05/21/1968
.~
.'-\
..........
.'1",1;.)
'rilE PLMINtNG AHD ZONING BOARD
Vi
Minutes of the Meeting, Tuesday, May 21, 1968.
The meeting was called to or'dot' c1t 3:'30 P. H. by the Chairman,
Mr. Kruse. Present were Members Mylandcr, Reade, Morris, Butler, Iley,
Galloway and Schutzendorf, Mr. Rettig of the Eneineerine Department, and
Mr. Wolle. .
Chairman Kruse' \.Jelcomed Mr. Gilbert 'Schutzendorf, who was ap-
pointed to the Board by the cor.unission on Hay 20 to fill the vacancy
created by the resignation of Mr. Daryl Swan, and expressed his pleasure
in having him serve with the Board. For the information of this new
member, the Chairman eave a brief resume of this Board's organization
and history since its inception in 1955 as the Planning Board. Mr.
Kruse explained' the duties and responsibilities of the Board and its
operations with four standing Committees: Zoning, SUbdivision, Housing,
and Public Relations.' ,
The Chairman appointed Mr. Schutzendorf to ~he Subdivision Commit-
tee to serve with Mr. Reade, Chairman, Mr. .Iley, and'Mr. Harries, wi~h
Mr. Butler to continue to serve as an interim member during the absence
of Mr. Harries. The Chairman also appointed Mr. Morris to the Zoning
Committee.
The minutes of the meeting .of' May 7, 1968, were approved as sub-
mitted in written summation to each member.
~lide Request - ConcerninE availability of a slide of the area
.study maE. for the Upper County/Lake Tarpon Area Study Report, Mr. Holle
reported that he had learned upon inquiry made to Mr. Gerald Taylor
that tl ' County h~d none; however, that Mr. Taylor is having all report
exhi...;....LS photographed
.:
3aid he would send him a complimentary set
for study pur?oses.
Plat Unit 6-3, Mornin~side E~tates - Mr. Wolle reported that he
had approved plat of the above unit, -which hnd been submitted the past
week, in that it was in conformance with the Master Plan.
ZOnING ORDI11AllCE N1END~F.H1'S ~- 4 SECTION Rr:VI S I o~rs -
'( a) AIA Comment ( b) S 1l1='f.!P.S tcd ~cvisions
The Planner confirmed Bourd ap,re~ment to reT!!ovine the heiGht re-
striction of 150 ft. 1n proposed R-4 A, B, and C classifications in
accordance ~dth Item ffl of sheet "/I.ns"'ler to AI/i. COr.'.rnents" 5/7/68. r.t
was also confirp~d that it was not the intent At this time to renove the
height linli ta ticn in the BU5 inc55 zone. Comment in firs 't letter :'rof!\
...
.l; ]
~< .':,' .~ .,' ~.. '.: '. '. ~ :.:' .... ~ ~~." :.;: ':t. '://:' I .. .t{'.'/.:':': ~ ".,' : ~. W,' ::,', ~.' :.'. :; ..t.. '.\ .,>;' :,\ :..:>t ': :. . ~..'.'.:\ ~ : ....\ ,: / .,~. .~.:. I~ ": ';. . ~ . :.~", ,:,: ~ :~.:.' '.~: ::. ::. . ~:'...:"~" ~:'<".":>< {";,~:' :\':". ::>:. ,:. ~.:., ::'t.;":. j~. '"I'"; '~'.;~~ "',:', ,~>:: .r:~..~." ~ ~:,.: ,': ::: ~.~ /:;.'~ ':\:
P&Z Bd l'1inutes
5/21/68
Page IJ 2
~
the architects that an apartment building on business-2'.oncd property
should conform to the requirements of an apartment zone wns further.
discusse<i (see P&Z Bd min utes of 5/7/68). The Board concurred wi th the
Planrier's opinion that this was debatable at this time, and if so, to
what detrac. It was felt that the question would require special study
of present and future "Btlsinessll type zoning classifications.
Copies were distributed of stud', orODosal sheets: "An5'..ler to Scc-
cnd Letter dated 5/7/68 AIA" and "StateT:'lents Added" (both datedP&'l
5/21/68). Copies are of acenda record. The BOord voted to aoorove
chanRe of orooosed r:.e,commendation on front setback on R-l~ A, B, and C
to 20 ft. from 15 ft. orcviouslv annroved in accordance with lanp.uage
- ~
..-...,
of Item h., revised to read:
I~In no case shall any portion of any structure be closer
than 20 feet from the street right-of-w~y lin~ or 15 feet
f~om the side or rear property line.
"On properties abutting a ri~ht-of-l"'ay of less than 60 feet
the setback shall be n minimum of 50 feet from the center
line or 20 feet from the front property line.whichever is
the g~eater."
., .......
Note was made by the Chairman of favorable comment by the. architects
.regardine the "Bulk Plane" concept as contained in the second para2raph
of their letter of May 2/68.
The Planner verbally proposed a chan~e from nreviouslv aDnt'ovp-d
recommendation ror 50% Haximum Lot Cdverap.e for. R-ll ^L B, and C classifi-
cations so as to T'estrict the R-4 A to 30%, the R-4 B to 40% and the
R-4 C to 50%. Board discussion showed a diverrence of opinion concern-
ing this new proposal. Mr. Morris cxpres~cd doubt that the 30% in R-4 A
.
is a large enough percentage and Mr. Galloway expressed the opinion that
the Bulk Plane proposal accomplishes what ~he Hoa~d is trying to do and
\ '
''''<JIJ thought a 30% restriction !,o./ould, on a tract like the Belvedere Apartment
site, penalize a builder. TIle Chairwan deferred decision in this'matter
4'
,...
P&'Z. Bd 11inutes
5/21/68
Pase IJ 3
~nd requested that the PlanneE' con,sult ~-1ith Mr. t'1~1~Ei? rCf'uI'ding Na~dmum
Lot.Covcrarc orovision before the next week.
~
The Planner presented pro~osal under Item fil of s[1cet, uAnSHCI'S
to Second Letter dated 5-7-68 AlAII, more specifically detailed as
follows:
IIlf 20% or more of the oarkinR reCluirement is met by parking
within the structure, then side and rear setback requirements
of the.structure may be reduced by not more than 10%."
The Planner presented pro'Dosal under Item .d. of sheet,nSTATEHElfTS
ADDED"~ reQardin~ a buffering orovision, with explanation that it was
taken in total from the Tampa Zoning 'Ordinance and that the inclusion
of this, or a similar provision, had been suggested to him by Mr. Forest
\'latson, .Jr.
After some discussion 'of ~nconsistencie5 and repetition of language
in proposal under Item d., the B~~rd voted to adopt the previsions of
20% parking reauirement (as abo've stated-t-lith addition of "Drincioal"
..b. ..
before the word, "structure") and also the ideas of bufferin? of fences
. and plant materi~)s, wordinp, to be worked out bv the Planne~ and the
architect.
. k'lNEXATION REOUESTS -
(a) vlilliams - rrancis "PUD-R" and "R-~1"
So. of Del Ore on Bayshore Blvd.
(b) Adelman "B"
S/W Cor. U. S. 19 and St. Road 60 (Gulf-to-Bay)
(c) \-1ightman "11rP'
Extension of Sky Harbor t-lobile Home Park - Old Tampa Bay
Some pre1imina~y dIscussi.on y/aS held to orient members with
above requests and site locations for field inspection prior to a Board
public hearing (for which date had not as yet been set). Chairman
'_) Kruse t'equested that the Planner send to members a rc fcrence map-dr"a~'I-
ing of property of annexation request at the S/W cornar of US 19 and
..
~
.,
;: '
, .
,
, .
, . .
f.":I.. " ,
.. \ \,.
'?:I.~ .
i: y'
, .~ ",'
PBZ. Bd Minutes
.5/21/68
Pc.tec 1I1~
St. Rd. 60. At this time the Chairman commented about the increasing
~raffic' ~rohlem at this iritersection. Thc.Board in their discussion
.recognized the immediate need for specific studies to be undertaken by
the State' Road Department. Such studies tyould determine ways to meet.
the future traffic condition at the intersection, as well as proper
.~cc~ss to the proposed abutting commercial develo~ments.
Agenda Items tJ 3 (b) " Summer Schedules, dnd..# If (a), Reports
Hennesen PUD-R Plan 1 Here not covered due .to a time limi ta,tion.
PlanniDg literature was distributed.
The, meeting ~as adjourned at 5:20P. M.
Respectfully submitted,
t~t.. 9... Lu~i{(!E_.
. ~ olie, Sec y
Planner
" :
,:
.. ,
. I
"
" .
f"
'.'1
,.,
. ,
..
;~: c.~.. .
.'(t......VI
",J ,.
.:.I~~';':';"""~". ..:.............A . .h~." ~.