02/25/1969
I:.'.." :.' ~:I ~ ~ ~. : 't :~'.. : : '. . ~ ~'.<1 . ~ ~ ,~', ',~' :' :' ,~,: . "~t. .' .',' :. ,:::,,:, ", ;' ".:- <'" " .}'. . ~~ ." ~': ~,','; ."~' ~;: 'i, ~: ':., ,;, , i,' .. . ;, ,~: ':. f..., ~ : ~',\.\ " , '~': ~:. :':-! : ,', \. : ~ .>' ,.; .: :' :'1. ~ ',~ :' /:: .1,: '..' ,,:. ',:".: ....,. ' ,'~ :~.:~:',': ! : :, ':,~. I.,: (,::~:. '\ ,'<:\: ,~: ...:~ ' . ~ 'i ,\ ',' :; .~' ::' I ';<
'fJJE PLANNIUG AND ZONING BOARD
I
J
f".
Minutes of the Heating, Tuesday, February 25, 1969.
The meeting was convened at 4:40 P. M. in the City Hall Auditorium
following a Public Hcaring before the Board, opening at 3:00 P. M., at
which the applications for zoning and annexation for the following three
properties were heard:
...-...
PH Item #1 Maryanne Libecap - Lot 19 and West 34.24 ft. of Lot 20,
Block A, Sunny Park Groves Sub. (located on the
Northeast corner of Nursery Rd. and Sunny Park Drive) -
Request R-IE (?ingle Tfamily>
PH Item #2 Champion Developers Inc. - Metes and Bounds parcel
Begin 384.88 ft. South of Northwest corner of NE 1/4
of NW 1/4, Sec. 2-29-1S~ thence run South 280 ft.,
East 337.61 ft., South 664.39 ft., East 330 ft.,
North 943.94 ft., West 667.89 Ft. to P.O.B. less West
50 ft. for right-of-way (located on the East side of
Highland Ave. about 250 ft. South of Union Street) -
Re9uest R-11 emul ti-family >
PH Item #3 Samuel .Campagna, Jr. - South 10 ft. of Lot 15, all
of Lots 16 to 22 incl., South 15 ft. of Lot 23, all
of Lots 79 and 83, Barrett Manor Sub. (located on
North side of Sunset Point Rd. about 1000 ft. East
of Old Coachman Rd. (County Rd. 32) -
Recuest R-4 (mu1ti-familv)
~ - ~
'Record of such hearing was taken on tape and is on file in the Planning
Office. Present at the hearing were Chairman Kruse, Members Butler,
Harries, Reade, Mylander, Morris, Spier and Galloway, Mr. Rettig of the
Engineering Department, and Mrs. Hall, Planning Office Secretary (in
the abs~nce of Mr. Wolle due to illness>. 'l'he same were present at' the
4:40 P. M. meeting.
ANNEXATION AND ZONING - ACTION FRON PUBLIC HEARING
r ~ ~
Item #1 Libecao
After review of the application, and an evaluation of the evidence
presented at the Board's public hearing, motion w~s made by Hr. Harries,
"
-....,,;.
seconded by Mr. Reade, and passed unanimouslv, that the Board reco~meno
. ap~roval of annexation reauest for R-1E, Single Fa~ily, zonin8 for par-
cel as legally described in Item #1 of No~ice of Public Hea~in~ for
P&Z Bd Minutes
P~ge H2
2/ ? 5/6,9
Ftlbruarv 25/69.
'WtldI ~
It \olilS ill BO rccomll\cnd~d that the ahove pare€! 3. be dcsig-
f*' natod as Firc Distx'ict' No. ? clHssification.
,,---,'
, ,
Such zoning recommendation was based on the following considerations:
Mrs. Libecap, applicant, appeared and explained her need for City
sewer services in order to be able to build on or to sell her
property, stating that sewer was available within 100 feet,
A Mrs. Calvina, 1401 Nursery Rd" requested information,as to the
use of the property, as she seemed to have been given the idea
that under R-IE zoning other than a single residence might be per-
mitted. She was assured tnat the zone requested would not permit
any other development than single family residence.
There were no objectors.
Lot and portion of lot of request are zoned R-3, Single Family
Residential, in the County and adjoin a City R-1E subdivision.
Zoning requested is consistent 'with R-IE zoning for prior annexa-
~ions of single lots in other blocks of Sunny Park Groves Subdivi-
sion. Property is surrounded by single family homes and proposed
zoning conforms to usage intended.
It was noted that existing platted right-of-way for adjoining Nursery
Road and Sunny Park Road is standard 60 foot.
Item #2 Sh~mpion Developers, Inc.
After review of the application, and an evaluation of the evidence
presented' at the Board's public hearing, ~otion was made by Mr. Butle~L
seco~d~p ?y Mr. Reade, that the Board reco~rnend approval of annexation
re~ue~t For R-4, Multiple ~lel1ing"zoning for uarcel as le~alLv~de-~
~cri~ed in It~m #2 of Notice of Public Hearin~ for Februarv 25/69, it to
be pointed out that the area to be developed will create another enclave
of the property to be retained by Dr. Center, and it to be recommended
that every effort be made to induce Dr. Center to bring hIs property into
the City; and ,it to be further recommended that building permits not be
issued to include any building in excess of two storis&.
t1otion was
,
passed unanimou?ly. It ~las also reco~mended that above parcel be desig-
nated as Fire Dis1:rict tIc. 2 classi fication.
Such Board recommendation ~'las based on the folloHint3 considerations:
,:'. .:' -': .: ',\,. . u' :",.;.. '.:,:',' . '-, ,:' ,'. ~ :',." ,:",~: ;: ,~ ~ ..,.:' .,: :0:" .~O ': .~,~ ,.:. :, . ~ ...; :.~."\:.~ :...: ~:::~ ::"..:~, >..~, ,: .~,' :',' , \',,~: ~ 0',; :: ':, ':,;':':- :.~': ~:.~ L:::O ,:.:. :."' :: .~. ,'.,:,:':: ~ ,:'.. . ;:.. ;~,1.1 .:; .:.'':.~,:. .J 0.;; :::.i,.~:' ." :.,... ,.:',:, .,.} ':, IF,) ~ ~:,,:' ':;.:.: : :,\'.' '.'" : :..:' ;'.'-.;' >,
P & Z Bd Hinutns
2/25/69
P~l~C #3
~
Mr. William McKenzie, Attorney, and Mr. John Ware, who Hppeared
in hchalf'of the applicant, presented ~ proposed site plan in-
dicating development in garden-type rental apartments limited ~o
2-stories in height with a total of 182 unitG. A statement was
made for the record by applicantts representatives that the appli-
cant has the property between Union Street and the area to be
annexed under contract and that, in the future development of this
tract, provision would be made for a street extending north to
Union Street so as to relieve some of the traffic on Highland
Ave. generated by this annexation.
Mr. Charles Landenberger, 1927 Souveni~ Drive, appeared in opposi-
tion, presenting a letter of objcction signcd by him as Committee
Chairman of the Sunset Lake Estates Association.
..--. ,
It was revealed to the Board that building foundation pe~mit has
already been issued by the County and that construction under this
permit is underHay. The County zoning for 'this property is R-5,
'comparable to the City's R-ll. It was assumed in this regard that
the County has taken under consideration the matter of the sewage
disposal through a privately operated disposal plant. It was also
understood that plans for these apartments have had some prelimi-
nary ~eview by the Building Dcpa~tment of the City, with the intent
by the applicant that if the property is annexed the building plans
would be acceptable to the City. Under these circumstances, and
the fo~egoing commitments by the applicant as, to height limitation
and a projected ~raffic outlet to Union Street, the recommendation
of the Board to approve the request for annexation seemed justi-
fied.
There are undeveloped properties to the north and east of this area.
Due to the orientation of the single family residences in the
area to the South of this property, it was felt that 2-story
buildings properly dispersed for low density would not adversely
affect the property values of the single family area.
It was noted that any needed dedication for adjoining Highland Ave. half
right-of-Hay will be obtained by the Engineering Department at the time
of annexation.
Item #3 CamDagna
f '
After review of the application, and an evaluation of the evidence
l
'--. ,.
presented at the Board's public hearing, motion was made by Mr. Harrie~t
seconded bl M~. Reade, and nassed unanimously, that the Board recow~cnd
approval of annexation reQuest for R-4, Multinle Dwellin~, zonin~ for
parcel as le~allv described in' Notice of Public Hearing for re~1.:.'.~ary
25, 1969-1 with further recommenda'tion that building permits not be is-
sued to inqlude any building in excess of tHO stories, and also with
P&Z Bd Minutes
2/25/G9
P~r.c H II
the stipulation that the two north rind south strcctoj Blliott and
,...... Meado'tft be \.,i,dened to 60 feet (5 ft. on Ouch n ide) from the nor th rieht-
,~~ -..
_.F
~
of-way line of Sunset Point Rd to the required setback line of buildings
to front on Sunset Point Road., It was also recommended that above
parcel be designated a,s Fire District no. 2 classification.
Such Board recommendation t1as based on the following considerations;
Mr. Samuel Campagna, Jr., applicant, appeared and presented a
proposed site plan indicating development ~lith five 2-story con-
dominium type apartment buildings, each containing l~ units.
Mr. Walter Straman, 2357' Michael Lane, appeared to express con-
cern that width of entranc~ streets might he inadequate as ac-
cess to the proposed development.
, .AI though this reque,st will require a "balloon" annexation of
Sunset Point Road west from U. S. Highway 19, reco~nition that
maintenance responsibility of the City on this road will not be
involved as it is a State highway.
This propel~ty lies immediately t-lest of the "Top of the ~.jorldn,
Which is a multi~story apartment development, a~d the proposed
use would be comnatihle to the area. It is understood that other
properties in this vi.cinity fronting on Sunset Point Road are
giving consideration to be annexed to the City so as to obtain
utilities,
It was noted that the adjoining right-of-way of Sunset Point Road
(St. Road 588) is full 100 feet.
The Board continued its discussion of the above request. Informa-
tion from Mr. Reade was that he had knowledge that the Planner was op-
posed to the vacation because of the need for access and for parking
at the back of~the school. Mr. Reade said that he thought it would be
better if instead of vacating Palm Avenue the church were permitted to
bridge the street, as he understood they didn't want to build on the
right-of-way. Hr. Horris suggested that if refuse trucks, service
trucks etc. use the alley they probably enter from Palm Ave. and the \
street vacation might cause more congestion. Mr. Rettie reported that
. "
,-...
,
"
" .\
4.l~ .~'
, )
, '........
P&'Z Bd l1inutes
2/25/69
P!lgc liS
if the st~ect'were to be vacated, an casement could be retained for
,
Florida PO~ler Corp. lines.' The Board voted to defer action for one
IIL~ 1 p-L T 1:1... ..a.
~eok in ord~r" to be able to receive the Planner's, recommendation prior
~o making a decision.
The Chairman suggested that anyone who had not
inspected the site do so before the next meeting.
Ap;enda Items #3(a), Ne~o to City Hanager - pierce Boulevard
Extension, #3(b-L. Memo 2/19/69 to City Managel" - P&Z Bd. Reportre,
Alexander and Mo~kowitz Concept Plan, ~nd 04, P&Z Bd. Public Hearing
Annexations March 4/69 3:00 P. 'M., were not covered due to a time
limitation.
~he'meeting was adjourned at 5:20 P. M.
Respe~tfully submitted,
~~ '
l~~nur: M. Kruse, Chairman'
',Acting Secretary
, ;
, .
h'
.II
"
.-..
. I
,.
"
.., . ~ , r ~ .....:" I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
~hc. Planning and Zonin~ Boa.rd of the City of Clearv!a tel", F1ct'ida,
will hold a pUblic hearing at the City Hall Auditorium, 112 S.
,Osceola Ave., Clearwater, Flori~~, beginning at 3:00 P.H., T~esday,
February 25, 1969, ,
AWD
t~
The City Commission' of the City of Cle.arVTdtar Hill hold a
hearing at the City &tll Auditorium, 112 S. Osceola Ave.,
Florida, beginning at 1:30 P.~., Thursday, March 6, 1969,
purpose of considel"'ing the fOllo'Nine items: ,
public
Clearo;.:3.ter, ,
for the ,//,
\-~lt "
- \ V
',The request for anne xa tion into the City of Cleart'l:l ter "'b ....~- /1",:'-
and the determination and establishment of the zoning ,J:" D l)
and firoe distric t classification for the followinG --(\~) '.Jr.~ ~./f"-- ,
described real pl~opert les in Pinella s County, Florida: ~. r/'//
1. Lot 19 and Hest 3l~. 24 it. of Lot 20) Block A,. o'{~/
Sunny. Pavk Groves Sub. (Libecap)
Property is loea ted on the Northeast cOJ....ner of
Nu~sery Rd. and Sunny Park Dr. The owner, of said
prop~rty .has requested that the City pf Clearwater.
e:staolish R-IE (single family) zoning and. Fire , . - .
District No. 2 classification thereon.
2. Begin 384.88 ft. South of Northwest,corner of
Northeast Quarter, (Nt.; 1/4) of North~.,est QU::l.rter
(NW 1/4), Section 2-29-15, thence run South 280 ft.,
East 337.61 ft., South 664.39 ft., East 330 f~.,
North 943.94 ft., West 66].89 ft. to P.O.B. less
Wast 50 ft. for right of way. (Champion Developers,
Inc .)
, "
P~operty is loc~ted on East side of Highl~nd Ave.
about 250 ft., South of Union St. The owner of said
property has requested that the Ci~y of C1ear~atar
~stablish R-4 (multi-facily) zoning a~d Fire
District No. 2 cl~ssification th~~eon.
....
3. 'South 10 ft. of Lot 15, All of Lots 16 to 22 incL.,
South 15 ft. of Lot 23, All of Lots 79 and 83, B~~~ett
Hanor Sub. " (Campa gria)
ppoperty is located on Horth side .,of Sunset Point Rd.
about 1000 ft. East of Old Coachm~n Rd~ (County Rd. 32)
and about 1/2 mile Hest of V. S. Hight'.'3Y 19 No!'th.
The own6r of said property has reque~teri th~t the City
of Clearwa~er establish R-4 (~ulti-fa~ilv) zonin? and
Fil"'e District 110. 2 classir.:.ca~ion th'':!l:'2on. ~
. , L ',: C ': l \..... ~hI" "'",
)~:.:~t,~d~{::{,.J~, :.;;, : \,;.,:'.
'if.:~I:;*ki:J.vJ~,\':';,;",(',"{-',;>;, """
,,'t.:t~~ "~(j..,1' a',U ~ 1" ., ,"
. '> .. ~
.'
,;.
f">
"
<...,.,..
,.....,.,., ... "Il~"'-""".~----->"'~'~'''' ...,'"
,The Ci'ty Commission) aft~~l' '.::onsiccri:1G al!. th.j [;;:let:;) ann r~colr.!~'~nd~.ti':l~\
of ,~he.Planr'.inr. an:! Z':)nine; 3oard,will r.::nd8t~ :l c<:!cision to r;,!'~"nt t;h~
zonlng request of the ownor or a zonins cla6~ification as may b~
de€:tned prope~"
~(:"
" ,
Those ~.p.~rson5, i:-.to::,e::tcd :.:--c t"e.que5t;~ Lv L~ 1lL'~st=nl for 1:he pUrp'jse
( ,of be~n&. hea I'd 0:' milY file to/I'i t ten ap?r~val 0'" ,?bj ecti,?ns ."ith 1;he
r.,;, " Pla nn, ng and 2.0 n' n g Eoard for that Eo... 1:'(\ I S pLl bhc hea ,"' ng and w. t h. ,the '
!",.., City Cl,et;k, ,for, the 'Ci'ty Commission public h~ering,. at Cl.."r<<atar City'
,(::' , Hall, 112 S: Osceol5.. ,:we.. ~lea,"water. Flar.da, p",a" to the de te of
,~, ,,' , the aooroo!"'.l.a ta ':)u bll.C hearJ.ng.
I"" .~, ~. ..
~,:a."
~~.'~''',
:{;,' "
\. "
r'\
\ "'Note:
'~,.", :
: 1 ,,"
\'
, i:. '
, , 'I",' .. , , ,
:,\':t:,':. :>' ':" >...: ,'''. .',;. ',: ',,', I ' ,,: .. ,.,"..",.'" '" ..
',; \""~""'n:.i.uu.m;~~~~~'-'-"-"""'''';-' " " d.''''.'
Ci ty of Clea t'H3. ter, rla.
R. G. J-1hite.head, City Cle!."'k
, Jack Holle,. ci ty Planner' '
"
"t;
: (;
"\',:
"'r
'.A.pplicants ,'or reprtlse:nt=itives must be., pt"csent at the
hearing t, '
.!.~
I,
c' ,'...1
,
'II":;'
, .'~~'~;\
2-18":69
., '
..I":
',." ';.'i.:: ,:~_~!i,:j:;~
:~}.i~. .;': :
:,;-::~'~ T:".-"- ...,....~.,..;1': \" ..~
,
,>'1,
'". .,~_.,:: :~l;"-. ':'c.: ,~~
~'>' .
r.:::;,.~:~)"
~~<: L,
,
:'\.
':,
~ ~ . ' ,
'/..'
. f. <: '
., '
,.,} .'
\',
, 1
; ;\' ,
, <-,
...' '
.,'
c. ,.
.,
.!
"
, ~
',/ " i c
, ,
, '-
'"
l .' ,.'
" '
'!,