Loading...
11/09/1978 ", ~:' ~ .-. \ .~ MINUTES RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE City of Clearwater, Florida November 9, 1978, ~ // ,,/ Members Present: Michael J. Paroby, Assistant City Manager David P. Healey, Director, Planning Department Michael W. Kenton, Environmental Planner, Planning Department Andy Nicholson, Engineer, Public Works Department Donald A. Meerians, Assistant Director, Traffic Engineering Dept. Ream Wilson, Directo~ Parks & Recreation Department Nick Lewis, Fire Department Joe Molnar, Fire Department Syd Snair, Building Department Paul Rettig, Director, Utilities Department Donald B. Alexander, Citizen Members Absent: Cecil Henderson, Assistant Director, Public Works Department Mr. Buhmeyer, Fire Marshal Albert P. Rogers, Citizen Others Present: Grace Loyd, Zoning Analyst, Planning Department John Richter, Senior Planner, Planning Department Mike Campbell, Land Resources Specialist, Planni~g Department Roy F. Smiech, S & N Development Company Gene Caudell, Caudell Gaylor Engineering, Inc.. Roy Nelson, S & N Development Company John Ehrig, AlA, Architect ,The meeting' was called to order at 1~30 p.m., in the Personnel Conference room on the first floor of City Hall. The Commtttee asked the developer if he had the documents "to'stibndt,to meet the C.l.S conditions of approval as noted at the Resource Development meeting of November 3. 1978. The developer , s~ated he would present the archeological report, letter of compliance and the environmental ,addendum required in the near future. - 1 - " .; . , ", ~ (1 . . The Committee at this time turned its consideration to the Preliminary Subdivision Plat. Mr. Smiech indicated he had met with City representatives of several departments in an effort to devise a more acceptable plat with regard to street alignment, minimizing double-frontage lots, and suitable park location. The revised configuration of lots presented by the developer' showed a cul-de-sac to the west with three streets for access to Montclair Road. Mr. Smiech indicated the plan as presented seemed to be the best design permitting a maximum number of lots. ' Mr. Nicholson indicated the retention area would have to be platted into adjacent lots; the retention area appeared insufficient; revisions would be required in the water line layout; a 40-foot 1/2 right-of-way will be required on Montclair Road and a 50-foot 1/2 right-of-way will be required on Hercules Avenue. Mr. Snair stat~d a combination of landscaping and fencing, to b~ approved by the City with no access permitted to Montclair Road or Hercules Avenue, would be required on all double-frontage lots. {I Mr. Rettig observed a 6" water main tied into the 81t main to the north in the Charter Oaks subdivision would be satisfactory providing it was. looped and there were no dead ends. Mr. Campbell and Mr. Wilson had no comment. The need for one additional fire hydrant was expressed by a representative of, the Fire Department. Mr. Healey noted there were 53 lots shown on the configura- tion of lots being presented and referred to the fact that several alternate lot configurations had been suggested. The developer pointed out that, all the alternatives to the present configuration resulted 1n-a lOBs-of-approximately,4 lots., , The representative of 'the Traffic Department, ,Mr. Meerians, presented an alternate sketch which included the Traffic Department's preference for a street that went straight through from the connec- tion with Charter Oaks to Montclair Road. Mr ." Kenton asked Mr. Wilson if the location .of the park at the east end of the subdivision was a problem for him. Mr. Wilson indicated it ,was not. He further stated that future plans for the site would be a Community Center similar to the Martin Luther King Center, and he felt for this type of use, either the site as shown or the one adjacent to Hercules Avenue would be acceptable. Mr. Healey reminded the developer of the concerns the Committee had expressed at the previous meeting, primarily the number of double frontage lots, street offset and park location. Mr.: - Healey stated the only problem that had been in any way changed,by ,the new configuration was 'the 'number of double-frontage lots. j ,I , ; , ' '. i " i, t, ' ' :', j " " ',' ','I'" J:\' ,,' 'I", C, " . . '. . "~",' ',', :', ; ....,'" . 'l ' " , " :. 'I .... ~ ~ . - Mr. Nicholson, voting for Mr. Henderson, made a motion to recommend approval of the revised subdivision plat. Mr. Paroby noting that the plat lacked all the information required, asked Mr. Nicholson to amend his motion. Mr. ,Nicholson amended the motion to recommend approval of the concept of the revised subdivision plat. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lewis of the Fire Department. The vote count was-S in favor and 3 against. The motion carried. Those voting against the motion were Mr. Meerians, Traffic Engineering, Mr. Healey and Mr. Kenton, Planning Department. Clearwater Harbor Yacht Basin Condominiums - located on Harnden Drive! Clearwater Beach - Review of CIS and Preliminary ~ite Plan as amended. Mr. Ehrig, representing the developer, presented an addendum to the C.I.S. and a revised Preliminary Site Plan. He explained to the City Commission at its meeting of October 5, 1978, had approved the C.t.S. and granted approval for a waiver of the IOO-foot from a residential zone requirement which then permitted him':ia bonus of 10 feet in height. Mr. Erhig pointed out to the Commdttee that the addendum to the C.l.S. and the revised site plan reflected the new height and the addition of two dwelling units. The individual units were completely redesigned. However, the "on-ground" site plan has only minor changes. A representative of the Fire Department noted an additional fire hydrant would be required. The dumpster location seemed to be acceptable. Mr. Nicholson stated the changes had no impact as far as they were concerned. Mr. Paroby, Mr. Wilson and Mr. Snair had no comments. Mr. Meerians noted an inadequate radius with regard to the north driveway. In addition, he suggested the elimination of the parking space next to the pool equipment shed arid the one adjacent to the storage area. The developer agreed to these modifications saying the number of parking spaces remaining would meet.the City's requirements and further explaining .the parking stall adjacent to the lobby would not have impaired visibility as the lobby is all glass in the line of vision. Mr. ,Campbell questioned the need for landscaping 'on the north side of the parking lot. Mr. Ehrig informed the Committee there was a $14,000 Qudget for landscaping and he would have no problem with landscaping this buffer area. , - 3 - .' (, '"" ,~~"""'~""""'''''~''~.~''''''_'''''_--'''''_'''''''''''''.';f"",_...-......,.Iot-.......t./'''.'~. :~t~:~:::)'~',(:~\~"\/-":'::: >"': '.': ~ii;;:; ;"," '~,~I,,"~:i :' .,: ",. ;~r~~~~~:: ...':' \',';i:'!', . ft',\ !Q\' .- f:!l,::;i.":<" ",' ," . i"'~ >. :,' ~;':;',: '.',.." 'i~i':,,> ;:" ., ' ,1:;~(;.:.::~c' '~. ::;:;:::;':'" " ~~~E:,::" t~', ~.,' , : ifl~.c.' ~'f\"';" " ~',',:,; :'".,+~/:,~.,~\:, ~, , '. ~\ " . .J', 'L... ,: .:~', ',<:",~., ,. ,: ~<.:'.., :.::"; '.:1.....' .... " . , . ~ ' '" "< '.'..., ., i':,~ ;:'~.. ~~::,:' '~ ~ .. ..,';~ :-... ~ ~~.;,;....... ! r'~ .. ." . ,. , r \ " . , - ~ .., > :'L"' " ..( , '.... ;,:' ,'I L':::~',.:' "> . .~<':. " . '... i '~', ,.' , .. 'T , .', , :~. " " l.l,: ~..q~....<. . ,', c }" J, ',' .. ~,. . 'ff' .. " Y!\'.r~'(j..... '4...tl'r~,. :,Il,,<t' ..,~:.'~,' . ',' ~\;"~' ~.\ ...)~".. '~\'r\.I" It. 't'J ".'" " I ~~~~~~~\;j..~:il1'ji~,~')H~~~~t':CI:~ f'~~'~l.'~;~,:.::~' ,J.:"./ ",' . " ,', o n , Mr. 'Healey informed the arEUJ~,' required' for a'ltvistaU; be' erected~ ' " developer the therefore; no pool was visual in the barrier could , ,': :' A- 'motion ,t'o' recommend appr'oval ,revi_~ed :site plan was', made. by' Mr. an~ :c~rr~ed uns.nimously'. . of ,the Wilson. amended C.I.S. The motion was and seconded . ' , ' ,The meeting was adjourned at 2:50 " p.m. ....e' , \ . :) .. . ~~ " . ~ \' 't; ,J' . :1:: .' , " ~, " " :,\.'" . "" " " ' , <:~':::\":'<';--,:. ! c ~. .'.':' ";. . , " ";:. ); '., :,." ,,' ",,<. q, '~" :>~':> . .', ".,. . ~ ": .. -: Ie . '!<". Ir'" ,'. " ", r " ....: 't' , '." ~ ,., c ,:,l :\;.1 '.. > :"1 ' ':: '. " .,,' 'J: ~ ,"' "'. . , : ~""', ,: ," '; .':, " .,>,,- ::~ ' ;. " ',' ,I' 'i , . " \, ./..... .1' t:, :;'1' :,}:' "r;::. ',' '" , ,', I" :.,,': , , :\" , ;'j : , :\ ',' "'v'... d, .; , ~!, " ,'. ')"1" '., i j .. .' .oc ::",,:,':~:" '- .' ::~ f..' " 'c:, l,d ~ l. ~ "l'{ " ' , .'.,' . " .I"' c ~ : 1 . , . I, I' ' ~, , ' -. ".' ". " .. ' " ',') , ",> j,. ,'., '".(j,:'J. ..". ,'\.' , ,.Ji, ; ~ " .. . .~ ". - \ , :.1 ,I' "