02/18/1969
~
"
.J
./1
t.l'HE PLANNING ^N)) 7.OlHNG BOARD
tH.nutcG of the 'Heati.ng, 'I'ucsdu.y, rehruilry 18, 19G9.
Thc meeting waG called to order at 3:00 P. M. by the Chairman,
Mr. Kruse. PY."csent Her.e HemhC!t's nylandet', Harries, Reade, Spier, MorriR,
Schutzcndorf an~ Butler, Mr. Rettig of the EneineerinB Department, and
Mr. HolJC!:.
The minutes of the mc~ting of January'14, 1969, were approved as
submitted in written summation to each member.
REPORT. ON A t..BXANDER M1D HOSKO\H'l'7, STUDY - BOARD COl'11'~EHT
-, (continued trom 2/11/69)
Concerning the Alexander and Moskowitz, Inc., plan for downtown
Clear:'~~tet' entitled, PART I) 'fHE CONCEPT PL^N, ChC\irman Kruse presented
written committee report addressed to him, submitted by Mr. Galloway
as Chai~man on behalf of the ASH Report Committee composed of himself,
Mr. Elmer Mylander, and Mr. Frank Morris (as per copy of agenda record).
The Planner reported on ~ecent conference held with City personnel by
Mr. Wallace Payne, regional coordinator of Federal programs for the
Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, concerning the City's application
for a planning grant under the Federal 701 program. It was learned that
the application was to include an increaged amount of $13~000 for in-
depth dot-mtot-m planning funds and that the City COlTmiss ion at its February
17 meeting had formally appro'ved ClenT't.-lrltcr' s 70 1 application .for uT'ban
!.
planning funds based on an estimated cost of $"9~500 for updating the
City's ~aster pJ.an and .providing for a second-phase detailed study of
the downtown area.
Chairman Kruse :recalled to the Board that the I1o:..ntm.m Association
proposes to put up $2,000 (to match u lil:c amount by the City) "to\'lard
the separ~te downtown study; further thRt the selection of a planning
consultant "lill be r.1~r}e as soon as possib2.e.
After review and discussion~ motion bv Mr. Reade,
....... -...",--,..--.. -
sp.conrkd hv n.r.
.... . ~~JII_~""'''''~
!3~~ler,
as rollo',.m Has
""-" ~ ____.1
unilnimouf'Jv
Dasscd:
~ ----
~
~.~.:~J
'I
"" l... ..
Pt.Z Bel Hinutp.s
2/18/69
P~ec 1/2
11 that in suhstance the COlnmi tteo IS Y'cpot't be fOrHilT'd cd to the
City Cormninsi.on without modi.fication t that it be adopt(~d an the
t · h 'h C' .,
BOilt'd s report t H:l.'t. rccornmf~ndatl.on t at the J.ty COmrnJ.8sJ.on
for\~ard the B081."d I s sur,r,p-stion to the DO\'mtovln Associution".
Chairman Kruse thAnKed }~l", GaJ lo\o:ay and the committee for its services,
CHESTNUT S'fP.EET - PIERCI: BOUL1~V^Tm LOOP - BOAF.D DISCUSSION
I . fcon t :i.j)U(~ d ".trom 2/1.'1: / () 9 )
..
The Board continued its review and discussion of the subject loop
connector, In the scope of the discussioll favo~able consideration was
given 'to a recommendation by Mr~ Wolle th~t prior to finalization of
plans that a study should be made to set up special zoning criteria as
a guide to development of the proposed fill areas and to a suggestion by
the Chait'man thclt the Board might approach the matter on the basis that
the information the Board has received has been so indefinite that the
Board would want to defe~ any comprehensive review of the sit\1ation
other t}lan to make a suggestion regarding zoning and ~ossibly regarding
the reservation of the properties on the Hest side of the proposed road
for public use.
After a lengthy session of comment, !.~~~~r'd. apjlr'ovcd in~s~?....:'?..~~
~e.cof1l!Jle~da!..iR2:. .by H.r_, R~adG that the Board reaffirm the recommendation
made by the Board as to a preferred route for the Chestnut Street ex-
tension (in January 1965), \.1ith the altel"lnative Y'ccommcndation that the
z~ning o'f any pT'operty .developed by filling to construct the roud",1<),y (as
currently proposed) be controlled by the City, and that th~ Bonrd be
brought' up-to-date on 'vhat is happr~ning,
The Chairman suggcs".:ed that toil"". ~lylander" r:rno Hr', Reade assist in
the preparation of a memoT.'andum covering the Boa~dl5 review,
RF}ZO!J ING~Q~,E.~!Ji
(a)
HJml!J~Sl:H - R-IE 'fa PUD-R - NETr:s P.;-.!f) BOlJ!!DS PP.!~C!:L H! St~(,.
J.1': fg:.l S apm~o:-:irn R to J.y biiT-rt--:--;:~)TT-f"f:"-'r(YF:~iT~AL"l,(I"(:!\'t'lllrn~
_.,.JI.oAoo...__-.t.__....._........___..._......._.__~.~__.. .--..... ..-.--.....-----...--.........-.-~......,..........~-
ncar SDturn !,ve, f, PLl.l!n(~t.....c 8t, anrl to \'!, of ('J e€lr\'1rJtCl" .t~11"'t''''.Y'}. -
d .___________________.-.....-__
The application was reviewed with study o~ Burroundine land uso
1',:, '. .
~,.\ ill'
P&Z Bd Hinutes
2/J.8/69
P~gc #3
and zonine and reference area map-drawincs. Zoning Committee membern ro-
: ~ ported their findings. Hr. \'10110 con firmed that the parcel of request
, .
was under the same ownership aD the adjoining rUD-R zoned parcel to
the north, but that there are different prospective dcvelope~s for the
separate parcels.
Recommendation of thcZoninp; Cornmi ttec \.ms to a'D'Dl.~ove.
J . I ,4..""--"....bd. _ 1 ..._ ~ -....
subject request for change of zoning from R-IE, Single Family, to PUD-R,
Plannerl Unit Development-Residential, as consistent \-lith prior granting
of zoning for parcel to the north. Upon motion by Mr. Reade, seconded
by Hr. Mylander, !bE......Bo,aEd voted unilnimo~.~ly, to aPD~ove ~he....!'ep,or~. ot.
the Zoning Committee.
~" ......... _,L....l~.......~
!;~_km:..~I~!R1A'3 ~ ~oR;,'-t-:l"".~'oR~IJ:,E ,TAD R- ?--r.=-L9'l'S,_l-~~1~!.' BEOOKHILL 'fERRACE SU~.'
\~~N~ L L w~ L" Hallea~r ~lva. and Eun~ce Lane) -
"f..~ ....
The application was ~~viewed Y1ith study of surrounding land use
. and zoning and reference a~ea map drawings. Zoning Committee members re-
'le'", . .
ported t~eir findings. Mr. Wolle pointed out that according to accompany-
ing apartment plan that developer does not intend to use the cul-de~sac
(Eunice Lane). The Engineering representative's opinion was that the
"
p,lat should be vacated. Mr'. \volle said that otherwise it should be re-
platted. Reco~ilenda!i.S!l.-of the Zo,ni!1,~~f.~lmi !!!=!:_Has to ,ap~~the sub-
ject request for chanf,e of zoning from R-JE, SingJe Family, to R-3 (LD),
Low Density Multiple Dwelling, for the reason that the R-3 requested to
provide for the ~onstruction of garden type apartments was considered a
logical transitional zone hetween the existinE R-l development to the
1:-
Hest and the R-II zone nm., occupied by tNO chu!~ches to the cast ~ Upon 1110-
tion by Hr. Reade, sect;:mded by NT' ~ Hy lander, !b.s..f~~~rd '{,o,.~2.sL~~'~~.rd..mou~
to aoorove the rcnort of the Zonin 7 ~ort~!r.i ttee. .
~ -..cI ~. J J . __~ ~
CHAIRt1AN I S ITEHS:
1
"J
( a)
Commission Action - Pt./', Hd ~ Pec:nr.:ffir;:nd2.\tions
Concern inn annexation rr~q UC'G t [or the 13 1ilk] ey lot in l'1cado'tl Creek
~
,
'..J
P&Z Bd Minutes
?IIB/G!)
P~.\r.r.:! /}'I
SUbdivision, Chair'man Kr.u~e, t'Cud fen" the nonr'c1' 5 inr 01"ffint:i.on POl"t ions of
the memo fOl"\o1C11"'dcd conta inil1e the Board's recommendation und(n" parar,r.i1ph5
headed, uComment on FutuI"c Considcriltionr:", and "Basis for Rccomrnendati,on".
He reported that at the ci toy COlc-miGn ion'::; February 17th meeting the Board' n
reco~nendation was read and thats after considerable discussion, the Com-
mi.5sion hnd appr.oveo the rna,klcy nnncxation.
(b) Corr.mission Action - OrdintlTlce ItEms
.Do. JII _A . r 11 .....-.-.
Mr~ Kruse and Mr. Wolle jointly reported that the Zoning Ordinance
amendment proposals regar'ding buildin~ overhangs and the extension of
duration of stay 'from 30 days up to 120 days in travel trailer parks
were on the agenda of the sarna. Commission meeting and that action \olas
taken to refer same back to the Planning and Zoning Board and for later
Commission public hearing. !:!?;tion HLlSy, passf-:d t~at upon recon~i.,.derfl!.~
;the '?oard re~~fil"mE'.d these. t\'10 'Pr:'e,vi~~propo;;als as detnilnd in ~.&Z.~R
Board minutes of 2/4/69 and 1/28/69.
......1.1lo....- 4.
Public HcarinA Bd. Fch. 25/69 Annexation and Zoning
b..... "II ___..........._Illt>. .. -....... r.. ... .L. 1 P111~_
Libcca~ -.Champion Deve~ot)e:rs, fnc. - ~pa~na
Some p:reliminary discussion Has held to orient members with site
location and other details of the abovc.th)"ee annexation ~equests sche~
duled for p~blic ~earing before the .Boa:rd at 3:00 P. M. the following
Tuesday. Reference map-dra0ines were to be mai~~d to membe:rs.
Reauest Vacation Palm Ave. from Tu:rner St. south to 10 ft.
(\lle'[ .7"I..:r';'TBt Un'! ~!:d t'1ethociis"t Church ~--
This 'item was on the a3cnda per request fro~ the City Manafor (in
memo dated ?/1IJ/69) for a Bea.rd study and r-ccoHtrnendiJtion. Usi.nf~ an
illustrative drawing obtained fran the Ciiy Clerk, Mr. Wolle flOV8 the
Board an orientation of ~hc property and cxplaincrl that the olley at
,.
the rear of the c~urch pr'opcrty 21so .Jdj oinn t:he school property and
'that he didn' t kno~'1 \<1hcth<::1" the schoo} U!;CS this r~) ley. As buckr.rouncI
information, Mr. Rettig advis0rl that the cllurch WQG ankin~ fo~ a setback
.t-
.", :. : .' . . :.,. :.'. ;.-:.: ~~', '. .'. . '. :;, I~t ". ,~ ~ . -:. .' .. -:.. :..: " :-' r, :':. :',: : \", , : .: . .' ~ :' '-:. ~ ~~ '. \ " " , : . I ~. >./~ .... ~:':..".t~ '. " '. ': ~ ~: ':" :;~ I ",:. ..:. :.', \.: , ~ ./..... I :'. :':;. ,~';O"",,',"/'~',:.:. <:,:': ~~'. ,': : '. :.. :'" ~.:. . \ I . '; ':. :... . :.: '.: . . ,"." ~ ~ : ~ .~~' '. I' ;. :. : . " ..:
.'" .'
,:,
',.
P&Z I3d Ni.nutcs
2/J.0/69
Pf1gc if 5
v,nr.i.ancc on PclJ.m AVl'!.ntle clnd hcHl been questi.oned i1:3 to \.,thy they didn t t
;, ........
;'>' ~
apply fOl"' a vacation of the }'Ii.eht-of:-WClY.
Upon information from the
... 11 --4.. r
-.' .
;:'/"
:~, ":'~ \
Planner,th~t he.would like time to do more r~5carch concerning the re-
III ,......... /7
~.: '.' .
gUf.!st, -\~t'ther discussion was defct'l";.d until the ne.xt mcctinr,.
. ~ganda Item #5 (b), Limited BU5in~q~ Usa~c R-M ~oned Tr~cts (con-
tinue,1 'fr-om 1/28 anti 2i11/69) ~ \>IuS not, covc~~~l due. to a time limitation.
,The meeting.was adjourned at 5:00 P. MI
Res~~ctfull~ submitted,
'J:' "
"I
" .
'\ '",
..11 ,,'
Q . '-:/'
, . l I/.';'
/ '&.c./Cr.-:; C,(./V~,/S
'. }lp'-eK. II \1/01 c, Seely
19i ty Planner
"
~. ~
:11 I .
. ~. :
r,l;:::,::' .
"'
I' . ~
.,. ." ','
:,<.. " ,
;~~ .1. : ~ I I
.;, . ~: , '
~}: .:~,; .. ,1: I
.,: .
"~'.,, :, '.,..
i:;' ~:'.' . '.
:;)>,,:. . .
...... I I.
:~l(..~ .....
~;/:> .!.. ,',
~\": ,!~, ":' I .
tt" L ..~:...,' i ':
~<~}.<. "':
.\".
;.~:,:,~:: '.' , .
~~ \ ~~;
.1 ~ >. ','
,
" .
"
. .
,. '
, .',
.'.
. 'J
\ :..' ..
f.f,/'.,
;L':< ~
.. "
'! "
;,' "
. Cn
....
'...1'
,".
:', :;':
{,L "
. ;,
.~'
. L
.!: \ ;=
., J ~ .' .
. ". .
':: . ~', ',"
"
:/",.'
.... ,
. . .
'1'- 1'....\
': ' '........;
~.:"> \
; .
'.t,'. ,
",
". 'i,' .
.' ,