01/14/1969
':.:...- :':, ~':""':"..'; ".' . -,:\~':,:)~': :.,'... ,~",~,,",.':,:::,.\..,{l'\.~ :': .....;:.;:..... '.::1".."; .,.. ~:~~:i"~.:'::~': ,~:: :"'. ~":" ~ :,..,: '<~'~+"~:'-.1,:",~", :' . "I... "':~';:':":' :':,:,.:....:.:; ',' ;.,:':~:
./
L/
'l'HT: prAut.IIrfG MID ZOrrtHG nOA!?!)
...~
.
Hinuteo .of th~ Hectinr;, Tunnd<.lj', .lTnnum:'y 111, 1969.
#fhc meoting '.188 called to order at 3: 00 P. ..1. hy the Chairman,
Mr. Kruse. Prescnt were ?lcnbcrs Hylander, Rcad~t Harries, Spier,
Schutzl~ndo~f, Butler t Horris c1nd Gal] oHn:, ,l1r. Rettig of the Enr;incet'in~
Department, . and :Ir. Holle.
The min~tes, of the meetings of NoveMber 12, 1968, and November 19,
1968, Here approved as subr.li tted in' Ht"i tten sur:\!na ticn to each member.
SLIDE PRESENTATImr OF COUNTY PLM.JinN~ - ~'!P,. KRUSE - By consent,
.this Agenda It~r.1 ;-;0. 1 Has deferred until la te.r in the meeting.
ORDINA~.rCF.. ITEI1S
~ ~
(a) Revigw of R-~ refined areas as final submittal
In introducto!'~' remarks, ~1r. Kruse recounted circu;:lstanceG of the
Board's in i tial proposal for zoni.ns ordinance amencment. creating R-ll A)
B, ~nd C classifications and of later revisions made in accordance to
Board study to incorporate recommendations in comment offered by corn-
c'..
.':
..~ mittees ~epresentativc of local architect ~nd realtor groups. He ad-
vised that the final proposal for submittal had been prepared in draft
{ordinance form) by the City Attorney after an administrative study par-
tibip~ted in by t~~ City Manager, City Attorney, ~r. W611e, and himself
(copies of such draft Here distributed to members and the ?lanner's
. master copy is, of office record). Hr. Kruse reported that he was mak-
inginquiry .of the City Manager to urge setting o! an early date for
Commission consideration Hhich he C11r. Kruse) and ~1r.Holle felt should
'.
beat a separate public hearine with copies of the final draft of t~is
amending ordinance bcinc made available to the sa~~ interested grou~5
prior to t~e ~caring.
I' \
" ,
Mr. Wolle explained that thin dr~ft was the last s~~plification
that Heni: =or'~"a:-,d anc didn't involv0 any r,ul:1::tani:i'/~ cha!"'.~'?;:;(that:.n
.... \
'_"
conte:<t
. ." .
~t ~a5 e5s~nt~a__y ~n
Rccord~;ICf}
1:0
fin~l ~iscu~~ion wit~ t~e
Board); hot'/ever, tha~ c~'an[es ht~d hcen T.;c'i'~t.! in ~ho; sc1lf~dul~ (p<J:{''2.S 8
P& 7. Ed r.1inu tDI1
,1 i.ln. 111/69
Page f/2
and g) in dc1(!tint~ an:! rcfe!'(mCl~ to hulk plane ano sllbst:i.tutin~~ a
'~
.~
minimu~ sethack to t)utldin~ height rClationnhip. Upon r~qucst of the
Chairman t ~rr. Holle conduct(~d an in.fOl:'r.,~l dOllill rCVi(.H',' of the proZJoflcd
amendinr,. ordinance, Hi th particulnr p.xplanati.on of 'I'.^.BLr.S ^ Arm n, and
PLATE I of the Supplemental SchcduJe (Explanatory Comment-Building Set-
back Detet'mina ticn an(~ Vistancr; Bett.teen Ouilcti.nzs).
'After discussion and anG'~lers gi.ven to BOAre question5, the Board
agreed to su~mit as an addenda for conGirlcr~tion reco!~endatinn~ to~-
1. In Tahle B (Si~e and ~ear Required Setbacks) - to clarify that
the table. a:9pl~.~d to each side and each rear setback.
2. In Schedule - to note thRt Schedule was only applicable to
R-4 A, B 6 C classifications.
3.
To chao~e minimum side and rear setbacKs of 15 ft. to 5 ft:
when f~r a I-story parking structure.
4.
On Page 10, Suhparaeraph (d) - in Line 2 and l.ine 5 to inscr~
"nublic" behleen -cermC'l.nent and O7.len snaC8.
. - t
. ....
.. ,
. .~.~.I
'5. .On Page 11 (re off-street parkine requirements) - For ~-4A
District, delete O.B space p~r dwelling ~nit for over 50
dwelling units and require for 21 and above' 9. V.IS - 1 space
per D. U.
No other changes or additions were propos~d in the ~aterial presented.
R-H' ZONnrr; CLASSlrICP.TIO~! -
-
Hr. Kruse brouc-ht to the Eoard' s attention a situation that e;-:-
isted wit~ reear~ to R-!f .zoning wherehy ~c felt the City was faced with
the need for some lir.li tation on t~8 use of larse ~u'ca:;; H~8rc P.-~! zonine
might be involved. He said he had held seas discussion cancerninf this
problem with ~r. Wolle. ~r. Kru5~ ~crorted th~t this situation ~aG na~e
h C. C . . l~'" onr:-"-onJ.'n.~
apparent at t. e .~ty Or:Hi\::..s~n.on reCf:nt PU).lJ.C f'l8aY':LDg " ..... L-
rc-
ques t for the Blacl:burn anne:.:a tion tr<1ct on U. S. H~.'y. 19, a t "'~lich
applicant hac supported their requ8:3t 8Y r:~ferC!nc8 to :~-~.
.
z or,,]. n[: fll"e-
'.,..}
viously granted for Rutenberp's Imp~riDl Cove project and to R-~ areas
in Morninsside Estates.
It f:lC3.S
learned ~h~t at thi~ h~~rins
~ II- ..... ,
clp?J.lcanl.. G
zoning request was granted, althou3h ~r. Y~U~e ~la~ cx~lainect to t\~ Cos-
;
:.,"'. ;". . - ~ :'I~ ..... ::, . ..; ,'. . ". . :.~ ..:' '.: :'~ I.':.:;: :'o,.~":' l.':~ . .' " : ':/ ;'/:' I," . ~ :'.' . I. . ':' ~,:'. .~- ~".' >~.. .~' ~ :.~: " '.\: ',: '.; ': : "j '~'" '.~': .r' ....~.. ;, .'i+' " .: " .:: .... . ~ :> I. ....,. ~~~ ":' /<" ":: :, \~ .~. : '..'.: : . ' ;,;', '; (:. ,'~'. '. ~, j :. ~' :. : .:-: ~ "; ::,.. ~ ". " " . , '.", ,.~.',,:., '.
P&'Z Bd Hinutct>
Junlll/69
Pc1cr~ If 3
mission th<:1t the nOCl.l"d' G t"cc01;.,mcnd<.lt:.on for P_ll zoninu f../t:1f, ~.l,lG,-,d on
"*'
the pr'anli.!1c t.1Hlt to fillet.' ,o~lldulc hu~d.n~rw urH1Bc in c,'l.ch of the p!"o-.
posed hui lcling!3 tl0U 1 cl hH u mi.r;t~1k~.
Mr. VIoll e pnosed out co?ic 0 of a s tuc1'1 ?l"OT)O~u]: ti tl ed) II J.ir.~i tad ,
Busi.ness tJsa;rc of P.-I~ Zoned '!'l"actn Und~1'" One OHncrshifJ Or '<anarremcnt"
(as per copy attached to these minutes). This was drawn up by the
Planner for tlle Board to analyze and S\lgeest changes if desired. ~!~.
Woile explained the proposal and discussed its intended application to--
. .
Apply tho R-M zone and services in this zone in accordance
to acreaGe (tracts of 3 acres or more)
To provide for allocation of services based upon a structure that
is large enough and by na~ure ~~ould.need soncthing or service
t~pe within the structure (his thinking that should be in a cate-
gory of 80 to 100 units--tentative figure proposed 88 units ~n
a buildine of minimum height of 6 stories)
Mr. Wolle also informed the Board that he had taken the original schema-
ti6 plan for the Blackburn property and tes~ed the new appro~ch for the
.c: .-..
dc \
'.. '-'.1
amount of husiness serviceo to be in accordance to total units rather
than a.percentage of floor area. It was confirmed that ~or under 3
acres it was proposed to retain the present ordinance p~ovision for 40%
.of the. ground floor area to be elieible for li~itcd husine;,s usage in
str'uctures containing 16 or mOr'e units.
Some members questioned Hhet~cr the proposed area for limited busi-
ness services within structures 01'" in separate service center struc-
tures woul~ be econo~ically fed~ible. Discussion sh~wed that Board ooin-
that
ion t-!dS generally in f(lvor of the ic~a of such cO!1trcl::; l'ut/thcre '..:a~
a divernenc~ of o,inion as
"to t:v;
_ _ ; c.~ ~
.:>peC_.1._C."
of t~e basis to bc us~d.
The Chair~an reau8sted mc~h~r~ to
~
.
V~ VI?. ':':Ol'(.!
t~on"f:-: to t:-d.s
j te;;'l
.:1.rld
.
deferred fl1rtn0.T' discu.:;siQn unt:;.] t~r; .'nf:x't r",eet.i.fL:.
.A r._
. I .
. ...--
AWjEY.fl.T!O~'; f\~:n zm:p-rr:: I':!.'T~"!;'; - ?'1:-:1.:.1:: 1':~'-'1r~.n?' P/J. ,!~:.~. ?l/G<J 1: ')0, !;"
(-: )-----:.:.r;;(~ ~,. (~ ~ !' =} r~ ~ ~. P. -1 f)
0.,) Rrocl-:l;;utD Su~:.. R-ll
( c) ~:a. ;lOr: Tr'(.~0- 11 Bit
'; ":~:'..:~: ;'0\"'. 1.:t~I,::'.:;'>..;,', ',:,:: '...:,!.'. ',\ " L:,~ ..I.~, ~"'j. .~' . .o,~.~). ;""),,:,,,~,'~"':,:':~:~,,:: :~~\:~"":I+"I': .':..... ~ (. :.: "'.1::.:. ~'. '...j ';.t,I'.':..\.,,' ~':;:'\"',:: .i.>'~'.r.'~"',:>.,,,""':'~'::\:<:"'..
Pf:Z Bel '~<v~t.1.nf.~
,T?ln 111/rl'J
P,'}.:~r-' ;'1 I!
I~t". ('!o U 11 d: ~~. Y' it,u t~(l
.1:, n c ~:';1 t :. c :\ t"VI!' - d 7' ,",I!:: 1'1:; n .
It,. int'
.... 4 i...
1"'l\){) 10m'..'):)"; t
....
. ~ ~~
he C t" t(! n 1: cd JH~n l: ('r s '..;1 i t:\ lac n t ien C'> f 1:h ~ ;->ropcY't i Po;'; () f rt:'! '1" c r; t. Sorr.r'!
1, . . r · f . 1 '1 1 . d
pre ~mlnur:, t>O~:1t.8 o~ .1n:OY.'i~lnt].Qn (~'?tfn..N In r(!.!:i'lt' to the.J.~~ove ~.rt:!t'f1
the t :
It~m (<1.) - '!';d.s !'cnl1cnt ~nvoJ.ver~ ar1l''lp.;{',1tion of ,'.), m:oe.ll acrcCl.i3o
stt'fp iHijoin'ln'e to t})(! f.m::lt Lot 96 of ld:i.ndl'ior P.;!rk for
th/? purpose of c}:panding the building sit~.
Item (h) - ':'his raqllcst in'loJv.nd a remaini.ne lot in th/3 car>t8t'n
ti E!r 0 f lo't~~ in Ole cl.;: r. of nro{)l-:lu~.ln Suh. to complete
. 'h .... f .
anncxatJ.on Hl. t. P-II zon:'..nr; 0": th1.S ha l' block t,lJ. t~
frontage on Kinrs Highway (exi~tinE apartment usage
in th8 area t.'a5 inr.icntcrl on photo;na?).
Item (c) - Thi s rcques t invol v8d a str.ip 0 f frontage on Ii. H~ines
Poad (approximately. 200' x G70~) immediately north of
the Knnoy. Tree Inn narcels taken into the City in the
prior annexation and zonfld "Bu and PUD-R.. Applicants
~lere r'equesti.ng "B", Businc:'33, for parkins.
.The Chai.rman suegestc.d th.:J.t memher5 vinit these sites prior' to the Board.
pUh~~~ hearing scheduled for the following Tuesday. .
. .
.'. .-")
.:: I '
" .....-.
,. '
Mr. Kruse co~plimented the Board on having a ~ull attendance at
this first m~ctins of the year.
t .. .
,.
,
The followin~ arrenda ite~s 11ere not bover~~ due to a time limitation.
:i
\. ,
If 1 .
#2 (b)
Slide PresentAtion of County Plans - Mr. Krus~
Ordinance Items .Change in Travel Trailer Park requirements
as nronos€'ld.
Orcinance Ite~s Cha~ee-in Sign Ordinance as pro?osed for
TA^ fac1lit'l
Requ~st for ~ezonine - 9rookhiJl T~rrac~ Sub., Lots 1 throuz~
14 - R-IE to D_3 - to Committee
P57. 3d. - Correctio:1s in zoni.n" on >1or'ningsice Estates
to Cor.unittee
'I.
( c)
11-5 ( a)
(b)
Planning literature was. diGt~ihuted.
,The meeting was Adjourned at 5:10 P. M.
Re~pectful1y suh~i~ted,
. o..o/C SJ. L;JJ-t!i
IJ ck I. \'lolle,~Sp.c~y
ity Planner
: \ I
'-'
~ : ~ ~
. o'.j
"'... 'I c
"
.
o.
.
.;,
ttI~tI'l'E:D BUSINESS USi\r,F: or P,-:'1 zonED
'l'R-AC'l"':':'--U\l D~' G-'-OI~ll'';'--O''J-\rr,t:l<~1:{~I'-l.J 0'" "i-.r;:rrG~:.0"1.'l"I'I'
u . ...4.. ..... ~ ",.[:,..,o...r. . ..~..4 +.4.. ....... :.....
___ w...,...._________
tt'lacts of ~_acres ot'more ~lhich ar~ und~r one oHncr'shi.p
,...
\ .
For R-H zoned
,
andlor,management the followi~B allocation of.area for limited business
,.
us~ge shal1~apply:
[) Dr)) le-t"Y-.~~-e.., '. .
. . If structure J.S 6 stories 0'" more and has a minimum'.or 88
units, then
/tJ
sq. ft. of retail and personal service floor area.
, .
is pe~mitted for each dHellins unit; such services to be located
within the structure.
..
,
.'
,vlhen thre~ or more structures (each less than 6 story) are
grouped, and in'total have a mininum of 88 units, then a retail-
c,,.....,
.pirsonal service center may be established in one of the structures
within the group or' as a se"Darate U sel'vice center" 'structure) and
shall be perm! tted floor - ~I'ea of . f.. squa':-e feet for each
. . _....
dwelling unit within such.groupi~g~
, ", A m'inimul.l of 700' iect (of 0 walki!lg. 'dis tance) must be retained
. . ~ .
between separate service. cente~ ~tructures.
,,'
; above allocation is separate frow.the non-profit accessqry)'
L
. m~~.,~~nance, social, and rec~eational uses per~itted for office and 01'-
.ganizatiooal management associated with. condominiun, cooperative, reli-
"
gipus and institutional residential devclopnents.
"
.
In no case s~all such ret~il or ?ersonal services be ~dve~tisec ~y
.'
.. . H 'd .,c. -i-. . F " ... +0-
exter10r s~gns. owever, one 1 ent~~1ca~10n 5lg~ _or eac~ sucn cen_er C
. 5~ &~}
structure is permitted provided tha~ it s~all not exceed 5qU2~C
feet of sign sur.:ac'2 :?rea and if e!'ected as a s ;;?ar>2.. te ::'00: or po 1-:::
.' ,
..0 ~_)
s~gn it ~hall not exceed
lit
I
feet in height.
1-9-69