07/14/1983
.'''-...,
I
('\
,
OPFICIAL
"
,
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
City of Clearwater
Minutes of Meeting - July 14, 1983
Mombers Present
E. S. Haeseker - Assistant City Manager, Chairman
Nick Lewis - Fire Inspector
Dave Christiansen - Chief of Inspections, Building Department
John'Rooks - Engineer, PUblic Works
Keith Crawford - Director, Traffic Engineering
Cecil M. Henderson, Jr. - Director, Utilities Department
David Healey - Director, Planning Department
Ream Wilson - Director, .Parks & Recreation Department
,j
,/
',.......'
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Haeseker at 10;10 a. m.
Minutes of
Minutes of
Minutes of
'Minutes of
Minutes of
previous meetings were reviewed -
April 25, 1983 - Approved as submitted.
May 26, 1983 - Approved as amended.
June 9, 19B3 - Approved as amended.
June 23, 1983 - Approved as submitted.
~. Sandy Oaks - located East side of Kings Highway at Otten street.
Douglas M. Carter - Engineer
Rick Rhoades Developer
:;r;~' Mark Gobisch - Contractor
"6U.
- Preliminary SUbdivision Plat
c'Ni~k Lewis. - No comment.
Dave Christiansen - No comment.
John Rooks - Engineering Department comments attached. Considerable dis-
cussion between John Rooks and Mr. Carter regarding the 20 foot ingress/
egress easement. John Rooks felt that this should not appear on the plat.
Consensus was to check into this further with Bill Shepard and abide by
· his direction and decision. John Rooks had no other problems with this
plat..
Keith Crawford - No comment.
Cecil Henderson - No problems.
David'Healey ~ Mr. Carter confirmed for Mr. Healey that the subdivision plat
is essentially the same as when originally submitted and that the conditions
imposed by the committee at the January 13, 1983 meeting have been met, in-
c~uding the shortening of the cul-de~aac on Heaven Sent Lane. Conditions
stipulated at 1/13/83 meeting are attached hereto and made a part of these
.,' minut.es.
.. ~ '
:\ Or., :Healey' moved to recommend approval of the preliminary Subdivision Plat
. subject to'the filing of the requisites - rights-of-way, and drainage and
utility easements. Motion seconded, and Preliminary Subdivision Plat at-
~roved unanimously.
" '""'.
- 2 -
r'""
\
2.
Chesapeake Villas - located East side of Bayvinw Avonuo, South of pro-
posed Draw Street extension.
l.~
Deborah Vincent - Clearwater Housing Authority
Revised Final Site Plan
Nick Lewis - No comment.
Dave Christiansen - No comment.
John Rooks - Sanitary Sewer is not shown on plan. This must appear on final
construction plans. Will resorve comments on storm system until final con-
struction plans come through.
Keith Crawford - as far as Traffic Engineering is concerned, everything
seems to have been taken care of on the plans. Only problem is with the
dumpster(s) location(s). Ms. Vincent stated her agency would prefer in-
dividual pickup if it is possible. Both Mr. Crawford and Mr. Henderson
advised they would recommend the use of dumpster~ at this project rather~
than the 90 gallon containers currently being used in the City, as they
feared the individual containers would more often\than not be left on the
street.
I
I
'!
i
j
Cecil Henderson - written comments attached. If dumpsters are to be used
for trash pickup they cannot be located in the right-of-way~ Water system
is in place. Natural gas is available to this location~
j~
~~:~:~avid Healey - would like a cover sheet listing information such as legal
;-~'-description, zoni~g district, number of units, parking places, building
, heights, dimensions, etc. Also would like the platted lot line to be
~ shown on the plan..
. \
"
C,'
t,':
;,. . Ream Wilson - No comment.
David Christiansen moved that the Final Site Plan be approved subject to
cited requisites, i.e. location of dumpsters; cover sheet information.
Motion seconded and carried unanimously.
".
Courtesy review - Preliminary Site Plan/Development Order
David Healey briefly reviewed project. Project is one of regional impact.
The Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council has issued their report which means
City Commission can now review this project - consisting of some 90 acres -
in its entirety. Scheduled to go before City commission on August 4, 1983,
ordinance reading for annexation and zoning scheduled at this meeting and
. ._entire property probably will be annexed into the City. A Development
.C=;rder probably will be issued and the City will be at the stage where we
will be able to review a series of individual site plans - probably extend-
ingover next eight or nine years. The project is planned to be developed in
three separate stages and what the Committee will be looking at today is a
portion of phase one~ The ProjectIDgineers have asked for this courtesy
7/14/83
" ;-
iW:::;,c:\' :~;~,~. .~'~' ::' ,=.:'" ", ::::~,:.;:~ :.i
:"'~'" .
..; C .'
'",i.
f~:~'; ~.!:
~; f."; ~,. !:'
,;,\., <.". .
~. ....
, '.
r....
.'\
- 3 -
review and the committoe's initial input so
liminary building and engineering plnns for
~ission on August 4th.
...'"
that thoy can prepare pro-
submission to the city Com-
Nick Lewis asked that the engineers and developers be aware that the Fire
Department requires fire hydrants throughout to be a distance of 300 ft.
from a fire hydrant to any point of an existing (or planned) building. On
tho plan as submitted, would need an additional hydrant at Southwest cornerJ
the hydrant that follows directly East from that point, would have to be
moved up to half~way area, between the building and existing hydrant.
Also the Fire Department has discussed this project with utilities and
would want a loop system in water lines to ensure adequate water supply.
Dave Christiansen stated the Building Inspection Department has no comments
at this time. All questions and problems will be covered when construction
plans are received and are being reviewed.
Comments from PUblic Works are attached and John Rooks commented and dis-
cussed each of the points with the Project Managers. Drainage has been
a problem in this area and the City wants assurance that this project
will not make the problem any worse.
.I"
-'1.1
~~ ;::.
Keith Crawford stated he has trouble determining just what the "improve-
ment" indicated on the plans is supposed to be. A very lengthy discussion
followed with reference to intersections on Gulf-to-Bay, the entrance to
this project, additional traffic lanes, etc. etc. but nothing could be re-
solved. The project manage~s for Metro have a meeting scheduled with DOT
:',: .r-~officials on July 15, 1983. Metro wishes to minimize their expel\ditures
':,:: :1.Jnd would like. .to coordinate their necessary construction with proposed
DOT construction and improvements that the state plans in this area with-
in the next one or two years.
'r'-
;Ji:
:/<::
I""
,..:
l:'.;
;, ~.::;:
.j
(:. ~;
i~,
. '
Keith Crawford pointed out
out as shown on the plans.
wide ,for one lane traffic
.this clarified.
necessary minor corrections in the parking lay-
He also questioned 20 ft. road widths - too
and not wide enough for two lanes. Would like
()~
~ ~.' ~
~;;.':~"
;::~\~
:: /;~~c
;,\','
.It is. unknown or undecided at this time as to whether streets within the
project will be City streets or private streets. If City streets side-
.walks, lighting, etc. will have to be addressed and the streets will have
to be constructed to meet City standar.ds.
,~ ~: I
,t:~~
':.:.
.):.:.
. .
~ ~.:
" I.
:: .l~
".'<.
. ~I.
" ~ .,.
"j'.1
: ~ 'r' ~
;.,;<,
" .
. c,
cClaude Howell submitted comments from the Utilities Department and then in-
dicated on a master plan various modifications to design and changes re-
quired in water lines by the Utilities Department. Mr. Howell also in-
formed the developer that the City would like to see gas used in this
c' complex and are willing to work with them in planning a distribution
system.
.. ,
, ',"
'.','.
'I
. ,
"' ~,
~.::;;~..
.... ~.t
The. Planning Department has been having trouble working from plans furnished
to them and would like to be furnished with a master plan the same as the
plan already made available to the Utilities and Engineering Departments.
., (.';"J?ave Healey stated speci fically the City would like three levels of detai I
'Jurnished - . ..
(!'~:,
First,. the Planning Department would like an overall master plan which
: ~~>:,:.
I,. I
, ,
:..',
"
~:~:,~'.
1. .~~.:
L, .
! ,',
I " I I...'....;...""...'.' .'.,' , .
'Y'//I I.\:)'.:.;::'::'.)IY"~':::.;/!:<..'" .{.:
:i:\;;:' W!'~!',>:\?J;':\'" .'. .... ....
;'.
.'.
,
,f '.:.
~ " ,
.....
, ,,,,,,,.,, . .". i . ,,' ',. " "'1/ "..' '... .'., f" ., ;. . " , , ". ".," \.. . " ..
,':"ii~'tl(tr1l!'1t:\i"':,:\ii:!'::~r~~~:~i);:'ii::;':"/1j:'[:!.:::;;i!~(),~':/,}:;:;i,:,;~,'~::?~::\rti"~;:11
'. '~ .
~(~\C?:!;~;':'\;~!::'{~~
if~.:t,c ..
'I' .'
!~ '::. 'It .
, '
"
1"'"""\
I I
- 4 -
n
"
,.ill show whero all roads or streots come from and whore they gOI also
\, ." he plan should show tho relationship betwQen the first buildings in the
", project and subsequent buildings in the entire project, etc.
Se~ondly, will require a preliminary site plnn for Phase one that meets
all ordinance requirements, to be received and accepted by City Commission.
Then from this preliminary site plan with all provisions stipulated by the
cCity Commission built in, a final site plan to be submitted to the Re-
Source Development committee for Phase onc, Tract one - phase one, Tract
two, etc. etc.
While the area to be dedicated for park purposes is shown on the master
plan, Mr. Healey stated this should be referenced on each specific plan
submitted.
Treatment of out-parcels is a major issue that should be addressed. The
preliminary plan for phase one should indicate the intended use of the
propertYI also where access is going to be provided; and definitely
they should inter-connect with parcels to the North. In other words, the
intended use of any out-parcels should be stipulated now and not left to
be resolved at some future date. Keith Crawford commented that plans
do not show any access to the two out-parcels in question and considerable
discussion ensued on this point.
While the Traffic Department is not entirely in agreement, Dave Healey
&eels' that the City should insist on this development inter-connecting to
the Bennigan/Chi Chi's driveways to the West. He stated that this is
vital, even if it will require the City condemning property to make this
" connection.
"
Major concern still is some reduction in peak hour traffic and developer
,has, given little or no consideration to this in design plans. Mr. Healey
stated the project must be designed at the outset with consideration given
to express bus lanes, pedestrian/bicycle provisions, preferred parking
designations to encourage car pooling, etc. etc.
I
'i
I
, '
.,
.);:~ ':.: I..'
In response to Dave Healey's question, project manager advised courtyard
areas will consist of islands of landscaped areas.
Mr. Healey asked that Off-street loading areas be shown on plans. Also
some more consideration given to placement of buildings in effort to
,save more trees now indicated on plans as having to be removed.
i
, I
I
Ream Wilson submi~ted comments from Chris Cowles, and questioood~tatus
of agreement with reference to parkland dedications. Developer advised
agreement and terms of ,agreement still stand as discussed with City
Manager. Mr. Wilson asked that his department also be furnished with a
master plan so that they can discern overall park dedication locations.
J
I
I
I
'1
I
,
, '
The project managers informed the
~: '~the help already given to them by
'.". \Shelp and advice in surveying this
1"."
Committee that they are appreciative of
Chris Cowles and asked for his continued
entire project. High prior~~y is
{;''-c.
:~ .
...: i, ~
.'.'."
~.:~:, I
::.
,.'
./l
',"
)l;':?":'" "','
~r( ,i'
J~::>;~ein9 given to .tree
(~~,,:~,;~\,ngaged the services
J~ ~W~rld so that 'allpossibla
.~j, c'c . c
:1,1:.. of. the older, :larger trees
fJ.I> oper .was assured that Chris
:~:;':": ':\';'B.ry way that he possibly
.,': :
. ';, 'r.
('.)
o
5
preservation
of the firm
natural
will be
Cowles
and transplanting and the developer
who directed the development of
vegetation will be preserved and
transplanted successfully. The devel-
will be available to assist them in
has
Disney
many
can.
Heet(ngadjourned.
'"\';1,>",
, .
"' ,
'(::,:
~ " . :
;~.l : .
'". -l
} ,\
,(1
1(;'::.~,:.:: ,.
~!{::~':
:. ~ ~ '.
:t...t....~ Cr'" ~ ,~ .
~.iH~.~'!,~.'.:.: . .
[~;;', ' "
i}t:::>:',~C;\. ", '.':.'
~rt~~r',:., ':"
Jt.',,,, fiif.:"" ' . " ,:. . .
.. I"" '~'i""+--) i.~ H ~ \ . ,
~.~ r --fl" 'l.o".1. .
_t'!.~::i:@t..~.,. ,
'..
," . j. :.' . ":.' I, -:d'.' ,
" ":' ;'q,
.., ':; : .:. . ;~, t' ,1,:. .. ..:'~. <.
" /:'
I ; .~.:. " ',~o' ,I
'"
"
, .
" '~~<:'" '~,~ >~
,'.
:>1
':"", .'"
t~..,.t~ ~-i ' " t,:, :\~,.'
~l.{~;~:<' . ,~..>
,~~~(,~~~~ ~+ , '." ~', .:' ~
~.i.'~c;;;:: '~;":T
... ':, 'II.'. '.t ../'~:'. .
~;~f. ~ ,/, <}:,;' ~" ,.', 'i','
,i;f;;€)':, ;.. c" " . . ..., "
. <: ' .' i:: I' < -, . ~.
.'
L+' ., '. ,;.
,e
~
ELIZAB TH S. HAESEKER,
'\
" ,}
..1
",
',. 'j",.. ;
."." "
, '
<'1
: "~ ~~ r I
"....i
c,,: :.'1
:.\ ;
;,
.',
"':,
'1 , ,lJ '<
"
. ,', ~
',' ....j
<:~;
"
',' .
:/
;;,,'
.\',
;"". l.
. .;
:.... ,~
'. I'.,
'.'
."
,..
..'.
'.
:. ':'!
, .
~ ~, '
", ,
.,., ,t
'L
'.
\'
, ': ~
-:'
t.
." "
.\
,
"
'.\
i
'j
.: i
.1
. ,
'.!
'. "
.':'
. ,
.,
~ ",
<,I.
"
.1\
'cc
'.! '
'l' '"
" ~.
.;: '
": ,'/1
,. )
..
I
\
!
. I.,.
".<J
';, , " .
, ,. "
\
."
. "\ ~ :
.' )
':
" ~,
.. " : ~ :. ,. ) t
~ " <
,',1
I'.,"f.