Loading...
07/30/1968 '..,.~1'1..,. . ~. ... THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD Minutes of the Meeti~g. Tuesday, July 3D. l~GB. , ,'-, The meeting was c~lled to order at 2: 00 P. M. by the Chairman, Mr. Arthur Kruse. Present were Members Mylander, Reade, Harris. and Spier. Mr. Rettig of the Enginec!'ing Department, Mr. Wolle, and Mrs. Marion Olsen. Acting RecorQing Secretary in the absence of Mrs. Hall on vacation. Since this was the first fo~mal meeting attended by Mr. Spier. the Chairman welcomed him on behalf of the Board. (Mr. Spier was appointetl to the Board by the City Commission on July 15/68 to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Pat Iley.) The minutes of the meetings of June 18. July 2, and July 9, 1968, were ~pproved as written. M~. Kruse stated that the agenda items involved necessary discus- sion and action of the Public Hearing held on July 23. 1968. Itein.#l (Curtis) !n reviewi~g tne Curtis request the following points were discussed: 1. ,The petition submitted objecting to the zoning of this proper-' ty for multi-family. Thirty to thirty-five names were on the list. ":".'~ . . , '_r Protection should be given to single f~nily dwellings abutting the property. The Meadowdale situation was similar to the Del Oro situation--residences backing to possible multi-family structures. : , Height of building and facing reduces privacy to the single 'family homes. No one should object if'there is sufficient set- . baCK and lower density to the structures abutting single family. . ,\ ,2.' Occupants of rental property deter~ine quality of maintenance, which may be questionable...~ .; 3. Duplex or the smaller apartment structure was not in line with the owners' intended density or return on anticipated develon- ment investment. Homes in this area are expensive. . 4. How far south would this type of development invade an ac- cepted "estatelt area (community). How much would this proposed development, if permitted, affect extended development of similar projects to the east. 5. Adequate right-of-way for Nursery & Belcher should be assured. I. 6. The features of PUD-R zoning should provide control, as well as permit developer to build in phases according to a Master Plan. .',J ::': /.:. ,1". ~'.:r ~t ,< .: ,',' .....~ " "0 ~. ~:'.~ '.'~' " y ~.., ',:.; :.~ ,I,". ;,', ~.~.:... '.~ :','~ I: ,'.' .~: ,:' .'.: I,.~ ~ , ...~: ::,':.: ;..~: I : :'~. :; :~:.:~' :::. ~~' ':'. ~:.... ~: I .:- (,:: ....1,:: .~/..': ~~..~ ~ .' . . ~t.'. " ;',': '/ t,': ~':. , -::~.:. '; I ".: " :., ;::' i', ,;, '.:.:~-.. I'; :.....: " '-':-:'::<., :\,':: :.:.:..;~::>.~ :, :: ,~ 'I""'~\:'" ,~~ '.' ~ ~~. .+ ~ '.:':'" . ;- ,'-':~. PEZ Dd Minutes 7/30/60 P~gc fl2 After the Board cons idcrcd the above, Hr. Rcnde made nfl, moti,on the t the,. r--.. !~qucst for R-I~ zoninn be denied , in lieu thereof 1;9 recommend PUD-R_ zoninR. A second motion ~'as made recommendinp, that the Dart that is ~l.readv in,_the City be rezoned to PUD-R , top,ether. with a re~uest that it be assured that a dedication be made of 40 ft. 1/2 right-of-wav on proPrrtv owned by the applicant which abuts Nurserv Road. Mr. Spier seconded both motions and these carried, each nassinp, separately. Such zoning was recommended: ,1; To give protection to single family dwellings, and have sufficient setbacks. 2. To permit adequate control of height and density. 3. To provide. density which will permit development to continue with the least amount of change in property valuations., It also recognizes that potential development to the east" along Nursery Road is of a different nature than that estate area to the south. ". '. Item #2 (Bortles and Burket) - Afte~ the Board ~eviewed public hearing information, motion was made, seconded, and nassed that this application be anproyed for R-lC zoning~ Basis for Recommendation-- 1'" ..' The continued development of this residential area is possible only upon availability of city sewers. Zoning request is con- 's~s~ent with the land use existing and is proper for the 'area. Item #3 (Eastwood Terrace, Inc. and Adro, Inc.) After the Board reviewed public hearing ,information, Mr. Reade made a motion that the lot on the east side of Fernwood Ave. be zoned R-4. It was also recommended that the request of R-4 zoning be, denied and those lots on the west side of Fernwood Ave. be ~oned R-2. Motion was i, seconded and carried. Basis for Recommendation-- R-4 zoning on west-side of Fernwood would affect substantially present valuation of homes on Baywood and further building on east side of Baywood and Dre S w t. ',~:.:~ ~., \, . ,:': ': ' \~. '/:: ; :~. f : ,< := ::, " ':.. ,~t ...',' '.. ~ .' ': ~ :. :,'.''-:- l ,,',: .' <~ (..;,.':/ ~. ':~ '~L. : .:: .: . ,:~ '. " L,:,' ,:: . t', ~.~ ~~.:: ;.~: :~.~ :; ~ .~~ ~ ':, " ':. '::' ';"::>~" 'I'~ ,~,~>:.:: ~'~ ::: .....,~ ~'~" : :': ~: -: ,;".: '; ~ ':: r -:<. :":,:,' ...:' ,:,.., ~ .:. ~.',.: ":' ::' . f: .::'::': ,'.: ':' ;,' .. ~,~. )", ,\, '.~ .:;. l,'~ ,~. ::. ", ~ ':" ... ::' ~.I:"':':::~' P&Z lid Minutes 7/30/68 P~Be #3 ,,........ R-2 - Duplox UOQgc would provide a buffer as well as permit a more compatible usaBc abutting existing ownerships. !Jern Ill. (Hobart~ Inc.) After review of discussion at'the previous meeting of 7/23/68, ~his action was confirmed on platted lots only. Because of condition ~butting stree~J the Board did not recommend annexation of abu~tin~ right-of-way for Ridge Ave. Basis for Recommendation-- The request is in conformance to land use, zoning, and future development of the area. ftem #5 (Metz and White, Inc.) Request was reviewed in accordance to action taken in meeting of 7/23/68 (after publio hearing). The R-4 zoning recommendation was con- firmed. Further recommendation included'request for additional dedica- .. - complete tion to/eemp~e~ 40 ft. 1/2 right-of-way for no~th one-half of Nursery Road. ~\ . B~$is for Recommendatio~-- Multi-family usage - Apartment complex is under construction on the site.' Zoning should conform to land use intended and desirable. Zoning should be protective to control all the existing and potential occupancy. with regard to the property itself and .also that of the community area surrounding it. ., ISLAND ESTATES PROPERTY Item #1 (R-lC reouest) - Public Hearing Island Estates (refer to L ac~ion recorded in P6Z Bd Minutes 7/23/68)- Item #2 (R-M reouest) - Public Hearing Island Estates r ~ After extensive discussion, Hr. Reade made a motion that ~he Board I. recommend that all of Island Hay be zoned R-H exceut the southeast cor- ner of Harbor Passage and Island Way which will be zoned R-3. Mr. Soier ....-~ .-/ ~econded the motion. Motion oassedi with Mr. Morris abstaining. It was noted that at the public hearing that the applicant committed the P&Z net l1inutcs 7/30/68 Pp.gc (/ ~ ,,......... dcv~lopmant to continue median strip and Island Way right-or-way to north cnd of legal fill. Basis for Recommcndation-- Pattern of use intended is similar to area to the south which has developed with apa~tments of varying density and with adj oi.ning island to east developing with single fami.ly usage. The southeast corner with R-3 zoning would limit height and density of building usage at a major residential collector intersection. Highland and Union Street - Center - Mr. Reade recommended that the letter prepared by Mr. Arthur Kruse and Mr. Wolle be ,forwarded to the City Commission with one ex- ception--that any form of R-5 usage on the' eastern side of Highland Ave. be excluded. Single family usage should abut Highland Ave. Mr, Spier seconded the motion and it carried. Carmichael Plan - The Board reviewed andapproved'the amended plan submitted. The City Planner stated that it would be forwarded .to'the City Commission after review and preparation of applicable deed restrictions by the ,Legal D~partment . .' REGIONAL RECREATION PLAN - Sand Key - Tampa Bay'Regional Planning Council - .. ,The Board was informed, of study being prepared by the TBRPC staff. It was shown that /~he situation had changed. Dunedin has developed Caladesi Stat", ;- 'irk. Sand Key is s"till available. However, the Board indicated that this . tract was not actual~y needed as a public park. PLAT OF UNITS ISLAND ESTATES - ,I Paul Rettig presented Plat of Island Estates, Unit 6D, 7A and 7C. . The Board reviewed the proposed plat and found no objection to it. It was ~ecommended that plat be approved and be submit,ted to the City Com- "-,,,' . ~:': ~' II ~:. ~.: ,:,1'( -:. . ~ '" -: :' ,,:: +.::.:.' . \ .::. :". ....~;.: .'", I.: . :" .~': . ~ :::: :..:', .' , ~.. . I,:' ': . ~ ,,'.' '.~'. .' . ',:" '. I ,::':',. , ~I. 1'1::".:.';: ;':::' ":: :: ..' : ':-: ":' .... "'::', :.:;. " ; : , ~,~ '.:: ;: '.;":'," I. " " ;,",;.. ': . :. ; : ':, :. .: ~ .' ,'d," I '~'.~ ::. "'~' ~'. '.. '1 . . ~ .. ~ \' ~. t. ~ ,. i ' ~ \~ ,.:'~ . ,(.. ,J~~ ~ . !;.'. ~, I. I .~ ~. ~.:;. c t <'&' , ( ~.:), . ~ '. ' ',r, t;..::.'{.,. f."I" , ' "j'l' ~~:. . , . ,- ~ ,'., (:~::.~.' :' ~ ,..........;,.: '~..' . ~"":.:/:..: ~ t.. " ,.. , .. " f"i;: ' f ~: .~;. . I ~ l}i;t" .' ~,~;.).::~t ~~~~~:i: ,\~~ ; ~ t "'.' ~, . . . 'to> ~ '.~ \. ';\";"',' ':." . ;":' :. ,":'. .;:,:: :'e t>,',:;:: ~f"';.'.",'," '. ~.i{~:.'.: . ~: ~ i " :,' . I; {. .' '..P&Z Bd'Minutes 7/30/60 P'llee N 6 miss'ion. .' . The meeting was ad10urned at 4:03 P. M~ Respectfully submitted~ a~ S? ~~!e- " .' .1. t,ololle, Sec y Pl.inner' ", , . " f ; , , i. " '. " , " ..:" '. "l "j: ~ .; , .( . ....1': ,. ~ . ." , .' ~ ~. ," :.' ; . ' , ~ ti' \ . " ': Ie .:..' :' .. , ' .j .! ' .! ('., . , .,fc: ':' , :.'. " ' .' '. , < ~~ ~,.. ,.'\'" 1~' ., " . ,P ~ . .. ~ ; t .' , ". " ., '1 '!: '. :; '.. ~.!, .~: . ~ 'l <t', "'.> ;~:.:~~.:'. ~~ ~ ' l,.....l ,.' ;:::1 \}.~:- ,~ , '. .....' !;-. ' . ~.' "'J }. , ,.'. ~~"/;:i '~!\, 'I ~~~ :,; \0" :''\i. '.:':" :.........-. '-I. . ,'~ . I ;.;": . '1.' .:; , ~ ~. I " ~:.., ~ - ' :Ll"j~'" o:! )., , . .0 , 'H~r:' i; N/,;': h":)~ ", " 0\ '. ,. " b ,...\ ;'.., " .'. '1 - , ; '. '1',)' ., '!."C , , ~ "