09/10/1968
'J'lJJ; PLMltfWr, ANll zorn!IG H()^]<n
.~
MinuttH3 of the t~cctinp.) 1'u~~;duv, SC'.ptwnhcl" 10, 19f1B.
The nicotine t.,riW culled to ol"'d~r' c':lt 3: 30 P. ~.t.. by tho Vice Chcl.i.r'lrWn,
M~. Nylander, who prcRidcd in the absence of Ch~irman Kruse on a vaca-
tion to\1t' to Spain and Portur:Cl.l. PresQllt ItICrO r"1cmbcrc Butler", Spinr.,
Reade, Schutzendorf) Mo~ris and 8nllowny, Mr, Rettig of. ~lC ~neinccring
Department, and H~. Wolle.
'fhe minuteD of the meetings of JUly 23, 19 G 8, ilnd Ju ly 30, ], 9 G 8,
\o1ere a.pprovctl Cl:~ suhmi tted in Hritten summation to ei:lch mmnb'IJl".
Mr. ~ylandcr informed the Board that Mr. Carl Spier had consented
to serve on the Zoninf, Committee.
^NN1~X/\1'ION 7.0!nH~ HE0tn~S'rs - Public Hcarin!; PSZ Board -
. . . ~'~SeDt. 17/G8 ] :3'O~ P. 1'1.--
. J.........
Items Hl througll #5, as legally described on copy of Notice of
Public Hearine distributed as an agenda attachmcntl and in brief
'referred to herein as:
Item il1. L. H. Thrasher tract (kno\'1n as ShadoH Lm10 'l'railer' Pilt'k)
located on the NIE cor. of County Road 61 & Virginia Ave. -
Req,uest HH.
Item #2 Sunset Pt. Baptist Church - Lots 9, 19 f, 20, E. A.
}'Iar-shall Sub., locatecJ on the N\.J cot'. of Sunset Pt. P.d.
and Kings HighHay - Rcau'cst' ~.
Item i/3 First Christian Church Site (in lHv l/ll Sec. l8-29-1G
so. aide Drew Street, about 1000 ft, cast of Belcher Rd.
p.eQuest R_I,.
Item /.l4 \>1m. K. Ar'nold - Lo,~ 0 f. 9, Oakland Heights Sub. - located
on Adams Ave., about 215 ft. no. of Lakeview Road
Request "B".
Item #5 Hunt f. Cussady - ~1ctes & Rounds in Sec. 7-29-16 & so.
60 ft. of Lot 21, Hillcpest Estates, 1st. Addn. - located
no. or County Rd. fJ?89 about 1/2 mi. E. of Belcher. ~d. -
Rcau'3st F.-IC.
a......_ '.
The PlannG~ recalled that location. map-drawings had been mailed to rncm-
bers for' reference in makine site inspcct-ioll~ pr.:i.ol" to his leavinG on
vacation August 26 and noted tJlat Board formal action would not he rc-
quired until after the Board's publ ic hCi:tl":i.ng \lhcn ~"\ '1lcnting ...,ould be
called (in thl".t BO~H:'d recommendations \'1e1:'C to !Ie subm1:t1:0.d }1}-'iOT' to the
j,'>ftJI) puhlic heurine before the City Comr:d.s:;;:i.on on Ser't. ?3/G8). ~1r. Hollf!
displayc(} and expla in Gel photo-map dr',:\'~}.i ng~; }/},-...qJc1pP'cl !lY th8 l~n~ :~no(.!pinr.
Department illuoty'ativ.:: of tJw pPop0rt:i C~G at T'cqllC:,t. F'UT't:l('l"
PE II Bel Minutc.u
9/10/(;0
Pur,c 11?
pl':'C liminar.y discus sion ",as held concerning the ,:\bove f1. ve rC!qu~f3ts
.~ and of thc', exil:ltine 01' intend('!d usar,e \od.thin, the pc:lt'cels. conGic1c~ration
baing given to information r~eardinB adjoining rights-of-way sub-
mitted jointly by the Planner and the engineering Representative. After
this review. it HUS informally ar.reed that in prcliminar'y analysi.s the
Board felt there would be no objection to the requested zoning. Some
reservatioris were expressed as to the advisability of R~4 zoning for
the entire 15 acres (approximately) involved in the application of the
Sunset Point Baptist Church unless inquiry at the public hcarine re-
vealed that it was all intended for church usu~e. It was arranged
that the Planner would mail annexation map-drawings showing lariduse
and zoning to members prior to the public hearing date.
" ,
>-
REZONING REOUESTS
(11 Casata Inc. & Dynamic Investment5 Inc.
,\ .-...
" 1
, ,
Z-10-768 Lots 2, 3i 4, Block K, Boulevard Heights Sub.
R_lj to PRS (NH cor. of San Rerne & Court St.)
(2) LO\ole11 F. Munson & Anita lJ. Bunson
'2-11-868 Lots 39 ~ 40, Block M., Brookhill Unit 4
R-2 & R-IE to R-3 (south side Lakeview Road,
- west of Hillcrest ".ve.)
(3) ,Clearwater Bay Xarine \oJays Inc.
Z-12-868 Lot 1, Block 2, J. A. Gorra's Sub. (with exception)
R-IE to DB (west side of N. Osceola, No. of
900 N. Osceola Ave.)
*(4) James R. Kezzatesta CRept. James Ault - GeniI Tel Co.)
Z-13-868 Lot 1, 2 & No. 25 ft. Lot 3, Block B,
Resubdivision of Padgett's Estates
*(5) Agnes Schuhrke
'Z-111-868 Lot 9, less the East 10 ft, of f. A. Kcnnedys
'Fairlane ^ddn.
-!~ (6) \'1illlam Lyons
,~
2-15-8138 Lot 13, Bloc}: 3, P.evisod Plat of Brook\-lood Ter-r'acc
1':( 4) (5) (G) All rcquc~;t H.-II to 13 - Generi'll Telephone Expansion
........... -.
;..'., '........ ' :'''''':'.'.:, .,'.~." l:.','. .,. :...."c..'..., ....' ,". :...... ," ..:'.' ,',.':.",'.':". '.',>.', '::",' ':,:':',' ....'.':,:....,.....,;...';'~.:'..,:....:.:.J;: ' .,.' I..........':...:..: ~. !".:;.,', '..... .' ~ ~....~.. ',' ." "'.'I_:~' ~..'~" ..'.:,'..,.'..".....,.;.... .. . ,. . I ." , . . ' . I ., . ., l ~
. T -'.....,. ,- - ,- ~':'~:/:::':~'~~>.';~.:~~.'~':::i~':r<~:;'.'..:',~I.I:ll" ..'~::)"'<,'/.'::"'.':':[,,(.::'.~...." :~,.....,:. ::.,
~~.:' :.:'<: ">,I',c :.1.,'
"t .~:: ;'. !':': :.~: ,: '+~ ' ,
.'<'
,..
.,< .
P&Z 13d Hinut0.n
~,~ ~~
n/lO/GCl
Pi\r,c f!;~
Mr. Wolle eave S0mc preliminary explanation of thcac locations
tI~ and reasons for r.cquests as stated in upplicr.1tions pri.or. to Zon.inr.
,-......
I, t
"-"
-.,J
: ,
,.::1::1
committee study.
\ ...
. .:'
~ ..
:~ '~:,
.'.',
, .::. ~
In regard to Z-10, it waG explained that: .
Iley real estate offices were directly across the street to
the east.
.; ." .:~
~. .
, ".
.j.
.:: ~:I
~', PI';
DraHing submitted \-1i th application shot-lcd il house on Lot ll.
'.,: ~ :
'....
I ~. ,
't .:~
. .~,'
> ;I~:."
'. .
'. .~
,..
~.': ~
:,;'
:)
,
Mr. Butler commented that the request was consistent with other ap-
provals of rezoning to PRS in this strip of Court Street to the west
of Highland. ,
~n r~~sr.ard to Z-11, it \oms explained that:
Lots were in a st~ip of duplex zoning on the north boundary
of Brookhill Subdivision. Lots of reouest extend Gouth into
a drainage area, with R-lE zoning on the southern portion of
such lots.
,..'
~<.:I
~ ~/:
':,:~; .1
','.,
"
'He (Mr. .\'lolle) had recommended to applicant a request for R-3
zoning as appropriate for a proposed use for triplexes.
Single family residences are to the south. A church is
across the street on Lakeview.
I'
,'..,
.~ "
"';/'
':\<i.
",'<"
,<I,.
Mr. Reade questioned ~'Jhcther R-3 zoning might not be objectionable' to
those owne~s 6f homes to the south of it. Mr. Wolle expressed .the
opinion that if used for triplcx.-they probably would not have morc
density than duplex.
]n re~~rd to 2-12, it was explained that:
Area of O\oJnersh:i.p (as indicated on dr-aHing displayed Hhich Has
submitted Hi th application) \.ias all zoned 11 gu) Business.
,.
Request for subjec~ property was for HB as proper zoning
under th~ present zoning ordinance.
Reason for request as quoted from applicntion was:
"Applicant m1nS lots 2 and 3 ~ Block 2 of Gorra' s Su!Jdivision, and
all or parts of lotG 13, 14, 22 and 23 of Barco Sub. and other
lands, both upland and submel~8ed in B(ldi t ion to sub j cet f)"'ac-
tional lot, all being contiguous. The remainder of the parcel,
e~cepting subject fractional lot, is utili~ed as a boat basin,
boat slips, boat ya~d and boat ways. Applicant desires to uti-
lize subj ect fractional lot in the overall bu ::>ines s operation. II
.The question \'1aS raised as to v,h8thm:' i':lpplicant miGht establish u. use
such as a high and dry mar:i.na ','1:1ich might ohsty'uct tho vie,.] from
neighhoring propc:r.ti0.~., 11:1". l:JolJ.e :'>tiltP.c1 thht fJl?r.au[;(! of the l()cati.on
of this Lot 1 (without water acceos) llG could not for0s~c a use such 88
this. Hr. .GulloHay pointed out thu.t the! Ni.l.r'ine Hays ha.s i1n establishec\
.: ,... .".'::, ::~;' ".'; ;.....;.' <.~~;:~...: ":"':i':'''.,~'':').ri''I''J~'~'; '. ~.:,,\:; 1.....:".,:./.:,.' ;....~:,::.:: ::'"J ...,..,:.~,.. ':~:,.r>:'. ";'.~':)".I..:..~I,:.\;:.'~>,:.',';:;." ,'':'1'" :.l:....,-.:.'~,~:(.: ;:".~L,.,:, :,<~:,'~:"~': ':'~..} ......~.'\.:.,':':..:{, ~/..:.. ."~ :.' ;., ';'\'.":.,l-,.
Pf.Z Del ni.nutc3
9/10/1.)0
PH!; c /,/1/
f!"4
uoc, nOH Compal"u.ble to HB UGl.."lS. 'file V~,c" Cll<l.i.r'lni.ln s\ll~r.entcd that: it
might be t'ecomm~ndcd' that the rCTIlili.nc1cr' of the :rll"oTH.n"ty be chmlged to
JIB. Tho Planner f(? 1 tit micht be advj,lwblc to rc t,d.n the more 1"'0-
stl"ict:tvc :7.oninr, of HU". 1'hi::; qu('.ot'iOl1 \ouw to he studied by the 7.oni.np;
Committee in its cape review.
In regard to 7.-13 ~ 7.-1It, and 7.-15 tit wa~ CXplll:i ned that:
As would be 'noted on map-drawing passed out, zieza~ line indi-
ca ted thl~ pre::;cnt Gener'a1. 'l'c1cpl1onc oNnel"ship.
James AUlt, attorney, was listed a~ the authorized repr~senta-
tive on all three applicati.ons, and General 'l'clophonc \'las
neiotiatinn fo~ purchase of' those three nrljoinine propertien
intended t6 be used'for company parking and general expansion.
Hr. Gallo\-lay sugr;ested that u traffic stucly should 1)(.~ rnade of this
area to alleviate traffic congestion. He Gaid. he thOUGht Betty I,ane
should be one-way in this vicinity.
After some further prcliminar'y diacussion, theRe Cases 2-10 1..
,Z-ll, f-12, Z-l3 " Z-lll and 7,-15 '~lCl""C refc'r'r'ed to th(:! Zoni.ng Committee
for investiRation and reoort in two weeks. M'r'. Wolle advised that he
~ ~
would get reference area drat:,ines out to the Commi ttoo .
,~~.
)
.. ..~...<
(7)
County Referral - Agenda #14
~, - Public Hearine Sept. 16, 1968
;,
..
Approx. 17 Acres lying on the east nide of U. S. J9,
approximately one mile south'of Gulf~to-Bay Blvd.,
po~tions of land Sec. 20, Twp. 29~ Rg,. 16.
From: County f=l, Com'1 to County ~~, 1'-1u1 tiple Family
The Planner presented the above request for change of zoning
scheduled to be heard by the County Examiner. fIe reported that notice
of s~ch hearing had been referred to the Board for recommendation to
the City Manager. After review of land use and zoninE in the area, in
concurrence with recommendation offered ~y the Planner, the Roar~
voted ,unani.moUS1\f to recommend th2.t the Ci tv T'c:;:i.step' no obiection to
b.. 1 _ __ T~" ...~............rr~__
\ ,
:the rCClucsted u~~adi:lfr. of this D!"O!?~;!. ~!,om." q-?, COffi!;\0rcial) to ~:l,
Mul;:s~le DHellin10.
" '
.......)
}:. .
': .. ... : '\ ':, :'~ ,: ~I., ~~ ':<":',: :~:. (:" :.~; \ <:: ,', :: ~:': ~I '," :;','/ ,:" " ','o~, I., " >:~ ~ :\l : . ",' ':: ',: ,I, :::' : " ..' ':', : : ,.:,.: ~ ~',\" ,': ' : '~ ': .' +' ~ " :' ::' : " "';: 'I L< ,: ,I " "::', I" ~ l~: ; ~ ':. ,',,'.' ", : ,~',: ,~,\: . ':::': ~~', : ,~ ":.'.' ::',:.j;: . ;:, ' '~ ~: '.:: : ~',,", ~:. '; ;." " ' ',' ': ;', ~
pr.7. Bel Hinutcs
!l/lO/GO
Page 1/5
VICE-CI1AIHNAN I S J.'l'};~r;:
.. 1.....l'7IIoI_ 1
~
(].) Action Comm.i.sr::i.on - Curtis ct~,
Mr. ~Iy1.under reported thilt (3"t itG meeting on S~ptmnbc.r 9th
the Ci.ty Commisr>ion--
. ,J.;' ....... ,1l ,~- I 'J-t'1Hl
(.,(J J 111 H:" T '" .
Approved the annexation" of the Curtis property at Belche~;>
and Nursery Road with ~estriction9 as to height and density
(\Jhich H111 be covena.ntl3 runn:i.nr, ",:i.th the land). BOClr>d
rccol1unendntion had been for PUD-P zoni.ne,
The public hearing on the Island Estates request for
R-M zoning was postponed upon request of the applicant
so that developer might v.ivc addi i:ional study to ci t)1
right-of-way proposals, particularly pertaining to
possibly obtai.ning a b1""idge head at v,est end of Harbor
Pa5sage(extended to edge offill).
The Commis sion agread to the rcq uef.lt of Het?. and ~tJhi te
to .\.d thdraH. an appli.cation for annexation of a parcel
north and east of the Belcher-Nul"'oery Rd, intersection,
ri neW request to be submitted at a later date (poSGibly
with the additicin of more property),
Communications fr>om Mr. Kruse
(2)
" ~........
The Vice Chairman reported receipt of communications from
,',
Chairman Kr,use, Mr, Hy1ander advised that he \o,as havins a \o10n-
derfu1 time. and v10uld return to New York September 14, Hnere he
probably would be spendine a weck.
PLANNE~ IS ITF.?1S:
Pinellas Planning Council - On behalf of the County, Mr. WollG
extended an invitation to members to attend the special proGram of the
Pinellas Planning Council on Wednesday, Septcmher 18/68, to hear a pre-
sentation by Candeub, Flcissig and Asnociatcs, County Consultants, of
the county-wide Preliminary 1985 Concept Plan.
. \
Planning literature waG distributed.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:10 p, M.
\,_J
C' .espectfully s~bm\ttcd,
. \\ L',! t ;; I' .-
. tL<.Jt. \.". -\j Vl.';,C......
Jack 1. Wolle, See y
~i ty Planner .
!. .
.. .