02/23/1984
.!f;~::"'":'~+:~ ,
'c
~
~
,
. '
~ , ..
cO'. lJ
.'. ',~~., ~ .
;T.'::. ' i ; .~.' ,
" ~, '.' . c .
,'~ 'c. ,: .: '..
'", ..
Z::":"
::!.;~~' ~- .:' , .
.~>;.''';';.'::..
I. ,", .: :
~,'. , . r , : '
f~;~::~ \'. ..:~
....,. .
t:... ."
I i~". .
:(\\:2\
~'i>:':0
~'\"',~: ~'
.\ . f !'
I
r:
OPI1 I CI I\l.
M I NUT E 5
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
February 23, 1984
v/
Members Present:
, /.
//
,,'
...."
Elizabeth S. Hneseker, Assistant City Manager - Chairman
Joseph Molnar, Fire Marshal
John Rooks, representing the Public Works Department
Andy Onufer, Acting Building Director
Keith Crawford, Traffic Engineering Director
Cecil Henderson, Utilities Director
Paula Harvey, representing the Planning Department
Ream Wilson, Parks and Recreation Director
Others Pl'esent:
Mrs. Agnes C. Rush, representing Keenes Inc.
Harold Griffin, Attorney for Keene, Inc.
George FrauncesJ Peter Brown Company
Edvard'lITitoll Vareas., Peter Brown Company
Sandy Lloveras, Lloveras, .BauT & Stevens
Tom Radcliffe, Lloveras, Baur & Stevens
Gordon. F. Killion; Gordon F. Killion & Associates, . Inc.
Tom Stower, Cogun Industries, Inc.
" '
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. The meeting was called to order by Elizabeth S. Haeseker, Chairman, at 10:07 a.m..
. .' .' \.
. in. the operations Center Conference Room. '
The'minutes of the regular Resource Development Committee meetings of Pebruary9,
1984', and January 26,' 1984, were approved as corrected.
'I
1.' Keene Townhouses, located on the North side.of Montclair Road, approxi-
mately 150 feet East of Keene Road. (Keene, Inc.)
PRE~IMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT CONTINUED
0',
FINAL SITE PLAN - CONTINUED
. Chairman Haeseker suggested the Committee discuss both the Preliminary Subdivision
'Plat and the Final Site Plan together; the Conunittee concurred.
Joseph Molnar - No comments regarding the Preliminary Subdivision Plat. Mr. Molnar
...... . ,~ommented a hydrant would be required 300 feet from the farthest building and '~ould
need to be '~hown on the Final Site Plan.
1.
2/23/84
. ' . 1 ~ , '.' .'. ' . " . ,... > , ~ . '.' , ' .' l' . l.' ~ ~ . " . ,', , ,~ , . ,,';',,'
~
.
J '
, ' ,.-"\
",J
, MOTION
~ '
'dQ
" '
, ,
.. .-......
,.---
John Rooks - See written comments (Attachment 1). Mr. Rooks stated tho setback
and easement lines were not noted properly on the plnn. He further stnted the
Florida Power casement runs directly under the building and documentation from
Florida Power would be required stating they hod no objection concerning the
easement. He further stnted the private drive may present a problem.
Andy Onufer - Commented handicapped parking needs to be properly identified.
Keith Crawford - Discussed Montclair Road, a collector rond, requiring a five-foot
sidewalk instead of the four-foot sidewalk.
Cecil Henderson - Had no objection or comment to the Preliminary Subdivision Plat.
See written comments (Attachment 2) concerning the Final Site Plan.
Paula Harvey - Commented on the following regarding the Preliminary Subdivision
Plat: the lot numbers need some identification by some sort of lettering identi-
fication identifying each lot as a separate unit; identification required for the
common ownership area indicating that it is, in fact. a common own~rship area;
the platting documents will need to contain specific information regarding main-
tenance of the area; assurance that there is access over the common area by all
of the individual property owners which can be' done in terms of an easement that
is granted to the individual lot owners; and that there be assurance within the
platting documents that there will be no density at a future date attributed to
the common area.
Mrs. Harvey commented on the following regarding the Final Site Plan: the
dumpster screen cannot exceed "30 inches in height unless a variance is obtained;
the building heights need to be identified on the plan (RM-8 zoning allows a
maximum building height of 25 feet; any height exceeding the 25-foot limitation
would require a variance); the location sign for the complex. if any. needs to
be identified on the plan; landscaping needs to be identified on the site plan
along the right-of-way and along the East and West property lines as a buffer
requirement for the parking area; the notation regarding the required parking as
1~ per unit needs to be corrected to 2 parking spaces per unit; and the dimensions
need to be'shown between the parking area and the ~FGa~-~a~~~n~-lG~~ property line.
Ream Wilson - See written comments (Attachment 3) regarding the City'S Open
Space/Recreation Assessments. Mr. Wilson stated the fees are based on the net
land area. Since the site plan indicates the gross land area, the developers
will need to calculate the net land area to figure the proper assessments.
Mr. Wilson distributed the City Forester's comments (Attachment 4).
moved
Paula Harvey ma-e6 to recommend the Final Site Plan and the Preliminary Subdivision
Plat be continued. Cecil Henderson seconded the'motion; the motion carried unanimously.
2.
2/23/84
.. . .'.'1. "j. ' , '_ . ~. > .,:. . .'~'.' ',) i,. . .' ': 'f, .., ;":~:'<"~~J"~';"'I",\;'~r"'~'I::':~'::t~:,I,::;~":
.............,
-.. '\
r,,:.~ 2. Wind Ward West Condominium (formerly "The Morringsll) located at the Nest
end of Windward Passage on Island Estates. (8lair and Harper)
FINAL SITE PLAN - APPROVED wrnt CONDITIONS
Joseph Molnar - Questioned whether the building \>lould be sprinkled. Mr. Lloverns
responded affinnativcly. Mr. Molnar had no other comments.
John Rooks - See written comments (Attachment 5).
Andy Onufer - Stated handicapped parking needs to be properly identified. Dis~
cuss ion ensued regarding handicapped parking requirements. Mr. Crawford commented
State law required one handicapped parking space for the first 20 parking spaces.
"'?I
. .6
Keith Crawford - Commented the common covered parking should be expanded to allow
for the columns. Mr. Praunces commented each stall has a clear space of 9 feet.
Mr. Crawford provided the developers with, a copy of the State law regarding handi-
capped parking requirements.
Cecil Henderson - See written comments (Attachment 6).
at NOJ:'th of the site.
Paula Harvey - Questioned the purpose of the paved area/. Mr. Radcliff responded
it is simply a turnaround area. Mrs. Harvey suggested a no parking sign be located
in the turnaround area. Mrs. Harvey had the following comments: the landscaping
needs to be shown on the plan; the need to provide the City with a dimension from
the North property line to the nortllern most building line which is not included
on the plan; the dimensions in the Southwest corner of the site need to be verified;
and the proposed six-foot wooden fence in the front building setback would require
a variance or the fence needs to be reduced to 30 inches in height.
Mrs. Harvey stated that covered parking is not permitted in the building setback
area and suggested providing covered parking in front of the building.
Ream Wilson - See written comments (Attachment 7) J:'egarding the City's Open Space/
Recreation Assessments. Mr. Wilson also submitted the City Forester's comments
(Attachment 8).
MOTION
Paula Harvey moved to recommend approval of the Final Site Plan based upon the
finding of this Committee that the plan confoTms with the design guidelines for
site plan ~eview subject to the following:
A. Changes to be made to the plan prior to certification:
(1) The paved area of the North section of the site be identified as
a no parking area.
(2) All landscaping be shown on the plan as required by the Code.
(3) Proper dimensions be identified from the most northern building
to the North property line.
(4) The height of the fence be adjusted to meet the height requirements
of the Code within the front building setback area.
(5) The dumpster pad be relocated out of the right-of-way.
3.
/"""'..
i {
,,-...
.~
.....~, ~.9
(6)
Handicapped purking be properly identified.
(7) The Opcn Spacc and Land Asscssmcnt information bc submitted
to the Parks nnd Recreation Director.
(B) The detention area be redistributed to keep out salt water
intrusion and that the d~vclopcr work with the Public Works
Department on adequate storm drainage prior to submission
of final construction drawings. .
(~) That consideration of the 5-foot elevation code be a part
of the engineering design.
(10) That covered parking be adjusted out of the building setback
areas. .
B. That the following conditions be noted on the plan for certification
and .recommendation for approval to the City Manager:
C.l)
That the building per.rnit be issued within 6 months from the
City Manager's approval and the project be completed within
2 years from the issuance of the building permit.
~ . , .
(~l That the Open Space and Recreational Land fees be paid prior
to certification of the plan.
"j. .
,~(':. :2):\: ·
.J ." 1.'
':"1 , e.
Cecil Henderson seconded the motion; the motion carried unanimously.
~~ ': ~ . ..
~;::,j.... .
3.
Central Church of the Nazarene, located on North Highland Avenue, South
of Linwood Drive.
',,: .
'"1 :/;,:
REVISED FINAL SITE PLAN - APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
',. .'
';,-~.
~<';!'. .
,
".., '
" ,
\,/' :
.' ,
<,.' "
.,'!
?'. ~ . .
'~h Molnar'~ Commented the fire hydrant needs to be shown across from the
. SOiitli drive. '
'John'Rooks - See written comments (Attachment 9).'
f: :,~~"
,: "
'Andy'Onufer - Commented handicapped parking needs to be identified.
Keith Crawford - Commented the driveway be shown to be not less than 24 feet
in width. Mr. Crawford also commented the parking stalls appear to be in the
dri veway . .,
',", I
;:: , .
;:< .
Cecil'Henderson - No Comments.
.,./
;"
Paula 'Harvey - Commented the reference to "future parki,ng" be deleted.
Ream'Wilson - See written comments (Attachment 10) regarding Open Space Assessment.
.. Mr. Wilson also distributed written comments from the City Forester (Attachment 11)
and the City Forester~s comments dated January 26, 1984 (Attachment 12). ~Ir. Killion
responded that the building was relocated to save the oak tree.
,
,
! .
f.@,
~L:', . :. .
-:1'..
. . ,.')
,.l.
4.
2/23/84
,
. .
... :, .': , ,;': :;',:;,;';" ,: :,:,. .
. ' , .'.' . ',,1 i "" ~ ". .:: ': .. .'
, '...' ":(:;;?,":/ '; :.'
-.,.' . ~..' ,
";-.~
.. .'j '. 1\
<.'1
~. .
" "
. .,
> . ~ j
, .
+. .1',.
, ."1\ :.,
')1 .,
. }t'
. ~-').
11'" ',' ..... .
.' . . , . . ~, '
. IC,,- :.1'.'.' .',
)'.i11 "
~ " '.',
1". ,
, .~, '. I
,...f." If
, ....
"'4. ,
.tc .<
I. /.;.. ~ .
> ~,c.
".
, .
, I:'~ 1
~ .c......
...,.
'. ,0:
j I " ~ .,
, .
. r
.1..
..:.; ;,.,
. ',...1
"",'. ,
..01"
': ~ .~ ~ '
>'!.
"';',
"'.
"j \.
~ '. ;:. .
. '<.:. t
. ~
,I"
f.;',.
.:,:, '.
.',
"',,\:
....,. :
"
t'.
. "
'.,
" '
,.~ "
"'.c
. I
"
" ,,'
. .'1/
,c,<
. l ~ ",:~ ,
I .1. . , .' ~ ) , , '.
." ,~:". i, " I' ;!.
.<.I.c
C".' ,
.,'
,". '
','
.'"
"
"
. ,
l' ,I ..~, \<,':'.( .. "/:,'~'.'~. -,.', ';";.' ~'P ./:....; I ,',;,,':,~.:/:.:~,
'. ,'. '(. '., ";:'~"I";';'':-' ", "r ',," ':"'.;:.?',""C
.... :/'1 ...' t. .. : '.:: ". ::"~:' v: '........':'.I."....:I...::.......'..:..~.,;,'.:.~.:,~::~1.,.;...,'.::, ~ :,,:: 'J: '/X::;, ::
,., 'I . "':'::"::;'<r-.;..:..." 'I. ,I . :';"; ..
~",.:'", . ., :~.i:.\.i.:.:./.:~:..:..:.l~.;.. I"":~:';' "J ',".. . ;':'>:....., ";"::."." ':"', ,
I .. . ;. .1/. .: .,: '-;:".; >'. :.:1 ~:'-:' ;' ) . ) . . ~ . j'
:. .'.
, .,. ~
'.
l<i
;,.
.' ,./... ~.: ..
" .
~ ',.c "
, ;:. <. i'~:' ~
\ _M.......--.._._~--_._--
n. \ I,
, \.
~~':,I',:'~ ~"
, ~~t' . :~.\ : I' ; ,.' :,
'. I
;:/.( :"J
".,:). ...~ I ..'.
".'
"
.1
f:r?r"!"""":",;~:~:
~'~'.::' :
l":~" . .'
l~'~":" .': r
\~}~i .:"'.' c .~
/.
<!\ :
~ " ',.
,
I
J'j:.
. .,
.j.:
..I .
.,.
'j
':"1'
; \ ~ '.
:,' .
. 'l'
1 ~ .
,II "j'
',1
, , ,
. 1,:,-
.',
'~"l /.
,.
\ . ., ~
.i:'
.(
, . j} ':
.,:
. 'S~
.{.
'I, .
..-...
t "
, MOTION
~
Pau~a Harvey moved to recommend approval of the Revised Final Site Plan hosed
upon the finding of this Committee that the plun conforms to the design guide-
lines for site plan review subject to the following:
A. Changes to.be made prior to certification:
:..,."
(1)
(2)
(3)
The reference to future parking be deleted.
That a fire hydrant be shown across from the South drive.
"
'.
. ,
;~ .
~'1- '
If a 10-foot easement exists along the railroad, it he shown
and extended down the length of the property.
(4) Handicapped parking be identified.
(5) The driveway be shown to be not less than 24 feet in width.
(6) Information regarding the assessed value of the property be
submitted to the Parks and Recreation Director.
(7)
Landscaping be shown on the site plan and a landscape plan be
submitted to the City Forester.
B. The conditions to be noted on the plan for certification would include:
"~
, j~).
(1) Grass parking to be approved by the City Engineer.
(2) .The 50-foot half right-of-way be provided along Highland
Avenue.
(3) Storm water detention be provided if determined to be required
by the City Engineer.
(4) The Open Space fees be paid prior to certification of the site
plan. I
(5) 'The building permit be issued within 6 months and the project
be completed within 2 years from the issuance of the building
permit.
Ream Wilson seconded the motion; the motion carried unanimously.
4.
Clearwater "19" Commerce Park/Kunnen Industrial Park, located on
U.S. 19. (Frank Kunnen)
, .
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT - APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS.
Joseph Molnar - No comment.
. John Rooks - Commented the easements for water should be blanket easements instead
of speci~ic easements; the drainage and utility easements along the private drive
need to be clarified to indicate that it is on both sides of the private drive;
, the five-foot drainage utility easement along the private drive needs to be clarified;
the 40-foot City of Clearwater easement is a right-of-way easement and needs to be
-c~arified; and the Florida Power easement is included in another existing drainage
and utility easement.
J'
5.
i: ' :
" .
I'" "
I
r
I'. .
, .
...........,
I I
,
!"
.:,,~
. .
. '. '~J":-"
"
Andy Dnufer - No comment.
Keith Crawford Commented onc of the driveways was very narrow and nceds to
be COTTected.
Cecil Henderson - Questioned the access to the lots and stated joint casements
between the owners would be necossary for access. He suggested private road
access casements be required.
Paula Harvey - Commented each lot will have to stand on its own for the purpose
of providing parking.
Ream Wilson - No comments.
. MOTION
Paula Harvey moved to recommend approval of the Preliminary Subdivision Plat
subj,ect to the following conditions:
A. That there be a blanket utility easement over all of the lots instead
of the specific easements.
B.
That there be access easements along the private drives to assure access
, to all of the individual lots.
i\
C.
That the 40-foot City of Clearwater casement be correctly identified as
a 40-foot right-of-way easement.
;;':'@
~.. '.
".1 ~ ~: ".. .~
{ " \ .:( ,.
)',' .
};~, '"J
" -
. .:. I ~ :'
That the S-foot drainage and utility easement along the private drive be
clarified to indicate that' it is on the sides of the private drive.
,'E. That 'the S-foot strip between the access easement and the Pine lIas County
private drive be included in the roadway easement.
D.,
'Joseph Molnar seconded the motion; the motion carried unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 11:41 a.m.
. ~ .
'}.'}>. .
. ~I' :.: .' .'
;'i{O . ·
rJ.;:'~"'~ .
. .
r.!:' ;. <
.')':.la ".'
~i::;~:':' ;~'" "
~f::i.; ·
6.
2/23/84