Loading...
10/24/1967 '" ~", ,:;,:, ;,: ',: :,I\~ . :. ',> " ..'..': ~: : ':", :.. < ')::. ' =~ ~\.. ,; :': ~I: ~: '; ..', ,:" .: ;'" .':. :~, ';,~' ,.',,'., : ' " 't' ;.. I.. ',r, , , <:', :\ '. ';'. ~ ': ',~ ":"': ..' t" :'':'' ". " :~ ~.':: : ' I , :' . ;: ; ~ <: , ',/," ': "'j ::: ',. l", ..', I . '.' 'L: .',: ' ",t ,',~', ~ .'1:: ,:'.L" '(. ", I /', ,Z: \ ;.. '...>: ::: 'I'm:: PLANNING Arm ZONIUG BOARD v' Jo Minutes of the Meetinc, 7uesdaY"Octoher 24, lOb~. 'l'he meeting was called to order at 3: 00 P. M. by the Ch:1irman, Mr. Kruse. Present were Members Butler, Harries, Mylander, Morris and Galloway, and Mr. Rettig of the Engineering Department. The Planner was unable to be present because of jury duty. The minutes of the meeting of October 17, 1967, were approved as submitted in written summation to each member with a correction on Page #4, Line 5, of ~ast side to west side. r--. " ZONING FOR ANNEXATION [, #l(a) Lot 19, Block E, Sunny Park Groves Subdivision, plus 20 ft. strip west of above lot R-IE (General location: on the north side of Kumquat Street " to the east of Block S of Brookhill SUbdivision, Unit 7) The Board was informed of request for zoning recommendation for lot as described above and in Petition of Annexation of J. Fred ~.. , I -,/. Campbell, Jr. ,and Hal"riette H. Campbell, as fi.led'. Lot was described . as adjoining on the north Lot 18 (presently in the City) of the same Block. The Engineering Department representative called attention. to a 10 ft. vacated portion of street right-of-way that would. be remain- ing in the County on the west'boundary of the Campbell property, but stated that this owner does not own this 10 feet. It was determined that the' zoning of Brookhill Subdivision to the west was R-IE. The . successive prior anne>:ations of individual lots in Sunny Park Groves with R-IE zoning was noted. Petition request was for R-l zoning with- out specification as to classificntion desired. The Board voted to recommen~ aoproval of R-IE, Single Familv~ zoninp for annexation of , Lot 19~ Block E~ Sunny Park Groves Subdivision, Elus 20 ft. strio west of such lot. "-."..) .J ,,;.--'-- ,,'.1. "' f.l& Z Bd Hin uteo 10/211/6" Paga 112 ~ gl(c) rarcels 1, 2, and 3 - East 70 ft. of Lot l~. Lot 16, nast 46.00 ft. Lot 3, Hm. Brown's Subdivision of Bayview... HIt - Gulf-~o-Bay, west of Bay Breeze Trai.leI' Park . Kirkpatrick-Andersen-Moreland " The Board was informed of request for zoning recommendation for parcels as described above and in Bill Kirkpatrick's Petition for Annexation, as filed. Petition was reviewed, together with annexation drawing submitted therewith outlining annexation area (red shaded por~ion). Mr. Rettig reperted that the intended us~ of the annexation property is for an addition to Bay Breeze Trailer Park, owned by the , petitioner; further, that Lots 15 and 16 become contiguous to the city by reason of the inclusion of the east 46.09 feet of Lot 3 and adjoin- -. " i,ng right-of-~7ay. He called attention to notations made on annexation drawing which represented certain commitments arranged for by peti- tioner with the City Manager. Land use and zoning in the area was reviewed and discussed. Upon inquiry made by the Chairman as to any possibility that Mr. Kirkpatrick might be persuaded to bring his ex- isting Bay Breeze Trailer Park into the city at this time, Mr. Rettig .\. stated that he doubted that he would be receptive to this idea. Unon . I motion made, it was voted concerninp, Ap,enda Item #l(e) to recommend .that Parcels #1, #2, and #3 as described, plus connectinp: r:1.p,ht-of- ~ay, be annexed with a~Dlicable zoning of CMU) Mobile Home Park. fllCb) Normandy Village - Request R-4 - 288 ft. south of Highlrlnd and Lakeview - Plan Submitted : ' The Board was informed of rp.quest for ,zoning recommendation .for parcel as described in Petition. for Annexation, Daniel T. Mc~ul1en, Jr. and Susie M. McMullen, as filed. Plan for development of the prop- ,'~ l "'~ erty in an apartment complex was an accompanyinE exhibit, top,ether with ; J, a letter of submitted dated September 19, 1967, from Douglas Lloyd, Inc. "j '. :"I~ " ., '-:,'~,,:..' ,:,,:.;,'> I, ~;'I\""".":""" ,IY,;",:::,'~::, ".~ >':":' ;',:>,~:,:, :\:+:. ,:': '.::'"~,)"::"~':',.r;,,,~:~,:':'.',"':';":';'~~,,lll....::-.I:~;,:,..,: ~'~., ,...,:,,':,..::,.:r~~\:.:.:I,' "'~"~'~~ ~"'r: ~.....:.'..~. :~.:,: ':-/: i;', ,::', :.'~::', ;.,:':"'.:"'~::~' ;'.,:."" ;,:' '~:,:, P&Z Bd Hinutcs 1 0 /2 II / 1) 7 Page (13 . ............ . " I ~t 3:30 P. M. Mr. Douglns Weiss,' Devclopc~, nnd Hr. Bandies WQ~e prasant by invitntion for discussion with the Board. The Chairman oriented members with generAl location of the site, described as to the east of Highland Ave. and south of the Seventh Day Adventist Church property. As background information, Mr. Kruse. reported that he and Mr.. Wolle had held a meeting in the Planning Office with Mr. Weiss and ',,' Mr'/Band~es some. while ago. In such meeting, suggestion was made to the' applicants as to the possibility of securing an outlet on the north- '. this would be desirable, explaining that t~ey had aiready asked the church for a favor in regard to an easement) but that if they had a letter from the City requesting this outlet then they felt they could follow up this matter with the church authorities with a better chance I' . '-, ': ' of' success. , ' , . Mr. Kruse reported as other points of discussion in this prior conference: , The desirability of a larger turning radius for the turnaround' of the cul-de-sac. An alternate zoning of R-3 which Mr. Weiss had. indicated would not be acceptable and would be objected. to by the mortgagor. Mr. Weiss repponded that, 2S stated in this prior meeting, he would be willing to put deed restrictions on the property limiting it to resi- dential u~e and to a 3-story height for structures. He added that, al though the densi ty they have planned noVl is wi thin the R-3 densi ty, R-3 zoning does not give the yield they require, and that the mort- . .' gagor also objects to PlJD-R zoning. " ' " I .-..-' Mr. Weiss explained the proposed plan more in detail as a combina- ticn of one and two-story buildingD, vlith one-story structures to be '~'placed adjacent to single-family residential arens and two-story next ,," t ~ ',: .": " , .', r .,.'",::,: \ ~ ; -. ':,': '-~ .....:, :: ': ...:' ;:.;..., . :' : I, '/ ':',: > .~ ~~.: . ',~' '.~:,:' : ,:: "., !.. ::' '":.,'{,,, : " : :.:- ::,: ~. ~.', ~~ : : /,:: ~ '~' >" ' ..:, .',...:~,,'..: ~ .. ~ ,:': .; ".~" , :, ': ..... I ':-: ,:... .. :"~ '. '; , ,... ,,~;:;', ...:' ~..'.. ' ~''':' ~ ,:.:: .' ~: : ~ :,' :. ';' ;1:."': :' =::. :::; ~.. :.~ ",~: >~" ',I : ' " , P&7. Bd Minutes 10/24/67 Pnflc #4 to thn recreation area, all of garden type and situnte\) 1:'0 afford maxi-. .r~ · mum pl'i"o1~Y to adj01,ning residents. Upon i.nquirics mad~, other infor- mation obtained was that: The total number of units planned was 15l~ on tract of approxi- mately 450,000 sq. ft. Private streets will have 30 ft. pavement. The basis of occupancy was planned as condominium with a management corporation as owner of common elements. If the first phase of three buildings goes well, they will follow ! the plan presented as a basic plan. If the experience with the first phase of development dictates a change of plan, they I want to be assured of flexibility to meet changing conditions and do not wqnt to be held to the restrictions under PUD-R zoning for public hearing and new approvals of any changes desired. Mr. W~iss confirmed that he would be willing to file with the city any deed restrictions agreed upon. Mr. Kruse expressed as the Board's opinion that the developer should open early negotiations with the church, authorities in regard to the property needed to provide the outlet to Hillcrest Ave. He advised that he did not think Mr. Weiss would need a letter, as requested, in that the Board only acted in an advisory capacity_ Mr. Weiss agreed to make his best endeavor to ob- tain this right-af-way but s~ated that he preferred that concluding such an arrangement not be made a condition of approval. There being no further questions, Mr. Heiss and Nr. Bandies were thanked for their attendance and retired from the meeting at 4:00 P. M. The Board reviewed and further discussed the plan of Normandy, Village presented and the information obtained in conference with the developer. The Board generally approved the plan as substantially con- 'forming to development standards depirable and compatible to this area subject to a requireMent for ~ccess to Hillcrest Ave. as previously --) discussed. However, it was recoenized that under R-4 zonine the appli- cant or future ownerships would not be bound by thA plan nor restricted , , .. , ',',........ ,.'.,'. ...,,':~.~..~'... ' .:',~ ':', . '. ... , ::.,.,.. ,: ",:', :','...' ':' I" ",:.:.::,".::r.,..,. ~.,~:l.~~:<:'...,",,~l.,:,:i;~~:../..':,:'.:I',~;',:':~~:<,:.~.:.,:'~.;'..::.f,.:.:~':,..~:.:~ P&Z Bd Minutes 10/211/67 Pano #5 to the density or height of structures shown. Bonrd cpi~ion was that ~~ I a PUD-R :cning would be the most dasirable, but that in view of the expressed objection to such zoninBt it would be well to have pro- tective deed restrictions to assure proper development. Members con- curred with recommendation of the Chairman to defer action for one . 0 week and have Mr. Mylander discuss with the Cityts Le~al Department ~he idea of a commitment of the owners, present or,in the future, through deed restrictions on heir-ht and density.~ Hr. Galloway t I agreed to make some inquiries and endeavor to obtain information con- cerning the attitude of, lending institutions to financing of PUD-R developments. In the scope of the Board's discussions it was again . . ....~' ,.I . , ......... brought out that there was a need for a revision in the R-4 zone to provide more refinement of restrictions. Mr. Mylander suggested a possible R-4 condominium district in the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Kruse made reference to a Board continued study of a few years ago concern- ing height restrictions and requested that Mr. Morris confer with Member Iley and possibly offer for Board consideration some recommenda- tions based on his experience as an architect. PLAN APPROVAL Clearwater Travel Trailer Park - - Stelzer property No. of Gulf-to-Bay and North Haines Road The Chairman presented plan for this park proposed to be es- tablished,in a "BII, Business, zone. Copy of letter dated October 9, . .1967, from the City Planner to Mr. Richard W. Stelzer was read for the record. Plan was reviewed with reference made to the Travel Trailer 'Park Section of the Zoning Ordinance and its compliance with adcli- ,,/. tional requirements set forth in the Planner's letter. ~pon motion by Mr. Mzlander. seconded by rf~. Butler. it was voted to recommend ap- proval of ~lan for Clearwater Travel TrRilcr Park as presented ac- / '~ J' " . .. ':; ".' .:' ~ : .. .: ,'-,' ..:..~, ': '.': ~ ',: " ,', ',:', .,':< . :~." .: ~. >~,::,~, ~,~,"'-',: : :' '. :,' -: :.;~ ...' ;: I'.' ~: '., ,,) :. .':. ,'",. ~ -,: r ':", ~ '.. ~: ':, ','.;,,::: ,,',~:. } :.:: .~, .' ~, '/'\',. ~. ....: :: : : '.:", ';, ,,'~,:,,:,: "~'':. ~.~~,:.; ':"::.: '. :'.~ ~ ' '! ,::' :. : .,..~: :'; ::: \: ::': .,' .', ~; " . " ,.,\' . ~ :' .: r-... · ~ " , . , ".' ,,' ;, ~";; ( .1,. :,: . 5,,' I , , :~:' " 't ,-, , :.~:' I ':~.. ,"": ,. ~ :~. ':'~' " -' > , ,':.,.( : ,', " , ' ~ ::,~ ' <: " ,~'I' , ..: '.',' , . . ~ '. I , " l " " " ..,., , ~. ,J , , ~ ' '.' ',\+' ' ,'. ~", ' :', .. P&Z Be! ~Hnutcs 10/2~/67 par,c #6. . ~ol\d~r~t-2. recommendation of the Ci tv 'Plimner that the plan meets all zoninr, ~~uiremcnts. ~. H. SUBDIVISION PROPOSALS - Copies of these proposals (copy Sheets 1 through 4 of agenda record) were di~tributecl to members. Mr. Mylanoer explained that these ware drafted by Mr. Wolle and screened with him, and that he had proposed that,they be submitted to m~mbers for study and suggestions. I Apnroval of Onen Space Proposol,- inclusion of E.,. 75 ft. of Lot "2, JEFFORD AND SMOYER lS~' ADDITION (01'" 326 Sunset Court, Clearwater, Pinellas County, Fla.> - completion of Coachman Park - public o~mership for public use - (removal of e}dsting structure), This item was, placed on the agenda upon request~of the City Planner. The Board voted approval of the inclusion of above captioned 'E.7S ft. of Lot 2 as part of an Open Space Proposal and of the re- 'rn6valof existing structtire thereon. The meeting was adjourned at 5:15 P. .M. Respectfully submitted, WLI-71? ~~ Arthur'M.Kruse, Chairman 'Acting Secretary , ') ,. '\