MEETING
May 30, 1984
,
. .,
j
Members Present:
?
~'
"
Elizabeth S. Haeseker, Assistant City Manager - Chairman
John Rooks, representing the Public Works Depnl'tment
John Chester, representing the Fire Department
Edward V. Bethel, Building Director
Keith Crawford, Traffic Engineering Director
Cecil Henderson, Utilities Director
Ream Wilson, Parks and Recreation Director
Paula llarveys representing the Planning Department
,
. .,
.~
Others Present:
I
;:
Richard Benware, represent ing Countryside \~oods
R..Ortega, Architect - Michael Lee Adams & Associates
5y Milgrom, representing Countryside Woods
\
.,
"
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Haeseker, at 8:46 a.m., in the Operations
Center Conference Room.
".
.
Minutes of the regular meeting of May 24, 1984, were approved as submitted.
, ,Paula Harvey offered an amendment to the May 10) 1984, minutes regarding the
Revised Preliminary Subdivision Plat for Landmark Woods. Chairman Haeseker
read the amendment to be included under Paula Harvey's comments on page 3:
'\
"Paula Harvey stated for the record that the Planning Department
supported Traffic Engineering's desire for a road connection to
McMullen-Booth Road but Mrs. Harvey voted no on the motion t~
deny as she felt a positive motion would be more appropriate."
Paula Harvel moved the amendment to the minutes be included in the record of the
minutes"of May 10, 1984. Ed Bethel seconded the motion; the motion carried
unanimously.
Countryside Woods Condominiums (Tract 62), located at Southwest
corner of Curlew Road and Countryside Blvd. (Continued from
Max 10 and May 24, 1984.)
CIS ADDENDUM - APPROVED WITH LETTER OF COMPLIANCE
REVISED FINAL SITE PLAN - APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
- 1 -
5/30/84
,~
I ,
---
,..,
i
Chairman Uneseker suggested the Committee review both the Communlty Impact Statement
Addendum and the Revised Pinal Site Plan at the snme time.
John Chester - No comments.
Ed Bethel - No comments.
Keith Crawford - Commented there is n problem with the driveways with the 750 turniftg
l'aEli,ys which is not acceptable. Mr. Crawford questioned the width of the garage door
and Mr. Ortega responded the garage door would be nine feet wide.
Discussion ensued regarding the driveways. Mr. Benware assured the Committee that
if the plan is in the parameters by which the Conunittec cnn operate, the developer
would be willing to the extent of dropping that unit, if necessary. lie stated they
would prefer not doing that as they believe they can make the driveways conform to
Traffic Engineering standards. Mr. Milgrom offered to increase the size of the
garage door and/or widen the driveway.
Cecil Henderson - No additional comments on the CIS Addendum. Mr. Henderson
offered the same comments on the revised final site plan as stated previously.
He commented the need for a 12-foot opening for the dumpster locations in front
of the enclosures and requested an easement over the water lines up to and in-
cluding the fire hydrants and meters. Mr. Milgram responded the easements were
noted on the plan.
. ..')
'...../
Ream Wilson - Reserved to continue his comments until discussion with City
Forester.
Paula Harvey - Discussed a procedural comment tllat the plan would go before the
City Commission on June 7 regarding the transfer of development rights. Mrs. Harvey
advised there was no guarantee that the City Commission would be giving the full 68
units. She stated further that the City Commission has the authority on the number
of units of this project with regard to the amount of transfer that the developers
were requesting.
Discussion ensued on the transfer of development rights. Mrs. Harvey stated that
under the guidance of the Code on the transfer of development rights, the exact
number is entirely up to the City Commission and that determination is based on
the proposed design for the project~ how well it fits on the site, and whether or
not all of the other requirements of the Code are being met at the same time.
John Rooks - Offered the same Engineering comments as stated previously--thnt an
easement be provided over the sidewalk or the sidewalk be re-Iocated into the
right-of-'\Iray on Curlew Road. Mr. Rooks also stated the stonn water detention
will be reviewed at the time of submittal of final construction plans. He com-
mented there may be some problems with the walls and storm drainage.
Ream \qilson: Stated the City Forester approved the revised landscape plans as
submitted.
'. ~ \
::'~y
"
Cecil Henderson moved to approve the CIS Addendum subject to the submission of
the, letter of compliance. Paula Harvey seconded the motion; the motion carried
unanimously.
j':"
"
- 2 -
5/30/84
':
~;;:;: .
~,NJ!.1ENT .
1;!;":. ".... ,
,so, .' '. . '.
It'i'''i1b '. .
~{!<t'~;" :, :.;
:,t~:;,/:,. ,.',..,., '
~f'~;<~' ..-- ::"', ;".
;h:. :' '.
~[:~;;: .: .' , "
&~t:~ ',..: .:;'
h.,:->:..",. ,',,:.
i~!:(!',; "
~"~~~:~::'~.;...~,.I." 'l.
~\:r.": .'.~ . ',.
{,'" .
"..:~.:.0.. '":,
li~;,,\i,c ,
~~~;~.~:; .. ,', , ..
(~r~)tj{,,:. >:' .', .
l)'I\;.~\... !.' ,.., I'. .' ~, .
~~1--;~".rh",:,,::: " ~ ~. '.
.' . ~ :: )
~. ,., .
~~I .
'.l<,
,
"~<~'
~;:' .
,.
.... .
~ '
'l'
,<~ i'~ ,
P' .
',:~
r
,.1
!~',~;,l :..
~~. ~'J.' I
r:~:~', :::: . .
\" .
.;~:
:!<, "
. .
1:<>. ,"'
.'
<',,'
I," .
!::' .
. "
()
..........
. Paula Harvey moved to approve tIle Revised Final Site Plan subj oct to the following
conditions:
1.
That casements be provided over the water lines up to nnd including
the meters and hydrants.
2.
That an easement be provided over the sidewalk or the sidewalk be
re-Iocated into the right-of-way.
That final storm water detention 'design be subject to the approval
of the City Engineer.
3.
4.
That final driveway design to the individual units be subject to the
approval of the Traffic Engineer.
S. That the initial building permit be issued within six months from the
date of City Commission approval and the project completed within two
years from the date of issuance of the initial building permit.
John Rooks seconded the motion.
Ream'\Ulson offered an amendment to the motion that the developer continue to
. work closely with the City Forester relating to the existing vegetation in
. accordance>with the revised landscape plans.
'Cecil'Henderson seconded the amendment to the motion; the amendment to the
motion carried unanimously.
The motion as ~ended carried unanimously.
. ' .
The m~eting adjourned at 9:30 a.m.
"
- 3 -