01/21/1969
;, ~ ::;~. ~.':>:Y .. ,:'. ',~'.> ~ ;,-:," ,,:, +..... :,' . '.':,' . '::;:f' :',' :", ~. :,': ',:/ . ", " ;: >', ~ ,;: :.:":';, "',:' :::'\~::~~'I'':'' < ',;;:',: '<',:<:: :':' \;',:, ":,.' :.'...,:.:.', ' " '~;,~ '("', ; ':.' -; ~~ '~""\ ], .:, I: :,J.....~, :~,:',::',: :, ~::-~ :.;...::,' ~:.:'.: :.:' (<, ::', ,,~.... ~:: ,..,: .. '" '.;::....':.-: " , ~ \.,~:,
. '
'l'HI~ PLM~NINl~ ^HD ZOtlI:ln BO/d.:n
/'
l/
Minutes of thc,~lcctin[l., '1'UC~.;ddY, ,.1anual~Y 21, IlJfjrl,
I.......
'l'hc meeting HaG convened ill II :00 P. :,1. fo110\>11n8 c:l Puhlic HrJurine
before,the Bourd, apcninr. at 3: on P. n., at uhich the appl.tci'ltions fo('
zoning and annexation for tIle following throa propcrtie~ were heard:
PH Item #1 Ralph W. Halgren - Metes and Bounds parcel Begin at
Southwest corner of Lot 96, Windsor Park 2nd. Addn.
run \o1est 27.27 ft., 110t"lth 115 ft., East 2B.2!3 ft. to
the Northwest corner of Lot 96, South 115 ft. to
P. O. B., Section 2-29-15, (located immediately West
of Lot 96, Windsor Park 2nd. Addn. on the South side
of Ashton Abbey Rd.) -
Bequest R-ID (sin~le family),
,-Kapok Tree Inn Inc. - Metes ~nd ~ounds parc6; The
North 200 ft. of South llOO ft. of the \1est-667.64 ft.
of Southeast Quarter of' Northwest Quarter Section
~-29-16 (located on East side of Booth-McMullen R.
CHaines Rd.) about 400 ft. North of the,Kapok Tree Inn) -
Reouest B (business)
--
PH ~tem: #,?
.1:
,~........\
PH Item #3 Wilson N. Rogers - Lot 7, Block E, Brooklawn Subdi-
vision (located on the Northwes't corner of, Kings
Highway and Arhelia Street)
~eque~~(multi-familYt
Record of such hearing was taken on tape and is on file in the Planning
Office. Present at the'hearing were Chairman Kruse, Members Nylander,
Har~ies) Spier, ~eade) Butler and Morris, ~r. Rettig of the Engineering
Department, and Mr. Wolle. The same were present at the 4:00 P. M.
meeting.
, ,~
ANr~EXATION AND ZONING - ACTION FRON PUBLIC HEARING
Item #1 (Hal~ren)
---...q-~- "
After review of the application, and an evaluation of evi~ence pre-
sented at the Board's public hearing, motion Nas r:lade by :-!.~orris)
E..econd~d e~--ltr. Harr>i~s, dnd pd:ss~d unani~~ly , tha t tnI'; Board recommer:d
anoroval of annexation reouest fob R-ID, Single Fanily, zoning for parcel
~~ .... -.. .. -.....-~ ---" ....- ...........---
as~lega...llY,~rihed .in Item f!~..9f H?.t:~5~E~_lic :!~ar'i~.::< f0!,_.~T-=-nua!-'\!
I
..../
21/69:.. It Has also recof;;menrled t:lat the above: parcel be desi9;natcd as
Fire gistriqt No. 2 claS5ific?tion~
, "The mlnutes of the meet1ne or nee. 10/6R were approvAd as submitted
in written summation to each member.
t"~' :' -~.:+.. >i \l ~ / :,;j';.' ': \ /,' ,: :' :', ',: '. :,::: ", ,':;' :,: ;',' , :',:;' :,';' ,::" ' ,,:'; ':;',:, ' ~ ':: /,,~,';~ \' . \':'~~ ',:', " ,;; ~ :'~~ '; ',~ ;:'" \:','..::,:,: ,: ,~::"I" ',:" ~ :'r~ '::~ \;-',: ,:?': : ~.~./ l' .':", ' . :+. '.;':: ~ ',;:~.<- :": ,:'. ~: '::,',/, ~..;,:: '.: ' ,,;':,": .:.', ':...:': ': : ':',:; '. :,: ,: ':. ~ ~: r:
Pf. 7, Ed tHnu b::w
)/71/69
P ..1 e c /! 7.
Information received from the Pl~nncr w~s that by overall area
fM'\ plan a linkc1r,c to the ~outh to Sunnct Lnke !:otf\tc~s HaG to occUt' further
to the west than Little Neck Road (hy way of Nugget Drive); therefore,
it was recognized that th~ alignment of Little Neck Road to dead end
at Ashton Abbey Road was in accordanc~ to such area plan. Information
received from Mr. Rettig was th~t applicant bought this approximately
27 ft. strip to add to his present lot of ownership and that se~er was
available.
Above zoning reco~rnendation was based on the folloHing considerations--
. .
Mr.~Ral~h'H418rcn appeared as applicant,: stating his Qee~ for
additionai lot area to extend building of home.
There were,no objectors.
"
: ' '...---'
The area to east and north is single family platted and zoned.
Area to south is zoned single family and is proposed to be a
platted subdivision. Area to west is acreage intended to be a
continuation of Windsor Park Subdivi5ion. Requested zoning con-
forms to usage in~cnded'.
,It was no'ted that property abuts a standard dedicated right-of-way
,,' '"".-....,
J
<,
(Ashton-Abbey Road).
.Item #3 C!~ogers ).
After review of the application, and an evaluation of the evidence
presented at the Board's public hearing, motion to~as ~made by Hr. Butle!:J.
~conded by Nr. P.eade , and passed unanirno~IY, that the ..Board recorr,rrH:~~
~pproval,d~~annexation 'reQuest for R-4, Multi-Family, zoning for Lot 7,
Block E.J Brooklat-Tn Subdivision .(~perty ~s ~~LllY described i'l~~~~
fj3 o...f N?tic~ of Pub!i~.y,tI~arinf!; for January 21/692.. It tdas also !"ccom-
.' I
mended that, 'above lot be designated as Fire. Distl'ict Ho. 2 classi f:i cation.
Such zoning reco~mendation was based on the fcllowinE considerations--
','~ .
~' ,
I
.~..'"
Mr. Hilson N. Roge:rs appeared as the applicant, explainine the
previous zoning and annexation of abut tine :.ropcrty alone 'the. !'!es t "
side of Kin85 Highway, south of Union Street. He stated t~~t the
request for R-4 zoning was necessary that he D~Y constvuct an
apat'tment buildine on this lq,t a] ong toli t~l other lots onthp. nr.p'lh
already zoned ~-~, Multi-Family, in the City.
/;' "
~
:,
r~-.......
"~4N) <
. . '.'
" r ',.n~
Pf,?, Ad rtinutcn
1/21/G9
P~go if 3
There appeared no objcctora.
Property to till": north and ec;"\s t if;! zoned it-II and purt:i,illly de..
velopcd with 2-~tory apartment structures. Property to south,
zoned R_II, is as yet undeveloped. Property to west is zoned
County R-4 (1-2-3 units) and is undeveloped.
The Eenerdl area io of n~ltiplc dwelling usage. Trend indicat~s
usagc--garden type apartment development--to continue. Typ~ of
occuparicy is compatible to surrounding community development
with juni.~r high school to nOl'-th and church site to south.
It \of as noted that Kings HiBhi':a.y and Arbelia Street have standard platting
of 60 foot right-of-way.
Item #2 (Kapok Tree Inn, Inc.)
-..-........MY~-..._
The': Boa~d~' r~vieHed the application, with: reference to ~ annexation
map drawing, and evaluated the evidence presented at the Board's public
hearing.
~
Two alternate motions Here considered and defeated: the first a
motion to recommend denial of the request as submitted and to recommend
"B", Business, zoning for the 200 ft. frontaee along N. Haines Road to a
depth of approximately 300 ft. (in alignment i-Tith previous "B" zoning of
property to the south) and PUD-C, Planned Unit Development-Co~~e~cial,
zoning for the easterly remaining portion of the property; the second a
motion to recommend denial of the request as submitted and to reco~~end
"B"', Business, zonine for the 200 ft. fronta.ge along N. Haines Road to
t,
a depth of appro>:imately 300 ft. (in alIgnment vTith previous liB" zon-
ing of property to the scuth) and AG CAericulturc) zoning fOF the easter-
ly remaininB portion of the property.
In final action, r.lotion_~~L'!l". Sutl.2.E.t-:?3..s..?nded b;~ l:!E..:,~'L.~an~r,
was oassed unani~ously that the Boarrl r~co~m~nd dcni21 of the annexation
~ ________ _____.., - ."'.....L 'I' . -+_._11I.-________ . ...--.....
req"!~t an sUp-'mj. 'tted [~:~1J5i n:2.s, ,~onin7. for ~ tOT:<.-t.l Dur~~al;; ] e.:.
$a!.lY de5...~~_. ~n l:E'~ 2 of H~!i,S~2.f~:ub 1.ic._!i!:2l"in~_l2.r.~~~!2...11.!..~.9 , a[o.d
in lieu th8T'FO!O: that: "B", Bu::;.i_)'1CG5: zon5,n.? ~)~ r'f~cc:.'~l1r:~cndcd fer th(; 2nO .f::.
... J1.. .....b. _._ ___K_....__.______... .. ....... -...... __...,~
frontage ,?~..2.n.E;. If. H~~nes.!..~~ t~;.:t':.ncii.!!.~:..J:9_~_c!e.Eth C?.f aI?EE.~:ir~r1!.~_1.2.Q._
".. :
': \ :"t ~,<: ..' -' :;" ~ ~ ~. ':~ : ':: '. ,:1":/'. ':,.' :' ',' .': - ,I ''-1 .." ...." ~ >~.. +, :.,::: '." \:.'~ ~/ ~ '.,:, ,;:,..'~ -:' ., < ~ " ',,' : > \ .: :' ''':-''; ;::: 'i',. ~ .... ~': ':, ",,:, " ' ' >.:;;.: ~ ~ ,~~ +, ~' ". ~.~~. : ,.'. ~ ~.',': : I ..:~,.. : r:~" ' , ::' :.. :' ,'.' : '; ;':; ,1,': .:' .,':, ;~', ~
" ..... ,
, ,..
P & 'l Bd Hinut I:'!l
J./21/G~
I.lilgl.."l f II
1.::. <:i.n, alir.I).!'!!:2.s...Hitb.-E.~~9l!r. "B" 2,on.in!':"wof rrop~~r:ty '!=_~~~,
~ !!lch 2r'opc.!.~~bc des ?:.E!!0~t~~~. fj.l~C Di,lLt!.:i.c t Jl~.:.....L_q~~si ~iC~1 tlEllL-
and that i.t he further recoT:1:TLcmded thi\1; the reoue,5t for anncxatjon of
~-cr ~_ .h 11 1 .1>.....____... ~ ill. ~...__..................r..
the remaincJ.~r-?..L the parcel be.~t:;!li9.9~]2!i] suCh...!..~~5 a d~_t:} t,fJ US.:1p.~
has been declared for this ca5te~lv portion.
-. J" . "'<[
Special note was made thdt at the puhlic hearing--
Mr. Elwood fiagan, Jr., attorney, repre~entative of the applicant,
had explained the request, referring to prcviouR expanded im-
provements for the Kapok Tree Inn restaurant. Pro Bob Ke~win,
applicant's business representative, had described the present
operation as it involved the need for additional parking. State-
ment was made that proposed parking area extension being completed
in area: o',f annexation request \oTas approxImately 100: ft.. Hide and
300 ft. deep, which was to provide for an immediate nced~
.........
A Mr. Clifton St~phens, owner of lots at Madera Ave. and along
the north side of San Jose, had stated his objection to the ex-
tension of "B" zoning beyond a north-south line in alignment
.to the easterly line of the existing and not-T being completed park-
ing lot. He had challeneed (having observed current peak patron
attendance) the need at this time for additional parking or
,future,usage for business on the easterly portion of the t~act
of re~uest.,
In addition to the above information~ the Board's zoning recommenda-
tion ,was based. on the following considerations--
"
.I,: ','
1. The past history of usage of property indicates normal
operation of business facility and usage of parking areas
causes abnormal'nuisance of distractive liehts and Gound to
,residents within a substantial distance.
'I
2. Applicant lacked proof of plan or condition of usage
beyond the fron~ approximate 300 feet of depth.
3. Partial annexation and zoning is within immediate needs
and is not speculative.
Concerning rights-of-way, thA Board reached the follc~ling co~clusions:
North Haines Poad is a County road and becoming an i~portant
traffic art~ry--rieht-of-way varies. Need is for a' full right-of-
way of 100 foot yidth in that futur~ USd3~ would domanrl addi-
tional laneaee, and drainage j,mpT.'OV(~;M:!nt s tr'ucttll..,p':s"; to serve
the B zoned and cevelopen parcels.
-j
Where 33 foot one-half riEht-of-way now ex~sts additiQr~al 17 fect
of right-of-~ay should he obtained.
It ~las to be recorded that the appl:i.c(:~nt 'fl<3.S inf')~"mc:d of tnl""! imr.1ccia t/'.::
, .1.
I' t ~.;;
~r/~.. ,~..\., .
. -"'~:\'f
P&Z lid. Hi.nuLos
1/21/G~
Ptlr:c !l5
need for thia additional rieht-of-wdY.
~
ORDItJAllCE ITEr-iS
4..................._
(a) ~h~~ i:1 T.!'?v!:..L.:~:!:~}l.er Park, requi.t'c!!1ents~ ,:15_ pro1.'pscd
(copies of p~oposal ~erc distributed to memhcrs at this ,meet-
, ing--as per copy of aennda record)
The Planner reported that previou~ly copies of this proposed amend-
ment to extend duration of stay from 30 days to periods up to 120 days
,had only been given to the Zonine Committee.
This aRenda item was de-
-..-'~_1' .....
ferred nendinR a reDort from the Zonin~ Co~mitte~ at a subscouent meet-
~ ~""'IIII - ... _'t ._....,.. .._.,.....,...<:I -.~Jl T.._....r.l>__
.~n~~
. .
,
- .
(b) Change in SiRn Ordinance as proposed for TBA Facilitv
1 ..,.rw.. -~ ~ ... L .L"Io-:I"_~_ __A
(copies of DroDosal were distributed to 'members at this meet-
ing--as per ,copy of agenda record) ,
The intent of this amendment~la~ to provide a definition for a
TIRE, BATTERY 8 ACCESSORY FACILITY and to establish an eligibj,lity fac-,
:: :
tor for signs for such facility. The Planner presented the proposed
\' ,c
amendment with information that--
After the appeal to the City Commission on signs for the
Penneys Auto Center building, Hr. Kennedy, Assistant City Attor-
ney, had been requested to compile a proposal for a sign ordi-
nance amend~ent relating to such facilities.
At Mr. Kenneey's suggestion, Hr. Wolle had a~reed to work up a
proposal, in consultation with Mr. Blanton of the Buildin~ Depart-
ment, and he had forwarded the proposal (as presented) to ~r.
Kennedy for his ~eview and consideration and possible preparation
in amendinz ordinance form.
He was bringing this to the Board's attention as a matter of in-
terest, since the Board was involved witl1 th~ original sign or-
dinance.
Mr. Wollets report was received as information by the Board.
DISTRIBur!'IO~; i\LE;'~^HDEP. S HOSJ<Q1;lITZ ESPO~T - fOR DISCUSSIOn JP.!.; 28
~ ..~ I~__.. _ 17....... ____ 1 b. 'V Y _~,__._.._____...._..._____
>.
The Ch~i~man r~questnd that members ~ivc further i~rlivi~ual study
',.,,-,-) to this rcnort and b~ nr.\~')a'!''2.d tr..> di2.CU;,S 1. t at the Board me(~tine "=~'Vl
I .. ~ ..
follcwin~ Tuesday
( '" .". .: r:> '" " n c t~
- t..:. _ .... ~ .
COpi9G wore distrihuted for the Board's
, f" ~
- , ..
.
P&Z Hd Hinuten
1/2J./f)D
P~r.(~ I' f.,
use) .. Mr. Kruse f UI\thc 1"' reported that in discusaion thtlt day \-d.th the
r). City Hanagcr hr.;: \Vas informed that' consideration of the Sacond PhrlO 0 of
',"
,this dot.,n tot-m study !tlas imminent, He cxpla:i.ned thnt the City HDuld be
j,
..
I,:
"
\
\ ....;,.;
involved to some extent in any,financial commitment. It was indicated
that the Board v~as given direction to rcvi.etl and submit an analysis
and report on ,this, First Phase study pI'ior to the 21st of February.
REOUEST FOR REZONING - BROOKHI LL TE!{RACr: SUBDIVISION - '
. ... .-..J l'" - ".......... ____"" .......... - ~ "1.~.41.
Lots 1. tnrou~h 14 - R-1E to R- 3 - to C:Oltl.1tJ. tt ee
'I><r ..........:1>.41:1 ~ .I!I __ "f ,... ~_ __ L_____
The Planner reported that he had indicated to Mr, Butler that
"this request ,would be referred to the Zoning Gomm~ttee. He also in-
.: ., , ., : : - ~~..,
'" . .
dicatedthat he has knoHledge, that the applicant is tenta,ti.v'Jly planning
Cln,2-story up-do\-ln rental apartments.
PLANNEP. 'S ITE:.tS:
p- ~61 j7 ~
~4end? It.;;nl 1.1,5 (a) ,( Planning and Zoning Board - corrections in
zoning on, Morningside Estates - to COlfmittee)
was not covered d~e to a
T -....~-..
, "
time limitation.
Planning literature was distributed.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:00 P. M.
Respectfully sUbmitted,
9J:v--/C- 9. 0(/A(:~
(~'ack' I.. loiolle'; See' y .
~i ty Hanager '
,\
\,
, M.. '
AND
.'
1
,The~City Commission'of the City of Clearwater will hold a public
hearing at the ,City fhll AUditorium, 112 S. Osceola,Av~., Clearwater,
Florida, beeinninc at 1:30 P.M., Monday, February 3, 1969, for the
purpose of considering the followin~items:
The request for annexation into the City of ClearHater>
and the determination and establi,shment of the zoning
and fire district classification for the following
,described real properties in Pinellas County, Florida:
1. Begin at Southwest (8\'1) corner at Lot 96, Hindsor
Park 2nd Addn. run West 27.27 ft., North lIS ft.,
East '28.29 ft. to the NorthHest (In.,) corner of
Lot 96, South 115 ft. to P.G_B., Section 2-29-15.
(Hal gren )
" ,
.
Property is loceted immediately West of Lot 96,
Windsor Park 2nd Addn. on the South side of
Ashton Abbey Rd. ,The owner of said property has
'~equested that the City of Clearwater establish
R-1D (single family) zoni:lg and Fire 'District No. 2
classification thereon.
2., The Horth 200ft. of South 400 ft. of the \vest '
667.64 ft. of Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Northwest
Quarter (tn'11/4) Section '9-29.-16. (Kapok Tree Inn, Inc.)
Prope~ty is located on East side of Booth-~cMullen Rd.
(Haines"Rd_) about 400 ft. North of the ~l.ook Tree Inn.
'The owner of said property has requested that the City
'of Clearwater establish B (business) zcninr, and fire
District No.1 classification thereon.
3. Lot 7, Block Et Brookla~n Sub. (Rog~rs)
Property is located on the Horthvlest corn~t" of :<in?,s
Hightvay and Arbeli.a' Street. The m.:ner of said ?t'or.~rty
has reauested that the Citv of ClearHate.'r establish
&-4 (m~lti-fenil'l) zoninE ~nd Fire District No. 2
classific~tion ~heroon.
." '> .)
14 i"
"I
, '
. "
1k~;'1;':';~;:.'[,;,,1 ,; ~~:;" ' , ,:"r '~;'. ,:' I~: ',: -',:' ,
. jl '>
',I ',. > 'l
.' ' ".:: \~..~: ~ '. "
~ j. c~ . "~:>';'!.,~' "".,>,J'.';,',' i,' ,~'I",:~,I 'i.,
.~, I,' 'j",: ',', I , , , 'I'
: ,., ~'~-'"
,,-,
The City COTllnission, after c'onsidcl~ing all the fac'ts and' ;ecommencla ti'on
"of the Plannine and Zoning Board,. t.Jill rl2nd~r a decision to {?ran't the"
zoning request of the owner or a zoning classification as ~ay be
deemed proper.'
;...'
~ ~'r' .
"
Those persons interested are requested to be present for the purpose
,of being heard or may file written approval or objections with the
Planning and Zoning 'Board for" that Board,' s public hearing and t'li th the
City Clerk for the Ci'ty Commission public hearing, 'a1: Clearv;ater City
Hall, 112 S. Osceola Ave.~ Clearwater~ florida, ?rior to the'd3te of
the appropriate public hearing.
,,/\'" "
:i,,:,
City of Clearwater>> Fla.
" R I, ,G.' \-lhi tehead , City Clerk
,Jack Woll~, CityPlanrie~
, Note:, Annlicantsor, r,epresentatives must be present at the
hearing.
'"
:' ~J.~ ' ,
.'~' ~ '
:,,~,:',~
':;"',....
cj ".:', , l.
,1,<" ,
;1'<' .
~,.' ,
. ~., '
, ,
, ,
,1-i6~69
'.:
. '
,.,,'1
" '
','1\." '.
\ ' ,
{::;'<", ' ',:, ,', '" . '. .," "", ,", ' ' " ',' ,
~~~~W:"'~}i';~U~::'''~-; ",,:~<,:,:J .,:" ,J;J'';~""""",,~,:,:;;,,';'',~~'_........,: ,~, '. ',~ . ,..' '--: ..... , ': :.'0, """: ''':~''':'''''~':~'YV,;__,,,.. ~"~.~.,::.,.:",,,,~..~ ...'-' . ,~. ,; ...... '
'j ~ \ ~.
,
" ,
.. '
, ,
" ",.
, ,
,J :.
. ~.
,'. }
,)
',)
; ,
. .,") ,
..' ~
, J'
- ,
',,' .
,+, >
, ,
l' "~