03/18/1969
fA'
'J
'1'1Il~ PLAflHItm AnD ZOlJIW::l HO^,~J)
Min utco of the !-teet :tnr. ~ 'l'ucGoay ~ 't'1u r'ch 10., 1969.
The mcctine WU9 called to ardor at 3:00 P. M. by the Chai~man,
Mr. Kruse. Present \'lerc Ncrnhorn HylClflr)rn', ButJcr, SchutzendoJ."'f, l1or'ris,
Spier, Galloway and Rende, Mr. Rettig of the Engineering Department, and
Hr. Holle.
The minutc!s of the mceti,np,:s of IJanuary 28, 1969, and Febr\Ja~y lJ,
1969, were approved an ~ubrnittfld in w~itten summation to each member.
REZONING REQUES'rS - COHHI'l"rr:E Rl.:POWrS
I L d J .. Y""'I' ...-__
Tne Board reviewed ann discussed seven pending rezoning 'applications
with study of land use and zoning of sur'rounding properties. Record of
Board action is 'as follo\o1s~
Z-3 AD.~L1NE~~C. .~.~AG];-= ~-2 TO ~"B~I - LLOTS } MJD 12, BLOCK 9.,_
j}l:NBCREST SUB. rnENEHJ'.L r:DCATiml: ON--gOUTH SID~ OF sLt.f.rNoLE
s'r~BE.T\'1EE!'1 MYR'l'LBAVi:. "'AtTff vni1-~ s~rRl:E:r _' ., · T
.. .......n.......
;he po~rd, ~oted to anor?ve reco~_endation of the Zoning Com-
mittee !O~ dpni~l of requested change for the reasons that:
Business zoning is not needed at this location
(Myrtle Ave. was improved as & by-pass traffic artery
and 'such use would be impaired by increased business
development) .
This area shtiuld be res~rved for residential useS of h1gher
density to provide for anticipated need for additional
housing units in proximity to area of rehabilitation and
for possible relocation sites.
Z_I~ Jas. R. I; Louisa E. Roberts - R-4 to "BlI ~. HETES AND BOUNDS
'PA1r'C~L tiJ TITE: j..!tTY/4 O}-Svr111f'~-st-,~ '22'::2"!f":'15' (j(P1'i'R"'CX::-P.>OrT.
X 290""'F'l'.) - U~}:1'iEP:AL. LOCA1'l'lOlJ :~'l\rOP,T}1I.'!i.:'!i'r COf([~ER~~of. S. G"RF:-f,;rr:-
HOOD AVE. I~:'ID \'100hLAt'JN S'I'!U~F;'f j ", ~ - . --:".
....,.. ......
Explanation v1as made concerning the e~.dsting nonconfor:ninB use'
on the property or a service station and store and garage.
Reason for 'request as stated in application was quoted as~
"in order- to utili 7.e property in conforr:d.ty Hi th sur-round in[;
business properties".
In concm:-rence Hi th recommendation of the Zoning Committee, !b2.
Board voted to table the Roberts' annlication for 1 w~ek in order to ob-
9II'JIli 1 -.J_.--...".., .. ~_~.....
tain more definite information in regard to the route of the proposed
. ,
St. Petersburg to ClearwatGr expressway Dnd its possihlc effect on this
segment of So. G~eenwood Ave. to the south of Lnkcv5ew Road.
,.
\
.. / " " ,,' ;,." . .',.,..., ," ,.,~ ~,'.: ;, " ': :"'; oJ'. ',' v' , ~., :'" :/\: ': '::' : ': '~':, ~,..', "':. 'j" :',:(: :: ::::;.1 ,', ,;., :: :'. . : \: ,- I',' t "'.~ :.:...... :, ~ ' "': : ." :~ i;:' ,r: >',":;'''~' ,~,'..:' ,,'.,' " '" d .' '.'. ':.l'::::::' \ ,', . ',' .' "''1.. .:':t ,,'..1,,~' , .' :::.',' 'p '. J ~ ~ . , ;" I' . ':' '. ~' ~~: :'
PSZ Bel Mi.nuter;
3/10/69
p~u:c /12
Z-5
-
Q^rI'l'~l~ I!O!:!.G4 ,Il,rc. ~- ~:.? TO.. ,R_ll _- , r~~'J'~'~,qJ. IJ'.l l?J 13 ,..1 Iii
l~ ~~~,2-.ni. t.v.;~g.. p t r. 1011 ~7r" !"ALH hL11'f~ SU!J1J.1.V1SloN
m~ L {All I.Oc..A.l lOlt: Ff7Jrd'hi'il:.Sl' CU1~. OF a. OSCJ~(rL^ AVt'. P.tID
PAlJI.l' G\,u}>l' '-~'t.. r' - . ~
. "" .J ~_--...........
~
Reason for Request Bfi stated in application was quoterl as,
"to construct apartment building on .the \Vnterfl~ont (Please
note that lots 111, 16 Sln are continuing to be used for
R-ij purposes as they \oJer'e before ?oning \-lent into effect)."
At 3:30 P. B. 11t'. James DaHson, representing Capital Homes,
Inc. ~ met with the Board upon invitation extended at the request of the
7.onil'~g Committee.. Mr. ha\>1Son explained and d:i.s cussed wi th the BOBrod ap-
plicant's request for R-~ zoning, displaying a general plot plan of a pro-
posed high rise apartmellt building project (drawn by Carlos Schoeppl) to
be develop~d with recreational area, pool. shuffl~board court, play area
and recreati,onal pier. It was explained that it was planned to 'have park-
~.....'
. ing. He said it would be a high 'quality typ~ of project that they thought
would encourage growth to upgrade the area. He presented the plan as the
product of the applicant's first considerations and not necessar.ily as
the ultimate plan--no basic design of the building yet.
.''>~
Upon inquiries made, some further information obtained ~las that:
"
He didn't know whcther"apqrtments will be rental or condominiums.
The exact number of units HouJ.d probably he determined by availa-
ble spaces for parking~ ~
The. buj.l~ing height might go up to the maximum alloHcd of 150 ft.
They would prefer not to dedicate any additional right-of-Hay for'
widening rf eith8r N. Osceola Ave. or Palm Bluff St.
Reference was made by some membero to proposed R-4 revisions now under
Commi.ssi.on study and Hr. DaHson e>:pr.r;o,Gscd himself as being unfamiliill"
\od:th provisions of fiuch proposal'. In discussion of setbacks, ~~r. DaHson
said that the plot p~an indicated more o~ less equ~l djstance from north.
'"
~_/
"and south lot linesJ at least 40 ft. on ona 8id~ and 50 ft. on the othert
and a greater distance from Osceol.J. .^.vC:. VLlri.cus O.tht~1" questions '.'}f;l"P.
answered by Mr. Dawson~
~: ,.:~.:), :.:-~'~ .,:, .t.,.. .,',: --:....'... ': ':,'':.' ".:~::' '..: "".":"~,: . ,'.' ::'<.:"~ 1':1 .~": ~ ;.-' ';,: , "; ;"}., .'...., ':: ..',.,'.', :','. ~':.: + 'h ::' / :',' ."\ ,t ,~::. ,,',;..:. ,', ,.'.: ':: : :~ '+' ,., ~:. ',_:I~: \_~.' ~". ~.:' ~(~:.,.. :~~."."j~" ."~.:.<:: ::', ~,: ,~.: J';::';: '.: l:"",~, :....
"'+"'-
Pr.? nd Mit"lutcn
3/JR/(~~
Page if 3
~
At 11: OS P. ~r. 'Ht'. Da\omcm \'lrl8 thilnb:~d for h i.s ;J, ttendance and
retired from the meetinc.
Agendtl 2-5 Han tnkl?n up again follo\o1ing 'considClt'tltion of othcl':'" aCr::!nda
items. After soma discussion, and withdrawal of one motion to recom-
mend approval of channe to R-II zoning based upon certain conditional
agreements, the Board voted that Cass.2,- 5, reauest of Ctlpi tal Homes) J;.nc.,
he tabled for.l week.
Z-7
1I!1~ EN1'ERPRISES '.~ INC. - R-II TO "!-1", ?-!f? , - hOTS 1, THROUGH .2.'.-1.
BLOCK II, l'lILTO~: PAi~K SUBDIVISIoN ( GI:~NEP,^L J ,0C/1:.r,'1 ON:' SOUTIIHEST
COR. I1Y RIfLE A V E. t:A~J}3f};Orms, S'i'.) - ,-., .,-
"
~ ~ .
Reason for Request as stated in application was quoted as,
',II Business Constructfon".
. .
It was dete~mincd that the Const~uction Co. operation
was a nonconforming use in the existing R-4 zona:
The Plann~r l"'epor'ted that he. thought the Committee felt
Business O~ PRS would be an appropriate ~oning for lots of
request.
At ~:l5 P. M. Mr. R. J~ Hupp, President of Hupp Enterprises,
Inc., met with the Boar.d upon invitation extended at the request of the
, , Zoning Committee. Mr. Hupp presented the request for rezoning with e~-
planation that the intended use of Lots 1 to 3, inclusive, was to build
an automa,ted quick tune-up car center, and that Lot 4 was included in
,
the request to provide zoning that would enable occupant to build for
po~s ible future expans ion. The Pla.nner advised t1r. Bupp that tl B" zoning
would permit him to have the use he intended (for the car center) and
recommended that 'if he had oHnership of all II lots that he have all
four' "Business". Hr. Bupp expl~essr~d a.Er~(2ment to fiB" 7.oning if i1:
covered the use intended~ It w~s s\lggestcd to him that he mi~ht contact
~h C' t Cl " .1 . h. ]' t. t 11 nil B' .
~ e l' erh anu reV1S~ 1S app .1Ca"10n reQu~st 0 n, U51ness.
.. ,,:-J
4: 30 P ~ M. HI". Hupp Hns th~n}:c(~ for' his c:3 P!)earanc(~ ar.d 1 eft
the fficctinr.
After review o~ the informatio~ obtained, th~ RCRr~ vot~d ~o vccc~-
"
~1<
0;' l~ ,it
Pr. 7.. Bd t1in\ltcs
3/1H/G9
Pagr.! (,111
,[lend urmr.oval of t1mended request f~_~h:<1ngp. fr.om R-II to "B" \ Eu s:i nes,s"
,.-...,
f..91" Lots 1 ~~~2 f.. 3,
Block I!, t1il ton PaY'k Subdivis.ion \ and to t"'r.!comrncnd
F "'_
9han~e from ~,-:I_~",:O "M", lift:;., fot' Lot 1(, Block 11) t't:i.lton PaT'l~ SUb(:Hvision),
!? accord with the land use (Case Z-7).
voting on the motion.
Mr. Gallo'~1ay abstained from
Z-9
-
Cl,YDr. Ii. LOnG JR. - R-ll TI) PRS - LOT 5 & F.AS1; 10 F'!'. OF LOT 6,
BLOC'Kl~ \ i30ULE:VARD HEI(~Ii~~'S slIh. ( GENERAL r.:bCATION: l,rOJ~JrH SrDE"-
OF tOUR'I' Srr., 11J fj t'll'. 1,.~t~SJror- SA1~ ~nLHo J - .
...- ..... J '<:i
,
,
The Zonine Com!7\itteet~ recommendation Has for a12proval of change
to PRS zoning as requested. The Doard voted to approve the recom~endation
of t~e Zonin~ Committee based on locati.on of this property between two
:J.
existing PRS properties and as in accordance to a general zoning plan
and previous studies by the Planning and Zoning Board of'Court Street
'frontage.
c',
Z-6 ARAtkTO E'::' AT:. - PRS TO II B" - L01;S 15 'fHROUGH 21, 1. BLOCK 24\
MAR'i110nT SUBDI VI::;1 ON (GI:~rr;p.AL ' IJOCA'J'i1,)p : NO R~:tr t tD1.~of" DP.l:H
ST., BP.ST or BR.~.PDOH >. - '
I,
Reason fer Request as stated in. application ~las quoted as,
"All property contiguous on Drew Street is business zone -
Dret.l Street is a main business thoroughfar'e - each applicant
desires to utilize property ~o highest, best and only de-
sirable use, busi.n~ss." The Board HaD informed of un3uppol"'tcd
statement on application that all property owners in rear
and contiguous ~~ object to z?ne change.
,
, ~ .
The Planner revie~cd prior zoning history of this Dre~ St.
strip and pointed out that the current application covered
'all lots in this block lon[; strip (!i':ccpi: those at the (last'
end nOH occupied by a. doctor. .
The Board voted tc:'.....!'.2.E~:>t~1l1enr1 d~~~y~l of chan~~ to". Il~.
Business, zoning for lots of rnques~ hasnd on th~ considerations that--
" ,
,:' ,~--'
Subjact lots abut single family rcoid~ntial'area on th~ north.
The Dr-eN St:o:-'e8t fT'ontar:~ of 'this Block 211 was rczone'd to p.}",S
(as a cc~~r~rnisc zonin~) in 19611, a~ which time there was
streng op~osition to a-chan~~ to BusinesG ~oning from ncarby
rcsiden-:s.
"
Sin~e ~~z~~in~, some p~S USfl[~ has cfitah~ishcd in tho strip
and it was felt this tr~nd for p~ofQsn1onnl use wcu~~ h~
continuc~ a~~ wouJ~ he the hast usarn.
, ,
, ,...~
"
. .
P&7. Ed Minutes
3/1B/6!l
P~nc /! 5
Z-8 HETZ 1; HHITJ~ - R-2 'fO "UII_
'Parcel' (1)
,-
S. J.B. 75' Ft. , ,l.ot 3, Block B,
Drew Heights Subdivision
Pal'1ccl (2)
U. 2!i ft.' of S. 250 ft. of the tol.
148.92 f~. of the E. 1/2 of W. ]/2
of the S~'! 1/ II of the SN 1/11
Sec. 12....29-15
Parcel (1)
Parcel (2)
West of Tulane Rd.
East of Tulane Rd.,
The Pl~nh0r distributed reference map-~rawings to those members
\-lh,o, had not ,previ,?us ly 'r'ec~ive.d these. Upon hiR nur,r-;estiori, the Board
v6ted to defer above Case Z-8 until the follow!nn week.
. ~
, .
Azenda fiB J. OP.DINANCE ITEHS TO COnSIDER - SC'f.'p.ening alone' front
,property line of Travel Trailer Park~, was not covered due ~o a timQ
limitation:
,Planning lit~rature was distributed. .
The meeting was adjourned at 5:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
l: ~k..Q.,W~ '
ok,I. Wolle, Sec'y
ty Planner, '
, .
t
, .
I
,
"